<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;user=Toadaron&amp;feedformat=atom</id>
		<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;user=Toadaron&amp;feedformat=atom"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Toadaron"/>
		<updated>2026-06-10T05:09:33Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=List_of_names_in_the_Russiagate_scandal&amp;diff=1953968</id>
		<title>List of names in the Russiagate scandal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=List_of_names_in_the_Russiagate_scandal&amp;diff=1953968"/>
				<updated>2023-06-10T19:42:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* Private citizens and entities */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This is a list of individuals involved in the [[Obamagate scandal]] to weoponize U.S. law enforcement and Intelliegence agencies against political opponents and dissidents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[2016 Clinton campaign]] paid [[Russia]]ns for dirt on [[Donald Trump]]. While the Russians took the money, there is no evidence the information they gave was real, and every indication the Russians made things up and gave Clinton operatives, in exchange for cash, whatever they wanted to hear. The Clinton operatives then handed off information to the Obama administration who didn't vet the information, leaked it to the media, and used America's foreign intelligence apparatus to violate the civil and [[constitutional]] rights of members of the Trump campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Inforgraphic-838x1024.jpg|right|400px|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==White House==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama]], President&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joe Biden]], Vice President&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greg Craig]], White House Counsel&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Susan Rice]], National Security Advisor&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Shailagh Murray]], Senior Advisor&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ben Rhodes]], Deputy National Security Advisor&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jake Sullivan]], Deputy Assistant to the President&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Celeste Wallander]], Senior Director for Russian Affairs at the [[National Security Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Colin Kahl]],&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sean Misko]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of Justice==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Loretta Lynch]], Attorney General&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sally Yates]], Deputy Attorney General&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Matthew Axelrod]], Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General (PADAG)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Carlin]], Assistant Attorney General for the Department of Justice National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mary McCord (DOJ)|Mary McCord]], Acting Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael K. Atkinson]], Senior Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General of the [[Department of Justice National Security Division]] (DOJ-NSD)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rachel Brand]], Associate Attorney General &lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Toscas]], Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the National Security Division,&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tashina Gauhar]], Deputy Assistant Attorney General (DAAG) in the Department of Justice National Security Division&lt;br /&gt;
*[[David Laufman]], Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Counterintelligence and Export Control Section (DOJ-NSD)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bruce Ohr]], Associate Deputy Attorney General&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peter Kadzik]], Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Trisha Anderson]], Office of Legal Counsel lawyer&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dana Boente]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rod Rosenstein]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/solomon-durham-is-building-a-small-number-of-indictments&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Demurs]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jim Crowell]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Federal Bureau of Investigation===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[James Comey]], Director&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew McCabe]], Deputy Director&lt;br /&gt;
*[[James Baker (DOJ)]], General Counsel&lt;br /&gt;
*[[James Rybicki]], Chief-of-Staff&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lisa Page]], Special Counsel to the Deputy Director&lt;br /&gt;
*[[E.W. “Bill” Priestap]], Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peter Strzok]], Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division  &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kevin Clinesmith]], FBI lawyer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/22/the-washington-post-helps-identify-fbi-lawyer-who-altered-fisa-docs/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sally Moyer]], FBI lawyer&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Pientka]], FBI agent&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jonathan Moffa]], FBI official&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Stephen M. Somma]], Case Agent 1, the handler for FBI confidential human source Stefan Halper.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/02/24/why-is-the-new-york-times-outing-lower-level-fbi-spygate-operatives-case-agent-1-stephen-m-somma/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Kortan]], Press Office&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anthony Ferrante]], Director For Cyber Incident Response and Cybersecurity Policy at the [[White House]] [[National Security Council]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.linkedin.com/in/anthonyjferrante/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/02/12/former-senior-fbi-official-is-leading-buzzfeeds-effort-to-verify-trump-dossier/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gregory Brower]], Congressional Liaison&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael J. Gaeta]], based in Rome. Christopher Steele's handler.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://mobile.twitter.com/the_war_economy/status/990900084190666754?lang=en&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Steinbach]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Randy Coleman]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Carl Ghattas]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frank Figliuzzi]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2021/06/11/former-asst-fbi-director-arresting-gop-congress-members-may-be-needed-to-really-tackle-terrorism-1087507/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of State==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Victoria Nuland]], Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jonathan Winer]], Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for International Law Enforcement&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Samantha Power]], UN Ambassador&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rachel Goldbrenner]], advisor to Samantha Power&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jonathan Finer]], Chief of Staff to Sec. Kerry&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elizabeth Dibble]], Deputy Chief London Embassy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://2001-2009.state.gov/p/nea/rls/37940.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lewis Lukens]], London Embassy&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thomas Williams]],&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Steve Linick]], State Department [[Office of Inspector General]] (OIG)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of Treasury==&lt;br /&gt;
===Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)===&lt;br /&gt;
*Unnamed Associate Director&lt;br /&gt;
*Natalie Edwards&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/ysLWTeRESpw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Internal Revenue Service===&lt;br /&gt;
*John Fry, intelligence analyst charged with leaking [[Michael Cohen]] financial records to [[Michael Avenatti]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/02/21/irs-intelligence-analyst-john-fry-charged-with-leaking-cohen-financial-records-to-creepy-porn-lawyer/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Office of the Director of National Intelligence==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[James Clapper]], Director&lt;br /&gt;
*Shelby Pierson&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Central Intelligence Agency==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Brennan]], Director&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eric Ciaramella]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Congress==&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Harry Reid]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Mark Warner]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Dianne Feinstein]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[John McCain]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Adam Kinzinger]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Speaker [[Paul Ryan]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jonathan Burks]], [[chief of staff]] to Paul Ryan&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/10/25/unreal-paul-ryan-announces-chamber-of-commerce-lobbyist-will-be-his-chief-of-staff/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Adam Schiff]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Eric Swalwell]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Congressional Research Service===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael E. DeVine]], author of ''Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protections'' revised version September 23, 2019.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/30/deleted-firsthand-knowledge-requirement-for-whistleblowers-implicates-another-federal-agency/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Private citizens and entities==&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign actors===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christopher Steele]], foreign intelligence operative paid by Hillary Clinton&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Erika Thompson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alexander Downer]], Australian High Commissioner (Ambassador) to UK&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Mifsud]], UK and NATO intelligence training and vetting, Middle Eastern expert, FBI informant&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Robert Hannigan]], [[GCHQ]] head&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Dearlove]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Wood]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Artem Sytnyk]], Ukraine [[NABU]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Serhiy Leshchenko]], Ukrainian member of parliament and journalist&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Greenberg]], Russian national, convicted felon and FBI informant.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://democratdossier.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Natalia Veselnitskaya]], hired FusionGPS to research dirt on Hillary Clinton for the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Edward Baumgartner]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2018/01/22/it-looks-like-the-james-bond-behind-the-dossier-let-a-putin-pawn-do-all-the-work/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christopher Burrows]], Chris Steele's Orbis International partner. &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Tawil]], longtime U.S. and Israeli intelligence operative, set-up Papadopolous' arrest&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Azra Turk]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===American citizens===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Dolan, Jr.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fiona Hill]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glenn Simpson]], took money from [[Vladimir Putin]] and [[Hillary Clinton]] to discredit Trump&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mary Jacoby]], wife of Glenn Simpson and daughter of major investor in the [[Inslaw]] affair&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nellie Ohr]], retired CIA employee, FusionGPS and FBI contractor&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alexandra Chalupa]], DNC &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Stefan Halper]], FBI outside continental United States lure&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Podesta]], alleged [[Pizzagate]] ringleader&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Marc Elias]], DNC and [[2016 Clinton campaign]] General Counsel who commissioned and paid for the ''[[Steele dossier]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Sussmann]], [[Perkins Coie]] lawyer&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dan Jones]], ex-[[Feinstein]] staffer and FusionGPS paymaster during the [[Deep state coup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hillary Clinton]], [[homosexual]] [[activist]] and [[war criminal]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sidney Blumenthal]], Clinton family consigliere&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cody Shearer]], Clinton goon who killed [[Kathleen Willey]]'s cat and spent the Summer and Fall of 2016 in Eastern Europe digging up dirt on Trump&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jennifer Palmieri]], Clinton campaign [[fake news]] spokesman&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Robby Mook]], Clinton youth organizer&lt;br /&gt;
*[[David Kramer]], McCain Institute&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Hayden]], former CIA and NSA director&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kathryn Ruemmler]], Attn. for Susan Rice, former White House Counsel June 30, 2011 – June 2, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William W. Taylor III]], Attn. for FusionGPS&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/sites/nationallawjournal/2017/10/25/russia-dossier-subpoena-fight-entangles-big-law-and-boutiques/?slreturn=20200909011630&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/10/08/evidence-surfaces-of-john-durham-grand-jury-team-following-deep-state-rabbit-hole-leading-to-ssci-effort/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amanda Renteria]], Clinton national political director&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evelyn Farkas]], former Defense deputy&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mark Zaid]], child porn lawyer&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/MarkSZaidEsq/status/962537227757682688&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and attorney of Eric Ciaramella&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thomas Catan]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peter Fritsch]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jake Berkowitz]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Neil King]], No. 2 man at Fusion GPS,  married to Obama Senior Advisor Shailagh Murray.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Adam Kaufmann]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sergei Millian]], ''[[Steele dossier]]'' source, Papadopoulos contact&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Monica McLean]], retired FBI&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Margaret Ratner Kunstler]], WikiLeaks attorney&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rinat Akhmetshin]], ex-[[GRU]] officer, lobbyist, naturalized citizen&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rodney Joffe]] (&amp;quot;Tech Executive-1&amp;quot; in [[Sussmann]] indictment&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/08/durham-investigates-pentagon-cybersecurity-contractors-who-helped-clinton-campaign-plot-russia-hoax/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), employee of DOD contractor Neustar Inc.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/10/07/durham_probes_pentagon_computer_contractors_in_anti-trump_conspiracy_797790.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hunter Biden]], [[drugs|drug addict]] and son  of Joe Biden&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Journalists===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|Fake news}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ken Dilanian]], [[NBC News]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[David Ignatius]], ''[[Washington Post]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[David Corn]], ''[[Mother Jones]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Isikoff]], ''[[Yahoo News]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ali Watkins]], [promoted from ''BuzzFeed'' to ''NYT'' after receiving leaked Carter Page FISA application]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Devlin Barrett]], ''WaPo'', formerly ''WSJ'' [2016 election year]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Robert Costa]], ''WaPo'' &amp;amp; PBS&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Matt Zapotosky]], ''WaPo''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ken Bensinger]], [[BuzzFeed]] reporter who received ''Steele dossier'' from David Kramer, McCain [[Chief of Staff]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Brian Ross]], [[ABC News]] [terminated in December 2017 over false Deutsche Bank subpoena leak that caused stock market selloff]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Matt Mosk]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Carl Bernstein]], [[CNN]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Julian Borger]], ''[[The Guardian]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ned Price]], NBC News&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Shawn Henry]], NBC News consultant, [[Crowdstrike]] executive&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peter Stone]], McClatchy&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greg Gordon]], McClatchy&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bob Little]], [[NPR]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rachel Martin]], NPR&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tom Hamburger]], ''[[The Washington Post]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rosalind Helderman]],''The Washington Post''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fred Hiatt]], ''The Washington Post''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Allan Cullison]], ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===American entities===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[FusionGPS]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Perkins Coie]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democracy Integrity Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CrowdStrike]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Brookings Institution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Clinton email coverup===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Paul Combetta]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Platte River Networks]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===News organizations===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CNN]]&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[The New Yorker]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[The New York Times]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[The Washington Post]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[BBC]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NBC]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[BuzzFeed]]&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[The Guardian]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Huffington Post]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Newsweek]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MSNBC]]&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Politico]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ABC]]&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Vanity Fair]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Slate]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[McClatchy]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Yahoo News]]&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Mother Jones]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[FBI scandal]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[FISA abuse]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[FISA abuse timeline]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democrat IT scandal]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obamagate timeline]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Russiagate timeline]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Muellergate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Deep State coup 1.0]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Deep State coup 2.0]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Biden family corruption timeline]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Uniparty]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Biden junta personnel]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External link==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/01/31/hindsight-folks-hindsight-compare-the-vindman-ciaramella-misko-mccord-and-atkinson-network-to-pelosis-rule-changes/ Compare the Vindman, Ciaramella, Misko, McCord and Atkinson Network To Pelosi’s Rule Changes] in the [[Deep State coup 2.0]] plot.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-cast-of-the-trump-russia-collusion-hoax/ The Cast of the Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax] - Capital Research Center&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Deep State}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Political Scandals]][[Category:Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax]][[Category:Hillary Clinton email scandal]][[Category:2016 Presidential Election]][[Category:Anti-Trump]][[Category:2010s]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Free_States_Movement&amp;diff=1145719</id>
		<title>Essay: Free States Movement</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Free_States_Movement&amp;diff=1145719"/>
				<updated>2015-03-21T06:50:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Not less common&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- NOTE to Editors: We request that you please DO NOT change or remove this title == Unfree State List == since it is being used by the redirect [[Unfree state]] as #redirect [[Free_States_Movement#Unfree_State_List]]. Thank you. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''Free state''' has two common meanings. One is the older meaning in the [[Antebellum]] period where a '''free state''' was a state where [[slavery]] was outlawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second meaning of '''Free state''' refers to the [[American]] '''Free States Movement'''. This is a newer and more common meaning in use since the late 1970's in [[America]] among [[libertarian]]s, [[conservative]]s, conservative [[Christian]]s, [[Patriot]]s, and [[Prepper]]s-[[Survivalist]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Modern &amp;quot;Free States&amp;quot; in the USA==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Free states]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A modern '''Free state''' in the [[USA]] can be defined by what it is not, more than what it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A free state is not:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Welfare state]] - [[Nanny state]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mass surveillance]] and [[Big government]] of the [[Police state]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Deficit spending]]&lt;br /&gt;
* High [[taxation]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal values]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Blue state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===List of Free States===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:238868166 ef70731f85.jpg|right|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Free States Movement is is picking up steam. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[American Redoubt]]:&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Idaho]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wyoming]] - [[Constitutional carry]] via the [[Second Amendment]] rather than [[Concealed carry]] [[license]]s&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Montana]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arizona]] - [[Constitutional carry]] via the [[Second Amendment]] rather than [[Concealed carry]] [[license]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kentucky]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Louisiana]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Alaska]] - [[Constitutional carry]] via the [[Second Amendment]] rather than [[Concealed carry]] [[license]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mississippi]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kentucky]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Louisiana]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Alaska]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mississippi]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Texas]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Utah]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kansas]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New Hampshire]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[North Carolina]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Georgia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Qualities of the Free States===&lt;br /&gt;
A free state suggests:&lt;br /&gt;
* Respect for the [[unalienable rights]]/[[civil rights]] of the [[Bill of Rights]], especially the [[gun rights]] / right to [[self-defense]], [[home security]] and [[deterrence]] against [[tyranny]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Libertarianism|Libertarian values]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative values]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ludwig von Mises]]' [[conservative]] [[libertarian]] [[Austrian economics]] and [[Fiscal conservatism]] -[[Capitalist]] [[Conservative economic policies]] of [[Ron Paul]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Modern Survivalism]]: &amp;quot;[[Essay:if times get tough, or even if then don't]]&amp;quot;, [[Essay:Debt is financial cancer]], [[Essay:Tax is theft]], [[Renewable energy]], [[Financial security]], [[Essay:You are in control of your life]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Essay:Invest in tangibles]] - [[Precious Metals]], [[Copper-jacketed lead]] and [[Firearms]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- NOTE to Editors: We request that you please DO NOT change or remove this title == Unfree State List == since it is being used by the redirect [[Unfree state]] as #redirect [[Free_States_Movement#Unfree_State_List]]. Thank you. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unfree State List ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also [[Most liberal American cities]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list of [[Unfree states]] - [[Nanny State]]s was established by polling readers/listeners of [[:Category:Conservative Blogs|conservative blogs]], [[:Category:Conservative Podcasts |conservative podcasts]], [[:Category:Conservative Websites|conservative websites]],  [[:Category:Conservative Forums|conservative forums]], [[:Category:Libertarian Blogs|libertarian blogs]], [[:Category:Preparedness Blogs|preparedness blogs]], and [[:Category:Gun Blogs|gun blogs]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://walkingtofreedom.com/forum/index.php?topic=2.0 Accessed March 28, 2014 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is the list with some of their [[gun control|gun grabbing]] [[Constitution]] violating, [[Oath]]-[[treason|breaker]] [[liberal]] [[Democrat]] [[elitist]] [[politician]]s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.rollcall.com/50richest/the-50-richest-members-of-congress-112th-2012.html Accessed March 29, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_richest_American_politicians Accessed March 29, 2014 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_members_of_the_United_States_Congress_by_wealth Accessed March 29, 2014 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===California===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[California]] - [[Diane Feinstein]] (worth $41.78 million), [[Nancy Pelosi]] (worth $26.43 million), [[Barbara Boxer]], [[Henry Waxman]], [[Alan Lowenthal]] (CA-47), Howard Berman, Bob Filner, Jane Harman, Adam Schiff, Brad Sherman, Tom Lantos, Susan Davis, [[Los Angeles]] Mayor [[Eric Garcetti]], [[San Diego]] Mayor [[Bob Filner]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/california_restrictions.pdf is the 5th worst state for Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
** According to a 2005 study of the 25 [[most liberal American cities]], [[San Francisco]], [[Berkeley]], [[Oakland]] ranked #1, #2 and #4 respectively.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Phil Reiff, Director of the [[San Francisco Bay Area|Bay Area]] Center for Voting Research says, &amp;quot;While there are a few liberal cities without large [[African American]] populations, these wind up being the exceptions. College towns like [[Berkeley]] and [[Cambridge]] have modest black populations but remain bastions of upper [[middle-class]], white, intellectual [[liberalism]].&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The list of Americas most liberal cities is dominated by cities with large African American populations that are concentrated in the [[Northeast]], [[Midwest]] and [[California]]. Conversely, the study found that the staunchest [[conservative]] cities are clustered in [[the South]] and interior [[:Category:Intermountain West|West]] and have extremely low numbers of African American residents.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;[[San Francisco Bay Area|Bay Area]] Center for Voting Research (BACVR) ranks the political leanings of every American city and finds that [[Detroit]], Michigan is the most liberal and [[Provo, Utah]] the most conservative.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The Bay Area Center for Voting Research is a nonpartisan&amp;quot; ('liberal') &amp;quot;[[think tank]] based in [[Berkeley]], California. A full copy of the report and the complete list of rankings for all 237 cities are available at http://www.votingresearch.org.&amp;quot; [http://americancityandcounty.com/content/study-ranks-americas-most-liberal-and-conservative-cities 2005 study rankings on liberal and conservative cities]. Posted Oct 27, 2014.  Accessed March 18, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Colorado===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Colorado]] - [[Jared Polis]] (worth $72.09 million)&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/colorado_restrictions.pdf Colorado Firearms Restrictions] since 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Connecticut===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Connecticut]] - [[Richard Blumenthal]] (worth $79.11 million), [[Joe Lieberman]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/connecticut_restrictions.pdf Connecticut Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Delaware===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Delaware]] - former Sen. [[Joe Biden]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/middle-school-kids-taken-hear-louis-farrakhan-call-violence-against-crackers Middle School Kids Taken To Hear Louis Farrakhan Call For Violence Against The 'Crackers']&amp;quot; [[Ben Shapiro]]'s ''Truth Revolt''. &amp;quot;Administrator at Booker T. Washington Middle School in [[Baltimore]], [[Maryland]], took forty young teenage students as young as eleven-years-old to the 2nd Annual [[African American|Black]] United Summit International (BUSI) conference where they heard [[racist|bigoted]] purveyor of hatred [[Louis Farrakhan]] reference [[caucasian|white people]] as &amp;quot;crackers” and a call for “retaliation” for [[Michael Brown]]'s death. When asked by Clark why the children were taken to this conference, Anthony Pena, the Middle School administrator who took the forty students between the ages of 11 and 15 to the conference, said, &amp;quot;At the end of the day… it’s about how we connect to our youth and help develop them to become our future.”&amp;quot; (See [[Public school values]]. Accessed January 5, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hawaii===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hawaii]] - [[Brian Schatz]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/hi_ak_vi_guam_restrictions.pdf Hawaii Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Illinois===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Illinois]] - [[Chicago]] Mayor [[Rahm Emanuel]] (worth $12 million with $6 mil salary)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1426034.html Accessed March 29, 2014 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[Brad Schneider]] (IL-10), [[Jan Schakowsky]] (IL-9)&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/illinois_restrictions.pdf Illinois is the 4th worst state for Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Maryland===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Maryland]] - [[Benjamin Cardin]], &lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/maryland_restrictions.pdf Maryland Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Maine===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Maine]] - [[Chellie Pingree]] (worth $28.58 million)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Massachusetts===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts]] - John Kerry (worth $193 million), [[Ted Kennedy]] (was worth $163 million), [[Barney Frank]] [D, MA-04]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/massachusetts_restrictions.pdf Massachusetts is the 2nd worst state for Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cambridge, Massachusetts]] was ranked #5 most liberal city in America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://americancityandcounty.com/content/study-ranks-americas-most-liberal-and-conservative-cities 2005 study rankings on liberal and conservative cities]. Posted Oct 27, 2014.  Accessed March 18, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===New Jersey===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New Jersey]] - [[Frank Lautenberg]] (was worth $116.1 million), Steve Rothman&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/michigan_restrictions.pdf New Jersey Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===New York===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New York]] - former Sen. [[Hillary Clinton]], [[New York City]] former Mayor [[Michael Bloomberg]] (worth $31 billion), [[Charles Schumer]], [[Mario Cuomo]], [[Jerrold Nadler]], [[Anthony Weiner]],  (sexting scandal), [[Gary Ackerman]], [[Steve Israel]], [[Eliot Engel]], [[Nita Lowey]], [[Jerrold Nadler]], &lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/new_york_restrictions.pdf New York is the 1st worst state for Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Oregon===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oregon]] - [[Ron Wyden]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Portland]], [[Oregon]] was ranked #3 most liberal city in America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://americancityandcounty.com/content/study-ranks-americas-most-liberal-and-conservative-cities 2005 study rankings on liberal and conservative cities]. Posted Oct 27, 2014.  Accessed March 18, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Rhode Island===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rhode Island]] - [[David Cicilline]] (RI-1)&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/washington_dc_restrictions.pdf Rhode Island Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vermont===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vermont]] - [[Bernie Sanders]], the only avowed [[socialist]] member of Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Washington State===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Washington State]] - Maria Cantwell (worth $5.56 million)&lt;br /&gt;
** So-called [[Universal background check|&amp;quot;Universal&amp;quot; background checks]] implemented on January 1, 2015 thanks to [[Bill Gates]] and [[Michael Bloomberg]] millions of dollars of donations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Summary of the Unfree States===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The [[East Coast]] and [[West Coast]] ([[Left Coast]]) had the most [[liberal states]] including [[Vermont]], [[Massachusetts]], [[Delaware]], [[New York]], [[Hawaii]], [[Oregon]], [[Washington]], [[Maine]], [[California]] and [[New Jersey]].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie TheHill.com] Accessed March 28, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Unfree Geographic Entities==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Washington D.C.===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Washington DC]] - [[President]] [[Barak Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/washington_dc_restrictions.pdf D.C. Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
** Best description of Washington D.C. gun grabbers propaganda and gun control is found in the book by [[Emily Miller]], ''[https://amazon.com/Emily-Gets-Her-Gun-Obama/dp/1621571920 Emily Gets Her Gun, But Obama Wants to Take Yours], 2013. Washington Times columnist Emily Miller finally got the gun she wanted after her Nanny state ordeal of spending &amp;quot;four months of jumping through regulatory hoops and $435 in fees.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;In the wake of tragic shootings in [[Newtown]] and [[Aurora]], the [[gun control|anti-gun]] [[lobby]] has launched a campaign of lies, distortion, misrepresentation, and emotional manipulation that is breathtaking in its vitriol and its denial of basic facts. Their goal is to take away our Second Amendment rights and then disarm law-abiding Americans. Emily Miller tells her personal story of how being a single, female victim of a [[home invasion]] drove her to try to obtain a legally registered gun in Washington, D.C. The narrative—sometimes shocking, other times hilarious in its absurdity—gives the reader a real life understanding of how gun-control laws only make it more difficult for honest, law-abiding people to get guns, while violent crime continues to rise. Using facts and newly uncovered research, Miller exposes the schemes politicians&lt;br /&gt;
on Capitol Hill, in the White House, and around the country are using to deny people their Second Amendment rights. She exposes the myths that gun grabbers and liberal media use to get new laws passed that infringe on our right to keep and bear arms. The gun rights debate isn’t just about firearms. It’s about protecting a fundamental right that is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. It’s about politicians who lie, manipulate, and outright break existing laws to get what they want. It’s about President Obama wanting a bigger federal government to control you. Not just your guns—you. The fight for gun rights is the fight for freedom. Emily Miller says stand up and fight back now because your Second Amendment will only be the first to go.&amp;quot; ''[https://amazon.com/Emily-Gets-Her-Gun-Obama/dp/1621571920 Emily Gets Her Gun, But Obama Wants to Take Yours on Amazon.com].  Accessed March 10, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scarry, Eddie, [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/09/18/this-newswoman-got-a-gun-for-protection-even-though-her-gun-carrying-dad-didnt-want-her-to/ POLITICS&lt;br /&gt;
This Newswoman Got a Gun For Protection…Even Though Her Gun-Carrying Dad Didn’t Want Her To], [[The Blaze]], Published September 18, 2013. Accessed March 10, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anything buy a Big City in an Unfree State==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Alex Barron]] suggests the following, &amp;quot;There are many people who write me who suggest that they cannot move to [[James Wesley Rawles|JWR]]’s perfect [[self-sufficient]] remote, defensible [[survivalist retreat|homestead]]. The reasons are often similar, money and wife issues. My recommendation to them is often similar. Think of moving to a [[small town values|small town]] or even the “big [[city]]” in a [[red state]]. It is my opinion that [[conservative]] more [[traditional values|traditional]] leaning states with balanced budgets and a “[[libertarian|leave me alone]]” style will weather what comes next better than many more [[progressive]], heavily [[national debt|indebted]], people are use to a [[entitlement mentality|safety net from cradle to grave mentality]]. Would you rather be in [[Los Angeles]] or [[Boise]] when a significant [[depression|economic downturn]] starts? BTW, the first time I visited Boise I thought “where is the city.” Then when we went out to drink later own, I was like, when do we get downtown?  They were like, you are “downtown.” Boise doesn’t qualify as a [[suburb]] of a major city like [[Chicago]], but it is one of the fastest growing cities in [[the West]]. When [[Idaho]], [[Montana]] or [[Wyoming]] says “big city” it is not what first comes to mind.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Alex Barron|Barron, Alex]], &amp;quot;[https://charlescarrollsociety.com/2015/01/19/orofino-idaho-prepper-homesteading/ Orofino, Idaho #prepper #homesteading]&amp;quot;. [[Idaho]], [[American Redoubt]] [[Charles Carroll Society]] [[:Category:Preparedness Podcasts|Podcast]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===California in Not a Free State===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Alex Barron]] reports, &amp;quot;In many parts of [[California]] people are paying more than $1,000 a month in [[property tax]] and what they call Mello-roos. Mello-roos is some form of supplemental tax for things like fire departments and [[law enforcement|police services]]. You know what you think your tax dollars already cover. That is $12,000 a year, every year for the privilege of owning property in the state.  Many [[red state]]s have much lower property taxes.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Alex Barron|Barron, Alex]], &amp;quot;[https://charlescarrollsociety.com/2015/01/21/the-advantageous-of-a-modern-neo-homestead-prepper-homesteading/ The advantageous of a modern (neo) homestead #prepper #homesteading]&amp;quot;. [[Idaho]], [[American Redoubt]] [[Charles Carroll Society]] [[:Category:Preparedness Podcasts|Podcast]], Published January 21, 2015. Accessed January 23, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Walking to Freedom Project==&lt;br /&gt;
'''Walking to Freedom''' is an initiative created by [[libertarian]] [[survivalist]] [[podcast]]er [[Jack Spirko]] ([[The Survival Podcast]]) where [[citizen]]s are encouraged to pull up stakes and to move to a more open and [[free state]] -- to [[vote with your feet | vote with their feet]]. States are broken down into two categories, the &amp;quot;naughty list and all the rest. People moving out of [[:Category:Oppression|oppressive]] states are asked to post a &amp;quot;goodbye letter&amp;quot; addressed to the state and state government officials regarding their decision to move out of their state. On the [[website]]'s (http://walkingtofreedom.com) [[Forum]] groups for the &amp;quot;non-naughty&amp;quot; states are used to welcome people considering or actually moving to that state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vision ====&lt;br /&gt;
For a few years Jack Spirko worked with and supported The [[Free State Project]] of [[New Hampshire]] (http://freestateproject.org) Spirko says, &amp;quot;While it is not in the cards for me to move to New Hampshire the concept to me is the hallmark of a [[republic]]. Individual member states band together to form a Federal Republic of States. In our case we call this 'The United States of America'. [[Citizen]]s have [[freedom]] of movement from state to state and the citizen is seen as the most [[sovereign]] entity with the most [[unalienable rights|rights]], next in the chain is the sovereignty of the member states and at the bottom of the sovereignty chain is the [[Federal government]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He continues, &amp;quot;Much of this system is broken today, the [[Federal government]] is filling many roles it isn't supposed to fill (see [[Tenth Amendment]]).  State governments then fail to stand up for their citizens or worse they often pile on more [[big government]] [[Nanny state]] restrictions and encumbrances upon [[liberty]].  There is one component of the system though that is still functioning, movement between the states.  The final act of a citizen [[voting]] in a [[republic]] is to [[vote with their feet]].  While I love the work being done in [[New Hampshire]], I realized like me there were many people who just can't for one reason or another move there.  What dawned on me then though was if we simply create an exodus from the 5-10 worst states it does many things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;It sends a message to ALL state governments, your citizens understand a republic and their power and are damn well willing to use it.  [[:Category:Oppression|Oppress]] your citizens and your most valuable producers (citizens and companies) will leave for a better environment.&amp;quot; (See [[Atlas Shrugged]]'s [[Galt's Gulch]])&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;States with more [[liberty]] like [[Idaho]], [[New Hampshire]], [[Wyoming]], [[Montana]], [[Texas]], [[Arizona]], etc. will attract more liberty oriented individuals.  Not for the purpose of transforming their new home states states but to at minimum hold the line and prevent said states from becoming less [[libertarian]].&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;It makes the entire movement far larger then just The [[Free State Project]] or other groups like [[Free State Wyoming]] or the [[American Redoubt]] movement.  By gaining maximum exposure and reach, Walking To Freedom, is a rising tide that will float all boats.  It will actually bring more people to states like Wyoming and New Hampshire by fostering competition among the member states.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;Most current oppression in the US is actually at the [[Big government|Federal level]].  There are a handful of states that go above and beyond that, it is easier to target those 5-10 on the 'naughty list' and let the other 40-45 states make their case as to why you should move there, then it is to try to get anyone upset with their state to choose a single option as a way out.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;[[Freedom]] is highly personal.  To some [[taxation|tax freedom]] is the main concern, others are more concerned with freedom over types of housing, some with [[Second Amendment|freedom to keep and bear arms]] yet others simply want what I call 'operational freedom'.  Operational freedom is simply the freedom to conduct business.  Many [[entrepreneur]]s are less concerned with the overall [[tax rate]]s and more concerned with the permits, [[license]]s, fees, hoops one must jump though just to open the doors.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;By fostering [[competition]] among all the states not on the 'naughty list' we have a much larger influence.  It brings public awareness to the issue and starts making many states that are at the far end or middle of the spectrum to start thinking about the [[cause and effect|consequences]] of being on the naughty list or having the list grow just because they have encouraged us to do so.  Yes the list can get bigger in time if necessary.  We use 'disapproval voting' to establish the list.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spirko elaborates:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;When I consider all of the above it is clear to me that Walking To Freedom is a true manifestation of the principle of a [[republic]].  Sure many states may not make the 'naughty list' that many of us feel should.  We can only hand out so many demerits you know but, the other side is those states will find that far less citizens choose them as a place to move to.  I am quite sure in time that this movement will result in tens of thousands of 'goodbye letters' to state and local officials.  While that is half of the equation, I wonder how the [[Chamber of Commerce]] of say a state at the bottom of the receiving end will feel if they see hundreds or even thousands choosing state relatively close to them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://walkingtofreedom.com/forum/index.php?topic=4.msg4#msg4 Accessed January 17, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spirko also wants to help with yet another problem: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;I have constantly heard in this debate how citizens of State X leave and move to State Y due to being fed up.  Yet they turn around and then try to turn State Y into the very State X they just left behind&amp;quot; For example, [[retirement|retiring]] [[California]]ns moved to formerly [[conservative]] [[Oregon]] and turned it into a [[liberal]] [[Nanny state]] just like California. &amp;quot;Perhaps if citizens were to move for more than one reason this would be mitigated?  By fostering conversations between movers and for lack of a better term stayers (perhaps recruiters) those who are fed up can find a state that is most closely aligned with who they are.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is often the case that a person will move over a [[economic|fiscal]] issue but not agree with a social issue where they land.  The state where they moved to may resent them and feel they are trying to turn where they moved to into the place they just left behind.  The reality though is different, they likely have no desire to increase taxes they just want more social freedom, they don't necessary want you to pay for it.  If such a citizen were able to find both more fiscal freedom and more social freedom, likely they and their new neighbors would be more happy.  In the end we all must learn to get along but good match making is a great place to start.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key is either way, the oppressive state loses a producer and are denied the opportunity to tax them and denied the privilege of having them conduct business and participate in commerce within their state.  Did you get that word?  Privilege!  Yes the states should understand when citizens have freedom of movement, the presence of a productive member or society in that state is a state's privilege not a states right.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end I feel our members will agree that it is relatively easy to identify the 5 or so worse offenders when it comes to liberty.  The states that are just a few shades above them are not something I feel we need to be very worried about.  Likely free states are going to attract quite a few of their citizens anyway.  The key is to zero in on a small naughty list and give the citizens of those states a message, your fellow Americans would love to have you as neighbors.  We all have some unique things to offer, each state has pluses and minuses but flatly about 40 of us look like entirely different nations then the 5-6 at the very bottom.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For instance I have no desire to return to my home state of [[Pennsylvania]], it has fallen too far for my taste from the ideals of our founders.  Yet if I compare Pennsylvania to [[New Jersey]] it is like Comparing East and West [[Germany]] during the [[Cold War]].  I mean if you are a freedom loving citizen of New Jersey I would love to have you in Texas and I am sure the folks in New Hampshire would as well, but to be blunt the Delaware river isn't the [[Berlin wall]]!  Escape is easy and not far away.  If Pennsylvania is as far as you can manage it is still a move away from one of the most oppressive governments in the nation.  A state where you can't even have a unloaded and cased [[gun]] locked in your trunk without being considered a [[felony|felon]].  For that matter New Jersey is a state that won't even let you pump your own [[gasoline|gas]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end though liberty is personal, it can only really be defined at the individual level.  Yet when some governments encroach too far measures must be taken.  Our [[Founding Fathers]] knew all [[government]]s do this, they founded a [[republic]] so the citizenry would have many options.  You can [[vote]] with dollars and do business with companies you agree with.  You can vote with a ballot and elect your leaders.  When you serve on a [[jury]] you have a final check on unjust law and a jury can indeed [[jury nullification|nullify]] such a law with a simple vote of not guilty.  The ultimate vote though is simply walking away.  The states on the naughty list are already by and large on the verge of fiscal crisis if not all out [[bankruptcy]], they can't afford to have their most productive citizens leave.  Yet they should all be warned that the citizens well, they can by and large very well afford to leave.  Not only can they afford to but they can often increase their quality of life by doing so.  In other words they need you a hell of a lot less then you need them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vision of Walking to Freedom is simple, to encourage tens or even hundreds of thousands of citizens to simply walk away from the most oppressive and [[national debt|fiscally irresponsible]] states in the union.  To allow them to find the best new home, to find friends, jobs, [[church]]es, communities, etc that will welcome them with open arms.  Many people feel moving is too hard to accomplish, we simply want to show them that it is far more difficult to live in oppression and abuse than to rent a U-haul and make some new friends.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once the naughty list is established we will move into action.  All the naughty list states will have a dedicated 'goodbye letter' board.  Where we encourage all of their citizens to leave a letter to their governor, state and federal reps, local officials and local news outlets telling them why they are leaving and what is being lost by their exodus.  All other states will get a board where their citizens, officials, chambers of commerce etc. may freely make a case as to why their state is a good choice.  Those looking to move can discuss what different states have to offer, job availability, local communities, finding housing, etc.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are an official in a state on the naughty list be warned.  This movement may seem like the vision of one &amp;quot;[[redneck]] in Texas&amp;quot; to you, but this red neck isn't alone.  He is also smart enough to know this is bigger then himself or his state of Texas.  As much as I want my fellow [[American]]s to join me in the Lone Star State, I want them to leave behind oppression even more.  If I could throw a level that moved 5 million productive freedom loving people out of the five most oppressive states tomorrow and Texas wouldn't get a single one of them, I would do it at once.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summary I always say a [[American Revolution|fight for liberty]] anywhere is a fight for liberty everywhere. While that is true it is also a fact that when oppression is sufficient, everywhere but where you are is better.  For those on the 'naughty list' that is the choice you have given to your citizenry, we simply aim to help them make the best choice for them and assist them with their walk to liberty.  Simply put for those states on the list, this isn't something we did to you, it is something you have done to yourselves, we are just shining a light on it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://walkingtofreedom.com/forum/index.php?topic=4.msg4#msg4 Accessed January 17, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Vote with your feet]] - [[Strategic relocation]]:''' [[Essay:Owning land is true wealth|Owning land is true wealth]] and [[Essay:Personal-Localized-Regional-State-National-Global|Personal-Localized-Regional-State-National-Global]] - Move to a [[Free state]] with [[Essay:State Firearms Laws Ranking|Firearms freedom]], [[Free market]]s and low [[population density]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[American Redoubt]] - [[Idaho]], [[Montana]], [[Wyoming]], [[Utah]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Free State Wyoming]] - [[Molon Labe!]] by [[Boston T. Party]] and [[Free State Project]] - [[New Hampshire]]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[Strategic Relocation - North American Guide to Safe Places]]'' by [[Joel Skousen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[Rawles on Retreats and Relocation]]'' by [[James Wesley Rawles]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cumberland Redoubt]] - [[Tennessee]] and [[Kentucky]] - [[M.D. Creekmore]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:If I wanted to save America]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography - Further Reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joel Skousen|Skousen, Joel]], ''Strategic Relocation - North American Guide to Safe Places''. 3rd Edition Perfect Paperback, 2011, ISBN-10: 1568612621, ISBN-13: 978-1568612621&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[James Wesley Rawles|Rawles, James Wesley]], ''[[Rawles on Retreats and Relocation]]''. 1st. Clearwater, [[Idaho]], [[American Redoubt]]: The Clearwater Press, 2007. Print.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Boston T. Party|Party, Boston T.]], ''[[Boston's Gun Bible]]''. [[Wyoming]] [[American Redoubt]] [[Javelin Press]], 2008. Contains an entire chapter devoted to why Christians, conservatives and libertarians are preppers and contains [[Essay:State Firearms Laws Ranking]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Boston T. Party|Party, Boston T.]], [[Molon Labe!]]. [[Wyoming]] [[American Redoubt]] [[Javelin Press]], 30 January 2004, 454 pp (first edition, paperback), ISBN 1-888766-07-7 - Conservative [[Christian]] [[Libertarian]] [[dystopian]] fiction novel entirely based around the issue of [[States' rights]] and the [[Tenth Amendment]]'s connection with the [[Second Amendment]] right to [[firearms|armed]] [[citizen]] defense against federal [[tyranny]]. Contains many long discussions on why Christians, conservatives and libertarians are preppers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : United States Political Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Pro Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : American Redoubt]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Strategic Relocation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Anti-Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Libertarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Libertarians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Idaho]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Wyoming]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Montana]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Arizona]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Kentucky]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Louisiana]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Alaska]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Mississippi]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Texas]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Utah]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Kansas]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : New Hampshire]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : North Carolina]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Georgia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : American Civil War]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Lists|List of Free States versus Unfree States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Political Movements]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : United States Political Movements]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Immigration]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : United States Political Terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Free_States_Movement&amp;diff=1145718</id>
		<title>Essay: Free States Movement</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Free_States_Movement&amp;diff=1145718"/>
				<updated>2015-03-21T06:48:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Washington D.C. - not a state&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- NOTE to Editors: We request that you please DO NOT change or remove this title == Unfree State List == since it is being used by the redirect [[Unfree state]] as #redirect [[Free_States_Movement#Unfree_State_List]]. Thank you. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''Free state''' has two common meanings. One is the older less common meaning in the [[Antebellum]] period where a '''free state''' was a state where [[slavery]] was outlawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second meaning of '''Free state''' refers to the [[American]] '''Free States Movement'''. This is a newer and more common meaning in use since the late 1970's in [[America]] among [[libertarian]]s, [[conservative]]s, conservative [[Christian]]s, [[Patriot]]s, and [[Prepper]]s-[[Survivalist]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Modern &amp;quot;Free States&amp;quot; in the USA==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Free states]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A modern '''Free state''' in the [[USA]] can be defined by what it is not, more than what it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A free state is not:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Welfare state]] - [[Nanny state]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mass surveillance]] and [[Big government]] of the [[Police state]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Deficit spending]]&lt;br /&gt;
* High [[taxation]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal values]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Blue state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===List of Free States===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:238868166 ef70731f85.jpg|right|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Free States Movement is is picking up steam. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[American Redoubt]]:&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Idaho]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Wyoming]] - [[Constitutional carry]] via the [[Second Amendment]] rather than [[Concealed carry]] [[license]]s&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Montana]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arizona]] - [[Constitutional carry]] via the [[Second Amendment]] rather than [[Concealed carry]] [[license]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kentucky]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Louisiana]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Alaska]] - [[Constitutional carry]] via the [[Second Amendment]] rather than [[Concealed carry]] [[license]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mississippi]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kentucky]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Louisiana]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Alaska]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mississippi]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Texas]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Utah]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kansas]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New Hampshire]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[North Carolina]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Georgia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Qualities of the Free States===&lt;br /&gt;
A free state suggests:&lt;br /&gt;
* Respect for the [[unalienable rights]]/[[civil rights]] of the [[Bill of Rights]], especially the [[gun rights]] / right to [[self-defense]], [[home security]] and [[deterrence]] against [[tyranny]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Libertarianism|Libertarian values]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative values]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ludwig von Mises]]' [[conservative]] [[libertarian]] [[Austrian economics]] and [[Fiscal conservatism]] -[[Capitalist]] [[Conservative economic policies]] of [[Ron Paul]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Modern Survivalism]]: &amp;quot;[[Essay:if times get tough, or even if then don't]]&amp;quot;, [[Essay:Debt is financial cancer]], [[Essay:Tax is theft]], [[Renewable energy]], [[Financial security]], [[Essay:You are in control of your life]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Essay:Invest in tangibles]] - [[Precious Metals]], [[Copper-jacketed lead]] and [[Firearms]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- NOTE to Editors: We request that you please DO NOT change or remove this title == Unfree State List == since it is being used by the redirect [[Unfree state]] as #redirect [[Free_States_Movement#Unfree_State_List]]. Thank you. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unfree State List ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also [[Most liberal American cities]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list of [[Unfree states]] - [[Nanny State]]s was established by polling readers/listeners of [[:Category:Conservative Blogs|conservative blogs]], [[:Category:Conservative Podcasts |conservative podcasts]], [[:Category:Conservative Websites|conservative websites]],  [[:Category:Conservative Forums|conservative forums]], [[:Category:Libertarian Blogs|libertarian blogs]], [[:Category:Preparedness Blogs|preparedness blogs]], and [[:Category:Gun Blogs|gun blogs]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://walkingtofreedom.com/forum/index.php?topic=2.0 Accessed March 28, 2014 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is the list with some of their [[gun control|gun grabbing]] [[Constitution]] violating, [[Oath]]-[[treason|breaker]] [[liberal]] [[Democrat]] [[elitist]] [[politician]]s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.rollcall.com/50richest/the-50-richest-members-of-congress-112th-2012.html Accessed March 29, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_richest_American_politicians Accessed March 29, 2014 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_members_of_the_United_States_Congress_by_wealth Accessed March 29, 2014 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===California===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[California]] - [[Diane Feinstein]] (worth $41.78 million), [[Nancy Pelosi]] (worth $26.43 million), [[Barbara Boxer]], [[Henry Waxman]], [[Alan Lowenthal]] (CA-47), Howard Berman, Bob Filner, Jane Harman, Adam Schiff, Brad Sherman, Tom Lantos, Susan Davis, [[Los Angeles]] Mayor [[Eric Garcetti]], [[San Diego]] Mayor [[Bob Filner]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/california_restrictions.pdf is the 5th worst state for Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
** According to a 2005 study of the 25 [[most liberal American cities]], [[San Francisco]], [[Berkeley]], [[Oakland]] ranked #1, #2 and #4 respectively.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Phil Reiff, Director of the [[San Francisco Bay Area|Bay Area]] Center for Voting Research says, &amp;quot;While there are a few liberal cities without large [[African American]] populations, these wind up being the exceptions. College towns like [[Berkeley]] and [[Cambridge]] have modest black populations but remain bastions of upper [[middle-class]], white, intellectual [[liberalism]].&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The list of Americas most liberal cities is dominated by cities with large African American populations that are concentrated in the [[Northeast]], [[Midwest]] and [[California]]. Conversely, the study found that the staunchest [[conservative]] cities are clustered in [[the South]] and interior [[:Category:Intermountain West|West]] and have extremely low numbers of African American residents.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;[[San Francisco Bay Area|Bay Area]] Center for Voting Research (BACVR) ranks the political leanings of every American city and finds that [[Detroit]], Michigan is the most liberal and [[Provo, Utah]] the most conservative.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The Bay Area Center for Voting Research is a nonpartisan&amp;quot; ('liberal') &amp;quot;[[think tank]] based in [[Berkeley]], California. A full copy of the report and the complete list of rankings for all 237 cities are available at http://www.votingresearch.org.&amp;quot; [http://americancityandcounty.com/content/study-ranks-americas-most-liberal-and-conservative-cities 2005 study rankings on liberal and conservative cities]. Posted Oct 27, 2014.  Accessed March 18, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Colorado===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Colorado]] - [[Jared Polis]] (worth $72.09 million)&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/colorado_restrictions.pdf Colorado Firearms Restrictions] since 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Connecticut===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Connecticut]] - [[Richard Blumenthal]] (worth $79.11 million), [[Joe Lieberman]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/connecticut_restrictions.pdf Connecticut Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Delaware===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Delaware]] - former Sen. [[Joe Biden]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/middle-school-kids-taken-hear-louis-farrakhan-call-violence-against-crackers Middle School Kids Taken To Hear Louis Farrakhan Call For Violence Against The 'Crackers']&amp;quot; [[Ben Shapiro]]'s ''Truth Revolt''. &amp;quot;Administrator at Booker T. Washington Middle School in [[Baltimore]], [[Maryland]], took forty young teenage students as young as eleven-years-old to the 2nd Annual [[African American|Black]] United Summit International (BUSI) conference where they heard [[racist|bigoted]] purveyor of hatred [[Louis Farrakhan]] reference [[caucasian|white people]] as &amp;quot;crackers” and a call for “retaliation” for [[Michael Brown]]'s death. When asked by Clark why the children were taken to this conference, Anthony Pena, the Middle School administrator who took the forty students between the ages of 11 and 15 to the conference, said, &amp;quot;At the end of the day… it’s about how we connect to our youth and help develop them to become our future.”&amp;quot; (See [[Public school values]]. Accessed January 5, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hawaii===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hawaii]] - [[Brian Schatz]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/hi_ak_vi_guam_restrictions.pdf Hawaii Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Illinois===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Illinois]] - [[Chicago]] Mayor [[Rahm Emanuel]] (worth $12 million with $6 mil salary)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1426034.html Accessed March 29, 2014 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[Brad Schneider]] (IL-10), [[Jan Schakowsky]] (IL-9)&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/illinois_restrictions.pdf Illinois is the 4th worst state for Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Maryland===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Maryland]] - [[Benjamin Cardin]], &lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/maryland_restrictions.pdf Maryland Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Maine===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Maine]] - [[Chellie Pingree]] (worth $28.58 million)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Massachusetts===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts]] - John Kerry (worth $193 million), [[Ted Kennedy]] (was worth $163 million), [[Barney Frank]] [D, MA-04]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/massachusetts_restrictions.pdf Massachusetts is the 2nd worst state for Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Cambridge, Massachusetts]] was ranked #5 most liberal city in America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://americancityandcounty.com/content/study-ranks-americas-most-liberal-and-conservative-cities 2005 study rankings on liberal and conservative cities]. Posted Oct 27, 2014.  Accessed March 18, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===New Jersey===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New Jersey]] - [[Frank Lautenberg]] (was worth $116.1 million), Steve Rothman&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/michigan_restrictions.pdf New Jersey Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===New York===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New York]] - former Sen. [[Hillary Clinton]], [[New York City]] former Mayor [[Michael Bloomberg]] (worth $31 billion), [[Charles Schumer]], [[Mario Cuomo]], [[Jerrold Nadler]], [[Anthony Weiner]],  (sexting scandal), [[Gary Ackerman]], [[Steve Israel]], [[Eliot Engel]], [[Nita Lowey]], [[Jerrold Nadler]], &lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/new_york_restrictions.pdf New York is the 1st worst state for Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Oregon===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oregon]] - [[Ron Wyden]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Portland]], [[Oregon]] was ranked #3 most liberal city in America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://americancityandcounty.com/content/study-ranks-americas-most-liberal-and-conservative-cities 2005 study rankings on liberal and conservative cities]. Posted Oct 27, 2014.  Accessed March 18, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Rhode Island===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rhode Island]] - [[David Cicilline]] (RI-1)&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/washington_dc_restrictions.pdf Rhode Island Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vermont===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vermont]] - [[Bernie Sanders]], the only avowed [[socialist]] member of Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Washington State===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Washington State]] - Maria Cantwell (worth $5.56 million)&lt;br /&gt;
** So-called [[Universal background check|&amp;quot;Universal&amp;quot; background checks]] implemented on January 1, 2015 thanks to [[Bill Gates]] and [[Michael Bloomberg]] millions of dollars of donations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Summary of the Unfree States===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The [[East Coast]] and [[West Coast]] ([[Left Coast]]) had the most [[liberal states]] including [[Vermont]], [[Massachusetts]], [[Delaware]], [[New York]], [[Hawaii]], [[Oregon]], [[Washington]], [[Maine]], [[California]] and [[New Jersey]].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie TheHill.com] Accessed March 28, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Unfree Geographic Entities==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Washington D.C.===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Washington DC]] - [[President]] [[Barak Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/feeds/state_reg/washington_dc_restrictions.pdf D.C. Firearms Restrictions]&lt;br /&gt;
** Best description of Washington D.C. gun grabbers propaganda and gun control is found in the book by [[Emily Miller]], ''[https://amazon.com/Emily-Gets-Her-Gun-Obama/dp/1621571920 Emily Gets Her Gun, But Obama Wants to Take Yours], 2013. Washington Times columnist Emily Miller finally got the gun she wanted after her Nanny state ordeal of spending &amp;quot;four months of jumping through regulatory hoops and $435 in fees.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;In the wake of tragic shootings in [[Newtown]] and [[Aurora]], the [[gun control|anti-gun]] [[lobby]] has launched a campaign of lies, distortion, misrepresentation, and emotional manipulation that is breathtaking in its vitriol and its denial of basic facts. Their goal is to take away our Second Amendment rights and then disarm law-abiding Americans. Emily Miller tells her personal story of how being a single, female victim of a [[home invasion]] drove her to try to obtain a legally registered gun in Washington, D.C. The narrative—sometimes shocking, other times hilarious in its absurdity—gives the reader a real life understanding of how gun-control laws only make it more difficult for honest, law-abiding people to get guns, while violent crime continues to rise. Using facts and newly uncovered research, Miller exposes the schemes politicians&lt;br /&gt;
on Capitol Hill, in the White House, and around the country are using to deny people their Second Amendment rights. She exposes the myths that gun grabbers and liberal media use to get new laws passed that infringe on our right to keep and bear arms. The gun rights debate isn’t just about firearms. It’s about protecting a fundamental right that is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. It’s about politicians who lie, manipulate, and outright break existing laws to get what they want. It’s about President Obama wanting a bigger federal government to control you. Not just your guns—you. The fight for gun rights is the fight for freedom. Emily Miller says stand up and fight back now because your Second Amendment will only be the first to go.&amp;quot; ''[https://amazon.com/Emily-Gets-Her-Gun-Obama/dp/1621571920 Emily Gets Her Gun, But Obama Wants to Take Yours on Amazon.com].  Accessed March 10, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scarry, Eddie, [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/09/18/this-newswoman-got-a-gun-for-protection-even-though-her-gun-carrying-dad-didnt-want-her-to/ POLITICS&lt;br /&gt;
This Newswoman Got a Gun For Protection…Even Though Her Gun-Carrying Dad Didn’t Want Her To], [[The Blaze]], Published September 18, 2013. Accessed March 10, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anything buy a Big City in an Unfree State==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Alex Barron]] suggests the following, &amp;quot;There are many people who write me who suggest that they cannot move to [[James Wesley Rawles|JWR]]’s perfect [[self-sufficient]] remote, defensible [[survivalist retreat|homestead]]. The reasons are often similar, money and wife issues. My recommendation to them is often similar. Think of moving to a [[small town values|small town]] or even the “big [[city]]” in a [[red state]]. It is my opinion that [[conservative]] more [[traditional values|traditional]] leaning states with balanced budgets and a “[[libertarian|leave me alone]]” style will weather what comes next better than many more [[progressive]], heavily [[national debt|indebted]], people are use to a [[entitlement mentality|safety net from cradle to grave mentality]]. Would you rather be in [[Los Angeles]] or [[Boise]] when a significant [[depression|economic downturn]] starts? BTW, the first time I visited Boise I thought “where is the city.” Then when we went out to drink later own, I was like, when do we get downtown?  They were like, you are “downtown.” Boise doesn’t qualify as a [[suburb]] of a major city like [[Chicago]], but it is one of the fastest growing cities in [[the West]]. When [[Idaho]], [[Montana]] or [[Wyoming]] says “big city” it is not what first comes to mind.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Alex Barron|Barron, Alex]], &amp;quot;[https://charlescarrollsociety.com/2015/01/19/orofino-idaho-prepper-homesteading/ Orofino, Idaho #prepper #homesteading]&amp;quot;. [[Idaho]], [[American Redoubt]] [[Charles Carroll Society]] [[:Category:Preparedness Podcasts|Podcast]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===California in Not a Free State===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Alex Barron]] reports, &amp;quot;In many parts of [[California]] people are paying more than $1,000 a month in [[property tax]] and what they call Mello-roos. Mello-roos is some form of supplemental tax for things like fire departments and [[law enforcement|police services]]. You know what you think your tax dollars already cover. That is $12,000 a year, every year for the privilege of owning property in the state.  Many [[red state]]s have much lower property taxes.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Alex Barron|Barron, Alex]], &amp;quot;[https://charlescarrollsociety.com/2015/01/21/the-advantageous-of-a-modern-neo-homestead-prepper-homesteading/ The advantageous of a modern (neo) homestead #prepper #homesteading]&amp;quot;. [[Idaho]], [[American Redoubt]] [[Charles Carroll Society]] [[:Category:Preparedness Podcasts|Podcast]], Published January 21, 2015. Accessed January 23, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Walking to Freedom Project==&lt;br /&gt;
'''Walking to Freedom''' is an initiative created by [[libertarian]] [[survivalist]] [[podcast]]er [[Jack Spirko]] ([[The Survival Podcast]]) where [[citizen]]s are encouraged to pull up stakes and to move to a more open and [[free state]] -- to [[vote with your feet | vote with their feet]]. States are broken down into two categories, the &amp;quot;naughty list and all the rest. People moving out of [[:Category:Oppression|oppressive]] states are asked to post a &amp;quot;goodbye letter&amp;quot; addressed to the state and state government officials regarding their decision to move out of their state. On the [[website]]'s (http://walkingtofreedom.com) [[Forum]] groups for the &amp;quot;non-naughty&amp;quot; states are used to welcome people considering or actually moving to that state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Vision ====&lt;br /&gt;
For a few years Jack Spirko worked with and supported The [[Free State Project]] of [[New Hampshire]] (http://freestateproject.org) Spirko says, &amp;quot;While it is not in the cards for me to move to New Hampshire the concept to me is the hallmark of a [[republic]]. Individual member states band together to form a Federal Republic of States. In our case we call this 'The United States of America'. [[Citizen]]s have [[freedom]] of movement from state to state and the citizen is seen as the most [[sovereign]] entity with the most [[unalienable rights|rights]], next in the chain is the sovereignty of the member states and at the bottom of the sovereignty chain is the [[Federal government]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He continues, &amp;quot;Much of this system is broken today, the [[Federal government]] is filling many roles it isn't supposed to fill (see [[Tenth Amendment]]).  State governments then fail to stand up for their citizens or worse they often pile on more [[big government]] [[Nanny state]] restrictions and encumbrances upon [[liberty]].  There is one component of the system though that is still functioning, movement between the states.  The final act of a citizen [[voting]] in a [[republic]] is to [[vote with their feet]].  While I love the work being done in [[New Hampshire]], I realized like me there were many people who just can't for one reason or another move there.  What dawned on me then though was if we simply create an exodus from the 5-10 worst states it does many things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;It sends a message to ALL state governments, your citizens understand a republic and their power and are damn well willing to use it.  [[:Category:Oppression|Oppress]] your citizens and your most valuable producers (citizens and companies) will leave for a better environment.&amp;quot; (See [[Atlas Shrugged]]'s [[Galt's Gulch]])&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;States with more [[liberty]] like [[Idaho]], [[New Hampshire]], [[Wyoming]], [[Montana]], [[Texas]], [[Arizona]], etc. will attract more liberty oriented individuals.  Not for the purpose of transforming their new home states states but to at minimum hold the line and prevent said states from becoming less [[libertarian]].&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;It makes the entire movement far larger then just The [[Free State Project]] or other groups like [[Free State Wyoming]] or the [[American Redoubt]] movement.  By gaining maximum exposure and reach, Walking To Freedom, is a rising tide that will float all boats.  It will actually bring more people to states like Wyoming and New Hampshire by fostering competition among the member states.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;Most current oppression in the US is actually at the [[Big government|Federal level]].  There are a handful of states that go above and beyond that, it is easier to target those 5-10 on the 'naughty list' and let the other 40-45 states make their case as to why you should move there, then it is to try to get anyone upset with their state to choose a single option as a way out.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;[[Freedom]] is highly personal.  To some [[taxation|tax freedom]] is the main concern, others are more concerned with freedom over types of housing, some with [[Second Amendment|freedom to keep and bear arms]] yet others simply want what I call 'operational freedom'.  Operational freedom is simply the freedom to conduct business.  Many [[entrepreneur]]s are less concerned with the overall [[tax rate]]s and more concerned with the permits, [[license]]s, fees, hoops one must jump though just to open the doors.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;By fostering [[competition]] among all the states not on the 'naughty list' we have a much larger influence.  It brings public awareness to the issue and starts making many states that are at the far end or middle of the spectrum to start thinking about the [[cause and effect|consequences]] of being on the naughty list or having the list grow just because they have encouraged us to do so.  Yes the list can get bigger in time if necessary.  We use 'disapproval voting' to establish the list.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spirko elaborates:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;When I consider all of the above it is clear to me that Walking To Freedom is a true manifestation of the principle of a [[republic]].  Sure many states may not make the 'naughty list' that many of us feel should.  We can only hand out so many demerits you know but, the other side is those states will find that far less citizens choose them as a place to move to.  I am quite sure in time that this movement will result in tens of thousands of 'goodbye letters' to state and local officials.  While that is half of the equation, I wonder how the [[Chamber of Commerce]] of say a state at the bottom of the receiving end will feel if they see hundreds or even thousands choosing state relatively close to them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://walkingtofreedom.com/forum/index.php?topic=4.msg4#msg4 Accessed January 17, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spirko also wants to help with yet another problem: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;I have constantly heard in this debate how citizens of State X leave and move to State Y due to being fed up.  Yet they turn around and then try to turn State Y into the very State X they just left behind&amp;quot; For example, [[retirement|retiring]] [[California]]ns moved to formerly [[conservative]] [[Oregon]] and turned it into a [[liberal]] [[Nanny state]] just like California. &amp;quot;Perhaps if citizens were to move for more than one reason this would be mitigated?  By fostering conversations between movers and for lack of a better term stayers (perhaps recruiters) those who are fed up can find a state that is most closely aligned with who they are.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is often the case that a person will move over a [[economic|fiscal]] issue but not agree with a social issue where they land.  The state where they moved to may resent them and feel they are trying to turn where they moved to into the place they just left behind.  The reality though is different, they likely have no desire to increase taxes they just want more social freedom, they don't necessary want you to pay for it.  If such a citizen were able to find both more fiscal freedom and more social freedom, likely they and their new neighbors would be more happy.  In the end we all must learn to get along but good match making is a great place to start.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The key is either way, the oppressive state loses a producer and are denied the opportunity to tax them and denied the privilege of having them conduct business and participate in commerce within their state.  Did you get that word?  Privilege!  Yes the states should understand when citizens have freedom of movement, the presence of a productive member or society in that state is a state's privilege not a states right.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end I feel our members will agree that it is relatively easy to identify the 5 or so worse offenders when it comes to liberty.  The states that are just a few shades above them are not something I feel we need to be very worried about.  Likely free states are going to attract quite a few of their citizens anyway.  The key is to zero in on a small naughty list and give the citizens of those states a message, your fellow Americans would love to have you as neighbors.  We all have some unique things to offer, each state has pluses and minuses but flatly about 40 of us look like entirely different nations then the 5-6 at the very bottom.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For instance I have no desire to return to my home state of [[Pennsylvania]], it has fallen too far for my taste from the ideals of our founders.  Yet if I compare Pennsylvania to [[New Jersey]] it is like Comparing East and West [[Germany]] during the [[Cold War]].  I mean if you are a freedom loving citizen of New Jersey I would love to have you in Texas and I am sure the folks in New Hampshire would as well, but to be blunt the Delaware river isn't the [[Berlin wall]]!  Escape is easy and not far away.  If Pennsylvania is as far as you can manage it is still a move away from one of the most oppressive governments in the nation.  A state where you can't even have a unloaded and cased [[gun]] locked in your trunk without being considered a [[felony|felon]].  For that matter New Jersey is a state that won't even let you pump your own [[gasoline|gas]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end though liberty is personal, it can only really be defined at the individual level.  Yet when some governments encroach too far measures must be taken.  Our [[Founding Fathers]] knew all [[government]]s do this, they founded a [[republic]] so the citizenry would have many options.  You can [[vote]] with dollars and do business with companies you agree with.  You can vote with a ballot and elect your leaders.  When you serve on a [[jury]] you have a final check on unjust law and a jury can indeed [[jury nullification|nullify]] such a law with a simple vote of not guilty.  The ultimate vote though is simply walking away.  The states on the naughty list are already by and large on the verge of fiscal crisis if not all out [[bankruptcy]], they can't afford to have their most productive citizens leave.  Yet they should all be warned that the citizens well, they can by and large very well afford to leave.  Not only can they afford to but they can often increase their quality of life by doing so.  In other words they need you a hell of a lot less then you need them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vision of Walking to Freedom is simple, to encourage tens or even hundreds of thousands of citizens to simply walk away from the most oppressive and [[national debt|fiscally irresponsible]] states in the union.  To allow them to find the best new home, to find friends, jobs, [[church]]es, communities, etc that will welcome them with open arms.  Many people feel moving is too hard to accomplish, we simply want to show them that it is far more difficult to live in oppression and abuse than to rent a U-haul and make some new friends.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once the naughty list is established we will move into action.  All the naughty list states will have a dedicated 'goodbye letter' board.  Where we encourage all of their citizens to leave a letter to their governor, state and federal reps, local officials and local news outlets telling them why they are leaving and what is being lost by their exodus.  All other states will get a board where their citizens, officials, chambers of commerce etc. may freely make a case as to why their state is a good choice.  Those looking to move can discuss what different states have to offer, job availability, local communities, finding housing, etc.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are an official in a state on the naughty list be warned.  This movement may seem like the vision of one &amp;quot;[[redneck]] in Texas&amp;quot; to you, but this red neck isn't alone.  He is also smart enough to know this is bigger then himself or his state of Texas.  As much as I want my fellow [[American]]s to join me in the Lone Star State, I want them to leave behind oppression even more.  If I could throw a level that moved 5 million productive freedom loving people out of the five most oppressive states tomorrow and Texas wouldn't get a single one of them, I would do it at once.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summary I always say a [[American Revolution|fight for liberty]] anywhere is a fight for liberty everywhere. While that is true it is also a fact that when oppression is sufficient, everywhere but where you are is better.  For those on the 'naughty list' that is the choice you have given to your citizenry, we simply aim to help them make the best choice for them and assist them with their walk to liberty.  Simply put for those states on the list, this isn't something we did to you, it is something you have done to yourselves, we are just shining a light on it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://walkingtofreedom.com/forum/index.php?topic=4.msg4#msg4 Accessed January 17, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Vote with your feet]] - [[Strategic relocation]]:''' [[Essay:Owning land is true wealth|Owning land is true wealth]] and [[Essay:Personal-Localized-Regional-State-National-Global|Personal-Localized-Regional-State-National-Global]] - Move to a [[Free state]] with [[Essay:State Firearms Laws Ranking|Firearms freedom]], [[Free market]]s and low [[population density]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[American Redoubt]] - [[Idaho]], [[Montana]], [[Wyoming]], [[Utah]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Free State Wyoming]] - [[Molon Labe!]] by [[Boston T. Party]] and [[Free State Project]] - [[New Hampshire]]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[Strategic Relocation - North American Guide to Safe Places]]'' by [[Joel Skousen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[Rawles on Retreats and Relocation]]'' by [[James Wesley Rawles]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cumberland Redoubt]] - [[Tennessee]] and [[Kentucky]] - [[M.D. Creekmore]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:If I wanted to save America]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography - Further Reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joel Skousen|Skousen, Joel]], ''Strategic Relocation - North American Guide to Safe Places''. 3rd Edition Perfect Paperback, 2011, ISBN-10: 1568612621, ISBN-13: 978-1568612621&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[James Wesley Rawles|Rawles, James Wesley]], ''[[Rawles on Retreats and Relocation]]''. 1st. Clearwater, [[Idaho]], [[American Redoubt]]: The Clearwater Press, 2007. Print.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Boston T. Party|Party, Boston T.]], ''[[Boston's Gun Bible]]''. [[Wyoming]] [[American Redoubt]] [[Javelin Press]], 2008. Contains an entire chapter devoted to why Christians, conservatives and libertarians are preppers and contains [[Essay:State Firearms Laws Ranking]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Boston T. Party|Party, Boston T.]], [[Molon Labe!]]. [[Wyoming]] [[American Redoubt]] [[Javelin Press]], 30 January 2004, 454 pp (first edition, paperback), ISBN 1-888766-07-7 - Conservative [[Christian]] [[Libertarian]] [[dystopian]] fiction novel entirely based around the issue of [[States' rights]] and the [[Tenth Amendment]]'s connection with the [[Second Amendment]] right to [[firearms|armed]] [[citizen]] defense against federal [[tyranny]]. Contains many long discussions on why Christians, conservatives and libertarians are preppers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : United States Political Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Pro Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : American Redoubt]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Strategic Relocation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Anti-Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Libertarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Libertarians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Idaho]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Wyoming]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Montana]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Arizona]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Kentucky]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Louisiana]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Alaska]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Mississippi]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Texas]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Utah]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Kansas]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : New Hampshire]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : North Carolina]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Georgia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : American Civil War]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Lists|List of Free States versus Unfree States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Political Movements]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : United States Political Movements]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : Immigration]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category : United States Political Terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gay_lobby&amp;diff=1144796</id>
		<title>Gay lobby</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gay_lobby&amp;diff=1144796"/>
				<updated>2015-03-14T03:33:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: added SOURCE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''gay lobby''' is a term to describe how a relatively small number of activists for the [[homosexual agenda]] seek to acquire influence over larger organizations and political entities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term was used, for example, to describe attempts by activists to infiltrate and gain control over the [[Catholic Church]], as initially reported by the Italian media and confirmed by Pope Francis:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/06/12/pope-francis-says-gay-lobby-at-work-inside-vatican/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In the document, Francis is quoted as saying that while there were many holy people in the Vatican, there was also a current of corruption. &amp;quot;The `gay lobby' is mentioned, and it is true, it is there ... We need to see what we can do ...&amp;quot; the synthesis reads. ...&lt;br /&gt;
In the days leading up to Pope Benedict XVI's Feb. 28 resignation, Italian media were rife with reports of a &amp;quot;gay lobby&amp;quot; influencing papal decision-making and Vatican policy through blackmail, and suggestions that the scandal had led in part to Benedict's decision to resign.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subsequently, in the summer 2013, Pope Francis said at a press conference:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.buzzfeed.com/mckaycoppins/rick-santorum-popes-gay-comments-were-taken-out-of-context&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|So much is written about the gay lobby. I have yet to find on a Vatican identity card the word 'gay'.&amp;quot; They say there are some gay people here. I think that when we encounter a gay person, we must make the distinction between the fact of a person being gay and the fact of a lobby, because lobbies are not good.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gay lobby has been increasingly influential over the [[Mormon Church]], such that by 2015 pro-[[homosexual agenda]] legislation began to pass easily in [[Utah]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03/12/utah-lawmakers-pass-anti-lgbt-discrimination-bill-endorsed-by-mormon-church/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Homosexuality]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=China&amp;diff=1091696</id>
		<title>China</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=China&amp;diff=1091696"/>
				<updated>2014-07-03T21:46:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* Religious discrimination */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =People's Republic of China&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;''Zhōnghuá Rénmín Gònghéguó''&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;中华人民共和国&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =China rel01.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|map2           =China location.png&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag_of_the_PRC.png‎&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of PR China.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Beijing&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Communist&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Chinese (Mandarin)&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Xi Jinping&lt;br /&gt;
|premier	=Li Keqiang&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =3,704,427 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =1,336,000,000 (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$47.1564 trillion (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$5,432 (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=Yuan&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''China''' is the world's largest country by population, with a rapidly growing economy. With thousands of years of continuous traditions, in three decades it has dramatically changed itself from a poor backward nation to a world power, and is one of the world's  top economies. It has emerged as a major regional power in East Asia, averaging over 9% economic growth per year since 1978 when it introduced a market-based economic system with many elements of capitalism, to replace its old socialism. Foreign businesses have flocked to invest in China, Americans and others rush to buy its cheap factory output, Chinese exports flooded the world.  It has vast reserves of dollar holdings.  China is modernizing its military, has joined numerous regional and international institutions, and plays an increasingly visible role in international politics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nation is under control from the [[Chinese Communist Party]], which encompasses mainland China, albeit with many border disputes. The Beijing claims [[Taiwan]] as a province, but the Taipei maintains its sovereignty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hong Kong]] was transferred back to Chinese control by the [[United Kingdom]] in 1997, and [[Macau]] was handed over by [[Portugal]] in 1999. Both territories are now [[Special Administrative Region]]s and have autonomy over local affairs. Since the 1950s China has increasingly asserted brutal control over [[Tibet]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The next 5 years represent a critical period in China's development. To investors and firms, particularly since China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, China represents a vast market that has yet to be fully tapped and a low-cost base for export-oriented production. Educationally, China is forging ahead as partnerships, and exchanges with foreign universities have helped create new research opportunities for its students. China used the Summer Olympics in 2008 to showcase to the world its amazing gains of the past two decades. The new leadership is committed to generating greater economic development in the interior and providing more services to those who do not live in China's coastal areas, goals that form the core of President Hu's concepts of a &amp;quot;harmonious society&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;spiritual civilization.&amp;quot; However, there is still much that needs to change in China. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more information on China, see [[World History Lecture Three]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Name==&lt;br /&gt;
{{language box&lt;br /&gt;
|s=中国&lt;br /&gt;
|t=中國&lt;br /&gt;
|l=central nation&lt;br /&gt;
|p=Zhōngguó&lt;br /&gt;
|w=Chung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-kuo&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The word &amp;quot;China&amp;quot; is derived from the [[Persian language|Persian]] word ''Cin'' (چین), which is from the [[Sanskrit]] word ''Cīna'' (चीन).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;AmHer&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/China?qsrc=2888 China]&amp;quot;. ''The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language'' (2000). Boston and New York: Houghton-Mifflin.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is first recorded in 1516 in the journal of the Portuguese explorer [[Duarte Barbosa]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;China&amp;quot;. ''Oxford English Dictionary'' (1989). ISBN 0-19-957315-8.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;''[http://books.google.com.vn/books?id=edzW9fuOF-cC&amp;amp;pg=PA211&amp;amp;dq=#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%22Very%20Great%20Kingdom%20of%20China%22&amp;amp;f=false The Book of Duarte Barbosa]'' (chapter title &amp;quot;The Very Great Kingdom of China&amp;quot;). ISBN 81-206-0451-2. In the [http://purl.pt/435/ Portuguese original], the chapter is titled &amp;quot;O Grande Reino da China&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The journal was translated and published in England in 1555.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Eden, Richard (1555). ''Decades of the New World'': &amp;lt;/br&amp;gt;{{cite book | title=Western Views of China and the Far East, Volume 1 | publisher=Asian Research Service | year=1984 | page=34 |first=Henry Allen |last=Myers}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The traditional theory, proposed in the 17th century by Martino Martini, is that ''Cīna'' is derived from &amp;quot;Qin&amp;quot; (秦), the westernmost of the Chinese kingdoms during the [[Zhou Dynasty]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Martini&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Martino, Martin, ''Novus Atlas Sinensis'', Vienna 1655, Preface, p. 2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, the word was used earlier in [[Hindu]] scripture, including the ''Mahābhārata'' (5th century BC) and the ''Laws of Manu'' (2nd century BC). Indian writers were not aware of China until the second century AD. Earlier usage of the word presumably refers to another entity, perhaps a country near the Tibetan-Burma border.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Liu, Lydia He, ''The Clash of Empires'', p. 77&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Wade, Geoff. &amp;quot;[http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp188_yelang_china.pdf The Polity of Yelang and the Origin of the Name 'China']&amp;quot;. ''[[Sino-Platonic Papers]]'', No. 188, May 2009, p. 20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==People==&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnic Groups===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Chinese people.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
China officially recognizes 56 distinct ethnic groups. The largest ethnic group is the Han Chinese, who constitute about 91.9% of the total population. The remaining 8.1% are Zhuang (16 million), Manchu (10 million), Hui (9 million), Miao (8 million), [[Uighur]] (7 million), Yi (7 million), Mongolian (5 million), Tibetan (5 million), Buyi (3 million), Korean (2 million), and other ethnic minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2009 large scale rioting erupted as the [[Uighur]] minority fought Chinese riot police in major cities in China's western Xinjiang province. Hundreds are dead..&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/07/world/asia/07kadeer.html?ref=world Wrik Eckholm, &amp;quot;China Points to Another Leader in Exile,&amp;quot; ''New York Times'' July 6, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Uighurs are angry at political, cultural and religious persecution as well as the growing presence in the region of Han Chinese - China's main ethnic group. Han now predominate in the cities, and Uighurs in the countryside. This is the first major violent unrest in China in two decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Language===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:China Ethnic language.jpg|thumb|left|Chinese Ethnolinguistic Groups.]]&lt;br /&gt;
There are seven major Chinese dialects and many subdialects. [[Mandarin Chinese|Mandarin]] (or Putonghua), the predominant dialect, is spoken by over 70% of the population. It is taught in all schools and is the medium of government. About two-thirds of the Han ethnic group are native speakers of Mandarin; the rest, concentrated in south and southeast China, speak one of the six other major Chinese dialects. Non-Chinese languages spoken widely by ethnic minorities include Mongolian, Tibetan, Uyghur and other Turkic languages (in Xinjiang), and Korean (in the northeast). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All Chinese dialects use the same written character sets. In mainland China, the [[Simplified Chinese|Simplified]] characters have been in use since 1949.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====The Pinyin System of Romanization====&lt;br /&gt;
On January 1, 1979, the Chinese Government officially adopted the [[Hanyu pinyin|pinyin]] system for spelling Chinese names and places in Roman letters. A system of Romanization invented by the Chinese, pinyin has long been widely used in China on street and commercial signs as well as in elementary Chinese textbooks as an aid in learning Chinese characters and for common character input systems. Variations of pinyin also are used as the written forms of several minority languages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pinyin has now replaced other conventional spellings in China's English-language publications. The U.S. Government also has adopted the pinyin system for all names and places in China. For example, the capital of China is now spelled &amp;quot;Beijing&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;Peking.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008 the anti-Communist government of Taiwan finally adopted the pinyin system, replaces the old [[Wade-Giles]] system which was increasingly ignored by the Chinese diaspora.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
A February 2007 survey concluded that 31% of Chinese citizens ages 16 and over, representing 300 million persons, follow some kind of religion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  This is approximately three times the official figure reported by the Government in April 2005.See [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108404.htm U.S. State Department &amp;quot;International Religious Freedom Report 2008&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are reportedly more than 100,000 officially recognized sites for religious activities, 300,000 officially recognized clergy, and more than 3,000 officially recognized religious organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:China B.jpg|left|280px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Government officially recognizes five main religions: [[Buddhism]], [[Taoism]], [[Islam]], [[Catholicism]], and [[Protestantism]]. There are five state-sanctioned &amp;quot;Patriotic Religious Associations&amp;quot; (PRAs) that manage the activities of the recognized faiths. The Russian Orthodox Church operates in some regions, particularly those with large populations of Russian expatriates or with close links to Russia. Foreign residents in the country who belonged to religious faiths not officially recognized by the Government were generally permitted to practice their religions. There is very little freedom for Christians however.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-25502760&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to estimate the number of Buddhists and Taoists, because they do not have congregational memberships and many practice exclusively at home.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Government estimated that there are 16,000 Buddhist temples and monasteries, 200,000 Buddhist monks and nuns, more than 1,700 reincarnate lamas, and 32 Buddhist schools. Most believers, particularly ethnic Han Buddhists, practice Mahayana Buddhism, while the majority of Tibetans and ethnic Mongolians, as well as a growing number of ethnic Chinese, practice Tibetan Buddhism, a Mahayana adaptation. Some ethnic minorities in southwest Yunnan Province practice Theravada Buddhism, the dominant tradition in parts of neighboring Southeast Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are more than 25,000 Taoist priests and nuns, more than 1,500 Taoist temples, and 2 Taoist schools. Traditional folk religions (worship of local gods, heroes, and ancestors) are practiced by hundreds of millions of citizens and are often affiliated with Taoism, Buddhism, or ethnic minority cultural practices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government says there are twenty million Muslims. Independent estimates range as high as fifty million or more. There are more than 40,000 Islamic places of worship (more than half of which are in the XUAR), more than 45,000 imams nationwide, and 10 Islamic schools. The country has ten predominantly Muslim ethnic groups, the largest of which is the Hui, estimated to number more than ten million. The Hui are centered in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, but there are significant concentrations of Hui throughout the country, including in Gansu, Henan, Qinghai, Yunnan, and Hebei Provinces, as well as in the TAR and the XUAR. Hui Muslims slightly outnumber Uighur Muslims, who live primarily in the XUAR. According to an official 2005 report, the XUAR had 23,900 mosques and 27,000 clerics at the end of 2004, but fewer than half of the mosques were authorized to hold Friday prayer and holiday services. The country also has more than one million Kazakh Muslims and thousands of Dongxiang, Kyrgyz, Salar, Tajik, Uzbek, Baoan, and Tatar Muslims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Officials from the Three-Self Patriotic Movement/China Christian Council (TSPM/CCC), the state-approved Protestant religious organization, estimated that at least twenty million citizens worship in official churches. Government officials stated that there are more than 50,000 registered TSPM churches and 18 TSPM theological schools. The Pew Research Center estimates that between 50 million and 70 million Christians practice without state sanction. The World Christian Database estimates that there are more than 300 unofficial house church networks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Catholic Patriotic Association (CPA) reports that 5.3 million persons worship in its churches and it is estimated that there are an additional 12 million or more persons who worship in unregistered Catholic churches that do not affiliate with the CPA. According to official sources, the government-sanctioned CPA has more than 70 bishops, nearly 3,000 priests and nuns, 6,000 churches and meeting places, and 12 seminaries. There are thought to be approximately 40 bishops operating &amp;quot;underground,&amp;quot; some of whom are in prison or under house arrest. During the reporting period, at least three bishops were ordained with papal approval. In September 2007 the official media reported that Liu Bainian, CPA vice president, stated that the young bishops were to be selected to serve dioceses without bishops and to replace older bishops. Of the 97 dioceses in the country, 40 reportedly did not have an acting bishop in 2007, and more than 30 bishops were over 80 years of age.&lt;br /&gt;
===Religious discrimination===&lt;br /&gt;
The Government restricts legal religious practice to government-sanctioned organizations and registered religious groups and places of worship, and seeks to control the growth and scope of the activity of both registered and unregistered religious groups, including &amp;quot;house churches.&amp;quot; Government authorities limit proselytism, particularly by foreigners and unregistered religious groups, but permit proselytism in state-approved religious venues and private settings. The Chinese government explicitly prohibits students and civil servants from participating in certain religious practices, even when not in school or at work. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://news.yahoo.com/china-bans-ramadan-fast-muslim-northwest-103756197.html Didi Tang &amp;quot;China bans Ramadan fast in Muslim northwest.&amp;quot; July 3, 2014. Associated Press.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Great Mosque Xi an China.jpg|thumb|330px|Great Mosque of Xi'an.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, the Government's repression of religious freedom intensified in some areas, including in Tibetan areas and in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region (XUAR). Unregistered Protestant religious groups in Beijing reported intensified harassment from government authorities in the lead up to the 2008 Summer Olympic Games. Media and China-based sources reported that municipal authorities in Beijing closed some house churches or asked them to stop meeting during the 2008 Summer Olympic Games and Paralympic Games. During the reporting period, officials detained and interrogated several foreigners about their religious activities and in several cases alleged that the foreigners had engaged in &amp;quot;illegal religious activities&amp;quot; and cancelled their visas. Media reported that the total number of expatriates expelled by the Government due to concerns about their religious activities exceeded one hundred. Officials in the XUAR, the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR), and other Tibetan areas tightly controlled religious activity. The Government sought the forcible return of several Uighur Muslims living abroad, some of whom had reportedly protested restrictions on the Hajj and encouraged other Muslims to pray and fast during Ramadan. Followers of Tibetan Buddhism, including those in the Inner Mongolian Autonomous Region and most Tibetan autonomous areas, faced more restrictions on their religious practice and ability to organize than Buddhists in other parts of the country. &amp;quot;Patriotic education&amp;quot; campaigns in the TAR and other Tibetan regions, which required monks and nuns to sign statements personally denouncing the Dalai Lama, and other new restrictions on religious freedom were major factors that led monks and nuns to mount peaceful protests at a number of monasteries on March 10, 2008. The protests and subsequent security response gave way to violence in Lhasa by March 14 and 15. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Underground&amp;quot; Roman Catholic clergy faced repression, in large part due to their avowed loyalty to the Vatican, which the Government accused of interfering in the country's internal affairs. The Government continued to repress groups that it designated as &amp;quot;cults,&amp;quot; which included several Christian groups and Falun Gong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religious and ethnic minority groups such as Tibetan Buddhists and Uighur Muslims experienced societal discrimination not only because of their religious beliefs but also because of their status as ethnic minorities with distinct languages and cultures. After the March 2008 protests in Lhasa and other Tibetan areas there were reports of increased tensions between Tibetan Buddhists and Hui Muslims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Falun Gong]] is a self-described spiritual movement that blends aspects of Taoism, Buddhism, and the meditation techniques and physical exercises of qigong (a traditional Chinese exercise discipline), with the teachings of Falun Gong leader Li Hongzhi. There are estimated to have been at least 2.1 million adherents of Falun Gong before the Government banned the group in 1999. Hundreds of thousands may practice Falun Gong privately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Population Policy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:China Mex RGarciaOrtiz.jpg|right|Chinese at Mexico]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|One-child Policy}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With a population officially just over 1.3 billion and an estimated growth rate of about 0.6%, China is very concerned about its population growth and has attempted with mixed results to implement a strict birth limitation policy. Until 2013 the government permited one child per family, with allowance for a second child under certain circumstances (such as twins), especially in rural areas, and with guidelines looser for ethnic minorities with small populations. Enforcement varies, and relies largely on &amp;quot;social compensation fees&amp;quot; to discourage extra births. Official government policy opposed forced [[abortion]] or sterilization, but in some localities there were instances of forced [[abortion]]. The government's goal was to stabilize the population in the first half of the 21st century, and current projections are that the population would peak at around 1.6 billion by 2050. Boys are highly prized, and because screening of fetuses is done to determine gender, selective abortion has resulted in 119 boys born for every 100 girls. By 2020, 24 million men of marrying age will find themselves without wives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2013 the government eased the One-child Policy strongly. Since then families in which at least one parent was an only child can have a second child now.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cnsnews.com/news/article/china-ease-1-child-policy-abolish-labor-camps&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government==&lt;br /&gt;
The People's Republic of China is an authoritarian state in which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) constitutionally is the paramount source of power. Party members hold almost all top government, police, and military positions. Ultimate authority rests with the 25-member political bureau (Politburo) of the CCP and its nine-member standing committee. '''[[Hu Jintao]]''' holds the three most powerful positions as CCP general secretary, president, and chairman of the Central Military Commission. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Chinese Communist Party===&lt;br /&gt;
The 71 million member CCP, authoritarian in structure and ideology, continues to dominate government. Nevertheless, China's population, geographical vastness, and social diversity frustrate attempts to rule by fiat from Beijing. Central leaders must increasingly build consensus for new policies among party members, local and regional leaders, influential non-party members, and the population at large. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In periods of greater openness, the influence of people and organizations outside the formal party structure has tended to increase, particularly in the economic realm. This phenomenon is most apparent today in the rapidly developing coastal region. Nevertheless, in all important government, economic, and cultural institutions in China, party committees work to see that party and state policy guidance is followed and that non-party members do not create autonomous organizations that could challenge party rule. Party control is tightest in government offices and in urban economic, industrial, and cultural settings; it is considerably looser in the rural areas, where the majority of the people live. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Theoretically, the party's highest body is the Party Congress, which traditionally meets at least once every 5 years. The 17th Party Congress is expected to take place in the fall of 2007. The primary organs of power in the Communist Party include: &lt;br /&gt;
*The Politburo Standing Committee, which currently consists of nine members (one seat is vacant following the June 2, 2007 death of Huang Ju); &lt;br /&gt;
*The Politburo, consisting of 24 full members, including the members of the Politburo Standing Committee; &lt;br /&gt;
*The Secretariat, the principal administrative mechanism of the CCP, headed by the General Secretary; &lt;br /&gt;
*The Central Military Commission; &lt;br /&gt;
*The Discipline Inspection Commission, which is charged with rooting out corruption and malfeasance among party cadres. &lt;br /&gt;
===State Structure===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Great Hall of the People in Tiananmen Square in Beijing China.jpg|thumb|left|340px|In front of the Great Hall of the People in Tiananmen Square in Beijing.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Chinese Government has always been subordinate to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP); its role is to implement party policies. The primary organs of state power are the National People's Congress (NPC), the President (the head of state), and the State Council. Members of the State Council include Premier Wen Jiabao (the head of government), a variable number of vice premiers (now four), five state councilors (protocol equivalents of vice premiers but with narrower portfolios), and 22 ministers and four State Council commission directors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Chinese constitution, the NPC is the highest organ of state power in China. It meets annually for about 2 weeks to review and approve major new policy directions, laws, the budget, and major personnel changes. These initiatives are presented to the NPC for consideration by the State Council after previous endorsement by the Communist Party's Central Committee. Although the NPC generally approves State Council policy and personnel recommendations, various NPC committees hold active debate in closed sessions, and changes may be made to accommodate alternate views. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the NPC is not in session, its permanent organ, the Standing Committee, exercises state power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Principal Government and Party Officials===&lt;br /&gt;
*President--Xi Jinping&lt;br /&gt;
*Vice President--Li Yuanchao&lt;br /&gt;
*Premier, State Council-- Li Keqiang&lt;br /&gt;
*NPC Chair--Wu Bangguo&lt;br /&gt;
*Vice Premier--Zhang Gaoli&lt;br /&gt;
*Politburo Standing Committee--Hu Jintao (General Secretary), Wu Bangguo, Wen Jiabao, Jia Qinglin, Zeng Qinghong, Wu Guanzheng, Li Changchun, Luo Gan&lt;br /&gt;
*Other Politburo Members--Cao Gangchuan, Guo Boxiong, He Guoqiang, Hui Liangyu, Liu Qi, Liu Yunshan, Wang Lequan, Wang Zhaoguo, Wu Yi, Yu Zhengsheng, Zeng Peiyan, Zhang Dejiang, Zhang Lichang, Zhou Yongkang, Wang Gang (alternate)&lt;br /&gt;
*Alternate Politburo Members--Wang Gang&lt;br /&gt;
*Chairman, Central Military Commission--Hu Jintao &lt;br /&gt;
*Foreign Minister--Yang Jiechi&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Commerce--Bo Xilai&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Finance--Jin Renqing&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Agriculture--Sun Zhengcai&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Information Industry--Wang Xudong&lt;br /&gt;
*Governor, People's Bank of China--Zhou Xiaochuan&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister, State Development and Reform Commission--Ma Kai&lt;br /&gt;
*Ambassador to U.S.--Zhou Wenzhong &lt;br /&gt;
*Ambassador to UN--Wang Guangya&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chinese painting.jpg|thumb|Chinese painting.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Since its establishment, the People's Republic has worked vigorously to win international support for its position that it is the sole legitimate government of all China, including Hong Kong, Macau, and [[Taiwan]]. In the early 1970s, Beijing was recognized diplomatically by most world powers. [[Beijing]] (Pekin) assumed the China seat in the [[United Nations]] in 1971 and has since become increasingly active in multilateral organizations. Japan established diplomatic relations with China in 1972, and the United States did so in 1979. As of July 2007, the number of countries that have diplomatic relations with Beijing had risen to 167, while 24 maintained diplomatic relations with Taiwan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the founding of the P.R.C., China's foreign policy initially focused on solidarity with the Soviet Union and other communist countries. In 1950, China sent the People's Liberation Army into North Korea to help North Korea halt the UN offensive that was approaching the Yalu River. After the conclusion of the Korean conflict, China sought to balance its identification as a member of the Soviet bloc by establishing friendly relations with Pakistan and other Third World countries, particularly in Southeast Asia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1960s, Beijing competed with Moscow for political influence among communist parties and in the developing world generally. Following the 1968 Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia and clashes in 1969 on the Sino-Soviet border, Chinese competition with the Soviet Union increasingly reflected concern over China's own strategic position. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 1978, the Chinese also became concerned over Vietnam's efforts to establish open control over Laos and Cambodia. In response to the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia, China fought a brief border war with Vietnam (February-March 1979) with the stated purpose of &amp;quot;teaching Vietnam a lesson.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chinese anxiety about Soviet strategic advances was heightened following the Soviet Union's December 1979 invasion of Afghanistan. Sharp differences between China and the Soviet Union persisted over Soviet support for Vietnam's continued occupation of Cambodia, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and Soviet troops along the Sino-Soviet border and in Mongolia--the so-called &amp;quot;three obstacles&amp;quot; to improved Sino-Soviet relations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1970s and 1980s China sought to create a secure regional and global environment for itself and to foster good relations with countries that could aid its economic development. To this end, China looked to the West for assistance with its modernization drive and for help in countering Soviet expansionism, which it characterized as the greatest threat to its national security and to world peace. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Map South Asia.jpg|left|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
China maintained its consistent opposition to &amp;quot;superpower hegemony,&amp;quot; focusing almost exclusively on the expansionist actions of the Soviet Union and Soviet proxies such as Vietnam and Cuba, but it also placed growing emphasis on a foreign policy independent of both the U.S. and the Soviet Union. While improving ties with the West, China continued to follow closely economic and other positions of the Third World nonaligned movement, although China was not a formal member. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the immediate aftermath of Tiananmen crackdown in June 1989, many countries reduced their diplomatic contacts with China as well as their economic assistance programs. In response, China worked vigorously to expand its relations with foreign countries, and by late 1990, had reestablished normal relations with almost all nations. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in late 1991, China also opened diplomatic relations with the republics of the former Soviet Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years, Chinese leaders have been regular travelers to all parts of the globe, and China has sought a higher profile in the UN through its permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council and other multilateral organizations. Closer to home, China has made efforts to reduce tensions in Asia, hosting the Six-Party Talks on North Korea's nuclear weapons program, cultivating a more cooperative relationship with members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and participating in the ASEAN Regional Forum. China has also taken steps to improve relations with countries in South Asia, including India. Following Premier Wen's 2005 visit to India, the two sides moved to increase commercial and cultural ties, as well as to resolve longstanding border disputes. The November 2006 visit of President Hu was the first state visit by a Chinese head of state to India in 10 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China has likewise improved ties with Russia, with Presidents Putin and Hu exchanging visits to Beijing and Moscow in April 2006 and March 2007. A second round of Russia-China joint military exercises is scheduled for fall 2007. China has played a prominent role in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), a regional grouping that includes Russia and the Central Asian nations of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Beijing has resolved many of its border and maritime disputes, notably including a November 1997 agreement with Russia that resolved almost all outstanding border issues and a 2000 agreement with Vietnam to resolve differences over their maritime border, though disagreements remain over islands in the South China Sea. Relations with Japan improved following Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's October 2006 visit to Beijing, although longstanding and emotionally charged disputes over history and competing claims to portions of the East China Sea remain sources of tension. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While in many ways Sudan's primary diplomatic patron, China has played a constructive role in support of peacekeeping operations in Southern Sudan and pledged to contribute an engineering unit in support of UN operations in Darfur. China has stated publicly that it shares the international community's concern over Iran's nuclear program and has voted in support of UN sanctions resolutions on Iran. Set against this has been an effort on the part of China to maintain close ties to countries such as Iran, Sudan, Zimbabwe, and Venezuela, which are sources of oil and other resources and which welcome China's non-conditional assistance and investment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political Conditions==&lt;br /&gt;
===Legal System===&lt;br /&gt;
The government's efforts to promote rule of law are significant and ongoing. After the Cultural Revolution, China's leaders aimed to develop a legal system to restrain abuses of official authority and revolutionary excesses. In 1982, the National People's Congress adopted a new state constitution that emphasized the rule of law under which even party leaders are theoretically held accountable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1979, when the drive to establish a functioning legal system began, more than 300 laws and regulations, most of them in the economic area, have been promulgated. The use of mediation committees--informed groups of citizens who resolve about 90% of China's civil disputes and some minor criminal cases at no cost to the parties--is one innovative device. There are more than 800,000 such committees in both rural and urban areas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Legal reform became a government priority in the 1990s. Legislation designed to modernize and professionalize the nation's lawyers, judges, and prisons was enacted. The 1994 Administrative Procedure Law allows citizens to sue officials for abuse of authority or malfeasance. In addition, the criminal law and the criminal procedures laws were amended to introduce significant reforms. The criminal law amendments abolished the crime of &amp;quot;counter-revolutionary&amp;quot; activity, although many persons are still incarcerated for that crime. Criminal procedures reforms also encouraged establishment of a more transparent, adversarial trial process. The Chinese constitution and laws provide for fundamental human rights, including due process, but these are often ignored in practice. In addition to other judicial reforms, the Constitution was amended in 2004 to include the protection of individual human rights and legally-obtained private property, but it is unclear how those provisions will be implemented. Although new criminal and civil laws have provided additional safeguards to citizens, previously debated political reforms, including expanding elections to the township level, and other legal reforms, including the reform of the reeducation through labor system, have been put on hold. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Military== &lt;br /&gt;
Establishment of a professional military force equipped with modern weapons and doctrine was the last of the &amp;quot;Four Modernizations&amp;quot; announced by Zhou Enlai and supported by Deng Xiaoping. In keeping with Deng's mandate to reform, the People's Liberation Army (PLA), which includes the strategic nuclear forces, army, navy, and air force, has demobilized millions of men and women since 1978 and introduced modern methods in such areas as recruitment and manpower, strategy, and education and training. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:China military.jpg|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
Following the June 1989 Tiananmen crackdown, ideological correctness was temporarily revived as the dominant theme in Chinese military affairs. Reform and modernization appear to have since resumed their position as the PLA's priority objectives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Chinese military is in the process of transforming itself from a land-based power, centered on a vast ground force, to a smaller, mobile, high-tech military eventually capable of mounting limited operations beyond its coastal borders. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China's power-projection capability is limited but has grown over recent years. China has acquired some advanced weapons systems from abroad, including Sovremmeny destroyers, SU-27 and SU-30 aircraft, and Kilo-class diesel submarines from Russia, and continued to develop domestic production capabilities, such as for the domestically-developed J-10 fighter aircraft. However, much of its air and naval forces continues to be based on 1960s-era technology. As the Defense Department's Quadrennial Defense Review, released February 2006, noted, the U.S. shares with other countries a concern about the pace, scope, and direction of China's military modernization. We view military exchanges, visits, and other forms of engagement are useful tools in promoting transparency, provided they have substance and are fully reciprocal. Regularized exchanges and contact also have the significant benefit of building confidence, reducing the possibility of accidents, and providing the lines of communication that are essential in ensuring that episodes such as the April 2001 EP-3 aircraft incident do not escalate into major crises. During their April 2006 meeting, President Bush and President Hu agreed to increase officer exchanges and to begin a strategic nuclear dialogue between STRATCOM and the Chinese military's strategic missile command. U.S. and Chinese militaries are also considering ways in which we might cooperate on disaster assistance relief. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nuclear Weapons and Arms Control Policy ===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1955, Mao Zedong's Chinese Communist Party decided to proceed with a nuclear weapons program; it was developed with Soviet assistance until 1960. After its first nuclear test in October 1964, Beijing deployed a modest but potent ballistic missile force, including land- and sea-based intermediate-range and intercontinental ballistic missiles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China became a major international arms exporter during the 1980s. Beijing joined the Middle East arms control talks, which began in July 1991 to establish global guidelines for conventional arms transfers, but announced in September 1992 that it would no longer participate because of the U.S. decision to sell F-16A/B aircraft to Taiwan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China was the first state to pledge &amp;quot;no first use&amp;quot; of nuclear weapons. It joined the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 1984 and pledged to abstain from further atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons in 1986. China acceded to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1992 and supported its indefinite and unconditional extension in 1995. In 1996, it signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) and agreed to seek an international ban on the production of fissile nuclear weapons material. To date, China has not ratified the CTBT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1996, China committed not to provide assistance to un-safeguarded nuclear facilities. China became a full member of the NPT Exporters (Zangger) Committee, a group that determines items subject to IAEA inspections if exported by NPT signatories. In September 1997, China issued detailed nuclear export control regulations. China began implementing regulations establishing controls over nuclear-related dual-use items in 1998. China also has committed not to engage in new nuclear cooperation with Iran (even under safeguards), and will complete existing cooperation, which is not of [[proliferation]] concern, within a relatively short period. In May 2004, with the support of the United States, China became a member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on significant, tangible progress with China on nuclear nonproliferation, President Clinton in 1998 took steps to bring into force the 1985 U.S.-China Agreement on Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Missiles===&lt;br /&gt;
Although it is not a member of the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), the multinational effort to restrict the proliferation of missiles, in March 1992 China undertook to abide by MTCR guidelines and parameters. China reaffirmed this commitment in 1994, and pledged not to transfer MTCR-class ground-to-ground missiles. In November 2000, China committed not to assist in any way the development by other countries of MTCR-class missiles. However, in August 29, 2003, the U.S. Government imposed missile proliferation sanctions lasting two years on the Chinese company China North Industries Corporation (NORINCO) after determining that it was knowingly involved in the transfer of equipment and technology controlled under Category II of the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) Annex that contributed to MTCR-class missiles in a non-MTCR country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In December 2003, the P.R.C. promulgated comprehensive new export control regulations governing exports of all categories of sensitive technologies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy ==&lt;br /&gt;
China's economy, based on rice and wheat farming, was generally prosperous until the 18th century. Population pressures, and failure to adopt new technology led to an impoverished nation by 1900. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Mao's death the policy of modernization along Western lines has led to a remarkable rate of economic growth in the industrial cities, which have pulled in millions of peasants from the still poor rural areas. Slack environmental standards have led to serious pollution problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The modern Chinese economy has benefited from investments from Taiwan and Hong Kong. They jumped far ahead of China by 1970 in terms of technology, and in recent years have invested in mainland industries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These two factors have changed Chinese economy, from a command economy to a more socialist state, with the Chinese economy increasingly in the hands of privately-owned businesses, not state- or military-run enterprises. The 2001 declaration by Jiang Zemin (former leader of the Communist Party) of the &amp;quot;theory of three represents&amp;quot; -- that the CCP represents not only workers, but also intellectuals and entrepreneurs -- was an explicit affirmation of what had been a trend for the previous years&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:National Stadium, Beijing.jpg|thumb|250px|National Stadium, Beijing.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1980 China has enjoyed the highest economic growth rates in the world. Suddenly in mid-2008, the growth rate slowed sharply from 11% a year to only 5.5%.  Much of the economy was geared to exports, and building factories for exports to the United States and Japan.  When the [[Financial Crisis of 2008]] hit, exports fell off and prices for industrial products like steel fell in half.  Many factories were shut down.  The decline has especially hit steel, cement and the construction industry.  The government in November 2008 announced a $586 billion stimulus program to build roads, dams, electric grids and other infrastructure projects that are designed to supplement the international market.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; David Barboza, &amp;quot;Great Engine of China Slows ,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/26/business/worldbusiness/26chinasteel.html?_r=1  ''New York Times'' Nov. 25, 2008] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1979, China has largely rejected socialism and embraced capitalism, while  maintaining Communist party rule.  Private ownership of the means of production has dramatically reduced poverty and increased wealth, especially in the cities but also in rural areas.  Nationally the GDP (in 2007 prices) has exploded from 2 trillion yuan in 1980 to 25 trillion in 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As late as 1980 60% of the people in rural China lives in poverty; by 2007 fewer than 5% did. Grain production has grown 300 to 500 tons per person, and rural income per person has soared from a few hundred yuan in 1980 to over 4000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See ''Economist'' Dec. 13, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reforms reformed and opened its economy. The Chinese leadership has adopted a more pragmatic perspective on many political and socioeconomic problems, and has reduced the role of ideology in economic policy. China's ongoing economic transformation has had a profound impact not only on China but on the world. The market-oriented reforms China has implemented over the past two decades have unleashed individual initiative and entrepreneurship. The result has been the largest reduction of poverty and one of the fastest increases in income levels ever seen. China today is the fourth-largest economy in the world. It has sustained average economic growth of over 9.5% for the past 26 years. In 2006 its $2.76 trillion economy was about one-fifth the size of the U.S. economy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1980s, China tried to combine central planning with market-oriented reforms to increase productivity, living standards, and technological quality without exacerbating inflation, unemployment, and budget deficits. China pursued agricultural reforms, dismantling the commune system and introducing a household-based system that provided peasants greater decision-making in agricultural activities. The government also encouraged nonagricultural activities such as village enterprises in rural areas, and promoted more self-management for state-owned enterprises, increased competition in the marketplace, and facilitated direct contact between Chinese and foreign trading enterprises. China also relied more upon foreign financing and imports. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 1980s, these reforms led to average annual rates of growth of 10% in agricultural and industrial output. Rural per capita real income doubled. China became self-sufficient in grain production; rural industries accounted for 23% of agricultural output, helping absorb surplus labor in the countryside. The variety of light industrial and consumer goods increased. Reforms began in the fiscal, financial, banking, price-setting, and labor systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the late 1980s, however, the economy had become overheated with increasing rates of inflation. At the end of 1988, in reaction to a surge of inflation caused by accelerated price reforms, the leadership introduced an austerity program. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shanghai China CIA.jpg|thumb|left|280px|The Oriental Pearl Tower in Shanghai overlooks the Huangpu River.]]&lt;br /&gt;
China's economy regained momentum in the early 1990s. During a visit to southern China in early 1992, China's paramount leader at the time, Deng Xiaoping, made a series of political pronouncements designed to reinvigorate the process of economic reform. The 14th Party Congress later in the year backed Deng's renewed push for market reforms, stating that China's key task in the 1990s was to create a &amp;quot;socialist market economy.&amp;quot; The 10-year development plan for the 1990s stressed continuity in the political system with bolder reform of the economic system. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China's economy grew at an average rate of 10% per year during the period 1990-2004, the highest growth rate in the world. China's gross domestic product (GDP) grew 10.0% in 2003, and even faster, 10.1%, in 2004, and 9.9% in 2005 despite attempts by the government to cool the economy. China's total trade in 2006 surpassed $1.76 trillion, making China the world's third-largest trading nation after the U.S. and Germany. Such high growth is necessary if China is to generate the 15 million jobs needed annually--roughly the size of Ecuador or Cambodia--to employ new entrants into the job market. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, serious imbalances exist behind the spectacular trade performance, high investment flows, and high GDP growth. High numbers of non-performing loans weigh down the state-run banking system. Inefficient state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are still a drag on growth, despite announced efforts to sell, merge, or close the vast majority of SOEs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Social and economic indicators have improved since reforms were launched, but rising inequality is evident between the more highly developed coastal provinces and the less developed, poorer inland regions. According to World Bank estimates, more than 152 million people in China in 2003--mostly in rural areas of the lagging inland provinces--still live in poverty, on consumption of less than U.S. $1 a day. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following the Chinese Communist Party's Third Plenum, held in October 2003, Chinese legislators unveiled several proposed amendments to the state constitution. One of the most significant was a proposal to provide protection for private property rights. Legislators also indicated there would be a new emphasis on certain aspects of overall government economic policy, including efforts to reduce unemployment (now in the 8-10% range in urban areas), to rebalance income distribution between urban and rural regions, and to maintain economic growth while protecting the environment and improving social equity. The National People's Congress approved the amendments when it met in March 2004. The Fifth Plenum in October 2005 approved the 11th Five-Year Economic Program aimed at building a &amp;quot;harmonious society&amp;quot; through more balanced wealth distribution and improved education, medical care, and social security.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Agriculture===&lt;br /&gt;
China is the world's most populous country and one of the largest producers and consumers of agricultural products. Roughly half of China's labor force is engaged in agriculture, even though only 10% of the land is suitable for cultivation and agriculture contributes only 13% of China's GDP. China's cropland area is only 75% of the U.S. total, but China still produces about 30% more crops and livestock than the U.S. because of intensive cultivation, China is among the world's largest producers of rice, corn, wheat, soybeans, vegetables, tea, and pork. Major non-food crops include cotton, other fibers, and oilseeds. China hopes to further increase agricultural production through improved plant stocks, fertilizers, and technology. Incomes for Chinese farmers are stagnating, leading to an increasing wealth gap between the cities and countryside. Government policies that continue to emphasize grain self-sufficiency and the fact that farmers do not own--and cannot buy or sell--the land they work have contributed to this situation. While this was the case in China before Communism, many other countries have since embrace individual ownership while China has not. In addition, inadequate port facilities and lack of warehousing and cold storage facilities impede both domestic and international agricultural trade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Industry===&lt;br /&gt;
{{History of China}}&lt;br /&gt;
Industry and construction account for about 46% of China's GDP. Major industries are mining and ore processing; iron; steel; aluminum; coal, machinery; textiles and apparel; armaments; petroleum; cement; chemicals; fertilizers; consumer products including footwear, toys, and electronics; automobiles and other transportation equipment including rail cars and locomotives, ships, and aircraft; and telecommunications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China has become a preferred destination for the relocation of global manufacturing facilities. Its strength as an export platform has contributed to incomes and employment in China. The state-owned sector still accounts for about 40% of GDP. In recent years, authorities have been giving greater attention to the management of state assets--both in the financial market as well as among state-owned-enterprises--and progress has been noteworthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regulatory Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
Though China's economy has expanded rapidly, its regulatory environment has not kept pace. Since Deng Xiaoping's open market reforms, the growth of new businesses has outpaced the government's ability to regulate them. This has created a situation where businesses, faced with mounting competition and poor oversight, will be willing to take drastic measures to increase profit margins, often at the expense of consumer safety. This issue has recently acquired more prominence, with a number of restrictions being placed on problematic Chinese exports by the U.S. The Chinese Government recognizes the severity of the problem, recently concluding that up to 20% of the country's products are substandard or tainted. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
Together with strong economic growth, China's demand for energy is surging rapidly. In 2003, China surpassed Japan to become the second-largest consumer of primary energy, after the United States. China is the world's second-largest consumer of oil, after the United States, and for 2006, China's increase in oil demand represented 38% of the world total increase in oil demand. China is also the third-largest energy producer in the world, after the United States and Russia. China's electricity consumption is expected to grow by over 4% a year through 2030, which will require more than $2 trillion in electricity infrastructure investment to meet the demand. China expects to add approximately 15,000 megawatts of generating capacity a year, with 20% of that coming from foreign suppliers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coal makes up the bulk of China's energy consumption (70% in 2005), and China is the largest producer and consumer of coal in the world. As China's economy continues to grow, China's coal demand is projected to rise significantly. Although coal's share of China's overall energy consumption will decrease, coal consumption will continue to rise in absolute terms. China's continued and increasing reliance on coal as a power source has contributed significantly to putting China on the path to becoming the world's largest emitter of acid rain-causing sulfur dioxide and green house gases, including carbon dioxide. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 11th Five-Year Program, announced in 2005, calls for greater energy conservation measures, including development of renewable energy sources and increased attention to environmental protection. Moving away from coal towards cleaner energy sources including oil, natural gas, renewable energy, and nuclear power is an important component of China's development program. China has abundant hydroelectric resources; the Three Gorges Dam, for example, will have a total capacity of 18 gigawatts when fully on-line (projected for 2009). In addition, the share of electricity generated by nuclear power is projected to grow from 1% in 2000 to 5% in 2030. China's renewable energy law, which went into effect in 2006, calls for 10% of its energy to come from renewable energy sources by 2020. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1993, China has been a net importer of oil, a large portion of which comes from the Middle East. Net imports are expected to rise to 3.5 million barrels per day by 2010. China is interested in diversifying the sources of its oil imports and has invested in oil fields around the world. Beijing also plans to increase China's natural gas production, which currently accounts for only 3% of China's total energy consumption. Analysts expect China's consumption of natural gas to more than double by 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In May 2004, then-Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with China's National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) that launched the U.S.-China Energy Policy Dialogue. The Dialogue has strengthened energy-related interactions between China and the United States, the world's two largest energy consumers. The U.S.-China Energy Policy Dialogue builds upon the two countries' existing cooperative ventures in high energy nuclear physics, fossil energy, energy efficiency and renewable energy and energy information exchanges. The NDRC and the Department of Energy also exchange views and expertise on Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Technologies, and we convene an annual Oil and Gas Industry Forum with China. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tianmenshan mountain.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Tian Shan, Gong Yuan, or Sky Mountain park, literally, is a world heritage site.]]&lt;br /&gt;
