Difference between revisions of "Common fallacies"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 14: Line 14:
 
*human thought can answer any question
 
*human thought can answer any question
 
*loaded questions: embodies an assumption that, if answered, indicates an implied agreement. (e.g., Have you stopped beating your wife yet?)
 
*loaded questions: embodies an assumption that, if answered, indicates an implied agreement. (e.g., Have you stopped beating your wife yet?)
 +
*Ad Hominem: arguments that focus on irrelevant personal attributes of an opponent, hoping to divert attention from the issue being discussed or the content of an opponents argument.
 +
*Guilt By Association: hoping to discredit a person by associating them with generally disliked persons who also hold their views, or rejecting an idea because a generally disliked person accepts it.
 +
*The Hitler Card: A version of Guilt by Association where an idea is considered false because Hitler believed it, or a person is discredited because Hitler had a view in common with them.
  
 
(please add and improve)
 
(please add and improve)
 
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Common_fallacies&action=edit
 
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Common_fallacies&action=edit
 
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
 
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]

Revision as of 18:38, January 17, 2009

Common fallacies are arguments that have a logical fallacy inherent in them, yet are still commonly accepted by people who:

  • have difficulties with abstract thinking
  • are young students, or are adults unwilling to reconsider opinions they formed as students
  • exercise their free will to embrace fallacies without concern for whether they are flawed

Examples of common fallacies are:

  • a theory should be accepted until a better alternative is found
  • rates of recession, decay or growth observed today are somehow constant for extrapolation backwards in time
  • higher taxes must produce more revenue for the government
  • fewer guns must reduce the rate of crime
  • choice is somehow meaningful regardless of whether it is informed
  • human thought can answer any question
  • loaded questions: embodies an assumption that, if answered, indicates an implied agreement. (e.g., Have you stopped beating your wife yet?)
  • Ad Hominem: arguments that focus on irrelevant personal attributes of an opponent, hoping to divert attention from the issue being discussed or the content of an opponents argument.
  • Guilt By Association: hoping to discredit a person by associating them with generally disliked persons who also hold their views, or rejecting an idea because a generally disliked person accepts it.
  • The Hitler Card: A version of Guilt by Association where an idea is considered false because Hitler believed it, or a person is discredited because Hitler had a view in common with them.

(please add and improve) http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Common_fallacies&action=edit