Difference between revisions of "Exact sciences"
From Conservapedia
(→Topics) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Topics== | ==Topics== | ||
*[[mathematics]] (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like [[proof by contradiction]])<ref>For more discussion, see: [[Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math]]</ref> | *[[mathematics]] (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like [[proof by contradiction]])<ref>For more discussion, see: [[Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math]]</ref> | ||
| − | *[[physics]] | + | *[[physics]], [[astronomy]] |
*[[chemistry]] | *[[chemistry]] | ||
*[[volcanology]] | *[[volcanology]] | ||
Revision as of 03:57, April 29, 2009
The exact sciences actually measure what they study, as opposed to the "fuzzy subjects" which mostly engage in uninformed speculation. Evolution is a "fuzzy subject" subject because it cannot be witnessed, but rather is based on guesses using presupposed naturalism. Needless to say, exact sciences are far more accurate than fuzzy subjects.
Topics
- mathematics (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like proof by contradiction)[1]
- physics, astronomy
- chemistry
- volcanology
- seismology
- creation science
- baraminology
Fuzzy subjects
- evolution
- paleontology
- linguistics
- psychology
- meteorology (especially global warming)
- astronomy (especially black holes, quasars, the Big Bang theory)
References
- ↑ For more discussion, see: Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math