One of the serious negative consequences of China's rapid industrial development has been increased pollution and degradation of natural resources. China is widely expected to surpass the United States as the world's largest emitter of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases sometime in 2007 or 2008. A World Health Organization report on air quality in 272 cities worldwide concluded that seven of the world's 10 most polluted cities were in China. According to China's own evaluation, two-thirds of the 338 cities for which air-quality data are available are considered polluted--two-thirds of them moderately or severely so. Respiratory and heart diseases related to air pollution are the leading cause of death in China. Almost all of the nation's rivers are considered polluted to some degree, and half of the population lacks access to clean water. By some estimates, every day approximately 300 million residents drink contaminated water. Ninety percent of urban water bodies are severely polluted. Water scarcity also is an issue; for example, severe water scarcity in Northern China is a serious threat to sustained economic growth and the government has begun working on a project for a large-scale diversion of water from the Yangtze River to northern cities, including Beijing and Tianjin. Acid rain falls on 30% of the country. Various studies estimate pollution costs the Chinese economy 7%-10% of GDP each year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China's leaders are increasingly paying attention to the country's severe environmental problems. In 1998, the State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA) was officially upgraded to a ministry-level agency, reflecting the growing importance the Chinese Government places on environmental protection. In recent years, China has strengthened its environmental legislation and made some progress in stemming environmental deterioration. In 2005, China joined the Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development, which brings industries and governments together to implement strategies that reduce pollution and address climate change. During the 10th Five-Year Plan, China plans to reduce total emissions by 10%. Beijing in particular is investing heavily in pollution control as part of its campaign to host a successful Olympiad in 2008. Some cities have seen improvement in air quality in recent years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China is an active participant in climate change talks and other multilateral environmental negotiations, taking environmental challenges seriously but pushing for the developed world to help developing countries to a greater extent. It is a signatory to the Basel Convention governing the transport and disposal of hazardous waste and the Montreal Protocol for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, as well as the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species and other major environmental agreements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The question of environmental impacts associated with the Three Gorges Dam project has generated controversy among environmentalists inside and outside China. Critics claim that erosion and silting of the Yangtze River threaten several endangered species, while Chinese officials say the dam will help prevent devastating floods and generate clean hydroelectric power that will enable the region to lower its dependence on coal, thus lessening air pollution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and China are members of the Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (APP). The APP is a public-private partnership of six nations--Australia, China, India, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and the United States--committed to explore new mechanisms to meet national pollution reduction, energy security and climate change goals in ways that reduce poverty and promote economic development. APP members have undertaken cooperative activities involving deployment of clean technology in partner countries in eight areas: cleaner fossil energy, renewable energy and distributed generation, power generation and transmission, steel, aluminum, cement, coal mining, and buildings and appliances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and China have been engaged in an active program of bilateral environmental cooperation since the mid-1990s, with an emphasis on clean energy technology and the design of effective environmental policy. While both governments view this cooperation positively, China has often compared the U.S. program, which lacks a foreign assistance component, with those of Japan and several European Union (EU) countries that include generous levels of aid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Science and Technology===&lt;br /&gt;
Science and technology have always preoccupied China's leaders; indeed, China's political leadership comes almost exclusively from technical backgrounds and has a high regard for science. Deng called it &amp;quot;the first productive force.&amp;quot; Distortions in the economy and society created by party rule have severely hurt Chinese science, according to some Chinese science policy experts. The Chinese Academy of Sciences, modeled on the Soviet system, puts much of China's greatest scientific talent in a large, under-funded apparatus that remains largely isolated from industry, although the reforms of the past decade have begun to address this problem. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chinese science strategists see China's greatest opportunities in newly emerging fields such as biotechnology and computers, where there is still a chance for China to become a significant player. Most Chinese students who went abroad have not returned, but they have built a dense network of trans-Pacific contacts that will greatly facilitate U.S.-China scientific cooperation in coming years. The U.S. space program is often held up as the standard of scientific modernity in China. China's small but growing space program, which successfully completed their second manned orbit in October 2005, is a focus of national pride. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S.-China Science and Technology Agreement remains the framework for bilateral cooperation in this field. A 5-year agreement to extend the Science and Technology Agreement was signed in April 2006. The Agreement is among the longest-standing U.S.-China accords, and includes over eleven U.S. Federal agencies and numerous branches that participate in cooperative exchanges under the S&amp;amp;T Agreement and its nearly 60 protocols, memoranda of understanding, agreements and annexes. The Agreement covers cooperation in areas such as marine conservation, renewable energy, and health. Biennial Joint Commission Meetings on Science and Technology bring together policymakers from both sides to coordinate joint science and technology cooperation. Executive Secretaries meetings are held biennially to implement specific cooperation programs. Japan and the European Union also have high profile science and technology cooperative relationships with China.&lt;br /&gt;
====Internet====&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has criticized Chinese censorship and restrictions on the Intrernet, and China is pushing back since the Communist Party considers Internet control essential if it is to keep power and avoid elections. The government has denied suggestions by Google that a major, sophisticated assault on Google in late 2009 was sponsored by the government. The attack targeted email accounts used by dissidents, the weak point in China's political dictatorship. Google is threatening to ignore the censorship policies demanded by the government, and perhaps leave the country.  The Communist Party promotes Internet use for commerce, but heavily censors content it deems pornographic, anti-social or politically subversive and blocks many foreign news and social media sites, including Twitter Facebook, and YouTube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Poor Medical care===&lt;br /&gt;
China, like most Communist countries, gives low priority to medicine and medical care.  China only spends 1% of GDP on health care, ranking #156 out of 196 nations surveys by the World Health Organization. Many people rely on traditional practitioners, having more faith in acupuncture than modern science.  In any case few have the opportunity to receive modern drugs or treatment with advanced devices. The local clinic has only a thermometer and stethoscope for instrumentation, and very few modern drugs. Only one in six medical personnel have a college degree, and those degrees are not high quality. The ordinary people want more medical care but that  hardly matters, for in a  dictatorship violence matters, but not public opinion.  &amp;lt;Ref&amp;gt; Gordon Fairclaugh, &amp;quot;In China, Rx for Ailing Health System,&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal,'' Oct. 15, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trade===&lt;br /&gt;
China's merchandise exports totaled $969.3 billion and imports totaled $791.8 billion in 2006. Its global trade surplus surged from $32 billion in 2004 to $177.5 billion in 2006. China's primary trading partners include Japan, the EU, the United States, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. According to U.S. statistics, China had a trade surplus with the U.S. of $232.6 billion in 2006. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China has taken important steps to open its foreign trading system and integrate itself into the world trading system. In November 1991, China joined the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) group, which promotes free trade and cooperation in the economic, trade, investment, and technology spheres. China served as APEC chair in 2001, and Shanghai hosted the annual APEC leaders meeting in October of that year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China formally joined the WTO in December 2001. As part of this far-reaching trade liberalization agreement, China agreed to lower tariffs and abolish market impediments. Chinese and foreign businessmen, for example, gained the right to import and export on their own, and to sell their products without going through a government middleman. By 2005, average tariff rates on key U.S. agricultural exports dropped from 31% to 14% and on industrial products from 25% to 9%. The agreement also opens up new opportunities for U.S. providers of services like banking, insurance, and telecommunications. China has made significant progress implementing its WTO commitments, but serious concerns remain, particularly in the realm of intellectual property rights protection. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While accession does not guarantee smaller trade deficits, full implementation of all WTO commitments would further open China's markets to--and help level the playing field for--U.S. exports. China is now one of the most important markets for U.S. exports: in 2006, U.S. exports to China totaled $55.2 billion, almost triple the $19 billion when China joined the WTO in 2001 and up 32% over 2005. U.S. agricultural exports have increased dramatically, making China our fourth-largest agricultural export market (after Canada, Japan, and Mexico). Over the same period (2001-2006), U.S. imports from China have risen from $102 billion to $287.8 billion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Export growth continues to be a major driver of China's rapid economic growth. To increase exports, China has pursued policies such as fostering the rapid development of foreign-invested factories, which assemble imported components into consumer goods for export, and liberalizing trading rights. In its eleventh Five-Year Program, adopted in 2005, China placed greater emphasis on developing a consumer demand-driven economy to sustain economic growth and address global imbalances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States is one of China's primary suppliers of power generating equipment, aircraft and parts, computers and industrial machinery, raw materials, and chemical and agricultural products. However, U.S. exporters continue to have concerns about fair market access due to strict testing and standards requirements for some imported products. In addition, a lack of transparency in the regulatory process makes it difficult for businesses to plan for changes in the domestic market structure. The April 11, 2006 U.S.-China Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade (JCCT) produced agreements on key U.S. trade concerns ranging from market access to U.S. beef, medical devices, and telecommunications; to the enforcement of intellectual property rights, including, significantly, software. The JCCT also produced an agreement to establish a U.S.-China High Technology and Strategic Trade Working Group to review export control cooperation and facilitate high technology trade. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Investment===&lt;br /&gt;
China's investment climate has changed dramatically in 24 years of reform. In the early 1980s, China restricted foreign investments to export-oriented operations and required foreign investors to form joint-venture partnerships with Chinese firms. Foreign direct investment (FDI) grew quickly during the 1980s, but stalled in late 1989 in the aftermath of Tiananmen. In response, the government introduced legislation and regulations designed to encourage foreigners to invest in high-priority sectors and regions. Since the early 1990s, China has allowed foreign investors to manufacture and sell a wide range of goods on the domestic market, and authorized the establishment of wholly foreign-owned enterprises, now the preferred form of FDI. However, the Chinese Government's emphasis on guiding FDI into manufacturing has led to market saturation in some industries, while leaving China's services sectors underdeveloped. China is now one of the leading recipients of FDI in the world, receiving almost $80 billion in 2005 according to World Bank statistics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As part of its WTO accession, China undertook to eliminate certain trade-related investment measures and to open up specified sectors that had previously been closed to foreign investment. New laws, regulations, and administrative measures to implement these commitments are being issued. Major remaining barriers to foreign investment include opaque and inconsistently enforced laws and regulations and the lack of a rules-based legal infrastructure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opening to the outside remains central to China's development. Foreign-invested enterprises produce about half of China's exports, and China continues to attract large investment inflows. Foreign exchange reserves were $1.1 trillion at the end of 2006, and have now surpassed those of Japan, making China's foreign exchange reserves the largest in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
===Higher education===&lt;br /&gt;
Despite fears that China may be outpacing the United States in turning out engineers, the number of college students in China who study engineering is on the decline, according to ''Global Times'', a Chinese newspaper. Fewer than one in 10 college graduates in 2009 majored in engineering. Instead, students are turning to economics, finance, and management, which pay more and carry more social status. &amp;quot;Engineering usually makes people think of factories, while factories often give people an impression of hard work, low wages, and layoffs,&amp;quot; the newspaper quoted one professor as saying.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile China is building universities overnight, and sending graduate students to the U.S. for PhD's so they can become professors.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exodus of Chinese undergraduate and graduate students continues; as 180,000 left in 2008, about 25% percent more than in 2007, as more families were able to pay overseas tuition. For every four students who left in the past decade, only one returned; those with American PhDs in science or engineering the least likely to return.  The intellectual vitality, quality of science, pay scales and political climate is much more attractive in the West.  Those who return to China risk being shunned as &amp;quot;foreigners&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/07/world/asia/07scholar.html?hp  Sharon LaFraniera, &amp;quot;Fighting Trend, China Is Luring Scientists Home,&amp;quot; ''New York Times'' Jan. 6. 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===The Chinese in Africa===&lt;br /&gt;
China has been spending huge amounts of money and time buying influence in various African countries&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/Africa-Monitor/2011/0217/China-s-latest-trade-visit-to-Africa-reveals-a-different-approach-to-business]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. China has given 45 Afriacn countries $115 billion, a figure which is growing at 44% every year. Africa has many desirable resources such as [[diamonds]], [[oil]], and rare earth metals such as [[Indium]] which is used to make the touch screens for new high-tech devices such as [[Apple]]'s [[iPad]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://blogs.indium.com/blog/an-interview-with-the-professor/assembled-cost-of-an-ipad]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[iPhone]], often under [[sweat shop]] conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China's aim in Africa seems to be to buy up the emerging markets of the developing nations there. China has a big population, but does not have many of the resources (see above) that they will need to improve themselves. When countries go through [[industrialization]] they need to use a lot more resources, and China does not have them. By buying up Africa they get these natural resources cheaply. They will also be able to use these resources as poker chips against the west.&lt;br /&gt;
US ambassador [[Johnnie Carson]] believes &amp;quot;China has no morals&amp;quot; in Africa&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/12/09/cable-kenya-risks-new-violence-reforms/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, which may be true given their [[communist]] ideology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|History of China}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although archaeologists have found settlements in China dating to [[5000 BC]], the earliest nation that can be dated in the area of modern China is the [[Shang Dynasty]], approximately [[2000 BC]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Great Wall of China.jpg|left|240px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Dynasty followed dynasty, as old regimes would lose the &amp;quot;mandate of heaven;&amp;quot; it was believed that each emperor ruled only with the approval of heaven, and a ruler who was unfit to rule would curse the nation until replaced.  In addition, the Chinese capital would occasionally be overrun by &amp;quot;barbarians,&amp;quot; who invariably would start a new dynasty in the Chinese capital, integrating their nations into the former dynasty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chinese had an advanced artistic culture and well-developed science and technology.  However, its science and technology stood still after 1700 and in the 21st century very little survives outside museums, except in for the popular forms of traditional medicine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 19th and early 20th centuries, the country was beset by large-scale civil wars, major famines, military defeats by Britain and Japan, regional control by powerful warlords and foreign intervention such as the [[Boxer Rebellion]] of 1900. In 1911 a revolution deposed the [[Qing dynasty]] and the [[Republic of China]] was proclaimed.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the leadership of the [[KMT]] (Kuomintang), headed by [[Chiang Kai-shek]] (1887-1975), the central government finally suppressed the local warlords who effectively controlled many provinces. The KMT tried to destroy the Communists under [[Mao Zedong]], but they escaped in the &amp;quot;Long March&amp;quot; of 1934-35. Japan seized Manchuria in 1931, and in 1937 invaded all of China, seizing the coast, the major cities, and setting up a puppet government that controlled most of the population. China was allied with the U.S. and Britain against Japan, and at war's end joined the United Nations as a permanent member of the 5-nation Security Council, with a veto.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1945-46, the U.S. attempted to force a negotiated settlement between the KMT and the Communists, but failed.  In the face of economic collapse the Communists won the civil war in 1949 under [[Mao Zedong]] established a dictatorship, driving the KMT to Taiwan. Taiwan is recognized as an integral part of China in theory, but in practice has been independent since 1949. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mao liquidated millions of opponents, fought the United States in the bloody [[Korean War]] (1950-53), and around 1960 broke bitterly with the Soviet Union over the issue of who best represented the Marxist orthodoxy.  Mao's regime imposed strict controls over everyday life and cost the lives of tens of millions of people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After 1978, Mao's successor [[Deng Xiaoping]] focused on market-oriented economic development, and by 2000 output had quadrupled, population growth ended (by imposing a one-child policy), and good relations were secured with the West. For much of the population, living standards have improved dramatically and the room for personal choice has expanded, yet political controls and Internet censorship remain tight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China's economy during the last quarter century has changed from a centrally planned system that was largely closed to international trade, to a more market-oriented economy that has a rapidly growing private sector and is a major player in the global economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Under Mao millions of Chinese were killed by famines or government action against the middle classes. The &amp;quot;[[Cultural Revolution]]&amp;quot; in the 1960s was a counterattack against intellectuals endorsed by Mao; it set back China by decades until his death in 1975.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the mid-1980s the new leader [[Deng Xiaoping]] promoted rapid modernization. While Mao's memory was still revered, most of his brutal policies were ended and much economic freedom--and a dash of political liberalization--was allowed.  Intellectuals were encouraged to speak out again and to share in a new spirit of &amp;quot;democratization.&amp;quot; However Communist party leaders in 1986 warned that modernization must not be used as an excuse to introduce &amp;quot;bourgeois philosophies and social doctrines.&amp;quot; By late 1986 student groups began to demonstrate demanding more student participation in local government, a greater degree of democracy, and better living conditions.  As demonstrations escalated Hu Yaobang, the general secretary of the party, resigned, confessing that he had made major mistakes and would take responsibility for them.  It was a setback to political and economic liberalization, though Hu remained, out of office, a symbol of the potential for democracy.  Hu's death in April 1989, sparked widespread public rallies in favor of broad social changes in Beijing, Shanghai, and other major cities.  Tens of thousands of students defied a government clampdown to demonstrate in May in [[Tiananmen Square]] central Beijing.  The Party moved to kill dissent, sending uneducated rural troops into square on June 3-4; hundreds of demonstrators were killed, wounded, or arrested.  The world was appalled.  Following the savage repression of democrats in all major cities Deng Xiaoping appeared to be even more firmly in control. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The China country reports in the U.S. State Department's 2009 Human Rights Practices and International Religious Freedom Reports&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2008/eap/119037.htm U.S. State Department, ''2008 Human Rights Report: China (includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau)'' Feb. 25, 2009] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; noted China's well-documented and continuing abuses of human rights in violation of internationally recognized norms, stemming both from the authorities' intolerance of dissent and the inadequacy of legal safeguards for basic freedoms. Reported abuses have included arbitrary and lengthy incommunicado detention, forced confessions, torture, and mistreatment of prisoners as well as severe restrictions on freedom of speech, the press, assembly, association, religion, privacy, worker rights, and coercive birth limitation. In 2006, China continued the monitoring, harassment, intimidation, and arrest of journalists, Internet writers, defense lawyers, religious activists, and political dissidents. The activities of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), especially those relating to the rule of law and expansion of judicial review, continue to be restricted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008 China loosened its restrictions somewhat for the Summer Olympics. The government arbitrarily closes down Internet access to prevent the people from learning about the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human rights failures remain a major concern. Abatement of pollution and improvements in systems to ensure food, drug, and product safety are major concerns,  especially after notorious episodes of exporting poisoned pet food, toothpaste and infant formula.&lt;br /&gt;
===Repression in 2008===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008 China's human rights record remained poor and worsened in some areas. During the year the government increased its severe cultural and religious repression of ethnic minorities in Tibetan areas and the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region (XUAR), increased detention and harassment of dissidents and petitioners, and maintained tight controls on freedom of speech and the Internet. Abuses peaked around high-profile events, such as the Olympics and the unrest in Tibet. As in previous years, citizens did not have the right to change their government. Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), both local and international, continued to face intense scrutiny and restrictions. Other serious human rights abuses included extrajudicial killings, torture and coerced confessions of prisoners, and the use of forced labor, including prison labor. Workers cannot choose an independent union to represent them in the workplace, and the law does not protect workers' right to strike.  The government continued to monitor, harass, detain, arrest, and imprison journalists, writers, activists, and defense lawyers and their families, many of whom were seeking to exercise their rights under the law.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2008/eap/119037.htm U.S. State Department, ''2008 Human Rights Report: China (includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau)'' Feb. 25, 2009] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Execution Controversy===&lt;br /&gt;
In December 2009, China executed a man named Akmal Shaikh for drug smuggling. There is evidence that Shaikh was mentally ill, but he was not given a psychological exam of any sort before the trial. He was not given an examination because the Chinese government declared that neither Shaikh or his family could prove he was mentally ill through documentation or family history. The British government made many requests for clemency, including at an eleventh-hour meeting with the Chinese ambassador, but they were consistently ignored.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-fg-britain-china30-2009dec30,0,4153003.story&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Chow, Gregory C. ''China's Economic Transformation'' (2nd ed. 2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Chinas-Economic-Transformation-Gregory-Chow/dp/1405156244/ref=pd_sim_b_img_3 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Eberharad, Wolfram. ''A History of China'' (2005), 380 pages' [http://books.google.com/books?id=5LgjunIn1CEC&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;amp;dq=intitle:history+intitle:china&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=1&amp;amp;sig=k1CgHXYb6jQ6BgdwVpUWngov7So full text online free] &lt;br /&gt;
* Entwisle, Barbara, and Gail E. Henderson, eds. ''Re-Drawing Boundaries: Work, Households, and Gender in China,'' U of California Press,  2000; on 1990; [http://content.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/kt938nd0k8/?&amp;amp;query=&amp;amp;brand=ucpress complete text online free]&lt;br /&gt;
* Fairbank, John King and Goldman, Merle.  ''China: A New History.'' (1998). 546 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Gries, Peter Hays. ''China's New Nationalism: Pride, Politics, and Diplomacy,'' U of California Press, (2004); recent history [http://content.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/kt9290249r/?&amp;amp;query=&amp;amp;brand=ucpress online edition free]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kang, David C. ''China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia'' (2007), argues a strong China stabilizes East Asia&lt;br /&gt;
*  Naughton, Barry. ''The Chinese Economy: Transitions and Growth'' (2007), important new survey&lt;br /&gt;
*Ogden S. (ed) ''China.'' (2006) &lt;br /&gt;
* Oi, Jean C.  ''Rural China Takes Off: Institutional Foundations of Economic Reform,'' U of California Press, (1999) [http://content.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft8j49p1hv/?&amp;amp;query=&amp;amp;brand=ucpress complete text online free] &lt;br /&gt;
* Perkins, Dorothy.  ''Encyclopedia of China: The Essential Reference to China, Its History and Culture.'' (1999). 662 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Rawski, Thomas G.  and Lillian M. Li, eds. ''Chinese History in Economic Perspective,'' University of California Press,  1992 [http://content.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft6489p0n6/?&amp;amp;query=&amp;amp;brand=ucpress online free]&lt;br /&gt;
* Roberts, J. A. G.  ''A Concise History of China.'' (1999). 341 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Schoppa, R. Keith.  ''The Columbia Guide to Modern Chinese History.'' (2000). 356 pp.  [http://www.questia.com/library/book/the-columbia-guide-to-modern-chinese-history-by-r-keith-schoppa.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Shambaugh, David. ''China's Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation'' (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
* Shambaugh, David. ''Modernizing China's Military: Progress, Problems, and Prospects'' U of California Press,  (2003) [http://content.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/kt4779q33t/?&amp;amp;query=&amp;amp;brand=ucpress complete text online free]&lt;br /&gt;
* Spence, Jonathan D. ''The Search for Modern China'' (1991), 876pp; well written survey from 1644 to 1980s [http://www.amazon.com/Search-Modern-China-Jonathan-Spence/dp/0393307808/ref=pd_sim_b_title_2 excerpt and text search]; [http://www.questia.com/read/98946348 complete edition online]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wang, Ke-wen, ed.  ''Modern China: An Encyclopedia of History, Culture, and Nationalism.'' (1998). 442 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Chinese History]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Chinese Painting]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Great Wall of China]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Oriental art]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/China|Articles about '''China''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.chinadetail.com/Nation/ All About China]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/china/home.html People's Daily: China at a Glance]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/country_profiles/1287798.stm BBC News - ''Country Profile: China'']&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ch.html CIA World Factbook - ''China'']&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.monthlyreview.org/1105wu.htm &amp;quot;Rethinking ‘Capitalist Restoration’ in China&amp;quot;] by Yiching Wu&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gov.cn/ The Central People's Government of People's Republic of China]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.china.org.cn/ China's Official Gateway for News &amp;amp; Information]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.globalpolitician.com/articles.asp?ID=341 The Dragon's Dawn: China as a Rising Imperial Power] February 11, 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.china-profile.com/history/hist_list_1.htm History of The People's Republic of China] Timeline of Key Events since 1949.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.danwei.org/ Media, advertising, and urban life in China.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.chinastudygroup.org/index.php?action=front2&amp;amp;type=view&amp;amp;id=152 China's Neoliberal Dynasty] by Peter Kwong, originally published in [[The Nation]] October 2, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://factoidz.com/the-largest-ethnic-group-in-the-world-han-chinese-of-china/ The Largest Ethnic Group in the World: Han Chinese of China.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Asian Countries}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:China]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communist States]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Global_Warming&amp;diff=1077682</id>
		<title>Counterexamples to Global Warming</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Global_Warming&amp;diff=1077682"/>
				<updated>2014-02-22T20:22:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* Warm Weather Patterns */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:GlobalTemps June2009.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Despite an increase in atmospheric CO2, the earth has been cooling slightly for the past decade.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Global warming]] is the theory that the earth is gradually warming up due to human influence. Unusual cold weather disproves the politically motivated claim by [[liberal|liberals]] that the [[Earth]] is rapidly warming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal bias]] is severe for this issue: the [[lamestream media]] are far more likely to report on unusually hot weather than unusually cold weather. When there is strikingly cold weather, the [[lamestream media]] headlines distort the truth by calling it &amp;quot;nasty&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;severe&amp;quot;, rather than &amp;quot;very cold.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cold Weather Patterns ==&lt;br /&gt;
====North America/United States====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many record-breaking cold temperatures and snowstorms have occurred in the last 10 years:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*About as many snowfalls have occurred in Florida in the past 10 years as in the 100 years before that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Prior to [[Thanksgiving]] 2013, a snowstorm ravaged the southwest and Texas, while temperatures in the northeast were about 15 degrees below normal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In January 2014, &amp;quot;the Midwest shivered through the region's lowest temperatures in two decades.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/01/05/3854506/savage-cold-spreads-and-florida.html#storylink=cpy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the first half of 2011, West Coast temperature have been consistently running at least 10-15 degrees below normal.  Many have theorized that this is [[God]] sending a message to [[liberals]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Truckee-Tahoe in the second half of June 2011, every day the temperatures have been colder than normal, '''''often nearly 30 degrees below average'''''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KTRK/2011/5/30/MonthlyHistory.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Though unreported by the [[lamestream media]], temperatures in [[New Jersey]] at the beginning of July 2011 are about ten degrees below normal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In January 2010, &amp;quot;coldest weather in 12 years hits North Texas.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Coldest-Weather-in-12-Years-Descends-on-North-Texas-80828417.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In early February 2011, snow and ice pummeled Dallas and Houston, Texas, in a nearly unprecedented fashion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-04/houston-gripped-by-ice-under-winter-storm-forecast-to-turn-toward-new-york.html?nstrack=sid:5028563|met:104|cat:247|order:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*February 2010, 241-mile Lake Erie was completely frozen over for the first time in 14 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.goerie.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100213/NEWS02/302129904&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Lake Michigan had not frozen over since the 1970s until ... 2009, when it froze over, and then again in 2010 and 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New York City]] had its sixth-largest snowstorm '''''ever''''' on the day after [[Christmas]] in 2010, and the [[liberals]] in charge were unprepared.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/snow_and_snowstorms/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In February 2011, [http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/26/us-weather-sanfrancisco-idUSTRE71P1NH20110226 some parts of San Francisco witnessed snow], though it was too little to count for an official measurement. San Francisco has not witnessed a recordable snow fall since 1976.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Meteorologists did a thirty-year study of California forecast data. 75% of measurement sites saw a reduction in temperatures. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/07/long-term-california-cooling-trend-blamed-on-global-warming/ Long-term California Cooling Trend Blamed on Global Warming, Gateway Pundit, July 6, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In late October of 2011, a [[Northeaster]] dumps 2+ feet of snow in much of the region, and leaves over 3 million people without power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Melia, Michael. &amp;quot;3M powerless as October snow surprises Northeast.&amp;quot; October 30, 2011. http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2011/10/30/snow_smacks_northeast_power_could_be_out_for_days/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In January 2014, a huge storm dropped over two feet of snow in some parts of the Northeast, while record low temperatures occurred in other parts of the country.  Just a couple of weeks later, another storm dumped over a foot of snow over the same region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Australia====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In spite of predictions, 2011 is shaping up to be a cold year for [[Australia]]. It saw the [http://www.qt.com.au/story/2011/06/24/ipswich-shivers-on-years-coldest-day/ coldest day on record for the east], the [http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/coldest-june-night-on-record-20100628-zdz9.html coldest June on record in the west], the [http://www.smh.com.au/national/coldest-may-on-record-for-darwin-20110531-1fe1x.html coldest May on record in the north], only *almost* record breaking [http://www.smh.com.au/national/coldest-may-on-record-for-darwin-20110531-1fe1x.html in the middle of the country], likewise for the [http://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/article/2011/05/31/260901_news.html south] and nationally it was [http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/current/season/aus/summary.shtml the coldest Autumn on record, ever].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, but, but global warming! Maybe the west should burn ''more'' fossil fuels to heat things up? Or maybe they can use the hot air coming out of Al Gore's mouth?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even SMH, a notoriously Liberal men's magazine, is asking [http://globalfreeze.wordpress.com/2011/05/20/australia-wakes-to-a-deep-freeze/ &amp;quot;Where's my Global Warming, Dude?&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Europe====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The North-Western part of the European continent had [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/snow-brings-parts-of-britain-to-a-standstill-2144267.html an unusually cold November and December in 2010], leaving even the most convinced &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; believer to ask &amp;quot;If everything is heating up and we're all going to die in a matter of a few years, why have these months been so cold!?&amp;quot; The global-warming alarmist &amp;quot;answer&amp;quot;: [http://andyrussell.wordpress.com/2011/01/06/why-has-this-winter-been-so-cold-in-europe/ &amp;quot;It's hotter, therefore it's colder. No really!&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In February of 2012, temperatures in Eastern Europe reached below -22 F. &amp;quot;Blizzards and the bone-chilling cold have resulted in the deaths of over 550 people so far, with rooftop-high snow drifts trapping tens of thousands of villagers in their homes and cutting off access to entire towns. It has even snowed as far south as North Africa.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Europe Hammered by Winter, Is North America Next?&amp;quot; February 16, 2012. NASA Science News. http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/16feb_deepfreeze/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====South America====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-10749124 Cold waves in Peru are so bad they have to issue safety warnings about them.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tom Rowan from the American Thinker asks, [http://arcticsnap.com/index.php?id=65&amp;amp;linkbox=true&amp;amp;position=7 will 2011 be the year without Summer?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thirty-two inches of snow fell on the driest place on earth, the Atacama Desert in [[Chile]].  They record less than 50mm of rain per year, 80cm of snow July 2011. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://beforeitsnews.com/story/792/905/32_Inches_Of_Snow_Falls_In_Driest_Place_On_Earth.html 32 Inches Of Snow Falls In Driest Place On Earth!, beforeitsnews, July 7, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Indian Subcontinent and Asia====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delhi has been hit by thick fog during the winter of 2011 which disrupted flights, [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12125207 closed schools] and killed [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8438879.stm dozens of people], proving that even the Indian subcontinent is [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12106386 not immune to the cold wave sweeping over the globe for 2011].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even the BBC, a liberal media bastion, is [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/8439136.stm showing the pictures for all to see]. Is even the mainstream media abandoning &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot;, or is the evidence too much for them to sweep under the rug any more?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile, the communist and atheist nation of North Korea (known as The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea) is [http://www.chinapost.com.tw/asia/korea/2011/02/02/289892/N-Korea.htm freezing their little Atheist toes off]. The cold is so bad that the river that bisects Pyongyang has frozen over. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cold appears to be universal, among industrial and non-industrial nations alike. Is it really ''carbon'' causing these events? And why are there no answers from the &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; community about the obvious inconsistencies in their theories?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Central America====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Mexico the unseasonably cold weather has caused [http://geo-mexico.com/?p=3766 significant destruction of crops] in early February 2011. If it's so cold that corn can't survive, why do people keep claiming the planet is warming up?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Russian Landmass====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A severe cold [http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/02/15/russian-winter-severe-cold-to-invade-moscow-and-eastern-europe/ was expected by Dr. Ryan N. Maue to hit Russia in February 2011].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The famous Russian cold defeated Napoleon's armies, perhaps it will defeat the armies of Al Gore too?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====China====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chaos in China as a cold snap there [http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-01/05/c_13677854.htm freezes over the highways, raises food price and causes Atheistic toes to curl]. Is there any part of the world actually affected by global warming? Going simply by the law of averages, at least *somewhere* must be getting warmer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Warm Weather Patterns ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warm weather patterns are fully expected in the absence of [[global warming]]. With global warming we wouldn't expect cold weather patterns, because the earth would be warmer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[lamestream media]] publicize reports of hot weather, but that is utterly ineffective in trying to prove the existence of [[global warming]]. Warm weather does not change the fact that record cold weather disproves global warming.  All the following record-breaking high temperatures would still be expected without [[global warming]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.accuweather.com/blogs/news/story/34756/moscow-breaks-alltime-high-tem.asp?partner=accuweather Moscow]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www2.tricities.com/news/2011/feb/18/tri-cities-area-ties-all-time-record-high-thursday-ar-851560/ Tennessee]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2011/04/syracuses_temperature_sets_his.html Syracuse]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-30/high-temperatures-hit-records-for-towns-in-oklahoma-arkansas.html Oklahoma]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.kwes.com/story/14931869/record-high-temperatures West Texas], [http://capitalclimate.blogspot.com/2011/06/texas-toasted-20-all-time-record-high.html including the all-time record high in Amarillo, TX]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.lsureveille.com/news/baton-rouge-facing-record-high-temperatures-1.2601916 Louisiana]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.wctv.tv/weather/headlines/105_DEGREES_Tallahassee_Sets_New_All-Time_Record_High_123943144.html Tallahassee]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/06/28/52485345.html  Western Europe]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://english.sina.com/china/p/2011/0517/373689.html China]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://lubbockonline.com/sports/2011-06-26/record-temperatures-dont-stop-competitors-ironman South Africa]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KICT/2011/6/9/WeeklyHistory.html Wichita, Kansas (temperature rose above 100 F around midnight)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://mapcenter.hamweather.com/records/7day/us.html?c=maxtemp,highmin| In one week in July 2011, approx 700 high temperature and 2000 high minimum temperature records are shattered] in a [http://www.foxnews.com/weather/2011/07/22/extreme-heat-smothers-large-part-us/?test=latestnews heatwave that blankets the entire MidWest and East Coast].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* However, this also happened alongside a massive cold streak during the winter, so it is not a legitimate sign of Global Warming, and the heat wave is relatively short in duration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44019419/ns/weather/#.Tj3h8GakLUg Little Rock, Arkansas, and 14 other cities and towns break their all-time record high temperature records], and Texas temperature records look set to be shattered in a summer heatwave that is sitting over the South in the summer of 2011.   &amp;quot;I can't remember any year with the magnitude and length of this heat wave,&amp;quot; Jack Hayes, director of the National Weather Service said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/11/us-drought-idUSTRE77A3P120110811 Texas drought is worst in a century, and extending to other Mid-Western States].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As of July 6, 2012, 23,283 daily high temperature records have been set in 2012, up 71% compared to the same period in 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Memmott, Mark. &amp;quot;How Hot Is It? All You Need To See Are These Two Maps.&amp;quot; July 6, 2012. NPR. http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/07/06/156369399/how-hot-is-it-all-you-need-to-see-are-these-two-maps&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In spite of record cold and snowfall in the U.S., January 2014 was still [http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2014/1 globally one of the warmest Januaries in history].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Random temperature fluctuations, including those above, would occur in the absence of [[global warming]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== General Climate Patterns ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although Global warming should be causing massive droughts,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.naturalnews.com/020649.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; massive flooding along the Mississippi river in 2011 has resulted in many deaths as well as billions in property damage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Gore Effect ==&lt;br /&gt;
Often, when a climate conference is held, a new record low temperature is set for that location. Maybe [[God]] is trying to send the alarmists a message? In light of the global cold snap all around the world, perhaps the message extends beyond Al Gore?&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*During the Cancun climate conference, record low temperatures in the low 50s were set on three consecutive days. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/12/08/gore-effect-strikes-cancun-climate-conference-3-days-in-a-row/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GoreFireBreathing.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to the Bible]] (none)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to Evolution]] (60 and growing)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to Relativity]] (48 and growing)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to an Old Earth]] (43 and growing)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.accuweather.com/ Find the temperature in almost any city]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://climate.rutgers.edu/stateclim_v1/norms/daily/index.html Daily Station Normals (extensive historical temperature data at NJ weather stations)]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.surfacestations.org/ Surface Stations]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://wattsupwiththat.com/ Watts Up With That]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/Climsum.html Western U.S. Climate Historical Summaries (find climate statistics for thousands of locations in the western United States)]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/ Science and Public Policy Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.JunkScience.org JunkScience.org] [[JunkScience|(Our wiki entry on JunkScience.org)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.globalclimatescam.com/ Global Warming Scam]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html NOAA Satellite &amp;amp; Information Service]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1871503 PDF: The Tragedy of the Risk-Perception Commons: Culture Conflict, Rationality Conflict, and Climate Change]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Counterexamples}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Counterexamples]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Environmentalism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&amp;diff=1077677</id>
		<title>Global warming</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&amp;diff=1077677"/>
				<updated>2014-02-22T19:55:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''See also [[Counterexamples to Global Warming|Counterexamples to global warming]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:NASA-1024x933.jpg|thumb|right|250px|A composite map of [[Antarctica]] showing areas of greatest warming in red. The Wilkins Ice Shelf lies off the peninsula in the top left corner, and shows extensive warming. Overall, Antarctica shows little warming, and many areas to the  East (right) are almost cooling&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Roberts, Greg. &amp;quot;Antarctic Ice is Growing, Not Melting Away.&amp;quot; April 18, 2009. http://www.news.com.au/antarctic-ice-is-growing-not-melting-away/story-0-1225700043191&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''global warming''' theory is the [[liberal]] hoax&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cringing Over Climategate [http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/01/climategate-scandal-science-obama-opinions-columnists-shikha-dalmia.html Forbes], 12/2/2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate [http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/11/23/climategate-2-0-new-e-mails-rock-the-global-warming-debate/ Forbes], 11/23/2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that the world is becoming dangerously warmer due to the human pollution of greenhouse gasses, such as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide. Liberals have used the theory of [[Global warming theory|man-made global warming]] to seek rationing by government of life-saving energy production and consumption. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The most accurate data -- from satellites -- confirms that there has been virtually no global warming since 1998'''''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://beforeitsnews.com/libertarian/2012/12/34-years-of-satellite-temperature-data-show-global-warming-is-on-a-plateau-2475696.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The media insist otherwise by publicizing local variations in unscientific surface thermometers,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2010-warmest-year.html NASA Research Finds 2010 Tied for Warmest Year on Record, Jan. 12 2011, NASA]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when the more scientific atmospheric temperature do not show such an increase.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/08/10/not-hot-ocean-sst-around-the-usa-not-anywhere-near-record-levels/ &amp;quot;Not so hot – ocean temperatures around the USA are not anywhere near record levels&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Moreover, natural periods of global warming and global cooling are expected to occur regardless of human activity, and not long ago liberals were demanding more government control to combat an alleged cooling in temperatures, with some scientists warning of a possible ice age.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Science: Another Ice Age?'' Time magazine, Monday, Jun. 24, 1974&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Global cooling]], a theory that predates global warming, obviously occurs naturally many times throughout [[Earth|Earth's]] geological history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;After any given warming phase begins, thousands of years later the cyclical [[Milankovitch]] decrease in the sun's heat kicks in. The warming stops, reverses and an [[ice age]] ensues.&amp;quot; [http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn06092007.html Counterpunch], June 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The ease of refutation of anthropogenic global cooling claims foretells the eventual fate of the current global warming hysteria.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many political activists use the term &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; to refer to [[anthropogenic global warming theory]] (AGW), which asserts that human activity such as spewing &amp;quot;[[greenhouse gases]]&amp;quot; is causing an increase in temperature and is more significant than natural causes and cycles. The AGW theory is supported by left-leaning political parties, as well as a majority of sovereign states, national agencies, and an intergovernmental panel (see [[IPCC]]). The reality is that there is no immediate global crisis, and even dire warnings by the UN's [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]] (IPCC) admit that significant effects will not be manifested for at least 100 years. Predictions made by [[climate model]]s publicized by the IPCC have not come to pass in recent years. Many scientists, such as Hal Lewis, have decried global warming as a conspiracy for the purpose of securing trillions of dollars in grant money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In November 2009, emails were disclosed that implicated a wrongful manipulation and concealment of data by scientists who have insisted that there is dangerous man-made global warming. Prior to [[ClimateGate]], both the Republican and Democratic party Platforms in 2008 suggested that global warming is happening, that it is caused by human activity, and that it should be counteracted. For example, in 2007, the Republican presidential candidate Senator [[John McCain]] called global warming &amp;quot;an issue we can no longer afford to ignore&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ontheissues.org/domestic/John_McCain_Environment.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2010, an independent analysis cleared the scientists involved of any wrongdoing, but the effects of the scandal still linger.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hilary Whiteman. [http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/07/07/climategate.email.review/?hpt=Sbin 'Climategate' review clears scientists of dishonesty], ''CNN World'', July 07, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former vice president [[Al Gore]], won a [[Nobel Prize]] in 2007 for claiming that there is a dangerous man-made global warming that threatens the world. However, it has since been revealed that he convinced many people through inaccurate information in his &amp;quot;documentary,&amp;quot; i.e., he only won the Nobel Prize by lying{{Citation needed|{{2013-04-05}}}}.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Summary of Arguments Against Anthropogenic Global Warming==&lt;br /&gt;
The following facts can help dissuade even the most illogical of liberals from believing in the flawed theory of anthropogenic global warming. &lt;br /&gt;
=== Temperature Flat ===&lt;br /&gt;
The overall temperature has been flat for about 16 years. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2217286/Global-warming-stopped-16-years-ago-reveals-Met-Office-report-quietly-released--chart-prove-it.html] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; .  &lt;br /&gt;
=== Data Manipulation ===&lt;br /&gt;
Climate data stating otherwise has been proven to be manipulated.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=30000] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
=== Alternate Causation ===&lt;br /&gt;
-Even if global warming did actually exist, the overall effect of human activities on global warming are minimal, if not nonexistent.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-08-30/news/ct-oped-0830-byrne-20110830_1_cosmic-rays-aerosols-magnetic-field] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Science of Global Warming==&lt;br /&gt;
===Presence of CO2===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary concerns of Global Warming research is the increased presence of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Original claims stated that the increase in carbon dioxide - which is a greenhouse gas - were caused primarily through the burning of [[fossil fuels]], and that such increases were the foremost cause of global temperatures rising. Historically, Global temperature changes precede changes in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most obvious way that this would occur would be through the heating of ocean water. The oceans are the single largest storage unit for carbon dioxide gas on the planet, containing about 93% of the Earth's carbon dioxide. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.waterencyclopedia.com/Bi-Ca/Carbon-Dioxide-in-the-Ocean-and-Atmosphere.html] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As the temperature rises, the [[solubility]] of carbon dioxide in ocean water is reduced&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://science.nasa.gov/earth-science/oceanography/ocean-earth-system/ocean-carbon-cycle/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, causing the dissolved carbon dioxide gas to enter the atmosphere, and begin trapping radiation from the sun. Scientists now believe that this cycle causes a sort of chain effect, where increased temperature causes more carbon dioxide to enter the atmosphere, which in turn causes more temperature rise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also noteworthy to point out that carbon dioxide, while not as abundant in the atmosphere, has a more significant effect on global warming than water vapor does. Carbon dioxide cannot form clouds, as water vapor does. When water vapor forms clouds, those clouds actually block some of the sun's radiation from reaching the Earth, causing water vapor to both contribute positively and negatively to global temperature rise. Carbon dioxide can only act as a greenhouse gas, causing the above mentioned cyclic effect. The current concentration of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere is about 392 ppm, which is the highest it has been in at least 800,000 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide&amp;quot; [http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/mlo.html NOAA], December 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Modern Warm Period===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Average [[Earth]] surface air temperature has risen about 1° F since 1970. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hansen's group at the Goddard Institute wrote, &amp;quot;Global warming is now 0.6&amp;amp;nbsp;°C [1.0&amp;amp;nbsp;°F] in the past three decades and 0.8&amp;amp;nbsp;°C [1.4&amp;amp;nbsp;°F] in the past century.&amp;quot; http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2005/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Studies have ruled out the possibility that errors in the measurements and sampling significantly affect the temperature trends detected over the past century. This accounts for spatial errors in the sampling and thus also incorporates errors associated with the urban-heating effect. According to Karl et al. (1993) ''&amp;quot;Results imply that the errors associated with century-scale trends of temperature are probably an order of magnitude smaller than the observed global warming of nearly 0.5°C per 100 years since the late nineteenth century&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994JCli....7.1144K Karl et al. (1993) 'Global and Hemispheric Temperature Trends: Uncertainties Related to Inadequate Spatial Sampling' in Journal of Climate, 7(7); 1144 - 1168&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to temperature reconstruction made within an [[Old Earth]] paradigm, there have been many cycles of naturally-caused global warming and cooling over many millions of years (see [[climate cycles]]). Some scientists, including [[Richard Lindzen]] of [[MIT]], [[Sallie Baliunas]] of [[Harvard]] and [[Fred Singer]] (independent), say that the recent warming could be part of another natural cycle or random fluctuations in the atmosphere. However, many scientists also think that human activities were most likely the cause of the the planet's recent warming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recent studies of the Milankovitch Cycles, which predict Earth's climate by studying changes in its orbit and axial tilt, suggest that we are currently 18,000 years into a 150,000 year period between ice ages. This would imply that we should expect the temperature to be rising anyway. A 2002 study by Berger and Loutre suggests 50,000 years of warmer weather before Earth begins to cool again, but that model incorroprated anthropogenic forces and concluded:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;While combinations of natural forcings produce a gradual warming up to about 1960, none of them leads to a warming over the last 30 years (this period containing three major volcanic eruptions). In contrast, simulations incorporating only anthropogenic forcings reproduce the warming over the last three decades at a rate consistent with that observed, but underestimate the early 20th century warming. As a consequence, only the use of both natural and anthropogenic forcings allows to reproduce much of the observed decadal scale variations of the annual mean hemispheric temperature over the last 150 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1034/j.1600-0870.2002.00287.x/full] Climate of the last millennium: a sensitivity study, May 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted, however, that computer simulated climate models are often tweaked so they agree with the historical temperature record. There is no way to completely simulate all of the Earth's climate with a computer program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sun Spots===&lt;br /&gt;
Sunspot activity is a factor in climate fluctuations, however, little details were known about how much of an impact these fluctuations had on the Earth's climate. During the deepest solar minimum ever recorded, from 2005 to 2010, NASA measured the Earth's energy balance, i.e. the amount of energy absorbed by the sun subtract the amount of energy lost to radiation into space. They concluded:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;If the Sun were the only climate forcing or the dominant climate forcing, then the planet would gain energy during the solar maxima, but lose energy during solar minima. The fact that Earth gained energy at a rate 0.58 W/m2 during a deep prolonged solar minimum reveals that there is a strong positive forcing overwhelming the negative forcing by below-average solar irradiance. That result is not a surprise, given knowledge of other forcings, but it provides unequivocal refutation of assertions that the Sun is the dominant climate forcing. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_16/ NASA: Earth's Energy Imbalance] nasa.gov, January, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
However, just because the sun isn't the dominate force, doesn't mean that it doesn't nonetheless have a significant impact upon the Earth's climate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economics of Global Warming==&lt;br /&gt;
===Unnecessary Expansion of Government===&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of dangerous anthropogenic (man-made) global warming (AGW) is promoted by liberals and socialists seeking greater government control over the production and use of energy, which is a substantial percentage of the economy. In economic terms, they would like to 'internalize' the 'externality,' which is to say that they think that producers of emissions should be directly connected to the consequences of those emissions, leading syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer to warn of an impending ''Environmental Shakedown''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/printpage/?url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/12/11/copenhagen_shakedown.html {{dead link}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Public Stances on Global Warming==&lt;br /&gt;
===Politicization of the Issue===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Environmentalists and their political allies have presented a one-sided, anti-scientific account of global warming. They have ignored natural warming cycles and suppressed evidence which contradicts their theories. They have viciously attacked the credibility of any scientist daring to contradict them, creating a climate of fear where only a tiny handful of scientists dare speak out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bill Gray wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
* The contrary views of the many warming skeptics have been largely ignored and their motives denigrated.&lt;br /&gt;
* The normal scientific process of objectively studying both sides of the question has not yet occurred.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/Trenberth/XchangeGray_FtCollinsFeb08.pdf Area Experts Debate Global Warming] {{dead link}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Journalists in the West, dominated by liberal viewpoints, have painted a misleading picture of the science. They have publicized liberal slanders against scientists who dare to speak up against the fake &amp;quot;consensus&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even organizations that are not normally biased towards leftist ideas have publicly supported the global warming theory. The oil company Exxon/Mobil official policy is that CO2 emissions pose risks to society and ecosystems. Exxon/Mobil has also committed to reducing their own CO2 emissions, and invested $600 million in algae based fuels.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/energy_climate_views.aspx] {{dead link}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Agencies of the United States Government such as NASA, EPA &amp;amp; NOAA give selected information that strongly supports the global warming theory. At the same time, they reject freedom of information requests to see the raw data. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/58087 Vitter, Inhofe Ask NASA Inspector General to Probe Possible Obstruction of FOIA Requests Seeking Climate Change Records, CNSNews.com, December 04, 2009] {{dead link}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), for one example, states that CO2 levels in the atmosphere are rising due to human activity, and that the surface of the Earth has warmed, on average, quickly over the last 50 years, even though North America cooled slightly.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html#q2]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2008 The Bush Administration requested $4.1 billion dollars of taxpayer money from Congress to fund NOAA, a 7.7 percent increase from 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.noaa.gov/budget/] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2008 Democratic National Committee Platform states;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[states;http://www.democrats.org/a/party/platform.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We must end the tyranny of oil in our time. This immediate danger is eclipsed only by the longer - term threat from climate change&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;...climate change is not just an economic issue or an environmental concern - this is a national security crisis.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2008 Republican National Committee Platform states; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gop.com/2008Platform/Environment.htm] {{dead link}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The same human economic activity that has brought freedom and opportunity to billions has also increased the amount of carbon in the atmosphere.  While the scope and long-term consequences of this are the subject of ongoing scientific research, common sense dictates that the United States should take measured and reasonable steps today to reduce any impact on the environment.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There have also been some Conservatives, such as John Bliese, Ph.D., who at one point believed that global warming is a critical problem, and that [[Conservatism]] and environmental conservation are fully compatible. Speaking to those who are skeptical of global warming, in the [[Summer]] of 2001, he wrote, &amp;quot;[T]here is nothing conservative about denying scientific evidence.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rep.org/news/GEvol5/ge5.1_globalwarming.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 10, 2009, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham coauthored (with Democrat Senator John Kerry) an op ed piece in the New York Times which stated &amp;quot;Even climate change skeptics should recognize that reducing our dependence on foreign oil and increasing our energy efficiency strengthens our national security. Both of us served in the military. We know that sending nearly $800 million a day to sometimes-hostile oil-producing countries threatens our security. In the same way, many scientists warn that failing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will lead to global instability and poverty that could put our nation at risk.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/11/opinion/11kerrygraham.html?pagewanted=1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
in 2008 the Center for Naval Analyses empaneled eleven retired generals and admirals to prepare a paper titled &amp;quot;National Security and the Threat of Climate Change&amp;quot;. They concluded that Global climate change presents a serious national security threat which could impact Americans at home, impact United States military operations and heighten global tensions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://securityandclimate.cna.org/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Central Intelligence Agency has opened The Center on Climate Change and National Security to study the impact of climate change on US national security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cia.gov/news-information/press-releases-statements/center-on-climate-change-and-national-security.html CIA Opens Center on Climate Change and National Security], Central Intelligence Agency, September 25, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative activist and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has called for a Conservative Environmentalism to find solutions to global warming by free market mechanisms.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newt.org/EditNewt/FeaturedBloggersDB/tabid/193/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/3392/Default.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Climate Change As A Cult===&lt;br /&gt;
The zeal of climate-change advocates and lack of objectivity has led some observers to see it as a core belief in a new eco-theology, using themes of traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs. columnist Deon Feder warns, that following other  attempts  such as  Marxism, overpopulation, ''Silent Spring'', &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;now we have the Church of Global Warming, under the leadership of Pope Albert I and his college of cardinals (the [[Natural Resources Defense Council]], Sierra Club and editorial board of The New York Times).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its Office for the Propagation of the Faith works overtime, churning out books, movies (from the fictional “The Day After Tomorrow” to the fictional “An Inconvenient Truth”), textbooks, concerts, congressional hearings, media pleading and inquisitions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Don Feder, ''The Cult of Global Warming'', GrassTopsUSA.com  7/31/2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Commenting on the tendency to hastily issue dire warnings of Climate Change, seen in the coming [[Ice Age]] scare of the 70's,  Maurizio Morabito asked, “Is the problem with the general public, who cannot talk about climate except in doom-laden terms, and for whom the sky is the last animist god?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Maurizio Morabito, ''The CIA’s ‘global cooling’ files'', The Spectator December 5 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mark Steyn writes in Macleans, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Forty years ago conventional religious belief was certainly in decline in what we once knew as Christendom, but the hole was not yet ozone-layer sized. Once the sea of faith had receded far from shore, the post-Christian West looked at what remained and found “Gaia.”&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And while, &amp;quot;When man was made in the image of God, he was fallen but redeemable&amp;quot;, among these devotees of [[Gaia]],  &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Anti-humanism is everywhere, not least in the barely concealed admiration for China’s (demographically disastrous) “One Child” policy advanced by everyone from the National Post’s Diane Francis to Sir David Attenborough, the world’s leading telly naturalist but also a BBC exec who once long ago commissioned the great series The Ascent of Man. If Sir David’s any guide, the great thing about man’s ascent is it gives him a higher cliff to nosedive off.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mark Steyn, ''Why climate change is hot hot hot'' Macleans, December 24, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Politics of Global Warming and Dissent===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Politics of global warming}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christine Stewart- Canadian Environment Ministry, &amp;quot;'''No matter if the science is all phony''', there are collateral environmental benefits . . . Climate change provides the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aim.org/wls/use-environmentalism-to-change-the-world/ Christine Stewart] Accuracy in Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'Global Warming Now World's Most Boring Topic’ &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/node/14167&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The need to fight &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; has become part of the dogma of the liberal conscience. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cato&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly, &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; is a tempting issue for many very important groups to exploit. &lt;br /&gt;
... dealing with the threat of warming fits in with a great variety of preexisting agendas [like] dissatisfaction with industrial society (neopastoralism), ... governmental desires for enhanced revenues (carbon taxes), and bureaucratic desires for enhanced power. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cato&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mark Steyn writes in &amp;quot;Why climate change is hot hot hot&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
What’s also changed since the seventies is the nature of the UN and the transnational bureaucracies...“Aid” is a discredited word these days and comes with too many strings attached. But eco-credits sluiced through an oil-for-food program on steroids offers splendid new opportunities for bulking up an ambitious dictator’s Swiss bank accounts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/24/why-climate-change-is-hot-hot-hot/2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IPCC is desperate to claim the 20th century-- the warmest on record. Thus, tying the progress of modern mankind to our supposed planet imbalance problem. Unfortunately for the IPCC, that point is disputed as well. In 2008, it was discovered that tree rings in Finland were more accurate record of the warmest century. The current era was not the warmest period-- it was the period between 931 and 1180. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://tbirdnow.mee.nu/archive/2008/6?page=2 The Trees of Finland; Temperature Readings and Historical Reconstruction] Tbirdnow.mee.nu Blog (with links to actual data sources), June 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assessments of climate science by the [[United Nations]] (see [[IPCC]] - ''Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'')&lt;br /&gt;
have claimed that scientists are 90% sure that over 50% of the observed global warming in recent decades is human-caused, and that continued global warming should be expected over at least the next century. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several prominent scientists have pointed out the [[politicized science]] of the UN's assessment methods. The scientific reports are submitted to a panel of representatives appointed by each country in the IPCC. Several scientists whose research demonstrates that climate change is taking place have complained about their work being misrepresented by the U.N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, a number of the participants have testified to the pressures placed on them to emphasize results supportive of the current scenario and to suppress other results. That pressure has frequently been effective, and a survey of participants reveals substantial disagreement with the final report. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cato&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richard Lindzen wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps more important are the pressures being brought to bear on scientists to get the &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; results. Such pressures are inevitable, given how far out on a limb much of the scientific community has gone. The situation is compounded by the fact that some of the strongest proponents of &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; in Congress are also among the major supporters of science (Sen. Gore is notable among those). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cato&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christopher Monckton wrote an article titled Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered. &lt;br /&gt;
:States that Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change studies are flawed. The present analysis suggests the models failure to predict other climatic phenomena arises from defects in its evaluation of radioactive forcing, no-feedbacks climate sensitivity parameter and feedback multiplier. In conclusion, that there may be no &amp;quot;Climate Crisis&amp;quot; and for governments to reduce emissions may be pointless or even harmful. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/monckton.cfm , Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered, July 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was published on a forum of the American Physical Society with the following disclaimer &amp;quot;The article has not undergone any scientific peer review&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the APS disagrees with the articles conclusions&amp;quot; In fact, the APS disagrees with the article without ever reviewing it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ryan N. Maue: &lt;br /&gt;
:A doctoral student at the Department of Meteorology at Florida State University did a study of global tropical cyclone activity. Its conclusions state that  global warming might be greatly overblown. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/s_617111.html# Global warming? More doubts] Pittsburgh Tribune, March 21, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mr. Maue found that tropical cyclone activity worldwide &amp;quot;has completely and utterly collapsed&amp;quot; during the past two to three years with energy levels sinking to those of the late 1970s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Vincent Gray:&lt;br /&gt;
:A member of the IPCC’s expert reviewers’ panel asserts, “There is no relationship between warming and the level of gases in the atmosphere,” and &amp;quot;there is no serious threat to the climate&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://americanfreedomnow.com/2009/06/04/the-panic-over-global-warming-is-totally-unjustified-says-vice-chair-ipcc/ “THE PANIC OVER GLOBAL WARMING IS TOTALLY UNJUSTIFIED” says Vice Chair, IPCC] Americanfreedomnow.com, June 4th, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joe D’Aleo: Climatologist &lt;br /&gt;
:The International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project says new data &amp;quot;show that in five of the last seven decades since World War II, including this one, global temperatures have cooled while carbon dioxide has continued to rise,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;'''The data suggest cooling''', not warming, in Earth's future.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=92557 Shocker: 'Global warming' simply no longer happening] Worldnetdaily, March 22, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. John S. Theon:&lt;br /&gt;
:Retired senior NASA atmospheric [[scientist]], Dr. John S. Theon, the former boss of global warming alarmist James Hansen of [[NASA]], rebukes him declaring “climate models are useless.” “My own belief concerning anthropogenic climate change is that the models do not realistically simulate the climate system because there are many very important sub-grid scale processes that the models either replicate poorly or completely omit,” “Furthermore, some scientists have manipulated the observed data to justify their model results.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2009/01/28/former-boss-rebukes-nasa-global-warming-alarmist-hansen-agw-skeptic Former Boss Rebukes NASA Global Warming Alarmist Hansen, Is AGW Skeptic] NewsBusters.org, January 28, 2009 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sammy Wilson -Ireland's environment minister &lt;br /&gt;
:He argues that global weather patterns are naturally cooling, not warming. He calls television ads that promote global warming as &amp;quot;an insidious propaganda campaign&amp;quot; peddling &amp;quot;patent nonsense.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=43255 Belfast Environment Chief Bans Climate Change Ads] AP, February 09, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the broadcast of his movie '[[The Great Global Warming Swindle]]', filmmaker Martin Durkin's statements read &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=32796  UK Broadcaster Scolded for Film on Global Warming] CNSNEWS July 22, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*“Everywhere you are told that man-made [[climate change]] is proved beyond doubt,”  “But you are being told lies.”&lt;br /&gt;
*“This is a story of how a theory about climate turned into a political [[ideology]] ... it is the story of the distortion of a whole area of [[science]].”&lt;br /&gt;
*“as the frenzy over man-made [[global warming]] grows shriller, many senior scientists say the actual scientific basis for the [[theory]] is crumbling.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2008, the [[AP]] published an article by its Science Writer Seth Borenstein, which is seen by skeptics as another example of one-sided, uncritical reporting on the issue by [[liberal media]]. The report stated that global warming was &amp;quot;a ticking time bomb that President-elect Barack Obama can't avoid&amp;quot;, and that  &amp;quot;We're out of time&amp;quot;, with Al Gore calling the situation &amp;quot;the equivalent of a five-alarm fire that has to be addressed immediately.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D952LKOO1&amp;amp;show_article=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In response, Fox News (December 16, 2008) reported that scientists skeptical of anthropogenic global warming criticized the report as &amp;quot;irrational hysteria,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;horrifically bad&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;incredibly biased&amp;quot;, containing sweeping scientific errors and being a one-sided portrayal of a complicated issue. Geology professor [[David Deming]] stated, &amp;quot;If the issues weren't so serious and the ramifications so profound, I would have to laugh at it&amp;quot;, and accused Borenstein of &amp;quot;writing a polemic and reporting it as fact.&amp;quot; Deming noted that &amp;quot;the mean global temperature, at least as measured by satellite, is now the same as it was in the year 1980. In the last couple of years sea level has stopped rising. Hurricane and cyclone activity in the northern hemisphere is at a 24-year low and sea ice globally is also the same as it was in 1980.&amp;quot; The AP responded to criticism by stating that, &amp;quot;It’s a news story, based on fact and the clearly expressed views of President-elect Barack Obama and others.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,468084,00.html Scientists Call AP Report on Global Warming 'Hysteria'] Fox News, December 16, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also in the discussion of the biased AP report, Michael R. Fox, a retired nuclear scientist and chemistry professor from the University of Idaho stated, &amp;quot;There is little evidence to believe that man-made carbon dioxide is causing temperature fluctuation. Other factors, including sun spots, solar winds, variations in the solar magnetic field and solar irradiation, could all be affecting temperature changes.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The year 2008 turned out to be the coolest year since 2000, yet the seventh to tenth warmest year on record, according to the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.eoportal.org/research/090127_res3.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to a preliminary analysis by NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center, the average June-August 2009 summer temperature for the contiguous United States was below average – the 34th coolest on record.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2009/20090910_summerstats.html NOAA: Summer Temperature Below Average for U.S.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richard S. Courtney, a U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) expert reviewer and a U.K.-based climate and atmospheric science consultant says  &amp;quot;Rubbish! Global warming is not 'accelerating,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;...that anybody who proclaims that 'Global warming is accelerating' is a liar, a fool, or both.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/brennan/global_warming_debunked/2008/12/16/162489.html Global Warming’s Last Gasp] NewsMax, December 17, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don J. Easterbrook, Ph.D., emeritus professor of geology at Western Washington University, asked, &amp;quot;What does it take to ignore 10 years of global cooling....? The answer is really quite simple — just follow the money!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2008 Presidential candidates on climate Change===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bob Barr]] is the only major 2008 Presidential Candidate who has not adopted wholesale the theory of human-caused global warming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to his website,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/News/PressReleases/BA6709C3-B27D-4EF9-81E6-2BA9D6F8AB20.htm John McCain on Global warming.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Republican]] Presidential candidate [[John McCain]] will take a more &amp;quot;aggressive approach&amp;quot; to global warming which he has declared as &amp;quot;undeniable and urgent.&amp;quot; He was supported in this in June 2008 by Republican governor [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]] who said McCain was the &amp;quot;real deal on the environment&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/30/MNDB11H66C.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics Schwarzenegger backs McCain on climate Change]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his own words, McCain says &amp;quot;the overwhelming majority of scientific opinion in America today, and in the world, is that climate change is real. The fact is that it ''is'' real. The fact is that the solution to it is the development of technologies.... and a [[cap and trade]] proposal.... the debate is over.&amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQMxIwpK_es] Unless McCain believes that Global Warming is entirely or largely man-made, there would be no sense in supporting a cap and trade solution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barack Obama]] believes &amp;quot;that global warming is not just the greatest [[environmental]] [[challenge]] facing our planet—it is one of our greatest challenges of any kind.&amp;quot; During his first 100 days in office, he would enact a giant and far-reaching [[tax]] &amp;quot;an economy-wide cap on U.S. carbon emissions that will reduce U.S. emissions by the amount scientists agree is necessary (80% by 2050). With worldwide cuts in emissions estimated to cost '''$45 Trillion dollars''' overall. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article4079036.ece World needs $45 trillion energy revolution] Timesonline.uk, June 6, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He comments &amp;quot;Putting a price on carbon is the most important step we can to take to reduce emissions.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://presidentialprofiles2008.org/Obama/tab1.html League of Conservation Voters] presidentialprofiles2008.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Evangelicals===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008 86 evangelical pastors, including Rev. Dr.[[Rick Warren]] signed a statement titled &amp;quot;Climate Change: An Evangelical Call to Action&amp;quot;, which called on Christians to acknowledge the moral importance of action to counteract man-made climate change. the statement includes specific support for market-based CO2 reductions such as a cap-and-trade program.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://christiansandclimate.org/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In contrast, a group of evangelical scholars, comprised of scientists, economists and theologians, contend that the liberal view of pending catastrophe caused by climate change is  misleading and/or exaggerated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christianpost.com/article/20091204/evangelicals-push-back-against-climate-change-hoax/pageall.html ''Evangelicals Push Back Against Global Warming Doom'',  Dec. 04 2009, christianpost.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Inaccuracies of Global Warming evidence==&lt;br /&gt;
===Climate &amp;quot;Science&amp;quot; Fraud===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Climategate}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Climategate#Climategate_scandal|Climategate scandal]] revealed how liberal scientists appeared to be deceiving the public with the use of fraudulent data for use as climate science. The [[Liberal media|liberal media]] has attempted to bury the story and discount it as the work of computer hackers illegally stealing data, however, [[FOIA|Freedom of Information]] requests is likely what led to the data being leaked — intentionally.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.junkscience.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dr. Willie Soon, a [[Physicist|physicist]], [[Astronomer|astronomer]] and climate researcher at the solar and stellar physics division of the [[Harvard University]]-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, said in an interview, &amp;quot;[The Climatic Research Unit climate scientists] are making scientific progress more difficult now. This is a shameful, dark day for science.&amp;quot; Dr. Soon also suggested that there has been systemic suppression of dissenting opinion among scientists in the climate change community, ranging from social snubs to e-mail stalking and even threats of harm.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gene J. Koprowski. [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,578368,00.html Global Warming Scandal Makes Scientific Progress More Difficult, Experts Say], ''[[Fox News]]'', December 01, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GoreFireBreathing.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Al Gore's [[Schlockumentary]] under fire; [[An Inconvenient Truth]] found to be an inconvenient [[lie]] based on [[junk science]] and digitally enhanced, totally faked scenes of polar icecaps melting.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal claims of &amp;quot;Consensus&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
Reports of a scientific &amp;quot;consensus&amp;quot; among scientists are similar to their one-sided support of other [[liberal]] policies and beliefs.  For example, nearly 100% of political donations from professors are to [[Democrats]] rather than Republicans.  Similarly, according to NASA, 97% of climate scientists believe that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These liberal scientists believe, or say they believe, that the Earth is warming overall, and that this warming, as well as other changes in climate patterns, is largely caused by human activities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Anderegg, Prall, Harold, and Schneider. &amp;quot;Expert credibility in climate change.&amp;quot; April 9, 2010. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.full.pdf+html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;From &amp;quot;IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007.&amp;quot; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/spmsspm-understanding-and.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These allegations do not necessarily make the consensus true, as discussed throughout the referenced citation. Numerous scientists, especially those outside of university faculties, have been critical of anthropogenic global warming. However, according to some researchers, scientists who do not support the anthropogenic global warming theory offer a general lack of comparative credentials; proponents of man-made global warming argue that this has led to agreement that, among authorities in scientific disciplines, there is a &amp;quot;[[scientific consensus]]&amp;quot; supporting the theory for greater government control. Scientists skeptical of the theory question whether there is a financial incentive for supporting research.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.seattlepi.com/printer2/index.asp?ploc=t&amp;amp;refer=http://www.seattlepi.com/opinion/336889_climatepolicy26.html Pual Chesser, &lt;br /&gt;
''Be wary of climate policy development'', Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Act. 25, 2007]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It has also been documented that on most college campuses criticism of the global warming theory is silenced or censored; evidence shows that scientists skeptical of AGW are being supressed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/1782/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=102031&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is well understood that most media companies do not offer balanced reporting. Many politicians have bought into the liberal claim of consensus, for example Barack Obama's views, &amp;quot;Few challenges facing America and the world are more urgent than fighting climate change. The science is beyond dispute and the facts are clear.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cato.org/special/climatechange/ Climate Change Reality] Cato Institute&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In fact, many scientists disagree with the &amp;quot;facts,&amp;quot; their certainty, and their interpretation. Over 100 of them have signed the statement that appears in the Cato Institute's newspaper ad. Liberals have failed to back up their claims with any scientific facts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ad.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Past Speculation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speculation and warnings of catastrophic climate change are not unprecedented.  In 2001 the ''Guardian'' noted that some 70s headlines shouted, &amp;quot;Brace yourself for another ice age&amp;quot;. In 1971 the journal ''Science'' reported that the subsequent cooling effect resulting from a possible eightfold increased from atmospheric aerosol concentrations, &amp;quot;if sustained over a period of several years - is believed to be sufficient to trigger an ice age.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reported by Alison George in ''Breaking the ice'', The Guardian, Thursday 28 June 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Richard Lindzen]] wrote in 1992 on the doubtfulness of man-caused warming on Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Indeed, a recent Gallup poll of climate scientists in the American Meteorological Society and in the American Geophysical Union shows that a vast majority doubts that there has been any identifiable man-caused warming to date (49 percent asserted no, 33 percent did not know, 18 percent thought some has occurred; however, among those actively involved in research and publishing frequently in peer-reviewed research journals, none believes that any man-caused global warming has been identified so far). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cato&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv15n2/reg15n2g.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oddly enough, even though 82% of US climate scientists refused to support the global warming theory then, [[liberal]] activists were already claiming a scientific consensus for [[anthropogenic global warming]]. (It's hard to understand how 18 percent credence in ''any'' global warming translates into &amp;quot;consensus&amp;quot; support for ''human-caused'' global warming.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The campaign to convince the public (and their elected representatives) that the &amp;quot;science is settled&amp;quot; began in 1988 or 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the 2008 elections both candidates for the Presidency of the United States were proposing plans to mitigate climate change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over 31,000 American scientists have signed the petition rejecting global warming. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.petitionproject.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Teller_Card_100dpi.jpg|600px|center|thumb| Global Warming Petition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June, 1974, ''[[Time]]'' magazine published its front page article, ''Science: Another Ice Age?'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Science: Another Ice Age?'' Time magazine, Monday, Jun. 24, 1974&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while a report by the [[CIA]] in the same year stated that, &amp;quot;The world's leading climatologists have confirmed recent reports of a detrimental global climatic change”, noting such things as that the &amp;quot;world's snow and ice cover had increased by at least 10 to 15 percent&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;the Canadian area of [[Arctic]] Greenland suffered below normal temperatures for 19 consecutive months&amp;quot;, which was unique during the last 100 years.  A &amp;quot;major climatic shift&amp;quot; was speculated, which would threaten the &amp;quot;the stability of most nations.” It further warned that &amp;quot;Scientists are confident that unless man is able to modify the climate, the  northern regions, such as Canada&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;major areas in northern China will again be covered with 100 to 200 feet of ice and snow&amp;quot;, within the next 2500 years - or sooner.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.climatemonitor.it/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/1974.pdf ''A study of climatological research as it pertains to intelligence problems'', August 1974]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also in 1974, Nigel Calder, former editor of ''New Scientist'' and atmospheric researcher wrote in his book ''The Weather Machine'', &amp;quot;One might argue that there is a virtual certainty of the next ice age starting some time in the next 2000 years. Then the odds are only about 20-to-1 against it beginning in the next 100 years.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1975 the liberal magazine ''[[Newsweek]]'' reported that &amp;quot;Meteorologists disagree about the cause and extent of the cooling trend,...but they are almost unanimous in the view that the trend will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century.&amp;quot; These authorities were skeptical that political leaders would take any positive action to compensate for the [[climate change]], and they conceded that the more dramatic solutions, such as melting the arctic ice cap, might create worse problems than that which they were designed to solve.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://denisdutton.com/newsweek_coolingworld.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Natural Variability of the Climate System===&lt;br /&gt;
It is virtually universally accepted amongst secular climatologists that the earth has experienced numerous [[Ice Age|ice age]]s over two million years, during which global temperatures fluctuated created glacial and inter-glacial periods. The frigid temperatures allowed ice sheets to expand southward, covering much of [[Asia]], [[Europe]], and [[North America]]. The cooling associated with ice ages is gradual, while the terminations are relatively rapid. However, even the rapid terminations of ice ages take centuries to millennia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Natural Climate Change on Other Planets===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the [[Viking spacecraft]] reached [[Mars]] in the 1970s until recent readings were taken, the average temperature on Mars has risen {{temperature|0.6|1.1}} just as the average temperature on the earth has risen.  Since human industrialization is clearly not to blame for the change on Mars, other causes are being considered.  One possibility is that dust storms are changing the albedo of the planet, allowing it to warm, while another possibility is that solar variations from the sun are causing the warming.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070404_gw_mars.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17977&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recently, it has also been found that similar to the Earth and Mars, [[Neptune]] is also undergoing global warming.  Measurements taken at the Lowell observatory in [[Arizona]] have shown an increase in Neptune's brightness and temperature since 1980 following the same pattern seen on Earth and Mars.  The researchers who discovered this warming suggest there may be a correlation between the warming and solar variations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007.../2006GL028764.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pluto]] has also been found to be undergoing global warming.  The overall temperature increase on Pluto has been greater than that on the earth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/pluto_warming_021009.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand [[Uranus]] has had no net change in temperature since 1977.  A rapid increase in temperature reversed itself.  The reasons for this are not understood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~layoung/eprint/ur149/Young2001Uranus.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Global temperatures change on other planets even when there is no life, something which strongly supports the idea that humans are not necessarily the cause of earth's global warming.  Moreover, the temperature on Uranus has fluctuated back and forth.  There is no reason that fluctuations cannot occur on earth, too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although measurements have been made of the temperatures of other planets these are by no means thorough or comparable with the measurements used for earth. The short space of time over which measurements have been taken and the very limited spatial coverage means that reliable average figures have not been obtained. They have certainly not been taken extensively enough to produce a five year average temperature, which is the standard when determining temperature trends on earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if accurate measurements could be made, and their accuracy and reliability is improving over time, then they may prove useful to climate science. Their different atmospheres and distances from the sun provide natural laboratories to study climatic changes without human influences. Though of course they will not be directly comparable due to the vast differences.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Al Gore's Claims===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gore GlobalWarming.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The decision by the government to distribute Al Gore's film, ''An Inconvenient Truth'', became the subject of a legal challenge by [[New Party]] member Stewart Dimmock. A school governor from Dover and father of two, Dimmock charged the Government with brainwashing children with propaganda by presenting Gore’s sci-fi film as science. In October 2007, Mr Justice Burton of London's High Court found that while the film was &amp;quot;broadly accurate&amp;quot;, it contained nine significant errors,“in which statements were made that were not supported by the current mainstream scientific consensus”, some of which had arisen in “the context of alarmism and exaggeration”. He also found the Guidance Notes drafted by the Education Secretary’s advisers only worked to exacerbate the political propaganda in the film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/07/clearly_its_al_gore_whos_in_de.html American Thinker;  ''Clearly It's Al Gore Who's In Denial'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Times online, October 11, 2007 ''Al Gore’s inconvenient judgment''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taken from the official transcript,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://noteviljustwrong.com/images/nejw/docs/22161.pdf Stuart Dimmock and Secretary of State for Education and Skills]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the nine errors the judge found were:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*1. Sea  level  rise  of  up  to  20  feet  (7 metres) will  be  caused  by melting  of either West Antarctica or Greenland in the near future. This is distinctly alarmist, and part of Mr Gore's 'wake-up call'. It is common ground that if indeed Greenland melted, it would release this amount of water, but only after, and  over,  millennia,  so  that  the  Armageddon  scenario  he  predicts,  insofar  as  it suggests that sea level rises of 7 metres might occur in the immediate future, is not in line with the scientific consensus.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*2. Low  lying  inhabited  Pacific  atolls  are  being  inundated  because  of anthropogenic global warming. In scene 20, Mr Gore states &amp;quot;that's why the citizens of these Pacific nations have all had to evacuate to New Zealand&amp;quot;. There is no evidence of any such evacuation having yet happened. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*3. Shutting down of the &amp;quot;Ocean Conveyor&amp;quot;. According  to  the  IPCC,  it  is  very  unlikely  that  the  Ocean  Conveyor (known  technically  as  the  Meridional  Overturning  Circulation  or  thermohaline circulation)  will  shut  down  in  the  future,  though  it  is  considered  likely  that thermohaline circulation may slow down. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*4. Direct coincidence between rise in CO2 in the atmosphere and in temperature, by reference to two graphs. In scenes 8 and 9, Mr Gore shows  two graphs relating  to a period of 650,000 years, one  showing  rise  in  CO2  and  one  showing  rise  in  temperature,  and  asserts  (by ridiculing  the  opposite  view)  that  they  show  an  exact  fit. Although  there  is  general scientific agreement  that  there  is a connection,  the  two graphs do not establish what Mr Gore asserts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*5. The snows of Kilimanjaro. The film asserted that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidenced global warming. The Government's expert was had to admit that this is not correct. Mr  Gore  asserts  in  scene  7  that  the  disappearance  of  snow  on Mt  Kilimanjaro  is expressly  attributable  to  global  warming.  It  is  noteworthy  that  this  is  a  point  that specifically  impressed Mr Milliband  (see  the  press  release  quoted  at  paragraph  6 above). However, it is common ground that, the scientific consensus is that it cannot be established that the recession of snows on Mt Kilimanjaro is mainly attributable to human-induced climate change.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*6. Lake Chad etc. The drying up of Lake Chad  is used  as  a prime  example of  a  catastrophic  result of global  warming.  However,  it  is  generally  accepted  that  the  evidence  remains insufficient to establish such an attribution. It is apparently considered to be far more likely  to result from other factors, such as population  increase and over-grazing, and regional climate variability.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*7. Hurricane Katrina. In  scene  12  Hurricane  Katrina  and  the  consequent  devastation  in  New  Orleans  is ascribed to global warming. It is common ground that there is insufficient evidence to show that. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*8. Death of polar bears. In scene 16, by reference to a dramatic graphic of a polar bear desperately swimming through  the water  looking  for  ice, Mr Gore says: &amp;quot;A new scientific study shows  that for  the  first  time  they are  finding polar bears  that have actually drowned swimming long distances up to 60 miles to find the ice. They did not find that before.&amp;quot; The only scientific  study  that  either  side  before me  can  find  is  one which  indicates  that  four polar bears have recently been found drowned because of a storm.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*9. Coral reefs. In scene 19, Mr Gore says: &amp;quot;Coral reefs all over the world because of global warming and  other  factors  are  bleaching  and  they  end  up  like  this. All  the  fish  species  that depend on  the coral reef are also  in  jeopardy as a result. Overall specie loss  is now occurring at a rate 1000 times greater than the natural background rate.&amp;quot; The actual scientific view, as recorded in the IPCC report, is that, if the temperature were to rise by 1-3 degrees Centigrade,  there would be  increased coral bleaching and widespread coral  mortality,  unless  corals  could  adapt or climatize, but  that  separating  the impacts  of  climate  change-related  stresses  from  other  stresses,  such  as  over-fishing and polluting, is difficult. &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
Dimmock's lawyer, Mr. Downes,  argued that by schools making available such film to its teachers, and if teachers then showed such  film  to  their pupils, then  this would inevitably result &amp;quot;in  the promotion of partisan political views  in  the  teaching of any  subject  in  the  school, which  is  thus not only not being forbidden  by  the  local  education  authority  (and  the  DES), but  being  positively facilitated by them.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr Justice Barton stressed that the “apocalyptic vision” presented in the film was politically partisan and not an impartial analysis of the science of climate change. “It is now common ground that it is not simply a science film – although it is clear that it is based substantially on scientific research and opinion – but that it is a political film.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Barton also stated that, “I conclude that the claimant substantially won this case by virtue of my finding that, but for the new guidance note, the film would have been distributed in breach of sections 406 and 407 of the 1996 Education Act.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; BBC news, Thursday, 11 October 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order for the film to be shown, the Government must first amend their Guidance Notes to Teachers to make clear that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*1.  The Film is a political work and promotes only one side of the argument. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*2. If teachers present the Film without making this plain they may be in breach of section 406 of the Education Act 1996 and guilty of political indoctrination. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*3.  Nine inaccuracies have to be specifically drawn to the attention of school children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newparty.co.uk/articles/inaccuracies-gore.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Science and Public Policy took issue with the response to the ruling by Al Gore’s spokesman and  environment adviser, and asserted that his film contains ''35 Inconvenient Truths''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/goreerrors.html 35 Inconvenient Truths]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding his claims that the snow cap atop Africa's Mt. Kilimanjaro is shrinking and that global warming is to blame, the November 23, 2003, issue of Nature magazine stated,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Although it's tempting to blame the ice loss on global warming, researchers think that deforestation of the mountain's foothills is the more likely culprit. Without the forests' humidity, previously moisture-laden winds blew dry. No longer replenished with water, the ice is evaporating in the strong equatorial sunshine.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many conservatives see Al Gore as an example of [[liberals]] using [[deceit]]ful tactics in important debates, in order to make a position seem more solid than it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scientists===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rogerrevelle.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Roger Revelle]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;35%&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Roger Revelle]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Achim Steiner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fred Singer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Richard Lindzen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sallie Baliunas]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lonnie Thompson]]&lt;br /&gt;
| valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;33%&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[James E. Hansen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Michael Mann]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Charles Keeling]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edwin A. Hernández-Delgado]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Hal Lewis====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal]] claims of global warming led to the resignation in October 2010 by Professor Hal Lewis from The American Physical Society because of &amp;quot;the [[global warming]] scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. '''It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist'''.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thegwpf.org/ipcc-news/1670-hal-lewis-my-resignation-from-the-american-physical-society.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Critique of the Hockey Stick Reconstruction===&lt;br /&gt;
::''See also : [[Climategate#Hockey_Stick_Graph|Climategate: hockey stick graph]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2005/09/mcintyre.mckitrick.2003.pdf Corrections To The Mann et. al. (1998) Proxy Data Base And Northern Hemispheric Average Temperature Series] by Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick, ''Energy &amp;amp; Enviornment'' volume 14, 2003.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://blogs.nature.com/climatefeedback/2007/05/the_decay_of_the_hockey_stick.html The Decay of the Hockey Stick by Von Storch] published on the journal ''Nature'''s blog, May 3, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/13830/ A Global Warming Bombshell] by Richard A. Muller, ''Technology Review'' , Oct. 2004; calls into question famous graph by Michael Mann.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/306/5696/679 Reconstructing Past Climate from Noisy Data] by Hans von Storch, Eduardo Zorita, Julie M. Jones, Yegor Dimitriev, Fidel González-Rouco, Simon F. B. Tett, ''Science'' magazine, 22 October 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.image.ucar.edu/~boli/manuscripts/2007-LNA-TeA.pdf The ‘hockey stick’ and the 1990s: a statistical perspective on reconstructing hemispheric temperatures] by Bo Li, Douglas W. Nychka and Casper M. Ammann, ''Institute for Mathmatics Applied to Geosciences''; (Manuscript received 22 March 2007; in final form 28 June 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/2006_articles/IceCoreSprg97.pdf Ice Core Data Show No Carbon Dioxide Increase] by Zbigniew Jaworowski, Ph.D., Spring 1997; this article examines one of the main pillars of the global warming thesis.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2005/09/mcintyre.ee.2005.pdf The M&amp;amp;M Critique of the MBH98 Northern Hemisphere Climate Index: Update and Implications] (''Energy &amp;amp; Environment'', vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 69-100, January 2005) - Stephen McIntyre, Ross McKitrick&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2005/09/mcintyre.grl.2005.pdf Hockey sticks, principal components, and spurious significance] (''Geophysical Research Letters'', vol. 32, February 2005) - Stephen McIntyre, Ross McKitrick&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Effects of Global Warming==&lt;br /&gt;
===Beneficial effects of Global Warming===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Autumn foliage.jpg|thumb|Canoing on a Colorful Day, (NY).]]&lt;br /&gt;
Some researchers point out that benefits of health global warming have been overlooked, or minimized. As far back as 1996, Thomas Gale Moore, Senior Fellow at Hoover Institution (Stanford University) contended that positive health and amenity effects would be a result of projected increases in temperature. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.stanford.edu/~moore/health.html Health and Amenity Effects of Global Warming]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another source notes,  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In areas that see extreme cold temperatures, deaths related to colder weather would drop significantly, leading to decreased health care costs, while areas that already have hot climates will see no increase. Warmer temperatures would also mean less energy use to heat homes and buildings, helping to conserve energy as cooling is much more energy efficient. With the changes brought about by global warming more land that is not lost to desert and/or rising sea levels would become available for uses like farming and living. Forests and plants would grow stronger, healthier, and more abundant because of the warmer weather, and this would mean more oxygen being released into the atmosphere.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bionomicfuel.com/what-are-the-benefits-of-global-warming/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reported effects of Climate Change===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides Global Warming, reported past or expected/possible future environmental and societal consequences of Climate Change include,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Global cooling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nowpublic.com/environment/global-warming-causing-global-cooling&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased food production.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Fred Pearce, ''Climate change warning over food production,'' Newscientist.com, April 26, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased food production.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P2-1127111.html] William Booth, ''Global Heating Could Benefit U.S. Farmers; Prices Seen Rising As Production Falls'' The Washington Post, May 17, 1990&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shrinking forests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/mar/11/amazon-global-warming-trees/print David Adam, ''Amazon could shrink by 85% due to climate change''] March 11, 2009, guardian.co.uk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased tree foliage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.greenfingers.com/articledisplay.asp?id=1734&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased productivity of high-elevation forests.'&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;'Global Warming May Spur Increased Growth In Pacific Northwest'' Oct. 20, 2009, Forests Science Daily&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Melting glaciers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Global warming causing hundreds of Antarctic Peninsula glaciers to melt,''&lt;br /&gt;
June 6, 2007, The Hindustan Times&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Growing glaciers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2043047/posts?page=51&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increasing landmass in Antarctica.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2005/05/27/antarctic-ice-a-global-warming-snow-job/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Colder winters &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Climate change could bring colder winters,'' March 13, 2003, Canadian Broadcasting Centre&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A new ice age.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2003/nov/13/comment.research/print Bill McGuire, The Guardian, November 13, 2003]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Prevention of an ice age.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,296060,00.html Andrea Thompson, ''Global Warming May Cancel Next Ice Age''], Monday, September 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Taller mountains.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ker Than, ''Taller Mountains Blamed on Global Warming, Too'', August 4, 2006, LiveScience&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A lop-sided planet.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Robert Roy Britt, June 29,2005 LiveScience.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Stronger hurricanes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Global Warming: Warmer Seas Linked To Strengthening Hurricanes,'' Sep. 4, 2008, ScienceDaily&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Weaker Hurricanes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Randolph E. Schmid, AP Science Writer, ''Global warming may diminish Atlantic hurricane activity'', 04-17-2007, USA Today&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shorter days.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.itwire.com/content/view/11220/1066/ William Atkins, ''Researchers say global warming should cause shorter days''], ITWire, April 11, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Earthquakes and volcanoes, and other geological disasters. Attempts to prevent climate change may do the same.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richard Fisher, ''Climate change may trigger earthquakes and volcanoes,'' September 23 2009 Newscientist.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shrinking brains.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gordon G. Gallup Jr., Human Nature (Vol. 18, Issue 2, 2007U)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shrinking sheep.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Steve Connor, Science Editor, ''How global warming shrank St Kilda's sheep,''&lt;br /&gt;
Independent.co.uk, 3 July 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tiger Attacks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Global Warming Linked to Indian Tiger Attacks'', Reuters, Mon Oct 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shark attacks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.junkscience.com/news3/shark.htmlBruce Johnston, ''Shark attack on boat result of global warming''] Augsut 31, 1998, Electronic Telegraph (U.K.)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Walrus stampede deaths.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1939754/posts ''Global warming is blamed for walrus stampede deaths'', Associated Press - December 14, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Imminent cannibalism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ted Turner, April 1, 2008, Charlie Rose PBS show&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The need for a drastic reduction of the earth’s population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thisistheendoftheworldasweknowit.com/archives/one-less-child-environmental-extremists-warn-that-overpopulation-is-causing-climate-change-and-will-ultimately-destroy-the-earth&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A strong increase in people dying of [[AIDS]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Daniel Tarantola, University of NSW, Australia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.skepticsglobalwarming.com/?p=608&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased risk of civil war in Africa.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.stanford.edu/news/2009/november23/climate-civil-wars-112309.html?view=print ''Global warming increases risk of civil war in Africa,''] Stanford Report, November 23, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Child ''climate cops''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=70811&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Increase in depression.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Emily Sohn Thurs., Discovery Channel, Dec . 10, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increase in psychiatric illness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;World Health Organisation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Climate change leads to psychiatric illness'' 04-08, 2008, Sify.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased anxiety and loss of sleep among many children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alan Jones, The Scotsman, February 22, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Climategate scandal}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also == &lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Massachusetts v. EPA]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal_hysteria#Global_Warming_Derangement_Syndrome|Global Warming Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Socialist Environmental Disasters]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.creationworldview.org/articles_view.asp?id=67 Global Warming? Absolutely No Truth To It!]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/global-warming/ What Liberals Say - Category: Global Warming], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://global-warming.accuweather.com/2007/12/attempting_to_stop_global_warm_1.html Attempting to Stop Global Warming is Futile and a Mistake, says letter to the UN]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=164004 Signatories of an open letter on the UN climate-conference] {{dead link}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://schwinger.harvard.edu/~motl/global-temperature-not-exist.pdf Does a global temperature exist?], ''Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics'', June 2007. {{dead link}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,2032821,00.html The appliance of science] by Mike Hulme.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.climatecrisis.net/ ''An Inconvenient Truth''], Film by [[Al Gore]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2332531355859226455&amp;amp;q=great+global+warming+swindle ''The Great Global Warming Swindle'' - Documentary Film]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.harvard.edu/~motl/iris-effect.pdf Climate Sensitivity and Observed Negative Feedbacks], lecture by Richard Lindzen and Roberto Rondanelli.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.harvard.edu/~motl/lindzen-nature-of-arguments.pdf Nature of Arguments for Anthropogenic Global Warming], by Richard Lindzen&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/store/book_detail.asp?bookID=42 ''Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warmings's Unfinished Debate'', by S. Fred Singer]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv15n2/reg15n2g.html Global Warming: The Origin and Nature of the Alleged Scientific Consensus] - [[Richard S. Lindzen]], Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=47&amp;amp;articleID=604 &amp;quot;Should We Have Acted Thirty Years Ago to Prevent Climate Change?&amp;quot;, by Randall G. Holcombe].&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=25&amp;amp;articleID=296 &amp;quot;After Kyoto: A Global Scramble for Advantage,&amp;quot; by Bruce Yandle].&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=2319 The physical evidence of earth's unstoppable 1,500-year climate cycle]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=1714 &amp;quot;Is There a Basis for Global Warming Alarm?&amp;quot;, by Richard Lindzen]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/policy_reports/detail.asp?type=full&amp;amp;id=5 &amp;quot;New Perspectives in Climate Change: What the EPA Isn’t Telling Us&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17181 Survey Shows Climatologists Are Split on Global Warming]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.magma.ca/~hurleyp/FightingTheHoax.htm Fighting the Hoax]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/news.php Refuting the Myth of Man-made Global Warming]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.climateaudit.org Climate Audit], Steve McIntyre's blog&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.realclimate.org Real Climate], blog by a group of climatologists including Michael Mann&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/01/co2_fairytales_in_global_warmi.html &amp;quot;CO2 Fairytales in Global Warming&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm A complete list of things caused by global warming]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/11/hackers-prove-global-warming-is-scam.html Hackers Prove Global Warming Is A Scam]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Earth Sciences]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Environmentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Bias]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Man made disasters]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Marriage_Equality&amp;diff=1073498</id>
		<title>Marriage Equality</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Marriage_Equality&amp;diff=1073498"/>
				<updated>2014-01-13T04:26:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Created page with &amp;quot;'''Marriage Equality''' is a misleading, deceitful term created by supporters of homosexuality to describe gay marriage. This is another liberal attempt to redefi...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Marriage Equality''' is a misleading, [[deceit]]ful term created by supporters of [[homosexuality]] to describe [[gay marriage]]. This is another [[liberal]] attempt to redefine the word &amp;quot;[[equality]]&amp;quot;, and ignores thousands of years of human history when [[traditional marriage]] was the only form of marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Homosexual Agenda]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Incarceration&amp;diff=1070569</id>
		<title>Incarceration</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Incarceration&amp;diff=1070569"/>
				<updated>2013-11-30T16:28:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Liberals often support abusively long imprisonment terms as part of their agenda to expand government power&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Incarceration''' is imprisonment or confinement in a [[jail]] or [[prison|penitentiary]]. [[Liberal]]s often support abusively long imprisonment terms as part of their agenda to expand [[government]] power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Legal Terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitch_McConnell&amp;diff=1068378</id>
		<title>Mitch McConnell</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitch_McConnell&amp;diff=1068378"/>
				<updated>2013-10-18T02:06:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: wikify&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Mitch McConnell&lt;br /&gt;
|image=McConnell.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Elaine Chao]]&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Baptist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Kentucky&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 1985 - Present&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Walter Huddleston]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Addison Mitchell &amp;quot;Mitch&amp;quot; McConnell, Jr.''', born February 20, 1942 (age {{age|1942|2|20}}), is the senior [[Republican]] United States Senator from [[Kentucky]] and the Senate [[Minority Leader]] in the 111th [[Congress]]. A [[RINO]] who pushed through a [[liberal]]-favored deal to increase the [[debt ceiling]], McConnell faces a [[Tea Party]] challenger in his primary in 2014 for reelection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McConnell was born in [[Tuscumbia]], [[Alabama]] to Julia Shockley and Addison Mitchell McConnell and raised in south [[Louisville]], Kentucky, he attended duPont Manual High School and graduated from the [[University of Louisville]] College of Arts and Sciences with honors in 1964, where he was student body president and member of Phi Kappa Tau. He graduated in 1967 from the [[University of Kentucky]] College of Law, where he was elected president of the Student Bar Association. McConnell gained experience on Capitol Hill as an intern under Senator [[John Sherman Cooper]], later as an assistant to Senator [[Marlow Cook]], and was a Deputy Assistant Attorney General under President [[Gerald R. Ford]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==U.S. Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McConnell was elected to the Senate in 1984 when he defeated two-term [[Democratic]] Senator Dee Huddleston. Since then he has been reelected four times. After the 2006 elections, he was unanimously elected Senate Minority Leader, previously serving as Majority Whip. He is married to former Secretary of Labor [[Elaine Chao]]. McConnell has been very involved in Republican party politics. He was chairman of the [[National Republican Senatorial Committee]] during the 1998 and 2000 election cycles. In both, Republicans maintained control of the [[Senate]]. McConnell is viewed as a [[conservative]] on nearly all issues, receiving an 89% lifetime rating from the [[American Conservative Union]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.acuratings.org/2008all.htm#KY&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, he was one of just three Senate Republicans who voted against a Constitutional ban on [[Flag Desecration Amendment|flag desecration]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&amp;amp;session=2&amp;amp;vote=00189&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McConnell offered offshore [[oil]] drilling resolutions on the Senate floor in July 2008. He was intent on setting a trigger to initiate drilling if the price exceeds a certain mark. First he offered to drill if gas prices hit $4.50 a gallon. This was rejected by Democrats. Then he offered a trigger at $5.50 a gallon, $7.50 a gallon and $10 per gallon, with Democrats rejecting each offer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=27826 Breaking: Dems like $10 per Gallon Gasoline] Human Events, July 31, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mitch McConnell managed to hold onto his senate seat in the 2008 elections, which saw a Democratic surge, just short of a supermajority.  Mitch McConnell is widely regarded within the Republican Party as an adept Minority Leader. The filibuster strategy used by the Democrats was first pushed by McConnell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://mcconnell.senate.gov Sen. McConnell's Official Web Site]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McConnell, Mitch}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: 110th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:111th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:112th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:113th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reagan Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kentucky]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Rino backers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:RINOs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitch_McConnell&amp;diff=1068377</id>
		<title>Mitch McConnell</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mitch_McConnell&amp;diff=1068377"/>
				<updated>2013-10-18T02:04:58Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: This obviously refers to the recent deal increasing the debt ceiling, which isn't the same thing as increasing the national debt. This demonstrates a gross misunderstanding of the issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Mitch McConnell&lt;br /&gt;
|image=McConnell.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Elaine Chao]]&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Baptist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Kentucky&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 1985 - Present&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Walter Huddleston]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Addison Mitchell &amp;quot;Mitch&amp;quot; McConnell, Jr.''', born February 20, 1942 (age {{age|1942|2|20}}), is the senior [[Republican]] United States Senator from [[Kentucky]] and the Senate [[Minority Leader]] in the 111th [[Congress]]. A [[RINO]] who pushed through a [[liberal]]-favored deal to increase the debt ceiling, McConnell faces a [[Tea Party]] challenger in his primary in 2014 for reelection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McConnell was born in [[Tuscumbia]], [[Alabama]] to Julia Shockley and Addison Mitchell McConnell and raised in south [[Louisville]], Kentucky, he attended duPont Manual High School and graduated from the [[University of Louisville]] College of Arts and Sciences with honors in 1964, where he was student body president and member of Phi Kappa Tau. He graduated in 1967 from the [[University of Kentucky]] College of Law, where he was elected president of the Student Bar Association. McConnell gained experience on Capitol Hill as an intern under Senator [[John Sherman Cooper]], later as an assistant to Senator [[Marlow Cook]], and was a Deputy Assistant Attorney General under President [[Gerald R. Ford]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==U.S. Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McConnell was elected to the Senate in 1984 when he defeated two-term [[Democratic]] Senator Dee Huddleston. Since then he has been reelected four times. After the 2006 elections, he was unanimously elected Senate Minority Leader, previously serving as Majority Whip. He is married to former Secretary of Labor [[Elaine Chao]]. McConnell has been very involved in Republican party politics. He was chairman of the [[National Republican Senatorial Committee]] during the 1998 and 2000 election cycles. In both, Republicans maintained control of the [[Senate]]. McConnell is viewed as a [[conservative]] on nearly all issues, receiving an 89% lifetime rating from the [[American Conservative Union]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.acuratings.org/2008all.htm#KY&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, he was one of just three Senate Republicans who voted against a Constitutional ban on [[Flag Desecration Amendment|flag desecration]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&amp;amp;session=2&amp;amp;vote=00189&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McConnell offered offshore [[oil]] drilling resolutions on the Senate floor in July 2008. He was intent on setting a trigger to initiate drilling if the price exceeds a certain mark. First he offered to drill if gas prices hit $4.50 a gallon. This was rejected by Democrats. Then he offered a trigger at $5.50 a gallon, $7.50 a gallon and $10 per gallon, with Democrats rejecting each offer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=27826 Breaking: Dems like $10 per Gallon Gasoline] Human Events, July 31, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mitch McConnell managed to hold onto his senate seat in the 2008 elections, which saw a Democratic surge, just short of a supermajority.  Mitch McConnell is widely regarded within the Republican Party as an adept Minority Leader. The filibuster strategy used by the Democrats was first pushed by McConnell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://mcconnell.senate.gov Sen. McConnell's Official Web Site]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McConnell, Mitch}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: 110th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:111th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:112th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:113th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reagan Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kentucky]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Rino backers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:RINOs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=HPV_vaccine&amp;diff=1057545</id>
		<title>HPV vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=HPV_vaccine&amp;diff=1057545"/>
				<updated>2013-06-22T03:53:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* Harm Exceeds Benefit */ Nowadays almost no journal articles are published free to the public&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''HPV vaccine''' exists as 2 products, Gardasil (marketed by [[Merck]] and protecting against types 6, 11, 16 and 18 of the [[HPV|human papillomavirus]]) and Cervarix (marketed by GlaxoSmithKline and protecting against types 16 and 18 only).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Genital warts are most commonly associated with HPV–6 and HPV–11. HPV types 16 and 18 together are found in about 70 percent of cervical cancers. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;National Cancer Institute:  Human Papillomaviruses and Cancer: Questions and Answers [http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/HPV]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only about 3% of women are infected by these four types of HPV (Types 6, 11, 16, 18) targeted by the vaccine.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;JAMA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;This was confirmed by a study published February 28, 2007 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, JAMA 297(8):813-819, February 28, 2007.  &amp;quot;HPV vaccine types 6 and 11 (low-risk types) and 16 and 18 (high-risk types) were detected in 3.4% of female participants ....&amp;quot;[http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/297/8/813]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The vaccine is very expensive and has been associated with severe adverse reactions, including paralysis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/3758983/Schoolgirl-12-paralysed-after-receiving-cervical-cancer-jab.html 12-year-old paralyzed]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HPV vaccine does not protect against other sexually transmitted diseases (e.g., [[chlamydia]], [[herpes]], [[hepatitis]], [[trichomoniasis]], [[gonorrhea]], [[syphilis]], [[HIV]], [[AIDS]], etc.), and the vaccine is not recommended for use in pregnant women or girls.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/g/gardasil/gardasil_pi.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Gardasil had three times the number of Emergency Room visits [than associated with the meningitis vaccine] - more than 5,000. Reports of side effects were up to 30 times higher with Gardasil.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/02/06/eveningnews/main4781658.shtml?source=RSSattr=HOME_4781658&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a remarkable move, a researcher for the HPV vaccine declared, &amp;quot;Public Should Receive More Complete Warnings&amp;quot;:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/08/19/cbsnews_investigates/main5253431.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dr. Diane Harper says young girls and their parents should receive more complete warnings before receiving the vaccine to prevent cervical cancer. ... It’s highly unusual for a researcher to publicly criticize a medicine or vaccine she helped get approved.  Dr. Harper joins a number of consumer watchdogs, vaccine safety advocates, and parents who question the vaccine’s risk-versus-benefit profile. She says data available for Gardasil shows that it lasts five years; there is no data showing that it remains effective beyond five years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Side Effects and Adverse Reactions==&lt;br /&gt;
As of May 1, 2009, there have been 13,758 adverse reactions occurring after administration of the HPV vaccine, including 39 deaths, reported to the CDC since the FDA approval on June 8 2006.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;CDC:  Reports of Adverse Events Following Gardasil® Vaccination [http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/vaers/gardasil.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Of the the 39 deaths, 26 were confirmed; the CDC claims that none of these were caused by the vaccine. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;CDC:  Reports of Adverse Events Following Gardasil® Vaccination [http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/vaers/gardasil.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to the above referenced injuries and deaths, many girls who receive the HPV vaccine say that it is the most painful of all injections they get, and that the vaccine itself burns, unlike the &amp;quot;other shots [that] tend to hurt only at the moment of the needle stick, and not after the vaccine plunges in.&amp;quot; Many girls have passed out from the pain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MSNBC:  Some girls fainting after receiving HPV vaccine Gardasil gaining reputation as most painful of childhood shots, experts say [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22492557/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FDA approved this HPV vaccine without reviewing any epidemiological studies, and after monitoring for only a brief period elevated [[antibody]] levels in recipients of the vaccine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5602a1.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  No tests were done, for example, to see if the vaccine causes cancer or birth defects in rats, though such tests would be easy for the FDA to require, if it weren't for the possibility that it might cause disapproval of the vaccine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/g/gardasil/gardasil_pi.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The long-term consequences of the HPV vaccine are not known. Children in the 9-year-old age group have been monitored for only 18 months, and there have been no studies of possible longer-term risks of the vaccine, such as [[infertility]], [[cancer]], or [[autism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Effectiveness==&lt;br /&gt;
The HPV vaccine is being promoted as protection against cervical cancer, but Merck itself does not ensure protection in its package insert.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/g/gardasil/gardasil_pi.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Rather, this claim is based on research showing that 70% of cervical cancer cases also have prevalence of these four strains of HPV.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/HPV&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Cervical cancer has already been quickly declining in the United States ''without'' the vaccine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Merck sells Gardasil for $360 ($120 per shot in a three-shot series). Adding administrative costs, the overall cost to the public is $400-500 per child vaccinated. Doing the math, the cost of vaccinating 100 children will be at least $40,000, but only 3 out of that 100 will ever be exposed to the HPV types targeted by the vaccine.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;JAMA&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The average age of diagnosis of cervical cancer is 48 years old. Accordingly, the effective cost is $13,000 per child to possibly protect her against a cancer over 30 years in the future. But the vaccine is not known to be effective for more than five years; most new vaccines are not effective any longer than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An effective means of protection against the same disease is freely available, and it is [[abstinence]]. The National Cancer Institute notes that &amp;quot;The surest way to eliminate risk for genital HPV infection is to refrain from any genital contact with another individual.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;National Cancer Institute:  Human Papillomaviruses and Cancer: Questions and Answers [http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/HPV]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Routine pap smears are an inexpensive and easy way to detect cervical cancer early so that it can be treated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MayoClinic.com:  Pap smear: Screening test for cervical cancer: Understand the importance of the Pap smear, including how it's done, what it means when it's abnormal and why it needs to be part of your regular health checkups. [http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/pap-smear/HQ01177]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Harm Exceeds Benefit ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HPV vaccine has caused many millions of dollars in health injuries, including at least two deaths.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/feds-pay-millions-due-to-deadly-hpv-shot/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Most of the victims have still be unable to recover any compensation for their injuries, despite promises that they would have that right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a journal article published in the June 17, 2013 edition of The Journal of Infectious Diseases, there is a claim that HPV has been effective in reducing the incidence of a few strains of HPV in teenage girls, but the same article found no long-term benefit in adults. The study compares the incidence of a few strains of HPV in a few thousand patients before and after 2006, when the HPV vaccine became available.  The study found no reduction in incidence of four strains of HPV among adults, but a 56 reduction in these particular strains in teenager girls 14-19 years old.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2013/p0619-hpv-vaccinations.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mandatory Vaccination==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Association of American Physicians and Surgeons]], the Texas Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics have not supported making this vaccine mandatory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Jon Abramson, a member of the [[CDC]]'s [[Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices]], said to the Washington Times that &amp;quot;I told Merck my personal opinion that it shouldn't be mandated. And they heard it from other committee members.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=40432&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parents can best decide whether to give this unproven vaccine to their own children, most of whom are never likely to benefit from it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Merck has succeeded in having its HPV Vaccine added to the &amp;quot;list of required vaccinations for immigrants applying to become citizens,&amp;quot; thereby forcing immigrants to pay for and receive this vaccine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thinkprogress.org/2008/09/15/immigrant-gardasil/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/vaers/gardasil.htm CDC Warning]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://truthaboutgardasil.org/ The Truth about Gardasil website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://healthwyze.org/index.php/the-lead-vaccine-developer-comes-clean-so-she-can-qsleep-at-nightq-gardasil-and-cervarix-dont-work-are-dangerous-and-werent-tested.html Lead researcher Dr. Diane Harper publicly claims that Gardasil and Cervarix don't work] &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.judicialwatch.org/gardasil Judicial Watch Investigates Side-Effects of HPV Vaccine]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2z6RK2uTWc Gardasil - The Damage is Done: From A Best Friend's View, YouTube video]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nvic.org/ National Vaccine Information Center]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:pharmaceuticals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:vaccines]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Young_mass_murderers&amp;diff=1031048</id>
		<title>Young mass murderers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Young_mass_murderers&amp;diff=1031048"/>
				<updated>2013-01-23T18:26:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Less ambiguous reports about the shooter's education, plus other info&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Recent increases in tragic mass-murders perpetrated by young individuals have prompted questions about their rationale for doing so.  Below is evidence that their motives have been overwhelmingly [[atheism|atheistic]] or [[liberal]], or driven by hatred of [[God]].  Virtually all of these killers are the product of [[public schools]] and most were big [[video game]] players.  Many of these murders fit the observation by the forensic psychiatrist Dr. Michael Welner about the Connecticut massacre: &amp;quot;This was a crime that was more than a mass shooting. He killed these people like an arcade game.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/local/northern_suburbs&amp;amp;id=8923831] Dr. Michael Welner appeared on the ''View''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Name(s)&lt;br /&gt;
!Education&lt;br /&gt;
!Killed&lt;br /&gt;
!Wounded&lt;br /&gt;
!Beliefs&lt;br /&gt;
![[Liberal]] response&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|Nehemiah Griego&lt;br /&gt;
|Homeschooled.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;USAToday21Jan2013&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/21/new-mexico-shooting-victims/1850677/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abqjournal.com/main/2013/01/22/opinion/griego-family-tragedy-is-felt-by-community.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Reportedly not registered with the local school district.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.capitalbay.com/latest-news/299812-nehemiah-griego-albuquerque-pastor-s-son-15-shoots-family-dead-with-assault-rifle.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|5, including mom, dad, and little children in his family&lt;br /&gt;
|None&lt;br /&gt;
|Loved to play violent video games, and even enjoyed talking about them to the crime investigators.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/22/new-mexico-teen-accused-in-killing-family-involved-heavily-with-violent-video/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He initially planned to kill more people in a public place, but instead visited a church then turned himself in.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;USAToday21Jan2013&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The liberal media initially and falsely implied he did not play video games.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/n-m-teen-accused-killing-family-quiet-article-1.1243888&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|Adam Lanza&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57559316-504083/connecticut-school-shooting-suspected-shooter-now-idd-as-adam-lanza-older-brother-ryan-questioned-by-cops/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public school]] honors student;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Adam Lanza&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/ap-source-suspect-killed-his-mother-at-their-home-before-going-on-school-rampage/2012/12/14/8ee3709e-464f-11e2-8c8f-fbebf7ccab4e_story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  His mom reportedly considered [[homeschooling]] but apparently chose public school instead.&lt;br /&gt;
|27, including the murderer and 20 children&lt;br /&gt;
|not yet known&lt;br /&gt;
|His &amp;quot;existence ... largely involved playing violent computer video games in a bedroom,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9751240/Connecticut-school-shooting-Adam-Lanzas-mother-thought-guns-would-teach-him-responsibility.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and he &amp;quot;spent hours playing violent video games such as Call Of Duty in a windowless bunker&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9752141/Connecticut-school-massacre-Adam-Lanza-spent-hours-playing-Call-Of-Duty.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he was &amp;quot;goth&amp;quot; and wore a mask; after the massacre, officers found evidence that he had been playing &amp;quot;graphically violent&amp;quot; video games recently;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.courant.com/2012-12-15/news/hc-adam-lanza-newtown-shooting-1216-20121215_1_law-officers-asperger-semiautomatic-rifle&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Dynasty Warriors&amp;quot; had been one of his favorites in the past&lt;br /&gt;
|not a word by the [[liberal media]] about violent video games, but instead they demand [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|Jacob Tyler Roberts is the suspect&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public school]] and a [[Facebook]] user&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://abcnews.go.com/US/oregon-mall-gunman-wanted-kill-people/story?id=17941415#.UMkG84PHegI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|2, including the murderer&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Played video games (his rampage enacted a scene in ''Grand Theft Auto''); he dressed in black for the murders as other young mass murderers have, and donned a hockey mask perhaps inspired by [[Hollywood]] horror films&lt;br /&gt;
|A day later, authorities and the [[liberal media]] still have disclosed almost nothing about the murderer; instead, [[liberals]] almost immediately demanded more [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|[[James Eagan Holmes‎|James Holmes]] is the suspect&lt;br /&gt;
|PhD student at [[University of Colorado]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/20/colorado-shooting-james-holmes_n_1688996.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|58&lt;br /&gt;
|Like other young mass murderers, dressed in all-black for the killings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/20/us/colorado-theater-suspect-profile/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was obsessed with playing [[video games]] like &amp;quot;World of Warcraft&amp;quot; (see Breivik below);&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tmz.com/2012/07/20/james-holmes-shooter-guitar-hero-dark-knight/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for the murderous rampage, he dyed his hair bright red presumably to imitate the Joker (Batman's nemesis).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tmz.com/2012/07/20/james-holmes-colorado-shooting-joker/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://mobile.twitter.com/#!/ABC/status/226365875245178880&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ABC News]] falsely suggests tie to [[Tea Party]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/27/tea-party-frequent-suspect-for-media/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberals call for gun control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/367020/20120726/james-holmes-court-colorado-shooting-barack-obama.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;T.J. Lane&amp;quot; of the Cleveland area&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57386938/suspect-in-ohio-school-shooting-arrives-at-court/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public school]]&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Posted a chilling rant on [[Facebook]] about two months before his murderous rampage.&lt;br /&gt;
|Insists he was a victim of bullying, which several students who knew him denied.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/national/two-reported-dead-three-injured-in-ohio-school-shooting-20120228&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Anders Behring Breivik&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wect.com/story/15134203/gunmans-background-puzzles-police-in-norway&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|public school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;He was 32 years old at the time of the crime.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|68 shot dead at a youth camp of the Norwegian Labor party, another 8 in a bombing of government buildings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.wsj.com/emergingeurope/2011/07/25/breivik-bought-chemicals-in-poland-security-agency-says/?mod=google_news_blog&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|Many continued to be missing after the killing rampage.&lt;br /&gt;
|According to the judgement rendered against him, he liked playing violent [[video games]] and saw himself as &amp;quot;ultra-nationalist&amp;quot; who fought against [[Muslim]] immigration and [[Marxist]] subversion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://da.scribd.com/doc/103815386/LOVDATA-DOM-toslo-2011-188627-24 Court's judgment in the case against Anders Behring Breivik], Oslo, 24 Aug 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|A typical headline in the [[liberal]] media blames [[fundamentalist]] [[Christianity]], while nearly ignoring his hobby of playing violent video games.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Jared Lee Loughner&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Suspected gunman as identified in the media.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public high school]]&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|at least 17, including a Congresswoman&lt;br /&gt;
|a [[nihilist]]; &amp;quot;Left wing, quite liberal ... a political radical&amp;quot; and he declared that ''[[The Communist Manifesto]]'', ''[[Animal Farm]]'' and ''[[Mein Kampf]]'' are among his favorite books&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40980334/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.zerohedge.com/article/jared-lee-laughners-youtube-site-reveals-clues-about-killer-lists-mein-kampf-and-communist-m&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It's [[Sarah Palin]]'s fault because nearly one year earlier she had posted targets on 20 congressional districts for Republican wins, and this massacre (by a liberal) occurred in one of those districts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blogs.forbes.com/carolinehoward/2011/01/08/gabrielle-giffords-shooting-and-sarah-palins-conscience/ &amp;quot;Gabrielle Giffords' Shooting And Sarah Palin's Conscience.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Amy Bishop]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[professor values|professor]], and daughter of a professor&lt;br /&gt;
|3, + many reporters believe brother in 1986 &lt;br /&gt;
|3, was also a suspect in attempted murder in 1993&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;was a far-left political extremist who was 'obsessed' with President Obama to the point of being off-putting.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/20100215oddball_protrait_emerges_suspects_family_pals_offer_clues/srvc=home&amp;amp;position=0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals liked her: she &amp;quot;was admired by her peers and loved by her students&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;was a super intelligent person.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/20100214everybody_described_her_as_gentle/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|Tim Kretschmer&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Germany]] [[public school]]&lt;br /&gt;
|15 + himself&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reports were that the police did not mortally wound him. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1161139/Are-dead-Police-gun-ex-student-17-targeted-women-German-school-massacre.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|several others&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Europe calls for more [[gun control]]; [[liberal]] media promotes falsehood: &amp;quot;We'll never know why they kill.&amp;quot;[http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/03/12/greene.shootings/]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Stephen Kazmierczak&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Northern Illinois University]]&lt;br /&gt;
|5 + himself&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Fan of [[Nietzsche]]'s &amp;quot;The Antichrist,&amp;quot; obsessed with self-injury, was a &amp;quot;cutter&amp;quot; in [[public high school]], wore all black to carry out his massacre, and was still a [[public school]] student at age 27&lt;br /&gt;
|Feigned shock at the fact that the gunman didn't &amp;quot;fit&amp;quot; the typical mold of a killer, when in fact the gunman wore all black and was taught at a [[public school]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|Robert Hawkins&lt;br /&gt;
|Papillion-La Vista public high school&lt;br /&gt;
|8 + himself&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|Targeted [[Christmas]] shoppers; wore black; &amp;quot;I can't take this meaningless existence anymore&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.omaha08dec08,0,6053469.story Baltimore Sun]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Told a therapist that &amp;quot;he is not sure if there is a [[God]] or life after death and that when he dies, he'll probably go to hell.&amp;quot; Told social workers he was [[Satan|Satanic]] and acknowledged that he often acted before thinking of the consequences. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,318506,00.html Mall Gunman Admitted He was Satanic, Attempted Suicide], [[Associated Press]], [[Fox News Channel]], December 27, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Avoided suggesting [[gun control]] lest [[Democrats]] lose [[West Virginia]] and [[Wisconsin]] in [[2008 presidential election]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|Pekka-Eric Auvinen&lt;br /&gt;
|Jokela High School public high school (Finland)&lt;br /&gt;
|8 + himself&lt;br /&gt;
|About 12&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Atheist]], &amp;quot;I, as a natural selector, will eliminate all who I see unfit.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Finland]] already had [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Seung-Hui Cho]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Westfield public high school (VA), then Virgina Tech public university&lt;br /&gt;
|32 + himself&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Ismail Ax&amp;quot; suggested [[Muslim]] beliefs, felt &amp;quot;[[Jesus]] was crucifying me.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Poem comparing it to environmental harm&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Virginia Tech, ''Transcript of Nikki Giovanni's Convocation address'', Delivered April 17, 2007[http://www.vt.edu/remember/archive/giovanni_transcript.html] ''We are Virginia Tech./We are sad today, and we will be sad for quite a while. We are not moving on, we are embracing our mourning./We are Virginia Tech./We are strong enough to stand tall tearlessly, we are brave enough to bend to cry, and we are sad enough to know that we must laugh again./We are Virginia Tech./We do not understand this tragedy. We know we did nothing to deserve it, but neither does a child in Africa dying of AIDS, neither do the invisible children walking the night away to avoid being captured by the rogue army, neither does the baby elephant watching his community being devastated for ivory, neither does the Mexican child looking for fresh water, neither does the Appalachian infant killed in the middle of the night in his crib in the home his father built with his own hands being run over by a boulder because the land was destabilized. No one deserves a tragedy./We are Virginia Tech./The Hokie Nation embraces our own and reaches out with open heart and hands to those who offer their hearts and minds. We are strong, and brave, and innocent, and unafraid. We are better than we think and not quite what we want to be. We are alive to the imaginations and the possibilities. We will continue to invent the future through our blood and tears and through all our sadness./We are the Hokies./We will prevail./We will prevail./We will prevail./We are Virginia Tech.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://americaabroad.tpmcafe.com/blog/oldengoldendecoy/2007/apr/17/nikki_giovanni_we_are_virginia_tech]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|Asa Coon&lt;br /&gt;
|SuccessTech public school Academy (Cleveland)&lt;br /&gt;
|Himself&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|Said he didn't believe in [[God]] and didn't respect [[God]], killed after classmate disagreed; wore black&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/1192092117230670.xml&amp;amp;coll=2]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Under-publicized because of his anti-[[God]] statements&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Kimveer Gill]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Rosemere High School (Quebec)&lt;br /&gt;
|1 + himself&lt;br /&gt;
|20&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;I hate [[God]]&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;I hate religious zealots&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Canada]] already had [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|Robert Steinhäuser&lt;br /&gt;
|Erfurt public school (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
|16 + himself&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|Wore black entirely, literally from head to toe; stopped only when a teacher pulled off his black mask&lt;br /&gt;
|[[German]] [[gun control]] already strict, demands for limitations on computer games&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Columbine public high school]] (CO)&lt;br /&gt;
|13 + themselves&lt;br /&gt;
|23&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Atheistic]], singled out a girl to kill her for believing in [[God]].&lt;br /&gt;
|Demand [[gun control]], causing [[Al Gore]] to lose [[West Virginia]], [[Tennessee]] and [[Arkansas]] in 2000 presidential election&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|Mitchell Johnson and Andrew Golden&lt;br /&gt;
|Westside Middle School&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|10&lt;br /&gt;
|Mitchell Johnson, the older of the two, was obsessed with rap lyrics like &amp;quot;coming to school and killing all the kids.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1998/06/16/entertainment/main11983.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals blame the guns rather than the killer's obsession with rap music.  Johnson is released at age 21 but is later arrested for new crimes.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Carneal&lt;br /&gt;
|Heath public high school (KY)&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|Murdered girls as they prayed in a [[prayer]] group; shooting had tell-tale signs it was incited/trained by video games: Carneal never moved his feet during his shootings, and never fired far to the left or right, but instead fired only once at each target that appeared, just as a player of video games maximizes his game score by shooting only once at each victim, in order to hit as many targets as possible.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lt. Col. Dave Grossman and Gloria DeGaetano, Stop Teaching Our Kids To Kill 75 (1999).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Under-publicized due to anti-[[Christian]] nature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|Marc Lépine, at the École Polytechnique de Montréal&lt;br /&gt;
||Collège d'enseignement général et professionnel, (''College of General and Vocational Education'')&lt;br /&gt;
|14 + himself&lt;br /&gt;
|14&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Montreal Coroners Report of the École Polytechnique de Montréal massacre [http://www.diarmani.com/Montreal_Coroners_Report.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|His religious views were unpublicized but he was raised in a home with an immigrant Muslim father who was allegedly highly critical of the [[feminist]] view of women's role in society; Marc's mother was an ex-nun; and his sister had allegedly committed suicide&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.volokh.com/posts/1142399687.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Allegedly his suicide note reflected anger towards feminists, See [http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_5897.aspx CityNews Rewind: The Montreal Massacre, December 6, 2006]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Ignore the personal background of the killer and instead use the massacre to push for stricter [[gun control]] and more laws concerning violence against women, and establish in [[Canada]] a National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:crime]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=1027247</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=1027247"/>
				<updated>2013-01-05T03:10:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Restoring some previously deleted content&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:President Barack Obama.jpg|thumbnail|right|180px|President [[Barack Obama]] advocates the use of [[Keynesian economics|Keynesian economic concepts]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' is someone who favors [[censorship]] of [[Christianity]] as well as increased government spending, power, and control, as in [[ObamaCare]].  Increasingly, liberals side with the [[homosexual agenda]], including supporting [[same-sex marriage|homosexual &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;]].  Many liberals favor a [[welfare state]] where people receive endless entitlements without working.  Liberals are often anti-[[Christian]], or otherwise disagree with moral or social principles held by many American Christians. The liberal ideology has worsened over the years and degenerated into economically unsound views and intolerant ideology.  Some liberals simply support, in knee-jerk fashion, the opposite of [[conservative]] principles without having any meaningful values of their own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polling data has consistently shown that a decreasingly large percentage of Americans identify as conservative, rather than as liberal, currently by 38% to 21%. Younger people and those with higher levels of education are more likely to identify as liberal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1042/winds-of-political-change-havent--shifted-publics-ideology-balance&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The decline in liberal principles can be illustrated by how [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] opposed and condemned public sector unions, stating that the idea of collective bargaining can't be transferred from the private to the public sector, as that would result in the government being unable to carry out its duties.  Yet today, decades later, [[Democrats]] and liberals are in lock-step with public sector unions, as they &amp;quot;donate&amp;quot; money to the reelection campaign in exchange for more taxpayer money in their wallets and fluffed up pensions.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Spending money on government programs (the significant economic problems in the [[Eurozone]] due to government debt will no doubt increasingly discredit this aspect of liberal ideology and make things more difficult for advocates of liberal economic ideologies)&lt;br /&gt;
* Government's ability to solve economic problems&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* The belief that terrorism is not a huge threat, and that the main reason for Muslim extremists' hostility towards America is because of bad foreign policy &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and/or legalized [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Cessation of teacher-led [[prayer]] in classrooms and school/state-sponsored religious events.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Affirmative action&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to government regulation or restriction of obscenity, pornography and violence in video games as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography.  These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-funded medical care, such as [[Obamacare]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and government-controlled [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Placement of men and women in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage]] and homosexual adoption&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tax and spend]] economics&lt;br /&gt;
* Economic sector regulations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Spreading of [[political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Non-syndicalist [[labor union|labor unions]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Encouraging promiscuity through sexual education (the teaching of safe sex) rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from premarital sex&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it is thought to have been intended.&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; and environmental organizations, for example [[Greenpeace]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Constitutionally mandated separation of church and state.&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full private property rights.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstatement of the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|The theory of evolution]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]], a major part of the [[War on Terrorism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to the [[War on Terrorism]] and the [[War in Iraq]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Regulation of business rather than a laissez-faire capitalist economy &lt;br /&gt;
* Denial of traditional [[gender roles]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of financially irresponsible policies&lt;br /&gt;
* Advocating policies which are proven to be incorrect&lt;br /&gt;
* Encouragement of [[Global Warming|global warming alarmism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals currently use two Clauses of the Constitution to try to expand their power: the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause. The General Welfare Clause mentions &amp;quot;promoting the general welfare&amp;quot;. This to a liberal means taxing the rich at increased rates and redistributing that money.  The Commerce Clause, on the other hand, says that Congress has the power to regulate trade with foreign nations, between the states and with the Indian tribes. Since the days of FDR this Clause has been interpreted very loosely and has resulted in the federal government expanding its power. The latest example is The Affordable Care Act (ACA), better know as [[Obamacare]]. In the ACA, the liberals justify the individual mandate by saying it regulates commerce between the states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current dictionaries describe the liberal ideology by pretending that a liberal is &amp;quot;a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=liberal&amp;amp;sub=Search+WordNet&amp;amp;o2=&amp;amp;o0=1&amp;amp;o7=&amp;amp;o5=&amp;amp;o1=1&amp;amp;o6=&amp;amp;o4=&amp;amp;o3=&amp;amp;h=00&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or &amp;quot;open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In practical usage, the term &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; is more closely synonymous with &amp;quot;radical,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;immoral,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;anti-freedom,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;bad.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] Liberals have been observed to give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition, [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and charity|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]] and [[Atheism and charity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, [[Arthur C. Brooks]], a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|Biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=152&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and charity|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ===&lt;br /&gt;
The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] exposing the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Barack Obama]] has been criticized concerning [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his lack of charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism and bestiality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[Liberalism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Peter-Singer.jpg|right|thumbnail|260px|The [[atheist]] philosopher [[Peter Singer]] defends the practice of [[bestiality]] (as well as [[abortion]], infanticide and [[euthanasia]]).  Despite holding these immoral views the liberal and pro-[[evolution]] academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at [[Princeton University]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview - Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/answer-to-philosophy-religion-professor-on-biblical-exegesis-and-the-problem-of-evil CMI answers philosophy/religion professor on biblical exegesis and the problem of evil]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See: [[Atheism and bestiality]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal. The [[atheist]] philosopher [[Peter Singer]] defends the practice of bestiality (as well as [[abortion]], infanticide and [[euthanasia]])&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview - Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/answer-to-philosophy-religion-professor-on-biblical-exegesis-and-the-problem-of-evil CMI answers philosophy/religion professor on biblical exegesis and the problem of evil]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Despite holding these immoral views the liberal and pro-[[evolution]] academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at [[Princeton University]] (Princeton University is a very liberal school - see: [[Liberalism and bestiality]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview - Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/answer-to-philosophy-religion-professor-on-biblical-exegesis-and-the-problem-of-evil CMI answers philosophy/religion professor on biblical exegesis and the problem of evil]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Peter Singer was installed as the Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at the University Center for Human Values at Princeton University in 1999 and in 2006 it was reported that he still worked part-time in that capacity. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2006, it was also reported that Singer worked part-time as Laureate Professor at the University of Melbourne in the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics since 2005.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Carter's ''[[First Things]]'' article entitled ''The Dangerous Mind'' declares concerning Peter  Singer declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Singer has spent a lifetime justifying the unjustifiable. He is the founding father of the [[Animal rights|animal liberation movement]] and advocates ending “the present speciesist bias against taking seriously the interests of nonhuman animals.” He is also a defender of killing the aged (if they have dementia), newborns (for almost any reason until they are two years old), necrophilia (assuming it’s consensual), and bestiality (also assuming it’s consensual).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 5, 2011, the British newspaper The Telegraph wrote an article which discussed how homosexuality &amp;quot;rights&amp;quot; have emboldened individuals to ask for so called bestiality &amp;quot;rights&amp;quot; (see: [[Homosexuality and bestiality]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100108943/the-gay-rights-movement-has-emboldened-americas-bestiality-advocates/ The dark side of sexual freedom: American 'zoophiles' take on the language of equality - October 5, 2011 - The Telegraph]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010, the liberal state of [[Washington]] has the highest number of reported cases of bestiality in the United States even though it was merely the 13th most populous state according to the 2010 United States census. (for more information please see: [[Washington state and bestiality]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pet-abuse.com/pages/cruelty_database/statistics/state_ranking.php?year=2010&amp;amp;search=go Pet Abuse -2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/apportionment-pop-text.php 2010 United States Census data]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/25/new-poll-identifies-most-liberal-and-conservative-states/ 2011 Political map - CNN]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005, four legislators in the liberal state of [[Massachusetts]] tried to soften it bestiality laws.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[Massachusetts bill to repeal fornication, adultery, and blasphemy, and to soften bestiality laws]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NBC Tower.jpg|thumbnail|200px|[[LifeSiteNews]] reported:&amp;quot;In 46 hours of programming, [[NBC]] contained only one reference to marital sex, but 11 references to non-marital sex and one reference to [[adultery]] were made. References to incest, pedophilia, partner swapping, prostitution, threesomes, transsexuals/transvestites, [[bestiality]], and necrophilia combined outnumbered references to sex in marriage on NBC by a ratio of 27 to 1.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2008/aug/08080602 Study Finds TV Treats Marital Sex as Burdensome, Adultery as Positive]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Liberalism and bestiality]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible says that bestiality is a perversion and, under the [[Old Testament]] [[Pentateuch|Jewish Law]], punishable by death (Exodus 22:19, Leviticus 18:23, Leviticus 20:15 and Deuteronomy 27:21). The atheistic worldview does not lend itself to the establishment of morality within society and individuals (see: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheism and deception]]).  The atheistic worldview does not lend itself to the establishment of morality within society and individuals (see: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheism and deception]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A study found that &amp;quot;Psychiatric patients were found to have a statistically significant higher prevalence rate (55%) of bestiality than the control groups (10% and 15% respectively).&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1778686 A prevalence study of bestiality (zoophilia) in psychiatric in-patients, medical in-patients, and psychiatric staff - Int J Psychosom. 1991;38(1-4):45-7.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The atheist population [[Atheism and suicide|has a higher suicide rate]] and [[Atheism and marriageability|lower marriage rates]] than the general population (see: [[Atheism and suicide]] and [[Atheism and marriageability]] and [[Atheism and health]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more information please see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberalism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal American entertainment industry and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia on bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bestiality and Sweden|Liberal Sweden and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bestiality and Britain|Godless Britain and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Denmark, Sweden, evolutionary belief and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Netherlands and bestiality|The liberal Netherlands and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Skeptic Skatje Myers' comments on bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Stalin's ape-men experiments]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Occupy Wall Street and bestiality chant ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Occupy Wall Street and bestiality chant]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal.  A crowd at Occupy Wall Street was led to repeat various chants which included a chant involving bestiality and the incident was videotaped.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rightwingnews.com/john-hawkins/the-10-greatest-moments-from-the-occupy-wall-street-protests-so-far/ The 10 Greatest Moments From The Occupy Wall Street Protests So Far]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is an excerpt of the chant:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Everything seems to be possible. [Crowd Parrot Chant] You can travel to the moon.  [CPC] You can become immortal [CPC] by biogenetics.  You can have sex with animals, or whatever. [CPC].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rightwingnews.com/john-hawkins/the-10-greatest-moments-from-the-occupy-wall-street-protests-so-far/ The 10 Greatest Moments From The Occupy Wall Street Protests So Far]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith &amp;amp;mdash; it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism in the United States Today ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Smear merchants.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and most media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are blatantly liberal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism in North America today practices three primary tactics to attack the Republican Party, and sometimes to attack American values in general. These three liberal tactics can be pronounced using the following [[acronym]]: SIN. Liberals (1) '''s'''hift the subject, they (2) '''i'''gnore the facts, and they (3) '''n'''ame call.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scott Baker. [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-herman-cain-give-the-dont-miss-speech-at-cpac/ Did Herman Cain Give the ‘Don’t Miss’ Speech at CPAC?], ''[[The Blaze]], February 12, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[YouTube]]. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N3-j3HM7-A&amp;amp; Herman Cain: &amp;quot;Stupid People Are Ruining America&amp;quot;], February 11, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals typically support a &amp;quot;mixed&amp;quot; economy, a policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== American liberalism, demographics and expected tipping point in the decline of American liberalism ===&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
See also:'' [[American atheism]] and [[Decline of atheism]] and [[Global atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] in traditional cultures and their influence on Western [[Christianity]] and the higher birth rate of [[Conservative Christianity|conservative Christians]] and religious conservatives, social conservatism is expected to rise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Birkbeck College, University of London professor Eric Kaufman wrote in his 2010 book ''Shall the Righteous Inherit the Earth?'' concerning America:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|High evangelical fertility rates more than compensated for losses to liberal Protestant sects during the twentieth century. In recent decades, white secularism has surged, but Latino and Asian religious immigration has taken up the slack, keeping secularism at bay. Across denominations, the fertility advantage of religious fundamentalists of all colours is significant and growing. After 2020, their demographic weight will to tip the balance in the [[Culture War|culture wars]] towards the conservative side, ramping up pressure on hot-button issues such as abortion. By the end of the century, three quarters of America may be pro-life. Their activism will leap over the borders of the 'Redeemer Nation' to evangelize the world. Already, the rise of the World Congress of Families has launched a global religious right, its arms stretching across the bloody lines of the War on Terror to embrace the entire Abrahamic family.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/why-are-years-2012-and-2020-key-years.html Why are 2012 and 2020 key years for Christian creationists and pro-lifers?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.alde.eu&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liberal-international.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; such as the Liberal Party of Australia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal.org.au/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and traditions derived from Northern European Protestantism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notable liberals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Infamous liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Margaret Sanger]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Wayne Gacy]] - In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, [[serial killer]] John Wayne Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]] and &amp;quot;very liberal&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s151/candypop_02/Serial%20Killers/John%20Wayne%20Gacy/?action=view&amp;amp;current=SERIAL_KILLER_John_Wayne_Gacy_In-1.mp4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gacy was also a [[Democratic Party]] activist who had his picture taken with [[Rosalynn Carter]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.digitaljournal.com/image/45527&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACORN|ACORN - Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.|ANSWER - Act Now to Stop War and End Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CAIR|CAIR - Council on American-Islamic Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women|NOW - National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[PETA|PETA - People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[SEIU|SEIU - Service Employees International Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes on Liberals==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I never use the words [[Democrats]] and [[Republicans]]. It's [[liberals]] and [[Americans]].&amp;quot; -James Watt, Secretary of the Interior under [[Ronald Reagan]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative resources]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Scientific Illiteracy and Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Best_New_Conservative_Words#New_Liberal_Terms|New Liberal Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Obama%27s_Religion&amp;diff=1027238</id>
		<title>Obama's Religion</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Obama%27s_Religion&amp;diff=1027238"/>
				<updated>2013-01-05T02:49:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Re-phrase to agree with the cited source&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:OBAMA MUSULMAN.jpg|right|thumb|'''Then-Senator Obama wearing traditional African garb''', a gift from his hosts while visiting Kenya&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-wore-muslim-gear-during-kenya-trip]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Barack Hussein Obama]]''' has been President of the United States since January 2009. Starting in 2007, unidentified people circulated a claim on the internet that he was a Muslim.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_barack_obama_muslim.htm|title=Is Barack Obama a Muslim?|work=About.com Urban Legends|accessdate=January 4, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  However, Obama has repeatedly stated that he is a Christian.  When interviewed by ''Christianity Today'' magazine, Obama said,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;I am a Christian, and I am a devout Christian. I believe in the redemptive death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. I believe that that faith gives me a path to be cleansed of sin and have eternal life. But most importantly, I believe in the example that Jesus set by feeding the hungry and healing the sick and always prioritizing the least of these over the powerful. I didn't 'fall out in church' as they say, but there was a very strong awakening in me of the importance of these issues in my life. I didn't want to walk alone on this journey. Accepting Jesus Christ in my life has been a powerful guide for my conduct and my values and my ideals.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;There is one thing that I want to mention that I think is important. Part of what we've been seeing during the course of this campaign is some scurrilous e-mails that have been sent out, denying my faith, talking about me being a Muslim, suggesting that I got sworn in at the U.S. Senate with a Quran in my hand or that I don't pledge allegiance to the flag. I think it's really important for your readers to know that I have been a member of the same church for almost 20 years, and I have never practiced Islam. I am respectful of the religion, but it's not my own. One of the things that's very important in this day and age is that we don't use religion as a political tool and certainly that we don't lie about religion as a way to score political points. I just thought it was important to get that in there to dispel rumors that have been over the Internet. We've done so repeatedly, but obviously it's a political tactic of somebody to try to provide this misinformation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2008/januaryweb-only/104-32.0.html?start=2|title=Q&amp;amp;A: Barack Obama|date=January 2008|work=Christianity Today|accessdate=January 4, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the efforts to spread the rumor, public opinion polls showed that only 10% to 18% of Americans believed the claim that Obama was a Muslim.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/41248.html August 2010 Pew Research poll]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, any reader can decide for himself. Here are points raised by those who believe that Obama is a Muslim rather than a Christian:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama declared in prepared remarks, &amp;quot;The United States has been enriched by Muslim Americans. Many other Americans have Muslims in their families or have lived in a Muslim-majority country - I know, because '''I am one of them'''.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://middleeast.about.com/b/2009/04/06/obama-in-turkey-at-the-gates-of-islam.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's wife [[Michelle Obama|Michelle]] does not accompany him to Muslim nations because [[Sharia law]] would apply to her there; on a presidential trip she was with him until [[France]], but then returned home.&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama seems to emotionally hold a Muslim view about Israel, in contrast with Americans who have been educated as Obama has.  Obama has never visited Israel as president despite repeated criticisms of his failure to do so, he waited many days before even mentioning the rocket attacks on Israel in late 2012, and he doesn't appear comfortable even discussing issues related to Israel. &lt;br /&gt;
*In prepared remarks in April 2012, Obama referred to [[Jesus]] as &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; Son of God rather than as &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; Son of God: &amp;quot;And for me, and I’m sure for some of you, it’s also a chance to remember the tremendous sacrifice that led up to that day, and all that Christ endured—not just as '''''a'' Son of God''', but as a human being.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-jesus-son-god&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's background and outlook are [[Muslim]], and fewer than 1% of Muslims convert to Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.religionnewsblog.com/17736/barack-obama-2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina31103.htm.  During the third and fourth grades, Obama learned about Islam for two hours each week in religion class, according to the LA ''Times''. [http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.obama16mar16,0,1634059,print.story?coll=bal_news_nation_promo Campaign downplays his connection during boyhood in Indonesia, Baltimore Sun, March 16, 2007]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Although Obama attended a [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic]] school while in Indonesia, he was a part of the Muslim society there.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/24/AR2007012400371_pf.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's middle name (Hussein) references '''Husayn''', who was the grandson of [[Muhammad]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A Brief History of The Fourteen Infallibles. Qum: Ansariyan Publications. 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;al-Qarashi, Baqir Shareef (2007). The life of Imam Husain. Qum: Ansariyan Publications.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Only after Obama became politically ambitious did he declare himself to be a [[Christian]], yet he never replaced his [[Muslim]] name &amp;quot;Hussein&amp;quot; with a Christian one as some do when they undergo a religious conversion.  For example, when the Italian journalist Magdi Allam recently converted to Christianity, he took a new name: &amp;quot;Cristiano&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=30814&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  When Saul became a Christian, he changed his name to &amp;quot;[[Saint Paul|Paul]]&amp;quot;; when the famous boxer Cassius Clay converted to [[Islam]], he took the Muslim name of [[Muhammad Ali]].  &amp;quot;It is common for those converting to a new religion to change their name on conversion&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ukdp.co.uk/pages/religiousconversion.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or adopt a Christian name at [[baptism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-name&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama also used his middle name when sworn in as President.  However, even if he were actually a [[Muslim]], he would ''not'' necessarily have to change his name according to Muslim tradition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;.http://zawaj.com/articles/do-muslim-converts-have-to-change-their-names.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama has said &amp;quot;[[John McCain]] has not talked about [[my Muslim faith]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKGdkqfBICw]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in an interview with [[George Stephanopoulos]] discussing whether John McCain's campaign has suggested that Obama is not a Christian. George Stephanopoulos -- who had previously been a high-ranking Democrat in the [[Clinton Administration]] -- then suggested that Obama change his answer to refer instead to &amp;quot;Christian faith.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/sep/07/obama-verbal-slip-fuels-his-critics/?page=all Christina Bellantoni, &amp;quot;Obama’s verbal slip fuels his critics&amp;quot;, ''Washington Times'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*He has said that &amp;quot;Islam can be compatible with the modern world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.newsweek.com/id/145971 Barack Obama's Christian Journey | Newsweek Politics: Campaign 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama said the Muslim call to prayer is &amp;quot;one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset,&amp;quot; and recited &amp;quot;with a first-class [[Arabic]] accent&amp;quot; the opening lines: [[Allah]] is Supreme! ... I witness that there is no god but Allah ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=78309&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama stated that the ''Autobiography of [[Malcolm X]]'', which was co-written by [[Alex Haley]], inspired him in his youth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama writes in his own autobiography, &amp;quot;Only Malcolm X's autobiography seemed to offer something different. His repeated acts of self-creation spoke to me. The blunt poetry of his words, his unadorned insistence on respect, promised a new and uncompromising order, martial in its discipline, forged through sheer force of will. ... [E]ven as I imagine myself following Malcolm's call, one line in the book stayed with me. He spoke of a wish he'd once had, the wish that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged.&amp;quot;[http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/does_obama_know_america.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama raised nearly $1 million and campaigned for a [[Kenyan]] presidential candidate who had a written agreement with [[Muslim]] leaders promising to convert Kenya to an Islamic state that bans Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78324] Text of the agreement, as three images: [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78323]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's claims of conversion to Christianity arose after he became politically ambitious, lacking a date of conversion or baptism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In his book, Obama oddly claims to have been baptized without giving his age or date, and later gave a date that postdates his political ambition (1992).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*In the book ''Obama,&amp;quot;Renegade&amp;quot;'' his friends say that &amp;quot;he actually really wasn't much of a churchgoer.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2009/06/16/wolffe-president-missed-rev-wright-s-racist-rants-because-he-wasn-t-much- Wolffe: President Missed Rev. Wright’s Racist Rants Because 'He Wasn’t Much of a Churchgoer'] NewsBusters.org, June 16, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*On the 2008 campaign trail, Obama was reading &amp;quot;The Post-American World&amp;quot; by [[Fareed Zakaria]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=fa8cf1bf-2cc8-4d6e-b72d-a07d406e19ff&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which was a general discussion of US foreign policy that was on the non-fiction best-seller lists for weeks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-08-09/news/the-interpreter/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although Zakaria had Muslim ancestors, he is a non-Muslim educated at Yale with a Ph.D. from Harvard.&lt;br /&gt;
*Contrary to [[Christianity]], the Islamic doctrine of [[taqiyya]] allows adherents to deny they are Muslim if it would be dangerous not to.&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama uses the Muslim Pakistani pronunciation for &amp;quot;[[Pakistan]]&amp;quot; rather than the common American one.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama repeatedly pronounced &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;Pokiston&amp;quot; in the first presidential debate.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
*Obama favors [[Pakistan]], a Muslim nation, in its conflicts with [[India]], a mostly [[Hindu]] nation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Indian press has been highly critical of Obama about this. [http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/11/08/obama-india-relations-indispensible-pushes-placement-un]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, the Obama Administration's relationship with Pakistan could be driven by its critical role in the battle against [[al-Qaeda]] in [[Afghanistan]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama was thoroughly exposed to Christianity as an adult in [[Chicago]] prior to attending law school, yet no one at law school saw him display any interest in converting. Obama unabashedly explained how he became &amp;quot;churched&amp;quot; in a 2007 speech: &amp;quot;It's around that time [while working as an organizer for the Developing Communities Project (DCP) of the Calumet Community Religious Conference (CCRC) in Chicago] that some pastors I was working with came around and asked if I was a member of a church. 'If you're organizing churches,' they said, 'it might be helpful if you went to a church once in a while.' And I thought, 'I guess that makes sense.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?id=15363 Obama, ACORN, and the churches] SperoNews, October 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Muammar Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi in Dimashq.jpg|left|175px|thumb|''&amp;quot;I really endorse and support the policies that he has adopted,&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Libya]]n leader [[Muammar Gaddafi]] said of President Barack Obama&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; as reported by the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; ''[[Washington Post]]''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/26/AR2010042604170.html ''Man's worst friend?''] By Dana Milbank, ''Washington Post'', April 27, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama is mentioned as helping to organize the 1995 [[Million Man March]] led by black [[Muslim]] leader [[Louis Farrakhan]] from the [[Nation of Islam]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nowpublic.com/world/obama-organized-farrakhan-s-million-man-march, Obama Organized Farrakhan’s ‘Million Man March’, NowPublic.com, April 2, 2008 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama visited &amp;quot;more than one [[mosque]]&amp;quot; in [[Kenya]] while on a political trip there but did not visit any churches, although there are a large proportion of churches and even a National Temple in Kenya.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://islamizationwatch.blogspot.com/2010/01/kenyan-delegation-visits-sderot-israel.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama has chosen the [[Secret Service]] code name &amp;quot;Renegade&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;[[Renegade]]&amp;quot; conventionally describes someone who goes against normal conventions of behavior, but its first usage was to describe someone who has turned from their religion. It is a word derived from the [[Spanish]] ''renegado'', which originally meant &amp;quot;Christian turned Muslim.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/3452281/Renegade-and-Renaissance-Obama-to-replace-Trailblazer-and-Tempo-Bush-in-the-White-House.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama enjoyed a bigger increase in voter support in 2008 (compared to 2004) by Muslims than by any other voting group, including blacks;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.altmuslim.com/a/a/a/2873/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Muslim turnout in the U.S. elections reached 95 percent, the highest Muslim turnout in U.S. history.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/islamsadvance/2008/11/is_obama_the_muslim_worlds_sup.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;President-elect [[Barack Hussein Obama]] has yet to attend [Sunday] church services since winning the [[White House]] earlier ..., a departure from the example of his two immediate predecessors.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15902.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-na-obama-religion26-2008dec26,0,1910913.story&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Liberal sources claim that this is due to security concerns.  However, in general, Presidents rarely attend weekly church services while in office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-obama-blackberry-faith-white-house/story?id=9689272#.T5jUxp8rpfV&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Yet, the Obama family has attended Christian church serves at various times since becoming President in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
*In 2009, Justice [[John Roberts]] failed to administer the [[oath of office]] correctly while Obama placed his hand on a Bible.  To avoid any claims that Obama was not the real President because of mis-stating the oath, Roberts dropped by the White House to re-administering the oath the next day, but no bible was used for that private re-do of the oath.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''At the [[G-20]] summit in April 2009, Obama bowed deeply to [[Saudi Arabia|Saudi]] King Abdullah, a Muslim who is also the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEUif1--r38&amp;amp;feature=player_embedded Video of Obama bowing almost to King's waist]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Image:Obamabow.jpg|thumb|right|250px|'''President Obama bowing to the King of Saudi Arabia''' - April 2009]]Never before in the history of the U.S. has a president displayed such shocking deference to a foreign official and Obama has not bowed to any other royal leaders. Obama later stated, &amp;quot;We have to change our behavior in showing the Muslim world greater respect.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/07/barack-takes-a-bow/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama's spin doctors and left-wing apologists dismissed the obviousness of the bow. One anonymous aide stated, &amp;quot;It wasn't a bow. He grasped his hand with two hands, and he's taller than King Abdullah.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0409/White_House_No_bow_to_Saudi.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, in video of the incident, Obama's left hand can clearly be seen staying at his side until after he had finished his bow.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WlqW6UCeaY&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, Obama also met with Queen Elizabeth, who is much shorter than King Abdullah, but he did not bow when he shook her hand and neither he nor the queen appeared to have any difficulty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71N34K9EVLU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (Many liberals and even a handful of conservatives have proposed that President Bush also bowed before King Abdullah.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/33289_Bush_Bowed_Too&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, there is a vast, inexorable difference between bending down to receive a medal as Bush did and bowing in deference to a foreign leader as Obama did.)&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama required that a religiously affiliated college take the extraordinary action of concealing with wood the monogram &amp;quot;IHS&amp;quot;, which represents the name of Jesus, during a speech by Obama there&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/04/16/georgetown-university-hid-religious-symbols-white-house-request/ Georgetown hides Jesus' name at request of Obama's White House]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{dead link}}&lt;br /&gt;
*On more than one occasion, Obama verbally attacks the economic livelihood of [[Las Vegas]] for unknown reasons, and Obama has also criticized state lotteries despite being heavily favored by most [[Democrats]]. The reason may be that [[gambling]] is forbidden in the [[Koran]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2010/02/02/AR2010020203169.html Lawmakers upset over Obama's 2nd anti-Vegas remark, WashingtonPost, February 2, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and frowned upon by many Protestant denominations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;rct=j&amp;amp;q=&amp;amp;esrc=s&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;cd=2&amp;amp;ved=0CE0QFjAB&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.efa2009.org%2Fpapers%2FSSRN-id1335855.pdf&amp;amp;ei=h7kUUPHTA8aBqgHysIHYCw&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1qfZFDgF1FpHG46FFDbMGzBu0Iw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*In 2006, Obama gave an irreverent speech about using the Bible in public policy. It resembled a stand-up comedy act, with Obama making fun of the books of the [[Torah]], the [[Ten Commandments]], the [[Sermon on the Mount]] and other key Biblical passages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnmS_vULPxw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*In 2010, while Obama was president, the Missile Defense Agency changed its logo, incorporating a crescent and star.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://loganswarning.com/2010/02/23/us-missile-defense-agency-changes-logo-to-obamaislamic-crescent-hybrid/ US Missile Defense Agency Changes Logo to Obama~Islamic Crescent Hybrid!]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The new logo closely resembles that of the [[Iran]]ian Space Agency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.prlog.org/10550380-missile-defense-agency-logo-new-twist-to-the-tale.html Missile Defense Agency Logo – A new twist to the tale]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The new logo was designed in 2007, prior to Obama's election as president.&lt;br /&gt;
*In 2012, Obama participated in a $40,000 per plate fundraiser on [[Holy Thursday]], which many devout Christians would find to be inappropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
*On September 25, 2012, in his address to [[United Nations General Assembly]], Obama said that &amp;quot;'''The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam'''.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FOX News: [http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/25/transcript-obama-address-to-un-general-assembly/ Transcript: Obama address to U.N. General Assembly] (September 25, 2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This outrageous comment was predictably ignored by the [[lamestream media]], but rightly highlighted by Conservative commentators.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FOX News: [http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/26/media-ignore-obama-attack-on-those-who-slander-prophet-islam/ Media ignore Obama attack on ‘those who slander the Prophet of Islam’] (September 26, 2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama tries to downplay his [[Islamic]] background by claiming that his [[Kenya]]n [[Muslim]] father was a &amp;quot;confirmed [[atheist]]&amp;quot; before Obama was born, but in fact less than 1% of Kenyans are atheists, agnostics, or non-religious.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adherents.com/Na/Na_14.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  (This obviously does not completely rule out the possibility that his father was a member of that 1%, because his father was in the small minority that left Kenya to be educated in the US.) There is apparently no evidence of any Christian activities or local church participation by Obama while he was in [[Massachusetts]] from 1988 to 1991.  Finally, Obama abruptly left his radical Christian church in Chicago in 2008, when it became politically controversial, without first finding another church to join. On April 7, 2009, Obama toured a mosque in [[Istanbul]], [[Turkey]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/barackobama/ss/obama_praying_at_mosque.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.c2e3700ab4e271bc32827b0fccfe560b.421&amp;amp;show_article=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Muslim agenda of the Obama administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Islam]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Power_plant&amp;diff=1027145</id>
		<title>Power plant</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Power_plant&amp;diff=1027145"/>
				<updated>2013-01-04T22:53:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Created page with &amp;quot;A '''power plant''' or power station is a facility that generates useful electricity. It is most commonly classified by fuel or energy source (e.g. coal, natural gas,...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''power plant''' or power station is a facility that generates useful [[electricity]]. It is most commonly classified by fuel or energy source (e.g. [[coal]], [[natural gas]], [[oil]], [[nuclear power|nuclear]], [[solar]], [[wind]], [[hydroelectric power|hydro]]). Power plants can also be classified by prime mover (e.g. steam turbine, gas turbine, reciprocating engine, water turbine) or by thermodynamic cycle (e.g. Brayton cycle, Rankine cycle, combined cycle, Diesel cycle).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pat_Robertson&amp;diff=1021514</id>
		<title>Pat Robertson</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pat_Robertson&amp;diff=1021514"/>
				<updated>2012-12-01T03:10:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Restoring accurate quotes, with reference&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Pat Robertson''' (b. 1930)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.patrobertson.com/education/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is a [[conservative]] [[American]] [[evangelist]], [[spiritual]] leader and [[politics|political]] leader, also owner and presenter of the [[TV]] show ''[[The 700 Club]]''. Robertson sought the 1988 [[Republican]] Presidential nomination and even managed to carry [[Washington]] State in the primary caucuses by mobilizing his supporters. Thereafter, he helped in the initial formation of the [[Christian Coalition]].  Robertson attacks anti-Christian bias in America and around the world and defends Christian liberties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Robertson graduated from Washington and Lee University in 1950, served in the [[Marine]]s during the [[Korean War]], then earned a law degree from [[Yale]] (1955) and a masters degree from the New York Theological Seminary (1959).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.infoplease.com/biography/var/patrobertson.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In November 2007, Robertson endorsed [[liberal]] Republican Presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani for President. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,308997,00.html Fox News - Robertson endorses Giuliani]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, Robertson appeared with [[Al Sharpton]] in a commercial urging people to fight [[global warming]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhmpsUMdTH8 The commercial on YouTube]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Robertson has a long history of being a prolific speaker appearing as the main host on the daily TV program The 700 Club.  Over those years quite a collection of quotes have been assorted by critics, among them:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Just like what [[Nazi Germany]] did to the Jews, so [[liberal]] America is now doing to the evangelical Christians. It's no different. It is the same thing. It is happening all over again. It is the Democratic Congress, the [[liberal-based media]], and the [[homosexual]]s who want to destroy the Christians. Wholesale abuse and [[discrimination]] and the worst bigotry directed toward any group in America today. More terrible than anything suffered by any minority in history.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pat Robertson, interview with Molly Ivins, 1993.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The [[Feminism|feminist agenda]] is not about equal rights for women. It is about a [[socialist]], anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, [[abortion|kill their children]], practice [[witchcraft]], destroy capitalism, and become [[Homosexuality|lesbian]]s.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pat Robertson, fund-raising letter, 1992&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;How can there be peace when drunkards, drug dealers, [[communist]]s, [[atheist]]s, [[Occult|New Age]] worshipers of Satan, [[secular humanist]]s, oppressive dictators, greedy money changers, revolutionary assassins, [[adulterer]]s, and homosexuals are on top?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pat Robertson, The New World Order, p.227&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;You say you're supposed to be nice to the [[Episcopalian]]s and the [[Presbyterian]]s and the [[Methodist]]s and this, that, and the other thing. Nonsense! I don't have to be nice to the spirit of the [[Antichrist]]. I can love the people who hold false opinions, but I don't have to be nice to them.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pat Robertson, &amp;quot;The 700 Club,&amp;quot; January 14, 1991.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Many of those people involved with [[Adolf Hitler]] were [[Satanist]]s, many of them were [[homosexuals]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pat Robertson, The 700 Club television program, January 21, 1993&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* To Zambian President [[Frederick Chiluba]], who in 1991 declared [[Zambia]] &amp;quot;A Christian Nation:&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Your country is a a standard for not only Africa but the rest of the world...Wouldn't you love to have someone like that as president of the United States of America?...The term 'Christian nation' seems to scare a lot of people in this nation of ours, but what Chiluba said is that it gives us a yardstick to measure the performance of the government. Otherwise, we have no yardstick.&amp;quot; (As President of Zambia, Chiluba saw to it that public schools and state-run radio and television would conform to standards of Christian principles.  Among his concerns was abolishing pornography; he called upon Christian ministers and missionaries to help him in this cause.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I think 'one man, one vote,' just unrestricted democracy, would not be wise. There needs to be some kind of protection for the minority which the white people represent now, a minority, and they need and have a right to demand a protection of their rights.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pat Robertson, The 700 Club television program, March 18, 1992&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (In regard to [[South Africa]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Something happened a long time ago in Haiti, and people may not want to talk about it.  They were under the heel of the French –you know, Napoleon III or whatever –and they got together and swore a pact to the devil.  They said, “We will serve you if you get us free from the French.”  True story.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Napoleon III was not yet born, and [[Napoleon]] was not yet in power.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   And so the Devil said, “Okay, it’s a deal.” … But ever since they have been cursed by one thing after the other … &amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nation.foxnews.com/culture/2010/01/13/pat-robertson-haiti-cursed-after-pact-devil&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (In regard to the 2010 Haiti Earthquake)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* “You go back in time, you've got radiocarbon dating. You got all these things, and you've got the carcasses of dinosaurs frozen in time out in the Dakotas. They’re out there. So, there was a time when these giant reptiles were on the Earth, and it was before the time of the Bible. So, don’t try and cover it up and make like everything was 6,000 years. That’s not the Bible.”&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;houston&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Berger, Eric. &amp;quot;Pat Robertson: 'If you fight science, you are going to lose your children.'&amp;quot; November 30, 2012. ''Houston Chronicle'', SciGuy blog. http://blog.chron.com/sciguy/2012/11/pat-robertson-if-you-fight-science-you-are-going-to-lose-your-children/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;If you fight science, you are going to lose your children, and I believe in telling them the way it was.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;houston&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Robertson, Pat}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Clergy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion and Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reagan Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian Media]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=1021260</id>
		<title>Essay:Best New Conservative Words</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=1021260"/>
				<updated>2012-11-28T22:31:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Added &amp;quot;welfare queen&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--[[Image:Tax-spend.jpg|thumb|480px|The &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; slogan stuck to [[Harry Hopkins]] like a well-fitted suit.]]--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Conservative words.jpg|thumb|480px|The growth in conservative words on an annual basis (red), compared with a geometric growth rate (Courtesy [[User:Jcw]])]]Each year the [[English language]] develops about a thousand new words.  The [[King James Version]] of the [[Bible]] contains only about 8,000 different words;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8013859.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; many good words have developed since then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative]] terms, expressing [[conservative insights]], originate at a faster rate, and with much higher quality, than [[liberal]] terms.  Conservative triumph over liberalism is thus inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Powerful new conservative terms have grown at a [[geometric progression|geometric rate]], roughly doubling every century.  For each new conservative term originating in the 1600s,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The King James Version of the Bible was published in 1611, by then [[William Shakespeare]] had written nearly all his plays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; there are two new terms originating in the 1700s, four new terms in the 1800s, and eight new terms in the 1900s, for a pattern of &amp;quot;1-2-4-8&amp;quot;.  This implies a conservative future and a correlation between conservatism and truth.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This extraordinary growth illustrates that the conservative movement itself will likewise continue to grow at a rapid rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Century&lt;br /&gt;
!# New Conservative Terms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1600s&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1700s&lt;br /&gt;
|59&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|120&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|241&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|25 (preliminary)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservative words and terms==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--{| align=lwft border=1 cellspacing=0 style=&amp;quot;border-width: 5px; border-color: #c0c0c0; background: #e0e0e0; margin: 2em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | Newest Layer by century, 1600s-1900s&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; 0-0-0-0&lt;br /&gt;
|}--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!New Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|A.M.&lt;br /&gt;
|1762&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;A.M.&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;before noon&amp;quot; in [[Latin]] (ante meridiem); it became popular much as &amp;quot;[[A.D.]]&amp;quot; did.  Also, a morning [[work ethic]] is a conservative concept.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[accountability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|the willingness or obligation to be held responsible for one's actions- a fundamental conservative ideal, unlike liberals who believe that 'society,' and not individuals, are responsible for their wrongdoing. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|accuracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1660&lt;br /&gt;
|conservatives strive for accuracy, while many liberals are masters of [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action-at-a-distance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1693&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Newton]]'s acceptance of this concept -- which became fundamental to [[electrostatics]] and [[quantum mechanics]] and has a basis in Christianity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', [[Jesus]]'s cure of the centurion's slave.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; -- was central to the development of his theory of gravity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-philosophy/#ActDis&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Materialists]] censor this concept, while Einstein criticized it  as &amp;quot;spooky&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|activism&lt;br /&gt;
|1915&lt;br /&gt;
|this differentiates conservatives from inactive people; this term might have originated in connection with [[Prohibition]] and efforts to pass the [[Eighteenth Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|addictive&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|the intrinsic characteristic of certain things or activities to induce repetitious involvement, usually with a harmful effect on the participant, as in [[gambling]], or [[video games]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|aerobics&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|invented by the [[Christian]] Dr. Kenneth H. Cooper&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianadvice.net/famous_christians.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to describe his self-help program to improve health; he gave the title &amp;quot;Aerobics&amp;quot; to his ground-breaking book in 1968, and eventually it revolutionized attitudes toward exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|agitprop&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|propaganda designed to incite agitation, originally coined to describe communist propaganda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|alarmism&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|needless warnings, as in the politically motivated claims of [[global warming]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{#ifexist: alcoholism | [[alcoholism]] | alcoholism }}&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive or addictive drinking of alcohol&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|algorithm&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient and consistent step-by-step methodology for achieving a goal, the opposite of [[liberal style]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|altruism&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|selfless assistance of others; this also occurs in the animal kingdom, and is a [[counterexample to evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ambulance chaser&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|a lawyer who searches for victims to persuade them to sue for his profit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American dream]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1911 is the date given by the &amp;quot;OED&amp;quot;, which refers to the Oxford English Dictionary. The Merriam-Webster dictionary gives a date of 1931.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the vision that, with hard work, anyone in American can attain happiness and prosperity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American exceptionalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1835&lt;br /&gt;
|the idea that the United States and the American people hold a special place in the world, by offering opportunity and hope for humanity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|American Way&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&lt;br /&gt;
|later conservative entrepreneurs used this to coin a new name for what became a highly successful and uniquely American business model: &amp;quot;Amway&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[anti-Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing Christian ideals and institutions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anticompetitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1854&lt;br /&gt;
|interfering with open competition and the enormous benefits that flow from it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|antilife&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|term criticizing a tendency to oppose life and lifesaving care&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apathetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1744&lt;br /&gt;
|term critical of the those who are deliberately inactive and disengaged mentally&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apple pie&lt;br /&gt;
|1780&lt;br /&gt;
|honesty, simplicity, wholesomeness. Relating to, or characterized by traditionally American values. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apple%20pie Merriam-webster- Apple pie]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|assimilate&lt;br /&gt;
|1880s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;estimate only; this originated sometime in the late 1880s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the desired absorption of immigrant groups into the culture and mores of the resident population&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|atheistic&lt;br /&gt;
|1625-35&lt;br /&gt;
|An adjective pertaining to or characteristic of atheists or atheism; containing, suggesting, or disseminating atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|attention span&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|correlated with intelligence, the attention span is how long someone can concentrate on something.  It is rapidly shortening; the Lincoln-Douglas debates 150 years ago lasted for hours, but none do today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.help4teachers.com/ras.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The average length of sentences in speech is another indication of attention span, and it has been shortening significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|axiomatic&lt;br /&gt;
|1797&lt;br /&gt;
|self-evident (first usage), and later it developed the meaning of being based on a set of axioms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|baby boom&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/baby-boomer.html Baby boomer] phrases.org.uk, retrieved August 30, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in birthrate, which is a good thing; note that what is known as post-World War II baby boom actually started before the war, contrary to what textbooks teach. Perpetuating the mistake, the U.S. Census Bureau counts the generation born between 1946 and 1964 as the baby boomers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/cb06-ffse01-2.html Newsroom: Facts for Features - Special Edition - The Oldest Baby Boomers Turn 60!]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|back burner&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|inactive status away from attention, as in &amp;quot;RINOs try to put social issues on the back burner&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bailout]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|wasting taxpayer money to rescue, temporarily, a failing company&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|balkanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|to break a region or neighborhood into divisive components; the opposite of the American concept of assimilation or &amp;quot;[[E pluribus unum]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bedrock&lt;br /&gt;
|1840-1850&lt;br /&gt;
|an American term for unbroken solid rock underneath fragments or soil, which adopted the figurative meaning of strong values:  &amp;quot;bedrock principles&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bedrock&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|beltway mentality&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Paul Weyrich]] though possibly first used by then-Governor [[John Sununu]] (&amp;quot;captives of yourselves&amp;quot;), it refers to a governing style that sees only as far as the highway that surrounds its capital, especially the one around D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Best of the Public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|A term coined by [[Andy Schlafly]] to express the idea that one does not need [[liberal]] credentials that so-called &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; have.  Indeed, many great historical figures would have failed the liberal &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; test.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|biased&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&lt;br /&gt;
|to show prejudice for or against something; American society is rapidly becoming ''biased'' against Christian and Conservative beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bidenism&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|an idiotic remark that would subject the politician to enormous ridicule if he were a [[conservative]], but when spoken by [[liberal]] [[Joe Biden]] the media are just fine with it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Big Brother&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|government constantly watching its citizens; [[George Orwell]] first coined this term in his classic, ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|biological clock&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how each woman begins to lose her ability to have children at age 27, no matter how much [[feminists]] try to conceal this scientific fact from women&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Blame America Crowd&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or &amp;quot;Blame-America-First Crowd&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Barone quoted [[Jeane Kirkpatrick]] as saying that the &amp;quot;San Francisco Democrats&amp;quot; (site of the Democratic National Convention in 1984) &amp;quot;always blame America first.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creators.com/opinion/michael-barone/the-blame-america-first-crowd.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blank check&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|irresponsibly giving someone unlimited spending authority or power, as in &amp;quot;a Con Con would be a blank check to destroy the nation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blather&lt;br /&gt;
|1719&lt;br /&gt;
|nonsensical or insignificant babble, as in &amp;quot;liberal blather is common in the [[lamestream media]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Blue Dog Democrat]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who adheres to conservative principles within the Democratic party, once called a Boll Weevil; as of 2009 there are 45-50 Blue Dog Democrats in the [[House of Representatives]], which is enough to form a majority with [[Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boondoggle&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;popularized during the [[New Deal]] as a contemptuous word for make-work projects for the unemployed.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=boondoggle&amp;amp;searchmode=none&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The term gained popularity in [[Canada]] following a corruption scandal tied to the [[Liberal]] government in 2000.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boomerang&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|originally coined to describe a throwing device that returns to the thrower, the term became increasingly useful to describe how wrongful conduct returns to bite the perpetrator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bootstrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|unaided effort, personal merit, hard work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bork&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by William Safire to refer to how Democrats savage a conservative nominee, such as their defeat of Supreme Court nominee [[Robert H. Bork]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|born-again&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|it takes an open mind and heart&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainstorm&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|a burst of productive thought&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainwashing&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|derived from the Chinese term &amp;quot;xǐnǎo&amp;quot; soon after the [[communist]] takeover of China, &amp;quot;brainwashing&amp;quot; means forced abandonment of [[faith]] in favor of regimented [[atheism]]. In a more general sense, it refers to the manipulation and control of the human mind through torture and propaganda techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bright-line rule&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First used by [[U.S. Supreme Court]] Justice [[John Harlan II]] in ''United States v. Jorn'', 400 U.S. 470, 486 (1971), where he rejected adopting a bright-line rule for that case.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a clear, unwavering line dividing what is allowed from what is prohibited; increasingly favored to avoid confusion and requirements that arbitrarily change&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brinkmanship&lt;br /&gt;
|1956&lt;br /&gt;
|the art of displaying a willingness to use military force in order to obtain a just resolution to a conflict between nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bureaucracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1818&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|busywork&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|meaningless activity under the pretense of accomplishing something&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|can-do&lt;br /&gt;
|1903 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; according to the Oxford English Dictionary. [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/can-do Miram-webster] gives the date of 1945 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Phrase coined in a short story by [[Rudyard Kipling]] that has come to refer to an attitude that espouses individual ability and responsibility and not reliance on [[entitlements]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-1855&lt;br /&gt;
|creating jobs and wealth based on a private invention, ownership and investments rather than state-controlled resources&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|career politician&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First use found by ''Conservapedia'' was in an article describing a controversy in communist [[Yugoslavia]] over their &amp;quot;career politicians,&amp;quot; published in the ''New York Times'' and authored by Malcolm W. Browne, sect. 4, p. 3, col. 1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a term used for the entrenched communist government officials in Yugoslavia, with whom even President Tito was fed up&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[carpetbagger]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|a politician who moves to a new area to be elected to a government position, as in [[Hillary Clinton]] moving to [[New York]] to become a U.S. Senator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|carte blanche&lt;br /&gt;
|1645-1655&lt;br /&gt;
|unconditional authority or power, without any limits on misuse of that power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|catharsis&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|facilitating forgiveness and spiritual renewal by expression, as in writing or teaching or confession&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|caucus&lt;br /&gt;
|1763&lt;br /&gt;
|citizens or representatives gathering to meet and reach political decisions as a group while harnessing aspects of the [[best of the public]]; first coined by John Adams&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The future author of the Massachusetts Constitution who also played a role in developing the [[Declaration of Independence]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when he described a meeting of political Boston elders as a &amp;quot;caucus club&amp;quot;; the word may be from an Algonquian term for a group of advisers or elders.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cesspool&lt;br /&gt;
|1782&lt;br /&gt;
|an evil or corrupt place or state.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|chaperone&lt;br /&gt;
|1720&lt;br /&gt;
|care and well-being of youths overseen by adults&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|charisma&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|literally &amp;quot;a gift from God&amp;quot;, charisma is a personal magic of leadership found in [[conservative]] public figures (but beware of the liberal tendency to put style before substance!) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Chicken Little&lt;br /&gt;
|1895&lt;br /&gt;
|one who falsely predicts disaster, especially for silly reasons: &amp;quot;global alarmists&amp;quot; are the Chicken Littles of our time&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In characteristically [[liberal]] style, the online Merriam-Webster spins the [[global warming]] example usage by saying the data showed he wasn't a Chicken Little.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|churchgoer&lt;br /&gt;
|1687&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who makes an effort, during the 168 hours in a week, to attend a church service&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|circle the wagons&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|regroup with family and friends, when under attack. usage from settlers in the old US west.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|citizen's arrest&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|private enforcement of the law without the need of a taxpayer-funded police officer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|civil defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|civilians protecting themselves and their community against attack or natural disasters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1799&lt;br /&gt;
|pretentious, verbose, and often liberal nonsense; example usage: &amp;quot;the professor wasted the rest of the class on his [[liberal claptrap]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|class act&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|exemplify conservative principles with values, integrity and a work ethic&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|class warfare&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|this concept was initially coined by [[Karl Marx]] in ''[[The Communist Manifesto]]'', but it has become so discredited that it is now used mostly by conservatives to point out liberal demagoguery&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|closed shop&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&lt;br /&gt;
|a business that requires membership in a union as a condition of working there; 22 conservative states prohibit this&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|clueless&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|hopelessly ignorant about something important, as liberals often are&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Coase theorem|Coasean]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient result or bargain based on market forces without the distortions caused by [[transaction costs]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cogent&lt;br /&gt;
|1659&lt;br /&gt;
|compelling with the powerful force of reason, the opposite of [[liberal]] claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Columbian&lt;br /&gt;
|1757&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to Christopher Columbus ''or the United States''	&lt;br /&gt;
|-	&lt;br /&gt;
|Cold War&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[George Orwell]] shortly after he wrote ''Animal Farm'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldwar2history.info/war/causes/Cold-War.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as recognition that communist nations were at war with American freedom even in the absence of actual military conflict&lt;br /&gt;
|-	&lt;br /&gt;
|collectivism&lt;br /&gt;
|1880&lt;br /&gt;
|when decision-making by a group takes priority over the good ideas of an individual, often preventing progress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|common sense&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|sound judgment based on facts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|competitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Con Con&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Phyllis Schlafly]] to highlight the deception and risks inherent in proposed national constitutional conventions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conniption&lt;br /&gt;
|1833&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria or alarm, as in &amp;quot;having a conniption fit&amp;quot;; a typical response by [[liberals]] when confronted with their [[double standards]] and illogical positions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conservation of charge&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|overall charge does not change in an isolated system; it is neither created nor destroyed; the concept was first suggested by [[Benjamin Franklin]] but the date of origin for this term is surprisingly recent&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who adheres to principles of limited government, personal responsibility and moral values&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=conservative&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative field]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1870s?&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of physical force over a region such that items moving throughout the region can store energy ''without loss'', as in the planetary system and electrical products&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The mathematical definition of a conservative field -- which arises in [[multivariable calculus]] -- is that a scalar potential exists for the function and, alternatively, it is [[irrotational]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[consumer surplus]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First coined by Cambridge University Professor Alfred Marshall in his acclaimed text, ''Principles of Economics'' (1890).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the extra benefit received by consumers above the price they paid for a good or service, illustrating the value of the [[free market]]; specifically, consumer surplus is the difference between what consumers would have paid for something, and the lower price they did pay.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constant&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) something unchanging in value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constitutionality&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|its date of origin is the year of the [[Constitutional Convention]] that proposed the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|contrarian&lt;br /&gt;
|1657&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who advocates views contrary to that of others; this type of person frustates [[liberal]] attempts to gain control&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cooking the data&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Charles Babbage]] used it in his book, &amp;quot;Reflections on the Decline of Science in England&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.scientus.org/Church-Science-History.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|coolant&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a fluid, typically water, that facilitates efficient energy production, especially nuclear energy to cool a reactor and slow down the fission of neutrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copacetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1890s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster officially lists its date of origin as 1919 and its source as unknown, but that is well after when Robinson says he developed it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Bill “Bojangles” Robinson, tap dancer extraordinaire, claimed the invention of this word; it was first popularized by African Americans&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copyright&lt;br /&gt;
|1735&lt;br /&gt;
|extending private property to protect expressive works&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|corporate socialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency of large corporations to act in a socialistic manner, at the expense of meritocracy and productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|correlate&lt;br /&gt;
|1742&lt;br /&gt;
|(verb) to show that one thing relates to another, such as [[atheism]] or [[homosexuality]] and selfishness or lack of charity; [[liberal]]s falsely rely on anecdotes to deny the general relationship&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[countability (Mathematics)|countability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1874&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Georg Cantor]], loathed by the leading contemporary [[mathematicians]], developed this in proving that the real numbers are ''uncountable''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterexample&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|an example that is contrary to the proposition. A common point in logical, reasoned debate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterfactual&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|especially assumptions that are contrary to fact; Chief Justice [[John Roberts]] wrote for the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], &amp;quot;petitioners' standing does not require precise proof of what the Board's policies might have been in that counterfactual world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Free Enter. Fund v. Pub. Co. Accounting Oversight Bd.'', 130 S. Ct. 3138, 3163 (2010) (5-4 decision).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterproductive&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|interfering with a worthy goal.  Example usage: &amp;quot;nearly everything a liberal supports is counterproductive.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crackpot&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|crazy talk, lunacy, a person on the fringe of reality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[creation science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|a term coined by the anti-[[evolution|evolutionist]] [[Henry Morris]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/28/AR2006022801716.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cross-examination&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|the most effective tool against [[liberal]] [[deceit]], better than even the requirement of an oath&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crystal clear&lt;br /&gt;
|1815&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals are the opposite&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[culture war]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after the book ''Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America'' by James Davison Hunter&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cyberbullying&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of obnoxious and hurtful liberal behavior on the internet&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deadweight loss]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Confirmation of the first use is desired.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the loss in overall wealth and efficiency imposed by monopolies and taxation, due to the loss in extra value that someone would have received beyond what he would have paid for a good at a free market price&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|death panel&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|a provision of [[Obamacare]] that will enable a panel of government bureaucrats to decide who receives medical treatment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|death tax&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|interestingly, the term was coined by Canadians opposed to the high estate tax on their assets held in the United States; Frank Luntz is credited with later popularizing this term in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' Dr. Frank Luntz, ''Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decentralization&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|the dispersion of power, as in a shift from national to local control&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decrypt&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|military code-breaking, which played an instrumental role in World War II in deciphering enemy codes that many felt were unbreakable; illustrates the &amp;quot;can do&amp;quot; approach of conservatism in a patriotic way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[defeatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|a negative attitude that becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|defensive driving&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of driving a car that always focuses on avoiding accidents, even those potentially caused by others; nearly a half-century later, dictionaries still do not recognize this term&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deflation&lt;br /&gt;
|1891&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in the value of savings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|defund&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|refers especially to termination of government funding of a wasteful or hurtful program&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deliberative assembly&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Introduction to Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised'' (19th Ed. 2000), xxv.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Edmund Burke in describing the British parliament during a speech to voters in Bristol; he meant a body of persons meeting to discuss and decide common action under parliamentary law&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|demagogue&lt;br /&gt;
|1648&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Den mother&lt;br /&gt;
|1936&lt;br /&gt;
|leader of children's group&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deregulation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|Reagan won in 1980 by campaigning on this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|design by committee&lt;br /&gt;
|before 1958&lt;br /&gt;
|pejorative term directed against collective production by a group &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|despotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1727&lt;br /&gt;
|a ruler with unlimited powers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deterrence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|Disincentive of committing a crime based on the amount of punishment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devalue&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|describing an unwelcome attitude or act, as in &amp;quot;devaluing human life&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devil's advocate&lt;br /&gt;
|1760&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who espouses the position of the wrong side, in order to test, sharpen and strengthen the right side&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devotee&lt;br /&gt;
|1645&lt;br /&gt;
|ardent follower, supporter, or loyalty to. 56 years separates devotee and devoted&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|disinformation&lt;br /&gt;
|1950s&lt;br /&gt;
|false information spread (and sometimes manufactured) by groups with a strong political agenda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|division of labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|increasing productivity through specialization of labor, as in a husband working in manufacturing while his wife cares for children&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dog and pony show&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|an overblown event, typically having more fanfare than substance; liberals like to run a &amp;quot;dog and pony show&amp;quot; in towns having a large public university, where students brainwashed by liberal professors are led like cattle to the events&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|domino effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|how the fall of one nation to communism can result in its harmful spread to neighboring nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|double standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|applying harsher criticism against one group, such as churchgoers or conservatives, than against another group, such as atheists or liberals; recognition of a double standard by the [[Prodigal Son]] led him to repent and convert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doublethink&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|a term first coined by [[George Orwell]] in his dystopian novel ''[[1984]]''; it means simultaneously holding contradictory beliefs, which is a characteristic of [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doubting Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who believes only what he can see and touch, and doubts all else&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|duh science&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|First coined by the ''LA Weekly'' to criticize the ''[[LA Times]]'' for failing to criticize a publicly funded study that concluded that pessimistic people are often in bad moods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Originally &amp;quot;duh!&amp;quot; science: &amp;quot;But couldn't we have been treated to just a soupcon of critical thinking, some irony even -- perhaps a glancing reference to the wisdom of public funding for 'duh!' science?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;L.A. TIMES WHO KNEW? DEPARTMENT&amp;quot;, ''LA Weekly'' p. 12 (Jan. 14, 2000).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dumb down&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dumpster diving&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|Searching through dumpsters for food or other material that can used rather than discarded; first known use: &amp;quot;Restaurant and store owners have complained about drunks panhandling during the day and 'dumpster diving' through trash at night.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Phil Long, &amp;quot;Special Wing for Drunks Suggested at Future Jail,&amp;quot; Miami Herald D1 (Nov. 24, 1982).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eagle Scout&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest rank in the [[Boy Scouts]], the term also means &amp;quot;a straight-arrow and self-reliant man.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|earmark&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;A provision in congressional legislation that allocates a specified amount of money for a specific project, program or organization.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster's Dictionary (2009).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|editorialize&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;to introduce opinion into the reporting of facts&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[efficiency]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1633&lt;br /&gt;
|ultimately from the Latin ''efficientem'', meaning ''&amp;quot;working out, or accomplishing&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=efficient Online Etymological Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|egotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1714&lt;br /&gt;
|the root of atheism, as explained by Paul in Romans 1:21-22; the root of depression and anxiety also&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|electioneering&lt;br /&gt;
|1780s&lt;br /&gt;
|to work for the success of a particular candidate, party, ticket, etc., in an election. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elementary proof]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|a mathematical proof based on the minimum assumptions associated with real analysis; term probably does not predate [[complex analysis]] and its first use may have been the English mathematician James Joseph Sylvester's paper, &amp;quot;On an elementary proof and generalisation of Sir Isaac Newton's hitherto undenionstrated rule for the discovery of imaginary roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/circular129johnuoft/circular129johnuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[embryoscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first endoscopic image of the unborn child was in 1967, by Mandelbaum.  The date of origin of the term &amp;quot;embryoscopy&amp;quot; may have been later, but likely before the 1990s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Search this term on the internet and see the spectacular photos of the unborn child (&amp;quot;embryo&amp;quot;) that were &amp;quot;scoped&amp;quot; by tiny cameras.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|empowerment&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|facilitating power for the ordinary; see also [[best of the public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entitlement]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|entrepreneur&lt;br /&gt;
|1852&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ethnic voting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|widely recognized and even advocated by some,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/5/2/3/4/p152345_index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet the dictionary doesn't yet recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|etiquette&lt;br /&gt;
|1740&lt;br /&gt;
|social standards of behavior that promote dignity and discourage inept communications (or lack thereof)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eurabia&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|A satirical word based on the idea that Europe is rapidly becoming Islamized.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eurosceptic&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who opposes joining the super-socialist [[European Union]]; some prefer the term &amp;quot;Eurorealist&amp;quot; to express this opposition, and sometimes &amp;quot;Eurosceptic&amp;quot; is used to criticize opponents of the EU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|everyman&lt;br /&gt;
|1906&lt;br /&gt;
|the typical person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exceptional&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|same year of origin as the [[U.S. Constitution]]!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exculpatory&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|often used in the phrase &amp;quot;exculpatory evidence,&amp;quot; it took nearly 50 years to develop this term after origination of the legal term suggesting guilt: &amp;quot;incriminate&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|expatriate&lt;br /&gt;
|1768&lt;br /&gt;
|to give up one's own citizenship, or be banished by one's own nation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|expose&lt;br /&gt;
|1803&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) a statement of the facts, typically to discredit wrongdoing by government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|facade&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1845 is the date of origin for the figurative use.  The literal use dates back to 1650s, meaning the front of a building.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Example usage: &amp;quot;The facade of a liberal politician is often conservative.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fair shake&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|approaching an idea or concept with an open mind&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|faith healing&lt;br /&gt;
|1885&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[falsifiability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|first emphasized by Karl Popper in 1934, this helps define science:  if a proposition is false, then it can be shown to be false.  If not, then the proposition is not scientific.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[family values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1916&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after a speech by Vice President [[Dan Quayle]], 1992 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fat farm&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a place where obese people -- such as self-centered [[atheists]] -- might go to try to lose weight&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|father figure&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who fulfills the essential role of a father&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|faux conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First coined by ''The Economist'', in &amp;quot;[[New England]]'s governors; All change&amp;quot; (September 22, 1990), in reference to [[Lowell Weicker]]'s &amp;quot;loss in 1988 to a Faux-conservative Democrat, Mr [[Joseph Lieberman]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[federalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1789&lt;br /&gt;
|the unique system of dual sovereigns, state and federal (national), established by the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fear-mongering&lt;br /&gt;
|1938&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The ''[[New York Times]]'' attributed the first use -- ironically -- to President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|stir up exaggerated fear by the public, typically to expand government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|feedback&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|an all-important element of accountability and improvement, and a key consideration in good engineering design&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[fellow traveller]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|may have existed earlier, but popularized in 1924 by Leon Trotsky. Describes a sympathizer of a cause but who does not formally belong to the cause, such as a [[communist]] sympathizer who is not part of the communist party. The term was invented by the communists in its original, non-negative sense, but the conservatives were the first to use it as a pejorative term. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Flip flop (politics)|flip-flop]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|''verb'', meaning to change political position, typically due to [[liberal]] pressure.  First used by the Republican S.I. Hayakawa campaign to describe California Democratic incumbent U.S. Senator John Tunney, whom Hayakawa defeated in an upset.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|force-feed&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|what liberals do to students in [[public schools]] today in training them to be [[atheist]]ic socialists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|forward-looking&lt;br /&gt;
|1800&lt;br /&gt;
|planning for the future rather than dwelling on the past&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Founding Fathers&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|the several dozen [[Christian]] men &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html Religious Affiliation of the Founding Fathers of the United States of America, Adherents.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who helped draft the formative documents of the United States&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[free enterprise]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free lunch&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|something acquired ostensibly without paying for it, as in welfare; often used to remind people that &amp;quot;there's no such thing as a free lunch&amp;quot; in order to point out that it must cost someone something, now or later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free market&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free speech&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|shorthand for &amp;quot;freedom of speech,&amp;quot; but with a connotation that extends to non-citizens and listeners; first used in a U.S. Supreme Court opinion in dissent in the [[Slaughter-House Cases]] by Justice Bradley&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free world&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|areas of the world free of communism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|freeloader&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who avoids paying or working for his share of a benefit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|frontiersmen&lt;br /&gt;
|1814&lt;br /&gt;
|living and working in a self-sufficient manner and with courage in a new land.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fuzzy math&lt;br /&gt;
|1937&lt;br /&gt;
|non-computational math designed to obscure the differences between the correct answers and the incorrect -- but perhaps politically motivated -- answers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|galvanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|as in, &amp;quot;the liberal proposals ''galvanized'' the grassroots in opposition&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[gambit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a sacrifice that obtains an advantageous position, as in the game of [[chess]] ([[Bobby Fischer]]'s queen's gambit was a masterpiece) or in real life (the [[Passion of Christ]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gang up&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|group pressure&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gateway drug&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|abuse of alcohol/marijuana eventually leads to harder drugs cocaine/heroin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gerrymandering&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by a newspaper editor to criticize the manipulation of the lines of a new district into a salamander shape&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allbusiness.com/information/publishing-industries/251259-1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that favored election of a liberal politician&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gimmick&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|originally meant a deceptive mechanical device for controlling a [[gambling]] machine, and then its meaning expanded to include all trickery to attract attention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|globalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|Merriam-Webster states it was first used in 1943&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/globalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the OED gives a date of 1965 for the exact term &amp;quot;globalism&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50095613/50095613se2?single=1&amp;amp;query_type=word&amp;amp;queryword=globalism&amp;amp;first=1&amp;amp;max_to_show=10&amp;amp;hilite=50095613se2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the term &amp;quot;globalization&amp;quot; was first used in the mid-1980s in a different, complimentary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God-fearing&lt;br /&gt;
|1835 &lt;br /&gt;
|Living by the rules of God; living in a way that is considered morally right.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|godsend&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|go-getter&lt;br /&gt;
|1921&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gold standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest standard; in currency, when money could be exchanged for a fixed amount of gold&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|golden parachute&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for a pre-arranged handout to a corporate executive when fired, as when the company is taken over by new ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|good book&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|the [[Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Good Samaritan&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|how genuine charity is the best approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|goon&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a dim-witted thug, espec. one who intimidates on behalf of a union&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|government school&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[economist]] [[Milton Friedman]] as a more accurate name for [[public schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grade inflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency by Liberal educationalists and public schools to increase marks, irrespective of merit or actual achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grassroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|greasy spoon&lt;br /&gt;
|1902&lt;br /&gt;
|a free enterprise term for a small, cheap restaurant - which in many places is just what the public wants; reflects Jesus' [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]] about the digestive system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Great Awakening&lt;br /&gt;
|1730-1740&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian spiritualism recurs periodically.  See [[Essay:The Coming Fifth Great Awakening in America]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gresham's law&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency in a free market for bad money (which loses its value) to drive out (be used more often in transactions) than good money (which retains its value), because people want to horde the good money while getting rid of the bad money; a similar effect can be seen when profanity drives out intelligent discussion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|groupthink&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of thought consisting of conformity to a manufactured consensus and self-deception; coined by William H. Whyte in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|half-baked&lt;br /&gt;
|1855&lt;br /&gt;
|an idea that can appear reasonable at first, but with just a little thought it is recognized to be absurd&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hallmark&lt;br /&gt;
|1721&lt;br /&gt;
|purity, authentic, official seal, distinguishing feature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|handout&lt;br /&gt;
|1882&lt;br /&gt;
|describes charity and government giveaways&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|happy talk&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|sensless banter among broadcasters in the [[lamestream media]], as a substitute for real news; more generally, happy talk is unjustifiably feel-good rhetoric that implicitly denies the real existence of [[Hell]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hardworking&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|harmless error&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|an insignificant violation of a duty or procedural rule; first used in ''Western Ins. Co. v. The Goody Friends'', 29 F. Cas. 764 (S.D. Ohio 1861) (referring to a duty)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hatchet job&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|still looking for the context of its first use; today it means an article, typically by a liberal, that misleadingly smears someone, typically a conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hawthorne effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&lt;br /&gt;
|the increase in achievement resulting merely from being observed; this was demonstrated by experiment at the Hawthorne Works of Western Electric in Cicero, Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heckler's veto&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by University of Chicago Law Professor Harvey Kalven, Jr., a strong supporter of free speech in politics, this term has been used in [[Supreme Court]] decisions by Justices [[Sam Alito]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' ''Pleasant Grove City v. Summum'', 129 S. Ct. 1125 (2009); ''see also'' ''Child Evangelism Fellowship of N.J., Inc. v. Stafford Twp. Sch. Dist.'', 386 F.3d 514 (3rd Cir. 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Antonin Scalia]], and [[Clarence Thomas]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Good News Club v. Milford Cent. Sch.'', 533 U.S. 98 (2001)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hippie&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who rejects traditional morality and does what he wants, often growing long hair and smoking [[marijuana]] rather than working hard; this term became increasingly pejorative over time&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hissy fit&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|an unjustified tantrum, typically female in nature, as in &amp;quot;[[feminist]]s had a hissy fit when [[Lawrence Summers]] suggested (but criticized) the possibility that women have weaker scientific aptitude than men, and Summers ultimately resigned.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hobson's choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;this term has the entertaining history of originating with an English liveryman who required customers to &amp;quot;choose&amp;quot; the horse closest to the door.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an ostensible choice that disguises a lack of freedom, because each alternative is completely unacceptable.  This term is invoked to criticize an illusory freedom of choice.  This term has been used in 48 cases by Supreme Court Justices, more often by conservatives than by liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hokey&lt;br /&gt;
|1927&lt;br /&gt;
|phony, in an obvious or corny way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|honor system&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|an approach to discipline that emphasizes and encourages trust, honesty and personal responsibility rather than constant supervision&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homeschool]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;the OED assigns a date of origin of 1850 to &amp;quot;homeschool&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homemaker]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1876&lt;br /&gt;
|a wife and mother whose efforts are wisely spent running the household for the family&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hometown&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|the place where someone grew up and typically obtained some benefit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homosexual agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|used to promote the agenda in the book ''After the Ball'', but then used to criticize the movement by Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] in his dissent in''Lawrence v. Texas'' (2003)''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|human rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1766&lt;br /&gt;
|rights of all peoples, such as to &amp;quot;life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness&amp;quot; as set forth in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hype&lt;br /&gt;
|1931&lt;br /&gt;
|originally meant to deceive or &amp;quot;put on,&amp;quot; and then its meaning shifted slightly to represent extravagant promotion of something as the liberal media often do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hyphenated American&lt;br /&gt;
|1889&lt;br /&gt;
|President Theodore Roosevelt said in 1915, &amp;quot;There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hypothesis&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a suggestion, typically scientific in nature, which must be tested and proven before asserted as truth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria&lt;br /&gt;
|1801&lt;br /&gt;
|From the Latin ''hystericus'', from Greek ''hystera '' meaning ''&amp;quot;womb&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hysteria Meriam Webster Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (an old notion that hysteria was caused by the [[womb]]).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|idealist&lt;br /&gt;
|1701&lt;br /&gt;
|a person guided by ideals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|illiteracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1660&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals seek to produce illiterate voters who lack independence, and many graduates of the [[public schools]] are illiterate today&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inalienable&lt;br /&gt;
|1640s&lt;br /&gt;
|cannot be taken away, especially by government, as in &amp;quot;inalienable rights&amp;quot; in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incentivize&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|create a reward to encourage good work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incidental inequality&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|inequalities that result as side effects of an objectively just system &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incoherent&lt;br /&gt;
|1626&lt;br /&gt;
|the term often applies to liberal [[double standard]]s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incompleteness&lt;br /&gt;
|1931&lt;br /&gt;
|a system of logic or mathematics that includes propositions that are impossible to prove or disprove; term coined as a result of [[Kurt Godel]]'s work in 1931&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incrementalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|imposing bad political or social change slowly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|independence&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|free will&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|individualism&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|values, rights and duties arise from the individual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inerrancy&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|free from error, as in &amp;quot;biblical inerrancy&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inflationary&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|policies causing inflation of the monetary supply&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|informed consent&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|consent to surgery is meaningful only if informed, a requirement that should apply to abortion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|initiative&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|self-starting first step toward improvement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inoculate&lt;br /&gt;
|1721&lt;br /&gt;
|to safeguard against future harm by developing immunity against it.  Sample usage: &amp;quot;Conservapedia inoculates against [[liberal claptrap]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|insightful&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|what conservatism is about: gaining insights into the truth, and bettering individuals and society with them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intangible&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|something valuable that cannot be seen or touched, such as goodwill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intellectual property&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;we [should] protect intellectual property, the labors of the mind, productions and interests as much a man's own, and as much the fruit of his honest industry, as the wheat he cultivates, or the flocks he rears.&amp;quot;  ''Davoll v. Brown'', 7 F. Cas. 197 (Cir. Ct. Mass. 1845) (Woodbury, federal judge).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intelligent design&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A few isolated references to this phrase, without its full current significance, can be found dating back to the mid-1800s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|coined in ''Darwin on Trial'', a book by Philip Johnson, who is considered the father of the intelligent design movement and who co-founded the [[Discovery Institute]]'s Center for Science and Culture in 1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://biologos.org/resources/johnson-phillip-e&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|interventionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;governmental interference in economic affairs at home or in political affairs of another country&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|invisible hand&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Adam Smith in the ''Wealth of Nations'' and widely used today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[invisible hand of marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|discovered on Conservapedia, it is the unseen force of productivity that results from marriage (only between a man and woman).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Iron curtain&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Winston Churchill in a speech in Missouri just after World War II, to describe the communist's figurative wall against freedom&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[irreducible complexity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|coined&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Alan Turing]] reportedly used the term for a completely different meaning that went nowhere. [http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/nasty-feelings-in-the-ool-community-toward-yockey/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and later adopted  and developed by [[Michael Behe]] to describe structure or system that could not possibly have evolved, because removing any part makes it nonfunctional, thereby showing that [[God]] must have created it whole into biology; if the [[Nobel Prize]] were not dominated by [[atheism]], Behe could win one for this insight.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Islamofascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1990?&lt;br /&gt;
|A form of totalitarian Muslim fundamentalist rule, or extreme Islamism.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ivory tower&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a description of the pampered culture of liberal [[professor values|professors]], and how far out of touch with the truth it is&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John Hancock&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|a personal signature, especially in a bold style that stands up for principles as John Hancock did with his signing the Declaration of Independence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial activism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in an article in ''Fortune'' magazine by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/278089&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and repeatedly used in U.S. Supreme Court opinions since 1967,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''United States v. Wade'', &lt;br /&gt;
388 U.S. 218 (1967).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet as of 2009 [[Merriam-Webster]] dictionary still fails to recognize this widely used term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial prejudice&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|the bias of a judge in favor of a political correct identity group intended to rig outcome equality in favor of that group based on subjective bias rather than objective justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial restraint&lt;br /&gt;
|1942&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Assuming that this court has power to act, it does not necessarily follow that it should act. ... In a number of situations, and in a number of cases, it has been held that courts should voluntarily refrain from using or asserting power. Where the use or assertion of power might be destructive of a well defined purpose of law or of a declared public policy such voluntarily imposed '''judicial restraint''' may be commendable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Osage Tribe of Indians v. Ickes, 45 F. Supp. 179, 184-85 (D.D.C. 1942) (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial supremacist&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|one who advocates that the courts should be supreme over the other branches of government for certain legal issues; first coined in a book by [[Phyllis Schlafly]]; first used by the judiciary by the Michigan Supreme Court in ''Paige v. City of Sterling Heights'', 476 Mich. 495 (2006).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A similar yet different concept, &amp;quot;judicial supremacy,&amp;quot; was coined by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justice [[Robert H. Jackson]] as the title of his book,'' The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy: A Study of a Crisis in American Political Power'' (New York: Knopf, 1941).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial taking]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|the deprivation of private property due to a court decision; this concept was introduced by conservative Justice [[Potter Stewart]] in 1967, and the term was used for the first time independently by the Michigan and Hawaii Supreme Courts in the same month (!) in December 1982, and then used often in law review articles and Circuit Court decisions in the 2000s, and then four Justices of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] endorsed the principle in a decision in 2010, with two others accepting the possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[junk science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://rated.com/dir/Society/Issues/Environment/Opposing_Views/Junk_Science&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the corruption of the scientific method to advance other, often political, goals (such as [[Global Warming]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|jury nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|the power of a jury to overrule the law and acquit an ostensibly guilty defendant; the power was established in the colonies in 1735 in the trial of [[John Peter Zenger]], but this term was first used in state court by Pfeuffer v. Haas, 55 S.W.2d 111 (Tex. Civ. App. 1932) and in federal court by ''Skidmore v. Baltimore &amp;amp; O. R. Co.'', 167 F.2d 54 (2nd Cir. 1948)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|killjoy&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|one who spoils the pleasure of others. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/killjoy Killjoy 1776 Mer-Web]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Example''-Vandals seek to disrupt conservative wikis, an education project. They are a killjoy to the learning process.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kiss of death&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|from Judas's betrayal of Jesus with a kiss, Mark 14:44-4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kleptocrat&lt;br /&gt;
|1819&lt;br /&gt;
|A politician who seeks status and personal gain at the expense of the governed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kowtow&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|obsequious, unthinking obedience to someone or something, used especially in the context of dictatorships and liberal belief systems&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kremlinology&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the otherwise indecipherable behavior of the government of the [[communist]] [[Soviet Union]]. Refers to the Kremlin, the traditional seat of Russian government (Soviet or not). &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kudos&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|praise for real achievement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|la-la land&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First known use was in an article by Tom Zito, &amp;quot;Mr. Mike's Mania; Sick Humor, Very Well Indulged,&amp;quot; [[Washington Post]] F1 (Nov. 8, 1979): &amp;quot;But now, it's off to La-La land, and his movie deal. 'The thing about Southern Californians,' he says, 'is this: They wake up and say, 'Gee, what a wonderful morning. I think I'll make a salad.' And that takes them the whole day. ...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a term for the decadent, liberal culture of [[Hollywood]]-driven [[Los Angeles]], originally capitalized as &amp;quot;La-La land.&amp;quot;; Merriam-Webster is in denial about this etymology and claims a later origin of 1983.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|labor camp&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|forced work prison&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|laissez-faire&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing governmental interference in economic affairs beyond what is minimally necessary&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lame duck&lt;br /&gt;
|1761&lt;br /&gt;
|one falling being in achievement, especially a public official whose power is limited because his term in office is set to expire without possibility of reelection.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lamestream media&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Bernie Goldberg to describe the clueless [[Mainstream media]] that repeat superficial, discredited liberal claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|landslide&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|In the political sense, an overwhelming election victory. A clear, democratic expression of popular will.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leadership&lt;br /&gt;
|1821&lt;br /&gt;
|an ability and willingness to lead, often by example&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leftism&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|principles and doctrine of leftists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|level-headed&lt;br /&gt;
|1876&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;balanced&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;having common sense and sound judgment&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leverage&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal creep&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal bias that gradually creeps or distorts an entry, definition, explanation, description, or historical account.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|life vest&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-life invention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lifelong&lt;br /&gt;
|1855&lt;br /&gt;
|something, usually a commitment, that lasts a lifetime, as in &amp;quot;a lifelong commitment to [[Christ]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|limousine liberal&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a multi-millionaire who pretends to be compassionate about the poor, but supports liberal policies that increase burdens on working Americans&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|local&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This date refers to its first usage as a ''noun'', which is an estimate of its adoption as a concept.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|common usage: &amp;quot;all politics is local&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lockstep&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|mindless conformity, often to liberal values&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|locomotive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|a great engine of economic growth during the [[Industrial Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lone wolf&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who prefers to work, act, or live alone,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lone%20wolf Lone wolf, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; synonymous with self-sufficiency&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|loose cannon&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|an undisciplined person or program that dangerously lacks forethought; used in mid-November 1976 to describe $11 billion in unspent appropriations by the Ford Administration:  &amp;quot;'That money,' says Arnold Packer, a senior Senate Budget Committee economist who is helping Carter draw up his shadow budget, 'is like a loose cannon rolling around the deck' because a sudden reappearance of the funds could be inflationary.&amp;quot; (''BusinessWeek'')&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lowest common denominator&lt;br /&gt;
|1854&lt;br /&gt;
|the lowest in work ethic, morals, or knowledge among a group; typically used to criticize the liberal practice of dumbing down content&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lunatic fringe&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by U.S. President [[Theodore Roosevelt]] to describe members of eccentric, radical or extremist groups&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=lunatic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|machismo&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|a word never used favorably by feminists!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mainstay&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|the primary support, typically for something good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|man-hater&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was during the epic struggle -- and defeat -- of the so-called [[Equal Rights Amendment]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|William Safire wrote in the ''New York Times'' in 1983, &amp;quot;Misandry, from the Greek misandros for 'hating men,' is in the 1961 Merriam-Webster New International Dictionary, and the Oxford Dictionary Supplement traces it to 1946.  The word is pronounced as 'Ms. Andry,' but I wonder why we need the Greek word for it. What's wrong with good, old-fashioned man-hater?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sunday, Oct. 30, 1983, Section 6, Page 12, Column 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|make-work&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|inefficient or useless activity that has the false appearance of being productive; a favorite endeavor of liberals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[market failure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[Coined as the title of a scholarly article by Francis M. Bator, &amp;quot;The Anatomy of Market Failure,&amp;quot; ''The Quarterly Journal of Economics'' (1958) [http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/Courses/econ335/out/bator_qje.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|instances where the free market does not provide a desirable result, as when information is withheld from an unsuspecting consumer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|manifest destiny&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|Providential design over future events, which originated in the context of expanding the United States to the Pacific Ocean&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the view of life that physical matter is all that exists; as an &amp;quot;ism&amp;quot;, the term criticizes such view&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|meat and potatoes&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|the most interesting or fundamental part&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Medal of Honor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|a special American honor for bravery on the battlefield&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[media bullying]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Media_bullying&amp;amp;oldid=430831 (Apr. 14, 2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined by ''Conservapedia'', media bullying is aggressive bias by the media in the attempt to influence a politician or others, typically toward a [[liberal]] goal&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|melting pot&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|requires &amp;quot;social and cultural assimilation&amp;quot; for successful immigration&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster dictionary (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[meritocracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|a system in which the talented are chosen and moved ahead on the basis of their achievement &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[microeconomics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the economics of the individual person or business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|micromanage&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|insistence on controlling details, typically by liberals to [[censorship|censor]] progress; [[Ronald Reagan]] was critical of this style by [[Democrat]] Presidents&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mind control&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for how an atheistic government influences what people believe, especially through public education&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|close-minded point-of-view, typically in adherence to a liberal falsehood and often to the exclusion of Christ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missile defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as part of [[SDI]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1625&lt;br /&gt;
|someone sent on a mission, typically a religious mission&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|mobocracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1754&lt;br /&gt;
|rule by a mob, as at Wikipedia&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|monogamy&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|this has the same date of origin as &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot;, and that may not be a coincidence!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moonlighting&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|working more than a full-time job in order to be as productive as possible; the [[work ethic]] at its best&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moral majority&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Jerry Falwell to describe the movement of growing moral, Christian conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|motivation&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe the word did not exist before 1873?!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckety–muck&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for an arrogant person who holds a title or position considered to be important by others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckraker&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who searches out and publicly exposes [[deceit]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/muckraker Merriam-Webster - Muckraker]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Murphy's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|if something can go wrong, then it will go wrong: this was a conservative insight by an engineer Edward Murphy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muscle car&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|placing a powerful engine in a classic two-door car for highly efficient performance; also celebrate masculine style against erosion by feminism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|myopic&lt;br /&gt;
|1752&lt;br /&gt;
|originally a term in optometry, 1990's used to describe liberals' lack of foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|name-dropping&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|a term critical of the [[liberal]] practice of seeking to impress others by casually mentioning personal association with prominent people, despite its lack of relevance to the conversation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nanny state&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Under the New Economic Policy, [the new French Prime Minister Raymond] Barre has made it clear that industrial lame ducks can no longer count on the generosity of Nanny i.e. the state - for bailing out.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leo Ryan, &amp;quot;Economy Shored up: France's new surge of liberalism,&amp;quot; The Globe and Mail (Canada) (Aug. 1, 1978)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Note how two powerful new conservative terms led to a third here!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|negativism&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|mental attitude that tends that is skeptical about almost everything, except one's own views&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|newspeak&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|political or media expressions using circumlocution and euphemisms to disguise or distract from the truth; first coined by [[George Orwell]] in ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-justiciable&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Used by the state attorneys for West Virginia (including Philip Steptoe, founder of Steptoe &amp;amp; Johnson) in ''Pennsylvania v. West Virginia'', 262 U.S. 553 (1923):  &amp;quot;It is not the 'subject of judicial cognizance,' Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 15; Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S 1, 15; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, or 'susceptible of judicial solution.' Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S. 1, 18, 22; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, 234.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a difficult issue that the courts should not attempt to resolve, often because it is too political in nature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-locality&lt;br /&gt;
|1920s&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action at a distance]] at the atomic level; even though proven, it is still opposed by those who believe in [[relativity]] and still not recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&lt;br /&gt;
|assertion of authority by a State against encroachment by the federal government, in defense of liberty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|obambulate&lt;br /&gt;
|1600&lt;br /&gt;
|From Latin ''obambulatus'', to walk to or before, akin to ''wander''.  Word currently claimed to have been invented by Rush Limbaugh in 2011 and used in reference to [[Barack Obama]], yet it is found in Oxford and Webster's dictionaries prior to 1991.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|obstructionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1879&lt;br /&gt;
|deliberate interference with free speech or legislative progress, as when liberal legislators (the &amp;quot;fleebaggers&amp;quot;) fled Wisconsin to try to block a reform&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Old Glory&lt;br /&gt;
|1862&lt;br /&gt;
|the ''United States of America'' flag, Stars &amp;amp; Stripes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-size-fits-all&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Was there an earlier conservative use?  Frank Zappa's album cover in the 1970s does not count!&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Lee Wishing, director of communications for conservative [[Grove City College]], in criticism of how the government administers student loans: &amp;quot;Unfortunately, with government programs, it's one size fits all.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/1996/dec96/er-dec96.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The 2008 Republican platform states, &amp;quot;We reject a one-size-fits-all approach and support parental options, including home schooling, and local innovations such as schools or classes for boys only or for girls only and alternative and innovative school schedules.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-trick pony&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|a person or group that relies repeatedly on the same gimmick, as in &amp;quot;the media are a one-trick pony in their criticism of [[Rand Paul]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|open-minded&lt;br /&gt;
|1828&lt;br /&gt;
|see [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[opportunity cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|optimism&lt;br /&gt;
|1759&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ordered pair&lt;br /&gt;
|1870s&lt;br /&gt;
|developed by the [[Christian]] [[Georg Cantor]], this [[conservative]] concept was part of the [[set theory]] that he invented and revolutionized mathematics with, despite opposition by the establishment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|originalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|taken from original intent, The belief that the United States Constitution should be interpreted in the way the authors originally intended it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Orwellian&lt;br /&gt;
|1960s&lt;br /&gt;
|terminology or style that advances the power of big government but is hurtful or nonsensical&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ntu.org/main/press.php?PressID=604&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ostensibly&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|having an outward appearance that may not reflect the underlying truth; good potential use is Luke 3:23 in describing Jesus as the son of Joseph&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|outflank&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|to move swiftly around an opponent, a military tactic mastered by [[conservative]] [[General]] [[George Patton]] to crush the [[Germans]] in [[World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|parenting&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|children raising&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Parkinson's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how bureaucracies expand regardless of the productivity, and how inefficient work expands to fill the time available for its completion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Parthian shot]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|a negative term for the tactic of expressing a criticism while one exits, just as the ancient Parthians would shoot arrows while retreating in battle.  This tactic is common among those who reject [[conservative]] truths, as seen when left-leaning editors leave ''Conservapedia''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[patent troll]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|a company that obtains or buys up patents for the sole purpose of asserting infringement claims, and without any intention of actually manufacturing the invention; the term was first coined by Peter Detkin, in-house counsel to Intel&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|patriotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pavlovian&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a conditioned, automatic and unthinking response to a signal; it has been used twice by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justices. &amp;quot;It is well established that this Court does not, or at least should not, respond in Pavlovian fashion to confessions of error by the [[Solicitor General]].&amp;quot;  ''De Marco v. United States'', 415 U.S. 449, 451 (1974) ([[Rehnquist]], J., dissenting); &amp;quot;'[[Incorporation doctrine|Incorporation]]' has become so Pavlovian that my Brother BLACK barely mentions the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] in the course of an 11-page opinion dealing with the procedural rule the State of [[Florida]] has adopted for cases tried in Florida courts under Florida's criminal laws.&amp;quot; '' Williams v. Fla.'', 399 U.S. 78, 144 (1970) ([[Potter Stewart|Stewart]], J., dissenting and concurring).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|perestroika&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|increasing economic freedom and free speech under [[communism]], which led to the unraveling of the [[communist]] [[Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|perpetual war&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|Coined by historian Charles A. Beard,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles A. Beard is best known for interpreting the Constitution as being primarily motivated by economic interests.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it has been used most recently by [[Ann Coulter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[personhood]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/personhood Personhood] Dictionary.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|Inherent rights guaranteed to all human beings from the beginning of their biological development, including the pre-born, partially born. Also, the state or fact of being a person.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Philadelphia&lt;br /&gt;
|1682&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[William Penn]] and meaning &amp;quot;city of brotherly love,&amp;quot; the concept captures the &amp;quot;[[best of the public]]&amp;quot; approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[phonics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1684&lt;br /&gt;
|conservatives have long championed phonics to promote literacy, Bible-reading, and informed voters; liberals take the opposite position&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|phony&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This surprisingly recent origin appears to be derived from a British confidence game.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|needed to address [[liberal deceit]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[photo bias]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A letter to the editor by a reader of the [[liberal]] ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' observed, &amp;quot;This is the third time in recent weeks that a weird or disfigured picture of Mr. Quayle has appeared in your Sunday paper.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a common trick of the [[liberal media]] to push the reader to the political left on an issue, as in displaying a man without teeth as an opponent of a liberal bill or candidate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|plasticity&lt;br /&gt;
|1783&lt;br /&gt;
|having a plastic quality that conforms to molding or pressure; in pejorative usage, someone who easily conforms to [[peer pressure]] or [[liberal]] falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|poetic justice&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&lt;br /&gt;
|when virtue is rewarded and/or wrongdoing is punished in an indirect or unexpected way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|political machine&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for local and typically Democratic power structures that prevent outsiders from winning elections; first used by George Washington Plunkitt to criticize the Tammany Hall machine for which he served&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[politically correct]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|This term originated among radicals at the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] to enforce radical orthodoxy, but immediately flipped in usage to become a term of mockery of radicals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For an early different usage of the word, see 1793 J. WILSON in U.S. Rep. (U.S. Supreme Court) 2 (1798) 462 Sentiments and expressions of this inaccurate kind prevail in our..language... ‘The United States’, instead of the ‘People of the United States’, is the toast given. This is not politically correct.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The term may have come from Chairman Mao in 1936.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|politicize&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|seeking political gain at the expense of truth or quality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Merriam-Webster definition (1994 ed.) is incomplete and unclear: &amp;quot;to give a political tone or character to&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|politics of envy&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Australian [[conservative]] Christopher Pine to describe the philosophy behind taking money from private schools and giving it to public ones.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pork barrel&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|government as a source of handouts that redistribute money from hard-working people to those who avoid work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[post-abortive]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|the unexpected trauma and physical harm -- which can worsen over time -- that is experienced by a woman after having an [[abortion]]; coined by Dr. Kaye Cash in an editorial describing what she learned during a 365-mile walk in southeast Arkansas to speak with the public about abortion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Editorial by Kaye Cash, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Little Rock, AR), October 23, 1986.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|potential&lt;br /&gt;
|1817&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Usage here refers to &amp;quot;promise&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;possibility&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pothead&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who smokes marijuana and doesn't realize how it destroys people&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|powerhouse&lt;br /&gt;
|1881&lt;br /&gt;
|source of energy and strength - which is what the conservative movement is&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[price discrimination]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|charging different prices for the exact same service or good; first coined by the British economist (and critic of [[John Maynard Keynes]]) Arthur Cecil Pigou in ''The Economics of Welfare''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|prioritize&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|to recognize that some goals and activities are more important than others, and then focus accordingly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|private sector&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|non-governmental businesses and jobs functioning in free enterprise&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|privatize&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|to return a business or enterprise from state to private control; to de-nationalize.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proactive&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Procrustean&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative description of the one-size-fits-all mentality, which disregards individual differences&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productive&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|1810&lt;br /&gt;
|the gap of about 200 years between the creation of &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;productivity&amp;quot; is astounding&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[pro-life]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1960&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|property right&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|provocateur&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who spends more time causing unproductive conflicts rather than advancing knowledge, accomplishing legitimate goals, or helping anyone&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pseudoscience&lt;br /&gt;
|1844&lt;br /&gt;
|worthless claims written with the appearance of scientific rigor to gain an aura of credibility&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|publicity stunt&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Earlier usage in the 1900s may have occurred, but the term &amp;quot;stunt&amp;quot; was not coined until 1878.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Used on April 10, 1969 by Republican Senators who withdrew from a tour and probe by Senator [[Ted Kennedy]], criticizing him for his &amp;quot;publicity stunt&amp;quot; in preparation for his expected run for the presidency; the [[Chappaquiddick incident]] sunk his chances three months later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|quantify&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|race card&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is the date of its widespread familiarity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Playing the race card&amp;quot; consists of relying on racial emotions or charges of racism in order to overcome the truth and logic in politics, legal proceedings, or otherwise; this term became familiar in the criticism of the defense and acquittal of O.J. Simpson for the murder of his ex-wife and her friend.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rapture&lt;br /&gt;
|1629&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritual ecstasy[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=rapture]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[recidivism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1886&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency for people lacking in [[faith]] and determination to revert to prior patterns of harmful behavior, such as repeat criminal offenders&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|recuse&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|self-removal by a decision-maker (especially a judge) because of possible bias with respect to the pending issue&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|red tape&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive bureaucracy and procedural complexity which frustrate meaningful activity and progress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|refudiate&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|combination of ''refute'' and ''repudiate'', as coined by [[Sarah Palin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[relativism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|the view that ethical truths are not absolute, but depend on the person or group that holds them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[responsibility]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1737&lt;br /&gt;
|HAMILTON Federalist No. 63 (1988) II. 193 Responsibility in order to be reasonable must be limited to objects within the power of the responsible party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reverse discrimination&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|the use of quotas or affirmative action to use race or gender to discriminate against a better qualified person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|revisionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term, now obscure, refers to a Marxist movement that preferred evolutionary rather than revolutionary change.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|distortions of history to promote liberal bias&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|revolving-door&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|the liberal practice of repeatedly transferring into and out of government in a way that impedes progress and access by others, like the same people going round-and-round in a real revolving door&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[RINO Backer]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|a more important term than &amp;quot;RINO&amp;quot;, because what matters most is whether someone will stand up for a [[conservative]] position and candidate when the [[liberal media]] demand that everyone flock to the liberal side.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|riot act&lt;br /&gt;
|1715&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Its colloquial use, as in &amp;quot;read them the riot act,&amp;quot; began in 1819.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the Riot Act was a law passed in England in 1715 to authorize officials to disperse riots&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rogue state&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|(Originally used in 1993 then reintroduced in 2002.) A 'rogue state' displays no regard for international law. It attempts to acquire weapons of mass destruction and other military technology with which to threaten neighbouring countries and support terrorism. Rogue states often reject human values and brutalize their own people.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rubber-stamp&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|unthinking repetition or endorsement of something, despite having the responsibility to make an independent decision, as in &amp;quot;Democrats rubber-stamp demands by the abortion industry.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|run of the mill&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|meaning &amp;quot;merely average, commonplace,&amp;quot; the term is critical of a failure to strive for excellence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sacred cow&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a person or idea, typically liberal, that becomes immune from criticism because of its political usefulness rather than its truthfulness, as in the theories of [[evolution]] and [[relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scapegoating&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|a term criticizing how people, particularly liberals, deflect accountability and blame from themselves to others; inspired by Leviticus 16:8.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|salutary neglect&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by the [[conservative]] [[Edmund Burke]] in his 1775 speech to the British [[House of Commons]] entitled &amp;quot;On Moving His Resolutions for Conciliation with the Colonies&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|school choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by Milton Friedman in his book, ''Free to Choose'' &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[scientific fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|a coordinated effort by a group of scientists to enforce a certain point of view upon others.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[secularism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-55&lt;br /&gt;
|attempts to educate, particularly through [[public school]], without including [[faith]] or even acknowledgment of [[God]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Segway&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|Dean Kamen's trademark spelling of &amp;quot;segue&amp;quot; for use of Yankee Ingenuity to improve efficiency, to refer to a form of battery-powered transportation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[self-defense]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1651&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-destruct&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|often the tragic result of liberal falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Discipline|self-discipline]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-preservation&lt;br /&gt;
|1614&lt;br /&gt;
|preservation of oneself from destruction or harm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-reliant&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|separation of powers&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the fundamental insight underlying the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|shotgun marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|pregnancy =&amp;gt; get married.  Think of someone besides yourself for a change.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|show trial&lt;br /&gt;
|1937&lt;br /&gt;
|trials, especially in communist countries, which have preordained outcomes but are used for propaganda purposes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sidewalk counseling&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice of volunteers exercising their right of [[free speech]] to advise women against [[abortion]] as they walk on sidewalks toward abortion clinics; liberals have passed laws to restrict and [[censorship|censor]] this&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|silent majority&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by President [[Richard Nixon]] in his speech to the nation on Nov. 3, 1969&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://watergate.info/nixon/silent-majority-speech-1969.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|skullduggery&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|underhanded or unscrupulous behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|slippery slope&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|term has been widely used for decades to expose the fallacy of &amp;quot;it doesn't hurt to try&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|small town values&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|term was first used by [[Democrat]] [[John Glenn]] in his failed presidential run in 1984, in a futile effort to appear more conservative than [[Ronald Reagan]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|something intended to disguise or draw attention away from an often embarrassing or unpleasant issue. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/smoke%20and%20mirrors Smoke and Mirrors, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Widely used during the 1990s to describe [[Bill Clinton]]'s political strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke-filled room&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term describing how a few political insiders sometimes pick a candidate or make a decision in a secret room (in the old days, filled with cigar smoke)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoking gun&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|a law-and-order term, &amp;quot;smoking gun&amp;quot; was first used as figurative term in a reported judicial decision in ''Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp.'', 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12775 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 1975), and many literal uses of the term in court decisions before that!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soapbox&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|staging for a typically liberal, unproductive rant having little substance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soccer mom&lt;br /&gt;
|1987&lt;br /&gt;
|a mother who devotes herself to her children's activities and a significant voting bloc or demographic group&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[socialist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who advocates government control over the economy, and particularly state control of the means of production&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|social justice rhetoric&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|Language and rhetorical ploys equating equality of outcome with justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spend-and-tax&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/02/morning-bell-the-obama-tax-and-spend-economy-is-here/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a variation on &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; (see below), &amp;quot;spend-and-tax&amp;quot; consists of spending the money first and then trying to justify raising taxes based on the deficit created by the spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spin doctor&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|someone ensuring that others interpret an event from a particular point of view.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/world/asia/22policy.html?_r=2 General Petraeus describes Axelrod by Bob Woodward]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spot-on&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|precisely correct, as in a prediction or in overcoming imprecision in a challenging task; its origin is from the military &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|squirrelly&lt;br /&gt;
|1928&lt;br /&gt;
|like a squirrel; jumpy and unpredictable; as in liberals get squirrelly when confronted with facts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[stagflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|inflation ''and'' high [[unemployment]] ''and'' stagnant demand by consumers, typically due to [[liberal]] policies as in the late 1970s under President [[Jimmy Carter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stalking horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1788&lt;br /&gt;
|a candidate or issue that serves to increase the chances that ''another'' will win, as in &amp;quot;antifederalists attempted to win elections by using 'the stalking horse of amendments.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Centinel'', 1788 (quoted in ''The Federalist party in Massachusetts to the year 1800'', By Anson Ely Morse).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[statism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|advocates for centralized government and government ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stem-winder&lt;br /&gt;
|1875&lt;br /&gt;
|first-rate of its kind, especially a political speech; term inspired by the innovation for the watch to be wound by stem rather than by a key&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straightforward&lt;br /&gt;
|1806&lt;br /&gt;
|something liberals are not&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straw man&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|an imaginary argument or example set up for the purpose of easily knocking down, while distracting from valid arguments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Stupaked&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|hurt by someone who reassured everyone he would do the right thing, but then switched at the last minute to do the opposite (refers especially to [[abortion betrayal]]s)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Columnist Kathleen Parker is credited with first coining this term.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[subsidiarity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1936&lt;br /&gt;
|the concept (opposed by liberals) that responsibilities performed by local or subordinate organizations should not be usurped by centralized government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|supply-side&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|the economic theory that reducing taxes expands economic activity by encouraging greater earnings and investments; proven successful during the Reagan Administration in the 1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|survivalist&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|one who is determined and prepared to stay alive, and even thrive, if liberals cause a breakdown of society&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|takeover&lt;br /&gt;
|1917&lt;br /&gt;
|as in the takeover of government by the communist revolution in that year&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tax-and-spend&lt;br /&gt;
|1937 &lt;br /&gt;
|not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster, it is included in dictionary.com and it means the liberal policy of raising taxes and increasing government spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|taxpayer&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|the word highlights who is really paying for things&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tea party&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|an amorphous group of ordinary citizens unified against a more expensive government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Tebowing]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|bending on one knee in public to give glory to God (named after [[pro-life]] [[NFL]] [[QB]] [[Tim Tebow]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[term limits]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe this is not in the dictionary yet? Merriam-Webster omits it, but dictionary.com has it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/term+limit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|terrorism&lt;br /&gt;
|1795&lt;br /&gt;
|this was during the French Revolution&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[textualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|first used by Justice [[Robert Jackson]] in his influential concurrence in ''[[Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer]]'', 343 U.S. 579 (1952), it now describes the legal philosophy of Justice [[Antonin Scalia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[think tank]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1940s&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in [[Britain]] to describe intelligence organizations that helped the military, think tanks became part of the rise of conservatism in the 1970s and 1980s; is ''Conservapedia'' the think tank of the future?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|time-tested&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|an approach that has proven to be beneficial over time, like heterosexual marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|top-notch&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest quality, which requires respect for merit to recognize&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|term which identifies the similarities of fascist and communist regimes and ideologies and urges resistance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tour de force&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|a feat of skill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trademark&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|extends the concept of private property to the marks used by business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalist&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;adherence to the doctrines or practices of a tradition...the beliefs of those opposed to modernism, liberalism, or radicalism&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/traditionalist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transaction cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|Economist [[Ronald Coase]] won a [[Nobel Prize]] for this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transistor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|named by John R. Pierce and developed at the [[conservative]] [[Bell Labs]], this invention epitomized Yankee ingenuity; Pierce was a critic of claims of [[artificial intelligence]] and was the future developer of [[Telstar]], a precursor to the [[Strategic Defense Initiative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tree huggers&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|still not recognized by the dictionary, this term criticizes extreme environmentalists, but they proudly use the term also to describe what they literally do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trivia&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|insignificant detail, which can sometimes obscure what is important and distract people from the Bible; liberal [[Wikipedia]] is filled with trivial junk&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Trojan horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1837&lt;br /&gt;
|describes a type of liberal [[deceit]]:  subversion from within&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trust but verify&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as the approach to use towards communist [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ugly duckling&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|an unpromising appearance but often with great unseen potential&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ultra vires&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|beyond the authority, especially of a government or corporate official&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unborn child&lt;br /&gt;
|1791&lt;br /&gt;
|the rights of the unborn child have been recognized in English law since the 1600s, but the specific term &amp;quot;unborn child&amp;quot; itself may have been first used by an attorney arguing before the New Jersey Supreme Court in ''Den v. Sparks'', 1 N.J.L. 67 (Sup. Ct. 1791)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underachiever&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|a typically liberal person who fails to accomplish what he could&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underdog&lt;br /&gt;
|1887&lt;br /&gt;
|[[David]] v. [[Goliath]], [[Cinderella]], [[best of the public]], etc.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[underemployed]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1908&lt;br /&gt;
|having less than full-time or suitable employment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underwater basket weaving&lt;br /&gt;
|1950s&lt;br /&gt;
|A pejorative that describes worthless college courses and a declining educational system; see [[Worst College Majors]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unscripted&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|speaking sincerely without parroting a script; &amp;quot;[[Rand Paul]] and [[Chris Christie]] are effective because, unlike [[Obama]], they are unscripted.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unsung hero&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who accomplishes good without receiving recognition for it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|useful idiot&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=135140 Attributed originally to Lenin], but since used by others like [[Nobel Prize]] winner (Literature) Doris Lessing to describe how she was manipulated by the [[communists]]: “I was taken around and shown things as a ‘useful idiot’... that’s what my role was. I can’t understand why I was so gullible.” [http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/documentaries/2010/07/100624_doc_useful_idiots_lenin.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Sample usage:  &amp;quot;There are not as many useful idiots on college campuses for the Obama reelection campaign in 2012 as there were in 2008, and it's doubtful he can fill a stadium rally unless the campaign pays students to attend.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vandalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&lt;br /&gt;
|malicious destruction of someone else's property&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|veracity&lt;br /&gt;
|1623&lt;br /&gt;
|devotion to truthfulness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vet&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2199254/?from=rss&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a verb meaning to screen for flaws&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[victimization]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|volunteer&lt;br /&gt;
|1618&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who freely offers to help&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wannabe&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a word that criticizes liberal [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|War on Terror&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|no listing at Merriam-Webster February 2, 2009 Obama ends use of the conservative lexicon. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pewforum.org/news/display.php?NewsID=17455 Obama administration drops 'war on terror' phrase] Pew Forum, February 2, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|washed-up&lt;br /&gt;
|1928&lt;br /&gt;
|no longer productive, as in &amp;quot;the washed-up liberal professor has not contributed anything to his field in 30 years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|waterloo&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|a final defeat or setback, coined merely one year after the [[English]] defeated [[Napoleon]] at the [[Battle of Waterloo]]; there has never been a &amp;quot;waterloo&amp;quot; for [[Christianity]] or [[conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|welfare queen&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|a disparaging term for someone who collects excessive welfare payments through fraud, manipulation, or laziness. First used by [[Ronald Reagan]] during his 1976 Presidential campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wildcatter&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-energy term that describes someone who drills for oil in fields not known to have oil&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wishy-washy&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;An archaic meaning of poor quality dates to 1690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|easily changing in opinion, usually due to peer pressure&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|word poverty&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/summer2001/lang_gap_moats.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President [[George W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work (physical sense)&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|a physical measure&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Work equals force times distance.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of effort used to increase energy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work ethic&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|a habit of working as a moral good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|workaholic&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by a Southern Baptist pastor to describe the work habits of himself and other ministers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2000/01/02/magazine/the-lives-they-lived-on-language-wordplayers.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|worldview&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|a comprehensive way of looking at life and the world; sometimes used to criticize a liberal's irrational belief system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Yankee&lt;br /&gt;
|1758   &lt;br /&gt;
|Inhabitants of New England, United States. Dutch slang in 1698- Americanized 50 years later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Yankee Ingenuity&lt;br /&gt;
|1761&lt;br /&gt;
|America's inhabitants had a knack for clever design and capitalist success. The early Americans had applied their exceptional skills prior to the terms existence, see [[Eli Whitney]] and [[Benjamin   Franklin]]. &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|yellow journalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice, started by newspaper publishers Joseph Pulitzer and his rival William Randolph Hearst, of sensationalizing and biasing newspaper headlines and articles in order to influence public opinion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative Words Not Yet Recognized by the Dictionary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thousand new words are developed in English each year.  Here is a growing list of conservative concepts, each of which is not yet defined by a single word or two.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Not Yet Recognized Terms&lt;br /&gt;
!Suggestions&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pre-9/11 thinking&lt;br /&gt;
|9/10 mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|terror is jurisdiction of the courts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anti-family&lt;br /&gt;
|tradition opposer, familiopathic&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blame shift&lt;br /&gt;
|false accusations&lt;br /&gt;
|e.g., guns blamed for an increasing murder rate&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|buycott&lt;br /&gt;
|counter support&lt;br /&gt;
|An effort to cooperate and promote an organization or a process to nullify campaigns that are targeted by boycott protests.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|causing harm by spreading falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|deceit&lt;br /&gt;
|e.g., denying or concealing disease and infertility caused by promiscuity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Constitutional values&lt;br /&gt;
|adherence to righteousness as set forth by the [[Founding Fathers]]&lt;br /&gt;
|principles set in the Declaration&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Counterfeit Marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|uncivil union&lt;br /&gt;
|Manipulating Man's laws by usurping God's laws.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cradle to grave &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/spanish/from%20cradle%20to%20grave cradle to grave- no entry found] Merriam-Websters&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|sanctity of life, conception to natural death&lt;br /&gt;
|pro-life stance, also can mean socialist entitlement programs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cut and run&lt;br /&gt;
|surrender advocates&lt;br /&gt;
|when the going gets tough, run away from the problem&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|debtucation&lt;br /&gt;
|tuition noose&lt;br /&gt;
|College student debt is now larger than credit card debt in the US&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deliberate ignorance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|mind-locked, self-centered pride obscuring the truth&lt;br /&gt;
|the term exists; the dictionary does not yet include it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|denial that [[Hell]] exists&lt;br /&gt;
|Hell-denier? Antinfernal? (Should be &amp;quot;antihadessic&amp;quot; so as not to mix Hellenate and Latinate roots)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[abstinence denial|denier of the effectiveness of abstinence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|abstinence-denier?&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|drive-by media&lt;br /&gt;
|partisan slander&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal mainstream media assault on the GOP or conservative principles, deceitful attacks for opposing viewpoints&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|easily amused by [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|dolophile&lt;br /&gt;
|from Greek/Latin root ''dolo-'' meaning guile, deceit, deception [http://www.wordinfo.info/words/index/info/view_unit/664]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|enemedia&lt;br /&gt;
|pressitutes, Democrat Media Complex&lt;br /&gt;
|a combination of domestic enemy and media, describing the biased media coordination between Democrats the legacy media&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Faculty lounge liberal&lt;br /&gt;
|educrat&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal professors with no real-world job experience, typically hired by Democrat administrations to implement their ideas, like [[Cass Sunstein]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|family-friendly&lt;br /&gt;
|wholesome&lt;br /&gt;
|describes TV programming, websites, social events that are not offensive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Fleebagger&lt;br /&gt;
|Oath breakers&lt;br /&gt;
|Describes [[liberal]] politicians who avoid their sworn duties as a way to advance their political agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hatred of one's country, refusal to recognize the good elements of it, or unreasonably critical of it&lt;br /&gt;
|misopatria, misopatrist&lt;br /&gt;
|From Greek ''misein'', to hate, and Latin ''patria'', nation or homeland&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heavenly body&lt;br /&gt;
|celestial body&lt;br /&gt;
|natural objects visible in the sky&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hellbound&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|recognized by over 1.3 million sites in a Google search and no substitute term is available, yet dictionaries refuse to recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hoax and Chains&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Keynesian economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|a phonetic play on the rhetoric slogan of Hope and Change. Hope replaced by unemployment and Change represents obsessive tax burdens. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hoax plant&lt;br /&gt;
|fake townhall, kkk teaparty&lt;br /&gt;
|a term to describe a deceitful method of placing an operative that appears to be part of a group in order to push an agenda or to make a competing agenda look ridiculous. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Hollywood values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|West Coast Hedonism &lt;br /&gt;
|Over 800,000 results on Google, not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|homo-fascist &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=1318230 LaBarbera: Apple's action stems from 'homo-facism', OneNewsNow, March 25, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|LGBT Stormtrooper, Gay-vangelist&lt;br /&gt;
|Guardians of gender identity ideology&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Illegal Alien|illegal alien]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|widely used in court decisions and political discourse for years, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it is as a term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ineptocracy&lt;br /&gt;
|circle of failure&lt;br /&gt;
|a government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|infotainment&lt;br /&gt;
|tabloid news, dramacast&lt;br /&gt;
|mainstream media presents drama fluff stories as news, e.g. 20/20 - Datelin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[limited government]]&lt;br /&gt;
|we the people democracy&lt;br /&gt;
|first testament to this was the [[U.S. Constitution]], defining [[Reagan]]s presidency, can't be found in Merriam-Websters. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/limited%20government Limited government - Not found] Merriam-Webster's&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|manufactured outrage&lt;br /&gt;
|fake tears &lt;br /&gt;
|liberal politicians and the liberal media's method of stroking anger to pursue an agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|media vigilantism&lt;br /&gt;
|soviet-style censorship&lt;br /&gt;
|media's public campaign to demonize dissent against people or groups, such as [[Juan Williams]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Mediscare&lt;br /&gt;
|fear card&lt;br /&gt;
|Democrats opposed to entitlement reform use fear to stop changes to Medicare&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|merit pay&lt;br /&gt;
|performance bonus&lt;br /&gt;
|Doing your job better with perks as a reward. The typical liberal union teacher avoids merit pay at all costs, self before students. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[militant gays]]&lt;br /&gt;
|intimidating homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|modern idolatry&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;media idolatry&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;money idolatry&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;celebrity idolatry&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|idolatry conjures images of golden calves, and a modern version is needed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moral fabric&lt;br /&gt;
|domestic tranquility&lt;br /&gt;
|ethics and virtues united for the common good of all&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|morally bankrupt&lt;br /&gt;
|[[atheism]], self-void  &lt;br /&gt;
|ethically and spiritually challenged souls&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|narrative hysteria&lt;br /&gt;
|delusional finger-pointing&lt;br /&gt;
|a frantic attempt to capitalize on calamity by casting their opponents as somehow responsible for an act of madness and evil&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|opposite of [[global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|regional warming&lt;br /&gt;
|the North pole shrinks as the South pole increases&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|opposite of [[materialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritualism and idealism have been its philosophical opposites, historically&lt;br /&gt;
|[[dualism]] has been suggested, but it is not the ''opposite'' of [[materialism]]; &amp;quot;spiritualism&amp;quot; is not a common term and is the &amp;quot;opposite&amp;quot; of materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[peer pressure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|used in titles to professional journal articles as early as 1994&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe that isn't recognized by Merriam-Webster?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proven wrong, a refusal to admit it&lt;br /&gt;
|mulism; heel-digger?&lt;br /&gt;
|cf. mulish. This refusal is what promoted the [[Parable of the Good Samaritan]]. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|religious right&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian conservatives&lt;br /&gt;
|religion in America almost exclusively a conservative institution, no religious left term in existence.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reward failure&lt;br /&gt;
|TARP &lt;br /&gt;
|too big to fail, bailout bankrupt, mismanagement subsidized &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rewrite history &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/rewrite%20history  rewrite history not found, Merriam-Websters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deceit]], mislead &lt;br /&gt;
|Commonly used term describing liberal deceit to hide, defraud others about factual history.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rogue states&lt;br /&gt;
|rogue nations&lt;br /&gt;
|nations defying international law, only rogue is listed in Merriman-Websters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|runaway jury&lt;br /&gt;
|The term has existed for decades, but Merriam-Webster has not recognized it yet.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rule of Law&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[schlockumentary]]&lt;br /&gt;
|propaganda film&lt;br /&gt;
|documentary films based on falsehoods and half-truths&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[Second generation atheist|second-generation atheist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|cradle atheist&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|selective outrage&lt;br /&gt;
|partisan hypocrisy, bipolar&lt;br /&gt;
|to be against something to further a cause and reject, stay silent, ignore or discount something similar. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smear merchant&lt;br /&gt;
|serial slander&lt;br /&gt;
|to constantly hurl degrading or false accusations against others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|strict constructionism&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|an important term for over 200 years to describe adherence to the text of the Constitution, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Conservative| Traditional Values]]&lt;br /&gt;
| principles of Conservatism&lt;br /&gt;
|much the same as family values but incorporating all aspects society; family, religion, self-sufficiency, the truth, hard work. Only listed in Merriam-Websters to describe what Nilihism is against. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|true emergency&lt;br /&gt;
|life support&lt;br /&gt;
|meaning a high probability of serious injury or death to an individual or property. Emergency has been watered down, e.g. to be locked out of one's car.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Unaffected by, or impervious to, the media&lt;br /&gt;
|mediaproof&lt;br /&gt;
|cf. bulletproof. ''Once John became aware of the extent of [[liberal deceit]], he set about mediaproofing his mind''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Wikipedia]]'s undue influence on people's thinking (eg the [[hearsay society]])&lt;br /&gt;
|wikiwashing&lt;br /&gt;
|comparable to brainwashing - Wikipedia's claims and procedures become more important than reality or [[logic]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terms Difficult to Classify ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These new terms are difficult to classify:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[affirmative action|affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|first used in [http://www.thecre.com/fedlaw/legal6/eo10925.htm JFK's Executive Order 10925] in 1961 and subsequently promoted by [[LBJ]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Americanism&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|Originally, a phrase unique to American English, later, loyalty to America and its principles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bipartisan&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|emphasized by liberals when they are in the minority in power, but ignored by liberals when they are the majority in power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colonist&lt;br /&gt;
|1701&lt;br /&gt;
|settlers of a new country&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|compartmentalize&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|compartmentalizing the Bible away from knowledge and education leads to ignorance and despair&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|contrarian&lt;br /&gt;
|1657&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who delights in taking a position contrary to others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|eclectic&lt;br /&gt;
|1683&lt;br /&gt;
|taking the best from among different styles or ideas; compare [[best of the public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|evangelism&lt;br /&gt;
|1620-30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;isms&amp;quot; are usually pejorative, though this acquired a positive meaning over time, and perhaps from the outset&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|genetics&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|perhaps this should be on the conservative list?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|identity politics&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|exploiting racial, ethnic, gender alliances for political gain&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inane&lt;br /&gt;
|1662&lt;br /&gt;
|refers to comments, often made by liberals, that are utterly devoid of substance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|junk legislation&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|used initially by liberals to complain about the lack of meaningful legislation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1635-1645&lt;br /&gt;
|conservative?&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|multitasking&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|performing multiple tasks all at once&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|polar coordinates&lt;br /&gt;
|1694&lt;br /&gt;
|Newton may have used it earlier&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|republican&lt;br /&gt;
|1685&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reverse engineer&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|to deconstruct a product (or software) in order to understand how it works, often with the purpose of copying it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scrooge&lt;br /&gt;
|1843&lt;br /&gt;
|the main character in Charles Dickens' ''A Christmas Carol''; the story is based on materialism and is often used as a substitute for the Biblical account, but charity is a conservative value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|describes the use of deceit, particularly in politics; probably a conservative term, but will await more etymology about it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soapbox&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|now used pejoratively, but probably not initially when it was a way for the public to participate&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|states' rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1790&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals often invoke this too; Democrats were its biggest champions in the 1800s (in connection with slavery), and even today on issues like legalizing drugs and same-sex marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|technocrat&lt;br /&gt;
|1932&lt;br /&gt;
|technical expert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|telecommute&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term was in the British magazine ''The Economist''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a combination of a Greek root (&amp;quot;tele&amp;quot;, which means &amp;quot;far off&amp;quot;) and a Latin root (&amp;quot;commutare&amp;quot;, which means &amp;quot;to exchange&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|toady&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|a toady caves into peer pressure to seek acceptance by others: &amp;quot;the largest gathering of toadies is by college students herded into Obama campaign rallies&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tomfoolery&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|playful or foolish behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;beliefs of those opposed to [[modernism]], [[liberalism]], or [[radicalism]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[twilight zone]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|the realm of imagination that seems impossible but is difficult to disprove, and which challenges ordinary views of reality; also the terminator between night and day on a planetary body&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Whip&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In its political usage.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|late 1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|An elected position in each political party for the legislator responsible for gathering and confirming support for the party position on particular bills.  This term is derived from &amp;quot;whipper-in,&amp;quot; which in fox-hunting refers to the man who prevents hunting dogs from straying amid a chase.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2010/11/durbin_re-elected_number_two_s.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wiki&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|a website (or website software) that facilitates contributions and corrections by the public&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|working class&lt;br /&gt;
|1789&lt;br /&gt;
|those who work regular, 40-hour weeks in manual labor, such as factory jobs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Downgraded Conservative Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These conservative terms are less significant:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|byzantine&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The usage here -- in sense of complex governmental rules -- probably developed later.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|connive&lt;br /&gt;
|1601&lt;br /&gt;
|to pretend ignorance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|eleemosynary&lt;br /&gt;
|1616&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to charity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entropy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|disorder&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[filibuster]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1851&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incandescent&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|bright and radiant, conquering darkness, precursor to the invention of the incandescent lamp (light bulb)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|jabberwocky&lt;br /&gt;
|1902&lt;br /&gt;
|talking nonsense&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|level playing field&lt;br /&gt;
|1977&lt;br /&gt;
|A term originally used to describe fair, competitive [[free market]] conditions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/228650.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal policies such as [[affirmative action]] and [[progressive taxation]] have been enacted in the name of leveling the playing field, but by favoring certain groups of people these policies do the opposite.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|luddite&lt;br /&gt;
|1811&lt;br /&gt;
|one who opposes and even destroys technological advances&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|media&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[milquetoast]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|timid and unassertive; easily persuaded or exploited; inspired by Caspar Milquetoast, the unassertive character in &amp;quot;The Timid Soul&amp;quot; cartoon strip by Harold T. Webster, which ran in the New York Herald Tribune on Sundays beginning in 1924.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|normalcy&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|related to the election of [[Warren G. Harding]] by the largest margin yet in history&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ne'er-do-well&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;an idle worthless person&amp;quot; - Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reticent&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|restrained in expression, presentation, or appearance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-indulgence&lt;br /&gt;
|1753&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smart aleck&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|an obnoxiously conceited and self-assertive person with pretensions to being superior to others. Etymology: Aleck, nickname for Alexander &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/smart%20alec Smart Aleck Merriam-Websters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ Merriam-Webster dictionary]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dictionary.reference.com/ Dictionary.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Conservapedia's Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:New Liberal Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Surprising Dates of Origin for Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Linguistic Analysis of Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Bible Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Secularized Language‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservapedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Best of Conservapedia]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_Griffin_III&amp;diff=1012054</id>
		<title>Robert Griffin III</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_Griffin_III&amp;diff=1012054"/>
				<updated>2012-10-14T13:15:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: categories&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Robert Griffin III''', known by fans and sports media as &amp;quot;RG3,&amp;quot; is an American [[football]] player. He currently plays for the [[Washington Redskins]] after being selected second overall in the 2012 [[NFL]] Draft. He played football in college for [[Baylor University]], and won the 2011 [[Heisman Trophy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After scoring touchdowns or completing other big plays, Griffin has been known to make the [[Sign of the Cross]], often in combination with a kneel, a brief [[prayer]], and a gesture towards [[Heaven]]. This act has been compared to [[Tebowing]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Football Players]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religious People]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_Griffin_III&amp;diff=1008471</id>
		<title>Robert Griffin III</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_Griffin_III&amp;diff=1008471"/>
				<updated>2012-09-23T19:53:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Created page with &amp;quot;'''Robert Griffin III''', known by fans and sports media as &amp;quot;RG3,&amp;quot; is an American football player. He currently plays for the Washington Redskins after being selected sec...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Robert Griffin III''', known by fans and sports media as &amp;quot;RG3,&amp;quot; is an American [[football]] player. He currently plays for the [[Washington Redskins]] after being selected second overall in the 2012 [[NFL]] Draft. He played football in college for [[Baylor University]], and won the 2011 [[Heisman Trophy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After scoring touchdowns or completing other big plays, Griffin has been known to make the [[Sign of the Cross]], often in combination with a kneel, a brief [[prayer]], and a gesture towards heaven. This act has been compared to [[Tebowing]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=University_of_Notre_Dame&amp;diff=1008301</id>
		<title>University of Notre Dame</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=University_of_Notre_Dame&amp;diff=1008301"/>
				<updated>2012-09-23T01:04:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* Athletics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{University&lt;br /&gt;
|name=University of Notre Dame du Lac&lt;br /&gt;
|image=&lt;br /&gt;
|text=#F7E79C&lt;br /&gt;
|background=#000066&lt;br /&gt;
|type=Private&lt;br /&gt;
|city=Notre Dame, Indiana&lt;br /&gt;
|sports=baseball, basketball, cross country, fencing, football, golf, hockey, lacrosse, rowing, soccer, softball, swimming and diving, tennis, track and field, volleyball&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;sports&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://und.cstv.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|colors=blue, gold&lt;br /&gt;
|mascot=Fighting Irish&lt;br /&gt;
|website=http://www.nd.edu/&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''University of Notre Dame''' is a historically [[Catholic]] university located near South Bend, Indiana.  It was founded by members of the French Catholic order of the Holy Cross (initials C.S.C.) in 1842 led until 1865 by Rev. Edward Sorin, C.S.C.  There are 8400 undergraduates and 3400 graduate students. In 2005 Rev. John I. Jenkins, C.S.C., became the 17th president replacing Rev. Edward A. Malloy, C.S.C., who served since 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The endowment reached $6.2 billion in 2008 (13th highest in the world); it has since slipped due to the recession. Tuition for undergraduates for 2009-10 is $38,722 a year. Over 4500 students receive financial aid, averaging $21,000.  There are 120,000 living alumni, plus uncounted &amp;quot;subway alumni&amp;quot; who follow the football team as an index of  Catholic prowess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
Although founded by the French, most of the original key people were Irish; all the school presidents have been Irish.   The first two students graduated in 1849; many early alumni became priests.  Sorin sent seven of his priests to be Union chaplains during the Civil War. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
William J. Hoynes (1846-1919) was dean of the law school 1883-1919, and when its new building was opened shortly after his death it was renamed in his honor. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Father John Zahm (1851-1921) became the Holy Cross Provincial for the United States (1896-1906), with overall supervision of the university, He tried to transform Notre Dame into a great university, erecting buildings and added to the campus art gallery and library, and amassing what became a famous Dante collection. His term was not renewed because of fears he had expanded Notre Dame too quickly and had run the Holy Cross order into serious debt. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:UND1910.jpg|thumb|280px|ND in 1910]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rev. Theodore Hesburgh, C.S.C., (born 1917) served as president for 35 years (1952-87). In that time the annual operating budget rose from $9.7 million to $176.6 million, the endowment from $9 million to $350 million, and research funding from $735,000 to $15 million.  Enrollment increased from 4,979 to 9,600, faculty from 389 to 950, and degrees awarded annually from 1,212 to 2,500. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 18 years under President Malloy (1987-2005), there was rapid rapid growth in the school's reputation, faculty, and resources. He increased the faculty by more than 500 professors; the academic quality of the student body has improved dramatically, the average SAT score rose from 1240 to 1360; the number of minority students more than doubled; the endowment grew from $350 million to more than $3 billion; the annual operating budget rose from $177 million to more than $650 million; and annual research funding improved from $15 million to more than $70 million. Notre Dame’s most recent capital campaign raised $1.1 billion, far exceeding its goal of $767 million, and is the largest in the history of Catholic higher education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Catholic status==&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1967 it has been controlled by a lay board, and not by the Catholic Church. The trustees are to select presidents from the pool of C.S.C. priests (that is, members of the Holy Cross order). President Hesburgh orchestrated the change to head off too-tight Church control.  The University's conferral of an honorary degree on President Obama in May 2009 led to protests by some bishops, who disagree with Obama's positions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the decade after the Second Vatican Council (1963) the university’s basic Catholicism did not change, but its ways of emphasizing it did. Instead of merely trying to perpetuate the institution and keep its adherents obedient to the institutional church, there was an attempt to develop a laity which is informed and dedicated.  Many previously ignored topics such as compulsory celibacy for the priesthood, birth control, and ecumenicity were discussed without limits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the faculty was well over 85% Catholic before 1970, search practices have broadened. In recent years about half the new faculty hires have been Catholics, and Catholics now comprise 52% of the faculty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; At the top 50 research universities in the U.S. about 6% of the faculty are Catholics. John T. Mcgreevy, &amp;quot;Catholic Enough? Religious Identity at Notre Dame,&amp;quot; ''Commonweal'', Vol. 134, September 28, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a policy statement the university declares that &amp;quot;the Catholic identity of the University depends upon ... the continuing presence of a predominant number of Catholic intellectuals&amp;quot; on the faculty. There is a consensus this means a solid majority. As the provost has explained, the aim is &amp;quot;to have a majority of faculty who are Catholic, who understand the nature of the religion, who can be living role models, who can talk with students about issues outside the classroom and can infuse values into what they do.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;William H. Dempsey, &amp;quot;How Catholic Is Notre Dame?&amp;quot; ''First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion and Public Life,'' No. 183, May 2008. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Intellectual life==&lt;br /&gt;
===Science=== &lt;br /&gt;
Father Joseph Carrier, C.S.C. was Director of the Science Museum and the Library and Professor of Chemistry and Physics until 1874. Carrier taught that scientific research and its promise for progress were not antagonistic to the ideals of intellectual and moral culture endorsed by the Church.  One of Carrier's students was Father John Zahm (1851-1921) who was made Professor and Co-Director of the Science Department at age 23 and by 1900 was a nationally prominent scientist and naturalist. Zahm was active in the Catholic Summer School movement, which introduced Catholic laity to contemporary intellectual issues. His book ''Evolution and Dogma'' (1896) defended certain aspects of evolutionary theory as true, and argued, moreover, that even the great Church teachers Thomas Aquinas and Augustine taught something like it. The intervention of Irish American Catholics in Rome prevented Zahm's censure by the Vatican.  In 1913, Zahm and former President [[Theodore Roosevelt]] embarked on a major expedition through the Amazon.&lt;br /&gt;
====Lobund Institute====&lt;br /&gt;
The Lobund Institute grew out of pioneering research in germ-free-life which began in 1928. This area of research originated in a question posed by Pasteur as to whether animal life was possible without bacteria. Though others had taken up this idea, their research was short lived and inconclusive. Lobund was the first research organization to answer definitively, that such life is possible and that it can be prolonged through generations. But the objective was not merely to answer Pasteur's question but also to produce the germ free animal as a new tool for biological and medical research. This objective was reached and for years Lobund was a unique center for the study and production of germ free animals and for their use in biological and medical investigations. Today the work has spread to other universities. In the beginning it was under the Department of Biology and a program leading to the master's degree accompanied the research program. In the 1940s Lobund achieved independent status as a purely research organization and in 1950 was raised to the status of an Institute. In 1958 it was brought back into the Department of Biology as integral part of that department, but with its own program leading to the degree of PhD in Gnotobiotics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Philip S. Moore, ''The Story of Notre Dame: Academic Development: University of Notre Dame'' [http://archives.nd.edu/moore/moore06.htm#138 online] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===English===&lt;br /&gt;
Richard Sullivan taught English from 1936 to 1974 and published six novels, dozens of short stories, and various other efforts. Though published by major houses, he never became an important mainstream writer but was known as a regional writer and a Catholic spokesman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During his long tenure as an English professor during the 1930s-60s, Frank O'Malley emerged as the exemplary American Catholic intellectual. Influenced by Jacques Maritain, John U. Nef, and others, O'Malley developed a concept of Christian philosophy that was a fundamental element in his thought. Through his course &amp;quot;Modern Catholic Writers&amp;quot; O'Malley introduced generations of undergraduates to Gabriel Marcel, Graham Greene, Evelyn Waugh, Sigrid Undset, Paul Clandel, and Gerard Manley Hopkins.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Arnold Sparr, &amp;quot;The Catholic Laity, the Intellectual Apostolate and the Pre-Vatican II Church: Frank O'Malley of Notre Dame.&amp;quot; ''U.S. Catholic Historian'' 1990 9(3): 305-320. 0735-8318 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===History===&lt;br /&gt;
The Program in Mediaeval Studies began in 1933 and expanded into a world-famous Mediaeval Institute in 1946, an upgrade from the which dates back to 1933. It provides a center of research, instruction, and preparation of teacher-scholars in the Christian civilization of the Middle Ages,&amp;quot; and offers courses on mediaeval thought, life and culture.  Its '' Publications in Mediaeval Studies'' began in 1936. ''Texts and Studies in Mediaeval Education'' published its first volume in 1953. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Father Thomas McAvoy (1903-69) was a leading historian of American Catholicism, professor of history and university archivist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The History department has hired [[Mark Noll]], a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and perhaps the nation's leading evangelical intellectual, as well as [[George Marsden]], another evangelical and the Bancroft Prize-winning biographer of Jonathan Edwards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===European émigrés===&lt;br /&gt;
The rise of Hitler and other dictators in the 1930s forced numerous Catholic intellectuals to flee Europe; many came to Notre Dame, including Anton-Hermann Chroust (1907-1982) in classics and law&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [http://myweb.wvnet.edu/~jelkins/lp-2001/chroust.html bibliography]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and Waldemar Gurian a German Catholic intellectual of Jewish descent Positivism dominated American intellectual life in the 1920s onward but in marked contrast, Gurian received a German Catholic education and wrote his doctoral dissertation under Max Scheler.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Frank O'Malley, &amp;quot;Waldemar Gurian at Notre Dame,&amp;quot; ''Review of Politics,'' Vol. 17, No. 1, The Gurian Memorial Issue (Jan., 1955), pp. 19-23 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1405095 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Ivan Meštrovic (1883-1962), a renown sculptor, brought Croatian culture to campus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [http://www.nd.edu/~ndethics/inspires/mestrovic.shtml Ivan Meštrovic (1883-1962)] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exiles developed a distinctive emphasis on the evils of totalitarianism.  For example the political science courses of Gerhart Niemeyer (1907-97) explained communist ideology and were particularly accessible to his students. He came to ND in 1955, and was a frequent contributor to the ''National Review'' and other conservative magazines.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; William S. Miller, &amp;quot;Gerhart Niemeyer: His Principles of Conservatism,&amp;quot; ''Modern Age'' 2007 49(3): 273-284 online at [[EBSCO]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Political Science====&lt;br /&gt;
''The Review of Politics'' was founded in 1939 by Gurian, modeled after German Catholic journals. It quickly emerged as part of an international Catholic intellectual revival, offering an alternative vision to the failed positivist philosophy. For 44 years, the ''Review'' was edited by Gurian, Matthew Fitzsimons, Frederick Crosson, and Thomas Stritch. Intellectual leaders included Gurian, Jacques Maritain, Frank O'Malley, Leo Richard Ward, F. A. Hermens, and John U. Nef. It became a major forum for political ideas and modern political concerns, especially from a Judeo-Christian and scholastic tradition..&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Thomas Stritch, &amp;quot;After Forty Years: Notre Dame and the Review of Politics&amp;quot; ''Review Of Politics'' 1978 40: 437-446. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1406757  in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Student life==&lt;br /&gt;
In the 19th century there were large boarding programs for elementary and high school boys; they were phased out by 1920. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Catholic Total Abstinence Union was influential among undergraduates from its founding in 1842, and by 1880 the campus was officially &amp;quot;dry.&amp;quot; World War I changes included a lessening of interest in temperance, more off-campus freedom for students, and national prohibition, and the phasing out of pre-collegiate prohgrams. While the use of alcohol by students, on or off campus, was  forbidden, it was increasingly more difficult to enforce. Father John O'Hara, the Prefect of Religion, re-encouraged temperance in the early 1920s, and although he became president of Notre Dame in 1933, the temperance movement had run its course by the time he left in 1939. The influx of World War II veterans to the university in the late 1940s sealed the fate of Notre Dame's temperance movement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; John F. Quinn, &amp;quot;'It's Fashionable Here to be a Total Abstainer': Temperance Advocacy at the University of Notre Dame, 1870-1940.&amp;quot; ''American Catholic Studies'' 1999 110: 1-27. 0002-7790 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women were admitted as graduate students after World War II, and as undergraduates in 1972, after a failed effort to merge with neighboring Saint Mary's College, an all-woman's college that remains independent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See Susan L. Poulson and Loretta P. Higgins, &amp;quot;Gender, Coeducation, and the Transformation of Catholic Identity American Catholic Higher Education&amp;quot; ''Catholic Historical Review'' 2003 89(3): 489-510 in [[EBSCO]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Athletics==&lt;br /&gt;
Football began in 1887 and by 1927 the team had the nickname &amp;quot;Fighting Irish&amp;quot;.  From 1918 to 1930 head football coach Knute Rockne (1888-1931) took ND football to the top, winning six national championships and setting a standard that subsequent coaches had to meet or be fired. Rockne's success was both a blessing and a curse. It made the small school nationally famous as the most visible institution of Catholicism in America, and a demonstration of physical prowess every Saturday in the fall season. Academic critics on and off campus complained about the promotion of brawn over brains, and the hyper-aggressive tactics used to recruit athletes and keep them eligible to play. But intellectuals made the same complaint about every top-ranked school, and downplayed the need of ND for money and the Catholic community for recognition. Rockne himself, until his death in a plane crash at the height of his career, never backed down from his advocacy of the positive value of both football and a winning tradition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ray Robinson, ''Rockne of Notre Dame: The Making of a Football Legend'' (1999); Murray Sperber, ''Shake Down the Thunder: The Creation of Notre Dame Football'' (1993)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notre Dame has 12 men's and 12 women's sports teams.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;sports&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The football program has won 13 bowl games (while losing 15) and 13 national championships.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nationalchamps.net/NCAA/database/notredame_database.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
George Gipp was the school’s legendary football player during 1916-20. He played semiprofessional baseball and smoked, drank, and gambled when not playing sports. He was also humble, generous to the needy, and a man of integrity. It was in 1928 that famed coach [[Knute Rockne]] used his final conversation with the dying Gipp to inspire the Notre Dame team to beat the Army team and &amp;quot;win one for the Gipper.&amp;quot; The  1940 film, &amp;quot;Knute Rockne - All American,&amp;quot; starred Pat O'Brien as Knute Rockne and [[Ronald Reagan]] as Gipp.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A mural visible from Notre Dame's football stadium that depicts the resurrected [[Jesus Christ]] has been given the nickname &amp;quot;Touchdown Jesus.&amp;quot; Some consider this sacrilegious because it minimizes the resurrection and possibly implies that Jesus actively involves himself in matters of football.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Burns, Robert E. ''Being Catholic, Being American: The Notre Dame Story, 1934-1952, Vol. 2.'' (2000). 632pp. [http://www.amazon.com/Being-Catholic-American-1934-1952-Education/dp/0268021635/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1242795543&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Hesburgh, Theodore M. ''God, Country, Notre Dame: The Autobiography of Theodore M. Hesburgh'' (2000)&lt;br /&gt;
*  McAvoy, Thomas T. &amp;quot;Notre Dame, 1919-1922: The Burns Revolution&amp;quot;. ''Review of Politics'' 1963 25(4): 431-450. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1405842  in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
*  McAvoy, Thomas T. ''Father O'Hara of Notre Dame'' (1967)&lt;br /&gt;
* Massa, Mark S. ''Catholics and American Culture: Fulton Sheen, Dorothy Day, and the Notre Dame Football Team.'' (1999). 278 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Moore, Philip S. ''The Story of Notre Dame: Academic Development: University of Notre Dame'' [http://archives.nd.edu/moore/moore.htm online book]&lt;br /&gt;
* O'Brien, Michael. ''Hesburgh: A Biography.'' (1998). 354 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* O'Connell, Marvin R. ''Edward Sorin.'' (2001). 792 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Rice, Charles E., Ralph McInerny, and Alfred J. Freddoso. What Happened to Notre Dame? (2009), laments the weakening of Catholicism at ND as shown by the Obama fiasco&lt;br /&gt;
* Robinson, Ray. ''Rockne of Notre Dame: The Making of a Football Legend.'' (1999). 290 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Sperber, Murray. ''Shake Down the Thunder: The Creation of Notre Dame Football.'' (1993) 634 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Yaeger, Don and Looney, Douglas S. ''Under the Tarnished Dome: How Notre Dame Betrayed Its Ideals for Football Glory.'' (1993). 299 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nd.edu/ University of Notre Dame]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Nb_US_universities|Indiana‎}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Universities]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Football]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Catholic Church]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Crude_oil&amp;diff=1005050</id>
		<title>Crude oil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Crude_oil&amp;diff=1005050"/>
				<updated>2012-09-08T23:02:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* External links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Oil''' is a [[viscosity|viscous]] [[liquid]] that is not [[solubility|soluble]] in [[water]] and which is used for mainly for lubrication and [[fuel]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of oil. Organic oils are derived from from plants and other types of organic matter, such as [[olive]]s. Mineral oils, such as [[petroleum]], are obtained from geological sources.  The latter is not formed by decayed matter, as that contradicts the Creationist worldview, but instead during a ''[[theobaric]]'' process. This oil existed in pristine state before the Flood, and moved during the Flood into the reservoirs where Noah emerged from the Ark, and where we now find it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/arj/v1/n1/origin-of-oil Origin of Oil], Answers in Genesis&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Consequently much of the oil is found in the Middle East, in addition to massive deposits in Canada&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rense.com/general37/petrol.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Venezuela&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/data_graphs/330.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uses ==&lt;br /&gt;
Uses of oil include the following:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Heat]]ing, by [[burn]]ing the oil&lt;br /&gt;
* Illumination, in oil lamps&lt;br /&gt;
* Generation of [[electricity]], by burning the oil to turn water to steam used to run generators&lt;br /&gt;
* Lubrication&lt;br /&gt;
* Anointing&lt;br /&gt;
* Manufacture of perfumes&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cooking]], to add [[flavor]], and to improve [[heat transfer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Where does Oil Come From? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a [[Young Earth Creationist]] model, a ''theobaric'' process produced the oil supply.  During the Creation Week, God created a mature earth, and in the Garden of Eden, everything was ready for its first occupants.  There must have been mature plants and trees to supply food for immediate consumption, and oil for various uses (e.g., anointing, lubrication - see [[oil#uses]]). It remained relatively undisturbed until the Noachian Flood.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This oil, created in deep primordial repositories during the Creation Week migrated upwards into present-day reservoirs during the Noachian Flood.  During the Flood, intense geological activity occurred whilst the “fountains of the great deep” described in Genesis were active, though after day 150 of the Flood God said that the fountains were closed, so we would expect a sharp cut-off in hydraulic activity. During the Flood, the primordial repositories containing the hydrocarbons will have been breached and fluids released.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/arj/v1/n1/origin-of-oil Origin of Oil], Answers in Genesis&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Oil in the Bible ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oil, probably usually referring to olive oil, appears over two hundred times in the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
* Oil, particularly olive oil, is used in drink offerings to God, but not in sin offerings.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Bible ref|Genesis|28|18}}, {{Bible ref|Genesis|35|14}}, {{Bible ref|Leviticus|2}}, {{Bible ref|Leviticus|14}}, {{Bible ref|Numbers|7}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Oil is used for anointing the priests of God by pouring it on their heads.  This sanctifies them and makes them holy&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Bible ref|Exodus|29|2,7,21}}, {{Bible ref|Exodus|30|25}}, {{Bible ref|Leviticus|8}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  It was also used for anointing the kings of Israel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Bible ref|I_Samuel|10|1}}, {{Bible ref|I_Kings|1|39}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Oil is used for lighting lamps.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Bible ref|Exodus|27|20}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* In a miracle, [[Elisha]] caused a poor widow's little bit of oil to be enough to fill all her jars, and her neighbor's jars, with oil that she could sell it to pay her debts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Bible ref|II_Kings|4|1-7}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Petroleum]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gasoline]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fossil fuel]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peak oil]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abiotic oil]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/02/26/how-the-gas-prices-are-manipulated-by-the-koch-brothers-and-other-wall-street-players/ How The Gas Prices Are Manipulated By The Koch Brothers And Other Wall Street Players.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShHI53zeb5M Cramer: How Oil Prices Are Manipulated.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article29042.html Mysterious Hidden Hand That Manipulates the Crude Oil Price.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://mondediplo.com/openpage/a-tough-oil-world A tough-oil world: Why twenty-first century oil will break the bank - and the planet]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:geology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:food and Drink]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jurassic_Park&amp;diff=1003386</id>
		<title>Jurassic Park</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jurassic_Park&amp;diff=1003386"/>
				<updated>2012-09-02T13:47:30Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* Themes */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Jurassic Park''' is a 1990 novel by [[Michael Crichton]], in which a [[theme park]] containing genetically engineered [[dinosaur]]s goes badly wrong. In 1993 it was turned into a feature film direct by [[Steven Speilberg]], which became the 13th highest grossing film ever in North America&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/domestic.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. It was followed by sequel 'The Lost World' in 1997.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Plot==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The InGen corporation led by [[entrepreneur]] John Hammond uses advanced [[genetic engineering]] techniques to breed long dead plants and animals and plans to use them as the basis for a theme park on the Costa Rican island Ilsa Nublar. During the parks construction a number of workers are killed and in order to reassure backers Hammond invites a small number of experts to visit the islands and give it their seal of approval. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During these experts visits the security systems confining the dinosaurs break down due to the actions of a disgruntled employee and the dinosaurs escape from their enclosures. A number of the experts are killed and the rest have several near misses. In the end the experts escape, Hammond is killed by his own creations and the Costa Rican government uses [[nerve gas]] to destroy the dinosaurs and cover up the incident. In the end of the book it is implied that some of the dinosaurs survived and escaped to the mainland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Themes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jurassic park is a cautionary tale similar to Mary Shelley's [[Frankenstein]], dealing with themes including scientific ethics, the limits of technology and chaos theory. It has a strong [[conservative]] message that humans should not attempt to &amp;quot;play God.&amp;quot; However, the scientific discussion is framed in a way that promotes an [[old Earth]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Books]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Thrillers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Debatable Whether Conservative]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=1003321</id>
		<title>Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=1003321"/>
				<updated>2012-09-02T04:23:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Clarification&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Barack Hussein Obama&lt;br /&gt;
|image=President Barack Obama.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama]]; may have had a prior marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=see [[Obama's religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/president&lt;br /&gt;
	|country=the United States&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=44th&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 20, 2009-Present&lt;br /&gt;
	|vp=[[Joe Biden]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[George W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 2005 – November 16, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=Peter Fitzgerald&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Roland Burris]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Barack Hussein Obama II''' (according to an unverified printed birth certificate he presented in response to criticism, he was born August 4, 1961, in [[Hawaii]]) was elected the 44th President.  Promoted heavily by [[liberals]], as demonstrated by his unjustified receipt of the 2009 [[Nobel Prize|Nobel Peace Prize]], Obama won the presidency despite a short and unremarkable political career by outspending his opponent, [[John McCain]], by hundreds of millions of dollars in 2008. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The liberal claptrap that helped elected Obama as president seems silly today.  It was claimed, for example, that Obama has millions of followers on Twitter, when in fact some 70% of them are FAKE.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2012/08/obama-has-millions-of-fake-twitter-followers/1#.UDfQVqA2et_&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama relies almost entirely on teleprompters for his speeches and even his press conferences, and at one point had teleprompters set up for him in a middle school classroom so he  would know what to say.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is [[pro-abortion]]. Obama during the 2008 election campaign said that he intended to &amp;quot;[[Redistribution of wealth|spread the wealth around]]&amp;quot; - which conservatives have condemned for being [[Socialism|socialist]]. Barack Obama has been widely criticized by the American [[business]] community and others for his anti-business policies that are destroying American jobs during a period of high unemployment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuckerman, M.B. (2010, July 16). [http://www.usnews.com/opinion/mzuckerman/articles/2010/07/16/obamas-anti-business-policies-are-our-economic-katrina Obama's Anti-business Policies are our Economic Katrina]. ''U.S. News''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Barnes, F. (2009, July 22). [http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/619dvjlm.asp An Anti-Business President]. ''The Weekly Standard''. Vol. 14, No. 38&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Shedlock, M. (2010, August 20). [http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/08/small-businesses-are-not-hiring-why.html Small Businesses are not hiring. Why should they?] Globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wright, C.E. (2012, February 12). [http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/dear_mr_president_why_we_are_n.html Dear Mr. President: Why we are not hiring]. ''American Thinker''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On July 26, 2012, the [[Gallup Poll|Gallup organization]] reported that merely 35% of business owners approved of Barack Obama's job performance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gallup.com/poll/156206/Business-Owners-Among-Least-Approving-Obama.aspx U.S. Business Owners Now Among Least Approving of Obama]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Former [[Democrat]] Presidential candidate [[Joe Lieberman]] endorsed Obama's opponent in 2008 and has declined to endorse [[Obama]] for the [[Presidential Election 2012]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lillis, M. (2012, April 22). [http://thehill.com/video/campaign/222929-lieberman-declines-to-endorse-in-presidential-race Sen. Lieberman declines to endorse in presidential race]. ''The Hill''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under President Obama's mismanagement of the economy, the United States Government's credit rating has, for the first time in its history, been downgraded from AAA to AA+, and [[poverty]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/incpovhlth/2009/pov09fig04.pdf Figure 4: Number in Poverty and Poverty Rate: 1959-2009]. ''U.S. Census Bureau''. Current Population Survey, 1960 to 2010 Annual Social and Economic Supplements.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; has increased markedly. By and large his policies to combat the recession, unemployment, slow growth, the deficit, and expanding [[national debt]], have failed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The vast majority (73%) of respondents reported the fiscal stimulus enacted in February 2009 has had no impact on employment to date. While 68% also believe a jobs bill, such as the one recently enacted into law, will have no impact on payrolls, 30% do believe it will boost payrolls moderately&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[http://www.nabe.com/press/ind1004.pdf Industry Survey], ''National Association for Business Economics'', April 2010, p. 2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also on the domestic front, Obama passed an expensive [[health care]] bill in 2009 with no [[bipartisan]] support and 34 Democrats dissenting. Recently, the [[Congressional Budget Office]] wrote an open letter to [[John Boehner]], the Speaker of the House, outlining the effects of repealing [[Obamacare]] and explaining why net loss of over 100 billion dollars would occur from the repeal. [http://cbo.gov/publication/43471]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fatalities in Afghanistan have more than doubled under Obama's leadership then in the preceding eight years combined, according to the Congressional Research Service &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chesser, S.G. (2012, July 12). [http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R41084.pdf Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians - CRS Report for Congress]. Pg. 3. ''Congressional Research Service''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Against his own Defense Secretary's advice, Obama [[Libyan uprising 2011|attacked Libya]] - a possible violation of the [[War Powers Act]]. After he announced the killing of [[September 11th]] mastermind and terrorist [[Osama bin Laden]], the [[U.S. State Department]] warned of the increased risk to the lives and safety of Americans around the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''KABC-TV/DT'' (2011, July 27). [http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/national_world&amp;amp;id=8273909 Risk of anti-US violence up after Osama bin Laden's death]. On ''ABC7 News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bin Laden's death had negligible long term impact on Obama's approval ratings, as seen in Gallup's daily poll.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Gallup''. [http://www.gallup.com/poll/113980/gallup-daily-obama-job-approval.aspx Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's bizarre gaffes are frequent and embarrassing, but typically unreported by the [[liberal media]]. Many hardworking American businessmen took offense to a 2012 campaign speech about the economy where he says &amp;quot;You didn't build that.&amp;quot; However, most people believe it is clear from the context of his speech&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKjPI6no5ng&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that the word &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; doesn't refer to businesses, but to roads and bridges funded by the government. Obama offended [[Poland]] by referring to the [[Nazi]] death camps there as &amp;quot;Polish death camps.&amp;quot; Later Obama apologized.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sink, J. (2012, June 1). [http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/europe/230419-obama-letter-says-he-regrets-polish-death-camp-gaffe Obama apologizes in writing for 'Polish death camp' verbal gaffe]. ''The Hill''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
===Birth===&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOC right}}&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article : [[Early life and career of Barack Hussein Obama]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also : [[Barack Obama's Muslim Heritage]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Obama claims to have been born in Hawaii to Stanley Ann Dunham and [[Barack Obama Sr.]] - who had married just six months prior - on August 4, 1961 in [[Honolulu, Hawaii]].&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc&amp;gt;''MSNBC'' (2008, February 20). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23257295/ns/msnbc_tv-documentaries/t/obama-becomes-rising-star-among-democrats/ Obama Becomes Rising Star Among Democrats].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Some contend that this story is a complete fabrication.  After many leading conservatives including the leadership of this site and  [[Donald Trump]]  called for Obama to release his birth certificate he did on April 27.  Sheriff [[Joe Arpaio]] of Maricopa County in Arizona conducted an investigation of the Obama's eligibility and alleged that the &amp;quot;birth certificate&amp;quot; was a fake; however, no charges have been filed.  [[Obama]] was reportedly assigned a social security number whose area code was assigned to applications coming from zip codes in Connecticut.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Beginning in 1972, all Social Security numbers were issued from a central office in Baltimore, Maryland.[http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama Sr. was not a [[Natural born citizen|citizen of the United States]]. At the time of Obama's birth, Kenya was a British colony, meaning that Obama Sr not only held British citizenship, but passed it on to his son. When Kenya gained independence, Obama and his father both lost British citizenship and gained Kenyan citizenship. Barack Obama was a dual citizen of the United States and Kenya until his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired in 1984, as he had failed to renounce US nationality and swear loyalty to Kenya. Despite having been born with US citizenship through his mother, it has been argued that as he was born with dual nationality, he is not a natural-born citizen of the United States, and thus constitutionally ineligible to become President.&lt;br /&gt;
===Early Life===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's birth parents divorced in 1963 due to strain caused by Barack Obama Sr. leaving Hawaii to study economics at Harvard, when Obama was 2 years old, following which his mother married Lolo Soetoro, an [[Indonesian]] geologist. When Barack Obama was age 6 his mother and adoptive father took him to Jakarta, Indonesia for 4 years while his mother pursued a Ph.D. in Anthropology requiring fieldwork there.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;db mother&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-05-03/a-singular-woman-by-janny-scott-review-by-stacy-schiff/#|work=The Daily Beast|format=HTML|language=English|title=Dreams of His Mother|author=Stacy Schiff}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His mother then left him in Hawaii with his grandparents (Stanley and Madelyn Dunham, who had moved to Hawaii in 1959) so he could pursue American education.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed&amp;gt;Malveaux, Suzanne (2008, August 20). &amp;quot;[http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0808/20/se.02.html Barack Obama Revealed].&amp;quot; ''CNN''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other siblings of Obama's include his half-sister Maya Soetoro-Ng and 7 other children born to his father by 4 different women.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama&amp;gt;Purdum, Todd (2008, March). &amp;quot;[http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/03/obama200803 Raising Obama].&amp;quot; ''Vanity Fair''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For much of his early life, prior to his transfer to Columbia University, he went by his nickname, &amp;quot;Barry&amp;quot;. In the summer of 1988, before attending Harvard Law School (he'd just been accepted), he visited Kogelo, Kenya, to learn more about his father's family. When his mother died in 1995, he and his sister Maya scattered her ashes over Hawaii's south shore.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Personal Life===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Michelle Obama.jpg|frame|right|Michelle (Robinson) Obama, wife of Barack Obama.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama met and began dating his future wife, an Attorney named Michelle Robinson, herself a recent Harvard Law School graduate, while he was working at Sidley Austin LLP, a prestigious corporate law firm.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; The two continued dating long-distance while he finished law school, and on October 18, 1982, were married by Reverend Jeremiah Wright at Trinity United Church.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; In 1999, their first child was born, Malia, and in 2001, another daughter, Natasha (often called Sasha).&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama joined Reverend Jeremiah Wright's Trinity United Church from 1985-1988 during his time as a community organizer (''See [[Barack_Obama#1985-1988.2C_Community_Organizer|1985-1988, Community Organizer]] section'').  Obama was married at Trinity United Church, credits Wright with his conversion to Christianity, and had both his daughters, Sasha and Malia, baptized there.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
At age 6, Obama attended schools in Indonesia, the first a Catholic School while he was in Kindergarten, and later a public school. While the public school had mostly Muslim students (since most Indonesians were Muslim), claims that it was a Muslim school or Madrassa are false. In 1971, at age 10, Barack Obama moved to Hawaii, and his grandparents helped him gain entrance to the prestigious Punahou Academy in Honolulu through a scholarship, while he was in 5th grade.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; At his elite high school with 1,200 students he was just 1 of 3 black students, and was on the second string of the state champion basketball team his senior year. During this time he also experimented briefly with marijuana and cocaine. He wrote a poem for the school's literary magazine, ''Ka Wai Ola''.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1979, he began a 2-year stint at Occidental College college in Los Angeles&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;, and then transferred to Columbia University in New York, which he graduated from in 1983.&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic&amp;gt;Scott, Janny (2007, July 30). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/30/us/politics/30obama.html?pagewanted=all In Illinois, Obama Proved Pragmatic and Shrewd].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During this time he allegedly spoke at an Anti-Apartheid rally on campus,&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; although several prominent student leaders said they did not remember him there. Professor Michael L. Baron was impressed by Obama and wrote him a recommendation for Harvard Law School.&amp;lt;ref name=differs&amp;gt;Scott, J. (2007, October 30). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/30/us/politics/30obama.html?pagewanted=all Obama's Account of New York Years Often Differs From What Others Say].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the winter of 1988 Barack Obama decided to attend Harvard Law School, and left Chicago for Cambridge, Massachusetts. In his 2nd year he became the first black president of the ''Harvard Law Review'', following a &amp;quot;marathon voting session&amp;quot; in which he was elected on the 19th ballot.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt; This led to national attention and numerous job offers, which Obama passed up, at age 30, to pursue a political career in Chicago.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Non-Political Employment===&lt;br /&gt;
====1983-1984, Financial Analyst and Writer====&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984 Obama worked as a writer and financial analyst for Business International Corporation, a small newsletter-publishing and research firm which aided multinational companies understand overseas markets. Obama served as a writer/researcher for a company reference service, Financing Foreign Operations, and wrote for a newsletter, Business International Money Report. His Supervisor was Cathy Lazere, and he worked at the company to pay off his student loans.&amp;lt;ref name=differs /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Henig, J. (2008, June 21). &amp;quot;[http://www.factcheck.org/2008/06/obama-polishes-his-resume-2/ Obama Polishes His Resume].&amp;quot; ''FactCheck.org''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====1984-1988, Community Organizer====&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984, Obama was hired by the New York Public Interest Research Group, a non-profit organization promoting environmental, consumer, and government reforms. He also was paid just under $10,000 annually as a full-time organizer for Harlem's City College to mobilize student volunteers.&amp;lt;ref name=differs /&amp;gt; From 1985-88, Obama worked as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago, for which he was paid $1,000 a year, with $2,000 extra for a car. He helped Loretta Herron gain city approval for a local community job center. &amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=streetwise&amp;gt;Scott, Janny (2007, September 9). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/09/us/politics/09obama.html?pagewanted=all In 2000, a Streetwise Veteran Schooled a Bold Young Obama].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During this time Obama joined Reverend Wright's Trinity United Church because in the words of Suzanne Malveaux of ''CNN'', &amp;quot;It was the church to join if you wanted to be one of Chicago's black movers and shakers.&amp;quot; At the time, community organizing involved close affiliation with churches, which was how Obama met Wright. The slow progress in fighting asbestos contamination in the Altgeld Gardens housing project led to Obama's departure from Chicago, and enrollment at Harvard Law School in the winter of 1988.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====1988-1996, Law Practice====&lt;br /&gt;
In 1988 Obama gained work as a Summer Associate at one of the most prestigious corporate law firms in the world, Sidley Austin LLP&amp;lt;ref name=austin&amp;gt;Lattman, P. (2007, May 11). &amp;quot;[http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/05/11/sidley-austin-when-barack-met-michelle/ When Barack Met Michelle].&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;, owned by Newton Minow, thanks to the recommendation of Minow's daughter Martha, a professor at Harvard Law School. It was at Minow's law firm that Obama would meet Michelle Robinson, his future wife.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt; From 1993-96 he practiced civil rights law, after graduating from Harvard, at Miner, Barnhill, &amp;amp; Galland, a small politically-connected law firm.&amp;lt;ref name=austin /&amp;gt; It was at Miner, Barnhill, &amp;amp; Galland that he would meet influential real estate developer Tony Rezko.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====1992-2004, Law Professor at University of Chicago====&lt;br /&gt;
Obama taught constitutional law part-time at the University of Chicago Law School&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt; from 1992-2004. He was a Lecturer from 1992-96, teaching 3 courses per year, and a Senior Lecturer from 1996-2004. Senior Lecturers are considered Law School faculty and regarded as professors but not full-time or tenured. Obama was invited to become a Senior Lecturer several times during this period but declined each time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media Media Inquiries: Statement Regarding Barack Obama].&amp;quot; ''University of Chicago Law School''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====1995, Author====&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995 Obama published &amp;quot;Dreams From My Father&amp;quot; about his life and family background.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Personal Awards===&lt;br /&gt;
====2009 Nobel Peace Prize====&lt;br /&gt;
On October 9, 2009 Barack H. Obama became the third sitting U.S. President&amp;lt;ref name=wilsons&amp;gt;Wilson, Scott (2009, October 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/09/AR2009100900914.html President Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize]. ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize &amp;quot;''for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples''&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NobelPrize.org (2009, October 9). &amp;quot;[http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2009/press.html The Nobel Prize for 2009: Press Release].&amp;quot; Oslo, Norway. Accessed May 13, 2012.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama stated that he was &amp;quot;surprised and deeply humbled&amp;quot; to receive the unexpected award,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, October 9). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2009-10-09/world/nobel.peace.prize_1_norwegian-nobel-committee-international-diplomacy-and-cooperation-nuclear-weapons?_s=PM:WORLD Obama: Nobel Peace Prize is 'Call to Action'].&amp;quot; ''CNN''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and also said, &amp;quot;To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who've been honored by this prize -- men and women who have inspired me and inspired the entire world through their courageous pursuit of peace&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=wilsons /&amp;gt; The award was widely criticized given Obama's then lack of accomplishments.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chazan, G. &amp;amp; MacDonald, A. (2009, October 11). &amp;quot;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125509603349176083.html Nobel Committee's Decision Courts Controversy].&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(2009, October 9). &amp;quot;[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/09/obamas-peace-prize-draws-criticism-liberals/ Obama's Peace Prize Draws Criticism, Even From Some Liberals].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==1991-1992, Project Vote==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1991 Obama was recruited by Sandy Newman to head the Chicago chapter of Project Vote!&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;, and in 1992 was the Executive Director, overseeing a voter registration drive which registered 125,000 black voters and was credited with helping elect U.S. Senator Carol Mosely Braun.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==1996-2003, Illinois State Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
===1996 Election===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:O-2002-antiwar-rally-davidson.jpg|right|thumb|250px| Obama speaking at the October 2002 rally in Chicago organized by [[Carl Davidson]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Davidson is a longtime [[Mao]]ist and champion of the ''Thought of Mao Tse Tung.'' Davidson's anti-Trotskyite polemic, [http://www.wengewang.org/read.php?tid=10925 ''Left in Form, Right in Essence''] defends Maoist doctrine.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''&amp;quot;[H]e is a brutal man who butchers his own people,&amp;quot;'' nevertheless Obama opposed ''&amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot;.'']]&lt;br /&gt;
====Knocking Candidates Off the Ballot====&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama ran for the Illinois state senate in 1996. He was initially supported by incumbent Alice Palmer, who declared she would run for the U.S. Congress. However, when her bid for Congress failed on November 28, 1995, she tried to run for her old seat in the March 1996 election. Her supporters asked Obama to step aside, although whether this was with her permission remains uncertain.&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic /&amp;gt; Not only did Obama not step down, he gathered a team of high-priced lawyers, including fellow Harvard Law School graduate Thomas Johnson, to challenge his opponent's petition signatures on technicalities after the filing deadline had passed. Such tactics are legal and frequently used in Chicago; in 2006 they eliminated 67 of the 245 aldermanic candidates;&amp;lt;ref name=bareknuckle&amp;gt;Jackson, David &amp;amp; Long, Ray (2007, April 4). &amp;quot;[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-0704030881apr04-archive,0,1523598,full.story Barack Obama: Showing His Bare Knuckles].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet nevertheless led to the term &amp;quot;hardball&amp;quot; by the ''New York Times''&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic /&amp;gt; and &amp;quot;cutthroat&amp;quot; by David Mendel as reported by both ''CNN''&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; and ''MSNBC''.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; The ''Chicago Tribune'' declared Obama had mastered &amp;quot;the bare-knuckle arts of Chicago electoral politics&amp;quot;, noting &amp;quot;The man now running for president on a message of giving a voice to the voiceless first entered public office not by leveling the playing field, but by clearing it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=bareknuckle /&amp;gt; As one of Obama's four opponents, eliminated through his ballot challenges, would put it: {{cquote|&amp;quot;Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago politics to remove legitimate candidates? He talks about honor and democracy, but what honor is there in getting rid of every other candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Gha-is Askia, 1996 Illinois Senate candidate&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jackson, David &amp;amp; Long, Ray (2007, April 3). &amp;quot;[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-070403obama-ballot-archive,0,5297304,full.story Obama Knows His Way Around a Ballot].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} Mark Ewell, another candidate, filed 1,286 signatures, and Obama's challenges left him 86 short of the minimum requirement (757&amp;lt;ref name=spivak&amp;gt;Spivak, Todd (2008, February 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.houstonpress.com/2008-02-28/news/barack-obama-screamed-at-me/ Barack Obama and Me].&amp;quot; ''Houston Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Ewell filed a federal lawsuit contesting the election board's decision but Tom Johnson intervened, and Ewell's case was dismissed just a few days later. Ewell and other Obama opponents were using early 1995 polling sheets to verify signatures of registered voters, but city authorities had just purged 15,871 unqualified people from the 13th district list, and Obama's challenges used the more recent, updated list. Askia was left 69 signatures short of the requirement. If names were printed instead of signed in cursive, they were declared invalid. If they were good but the person registering the signatures wasn't a registered voter (e.g. underage) they were invalid.&amp;lt;ref name=hardball&amp;gt;Griffin, Drew &amp;amp; Johnston, Kathleen (2008, May 29). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2008-05-29/politics/obamas.first.campaign_1_obama-campaign-barack-obama-chicago-politics?_s=PM:POLITICS Obama Played Hardball in First Chicago Campaign].&amp;quot; ''CNN''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palmer had according to Obama campaign consult Ronald Davis, used two children to help gather her petition signatures. To this day Palmer denies the challenges were valid, and maintains she could have overcome the objections with more time and resources.&amp;lt;ref name=bareknuckle /&amp;gt; Thanks to his lawyers, Obama would win the election without a single other candidate on the ballot.&lt;br /&gt;
===2000 Election===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Illinois 1st congressional district election, 2000]]''&lt;br /&gt;
In 2000, Obama lost his only political election when he chose to run against experienced incumbent and former Black Panther Bobby L. Rush for the U.S. Congress in a 65% black district. Rush's name recognition began at 90%, Obama's at 11%. As media consultant and former Rush campaign staffer Eric Adelstein noted, &amp;quot;Nobody said he’s ‘not black enough.’ They said he’s a professor, a Harvard elite who lives in Hyde Park.&amp;quot; Todd Spivak would give voice to this impression of Obama, noting that{{cquote|&amp;quot;My view of Obama then wasn't all that different from the image he projects now. He was smart, confident, charismatic and liberal. One thing I can say is, I never heard him launch into the preacher-man voice he now employs during speeches. He sounded vanilla, and activists in his mostly black district often chided him for it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt;}}Rush would go on to win the Primary with 61.02% of the vote; Obama received 30.36%.&amp;lt;ref name=streetwise /&amp;gt; The loss led to Obama considering dropping out of politics altogether, particularly after the September 11, 2001 attacks, since his name sounds similar to &amp;quot;Osama bin Laden&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Voting Record===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama entered the Illinois Senate promising change to a corrupt system. He mixed often radical votes with more pragmatic agreements. Possibly one of his most radical votes was against requiring medical care for aborted children who survive [[abortion|the procedure]] - in fact the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council ascribed him a 100% rating for his consistently pro-choice votes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cbs illinois&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/17/politics/main2369157.shtml|title=Obama Record May Be Gold Mine For Critics|work=CBS|format=HTML|language=English|last=Clark|first=Amy S.|date=Jan. 17, 2007}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was criticized for using the statehouse as a stepping stone for a more illustrious career: Steven J. Rauschenberger, a [[Republican]], said prior to Obama's election as president: “He is a very bright but very ambitious person who has always had his eyes on the prize, and it wasn’t Springfield. If he deserves to be president, it is not because he was a great legislator.”&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt illinois&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=The New York Times|title=In Illinois, Obama Proved Pragmatic and Shrewd|last=Scott|first=Janny|format=HTML|language=English|date=July 30, 2007|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/30/us/politics/30obama.html}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The statehouse was majority Republican, so the Senator was sometimes forced to compromise. He formed allegiances across party lines to pass [[campaign finance]] reform that banned most gifts by lobbyists, prohibited spending campaign money for legislators’ personal use and required electronic filing of campaign disclosure reports.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt illinois&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Obama also helped pass  a so-called “driving-while-black bill”, which required the police to collect data on the race of drivers they stopped as a way to monitor [[racial profiling]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt illinois&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama established himself as a chief spokesperson in opposition to the [[War on Terror]] during an October 2002 rally at Federal Plaza in Chicago&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The rally was organized by Chicagoans Against War in Iraq (CAWI) later renamed Chicagoans Against War and Injustice. [http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?page_id=2 About CAWI] by Carl Davidson, Nov 02 2006. Retrieved from Chicagoans Against War and Injustice, March 15, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[community organizing|organized]] by veteran [[Mao]]ist and webmaster of [[Progressives for Obama]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.linkedin.com/in/carldavidson Carl Davidson,] LinkedIn.com, retrieved March 13, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Carl Davidson]]. &lt;br /&gt;
===Radical foundation and connection to William Ayers===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Radical roots of Barack Hussein Obama}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995 a cadre of like minded individuals gathered in the home of [[Weather Underground]] (WUO) [[terrorist]]s [[Bernardine Dohrn]] and [[William Ayers|William &amp;quot;Bill&amp;quot; Ayers]].  Dohrn,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Georgie Anne Geyer and Keyes Beach &amp;quot;Cuba: School for U.S. Radicals&amp;quot;, ''Chicago Daily News/Chicago Sun-Times'' five part series October 1970, excerpted in [http://foia.fbi.gov/filelink.html?file=/weather/weath1c.pdf FBI file Weather Underground Organization (Weatherman),] Part 1c pp. 5-7 pdf (113-115 in original). [http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/2009/06/07/clandestine-agents-of-the-cuban-government-ayers-dohrn-myers/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; along with Carl Davidson, are veterans of [[guerrilla warfare]] training in [[Cuba]] prior 1968 Democratic National Convention riots.  Ayers and Dohrn have taken credit for, and never denied, bombing the [[U.S. Capitol]], the [[Pentagon]] and the [[State Department]].    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ayers and Dohrn used their celebrity status among [[leftist]]s to launch Obama's career. Ayers, Dohrn and [[Jeff Jones]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=106653 ''Obama's 'green jobs czar' worked with terror founder] Van Jones served on board of activist group where ex-Weatherman serves as top director'', By Aaron Klein, [[WorldNetDaily]], August 13, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; are authors of ''[[Bill_Ayers#Prairie_Fire_Organizing_Committee_and_Maoist_thought|Prairie Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-imperialism]],'' the title taken from ''The Sayings of Mao Zedong.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/works/red-book/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The book declares &amp;quot;we are [[communist]] men and women.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Harvey Klehr, ''Far Left of Center: The American Radical Left Today'' (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, 1988), 109.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ayers later jokingly, publicly admitted to ghostwriting Obama's book, ''Dreams From My Father''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cashill, J. (2011, March 28). [http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/03/ayers_affirms_he_wrote_dreams.html Ayers Affirms He Wrote Dreams From My Father]. ''American Thinker''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Obama was to appoint several openly avowed Maoists to prominent White House and Executive Branch positions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fund, J. (2009, October 21). [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704597704574487431322664964.html From Mao to Obama]. ''The Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2003 Emil Jones Deal===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[2003 Barack Obama deal with Emil Jones]]''&lt;br /&gt;
When Illinois' U.S. Senator Peter Fitzgerald announced he would be retiring in April 2003, Obama jumped at the opportunity, declaring that he would be a candidate for the U.S. Senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; To boost his chances at reaching the U.S. Congress in the 2004 elections, in 2003 Barack Obama approached the newly crowned head of the Illinois Senate, Emil Jones Jr., with a proposal. According to Jones, who Obama has since called his &amp;quot;godfather&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=godfather&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2009, June 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-250_162-3983147.html Obama's Political 'Godfather' In Illinois].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the conversation went as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Emil Jones.jpg|frame|right|Left to Right, Rod Blagojevich, Emil Jones, and Jeffrey Schoenberg.]]{{cquote|&amp;quot;After I was elected president, in 2003, he came to see me, a couple months later. And he said to me, he said, ‘You’re the senate president now, and with that, you have a lot of pow-er.’  And I told Barack, ‘You think I got a lot of pow-er now?,’ and he said, ‘Yeah, you got a lot of pow-er.’ And I said, ‘What kind of pow-er do I have?’ He said, ‘You have the pow-er to make a United States sen-a-tor!’  I said to Barack, I said, ‘That sounds good!’ I said, ‘I haven’t even thought of that.’ I said, ‘Do you have someone in mind you think I could make?,’ and he said, ‘Yeah. Me.’ &amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the deal, Obama's entire Illinois Senate legislative record was, as longtime Obama reporter Todd Spivak put it, built in a single year. During his 7th and final year in the Illinois Senate, Obama sponsored an incredible 26 bills into law, including many he now points to when criticized as inexperienced&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt; - as ''CNN's'' Suzanne Malveaux observed, &amp;quot;With help from on high, Obama got his name on hundreds of bills that he pushed through.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; Jones not only had Obama craft legislation addressing daily tragedies to raise his political profile&amp;lt;ref name=godfather /&amp;gt;, he also appointed Obama head of almost all high-profile legislation in the Illinois Senate, angering other state legislators with more seniority who'd spent years supporting the bills.&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt; Illinois State Senator Rickey Hendon, the original sponsor of the famous racial profiling bill requiring videotaped confessions in police interrogations, complained bitterly about Jones' decision.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=intheblack&amp;gt;Spivak, Todd (2004, March 25). &amp;quot;[http://www.illinoistimes.com/Springfield/article-922-in-the-black.html In the Black].&amp;quot; ''Illinois Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Jones' influence had a major impact on Obama's chances in the 2004 elections, preventing major political players from backing Obama's opponents. To quote Emil Jones,{{cquote|&amp;quot;He knew if he had me in the run for the Senate, it would put a block on the current mayor. The current mayor and the father of the controller, which was Dan Hynes, they were roommates in Springfield when the mayor was a state senator, so they had a relationship. Another big financial backer for the governor was Blair Hull. Barack knew if he had me it would checkmate the governor, ’cause the governor couldn’t come out and go with Blair Hull, ’cause the governor needs me. Same with the mayor. So he had analyzed and figured all of that out. He knew I could help him with labor support. And I could put a checkmate on some of the local politicians that didn’t know him, but they couldn’t really go against me.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Emil Jones&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2004-2008, U.S. Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Early_life_and_career_of_Barack_Hussein_Obama#U.S._Senate_.282004-2008.29|Barack Obama:U.S. Senate (2004-2008)]], [[United States Senate election in Illinois, 2004]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|left|Senator Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
===2004 Primary Election===&lt;br /&gt;
Despite initially trailing in the polls to frontrunner [[Blair Hull]]&amp;lt;ref name=intheblack /&amp;gt;, Obama greatly benefited from what the ''Chicago Tribune'' called &amp;quot;the most inglorious campaign implosion in Illinois political history&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=mendell&amp;gt;Mendell, David (2004, March 17). &amp;quot;[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-03-17/news/0403170332_1_blair-hull-gery-chico-blacks-and-liberal-whites Obama Routs Democratic Foes].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when pressure from journalists and opposing candidates, just weeks before the election, forced the unsealing of Hull's messy divorce files.&amp;lt;ref name=blairhull&amp;gt;Voegeli, William (2004, March 19). &amp;quot;[http://www.claremont.org/publications/pubid.339/pub_detail.asp The Rise and Fall of Blair Hull].&amp;quot; ''The Claremont Institute''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The files revealed Hull's ex-wife's accusations of verbal and physical abuse.&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt; Hull would afterwards criticize the media, stating, &amp;quot;As for the press, I will never read the newspaper the same way again.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=mendell /&amp;gt; Obama would go on to win the Primary with 53% of the vote.&amp;lt;ref name=blairhull /&amp;gt; Obama's unexpected victory led to him being termed a &amp;quot;rising star&amp;quot; by the media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Howlett, Debbie (2004, March 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/2004-03-18-obama-usat_x.htm Dems See a Rising Star in Illinois Senate Candidate].&amp;quot; ''USA Today''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===2004 General Election, Jack Ryan===&lt;br /&gt;
Once again Obama found himself trailing to popular frontrunner [[Jack Ryan]], and once again a candidate's campaign imploded thanks to media intervention. In an unprecedented move, the ''Chicago Tribune'' and local TV station WLS sued to force the unsealing of Ryan's divorce files, despite opposition from both Ryan and his wife, Jeri Ryan, who in the files accused Jack Ryan of trying to coerce her to perform sex acts in public. Though Ryan advisors told him he could still win if using a negative attack on Obama, Ryan refused to engage in what he considered dirty politics.&amp;lt;ref name=abandon&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2004, June 26). &amp;quot;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/state/2004-06-25-ryan_x.htm Jack Ryan Abandons Senate Bid].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ryan then dropped out of the race (per request by the Illinois GOP&amp;lt;ref name=idealist&amp;gt;Sangwan, Rahul (2004, October 1). &amp;quot;[http://www.dartmouthindependent.com/archives/2004/10/jack_ryan_81_th.html Jack Ryan '81: The Conservative Idealist].&amp;quot; ''Dartmouth Independent''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), following which the Illinois GOP scrambled to find a replacement, leaving Obama uncontested for weeks to campaign and build up public support. On top of all this, Obama was selected to give the keynote speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention (July 27&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Washington Post'' (2004, June 26). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19751-2004Jul27.html Illinois Senate Candidate Barack Obama].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), catapulting him into the national spotlight, and leading to further media publicity terming him a &amp;quot;rising star&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Page, Susan &amp;amp; Despoignes, Peronet (2004, July 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-07-28-obama-speech_x.htm Rising Star Brings Democrats to Their Feet].&amp;quot; ''USA Today''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===2004 General Election, Alan Keyes===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Obama born alive controversy]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Alan_Keyes.jpg‎|thumb|150px|right|Alan Keyes.]]&lt;br /&gt;
After a number of candidates including former Chicago Bears coach Mike Ditka declined to run&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN'' (2004, August 9). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2004-08-09/politics/il.keyes_1_senate-candidate-senate-race-illinois-senate?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS Keyes Challenges Obama for Illinois Senate Seat].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the Illinois GOP finally settled on fiery [[Alan Keyes]], a former Ambassador to the Economic and Social Counsel of the United Nations&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt;, with less than 3 months left before the November 2004 election.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; His sudden entrance into the state for the election was initially attacked in the press as &amp;quot;carpetbagging&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Chicago Tribune''. &amp;quot;[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-08-06/news/0408060313_1_mr-keyes-judy-baar-topinka-alan-keyes The GOP's Rent-A-Senator].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''Washington Post'' (2004, August 9). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50885-2004Aug8.html Mr. Keyes the Carpetbagger].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=pearson&amp;gt;Pearson, Rick (2004, September 5). &amp;quot;[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-09-05/news/0409050304_1_selfish-hedonist-alan-keyes-illinois-republican-party Keyes, State GOP Gearing Up Blame Campaign].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Keyes repeatedly claimed his primary motivation for entering a race he had seemingly no chance of winning was his disgust at Obama's votes on the popular [[Born Alive]] bills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Keyes, Alan (2004, August 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.mail-archive.com/newsandviews@chuckmuth.com/msg00699.html How You Can Help Alan Keyes for Senate!].&amp;quot; ''Keyes2004 Inc.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Keyes, from his first day of arriving in Illinois (August 9, 2004)&amp;lt;ref name=assails&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2004, August 9). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5654128/ Keyes Assails Obama's Abortion Views].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, accused Obama of having voted against bills mandating medical care for newborn children, and supporting &amp;quot;infanticide&amp;quot; (the term twice used in the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''United States Congress'' (2003, March 13). &amp;quot;[http://news.findlaw.com/wp/docs/abortion/2003s3.html S.3: Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) where hospitals left newborn infants to die like garbage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Smiley, Tavis (2004, August 31). &amp;quot;[http://www.keyesarchives.com/transcript.php?id=341 Alan Keyes on the Tavis Smiley Show].&amp;quot; ''NPR''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''CBS2 Chicago'' (2004, August 30). &amp;quot;[http://www.keyesarchives.com/transcript.php?id=337 Alan Keyes on CBS2 Chicago This Morning].&amp;quot; This Morning.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama in a debate on October 13, 2004, defended himself against Keyes' accusations of infanticide by claiming that Illinois law was already sufficient.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Chicago Tribune'' (2004, October 13). &amp;quot;[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-10-13/news/0410140004_1_alan-keyes-senate-race-first-of-three-debates Debate or Discussion?]&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Keyes' rhetoric, calling Obama's votes &amp;quot;the slaveholder's position&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=assails /&amp;gt; and saying &amp;quot;Jesus Christ would not vote for Obama&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Thomas, Scott (2004, September 7). &amp;quot;[http://www.keyesarchives.com/transcript.php?id=348 Alan Keyes on the Scott Thomas Show (AM1160 - WYLL)].&amp;quot; ''Scott Thomas Show''. Chicago, Illinois.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was widely ridiculed by the press. Keyes' unabashed criticism of homosexuality as &amp;quot;selfish hedonism&amp;quot; was also targeted.&amp;lt;ref name=pearson /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press''. &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5897569/ Keyes: Cheney's Gay Daughter Practicing Selfish Hedonism].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Pallasch, Abdom M. (2004, September 2). &amp;quot;[http://web.archive.org/web/20071017122135/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4155/is_20040902/ai_n12560727 Topinka Says He Should Apologize for 'Idiotic' Comment].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Sun-Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama would ultimately win the election, 70% to 27%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN.com''. &amp;quot;[http://cnn.hu/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/IL/S/01/index.html Election Results: U.S. Senate/Illinois].&amp;quot; Election 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Voting Record===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama frequently used the [[filibuster]] to obstruct the operations of government,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;O'Keefe, E. (2010, February 4). [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/03/AR2010020303801_pf.html Obama criticizes Senate Republicans for delaying confirmation votes]. ''The Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; voted against the [[minimum wage]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://uspolitics.about.com/od/legislatio1/a/HR2206.htm HR 2206 - Emergency Appropriations], Kathy Gill, Your Guide to U.S. Politics: Current Events. May 26 2007.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[http://more.gov.mtopgroup.com/2007/05/votes-hr-2206-iraq-supplemental.html Votes - H.R. 2206: Iraq Supplemental], May 28, 2007. Retrieved from Deeper Inside the Mountain, June 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and debt ceiling increases,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaplan, R. (2011, April 11). [http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/04/obama-once-opposed-debt-ceiling-hike/237129/ Obama Once Opposed Debt Ceiling Hike]. ''The Atlantic''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and recieved more than $126,000 in campaign contributions from [[Fannie Mae]]. The ''[[National Journal]]'' ranked him the most liberal senator in 2007.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ranked&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-502163_162-3775451-502163.html|title=National Journal: Obama Most Liberal Senator In 2007|author=Brian Montopoli|date=January 31, 2008|work=CBS}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2008 Presidential Election==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Barack Hussein Obama 2008 Presidential campaign}}&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats began calling for an Obama candidacy after liberals lauded his 2004 [[Democratic National Convention]] speech.&lt;br /&gt;
====Primary Election====&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007-08, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton competed for the Democratic nomination. Hillary Clinton cleverly resurrected the &amp;quot;Born Alive&amp;quot; controversy surrounding Obama that had lain largely dormant since 2004 (notwithstanding the continuing mentions by Jill Stanek), by accusing Obama of not being pro-choice for voting &amp;quot;Present&amp;quot; on a number of abortion-related bills&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bettelheim, Adriel (2008, February 13). &amp;quot;[http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/feb/13/obamas-present-tension/ Obama's 'Present' Tension].&amp;quot; ''PolitiFact''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; - including the Born Alive ones,&amp;lt;ref name=clinton&amp;gt;Berman, Russell (2008, January 17). &amp;quot;[http://www.nysun.com/national/clinton-obama-should-vote-no-on-abortion-issue/69700/ Clinton: Obama Should Vote 'No' On Abortion Issue She Backed].&amp;quot; ''New York Sun''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Hernandez, Raymond &amp;amp; Drew, Christopher (2007, December 20). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html?pagewanted=all It's Not Just 'Ayes' and 'Nays': Obama's Votes in Illinois Echo].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and cowardly ducking the votes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Politi-Fact''. &amp;quot;[http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/feb/13/hillary-clinton/yes-but-its-complicated/ Response to Hillary Clinton Comment for January 21st, 2008].&amp;quot; Truth-o-Meter.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Dorning, Mike (2007, December 20). &amp;quot;[http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/12/criticism_of_obama_present_vot.html Clinton Camp Criticizes Obama 'Present' Votes].&amp;quot; The Swamp. ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This led to criticism of Obama by two pro-choice organizations, Emily's List, and the National Organization for Women.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dorning, Mike (2008, January 14). &amp;quot;[http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/01/obama_campaign_mounts_defense.html The Swamp: Obama Campaign Defends His Abortion-Rights Record].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Dorn, Michael (2008, February 6). &amp;quot;[http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/02/obamas_voting_record_on_aborti_1.html Obama's Voting Record on Abortion].&amp;quot; ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Newton-Small, Jay (2008, January 14). &amp;quot;[http://swampland.time.com/2008/01/14/obama_campaign_defends_present/ Obama Campaign Defends 'Present' Abortion Votes].&amp;quot; ''Time Magazine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, Pam Sutherland, the long-time head of Illinois Planned Parenthood, came to Obama's aid, criticizing Clinton for making the attack, and stating repeatedly that Obama's present votes were part of a broader strategy used by Planned Parenthood to keep Illinois voters from knowing their state senators were voting against the controversial and popular bills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hernandez, Raymond &amp;amp; Drew, Christopher (2007, December 20). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20cnd-obama.html?_r=2&amp;amp;hp&amp;amp;oref=slogin Obama's Vote in Illinois Was Often Just 'Present'].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Follmer, Max (2008, March 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/14/obama-emphasizes-prochoic_n_81460.html Obama Emphasizes Pro-Choice Voting Record as Clinton Questions 'Present' Votes].&amp;quot; ''Huffington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;He came to me and said: ‘My members are being attacked. We need to figure out a way to protect members and to protect women. A ‘present’ vote was hard to pigeonhole which is exactly what Obama wanted. What it did was give cover to moderate Democrats who wanted to vote with us but were afraid to do so&amp;quot; because of how their votes would be used against them electorally. A ‘present’ vote would protect them. Your senator voted ‘present.’ Most of the electorate is not going to know what that means.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Pam Sutherland, President/CEO of Illinois Planned Parenthood Council, 1980-2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Davis, Teddy (2007, July 17). &amp;quot;[http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2007/07/obama-abortion/ Obama Abortion Dodges Blessed by Planned Parenthood], ''ABC News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}Clinton also made the claim repeatedly that while Obama was leading in Delegates she was winning the Popular Vote&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Koffler, Daniel (2008, May 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-koffler/hillary-clinton-and-the-p_b_103913.html Hillary Clinton and the Popular Vote: Not Wrong, but Meaningless].&amp;quot; ''Huffington Post''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Barone, Michael (2008, March 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/barone/2008/03/28/projection-clinton-wins-popular-vote-obama-wins-delegate-count Projection: Clinton Wins Popular Vote, Obama Wins Delegate Vote].&amp;quot; ''U.S. News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, though this was in part because Obama hadn't been registered in Michigan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Romano, Andrew (2008, August 2). &amp;quot;[http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/blogs/stumper/2008/06/02/clinton-s-popular-vote-claim-close-but-not-quite.html Clinton's Popular Vote Claim? Close--But Not Quite*].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''RealClearPolitics''. &amp;quot;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html 2008 Democratic Popular Vote].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama's advantage with super-delegates over Clinton was about 2-to-1.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|title=Superdelegate endorsements for Friday 6/6|work=Democratic Convention Watch|url=http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/06/superdelegate-endorsements-for-friday.html}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama was able to attract the support of [[liberals]] by pointing out that he had come out against the [[Iraq War]] &amp;quot;from the beginning&amp;quot; whereas Clinton had voted in favor of the war in 2002.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-01-31-democrats-debate_N.htm|title=Obama, Clinton stress differences on Iraq, issues|author=David Jackson|work=USA Today|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On June 7, 2008, Hillary Clinton withdrew from the Primaries, conceding the race and endorsing her opponent&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press''. &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24993082/ns/politics-decision_08/t/clinton-ends-historic-bid-endorses-obama/ Clinton Ends Historic Bid, Endorses Obama].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, when Obama passed the 2,118 Delegates required; winning 2,201 delegates to Clinton's 1,896.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN''. &amp;quot;[http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/#D Election Center 2008].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Born Alive Record Resurfaces====&lt;br /&gt;
On June 30, 2008, Obama's voting record on the &amp;quot;Born Alive&amp;quot; bills came once more to the forefront when CNN gave voice to the growing controversy and revealed the defense Obama had been using since 2004-2008, that the Illinois bills he'd voted against were different from the federal bill, was false, since he'd brought up for a vote a bill word for word identical to the federal bill in the Health and Human Services Committee he chaired, and voted against it, defeating it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN''. &amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPZCXcTwZPY How He Really Voted on Abortion: Obama's Record Under Attack].&amp;quot; ''The Situation Room''. Uploaded to ''YouTube'' by Jill Stanek.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''CNN''. &amp;quot;[http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0806/30/sitroom.02.html Transcripts: June 30, 2008].&amp;quot; The Situation Room.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This led in August to a confrontation between Obama and the [[NRLC]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''National Right to Life Committee''. &amp;quot;[http://www.nrlc.org/news/2008/NRL08/ObamaCoverup.html Obama Cover-up Revealed on Born-Alive Abortion Survivor's Bill].&amp;quot; NRL News, Vol. 35, Issue 7-8, pg. 5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After Obama accused critics of 'lying'&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brody, David (2008, August 16). &amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Skq5M1Ksp_c McCain/Obama Forum].&amp;quot; ''CNN''. Uploaded to ''YouTube'' by Jill Stanek.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;David Brody (August 16, 2008). &amp;quot;[http://blogs.cbn.com/thebrodyfile/archive/2008/08/16/obama-gets-heated-on-born-alive-infant-protection-act.aspx Obama Gets Heated on Born Alive Infant Protection Act].&amp;quot; ''CBN News''. The Brody File.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the NRLC challenged the assertion, and the Obama campaign conceded he &amp;quot;misspoke&amp;quot; and had voted against an identical bill to the &amp;quot;federal bill that everybody supported&amp;quot; but focused on Obama's new claim, that Illinois law was already sufficient to protect newborn children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berman, Russell (2008, August 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.nysun.com/national/obama-facing-attacks-from-all-sides-over-abortion/84059/ Obama Facing Attacks From All Sides Over Abortion Record].&amp;quot; ''New York Sun''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The NRLC promptly declared &amp;quot;Senator Barack Obama's four-year effort to cover up his full role in killing legislation to protect born-alive survivors of abortions continues to unravel.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johnson, Douglas (2008, August 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.nrlc.org/ObamaBAIPA/Obamacoveruponbornalive.htm Obama Cover-up on Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Continues to Unravel After Sen. Obama Says NRLC is 'Lying'].&amp;quot; ''National Right to Life Committee''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Jeremiah Wright====&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Barack Obama and Liberation Theology]]''&lt;br /&gt;
One major dilemma that arose for Obama during his campaign was his connection to his preacher [[Jeremiah Wright]]. Obama and his wife (raised a Baptist) were members of the Trinity [[United Church of Christ]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1776246/posts&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in Chicago, a chruch that embraced [[black liberation theology]] and its emphasis on empowering so-called &amp;quot;oppressed groups&amp;quot; against &amp;quot;establishment forces&amp;quot;. This denomination was the first in America to ordain gays as ministers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html, Obama's church pushes controversial doctrines, March 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Church pastor Jeremiah Wright had been making inflammatory comments and posting his sermons online for sale. These include the statement &amp;quot;G-d damn America,&amp;quot; and in describing the September 11th attacks, &amp;quot;We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4443788 Obama's Pastor: G-d Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Rev. Wright blamed America saying &amp;quot;We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians and branding anybody who spoke out against it as being [[anti-Semitic]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2008, after 20 years in the church, candidate Obama made public statements poised to set him at odds with the man who conducted his wedding and baptized his children. With the negative publicity persisting, a month later Obama ended the friendship, left Wright's church, and blamed the media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/31/obama-resigns-church-membership-in-chicago/], Obama Drops Church Membership in Chicago, May 31, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama claimed “It’s not fair to the other members of the church who seek to worship in peace...&amp;quot;, and distanced himself from  Wright's sermons  as &amp;quot;a bunch of rants that aren't grounded in the truth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;USA TODAY, ''Obama breaks with former pastor, Candidate cites rants on U.S. role in terror, AIDS'', by Kathy Kiely and David Jackson [http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20080430/1a_offlede30_dom.art.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Obama Says He Is Outraged By Wright's &amp;quot;Rants&amp;quot;''[http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/bulletin/bulletin_080430.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Result====&lt;br /&gt;
Obama made an effort to portray John McCain as similar to George W. Bush, drawing attention to McCain's refusal to criticize the unpopular president. McCain was particularly criticized for saying of how many years we should be willing to stay in Iraq, &amp;quot;Make it a hundred.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dobbs, Michael (2008, April 2). &amp;quot;[http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/04/mccains_100year_war.html FactChecker: McCain's '100-Year War'].&amp;quot; ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{cquote|&amp;quot;John McCain went on television and said that there has been great progress economically over the last seven-and-a-half years. John McCain thinks our economy has made great progress under George W. Bush? How could somebody who has been traveling across this country, somebody who came to Erie, Pennsylvania, say we’ve made great progress?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Barack Obama&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zeleny, Jeff (2008, April 18). &amp;quot;[http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/18/obama-criticizes-mccain-on-economic-stance/ Obama Criticizes McCain on Economic Stance].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} On August 22nd, Obama selected [[Joe Biden]] as his running mate for the vice presidency&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN'' (2008, August 23). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2008-08-23/politics/biden.democrat.vp.candidate_1_biden-john-mccain-barack-obama?_s=PM:POLITICS Obama Introduces Biden as Running Mate].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, which would be contrasted one week later with John McCain's selection of [[Sarah Palin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cooper, Michael &amp;amp; Bumiller, Elisabeth (2008, August 29). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/30/us/politics/29palin.html?pagewanted=all Alaskan is McCain's Choice; First Woman on G.O.P. Ticket]. ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 2, 2008, Barack Obama won the presidential election with 365 electoral votes to John McCain's 173.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2008, November 14). &amp;quot;[http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/explorer.html Electoral Explorer].&amp;quot; Election Results 2008. ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama received 53% of the popular vote to John McCain's 46%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2008, November 17). &amp;quot;[http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/president/ President].&amp;quot; Election Center 2008. ''CNN''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2009-2012, U.S. Presidency==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Obama administration}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Obama and George H. W. Bush.jpg|thumb|right|300px|President Barack Obama meets with former President George H. W. Bush in the Oval Office, Feb. 15, 2011. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza).]]&lt;br /&gt;
Under Obama's stewardship the United States has suffered the largest [[Federal budget deficit|deficit]]s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Edwards, B. et. al. (2009, November 6). [http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/107xx/doc10708/11-06-mbr.htm Monthly Budget Review: Fiscal Year 2009]. ''Congressional Budget Office''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Delisle, E.C. et. al. (2010, November 5). [http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/118xx/doc11873/NovemberMBR.pdf Monthly Budget Review: Fiscal Year 2010]. ''Congressional Budget Office''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in history and a credit downgrade from the rating agency Standard &amp;amp; Poor.  However, during the Obama Administration the national deficit has increased at a much lower rate than during the Bush Administration. Most observers attribute the deficits to increasing benefits and welfare paid out on account of the Recession he inherited and has failed to end along with decreasing tax receipts.  Standard &amp;amp; Poor decided to downgrade U.S. government deby after the debt ceiling debate debacle, where Congressional leaders refused to pass a bill authorizing borrowing to pay for the budget they had passed with much debate and controversy earlier in the year.  Cynics have argued that rhetoric directed at the rating agencies about the issuance of AAA ratings to junk real estate bonds spurred the downgrade as a form of retribution.  Ironically, the investor scare led to the flocking of investors to the safe haven of the Treasury bonds which had been downgraded, resulting in lower interest rates.  As there are very few AAA bond markets, investors will likely continue to buy U.S. government debt for the foreseeable future.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Greenwald, A. (2011, April 18). [http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/04/18/the-sp-outlook-and-obama/ The S&amp;amp;P Outlook and Obama]. ''Commentary Magazine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  When his [[economic stimulus]] program was adopted unemployment rose and stagnated in the 10% range, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Di Leo, L &amp;amp; Lynch, S.N. (2010, August 20). [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704476104575439172480870774.html Jobless Claims Jump in New Sign Recovery is Sputtering]. ''The Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; leaving tens of millions without [[hope]] of finding a job.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bureau of Labor Statistics. [http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&amp;amp;series_id=LNS11300000&amp;amp;years_option=specific_years&amp;amp;include_graphs=true&amp;amp;to_month=1&amp;amp;from_month=2 Databases, Tables &amp;amp; Calculators by Subject: Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey]. ''United States Department of Labor''. Data extracted on: July 19, 2010 (4:31:11 PM).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patrick H. Caddell and Douglas E. Schoen, writing in the [[Wall Street Journal]], noted, &amp;quot;Rather than being a unifier, Mr. Obama has divided America on the basis of race, class and partisanship.&amp;quot; The commentators also note Obama's approach to governance has encouraged radical leftists to pursue a similar strategy on his behalf. Mary Frances Berry, former head of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, acknowledged that the [[Obama administration]] has taken to polarizing America around the issue of race as a means of diverting attention from other issues, saying, &amp;quot;Having one's opponent [[race card|rebut charges of racism]] is far better than discussing [[Unemployment|joblessness]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berry, M.F. (2010, July 20). [http://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Mary_Frances_Berry_91E3D9D5-C40D-440C-9D48-1C50CBC60C87.html Energy Arena, Driving the Conversation: Contracting Out U.S. Security? And will Branding Tea Party Racist Work?] ''Politico''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Caddell and Schoen, who worked for President Carter and Clinton, respectively, further stated, &amp;quot;Mr. Obama has also cynically [[class warfare|divided the country on class lines]]. He has taken to playing the populist card time and time again. He bashes Wall Street and insurance companies whenever convenient to advance his programs, yet he has been eager to accept campaign contributions and negotiate with these very same banks and [[corporation]]s behind closed doors in order to advance his political agenda... President Obama's divisive approach to governance has weakened us as a people and paralyzed our political culture.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Caddell, P.H. &amp;amp; Schoen, D.E. (2010, July 28). [http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052748703700904575391553798363586.html Our Divisive President]. ''The Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Domestic policy===&lt;br /&gt;
====Popular bills====&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's first act of office was to sign the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act - effectively nullifying the [[Supreme Court]] case ''Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire &amp;amp; Rubber Co.'', which ruled that Ledbetter had to have filed a pay [[discrimination]] suit within 180 days of the first time Ledbetter was payed less than her male peers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/30/us/politics/30ledbetter-web.html|work=The New York Times|format=HTML|language=English|title=Obama Signs Equal-Pay Legislation|author=Sheryl Gay Stolberg|date=January 29, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the law made corporations subject to suit within 180 days of each time the employee was unfairly paid.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://writ.news.findlaw.com/grossman/20090213.html?=features|work=FindLaw|author=Joanna L. Grossman|date=Feb. 13, 2009|format=HTML|language=English|title=The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 2, 2011, Obama signed the James Zadroga [[9/11]] Healthcare and Compensation Act.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.wnyc.org/articles/wnyc-news/2011/jan/02/obama-signs-zadroga-act-law/|publisher=New York Public Radio|title=Obama Signs Zadroga Act into Law|author=Fred Mogul|date=January 02, 2011|work=wNYC|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The act, which afforded 9/11 first responders who were sickened by the dust from the collapse of the [[World Trade Center]] health care and compensation, passed [[Congress]] after its sponsored agreed to scale down the pricing from 7.4 to 4.2 billion dollars.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.wnyc.org/articles/wnyc-news/2010/dec/22/zadroga-911-bill-passes-senate/|publisher=New York Public Radio|work=wNYC|format=HTML|language=English|title=Congress Approves 9/11 Health Bill|date=December 22, 2010}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Economic policy====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Keynes.jpg|thumbnail|right|190px|[[Barack Obama]] advocates the use of discredited [[Keynesian economics|Keynesian economic concepts]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2011/03/20/fabian-john-maynard-keynes-the-stealthy-enemy-of-human-freedom/ John Maynard Keynes the stealthy enemy of human freedom]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-02-22/deathbed-of-keynesian-economics-will-be-in-u-k-matthew-lynn.html Deathbed of Keynesian Economics will be in the UK]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iwf.org/inkwell/show/23102.html Will the G8 Repudiate the Philosophy of Living Beyond Our Means?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html KEYNES AT HARVARD Economic Deception as a Political Credo BY ZYGMUND DOBBS]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  ]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{see also|Obamunism|American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009}}&lt;br /&gt;
Critics of the Obama administration have coined the word &amp;quot;[[Obamunism]]&amp;quot; to describe Barack Obama's [[socialism|socialistic]] and &amp;quot;[[fascism]] light&amp;quot; [[economic planning]] policies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Benito Mussolini]] defined fascism as the wedding of state and corporate powers.  Accordingly, trend forecaster [[Gerald Celente]] labels [[Obama administration corporate bailouts|Obama's corporate bailouts]] as being &amp;quot;fascism light&amp;quot; in nature.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/daily-intel/2009/07/20/obamunism-inc|work=The Big Money|publisher=WashingtonPost.Newsweek Interactive Co. LLC|format=HTML|language=English|title=Obamunism, Inc.|author=David Sessions|date=July 20, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.smallbusinessadvocate.com/small-business-interviews/gerald-celente-6944|author=Jim Blasingame|title=Is the government creating a bailout bubble?}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obamunism can also refer to Obama's [[Obama administration fiscal policy|ruinous fiscal policies]] and [[Obama administration monetary policy|reckless monetary policies]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gerard&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://seekingalpha.com/article/120883-monetary-policynot-obama-s-stimulusis-what-needs-watching|title=Monetary Policy-Not Obama's Stimulus-Is What Needs Watching|author=Gerard Jackson|date=February 16, 2009|work=Seeking Alpha}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bam&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=New York Post|date=May 17, 2009|url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/05172009/postopinion/editorials/bams_wise_words_169731.htm|title=BAM'S WISE WORDS}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/|title=Bush Deficit vs. Obama Deficit in Pictures|work=The Foundry|publisher=The Heritage Foundation|author=Conn Carroll|date=March 24th, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As seen in his own actions, Barack Obama instructed his advisors to find loopholes that would enable the president to act as a [[dictator]] by pushing through legislation and increases in spending without congressional authority.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Naked Emperor News (2011, October 12). [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/executive-dictatorship-obama-instructs-advisers-to-push-through-stimulus-projects-without-pesky-congressional-authorization/ Exclusive Dictatorship: Obama Instructs Advisors to Push Through Stimulus Projects Without Pesky 'Congressional Authorization']. ''The Blaze''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, budgets passed under President Obama have included the smallest average annualized growth of federal spending (1.4%) since before President Reagan. Federal spending grew an average of 8.7% per year during Reagan's first term and an average of 8.1% per year during George W. Bush's second term.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/|title=Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower? Would You Believe It's Barack Obama?|publisher=Forbes|author=Rick Ungar|date=May 24th, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Wall Street]] firms and banks that were bailed out were among Obama's biggest campaign supporters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''OpenSecrets.org''. [http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&amp;amp;cid=N00009638 Barack Obama: Top Contributors]. The Center for Responsive Politics.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, the Obama administration bailouts of corrupt, unproductive, and reckless Wall Street firms was hardly surprising, and many argue that it was not helpful in making the United States economy more productive and prosperous by encouraging more risk taking through letting banks off with a slap on the wrist.  Others argue that bailing out the banks kept credit flowing and prevented a much deeper recession and a total collapse of the financial system.  The government will recoup some though not all of its capital infusions over time.  A 2005 study found that government corporate bailouts are often done for mere political considerations and the economic resources allocated exhibit significantly worse economic performance than resources allocated using purely business considerations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Faccio, M. et. al. (2005, March 1). [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=676905 Political Connections and Corporate Bailouts]. ''Social Science Research Network''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Proponents of [[free market]] capitalism said Bernanke should not have bailed out failing firms and instead should have allowed free market capitalism to quickly recover as it did in the depression of 1920 without government intervention (free market capitalists assert that government intervention drags out economic recessions and depressions).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Woods, T.E. (2009, April 10). [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czcUmnsprQI Why You've Never Heard of the Great Depression of 1920]. ''Ludwig Von Mises Institute''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Top trend forecaster [[Gerald Celente]] predicts that the corrupt economic policies of the Obama administration will lead to a second [[Great Depression|great depression]] (Celente predicted the 1987 US stock market crash, the dot.com crash, the US 2008/2009 recession, and the collapse of the USSR in the early 1990s) and may lead to a &amp;quot;second [[American Revolution]]&amp;quot; (Celente predicted the [[Tea Party Movement|tax protests]] that are now occurring in America).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Celente, G. (2009, August 1). [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MMX3SKzrfU&amp;amp;feature=channel_page pt 2/2 Gerald Celente on Financial Sense Newshour Aug 1st 2009]. ''Financial Sense Newshour''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Celente, G. (2009, August 2). [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sy9bfw1ebgw&amp;amp;feature=response_watch ]. ''Financial Sense Newshour''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Celente also asserts that the costly and inefficient temporary short term methods that the Obama administration is using to alleviate economic problems in the short term (which is causing massive increases in [[Obama administration deficit spending]]) is only making matters worse and will not prevent the worse economic depression in United States history from occurring.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Celente, G. (2009, August 11). [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_C8K7rWkGGw pt 1/2 Gerald Celente on Howestreet.com 11 Aug 2009]. ''HoweStreet.com''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Celente, G. (2009, August 11). [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LBffdIW0XA&amp;amp;feature=response_watch pt 2/2 Gerald Celente on Howestreet.com 11 Aug 2009]. ''HoweStreet.com''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Obama administration has been sharply criticized for [[Obama administration deficit spending|its massive deficit spending]] and [[Obama administration monetary policy|its reckless monetary policy]] via vast increases in the [[money supply]], although inflation under Bernanke has been below the historic mean.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gerard&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bam&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carroll, C. (2009, March 24). [http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/ Bush Deficit vs. Obama Deficit in Pictures]. ''The Foundry''. The Heritage Network.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Celente predicts that if a &amp;quot;second American Revolution&amp;quot; occurs in a peaceful and productive manner, it may include a [[Third Party System|third party movement]] of governance that will advocate a more [[free market]] [[capitalism]] approach to the American economy and a more strict interpretation of the [[United States Constitution|United States constitution]] as far as the authors' [[original intent]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente1&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During what the [[White House]] billed as [[Recovery Summer]], one half million workers per week continued losing their jobs. His signature legislative achievement, [[ObamaCare]],has been found to be [[unconstitutional]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Schoenberg, T. &amp;amp; Fisk, M.T. (2010, December 13). [http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-13/u-s-health-care-law-requirement-thrown-out-by-judge.html Obama's Health-Care Law Ruled Unconstitutional Over Insurance Requirement]. ''Bloomberg''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by several judges and constitutional by others, and is credited as a major cause of uncertainty, high [[unemployment]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=33220&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; lagging job creation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Foster, J.D. (2010, August 5). [http://blog.heritage.org/2010/08/05/it%E2%80%99s-official-medicare%E2%80%99s-finances-shadowed-by-uncertainty/ It’s Official: Medicare’s Finances Shadowed by Uncertainty]. ''The Foundry''. The Heritage Network.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and risk of a credit default crisis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Samuelson, R.J. (2010, March 29). [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/28/AR2010032802353.html With health bill, Obama has sown the seeds of a budget crisis]. ''The Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cramer, J. (2010, March 16). [http://www.thestreet.com/story/10703361/cramer-obamacare-will-topple-the-market.html Cramer: Obamacare Will Topple the Market]. ''The Street''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His 2012 Budget plan has been roundly criticized in the mainstream and liberal press as not a serious effort to deal with the nation's economic crisis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://republican.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=blogs.view&amp;amp;blog_id=1551d6f5-2ac9-4b8d-97ab-74def354024e Newspapers Call Out White House: ‘What Would That Path Be, Mr. President?’]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jeffrey Tucker]] wrote, &amp;quot;President Obama's economic policy has been catastrophic for liberty, enterprise, and the American dream—the very archetype of what not to do to end recession.&amp;quot; [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1118186176/ref=as_li_tf_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=anncoulter-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=1118186176]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====2009 Stimulus====&lt;br /&gt;
In early 2009, Obama lobbied Congress and the public to pass sweeping Stimulus legislation for the ailing economy&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, January 3). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28479998/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-urges-congress-pass-stimulus-plan/ Obama Urges Congress to Pass Stimulus Plan].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Parsons, C. &amp;amp; Nicholas, P. (2009, February 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28479998/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-urges-congress-pass-stimulus-plan/ Barack Obama Sternly Urges Congress to Pass Economic Stimulus].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; known as ''The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009'' (H.R. 1)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.1: Bill Text Versions: H.R. 1].&amp;quot; 111th Congress (2009-2010). ''Library of Congress''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=204335,00.html The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Information Center].&amp;quot; ''IRS''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, ignoring a report by the Congressional Budget Office that the legislation would ultimately harm the economy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinan, S. (2009, February 4). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/04/cbo-obama-stimulus-harmful-over-long-haul/ CBO: Obama Stimulus Harmful Over Long Haul].&amp;quot; ''U.S. News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Contrary to his earlier promises of bipartisanship&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinan, S. (2009, March 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/28/mccain-obama-breaks-campaign-promises-shuns-bipart/?page=all McCain: Obama Breaks Promise of Bipartisanship].&amp;quot; ''Washington Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the bill passed the House 244-188 without a single Republican vote on January 28, 2009,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Calmes, J. (2009, January 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/us/politics/29obama.html House Passes Stimulus Plan With No G.O.P. Votes].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and received just 3 Republican votes when passing the Senate 61-37.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Herszenhorn, D.M. (2009, February 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/washington/11web-stim.html Senate Approves Stimulus Plan].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One third of the massive $838 billion bill consisted of tax cuts&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, February 11). &amp;quot;Senate Passes $838 Billion Stimulus Bill].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the rest spending on &amp;quot;just about every pent-up Democratic proposal of the last 40 years.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, January 28). &amp;quot;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123310466514522309.html A 40-Year Wish List].&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In responding to criticism of the broken bipartisanship promise at the time, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi famously quipped, &amp;quot;We won the election. We wrote the bill.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kane, P. (2009, January 23). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/22/AR2009012203961.html Stimulus Plan Meets More GOP Resistance].&amp;quot; ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On February 18, 2009, the Stimulus was signed into law by Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, February 17). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29231790/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-stimulus-lets-americans-claim-destiny/ Obama: Stimulus Lets Americans Claim Destiny].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In August 2009, Republicans and Democratic Senator David Obey drew attention to mistakes on the Recovery.gov site claiming Stimulus jobs created that didn't exist. Obama responded by saying the errors just indicate the accounting is an &amp;quot;inexact science&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, November 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/18/obama-calls-stimulus-data-errors-issue-says-focus-job-growth/ Obama Calls Stimulus Data Errors 'Side Issue,' Says Focus Is on Job Growth].&amp;quot; ''FOX News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Healthcare====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Obamacare}}&lt;br /&gt;
On March 23, 2010, Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). The act had originated in the House of Representatives and passed September 17, 2009. The act was amended and passed the Senate prior to [[Democrat]] [[Ted Kennedy]]'s passing along party lines - just a filibuster-proof majority at 60-39. In what can be construed as a de facto rejection of the bill, [[Massachusetts]] voters elected a [[Republican]] candidate, [[Scott Brown]], who promised to vote against the bill,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/senate/scott-brown-wins-massachusetts-senate-race.html|work=The Washington Post|author=Chris Cillizza|date=January 19, 2010|title=Scott Brown wins Massachusetts Senate special election race|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but another Senate vote would not occur.  Scott Brown was also an excellent campaigner and judged to be a better candidate than his rival, Martha Coakley.  He has since achieved one of the most moderate senate voting records, likely to avoid the anger of his mostly liberal constituency.  After Obama made a promise to issue an [[executive order]] that would ultimately prohibit the use of taxpayer subsidies to pay for [[abortion]] services,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/22/nation/la-na-healthcare-passage22-2010mar22/3|work=The Los Angeles Times|format=HTML|language=English|title=House passes historic healthcare overhaul|date=March 22, 2010|author=Noam N. Levey and Janet Hook}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the [[House of Representatives]] would pass the bill as it left the Senate 219-212, with 34 Democrats and all other parties dissenting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://articles.cnn.com/2010-03-21/politics/health.care.main_1_health-care-entire-house-democratic-caucus-pre-existing-conditions?_s=PM:POLITICS|date=March 21, 2010|author=Alan Silverleib|work=CNN|format=HTML|language=English|title=House passes health care bill on 219-212 vote}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amongst other things, the act mandates that the population purchase health care coverage or face punitive tax measures, and on this basis has been constitutionally challenged in the federal courts, with mixed results (three courts have upheld the act, two have declared it unconstitutional); thus, the Act is likely destined for [[Supreme Court]] reviewal.  Plans originally proposed involved instituting a universal public insurance program, that is, extending Medicare to everyone.  The universal mandate included in the act was originally a conservative idea that was enacted in Massachusetts under Republican Mitt Romney.  Its supporters note that having health insurance results in reduced costs in paying for treatment of uninsured and forcing people to take responsibility for their healthcare.  Due to ethical constraints, doctors cannot deny care to poor patients, resulting in the hospital and the healthcare system at large bearing the cost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Gulf oil spill====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster}}&lt;br /&gt;
President Obama authorized offshore oil drilling in the [[Gulf of Mexico]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0430/Gulf-of-Mexico-oil-spill-imperils-Obama-s-offshore-drilling-plan Gulf of Mexico oil spill imperils Obama's offshore drilling plan,] By Mark Clayton, ''Christian Science Monitor'', April 30, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; stating, &amp;quot;oil rigs today generally don’t cause spills&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;White House Press Release, [http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-a-discussion-jobs-and-economy-charlotte-north-carolina Remarks by the President in a Discussion on Jobs and the Economy in Charlotte, North Carolina,] Office of the Press Secretary, April 02, 2010. Retrieved from whitehouse.gov 3 May 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was widely criticized for his mishandling of the &amp;quot;[[Gulf oil spill disaster|worst environmental disaster]] in US history.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.examiner.com/x-33986-Political-Spin-Examiner~y2010m4d29-Worst-environmental-disaster-in-US-history-Oil-slick-in-Gulf-of-Mexico-is-set-on-fire Worst environmental disaster in US history,] Maryann Tobin, ''Examiner'', April 29, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/the-oil-spill-is-obamas-fault/?src=twt&amp;amp;twt=NytimesKrugman Conscience of a Liberal: The Oil Spill Is Obama’s Fault,] Paul Krugman, ''New York Times'', April 30, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Don't Ask Don't Tell====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Don't Ask Don't Tell}}&lt;br /&gt;
Candidate Obama promised to repeal a policy that originated in the Clinton era that prohibited inquiries into military personnel's [[sexual orientation]] while also barring &amp;quot;out&amp;quot; [[homosexuals]] from serving in the military. [[Liberals]] expressed anger when time passed and no effort to repeal the law was seen;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/nov/21/obama-to-delay-repeal-of-dont-ask-dont-tell/|work=The Washington Times|format=HTML|title=Obama to delay ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ repeal|language=English|author=Rowan Scarborough|date=November 21, 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in fact, Obama's [[justice department]], as part of their duty to defend all laws passed by any administration, filed a brief arguing against the [[Supreme Court]] granting a [[writ of certiorari]] to a gay soldier challenging the law (the writ was not granted). In response, the soldier, James Pietrangelo II, a former Army infantryman and lawyer, said, “[Obama's] a coward, a bigot and a pathological liar. This is a guy who spent more time picking out his dog, Bo, and playing with him on the White House lawn than he has working for equality for gay people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=Time Magazine|publisher=Time Inc.|format=HTML|url=http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1903545,00.html?imw=Y|title=Dismay Over Obama's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Turnabout|author=Mark Thompson|date=Jun. 09, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 15th, 2010, a bill was introduced in the [[House of Representatives]] to repeal the law - it passed a day later by a vote of 250-175;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2010/roll638.xml|title=FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 638|format=HTML|work=Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it passed the Senate three days later 65-31.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&amp;amp;session=2&amp;amp;vote=00281|work=The U.S. Senate|title=U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 111th Congress - 2nd Session|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama signed the Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010 on December 22nd.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;g dadt&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/22/obama-repeals-dont-ask-dont-tell|work=The Guardian|format=HTML|language=English|title='Don't ask, don't tell' repealed as Obama signs landmark law|date=22 December 2010}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Pentagon]] itself could not immediately implement the repeal and questioned whether it would hurt combat readiness.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;g dadt&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Senator [[John McCain]], the senior Republican on the Armed Services Committee, opposed the bill, saying &amp;quot;It may be premature to make such a change at this time and in this manner, without further consideration of this report and further study of the issue by Congress – for of all the people we serve, one of our highest responsibilities is to the men and women of our armed services, especially those risking their lives in combat.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/02/mccain-on-dont-ask-dont-tell-dont-rush/|title=McCain on ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’: Don’t Rush|date=December 2nd, 2010|format=HTML|author=David M. Herszenhorn|language=English|work=The New York Times}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign policy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Western Wall Obama.jpg|thumb|left|320px|At [[Western Wall]], Jerusalem, 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
As Senator, Obama was highly critical of President Bush and promised change. As President, Obama has tripled down in Afghanistan, widened the war into Pakistan, multiplied drone attacks, bombed Yemen and Somalia, and started an undeclared NATO war in Libya. On presidential war powers, surveillance questions, Guantanamo, detention policy and habeas corpus, Obama has similarly stayed the course, or expanded Bush's precedents. In a speech on May 19, 2011 Obama fully embraced the [[Bush Doctrine]] of preventative war.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Krauthammer, C. (April 19). [http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-news-in-obamas-speech/2011/05/19/AF4dFN7G_story.html The News in Obama's Speech]. ''The Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The New America Foundation, which tracks the strikes, has listed 23 raids since the beginning of April, 2011, all but one in Pakistan’s tribal regions of North and South Waziristan. A June 20 attack was reported in Kurram, an area north of North Waziristan along the Afghanistan border.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The drone program has become increasingly controversial as the Obama administration has expanded its use beyond the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. Lethal missiles have been launched from unmanned aircraft in at least five countries in addition to Pakistan: Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, and, most recently, Somalia. The military’s Joint Special Operations Command used a drone last June to attack what officials said were two senior members of the Al Shabab militant group on the Somali coast.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;DeYoung, K. (2011, July 4).  [http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/2011/07/04/cia_halts_drone_launches_from_pakistan_base/ CIA Halts Drone Launches From Pakistan Base]. ''The Boston Globe''. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is commendable when he says he wants to avoid war. His policies, however, favor war by destabilizing the Middle East making it extremely hostile and favoring radical Islam over America’s ally, Israel, and American interests in the region... The president has chosen a very dangerous path for every American and one that promises great difficulty for Israel. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.thejerusalemconnection.us/blog/2012/03/14/obamas-words-disguise-his-israel-foreign-policy-actions.html Obama's words disguise his Israel foreign policy actions.] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Commander-in-chief====&lt;br /&gt;
By Obama's third year as Commander-in-Chief, over 1200 American troops died in Iraq and Afghanistan - significantly more than the number who died during President [[George W. Bush]]'s term of office.  And growing numbers of civilian contractors also have fallen. In the first half of 2010, 250 contractors reportedly died in Iraq and Afghanistan - more than the 235 military personnel who fell during the same period.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/05/24/114662/what-price-war.html#ixzz1Nz07pg5O&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=====National Defense=====&lt;br /&gt;
President Obama signed into U.S. law the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), only after his administration successfully lobbied to remove language from the bill that would have protected American citizens from being detained indefinitely without trial.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aaron Dykes. [http://www.infowars.com/president-obamas-ndaa-signing-statement-i-have-the-power-to-detain-americans-but-i-wont/ Obama’s Signing Statement on NDAA: I have the power to detain Americans… but I won’t], Infowars.com, January 1, 2012. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After the legislation cleared Congress, the ACLU commented that if President Obama signed the bill it &amp;quot;will damage both his legacy and American’s reputation for upholding the rule of law,&amp;quot; while executive director of the ''Human Rights Watch'' blasted the President for being ‘on the wrong side of history,’ noting that &amp;quot;Obama will go down in history as the president who enshrined indefinite detention without trial in US law.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;President Decides to Sign Ill-Conceived National Defense Authorization Act. [http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/12/14/us-refusal-veto-detainee-bill-historic-tragedy-rights US: Refusal to Veto Detainee Bill A Historic Tragedy for Rights], ''Human Rights Watch'', December 14, 2011. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[http://www.aclu.org/national-security/white-house-backs-away-defense-bill-veto-threat White House Backs Away from Defense Bill Veto Threat], ''[[ACLU]]'', December 14, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Section 1031 of the NDAA bill, which itself defines the entirety of the United States as a “battlefield,” allows American citizens to be snatched from the streets, carted off to a foreign detention camp and held indefinitely without trial. As reported by Infowars.com, the bill states that “any person who has committed a belligerent act” faces indefinite detention, but no trial or evidence has to be presented, the White House merely needs to make the accusation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Paul Joseph Watson. [http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-demanded-power-to-indefinitely-detain-u-s-citizens/ Obama Administration Demanded Power To Indefinitely Detain U.S. Citizens], Infowars.com, December 12, 2011.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;S.1867 [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c112:2:./temp/~c1122VN0Iv:e548990: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Engrossed in Senate [Passed Senate] - ES)], ''The Library of Congress'' THOMAS, 112th Congress (2011-2011), Accessed January 25, 2012.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Text of S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. [http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/text?version=es&amp;amp;nid=t0:es:281 Sec. 1031. Affirmation of authority of the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force.], [[U.S. Congress]], ''OpenCongress.org'', (Accessed January 25, 2012).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====2009-2011 Iraq Troop Withdrawal=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Operation Iraqi Freedom}}&lt;br /&gt;
On February 10, 2007, Barack Obama announced his campaign for the U.S. presidency while stating he had a &amp;quot;''plan that will bring our combat troops home by March of 2008.''&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=announcement&amp;gt;(2007, February 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/10/AR2007021000879.html Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's Announcement Speech].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Later, Obama campaigned on having troops entirely out of Iraq within 16 months, but in February 2009 revised this promise to withdrawing all but 35-50 thousand troops by December 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barry, J. (2009, February 25). &amp;quot;[http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2009/02/25/reality-on-the-ground.html Reality on the Ground].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  However, some of the newly withdrawn troops were simply redirected from Iraq to Afghanistan - Obama in Summer 2009 ordered 21,000 troops to Afghanistan.&amp;lt;ref name=amanpour&amp;gt;Amanpour, C. (2009, April 29). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2009-04-29/politics/amanpour.obama.foreign.policy_1_president-obama-obama-administration-iraq?_s=PM:POLITICS Amanpour: Obama's 100 Days of Foreign Affairs].&amp;quot; ''CNN Politics''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{cquote|&amp;quot;But all of this cannot come to pass until we bring an end to this war in Iraq. Most of you know I opposed this war from the start. I thought it was a tragic mistake. Today we grieve for the families who have lost loved ones, the hearts that have been broken, and the young lives that could have been. America, it's time to start bringing our troops home. It's time to admit that no amount of American lives can resolve the political disagreement that lies at the heart of someone else's civil war. That's why I have a plan that will bring our combat troops home by March of 2008. Letting the Iraqis know that we will not be there forever is our last, best hope to pressure the Sunni and Shia to come to the table and find peace.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Barack Obama, February 10, 2007 Presidential Campaign Announcement Speech&amp;lt;ref name=announcement /&amp;gt;}}Ultimately, it was the Status of Forces Agreement signed by George W. Bush on November 17, 2008 which forced U.S. combat troops to withdraw from Iraq's cities, villages, and localities by June 30, 2009, and from Iraq entirely by December 31st 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2008, November 17). &amp;quot;[http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/world/20081119_SOFA_FINAL_AGREED_TEXT.pdf Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq On the Withdrawal of United States from Iraq and the Organization of Their Activities during Their Temporary Presence in Iraq].&amp;quot; Article 24. Withdrawal of the United States Forces from Iraq. Hosted by ''The New York Times''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Office of the Press Secretary (2008, November 27). &amp;quot;[http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2008/11/20081127-1.html Statement by the President on Agreements with Iraq].&amp;quot; ''The White House''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama privately contacted the Iraq government in an attempt to persuade them to let 10,000 troops stay, but was rejected.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Froomkin, D. (2011, October 26). &amp;quot;[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/26/obama-iraq_n_1032507.html Ending the War in Iraq: How Obama's Own Rhetoric - And George Bush's Pact - Boxed in the President].&amp;quot; ''Huffington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Newsweek's Michael Ware accused Obama of a &amp;quot;War Crime&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;''falsely taking credit for finally bringing Iraq to a close—a war actually ended by the Bush administration back in 2008''&amp;quot; and stated, &amp;quot;''The U.S. troops who fought and died in that war, the Iraqis who perished, and the American people deserve far better.''&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ware, M. (2011, October 24). &amp;quot;[http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/10/24/obamas-war-crime-taking-credit-from-bush-adminsitration-for-ending-the-iraq-war.html Obama's War Crime].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''. U.S. Politics.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The last of Iraq's combat troops have now been withdrawn because of Bush's Status of Forces Agreement which Obama took credit for.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://articles.cnn.com/2011-12-17/middleeast/world_meast_iraq-troops-leave_1_1st-cavalry-division-camp-adder-troop-movements?_s=PM:MIDDLEEAST|work=CNN|title=Obama: Last U.S. troops leave Iraq|date=December 17, 2011|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=====Afghanistan=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Afghanistan War}}&lt;br /&gt;
Obama escalated troop strength&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pbs&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/obamaswar/themes/strategy.html#ixzz1LhWNImZp|title=Obama's New Strategy (March '09)|author=George Packer, Seth Jones, David Kilcullen, Rory Stewart, Andrew Exum, Col. Andrew Bacevich (Ret.)|work=PBS|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and defense costs in Afghanistan from $43.5 billion in George Bush's last year to $113.7 billion for 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Congressional Research Service, quoted in Gregory Anthony, ''What price war?''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Adviser to General [[Stanley McChrystal]] David Kilcullen wrote, &amp;quot;One of the big strategic shifts is the use of language now which talks about Pakistan and Afghanistan as the same theater. Now we talked about Af-Pak long before the Obama administration came about, but the public use of that term, and the description of it as the Afghanistan-Pakistan campaign, sends a new message to people about how the administration is going to think about Afghanistan and Pakistan.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pbs&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; This became evident when, under the orders of Obama, a military SEALs team killed September 11th mastermind [[Osama bin Laden]] in Abottabad, Pakistan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.newsweek.com/2011/05/05/commander-in-chief.html|title=Commander in Chief|author=Daniel Romano and Daniel Klaidman|date=May 05, 2011|work=Newsweek|publisher=The Newsweek/Daily Beast Company LLC|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=====Guantanamo Bay=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Guantanamo Bay}}&lt;br /&gt;
One of Obama's campaign promises was that he would close the American detention center at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba - detainees would be flown to other countries while the ones awaiting trial would enter the American court system. Two days after taking office he signed an order directing the military to do so.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;salon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/04/25/obama_guantanamo_rhetoric|work=Salon|title=The Obama/Gitmo timeline|author=Natasha Lennard|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But, in November 2009 Obama admitted that his self imposed deadline of January 2010 would be missed, and in March 2011 the president went back on his campaign promise, signing an executive order to create a formal system of indefinite detention for the prisoners.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;salon&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=====Mexico=====&lt;br /&gt;
In May 2012, President Obama promised Mexican President [[Felipe Calderon]] that his administration would assist Mexico in curbing drug cartel violence, which has led to 30,000 deaths in Mexico. &amp;quot;President Calderon and I . . . stand together against the drug cartels that have unleashed horrific violence in so many communities,&amp;quot; Obama said on May 19. &amp;quot;Mexico can count on the United States as a full partner in this effort.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''[[Washington Post]]'' has reported however that White House officials stopped a requirement for gun dealers to report bulk sales of high-powered semiautomatic rifles commonly used by illegal drug cartels.  [[Justice Department]] officials had asked for White House approval to require thousands of gun dealers along the border to report the purchases to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and Explosives. ATF investigators expected to get leads on suspected arms traffickers. Senior law enforcement sources said the proposal from the ATF was held up by then White House chief of staff [[Rahm Emanuel]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Horwitz, S. &amp;amp; Grimaldi, J.V. (2010, December 17). [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/17/AR2010121706598.html White House Delayed Rule Meant to Stop Gun Flow to Mexico]. ''The Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gun dealers have been required for decades to report the sales of multiple handguns to the ATF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Libya=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Libyan uprising 2011}}&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2011, the political unrest that had spread through the Arab world showed up as protests in Libya. Colonel Muammar el-Qaddafi - leader of Libya for 41 years - responded to the violent activism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28376.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with legible steps.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt libya&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/libya/index.html|work=The New York Times|publisher=The New York Times Inc.|format=HTML|language=English|title=Libya — Protests and Revolt (2011)}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[United Nations Security Council]] voted unanimously to impose [[sanctions]], and later authorized all members to take action to protect civilians. Obama, acting without approval from Congress and at the beckoning of the [[United Nations]], directed American forces to take out Libya's air defense system.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt libya&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Obama later said, &amp;quot;[I]f we waited one more day Benghazi, a city nearly the size of Charlotte, could suffer a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Barack Obama|url=http://www.npr.org/2011/03/28/134935452/obamas-speech-on-libya-a-responsibility-to-act|title=Obama's Speech On Libya: 'A Responsibility To Act'|date=March 28, 2011|publisher=National Public Radio ([[NPR]])|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Alan J. Kuperman]] - writing an editorial for the ''[[Boston Globe]]'' - suggested this statement was false, writing, &amp;quot;[I]ntervention did not prevent genocide, because no such bloodbath was in the offing. To the contrary, by emboldening rebellion, US interference has prolonged Libya’s civil war and the resultant suffering of innocents.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuperman&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Alan J. Kuperman|work=The Boston Globe|url=http://articles.boston.com/2011-04-14/bostonglobe/29418371_1_rebel-stronghold-civilians-rebel-positions|title=False pretense for war in Libya?|date=April 14, 2011}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kuperman, a professor of public affairs at the University of Texas who authored a book called ''The Limits of Humanitarian Intervention'', further stated that the rebels had tricked the world into thinking a bloodbath was at hand and that Obama had lied to the American people in order to act on this theory.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuperman&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Gaddafi [never] threaten civilian massacre in Benghazi, as Obama alleged. The “no mercy’’ warning, of March 17, targeted rebels only, as reported by The New York Times, which noted that Libya’s leader promised amnesty for those “who throw their weapons away.’’ Khadafy even offered the rebels an escape route and open border to Egypt, to avoid a fight “to the bitter end.’’ &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://politicalcartel.org/2011/04/17/libya-and-the-obama-doctrine/ Libya and the “Obama Doctrine”.] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However Gaddafi wrote to Obama:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Gaddafi said he bore no ill will toward Obama. &amp;quot;We have been hurt more morally than physically because of what had happened against us in both deeds and words by you,&amp;quot; he wrote. &amp;quot;Despite all this you will always remain our son whatever happened. We still pray that you continue to be president of the USA. We endeavour and hope that you will gain victory in the new election campaign.&amp;quot; The letter, dated 5 April 2011 in Tripoli, is signed &amp;quot;Mu'aumer Qaddaffi, Leader of the Revolution&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/06/gaddafi-obama-nato-libya?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Critics point out the only thing worse than starting a &amp;quot;stupid, unnecessary war&amp;quot; against a madman is losing it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/271847/war-libya-dumb-and-dumber-victor-davis-hanson&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2012 Presidential Campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
===2011, Birth Certificate Released===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Barack_Obama_Controversies#Birth_Certificate]]''&lt;br /&gt;
On April 27, 2011&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;CNN Political Unit (2011, April 27). &amp;quot;[http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/27/white-house-releases-obama-birth-certificate/ White House Releases Obama Birth Certificate].&amp;quot; ''CNN''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a long-running controversy surrounding Obama's birth was largely put to rest&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Winter, J. (2011, April 29). &amp;quot;[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/29/expert-says-obamas-birth-certificate-legit/ Expert: No Doubt Obama's Birth Certificate is Legit].&amp;quot; ''FOX News''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Tuchman, G. (2011, April 25). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2011-04-25/politics/birthers.obama.hawaii_1_birther-controversy-obama-opinion-research-corporation?_s=PM:POLITICS Obama Birther Claims Have No Merit].&amp;quot; ''CNN''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(2011, April 27). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42779923/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-releases-detailed-us-birth-certificate/ Obama Releases Detailed U.S. Birth Certificate].&amp;quot; ''MSNBC''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when Obama had his long-form birth certificate posted at WhiteHouse.gov.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf Certificate of Live Birth].&amp;quot; State of Hawaii. Retrieved from ''WhiteHouse.gov''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Donald Trump, who had attacked Obama on the Birth Certificate issue and was then leading Republicans in polls for the upcoming GOP primary&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James, F. (2011, April 15). &amp;quot;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2011/04/15/135446314/poll-donald-trump-birther-darling-leads-gop-field-at-26 Donald Trump, Birther In Chief? Poll Has Him Leading GOP Field with 26 Percent].&amp;quot; ''NPR''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, was effectively knocked out of the race because of this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kapur, S. (2011, May 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/05/10/trumps-popularity-tanks-after-obama-releases-long-form-birth-certificate/ Trump's Popularity Tanks After Obama Releases Long-Form Birth Certificate].&amp;quot; ''RawStory.com''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following is a timeline of previous events leading up to the release:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In June 2008 the Obama campaign allowed FactCheck.org to look at his “Certificate of Live Birth” and take photos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Henig, J. (2008, August 21). Born in the U.S.A. FactCheck.org. Retrieved from http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* In July 2008 a blogger discovered a birth announcement from the Honolulu Advertiser from August 13, 1961 for Barack Obama. It has since been discovered another newspaper, the Star Bulletin, also documented the birth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Snopes.com. Barack Obama Birth Certificate. Retrieved from http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* PolitiFact went to extreme lengths to verify Obama’s citizenship, attaining scanned copies of his 1992 marriage certificate from Cook County, IL, his driver’s license record, and his registration and disciplinary record. PolitiFact also addressed a number of concerns about the documentation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hollyfield, A. (2008, June 27). Obama’s birth certificate: Final chapter. PolitiFact. Retrieved from http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/jun/27/obamas-birth-certificate-part-ii/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* In October 2008 Hawaii’s Department of Health released a statement by Dr. Chiyome Fu.kino verifying that Obama’s birth certificate was on record.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hawaii Department of Health. News Release: Statement by Dr. Chiyome Fu.kino. Retrieved from http://hawaii.gov/health/about/pr/2008/08-93.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* In August 2009 it was revealed that an alleged Kenyan birth certificate for Obama was a hoax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Snopes.com. Kenyan Mistake. Retrieved from http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/kenyacert.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Another website allows you to create your own imitation Kenyan birth certificates online.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;KenyanBirthCertificateGenerator.com. Blue Collar Industries. Retrieved from http://kenyanbirthcertificategenerator.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2011, Osama Bin Laden Confirmed Dead===&lt;br /&gt;
On May 1, 2011, Obama announced in a press conference&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama, B. (2011, May 2). &amp;quot;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/05/02/osama-bin-laden-dead Osama Bin Laden Dead].&amp;quot; ''WhiteHouse.gov''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that Osama Bin Laden was dead after a U.S. assault force infiltrated his military compound in Abottobad, Pakistan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Baker, P., Cooper, H., &amp;amp; Mazzetti, M. (2011, May 1). &amp;quot;[Bin Laden is Dead, Obama Says].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Osama_Bin_Laden/ Target Bin Laden: The Death of Public Enemy #1].&amp;quot; ''ABC News''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''NPR''. &amp;quot;[http://www.npr.org/series/135908383/osama-bin-laden-dead Special Series: Osama Bin Laden Killed].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bin Laden was reportedly shot in the head after a helicopter raid ferried Navy SEAL Team Six and CIA paramilitary operatives into Pakistan on April 29.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2011, May 1). &amp;quot;[http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-201_162-20058777.html Osama bin Laden is Dead].&amp;quot; Retrieved from ''CBSNews.com''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Reuters obtained photos of unidentified dead bodies from the raid, none of which look like bin Laden. However, the White House had the body of Osama bin Laden disposed of at sea because it claimed this was &amp;quot;in accordance with Islamic tradition&amp;quot; and didn't want to give Bin Laden followers a gravesite shrine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Daily Beast (2011, May 2). &amp;quot;[http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/05/02/osama-bin-laden-killed-and-buried-at-sea-breaking-details.html Osama Bin Laden Killed and Buried at Sea].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The White House also refused to publicly reveal photos or evidence of the body, because Obama claimed that &amp;quot;given the graphic nature of these photos, it would create some national security risk.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Allbritton, C. (2011, May 4). &amp;quot;[http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/04/us-binladen-pakistan-photos-idUSTRE7437KK20110504 Photos Show Three Dead Men at Bin Laden Raid House].&amp;quot; ''Reuters''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''Reuters''. &amp;quot;[http://www.reuters.com/subjects/bin-laden-compound Photos From the Bin Laden Compound].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The burial at sea was criticized by Islamic scholars&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2011, May 2). &amp;quot;[http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-202_162-20058892.html Islamic Scholars Criticize Bin Laden Sea Burial].&amp;quot; Retrieved from ''CBSNews.com''. Also at [http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/05/02/islamic-scholars-question-bin-ladens-sea-burial/ Fox News].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and 9/11 families.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zirulnick, A. (2011, May 3). &amp;quot;[http://www.csmonitor.com/World/terrorism-security/2011/0503/Osama-bin-Laden-s-burial-at-sea-critics-range-from-9-11-families-to-militants Osama Bin Laden's Burial At Sea: Critics Range from 9/11 Families to Militants].&amp;quot; ''Christian Science Monitor''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The lack of photos resulted in skepticism about the death from a variety of sources, including the Taliban&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Faiez, R. &amp;amp; Vogt, H. (2011, May 4). &amp;quot;[http://articles.boston.com/2011-05-04/news/29509464_1_bin-taliban-spokesman-zabiullah-mujahid-samiullah-khan Taliban Holding Out for Clear Evidence].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Republican Senator Lindsey Graham.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rosen, J. &amp;amp; Thomma, S. (2011, May 5). &amp;quot;[http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/05/05/113709/sc-sen-graham-wants-bin-laden.html S.C. Sen. Graham Wants Bin Laden Photos Released].&amp;quot; ''McClatchy Newspapers''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The death of bin Laden, coupled with the revealing of Obama's long-form Birth Certificate, resulted in a boost of Obama's job approval from 46% to 57% within one month.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dao, J. &amp;amp; Sussman, D. (2011, May 4). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/05/us/politics/05poll.html For Obama, Big Rise in Poll Numbers After Bin Laden Raid].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''Pew Research Center'' (2011, May 2). &amp;quot;[http://www.people-press.org/2011/05/03/public-relieved-by-bin-ladens-death-obamas-job-approval-rises/ Public 'Relieved' by Bin Laden's Death, Obama's Job Approval Rises].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Jones, J.M. (2011, May 5). &amp;quot;[http://www.gallup.com/poll/147437/obama-approval-rallies-six-points-bin-laden-death.aspx Obama Job Approval Rallies Six Points to 52% After Bin Laden Death].&amp;quot; ''Gallup''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2012, relations between the U.S. and Pakistan remain sour because the U.S. did not involve Pakistan fully in the raid to ensure success.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CBS/Associated Press'' (2012, May 1). &amp;quot;[http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57424622/1-year-after-osama-bin-laden-killed-still-no-answers-from-pakistan/ 1 Year After Osama bin Laden Killed, Still No Answers from Pakistan].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Pakistan has denied White House claims that there was a deal with it allowing the raid.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2011, May 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/05/10/pakistani-president-claims-bin-laden-deal/ Former Pakistani President Claims There Was Never Bin Laden Deal With U.S.].&amp;quot; Retrieved from ''FOX News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2012: Ties to ACORN? ===&lt;br /&gt;
According to Stanley Kurtz - author of ''Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism'' (2010) Obama in 1995 sought and obtained the endorsement of a left-wing third party, the [[New Party]] in his quest to be elected to the Illinois State Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kurtz, S. (2012, June 7). [http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/302031/obamas-third-party-history-stanley-kurtz Obama's Third-Party History]. ''National Review Online''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama's &amp;quot;Fight the Smears&amp;quot; campaign has denied this, as has Politico's Ben Smith.&amp;lt;ref name=pollack&amp;gt;Pollack, J.B. (2012, June 7). [http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/07/Obama-Caught-Lying-Again-He-WAS-Member-of-New-Party-Says-Kurtz Obama Caught Lying Again: He WAS Member of 'New Party', Says Kurtz]. ''Breitbart''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Smith, B. (2008, October 25). [http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/The_dread_New_Party.html The Dread New Party]. ''Politico''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Others who claim he was affiliated with the New Party/ACORN include The Blaze's Billy Hallowell&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hallowell, B. (2012, June 7). [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/report-new-documents-show-obama-was-a-member-of-the-far-left-new-party/ News Docs Reportedly Show Obama Was a Member of the Far-Left 'New Party']. ''The Blaze''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Breitbart's Joel Pollack, Human Events' Erick Erickson&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Erickson, E. (2008, June 10). [http://www.humanevents.com/2008/06/10/obama-and-the-new-party/ Obama and the New Party]. ''Human Events''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Newsbusters' P.J. Gladnick&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gladnick, P.J. (2008, October 12). [http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/10/08/will-msm-report-obama-membership-socialist-new-party#ixzz21JfE3z1z Will MSM Report on Obama Membership in Socialist New Party?] ''Newsbusters''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Rick Moran at AmericanThinker.com&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rick Moran. [http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/06/obamas_alliance_with_marxists.html Obama's Alliance with Marxists], ''American Thinker'', June 03, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and various writers at Discover the Networks (which include Kurtz and Erickson).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7434 NEW PARTY (NP)], ''DiscoverTheNetworks.org''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kurtz in 2012 has claimed to find minutes of the New Party Chicago chapter that say, &amp;quot;''Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party 'Candidate Contract' and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.''&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=pollack /&amp;gt; Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod responded to Kurtz with silence and when asked if that meant &amp;quot;yes or no&amp;quot;, Axelrod stated, &amp;quot;You can take that as I have no idea what you are talking about.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollack, J.B. (2012, June 7). [http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/07/Exclusive-Axelrod-Plays-Dumb-on-Obama-and-Socialist-New-Party Exclusive: Axelrod Plays Dumb on Obama and Socialist New Party]. ''Breitbart''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;You didn't build that&amp;quot; Controversy===&lt;br /&gt;
On July 13, 2012, at a campaign event in [[Virginia]], Obama gave a speech that immediately stirred up controversy. Speaking about the Government's role in the success of private business, he said:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/07/13/remarks-president-campaign-event-roanoke-virginia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help.  There was a great teacher somewhere in your life.  Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive.  Somebody invested in roads and bridges.  If you’ve got a business - you didn’t build that.  Somebody else made that happen.}}&lt;br /&gt;
It is fairly clear that when Obama said &amp;quot;you didn't build that,&amp;quot; he is referring to roads, bridges, and other [[infrastructure]] and technological advancements that government played a key role in funding and creating, though plenty of people may disagree over how much government is actually required for businesses to be successful. But many Obama opponents, including the [[Romney]] campaign, took that one sentence (&amp;quot;If you’ve got a business - you didn’t build that&amp;quot;) out of context, making it seem like the President is not giving credit to business owners for having built their own businesses. Obama could have been more clear about what he was referring to, which is unusual because he is often praised for his [[Political_positions_of_Barack_Obama#Public_speaking|public speeches]]. This could be a case of Obama speaking off-script, providing further evidence for his reliance on [[teleprompter]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Accusations about birth certificate and cultural and name identity==&lt;br /&gt;
Some conservative opponents have accused Obama of not being an American but born outside of the United States, this accusation was bolstered by Obama's reluctance to show his birth certificate to the public, until prompted by [[Donald Trump]]. Obama presented a birth certificate to the public. Some conservative opponents believe that the birth certificate he presented was a forgery, and they are known as &amp;quot;birthers&amp;quot; both by their conservative and liberal opponents. However conservatives like [[Ann Coulter]] reject the birthers' accusations and view birthers as a fringe group that left-wing media like MSNBC have exaggerated in order to discredit the conservative movement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are other right-wing and anti-Islamic opponents of Obama who claim that he is a Muslim  '''Barry Soetoro''' during his time in [[Indonesia]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQPXVJuT2vY Barry Soetoro the muslim - YouTube]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other right-wing opponents claim that Obama is an [[Atheism|atheist]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Political positions of Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama and abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Born Outside the U.S.A.!]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Special Interests Candidate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jobsgate]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Recovery Summer]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lobbyists ties to the Obama administration]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Party]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ObamaCare]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama doublespeak]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama inauguration]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Religion of Barack Hussein Obama]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Honorable James David Manning]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Young Communist League]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.antiobama.net/ Anti Obama.net]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.dontvoteobama.net/ Don’t Vote For Obama.net]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nobamanetwork.com/ Nobama Network]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/ Audacity Of Hypocrisy]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/ The Real Barack Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/6130/ The New Cult of Personality]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.survivingobamunism.com/index.html Surviving Obamunism T-shirts]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.barackobamaantichrist.blogspot.com/ Barack Obama the Anti-Christ ?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/23/che-obama-and-the-revolutionary-agenda/ Che, Obama, and the Revolutionary Agenda]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/fashion-shows/ Obama Laundry List of Lies]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/09/americas-first-muslim-president/ GAFFNEY: America's first Muslim president?] Washington Times&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-l-esposito/barack-obama-and-islam_b_212519.html Barack Obama and Islam.] by [[John L. Esposito]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78931 Democrat: Obama's grandma confirms Kenyan birth.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/barack_obama.htm Barack Obama on the issues.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etWLwrvT2vo Obama = Kosher Puppet.] video on You Tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USPresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{2008 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Barack Hussein Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Presidency]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Nobel laureates in Peace]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion Advocates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Obama, Barack Hussein}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Media_bullying&amp;diff=1003304</id>
		<title>Media bullying</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Media_bullying&amp;diff=1003304"/>
				<updated>2012-09-02T04:07:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: citation needed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Media bullying''' is aggressive [[bias]] by the [[media]] in the attempt to influence a candidate, a politician, an institution, or even sports contestants. In some cases, the victim's opponents use the media in a calculated fashion to frame an issue in a light unfavorable to the victim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Examples of '''media bullying''' include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* caused [[RINO]]s to cancel the first 36 hours of the [[Republican National Convention]] in August 2012, an unprecedented capitulation, lest the media blame Republicans for supposedly being indifferent to a hurricane's (relatively modest) forecasted effects&lt;br /&gt;
* trying to force [[conservative]] [[Todd Akin]] to pull out of the key [[U.S. Senate]] race in [[Missouri]] in August 2012&lt;br /&gt;
* trying to force [[Hillary Clinton]] to pull out of the [[Democratic]] primary in 2008&lt;br /&gt;
* consistently holding [[Sarah Palin]] to an unfairly high standard while giving a pass to liberal candidates &lt;br /&gt;
* forcing Queen Elizabeth to give a special public eulogy for the media favorite [[Princess Diana]], who had been estranged from the royal family&lt;br /&gt;
* imposing strict [[gun control]] in [[Britain]] and [[Australia]] by creating an hysteria from over-publicized and isolated incidents in the 1990s&lt;br /&gt;
* ridiculing Vice President [[Dan Quayle]] for his supposed gaffes, in contrast with downplaying gaffes by [[liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* forcing President [[Richard Nixon]] to resign for covering up a scandal, in contrast with defending President [[Bill Clinton]]'s covering up a scandal&lt;br /&gt;
* sex abuse in [[public schools]] is worse than in religious institutions{{fact}}, yet the media constantly bullies religious (especially [[Catholic]]) officials about it&lt;br /&gt;
* the media bullies the competitors of [[Tiger Woods]] in every major golf contest&lt;br /&gt;
* the media portrays [[Paris Hilton]] as dumb, but she's no dumber than other [[Hollywood]] figures&lt;br /&gt;
* the media bullied airships into terminating service by creating an unjustified hysteria based on the [[Hindenburg]] accident&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:media]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Welfare&amp;diff=1003302</id>
		<title>Welfare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Welfare&amp;diff=1003302"/>
				<updated>2012-09-02T04:02:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Economic definition&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Welfare''' is a set of government programs paid for by the taxpayers that provide social or financial support programs specific sectors of the population deemed to be vulnerable, either financially, socially or physically. However, welfare programs can also be extended to much wider segments of the population, such as [[universal healthcare]] systems, [[vaccination]] programs, public roads, schools, and libraries. Some elements are opposed by [[libertarian]]s and [[conservative]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As an economic term, welfare refers to general well-being, economic prosperity, or living standards. Welfare is derived from [[utility]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Welfare in the United States==&lt;br /&gt;
Welfare expenditures in the United States have been growing for many years. The welfare system was established by President [[Franklin Roosevelt]], and extended by [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] as part of the [[Great Society]]. Opponents say that the top 50% of Americans pay over 96% of the taxes. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/250.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Supporters may cite the supposed effectiveness of Roosevelt's policies to help end the Great Depression.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/depression/overview.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Welfare also comes in the forms of [[food stamp]]s, free school lunches, and [[Medicaid]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Corporate Welfare==&lt;br /&gt;
This is a pejorative term used to describe business loans, subsidies, bailouts, and tax breaks, or a government providing a closed bid contract to a favored company. The term is especially for these actions when directed toward large corporations, and especially in favored sectors such as finance, energy, defense and motor industries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Welfare Reform in the US==&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United States]], Conservative legislators passed the [[Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996]], which ended the AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependent Children) and radically changed the US welfare system. Tighter restrictions were placed on the eligibility and manner of receiving public aid in order to discourage families (mainly single, divorced, or widowed mothers with children)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://futureofchildren.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; from remaining idle (outside of the work force). For instance, recipients are required to find employment within two years of receiving aid, and a single family could receive aid for a total of five years. If a mother gives birth to a child while on public assistance, states are allowed to establish &amp;quot;family caps&amp;quot; in order to deny further benefits the family may have been eligible for before the reform&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Washington Post [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/welfare/welfare.htm#new]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Legal immigrants have also been made ineligible for any [[Social Security]] Income (SSI)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cornell University Law School&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/welfare]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People who take advantage of the welfare system by collecting benefits for an extended period of time without trying to improve their situation (i.e. by getting a job) are known colloquially as [[welfare queen]]s. The legislative changes mentioned above help this problem, but there is still much room for improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Welfare and Welfare Reform in Egypt ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Egyptian welfare system is significantly different. Rather than specific programs aimed at helping vulnerable individuals or families, the government prefers to maintain price controls and subsidies, as [[poverty]] is regarded as the most serious social issue, and is widespread. Staple goods such as bread, cooking oil and fuel are all blanket subsidised, that is supplied at the subsidised price to the entire population, with no form of means testing employed. Although this is more expensive than a more targeted means-tested approach, it is administratively simpler, a major factor in a country where the civil service often has limited resources, and limited computerization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government also implements non-financial programs, including [[family planning]] (which has succeeded in halving population growth, but still faces many challenges), subsidized basic medical care at the village level, [[vaccination]] programs, and agricultural assistance programs. The government also provides more sophisticated medical services through a network of public hospitals, though care is not free at point of access and facilities are generally less sophisticated than in private hospitals, though geographic coverage is much more extensive. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attempts to reform the system, by reducing subsidies overall has been proposed many times by the government, and limited cuts have taken place, but there exists huge public resistance to deeper reform, especially amongst the poor, who comprise a huge percentage of the population. At present, there are no plans to drastically alter the provision of medical services, and most reform efforts are aimed at reform of the blanket subsidies on basic goods, and agricultural programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Finding welfare ==&lt;br /&gt;
Welfare in the U.S. is administered at the county level. Search terms include welfare, social services, public assistance, and food stamps plus the name of the county. Like before the internet, phone books and yellow pages can be searched as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Greatest Conservative Legislation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social democracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Welfare State]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Government Programs]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Social Problems]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Welfare State]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Patent&amp;diff=1003297</id>
		<title>Patent</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Patent&amp;diff=1003297"/>
				<updated>2012-09-02T03:58:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Controversy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''patent''' is a legal document that protects an inventor's exclusivity to his invention.  This gives an incentive for inventing useful things, as the inventor can earn fees, also known as royalties,  by obtaining a patent and then licensing it to others.  There are several types of patents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The patent right is, in the language of the American patent statute, &amp;quot;the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling&amp;quot; the invention in the United States or &amp;quot;importing&amp;quot; the invention into the United States. What is protected is not the right to make, use, offer for sale, sell or import, but the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, selling or importing the invention. Once a patent is issued, the patentee must enforce the patent without aid of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/doc/general/index.html#patent&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three types of patents:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Utility patent]]s may be granted to anyone who invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, article of manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Design patent]]s may be granted to anyone who invents a new, original, and ornamental design for an article of manufacture; and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Plant patent]]s may be granted to anyone who invents or discovers and asexually reproduces any distinct and new variety of plant. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To be the subject of a U.S. utility patent, an invention must be new, useful, and non-obvious.  Obviousness is determined from the standpoint of a person having ordinary skill in the art who had [[hindsight|no knowledge of the invention itself]].  Other countries typically require novelty, inventive step (in practice the same thing as non-obviousness), and industrial applicability (a somewhat more stringent standard than utility).  They may also exclude certain categories of inventions patentable in the United States, such as methods of diagnosis or treatment performed on a human or animal body and computer-implemented business methods.&lt;br /&gt;
== Patent Term ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United States]], the term of a utility patent (filed after 1995) is 20 years from the earliest non-provisional U.S. filing date of which the patent application claims the benefit, although that term may be adjusted for excessive delays on the part of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (not those on the part of the applicant).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/appxl_35_U_S_C_154.htm#usc35s154 35 U.S.C. § 154]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For applications filed on or after June 8, 1995, utility and plant patents are granted for a term which begins with the date of the grant and usually ends 20 years from the date you first applied for the patent subject to the payment of appropriate maintenance fees. Design patents last 14 years from the date you are granted the patent. Note: Patents in force on June 8 and patents issued thereafter on applications filed prior to June 8, 1995 automatically have a term that is the greater of the twenty year term discussed above or seventeen years from the patent grant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
Patents are a distortion of the [[free market]], since they essentially create an artificial [[monopoly]] for the patent holder. Many economists believe that patents are a good idea nevertheless, because they encourage research and development and the products that result ultimately increase net welfare for consumers. Also, the details disclosed in a patent may lead to further improvement of a product by other inventors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some opponents of patents believe that any such distortion of [[free trade]] and other free market outcomes is automatically bad for society. Other critics believe that patents are too easily abused. &amp;quot;Patent trolls&amp;quot; may defend their patents not to protect their own interests in producing a product, but merely to harm competitors. Other critics of patents contend that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office does a poor job of reviewing applications, often issuing patents that are too broad or that overlap previously patented inventions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Xmas&amp;diff=1001841</id>
		<title>Xmas</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Xmas&amp;diff=1001841"/>
				<updated>2012-08-25T20:47:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: used by secularists and atheists&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The term '''Xmas''' is an alternate spelling for [[Christmas]]. This spelling is disliked by many [[Christian]]s, who believe that it is an informal or flippant abbreviation because, as written in English, it literally takes &amp;quot;[[Christ]]&amp;quot; out of &amp;quot;Christmas.&amp;quot; The word has been adopted by many [[secular]]ists and [[atheist]]s who try to downplay the religious aspects of Christmas. Further, in modern English the letter &amp;quot;X&amp;quot; is sometimes associated with [[pornography]] or with the pseudo-word [[xtreme]] (denoting a nihilistic lifestyle).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, in actuality, the term is a Greek-based abbreviation, with the &amp;quot;X&amp;quot; standing for the first letter of the Greek term &amp;quot;Χριστος&amp;quot; (Christ).  Therefore, the usage of Xmas by Christians (or even the term &amp;quot;Xtian&amp;quot; as a parallel abbreviation for &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot;) may be used by believers as an attempt to re-appropriate the [[means of discourse]], thereby reclaiming a portion of the linguistic heritage of the [[English language]] and Christian culture in the West.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Holidays]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Linguistics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Xmas&amp;diff=1001840</id>
		<title>Xmas</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Xmas&amp;diff=1001840"/>
				<updated>2012-08-25T20:45:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: more explanation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The term '''Xmas''' is an alternate spelling for [[Christmas]].  This spelling is disliked by many [[Christian]]s, who believe that it is an informal or flippant abbreviation because, as written in English, it literally takes &amp;quot;[[Christ]]&amp;quot; out of &amp;quot;Christmas.&amp;quot;  Further, in modern English the letter &amp;quot;X&amp;quot; is sometimes associated with [[pornography]] or with the pseudo-word [[xtreme]] (denoting a nihilistic lifestyle).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, in actuality, the term is a Greek-based abbreviation, with the &amp;quot;X&amp;quot; standing for the first letter of the Greek term &amp;quot;Χριστος&amp;quot; (Christ).  Therefore, the usage of Xmas by Christians (or even the term &amp;quot;Xtian&amp;quot; as a parallel abbreviation for &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot;) may be used by believers as an attempt to re-appropriate the [[means of discourse]], thereby reclaiming a portion of the linguistic heritage of the [[English language]] and Christian culture in the West.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Holidays]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Linguistics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Todd_Akin&amp;diff=1001781</id>
		<title>Todd Akin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Todd_Akin&amp;diff=1001781"/>
				<updated>2012-08-25T15:09:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* Media bullying of Akin */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Rep. '''Todd Akin''' (R - [[MO]]) is a [[movement conservative]] in [[Missouri]] who is the [[Republican Party]] nominee for one of the most-watched races for the [[U.S. Senate]] in 2012.  He has represented a portion of the greater [[St. Louis]], [[Missouri]] area in the [[House of Representatives]] since 2000.  Prior to that he served 12 years in the Missouri General Assembly. In late July 2011 he said, &amp;quot;... at the heart of [[liberalism]] really is a hatred for God and a belief that government should replace [[God]].&amp;quot; [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/rep-todd-akin-refuses-to-apologize-for-saying-at-the-heart-of-liberalism-is-a-hatred-for-god/] [http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2011/06/28/congressmans-claim-liberals-hate-god/] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Todd Akin has never lost an election, and has repeatedly won upset victories against more [[liberal]] opponents who have spent far more money than he has.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[veteran]], Congressman Akin has been a leader on military issues in the [[Republican Party]] in [[Congress]].  He is also a minister who has championed the greater use of [[prayer]] and [[charity]].  His family has [[homeschooled]] their children.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Media bullying]] of Akin ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August19, 2012 in an interview with local TV host Charles Jaco, Todd Akin addressed a suggestion that there should be a broad [[rape]] exception to any limits on [[abortion]]. Akin distinguished between an actual rape and a false allegation of rape by referring to the former as a &amp;quot;legitimate rape,&amp;quot; an ambiguous word choice that the [[liberal media]] then unfairly took out of context. Akin's statement from the interview was:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McMorris-Santoro, Evan. &amp;quot;Republican Senate Nominee: Victims Of ‘Legitimate Rape’ Don’t Get Pregnant.&amp;quot; August 19, 2012. Talking Points Memo. http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/todd-akin-legitimate-rape.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|First of all, from what I understand from doctors [pregnancy from rape] is really rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Akin restated the same fact that has been published in the medical literature, which is that the incidence of pregnancy due to rape is rare. For example, the 6th Edition (2012) of the classic textbook by Lentz confirms:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lentz: Comprehensive Gynecology, 6th ed. (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In the experience of most sexual assault centers, the chance of pregnancy occurring is quite low.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Published peer-reviewed studies confirm that stress -- which rape would induce -- interferes with the establishment and maintenance of a pregnancy:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22687324&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|[stress-related biomarkers ... affect establishment of pregnancy.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Hormones and other chemicals wreak havoc on the uterus&amp;quot; due to stress, as reported in 2003 in this peer-reviewed study:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.webmd.com/infertility-and-reproduction/news/20030605/how-stress-causes-miscarriage&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In what may prove to be a breakthrough finding, a team of scientists from Tufts University and Greece have identified a suspected chain reaction detailing exactly how stress hormones and other chemicals wreak havoc on the uterus and fetus.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mitt Romney|Romney]]-[[Paul Ryan|Ryan]] campaign, which had already caved in to [[liberals]] on abortion and other important social issues, then ran away from Todd Akin's principled stance in a manner that reflected poorly on Romney and Ryan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/world/mitt-romney-slams-lawmaker-todd-akins-rape-comments/story-fnd134gw-1226454546819&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[RINO]]s tried to pressure Romney into withdrawing from the race for [[U.S. Senate]], so that a more [[liberal]], Establishment-supported candidate could be nominated.  Akin stood up against the pressure and rejected the liberal demands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Todd Akin has stood up against [[media bullying]] and namecalling by [[liberals]] such as [[Piers Morgan]] of ''[[CNN]]''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2012/08/piers-morgan-calls-todd-akin-gutless-little-twerp-132635.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Akin, Todd}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Todd_Akin&amp;diff=1001780</id>
		<title>Todd Akin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Todd_Akin&amp;diff=1001780"/>
				<updated>2012-08-25T15:09:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* Media bullying of Akin */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Rep. '''Todd Akin''' (R - [[MO]]) is a [[movement conservative]] in [[Missouri]] who is the [[Republican Party]] nominee for one of the most-watched races for the [[U.S. Senate]] in 2012.  He has represented a portion of the greater [[St. Louis]], [[Missouri]] area in the [[House of Representatives]] since 2000.  Prior to that he served 12 years in the Missouri General Assembly. In late July 2011 he said, &amp;quot;... at the heart of [[liberalism]] really is a hatred for God and a belief that government should replace [[God]].&amp;quot; [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/rep-todd-akin-refuses-to-apologize-for-saying-at-the-heart-of-liberalism-is-a-hatred-for-god/] [http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2011/06/28/congressmans-claim-liberals-hate-god/] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Todd Akin has never lost an election, and has repeatedly won upset victories against more [[liberal]] opponents who have spent far more money than he has.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[veteran]], Congressman Akin has been a leader on military issues in the [[Republican Party]] in [[Congress]].  He is also a minister who has championed the greater use of [[prayer]] and [[charity]].  His family has [[homeschooled]] their children.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Media bullying]] of Akin ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August19, 2012 in an interview with local TV host Charles Jaco, Todd Akin addressed a suggestion that there should be a broad [[rape]] exception to any limits on [[abortion]]. Akin distinguished between an actual rape and a false allegation of rape by referring to the former as a &amp;quot;legitimate rape,&amp;quot; an ambiguous word choice that the [[liberal media]] then unfairly took out of context. Akin's statement from the interview was:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McMorris-Santoro, Evan. &amp;quot;Republican Senate Nominee: Victims Of ‘Legitimate Rape’ Don’t Get Pregnant.&amp;quot; August 19, 2012. Talking Points Memo. http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/todd-akin-legitimate-rape.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|“First of all, from what I understand from doctors [pregnancy from rape] is really rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”}}&lt;br /&gt;
Akin restated the same fact that has been published in the medical literature, which is that the incidence of pregnancy due to rape is rare. For example, the 6th Edition (2012) of the classic textbook by Lentz confirms:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lentz: Comprehensive Gynecology, 6th ed. (2012)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In the experience of most sexual assault centers, the chance of pregnancy occurring is quite low.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Published peer-reviewed studies confirm that stress -- which rape would induce -- interferes with the establishment and maintenance of a pregnancy:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22687324&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|[stress-related biomarkers ... affect establishment of pregnancy.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Hormones and other chemicals wreak havoc on the uterus&amp;quot; due to stress, as reported in 2003 in this peer-reviewed study:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.webmd.com/infertility-and-reproduction/news/20030605/how-stress-causes-miscarriage&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In what may prove to be a breakthrough finding, a team of scientists from Tufts University and Greece have identified a suspected chain reaction detailing exactly how stress hormones and other chemicals wreak havoc on the uterus and fetus.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mitt Romney|Romney]]-[[Paul Ryan|Ryan]] campaign, which had already caved in to [[liberals]] on abortion and other important social issues, then ran away from Todd Akin's principled stance in a manner that reflected poorly on Romney and Ryan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/world/mitt-romney-slams-lawmaker-todd-akins-rape-comments/story-fnd134gw-1226454546819&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[RINO]]s tried to pressure Romney into withdrawing from the race for [[U.S. Senate]], so that a more [[liberal]], Establishment-supported candidate could be nominated.  Akin stood up against the pressure and rejected the liberal demands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Todd Akin has stood up against [[media bullying]] and namecalling by [[liberals]] such as [[Piers Morgan]] of ''[[CNN]]''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2012/08/piers-morgan-calls-todd-akin-gutless-little-twerp-132635.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Akin, Todd}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Misenber&amp;diff=996267</id>
		<title>User talk:Misenber</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Misenber&amp;diff=996267"/>
				<updated>2012-07-26T03:29:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Welcome and stuff&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome|--[[User:Toadaron|AaronT]] 23:29, 25 July 2012 (EDT)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Image Request==&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding your request for an image in the [[Full Asylum]] article, [[Template:Image_request]] doesn't do a good job of drawing attention to the image request. You should probably make a request at [[Conservapedia:Image_upload_requests]] or contact an [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&amp;amp;group=sysop administrator] (who has upload rights) directly on his or her talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, please sign your edits on talk pages and other discussion pages by typing &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. Best regards. --[[User:Toadaron|AaronT]] 23:29, 25 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Desk/Miscellany&amp;diff=996266</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Desk/Miscellany</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Desk/Miscellany&amp;diff=996266"/>
				<updated>2012-07-26T03:25:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* Blocked and no idea how to let you know about a great article for the news */ Tidying up&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;[[Conservapedia:Desk|Back to the Desk]]&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;General Messages&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;=&lt;br /&gt;
Archives: [[Conservapedia:Desk/Miscellany/Archive1|1]] [[Conservapedia:Desk/Miscellany/Archive2|2]] [[Conservapedia:Desk/Miscellany/Archive3|3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;lt;hiero&amp;gt; tag and WikiHiero ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it possible to introduce support for WikiHiero on Conservapedia? On Wikipedia it is possible to insert hieroglyphs into an article using this tag along with the WikiHiero syntax to enter the signs correctly. It'd be useful to have this feature here too.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Krysg|Krysg]] 07:54, 10 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Someone is trying to steal my password ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I recently received this E-mail:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Someone (probably you, from IP address 92.16.2.122)&lt;br /&gt;
 requested that we send you a new password for Conservapedia (http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php).&lt;br /&gt;
 The password for user &amp;quot;Kuyper&amp;quot; is now &amp;quot;[removed]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
 You should log in and change your password now.&lt;br /&gt;
 If someone else made this request or if you have remembered your password and you no longer wish to change it, &lt;br /&gt;
 you may ignore this message and continue using your old password.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You might want to consider looking into this as hacking is a serious problem. [[User:Kuyper|Kuyper]] 16:50, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The operative phrase is below. There wasn't any &amp;quot;hacking&amp;quot; or even &amp;quot;cracking&amp;quot; here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''If someone else made this request or if you have remembered your password and you no longer wish to change it, &lt;br /&gt;
''you may ignore this message and continue using your old password.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:57, 21 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to edit? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I read the article on Barak Obama.  Basically, it is a train wreck.  I am not an expert on him, but I thought I could at least take out all the snide innuendo's, and even if the artilce is much shorter, at least it will be more credible.  He is, after all, the President of the United States, and deserves some minimal respect.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, I have no idea how to edit articles on this thing, and there is just about no help or assistance.  It certainly does not seem to be user friendly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, I am just about ready to give up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also read the article on Virgnia, since that is where I am from.  Under the list of counties, it only had about half of them.  It was a terribel article.  I do not understand how this organizaiton works, but many of the articles are not vey good, and then when you invite people to edit them, how do we do it?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sincerely&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Daniel Sharp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: With all due respect, your misspellings are the worst I've seen.  Please improve and then try to improve the Virginia article, with good spelling.  Thanks much, and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:44, 18 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: As well as the links that I've just put on your user talk page, see [[Help:Contents]] for some more advice.  However, that help is not designed for someone who has never edited a Wiki before.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:37, 18 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Daniel Sharp is also user [[user talk:Lucyjordan|Lucy Jordan]]?  I'm really confused here. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:52, 19 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are some very serious problems with the entries concerning topics related to Confucianism. Many of entries are not strictly incorrect but are sufficiently superficial to be grossly misleading. When it comes to topics as foreign as Confucianism, brevity is not your friend. I will try to help, but unfortunately I do not have the time or the resources to do everything that needs doing. You need a total overhaul.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Noah's Ark Page Locked==&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to create responses to the criticisms on the [[Noah's Ark]] article but the page has been locked by an administrator. The problem is that the locking admin (MountainDew/DanH) is MIA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can I get a little help? [[User:CherylE|CherylE]] 12:54, 29 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
: I've unlocked it.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 15:02, 29 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Multiple Problems ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've made many edits this month, but most of them have disappeared from &amp;quot;my contributions&amp;quot; and from the pages I edited. Also, many of the math pages (e.g. [[Covariance]]) can't display formulas properly. Finally, another user made an edit to my user page a while ago. But that edit has also disappeared from the record. What's going on? [[User:Sjay|Sjay]] 21:11, 30 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Conservapedia suffered a hard drive failure earlier this week. We restored up until the 19th, and are adding more current revisions manually, as we find them viable.  Sorry for the loss, it has effected all of us. Look for bits and pieces to appear back slowly, bit by bit. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:17, 31 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*The hard drive failure explains the missing edits, but why isn't the math environment working? The following should appear as an equation, but doesn't:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
\mbox{E}\left[T\right]=&lt;br /&gt;
\begin{cases}&lt;br /&gt;
\mu\sqrt{\frac{\nu}{2}}\frac{\Gamma((\nu-1)/2)}{\Gamma(\nu/2)}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;\nu&amp;gt;1\\&lt;br /&gt;
\mbox{Does not exist}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;\nu\le1\\&lt;br /&gt;
\end{cases}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*At the moment, this problem is present on every page I've looked at ([[Linear model]], [[Normal distribution]], etc...). [[User:Sjay|Sjay]] 10:34, 31 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The math problems are a problem related to moving to a new server. Other, more major issues are taking priority over the math. I'll get to is soon though. [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 16:30, 3 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Messed up linking... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I created a new page for the Show hannity that took over Hannity and colmes. I'm not sure what I did, but linking to [[Hannity &amp;amp; Colmes]] directs to [[Hannity]]. If an admin could let me know what I did wrong so I can fix it, that would be great. Thanks.--[[User:TylerG|Tyler]] 23:58, 1 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
: Well I found the problem, [[Hannity &amp;amp; Colmes]] is for some reason linking to [[Hannity]] and not [[Hannity and Colmes]]...--[[User:TylerG|Tyler]] 00:04, 2 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: We've had problems in the past with ampersands in article names, although I thought that problem had disappeared.  Perhaps it is back again.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:16, 3 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New outage? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The past few times I've checked the site all the pages were protected. One time was around 3PM. Was there an extension of the 1-6AM closing?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:CMcFreeze|CMcFreeze]] 09:55, 8 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservapedia's editing is turned off over-night, for all but Administrators and specially righted editors.  That would generally be between Midnight and 6:00AM, Eastern Standard Time, U.S. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:02, 8 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wikipedia==&lt;br /&gt;
Article [[Wikipedia]] says &amp;quot;Wikipedia bills itself as a democracy.&amp;quot; However, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_democracy here], Wikipedia clearly does not bill itself as a democracy. Regards, [[User:J|J]] 19:57, 21 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Requested move of [[Hull City F.C.]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not sure if this is the right place, but can the article [[Hull City F.C.]] please be moved to [[Hull City A.F.C]], as that is the correct name of the club. (see the badge and the club website [http://www.hullcityafc.net/page/World/ here]. Thanks, [[User:Ozoo|Ozoo]] 14:56, 26 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Done. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:51, 26 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to start? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just joined and want to edit an article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I know that part of the information is incorrect should I first describe the changes I'm going to make on the talk page or should I just go ahead and make the changes?  {{Unsigned|ChrisMH -- 09:08, 1 December 2009 (EST)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Glad you joined!  In my totally unofficial opinion:  If the article's been undergoing a lot of controversy recently, or if there's been controversy before about the issues you want to address, I'd describe the changes.  If it's been undergoing a lot of editing recently, and the changes are major, I'd describe them.  Otherwise, I'd go right ahead and edit; if someone objects, he can always (revert and) describe his objections.  This's what I'd do; it's definitely not official policy.  --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 11:27, 1 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Chris, the important thing to remember is that encyclopedia's rely on ''facts''.  '''That means having verifiable sources included with your edits.'''  If you or I know something is a fact, and we add it to an article, that doesn't help other users without their ability to confirm it with a reliable source.  Please check the links I placed on your talk page, including our Manual of Style for help.  Our Guidelines will also be of help.  Remember part of your online reputation includes not using anonymous proxies to mask your location.  That said, welcome to you as well, and that is the ''official'' word on your question! --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:43, 1 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed your main page states &amp;quot;wikiproject&amp;quot; - I recommend changing to &amp;quot;pediaproject&amp;quot; or something along those lines; don't want to reinforce or reference wikipedia, sticking to conservapedia. sw&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technical problem creating AT&amp;amp;T article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've recently attempted to create an article about telephone giant [[AT&amp;amp;T]], but having technical difficulties. The article is created, but attempting to view the article results in an error message stating that there is no article for &amp;quot;AT.&amp;quot; Basically, attempting to view &amp;quot;AT&amp;amp;T&amp;quot; results in &amp;quot;AT&amp;quot; being displayed. Anyway we can fix this? AT&amp;amp;T is the largest telephone provider worldwide, certainly worthy of an article if [[Vodafone]] is. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 22:21, 27 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Keep Needing to Reset My Password ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I apologize if I'm posting this in the wrong place; I'm still relatively new here. After I log out every time, the next time I log in, the form says that my password is incorrect. I e-mail myself a new password, then promptly change my password to something new. The website accepts it and I log in, but after I log out and try to log back in, the same situation happens. Could this because I'm trying to log in from a blocked IP? I'm at a university campus where account creation is blocked by IP, but I spoke with TK and was cleared to create an account from my home IP. Thank you for the help! [[User:Tzoran|Tzoran]] 14:50, 1 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My new article. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi there. I've added the article [[Nick Clegg]]. I've researched it, and tried to make it work. I'd really appreciate if somebody would take a look and let me know if it's the right kind of style. Thank you. --[[User:Newton|Newton]] 12:21, 11 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good start. I made a few changes. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:37, 11 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Regarding the UK ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello. I'd like to take a serious role in the UK side of Conservapedia, and try to get some serious articles done about the United Kingdom from a proper Christian conservative point of view. Peraonlly, I think that all of the political parties in the United Kingdom are liberal.. it's just a matter of being more or less liberal. But that's just my opinion. Anyway, sorry for rambling...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If any of the administrators would like to request an article about the UK, please let me know on my talk page. I'm more than happy to accept writing assignments. Who knows? Maybe if I write enough good articles, you'll come to think of me as your 'UK Politics &amp;amp; Religion Editor.' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm going to bed now, take care. --[[User:Newton|Newton]] 23:49, 25 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks, Newton!  Dive right in, and I am certain any of us who see the need will do as you ask and post on your talk page. I am sure many of the U.K articles we have are in need, as some I have spotted misleading information and removed it.  --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:58, 26 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is there a way that I could possibly edit during your night-time period? Who would I speak to about this? At the moment, I can't edit before 10am. On days when I'm in class, I'm often up at 7am or 8am, and have a lot of free time to edit. --[[User:Newton|Newton]] 19:12, 26 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry Newton, you have to earn that through contributions--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 19:16, 26 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Okay, that's reasonable. Thanks for your quick reply. --[[User:Newton|Newton]] 19:20, 26 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Pcook]] is on a vandalism spree, please block him!!! I can't edit the abuse reports section!&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Newton|Newton]] 13:31, 29 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Wuhao1911 blocked him, thank you. I have removed all of his edits. At first I just removed the obvious vandalism, but then I noticed the blasphemous comments and that he has inserted parts into peoples' debate arguements, so it is all gone. [[User:Newton|Newton]] 13:34, 29 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:YeVeg]] (is that how you type a username?) is engaging in excessive vandalism, some of it racist. [[User:RichardKerry|RichardKerry]] 08:04, 16 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Content for Geeks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've noticed that Conservapedia seems to lack some content that could be useful to geeks.  Being a geek myself, I was wondering if I could write or at least recommend articles to be written or updated for the geek/technophile audience.  Articles for [[HTTP]] and [[XML]] are missing entirely.  Examples could be added to [[Java]], [[SQL]], and [[JavaScript]].  Finally, [[XHTML]] could probably be set as a redirect to [[HTML]] in the way [[Kitty]] redirects to [[Cat]].  This is just an idea, please don't flame me. ([[User:JlHawkwell|JlHawkwell]] 14:25, 2 August 2010 (EDT))&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are registered here, and adding technical articles such as you suggest doesn't need permission or discussion to add, JlHawkwell. Please proceed! --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:35, 2 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What should I edit? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you mind if I do some massive expansion of chemistry articles here? --[[User:LanthanumK|L]][[User talk:LanthanumK|K]] 10:07, 16 November 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe Mr. Schlafly responded to this same question on his talk page, so please proceed. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:27, 16 November 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Slug&amp;quot; article - Candidate For Deletion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't mean to complain, but the article &amp;quot;Slug&amp;quot; is just so embarrassingly bad in so many different ways that it should be deleted.  I don't have the energy to write an article on slugs - because this thing is not really editable - somebody should start over.  [[User:PaulBurnett|PaulBurnett]] 00:47, 27 November 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Looks like Karajou removed the false information that was added by vandal trolls, Paul.  I think you can now delete such articles or alter them, as you see fit. :D  --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:56, 27 November 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 403 Errors ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I participate as a Conservative on another board. One of the members of my group has been a regular user of Conservapedia, but recently began having difficulty accessing your site. She is getting 403 errors. I would appreciate it if you would give me an e-mail address that I can pass on to her so that she may contact someone with your site in order to find out why she is being forbidden access.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any assistance you can provide will be greatly appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Contact info for this account-related issue is on the front page:  conservapedia@zoho.com .  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:35, 5 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I May Have Been Blocked but I wasn't ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey. I don't know if this is the place to post this, but it didn't seem to fit into any of the other categories. A user posted on my talk page that I was blocked and didn't sign it. I have only made a few edits and am very new here and no reason was specified for the block. However, I am still able to edit pages so I don't think I was actually blocked. So what is going on? Thank you. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 09:39, 23 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:nope! you're not blocked, or you wouldn't be able to edit - the user was a vandal.--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 09:41, 23 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== CBP compilations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, I am trying to get the latest CBP compilations, when I click on the &amp;quot;click hear&amp;quot; it directs me to a google group i am not a part of and don't have sufficient permissions for. I downloaded the pdfs awhile back to start reading, am I obviously missing something on how to get the pdf compilations or is that out of commission?&lt;br /&gt;
Thank You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good question.  The pdf compilations have been a helpful format, but I'm not sure if they are up to date.  I will look into this.  Thanks for the inquiry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:37, 28 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello again, Any luck on the compilations? still can't access them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== /how do I start a new page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
how doI start a new page?? Help??&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RSS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can whoever made this site make an RSS feed for the &amp;quot;in the news&amp;quot; thing?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Weird error on [[Bias in Wikipedia]] page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm trying to edit [[Bias in Wikipedia]]. I tried to remove an item from the list that I moved to another page, but I get this error:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The page you wanted to save was blocked by the spam filter. This is probably caused by a link to a blacklisted external site.&lt;br /&gt;
The following text is what triggered our spam filter: p u e r i l e&lt;br /&gt;
Return to Examples of Bias in Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How can I edit the page? I'm not doing anything related to that word or link. In fact I had to add spaces to the word on this page to get it to save! [[User:RickTx|RickTx]] 17:10, 26 April 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't know. Maybe some automatic filter that is attempting to filter childish edits is actually filtering edits that have a synonym for childish. Let's see if this gets blocked. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 15:08, 22 May 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bias in Wikipedia Navbox Spelling error ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone please correct the spelling of &amp;quot;Nazism&amp;quot; in the Bias in Wikipedia navbox (or infobox, I always mix those up). It is spelled &amp;quot;Naziism&amp;quot; but the template is protected. When you are done, you should also move the page on Nazism, Communism, and whatever else we lumped in there to reflect the proper spelling. I don't want to do that first or it will cause problems in the interim. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 15:06, 22 May 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Profanity in Proper Name ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What should be done about a moderate profanity in a proper name? I'm trying to make an article about the 2010 New York Gubernatorial Election, but I realized that one of the parties was the &amp;quot;Rent is Too D*** High Party&amp;quot;, with the censored word spelled out in the official name. Should I spell out the word, since that is the official name of the Party? Keep in mind that Jimmy McMillan, who was the party's nominee, sued the NY Board of Elections to keep that word in the Party name after they took it out for length reasons (they eventually settled out of court by shortening &amp;quot;Too&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;2&amp;quot; and keeping it under the maximum length). I don't want him suing Conservapedia if we take it out, and I wouldn't put it past him to do so. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 15:07, 28 May 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blocked and no idea how to let you know about a great article for the news ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blitzman: Hello, I was blocked in 2009 by TK for reasons he/she would not tell me. I saw some typos in several pages but did not want to write any articles. If I did something wrong tell me. I was Blitzman just added Blitzman7 so I could add this. I have no idea why you don't have a contact us area?!?! I wanted to tell you to post this news article on the main page if you want: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/creationists-convince-south-korean-officials-to-remove-evolutionary-references-from-high-school-textbooks/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If this does not post I give up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Image Request==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi. I added the &amp;quot;Articles in Need of an Image&amp;quot; tag to my article http://www.conservapedia.com/Full_Asylum about a week ago but it doesn't seem to have been uploaded yet. Did I miss something?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;
Mike&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=996263</id>
		<title>Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=996263"/>
				<updated>2012-07-26T03:11:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* &amp;quot;You didn't build that&amp;quot; Controversy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Barack Hussein Obama&lt;br /&gt;
|image=President Barack Obama.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama]]; may have had a prior marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=see [[Obama's religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/president&lt;br /&gt;
	|country=the United States&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=44th&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 20, 2009-Present&lt;br /&gt;
	|vp=[[Joe Biden]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[George W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 2005 – November 16, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=Peter Fitzgerald&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Roland Burris]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Barack Hussein Obama II''', also known by the alias '''Barry Soetoro''' during his time in [[Indonesia]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQPXVJuT2vY Barry Soetoro the muslim - YouTube]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (reportedly born August 4, 1961, in [[Hawaii]]) was elected the 44th President.  Promoted heavily by [[liberals]], as demonstrated by his unjustified receipt of the 2009 [[Nobel Prize|Nobel Peace Prize]], Obama won the presidency despite a short and unremarkable political career by campaigning on promises of &amp;quot;hope&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; against his listless opponent [[John McCain]] in 2008. In effect, that change has been an embrace of [[socialism]] and [[liberal]] policies. Barack Obama has been widely criticized by the American [[business]] community and others for his anti-business policies that are killing American jobs during a period of high unemployment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuckerman, M.B. (2010, July 16). [http://www.usnews.com/opinion/mzuckerman/articles/2010/07/16/obamas-anti-business-policies-are-our-economic-katrina Obama's Anti-business Policies are our Economic Katrina]. ''U.S. News''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Barnes, F. (2009, July 22). [http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/619dvjlm.asp An Anti-Business President]. ''The Weekly Standard''. Vol. 14, No. 38&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Shedlock, M. (2010, August 20). [http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/08/small-businesses-are-not-hiring-why.html Small Businesses are not hiring. Why should they?] Globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wright, C.E. (2012, February 12). [http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/dear_mr_president_why_we_are_n.html Dear Mr. President: Why we are not hiring]. ''American Thinker''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Former [[Democrat]] Presidential candidate [[Joe Lieberman]] endorsed Obama's opponent in 2008 and has declined to endorse [[Obama]] for the [[Presidential Election 2012]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lillis, M. (2012, April 22). [http://thehill.com/video/campaign/222929-lieberman-declines-to-endorse-in-presidential-race Sen. Lieberman declines to endorse in presidential race]. ''The Hill''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under President Obama's mismanagement of the economy, the United States Government's credit rating has, for the first time in its history, been downgraded from AAA to AA+, and [[poverty]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/incpovhlth/2009/pov09fig04.pdf Figure 4: Number in Poverty and Poverty Rate: 1959-2009]. ''U.S. Census Bureau''. Current Population Survey, 1960 to 2010 Annual Social and Economic Supplements.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; has increased markedly. By and large his policies to combat the recession, unemployment, slow growth, the deficit, and expanding [[national debt]], have failed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The vast majority (73%) of respondents reported the fiscal stimulus enacted in February 2009 has had no impact on employment to date. While 68% also believe a jobs bill, such as the one recently enacted into law, will have no impact on payrolls, 30% do believe it will boost payrolls moderately&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[http://www.nabe.com/press/ind1004.pdf Industry Survey], ''National Association for Business Economics'', April 2010, p. 2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also on the domestic front, Obama passed an expensive [[health care]] bill in 2009 with no [[bipartisan]] support and 34 Democrats dissenting. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fatalities in Afghanistan have more than doubled under Obama's leadership then in the preceding eight years combined, according to the Congressional Research Service &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chesser, S.G. (2012, July 12). [http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R41084.pdf Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians - CRS Report for Congress]. Pg. 3. ''Congressional Research Service''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Against his own Defense Secretary's advice, Obama [[Libyan uprising 2011|attacked Libya]] - a possible violation of the [[War Powers Act]]. After he announced the killing of [[September 11th]] mastermind and terrorist [[Osama bin Laden]], the [[U.S. State Department]] warned of the increased risk to the lives and safety of Americans around the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''KABC-TV/DT'' (2011, July 27). [http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/national_world&amp;amp;id=8273909 Risk of anti-US violence up after Osama bin Laden's death]. On ''ABC7 News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bin Laden's death had negligible long term impact on Obama's approval ratings, as seen in Gallup's daily poll.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Gallup''. [http://www.gallup.com/poll/113980/gallup-daily-obama-job-approval.aspx Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's bizarre gaffes are frequent and embarrassing, but typically unreported by the [[liberal media]].  Obama offended [[Poland]] by referring to the [[Nazi]] death camps there as &amp;quot;Polish death camps.&amp;quot; Later Obama apologized.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sink, J. (2012, June 1). [http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/europe/230419-obama-letter-says-he-regrets-polish-death-camp-gaffe Obama apologizes in writing for 'Polish death camp' verbal gaffe]. ''The Hill''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
===Birth===&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article : [[Early life and career of Barack Hussein Obama]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also : [[Barack Obama's Muslim Heritage]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Obama claims to have been born in Hawaii to Stanley Ann Dunham and [[Barack Obama Sr.]] - who had married just six months prior - on August 4, 1961 in [[Honolulu, Hawaii]].&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc&amp;gt;''MSNBC'' (2008, February 20). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23257295/ns/msnbc_tv-documentaries/t/obama-becomes-rising-star-among-democrats/ Obama Becomes Rising Star Among Democrats].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Some contend that this story is a complete fabrication.  After many leading conservatives including the leadership of this site and  [[Donald Trump]]  called for Obama to release his birth certificate he did on April 27.  Sheriff [[Joe Arpaio]] of Maricopa County in Arizona conducted an investigation of the Obama's eligibility and alleged that the &amp;quot;birth certificate&amp;quot; was a fake; however, no charges have been filed.  [[Obama]] was reportedly assigned a social security number whose area code was assigned to applications coming from zip codes in Connecticut.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Beginning in 1972, all Social Security numbers were issued from a central office in Baltimore, Maryland.[http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama Sr. was not a [[Natural born citizen|citizen of the United States]]. At the time of Obama's birth, Kenya was a British colony, meaning that Obama Sr not only held British citizenship, but passed it on to his son. When Kenya gained independence, Obama and his father both lost British citizenship and gained Kenyan citizenship. Barack Obama was a dual citizen of the United States and Kenya until his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired in 1984, as he had failed to renounce US nationality and swear loyalty to Kenya. Despite having been born with US citizenship through his mother, it has been argued that as he was born with dual nationality, he is not a natural-born citizen of the United States, and thus constitutionally ineligible to become President.&lt;br /&gt;
===Early Life===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's birth parents divorced in 1963 due to strain caused by Barack Obama Sr. leaving Hawaii to study economics at Harvard, when Obama was 2 years old, following which his mother married Lolo Soetoro, an [[Indonesian]] geologist. When Barack Obama was age 6 his mother and adoptive father took him to Jakarta, Indonesia for 4 years while his mother pursued a Ph.D. in Anthropology requiring fieldwork there.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;db mother&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-05-03/a-singular-woman-by-janny-scott-review-by-stacy-schiff/#|work=The Daily Beast|format=HTML|language=English|title=Dreams of His Mother|author=Stacy Schiff}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His mother then left him in Hawaii with his grandparents (Stanley and Madelyn Dunham, who had moved to Hawaii in 1959) so he could pursue American education.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed&amp;gt;Malveaux, Suzanne (2008, August 20). &amp;quot;[http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0808/20/se.02.html Barack Obama Revealed].&amp;quot; ''CNN''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other siblings of Obama's include his half-sister Maya Soetoro-Ng and 7 other children born to his father by 4 different women.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama&amp;gt;Purdum, Todd (2008, March). &amp;quot;[http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/03/obama200803 Raising Obama].&amp;quot; ''Vanity Fair''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For much of his early life, prior to his transfer to Columbia University, he went by his nickname, &amp;quot;Barry&amp;quot;. In the summer of 1988, before attending Harvard Law School (he'd just been accepted), he visited Kogelo, Kenya, to learn more about his father's family. When his mother died in 1995, he and his sister Maya scattered her ashes over Hawaii's south shore.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Personal Life===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Michelle Obama.jpg|frame|right|Michelle (Robinson) Obama, wife of Barack Obama.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama met and began dating his future wife, an Attorney named Michelle Robinson, herself a recent Harvard Law School graduate, while he was working at Sidley Austin LLP, a prestigious corporate law firm.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; The two continued dating long-distance while he finished law school, and on October 18, 1982, were married by Reverend Jeremiah Wright at Trinity United Church.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; In 1999, their first child was born, Malia, and in 2001, another daughter, Natasha (often called Sasha).&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama joined Reverend Jeremiah Wright's Trinity United Church from 1985-1988 during his time as a community organizer (''See [[Barack_Obama#1985-1988.2C_Community_Organizer|1985-1988, Community Organizer]] section'').  Obama was married at Trinity United Church, credits Wright with his conversion to Christianity, and had both his daughters, Sasha and Malia, baptized there.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
At age 6, Obama attended schools in Indonesia, the first a Catholic School while he was in Kindergarten, and later a public school. While the public school had mostly Muslim students (since most Indonesians were Muslim), claims that it was a Muslim school or Madrassa are false. In 1971, at age 10, Barack Obama moved to Hawaii, and his grandparents helped him gain entrance to the prestigious Punahou Academy in Honolulu through a scholarship, while he was in 5th grade.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; At his elite high school with 1,200 students he was just 1 of 3 black students, and was on the second string of the state champion basketball team his senior year. During this time he also experimented briefly with marijuana and cocaine. He wrote a poem for the school's literary magazine, ''Ka Wai Ola''.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1979, he began a 2-year stint at Occidental College college in Los Angeles&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;, and then transferred to Columbia University in New York, which he graduated from in 1983.&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic&amp;gt;Scott, Janny (2007, July 30). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/30/us/politics/30obama.html?pagewanted=all In Illinois, Obama Proved Pragmatic and Shrewd].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During this time he allegedly spoke at an Anti-Apartheid rally on campus,&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; although several prominent student leaders said they did not remember him there. Professor Michael L. Baron was impressed by Obama and wrote him a recommendation for Harvard Law School.&amp;lt;ref name=differs&amp;gt;Scott, J. (2007, October 30). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/30/us/politics/30obama.html?pagewanted=all Obama's Account of New York Years Often Differs From What Others Say].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the winter of 1988 Barack Obama decided to attend Harvard Law School, and left Chicago for Cambridge, Massachusetts. In his 2nd year he became the first black president of the ''Harvard Law Review'', following a &amp;quot;marathon voting session&amp;quot; in which he was elected on the 19th ballot.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt; This led to national attention and numerous job offers, which Obama passed up, at age 30, to pursue a political career in Chicago.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Non-Political Employment===&lt;br /&gt;
====1983-1984, Financial Analyst and Writer====&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984 Obama worked as a writer and financial analyst for Business International Corporation, a small newsletter-publishing and research firm which aided multinational companies understand overseas markets. Obama served as a writer/researcher for a company reference service, Financing Foreign Operations, and wrote for a newsletter, Business International Money Report. His Supervisor was Cathy Lazere, and he worked at the company to pay off his student loans.&amp;lt;ref name=differs /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Henig, J. (2008, June 21). &amp;quot;[http://www.factcheck.org/2008/06/obama-polishes-his-resume-2/ Obama Polishes His Resume].&amp;quot; ''FactCheck.org''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====1984-1988, Community Organizer====&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984, Obama was hired by the New York Public Interest Research Group, a non-profit organization promoting environmental, consumer, and government reforms. He also was paid just under $10,000 annually as a full-time organizer for Harlem's City College to mobilize student volunteers.&amp;lt;ref name=differs /&amp;gt; From 1985-88, Obama worked as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago, for which he was paid $1,000 a year, with $2,000 extra for a car. He helped Loretta Herron gain city approval for a local community job center. &amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=streetwise&amp;gt;Scott, Janny (2007, September 9). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/09/us/politics/09obama.html?pagewanted=all In 2000, a Streetwise Veteran Schooled a Bold Young Obama].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During this time Obama joined Reverend Wright's Trinity United Church because in the words of Suzanne Malveaux of ''CNN'', &amp;quot;It was the church to join if you wanted to be one of Chicago's black movers and shakers.&amp;quot; At the time, community organizing involved close affiliation with churches, which was how Obama met Wright. The slow progress in fighting asbestos contamination in the Altgeld Gardens housing project led to Obama's departure from Chicago, and enrollment at Harvard Law School in the winter of 1988.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====1988-1996, Law Practice====&lt;br /&gt;
In 1988 Obama gained work as a Summer Associate at one of the most prestigious corporate law firms in the world, Sidley Austin LLP&amp;lt;ref name=austin&amp;gt;Lattman, P. (2007, May 11). &amp;quot;[http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/05/11/sidley-austin-when-barack-met-michelle/ When Barack Met Michelle].&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;, owned by Newton Minow, thanks to the recommendation of Minow's daughter Martha, a professor at Harvard Law School. It was at Minow's law firm that Obama would meet Michelle Robinson, his future wife.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt; From 1993-96 he practiced civil rights law, after graduating from Harvard, at Miner, Barnhill, &amp;amp; Galland, a small politically-connected law firm.&amp;lt;ref name=austin /&amp;gt; It was at Miner, Barnhill, &amp;amp; Galland that he would meet influential real estate developer Tony Rezko.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====1992-2004, Law Professor at University of Chicago====&lt;br /&gt;
Obama taught constitutional law part-time at the University of Chicago Law School&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt; from 1992-2004. He was a Lecturer from 1992-96, teaching 3 courses per year, and a Senior Lecturer from 1996-2004. Senior Lecturers are considered Law School faculty and regarded as professors but not full-time or tenured. Obama was invited to become a Senior Lecturer several times during this period but declined each time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media Media Inquiries: Statement Regarding Barack Obama].&amp;quot; ''University of Chicago Law School''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====1995, Author====&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995 Obama published &amp;quot;Dreams From My Father&amp;quot; about his life and family background.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Personal Awards===&lt;br /&gt;
====2009 Nobel Peace Prize====&lt;br /&gt;
On October 9, 2009 Barack H. Obama became the third sitting U.S. President&amp;lt;ref name=wilsons&amp;gt;Wilson, Scott (2009, October 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/09/AR2009100900914.html President Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize]. ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize &amp;quot;''for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples''&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NobelPrize.org (2009, October 9). &amp;quot;[http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2009/press.html The Nobel Prize for 2009: Press Release].&amp;quot; Oslo, Norway. Accessed May 13, 2012.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama stated that he was &amp;quot;surprised and deeply humbled&amp;quot; to receive the unexpected award,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, October 9). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2009-10-09/world/nobel.peace.prize_1_norwegian-nobel-committee-international-diplomacy-and-cooperation-nuclear-weapons?_s=PM:WORLD Obama: Nobel Peace Prize is 'Call to Action'].&amp;quot; ''CNN''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and also said, &amp;quot;To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who've been honored by this prize -- men and women who have inspired me and inspired the entire world through their courageous pursuit of peace&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=wilsons /&amp;gt; The award was widely criticized given Obama's then lack of accomplishments.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chazan, G. &amp;amp; MacDonald, A. (2009, October 11). &amp;quot;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125509603349176083.html Nobel Committee's Decision Courts Controversy].&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(2009, October 9). &amp;quot;[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/09/obamas-peace-prize-draws-criticism-liberals/ Obama's Peace Prize Draws Criticism, Even From Some Liberals].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==1991-1992, Project Vote==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1991 Obama was recruited by Sandy Newman to head the Chicago chapter of Project Vote!&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;, and in 1992 was the Executive Director, overseeing a voter registration drive which registered 125,000 black voters and was credited with helping elect U.S. Senator Carol Mosely Braun.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==1996-2003, Illinois State Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
===1996 Election===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:O-2002-antiwar-rally-davidson.jpg|right|thumb|250px| Obama speaking at the October 2002 rally in Chicago organized by [[Carl Davidson]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Davidson is a longtime [[Mao]]ist and champion of the ''Thought of Mao Tse Tung.'' Davidson's anti-Trotskyite polemic, [http://www.wengewang.org/read.php?tid=10925 ''Left in Form, Right in Essence''] defends Maoist doctrine.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''&amp;quot;[H]e is a brutal man who butchers his own people,&amp;quot;'' nevertheless Obama opposed ''&amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot;.'']]&lt;br /&gt;
====Knocking Candidates Off the Ballot====&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama ran for the Illinois state senate in 1996. He was initially supported by incumbent Alice Palmer, who declared she would run for the U.S. Congress. However, when her bid for Congress failed on November 28, 1995, she tried to run for her old seat in the March 1996 election. Her supporters asked Obama to step aside, although whether this was with her permission remains uncertain.&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic /&amp;gt; Not only did Obama not step down, he gathered a team of high-priced lawyers, including fellow Harvard Law School graduate Thomas Johnson, to challenge his opponent's petition signatures on technicalities after the filing deadline had passed. Such tactics are legal and frequently used in Chicago; in 2006 they eliminated 67 of the 245 aldermanic candidates;&amp;lt;ref name=bareknuckle&amp;gt;Jackson, David &amp;amp; Long, Ray (2007, April 4). &amp;quot;[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-0704030881apr04-archive,0,1523598,full.story Barack Obama: Showing His Bare Knuckles].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet nevertheless led to the term &amp;quot;hardball&amp;quot; by the ''New York Times''&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic /&amp;gt; and &amp;quot;cutthroat&amp;quot; by David Mendel as reported by both ''CNN''&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; and ''MSNBC''.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; The ''Chicago Tribune'' declared Obama had mastered &amp;quot;the bare-knuckle arts of Chicago electoral politics&amp;quot;, noting &amp;quot;The man now running for president on a message of giving a voice to the voiceless first entered public office not by leveling the playing field, but by clearing it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=bareknuckle /&amp;gt; As one of Obama's four opponents, eliminated through his ballot challenges, would put it: {{cquote|&amp;quot;Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago politics to remove legitimate candidates? He talks about honor and democracy, but what honor is there in getting rid of every other candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Gha-is Askia, 1996 Illinois Senate candidate&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jackson, David &amp;amp; Long, Ray (2007, April 3). &amp;quot;[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-070403obama-ballot-archive,0,5297304,full.story Obama Knows His Way Around a Ballot].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} Mark Ewell, another candidate, filed 1,286 signatures, and Obama's challenges left him 86 short of the minimum requirement (757&amp;lt;ref name=spivak&amp;gt;Spivak, Todd (2008, February 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.houstonpress.com/2008-02-28/news/barack-obama-screamed-at-me/ Barack Obama and Me].&amp;quot; ''Houston Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Ewell filed a federal lawsuit contesting the election board's decision but Tom Johnson intervened, and Ewell's case was dismissed just a few days later. Ewell and other Obama opponents were using early 1995 polling sheets to verify signatures of registered voters, but city authorities had just purged 15,871 unqualified people from the 13th district list, and Obama's challenges used the more recent, updated list. Askia was left 69 signatures short of the requirement. If names were printed instead of signed in cursive, they were declared invalid. If they were good but the person registering the signatures wasn't a registered voter (e.g. underage) they were invalid.&amp;lt;ref name=hardball&amp;gt;Griffin, Drew &amp;amp; Johnston, Kathleen (2008, May 29). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2008-05-29/politics/obamas.first.campaign_1_obama-campaign-barack-obama-chicago-politics?_s=PM:POLITICS Obama Played Hardball in First Chicago Campaign].&amp;quot; ''CNN''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palmer had according to Obama campaign consult Ronald Davis, used two children to help gather her petition signatures. To this day Palmer denies the challenges were valid, and maintains she could have overcome the objections with more time and resources.&amp;lt;ref name=bareknuckle /&amp;gt; Thanks to his lawyers, Obama would win the election without a single other candidate on the ballot.&lt;br /&gt;
===2000 Election===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Illinois 1st congressional district election, 2000]]''&lt;br /&gt;
In 2000, Obama lost his only political election when he chose to run against experienced incumbent and former Black Panther Bobby L. Rush for the U.S. Congress in a 65% black district. Rush's name recognition began at 90%, Obama's at 11%. As media consultant and former Rush campaign staffer Eric Adelstein noted, &amp;quot;Nobody said he’s ‘not black enough.’ They said he’s a professor, a Harvard elite who lives in Hyde Park.&amp;quot; Todd Spivak would give voice to this impression of Obama, noting that{{cquote|&amp;quot;My view of Obama then wasn't all that different from the image he projects now. He was smart, confident, charismatic and liberal. One thing I can say is, I never heard him launch into the preacher-man voice he now employs during speeches. He sounded vanilla, and activists in his mostly black district often chided him for it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt;}}Rush would go on to win the Primary with 61.02% of the vote; Obama received 30.36%.&amp;lt;ref name=streetwise /&amp;gt; The loss led to Obama considering dropping out of politics altogether, particularly after the September 11, 2001 attacks, since his name sounds similar to &amp;quot;Osama bin Laden&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Voting Record===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama entered the Illinois Senate promising change to a corrupt system. He mixed often radical votes with more pragmatic agreements. Possibly one of his most radical votes was against requiring medical care for aborted children who survive [[abortion|the procedure]] - in fact the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council ascribed him a 100% rating for his consistently pro-choice votes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cbs illinois&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/17/politics/main2369157.shtml|title=Obama Record May Be Gold Mine For Critics|work=CBS|format=HTML|language=English|last=Clark|first=Amy S.|date=Jan. 17, 2007}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was criticized for using the statehouse as a stepping stone for a more illustrious career: Steven J. Rauschenberger, a [[Republican]], said prior to Obama's election as president: “He is a very bright but very ambitious person who has always had his eyes on the prize, and it wasn’t Springfield. If he deserves to be president, it is not because he was a great legislator.”&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt illinois&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=The New York Times|title=In Illinois, Obama Proved Pragmatic and Shrewd|last=Scott|first=Janny|format=HTML|language=English|date=July 30, 2007|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/30/us/politics/30obama.html}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The statehouse was majority Republican, so the Senator was sometimes forced to compromise. He formed allegiances across party lines to pass [[campaign finance]] reform that banned most gifts by lobbyists, prohibited spending campaign money for legislators’ personal use and required electronic filing of campaign disclosure reports.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt illinois&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Obama also helped pass  a so-called “driving-while-black bill”, which required the police to collect data on the race of drivers they stopped as a way to monitor [[racial profiling]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt illinois&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama established himself as a chief spokesperson in opposition to the [[War on Terror]] during an October 2002 rally at Federal Plaza in Chicago&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The rally was organized by Chicagoans Against War in Iraq (CAWI) later renamed Chicagoans Against War and Injustice. [http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?page_id=2 About CAWI] by Carl Davidson, Nov 02 2006. Retrieved from Chicagoans Against War and Injustice, March 15, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[community organizing|organized]] by veteran [[Mao]]ist and webmaster of [[Progressives for Obama]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.linkedin.com/in/carldavidson Carl Davidson,] LinkedIn.com, retrieved March 13, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Carl Davidson]]. &lt;br /&gt;
===Radical foundation and connection to William Ayers===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Radical roots of Barack Hussein Obama}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995 a cadre of like minded individuals gathered in the home of [[Weather Underground]] (WUO) [[terrorist]]s [[Bernardine Dohrn]] and [[William Ayers|William &amp;quot;Bill&amp;quot; Ayers]].  Dohrn,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Georgie Anne Geyer and Keyes Beach &amp;quot;Cuba: School for U.S. Radicals&amp;quot;, ''Chicago Daily News/Chicago Sun-Times'' five part series October 1970, excerpted in [http://foia.fbi.gov/filelink.html?file=/weather/weath1c.pdf FBI file Weather Underground Organization (Weatherman),] Part 1c pp. 5-7 pdf (113-115 in original). [http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/2009/06/07/clandestine-agents-of-the-cuban-government-ayers-dohrn-myers/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; along with Carl Davidson, are veterans of [[guerrilla warfare]] training in [[Cuba]] prior 1968 Democratic National Convention riots.  Ayers and Dohrn have taken credit for, and never denied, bombing the [[U.S. Capitol]], the [[Pentagon]] and the [[State Department]].    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ayers and Dohrn used their celebrity status among [[leftist]]s to launch Obama's career. Ayers, Dohrn and [[Jeff Jones]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=106653 ''Obama's 'green jobs czar' worked with terror founder] Van Jones served on board of activist group where ex-Weatherman serves as top director'', By Aaron Klein, [[WorldNetDaily]], August 13, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; are authors of ''[[Bill_Ayers#Prairie_Fire_Organizing_Committee_and_Maoist_thought|Prairie Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-imperialism]],'' the title taken from ''The Sayings of Mao Zedong.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/works/red-book/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The book declares &amp;quot;we are [[communist]] men and women.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Harvey Klehr, ''Far Left of Center: The American Radical Left Today'' (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, 1988), 109.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ayers later jokingly, publicly admitted to ghostwriting Obama's book, ''Dreams From My Father''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cashill, J. (2011, March 28). [http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/03/ayers_affirms_he_wrote_dreams.html Ayers Affirms He Wrote Dreams From My Father]. ''American Thinker''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Obama was to appoint several openly avowed Maoists to prominent White House and Executive Branch positions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fund, J. (2009, October 21). [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704597704574487431322664964.html From Mao to Obama]. ''The Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2003 Emil Jones Deal===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[2003 Barack Obama deal with Emil Jones]]''&lt;br /&gt;
When Illinois' U.S. Senator Peter Fitzgerald announced he would be retiring in April 2003, Obama jumped at the opportunity, declaring that he would be a candidate for the U.S. Senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; To boost his chances at reaching the U.S. Congress in the 2004 elections, in 2003 Barack Obama approached the newly crowned head of the Illinois Senate, Emil Jones Jr., with a proposal. According to Jones, who Obama has since called his &amp;quot;godfather&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=godfather&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2009, June 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-250_162-3983147.html Obama's Political 'Godfather' In Illinois].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the conversation went as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Emil Jones.jpg|frame|right|Left to Right, Rod Blagojevich, Emil Jones, and Jeffrey Schoenberg.]]{{cquote|&amp;quot;After I was elected president, in 2003, he came to see me, a couple months later. And he said to me, he said, ‘You’re the senate president now, and with that, you have a lot of pow-er.’  And I told Barack, ‘You think I got a lot of pow-er now?,’ and he said, ‘Yeah, you got a lot of pow-er.’ And I said, ‘What kind of pow-er do I have?’ He said, ‘You have the pow-er to make a United States sen-a-tor!’  I said to Barack, I said, ‘That sounds good!’ I said, ‘I haven’t even thought of that.’ I said, ‘Do you have someone in mind you think I could make?,’ and he said, ‘Yeah. Me.’ &amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the deal, Obama's entire Illinois Senate legislative record was, as longtime Obama reporter Todd Spivak put it, built in a single year. During his 7th and final year in the Illinois Senate, Obama sponsored an incredible 26 bills into law, including many he now points to when criticized as inexperienced&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt; - as ''CNN's'' Suzanne Malveaux observed, &amp;quot;With help from on high, Obama got his name on hundreds of bills that he pushed through.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; Jones not only had Obama craft legislation addressing daily tragedies to raise his political profile&amp;lt;ref name=godfather /&amp;gt;, he also appointed Obama head of almost all high-profile legislation in the Illinois Senate, angering other state legislators with more seniority who'd spent years supporting the bills.&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt; Illinois State Senator Rickey Hendon, the original sponsor of the famous racial profiling bill requiring videotaped confessions in police interrogations, complained bitterly about Jones' decision.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=intheblack&amp;gt;Spivak, Todd (2004, March 25). &amp;quot;[http://www.illinoistimes.com/Springfield/article-922-in-the-black.html In the Black].&amp;quot; ''Illinois Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Jones' influence had a major impact on Obama's chances in the 2004 elections, preventing major political players from backing Obama's opponents. To quote Emil Jones,{{cquote|&amp;quot;He knew if he had me in the run for the Senate, it would put a block on the current mayor. The current mayor and the father of the controller, which was Dan Hynes, they were roommates in Springfield when the mayor was a state senator, so they had a relationship. Another big financial backer for the governor was Blair Hull. Barack knew if he had me it would checkmate the governor, ’cause the governor couldn’t come out and go with Blair Hull, ’cause the governor needs me. Same with the mayor. So he had analyzed and figured all of that out. He knew I could help him with labor support. And I could put a checkmate on some of the local politicians that didn’t know him, but they couldn’t really go against me.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Emil Jones&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2004-2008, U.S. Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Early_life_and_career_of_Barack_Hussein_Obama#U.S._Senate_.282004-2008.29|Barack Obama:U.S. Senate (2004-2008)]], [[United States Senate election in Illinois, 2004]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|left|Senator Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
===2004 Primary Election===&lt;br /&gt;
Despite initially trailing in the polls to frontrunner [[Blair Hull]]&amp;lt;ref name=intheblack /&amp;gt;, Obama greatly benefited from what the ''Chicago Tribune'' called &amp;quot;the most inglorious campaign implosion in Illinois political history&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=mendell&amp;gt;Mendell, David (2004, March 17). &amp;quot;[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-03-17/news/0403170332_1_blair-hull-gery-chico-blacks-and-liberal-whites Obama Routs Democratic Foes].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when pressure from journalists and opposing candidates, just weeks before the election, forced the unsealing of Hull's messy divorce files.&amp;lt;ref name=blairhull&amp;gt;Voegeli, William (2004, March 19). &amp;quot;[http://www.claremont.org/publications/pubid.339/pub_detail.asp The Rise and Fall of Blair Hull].&amp;quot; ''The Claremont Institute''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The files revealed Hull's ex-wife's accusations of verbal and physical abuse.&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt; Hull would afterwards criticize the media, stating, &amp;quot;As for the press, I will never read the newspaper the same way again.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=mendell /&amp;gt; Obama would go on to win the Primary with 53% of the vote.&amp;lt;ref name=blairhull /&amp;gt; Obama's unexpected victory led to him being termed a &amp;quot;rising star&amp;quot; by the media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Howlett, Debbie (2004, March 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/2004-03-18-obama-usat_x.htm Dems See a Rising Star in Illinois Senate Candidate].&amp;quot; ''USA Today''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===2004 General Election, Jack Ryan===&lt;br /&gt;
Once again Obama found himself trailing to popular frontrunner [[Jack Ryan]], and once again a candidate's campaign imploded thanks to media intervention. In an unprecedented move, the ''Chicago Tribune'' and local TV station WLS sued to force the unsealing of Ryan's divorce files, despite opposition from both Ryan and his wife, Jeri Ryan, who in the files accused Jack Ryan of trying to coerce her to perform sex acts in public. Though Ryan advisors told him he could still win if using a negative attack on Obama, Ryan refused to engage in what he considered dirty politics.&amp;lt;ref name=abandon&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2004, June 26). &amp;quot;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/state/2004-06-25-ryan_x.htm Jack Ryan Abandons Senate Bid].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ryan then dropped out of the race (per request by the Illinois GOP&amp;lt;ref name=idealist&amp;gt;Sangwan, Rahul (2004, October 1). &amp;quot;[http://www.dartmouthindependent.com/archives/2004/10/jack_ryan_81_th.html Jack Ryan '81: The Conservative Idealist].&amp;quot; ''Dartmouth Independent''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), following which the Illinois GOP scrambled to find a replacement, leaving Obama uncontested for weeks to campaign and build up public support. On top of all this, Obama was selected to give the keynote speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention (July 27&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Washington Post'' (2004, June 26). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19751-2004Jul27.html Illinois Senate Candidate Barack Obama].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), catapulting him into the national spotlight, and leading to further media publicity terming him a &amp;quot;rising star&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Page, Susan &amp;amp; Despoignes, Peronet (2004, July 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-07-28-obama-speech_x.htm Rising Star Brings Democrats to Their Feet].&amp;quot; ''USA Today''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===2004 General Election, Alan Keyes===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Obama born alive controversy]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Alan_Keyes.jpg‎|thumb|150px|right|Alan Keyes.]]&lt;br /&gt;
After a number of candidates including former Chicago Bears coach Mike Ditka declined to run&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN'' (2004, August 9). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2004-08-09/politics/il.keyes_1_senate-candidate-senate-race-illinois-senate?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS Keyes Challenges Obama for Illinois Senate Seat].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the Illinois GOP finally settled on fiery [[Alan Keyes]], a former Ambassador to the Economic and Social Counsel of the United Nations&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt;, with less than 3 months left before the November 2004 election.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; His sudden entrance into the state for the election was initially attacked in the press as &amp;quot;carpetbagging&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Chicago Tribune''. &amp;quot;[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-08-06/news/0408060313_1_mr-keyes-judy-baar-topinka-alan-keyes The GOP's Rent-A-Senator].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''Washington Post'' (2004, August 9). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50885-2004Aug8.html Mr. Keyes the Carpetbagger].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=pearson&amp;gt;Pearson, Rick (2004, September 5). &amp;quot;[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-09-05/news/0409050304_1_selfish-hedonist-alan-keyes-illinois-republican-party Keyes, State GOP Gearing Up Blame Campaign].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Keyes repeatedly claimed his primary motivation for entering a race he had seemingly no chance of winning was his disgust at Obama's votes on the popular [[Born Alive]] bills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Keyes, Alan (2004, August 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.mail-archive.com/newsandviews@chuckmuth.com/msg00699.html How You Can Help Alan Keyes for Senate!].&amp;quot; ''Keyes2004 Inc.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Keyes, from his first day of arriving in Illinois (August 9, 2004)&amp;lt;ref name=assails&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2004, August 9). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5654128/ Keyes Assails Obama's Abortion Views].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, accused Obama of having voted against bills mandating medical care for newborn children, and supporting &amp;quot;infanticide&amp;quot; (the term twice used in the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''United States Congress'' (2003, March 13). &amp;quot;[http://news.findlaw.com/wp/docs/abortion/2003s3.html S.3: Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) where hospitals left newborn infants to die like garbage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Smiley, Tavis (2004, August 31). &amp;quot;[http://www.keyesarchives.com/transcript.php?id=341 Alan Keyes on the Tavis Smiley Show].&amp;quot; ''NPR''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''CBS2 Chicago'' (2004, August 30). &amp;quot;[http://www.keyesarchives.com/transcript.php?id=337 Alan Keyes on CBS2 Chicago This Morning].&amp;quot; This Morning.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama in a debate on October 13, 2004, defended himself against Keyes' accusations of infanticide by claiming that Illinois law was already sufficient.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Chicago Tribune'' (2004, October 13). &amp;quot;[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-10-13/news/0410140004_1_alan-keyes-senate-race-first-of-three-debates Debate or Discussion?]&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Keyes' rhetoric, calling Obama's votes &amp;quot;the slaveholder's position&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=assails /&amp;gt; and saying &amp;quot;Jesus Christ would not vote for Obama&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Thomas, Scott (2004, September 7). &amp;quot;[http://www.keyesarchives.com/transcript.php?id=348 Alan Keyes on the Scott Thomas Show (AM1160 - WYLL)].&amp;quot; ''Scott Thomas Show''. Chicago, Illinois.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was widely ridiculed by the press. Keyes' unabashed criticism of homosexuality as &amp;quot;selfish hedonism&amp;quot; was also targeted.&amp;lt;ref name=pearson /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press''. &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5897569/ Keyes: Cheney's Gay Daughter Practicing Selfish Hedonism].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Pallasch, Abdom M. (2004, September 2). &amp;quot;[http://web.archive.org/web/20071017122135/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4155/is_20040902/ai_n12560727 Topinka Says He Should Apologize for 'Idiotic' Comment].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Sun-Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama would ultimately win the election, 70% to 27%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN.com''. &amp;quot;[http://cnn.hu/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/IL/S/01/index.html Election Results: U.S. Senate/Illinois].&amp;quot; Election 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Voting Record===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama frequently used the [[filibuster]] to obstruct the operations of government,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;O'Keefe, E. (2010, February 4). [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/03/AR2010020303801_pf.html Obama criticizes Senate Republicans for delaying confirmation votes]. ''The Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; voted against the [[minimum wage]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://uspolitics.about.com/od/legislatio1/a/HR2206.htm HR 2206 - Emergency Appropriations], Kathy Gill, Your Guide to U.S. Politics: Current Events. May 26 2007.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[http://more.gov.mtopgroup.com/2007/05/votes-hr-2206-iraq-supplemental.html Votes - H.R. 2206: Iraq Supplemental], May 28, 2007. Retrieved from Deeper Inside the Mountain, June 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and debt ceiling increases,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaplan, R. (2011, April 11). [http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/04/obama-once-opposed-debt-ceiling-hike/237129/ Obama Once Opposed Debt Ceiling Hike]. ''The Atlantic''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and recieved more than $126,000 in campaign contributions from [[Fannie Mae]]. The ''[[National Journal]]'' ranked him the most liberal senator in 2007.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ranked&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-502163_162-3775451-502163.html|title=National Journal: Obama Most Liberal Senator In 2007|author=Brian Montopoli|date=January 31, 2008|work=CBS}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2008 Presidential Election==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Barack Hussein Obama 2008 Presidential campaign}}&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats began calling for an Obama candidacy after liberals lauded his 2004 [[Democratic National Convention]] speech.&lt;br /&gt;
====Primary Election====&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007-08, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton competed for the Democratic nomination. Hillary Clinton cleverly resurrected the &amp;quot;Born Alive&amp;quot; controversy surrounding Obama that had lain largely dormant since 2004 (notwithstanding the continuing mentions by Jill Stanek), by accusing Obama of not being pro-choice for voting &amp;quot;Present&amp;quot; on a number of abortion-related bills&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bettelheim, Adriel (2008, February 13). &amp;quot;[http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/feb/13/obamas-present-tension/ Obama's 'Present' Tension].&amp;quot; ''PolitiFact''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; - including the Born Alive ones,&amp;lt;ref name=clinton&amp;gt;Berman, Russell (2008, January 17). &amp;quot;[http://www.nysun.com/national/clinton-obama-should-vote-no-on-abortion-issue/69700/ Clinton: Obama Should Vote 'No' On Abortion Issue She Backed].&amp;quot; ''New York Sun''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Hernandez, Raymond &amp;amp; Drew, Christopher (2007, December 20). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html?pagewanted=all It's Not Just 'Ayes' and 'Nays': Obama's Votes in Illinois Echo].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and cowardly ducking the votes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Politi-Fact''. &amp;quot;[http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/feb/13/hillary-clinton/yes-but-its-complicated/ Response to Hillary Clinton Comment for January 21st, 2008].&amp;quot; Truth-o-Meter.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Dorning, Mike (2007, December 20). &amp;quot;[http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/12/criticism_of_obama_present_vot.html Clinton Camp Criticizes Obama 'Present' Votes].&amp;quot; The Swamp. ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This led to criticism of Obama by two pro-choice organizations, Emily's List, and the National Organization for Women.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dorning, Mike (2008, January 14). &amp;quot;[http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/01/obama_campaign_mounts_defense.html The Swamp: Obama Campaign Defends His Abortion-Rights Record].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Dorn, Michael (2008, February 6). &amp;quot;[http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/02/obamas_voting_record_on_aborti_1.html Obama's Voting Record on Abortion].&amp;quot; ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Newton-Small, Jay (2008, January 14). &amp;quot;[http://swampland.time.com/2008/01/14/obama_campaign_defends_present/ Obama Campaign Defends 'Present' Abortion Votes].&amp;quot; ''Time Magazine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, Pam Sutherland, the long-time head of Illinois Planned Parenthood, came to Obama's aid, criticizing Clinton for making the attack, and stating repeatedly that Obama's present votes were part of a broader strategy used by Planned Parenthood to keep Illinois voters from knowing their state senators were voting against the controversial and popular bills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hernandez, Raymond &amp;amp; Drew, Christopher (2007, December 20). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20cnd-obama.html?_r=2&amp;amp;hp&amp;amp;oref=slogin Obama's Vote in Illinois Was Often Just 'Present'].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Follmer, Max (2008, March 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/14/obama-emphasizes-prochoic_n_81460.html Obama Emphasizes Pro-Choice Voting Record as Clinton Questions 'Present' Votes].&amp;quot; ''Huffington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;He came to me and said: ‘My members are being attacked. We need to figure out a way to protect members and to protect women. A ‘present’ vote was hard to pigeonhole which is exactly what Obama wanted. What it did was give cover to moderate Democrats who wanted to vote with us but were afraid to do so&amp;quot; because of how their votes would be used against them electorally. A ‘present’ vote would protect them. Your senator voted ‘present.’ Most of the electorate is not going to know what that means.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Pam Sutherland, President/CEO of Illinois Planned Parenthood Council, 1980-2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Davis, Teddy (2007, July 17). &amp;quot;[http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2007/07/obama-abortion/ Obama Abortion Dodges Blessed by Planned Parenthood], ''ABC News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}Clinton also made the claim repeatedly that while Obama was leading in Delegates she was winning the Popular Vote&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Koffler, Daniel (2008, May 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-koffler/hillary-clinton-and-the-p_b_103913.html Hillary Clinton and the Popular Vote: Not Wrong, but Meaningless].&amp;quot; ''Huffington Post''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Barone, Michael (2008, March 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/barone/2008/03/28/projection-clinton-wins-popular-vote-obama-wins-delegate-count Projection: Clinton Wins Popular Vote, Obama Wins Delegate Vote].&amp;quot; ''U.S. News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, though this was in part because Obama hadn't been registered in Michigan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Romano, Andrew (2008, August 2). &amp;quot;[http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/blogs/stumper/2008/06/02/clinton-s-popular-vote-claim-close-but-not-quite.html Clinton's Popular Vote Claim? Close--But Not Quite*].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''RealClearPolitics''. &amp;quot;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html 2008 Democratic Popular Vote].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama's advantage with super-delegates over Clinton was about 2-to-1.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|title=Superdelegate endorsements for Friday 6/6|work=Democratic Convention Watch|url=http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/06/superdelegate-endorsements-for-friday.html}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama was able to attract the support of [[liberals]] by pointing out that he had come out against the [[Iraq War]] &amp;quot;from the beginning&amp;quot; whereas Clinton had voted in favor of the war in 2002.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-01-31-democrats-debate_N.htm|title=Obama, Clinton stress differences on Iraq, issues|author=David Jackson|work=USA Today|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On June 7, 2008, Hillary Clinton withdrew from the Primaries, conceding the race and endorsing her opponent&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press''. &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24993082/ns/politics-decision_08/t/clinton-ends-historic-bid-endorses-obama/ Clinton Ends Historic Bid, Endorses Obama].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, when Obama passed the 2,118 Delegates required; winning 2,201 delegates to Clinton's 1,896.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN''. &amp;quot;[http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/#D Election Center 2008].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Born Alive Record Resurfaces====&lt;br /&gt;
On June 30, 2008, Obama's voting record on the &amp;quot;Born Alive&amp;quot; bills came once more to the forefront when CNN gave voice to the growing controversy and revealed the defense Obama had been using since 2004-2008, that the Illinois bills he'd voted against were different from the federal bill, was false, since he'd brought up for a vote a bill word for word identical to the federal bill in the Health and Human Services Committee he chaired, and voted against it, defeating it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN''. &amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPZCXcTwZPY How He Really Voted on Abortion: Obama's Record Under Attack].&amp;quot; ''The Situation Room''. Uploaded to ''YouTube'' by Jill Stanek.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''CNN''. &amp;quot;[http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0806/30/sitroom.02.html Transcripts: June 30, 2008].&amp;quot; The Situation Room.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This led in August to a confrontation between Obama and the [[NRLC]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''National Right to Life Committee''. &amp;quot;[http://www.nrlc.org/news/2008/NRL08/ObamaCoverup.html Obama Cover-up Revealed on Born-Alive Abortion Survivor's Bill].&amp;quot; NRL News, Vol. 35, Issue 7-8, pg. 5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After Obama accused critics of 'lying'&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brody, David (2008, August 16). &amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Skq5M1Ksp_c McCain/Obama Forum].&amp;quot; ''CNN''. Uploaded to ''YouTube'' by Jill Stanek.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;David Brody (August 16, 2008). &amp;quot;[http://blogs.cbn.com/thebrodyfile/archive/2008/08/16/obama-gets-heated-on-born-alive-infant-protection-act.aspx Obama Gets Heated on Born Alive Infant Protection Act].&amp;quot; ''CBN News''. The Brody File.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the NRLC challenged the assertion, and the Obama campaign conceded he &amp;quot;misspoke&amp;quot; and had voted against an identical bill to the &amp;quot;federal bill that everybody supported&amp;quot; but focused on Obama's new claim, that Illinois law was already sufficient to protect newborn children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berman, Russell (2008, August 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.nysun.com/national/obama-facing-attacks-from-all-sides-over-abortion/84059/ Obama Facing Attacks From All Sides Over Abortion Record].&amp;quot; ''New York Sun''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The NRLC promptly declared &amp;quot;Senator Barack Obama's four-year effort to cover up his full role in killing legislation to protect born-alive survivors of abortions continues to unravel.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johnson, Douglas (2008, August 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.nrlc.org/ObamaBAIPA/Obamacoveruponbornalive.htm Obama Cover-up on Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Continues to Unravel After Sen. Obama Says NRLC is 'Lying'].&amp;quot; ''National Right to Life Committee''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Jeremiah Wright====&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Barack Obama and Liberation Theology]]''&lt;br /&gt;
One major dilemma that arose for Obama during his campaign was his connection to his preacher [[Jeremiah Wright]]. Obama and his wife (raised a Baptist) were members of the Trinity [[United Church of Christ]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1776246/posts&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in Chicago, a chruch that embraced [[black liberation theology]] and its emphasis on empowering so-called &amp;quot;oppressed groups&amp;quot; against &amp;quot;establishment forces&amp;quot;. This denomination was the first in America to ordain gays as ministers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html, Obama's church pushes controversial doctrines, March 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Church pastor Jeremiah Wright had been making inflammatory comments and posting his sermons online for sale. These include the statement &amp;quot;G-d damn America,&amp;quot; and in describing the September 11th attacks, &amp;quot;We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4443788 Obama's Pastor: G-d Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Rev. Wright blamed America saying &amp;quot;We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians and branding anybody who spoke out against it as being [[anti-Semitic]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2008, after 20 years in the church, candidate Obama made public statements poised to set him at odds with the man who conducted his wedding and baptized his children. With the negative publicity persisting, a month later Obama ended the friendship, left Wright's church, and blamed the media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/31/obama-resigns-church-membership-in-chicago/], Obama Drops Church Membership in Chicago, May 31, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama claimed “It’s not fair to the other members of the church who seek to worship in peace...&amp;quot;, and distanced himself from  Wright's sermons  as &amp;quot;a bunch of rants that aren't grounded in the truth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;USA TODAY, ''Obama breaks with former pastor, Candidate cites rants on U.S. role in terror, AIDS'', by Kathy Kiely and David Jackson [http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20080430/1a_offlede30_dom.art.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Obama Says He Is Outraged By Wright's &amp;quot;Rants&amp;quot;''[http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/bulletin/bulletin_080430.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Result====&lt;br /&gt;
Obama made an effort to portray John McCain as similar to George W. Bush, drawing attention to McCain's refusal to criticize the unpopular president. McCain was particularly criticized for saying of how many years we should be willing to stay in Iraq, &amp;quot;Make it a hundred.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dobbs, Michael (2008, April 2). &amp;quot;[http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/04/mccains_100year_war.html FactChecker: McCain's '100-Year War'].&amp;quot; ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{cquote|&amp;quot;John McCain went on television and said that there has been great progress economically over the last seven-and-a-half years. John McCain thinks our economy has made great progress under George W. Bush? How could somebody who has been traveling across this country, somebody who came to Erie, Pennsylvania, say we’ve made great progress?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Barack Obama&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zeleny, Jeff (2008, April 18). &amp;quot;[http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/18/obama-criticizes-mccain-on-economic-stance/ Obama Criticizes McCain on Economic Stance].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} On August 22nd, Obama selected [[Joe Biden]] as his running mate for the vice presidency&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN'' (2008, August 23). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2008-08-23/politics/biden.democrat.vp.candidate_1_biden-john-mccain-barack-obama?_s=PM:POLITICS Obama Introduces Biden as Running Mate].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, which would be contrasted one week later with John McCain's selection of [[Sarah Palin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cooper, Michael &amp;amp; Bumiller, Elisabeth (2008, August 29). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/30/us/politics/29palin.html?pagewanted=all Alaskan is McCain's Choice; First Woman on G.O.P. Ticket]. ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 2, 2008, Barack Obama won the presidential election with 365 electoral votes to John McCain's 173.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2008, November 14). &amp;quot;[http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/explorer.html Electoral Explorer].&amp;quot; Election Results 2008. ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama received 53% of the popular vote to John McCain's 46%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2008, November 17). &amp;quot;[http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/president/ President].&amp;quot; Election Center 2008. ''CNN''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2009-2012, U.S. Presidency==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Obama administration}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Obama and George H. W. Bush.jpg|thumb|right|300px|President Barack Obama meets with former President George H. W. Bush in the Oval Office, Feb. 15, 2011. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza).]]&lt;br /&gt;
Under Obama's stewardship the United States has suffered the largest [[Federal budget deficit|deficit]]s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Edwards, B. et. al. (2009, November 6). [http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/107xx/doc10708/11-06-mbr.htm Monthly Budget Review: Fiscal Year 2009]. ''Congressional Budget Office''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Delisle, E.C. et. al. (2010, November 5). [http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/118xx/doc11873/NovemberMBR.pdf Monthly Budget Review: Fiscal Year 2010]. ''Congressional Budget Office''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in history and a credit downgrade from the rating agency Standard &amp;amp; Poor.  However, during the Obama Administration the national deficit has increased at a much lower rate than during the Bush Administration. Most observers attribute the deficits to increasing benefits and welfare paid out on account of the Recession he inherited and has failed to end along with decreasing tax receipts.  Standard &amp;amp; Poor decided to downgrade U.S. government deby after the debt ceiling debate debacle, where Congressional leaders refused to pass a bill authorizing borrowing to pay for the budget they had passed with much debate and controversy earlier in the year.  Cynics have argued that rhetoric directed at the rating agencies about the issuance of AAA ratings to junk real estate bonds spurred the downgrade as a form of retribution.  Ironically, the investor scare led to the flocking of investors to the safe haven of the Treasury bonds which had been downgraded, resulting in lower interest rates.  As there are very few AAA bond markets, investors will likely continue to buy U.S. government debt for the foreseeable future.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Greenwald, A. (2011, April 18). [http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/04/18/the-sp-outlook-and-obama/ The S&amp;amp;P Outlook and Obama]. ''Commentary Magazine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  When his [[economic stimulus]] program was adopted unemployment rose and stagnated in the 10% range, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Di Leo, L &amp;amp; Lynch, S.N. (2010, August 20). [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704476104575439172480870774.html Jobless Claims Jump in New Sign Recovery is Sputtering]. ''The Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; leaving tens of millions without [[hope]] of finding a job.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bureau of Labor Statistics. [http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&amp;amp;series_id=LNS11300000&amp;amp;years_option=specific_years&amp;amp;include_graphs=true&amp;amp;to_month=1&amp;amp;from_month=2 Databases, Tables &amp;amp; Calculators by Subject: Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey]. ''United States Department of Labor''. Data extracted on: July 19, 2010 (4:31:11 PM).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patrick H. Caddell and Douglas E. Schoen, writing in the [[Wall Street Journal]], noted, &amp;quot;Rather than being a unifier, Mr. Obama has divided America on the basis of race, class and partisanship.&amp;quot; The commentators also note Obama's approach to governance has encouraged radical leftists to pursue a similar strategy on his behalf. Mary Frances Berry, former head of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, acknowledged that the [[Obama administration]] has taken to polarizing America around the issue of race as a means of diverting attention from other issues, saying, &amp;quot;Having one's opponent [[race card|rebut charges of racism]] is far better than discussing [[Unemployment|joblessness]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berry, M.F. (2010, July 20). [http://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Mary_Frances_Berry_91E3D9D5-C40D-440C-9D48-1C50CBC60C87.html Energy Arena, Driving the Conversation: Contracting Out U.S. Security? And will Branding Tea Party Racist Work?] ''Politico''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Caddell and Schoen, who worked for President Carter and Clinton, respectively, further stated, &amp;quot;Mr. Obama has also cynically [[class warfare|divided the country on class lines]]. He has taken to playing the populist card time and time again. He bashes Wall Street and insurance companies whenever convenient to advance his programs, yet he has been eager to accept campaign contributions and negotiate with these very same banks and [[corporation]]s behind closed doors in order to advance his political agenda... President Obama's divisive approach to governance has weakened us as a people and paralyzed our political culture.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Caddell, P.H. &amp;amp; Schoen, D.E. (2010, July 28). [http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052748703700904575391553798363586.html Our Divisive President]. ''The Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Domestic policy===&lt;br /&gt;
====Popular bills====&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's first act of office was to sign the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act - effectively nullifying the [[Supreme Court]] case ''Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire &amp;amp; Rubber Co.'', which ruled that Ledbetter had to have filed a pay [[discrimination]] suit within 180 days of the first time Ledbetter was payed less than her male peers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/30/us/politics/30ledbetter-web.html|work=The New York Times|format=HTML|language=English|title=Obama Signs Equal-Pay Legislation|author=Sheryl Gay Stolberg|date=January 29, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the law made corporations subject to suit within 180 days of each time the employee was unfairly paid.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://writ.news.findlaw.com/grossman/20090213.html?=features|work=FindLaw|author=Joanna L. Grossman|date=Feb. 13, 2009|format=HTML|language=English|title=The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 2, 2011, Obama signed the James Zadroga [[9/11]] Healthcare and Compensation Act.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.wnyc.org/articles/wnyc-news/2011/jan/02/obama-signs-zadroga-act-law/|publisher=New York Public Radio|title=Obama Signs Zadroga Act into Law|author=Fred Mogul|date=January 02, 2011|work=wNYC|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The act, which afforded 9/11 first responders who were sickened by the dust from the collapse of the [[World Trade Center]] health care and compensation, passed [[Congress]] after its sponsored agreed to scale down the pricing from 7.4 to 4.2 billion dollars.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.wnyc.org/articles/wnyc-news/2010/dec/22/zadroga-911-bill-passes-senate/|publisher=New York Public Radio|work=wNYC|format=HTML|language=English|title=Congress Approves 9/11 Health Bill|date=December 22, 2010}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Economic policy====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Keynes.jpg|thumbnail|right|190px|[[Barack Obama]] advocates the use of discredited [[Keynesian economics|Keynesian economic concepts]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2011/03/20/fabian-john-maynard-keynes-the-stealthy-enemy-of-human-freedom/ John Maynard Keynes the stealthy enemy of human freedom]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-02-22/deathbed-of-keynesian-economics-will-be-in-u-k-matthew-lynn.html Deathbed of Keynesian Economics will be in the UK]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iwf.org/inkwell/show/23102.html Will the G8 Repudiate the Philosophy of Living Beyond Our Means?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html KEYNES AT HARVARD Economic Deception as a Political Credo BY ZYGMUND DOBBS]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  ]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{see also|Obamunism|American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009}}&lt;br /&gt;
Critics of the Obama administration have coined the word &amp;quot;[[Obamunism]]&amp;quot; to describe Barack Obama's [[socialism|socialistic]] and &amp;quot;[[fascism]] light&amp;quot; [[economic planning]] policies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Benito Mussolini]] defined fascism as the wedding of state and corporate powers.  Accordingly, trend forecaster [[Gerald Celente]] labels [[Obama administration corporate bailouts|Obama's corporate bailouts]] as being &amp;quot;fascism light&amp;quot; in nature.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/daily-intel/2009/07/20/obamunism-inc|work=The Big Money|publisher=WashingtonPost.Newsweek Interactive Co. LLC|format=HTML|language=English|title=Obamunism, Inc.|author=David Sessions|date=July 20, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.smallbusinessadvocate.com/small-business-interviews/gerald-celente-6944|author=Jim Blasingame|title=Is the government creating a bailout bubble?}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obamunism can also refer to Obama's [[Obama administration fiscal policy|ruinous fiscal policies]] and [[Obama administration monetary policy|reckless monetary policies]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gerard&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://seekingalpha.com/article/120883-monetary-policynot-obama-s-stimulusis-what-needs-watching|title=Monetary Policy-Not Obama's Stimulus-Is What Needs Watching|author=Gerard Jackson|date=February 16, 2009|work=Seeking Alpha}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bam&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=New York Post|date=May 17, 2009|url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/05172009/postopinion/editorials/bams_wise_words_169731.htm|title=BAM'S WISE WORDS}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/|title=Bush Deficit vs. Obama Deficit in Pictures|work=The Foundry|publisher=The Heritage Foundation|author=Conn Carroll|date=March 24th, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As seen in his own actions, Barack Obama instructed his advisors to find loopholes that would enable the president to act as a [[dictator]] by pushing through legislation and increases in spending without congressional authority.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Naked Emperor News (2011, October 12). [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/executive-dictatorship-obama-instructs-advisers-to-push-through-stimulus-projects-without-pesky-congressional-authorization/ Exclusive Dictatorship: Obama Instructs Advisors to Push Through Stimulus Projects Without Pesky 'Congressional Authorization']. ''The Blaze''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, budgets passed under President Obama have included the smallest average annualized growth of federal spending (1.4%) since before President Reagan. Federal spending grew an average of 8.7% per year during Reagan's first term and an average of 8.1% per year during George W. Bush's second term.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/|title=Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower? Would You Believe It's Barack Obama?|publisher=Forbes|author=Rick Ungar|date=May 24th, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Wall Street]] firms and banks that were bailed out were among Obama's biggest campaign supporters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''OpenSecrets.org''. [http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&amp;amp;cid=N00009638 Barack Obama: Top Contributors]. The Center for Responsive Politics.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, the Obama administration bailouts of corrupt, unproductive, and reckless Wall Street firms was hardly surprising, and many argue that it was not helpful in making the United States economy more productive and prosperous by encouraging more risk taking through letting banks off with a slap on the wrist.  Others argue that bailing out the banks kept credit flowing and prevented a much deeper recession and a total collapse of the financial system.  The government will recoup some though not all of its capital infusions over time.  A 2005 study found that government corporate bailouts are often done for mere political considerations and the economic resources allocated exhibit significantly worse economic performance than resources allocated using purely business considerations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Faccio, M. et. al. (2005, March 1). [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=676905 Political Connections and Corporate Bailouts]. ''Social Science Research Network''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Proponents of [[free market]] capitalism said Bernanke should not have bailed out failing firms and instead should have allowed free market capitalism to quickly recover as it did in the depression of 1920 without government intervention (free market capitalists assert that government intervention drags out economic recessions and depressions).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Woods, T.E. (2009, April 10). [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czcUmnsprQI Why You've Never Heard of the Great Depression of 1920]. ''Ludwig Von Mises Institute''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Top trend forecaster [[Gerald Celente]] predicts that the corrupt economic policies of the Obama administration will lead to a second [[Great Depression|great depression]] (Celente predicted the 1987 US stock market crash, the dot.com crash, the US 2008/2009 recession, and the collapse of the USSR in the early 1990s) and may lead to a &amp;quot;second [[American Revolution]]&amp;quot; (Celente predicted the [[Tea Party Movement|tax protests]] that are now occurring in America).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Celente, G. (2009, August 1). [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MMX3SKzrfU&amp;amp;feature=channel_page pt 2/2 Gerald Celente on Financial Sense Newshour Aug 1st 2009]. ''Financial Sense Newshour''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Celente, G. (2009, August 2). [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sy9bfw1ebgw&amp;amp;feature=response_watch ]. ''Financial Sense Newshour''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Celente also asserts that the costly and inefficient temporary short term methods that the Obama administration is using to alleviate economic problems in the short term (which is causing massive increases in [[Obama administration deficit spending]]) is only making matters worse and will not prevent the worse economic depression in United States history from occurring.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Celente, G. (2009, August 11). [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_C8K7rWkGGw pt 1/2 Gerald Celente on Howestreet.com 11 Aug 2009]. ''HoweStreet.com''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Celente, G. (2009, August 11). [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LBffdIW0XA&amp;amp;feature=response_watch pt 2/2 Gerald Celente on Howestreet.com 11 Aug 2009]. ''HoweStreet.com''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Obama administration has been sharply criticized for [[Obama administration deficit spending|its massive deficit spending]] and [[Obama administration monetary policy|its reckless monetary policy]] via vast increases in the [[money supply]], although inflation under Bernanke has been below the historic mean.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gerard&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bam&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carroll, C. (2009, March 24). [http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/ Bush Deficit vs. Obama Deficit in Pictures]. ''The Foundry''. The Heritage Network.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Celente predicts that if a &amp;quot;second American Revolution&amp;quot; occurs in a peaceful and productive manner, it may include a [[Third Party System|third party movement]] of governance that will advocate a more [[free market]] [[capitalism]] approach to the American economy and a more strict interpretation of the [[United States Constitution|United States constitution]] as far as the authors' [[original intent]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente1&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During what the [[White House]] billed as [[Recovery Summer]], one half million workers per week continued losing their jobs. His signature legislative achievement, [[ObamaCare]],has been found to be [[unconstitutional]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Schoenberg, T. &amp;amp; Fisk, M.T. (2010, December 13). [http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-13/u-s-health-care-law-requirement-thrown-out-by-judge.html Obama's Health-Care Law Ruled Unconstitutional Over Insurance Requirement]. ''Bloomberg''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by several judges and constitutional by others, and is credited as a major cause of uncertainty, high [[unemployment]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=33220&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; lagging job creation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Foster, J.D. (2010, August 5). [http://blog.heritage.org/2010/08/05/it%E2%80%99s-official-medicare%E2%80%99s-finances-shadowed-by-uncertainty/ It’s Official: Medicare’s Finances Shadowed by Uncertainty]. ''The Foundry''. The Heritage Network.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and risk of a credit default crisis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Samuelson, R.J. (2010, March 29). [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/28/AR2010032802353.html With health bill, Obama has sown the seeds of a budget crisis]. ''The Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cramer, J. (2010, March 16). [http://www.thestreet.com/story/10703361/cramer-obamacare-will-topple-the-market.html Cramer: Obamacare Will Topple the Market]. ''The Street''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His 2012 Budget plan has been roundly criticized in the mainstream and liberal press as not a serious effort to deal with the nation's economic crisis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://republican.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=blogs.view&amp;amp;blog_id=1551d6f5-2ac9-4b8d-97ab-74def354024e Newspapers Call Out White House: ‘What Would That Path Be, Mr. President?’]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jeffrey Tucker]] wrote, &amp;quot;President Obama's economic policy has been catastrophic for liberty, enterprise, and the American dream—the very archetype of what not to do to end recession.&amp;quot; [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1118186176/ref=as_li_tf_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=anncoulter-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=1118186176]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====2009 Stimulus====&lt;br /&gt;
In early 2009, Obama lobbied Congress and the public to pass sweeping Stimulus legislation for the ailing economy&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, January 3). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28479998/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-urges-congress-pass-stimulus-plan/ Obama Urges Congress to Pass Stimulus Plan].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Parsons, C. &amp;amp; Nicholas, P. (2009, February 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28479998/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-urges-congress-pass-stimulus-plan/ Barack Obama Sternly Urges Congress to Pass Economic Stimulus].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; known as ''The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009'' (H.R. 1)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.1: Bill Text Versions: H.R. 1].&amp;quot; 111th Congress (2009-2010). ''Library of Congress''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=204335,00.html The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Information Center].&amp;quot; ''IRS''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, ignoring a report by the Congressional Budget Office that the legislation would ultimately harm the economy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinan, S. (2009, February 4). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/04/cbo-obama-stimulus-harmful-over-long-haul/ CBO: Obama Stimulus Harmful Over Long Haul].&amp;quot; ''U.S. News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Contrary to his earlier promises of bipartisanship&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinan, S. (2009, March 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/28/mccain-obama-breaks-campaign-promises-shuns-bipart/?page=all McCain: Obama Breaks Promise of Bipartisanship].&amp;quot; ''Washington Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the bill passed the House 244-188 without a single Republican vote on January 28, 2009,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Calmes, J. (2009, January 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/us/politics/29obama.html House Passes Stimulus Plan With No G.O.P. Votes].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and received just 3 Republican votes when passing the Senate 61-37.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Herszenhorn, D.M. (2009, February 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/washington/11web-stim.html Senate Approves Stimulus Plan].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One third of the massive $838 billion bill consisted of tax cuts&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, February 11). &amp;quot;Senate Passes $838 Billion Stimulus Bill].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the rest spending on &amp;quot;just about every pent-up Democratic proposal of the last 40 years.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, January 28). &amp;quot;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123310466514522309.html A 40-Year Wish List].&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In responding to criticism of the broken bipartisanship promise at the time, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi famously quipped, &amp;quot;We won the election. We wrote the bill.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kane, P. (2009, January 23). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/22/AR2009012203961.html Stimulus Plan Meets More GOP Resistance].&amp;quot; ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On February 18, 2009, the Stimulus was signed into law by Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, February 17). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29231790/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-stimulus-lets-americans-claim-destiny/ Obama: Stimulus Lets Americans Claim Destiny].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In August 2009, Republicans and Democratic Senator David Obey drew attention to mistakes on the Recovery.gov site claiming Stimulus jobs created that didn't exist. Obama responded by saying the errors just indicate the accounting is an &amp;quot;inexact science&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, November 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/18/obama-calls-stimulus-data-errors-issue-says-focus-job-growth/ Obama Calls Stimulus Data Errors 'Side Issue,' Says Focus Is on Job Growth].&amp;quot; ''FOX News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Healthcare====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Obamacare}}&lt;br /&gt;
On March 23, 2010, Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). The act had originated in the House of Representatives and passed September 17, 2009. The act was amended and passed the Senate prior to [[Democrat]] [[Ted Kennedy]]'s passing along party lines - just a filibuster-proof majority at 60-39. In what can be construed as a de facto rejection of the bill, [[Massachusetts]] voters elected a [[Republican]] candidate, [[Scott Brown]], who promised to vote against the bill,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/senate/scott-brown-wins-massachusetts-senate-race.html|work=The Washington Post|author=Chris Cillizza|date=January 19, 2010|title=Scott Brown wins Massachusetts Senate special election race|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but another Senate vote would not occur.  Scott Brown was also an excellent campaigner and judged to be a better candidate than his rival, Martha Coakley.  He has since achieved one of the most moderate senate voting records, likely to avoid the anger of his mostly liberal constituency.  After Obama made a promise to issue an [[executive order]] that would ultimately prohibit the use of taxpayer subsidies to pay for [[abortion]] services,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/22/nation/la-na-healthcare-passage22-2010mar22/3|work=The Los Angeles Times|format=HTML|language=English|title=House passes historic healthcare overhaul|date=March 22, 2010|author=Noam N. Levey and Janet Hook}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the [[House of Representatives]] would pass the bill as it left the Senate 219-212, with 34 Democrats and all other parties dissenting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://articles.cnn.com/2010-03-21/politics/health.care.main_1_health-care-entire-house-democratic-caucus-pre-existing-conditions?_s=PM:POLITICS|date=March 21, 2010|author=Alan Silverleib|work=CNN|format=HTML|language=English|title=House passes health care bill on 219-212 vote}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amongst other things, the act mandates that the population purchase health care coverage or face punitive tax measures, and on this basis has been constitutionally challenged in the federal courts, with mixed results (three courts have upheld the act, two have declared it unconstitutional); thus, the Act is likely destined for [[Supreme Court]] reviewal.  Plans originally proposed involved instituting a universal public insurance program, that is, extending Medicare to everyone.  The universal mandate included in the act was originally a conservative idea that was enacted in Massachusetts under Republican Mitt Romney.  Its supporters note that having health insurance results in reduced costs in paying for treatment of uninsured and forcing people to take responsibility for their healthcare.  Due to ethical constraints, doctors cannot deny care to poor patients, resulting in the hospital and the healthcare system at large bearing the cost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Gulf oil spill====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster}}&lt;br /&gt;
President Obama authorized offshore oil drilling in the [[Gulf of Mexico]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0430/Gulf-of-Mexico-oil-spill-imperils-Obama-s-offshore-drilling-plan Gulf of Mexico oil spill imperils Obama's offshore drilling plan,] By Mark Clayton, ''Christian Science Monitor'', April 30, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; stating, &amp;quot;oil rigs today generally don’t cause spills&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;White House Press Release, [http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-a-discussion-jobs-and-economy-charlotte-north-carolina Remarks by the President in a Discussion on Jobs and the Economy in Charlotte, North Carolina,] Office of the Press Secretary, April 02, 2010. Retrieved from whitehouse.gov 3 May 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was widely criticized for his mishandling of the &amp;quot;[[Gulf oil spill disaster|worst environmental disaster]] in US history.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.examiner.com/x-33986-Political-Spin-Examiner~y2010m4d29-Worst-environmental-disaster-in-US-history-Oil-slick-in-Gulf-of-Mexico-is-set-on-fire Worst environmental disaster in US history,] Maryann Tobin, ''Examiner'', April 29, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/the-oil-spill-is-obamas-fault/?src=twt&amp;amp;twt=NytimesKrugman Conscience of a Liberal: The Oil Spill Is Obama’s Fault,] Paul Krugman, ''New York Times'', April 30, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Don't Ask Don't Tell====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Don't Ask Don't Tell}}&lt;br /&gt;
Candidate Obama promised to repeal a policy that originated in the Clinton era that prohibited inquiries into military personnel's [[sexual orientation]] while also barring &amp;quot;out&amp;quot; [[homosexuals]] from serving in the military. [[Liberals]] expressed anger when time passed and no effort to repeal the law was seen;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/nov/21/obama-to-delay-repeal-of-dont-ask-dont-tell/|work=The Washington Times|format=HTML|title=Obama to delay ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ repeal|language=English|author=Rowan Scarborough|date=November 21, 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in fact, Obama's [[justice department]], as part of their duty to defend all laws passed by any administration, filed a brief arguing against the [[Supreme Court]] granting a [[writ of certiorari]] to a gay soldier challenging the law (the writ was not granted). In response, the soldier, James Pietrangelo II, a former Army infantryman and lawyer, said, “[Obama's] a coward, a bigot and a pathological liar. This is a guy who spent more time picking out his dog, Bo, and playing with him on the White House lawn than he has working for equality for gay people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=Time Magazine|publisher=Time Inc.|format=HTML|url=http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1903545,00.html?imw=Y|title=Dismay Over Obama's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Turnabout|author=Mark Thompson|date=Jun. 09, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 15th, 2010, a bill was introduced in the [[House of Representatives]] to repeal the law - it passed a day later by a vote of 250-175;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2010/roll638.xml|title=FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 638|format=HTML|work=Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it passed the Senate three days later 65-31.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&amp;amp;session=2&amp;amp;vote=00281|work=The U.S. Senate|title=U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 111th Congress - 2nd Session|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama signed the Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010 on December 22nd.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;g dadt&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/22/obama-repeals-dont-ask-dont-tell|work=The Guardian|format=HTML|language=English|title='Don't ask, don't tell' repealed as Obama signs landmark law|date=22 December 2010}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Pentagon]] itself could not immediately implement the repeal and questioned whether it would hurt combat readiness.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;g dadt&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Senator [[John McCain]], the senior Republican on the Armed Services Committee, opposed the bill, saying &amp;quot;It may be premature to make such a change at this time and in this manner, without further consideration of this report and further study of the issue by Congress – for of all the people we serve, one of our highest responsibilities is to the men and women of our armed services, especially those risking their lives in combat.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/02/mccain-on-dont-ask-dont-tell-dont-rush/|title=McCain on ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’: Don’t Rush|date=December 2nd, 2010|format=HTML|author=David M. Herszenhorn|language=English|work=The New York Times}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign policy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Western Wall Obama.jpg|thumb|left|320px|At [[Western Wall]], Jerusalem, 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
As Senator, Obama was highly critical of President Bush and promised change. As President, Obama has tripled down in Afghanistan, widened the war into Pakistan, multiplied drone attacks, bombed Yemen and Somalia, and started an undeclared NATO war in Libya. On presidential war powers, surveillance questions, Guantanamo, detention policy and habeas corpus, Obama has similarly stayed the course, or expanded Bush's precedents. In a speech on May 19, 2011 Obama fully embraced the [[Bush Doctrine]] of preventative war.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Krauthammer, C. (April 19). [http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-news-in-obamas-speech/2011/05/19/AF4dFN7G_story.html The News in Obama's Speech]. ''The Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The New America Foundation, which tracks the strikes, has listed 23 raids since the beginning of April, 2011, all but one in Pakistan’s tribal regions of North and South Waziristan. A June 20 attack was reported in Kurram, an area north of North Waziristan along the Afghanistan border.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The drone program has become increasingly controversial as the Obama administration has expanded its use beyond the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. Lethal missiles have been launched from unmanned aircraft in at least five countries in addition to Pakistan: Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, and, most recently, Somalia. The military’s Joint Special Operations Command used a drone last June to attack what officials said were two senior members of the Al Shabab militant group on the Somali coast.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;DeYoung, K. (2011, July 4).  [http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/2011/07/04/cia_halts_drone_launches_from_pakistan_base/ CIA Halts Drone Launches From Pakistan Base]. ''The Boston Globe''. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is commendable when he says he wants to avoid war. His policies, however, favor war by destabilizing the Middle East making it extremely hostile and favoring radical Islam over America’s ally, Israel, and American interests in the region... The president has chosen a very dangerous path for every American and one that promises great difficulty for Israel. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.thejerusalemconnection.us/blog/2012/03/14/obamas-words-disguise-his-israel-foreign-policy-actions.html Obama's words disguise his Israel foreign policy actions.] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Commander-in-chief====&lt;br /&gt;
By Obama's third year as Commander-in-Chief, over 1200 American troops died in Iraq and Afghanistan - significantly more than the number who died during President [[George W. Bush]]'s term of office.  And growing numbers of civilian contractors also have fallen. In the first half of 2010, 250 contractors reportedly died in Iraq and Afghanistan - more than the 235 military personnel who fell during the same period.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/05/24/114662/what-price-war.html#ixzz1Nz07pg5O&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=====National Defense=====&lt;br /&gt;
President Obama signed into U.S. law the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), only after his administration successfully lobbied to remove language from the bill that would have protected American citizens from being detained indefinitely without trial.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aaron Dykes. [http://www.infowars.com/president-obamas-ndaa-signing-statement-i-have-the-power-to-detain-americans-but-i-wont/ Obama’s Signing Statement on NDAA: I have the power to detain Americans… but I won’t], Infowars.com, January 1, 2012. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After the legislation cleared Congress, the ACLU commented that if President Obama signed the bill it &amp;quot;will damage both his legacy and American’s reputation for upholding the rule of law,&amp;quot; while executive director of the ''Human Rights Watch'' blasted the President for being ‘on the wrong side of history,’ noting that &amp;quot;Obama will go down in history as the president who enshrined indefinite detention without trial in US law.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;President Decides to Sign Ill-Conceived National Defense Authorization Act. [http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/12/14/us-refusal-veto-detainee-bill-historic-tragedy-rights US: Refusal to Veto Detainee Bill A Historic Tragedy for Rights], ''Human Rights Watch'', December 14, 2011. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[http://www.aclu.org/national-security/white-house-backs-away-defense-bill-veto-threat White House Backs Away from Defense Bill Veto Threat], ''[[ACLU]]'', December 14, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Section 1031 of the NDAA bill, which itself defines the entirety of the United States as a “battlefield,” allows American citizens to be snatched from the streets, carted off to a foreign detention camp and held indefinitely without trial. As reported by Infowars.com, the bill states that “any person who has committed a belligerent act” faces indefinite detention, but no trial or evidence has to be presented, the White House merely needs to make the accusation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Paul Joseph Watson. [http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-demanded-power-to-indefinitely-detain-u-s-citizens/ Obama Administration Demanded Power To Indefinitely Detain U.S. Citizens], Infowars.com, December 12, 2011.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;S.1867 [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c112:2:./temp/~c1122VN0Iv:e548990: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Engrossed in Senate [Passed Senate] - ES)], ''The Library of Congress'' THOMAS, 112th Congress (2011-2011), Accessed January 25, 2012.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Text of S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. [http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/text?version=es&amp;amp;nid=t0:es:281 Sec. 1031. Affirmation of authority of the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force.], [[U.S. Congress]], ''OpenCongress.org'', (Accessed January 25, 2012).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====2009-2011 Iraq Troop Withdrawal=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Operation Iraqi Freedom}}&lt;br /&gt;
On February 10, 2007, Barack Obama announced his campaign for the U.S. presidency while stating he had a &amp;quot;''plan that will bring our combat troops home by March of 2008.''&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=announcement&amp;gt;(2007, February 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/10/AR2007021000879.html Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's Announcement Speech].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Later, Obama campaigned on having troops entirely out of Iraq within 16 months, but in February 2009 revised this promise to withdrawing all but 35-50 thousand troops by December 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barry, J. (2009, February 25). &amp;quot;[http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2009/02/25/reality-on-the-ground.html Reality on the Ground].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  However, some of the newly withdrawn troops were simply redirected from Iraq to Afghanistan - Obama in Summer 2009 ordered 21,000 troops to Afghanistan.&amp;lt;ref name=amanpour&amp;gt;Amanpour, C. (2009, April 29). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2009-04-29/politics/amanpour.obama.foreign.policy_1_president-obama-obama-administration-iraq?_s=PM:POLITICS Amanpour: Obama's 100 Days of Foreign Affairs].&amp;quot; ''CNN Politics''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{cquote|&amp;quot;But all of this cannot come to pass until we bring an end to this war in Iraq. Most of you know I opposed this war from the start. I thought it was a tragic mistake. Today we grieve for the families who have lost loved ones, the hearts that have been broken, and the young lives that could have been. America, it's time to start bringing our troops home. It's time to admit that no amount of American lives can resolve the political disagreement that lies at the heart of someone else's civil war. That's why I have a plan that will bring our combat troops home by March of 2008. Letting the Iraqis know that we will not be there forever is our last, best hope to pressure the Sunni and Shia to come to the table and find peace.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Barack Obama, February 10, 2007 Presidential Campaign Announcement Speech&amp;lt;ref name=announcement /&amp;gt;}}Ultimately, it was the Status of Forces Agreement signed by George W. Bush on November 17, 2008 which forced U.S. combat troops to withdraw from Iraq's cities, villages, and localities by June 30, 2009, and from Iraq entirely by December 31st 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2008, November 17). &amp;quot;[http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/world/20081119_SOFA_FINAL_AGREED_TEXT.pdf Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq On the Withdrawal of United States from Iraq and the Organization of Their Activities during Their Temporary Presence in Iraq].&amp;quot; Article 24. Withdrawal of the United States Forces from Iraq. Hosted by ''The New York Times''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Office of the Press Secretary (2008, November 27). &amp;quot;[http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2008/11/20081127-1.html Statement by the President on Agreements with Iraq].&amp;quot; ''The White House''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama privately contacted the Iraq government in an attempt to persuade them to let 10,000 troops stay, but was rejected.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Froomkin, D. (2011, October 26). &amp;quot;[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/26/obama-iraq_n_1032507.html Ending the War in Iraq: How Obama's Own Rhetoric - And George Bush's Pact - Boxed in the President].&amp;quot; ''Huffington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Newsweek's Michael Ware accused Obama of a &amp;quot;War Crime&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;''falsely taking credit for finally bringing Iraq to a close—a war actually ended by the Bush administration back in 2008''&amp;quot; and stated, &amp;quot;''The U.S. troops who fought and died in that war, the Iraqis who perished, and the American people deserve far better.''&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ware, M. (2011, October 24). &amp;quot;[http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/10/24/obamas-war-crime-taking-credit-from-bush-adminsitration-for-ending-the-iraq-war.html Obama's War Crime].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''. U.S. Politics.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The last of Iraq's combat troops have now been withdrawn because of Bush's Status of Forces Agreement which Obama took credit for.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://articles.cnn.com/2011-12-17/middleeast/world_meast_iraq-troops-leave_1_1st-cavalry-division-camp-adder-troop-movements?_s=PM:MIDDLEEAST|work=CNN|title=Obama: Last U.S. troops leave Iraq|date=December 17, 2011|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=====Afghanistan=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Afghanistan War}}&lt;br /&gt;
Obama escalated troop strength&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pbs&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/obamaswar/themes/strategy.html#ixzz1LhWNImZp|title=Obama's New Strategy (March '09)|author=George Packer, Seth Jones, David Kilcullen, Rory Stewart, Andrew Exum, Col. Andrew Bacevich (Ret.)|work=PBS|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and defense costs in Afghanistan from $43.5 billion in George Bush's last year to $113.7 billion for 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Congressional Research Service, quoted in Gregory Anthony, ''What price war?''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Adviser to General [[Stanley McChrystal]] David Kilcullen wrote, &amp;quot;One of the big strategic shifts is the use of language now which talks about Pakistan and Afghanistan as the same theater. Now we talked about Af-Pak long before the Obama administration came about, but the public use of that term, and the description of it as the Afghanistan-Pakistan campaign, sends a new message to people about how the administration is going to think about Afghanistan and Pakistan.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pbs&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; This became evident when, under the orders of Obama, a military SEALs team killed September 11th mastermind [[Osama bin Laden]] in Abottabad, Pakistan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.newsweek.com/2011/05/05/commander-in-chief.html|title=Commander in Chief|author=Daniel Romano and Daniel Klaidman|date=May 05, 2011|work=Newsweek|publisher=The Newsweek/Daily Beast Company LLC|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=====Guantanamo Bay=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Guantanamo Bay}}&lt;br /&gt;
One of Obama's campaign promises was that he would close the American detention center at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba - detainees would be flown to other countries while the ones awaiting trial would enter the American court system. Two days after taking office he signed an order directing the military to do so.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;salon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/04/25/obama_guantanamo_rhetoric|work=Salon|title=The Obama/Gitmo timeline|author=Natasha Lennard|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But, in November 2009 Obama admitted that his self imposed deadline of January 2010 would be missed, and in March 2011 the president went back on his campaign promise, signing an executive order to create a formal system of indefinite detention for the prisoners.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;salon&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=====Mexico=====&lt;br /&gt;
In May 2012, President Obama promised Mexican President [[Felipe Calderon]] that his administration would assist Mexico in curbing drug cartel violence, which has led to 30,000 deaths in Mexico. &amp;quot;President Calderon and I . . . stand together against the drug cartels that have unleashed horrific violence in so many communities,&amp;quot; Obama said on May 19. &amp;quot;Mexico can count on the United States as a full partner in this effort.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''[[Washington Post]]'' has reported however that White House officials stopped a requirement for gun dealers to report bulk sales of high-powered semiautomatic rifles commonly used by illegal drug cartels.  [[Justice Department]] officials had asked for White House approval to require thousands of gun dealers along the border to report the purchases to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and Explosives. ATF investigators expected to get leads on suspected arms traffickers. Senior law enforcement sources said the proposal from the ATF was held up by then White House chief of staff [[Rahm Emanuel]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Horwitz, S. &amp;amp; Grimaldi, J.V. (2010, December 17). [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/17/AR2010121706598.html White House Delayed Rule Meant to Stop Gun Flow to Mexico]. ''The Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gun dealers have been required for decades to report the sales of multiple handguns to the ATF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Libya=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Libyan uprising 2011}}&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2011, the political unrest that had spread through the Arab world showed up as protests in Libya. Colonel Muammar el-Qaddafi - leader of Libya for 41 years - responded to the violent activism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28376.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with legible steps.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt libya&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/libya/index.html|work=The New York Times|publisher=The New York Times Inc.|format=HTML|language=English|title=Libya — Protests and Revolt (2011)}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[United Nations Security Council]] voted unanimously to impose [[sanctions]], and later authorized all members to take action to protect civilians. Obama, acting without approval from Congress and at the beckoning of the [[United Nations]], directed American forces to take out Libya's air defense system.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt libya&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Obama later said, &amp;quot;[I]f we waited one more day Benghazi, a city nearly the size of Charlotte, could suffer a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Barack Obama|url=http://www.npr.org/2011/03/28/134935452/obamas-speech-on-libya-a-responsibility-to-act|title=Obama's Speech On Libya: 'A Responsibility To Act'|date=March 28, 2011|publisher=National Public Radio ([[NPR]])|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Alan J. Kuperman]] - writing an editorial for the ''[[Boston Globe]]'' - suggested this statement was false, writing, &amp;quot;[I]ntervention did not prevent genocide, because no such bloodbath was in the offing. To the contrary, by emboldening rebellion, US interference has prolonged Libya’s civil war and the resultant suffering of innocents.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuperman&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Alan J. Kuperman|work=The Boston Globe|url=http://articles.boston.com/2011-04-14/bostonglobe/29418371_1_rebel-stronghold-civilians-rebel-positions|title=False pretense for war in Libya?|date=April 14, 2011}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kuperman, a professor of public affairs at the University of Texas who authored a book called ''The Limits of Humanitarian Intervention'', further stated that the rebels had tricked the world into thinking a bloodbath was at hand and that Obama had lied to the American people in order to act on this theory.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuperman&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Gaddafi [never] threaten civilian massacre in Benghazi, as Obama alleged. The “no mercy’’ warning, of March 17, targeted rebels only, as reported by The New York Times, which noted that Libya’s leader promised amnesty for those “who throw their weapons away.’’ Khadafy even offered the rebels an escape route and open border to Egypt, to avoid a fight “to the bitter end.’’ &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://politicalcartel.org/2011/04/17/libya-and-the-obama-doctrine/ Libya and the “Obama Doctrine”.] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However Gaddafi wrote to Obama:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Gaddafi said he bore no ill will toward Obama. &amp;quot;We have been hurt more morally than physically because of what had happened against us in both deeds and words by you,&amp;quot; he wrote. &amp;quot;Despite all this you will always remain our son whatever happened. We still pray that you continue to be president of the USA. We endeavour and hope that you will gain victory in the new election campaign.&amp;quot; The letter, dated 5 April 2011 in Tripoli, is signed &amp;quot;Mu'aumer Qaddaffi, Leader of the Revolution&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/06/gaddafi-obama-nato-libya?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Critics point out the only thing worse than starting a &amp;quot;stupid, unnecessary war&amp;quot; against a madman is losing it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/271847/war-libya-dumb-and-dumber-victor-davis-hanson&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2012 Presidential Campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
===2011, Birth Certificate Released===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Barack_Obama_Controversies#Birth_Certificate]]''&lt;br /&gt;
On April 27, 2011&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;CNN Political Unit (2011, April 27). &amp;quot;[http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/27/white-house-releases-obama-birth-certificate/ White House Releases Obama Birth Certificate].&amp;quot; ''CNN''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a long-running controversy surrounding Obama's birth was largely put to rest&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Winter, J. (2011, April 29). &amp;quot;[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/29/expert-says-obamas-birth-certificate-legit/ Expert: No Doubt Obama's Birth Certificate is Legit].&amp;quot; ''FOX News''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Tuchman, G. (2011, April 25). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2011-04-25/politics/birthers.obama.hawaii_1_birther-controversy-obama-opinion-research-corporation?_s=PM:POLITICS Obama Birther Claims Have No Merit].&amp;quot; ''CNN''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(2011, April 27). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42779923/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-releases-detailed-us-birth-certificate/ Obama Releases Detailed U.S. Birth Certificate].&amp;quot; ''MSNBC''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when Obama had his long-form birth certificate posted at WhiteHouse.gov.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf Certificate of Live Birth].&amp;quot; State of Hawaii. Retrieved from ''WhiteHouse.gov''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Donald Trump, who had attacked Obama on the Birth Certificate issue and was then leading Republicans in polls for the upcoming GOP primary&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James, F. (2011, April 15). &amp;quot;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2011/04/15/135446314/poll-donald-trump-birther-darling-leads-gop-field-at-26 Donald Trump, Birther In Chief? Poll Has Him Leading GOP Field with 26 Percent].&amp;quot; ''NPR''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, was effectively knocked out of the race because of this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kapur, S. (2011, May 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/05/10/trumps-popularity-tanks-after-obama-releases-long-form-birth-certificate/ Trump's Popularity Tanks After Obama Releases Long-Form Birth Certificate].&amp;quot; ''RawStory.com''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following is a timeline of previous events leading up to the release:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In June 2008 the Obama campaign allowed FactCheck.org to look at his “Certificate of Live Birth” and take photos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Henig, J. (2008, August 21). Born in the U.S.A. FactCheck.org. Retrieved from http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* In July 2008 a blogger discovered a birth announcement from the Honolulu Advertiser from August 13, 1961 for Barack Obama. It has since been discovered another newspaper, the Star Bulletin, also documented the birth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Snopes.com. Barack Obama Birth Certificate. Retrieved from http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* PolitiFact went to extreme lengths to verify Obama’s citizenship, attaining scanned copies of his 1992 marriage certificate from Cook County, IL, his driver’s license record, and his registration and disciplinary record. PolitiFact also addressed a number of concerns about the documentation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hollyfield, A. (2008, June 27). Obama’s birth certificate: Final chapter. PolitiFact. Retrieved from http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/jun/27/obamas-birth-certificate-part-ii/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* In October 2008 Hawaii’s Department of Health released a statement by Dr. Chiyome Fu.kino verifying that Obama’s birth certificate was on record.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hawaii Department of Health. News Release: Statement by Dr. Chiyome Fu.kino. Retrieved from http://hawaii.gov/health/about/pr/2008/08-93.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* In August 2009 it was revealed that an alleged Kenyan birth certificate for Obama was a hoax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Snopes.com. Kenyan Mistake. Retrieved from http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/kenyacert.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Another website allows you to create your own imitation Kenyan birth certificates online.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;KenyanBirthCertificateGenerator.com. Blue Collar Industries. Retrieved from http://kenyanbirthcertificategenerator.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2011, Osama Bin Laden Confirmed Dead===&lt;br /&gt;
On May 1, 2011, Obama announced in a press conference&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama, B. (2011, May 2). &amp;quot;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/05/02/osama-bin-laden-dead Osama Bin Laden Dead].&amp;quot; ''WhiteHouse.gov''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that Osama Bin Laden was dead after a U.S. assault force infiltrated his military compound in Abottobad, Pakistan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Baker, P., Cooper, H., &amp;amp; Mazzetti, M. (2011, May 1). &amp;quot;[Bin Laden is Dead, Obama Says].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Osama_Bin_Laden/ Target Bin Laden: The Death of Public Enemy #1].&amp;quot; ''ABC News''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''NPR''. &amp;quot;[http://www.npr.org/series/135908383/osama-bin-laden-dead Special Series: Osama Bin Laden Killed].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bin Laden was reportedly shot in the head after a helicopter raid ferried Navy SEAL Team Six and CIA paramilitary operatives into Pakistan on April 29.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2011, May 1). &amp;quot;[http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-201_162-20058777.html Osama bin Laden is Dead].&amp;quot; Retrieved from ''CBSNews.com''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Reuters obtained photos of unidentified dead bodies from the raid, none of which look like bin Laden. However, the White House had the body of Osama bin Laden disposed of at sea because it claimed this was &amp;quot;in accordance with Islamic tradition&amp;quot; and didn't want to give Bin Laden followers a gravesite shrine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Daily Beast (2011, May 2). &amp;quot;[http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/05/02/osama-bin-laden-killed-and-buried-at-sea-breaking-details.html Osama Bin Laden Killed and Buried at Sea].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The White House also refused to publicly reveal photos or evidence of the body, because Obama claimed that &amp;quot;given the graphic nature of these photos, it would create some national security risk.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Allbritton, C. (2011, May 4). &amp;quot;[http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/04/us-binladen-pakistan-photos-idUSTRE7437KK20110504 Photos Show Three Dead Men at Bin Laden Raid House].&amp;quot; ''Reuters''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''Reuters''. &amp;quot;[http://www.reuters.com/subjects/bin-laden-compound Photos From the Bin Laden Compound].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The burial at sea was criticized by Islamic scholars&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2011, May 2). &amp;quot;[http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-202_162-20058892.html Islamic Scholars Criticize Bin Laden Sea Burial].&amp;quot; Retrieved from ''CBSNews.com''. Also at [http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/05/02/islamic-scholars-question-bin-ladens-sea-burial/ Fox News].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and 9/11 families.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zirulnick, A. (2011, May 3). &amp;quot;[http://www.csmonitor.com/World/terrorism-security/2011/0503/Osama-bin-Laden-s-burial-at-sea-critics-range-from-9-11-families-to-militants Osama Bin Laden's Burial At Sea: Critics Range from 9/11 Families to Militants].&amp;quot; ''Christian Science Monitor''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The lack of photos resulted in skepticism about the death from a variety of sources, including the Taliban&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Faiez, R. &amp;amp; Vogt, H. (2011, May 4). &amp;quot;[http://articles.boston.com/2011-05-04/news/29509464_1_bin-taliban-spokesman-zabiullah-mujahid-samiullah-khan Taliban Holding Out for Clear Evidence].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Republican Senator Lindsey Graham.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rosen, J. &amp;amp; Thomma, S. (2011, May 5). &amp;quot;[http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/05/05/113709/sc-sen-graham-wants-bin-laden.html S.C. Sen. Graham Wants Bin Laden Photos Released].&amp;quot; ''McClatchy Newspapers''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The death of bin Laden, coupled with the revealing of Obama's long-form Birth Certificate, resulted in a boost of Obama's job approval from 46% to 57% within one month.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dao, J. &amp;amp; Sussman, D. (2011, May 4). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/05/us/politics/05poll.html For Obama, Big Rise in Poll Numbers After Bin Laden Raid].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''Pew Research Center'' (2011, May 2). &amp;quot;[http://www.people-press.org/2011/05/03/public-relieved-by-bin-ladens-death-obamas-job-approval-rises/ Public 'Relieved' by Bin Laden's Death, Obama's Job Approval Rises].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Jones, J.M. (2011, May 5). &amp;quot;[http://www.gallup.com/poll/147437/obama-approval-rallies-six-points-bin-laden-death.aspx Obama Job Approval Rallies Six Points to 52% After Bin Laden Death].&amp;quot; ''Gallup''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2012, relations between the U.S. and Pakistan remain sour because the U.S. did not involve Pakistan fully in the raid to ensure success.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CBS/Associated Press'' (2012, May 1). &amp;quot;[http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57424622/1-year-after-osama-bin-laden-killed-still-no-answers-from-pakistan/ 1 Year After Osama bin Laden Killed, Still No Answers from Pakistan].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Pakistan has denied White House claims that there was a deal with it allowing the raid.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2011, May 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/05/10/pakistani-president-claims-bin-laden-deal/ Former Pakistani President Claims There Was Never Bin Laden Deal With U.S.].&amp;quot; Retrieved from ''FOX News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2012: Ties to ACORN? ===&lt;br /&gt;
According to Stanley Kurtz - author of ''Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism'' (2010) Obama in 1995 sought and obtained the endorsement of a left-wing third party, the [[New Party]] in his quest to be elected to the Illinois State Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kurtz, S. (2012, June 7). [http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/302031/obamas-third-party-history-stanley-kurtz Obama's Third-Party History]. ''National Review Online''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama's &amp;quot;Fight the Smears&amp;quot; campaign has denied this, as has Politico's Ben Smith.&amp;lt;ref name=pollack&amp;gt;Pollack, J.B. (2012, June 7). [http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/07/Obama-Caught-Lying-Again-He-WAS-Member-of-New-Party-Says-Kurtz Obama Caught Lying Again: He WAS Member of 'New Party', Says Kurtz]. ''Breitbart''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Smith, B. (2008, October 25). [http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/The_dread_New_Party.html The Dread New Party]. ''Politico''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Others who claim he was affiliated with the New Party/ACORN include The Blaze's Billy Hallowell&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hallowell, B. (2012, June 7). [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/report-new-documents-show-obama-was-a-member-of-the-far-left-new-party/ News Docs Reportedly Show Obama Was a Member of the Far-Left 'New Party']. ''The Blaze''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Breitbart's Joel Pollack, Human Events' Erick Erickson&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Erickson, E. (2008, June 10). [http://www.humanevents.com/2008/06/10/obama-and-the-new-party/ Obama and the New Party]. ''Human Events''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Newsbusters' P.J. Gladnick&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gladnick, P.J. (2008, October 12). [http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/10/08/will-msm-report-obama-membership-socialist-new-party#ixzz21JfE3z1z Will MSM Report on Obama Membership in Socialist New Party?] ''Newsbusters''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Rick Moran at AmericanThinker.com&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rick Moran. [http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/06/obamas_alliance_with_marxists.html Obama's Alliance with Marxists], ''American Thinker'', June 03, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and various writers at Discover the Networks (which include Kurtz and Erickson).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7434 NEW PARTY (NP)], ''DiscoverTheNetworks.org''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kurtz in 2012 has claimed to find minutes of the New Party Chicago chapter that say, &amp;quot;''Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party 'Candidate Contract' and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.''&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=pollack /&amp;gt; Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod responded to Kurtz with silence and when asked if that meant &amp;quot;yes or no&amp;quot;, Axelrod stated, &amp;quot;You can take that as I have no idea what you are talking about.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollack, J.B. (2012, June 7). [http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/07/Exclusive-Axelrod-Plays-Dumb-on-Obama-and-Socialist-New-Party Exclusive: Axelrod Plays Dumb on Obama and Socialist New Party]. ''Breitbart''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;You didn't build that&amp;quot; Controversy===&lt;br /&gt;
On July 13, 2012, at a campaign event in [[Virginia]], Obama gave a speech that immediately stirred up controversy. Speaking about the Government's role in the success of private business, he said:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/07/13/remarks-president-campaign-event-roanoke-virginia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help.  There was a great teacher somewhere in your life.  Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive.  Somebody invested in roads and bridges.  If you’ve got a business - you didn’t build that.  Somebody else made that happen.}}&lt;br /&gt;
It is fairly clear that when Obama said &amp;quot;you didn't build that,&amp;quot; he is referring to roads, bridges, and other [[infrastructure]] and technological advancements that government played a key role in funding and creating, though plenty of people may disagree over how much government is actually required for businesses to be successful. But many Obama opponents, including the [[Romney]] campaign, took that one sentence (&amp;quot;If you’ve got a business - you didn’t build that&amp;quot;) out of context, making it seem like the President is not giving credit to business owners for having built their own businesses. Obama could have been more clear about what he was referring to, which is unusual because he is often praised for his [[Political_positions_of_Barack_Obama#Public_speaking|public speeches]]. This could be a case of Obama speaking off-script, providing further evidence for his reliance on [[teleprompter]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Political positions of Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama and abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Born Outside the U.S.A.!]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Special Interests Candidate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jobsgate]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Recovery Summer]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lobbyists ties to the Obama administration]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Party]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ObamaCare]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama doublespeak]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama inauguration]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Religion of Barack Hussein Obama]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Honorable James David Manning]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Young Communist League]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.antiobama.net/ Anti Obama.net]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.dontvoteobama.net/ Don’t Vote For Obama.net]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nobamanetwork.com/ Nobama Network]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/ Audacity Of Hypocrisy]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/ The Real Barack Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/6130/ The New Cult of Personality]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.survivingobamunism.com/index.html Surviving Obamunism T-shirts]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.barackobamaantichrist.blogspot.com/ Barack Obama the Anti-Christ ?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/23/che-obama-and-the-revolutionary-agenda/ Che, Obama, and the Revolutionary Agenda]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/fashion-shows/ Obama Laundry List of Lies]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/09/americas-first-muslim-president/ GAFFNEY: America's first Muslim president?] Washington Times&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-l-esposito/barack-obama-and-islam_b_212519.html Barack Obama and Islam.] by [[John L. Esposito]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78931 Democrat: Obama's grandma confirms Kenyan birth.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/barack_obama.htm Barack Obama on the issues.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etWLwrvT2vo Obama = Kosher Puppet.] video on You Tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USPresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{2008 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Barack Hussein Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Presidency]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Nobel laureates in Peace]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion Advocates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Obama, Barack Hussein}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=996262</id>
		<title>Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=996262"/>
				<updated>2012-07-26T03:09:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* 2012 Presidential Campaign */ &amp;quot;You didn't build that&amp;quot; controversy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Barack Hussein Obama&lt;br /&gt;
|image=President Barack Obama.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama]]; may have had a prior marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=see [[Obama's religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/president&lt;br /&gt;
	|country=the United States&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=44th&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 20, 2009-Present&lt;br /&gt;
	|vp=[[Joe Biden]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[George W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 2005 – November 16, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=Peter Fitzgerald&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Roland Burris]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Barack Hussein Obama II''', also known by the alias '''Barry Soetoro''' during his time in [[Indonesia]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQPXVJuT2vY Barry Soetoro the muslim - YouTube]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (reportedly born August 4, 1961, in [[Hawaii]]) was elected the 44th President.  Promoted heavily by [[liberals]], as demonstrated by his unjustified receipt of the 2009 [[Nobel Prize|Nobel Peace Prize]], Obama won the presidency despite a short and unremarkable political career by campaigning on promises of &amp;quot;hope&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; against his listless opponent [[John McCain]] in 2008. In effect, that change has been an embrace of [[socialism]] and [[liberal]] policies. Barack Obama has been widely criticized by the American [[business]] community and others for his anti-business policies that are killing American jobs during a period of high unemployment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuckerman, M.B. (2010, July 16). [http://www.usnews.com/opinion/mzuckerman/articles/2010/07/16/obamas-anti-business-policies-are-our-economic-katrina Obama's Anti-business Policies are our Economic Katrina]. ''U.S. News''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Barnes, F. (2009, July 22). [http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/619dvjlm.asp An Anti-Business President]. ''The Weekly Standard''. Vol. 14, No. 38&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Shedlock, M. (2010, August 20). [http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/08/small-businesses-are-not-hiring-why.html Small Businesses are not hiring. Why should they?] Globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wright, C.E. (2012, February 12). [http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/dear_mr_president_why_we_are_n.html Dear Mr. President: Why we are not hiring]. ''American Thinker''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Former [[Democrat]] Presidential candidate [[Joe Lieberman]] endorsed Obama's opponent in 2008 and has declined to endorse [[Obama]] for the [[Presidential Election 2012]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lillis, M. (2012, April 22). [http://thehill.com/video/campaign/222929-lieberman-declines-to-endorse-in-presidential-race Sen. Lieberman declines to endorse in presidential race]. ''The Hill''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under President Obama's mismanagement of the economy, the United States Government's credit rating has, for the first time in its history, been downgraded from AAA to AA+, and [[poverty]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/incpovhlth/2009/pov09fig04.pdf Figure 4: Number in Poverty and Poverty Rate: 1959-2009]. ''U.S. Census Bureau''. Current Population Survey, 1960 to 2010 Annual Social and Economic Supplements.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; has increased markedly. By and large his policies to combat the recession, unemployment, slow growth, the deficit, and expanding [[national debt]], have failed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The vast majority (73%) of respondents reported the fiscal stimulus enacted in February 2009 has had no impact on employment to date. While 68% also believe a jobs bill, such as the one recently enacted into law, will have no impact on payrolls, 30% do believe it will boost payrolls moderately&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[http://www.nabe.com/press/ind1004.pdf Industry Survey], ''National Association for Business Economics'', April 2010, p. 2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also on the domestic front, Obama passed an expensive [[health care]] bill in 2009 with no [[bipartisan]] support and 34 Democrats dissenting. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fatalities in Afghanistan have more than doubled under Obama's leadership then in the preceding eight years combined, according to the Congressional Research Service &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chesser, S.G. (2012, July 12). [http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R41084.pdf Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians - CRS Report for Congress]. Pg. 3. ''Congressional Research Service''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Against his own Defense Secretary's advice, Obama [[Libyan uprising 2011|attacked Libya]] - a possible violation of the [[War Powers Act]]. After he announced the killing of [[September 11th]] mastermind and terrorist [[Osama bin Laden]], the [[U.S. State Department]] warned of the increased risk to the lives and safety of Americans around the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''KABC-TV/DT'' (2011, July 27). [http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/national_world&amp;amp;id=8273909 Risk of anti-US violence up after Osama bin Laden's death]. On ''ABC7 News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bin Laden's death had negligible long term impact on Obama's approval ratings, as seen in Gallup's daily poll.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Gallup''. [http://www.gallup.com/poll/113980/gallup-daily-obama-job-approval.aspx Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's bizarre gaffes are frequent and embarrassing, but typically unreported by the [[liberal media]].  Obama offended [[Poland]] by referring to the [[Nazi]] death camps there as &amp;quot;Polish death camps.&amp;quot; Later Obama apologized.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sink, J. (2012, June 1). [http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/europe/230419-obama-letter-says-he-regrets-polish-death-camp-gaffe Obama apologizes in writing for 'Polish death camp' verbal gaffe]. ''The Hill''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
===Birth===&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article : [[Early life and career of Barack Hussein Obama]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also : [[Barack Obama's Muslim Heritage]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Obama claims to have been born in Hawaii to Stanley Ann Dunham and [[Barack Obama Sr.]] - who had married just six months prior - on August 4, 1961 in [[Honolulu, Hawaii]].&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc&amp;gt;''MSNBC'' (2008, February 20). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23257295/ns/msnbc_tv-documentaries/t/obama-becomes-rising-star-among-democrats/ Obama Becomes Rising Star Among Democrats].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Some contend that this story is a complete fabrication.  After many leading conservatives including the leadership of this site and  [[Donald Trump]]  called for Obama to release his birth certificate he did on April 27.  Sheriff [[Joe Arpaio]] of Maricopa County in Arizona conducted an investigation of the Obama's eligibility and alleged that the &amp;quot;birth certificate&amp;quot; was a fake; however, no charges have been filed.  [[Obama]] was reportedly assigned a social security number whose area code was assigned to applications coming from zip codes in Connecticut.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Beginning in 1972, all Social Security numbers were issued from a central office in Baltimore, Maryland.[http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama Sr. was not a [[Natural born citizen|citizen of the United States]]. At the time of Obama's birth, Kenya was a British colony, meaning that Obama Sr not only held British citizenship, but passed it on to his son. When Kenya gained independence, Obama and his father both lost British citizenship and gained Kenyan citizenship. Barack Obama was a dual citizen of the United States and Kenya until his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired in 1984, as he had failed to renounce US nationality and swear loyalty to Kenya. Despite having been born with US citizenship through his mother, it has been argued that as he was born with dual nationality, he is not a natural-born citizen of the United States, and thus constitutionally ineligible to become President.&lt;br /&gt;
===Early Life===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's birth parents divorced in 1963 due to strain caused by Barack Obama Sr. leaving Hawaii to study economics at Harvard, when Obama was 2 years old, following which his mother married Lolo Soetoro, an [[Indonesian]] geologist. When Barack Obama was age 6 his mother and adoptive father took him to Jakarta, Indonesia for 4 years while his mother pursued a Ph.D. in Anthropology requiring fieldwork there.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;db mother&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-05-03/a-singular-woman-by-janny-scott-review-by-stacy-schiff/#|work=The Daily Beast|format=HTML|language=English|title=Dreams of His Mother|author=Stacy Schiff}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His mother then left him in Hawaii with his grandparents (Stanley and Madelyn Dunham, who had moved to Hawaii in 1959) so he could pursue American education.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed&amp;gt;Malveaux, Suzanne (2008, August 20). &amp;quot;[http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0808/20/se.02.html Barack Obama Revealed].&amp;quot; ''CNN''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other siblings of Obama's include his half-sister Maya Soetoro-Ng and 7 other children born to his father by 4 different women.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama&amp;gt;Purdum, Todd (2008, March). &amp;quot;[http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/03/obama200803 Raising Obama].&amp;quot; ''Vanity Fair''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For much of his early life, prior to his transfer to Columbia University, he went by his nickname, &amp;quot;Barry&amp;quot;. In the summer of 1988, before attending Harvard Law School (he'd just been accepted), he visited Kogelo, Kenya, to learn more about his father's family. When his mother died in 1995, he and his sister Maya scattered her ashes over Hawaii's south shore.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Personal Life===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Michelle Obama.jpg|frame|right|Michelle (Robinson) Obama, wife of Barack Obama.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama met and began dating his future wife, an Attorney named Michelle Robinson, herself a recent Harvard Law School graduate, while he was working at Sidley Austin LLP, a prestigious corporate law firm.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; The two continued dating long-distance while he finished law school, and on October 18, 1982, were married by Reverend Jeremiah Wright at Trinity United Church.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; In 1999, their first child was born, Malia, and in 2001, another daughter, Natasha (often called Sasha).&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama joined Reverend Jeremiah Wright's Trinity United Church from 1985-1988 during his time as a community organizer (''See [[Barack_Obama#1985-1988.2C_Community_Organizer|1985-1988, Community Organizer]] section'').  Obama was married at Trinity United Church, credits Wright with his conversion to Christianity, and had both his daughters, Sasha and Malia, baptized there.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
At age 6, Obama attended schools in Indonesia, the first a Catholic School while he was in Kindergarten, and later a public school. While the public school had mostly Muslim students (since most Indonesians were Muslim), claims that it was a Muslim school or Madrassa are false. In 1971, at age 10, Barack Obama moved to Hawaii, and his grandparents helped him gain entrance to the prestigious Punahou Academy in Honolulu through a scholarship, while he was in 5th grade.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; At his elite high school with 1,200 students he was just 1 of 3 black students, and was on the second string of the state champion basketball team his senior year. During this time he also experimented briefly with marijuana and cocaine. He wrote a poem for the school's literary magazine, ''Ka Wai Ola''.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1979, he began a 2-year stint at Occidental College college in Los Angeles&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;, and then transferred to Columbia University in New York, which he graduated from in 1983.&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic&amp;gt;Scott, Janny (2007, July 30). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/30/us/politics/30obama.html?pagewanted=all In Illinois, Obama Proved Pragmatic and Shrewd].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During this time he allegedly spoke at an Anti-Apartheid rally on campus,&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; although several prominent student leaders said they did not remember him there. Professor Michael L. Baron was impressed by Obama and wrote him a recommendation for Harvard Law School.&amp;lt;ref name=differs&amp;gt;Scott, J. (2007, October 30). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/30/us/politics/30obama.html?pagewanted=all Obama's Account of New York Years Often Differs From What Others Say].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the winter of 1988 Barack Obama decided to attend Harvard Law School, and left Chicago for Cambridge, Massachusetts. In his 2nd year he became the first black president of the ''Harvard Law Review'', following a &amp;quot;marathon voting session&amp;quot; in which he was elected on the 19th ballot.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt; This led to national attention and numerous job offers, which Obama passed up, at age 30, to pursue a political career in Chicago.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Non-Political Employment===&lt;br /&gt;
====1983-1984, Financial Analyst and Writer====&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984 Obama worked as a writer and financial analyst for Business International Corporation, a small newsletter-publishing and research firm which aided multinational companies understand overseas markets. Obama served as a writer/researcher for a company reference service, Financing Foreign Operations, and wrote for a newsletter, Business International Money Report. His Supervisor was Cathy Lazere, and he worked at the company to pay off his student loans.&amp;lt;ref name=differs /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Henig, J. (2008, June 21). &amp;quot;[http://www.factcheck.org/2008/06/obama-polishes-his-resume-2/ Obama Polishes His Resume].&amp;quot; ''FactCheck.org''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====1984-1988, Community Organizer====&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984, Obama was hired by the New York Public Interest Research Group, a non-profit organization promoting environmental, consumer, and government reforms. He also was paid just under $10,000 annually as a full-time organizer for Harlem's City College to mobilize student volunteers.&amp;lt;ref name=differs /&amp;gt; From 1985-88, Obama worked as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago, for which he was paid $1,000 a year, with $2,000 extra for a car. He helped Loretta Herron gain city approval for a local community job center. &amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=streetwise&amp;gt;Scott, Janny (2007, September 9). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/09/us/politics/09obama.html?pagewanted=all In 2000, a Streetwise Veteran Schooled a Bold Young Obama].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During this time Obama joined Reverend Wright's Trinity United Church because in the words of Suzanne Malveaux of ''CNN'', &amp;quot;It was the church to join if you wanted to be one of Chicago's black movers and shakers.&amp;quot; At the time, community organizing involved close affiliation with churches, which was how Obama met Wright. The slow progress in fighting asbestos contamination in the Altgeld Gardens housing project led to Obama's departure from Chicago, and enrollment at Harvard Law School in the winter of 1988.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====1988-1996, Law Practice====&lt;br /&gt;
In 1988 Obama gained work as a Summer Associate at one of the most prestigious corporate law firms in the world, Sidley Austin LLP&amp;lt;ref name=austin&amp;gt;Lattman, P. (2007, May 11). &amp;quot;[http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/05/11/sidley-austin-when-barack-met-michelle/ When Barack Met Michelle].&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;, owned by Newton Minow, thanks to the recommendation of Minow's daughter Martha, a professor at Harvard Law School. It was at Minow's law firm that Obama would meet Michelle Robinson, his future wife.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt; From 1993-96 he practiced civil rights law, after graduating from Harvard, at Miner, Barnhill, &amp;amp; Galland, a small politically-connected law firm.&amp;lt;ref name=austin /&amp;gt; It was at Miner, Barnhill, &amp;amp; Galland that he would meet influential real estate developer Tony Rezko.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====1992-2004, Law Professor at University of Chicago====&lt;br /&gt;
Obama taught constitutional law part-time at the University of Chicago Law School&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt; from 1992-2004. He was a Lecturer from 1992-96, teaching 3 courses per year, and a Senior Lecturer from 1996-2004. Senior Lecturers are considered Law School faculty and regarded as professors but not full-time or tenured. Obama was invited to become a Senior Lecturer several times during this period but declined each time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media Media Inquiries: Statement Regarding Barack Obama].&amp;quot; ''University of Chicago Law School''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====1995, Author====&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995 Obama published &amp;quot;Dreams From My Father&amp;quot; about his life and family background.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Personal Awards===&lt;br /&gt;
====2009 Nobel Peace Prize====&lt;br /&gt;
On October 9, 2009 Barack H. Obama became the third sitting U.S. President&amp;lt;ref name=wilsons&amp;gt;Wilson, Scott (2009, October 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/09/AR2009100900914.html President Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize]. ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize &amp;quot;''for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples''&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NobelPrize.org (2009, October 9). &amp;quot;[http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2009/press.html The Nobel Prize for 2009: Press Release].&amp;quot; Oslo, Norway. Accessed May 13, 2012.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama stated that he was &amp;quot;surprised and deeply humbled&amp;quot; to receive the unexpected award,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, October 9). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2009-10-09/world/nobel.peace.prize_1_norwegian-nobel-committee-international-diplomacy-and-cooperation-nuclear-weapons?_s=PM:WORLD Obama: Nobel Peace Prize is 'Call to Action'].&amp;quot; ''CNN''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and also said, &amp;quot;To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who've been honored by this prize -- men and women who have inspired me and inspired the entire world through their courageous pursuit of peace&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=wilsons /&amp;gt; The award was widely criticized given Obama's then lack of accomplishments.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chazan, G. &amp;amp; MacDonald, A. (2009, October 11). &amp;quot;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125509603349176083.html Nobel Committee's Decision Courts Controversy].&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(2009, October 9). &amp;quot;[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/09/obamas-peace-prize-draws-criticism-liberals/ Obama's Peace Prize Draws Criticism, Even From Some Liberals].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==1991-1992, Project Vote==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1991 Obama was recruited by Sandy Newman to head the Chicago chapter of Project Vote!&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;, and in 1992 was the Executive Director, overseeing a voter registration drive which registered 125,000 black voters and was credited with helping elect U.S. Senator Carol Mosely Braun.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==1996-2003, Illinois State Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
===1996 Election===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:O-2002-antiwar-rally-davidson.jpg|right|thumb|250px| Obama speaking at the October 2002 rally in Chicago organized by [[Carl Davidson]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Davidson is a longtime [[Mao]]ist and champion of the ''Thought of Mao Tse Tung.'' Davidson's anti-Trotskyite polemic, [http://www.wengewang.org/read.php?tid=10925 ''Left in Form, Right in Essence''] defends Maoist doctrine.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''&amp;quot;[H]e is a brutal man who butchers his own people,&amp;quot;'' nevertheless Obama opposed ''&amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot;.'']]&lt;br /&gt;
====Knocking Candidates Off the Ballot====&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama ran for the Illinois state senate in 1996. He was initially supported by incumbent Alice Palmer, who declared she would run for the U.S. Congress. However, when her bid for Congress failed on November 28, 1995, she tried to run for her old seat in the March 1996 election. Her supporters asked Obama to step aside, although whether this was with her permission remains uncertain.&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic /&amp;gt; Not only did Obama not step down, he gathered a team of high-priced lawyers, including fellow Harvard Law School graduate Thomas Johnson, to challenge his opponent's petition signatures on technicalities after the filing deadline had passed. Such tactics are legal and frequently used in Chicago; in 2006 they eliminated 67 of the 245 aldermanic candidates;&amp;lt;ref name=bareknuckle&amp;gt;Jackson, David &amp;amp; Long, Ray (2007, April 4). &amp;quot;[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-0704030881apr04-archive,0,1523598,full.story Barack Obama: Showing His Bare Knuckles].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet nevertheless led to the term &amp;quot;hardball&amp;quot; by the ''New York Times''&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic /&amp;gt; and &amp;quot;cutthroat&amp;quot; by David Mendel as reported by both ''CNN''&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; and ''MSNBC''.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; The ''Chicago Tribune'' declared Obama had mastered &amp;quot;the bare-knuckle arts of Chicago electoral politics&amp;quot;, noting &amp;quot;The man now running for president on a message of giving a voice to the voiceless first entered public office not by leveling the playing field, but by clearing it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=bareknuckle /&amp;gt; As one of Obama's four opponents, eliminated through his ballot challenges, would put it: {{cquote|&amp;quot;Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago politics to remove legitimate candidates? He talks about honor and democracy, but what honor is there in getting rid of every other candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Gha-is Askia, 1996 Illinois Senate candidate&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jackson, David &amp;amp; Long, Ray (2007, April 3). &amp;quot;[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-070403obama-ballot-archive,0,5297304,full.story Obama Knows His Way Around a Ballot].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} Mark Ewell, another candidate, filed 1,286 signatures, and Obama's challenges left him 86 short of the minimum requirement (757&amp;lt;ref name=spivak&amp;gt;Spivak, Todd (2008, February 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.houstonpress.com/2008-02-28/news/barack-obama-screamed-at-me/ Barack Obama and Me].&amp;quot; ''Houston Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). Ewell filed a federal lawsuit contesting the election board's decision but Tom Johnson intervened, and Ewell's case was dismissed just a few days later. Ewell and other Obama opponents were using early 1995 polling sheets to verify signatures of registered voters, but city authorities had just purged 15,871 unqualified people from the 13th district list, and Obama's challenges used the more recent, updated list. Askia was left 69 signatures short of the requirement. If names were printed instead of signed in cursive, they were declared invalid. If they were good but the person registering the signatures wasn't a registered voter (e.g. underage) they were invalid.&amp;lt;ref name=hardball&amp;gt;Griffin, Drew &amp;amp; Johnston, Kathleen (2008, May 29). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2008-05-29/politics/obamas.first.campaign_1_obama-campaign-barack-obama-chicago-politics?_s=PM:POLITICS Obama Played Hardball in First Chicago Campaign].&amp;quot; ''CNN''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palmer had according to Obama campaign consult Ronald Davis, used two children to help gather her petition signatures. To this day Palmer denies the challenges were valid, and maintains she could have overcome the objections with more time and resources.&amp;lt;ref name=bareknuckle /&amp;gt; Thanks to his lawyers, Obama would win the election without a single other candidate on the ballot.&lt;br /&gt;
===2000 Election===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Illinois 1st congressional district election, 2000]]''&lt;br /&gt;
In 2000, Obama lost his only political election when he chose to run against experienced incumbent and former Black Panther Bobby L. Rush for the U.S. Congress in a 65% black district. Rush's name recognition began at 90%, Obama's at 11%. As media consultant and former Rush campaign staffer Eric Adelstein noted, &amp;quot;Nobody said he’s ‘not black enough.’ They said he’s a professor, a Harvard elite who lives in Hyde Park.&amp;quot; Todd Spivak would give voice to this impression of Obama, noting that{{cquote|&amp;quot;My view of Obama then wasn't all that different from the image he projects now. He was smart, confident, charismatic and liberal. One thing I can say is, I never heard him launch into the preacher-man voice he now employs during speeches. He sounded vanilla, and activists in his mostly black district often chided him for it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt;}}Rush would go on to win the Primary with 61.02% of the vote; Obama received 30.36%.&amp;lt;ref name=streetwise /&amp;gt; The loss led to Obama considering dropping out of politics altogether, particularly after the September 11, 2001 attacks, since his name sounds similar to &amp;quot;Osama bin Laden&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Voting Record===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama entered the Illinois Senate promising change to a corrupt system. He mixed often radical votes with more pragmatic agreements. Possibly one of his most radical votes was against requiring medical care for aborted children who survive [[abortion|the procedure]] - in fact the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council ascribed him a 100% rating for his consistently pro-choice votes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cbs illinois&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/17/politics/main2369157.shtml|title=Obama Record May Be Gold Mine For Critics|work=CBS|format=HTML|language=English|last=Clark|first=Amy S.|date=Jan. 17, 2007}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was criticized for using the statehouse as a stepping stone for a more illustrious career: Steven J. Rauschenberger, a [[Republican]], said prior to Obama's election as president: “He is a very bright but very ambitious person who has always had his eyes on the prize, and it wasn’t Springfield. If he deserves to be president, it is not because he was a great legislator.”&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt illinois&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=The New York Times|title=In Illinois, Obama Proved Pragmatic and Shrewd|last=Scott|first=Janny|format=HTML|language=English|date=July 30, 2007|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/30/us/politics/30obama.html}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The statehouse was majority Republican, so the Senator was sometimes forced to compromise. He formed allegiances across party lines to pass [[campaign finance]] reform that banned most gifts by lobbyists, prohibited spending campaign money for legislators’ personal use and required electronic filing of campaign disclosure reports.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt illinois&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Obama also helped pass  a so-called “driving-while-black bill”, which required the police to collect data on the race of drivers they stopped as a way to monitor [[racial profiling]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt illinois&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama established himself as a chief spokesperson in opposition to the [[War on Terror]] during an October 2002 rally at Federal Plaza in Chicago&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The rally was organized by Chicagoans Against War in Iraq (CAWI) later renamed Chicagoans Against War and Injustice. [http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?page_id=2 About CAWI] by Carl Davidson, Nov 02 2006. Retrieved from Chicagoans Against War and Injustice, March 15, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[community organizing|organized]] by veteran [[Mao]]ist and webmaster of [[Progressives for Obama]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.linkedin.com/in/carldavidson Carl Davidson,] LinkedIn.com, retrieved March 13, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Carl Davidson]]. &lt;br /&gt;
===Radical foundation and connection to William Ayers===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Radical roots of Barack Hussein Obama}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995 a cadre of like minded individuals gathered in the home of [[Weather Underground]] (WUO) [[terrorist]]s [[Bernardine Dohrn]] and [[William Ayers|William &amp;quot;Bill&amp;quot; Ayers]].  Dohrn,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Georgie Anne Geyer and Keyes Beach &amp;quot;Cuba: School for U.S. Radicals&amp;quot;, ''Chicago Daily News/Chicago Sun-Times'' five part series October 1970, excerpted in [http://foia.fbi.gov/filelink.html?file=/weather/weath1c.pdf FBI file Weather Underground Organization (Weatherman),] Part 1c pp. 5-7 pdf (113-115 in original). [http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/2009/06/07/clandestine-agents-of-the-cuban-government-ayers-dohrn-myers/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; along with Carl Davidson, are veterans of [[guerrilla warfare]] training in [[Cuba]] prior 1968 Democratic National Convention riots.  Ayers and Dohrn have taken credit for, and never denied, bombing the [[U.S. Capitol]], the [[Pentagon]] and the [[State Department]].    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ayers and Dohrn used their celebrity status among [[leftist]]s to launch Obama's career. Ayers, Dohrn and [[Jeff Jones]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=106653 ''Obama's 'green jobs czar' worked with terror founder] Van Jones served on board of activist group where ex-Weatherman serves as top director'', By Aaron Klein, [[WorldNetDaily]], August 13, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; are authors of ''[[Bill_Ayers#Prairie_Fire_Organizing_Committee_and_Maoist_thought|Prairie Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-imperialism]],'' the title taken from ''The Sayings of Mao Zedong.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/works/red-book/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The book declares &amp;quot;we are [[communist]] men and women.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Harvey Klehr, ''Far Left of Center: The American Radical Left Today'' (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, 1988), 109.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ayers later jokingly, publicly admitted to ghostwriting Obama's book, ''Dreams From My Father''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cashill, J. (2011, March 28). [http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/03/ayers_affirms_he_wrote_dreams.html Ayers Affirms He Wrote Dreams From My Father]. ''American Thinker''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Obama was to appoint several openly avowed Maoists to prominent White House and Executive Branch positions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fund, J. (2009, October 21). [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704597704574487431322664964.html From Mao to Obama]. ''The Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2003 Emil Jones Deal===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[2003 Barack Obama deal with Emil Jones]]''&lt;br /&gt;
When Illinois' U.S. Senator Peter Fitzgerald announced he would be retiring in April 2003, Obama jumped at the opportunity, declaring that he would be a candidate for the U.S. Senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; To boost his chances at reaching the U.S. Congress in the 2004 elections, in 2003 Barack Obama approached the newly crowned head of the Illinois Senate, Emil Jones Jr., with a proposal. According to Jones, who Obama has since called his &amp;quot;godfather&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=godfather&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2009, June 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-250_162-3983147.html Obama's Political 'Godfather' In Illinois].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the conversation went as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Emil Jones.jpg|frame|right|Left to Right, Rod Blagojevich, Emil Jones, and Jeffrey Schoenberg.]]{{cquote|&amp;quot;After I was elected president, in 2003, he came to see me, a couple months later. And he said to me, he said, ‘You’re the senate president now, and with that, you have a lot of pow-er.’  And I told Barack, ‘You think I got a lot of pow-er now?,’ and he said, ‘Yeah, you got a lot of pow-er.’ And I said, ‘What kind of pow-er do I have?’ He said, ‘You have the pow-er to make a United States sen-a-tor!’  I said to Barack, I said, ‘That sounds good!’ I said, ‘I haven’t even thought of that.’ I said, ‘Do you have someone in mind you think I could make?,’ and he said, ‘Yeah. Me.’ &amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the deal, Obama's entire Illinois Senate legislative record was, as longtime Obama reporter Todd Spivak put it, built in a single year. During his 7th and final year in the Illinois Senate, Obama sponsored an incredible 26 bills into law, including many he now points to when criticized as inexperienced&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt; - as ''CNN's'' Suzanne Malveaux observed, &amp;quot;With help from on high, Obama got his name on hundreds of bills that he pushed through.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; Jones not only had Obama craft legislation addressing daily tragedies to raise his political profile&amp;lt;ref name=godfather /&amp;gt;, he also appointed Obama head of almost all high-profile legislation in the Illinois Senate, angering other state legislators with more seniority who'd spent years supporting the bills.&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt; Illinois State Senator Rickey Hendon, the original sponsor of the famous racial profiling bill requiring videotaped confessions in police interrogations, complained bitterly about Jones' decision.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=intheblack&amp;gt;Spivak, Todd (2004, March 25). &amp;quot;[http://www.illinoistimes.com/Springfield/article-922-in-the-black.html In the Black].&amp;quot; ''Illinois Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Jones' influence had a major impact on Obama's chances in the 2004 elections, preventing major political players from backing Obama's opponents. To quote Emil Jones,{{cquote|&amp;quot;He knew if he had me in the run for the Senate, it would put a block on the current mayor. The current mayor and the father of the controller, which was Dan Hynes, they were roommates in Springfield when the mayor was a state senator, so they had a relationship. Another big financial backer for the governor was Blair Hull. Barack knew if he had me it would checkmate the governor, ’cause the governor couldn’t come out and go with Blair Hull, ’cause the governor needs me. Same with the mayor. So he had analyzed and figured all of that out. He knew I could help him with labor support. And I could put a checkmate on some of the local politicians that didn’t know him, but they couldn’t really go against me.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Emil Jones&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2004-2008, U.S. Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Early_life_and_career_of_Barack_Hussein_Obama#U.S._Senate_.282004-2008.29|Barack Obama:U.S. Senate (2004-2008)]], [[United States Senate election in Illinois, 2004]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|left|Senator Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
===2004 Primary Election===&lt;br /&gt;
Despite initially trailing in the polls to frontrunner [[Blair Hull]]&amp;lt;ref name=intheblack /&amp;gt;, Obama greatly benefited from what the ''Chicago Tribune'' called &amp;quot;the most inglorious campaign implosion in Illinois political history&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=mendell&amp;gt;Mendell, David (2004, March 17). &amp;quot;[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-03-17/news/0403170332_1_blair-hull-gery-chico-blacks-and-liberal-whites Obama Routs Democratic Foes].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when pressure from journalists and opposing candidates, just weeks before the election, forced the unsealing of Hull's messy divorce files.&amp;lt;ref name=blairhull&amp;gt;Voegeli, William (2004, March 19). &amp;quot;[http://www.claremont.org/publications/pubid.339/pub_detail.asp The Rise and Fall of Blair Hull].&amp;quot; ''The Claremont Institute''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The files revealed Hull's ex-wife's accusations of verbal and physical abuse.&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt; Hull would afterwards criticize the media, stating, &amp;quot;As for the press, I will never read the newspaper the same way again.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=mendell /&amp;gt; Obama would go on to win the Primary with 53% of the vote.&amp;lt;ref name=blairhull /&amp;gt; Obama's unexpected victory led to him being termed a &amp;quot;rising star&amp;quot; by the media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Howlett, Debbie (2004, March 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/2004-03-18-obama-usat_x.htm Dems See a Rising Star in Illinois Senate Candidate].&amp;quot; ''USA Today''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===2004 General Election, Jack Ryan===&lt;br /&gt;
Once again Obama found himself trailing to popular frontrunner [[Jack Ryan]], and once again a candidate's campaign imploded thanks to media intervention. In an unprecedented move, the ''Chicago Tribune'' and local TV station WLS sued to force the unsealing of Ryan's divorce files, despite opposition from both Ryan and his wife, Jeri Ryan, who in the files accused Jack Ryan of trying to coerce her to perform sex acts in public. Though Ryan advisors told him he could still win if using a negative attack on Obama, Ryan refused to engage in what he considered dirty politics.&amp;lt;ref name=abandon&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2004, June 26). &amp;quot;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/state/2004-06-25-ryan_x.htm Jack Ryan Abandons Senate Bid].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ryan then dropped out of the race (per request by the Illinois GOP&amp;lt;ref name=idealist&amp;gt;Sangwan, Rahul (2004, October 1). &amp;quot;[http://www.dartmouthindependent.com/archives/2004/10/jack_ryan_81_th.html Jack Ryan '81: The Conservative Idealist].&amp;quot; ''Dartmouth Independent''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), following which the Illinois GOP scrambled to find a replacement, leaving Obama uncontested for weeks to campaign and build up public support. On top of all this, Obama was selected to give the keynote speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention (July 27&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Washington Post'' (2004, June 26). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19751-2004Jul27.html Illinois Senate Candidate Barack Obama].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), catapulting him into the national spotlight, and leading to further media publicity terming him a &amp;quot;rising star&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Page, Susan &amp;amp; Despoignes, Peronet (2004, July 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-07-28-obama-speech_x.htm Rising Star Brings Democrats to Their Feet].&amp;quot; ''USA Today''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===2004 General Election, Alan Keyes===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Obama born alive controversy]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Alan_Keyes.jpg‎|thumb|150px|right|Alan Keyes.]]&lt;br /&gt;
After a number of candidates including former Chicago Bears coach Mike Ditka declined to run&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN'' (2004, August 9). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2004-08-09/politics/il.keyes_1_senate-candidate-senate-race-illinois-senate?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS Keyes Challenges Obama for Illinois Senate Seat].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the Illinois GOP finally settled on fiery [[Alan Keyes]], a former Ambassador to the Economic and Social Counsel of the United Nations&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt;, with less than 3 months left before the November 2004 election.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; His sudden entrance into the state for the election was initially attacked in the press as &amp;quot;carpetbagging&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Chicago Tribune''. &amp;quot;[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-08-06/news/0408060313_1_mr-keyes-judy-baar-topinka-alan-keyes The GOP's Rent-A-Senator].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''Washington Post'' (2004, August 9). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50885-2004Aug8.html Mr. Keyes the Carpetbagger].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=pearson&amp;gt;Pearson, Rick (2004, September 5). &amp;quot;[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-09-05/news/0409050304_1_selfish-hedonist-alan-keyes-illinois-republican-party Keyes, State GOP Gearing Up Blame Campaign].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Keyes repeatedly claimed his primary motivation for entering a race he had seemingly no chance of winning was his disgust at Obama's votes on the popular [[Born Alive]] bills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Keyes, Alan (2004, August 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.mail-archive.com/newsandviews@chuckmuth.com/msg00699.html How You Can Help Alan Keyes for Senate!].&amp;quot; ''Keyes2004 Inc.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Keyes, from his first day of arriving in Illinois (August 9, 2004)&amp;lt;ref name=assails&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2004, August 9). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5654128/ Keyes Assails Obama's Abortion Views].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, accused Obama of having voted against bills mandating medical care for newborn children, and supporting &amp;quot;infanticide&amp;quot; (the term twice used in the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''United States Congress'' (2003, March 13). &amp;quot;[http://news.findlaw.com/wp/docs/abortion/2003s3.html S.3: Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) where hospitals left newborn infants to die like garbage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Smiley, Tavis (2004, August 31). &amp;quot;[http://www.keyesarchives.com/transcript.php?id=341 Alan Keyes on the Tavis Smiley Show].&amp;quot; ''NPR''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''CBS2 Chicago'' (2004, August 30). &amp;quot;[http://www.keyesarchives.com/transcript.php?id=337 Alan Keyes on CBS2 Chicago This Morning].&amp;quot; This Morning.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama in a debate on October 13, 2004, defended himself against Keyes' accusations of infanticide by claiming that Illinois law was already sufficient.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Chicago Tribune'' (2004, October 13). &amp;quot;[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-10-13/news/0410140004_1_alan-keyes-senate-race-first-of-three-debates Debate or Discussion?]&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Keyes' rhetoric, calling Obama's votes &amp;quot;the slaveholder's position&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=assails /&amp;gt; and saying &amp;quot;Jesus Christ would not vote for Obama&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Thomas, Scott (2004, September 7). &amp;quot;[http://www.keyesarchives.com/transcript.php?id=348 Alan Keyes on the Scott Thomas Show (AM1160 - WYLL)].&amp;quot; ''Scott Thomas Show''. Chicago, Illinois.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was widely ridiculed by the press. Keyes' unabashed criticism of homosexuality as &amp;quot;selfish hedonism&amp;quot; was also targeted.&amp;lt;ref name=pearson /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press''. &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5897569/ Keyes: Cheney's Gay Daughter Practicing Selfish Hedonism].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Pallasch, Abdom M. (2004, September 2). &amp;quot;[http://web.archive.org/web/20071017122135/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4155/is_20040902/ai_n12560727 Topinka Says He Should Apologize for 'Idiotic' Comment].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Sun-Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama would ultimately win the election, 70% to 27%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN.com''. &amp;quot;[http://cnn.hu/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/IL/S/01/index.html Election Results: U.S. Senate/Illinois].&amp;quot; Election 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Voting Record===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama frequently used the [[filibuster]] to obstruct the operations of government,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;O'Keefe, E. (2010, February 4). [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/03/AR2010020303801_pf.html Obama criticizes Senate Republicans for delaying confirmation votes]. ''The Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; voted against the [[minimum wage]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://uspolitics.about.com/od/legislatio1/a/HR2206.htm HR 2206 - Emergency Appropriations], Kathy Gill, Your Guide to U.S. Politics: Current Events. May 26 2007.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[http://more.gov.mtopgroup.com/2007/05/votes-hr-2206-iraq-supplemental.html Votes - H.R. 2206: Iraq Supplemental], May 28, 2007. Retrieved from Deeper Inside the Mountain, June 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and debt ceiling increases,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaplan, R. (2011, April 11). [http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/04/obama-once-opposed-debt-ceiling-hike/237129/ Obama Once Opposed Debt Ceiling Hike]. ''The Atlantic''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and recieved more than $126,000 in campaign contributions from [[Fannie Mae]]. The ''[[National Journal]]'' ranked him the most liberal senator in 2007.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ranked&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-502163_162-3775451-502163.html|title=National Journal: Obama Most Liberal Senator In 2007|author=Brian Montopoli|date=January 31, 2008|work=CBS}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2008 Presidential Election==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Barack Hussein Obama 2008 Presidential campaign}}&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats began calling for an Obama candidacy after liberals lauded his 2004 [[Democratic National Convention]] speech.&lt;br /&gt;
====Primary Election====&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007-08, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton competed for the Democratic nomination. Hillary Clinton cleverly resurrected the &amp;quot;Born Alive&amp;quot; controversy surrounding Obama that had lain largely dormant since 2004 (notwithstanding the continuing mentions by Jill Stanek), by accusing Obama of not being pro-choice for voting &amp;quot;Present&amp;quot; on a number of abortion-related bills&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bettelheim, Adriel (2008, February 13). &amp;quot;[http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/feb/13/obamas-present-tension/ Obama's 'Present' Tension].&amp;quot; ''PolitiFact''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; - including the Born Alive ones,&amp;lt;ref name=clinton&amp;gt;Berman, Russell (2008, January 17). &amp;quot;[http://www.nysun.com/national/clinton-obama-should-vote-no-on-abortion-issue/69700/ Clinton: Obama Should Vote 'No' On Abortion Issue She Backed].&amp;quot; ''New York Sun''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Hernandez, Raymond &amp;amp; Drew, Christopher (2007, December 20). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html?pagewanted=all It's Not Just 'Ayes' and 'Nays': Obama's Votes in Illinois Echo].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and cowardly ducking the votes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Politi-Fact''. &amp;quot;[http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/feb/13/hillary-clinton/yes-but-its-complicated/ Response to Hillary Clinton Comment for January 21st, 2008].&amp;quot; Truth-o-Meter.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Dorning, Mike (2007, December 20). &amp;quot;[http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/12/criticism_of_obama_present_vot.html Clinton Camp Criticizes Obama 'Present' Votes].&amp;quot; The Swamp. ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This led to criticism of Obama by two pro-choice organizations, Emily's List, and the National Organization for Women.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dorning, Mike (2008, January 14). &amp;quot;[http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/01/obama_campaign_mounts_defense.html The Swamp: Obama Campaign Defends His Abortion-Rights Record].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Dorn, Michael (2008, February 6). &amp;quot;[http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/02/obamas_voting_record_on_aborti_1.html Obama's Voting Record on Abortion].&amp;quot; ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Newton-Small, Jay (2008, January 14). &amp;quot;[http://swampland.time.com/2008/01/14/obama_campaign_defends_present/ Obama Campaign Defends 'Present' Abortion Votes].&amp;quot; ''Time Magazine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, Pam Sutherland, the long-time head of Illinois Planned Parenthood, came to Obama's aid, criticizing Clinton for making the attack, and stating repeatedly that Obama's present votes were part of a broader strategy used by Planned Parenthood to keep Illinois voters from knowing their state senators were voting against the controversial and popular bills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hernandez, Raymond &amp;amp; Drew, Christopher (2007, December 20). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20cnd-obama.html?_r=2&amp;amp;hp&amp;amp;oref=slogin Obama's Vote in Illinois Was Often Just 'Present'].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Follmer, Max (2008, March 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/14/obama-emphasizes-prochoic_n_81460.html Obama Emphasizes Pro-Choice Voting Record as Clinton Questions 'Present' Votes].&amp;quot; ''Huffington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;He came to me and said: ‘My members are being attacked. We need to figure out a way to protect members and to protect women. A ‘present’ vote was hard to pigeonhole which is exactly what Obama wanted. What it did was give cover to moderate Democrats who wanted to vote with us but were afraid to do so&amp;quot; because of how their votes would be used against them electorally. A ‘present’ vote would protect them. Your senator voted ‘present.’ Most of the electorate is not going to know what that means.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Pam Sutherland, President/CEO of Illinois Planned Parenthood Council, 1980-2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Davis, Teddy (2007, July 17). &amp;quot;[http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2007/07/obama-abortion/ Obama Abortion Dodges Blessed by Planned Parenthood], ''ABC News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}Clinton also made the claim repeatedly that while Obama was leading in Delegates she was winning the Popular Vote&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Koffler, Daniel (2008, May 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-koffler/hillary-clinton-and-the-p_b_103913.html Hillary Clinton and the Popular Vote: Not Wrong, but Meaningless].&amp;quot; ''Huffington Post''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Barone, Michael (2008, March 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/barone/2008/03/28/projection-clinton-wins-popular-vote-obama-wins-delegate-count Projection: Clinton Wins Popular Vote, Obama Wins Delegate Vote].&amp;quot; ''U.S. News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, though this was in part because Obama hadn't been registered in Michigan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Romano, Andrew (2008, August 2). &amp;quot;[http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/blogs/stumper/2008/06/02/clinton-s-popular-vote-claim-close-but-not-quite.html Clinton's Popular Vote Claim? Close--But Not Quite*].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''RealClearPolitics''. &amp;quot;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html 2008 Democratic Popular Vote].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama's advantage with super-delegates over Clinton was about 2-to-1.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|title=Superdelegate endorsements for Friday 6/6|work=Democratic Convention Watch|url=http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/06/superdelegate-endorsements-for-friday.html}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama was able to attract the support of [[liberals]] by pointing out that he had come out against the [[Iraq War]] &amp;quot;from the beginning&amp;quot; whereas Clinton had voted in favor of the war in 2002.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-01-31-democrats-debate_N.htm|title=Obama, Clinton stress differences on Iraq, issues|author=David Jackson|work=USA Today|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On June 7, 2008, Hillary Clinton withdrew from the Primaries, conceding the race and endorsing her opponent&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press''. &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24993082/ns/politics-decision_08/t/clinton-ends-historic-bid-endorses-obama/ Clinton Ends Historic Bid, Endorses Obama].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, when Obama passed the 2,118 Delegates required; winning 2,201 delegates to Clinton's 1,896.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN''. &amp;quot;[http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/#D Election Center 2008].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Born Alive Record Resurfaces====&lt;br /&gt;
On June 30, 2008, Obama's voting record on the &amp;quot;Born Alive&amp;quot; bills came once more to the forefront when CNN gave voice to the growing controversy and revealed the defense Obama had been using since 2004-2008, that the Illinois bills he'd voted against were different from the federal bill, was false, since he'd brought up for a vote a bill word for word identical to the federal bill in the Health and Human Services Committee he chaired, and voted against it, defeating it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN''. &amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPZCXcTwZPY How He Really Voted on Abortion: Obama's Record Under Attack].&amp;quot; ''The Situation Room''. Uploaded to ''YouTube'' by Jill Stanek.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''CNN''. &amp;quot;[http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0806/30/sitroom.02.html Transcripts: June 30, 2008].&amp;quot; The Situation Room.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This led in August to a confrontation between Obama and the [[NRLC]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''National Right to Life Committee''. &amp;quot;[http://www.nrlc.org/news/2008/NRL08/ObamaCoverup.html Obama Cover-up Revealed on Born-Alive Abortion Survivor's Bill].&amp;quot; NRL News, Vol. 35, Issue 7-8, pg. 5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After Obama accused critics of 'lying'&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brody, David (2008, August 16). &amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Skq5M1Ksp_c McCain/Obama Forum].&amp;quot; ''CNN''. Uploaded to ''YouTube'' by Jill Stanek.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;David Brody (August 16, 2008). &amp;quot;[http://blogs.cbn.com/thebrodyfile/archive/2008/08/16/obama-gets-heated-on-born-alive-infant-protection-act.aspx Obama Gets Heated on Born Alive Infant Protection Act].&amp;quot; ''CBN News''. The Brody File.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the NRLC challenged the assertion, and the Obama campaign conceded he &amp;quot;misspoke&amp;quot; and had voted against an identical bill to the &amp;quot;federal bill that everybody supported&amp;quot; but focused on Obama's new claim, that Illinois law was already sufficient to protect newborn children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berman, Russell (2008, August 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.nysun.com/national/obama-facing-attacks-from-all-sides-over-abortion/84059/ Obama Facing Attacks From All Sides Over Abortion Record].&amp;quot; ''New York Sun''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The NRLC promptly declared &amp;quot;Senator Barack Obama's four-year effort to cover up his full role in killing legislation to protect born-alive survivors of abortions continues to unravel.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johnson, Douglas (2008, August 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.nrlc.org/ObamaBAIPA/Obamacoveruponbornalive.htm Obama Cover-up on Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Continues to Unravel After Sen. Obama Says NRLC is 'Lying'].&amp;quot; ''National Right to Life Committee''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Jeremiah Wright====&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Barack Obama and Liberation Theology]]''&lt;br /&gt;
One major dilemma that arose for Obama during his campaign was his connection to his preacher [[Jeremiah Wright]]. Obama and his wife (raised a Baptist) were members of the Trinity [[United Church of Christ]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1776246/posts&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in Chicago, a chruch that embraced [[black liberation theology]] and its emphasis on empowering so-called &amp;quot;oppressed groups&amp;quot; against &amp;quot;establishment forces&amp;quot;. This denomination was the first in America to ordain gays as ministers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html, Obama's church pushes controversial doctrines, March 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Church pastor Jeremiah Wright had been making inflammatory comments and posting his sermons online for sale. These include the statement &amp;quot;G-d damn America,&amp;quot; and in describing the September 11th attacks, &amp;quot;We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4443788 Obama's Pastor: G-d Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Rev. Wright blamed America saying &amp;quot;We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians and branding anybody who spoke out against it as being [[anti-Semitic]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2008, after 20 years in the church, candidate Obama made public statements poised to set him at odds with the man who conducted his wedding and baptized his children. With the negative publicity persisting, a month later Obama ended the friendship, left Wright's church, and blamed the media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/31/obama-resigns-church-membership-in-chicago/], Obama Drops Church Membership in Chicago, May 31, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama claimed “It’s not fair to the other members of the church who seek to worship in peace...&amp;quot;, and distanced himself from  Wright's sermons  as &amp;quot;a bunch of rants that aren't grounded in the truth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;USA TODAY, ''Obama breaks with former pastor, Candidate cites rants on U.S. role in terror, AIDS'', by Kathy Kiely and David Jackson [http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20080430/1a_offlede30_dom.art.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Obama Says He Is Outraged By Wright's &amp;quot;Rants&amp;quot;''[http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/bulletin/bulletin_080430.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Result====&lt;br /&gt;
Obama made an effort to portray John McCain as similar to George W. Bush, drawing attention to McCain's refusal to criticize the unpopular president. McCain was particularly criticized for saying of how many years we should be willing to stay in Iraq, &amp;quot;Make it a hundred.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dobbs, Michael (2008, April 2). &amp;quot;[http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/04/mccains_100year_war.html FactChecker: McCain's '100-Year War'].&amp;quot; ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{cquote|&amp;quot;John McCain went on television and said that there has been great progress economically over the last seven-and-a-half years. John McCain thinks our economy has made great progress under George W. Bush? How could somebody who has been traveling across this country, somebody who came to Erie, Pennsylvania, say we’ve made great progress?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Barack Obama&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zeleny, Jeff (2008, April 18). &amp;quot;[http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/18/obama-criticizes-mccain-on-economic-stance/ Obama Criticizes McCain on Economic Stance].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} On August 22nd, Obama selected [[Joe Biden]] as his running mate for the vice presidency&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN'' (2008, August 23). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2008-08-23/politics/biden.democrat.vp.candidate_1_biden-john-mccain-barack-obama?_s=PM:POLITICS Obama Introduces Biden as Running Mate].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, which would be contrasted one week later with John McCain's selection of [[Sarah Palin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cooper, Michael &amp;amp; Bumiller, Elisabeth (2008, August 29). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/30/us/politics/29palin.html?pagewanted=all Alaskan is McCain's Choice; First Woman on G.O.P. Ticket]. ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 2, 2008, Barack Obama won the presidential election with 365 electoral votes to John McCain's 173.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2008, November 14). &amp;quot;[http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/explorer.html Electoral Explorer].&amp;quot; Election Results 2008. ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama received 53% of the popular vote to John McCain's 46%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2008, November 17). &amp;quot;[http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/president/ President].&amp;quot; Election Center 2008. ''CNN''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2009-2012, U.S. Presidency==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Obama administration}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Obama and George H. W. Bush.jpg|thumb|right|300px|President Barack Obama meets with former President George H. W. Bush in the Oval Office, Feb. 15, 2011. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza).]]&lt;br /&gt;
Under Obama's stewardship the United States has suffered the largest [[Federal budget deficit|deficit]]s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Edwards, B. et. al. (2009, November 6). [http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/107xx/doc10708/11-06-mbr.htm Monthly Budget Review: Fiscal Year 2009]. ''Congressional Budget Office''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Delisle, E.C. et. al. (2010, November 5). [http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/118xx/doc11873/NovemberMBR.pdf Monthly Budget Review: Fiscal Year 2010]. ''Congressional Budget Office''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in history and a credit downgrade from the rating agency Standard &amp;amp; Poor.  However, during the Obama Administration the national deficit has increased at a much lower rate than during the Bush Administration. Most observers attribute the deficits to increasing benefits and welfare paid out on account of the Recession he inherited and has failed to end along with decreasing tax receipts.  Standard &amp;amp; Poor decided to downgrade U.S. government deby after the debt ceiling debate debacle, where Congressional leaders refused to pass a bill authorizing borrowing to pay for the budget they had passed with much debate and controversy earlier in the year.  Cynics have argued that rhetoric directed at the rating agencies about the issuance of AAA ratings to junk real estate bonds spurred the downgrade as a form of retribution.  Ironically, the investor scare led to the flocking of investors to the safe haven of the Treasury bonds which had been downgraded, resulting in lower interest rates.  As there are very few AAA bond markets, investors will likely continue to buy U.S. government debt for the foreseeable future.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Greenwald, A. (2011, April 18). [http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/04/18/the-sp-outlook-and-obama/ The S&amp;amp;P Outlook and Obama]. ''Commentary Magazine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  When his [[economic stimulus]] program was adopted unemployment rose and stagnated in the 10% range, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Di Leo, L &amp;amp; Lynch, S.N. (2010, August 20). [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704476104575439172480870774.html Jobless Claims Jump in New Sign Recovery is Sputtering]. ''The Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; leaving tens of millions without [[hope]] of finding a job.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bureau of Labor Statistics. [http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&amp;amp;series_id=LNS11300000&amp;amp;years_option=specific_years&amp;amp;include_graphs=true&amp;amp;to_month=1&amp;amp;from_month=2 Databases, Tables &amp;amp; Calculators by Subject: Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey]. ''United States Department of Labor''. Data extracted on: July 19, 2010 (4:31:11 PM).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patrick H. Caddell and Douglas E. Schoen, writing in the [[Wall Street Journal]], noted, &amp;quot;Rather than being a unifier, Mr. Obama has divided America on the basis of race, class and partisanship.&amp;quot; The commentators also note Obama's approach to governance has encouraged radical leftists to pursue a similar strategy on his behalf. Mary Frances Berry, former head of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, acknowledged that the [[Obama administration]] has taken to polarizing America around the issue of race as a means of diverting attention from other issues, saying, &amp;quot;Having one's opponent [[race card|rebut charges of racism]] is far better than discussing [[Unemployment|joblessness]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berry, M.F. (2010, July 20). [http://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Mary_Frances_Berry_91E3D9D5-C40D-440C-9D48-1C50CBC60C87.html Energy Arena, Driving the Conversation: Contracting Out U.S. Security? And will Branding Tea Party Racist Work?] ''Politico''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Caddell and Schoen, who worked for President Carter and Clinton, respectively, further stated, &amp;quot;Mr. Obama has also cynically [[class warfare|divided the country on class lines]]. He has taken to playing the populist card time and time again. He bashes Wall Street and insurance companies whenever convenient to advance his programs, yet he has been eager to accept campaign contributions and negotiate with these very same banks and [[corporation]]s behind closed doors in order to advance his political agenda... President Obama's divisive approach to governance has weakened us as a people and paralyzed our political culture.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Caddell, P.H. &amp;amp; Schoen, D.E. (2010, July 28). [http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052748703700904575391553798363586.html Our Divisive President]. ''The Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Domestic policy===&lt;br /&gt;
====Popular bills====&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's first act of office was to sign the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act - effectively nullifying the [[Supreme Court]] case ''Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire &amp;amp; Rubber Co.'', which ruled that Ledbetter had to have filed a pay [[discrimination]] suit within 180 days of the first time Ledbetter was payed less than her male peers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/30/us/politics/30ledbetter-web.html|work=The New York Times|format=HTML|language=English|title=Obama Signs Equal-Pay Legislation|author=Sheryl Gay Stolberg|date=January 29, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the law made corporations subject to suit within 180 days of each time the employee was unfairly paid.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://writ.news.findlaw.com/grossman/20090213.html?=features|work=FindLaw|author=Joanna L. Grossman|date=Feb. 13, 2009|format=HTML|language=English|title=The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 2, 2011, Obama signed the James Zadroga [[9/11]] Healthcare and Compensation Act.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.wnyc.org/articles/wnyc-news/2011/jan/02/obama-signs-zadroga-act-law/|publisher=New York Public Radio|title=Obama Signs Zadroga Act into Law|author=Fred Mogul|date=January 02, 2011|work=wNYC|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The act, which afforded 9/11 first responders who were sickened by the dust from the collapse of the [[World Trade Center]] health care and compensation, passed [[Congress]] after its sponsored agreed to scale down the pricing from 7.4 to 4.2 billion dollars.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.wnyc.org/articles/wnyc-news/2010/dec/22/zadroga-911-bill-passes-senate/|publisher=New York Public Radio|work=wNYC|format=HTML|language=English|title=Congress Approves 9/11 Health Bill|date=December 22, 2010}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Economic policy====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Keynes.jpg|thumbnail|right|190px|[[Barack Obama]] advocates the use of discredited [[Keynesian economics|Keynesian economic concepts]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2011/03/20/fabian-john-maynard-keynes-the-stealthy-enemy-of-human-freedom/ John Maynard Keynes the stealthy enemy of human freedom]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-02-22/deathbed-of-keynesian-economics-will-be-in-u-k-matthew-lynn.html Deathbed of Keynesian Economics will be in the UK]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iwf.org/inkwell/show/23102.html Will the G8 Repudiate the Philosophy of Living Beyond Our Means?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html KEYNES AT HARVARD Economic Deception as a Political Credo BY ZYGMUND DOBBS]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  ]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{see also|Obamunism|American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009}}&lt;br /&gt;
Critics of the Obama administration have coined the word &amp;quot;[[Obamunism]]&amp;quot; to describe Barack Obama's [[socialism|socialistic]] and &amp;quot;[[fascism]] light&amp;quot; [[economic planning]] policies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Benito Mussolini]] defined fascism as the wedding of state and corporate powers.  Accordingly, trend forecaster [[Gerald Celente]] labels [[Obama administration corporate bailouts|Obama's corporate bailouts]] as being &amp;quot;fascism light&amp;quot; in nature.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/daily-intel/2009/07/20/obamunism-inc|work=The Big Money|publisher=WashingtonPost.Newsweek Interactive Co. LLC|format=HTML|language=English|title=Obamunism, Inc.|author=David Sessions|date=July 20, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.smallbusinessadvocate.com/small-business-interviews/gerald-celente-6944|author=Jim Blasingame|title=Is the government creating a bailout bubble?}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obamunism can also refer to Obama's [[Obama administration fiscal policy|ruinous fiscal policies]] and [[Obama administration monetary policy|reckless monetary policies]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gerard&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://seekingalpha.com/article/120883-monetary-policynot-obama-s-stimulusis-what-needs-watching|title=Monetary Policy-Not Obama's Stimulus-Is What Needs Watching|author=Gerard Jackson|date=February 16, 2009|work=Seeking Alpha}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bam&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=New York Post|date=May 17, 2009|url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/05172009/postopinion/editorials/bams_wise_words_169731.htm|title=BAM'S WISE WORDS}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/|title=Bush Deficit vs. Obama Deficit in Pictures|work=The Foundry|publisher=The Heritage Foundation|author=Conn Carroll|date=March 24th, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As seen in his own actions, Barack Obama instructed his advisors to find loopholes that would enable the president to act as a [[dictator]] by pushing through legislation and increases in spending without congressional authority.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Naked Emperor News (2011, October 12). [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/executive-dictatorship-obama-instructs-advisers-to-push-through-stimulus-projects-without-pesky-congressional-authorization/ Exclusive Dictatorship: Obama Instructs Advisors to Push Through Stimulus Projects Without Pesky 'Congressional Authorization']. ''The Blaze''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, budgets passed under President Obama have included the smallest average annualized growth of federal spending (1.4%) since before President Reagan. Federal spending grew an average of 8.7% per year during Reagan's first term and an average of 8.1% per year during George W. Bush's second term.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/|title=Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower? Would You Believe It's Barack Obama?|publisher=Forbes|author=Rick Ungar|date=May 24th, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Wall Street]] firms and banks that were bailed out were among Obama's biggest campaign supporters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''OpenSecrets.org''. [http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&amp;amp;cid=N00009638 Barack Obama: Top Contributors]. The Center for Responsive Politics.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, the Obama administration bailouts of corrupt, unproductive, and reckless Wall Street firms was hardly surprising, and many argue that it was not helpful in making the United States economy more productive and prosperous by encouraging more risk taking through letting banks off with a slap on the wrist.  Others argue that bailing out the banks kept credit flowing and prevented a much deeper recession and a total collapse of the financial system.  The government will recoup some though not all of its capital infusions over time.  A 2005 study found that government corporate bailouts are often done for mere political considerations and the economic resources allocated exhibit significantly worse economic performance than resources allocated using purely business considerations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Faccio, M. et. al. (2005, March 1). [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=676905 Political Connections and Corporate Bailouts]. ''Social Science Research Network''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Proponents of [[free market]] capitalism said Bernanke should not have bailed out failing firms and instead should have allowed free market capitalism to quickly recover as it did in the depression of 1920 without government intervention (free market capitalists assert that government intervention drags out economic recessions and depressions).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Woods, T.E. (2009, April 10). [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czcUmnsprQI Why You've Never Heard of the Great Depression of 1920]. ''Ludwig Von Mises Institute''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Top trend forecaster [[Gerald Celente]] predicts that the corrupt economic policies of the Obama administration will lead to a second [[Great Depression|great depression]] (Celente predicted the 1987 US stock market crash, the dot.com crash, the US 2008/2009 recession, and the collapse of the USSR in the early 1990s) and may lead to a &amp;quot;second [[American Revolution]]&amp;quot; (Celente predicted the [[Tea Party Movement|tax protests]] that are now occurring in America).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Celente, G. (2009, August 1). [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MMX3SKzrfU&amp;amp;feature=channel_page pt 2/2 Gerald Celente on Financial Sense Newshour Aug 1st 2009]. ''Financial Sense Newshour''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Celente, G. (2009, August 2). [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sy9bfw1ebgw&amp;amp;feature=response_watch ]. ''Financial Sense Newshour''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Celente also asserts that the costly and inefficient temporary short term methods that the Obama administration is using to alleviate economic problems in the short term (which is causing massive increases in [[Obama administration deficit spending]]) is only making matters worse and will not prevent the worse economic depression in United States history from occurring.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Celente, G. (2009, August 11). [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_C8K7rWkGGw pt 1/2 Gerald Celente on Howestreet.com 11 Aug 2009]. ''HoweStreet.com''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Celente, G. (2009, August 11). [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LBffdIW0XA&amp;amp;feature=response_watch pt 2/2 Gerald Celente on Howestreet.com 11 Aug 2009]. ''HoweStreet.com''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Obama administration has been sharply criticized for [[Obama administration deficit spending|its massive deficit spending]] and [[Obama administration monetary policy|its reckless monetary policy]] via vast increases in the [[money supply]], although inflation under Bernanke has been below the historic mean.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gerard&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bam&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carroll, C. (2009, March 24). [http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/ Bush Deficit vs. Obama Deficit in Pictures]. ''The Foundry''. The Heritage Network.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Celente predicts that if a &amp;quot;second American Revolution&amp;quot; occurs in a peaceful and productive manner, it may include a [[Third Party System|third party movement]] of governance that will advocate a more [[free market]] [[capitalism]] approach to the American economy and a more strict interpretation of the [[United States Constitution|United States constitution]] as far as the authors' [[original intent]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente1&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During what the [[White House]] billed as [[Recovery Summer]], one half million workers per week continued losing their jobs. His signature legislative achievement, [[ObamaCare]],has been found to be [[unconstitutional]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Schoenberg, T. &amp;amp; Fisk, M.T. (2010, December 13). [http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-13/u-s-health-care-law-requirement-thrown-out-by-judge.html Obama's Health-Care Law Ruled Unconstitutional Over Insurance Requirement]. ''Bloomberg''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by several judges and constitutional by others, and is credited as a major cause of uncertainty, high [[unemployment]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=33220&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; lagging job creation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Foster, J.D. (2010, August 5). [http://blog.heritage.org/2010/08/05/it%E2%80%99s-official-medicare%E2%80%99s-finances-shadowed-by-uncertainty/ It’s Official: Medicare’s Finances Shadowed by Uncertainty]. ''The Foundry''. The Heritage Network.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and risk of a credit default crisis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Samuelson, R.J. (2010, March 29). [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/28/AR2010032802353.html With health bill, Obama has sown the seeds of a budget crisis]. ''The Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cramer, J. (2010, March 16). [http://www.thestreet.com/story/10703361/cramer-obamacare-will-topple-the-market.html Cramer: Obamacare Will Topple the Market]. ''The Street''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His 2012 Budget plan has been roundly criticized in the mainstream and liberal press as not a serious effort to deal with the nation's economic crisis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://republican.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=blogs.view&amp;amp;blog_id=1551d6f5-2ac9-4b8d-97ab-74def354024e Newspapers Call Out White House: ‘What Would That Path Be, Mr. President?’]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jeffrey Tucker]] wrote, &amp;quot;President Obama's economic policy has been catastrophic for liberty, enterprise, and the American dream—the very archetype of what not to do to end recession.&amp;quot; [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1118186176/ref=as_li_tf_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=anncoulter-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=1118186176]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====2009 Stimulus====&lt;br /&gt;
In early 2009, Obama lobbied Congress and the public to pass sweeping Stimulus legislation for the ailing economy&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, January 3). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28479998/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-urges-congress-pass-stimulus-plan/ Obama Urges Congress to Pass Stimulus Plan].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Parsons, C. &amp;amp; Nicholas, P. (2009, February 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28479998/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-urges-congress-pass-stimulus-plan/ Barack Obama Sternly Urges Congress to Pass Economic Stimulus].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; known as ''The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009'' (H.R. 1)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.1: Bill Text Versions: H.R. 1].&amp;quot; 111th Congress (2009-2010). ''Library of Congress''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=204335,00.html The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Information Center].&amp;quot; ''IRS''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, ignoring a report by the Congressional Budget Office that the legislation would ultimately harm the economy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinan, S. (2009, February 4). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/04/cbo-obama-stimulus-harmful-over-long-haul/ CBO: Obama Stimulus Harmful Over Long Haul].&amp;quot; ''U.S. News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Contrary to his earlier promises of bipartisanship&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinan, S. (2009, March 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/28/mccain-obama-breaks-campaign-promises-shuns-bipart/?page=all McCain: Obama Breaks Promise of Bipartisanship].&amp;quot; ''Washington Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the bill passed the House 244-188 without a single Republican vote on January 28, 2009,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Calmes, J. (2009, January 28). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/us/politics/29obama.html House Passes Stimulus Plan With No G.O.P. Votes].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and received just 3 Republican votes when passing the Senate 61-37.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Herszenhorn, D.M. (2009, February 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/washington/11web-stim.html Senate Approves Stimulus Plan].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One third of the massive $838 billion bill consisted of tax cuts&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, February 11). &amp;quot;Senate Passes $838 Billion Stimulus Bill].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the rest spending on &amp;quot;just about every pent-up Democratic proposal of the last 40 years.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, January 28). &amp;quot;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123310466514522309.html A 40-Year Wish List].&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In responding to criticism of the broken bipartisanship promise at the time, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi famously quipped, &amp;quot;We won the election. We wrote the bill.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kane, P. (2009, January 23). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/22/AR2009012203961.html Stimulus Plan Meets More GOP Resistance].&amp;quot; ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On February 18, 2009, the Stimulus was signed into law by Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, February 17). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29231790/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-stimulus-lets-americans-claim-destiny/ Obama: Stimulus Lets Americans Claim Destiny].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In August 2009, Republicans and Democratic Senator David Obey drew attention to mistakes on the Recovery.gov site claiming Stimulus jobs created that didn't exist. Obama responded by saying the errors just indicate the accounting is an &amp;quot;inexact science&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, November 18). &amp;quot;[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/18/obama-calls-stimulus-data-errors-issue-says-focus-job-growth/ Obama Calls Stimulus Data Errors 'Side Issue,' Says Focus Is on Job Growth].&amp;quot; ''FOX News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Healthcare====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Obamacare}}&lt;br /&gt;
On March 23, 2010, Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). The act had originated in the House of Representatives and passed September 17, 2009. The act was amended and passed the Senate prior to [[Democrat]] [[Ted Kennedy]]'s passing along party lines - just a filibuster-proof majority at 60-39. In what can be construed as a de facto rejection of the bill, [[Massachusetts]] voters elected a [[Republican]] candidate, [[Scott Brown]], who promised to vote against the bill,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/senate/scott-brown-wins-massachusetts-senate-race.html|work=The Washington Post|author=Chris Cillizza|date=January 19, 2010|title=Scott Brown wins Massachusetts Senate special election race|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but another Senate vote would not occur.  Scott Brown was also an excellent campaigner and judged to be a better candidate than his rival, Martha Coakley.  He has since achieved one of the most moderate senate voting records, likely to avoid the anger of his mostly liberal constituency.  After Obama made a promise to issue an [[executive order]] that would ultimately prohibit the use of taxpayer subsidies to pay for [[abortion]] services,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/22/nation/la-na-healthcare-passage22-2010mar22/3|work=The Los Angeles Times|format=HTML|language=English|title=House passes historic healthcare overhaul|date=March 22, 2010|author=Noam N. Levey and Janet Hook}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the [[House of Representatives]] would pass the bill as it left the Senate 219-212, with 34 Democrats and all other parties dissenting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://articles.cnn.com/2010-03-21/politics/health.care.main_1_health-care-entire-house-democratic-caucus-pre-existing-conditions?_s=PM:POLITICS|date=March 21, 2010|author=Alan Silverleib|work=CNN|format=HTML|language=English|title=House passes health care bill on 219-212 vote}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amongst other things, the act mandates that the population purchase health care coverage or face punitive tax measures, and on this basis has been constitutionally challenged in the federal courts, with mixed results (three courts have upheld the act, two have declared it unconstitutional); thus, the Act is likely destined for [[Supreme Court]] reviewal.  Plans originally proposed involved instituting a universal public insurance program, that is, extending Medicare to everyone.  The universal mandate included in the act was originally a conservative idea that was enacted in Massachusetts under Republican Mitt Romney.  Its supporters note that having health insurance results in reduced costs in paying for treatment of uninsured and forcing people to take responsibility for their healthcare.  Due to ethical constraints, doctors cannot deny care to poor patients, resulting in the hospital and the healthcare system at large bearing the cost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Gulf oil spill====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster}}&lt;br /&gt;
President Obama authorized offshore oil drilling in the [[Gulf of Mexico]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0430/Gulf-of-Mexico-oil-spill-imperils-Obama-s-offshore-drilling-plan Gulf of Mexico oil spill imperils Obama's offshore drilling plan,] By Mark Clayton, ''Christian Science Monitor'', April 30, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; stating, &amp;quot;oil rigs today generally don’t cause spills&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;White House Press Release, [http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-a-discussion-jobs-and-economy-charlotte-north-carolina Remarks by the President in a Discussion on Jobs and the Economy in Charlotte, North Carolina,] Office of the Press Secretary, April 02, 2010. Retrieved from whitehouse.gov 3 May 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was widely criticized for his mishandling of the &amp;quot;[[Gulf oil spill disaster|worst environmental disaster]] in US history.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.examiner.com/x-33986-Political-Spin-Examiner~y2010m4d29-Worst-environmental-disaster-in-US-history-Oil-slick-in-Gulf-of-Mexico-is-set-on-fire Worst environmental disaster in US history,] Maryann Tobin, ''Examiner'', April 29, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/the-oil-spill-is-obamas-fault/?src=twt&amp;amp;twt=NytimesKrugman Conscience of a Liberal: The Oil Spill Is Obama’s Fault,] Paul Krugman, ''New York Times'', April 30, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Don't Ask Don't Tell====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Don't Ask Don't Tell}}&lt;br /&gt;
Candidate Obama promised to repeal a policy that originated in the Clinton era that prohibited inquiries into military personnel's [[sexual orientation]] while also barring &amp;quot;out&amp;quot; [[homosexuals]] from serving in the military. [[Liberals]] expressed anger when time passed and no effort to repeal the law was seen;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/nov/21/obama-to-delay-repeal-of-dont-ask-dont-tell/|work=The Washington Times|format=HTML|title=Obama to delay ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ repeal|language=English|author=Rowan Scarborough|date=November 21, 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in fact, Obama's [[justice department]], as part of their duty to defend all laws passed by any administration, filed a brief arguing against the [[Supreme Court]] granting a [[writ of certiorari]] to a gay soldier challenging the law (the writ was not granted). In response, the soldier, James Pietrangelo II, a former Army infantryman and lawyer, said, “[Obama's] a coward, a bigot and a pathological liar. This is a guy who spent more time picking out his dog, Bo, and playing with him on the White House lawn than he has working for equality for gay people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=Time Magazine|publisher=Time Inc.|format=HTML|url=http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1903545,00.html?imw=Y|title=Dismay Over Obama's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Turnabout|author=Mark Thompson|date=Jun. 09, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 15th, 2010, a bill was introduced in the [[House of Representatives]] to repeal the law - it passed a day later by a vote of 250-175;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2010/roll638.xml|title=FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 638|format=HTML|work=Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it passed the Senate three days later 65-31.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&amp;amp;session=2&amp;amp;vote=00281|work=The U.S. Senate|title=U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 111th Congress - 2nd Session|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama signed the Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010 on December 22nd.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;g dadt&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/22/obama-repeals-dont-ask-dont-tell|work=The Guardian|format=HTML|language=English|title='Don't ask, don't tell' repealed as Obama signs landmark law|date=22 December 2010}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Pentagon]] itself could not immediately implement the repeal and questioned whether it would hurt combat readiness.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;g dadt&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Senator [[John McCain]], the senior Republican on the Armed Services Committee, opposed the bill, saying &amp;quot;It may be premature to make such a change at this time and in this manner, without further consideration of this report and further study of the issue by Congress – for of all the people we serve, one of our highest responsibilities is to the men and women of our armed services, especially those risking their lives in combat.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/02/mccain-on-dont-ask-dont-tell-dont-rush/|title=McCain on ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’: Don’t Rush|date=December 2nd, 2010|format=HTML|author=David M. Herszenhorn|language=English|work=The New York Times}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign policy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Western Wall Obama.jpg|thumb|left|320px|At [[Western Wall]], Jerusalem, 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
As Senator, Obama was highly critical of President Bush and promised change. As President, Obama has tripled down in Afghanistan, widened the war into Pakistan, multiplied drone attacks, bombed Yemen and Somalia, and started an undeclared NATO war in Libya. On presidential war powers, surveillance questions, Guantanamo, detention policy and habeas corpus, Obama has similarly stayed the course, or expanded Bush's precedents. In a speech on May 19, 2011 Obama fully embraced the [[Bush Doctrine]] of preventative war.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Krauthammer, C. (April 19). [http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-news-in-obamas-speech/2011/05/19/AF4dFN7G_story.html The News in Obama's Speech]. ''The Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The New America Foundation, which tracks the strikes, has listed 23 raids since the beginning of April, 2011, all but one in Pakistan’s tribal regions of North and South Waziristan. A June 20 attack was reported in Kurram, an area north of North Waziristan along the Afghanistan border.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The drone program has become increasingly controversial as the Obama administration has expanded its use beyond the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. Lethal missiles have been launched from unmanned aircraft in at least five countries in addition to Pakistan: Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, and, most recently, Somalia. The military’s Joint Special Operations Command used a drone last June to attack what officials said were two senior members of the Al Shabab militant group on the Somali coast.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;DeYoung, K. (2011, July 4).  [http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/2011/07/04/cia_halts_drone_launches_from_pakistan_base/ CIA Halts Drone Launches From Pakistan Base]. ''The Boston Globe''. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is commendable when he says he wants to avoid war. His policies, however, favor war by destabilizing the Middle East making it extremely hostile and favoring radical Islam over America’s ally, Israel, and American interests in the region... The president has chosen a very dangerous path for every American and one that promises great difficulty for Israel. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.thejerusalemconnection.us/blog/2012/03/14/obamas-words-disguise-his-israel-foreign-policy-actions.html Obama's words disguise his Israel foreign policy actions.] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Commander-in-chief====&lt;br /&gt;
By Obama's third year as Commander-in-Chief, over 1200 American troops died in Iraq and Afghanistan - significantly more than the number who died during President [[George W. Bush]]'s term of office.  And growing numbers of civilian contractors also have fallen. In the first half of 2010, 250 contractors reportedly died in Iraq and Afghanistan - more than the 235 military personnel who fell during the same period.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/05/24/114662/what-price-war.html#ixzz1Nz07pg5O&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=====National Defense=====&lt;br /&gt;
President Obama signed into U.S. law the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), only after his administration successfully lobbied to remove language from the bill that would have protected American citizens from being detained indefinitely without trial.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aaron Dykes. [http://www.infowars.com/president-obamas-ndaa-signing-statement-i-have-the-power-to-detain-americans-but-i-wont/ Obama’s Signing Statement on NDAA: I have the power to detain Americans… but I won’t], Infowars.com, January 1, 2012. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After the legislation cleared Congress, the ACLU commented that if President Obama signed the bill it &amp;quot;will damage both his legacy and American’s reputation for upholding the rule of law,&amp;quot; while executive director of the ''Human Rights Watch'' blasted the President for being ‘on the wrong side of history,’ noting that &amp;quot;Obama will go down in history as the president who enshrined indefinite detention without trial in US law.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;President Decides to Sign Ill-Conceived National Defense Authorization Act. [http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/12/14/us-refusal-veto-detainee-bill-historic-tragedy-rights US: Refusal to Veto Detainee Bill A Historic Tragedy for Rights], ''Human Rights Watch'', December 14, 2011. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[http://www.aclu.org/national-security/white-house-backs-away-defense-bill-veto-threat White House Backs Away from Defense Bill Veto Threat], ''[[ACLU]]'', December 14, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Section 1031 of the NDAA bill, which itself defines the entirety of the United States as a “battlefield,” allows American citizens to be snatched from the streets, carted off to a foreign detention camp and held indefinitely without trial. As reported by Infowars.com, the bill states that “any person who has committed a belligerent act” faces indefinite detention, but no trial or evidence has to be presented, the White House merely needs to make the accusation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Paul Joseph Watson. [http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-demanded-power-to-indefinitely-detain-u-s-citizens/ Obama Administration Demanded Power To Indefinitely Detain U.S. Citizens], Infowars.com, December 12, 2011.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;S.1867 [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c112:2:./temp/~c1122VN0Iv:e548990: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Engrossed in Senate [Passed Senate] - ES)], ''The Library of Congress'' THOMAS, 112th Congress (2011-2011), Accessed January 25, 2012.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Text of S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. [http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/text?version=es&amp;amp;nid=t0:es:281 Sec. 1031. Affirmation of authority of the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force.], [[U.S. Congress]], ''OpenCongress.org'', (Accessed January 25, 2012).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====2009-2011 Iraq Troop Withdrawal=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Operation Iraqi Freedom}}&lt;br /&gt;
On February 10, 2007, Barack Obama announced his campaign for the U.S. presidency while stating he had a &amp;quot;''plan that will bring our combat troops home by March of 2008.''&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=announcement&amp;gt;(2007, February 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/10/AR2007021000879.html Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's Announcement Speech].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Later, Obama campaigned on having troops entirely out of Iraq within 16 months, but in February 2009 revised this promise to withdrawing all but 35-50 thousand troops by December 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barry, J. (2009, February 25). &amp;quot;[http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2009/02/25/reality-on-the-ground.html Reality on the Ground].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  However, some of the newly withdrawn troops were simply redirected from Iraq to Afghanistan - Obama in Summer 2009 ordered 21,000 troops to Afghanistan.&amp;lt;ref name=amanpour&amp;gt;Amanpour, C. (2009, April 29). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2009-04-29/politics/amanpour.obama.foreign.policy_1_president-obama-obama-administration-iraq?_s=PM:POLITICS Amanpour: Obama's 100 Days of Foreign Affairs].&amp;quot; ''CNN Politics''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{cquote|&amp;quot;But all of this cannot come to pass until we bring an end to this war in Iraq. Most of you know I opposed this war from the start. I thought it was a tragic mistake. Today we grieve for the families who have lost loved ones, the hearts that have been broken, and the young lives that could have been. America, it's time to start bringing our troops home. It's time to admit that no amount of American lives can resolve the political disagreement that lies at the heart of someone else's civil war. That's why I have a plan that will bring our combat troops home by March of 2008. Letting the Iraqis know that we will not be there forever is our last, best hope to pressure the Sunni and Shia to come to the table and find peace.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Barack Obama, February 10, 2007 Presidential Campaign Announcement Speech&amp;lt;ref name=announcement /&amp;gt;}}Ultimately, it was the Status of Forces Agreement signed by George W. Bush on November 17, 2008 which forced U.S. combat troops to withdraw from Iraq's cities, villages, and localities by June 30, 2009, and from Iraq entirely by December 31st 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2008, November 17). &amp;quot;[http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/world/20081119_SOFA_FINAL_AGREED_TEXT.pdf Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq On the Withdrawal of United States from Iraq and the Organization of Their Activities during Their Temporary Presence in Iraq].&amp;quot; Article 24. Withdrawal of the United States Forces from Iraq. Hosted by ''The New York Times''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Office of the Press Secretary (2008, November 27). &amp;quot;[http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2008/11/20081127-1.html Statement by the President on Agreements with Iraq].&amp;quot; ''The White House''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama privately contacted the Iraq government in an attempt to persuade them to let 10,000 troops stay, but was rejected.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Froomkin, D. (2011, October 26). &amp;quot;[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/26/obama-iraq_n_1032507.html Ending the War in Iraq: How Obama's Own Rhetoric - And George Bush's Pact - Boxed in the President].&amp;quot; ''Huffington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Newsweek's Michael Ware accused Obama of a &amp;quot;War Crime&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;''falsely taking credit for finally bringing Iraq to a close—a war actually ended by the Bush administration back in 2008''&amp;quot; and stated, &amp;quot;''The U.S. troops who fought and died in that war, the Iraqis who perished, and the American people deserve far better.''&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ware, M. (2011, October 24). &amp;quot;[http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/10/24/obamas-war-crime-taking-credit-from-bush-adminsitration-for-ending-the-iraq-war.html Obama's War Crime].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''. U.S. Politics.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The last of Iraq's combat troops have now been withdrawn because of Bush's Status of Forces Agreement which Obama took credit for.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://articles.cnn.com/2011-12-17/middleeast/world_meast_iraq-troops-leave_1_1st-cavalry-division-camp-adder-troop-movements?_s=PM:MIDDLEEAST|work=CNN|title=Obama: Last U.S. troops leave Iraq|date=December 17, 2011|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=====Afghanistan=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Afghanistan War}}&lt;br /&gt;
Obama escalated troop strength&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pbs&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/obamaswar/themes/strategy.html#ixzz1LhWNImZp|title=Obama's New Strategy (March '09)|author=George Packer, Seth Jones, David Kilcullen, Rory Stewart, Andrew Exum, Col. Andrew Bacevich (Ret.)|work=PBS|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and defense costs in Afghanistan from $43.5 billion in George Bush's last year to $113.7 billion for 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Congressional Research Service, quoted in Gregory Anthony, ''What price war?''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Adviser to General [[Stanley McChrystal]] David Kilcullen wrote, &amp;quot;One of the big strategic shifts is the use of language now which talks about Pakistan and Afghanistan as the same theater. Now we talked about Af-Pak long before the Obama administration came about, but the public use of that term, and the description of it as the Afghanistan-Pakistan campaign, sends a new message to people about how the administration is going to think about Afghanistan and Pakistan.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pbs&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; This became evident when, under the orders of Obama, a military SEALs team killed September 11th mastermind [[Osama bin Laden]] in Abottabad, Pakistan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.newsweek.com/2011/05/05/commander-in-chief.html|title=Commander in Chief|author=Daniel Romano and Daniel Klaidman|date=May 05, 2011|work=Newsweek|publisher=The Newsweek/Daily Beast Company LLC|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=====Guantanamo Bay=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Guantanamo Bay}}&lt;br /&gt;
One of Obama's campaign promises was that he would close the American detention center at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba - detainees would be flown to other countries while the ones awaiting trial would enter the American court system. Two days after taking office he signed an order directing the military to do so.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;salon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/04/25/obama_guantanamo_rhetoric|work=Salon|title=The Obama/Gitmo timeline|author=Natasha Lennard|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But, in November 2009 Obama admitted that his self imposed deadline of January 2010 would be missed, and in March 2011 the president went back on his campaign promise, signing an executive order to create a formal system of indefinite detention for the prisoners.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;salon&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=====Mexico=====&lt;br /&gt;
In May 2012, President Obama promised Mexican President [[Felipe Calderon]] that his administration would assist Mexico in curbing drug cartel violence, which has led to 30,000 deaths in Mexico. &amp;quot;President Calderon and I . . . stand together against the drug cartels that have unleashed horrific violence in so many communities,&amp;quot; Obama said on May 19. &amp;quot;Mexico can count on the United States as a full partner in this effort.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''[[Washington Post]]'' has reported however that White House officials stopped a requirement for gun dealers to report bulk sales of high-powered semiautomatic rifles commonly used by illegal drug cartels.  [[Justice Department]] officials had asked for White House approval to require thousands of gun dealers along the border to report the purchases to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and Explosives. ATF investigators expected to get leads on suspected arms traffickers. Senior law enforcement sources said the proposal from the ATF was held up by then White House chief of staff [[Rahm Emanuel]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Horwitz, S. &amp;amp; Grimaldi, J.V. (2010, December 17). [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/17/AR2010121706598.html White House Delayed Rule Meant to Stop Gun Flow to Mexico]. ''The Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gun dealers have been required for decades to report the sales of multiple handguns to the ATF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Libya=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Libyan uprising 2011}}&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2011, the political unrest that had spread through the Arab world showed up as protests in Libya. Colonel Muammar el-Qaddafi - leader of Libya for 41 years - responded to the violent activism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28376.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with legible steps.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt libya&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/libya/index.html|work=The New York Times|publisher=The New York Times Inc.|format=HTML|language=English|title=Libya — Protests and Revolt (2011)}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[United Nations Security Council]] voted unanimously to impose [[sanctions]], and later authorized all members to take action to protect civilians. Obama, acting without approval from Congress and at the beckoning of the [[United Nations]], directed American forces to take out Libya's air defense system.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt libya&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Obama later said, &amp;quot;[I]f we waited one more day Benghazi, a city nearly the size of Charlotte, could suffer a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Barack Obama|url=http://www.npr.org/2011/03/28/134935452/obamas-speech-on-libya-a-responsibility-to-act|title=Obama's Speech On Libya: 'A Responsibility To Act'|date=March 28, 2011|publisher=National Public Radio ([[NPR]])|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Alan J. Kuperman]] - writing an editorial for the ''[[Boston Globe]]'' - suggested this statement was false, writing, &amp;quot;[I]ntervention did not prevent genocide, because no such bloodbath was in the offing. To the contrary, by emboldening rebellion, US interference has prolonged Libya’s civil war and the resultant suffering of innocents.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuperman&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Alan J. Kuperman|work=The Boston Globe|url=http://articles.boston.com/2011-04-14/bostonglobe/29418371_1_rebel-stronghold-civilians-rebel-positions|title=False pretense for war in Libya?|date=April 14, 2011}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kuperman, a professor of public affairs at the University of Texas who authored a book called ''The Limits of Humanitarian Intervention'', further stated that the rebels had tricked the world into thinking a bloodbath was at hand and that Obama had lied to the American people in order to act on this theory.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuperman&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Gaddafi [never] threaten civilian massacre in Benghazi, as Obama alleged. The “no mercy’’ warning, of March 17, targeted rebels only, as reported by The New York Times, which noted that Libya’s leader promised amnesty for those “who throw their weapons away.’’ Khadafy even offered the rebels an escape route and open border to Egypt, to avoid a fight “to the bitter end.’’ &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://politicalcartel.org/2011/04/17/libya-and-the-obama-doctrine/ Libya and the “Obama Doctrine”.] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However Gaddafi wrote to Obama:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Gaddafi said he bore no ill will toward Obama. &amp;quot;We have been hurt more morally than physically because of what had happened against us in both deeds and words by you,&amp;quot; he wrote. &amp;quot;Despite all this you will always remain our son whatever happened. We still pray that you continue to be president of the USA. We endeavour and hope that you will gain victory in the new election campaign.&amp;quot; The letter, dated 5 April 2011 in Tripoli, is signed &amp;quot;Mu'aumer Qaddaffi, Leader of the Revolution&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/06/gaddafi-obama-nato-libya?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Critics point out the only thing worse than starting a &amp;quot;stupid, unnecessary war&amp;quot; against a madman is losing it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/271847/war-libya-dumb-and-dumber-victor-davis-hanson&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2012 Presidential Campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
===2011, Birth Certificate Released===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Barack_Obama_Controversies#Birth_Certificate]]''&lt;br /&gt;
On April 27, 2011&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;CNN Political Unit (2011, April 27). &amp;quot;[http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/27/white-house-releases-obama-birth-certificate/ White House Releases Obama Birth Certificate].&amp;quot; ''CNN''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a long-running controversy surrounding Obama's birth was largely put to rest&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Winter, J. (2011, April 29). &amp;quot;[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/29/expert-says-obamas-birth-certificate-legit/ Expert: No Doubt Obama's Birth Certificate is Legit].&amp;quot; ''FOX News''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Tuchman, G. (2011, April 25). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2011-04-25/politics/birthers.obama.hawaii_1_birther-controversy-obama-opinion-research-corporation?_s=PM:POLITICS Obama Birther Claims Have No Merit].&amp;quot; ''CNN''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(2011, April 27). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42779923/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-releases-detailed-us-birth-certificate/ Obama Releases Detailed U.S. Birth Certificate].&amp;quot; ''MSNBC''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when Obama had his long-form birth certificate posted at WhiteHouse.gov.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf Certificate of Live Birth].&amp;quot; State of Hawaii. Retrieved from ''WhiteHouse.gov''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Donald Trump, who had attacked Obama on the Birth Certificate issue and was then leading Republicans in polls for the upcoming GOP primary&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James, F. (2011, April 15). &amp;quot;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2011/04/15/135446314/poll-donald-trump-birther-darling-leads-gop-field-at-26 Donald Trump, Birther In Chief? Poll Has Him Leading GOP Field with 26 Percent].&amp;quot; ''NPR''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, was effectively knocked out of the race because of this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kapur, S. (2011, May 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/05/10/trumps-popularity-tanks-after-obama-releases-long-form-birth-certificate/ Trump's Popularity Tanks After Obama Releases Long-Form Birth Certificate].&amp;quot; ''RawStory.com''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following is a timeline of previous events leading up to the release:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In June 2008 the Obama campaign allowed FactCheck.org to look at his “Certificate of Live Birth” and take photos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Henig, J. (2008, August 21). Born in the U.S.A. FactCheck.org. Retrieved from http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* In July 2008 a blogger discovered a birth announcement from the Honolulu Advertiser from August 13, 1961 for Barack Obama. It has since been discovered another newspaper, the Star Bulletin, also documented the birth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Snopes.com. Barack Obama Birth Certificate. Retrieved from http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* PolitiFact went to extreme lengths to verify Obama’s citizenship, attaining scanned copies of his 1992 marriage certificate from Cook County, IL, his driver’s license record, and his registration and disciplinary record. PolitiFact also addressed a number of concerns about the documentation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hollyfield, A. (2008, June 27). Obama’s birth certificate: Final chapter. PolitiFact. Retrieved from http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/jun/27/obamas-birth-certificate-part-ii/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* In October 2008 Hawaii’s Department of Health released a statement by Dr. Chiyome Fu.kino verifying that Obama’s birth certificate was on record.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hawaii Department of Health. News Release: Statement by Dr. Chiyome Fu.kino. Retrieved from http://hawaii.gov/health/about/pr/2008/08-93.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* In August 2009 it was revealed that an alleged Kenyan birth certificate for Obama was a hoax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Snopes.com. Kenyan Mistake. Retrieved from http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/kenyacert.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Another website allows you to create your own imitation Kenyan birth certificates online.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;KenyanBirthCertificateGenerator.com. Blue Collar Industries. Retrieved from http://kenyanbirthcertificategenerator.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2011, Osama Bin Laden Confirmed Dead===&lt;br /&gt;
On May 1, 2011, Obama announced in a press conference&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama, B. (2011, May 2). &amp;quot;[http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/05/02/osama-bin-laden-dead Osama Bin Laden Dead].&amp;quot; ''WhiteHouse.gov''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that Osama Bin Laden was dead after a U.S. assault force infiltrated his military compound in Abottobad, Pakistan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Baker, P., Cooper, H., &amp;amp; Mazzetti, M. (2011, May 1). &amp;quot;[Bin Laden is Dead, Obama Says].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Osama_Bin_Laden/ Target Bin Laden: The Death of Public Enemy #1].&amp;quot; ''ABC News''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''NPR''. &amp;quot;[http://www.npr.org/series/135908383/osama-bin-laden-dead Special Series: Osama Bin Laden Killed].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bin Laden was reportedly shot in the head after a helicopter raid ferried Navy SEAL Team Six and CIA paramilitary operatives into Pakistan on April 29.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2011, May 1). &amp;quot;[http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-201_162-20058777.html Osama bin Laden is Dead].&amp;quot; Retrieved from ''CBSNews.com''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Reuters obtained photos of unidentified dead bodies from the raid, none of which look like bin Laden. However, the White House had the body of Osama bin Laden disposed of at sea because it claimed this was &amp;quot;in accordance with Islamic tradition&amp;quot; and didn't want to give Bin Laden followers a gravesite shrine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Daily Beast (2011, May 2). &amp;quot;[http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/05/02/osama-bin-laden-killed-and-buried-at-sea-breaking-details.html Osama Bin Laden Killed and Buried at Sea].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The White House also refused to publicly reveal photos or evidence of the body, because Obama claimed that &amp;quot;given the graphic nature of these photos, it would create some national security risk.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Allbritton, C. (2011, May 4). &amp;quot;[http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/04/us-binladen-pakistan-photos-idUSTRE7437KK20110504 Photos Show Three Dead Men at Bin Laden Raid House].&amp;quot; ''Reuters''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''Reuters''. &amp;quot;[http://www.reuters.com/subjects/bin-laden-compound Photos From the Bin Laden Compound].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The burial at sea was criticized by Islamic scholars&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2011, May 2). &amp;quot;[http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-202_162-20058892.html Islamic Scholars Criticize Bin Laden Sea Burial].&amp;quot; Retrieved from ''CBSNews.com''. Also at [http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/05/02/islamic-scholars-question-bin-ladens-sea-burial/ Fox News].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and 9/11 families.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zirulnick, A. (2011, May 3). &amp;quot;[http://www.csmonitor.com/World/terrorism-security/2011/0503/Osama-bin-Laden-s-burial-at-sea-critics-range-from-9-11-families-to-militants Osama Bin Laden's Burial At Sea: Critics Range from 9/11 Families to Militants].&amp;quot; ''Christian Science Monitor''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The lack of photos resulted in skepticism about the death from a variety of sources, including the Taliban&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Faiez, R. &amp;amp; Vogt, H. (2011, May 4). &amp;quot;[http://articles.boston.com/2011-05-04/news/29509464_1_bin-taliban-spokesman-zabiullah-mujahid-samiullah-khan Taliban Holding Out for Clear Evidence].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Republican Senator Lindsey Graham.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rosen, J. &amp;amp; Thomma, S. (2011, May 5). &amp;quot;[http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/05/05/113709/sc-sen-graham-wants-bin-laden.html S.C. Sen. Graham Wants Bin Laden Photos Released].&amp;quot; ''McClatchy Newspapers''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The death of bin Laden, coupled with the revealing of Obama's long-form Birth Certificate, resulted in a boost of Obama's job approval from 46% to 57% within one month.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dao, J. &amp;amp; Sussman, D. (2011, May 4). &amp;quot;[http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/05/us/politics/05poll.html For Obama, Big Rise in Poll Numbers After Bin Laden Raid].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''Pew Research Center'' (2011, May 2). &amp;quot;[http://www.people-press.org/2011/05/03/public-relieved-by-bin-ladens-death-obamas-job-approval-rises/ Public 'Relieved' by Bin Laden's Death, Obama's Job Approval Rises].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Jones, J.M. (2011, May 5). &amp;quot;[http://www.gallup.com/poll/147437/obama-approval-rallies-six-points-bin-laden-death.aspx Obama Job Approval Rallies Six Points to 52% After Bin Laden Death].&amp;quot; ''Gallup''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2012, relations between the U.S. and Pakistan remain sour because the U.S. did not involve Pakistan fully in the raid to ensure success.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CBS/Associated Press'' (2012, May 1). &amp;quot;[http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57424622/1-year-after-osama-bin-laden-killed-still-no-answers-from-pakistan/ 1 Year After Osama bin Laden Killed, Still No Answers from Pakistan].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Pakistan has denied White House claims that there was a deal with it allowing the raid.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2011, May 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/05/10/pakistani-president-claims-bin-laden-deal/ Former Pakistani President Claims There Was Never Bin Laden Deal With U.S.].&amp;quot; Retrieved from ''FOX News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2012: Ties to ACORN? ===&lt;br /&gt;
According to Stanley Kurtz - author of ''Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism'' (2010) Obama in 1995 sought and obtained the endorsement of a left-wing third party, the [[New Party]] in his quest to be elected to the Illinois State Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kurtz, S. (2012, June 7). [http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/302031/obamas-third-party-history-stanley-kurtz Obama's Third-Party History]. ''National Review Online''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama's &amp;quot;Fight the Smears&amp;quot; campaign has denied this, as has Politico's Ben Smith.&amp;lt;ref name=pollack&amp;gt;Pollack, J.B. (2012, June 7). [http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/07/Obama-Caught-Lying-Again-He-WAS-Member-of-New-Party-Says-Kurtz Obama Caught Lying Again: He WAS Member of 'New Party', Says Kurtz]. ''Breitbart''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Smith, B. (2008, October 25). [http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/The_dread_New_Party.html The Dread New Party]. ''Politico''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Others who claim he was affiliated with the New Party/ACORN include The Blaze's Billy Hallowell&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hallowell, B. (2012, June 7). [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/report-new-documents-show-obama-was-a-member-of-the-far-left-new-party/ News Docs Reportedly Show Obama Was a Member of the Far-Left 'New Party']. ''The Blaze''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Breitbart's Joel Pollack, Human Events' Erick Erickson&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Erickson, E. (2008, June 10). [http://www.humanevents.com/2008/06/10/obama-and-the-new-party/ Obama and the New Party]. ''Human Events''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Newsbusters' P.J. Gladnick&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gladnick, P.J. (2008, October 12). [http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/10/08/will-msm-report-obama-membership-socialist-new-party#ixzz21JfE3z1z Will MSM Report on Obama Membership in Socialist New Party?] ''Newsbusters''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Rick Moran at AmericanThinker.com&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rick Moran. [http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/06/obamas_alliance_with_marxists.html Obama's Alliance with Marxists], ''American Thinker'', June 03, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and various writers at Discover the Networks (which include Kurtz and Erickson).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7434 NEW PARTY (NP)], ''DiscoverTheNetworks.org''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kurtz in 2012 has claimed to find minutes of the New Party Chicago chapter that say, &amp;quot;''Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party 'Candidate Contract' and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.''&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=pollack /&amp;gt; Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod responded to Kurtz with silence and when asked if that meant &amp;quot;yes or no&amp;quot;, Axelrod stated, &amp;quot;You can take that as I have no idea what you are talking about.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollack, J.B. (2012, June 7). [http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/07/Exclusive-Axelrod-Plays-Dumb-on-Obama-and-Socialist-New-Party Exclusive: Axelrod Plays Dumb on Obama and Socialist New Party]. ''Breitbart''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;You didn't build that&amp;quot; Controversy===&lt;br /&gt;
In a campaign even speech on July 13, 2012, Obama gave a speech that immediately stirred up controversy. Speaking about the Government's role in the success of private business, he said:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/07/13/remarks-president-campaign-event-roanoke-virginia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help.  There was a great teacher somewhere in your life.  Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive.  Somebody invested in roads and bridges.  If you’ve got a business - you didn’t build that.  Somebody else made that happen.}}&lt;br /&gt;
It is fairly clear that when Obama said &amp;quot;you didn't build that,&amp;quot; he is referring to roads, bridges, and other [[infrastructure]] and technological advancements that government played a key role in funding and creating, though plenty of people may disagree over how much government is actually required for businesses to be successful. But many Obama opponents, including the [[Romney]] campaign, took that one sentence (&amp;quot;If you’ve got a business - you didn’t build that&amp;quot;) out of context, making it seem like the President is not giving credit to business owners for having built their own businesses. Obama could have been more clear about what he was referring to, which is unusual because he is often praised for his [[Political_positions_of_Barack_Obama#Public_speaking|public speeches]]. This could be a case of Obama speaking off-script, providing further evidence for his reliance on [[teleprompter]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Political positions of Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama and abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Born Outside the U.S.A.!]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Special Interests Candidate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jobsgate]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Recovery Summer]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lobbyists ties to the Obama administration]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Party]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ObamaCare]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama doublespeak]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama inauguration]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Religion of Barack Hussein Obama]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Honorable James David Manning]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Young Communist League]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.antiobama.net/ Anti Obama.net]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.dontvoteobama.net/ Don’t Vote For Obama.net]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nobamanetwork.com/ Nobama Network]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/ Audacity Of Hypocrisy]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/ The Real Barack Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/6130/ The New Cult of Personality]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.survivingobamunism.com/index.html Surviving Obamunism T-shirts]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.barackobamaantichrist.blogspot.com/ Barack Obama the Anti-Christ ?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/23/che-obama-and-the-revolutionary-agenda/ Che, Obama, and the Revolutionary Agenda]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/fashion-shows/ Obama Laundry List of Lies]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/09/americas-first-muslim-president/ GAFFNEY: America's first Muslim president?] Washington Times&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-l-esposito/barack-obama-and-islam_b_212519.html Barack Obama and Islam.] by [[John L. Esposito]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78931 Democrat: Obama's grandma confirms Kenyan birth.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/barack_obama.htm Barack Obama on the issues.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etWLwrvT2vo Obama = Kosher Puppet.] video on You Tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USPresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{2008 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Barack Hussein Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Presidency]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Nobel laureates in Peace]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion Advocates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Obama, Barack Hussein}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gun_control&amp;diff=995766</id>
		<title>Gun control</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gun_control&amp;diff=995766"/>
				<updated>2012-07-23T23:11:58Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* The Fallacy and Motivation for Gun Control */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Gun control''' laws restrict the purchase or ownership of guns, even though guns are typically acquired for defensive and/or sporting purposes.  Studies show that more gun ownership results in less crime, but [[liberals]] push gun control because it increases the dependency of voters on government for protection. The political effect of gun control is to shift voters leftward, and hence the primary supporters of gun control are the [[liberal media]] and [[leftist]] politicians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/quotes/repeal.html Quotes of Leftists Demanding Gun Control]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the [[United Kingdom]], which already has the strictest gun control in Europe, [[leftists]] demand control over 120,000 ''deactivated'' guns, even though their activation and use constitute only 0.04% of all gun offenses there. But leftists want gun control because fewer guns means greater dependency on government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3168607.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control is a denial or limitation by [[government]]s of the right to armed [[self-defense]],&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Washington University Law Quarterly&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;quot;In contrast to most other weaponry, firearms are preeminently defensive in effect.&amp;quot; [http://www.constitution.org/2ll/2ndschol/76holo.htm Washington University Law Quarterly]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as promised by the [[Second Amendment]] of the Constitution of the [[United States of America]].  Genocide has occurred only after gun control first disarmed the citizenry.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Washington University Law Quarterly&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proponents use the discredited - but superficially appealing - claim that fewer lawfully-owned guns somehow leads to less crime, even though guns are primarily defensive weapons.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;People who support gun control claim or pretend that gun control laws significantly reduce violent crime. [http://home.sprynet.com/~owl1/irrationality.htm Why People Are Irrational about Politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gun control primarily restricts the lawful acquisition and use of guns.  Over 99% of the guns restricted by most gun control regulation are used in a lawful manner.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control laws cause enormous hardships.  In May 2012, a gun control law resulted in a 20-year prison sentence against an [[African American]] woman for merely firing warning shots against her husband, and there was widespread outrage in [[Florida]] against this unconscionable sentence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/11/justice/florida-stand-ground-sentencing/index.html?hpt=hp_t3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States the three primary [[federal]] gun control laws are:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[National Firearms Act]] (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gun Control Act]] (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Brady Bill]] (1993)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These laws have further been amended by other laws such as the Firearms Owners Protection Act (1986) and the Omnibus Crime Bill (1994).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fed up with federal gun control, in 2009 States began considering (Utah) or passing (Montana) laws &amp;quot;making guns that are made and kept within state boundaries exempt from federal regulations&amp;quot; including &amp;quot;background checks, licensing and registration.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&amp;amp;sid=6367553&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Fallacy and Motivation for Gun Control ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:No Weapons Allowed.gif|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control potentially causes an increase in crime by restricting its main deterrent: [[self-defense]]. A study by Professor Gary Kleck, initially a liberal critic of gun control, caused him to change his mind on this issue when the evidence showed that crime was predominantly ''prevented'' when people could carry guns.  ''See Point Blank: Guns and Violence in America''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.largo.org/effects.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the United States, law-abiding uses of guns outnumber criminal uses by about a factor of 1000 to 1,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americanselfdefense.com/gunfacts3.0.pdf (p. 60)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the removal of guns from everyone eliminates the lawful use of self-defense and its deterrent effect.  &amp;quot;[[Americans]] use firearms to defend themselves from criminals at least 764,000 times a year.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Gallup_LAT&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;This figure is the lowest among a group of 9 nationwide surveys done by organizations including Gallup and the Los Angeles Times.&amp;quot; (Just Facts - [http://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp Gun Control])&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Specific examples of guns being used successfully in [[self-defense]] are easy to find.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Two 70-ish store owners stopped armed robberies of their stores by shooting at the bandits.  &amp;quot;The person came in and pointed the gun at him and my father shot him.  I'm proud of him.&amp;quot; [http://www.buffalonews.com/cityregion/buffaloerie/story/253849.html Buffalo News]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;In 1982, a survey of imprisoned criminals found that 34% of them had been &amp;quot;scared off, shot at, wounded or captured by an armed victim.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Gallup_LAT&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; When [[Florida]] began allowing its citizens to carry a concealed weapon, [[Florida]]'s firearm homicide rate fell by 37% while the national average ''increased'' by 15%.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Gallup_LAT&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  As explained below, the political effect of gun control is to cause voters to become more dependent emotionally on government and more supportive of bigger government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies by [[John Lott]] and others indicate that gun control causes higher crime rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnrlott.com/ John Lott's Website]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Washington, D.C.]] has one of the highest crime rates in [[America]] even though it completely bans private handguns.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/dccrime.htm District of Columbia Crime Rates 1960 - 2006]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;Switzerland, Israel, Denmark and Finland, all of whom have a higher gun ownership rate than America, all have lower crime rates than America, in fact, their crime rates are among the lowest in the Western World.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slashdoc - [http://www.slashdoc.com/documents/71244 gun control]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Lott demonstrates that in [[Britain]], [[Australia]] and [[Canada]], increased gun control in the late 1990s led to increased crime, the exact opposite of what the proponents of the gun control promised.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John R. Lott Jr. and Eli Lehrer - [http://johnrlott.tripod.com/op-eds/IBDGunConFailure.html Add Gun Control To Litany Of Misbegotten Gov't Plans]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  States in the [[U.S.]] that have enacted concealed-carry laws enjoy lower crime rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=4706 Cato report]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Robbery victims per 100K.png|300px|thumb|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Source data:  Australian Bureau of Statistics&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Robbery victims.png|300px|thumb|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Source data:  Australian Bureau of Statistics&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Australia]], where gun ownership was less widespread and the gun control measures were less strict, there was an immediate increase in robbery and armed robbery after the gun control went into effect in 1996 (see chart at right).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control passed in Australia because &amp;quot;public was immediately whipped into a gun control frenzy by the press&amp;quot; after the &amp;quot;Port Arthur massacre&amp;quot; in Tasmania on April 28, 1996, in which 32 were shot dead and 19 injured.  &amp;quot;Although polls done prior to the massacre indicated that the public was satisfied with the amount of 'gun control' they already had, a major newspaper did a poll just a few days after the massacre (while all minds were &amp;quot;clear&amp;quot;) and, not surprisingly, found high levels of support for extreme gun control measures.  This poll would be used forever by the commonwealth government and other gun controllers to claim that Australians supported the new gun laws to come.&amp;quot; - [http://www.gunsandcrime.org/aussiegc.html Gun Control in Australia] (by gunsandcrime.org)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no clear evidence supporting a decrease in crime from gun control.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Results&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.gunsandcrime.org/auresult.html Results of the Australian Gun &amp;quot;Buyback&amp;quot; &amp;amp; New Gun Laws], October 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/azl084v1 Study showing lack of promised benefits from gun control]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although from 1979 to 1996, 11,110 Australians died by gunshot representing an annual average of 617. In the seven years after new gun laws were announced (1997 to 2003), the yearly average almost halved, to 331. In the decade up to and including Port Arthur There have been 11 mass shootings where 100 people were shot dead and another 52 wounded, while in In the 10 years since 1996 and the new gun laws, not one mass shooting (more than five victims) has occurred in Australia (although in 2002 a gunman killed two and wounded four at Monash University) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/a-safer-place-after-howards-gun-buyback/2006/04/27/1145861484114.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subsequent to gun control in England:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reason.com/news/show/28582.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;from 1997 to 2001, the rate of violent crime more than doubled. Your chances of being mugged in London are now [as of 2002] six times greater than in New York. England's rates of assault, robbery, and burglary are far higher than America's, and 53 percent of English burglaries occur while occupants are at home, compared with 13 percent in the U.S., where burglars admit to fearing armed homeowners more than the police. In a United Nations study of crime in 18 developed nations published in July, England and Wales led the Western world's crime league, with nearly 55 crimes per 100 people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;However this increase in recorded violent crime between 1997 and 2001 is explained by the Home Office as a result of changes in the definition of violent crime and new counting rules introduced in 1998. [http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/rdsolr1804.pdf Violent Crime in England and Wales] According to the British Crime Survey, which is considered a more reliable guide to trends in crime[http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs06/crime-statistics-independent-review-06.pdf], violent crime fell 24% between 1997 and 2001/02, and burglary fell 40% over the same period.[http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs05/hosb1105tab201.xls Trends in BCS incidents of crime]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control in [[Britain]] and [[Australia]] has been followed by a predictable shift to the left politically by voters as they lost their instrument of self-defense and became more emotionally dependent on government.  Contrast that with the [[United States]], where an effort to push gun control after the [[Columbine massacre]] failed in 2000 and the government has remained as [[conservative]] -- if not more so -- ever since.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emasculation of the citizenry by gun control also arguably reduces the resistance of a society to intimidation, and exacerbates fear of consequences from causing offense. Subsequent to the passage of strict gun control in [[England]] some teachers have avoided teaching controversial subjects such as the [[Holocaust]], the Arab-Israeli conflict and the [[Crusades]] during history classes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RW100.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Teaching Emotive and Controversial History 3-19] (p.15) The anti-self-defense attitude of British authorities has also turned criminals into &amp;quot;victims&amp;quot; and victims who fight back into &amp;quot;criminals.&amp;quot; One particularly egregious case involved a farmer being sentenced to life imprisonment for defending himself in his home after the home was repeatedly burglarized &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theinternetparty.org/commentary/c_s.php?td=200107200000&amp;amp;section_type=com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many [[religious]] leaders are in favor of gun control for &amp;quot;pro-life&amp;quot; reasons.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americamagazine.org/blog/entry.cfm?blog_id=2&amp;amp;entry_id=5250&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-faith/religious-leaders-call-for-prayer-and-tighter-gun-control-after-colorado-shooting/2012/07/20/gJQAwMRcyW_story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Opponents of gun control argue that this is a misguided position, and that guns actually do more to protect life than end life, as discussed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trends ==&lt;br /&gt;
After decades of increasing gun control laws, the current trend in the [[United States]] is in the direction of more gun rights.  The 1994 Omnibus Crime Bill included a ban on certain new rifles labeled assault rifles solely because of features of their appearance, and on new high-capacity magazines.  This law recently expired and was not renewed by [[Congress]].  Also, Washington D.C.'s gun ban was struck down as unconstitutional by the U.S. Court of Appeals on March 9, 2007.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The New York Times - [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/09/washington/09cnd-gun.html?hp Appeals Court Says Gun Ban Violates 2nd Amendment]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Washington Post - [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/09/AR2007030902416.html D.C.'s Ban On Handguns In Homes Is Thrown Out]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By removing the deterrent effect of guns, gun control causes dramatic increases in crimes committed with other weapons:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bbc&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2656875.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are now six times more likely to be mugged in [[London]] than [[New York]]. Why? Because as common law appreciated, not only does an armed individual have the ability to protect himself or herself but criminals are less likely to attack them. They help keep the peace. A study found American burglars fear armed home-owners more than the police. As a result burglaries are much rarer and only 13% occur when people are at home, in contrast to 53% in England.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Supporters of gun control argue that homicide with guns is much less in [[England]] than in the [[United States]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 2005/06, the total number of victims of homicide by shooting (including crossbows) in England and Wales was 50 and there were 212 victims of homicide by sharp instruments. [Home Office Statistical Bulletin - [http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs07/hosb0207.pdf Homicides, Firearm Offences and Intimate Violence 2005/2006][http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/hosb0104.pdf]  The data for gun deaths in the United States include guns used in self-defense, as in fending off an assault, robbery or rape, and there were a total of 11,350 gun deaths (including deaths of criminals) in 2005.[US Department of Justice, FBI - [http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/data/table_01.html Crime in the United States by Volume and Rate per 100,000 Inhabitants, 1986 - 2005]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but that was true even before gun control and is likely due to cultural reasons.  &amp;quot;A study comparing New York and London over 200 years found the New York homicide rate consistently five times the London rate, although for most of that period residents of both cities had unrestricted access to firearms.  When guns were available in England they were seldom used in crime. A government study for 1890-1892 found an average of one handgun homicide a year in a population of 30 million.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bbc&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control laws are often seen to conflict with the [[Second Amendment]] to the [[United States Constitution]], which recognizes the right to bear arms.  The Second Amendment reads: &amp;quot;A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;right to keep and bear arms&amp;quot; is a right guaranteed to the American citizen by the Bill of Rights through the virtue of a selective reading of said Bill. The phrase &amp;quot;a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state&amp;quot; precedes the statement, and most federal Courts of Appeals have held that this phrase requires that the &amp;quot;right to bear arms&amp;quot; relates to the collective rights of state militias, as opposed to the individual's rights to have any weapon desired.  Just recently, the Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit went against nine other circuits in holding that the Second Amendment constitutes an individual right.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The New York Times - [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/10/washington/10gun.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin Court Rejects Strict Gun Law as Unconstitutional]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FOX News - [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258067,00.html Appeals Court Strikes Down Washington, D.C. Handgun Ban]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, according to the judge writing for the majority in this case, its decision does still allow for &amp;quot;reasonable restrictions&amp;quot; on gun ownership and use, such as carrying of guns by intoxicated individuals, or in churches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only six cities in the [[United States]] ban handguns:  [[Washington, D.C.]], [[Chicago]], and four of its suburbs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Kopel, &amp;quot;The Democrats and Gun Control,&amp;quot; Wall St.J., Page A19, April 17, 2008 [http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB120839466717921537-lMyQjAxMDI4MDE4NzMxOTc0Wj.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Gun control&amp;quot; can include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Restricting which persons can own firearms.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Restrictions on the number of firearms a person may own, or purchase during a given time period&lt;br /&gt;
* Requirements that privately owned firearms be registered with the government.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Bans on certain types of firearms; for example, &amp;quot;handguns&amp;quot; or assault rifles&lt;br /&gt;
* Restrictions on where firearms may be carried, for example into restaurants or post offices&lt;br /&gt;
* Requiring a &amp;quot;background check&amp;quot; and/or a &amp;quot;waiting period&amp;quot; to purchase a firearm&lt;br /&gt;
* Restricting when and where firearms may be bought and sold, for example banning their sale through the mail&lt;br /&gt;
* Requiring licenses or some other form of permission from the government to buy and/or sell a firearm&lt;br /&gt;
* Requiring some form of permission from the government to carry a firearm in public, either concealed or openly&lt;br /&gt;
* Laws granting special gun rights for some people, for example retired law enforcement officers, which are denied the rest of the public, which was used in several southern states.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Outright bans on carrying firearms in public&lt;br /&gt;
* Outright bans on private possession of firearms, though this has never occurred in the United States&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Constitutional Debate==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Second Amendment]] reads:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most constitutional scholars agree that since the amendment refers to &amp;quot;the right of the People&amp;quot; instead of the right of the militia, it protects an individual right to own guns. The reason for this was the fact that the supplying of guns for the military and militas was already provided for in Article I Section 8 as a power of Congress.  The extent of that right was something hotly debated for decades, until the Supreme Court ruling of 26 June, 2008, Heller v District of Columbia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The majority opinion, written by Justice [[Antonin Scalia]], held for the first time that the Constitution provides an individual right to bear arms, such as for self-defense, rather than a right that applies only to a state militia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The decision upheld an appellate court ruling striking down Washington, D.C.'s 1976 handgun ban. The case marked the first time in more than 70 years that the Supreme Court had addressed the Second Amendment ''and the first time it spoke directly about the implication of an individual right''.  The court struck down two of the District of Columbia's gun control laws: its handgun ban and its requirement that other firearms kept at home have a trigger lock or be disassembled. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Relying on the broader historical record, Justice Scalia wrote: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|'''putting all of these textual elements together, we find that they guarantee the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation.'''}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scalia noted that the ruling should not be interpreted to &amp;quot;cast doubt on long-standing prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons or the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/07-2901.pdf Supreme Court Opinion, District of Columbia v Heller]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Racism of gun control==&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United States of America]], gun control has a strong racist origin and reasoning. Before the Civil War ended, State &amp;quot;Slave Codes&amp;quot; prohibited slaves from owning guns. After President [[Abraham Lincoln]] issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, and after the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution abolishing slavery was adopted and the Civil War ended in 1865, States persisted in prohibiting blacks, now freemen, from owning guns under laws renamed &amp;quot;Black Codes.&amp;quot; They did so on the basis that blacks were not citizens, and thus did not have the same rights, including the right to keep and bear arms protected in the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as whites. This view was specifically articulated by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] in its infamous 1857 decision in ''[[Dred Scott v. Sandford]]'' to uphold slavery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States Congress overrode most portions of the Black Codes by passing the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The legislative histories of both the Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment, as well as The Special Report of the Anti-Slavery Conference of 1867, are replete with denunciations of those particular statutes that denied blacks equal access to firearms. [Kates, &amp;quot;Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment,&amp;quot; 82 Mich. L. Rev. 204, 256 (1983)] However, facially neutral disarming through economic means laws remain in effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1878, most States turned to &amp;quot;facially neutral&amp;quot; business or transaction taxes on handgun purchases. However, the intention of these laws was not neutral. An article in Virginia's official university law review called for a &amp;quot;prohibitive tax...on the privilege&amp;quot; of selling handguns as a way of disarming &amp;quot;the son of Ham,&amp;quot; whose &amp;quot;cowardly practice of 'toting' guns has been one of the most fruitful sources of crime.... Let a negro board a railroad train with a quart of mean whiskey and a pistol in his grip and the chances are that there will be a murder, or at least a row, before he alights.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Comment, Carrying Concealed Weapons, 15 Va L. Reg. 391, 391-92 (1909); George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal (GMU CR LJ), Vol. 2, No. 1, &amp;quot;Gun Control and Racism,&amp;quot; Stefan Tahmassebi, 1991, p. 75.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Thus, many Southern States imposed high taxes or banned inexpensive guns so as to price blacks and poor whites out of the gun market.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, &amp;quot;gun control&amp;quot; laws continue to be enacted so as to have a racist effect if not intent:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Police-issued license and permit laws, unless drafted to require issuance to those not prohibited by law from owning guns, are routinely used to prevent lawful gun ownership among &amp;quot;unpopular&amp;quot; populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Public housing residents, approximately 3 million Americans, are singled out for gun bans.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Gun sweeps&amp;quot; by police in &amp;quot;high crime neighborhoods&amp;quot; whereby vehicles and &amp;quot;pedestrians who meet a specific profile that might indicate they are carrying a weapon&amp;quot; are searched are becoming popular, and are being studied by the [[U.S. Department of Justice]] as &amp;quot;Operation Ceasefire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* Some U.S. cities with high minority populations, such as Washington, D.C., are singled out for gun bans.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Project Exile&amp;quot; began in the U.S. city of Richmond, Virginia and mandated that people arrested for technical firearms violations (note: not for violent crimes committed with a firearm, but for technical violations of the law) be tried in federal court where they would be subject to lengthy mandatory minimum sentences rather than in state court under the more lenient Virginia laws. As with many other restrictions this was aimed primarily at the city's Black residents. It has since been copied in many other cities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sexism of gun control ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firearms, especially lower recoiling ones such as many handguns, allow any person to wield enough power to stop another person from attacking them.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;genderDiscrimination1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.learnaboutguns.com/2008/03/19/firearms-rights-are-a-gender-equality-issue-too/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Many women (quite reasonably) fear the threat of attack by a physically stronger man, and a firearm could prevent many of these attacks, but gun bans leave these women vulnerable. Take the case of the “North Side Rapist” in Chicago, a city where hand guns are banned, as an example: The rapist broke in to the womens homes, and at least one of the women heard him break in and then climb the stairs. Had this woman had a handgun, she almost certainly could have stopped the rapist before it was too late. This would have prevented her from enduring such a horrific crime, as well as preventing the rapist’s future victims from experiencing the same thing. Instead, Chicago law prevented her from being able to defend herself, and gave the advantage to the rapist/home-invader. This is not an isolated incident, and similar events happen every day across the county.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elitism  of gun control ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the most ardent American anti-gun politicians, such as Chicago’s Mayor Daley, are protected by taxpayer-sponsored armed body guards, but deny law abiding citizens the right to defend themselves with a gun. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;classDiscrimination1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.learnaboutguns.com/2008/04/16/a-double-standard-anti-gun-politicians-and-their-gun-toting-bodyguards/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These politicians seemingly believe themselves to be part of an elite group who deserve to be protected against violent criminals, while ordinary law-abiding citizens are left with less-effective means to defend themselves, and must instead rely on the police arriving in time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gun control outside the United States ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control advocates cite foreign countries to argue that gun control can reduce crime, but such comparison can be difficult due to the presence of other factors.  For example, they cite [[Singapore]] as having gun control and a lower crime rate than the [[United States]], but Singapore has less than 5 million persons and one of the highest literacy and average wealth in the world. It lacks many of the freedoms found in the [[United States]] and strictly imposes harsh physical punishment, such as caning and the [[death penalty]], for crimes that are not punished so harshly in the [[United States]]. The real issue of the security in Singapore is its tight criminal control, not the gun control itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control supporters also cite [[Gun Control in Japan|Japan's gun control laws]], which severely restrict gun ownership and crime rates are relatively low.  But [[Japan]] also lacks many freedoms and diversity which exist in the [[United States]], and [[Japan]] has strong cultural deterrents to crime.  Ironically, [[Japan]] is home to [[Tokyo Marui]], the world's largest [[airsoft]] gun manufacturer, which designs airsoft guns that are made to the same scale and with the same materials as the real counterpart and which have been mistaken by police for real guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[European Union]], gun control is more strict than in the United States, but gun ownership differs widely between member states, from 36 per 100 people in [[Cyprus]] to one per 100 in [[Poland]].&amp;quot; In [[Switzerland]], on the other hand, gun ownership is quite widespread, which no doubt contributes to its reputation as a peaceful  and neutral country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/09/27/switzerland.shooting Gun control in Switzerland]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In November 2007, the [[European Parliament]] passed legislation to tighten and harmonize gun control across the EU, and oblige each member state to set up a computerized database of firearms, as it &amp;quot;hoped to prevent Europe from becoming a gun-friendly culture like the United States&amp;quot;. Parliament wanted to limit cross-border trade from states with less control to those with tougher laws, such as from [[Lithuania]], where replica guns can cost as little as [[Euro|€]]100 (US$150), to the [[United Kingdom]], where most replicas are outlawed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Australia, gun violence has always been significantly lower than other types of violence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gunsandcrime.org/aussiegc.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Australia has not experienced considerable violence problems with legally purchased guns. It has always had a much lower homicide rate than the more violent culture in the [[United States]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In Australia the gun related homicide rate is 0.44 per 100,000 of population.  In the US it is about 8 times as high at 3.72 per 100,000 of population.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; From 1979 to 1996, 11,110 Australians died by gunshot representing an annual average of 617. In the seven years after new gun laws were announced (1997 to 2003), the yearly average almost halved, to 331. In the decade up to and including Port Arthur There have been 11 mass shootings where 100 people were shot dead and another 52 wounded, while in In the 10 years since 1996 and the new gun laws, not one mass shooting (more than five victims) has occurred in Australia (although in 2002 a gunman killed two and wounded four at Monash University).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/a-safer-place-after-howards-gun-buyback/2006/04/27/1145861484114.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control began in Australia in response to fears that guns would be used by home-grown Communist Revolutionaries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1083528 This study discusses the parallel policies of early-mid 20th century Britain and Australia.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The most restrictive reforms were made in 1996 and 2002, following highly publicized shootings.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/a-safer-place-after-howards-gun-buyback/2006/04/27/1145861484114.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both sets of reforms (1996 and 2002) were lead by Prime Minister [[John Howard]] of the Coalition(Australia’s conservative government). Howard was well known as an anti-gun advocate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/anger-lingers-among-those-who-lost-their-firearms/2006/04/27/1145861489398.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The move offended gun supporters, many of whom had traditionally supported the Coalition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/anger-lingers-among-those-who-lost-their-firearms/2006/04/27/1145861489398.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Despite the loss of this voting group, Howard won elections following both reforms (in 1998 and 2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is controversy over the success of Australia’s gun restrictions. Studies suggest overall gun violence has decreased since the 1996 and 2002 bans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/a-safer-place-after-howards-gun-buyback/2006/04/27/1145861484114.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, Australia’s bike and drug gangs, the main perpetrators of gun violence, still easily access illegal firearms.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theage.com.au/news/in-depth/a-disarming-cause/2006/04/27/1145861489519.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Further, the overall homicide rate remains constant.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/a-safer-place-after-howards-gun-buyback/2006/04&lt;br /&gt;
/27/1145861484114.html?page=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gun Control and Genocide ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control &amp;quot;contributes to the probability of its government engaging&amp;quot; in [[genocide]], including the three worst instances in the 20th century:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[A] society's weapons policy might be one of the institutional arrangements that contributes to the probability of its government engaging in some of the more extreme varieties of outrage. ... [I]t is [] an arresting reality that not one of the principal genocides of the twentieth century, and there have been dozens, has been inflicted on a population that was armed.&amp;quot; [http://ls.wustl.edu/WULQ/75-3/753-4.html Washington University Law Quarterly]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In 1911, [[Turkey]] imposed gun control and then, from 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million defenseless Armenians were killed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In 1929, the [[Soviet Union]] imposed gun control and over the next 24 years about 20 million defenseless dissidents were killed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In 1938, [[Germany]] imposed gun control and then over the next seven years 13 million defenseless Jews and other victims were exterminated. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thegunzone.com/rkba/rkba-12.html The True Face of Gun Control], Dean Speir, The Gun Zone RKBA, Accessed December 26, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Nazis made only two important changes to the Weapons Law that was in place when they came to power. First, they forbade Jews from owning guns or any other weapon. Second, they exempted members of the Sturmabteilung (SA) and many Nazi party officials from the law's strictures.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Washington University Law Quarterly&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The German Firearms Act of 1937 stated &amp;quot;No civilian is to have a firearm without a permit and permits shall not be issued to persons suspected of acting against the state. ''For Jews, this permission will not be granted.'' Those people who do not require permission to carry weapons include the whole of the SS, and the SA - including the Deaths Head group, and the officers of the Hitler youth.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Volokh&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a38d04d5c7c40.htm The Journalist's Guide to Gun Policy Scholars and Second Amendment Scholars], Professor Eugene Volokh, FreeRepublic.com, March 15, 2000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adolf Hitler said, &amp;quot;The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Volokh&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Josef Stalin]], former dictator of the [[USSR]] and murderer of over 20 million people, infamously supported Gun control in the fear that his evil regime might be torn down and so only soldiers could have firearms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gun Control and young mass murderers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Main article: [[Young mass murderers]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strict gun control failed and still fails to prevent mass murderers from starting killing sprees while the victims are unable to defend themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Compare the cases of Pekka-Eric Auvinen ([[Finland]]) and Robert Steinhäuser ([[Germany]]) with the case of Matthew Murray. The latter was stopped by an armed citizen before he could harm more victims; Auvinen killed 8 people and Steinhäuser killed 16. Both Finland and Germany have gun control laws.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other terms==&lt;br /&gt;
Other terms sometimes used by those who are opposed to gun control include:&lt;br /&gt;
* Rights restriction&lt;br /&gt;
* Victim disarmament&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gun control quotes]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:US Armed Citizens and Crime Control]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Lott]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gun Control in Nazi Germany]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Opposed to gun control ===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.2asisters.org/ Second Amendment Sisters]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nra.org/ The National Rifle Association]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nrapublications.org/AC/index.asp Armed citizens defending themselves.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.a-human-right.com/ A Human Right] Discussion of the human right to self defense with a firearm.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.learnaboutguns.com/ Learn About Guns] Firearm information and politics.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gunowners.org/ Gun Owners of America] A no-compromise pro-gun lobby in Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/gun-control/ What Liberals Say - Category: Gun Control]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.guncite.com/ GunCite: Gun Control and Second Amendment Issues]&lt;br /&gt;
=== In favor of gun control ===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.guninformation.org/ Gun Control and the Second Amendment]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-switzerland.htm Myth: Switzerland proves that high gun-ownership doesn't increase murder]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Oppression]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Obamanomics&amp;diff=993487</id>
		<title>Obamanomics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Obamanomics&amp;diff=993487"/>
				<updated>2012-07-14T16:33:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: spending data, and comparison to other presidents&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Obamanomics''' is a term describing the school of economic thought and policy being pushed by the [[Obama Administration]].  Its main doctrine is massive government spending (as evidenced by the [[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009]]) in excess of $1 trillion, which is funded by massive borrowing through U.S. Treasury bonds&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.amherstwire.com/2009/03/06/faq-obamas-economic-stimulus-package/ ''Amherstwire.com'': &amp;quot;FAQ: Obama's Economic Stimulus Package&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  With unemployment at 10.2% as of October 2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/jobs_lost/2009/11/06/282644.html ''Newsmax'': &amp;quot;U.S. Jobless Rate Hits 10.2%; 190,000 Jobs Lost&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the value of the U.S. dollar plummeting&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbc.ca/fp/story/2009/11/09/2202568.html &amp;quot;Gold, Loonie Soars on Plunging Greenback CBC News]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, it has proven to be a failed system.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:G.D.P. Q2 2010.JPG|175px|right|thumb|Obamanomics did not produce 1% growth in its first year, and growth turned down significantly 9 months into recovery.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Through three fiscal years, the federal government takes in $6 billion a day and spends $10 billion a day. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nation.foxnews.com/president-obama/2012/01/02/every-day-obama-regime-takes-6-billion-and-spends-10-billion Every Day, the Obama Regime Takes in $6 Billion and Spends $10 Billion, Fox Nation, January 02, 2012]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  One outcome of Obamanomics has been to saddle America with debt and no positive benefits can be attributed to the gobs of money spent. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, budgets passed under President Obama have included the smallest average annualized growth of federal spending (1.4%) since before President Reagan. Federal spending grew an average of 8.7% per year during Reagan's first term and an average of 8.1% per year during George W. Bush's second term.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/|title=Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower? Would You Believe It's Barack Obama?|publisher=Forbes|author=Rick Ungar|date=May 24th, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key Components of Obamanomics==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GDP Q2 1983.JPG|175px|right|thumb|Reaganomics produced 3%+ sustained growth immediately, and more than 22 million new jobs were created over the next 28 years.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Obamanomics is diametrically opposed to [[Reaganomics]], embraces higher taxes, more regulation, more spending, and loose money.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123431484726570949.html Wall Street Journal: Reaganomics v. Obamanomics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Whereas Reaganomics jump started sustainable recovery during the 1980s, Obamanomics is expected to impede recovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By mid 2010 the [[U.S. Commerce Dept.]] reported [[Gross Domestic Product]] did not responded adequately to the [[economic stimulus]] passed in February 2009. More than 3 million jobs however were lost and more than a trillion dollars was added to the '''[[National debt]]'''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, the 3.0%+ growth rates sustained by the [[Reagan]] era tax cuts as the United States emerged from the 1982 [[recession]] provided the necessary stimulus to maintain a growing population and declining [[unemployment]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Increased government spending===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Loose monetary policy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Increased regulation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tax increases===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Obama tax increases.JPG|right|275px]]&lt;br /&gt;
On September 12, 2008 while campaigning in [[Dover]], [[New Hampshire]], then [[Barack Hussein Obama 2008 Presidential campaign|candidate Obama]] made this solemn promise to the American people:&lt;br /&gt;
:''I can make a firm pledge: under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 will see their taxes increase - not your income taxes, not your payroll taxes.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8erePM8V5 Video]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/obamas_remarks_in_dover_new_ha.html Transcript]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of January 1, 2011, income taxes and payroll taxes are slated to increase on all working people in the [[United States]], including the poor and those least able to afford it.  A working family with four children, for example, will pay $215 more ''per month'' under [[President Obama]] and the Congressional Democrats economic program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Capital gains tax====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Dividends tax====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Income tax====&lt;br /&gt;
Obamaonomics proposes raising [[income tax]]es on all working Americans effective January 1, 2010. The rate of increase on the poorest workers, those least able to afford it, is 50%, from a progressive tax rate of 10% to a rate of 15%.  By contrast the upper 2%, those with taxable income of $250,000, will only experience a 10% increase, from 36% to 39.6%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Payroll tax====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Cap and trade energy tax====&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article:'' [[Cap and Trade]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====VAT tax proposal====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Recovery Summer 2010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Barack Hussein Obama]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=993486</id>
		<title>Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=993486"/>
				<updated>2012-07-14T16:31:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* Economic policy */ spending data, and comparison to other presidents&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Barack Hussein Obama&lt;br /&gt;
|image=President Barack Obama.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=see [[Obama's religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/president&lt;br /&gt;
	|country=the United States&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=44th&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 20, 2009-Present&lt;br /&gt;
	|vp=[[Joe Biden]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[George W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 2005 – November 16, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=Peter Fitzgerald&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Roland Burris]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Barack Hussein Obama II''', also known by the alias '''Barry Soetoro''' during his time in [[Indonesia]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQPXVJuT2vY Barry Soetoro the muslim - YouTube]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (born August 4, 1961, in [[Hawaii]]) was elected the 44th President.  Promoted heavily by [[liberals]], as demonstrated by his unjustified receipt of the 2009 [[Nobel Prize|Nobel Peace Prize]], Obama won the presidency despite a short and unremarkable political career by campaigning on promises of &amp;quot;hope&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; against his listless opponent [[John McCain]] in 2008. In effect, that change has been an embrace of [[socialism]] and [[liberal]] policies. Barack Obama has been widely criticized by the American [[business]] community and others for his anti-business policies that are killing American jobs during a period of high unemployment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.usnews.com/opinion/mzuckerman/articles/2010/07/16/obamas-anti-business-policies-are-our-economic-katrina Obama's Anti-business Policies are our Economic Katrina]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/619dvjlm.asp An Anti-Business President]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/08/small-businesses-are-not-hiring-why.html Small Businesses are not hiring. Why should they?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/dear_mr_president_why_we_are_n.html Dear Mr. President: Why we are not hiring]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Former [[Democrat]] Presidential candidate [[Joe Lieberman]] endorsed Obama's opponent in 2008 and has declined to endorse [[Obama]] for the [[Presidential Election 2012]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thehill.com/video/campaign/222929-lieberman-declines-to-endorse-in-presidential-race&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under President Obama's mismanagement of the economy, the United States Government's credit rating has, for the first time in its history, been downgraded from AAA to AA+, and [[poverty]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/incpovhlth/2009/pov09fig04.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; has increased markedly. By and large his policies to combat the recession, unemployment, slow growth, the deficit, and expanding [[national debt]], have failed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The vast majority (73%) of respondents reported the fiscal stimulus enacted in February 2009 has had no impact on employment to date. While 68% also believe a jobs bill, such as the one recently enacted into law, will have no impact on payrolls, 30% do believe it will boost payrolls moderately&amp;quot;. ''Industry Survey'', National Association for Business Economics, April 2010, [http://www.nabe.com/press/ind1004.pdf p. 2 pdf].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also on the domestic front, Obama passed an expensive [[health care]] bill in 2009 with no [[bipartisan]] support and 34 Democrats dissenting. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fatalities in Afghanistan have more than doubled under Obama's leadership then in the preceding eight years combined, according to the Congressional Research Service &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R41084.pdf (pg. 3 pdf)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Against his own Defense Secretary's advice, Obama [[Libyan uprising 2011|attacked Libya]] - a possible violation of the [[War Powers Act]]. After he announced the killing of [[September 11th]] mastermind and terrorist [[Osama bin Laden]], the [[U.S. State Department]] warned of the increased risk to the lives and safety of Americans around the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/national_world&amp;amp;id=8273909&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bin Laden's death had negligible long term impact on Obama's approval ratings, as seen in Gallup's daily poll.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gallup.com/poll/113980/gallup-daily-obama-job-approval.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's bizarre gaffes are frequent and embarrassing, but typically unreported by the [[liberal media]].  Obama offended [[Poland]] by referring to the [[Nazi]] death camps there as &amp;quot;Polish death camps.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/europe/230419-obama-letter-says-he-regrets-polish-death-camp-gaffe&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Later Obama apologized.  When Obama visited [[England]] in 2011, he signed his name and added the date of &amp;quot;2008&amp;quot; -- the last time he won an election.  He never explaned that one.  When Obama read a speech from a teleprompter, as he almost always does, he repeatedly mispronounced the familiar military term of &amp;quot;corpsman&amp;quot; by sounding out the &amp;quot;p&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article : [[Early life and career of Barack Hussein Obama]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also : [[Barack Obama's Muslim Heritage]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Obama [[Barack Obama's past dog meat eating and 2012 election campaign|ate dog meat]] as a child.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama claims to have been born in Hawaii to Stanley Ann Dunham and [[Barack Obama Sr.]] - who had married just six months prior - on August 4, 1961 in [[Honolulu, Hawaii]].  Some contend that this story is a complete fabrication.  After many leading conservatives including the leadership of this site and brilliant business man [[Donald Trump]] AKA &amp;quot;The Donald&amp;quot; called for Obama to release his birth certificate he did on April 27.  Another [[American Hero]] Sheriff [[Joe Arpaio]] of Phoenix, AZ conducted an investigation of the Obama's eligibility and alleged that the &amp;quot;birth certificate&amp;quot; was a fake; however, no charges have been filed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama Sr. was not a [[Natural born citizen|citizen of the United States]]. At the time of Obama's birth, Kenya was a British colony, meaning that Obama Sr not only held British citizenship, but passed it on to his son. When Kenya gained independence, Obama and his father both lost British citizenship and gained Kenyan citizenship. Barack Obama was a dual citizen of the United States and Kenya until his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired in 1984, as he had failed to renounce US nationality and swear loyalty to Kenya. Despite having been born with US citizenship through his mother, it has been argued that as he was born with dual nationality, he is not a natural-born citizen of the United States, and thus constitutionally ineligible to become President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The couple divorced in 1964. Dunham remarried Lolo Soetoro, an [[Indonesia]]n student. When Obama was six, Soetoro returned to Indonesia, and Dunham and Obama followed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;db mother&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-05-03/a-singular-woman-by-janny-scott-review-by-stacy-schiff/#|work=The Daily Beast|format=HTML|language=English|title=Dreams of His Mother|author=Stacy Schiff}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He spent four years in Indonesia,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;rct=j&amp;amp;q=obama%20ate%20dog&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;cd=1&amp;amp;ved=0CDAQFjAA&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nypost.com%2Fp%2Fnews%2Fnational%2Fromney_aides_point_out_obama_ate_pCetn9EcM0lOYNiJFl1zgI&amp;amp;ei=hAqaT86sMbOr2AXHoYj6Dg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNENy7Tz2DPv2_sO0EH6TGZ23rJtxA&amp;amp;cad=rja]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; before returning to Hawaii to be raised by his grandparents, Madelyn and WW2 veteran Stanley Armour Dunham. He would later attend Occidental College, [[Columbia University]] and then [[Harvard University]] for law school, where he would become the first black president of the Harvard Law Review. Also Obama is a socialist and a Muslim. Recently he instated socialized healthcare in the USA which will eventually lead to a Communist regime that resembles the Soviet Union. Expert economists in this field have also speculated that he is truly the anti-Christ. In the next few months Obama's secret police will start taking away your freedom. The bible makes this very clear. For example, Revelation 13:7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. In order to have power over all of the people of the Earth this would likely require a One-World-Government.Obama talks about a New World Order in his Berlin speech that basically says Global Citizenship is required and not an option. Many people already see Obama as the &amp;quot;President of the World.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Illinois State Senate career==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:O-2002-antiwar-rally-davidson.jpg|right|thumb|250px| Obama speaking at the October 2002 rally in Chicago organized by [[Carl Davidson]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Davidson is a longtime [[Mao]]ist and champion of the ''Thought of Mao Tse Tung.'' Davidson's anti-Trotskyite polemic, [http://www.wengewang.org/read.php?tid=10925 ''Left in Form, Right in Essence''] defends Maoist doctrine.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Retrieved from 对当代托洛茨基主义的批判：英文论集百花齐放 - 中国文革研究网, March 15, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''&amp;quot;[H]e is a brutal man who butchers his own people,&amp;quot;'' nevertheless Obama opposed ''&amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot;.'']]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995 Obama openly sought and obtained the endorsement of the [[Marxist]] [[New Party]] in his quest to be elected to the Illinois State Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7434 NEW PARTY (NP)], discoverthenetwork.org.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rick Moran. [http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/06/obamas_alliance_with_marxists.html Obama's Alliance with Marxists], ''American Thinker'', June 03, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He became the [[Democrat]] nominee and ran unopposed to win the election. Obama entered the Illinois Senate promising change to a corrupt system. He mixed often radical votes with more pragmatic agreements. Possibly one of his most radical votes was against requiring medical care for aborted children who survive [[abortion|the procedure]] - in fact the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council ascribed him a 100% rating for his consistently pro-choice votes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cbs illinois&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/17/politics/main2369157.shtml|title=Obama Record May Be Gold Mine For Critics|work=CBS|format=HTML|language=English|last=Clark|first=Amy S.|date=Jan. 17, 2007}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was criticized for using the statehouse as a stepping stone for a more illustrious career: Steven J. Rauschenberger, a [[Republican]], said prior to Obama's election as president: “He is a very bright but very ambitious person who has always had his eyes on the prize, and it wasn’t Springfield. If he deserves to be president, it is not because he was a great legislator.”&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt illinois&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=The New York Times|title=In Illinois, Obama Proved Pragmatic and Shrewd|last=Scott|first=Janny|format=HTML|language=English|date=July 30, 2007|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/30/us/politics/30obama.html}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The statehouse was majority Republican, so the Senator was sometimes forced to compromise. He formed allegiances across party lines to pass [[campaign finance]] reform that banned most gifts by lobbyists, prohibited spending campaign money for legislators’ personal use and required electronic filing of campaign disclosure reports.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt illinois&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Obama also helped pass  a so-called “driving-while-black bill”, which required the police to collect data on the race of drivers they stopped as a way to monitor [[racial profiling]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt illinois&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama established himself as a chief spokesperson in opposition to the [[War on Terror]] during an October 2002 rally at Federal Plaza in Chicago&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The rally was organized by Chicagoans Against War in Iraq (CAWI) later renamed Chicagoans Against War and Injustice. [http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?page_id=2 About CAWI] by Carl Davidson, Nov 02 2006. Retrieved from Chicagoans Against War and Injustice, March 15, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[community organizing|organized]] by veteran [[Mao]]ist and webmaster of [[Progressives for Obama]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.linkedin.com/in/carldavidson Carl Davidson,] LinkedIn.com, retrieved March 13, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Carl Davidson]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Radical foundation and connection to William Ayers===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Radical roots of Barack Hussein Obama}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995 a cadre of like minded individuals gathered in the home of [[Weather Underground]] (WUO) [[terrorist]]s [[Bernardine Dohrn]] and [[William Ayers|William &amp;quot;Bill&amp;quot; Ayers]].  Dohrn,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Georgie Anne Geyer and Keyes Beach &amp;quot;Cuba: School for U.S. Radicals&amp;quot;, ''Chicago Daily News/Chicago Sun-Times'' five part series October 1970, excerpted in [http://foia.fbi.gov/filelink.html?file=/weather/weath1c.pdf FBI file Weather Underground Organization (Weatherman),] Part 1c pp. 5-7 pdf (113-115 in original). [http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/2009/06/07/clandestine-agents-of-the-cuban-government-ayers-dohrn-myers/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; along with Carl Davidson, are veterans of [[guerrilla warfare]] training in [[Cuba]] prior 1968 Democratic National Convention riots.  Ayers and Dohrn have taken credit for, and never denied, bombing the [[U.S. Capitol]], the [[Pentagon]] and the [[State Department]].    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ayers and Dohrn used their celebrity status among [[leftist]]s to launch Obama's career. Ayers, Dohrn and [[Jeff Jones]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=106653 ''Obama's 'green jobs czar' worked with terror founder] Van Jones served on board of activist group where ex-Weatherman serves as top director'', By Aaron Klein, [[WorldNetDaily]], August 13, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; are authors of ''[[Bill_Ayers#Prairie_Fire_Organizing_Committee_and_Maoist_thought|Prairie Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-imperialism]],'' the title taken from ''The Sayings of Mao Zedong.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/works/red-book/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The book declares &amp;quot;we are [[communist]] men and women.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Harvey Klehr, ''Far Left of Center: The American Radical Left Today'' (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, 1988), 109.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ayers later jokingly, publicly admitted to ghostwriting Obama's book, ''Dreams From My Father''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/03/ayers_affirms_he_wrote_dreams.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Obama was to appoint several openly avowed Maoists to prominent White House and Executive Branch positions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704597704574487431322664964.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==U.S. Senate career==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Early_life_and_career_of_Barack_Hussein_Obama#U.S._Senate_.282004-2008.29|Barack Obama:U.S. Senate (2004-2008)]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|left|Senator Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following a failed campaign for the U. S. House of Representatives, Obama ran for the open Senate seat from Illinois in 2004 against Republican candidate Jack Ryan. He won the seat after Chicago media outlets The Chicago Tribune newspaper and Chicago ABC affiliate WLS-TV; together with candidate Jack Ryan's Republican Primary opponents, sought and obtained the release of the confidential and personally embarrassing records in his California divorce from actress Jeri Ryan, forcing him to end his campaign. Ryan was replaced by the out-of-state candidate [[Alan Keyes]]. Obama won over Keyes 70% to 27% in the general election. Obama spent very little time in the Senate - &amp;quot;frustrated by his lack of influence and what he called the 'glacial pace' ... [he began] running for president even as he was still getting lost in the Capitol’s corridors.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt senate&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=The New York Times|publisher=The New York Times, Inc.|format=HTML|language=English|title=Obama in Senate: Star Power, Minor Role|author=Kate Zernike and Jeff Zelleny|date=March 9, 2008|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/us/politics/09obama.html}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama frequently used the [[filibuster]] to obstruct the operations of government,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/03/AR2010020303801_pf.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; voted against the [[minimum wage]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://uspolitics.about.com/od/legislatio1/a/HR2206.htm HR 2206 - Emergency Appropriations], Kathy Gill, Your Guide to U.S. Politics: Current Events. May 26 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://more.gov.mtopgroup.com/2007/05/votes-hr-2206-iraq-supplemental.html Votes - H.R. 2206: Iraq Supplemental], May 28, 2007. Retrieved from Deeper Inside the Mountain, June 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and debt ceiling increases,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/04/obama-once-opposed-debt-ceiling-hike/237129/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and recieved more than $126,000 in campaign contributions from [[Fannie Mae]]. The ''[[National Journal]]'' ranked him the most liberal senator in 2007.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ranked&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-502163_162-3775451-502163.html|title=National Journal: Obama Most Liberal Senator In 2007|author=Brian Montopoli|date=January 31, 2008|work=CBS}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidential Election==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Barack Hussein Obama 2008 Presidential campaign}}&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats began calling for an Obama candidacy after liberals lauded his 2004 [[Democratic National Convention]] speech.&lt;br /&gt;
===Campaign to be the Democratic nominee===&lt;br /&gt;
The race for the Democratic ticket originally seemed [[Hillary Clinton]]'s to lose, but was ultimately a close race between Clinton and Obama. Clinton would take a slim advantage in the popular vote, while Obama would carry significantly more states and territories. Obama's advantage with super-delegates over Clinton was about 2-to-1.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|title=Superdelegate endorsements for Friday 6/6|work=Democratic Convention Watch|url=http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/06/superdelegate-endorsements-for-friday.html}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama was able to attract the support of [[liberals]] by pointing out that he had come out against the [[Iraq War]] &amp;quot;from the beginning&amp;quot; whereas Clinton had voted in favor of the war in 2002.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-01-31-democrats-debate_N.htm|title=Obama, Clinton stress differences on Iraq, issues|author=David Jackson|work=USA Today|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Campaign for the Presidency===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama campaigned against Senator [[John McCain]] in the general election. To the chagrin of Clinton supporters, he selected Senator [[Joe Biden]] to be his running mate, whereas McCain selected [[Governor]] of [[Alaska]] [[Sarah Palin]]. The Obama and Biden ticket would win the election, and Obama would become the nation's first [[African American]] president.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Jeremiah Wright====&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Barack Obama and Liberation Theology]]''&lt;br /&gt;
One major dilemma that arose for Obama during his campaign was his connection to his preacher [[Jeremiah Wright]]. Obama and his wife (raised a Baptist) were members of the Trinity [[United Church of Christ]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1776246/posts&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in Chicago, a chruch that embraced [[black liberation theology]] and its emphasis on empowering so-called &amp;quot;oppressed groups&amp;quot; against &amp;quot;establishment forces&amp;quot;. This denomination was the first in America to ordain gays as ministers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html, Obama's church pushes controversial doctrines, March 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Church pastor Jeremiah Wright had been making inflammatory comments and posting his sermons online for sale. These include the statement &amp;quot;G-d damn America,&amp;quot; and in describing the September 11th attacks, &amp;quot;We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4443788 Obama's Pastor: G-d Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Rev. Wright blamed America saying &amp;quot;We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians and branding anybody who spoke out against it as being [[anti-Semitic]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2008, after 20 years in the church, candidate Obama made public statements poised to set him at odds with the man who conducted his wedding and baptized his children. With the negative publicity persisting, a month later Obama ended the friendship, left Wright's church, and blamed the media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/31/obama-resigns-church-membership-in-chicago/], Obama Drops Church Membership in Chicago, May 31, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama claimed “It’s not fair to the other members of the church who seek to worship in peace...&amp;quot;, and distanced himself from  Wright's sermons  as &amp;quot;a bunch of rants that aren't grounded in the truth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;USA TODAY, ''Obama breaks with former pastor, Candidate cites rants on U.S. role in terror, AIDS'', by Kathy Kiely and David Jackson [http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20080430/1a_offlede30_dom.art.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Obama Says He Is Outraged By Wright's &amp;quot;Rants&amp;quot;''[http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/bulletin/bulletin_080430.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidential career==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Obama administration}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Obama and George H. W. Bush.jpg|thumb|right|300px|President Barack Obama meets with former President George H. W. Bush in the Oval Office, Feb. 15, 2011. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza).]]&lt;br /&gt;
Under Obama's stewardship the United States has suffered the largest [[Federal budget deficit|deficit]]s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/107xx/doc10708/11-06-mbr.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/118xx/doc11873/NovemberMBR.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in history and a credit downgrade from the rating agency Standard &amp;amp; Poor.  However, during the Obama Administration the national deficit has increased at a much lower rate than during the Bush Administration. Most observers attribute the deficits to increasing benefits and welfare paid out on account of the Recession he inherited and has failed to end along with decreasing tax receipts.  Standard &amp;amp; Poor decided to downgrade U.S. government deby after the debt ceiling debate debacle, where Congressional leaders refused to pass a bill authorizing borrowing to pay for the budget they had passed with much debate and controversy earlier in the year.  Cynics have argued that rhetoric directed at the rating agencies about the issuance of AAA ratings to junk real estate bonds spurred the downgrade as a form of retribution.  Ironically, the investor scare led to the flocking of investors to the safe haven of the Treasury bonds which had been downgraded, resulting in lower interest rates.  As there are very few AAA bond markets, investors will likely continue to buy U.S. government debt for the foreseeable future.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/04/18/the-sp-outlook-and-obama/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  When his [[economic stimulus]] program was adopted unemployment rose and stagnated in the 10% range, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704476104575439172480870774.html?mod=googlenews_wsj&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; leaving tens of millions without [[hope]] of finding a job.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&amp;amp;series_id=LNS11300000&amp;amp;years_option=specific_years&amp;amp;include_graphs=true&amp;amp;to_month=1&amp;amp;from_month=2 United States Department of Labor], Bureau of Labor Statistics. Data extracted on: July 19, 2010 (4:31:11 PM).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patrick H. Caddell and Douglas E. Schoen, writing in the [[Wall Street Journal]], noted, &amp;quot;Rather than being a unifier, Mr. Obama has divided America on the basis of race, class and partisanship.&amp;quot; The commentators also note Obama's approach to governance has encouraged radical leftists to pursue a similar strategy on his behalf. Mary Frances Berry, former head of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, acknowledged that the [[Obama administration]] has taken to polarizing America around the issue of race as a means of diverting attention from other issues, saying, &amp;quot;Having one's opponent [[race card|rebut charges of racism]] is far better than discussing [[Unemployment|joblessness]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Mary_Frances_Berry_91E3D9D5-C40D-440C-9D48-1C50CBC60C87.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Caddell and Schoen, who worked for President Carter and Clinton, respectively, further stated, &amp;quot;Mr. Obama has also cynically [[class warfare|divided the country on class lines]]. He has taken to playing the populist card time and time again. He bashes Wall Street and insurance companies whenever convenient to advance his programs, yet he has been eager to accept campaign contributions and negotiate with these very same banks and [[corporation]]s behind closed doors in order to advance his political agenda... President Obama's divisive approach to governance has weakened us as a people and paralyzed our political culture.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052748703700904575391553798363586.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domestic policy===&lt;br /&gt;
====Popular bills====&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's first act of office was to sign the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act - effectively nullifying the [[Supreme Court]] case ''Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire &amp;amp; Rubber Co.'', which ruled that Ledbetter had to have filed a pay [[discrimination]] suit within 180 days of the first time Ledbetter was payed less than her male peers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/30/us/politics/30ledbetter-web.html|work=The New York Times|format=HTML|language=English|title=Obama Signs Equal-Pay Legislation|author=Sheryl Gay Stolberg|date=January 29, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the law made corporations subject to suit within 180 days of each time the employee was unfairly paid.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://writ.news.findlaw.com/grossman/20090213.html?=features|work=FindLaw|author=Joanna L. Grossman|date=Feb. 13, 2009|format=HTML|language=English|title=The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 2, 2011, Obama signed the James Zadroga [[9/11]] Healthcare and Compensation Act.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.wnyc.org/articles/wnyc-news/2011/jan/02/obama-signs-zadroga-act-law/|publisher=New York Public Radio|title=Obama Signs Zadroga Act into Law|author=Fred Mogul|date=January 02, 2011|work=wNYC|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The act, which afforded 9/11 first responders who were sickened by the dust from the collapse of the [[World Trade Center]] health care and compensation, passed [[Congress]] after its sponsored agreed to scale down the pricing from 7.4 to 4.2 billion dollars.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.wnyc.org/articles/wnyc-news/2010/dec/22/zadroga-911-bill-passes-senate/|publisher=New York Public Radio|work=wNYC|format=HTML|language=English|title=Congress Approves 9/11 Health Bill|date=December 22, 2010}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Economic policy====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Keynes.jpg|thumbnail|right|190px|[[Barack Obama]] advocates the use of discredited [[Keynesian economics|Keynesian economic concepts]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2011/03/20/fabian-john-maynard-keynes-the-stealthy-enemy-of-human-freedom/ John Maynard Keynes the stealthy enemy of human freedom]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-02-22/deathbed-of-keynesian-economics-will-be-in-u-k-matthew-lynn.html Deathbed of Keynesian Economics will be in the UK]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iwf.org/inkwell/show/23102.html Will the G8 Repudiate the Philosophy of Living Beyond Our Means?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html KEYNES AT HARVARD Economic Deception as a Political Credo BY ZYGMUND DOBBS]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  ]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{see also|Obamunism|American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009}}&lt;br /&gt;
Critics of the Obama administration have coined the word &amp;quot;[[Obamunism]]&amp;quot; to describe Barack Obama's [[socialism|socialistic]] and &amp;quot;[[fascism]] light&amp;quot; [[economic planning]] policies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Benito Mussolini]] defined fascism as the wedding of state and corporate powers.  Accordingly, trend forecaster [[Gerald Celente]] labels [[Obama administration corporate bailouts|Obama's corporate bailouts]] as being &amp;quot;fascism light&amp;quot; in nature.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/daily-intel/2009/07/20/obamunism-inc|work=The Big Money|publisher=WashingtonPost.Newsweek Interactive Co. LLC|format=HTML|language=English|title=Obamunism, Inc.|author=David Sessions|date=July 20, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.smallbusinessadvocate.com/small-business-interviews/gerald-celente-6944|author=Jim Blasingame|title=Is the government creating a bailout bubble?}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obamunism can also refer to Obama's [[Obama administration fiscal policy|ruinous fiscal policies]] and [[Obama administration monetary policy|reckless monetary policies]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gerard&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://seekingalpha.com/article/120883-monetary-policynot-obama-s-stimulusis-what-needs-watching|title=Monetary Policy-Not Obama's Stimulus-Is What Needs Watching|author=Gerard Jackson|date=February 16, 2009|work=Seeking Alpha}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bam&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=New York Post|date=May 17, 2009|url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/05172009/postopinion/editorials/bams_wise_words_169731.htm|title=BAM'S WISE WORDS}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/|title=Bush Deficit vs. Obama Deficit in Pictures|work=The Foundry|publisher=The Heritage Foundation|author=Conn Carroll|date=March 24th, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As seen in his own actions, Barack Obama instructed his advisors to find loopholes that would enable the president to act as a [[dictator]] by pushing through legislation and increases in spending without congressional authority.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theblaze.com/stories/executive-dictatorship-obama-instructs-advisers-to-push-through-stimulus-projects-without-pesky-congressional-authorization/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, budgets passed under President Obama have included the smallest average annualized growth of federal spending (1.4%) since before President Reagan. Federal spending grew an average of 8.7% per year during Reagan's first term and an average of 8.1% per year during George W. Bush's second term.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/|title=Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower? Would You Believe It's Barack Obama?|publisher=Forbes|author=Rick Ungar|date=May 24th, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Wall Street]] firms and banks that were bailed out were among Obama's biggest campaign supporters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&amp;amp;cid=N00009638&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, the Obama administration bailouts of corrupt, unproductive, and reckless Wall Street firms was hardly surprising, and many argue that it was not helpful in making the United States economy more productive and prosperous by encouraging more risk taking through letting banks off with a slap on the wrist.  Others argue that bailing out the banks kept credit flowing and prevented a much deeper recession and a total collapse of the financial system.  The government will recoup some though not all of its capital infusions over time.  A 2005 study found that government corporate bailouts are often done for mere political considerations and the economic resources allocated exhibit significantly worse economic performance than resources allocated using purely business considerations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=676905&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Proponents of [[free market]] capitalism said Bernanke should not have bailed out failing firms and instead should have allowed free market capitalism to quickly recover as it did in the depression of 1920 without government intervention (free market capitalists assert that government intervention drags out economic recessions and depressions).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czcUmnsprQI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Top trend forecaster [[Gerald Celente]] predicts that the corrupt economic policies of the Obama administration will lead to a second [[Great Depression|great depression]] (Celente predicted the 1987 US stock market crash, the dot.com crash, the US 2008/2009 recession, and the collapse of the USSR in the early 1990s) and may lead to a &amp;quot;second [[American Revolution]]&amp;quot; (Celente predicted the [[Tea Party Movement|tax protests]] that are now occurring in America).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MMX3SKzrfU&amp;amp;feature=channel_page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sy9bfw1ebgw&amp;amp;feature=response_watch&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Celente also asserts that the costly and inefficient temporary short term methods that the Obama administration is using to alleviate economic problems in the short term (which is causing massive increases in [[Obama administration deficit spending]]) is only making matters worse and will not prevent the worse economic depression in United States history from occurring.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_C8K7rWkGGw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LBffdIW0XA&amp;amp;feature=response_watch&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Obama administration has been sharply criticized for [[Obama administration deficit spending|its massive deficit spending]] and [[Obama administration monetary policy|its reckless monetary policy]] via vast increases in the [[money supply]], although inflation under Bernanke has been below the historic mean.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gerard&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bam&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Celente predicts that if a &amp;quot;second American Revolution&amp;quot; occurs in a peaceful and productive manner, it may include a [[Third Party System|third party movement]] of governance that will advocate a more [[free market]] [[capitalism]] approach to the American economy and a more strict interpretation of the [[United States Constitution|United States constitution]] as far as the authors' [[original intent]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente1&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;celente2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During what the [[White House]] billed as [[Recovery Summer]], one half million workers per week continued losing their jobs. His signature legislative achievement, [[ObamaCare]],has been found to be [[unconstitutional]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-13/u-s-health-care-law-requirement-thrown-out-by-judge.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by several judges and constitutional by others, and is credited as a major cause of uncertainty, high [[unemployment]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=33220&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; lagging job creation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2010/08/05/it%E2%80%99s-official-medicare%E2%80%99s-finances-shadowed-by-uncertainty/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and risk of a credit default crisis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/28/AR2010032802353.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thestreet.com/story/10703361/cramer-obamacare-will-topple-the-market.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His 2012 Budget plan has been roundly criticized in the mainstream and liberal press as not a serious effort to deal with the nation's economic crisis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://republican.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=blogs.view&amp;amp;blog_id=1551d6f5-2ac9-4b8d-97ab-74def354024e Newspapers Call Out White House: ‘What Would That Path Be, Mr. President?’]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jeffrey Tucker]] wrote, &amp;quot;President Obama's economic policy has been catastrophic for liberty, enterprise, and the American dream—the very archetype of what not to do to end recession.&amp;quot; [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1118186176/ref=as_li_tf_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=anncoulter-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=1118186176]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Healthcare=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Obamacare}}&lt;br /&gt;
On March 23, 2010, Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). The act had originated in the House of Representatives and passed September 17, 2009. The act was amended and passed the Senate prior to [[Democrat]] [[Ted Kennedy]]'s passing along party lines - just a filibuster-proof majority at 60-39. In what can be construed as a de facto rejection of the bill, [[Massachusetts]] voters elected a [[Republican]] candidate, [[Scott Brown]], who promised to vote against the bill,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/senate/scott-brown-wins-massachusetts-senate-race.html|work=The Washington Post|author=Chris Cillizza|date=January 19, 2010|title=Scott Brown wins Massachusetts Senate special election race|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but another Senate vote would not occur.  Scott Brown was also an excellent campaigner and judged to be a better candidate than his rival, Martha Coakley.  He has since achieved one of the most moderate senate voting records, likely to avoid the anger of his mostly liberal constituency.  After Obama made a promise to issue an [[executive order]] that would ultimately prohibit the use of taxpayer subsidies to pay for [[abortion]] services,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/22/nation/la-na-healthcare-passage22-2010mar22/3|work=The Los Angeles Times|format=HTML|language=English|title=House passes historic healthcare overhaul|date=March 22, 2010|author=Noam N. Levey and Janet Hook}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the [[House of Representatives]] would pass the bill as it left the Senate 219-212, with 34 Democrats and all other parties dissenting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://articles.cnn.com/2010-03-21/politics/health.care.main_1_health-care-entire-house-democratic-caucus-pre-existing-conditions?_s=PM:POLITICS|date=March 21, 2010|author=Alan Silverleib|work=CNN|format=HTML|language=English|title=House passes health care bill on 219-212 vote}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amongst other things, the act mandates that the population purchase health care coverage or face punitive tax measures, and on this basis has been constitutionally challenged in the federal courts, with mixed results (three courts have upheld the act, two have declared it unconstitutional); thus, the Act is likely destined for [[Supreme Court]] reviewal.  Plans originally proposed involved instituting a universal public insurance program, that is, extending Medicare to everyone.  The universal mandate included in the act was originally a conservative idea that was enacted in Massachusetts under Republican Mitt Romney.  Its supporters note that having health insurance results in reduced costs in paying for treatment of uninsured and forcing people to take responsibility for their healthcare.  Due to ethical constraints, doctors cannot deny care to poor patients, resulting in the hospital and the healthcare system at large bearing the cost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Gulf oil spill====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster}}&lt;br /&gt;
President Obama authorized offshore oil drilling in the [[Gulf of Mexico]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0430/Gulf-of-Mexico-oil-spill-imperils-Obama-s-offshore-drilling-plan Gulf of Mexico oil spill imperils Obama's offshore drilling plan,] By Mark Clayton, ''Christian Science Monitor'', April 30, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; stating, &amp;quot;oil rigs today generally don’t cause spills&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;White House Press Release, [http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-a-discussion-jobs-and-economy-charlotte-north-carolina Remarks by the President in a Discussion on Jobs and the Economy in Charlotte, North Carolina,] Office of the Press Secretary, April 02, 2010. Retrieved from whitehouse.gov 3 May 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was widely criticized for his mishandling of the &amp;quot;[[Gulf oil spill disaster|worst environmental disaster]] in US history.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.examiner.com/x-33986-Political-Spin-Examiner~y2010m4d29-Worst-environmental-disaster-in-US-history-Oil-slick-in-Gulf-of-Mexico-is-set-on-fire Worst environmental disaster in US history,] Maryann Tobin, ''Examiner'', April 29, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/the-oil-spill-is-obamas-fault/?src=twt&amp;amp;twt=NytimesKrugman Conscience of a Liberal: The Oil Spill Is Obama’s Fault,] Paul Krugman, ''New York Times'', April 30, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Don't Ask Don't Tell====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Don't Ask Don't Tell}}&lt;br /&gt;
Candidate Obama promised to repeal a policy that originated in the Clinton era that prohibited inquiries into military personnel's [[sexual orientation]] while also barring &amp;quot;out&amp;quot; [[homosexuals]] from serving in the military. [[Liberals]] expressed anger when time passed and no effort to repeal the law was seen;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/nov/21/obama-to-delay-repeal-of-dont-ask-dont-tell/|work=The Washington Times|format=HTML|title=Obama to delay ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ repeal|language=English|author=Rowan Scarborough|date=November 21, 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in fact, Obama's [[justice department]], as part of their duty to defend all laws passed by any administration, filed a brief arguing against the [[Supreme Court]] granting a [[writ of certiorari]] to a gay soldier challenging the law (the writ was not granted). In response, the soldier, James Pietrangelo II, a former Army infantryman and lawyer, said, “[Obama's] a coward, a bigot and a pathological liar. This is a guy who spent more time picking out his dog, Bo, and playing with him on the White House lawn than he has working for equality for gay people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=Time Magazine|publisher=Time Inc.|format=HTML|url=http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1903545,00.html?imw=Y|title=Dismay Over Obama's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Turnabout|author=Mark Thompson|date=Jun. 09, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 15th, 2010, a bill was introduced in the [[House of Representatives]] to repeal the law - it passed a day later by a vote of 250-175;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2010/roll638.xml|title=FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 638|format=HTML|work=Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it passed the Senate three days later 65-31.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&amp;amp;session=2&amp;amp;vote=00281|work=The U.S. Senate|title=U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 111th Congress - 2nd Session|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama signed the Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010 on December 22nd.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;g dadt&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/22/obama-repeals-dont-ask-dont-tell|work=The Guardian|format=HTML|language=English|title='Don't ask, don't tell' repealed as Obama signs landmark law|date=22 December 2010}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Pentagon]] itself could not immediately implement the repeal and questioned whether it would hurt combat readiness.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;g dadt&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Senator [[John McCain]], the senior Republican on the Armed Services Committee, opposed the bill, saying &amp;quot;It may be premature to make such a change at this time and in this manner, without further consideration of this report and further study of the issue by Congress – for of all the people we serve, one of our highest responsibilities is to the men and women of our armed services, especially those risking their lives in combat.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/02/mccain-on-dont-ask-dont-tell-dont-rush/|title=McCain on ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’: Don’t Rush|date=December 2nd, 2010|format=HTML|author=David M. Herszenhorn|language=English|work=The New York Times}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign policy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Western Wall Obama.jpg|thumb|left|320px|At [[Western Wall]], Jerusalem, 2008.]]&lt;br /&gt;
As Senator, Obama was highly critical of President Bush and promised change. As President, Obama has tripled down in Afghanistan, widened the war into Pakistan, multiplied drone attacks, bombed Yemen and Somalia, and started an undeclared NATO war in Libya. On presidential war powers, surveillance questions, Guantanamo, detention policy and habeas corpus, Obama has similarly stayed the course, or expanded Bush's precedents. In a speech on May 19, 2011 Obama fully embraced the [[Bush Doctrine]] of preventative war.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-news-in-obamas-speech/2011/05/19/AF4dFN7G_story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The New America Foundation, which tracks the strikes, has listed 23 raids since the beginning of April, 2011, all but one in Pakistan’s tribal regions of North and South Waziristan. A June 20 attack was reported in Kurram, an area north of North Waziristan along the Afghanistan border.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The drone program has become increasingly controversial as the Obama administration has expanded its use beyond the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. Lethal missiles have been launched from unmanned aircraft in at least five countries in addition to Pakistan: Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, and, most recently, Somalia. The military’s Joint Special Operations Command used a drone last June to attack what officials said were two senior members of the Al Shabab militant group on the Somali coast.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/2011/07/04/cia_halts_drone_launches_from_pakistan_base/] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is commendable when he says he wants to avoid war. His policies, however, favor war by destabilizing the Middle East making it extremely hostile and favoring radical Islam over America’s ally, Israel, and American interests in the region... The president has chosen a very dangerous path for every American and one that promises great difficulty for Israel. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.thejerusalemconnection.us/blog/2012/03/14/obamas-words-disguise-his-israel-foreign-policy-actions.html Obama's words disguise his Israel foreign policy actions.] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Commander-in-chief====&lt;br /&gt;
By Obama's third year as Commander-in-Chief, over 1200 American troops died in Iraq and Afghanistan - significantly more than the number who died during President [[George W. Bush]]'s term of office.  And growing numbers of civilian contractors also have fallen. In the first half of 2010, 250 contractors reportedly died in Iraq and Afghanistan - more than the 235 military personnel who fell during the same period.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/05/24/114662/what-price-war.html#ixzz1Nz07pg5O&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====National Defense=====&lt;br /&gt;
President Obama signed into U.S. law the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), only after his administration successfully lobbied to remove language from the bill that would have protected American citizens from being detained indefinitely without trial.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aaron Dykes. [http://www.infowars.com/president-obamas-ndaa-signing-statement-i-have-the-power-to-detain-americans-but-i-wont/ Obama’s Signing Statement on NDAA: I have the power to detain Americans… but I won’t], Infowars.com, January 1, 2012. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After the legislation cleared Congress, the ACLU commented that if President Obama signed the bill it &amp;quot;will damage both his legacy and American’s reputation for upholding the rule of law,&amp;quot; while executive director of the ''Human Rights Watch'' blasted the President for being ‘on the wrong side of history,’ noting that &amp;quot;Obama will go down in history as the president who enshrined indefinite detention without trial in US law.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;President Decides to Sign Ill-Conceived National Defense Authorization Act. [http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/12/14/us-refusal-veto-detainee-bill-historic-tragedy-rights US: Refusal to Veto Detainee Bill A Historic Tragedy for Rights], ''Human Rights Watch'', December 14, 2011. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aclu.org/national-security/white-house-backs-away-defense-bill-veto-threat White House Backs Away from Defense Bill Veto Threat], ''[[ACLU]]'', December 14, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Section 1031 of the NDAA bill, which itself defines the entirety of the United States as a “battlefield,” allows American citizens to be snatched from the streets, carted off to a foreign detention camp and held indefinitely without trial. As reported by Infowars.com, the bill states that “any person who has committed a belligerent act” faces indefinite detention, but no trial or evidence has to be presented, the White House merely needs to make the accusation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Paul Joseph Watson. [http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-demanded-power-to-indefinitely-detain-u-s-citizens/ Obama Administration Demanded Power To Indefinitely Detain U.S. Citizens], Infowars.com, December 12, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S.1867 [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c112:2:./temp/~c1122VN0Iv:e548990: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Engrossed in Senate [Passed Senate] - ES)], ''The Library of Congress'' THOMAS, 112th Congress (2011-2011), Accessed January 25, 2012.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Text of S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. [http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/text?version=es&amp;amp;nid=t0:es:281 Sec. 1031. Affirmation of authority of the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force.], [[U.S. Congress]], ''OpenCongress.org'', (Accessed January 25, 2012).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Afghanistan=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Afghanistan War}}&lt;br /&gt;
Obama escalated troop strength&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pbs&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/obamaswar/themes/strategy.html#ixzz1LhWNImZp|title=Obama's New Strategy (March '09)|author=George Packer, Seth Jones, David Kilcullen, Rory Stewart, Andrew Exum, Col. Andrew Bacevich (Ret.)|work=PBS|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and defense costs in Afghanistan from $43.5 billion in George Bush's last year to $113.7 billion for 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Congressional Research Service, quoted in Gregory Anthony, ''What price war?''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Adviser to General [[Stanley McChrystal]] David Kilcullen wrote, &amp;quot;One of the big strategic shifts is the use of language now which talks about Pakistan and Afghanistan as the same theater. Now we talked about Af-Pak long before the Obama administration came about, but the public use of that term, and the description of it as the Afghanistan-Pakistan campaign, sends a new message to people about how the administration is going to think about Afghanistan and Pakistan.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pbs&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; This became evident when, under the orders of Obama, a military SEALs team killed September 11th mastermind [[Osama bin Laden]] in Abottabad, Pakistan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.newsweek.com/2011/05/05/commander-in-chief.html|title=Commander in Chief|author=Daniel Romano and Daniel Klaidman|date=May 05, 2011|work=Newsweek|publisher=The Newsweek/Daily Beast Company LLC|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Guantanamo Bay=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Guantanamo Bay}}&lt;br /&gt;
One of Obama's campaign promises was that he would close the American detention center at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba - detainees would be flown to other countries while the ones awaiting trial would enter the American court system. Two days after taking office he signed an order directing the military to do so.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;salon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/04/25/obama_guantanamo_rhetoric|work=Salon|title=The Obama/Gitmo timeline|author=Natasha Lennard|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But, in November 2009 Obama admitted that his self imposed deadline of January 2010 would be missed, and in March 2011 the president went back on his campaign promise, signing an executive order to create a formal system of indefinite detention for the prisoners.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;salon&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Mexico=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In May 2012, President Obama promised Mexican President [[Felipe Calderon]] that his administration would assist Mexico in curbing drug cartel violence, which has led to 30,000 deaths in Mexico. &amp;quot;President Calderon and I . . . stand together against the drug cartels that have unleashed horrific violence in so many communities,&amp;quot; Obama said on May 19. &amp;quot;Mexico can count on the United States as a full partner in this effort. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''[[Washington Post]]'' has reported however that White House officials stopped a requirement for gun dealers to report bulk sales of high-powered semiautomatic rifles commonly used by illegal drug cartels.  [[Justice Department]] officials had asked for White House approval to require thousands of gun dealers along the border to report the purchases to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and Explosives. ATF investigators expected to get leads on suspected arms traffickers. Senior law enforcement sources said the proposal from the ATF was held up by then White House chief of staff [[Rahm Emanuel]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/17/AR2010121706598.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gun dealers have been required for decades to report the sales of multiple handguns to the ATF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Libya=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Libyan uprising 2011}}&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2011, the political unrest that had spread through the Arab world showed up as protests in Libya. Colonel Muammar el-Qaddafi - leader of Libya for 41 years - responded to the violent activism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28376.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with legible steps.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt libya&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/libya/index.html|work=The New York Times|publisher=The New York Times Inc.|format=HTML|language=English|title=Libya — Protests and Revolt (2011)}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[United Nations Security Council]] voted unanimously to impose [[sanctions]], and later authorized all members to take action to protect civilians. Obama, acting without approval from Congress and at the beckoning of the [[United Nations]], directed American forces to take out Libya's air defense system.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt libya&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Obama later said, &amp;quot;[I]f we waited one more day Benghazi, a city nearly the size of Charlotte, could suffer a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Barack Obama|url=http://www.npr.org/2011/03/28/134935452/obamas-speech-on-libya-a-responsibility-to-act|title=Obama's Speech On Libya: 'A Responsibility To Act'|date=March 28, 2011|publisher=National Public Radio ([[NPR]])|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Alan J. Kuperman]] - writing an editorial for the ''[[Boston Globe]]'' - suggested this statement was false, writing, &amp;quot;[I]ntervention did not prevent genocide, because no such bloodbath was in the offing. To the contrary, by emboldening rebellion, US interference has prolonged Libya’s civil war and the resultant suffering of innocents.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuperman&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Alan J. Kuperman|work=The Boston Globe|url=http://articles.boston.com/2011-04-14/bostonglobe/29418371_1_rebel-stronghold-civilians-rebel-positions|title=False pretense for war in Libya?|date=April 14, 2011}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kuperman, a professor of public affairs at the University of Texas who authored a book called ''The Limits of Humanitarian Intervention'', further stated that the rebels had tricked the world into thinking a bloodbath was at hand and that Obama had lied to the American people in order to act on this theory.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuperman&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Gaddafi [never] threaten civilian massacre in Benghazi, as Obama alleged. The “no mercy’’ warning, of March 17, targeted rebels only, as reported by The New York Times, which noted that Libya’s leader promised amnesty for those “who throw their weapons away.’’ Khadafy even offered the rebels an escape route and open border to Egypt, to avoid a fight “to the bitter end.’’ &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://politicalcartel.org/2011/04/17/libya-and-the-obama-doctrine/ Libya and the “Obama Doctrine”.] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However Gaddafi wrote to Obama:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Gaddafi said he bore no ill will toward Obama. &amp;quot;We have been hurt more morally than physically because of what had happened against us in both deeds and words by you,&amp;quot; he wrote. &amp;quot;Despite all this you will always remain our son whatever happened. We still pray that you continue to be president of the USA. We endeavour and hope that you will gain victory in the new election campaign.&amp;quot; The letter, dated 5 April 2011 in Tripoli, is signed &amp;quot;Mu'aumer Qaddaffi, Leader of the Revolution&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/06/gaddafi-obama-nato-libya?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Critics point out the only thing worse than starting a &amp;quot;stupid, unnecessary war&amp;quot; against a madman is losing it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/271847/war-libya-dumb-and-dumber-victor-davis-hanson&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Iraq=====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Operation Iraqi Freedom}}&lt;br /&gt;
Obama campaigned on a promise to carry out [[George W. Bush]]'s timetable to end the War in Iraq, which has been completed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://articles.cnn.com/2011-12-17/middleeast/world_meast_iraq-troops-leave_1_1st-cavalry-division-camp-adder-troop-movements?_s=PM:MIDDLEEAST|work=CNN|title=Obama: Last U.S. troops leave Iraq|date=December 17, 2011|language=English|format=HTML}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Political positions of Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama and abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Born Outside the U.S.A.!]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Special Interests Candidate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jobsgate]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Recovery Summer]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lobbyists ties to the Obama administration]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Party]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ObamaCare]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama doublespeak]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama inauguration]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Religion of Barack Hussein Obama]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Honorable James David Manning]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Young Communist League]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.antiobama.net/ Anti Obama.net]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.dontvoteobama.net/ Don’t Vote For Obama.net]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nobamanetwork.com/ Nobama Network]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/ Audacity Of Hypocrisy]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/ The Real Barack Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/6130/ The New Cult of Personality]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.survivingobamunism.com/index.html Surviving Obamunism T-shirts]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.barackobamaantichrist.blogspot.com/ Barack Obama the Anti-Christ ?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/23/che-obama-and-the-revolutionary-agenda/ Che, Obama, and the Revolutionary Agenda]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/fashion-shows/ Obama Laundry List of Lies]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/09/americas-first-muslim-president/ GAFFNEY: America's first Muslim president?] Washington Times&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-l-esposito/barack-obama-and-islam_b_212519.html Barack Obama and Islam.] by [[John L. Esposito]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78931 Democrat: Obama's grandma confirms Kenyan birth.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/barack_obama.htm Barack Obama on the issues.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etWLwrvT2vo Obama = Kosher Puppet.] video on You Tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USPresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{2008 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Barack Hussein Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Presidency]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Nobel laureates in Peace]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion Advocates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Obama, Barack Hussein}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Global_Warming&amp;diff=992626</id>
		<title>Counterexamples to Global Warming</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Global_Warming&amp;diff=992626"/>
				<updated>2012-07-10T00:08:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: more data&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:GlobalTemps June2009.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Despite an increase in atmospheric CO2, the earth has been cooling slightly for the past decade.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Global warming]] is the theory that the earth is gradually warming up due to human influence. Unusual cold weather disproves the politically motivated claim by [[liberal|liberals]] that the [[Earth]] is rapidly warming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal bias]] is severe for this issue: the [[lamestream media]] are far more likely to report on unusually hot weather than unusually cold weather.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cold Weather Patterns ==&lt;br /&gt;
====North America/United States====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many record-breaking cold temperatures and snowstorms have occurred in the last 10 years:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*About as many snowfalls have occurred in Florida in the past 10 years as in the 100 years before that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the first half of 2011, West Coast temperature have been consistently running at least 10-15 degrees below normal.  Many have theorized that this is [[God]] sending a message to [[liberals]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In Truckee-Tahoe in the second half of June 2011, every day the temperatures have been colder than normal, '''''often nearly 30 degrees below average'''''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KTRK/2011/5/30/MonthlyHistory.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Though unreported by the [[lamestream media]], temperatures in [[New Jersey]] at the beginning of July 2011 are about ten degrees below normal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In January 2010, &amp;quot;coldest weather in 12 years hits North Texas.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Coldest-Weather-in-12-Years-Descends-on-North-Texas-80828417.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In early February 2011, snow and ice pummeled Dallas and Houston, Texas, in a nearly unprecedented fashion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-04/houston-gripped-by-ice-under-winter-storm-forecast-to-turn-toward-new-york.html?nstrack=sid:5028563|met:104|cat:247|order:1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*February 2010, 241-mile Lake Erie was completely frozen over for the first time in 14 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.goerie.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100213/NEWS02/302129904&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Lake Michigan had not frozen over since the 1970s until ... 2009, when it froze over, and then again in 2010 and 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New York City]] had its sixth-largest snowstorm '''''ever''''' on the day after [[Christmas]] in 2010, and the [[liberals]] in charge were unprepared.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/snow_and_snowstorms/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In February 2011, [http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/26/us-weather-sanfrancisco-idUSTRE71P1NH20110226 some parts of San Francisco witnessed snow], though it was too little to count for an official measurement. San Francisco has not witnessed a recordable snow fall since 1976.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Meteorologists did a thirty-year study of California forecast data. 75% of measurement sites saw a reduction in temperatures. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/07/long-term-california-cooling-trend-blamed-on-global-warming/ Long-term California Cooling Trend Blamed on Global Warming, Gateway Pundit, July 6, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In late October of 2011, a [[Northeaster]] dumps 2+ feet of snow in much of the region, and leaves over 3 million people without power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Melia, Michael. &amp;quot;3M powerless as October snow surprises Northeast.&amp;quot; October 30, 2011. http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2011/10/30/snow_smacks_northeast_power_could_be_out_for_days/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Australia====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In spite of predictions, 2011 is shaping up to be a cold year for [[Australia]]. It saw the [http://www.qt.com.au/story/2011/06/24/ipswich-shivers-on-years-coldest-day/ coldest day on record for the east], the [http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/coldest-june-night-on-record-20100628-zdz9.html coldest June on record in the west], the [http://www.smh.com.au/national/coldest-may-on-record-for-darwin-20110531-1fe1x.html coldest May on record in the north], only *almost* record breaking [http://www.smh.com.au/national/coldest-may-on-record-for-darwin-20110531-1fe1x.html in the middle of the country], likewise for the [http://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/article/2011/05/31/260901_news.html south] and nationally it was [http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/current/season/aus/summary.shtml the coldest Autumn on record, ever].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, but, but global warming! Maybe the west should burn ''more'' fossil fuels to heat things up? Or maybe they can use the hot air coming out of Al Gore's mouth?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even SMH, a notoriously Liberal men's magazine, is asking [http://globalfreeze.wordpress.com/2011/05/20/australia-wakes-to-a-deep-freeze/ &amp;quot;Where's my Global Warming, Dude?&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Europe====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The North-Western part of the European continent had [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/snow-brings-parts-of-britain-to-a-standstill-2144267.html an unusually cold November and December in 2010], leaving even the most convinced &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; believer to ask &amp;quot;If everything is heating up and we're all going to die in a matter of a few years, why have these months been so cold!?&amp;quot; The global-warming alarmist &amp;quot;answer&amp;quot;: [http://andyrussell.wordpress.com/2011/01/06/why-has-this-winter-been-so-cold-in-europe/ &amp;quot;It's hotter, therefore it's colder. No really!&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In February of 2012, temperatures in Eastern Europe reached below -22 F. &amp;quot;Blizzards and the bone-chilling cold have resulted in the deaths of over 550 people so far, with rooftop-high snow drifts trapping tens of thousands of villagers in their homes and cutting off access to entire towns. It has even snowed as far south as North Africa.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Europe Hammered by Winter, Is North America Next?&amp;quot; February 16, 2012. NASA Science News. http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/16feb_deepfreeze/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====South America====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-10749124 Cold waves in Peru are so bad they have to issue safety warnings about them.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tom Rowan from the American Thinker asks, [http://arcticsnap.com/index.php?id=65&amp;amp;linkbox=true&amp;amp;position=7 will 2011 be the year without Summer?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thirty-two inches of snow fell on the driest place on earth, the Atacama Desert in [[Chile]].  They record less than 50mm of rain per year, 80cm of snow July 2011. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://beforeitsnews.com/story/792/905/32_Inches_Of_Snow_Falls_In_Driest_Place_On_Earth.html 32 Inches Of Snow Falls In Driest Place On Earth!, beforeitsnews, July 7, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Indian Subcontinent and Asia====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delhi has been hit by thick fog during the winter of 2011 which disrupted flights, [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12125207 closed schools] and killed [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8438879.stm dozens of people], proving that even the Indian subcontinent is [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12106386 not immune to the cold wave sweeping over the globe for 2011].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even the BBC, a liberal media bastion, is [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/8439136.stm showing the pictures for all to see]. Is even the mainstream media abandoning &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot;, or is the evidence too much for them to sweep under the rug any more?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile, the communist and atheist nation of North Korea (known as The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea) is [http://www.chinapost.com.tw/asia/korea/2011/02/02/289892/N-Korea.htm freezing their little Atheist toes off]. The cold is so bad that the river that bisects Pyongyang has frozen over. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cold appears to be universal, among industrial and non-industrial nations alike. Is it really ''carbon'' causing these events? And why are there no answers from the &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; community about the obvious inconsistencies in their theories?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Central America====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Mexico the unseasonably cold weather has caused [http://geo-mexico.com/?p=3766 significant destruction of crops] in early February 2011. If it's so cold that corn can't survive, why do people keep claiming the planet is warming up?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Russian Landmass====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A severe cold [http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/02/15/russian-winter-severe-cold-to-invade-moscow-and-eastern-europe/ was expected by Dr. Ryan N. Maue to hit Russia in February 2011].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The famous Russian cold defeated Napoleon's armies, perhaps it will defeat the armies of Al Gore too?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====China====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chaos in China as a cold snap there [http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011-01/05/c_13677854.htm freezes over the highways, raises food price and causes Atheistic toes to curl]. Is there any part of the world actually affected by global warming? Going simply by the law of averages, at least *somewhere* must be getting warmer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Warm Weather Patterns ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warm weather patterns are fully expected in the absence of [[global warming]]. With global warming we wouldn't expect cold weather patterns, because the earth would be warmer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[lamestream media]] publicize reports of hot weather, but that is utterly ineffective in trying to prove the existence of [[global warming]]. Warm weather does not change the fact that record cold weather disproves global warming.  All the following record-breaking high temperatures would still be expected without [[global warming]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.accuweather.com/blogs/news/story/34756/moscow-breaks-alltime-high-tem.asp?partner=accuweather Moscow]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www2.tricities.com/news/2011/feb/18/tri-cities-area-ties-all-time-record-high-thursday-ar-851560/ Tennessee]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2011/04/syracuses_temperature_sets_his.html Syracuse]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-30/high-temperatures-hit-records-for-towns-in-oklahoma-arkansas.html Oklahoma]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.kwes.com/story/14931869/record-high-temperatures West Texas], [http://capitalclimate.blogspot.com/2011/06/texas-toasted-20-all-time-record-high.html including the all-time record high in Amarillo, TX]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.lsureveille.com/news/baton-rouge-facing-record-high-temperatures-1.2601916 Louisiana]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.wctv.tv/weather/headlines/105_DEGREES_Tallahassee_Sets_New_All-Time_Record_High_123943144.html Tallahassee]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/06/28/52485345.html  Western Europe]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://english.sina.com/china/p/2011/0517/373689.html China]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://lubbockonline.com/sports/2011-06-26/record-temperatures-dont-stop-competitors-ironman South Africa]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KICT/2011/6/9/WeeklyHistory.html Wichita, Kansas (temperature rose above 100 F around midnight)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://mapcenter.hamweather.com/records/7day/us.html?c=maxtemp,highmin| In one week in July 2011, approx 700 high temperature and 2000 high minimum temperature records are shattered] in a [http://www.foxnews.com/weather/2011/07/22/extreme-heat-smothers-large-part-us/?test=latestnews heatwave that blankets the entire MidWest and East Coast].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* However, this also happened alongside a massive cold streak during the winter, so it is not a legitimate sign of Global Warming, and the heat wave is relatively short in duration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44019419/ns/weather/#.Tj3h8GakLUg Little Rock, Arkansas, and 14 other cities and towns break their all-time record high temperature records], and Texas temperature records look set to be shattered in a summer heatwave that is sitting over the South in the summer of 2011.   &amp;quot;I can't remember any year with the magnitude and length of this heat wave,&amp;quot; Jack Hayes, director of the National Weather Service said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/11/us-drought-idUSTRE77A3P120110811 Texas drought is worst in a century, and extending to other Mid-Western States].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* As of July 6, 2012, 23,283 daily high temperature records have been set in 2012, up 71% compared to the same period in 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Memmott, Mark. &amp;quot;How Hot Is It? All You Need To See Are These Two Maps.&amp;quot; July 6, 2012. NPR. http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/07/06/156369399/how-hot-is-it-all-you-need-to-see-are-these-two-maps&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Random temperature fluctuations, including those above, would occur in the absence of [[global warming]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== General Climate Patterns ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Although Global warming should be causing massive droughts,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.naturalnews.com/020649.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; massive flooding along the Mississippi river in 2011 has resulted in many deaths as well as billions in property damage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Gore Effect ==&lt;br /&gt;
Often, when a climate conference is held, a new record low temperature is set for that location. Maybe [[God]] is trying to send the alarmists a message? In light of the global cold snap all around the world, perhaps the message extends beyond Al Gore?&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*During the Cancun climate conference, record low temperatures in the low 50s were set on three consecutive days. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/12/08/gore-effect-strikes-cancun-climate-conference-3-days-in-a-row/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GoreFireBreathing.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.accuweather.com/ Find the temperature in almost any city]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://climate.rutgers.edu/stateclim_v1/norms/daily/index.html Daily Station Normals (extensive historical temperature data at NJ weather stations)]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.surfacestations.org/ Surface Stations]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://wattsupwiththat.com/ Watts Up With That]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/Climsum.html Western U.S. Climate Historical Summaries (find climate statistics for thousands of locations in the western United States)]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/ Science and Public Policy Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.JunkScience.org JunkScience.org] [[JunkScience|(Our wiki entry on JunkScience.org)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.globalclimatescam.com/ Global Warming Scam]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html NOAA Satellite &amp;amp; Information Service]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1871503 PDF: The Tragedy of the Risk-Perception Commons: Culture Conflict, Rationality Conflict, and Climate Change]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Counterexamples]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Environmentalism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Algorithms_and_information_processing_in_biology&amp;diff=991525</id>
		<title>Template:Algorithms and information processing in biology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Algorithms_and_information_processing_in_biology&amp;diff=991525"/>
				<updated>2012-07-04T04:33:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: This requires quotation marks because it is not an original contribution&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;{{move|Template:Algorithms and information processing in biology}}&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The '''algorithms and information processing in biology''' are more sophisticated than anything made by a human [[software engineer]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.evolutionnews.org/2005/11/minnich_vs_harvey_the_witness001301.html#more Casey Luskin ''&amp;quot;Minnich vs Harvey: &amp;quot;The witness is smarter than the lawyer&amp;quot;''], 5 Dec 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Template quotes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Peer-reviewed_ID_literature&amp;diff=991523</id>
		<title>Peer-reviewed ID literature</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Peer-reviewed_ID_literature&amp;diff=991523"/>
				<updated>2012-07-04T04:29:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: This requires quotation marks because it is not an original contribution&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Whether or not any scientific papers have been published about [[intelligent design]] is a bone of contention among those debating whether ID should be studied in government-financed schools. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Minnich testified that he believed that about 10 peer-reviewed papers had been published which were by ID proponents and supported ID arguments. Minnich specifically mentioned papers by Axe, Behe, and Meyer. Harvey tried to take apart the papers by Axe and Behe by noting that they didn't specifically mention ID. But Minnich explained that the point of these papers is to find specified complexity in sequence space--a prediction of ID.&amp;quot; [http://www.evolutionnews.org/2005/11/minnich_vs_harvey_the_witness001301.html#more]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peer review]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Critics of intelligent design]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category: Intelligent Design]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Second_Law_of_Thermodynamics&amp;diff=985989</id>
		<title>Talk:Second Law of Thermodynamics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Second_Law_of_Thermodynamics&amp;diff=985989"/>
				<updated>2012-06-13T04:07:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Undo revision 985988 by Toadaron (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{unprotected|19 March 2007|Tsumetai}}&lt;br /&gt;
== Protection and other issues ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The trend towards protecting articles by users in edit conflicts is worrisome. Furthermore, the protected version is simply wrong. One of the Conservapedia Commandments is that everything should be sourced. I therefore would very much like to know if there is any source for the claim that &amp;quot;he Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the entropy of the universe tends towards a maximum&amp;quot; This statement is wrong at multiple levels- the 2nd Law is about closed systems (or can be stated about open systems with a some tweaking of the consequent), it says nothing about the universe. Furthermore, tending towards a maximum doesn't even mean that the entropy levels can't decrease. For example, the sequence, 1,3,2,5,4,7,6,9,8... tends towards infinity but is not an increasing sequence. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 04:05, 4 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Second law also says nothing about an upper bound to the entropy of a system; the entropy of the Universe could increase without limit, in principle, making the 'maximum' part wrong too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To be fair to Philip, the increase of the Universe's entropy ''is'' a tendency, not an absolute. The total entropy of an isolated system can decrease; it's just hugely improbable on the scales we're used to dealing with. Quantum effects can lead to a decrease in entropy; one has to deal with a very small system over short periods of time to actually notice this, however. Arbitrarily large decreases in entropy are also possible, given sufficient time. This is true whether one is discussing the fluctuation theorems of QM, or good old-fashioned classical systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But these are not, strictly speaking, parts of the second law. Second law doesn't say anything about tendency. The rest of physics just says that second law is not absolute. So I don't think using the word 'tends' in the definition is very useful. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The main problem with the article is, of course, the part about evolution, which as Horace says is just wrong, and painfully so. It's a seductive argument to the layman; after all, entropy is all about order and disorder, and evolution clearly requires the production of order. Right?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wrong, of course. The second law of '''thermo'''dynamics is a statement about '''thermodynamic''' quantities; 'order' is not one. One can choose to ''define'' the term 'order' in thermodynamic terms, in which case the statement that the Universe must become, on net, more disordered over time is true, for certain definitions. But the price for that is rejecting one's intuitive understanding of what constitutes 'order' and 'disorder,' and going with the maths. By a thermodynamic definition of order, my hot chocolate is self-organizing as we speak. Therein lies the danger of describing esoteric physics in terms which carry the baggage of their lay definition. Better to stick with entropy, and check one's prejudices at the door.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps the simplest way to illustrate this is with a different statement of the second law; the Clausius statement, which reads:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It is impossible to construct a heat engine which, operating in a cycle, produces no effect other than the transfer of a quantity of heat from a colder to a hotter body.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now, precisely which part of evolution violates ''that''? This version of the second law makes it abundantly clear that we're talking about a specific, mathematically rigorous statement about heat flow, not some general philosophical statement about order and chaos. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 07:51, 4 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, yes, I forgot to weigh in on the page protection issue. Tonya Harding strategy, right?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A while ago, I [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Page_protection_policy suggested to ASchlafly] that a written policy on when page protection should be used, and for how long it should last would be helpful. Anyone else agree? [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 07:58, 4 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The following is incorrect ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the article:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is impossible for the total entropy of an isolated system to decrease, therefore the universe is becoming more and more disordered. In this way the Second Law of Thermodynamics disproves evolution.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first sentence is true, but the second is false. Evolution does not cause the total entropy in the universe to decrease, only local variations. By analogy, a fridge does not cool the universe, only a small part of it at the expense of the rest. Please correct this clear error to avoid the increasing levels of criticisms being levelled at this wiki. [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 07:45, 5 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To add my thoughts on this: there are two errors in this article. First, the second law ''only'' applies to ''isolated'' systems, not to systems that are merely closed, let alone open. Then it becomes clear that the &amp;quot;disproving&amp;quot; of evolution by referring to the second law is severely flawed. There is nothing against a local decrease in entropy, as long as it is balanced by at least as large an increase elsewhere. Moreover, the assumption that evolution is directly linked to a decrease in thermodynamic entropy is not immediately obvious. I agree with Nematocyte that in its present state, this article will just serve to invite more criticism. [[User:PaulB|PaulB]] 09:16, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Strictly speaking, second law applies to all systems; for instance, consider the Clausius statement, which I posted up the page. No mention of an isolated system there. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 12:01, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That not what my stat.mech. text says ;-). Let's put it this way: the ''entropy'' formulation only applies to isolated systems. In fact, I think that the heat engine in the Clausius formulation should itself be taken as isolated. If we allow it to be (thermally or otherwise) coupled to anything else than a hot and a cold &amp;quot;temperature bath&amp;quot;, I think we could make the heat flow up the temperature gradient, at the expense of course of something happening outside the engine. Of course, these thermal reservoirs are abstractions, etc. etc. Anyway, here as well, either we should take the system (engine) as isolated, or we should take it as the entire universe. Both cases are not going to help disprove evolution at any rate. [[User:PaulB|PaulB]] 12:24, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think even the entropy formulation will work with open systems, so long as one takes care to quantify the entropy flow through the boundary. The requirement then becomes that entropy decrease within the boundary is no greater than the net entropy flow out of the system through the boundary. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 12:37, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I think it's effectively the same as looking at an isolated system made out of two parts, inside and outside, and applying the second law to the total system. But what you propose should indeed work. I hadn't thought of doing it that way. [[User:PaulB|PaulB]] 13:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Absolutely; you can always expand the boundary of an open system to obtain an isolated one, in principle. But it's very useful to be able to work with open systems, if the boundary terms can be computed, since it allows one to ignore entropy generation in the environment. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 13:08, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Time to unprotect ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK, it's been over a week now, and no one has attempted to defend the inclusion of such rubbish. Might we have the article unprotected so that those of us who actually understand elementary thermodynamics can fix it? [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 07:50, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nothing doing sir, the numbskulls are the experts. Who said Sri Lanka became independent in the 1970s, none other than the owner of this site! [[User:Zaheerabbas|Zaheerabbas]] 02:12, 15 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ressurection a violation? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think we should add a section about the resurrection of Jesus and that it &amp;quot;technically&amp;quot; violates the second law of thermodynamics, but that since it was a miracle, it does not need to adhere to the second law. Thoughts?&lt;br /&gt;
:...*blinks* Are there sources that are actually saying that? *honestly curious* --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the latter part is pretty obvious, and negates the need for the former. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 11:58, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Gonna back Tsumetai up on this one.  Also, it's shocking and appalling that this article is protected while containing such tripe in the content of it.--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 12:00, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not to mention the fact that in the ten days since criticisms were first raised, no one who supports the article in its current state has bothered to defend it.[[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 12:03, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Agreed. I'll leave a message on the protecting admin's Talk page, maybe it'll help. Talking on here doesn't seem to have any impact. =/ --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 12:05, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, of course. Many intellectuals here! Long live the stone age numbskull army!!! [[User:Zaheerabbas|Zaheerabbas]] 02:11, 15 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==This law and evolution==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Timothy Wallace wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Evolutionist theory faces a problem in the second law, since the law is plainly understood to indicate (as does empirical observation) that things tend towards disorder, simplicity, randomness, and disorganization, while the theory insists that precisely the opposite has been taking place since the universe began (assuming it had a beginning).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Beginning with the “Big Bang” and the self-formation and expansion of space and matter, the evolutionist scenario declares that every structure, system, and relationship—down to every atom, molecule, and beyond—is the result of a loosely-defined, spontaneous self-assembly process of increasing organization and complexity, and a direct contradiction (i.e., theorized violation) of the second law. [http://www.trueorigin.org/steiger.asp]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comments? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:24, 3 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Its a considerable misunderstanding. Points:&lt;br /&gt;
::*The second law refers to the flow of heat, it is unclear how exactly that translates into &amp;quot;disorder&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;order&amp;quot; when applied to something like life. &lt;br /&gt;
::*The second law refers to closed systems, open systems are a much more complex processes and the &amp;quot;law&amp;quot; does not apply cleanly here. Life and Earth are open systems.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Evolution is essentially a favored random walk, these systems are able to produce violations of &amp;quot;disorder&amp;quot; all the time. For example any [[Monte Carlo method]] algorithm demonstrates this beautifully, you can reach local &amp;quot;maximum&amp;quot; and avoid &amp;quot;minimums&amp;quot; by using evolutionary algorithms and many other variations on the theme.  &lt;br /&gt;
::*Complexity theory and Self-organizing systems also routinely violate the maxim that order can not be created from disorder. The sorts of things needed to produce an SOS or complex system are just the kinds of things we find in life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Life is not a good place to be trying to appeal a mathematical description of heat.  [[User:Etaroced|Etaroced]] 16:31, 3 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, applying the second law to evolution reflects a plain misunderstanding.  Beings today are not &amp;quot;more perfect&amp;quot; than those that came before.  Greater &amp;quot;perfection&amp;quot; may be a violation of the idea of entropy.  However, evolved organisms are not more &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot; than earlier organisms, since Darwin's point is that there is no biological level of &amp;quot;perfection.&amp;quot;  Evolved organisms don't violate entropy anymore than ''older'' organisms (a 20 year old relative to a 10 year old) do!-'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#007FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ames&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 17:02, 3 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ames, you're disagreeing with one of the best Renaissance minds, [[William Shakespeare]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;quot;What a piece of work is man! how noble in reason! how infinite in faculty! in form and moving how express and admirable! in action how like an angel! in apprehension how like a god! the beauty of the world, the paragon of animals! &amp;quot;. - ([[Hamlet]], Act II, Scene II).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now, how does Evolution explain man evolving through an unguided process from one-celled organisms? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:56, 3 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare is not a scientist.  Science and art are different.  I realize they may not be for creationists, which is shocking and kind of funny.  But they are different in the real world.-'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#007FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ames&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 18:15, 3 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Discuss here before deleting information ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK. I deleted the &amp;quot;three types of systems the Second Law can apply to,&amp;quot; because it only applies to closed systems. I also deleted the claim that it disproves evolution and relativity, because it doesn't. Evolution is nonsense, but isn't disproved by the Second Law because EARTH IS NOT A CLOSED SYSTEM. As for relativity, the Second Law has no connection to it at all. This article is about one of the key laws of science, and if it's blatant nonsense the credibility of the whole site suffers. --[[User:DonauKind|DonauKind]] 23:47, 16 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There is no such thing as a perfectly closed system, so your attempt to limit the important Second Law to closed systems is misplaced.  The Second Law is far more meaningful than that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:49, 16 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Irrelevant. The Second Law only applies to closed systems. If a system isn't closed then energy can be added, thus reducing entropy. That is the MEANING of the Second Law. --[[User:DonauKind|DonauKind]] 23:52, 16 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::OK, give me a statement of the Second Law that works in an open system. --[[User:DonauKind|DonauKind]] 23:53, 16 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your approach would appear to limit the Second Law to something that doesn't exist.  It's more meaningful than that.  Its entry here explains its insight.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:58, 16 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::No ''ideal gas'' exists either, yet the Ideal Gas Law only applies to this non-existent hypothetical gas. --[[User:JoshuaB|JoshuaB]] 00:00, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The Second Law isn't an ''insight''. It's a description of energy available for work in a closed system. It doesn't have some deep ''meaning'' that can be applied to whatever you like. The Second Law is an accurate description of entropy (note: ''entropy'', not ''disorder'') in a closed system, and if ever a closed system is found then rest assured that overall entropy will not decrease inside it. But to say it disproves evolution is nonsense, especially when you yourself admit that Earth is NOT a closed system! --[[User:DonauKind|DonauKind]] 00:05, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::And your point is ....?  Attempts to limit the Ideal Gas Law to perfectly ideal gases would be misguided also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:02, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Uh what? How can the Ideal Gas law be applied to something that isn't an ideal gas? --[[User:DonauKind|DonauKind]] 00:06, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::The Ideal Gas Law has insights that extend beyond ideal gases.  Ditto for the Second Law with respect to closed systems.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:10, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::OK then, tell me an &amp;quot;insight&amp;quot; that the Second Law can bring to a system that is ''not'' closed. --[[User:DonauKind|DonauKind]] 00:14, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::The entry explains this well.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:25, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
After going back and re-reading the article a few times, I think I know where the confusion lies with some editors. It appears that the article is conflating the thermal definition of entropy with the information theory definition of entropy. This conflation allows the topic of &amp;quot;disorder&amp;quot; to arise. Which has absolutely nothing to do with thermaldynamics. The basic definition of thermal entropy is simply a measure of energy that is unusable to perform work in a system. How a law that breaks down in layman's terms to: &amp;quot;heat won't travel from a cooler body to a hotter body without an additional input of energy&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;no process is possible in which the sole result is the transfer of energy from a cooler to a hotter body&amp;quot; can be used to &amp;quot;disprove&amp;quot; evolution or relativity escapes me. --[[User:JoshuaB|JoshuaB]] 02:19, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps [[Talk:Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth#Major earthquakes are doubling every 40 years? |this discussion]] sheds some light on Aschlafly's misconception of the 2nd law. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 08:27, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thing is, is that there is a link between thermodynamics and disorder. This is the tour de force result of statistical thermodynamics vs classical thermodynamics - i.e. that the macroscopic quantity which we can measure called &amp;quot;entropy&amp;quot; is related to the number of possible microstates the system can explore. As has been correctly pointed out, the problems start when we directly equate this with &amp;quot;information&amp;quot;, or entropy as defined in information theory i.e. &amp;quot;Shannon entropy&amp;quot;. This is an analogous concept, based on the fundamental information content of a system. But there isn't an equivalence between information-theoretic entropy and thermodynamic entropy. In the actual physical world, there is no need to directly connect the quantities  of  &amp;quot;disorder&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;information&amp;quot;. This, in part, along with the more important facts that all these things apply to closed systems and the Earth is not a closed system, means that any argument based on how &amp;quot;entropy&amp;quot; disproves evolution due to some information argument is bogus. [[User:DanPW]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Second Law and Evolution ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have removed the statement about the Second Law disproving evolution. It is pretty obvious that Mr. Schlafly does not have a correct understanding of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, and with all due respect, his inaccurate contributions to this article must be removed. From what I understand, Mr. Schlafly's reasoning is based on his belief that evolution is &amp;quot;disorder changing by itself into a more ordered state,&amp;quot; which is not true. This has been explained in most of the above sections on this talk page, so I will not rehash arguments. I just expect a better explanation if the article is to be changed back to saying that the Second Law does disprove evolution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect that the Second Law does not disprove the theory of relativity either, but I have not looked into the arguments for or against this claim so I am leaving this in the article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 01:31, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Your edit was reverted because the Second Law does ban disorder becoming more orderly, just as it bans heat spontaneously flowing to hotter locations.  The theory of evolution is based on the contrary claim that random (disordered) mutations create greater order.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 01:35, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In thermodynamic terms, the concept of &amp;quot;order&amp;quot; is not usually applied to the Second Law except in rigorous terms of &amp;quot;molecular ordering,&amp;quot; which you have not made a clear connection to the theory of evolution. Also, you are ignoring the fact that the Second Law only applies to a closed system (and the Earth is not a closed system), which has been explained many times above. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 02:02, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::And just what is this &amp;quot;closed system&amp;quot; that the 2nd Law here has to be restricted to?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 02:16, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The standard thermodynamic definition of a closed system is one that cannot exchange mass with its surroundings. But in the context of Mr. Schlafly's assertions about the Second Law and evolution, his misunderstanding about the thermodynamic concept of order is even more significant. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 02:38, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And why can't that happen on earth?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 02:42, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The Earth is actually pretty close to being a closed system, but obviously it is possible for matter to leave or enter the Earth's atmosphere. But the main problem with the Second Law being used as an argument against evolution is the claim that evolution requires &amp;quot;disorder changing by itself into a more ordered state&amp;quot; (this was most recently stated on [[Talk:Main_Page]]) and the idea that &amp;quot;disorder&amp;quot; (however that is defined) is always increasing. Mr. Schlafly has not provided any substantial evidence or explanation for this, and that is why I removed the claim about evolution from the article. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 03:05, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::You and everyone else above kept right on saying that earth is a closed system; now you're changing it to &amp;quot;''pretty close'' to being a closed system&amp;quot;?  Have you ever put together logs in a fireplace and watched them burn?  Which was more complex: the logs assembled, or the ashes several hours later?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 03:10, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::As I stated in my most recent 2 comments, the fact that the Earth is not a closed system is not as relevant to Mr. Schlafly's Second Law vs. evolution argument as is his concept of order. (And I do believe much of the discussion above on this talk page is not well focused.) I am not seeing the connection between your burning log example and evolution. Please elaborate. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 03:27, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Now it's back to being a closed system?  Did &amp;quot;pretty close&amp;quot; just disappear?  Answer the question about the logs.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 03:45, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::The logs are more complex; in the act of burning them, matter goes from an ordered state to a more disordered one, and energy is given off. Are you going to elaborate on how this relates to evolution as Randall asked? [[User:CWest|CWest]] 08:28, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::That is correct.  Now explain why the 2nd Law only applies to a closed system.  Those are your words, Randall7, and I expect you to answer it...not CWest.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:41, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::The two statements that make up the foundation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics - the Kelvin-Planck statement and the Clausius statement - both describe systems that exchange heat and/or work with their surroundings, but not mass. But as I said before, my concern is less about the closed system argument and more about the abuse of the concept of &amp;quot;order&amp;quot; to claim that the Second Law disproves evolution. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 20:37, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several more questions, Mr. Randal7, because now you're drifting away from the &amp;quot;closed&amp;quot; system here.&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Is iron more complex than rust?  And when iron does rust, does it constitute an improvement, or a breakdown?&lt;br /&gt;
:2. What happens to boiling water when you turn off the stove?  Does it stay the same, or does it get cooler?&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Is CWest's statement above correct, in that ''&amp;quot;matter goes from an ordered state to a more disordered one&amp;quot;''?  Does that statement apply only to the fireplace?  Could it also apply to a freshly-cleaned living room, just prior to adding three eight-year-old spoiled brats with pop guns and a baby sitter unable to control the outcome?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 03:25, 10 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I feel like this discussion is becoming less productive and more of a waste of time, but I'll answer the questions because I want to see how you relate them to the Second Law of Thermodynamics disproving evolution. (I so far have failed to see the connection.)&lt;br /&gt;
::#Iron is generally less complex than rust. (Although &amp;quot;complex&amp;quot; is not a very precise term.) Iron is a single element, whereas rust can be a number of iron oxide or iron hydroxide compounds. Iron is usually much more homogeneous than rust. When iron rusts it is a chemical and thermodynamic improvement - it would not happen spontaneously if it were not energetically favorable. In practical terms, rusting is not an improvement because pure iron is more useful for structural or electrical applications, but pure iron does not usually stay pure for long because of its propensity to oxidate. This is why iron alloys are much more common.&lt;br /&gt;
::#When the stove is turned off, boiling water cools as heat is transferred from the water to its cooler surroundings. Entropy is generated from this heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
::#In the burning log example, it is true that &amp;quot;matter goes from an ordered state to a more disordered one,&amp;quot; and there are plenty of other examples where this statement is true. There are also many instances where matter goes from a disordered state to a more ordered one, such as water freezing or magnetization. But in theses cases of matter becoming more ordered, net entropy of the matter and its surroundings will still never decrease. The statement could also apply to a room of spoiled brats, but in this case the term &amp;quot;order&amp;quot; is no longer being used in a thermodynamic or chemical sense.&lt;br /&gt;
::--[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 15:27, 10 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===My answers to Randall7===&lt;br /&gt;
With regards to the iron, you are wrong.  Rust is a breakdown; it is a disintegration of the iron itself.  The rust can be stopped; the iron can be prevented from rusting further, but rust in and of itself can never be restored into iron.  It goes one-way only.  Likewise the water on the stove; take away the heat which makes the water boil, and the water temperature will drop to the lowest level possible, which one can call &amp;quot;room temperature&amp;quot;.  Likewise the fireplace logs, likewise the living room.  One-way only.  Complex to simple, order to disorder.  It never, ever happens in reverse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2nd Law of thermodynamics is the same way.  You can restrict the 2nd Law to heating and/or energy concepts all you want, but the very core of this law is the same thing cited above: order ''always'' goes to disorder; complex ''always'' goes to simple.  The 2nd Law may be about heat, but turn off the fire and what do you get?  Water cooling down, heat cooling and dissipating, complex to simple, order to disorder.  The fireplace scene has the heat, but the logs always end up as ashes.  The ashes ''never'' turn back into logs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the final answer to the question &amp;quot;what does this have to do with evolution?&amp;quot;.  It was evolutionists who stated we should ''accept'' their scenario as to how life came to be: ''simple'' organisms ''evolved'' into more and more ''complex'' ones over time.  ''Simple'' to ''complex''; ''disorder'' to ''order''.  When making scientific investigations the very first step of the [[scientific method]] that must be followed is ''observation''; a scientist has to ''observe'' what is going on, and every single minute of every day scientists and layman alike are observing the 2nd Law in action; no one can get away from it.  ''Observation'' proves complex always goes to simple; ''observation'' proves order always goes to disorder.  ''Observation'', scientific or not, ''confirms'' the validity of the 2nd Law.  The examples I posted above - the fireplace, the iron, the living room, the stove top - are perfect examples of the 2nd Law in action, closed system or not.  It's impossible to go into reverse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is why we're going to post the impossibility of evolution on this website, ''vis-a-vis'' the 2nd Law.  Case closed.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:14, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You make a good point that irreversibility is an unavoidable consequence of the Second Law. There is no such thing as a truly reversible process and all processes generate entropy. But your claim that &amp;quot;order ''always'' goes to disorder; complex ''always'' goes to simple&amp;quot; is absurd. More ordered/&amp;quot;complex&amp;quot; materials can be formed through [[work]]. (&amp;quot;Simple&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;complex&amp;quot; do not have rigorous thermodynamic definitions, by the way.) Otherwise every single ordered object would have to have existed existed exactly as it is since the beginning of time, or have existed in a larger or more ordered form. Organisms gain energy - the capacity do do work - by eating, respiring, photosynthesizing, or otherwise absorbing energy from their surroundings. This allows them to become more ordered or more &amp;quot;complex,&amp;quot; but this is not in violation of the the Second Law because during their processes of converting energy and exerting work, net entropy is generated. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 23:57, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Randall7, these organisms do take in food, use it as energy, and continue on with their lives, but their status as organisms remains unchanged until they ''cease the work''; when that happens they wither away and die; they decompose, they turn to dust.  Complex to simple, order to disorder.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:03, 13 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, how do you explain the growth of a crystal (an ordered arrangement of ions) from a solution (a disordered arrangement), if &amp;quot;the Second Law does ban disorder becoming more orderly&amp;quot;, as you say? --[[User:FrederickT3|FrederickT3]] 03:39, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Order is not really increasing when a crystal grows in a solution, or when water changes its phase and becomes ice.  If the crystal or ice is melted again, then one back to where it started.  This is no increase in order.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:53, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Mr. Schlafly, it is clear that your concept of order differs from the thermodynamic concept of order. When water freezes, its entropy decreases and when ice melts, its entropy increases, but during these processes the entropy of the water's surroundings also increase/decrease (such that total net change in entropy is never negative, and in reality is net positive). I would like to hear an explanation of how changes in &amp;quot;order&amp;quot; during evolution relate to the actual Second Law of Thermodynamics. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 20:37, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Mr. Schlafly, are you honestly suggesting there is no change in entropy when water melts? --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 01:57, 10 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Second_Law_of_Thermodynamics&amp;diff=985988</id>
		<title>Talk:Second Law of Thermodynamics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Second_Law_of_Thermodynamics&amp;diff=985988"/>
				<updated>2012-06-13T04:06:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* My answers to Randall7 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{unprotected|19 March 2007|Tsumetai}}&lt;br /&gt;
== Protection and other issues ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The trend towards protecting articles by users in edit conflicts is worrisome. Furthermore, the protected version is simply wrong. One of the Conservapedia Commandments is that everything should be sourced. I therefore would very much like to know if there is any source for the claim that &amp;quot;he Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the entropy of the universe tends towards a maximum&amp;quot; This statement is wrong at multiple levels- the 2nd Law is about closed systems (or can be stated about open systems with a some tweaking of the consequent), it says nothing about the universe. Furthermore, tending towards a maximum doesn't even mean that the entropy levels can't decrease. For example, the sequence, 1,3,2,5,4,7,6,9,8... tends towards infinity but is not an increasing sequence. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 04:05, 4 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Second law also says nothing about an upper bound to the entropy of a system; the entropy of the Universe could increase without limit, in principle, making the 'maximum' part wrong too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To be fair to Philip, the increase of the Universe's entropy ''is'' a tendency, not an absolute. The total entropy of an isolated system can decrease; it's just hugely improbable on the scales we're used to dealing with. Quantum effects can lead to a decrease in entropy; one has to deal with a very small system over short periods of time to actually notice this, however. Arbitrarily large decreases in entropy are also possible, given sufficient time. This is true whether one is discussing the fluctuation theorems of QM, or good old-fashioned classical systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But these are not, strictly speaking, parts of the second law. Second law doesn't say anything about tendency. The rest of physics just says that second law is not absolute. So I don't think using the word 'tends' in the definition is very useful. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The main problem with the article is, of course, the part about evolution, which as Horace says is just wrong, and painfully so. It's a seductive argument to the layman; after all, entropy is all about order and disorder, and evolution clearly requires the production of order. Right?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wrong, of course. The second law of '''thermo'''dynamics is a statement about '''thermodynamic''' quantities; 'order' is not one. One can choose to ''define'' the term 'order' in thermodynamic terms, in which case the statement that the Universe must become, on net, more disordered over time is true, for certain definitions. But the price for that is rejecting one's intuitive understanding of what constitutes 'order' and 'disorder,' and going with the maths. By a thermodynamic definition of order, my hot chocolate is self-organizing as we speak. Therein lies the danger of describing esoteric physics in terms which carry the baggage of their lay definition. Better to stick with entropy, and check one's prejudices at the door.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps the simplest way to illustrate this is with a different statement of the second law; the Clausius statement, which reads:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It is impossible to construct a heat engine which, operating in a cycle, produces no effect other than the transfer of a quantity of heat from a colder to a hotter body.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now, precisely which part of evolution violates ''that''? This version of the second law makes it abundantly clear that we're talking about a specific, mathematically rigorous statement about heat flow, not some general philosophical statement about order and chaos. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 07:51, 4 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, yes, I forgot to weigh in on the page protection issue. Tonya Harding strategy, right?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A while ago, I [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Page_protection_policy suggested to ASchlafly] that a written policy on when page protection should be used, and for how long it should last would be helpful. Anyone else agree? [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 07:58, 4 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The following is incorrect ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the article:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is impossible for the total entropy of an isolated system to decrease, therefore the universe is becoming more and more disordered. In this way the Second Law of Thermodynamics disproves evolution.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first sentence is true, but the second is false. Evolution does not cause the total entropy in the universe to decrease, only local variations. By analogy, a fridge does not cool the universe, only a small part of it at the expense of the rest. Please correct this clear error to avoid the increasing levels of criticisms being levelled at this wiki. [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 07:45, 5 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To add my thoughts on this: there are two errors in this article. First, the second law ''only'' applies to ''isolated'' systems, not to systems that are merely closed, let alone open. Then it becomes clear that the &amp;quot;disproving&amp;quot; of evolution by referring to the second law is severely flawed. There is nothing against a local decrease in entropy, as long as it is balanced by at least as large an increase elsewhere. Moreover, the assumption that evolution is directly linked to a decrease in thermodynamic entropy is not immediately obvious. I agree with Nematocyte that in its present state, this article will just serve to invite more criticism. [[User:PaulB|PaulB]] 09:16, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Strictly speaking, second law applies to all systems; for instance, consider the Clausius statement, which I posted up the page. No mention of an isolated system there. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 12:01, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That not what my stat.mech. text says ;-). Let's put it this way: the ''entropy'' formulation only applies to isolated systems. In fact, I think that the heat engine in the Clausius formulation should itself be taken as isolated. If we allow it to be (thermally or otherwise) coupled to anything else than a hot and a cold &amp;quot;temperature bath&amp;quot;, I think we could make the heat flow up the temperature gradient, at the expense of course of something happening outside the engine. Of course, these thermal reservoirs are abstractions, etc. etc. Anyway, here as well, either we should take the system (engine) as isolated, or we should take it as the entire universe. Both cases are not going to help disprove evolution at any rate. [[User:PaulB|PaulB]] 12:24, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think even the entropy formulation will work with open systems, so long as one takes care to quantify the entropy flow through the boundary. The requirement then becomes that entropy decrease within the boundary is no greater than the net entropy flow out of the system through the boundary. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 12:37, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I think it's effectively the same as looking at an isolated system made out of two parts, inside and outside, and applying the second law to the total system. But what you propose should indeed work. I hadn't thought of doing it that way. [[User:PaulB|PaulB]] 13:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Absolutely; you can always expand the boundary of an open system to obtain an isolated one, in principle. But it's very useful to be able to work with open systems, if the boundary terms can be computed, since it allows one to ignore entropy generation in the environment. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 13:08, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Time to unprotect ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK, it's been over a week now, and no one has attempted to defend the inclusion of such rubbish. Might we have the article unprotected so that those of us who actually understand elementary thermodynamics can fix it? [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 07:50, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nothing doing sir, the numbskulls are the experts. Who said Sri Lanka became independent in the 1970s, none other than the owner of this site! [[User:Zaheerabbas|Zaheerabbas]] 02:12, 15 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ressurection a violation? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think we should add a section about the resurrection of Jesus and that it &amp;quot;technically&amp;quot; violates the second law of thermodynamics, but that since it was a miracle, it does not need to adhere to the second law. Thoughts?&lt;br /&gt;
:...*blinks* Are there sources that are actually saying that? *honestly curious* --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the latter part is pretty obvious, and negates the need for the former. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 11:58, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Gonna back Tsumetai up on this one.  Also, it's shocking and appalling that this article is protected while containing such tripe in the content of it.--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 12:00, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not to mention the fact that in the ten days since criticisms were first raised, no one who supports the article in its current state has bothered to defend it.[[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 12:03, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Agreed. I'll leave a message on the protecting admin's Talk page, maybe it'll help. Talking on here doesn't seem to have any impact. =/ --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 12:05, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, of course. Many intellectuals here! Long live the stone age numbskull army!!! [[User:Zaheerabbas|Zaheerabbas]] 02:11, 15 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==This law and evolution==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Timothy Wallace wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Evolutionist theory faces a problem in the second law, since the law is plainly understood to indicate (as does empirical observation) that things tend towards disorder, simplicity, randomness, and disorganization, while the theory insists that precisely the opposite has been taking place since the universe began (assuming it had a beginning).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Beginning with the “Big Bang” and the self-formation and expansion of space and matter, the evolutionist scenario declares that every structure, system, and relationship—down to every atom, molecule, and beyond—is the result of a loosely-defined, spontaneous self-assembly process of increasing organization and complexity, and a direct contradiction (i.e., theorized violation) of the second law. [http://www.trueorigin.org/steiger.asp]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comments? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:24, 3 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Its a considerable misunderstanding. Points:&lt;br /&gt;
::*The second law refers to the flow of heat, it is unclear how exactly that translates into &amp;quot;disorder&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;order&amp;quot; when applied to something like life. &lt;br /&gt;
::*The second law refers to closed systems, open systems are a much more complex processes and the &amp;quot;law&amp;quot; does not apply cleanly here. Life and Earth are open systems.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Evolution is essentially a favored random walk, these systems are able to produce violations of &amp;quot;disorder&amp;quot; all the time. For example any [[Monte Carlo method]] algorithm demonstrates this beautifully, you can reach local &amp;quot;maximum&amp;quot; and avoid &amp;quot;minimums&amp;quot; by using evolutionary algorithms and many other variations on the theme.  &lt;br /&gt;
::*Complexity theory and Self-organizing systems also routinely violate the maxim that order can not be created from disorder. The sorts of things needed to produce an SOS or complex system are just the kinds of things we find in life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Life is not a good place to be trying to appeal a mathematical description of heat.  [[User:Etaroced|Etaroced]] 16:31, 3 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, applying the second law to evolution reflects a plain misunderstanding.  Beings today are not &amp;quot;more perfect&amp;quot; than those that came before.  Greater &amp;quot;perfection&amp;quot; may be a violation of the idea of entropy.  However, evolved organisms are not more &amp;quot;perfect&amp;quot; than earlier organisms, since Darwin's point is that there is no biological level of &amp;quot;perfection.&amp;quot;  Evolved organisms don't violate entropy anymore than ''older'' organisms (a 20 year old relative to a 10 year old) do!-'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#007FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ames&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 17:02, 3 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ames, you're disagreeing with one of the best Renaissance minds, [[William Shakespeare]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;quot;What a piece of work is man! how noble in reason! how infinite in faculty! in form and moving how express and admirable! in action how like an angel! in apprehension how like a god! the beauty of the world, the paragon of animals! &amp;quot;. - ([[Hamlet]], Act II, Scene II).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now, how does Evolution explain man evolving through an unguided process from one-celled organisms? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:56, 3 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shakespeare is not a scientist.  Science and art are different.  I realize they may not be for creationists, which is shocking and kind of funny.  But they are different in the real world.-'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#007FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ames&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 18:15, 3 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Discuss here before deleting information ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK. I deleted the &amp;quot;three types of systems the Second Law can apply to,&amp;quot; because it only applies to closed systems. I also deleted the claim that it disproves evolution and relativity, because it doesn't. Evolution is nonsense, but isn't disproved by the Second Law because EARTH IS NOT A CLOSED SYSTEM. As for relativity, the Second Law has no connection to it at all. This article is about one of the key laws of science, and if it's blatant nonsense the credibility of the whole site suffers. --[[User:DonauKind|DonauKind]] 23:47, 16 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There is no such thing as a perfectly closed system, so your attempt to limit the important Second Law to closed systems is misplaced.  The Second Law is far more meaningful than that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:49, 16 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Irrelevant. The Second Law only applies to closed systems. If a system isn't closed then energy can be added, thus reducing entropy. That is the MEANING of the Second Law. --[[User:DonauKind|DonauKind]] 23:52, 16 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::OK, give me a statement of the Second Law that works in an open system. --[[User:DonauKind|DonauKind]] 23:53, 16 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your approach would appear to limit the Second Law to something that doesn't exist.  It's more meaningful than that.  Its entry here explains its insight.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:58, 16 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::No ''ideal gas'' exists either, yet the Ideal Gas Law only applies to this non-existent hypothetical gas. --[[User:JoshuaB|JoshuaB]] 00:00, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The Second Law isn't an ''insight''. It's a description of energy available for work in a closed system. It doesn't have some deep ''meaning'' that can be applied to whatever you like. The Second Law is an accurate description of entropy (note: ''entropy'', not ''disorder'') in a closed system, and if ever a closed system is found then rest assured that overall entropy will not decrease inside it. But to say it disproves evolution is nonsense, especially when you yourself admit that Earth is NOT a closed system! --[[User:DonauKind|DonauKind]] 00:05, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::And your point is ....?  Attempts to limit the Ideal Gas Law to perfectly ideal gases would be misguided also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:02, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Uh what? How can the Ideal Gas law be applied to something that isn't an ideal gas? --[[User:DonauKind|DonauKind]] 00:06, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::The Ideal Gas Law has insights that extend beyond ideal gases.  Ditto for the Second Law with respect to closed systems.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:10, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::OK then, tell me an &amp;quot;insight&amp;quot; that the Second Law can bring to a system that is ''not'' closed. --[[User:DonauKind|DonauKind]] 00:14, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::The entry explains this well.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:25, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
After going back and re-reading the article a few times, I think I know where the confusion lies with some editors. It appears that the article is conflating the thermal definition of entropy with the information theory definition of entropy. This conflation allows the topic of &amp;quot;disorder&amp;quot; to arise. Which has absolutely nothing to do with thermaldynamics. The basic definition of thermal entropy is simply a measure of energy that is unusable to perform work in a system. How a law that breaks down in layman's terms to: &amp;quot;heat won't travel from a cooler body to a hotter body without an additional input of energy&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;no process is possible in which the sole result is the transfer of energy from a cooler to a hotter body&amp;quot; can be used to &amp;quot;disprove&amp;quot; evolution or relativity escapes me. --[[User:JoshuaB|JoshuaB]] 02:19, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps [[Talk:Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth#Major earthquakes are doubling every 40 years? |this discussion]] sheds some light on Aschlafly's misconception of the 2nd law. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 08:27, 17 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thing is, is that there is a link between thermodynamics and disorder. This is the tour de force result of statistical thermodynamics vs classical thermodynamics - i.e. that the macroscopic quantity which we can measure called &amp;quot;entropy&amp;quot; is related to the number of possible microstates the system can explore. As has been correctly pointed out, the problems start when we directly equate this with &amp;quot;information&amp;quot;, or entropy as defined in information theory i.e. &amp;quot;Shannon entropy&amp;quot;. This is an analogous concept, based on the fundamental information content of a system. But there isn't an equivalence between information-theoretic entropy and thermodynamic entropy. In the actual physical world, there is no need to directly connect the quantities  of  &amp;quot;disorder&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;information&amp;quot;. This, in part, along with the more important facts that all these things apply to closed systems and the Earth is not a closed system, means that any argument based on how &amp;quot;entropy&amp;quot; disproves evolution due to some information argument is bogus. [[User:DanPW]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Second Law and Evolution ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have removed the statement about the Second Law disproving evolution. It is pretty obvious that Mr. Schlafly does not have a correct understanding of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, and with all due respect, his inaccurate contributions to this article must be removed. From what I understand, Mr. Schlafly's reasoning is based on his belief that evolution is &amp;quot;disorder changing by itself into a more ordered state,&amp;quot; which is not true. This has been explained in most of the above sections on this talk page, so I will not rehash arguments. I just expect a better explanation if the article is to be changed back to saying that the Second Law does disprove evolution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect that the Second Law does not disprove the theory of relativity either, but I have not looked into the arguments for or against this claim so I am leaving this in the article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 01:31, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Your edit was reverted because the Second Law does ban disorder becoming more orderly, just as it bans heat spontaneously flowing to hotter locations.  The theory of evolution is based on the contrary claim that random (disordered) mutations create greater order.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 01:35, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In thermodynamic terms, the concept of &amp;quot;order&amp;quot; is not usually applied to the Second Law except in rigorous terms of &amp;quot;molecular ordering,&amp;quot; which you have not made a clear connection to the theory of evolution. Also, you are ignoring the fact that the Second Law only applies to a closed system (and the Earth is not a closed system), which has been explained many times above. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 02:02, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::And just what is this &amp;quot;closed system&amp;quot; that the 2nd Law here has to be restricted to?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 02:16, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The standard thermodynamic definition of a closed system is one that cannot exchange mass with its surroundings. But in the context of Mr. Schlafly's assertions about the Second Law and evolution, his misunderstanding about the thermodynamic concept of order is even more significant. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 02:38, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And why can't that happen on earth?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 02:42, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The Earth is actually pretty close to being a closed system, but obviously it is possible for matter to leave or enter the Earth's atmosphere. But the main problem with the Second Law being used as an argument against evolution is the claim that evolution requires &amp;quot;disorder changing by itself into a more ordered state&amp;quot; (this was most recently stated on [[Talk:Main_Page]]) and the idea that &amp;quot;disorder&amp;quot; (however that is defined) is always increasing. Mr. Schlafly has not provided any substantial evidence or explanation for this, and that is why I removed the claim about evolution from the article. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 03:05, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::You and everyone else above kept right on saying that earth is a closed system; now you're changing it to &amp;quot;''pretty close'' to being a closed system&amp;quot;?  Have you ever put together logs in a fireplace and watched them burn?  Which was more complex: the logs assembled, or the ashes several hours later?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 03:10, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::As I stated in my most recent 2 comments, the fact that the Earth is not a closed system is not as relevant to Mr. Schlafly's Second Law vs. evolution argument as is his concept of order. (And I do believe much of the discussion above on this talk page is not well focused.) I am not seeing the connection between your burning log example and evolution. Please elaborate. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 03:27, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Now it's back to being a closed system?  Did &amp;quot;pretty close&amp;quot; just disappear?  Answer the question about the logs.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 03:45, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::The logs are more complex; in the act of burning them, matter goes from an ordered state to a more disordered one, and energy is given off. Are you going to elaborate on how this relates to evolution as Randall asked? [[User:CWest|CWest]] 08:28, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::That is correct.  Now explain why the 2nd Law only applies to a closed system.  Those are your words, Randall7, and I expect you to answer it...not CWest.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:41, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::The two statements that make up the foundation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics - the Kelvin-Planck statement and the Clausius statement - both describe systems that exchange heat and/or work with their surroundings, but not mass. But as I said before, my concern is less about the closed system argument and more about the abuse of the concept of &amp;quot;order&amp;quot; to claim that the Second Law disproves evolution. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 20:37, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several more questions, Mr. Randal7, because now you're drifting away from the &amp;quot;closed&amp;quot; system here.&lt;br /&gt;
:1. Is iron more complex than rust?  And when iron does rust, does it constitute an improvement, or a breakdown?&lt;br /&gt;
:2. What happens to boiling water when you turn off the stove?  Does it stay the same, or does it get cooler?&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Is CWest's statement above correct, in that ''&amp;quot;matter goes from an ordered state to a more disordered one&amp;quot;''?  Does that statement apply only to the fireplace?  Could it also apply to a freshly-cleaned living room, just prior to adding three eight-year-old spoiled brats with pop guns and a baby sitter unable to control the outcome?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 03:25, 10 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I feel like this discussion is becoming less productive and more of a waste of time, but I'll answer the questions because I want to see how you relate them to the Second Law of Thermodynamics disproving evolution. (I so far have failed to see the connection.)&lt;br /&gt;
::#Iron is generally less complex than rust. (Although &amp;quot;complex&amp;quot; is not a very precise term.) Iron is a single element, whereas rust can be a number of iron oxide or iron hydroxide compounds. Iron is usually much more homogeneous than rust. When iron rusts it is a chemical and thermodynamic improvement - it would not happen spontaneously if it were not energetically favorable. In practical terms, rusting is not an improvement because pure iron is more useful for structural or electrical applications, but pure iron does not usually stay pure for long because of its propensity to oxidate. This is why iron alloys are much more common.&lt;br /&gt;
::#When the stove is turned off, boiling water cools as heat is transferred from the water to its cooler surroundings. Entropy is generated from this heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
::#In the burning log example, it is true that &amp;quot;matter goes from an ordered state to a more disordered one,&amp;quot; and there are plenty of other examples where this statement is true. There are also many instances where matter goes from a disordered state to a more ordered one, such as water freezing or magnetization. But in theses cases of matter becoming more ordered, net entropy of the matter and its surroundings will still never decrease. The statement could also apply to a room of spoiled brats, but in this case the term &amp;quot;order&amp;quot; is no longer being used in a thermodynamic or chemical sense.&lt;br /&gt;
::--[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 15:27, 10 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===My answers to Randall7===&lt;br /&gt;
With regards to the iron, you are wrong.  Rust is a breakdown; it is a disintegration of the iron itself.  The rust can be stopped; the iron can be prevented from rusting further, but rust in and of itself can never be restored into iron.  It goes one-way only.  Likewise the water on the stove; take away the heat which makes the water boil, and the water temperature will drop to the lowest level possible, which one can call &amp;quot;room temperature&amp;quot;.  Likewise the fireplace logs, likewise the living room.  One-way only.  Complex to simple, order to disorder.  It never, ever happens in reverse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2nd Law of thermodynamics is the same way.  You can restrict the 2nd Law to heating and/or energy concepts all you want, but the very core of this law is the same thing cited above: order ''always'' goes to disorder; complex ''always'' goes to simple.  The 2nd Law may be about heat, but turn off the fire and what do you get?  Water cooling down, heat cooling and dissipating, complex to simple, order to disorder.  The fireplace scene has the heat, but the logs always end up as ashes.  The ashes ''never'' turn back into logs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the final answer to the question &amp;quot;what does this have to do with evolution?&amp;quot;.  It was evolutionists who stated we should ''accept'' their scenario as to how life came to be: ''simple'' organisms ''evolved'' into more and more ''complex'' ones over time.  ''Simple'' to ''complex''; ''disorder'' to ''order''.  When making scientific investigations the very first step of the [[scientific method]] that must be followed is ''observation''; a scientist has to ''observe'' what is going on, and every single minute of every day scientists and layman alike are observing the 2nd Law in action; no one can get away from it.  ''Observation'' proves complex always goes to simple; ''observation'' proves order always goes to disorder.  ''Observation'', scientific or not, ''confirms'' the validity of the 2nd Law.  The examples I posted above - the fireplace, the iron, the living room, the stove top - are perfect examples of the 2nd Law in action, closed system or not.  It's impossible to go into reverse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is why we're going to post the impossibility of evolution on this website, ''vis-a-vis'' the 2nd Law.  Case closed.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:14, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You make a good point that irreversibility is an unavoidable consequence of the Second Law. There is no such thing as a truly reversible process and all processes generate entropy. But your claim that &amp;quot;order ''always'' goes to disorder; complex ''always'' goes to simple&amp;quot; is absurd. More ordered/&amp;quot;complex&amp;quot; materials can be formed through [[work]]. (&amp;quot;Simple&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;complex&amp;quot; do not have rigorous thermodynamic definitions, by the way.) Otherwise every single ordered object would have to have existed existed exactly as it is since the beginning of time, or have existed in a larger or more ordered form. Organisms gain energy - the capacity do do work - by eating, respiring, photosynthesizing, or otherwise absorbing energy from their surroundings. This allows them to become more ordered or more &amp;quot;complex,&amp;quot; but this is not in violation of the the Second Law because during their processes of converting energy and exerting work, net entropy is generated. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 23:57, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Randall7, these organisms do take in food, use it as energy, and continue on with their lives, but their status as organisms remains unchanged until they ''cease the work''; when that happens they wither away and die; they decompose, they turn to dust.  Complex to simple, order to disorder.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:03, 13 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I suppose that is true, but you did not refute anything I just said. --[[User:Toadaron|AaronT]] 00:06, 13 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, how do you explain the growth of a crystal (an ordered arrangement of ions) from a solution (a disordered arrangement), if &amp;quot;the Second Law does ban disorder becoming more orderly&amp;quot;, as you say? --[[User:FrederickT3|FrederickT3]] 03:39, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Order is not really increasing when a crystal grows in a solution, or when water changes its phase and becomes ice.  If the crystal or ice is melted again, then one back to where it started.  This is no increase in order.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:53, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Mr. Schlafly, it is clear that your concept of order differs from the thermodynamic concept of order. When water freezes, its entropy decreases and when ice melts, its entropy increases, but during these processes the entropy of the water's surroundings also increase/decrease (such that total net change in entropy is never negative, and in reality is net positive). I would like to hear an explanation of how changes in &amp;quot;order&amp;quot; during evolution relate to the actual Second Law of Thermodynamics. --[[User:Randall7|Randall7]] 20:37, 9 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Mr. Schlafly, are you honestly suggesting there is no change in entropy when water melts? --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 01:57, 10 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cafeteria_Catholic&amp;diff=983235</id>
		<title>Cafeteria Catholic</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cafeteria_Catholic&amp;diff=983235"/>
				<updated>2012-05-27T02:55:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Re-adding; reasons given in Rick_Santorum#Political_Positions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''Cafeteria Catholic,''' '''Catholic in name only,''' or '''C&amp;amp;E Catholic (Christmas &amp;amp; Easter only Catholic)''' is someone who self-identifies as a member of the [[Roman Catholic church]] and yet picks and chooses which of the Church's doctrines to believe. In particular, those terms are often used to refer to a self-identified Catholic who rejects the Vatican's instructions, Canon law and Papal Encyclicals directing Catholics to abhor [[abortion]] as murder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catholic [[Democrats]] may be associated with Cafeteria Catholics because their party ideology believes in [[abortion]] as a right and also in gay [[marriage]]. This is in direct opposition to what Catholics are taught. By no means is the practice exclusive to Democrats. Catholic [[Republicans]] who believe in the necessity of capital punishment are also considered Cafeteria Catholics. The Church decries capital punishment as un-Biblical. However, the Church teaches that the guilty put to death in no way equals the innocent death of children in the womb, an intrinsic Evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other examples of the pick-and-choose approach include Catholics who deny there is a [[Hell]], deny the miracle of transubstantiation and the place of the eucharist as the most important of the seven sacraments,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mark 14:22-24; Luke 22:14-20; John 6:53–58; Code of Canon Law of 1983 1396&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;,  deny that [[Mary]] was Immaculate,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Encyclical Munificentissimus Deus, etc.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, deny fundamental church teachings regarding the origin of life, or deny other core teachings of the Church (apostasy).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Encyclical Sapaentiae Christianae: &amp;quot;to refuse to believe in any one of [dogmas of the Church] is equivalent to rejecting all of them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By Canon law, a Catholic believing contrary to certain truths taught by the Universal, Ordinary and Solemn Magisteria may be guilty of [[heresy]] or worse, apostasy, and should not take [[Holy Communion]]. These truths are not defined in a single teaching and may be difficult to discern, which is a false conundrum cafeteria Catholics rely on to deny faith rather than learn and explore. Some Cafeteria Catholics ignore this and take Communion anyway, which is a Mortal [[Sin]]. The Church believes that such a person is separated from the [[Holy Spirit]], even without direct [[excommunication]] from Church authorities. Alternatively, some cafeteria Catholics are very sensitive to the difficulty their compromised faith presents and in picking and choosing which sacraments and Canons to honor may abstain from defiling the eucharist by feasting in a state of sin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An extreme form of a cafeteria Catholic is a '''cultural Catholic'''.  A cultural Catholic is someone who has a strong emotional attachment to Catholic social and cultural identity, but who does not understand Catholicism and does not seriously follow its ethical teaching.  The majority of Catholics in the world are believed to be cultural Catholics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://withchrist.org/catholic.htm#Cultural Who Is a Roman Catholic? Cultural Catholics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Divorce and abortion rates among Catholics are identical to the secular society as a whole, showcasing the effects of the Cultural Catholic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joe Biden]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Geraldine Ferraro]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Castle]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Chris Christie]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Stephen Colbert]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rudy Giuliani]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sean Hannity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joe Kennedy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ted Kennedy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Kerry]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Moore]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bill O'Reilly]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Pataki]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nancy Pelosi]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Rangel]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Dan Rooney&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew Cuomo]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Martin Scorsese]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Chris Matthews]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rick Santorum]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cafeteria Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Catholics for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Republican in name only]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:idioms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Catholic Church]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Treaty_of_Tripoli&amp;diff=982587</id>
		<title>Treaty of Tripoli</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Treaty_of_Tripoli&amp;diff=982587"/>
				<updated>2012-05-22T00:37:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Praise by atheists&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Treaty of Tripoli''' was a peace agreement made between the [[United States]] and Tripoli. It was drafted and signed by the Bey in [[Algiers]] in 1796, the ratified by Congress and signed by President [[John Adams]] in 1797.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The treaty has been lauded by [[atheists]] in modern times because of Article 11, which states, in part, that &amp;quot;the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authored by American diplomat Joel Barlow in 1796, the following treaty was sent to the floor of the [[Senate]], June 7, 1797, where it was read aloud in its entirety and unanimously approved. John Adams, having seen the treaty, signed it and proudly proclaimed it to the Nation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Full Text==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the United States and the Bey and Subjects of Tripoli of Barbary''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Annals of Congress, 5th Congress&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Art 1. There is a firm and perpetual peace and friendship between the United States of America and the Bey and subjects of Tripoli, of Barbary, made by the free consent of both parties, and guarantied by the most potent Dey and Regency of Algiers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Art. 2. If any goods belonging to any nation with which either of the parties is at war, shall be loaded on board of vessels belonging to the other party, they shall pass free, and no attempt shall be made to take or detain them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Art. 3. If any citizens , subjects, or effects, belonging to either party, shall be found on board a prize vessel taken from an enemy by the other party, such citizens or subjects shall be set at liberty, and the effects restored to the owners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Art. 4. Proper passports are to be given to all vessels of both parties, by which they are to be known. And considering the distance between the two countries, eighteen months from the date of this treaty, shall be allowed for procuring such passports. During this interval the other papers, belonging to such vessels, shall be sufficient for their protection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Art. 5. A citizen or subject of either party having bought a prize vessel, condemned by the other party, or by any other nation, the certificates of condemnation and bill of sale shall be a sufficient passport for such vessel for one year; this being a reasonable time for her to procure a proper passport.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Art. 6. Vessels of either party, putting into the ports of the other, and having need of provisions or other supplies, they shall be furnished at the market price. And if any such vessel shall so put in, from a disaster at sea, and have occasion to repair, she shall be at liberty to land and re-embark her cargo without paying any duties. But in case shall she be compelled to the land her cargo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Art. 7. Should a vessel of either party be cast on the shore of the other, all proper assistance shall be given to her and her people; no pillage shall be allowed; the property shall remain at the disposition of the owners; and the crew protectedand succored till they can be sent to their country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Art. 8. If a vessel of either party should be attacked by an enemy, within gun-shot of the forts of the other , she shall be defended as much as possible. If she be in port she shall not be seized on or attacked, when it is in the power of the other party to protect her. And when she proceeds to sea, no enemy shall be allowed to pursue her from the same port, within twenty-four hours after her departure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Art. 9. The commerce between the United States and Tripoli; the protection to be given to merchants, masters of vessels, and seamen; the reciprocal right of the establishing Consuls in each country; and the privileges, immunities, and jurisdiction, to be on the same footing with those of the most favored nations respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Art. 10. The money and presents demanded by the Bey of Tripoli, as a full and satisfactory consideration on his part, and on the part of his subjects, for this treaty of perpetual peace and friendship, are acknowledged to have been received by him previous to his signing the same, according to a receipt which is hereto annexed, except such as part as is promised, on the part of the United States, to be delivered and paid by them on the arrival of their Consul in Tripoli; of which part a note is likewise hereto annexed. And no pretense of any periodical tribute of further payments is ever to be made by either party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Art. 11. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Art. 12. In case of any dispute, arising from a violation of any of the articles of this treaty, no appeal shall be made to arms; nor shall war be declared on any pretext whatever. But if the Consul, residing at the place where the dispute shall happen, shall not be able to settle the same, an amicable referrence shall be made to the mutual friend of the parties, the Dey of Algiers; the parties hereby engaging to abide by his decision. And he, by virtue of his signature to this treaty, engages for himself and successors to declare the justice of the case, according to the true interpretation of the treaty, and to use all the means in his power to enforce the observance of the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Signed and sealed at Tripoli of Barbary the 3d day of Junad in the year of the Hegira 1211— corresponding with the 4th day of November, 1796, by&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JUSSOF BASHAW MAHOMET, Bey.&lt;br /&gt;
MAMET, Treasurer.&lt;br /&gt;
AMET, Minister of Marine.&lt;br /&gt;
SOLIMAN KAYA.&lt;br /&gt;
GALIL, General of the Troops.&lt;br /&gt;
MAHOMET, Commander of the City.&lt;br /&gt;
AMET, Chamberlain.&lt;br /&gt;
ALLY, Chief of the Divan.&lt;br /&gt;
MAMET, Secretary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Signed and sealed at Algiers, the 4th day of Argill, 1211—corresponding with the 3d day of&lt;br /&gt;
January, 1797, by&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HASSAN BASHAW, Dey,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And by the agent Plenipotentiary of the United States of America,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JOEL BARLOW.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diplomacy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Early National U.S.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:African History]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=980386</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay:Best New Conservative Words</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=980386"/>
				<updated>2012-05-09T01:03:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* Level Playing Field */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''[[/archive1 | Archive 1 ]]'''&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[/archive2 | Archive 2 ]]'''&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[/archive3 | Archive 3 ]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Additional liberal terms? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What about &amp;quot;ethnocentrism&amp;quot; (1905-1910) and &amp;quot;multiculturalism&amp;quot; (1960-1965)?  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 09:34, 16 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Superb suggestions.  Please add as you think best!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:37, 16 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
==Refudiate==&lt;br /&gt;
Even though liberal dictionaries added this word, Palin admitted it was an error on her part. If it stays then we must add Corpse men for lib terms.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:01, 23 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not necessarily--no dictionaries made &amp;quot;corpse man&amp;quot; a [http://www.execdigital.com/business/leader/who-s-laughing-now-sarah-palin-s-refudiate-oxford-s-top-word-2010 word of the year]. Moreover, the word seems to be getting some leverage and use on its own terms. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 14:43, 23 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps time will tell.  The term &amp;quot;Big Bang&amp;quot; was born of mockery also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:15, 23 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Andy, could that explain the perceived scarcity of conservative words dating from the 21st century? Because I think the notion that a word can &amp;quot;mature&amp;quot; to be conservative is a fascinating and powerful insight. [[User:BradB|BradB]] 23:10, 4 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charisma? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have doubts that charisma, despite its etymology, is a conservative term.  It seems to elevate style over substance -- a definite [[liberal]] trait.  Nowhere does the Bible refer to Jesus as having charisma.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect the original meaning of charisma was for religious charisma.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:59, 4 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I would suggest, (if we do ''indeed,'' keep it), to change the phrasing to something more on the order of:&lt;br /&gt;
::'''literally &amp;quot;a gift from God&amp;quot;, charisma is the quality of a person imbued by God to leadership, often found in [[conservative]] public figures.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:This nixes the &amp;quot;magic&amp;quot; from the sentence since as wonderful as a gift from God is, it isn't &amp;quot;magic&amp;quot;. [[User:DevonJ|DevonJ]] 20:20, 4 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Andy, that's a good point. I prefer to think of charisma as ''the style of substance'', but that's definitely not the case for everyone (especially liberals). While the etymology is undoubtedly conservative, perhaps &amp;quot;difficult to classify&amp;quot; may be a better resting place for charisma. Devon, either way, definitely an improvement on your part, thanks. [[User:BradB|BradB]] 22:21, 4 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
==New words added==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I have added 4 new words: deference (1660), idealist (1701), god-fearing (1835) &amp;amp; Rogue state (1993). If everyone accepts these, they will fill out the doubling pattern for those centuries. Shall I change the numbers in the summary at the top of the page?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have also added 'liberal creep' (2008). [[User:CharlieJ|CharlieJ]] 01:08, 14 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:All your additions look superb except &amp;quot;deference,&amp;quot; which I'm not sure is [[conservative]].  Please do update the counts the top (I already did increment the 1800s count for &amp;quot;God-fearing&amp;quot;).--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 02:05, 14 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I added 'deference' because CP has 'giving those in authority due respect' listed as a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_values Conservative Value]. I will tweak the definition a bit to emphasis the necessary legitimacy of the superior. Thanks for the positive feedback. [[User:CharlieJ|CharlieJ]] 02:21, 14 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::But look at the remainder of the chat quote:  &amp;quot;giving those in authority due respect, but not to the point of accepting orders or assertions that are contrary to logic or morality.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 02:34, 14 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Let's continue this discussion later Monday morning.  Thanks and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 02:40, 14 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi again. Firstly, let me tell you that I am an Aussie and my timezone is GMT+10. This makes me 12-15 hours ahead of you. Our conversations may be a bit disjointed because of this. Right now it is my bedtime, so I will post this comment &amp;amp; then go, leaving it for your consideration. (Editing has been switched off for a while, is that correct? I realise that you do this most nights. I didn't expect it to be on again tonight.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To return to 'deference': to me the word embodies respect and consideration which I would regard as being conservative values, but not necessarily 'giving in'. However, I do not have the right American nuances to interpret this as you do and will not push this strongly and am happy to remove it from the list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a couple of alternatives for consideration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
atheistic (1625-35) An adjective pertaining to or characteristic of atheists or atheism; containing, suggesting, or disseminating atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
secularize (1611) To make secular; to transfer from ecclesiastical to civil or lay use, possession, or control&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me, these are useful words for conservatives. They do not describe conservatives. My reading of the list suggests that useful words are acceptable eg alarmist. Anyway, goodnight for now, catch up with you tomorrow. [[User:CharlieJ|CharlieJ]] 08:32, 14 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;atheistic&amp;quot; is good.  Let's go with that.  I didn't see why &amp;quot;patriarchy&amp;quot; was conservative, so I removed that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:04, 18 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::No worries. I'll add 'atheistic'. [[User:CharlieJ|CharlieJ]] 22:36, 18 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Copacetic&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure how conservative this word is. There's no reasoning given for its inclusion, apart from the fact that Bojangles Robinson supposedly created it (and even that is extremely weak evidence and I'm not sure what it adds. I'm going to remove it from the list if no one raises any opposition. [[User:DennyW66|DennyW66]] 22:37, 19 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;Copacetic&amp;quot; is the very satisfactory result of conservative values.  It is associated with good and honest living.  I do object to removal of this conservative term.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:32, 20 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Moral Majority - A suggestion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Andy, I saw your addition &amp;quot;silent majority&amp;quot; and it made me immediately think of &amp;quot;Moral Majority&amp;quot;. [http://www.answers.com/topic/moral-majority This page credits it to Jerry Falwell in 1979]. Although in it's strictest sense it describes a movement it is still has greater symbolism. Thanks, [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 20:30, 21 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Great suggestion.  Please included it ... and increment the total near the beginning for the 1900s.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:04, 21 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Done! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:22, 21 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obambulate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe it's just my public school education at work, but I fail to see how obambulate is conservative. Apart from its obvious similarities with &amp;quot;Obama&amp;quot;, it simply means &amp;quot;to walk around&amp;quot;. I know that Obama has been bumbling and whatnot, but it's an innocuous word that is being assigned a special significance due to coincidence. I'm not sure it belongs on this list. [[User:DennyW66|DennyW66]] 22:05, 27 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It is probably as a result of it being mentioned on Rush Limbaugh's show and the liberal reactions to it during the past week.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 23:08, 27 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What was the reaction? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:14, 27 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Denny, your comment is a valid one, but the modern usage of the term &amp;quot;obambulate&amp;quot; is to criticize the directionless wandering characteristic of liberal leadership.  None of the terms in the list should be viewed in a vacuum independent of their usage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Hey, my response used another candidate:  &amp;quot;directionless&amp;quot;.  ''Trying to find its date of origin next ....''--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:35, 27 March 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agitprop ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I get the etiquette wrong, first time commenting. I was just wondering if there was a source for Agitprop? I always understood it to be derived from Soviet Russian institutions, so would be quite keen to see the conservative routes of it. Everything I have tried so far has turned up the term as being derived from Russian e.g. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=agitprop&amp;amp;searchmode=none , and I would be surprised if the internal machinations of the USSR would come up with something conservative, so would be keen to find out the alternative you uncovered&amp;quot;[[User:JTpldl|JTlpdl]] 09:18, 28 March 2011 (EDT)&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Page dividing ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the success of this essay, it's really slow, so can I split it into pages by century of origin? This would allow the page to load faster and be easier to navigate. Any thoughts on the idea? [[User:BenDylan|BenDylan]] 20:09, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd like to see it be broken up by century and automatically numbered. I'm not sure that breaking it up into many pages would facilitate more than inconvenience. [[User:BradB|BradB]] 23:55, 26 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Audit==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm getting 25,48,100,201,17 as the counts. If so, this wouldn't be the first time I've seen them wrong. As I mentioned above, we should consider breaking the list up by century to help avoid counting errors. [[User:BradB|BradB]] 18:37, 27 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Word for 1700's ==&lt;br /&gt;
Could belittle be the word we are looking for to perfect the list? It was coined in 1785 by Thomas Jefferson himself, and is certainly a way to describe an action often done by liberals to protect their ideas. [[User:JoshuaL|JoshuaL]] 19:34, 28 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Joshua, I'm inclined to agree, as Jefferson likely coined the term in response to critics trying to deceptively minimize issues he raised. [[User:BradB|BradB]] 02:07, 29 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not sure &amp;quot;belittle&amp;quot; is conservative.  But how about &amp;quot;axiomatic&amp;quot;?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 02:20, 30 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
If you're still looking for an 18th century word, 'nationalist' would fit well - it's a core conservative value, synonymous with 'patriot', the antithesis of 'internationalist', and one of the defining features of the 18th century. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 16:17, 5 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal creep ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do we reconcile this with liberal creep? If language is becoming more conservative, why is opinion and perception becoming more liberal? Do liberals or conservatives dictate the terms of the national conversation? If someone could take a look at the two phenomena and find out what makes one move in one direction and the other in the opposite, it would make a great essay. [[User:KingHanksley|KingHanksley]] 15:05, 8 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I've also brought this up for discussion [[Talk:Essay:Conservapedia's_Law#Putting_Conservapedia.27s_Law_in_perspective|here]]. Conservapedia's Law, the observation that conservative insights double over time, is clearly incomplete, perhaps even flawed. I agree that there could be a complex relationship between liberal creep and Conservapedia's Law and it is worth investigating. [[User:BradB|BradB]] 15:15, 8 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Graph of words over time ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I was drawing graphs, I wrote a quick script to generate a graph of the data in this page. [http://static.inky.ws/image/405/image.jpg This graph] shows the growth in conservative terms year-by-year, rather than just per-century. The red line is the data from this page, the green line is a quadratic curve. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 20:59, 18 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow, that's a spectacular graph!  Can you give permission for me to include it in the entry page?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The graph disproves the theory that there were bursts of new words during certain periods.  I'll remove that from the entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:43, 19 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Please do use the graph as you see fit. I can generate new graphs from the latest data with no trouble at all, so if you'd like it can be updated periodically. I'm currently trying to find a suitably analogous source of data for liberal words/ideas, which would allow comparative analysis. This kind of data is very interesting as it seems to avoid the short-term political cycles which characterize much of popular discourse, focusing on the really significant point of the growth of ideas. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 08:59, 19 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I posted the graph and your idea is marvelous.  However, I don't think the graph is completely accurate: the curve for the actual data should intersect the predicted curve at each turning of the centuries.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:45, 19 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Is the green curve really a fit for the data according to Aschlafly's theory? I mean, Jcw says ''the green line is a quadratic curve'' - at best it's a second approximation for the geometric curve...&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Personally, I find quite hard to judge the existance of ''bursts'' from a [[cdf]]. Perhaps Jcw could create a histogram - perhaps for decades?&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:30, 20 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::You both raise valid points, which hopefully will be answered soon. Andy and August both mention that the x^2 curve isn't a perfect fit - it certainly isn't, and I'm pretty sure a 2^x curve with appropriate constants will fit better; I'm planning to do that tonight. August mentions different ways of representing the data - I'll happily produce a histogram of the data if that'd be interesting, but the reason for plotting it as I have is to produce a curve that I can use for my more grandiose scheme, of which more later. My background is not so much in statistics - although I've done a fair bit of that - but in purer maths, so my thinking is mostly based around the relationships between smooth(-ish) functions. That may not be the best way to deal with these data qua data, but to extract patterns for further, more abstract work, it's ideal. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 12:43, 20 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://static.inky.ws/image/412/image.jpg Et voila], a better fit. This is an exponential curve fitted to the same data. Note that it fits much better in the region with the most words, but is a bit out for the earlier period where there are fewer words in the list. This is because we can more easily find suitable words from more recent periods, so naturally the pattern is most exact there. No doubt if we could go through a large, representative corpus and extract words uniformly, it would fit nicely all the way along. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 16:25, 20 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''@Aschlafly: ''' Could you recount the words? My count gave me 26-51-103-210-18 (Sum: 408) instead of 26-52-103-208-18 (Sum: 407). Perhaps a fourth column for the century (or even better, the decade) could be added? That would make it much easier to keep track of the numbers!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''@Jcw: ''' I don't think that your ''better fit'' is the function which Aschlafly has in mind: it should be &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F_{theo}(t) = \frac{\#words }{15}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2^{\frac{t-1599}{100}}-1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where ''#words'' is the number of words created before 2000, i.e., 390. This function touches/intersects the empirical cdf at the turn of each century, a fact which betrays the biased method of looking for these words.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:12, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::August, so you've constructed a function which you claim 'betrays the biased method of looking for these words'? I'd be interested to see a more thorough explanation of that point. Another editor has attempted a similar argument above, but without success. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 15:42, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::August, I have an open mind about this.  I don't see how we could so easily find [[conservative]] words that double by century if the underlying pattern were not there.  But please explain if you think that is in error.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:27, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope we can agree on the function ''F&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;theo&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;'' - it should be uncontroversial:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*one layer exists from 1 - 2 - 4 - 8 words, i.e., 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;,2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*the partial sums are 1 - 3 - 7 - 15, i.e., 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-1, 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-1, 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-1, and 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-1&lt;br /&gt;
*so, with the turn of the n-th century, there should be 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;n+1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-1 words&lt;br /&gt;
*for K layers, the number is K * (2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;n+1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-1). Each layer has 15 words, thus, if there are '''N''' feasible words, the number of layers is '''N'''/15&lt;br /&gt;
*now adjust for years instead of centuries, and don't start with the first, but with the 17th, and you get the formula &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F_{theo}(t) = \frac{\#words }{15}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2^{\frac{t-1599}{100}}-1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''@jcw: ''' ''Another editor has attempted a similar argument above, but without success.'' I read the sections above, and I ''was'' convinced by the argument.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''@Aschlafly:''' ''I don't see how we could so easily find [[conservative]] words that double by century if the underlying pattern were not there.''  The effects of the miscount ([[Talk:Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words#PERFECTION: 20-40-80-160 BY CENTURY]]) have shown that you are able to match any   pattern you were looking for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 12:11, 22 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
August's contrary theory aside, here's an interesting consequence of this trend: [http://static.inky.ws/image/421/image.jpg this graph] shows the curve from above in green, an hypothetical linear growth of liberalism ([liberal creep], in blue) and the effect of the latter on the former (in red). Note how the red line - the net effect of liberal and conservative ideas - falls for a while, reaching a minimum in the twentieth century before shooting up. This is because the exponential growth of conservatism is slower at first that the linear growth of liberalism, but gets very much faster later on, easily overtaking the linear function and increasing to infinity. Obviously the liberalism line is hypothetical, but it's interesting nonetheless. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 12:41, 24 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's remarkably insightful.  In other words, the combination of linear [[liberal creep]] and the geometric growth rate of [[Best New Conservative Words]] results in a liberal trend for a while (until the [[Great Depression]]), and then a rapidly increasing conservative trend thereafter.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:16, 24 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Exactly. The precise shape of the final curve depends on the values assumed for the [[liberal creep]] line, but any reasonable values give a final curve with much the same shape. It agrees rather remarkably with the observed facts, especially as nothing in the calculations refers to historical events at all. Purely linguistic inputs produce an undeniably historical result, demonstrating the power of language very clearly. As ever, feel free to use the graph however you please. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 13:48, 24 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I am skeptical that the complexities of human society and political philosophies can be summed up simply as an exponential function minus a linear function. What evidence is there that this [[liberal creep]] is linear? How is that even quantified? Does this hypothesis make any specific predictions, in order to make it [[falsifiable]] and thus scientific? --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 02:09, 25 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Good questions.  I'll consider them (as others probably will also) and reply after some thought.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 02:15, 25 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Good questions indeed. The immediate answer is 'no': of course all the complexities of human society can't be summed up as simply as this. Quantifying complex abstract phenomena is a very rough business, most especially on a short timescale. The goal of my graphs isn't to present concrete mathematical laws, or anything like them, but just to illustrate a conceptual relationship using mathematics. &lt;br /&gt;
:::: To answer your specific questions: &lt;br /&gt;
:::: * 'how is that even quantified?': Crudely and by guesswork, like many first attempts in all sciences, especially those relating to human activity. The crude guess is justified by the answer to:&lt;br /&gt;
:::: * 'Does this hypothesis make any specific predictions...': In one way, the hypothesis is supported by the same kind of evidence as is used to defend evolution - the hypothesis I've produced now gives results which agree with events in the past. As we all agree, that's not the best kind of evidence, but in this case it's rather compelling. Secondly, it does make concrete predictions - indeed, it makes an inescapable prediction which can't be fudged or avoided - the 'conservatism' curve increases very rapidly to infinity, rather than going up and down or settling into a steady state. This suggests a discontinuity in the future, where the level of conservatism rises to something quite outside our experience. I'm not sure what that would look like, but I think we'd recognize it if we saw it. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 20:49, 25 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: In furtherance of Jcw's remarks, it is perhaps easier to study the development of language and politics, which are closely related to each other, than it is to study and predict ... the weather.  Nobody had a problem with [[Al Gore]] trying to predict the weather, so why object when a simpler task is undertaken?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:01, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: @Jcw How specifically does your graph &amp;quot;agree with events in the past&amp;quot;? Also, the claim that &amp;quot;the level of conservatism rises to something quite outside our experience&amp;quot; is not a specific prediction. I'm not even sure what that means. Finally, in [http://static.inky.ws/image/421/image.jpg your graph] what does the y-axis represent? Words? Aschlafly above links the exponential function to the growth of conservative terms.  If so, why is [[liberal creep]] linear? Is there any empirical or theoretical reason to believe this? Looking at [[Essay:New_Liberal_Terms|liberal terms]] by century it seems like liberal terms are also growing exponentially, even though the article claims they don't grow &amp;quot;geometrically&amp;quot; and are &amp;quot;heavily influenced by culture&amp;quot;. In any case, it doesn't look linear. Wouldn't the diminishing intelligence of humans mean liberal terms would be growing quickly?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: @Aschlafly Weather and climate are distinct things. I don't think anyone believes Al Gore is a climate scientist qualified to make scientific predictions, only a spokesman. Many people do have a problem with him and the whole idea of climate change.  &lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Also, human beings are extremely complicated and it isn't obvious to me that accurately predicting and quantifying the political philosophy of a complex society is much simpler than either meteorology or climatology. Even if the development of politics and language are closely related (I'm not sure they are),  why would studying them be necessarily be a simpler task than studying climates?--[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 01:39, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(unindent)Matthew: now you're asking questions that have already been answered or are clear from the context. I note that your edits on this site are almost exclusively to talk pages; may we assume that you are here simply to argue rather than to contribute? [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 08:44, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The interesting question is, what would an (effectively) infinite level of conservatism look like? I'm afraid I don't know enough about the US to answer that: over here 'conservatism' looks a great deal like US liberalism... [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 12:32, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: One characteristic of infinite conservatism might be when it is impossible to notice a difference in the level of service and attitude between government and a perfectly competitive industry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:18, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: In a perfectly conservative society, would there be any need for government as we now know it? I suppose there are limits to how conservative a society can be in a fallen world... [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 14:52, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Conservatives aren't [[libertarian]]s or [[anarchist]]s, so a '''''limited''''' government would exist ....--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:48, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I'm sorry, I still don't understand what 'infinite conservatism' means. Perhaps an article detailing how conservatism can be quantified and what happens in the limit as it approaches infinity would help. --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 21:32, 26 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: That's an interesting idea, Matthew. I think that in the US conservatism is closely correlated with Evangelical Christianity, which is not at all the case here in the UK, where our conservatives are more likely to belong to the Church of England - a decidedly liberal institution by US standards. Andy's suggestion above is concise, but if you think about it it's a very acute description of a hypothetical perfectly conservative government. I shudder to think what a perfectly liberal government would be like. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 16:33, 27 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Jcw, your description of US conservatism compared with the UK is interesting, and I've thought about it.  While certainly there are more evangelicals here than there, not all are conservative.  Moreover, the cause-and-effect is less than clear:  does the conservative nature of America allow evangelicalism to develop more fully than in a liberal nation?  If so, there still remains an underlying mystery of why America is more conservative than the UK.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:41, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Yes, a very interesting question. Our two nations have a great deal of shared history, but today are vastly different in fundamental ways. I think the Reformation is particularly important in this context - the UK experienced it directly, while the nascent US only experienced the aftereffects; the US was never a Catholic nation in the Mediaeval sense. Another - perhaps related - aspect is the persistence of monarchy in the UK compared to its outright rejection by the US. There's a lot to be said on this topic, so I'll begin an essay with some of my thoughts and see how it compares with a US view. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 18:39, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Please do start an essay on this, hopefully here so that I can contribute to it too!  Religious differences between the US and the UK are surely part of the explanation for the political differences, but I think there is more to it than that.  [[Federalism]], for example, prevents [[liberals]] from gaining control over the US, while that protection does not exist in the UK.  I will say this:  the UK media is much more free with respect to American politics than the American press is!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:13, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''@Jcw: ''' What are the parameters of your interpolating function? And how did you calculate them? Could you also display: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F_{theo}(t) = \frac{\#words }{15}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(2^{\frac{t-1599}{100}}-1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And why not use these paramaters - they are the direct result of applying Aschlafly's rule of doubling-by-century...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:08, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
August, if you'd like to do those calculations, please feel free - the data isn't kept secret, it's right there on the page. If you'd like to see another presentation of it, go ahead. I'm very happy to explain things - and to justify my choices! - to well-meaning editors with genuine questions, but you seem to be on the wrong side of every argument around here, as if you're deliberately disagreeing for the sake of it. The amount of time and attention you're willing to give to criticizing other people's ideas is remarkable. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 10:35, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Well put, Jcw.  Actually, the entries begin with the year 1612, after the publication of the [[KJV]] and the completion of nearly all of [[Shakespeare]]'s works.  So August's date in his exponent appears wrong, but your graph is correct in show an intersection with the x-axis over a decade after 1600.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:45, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''@Jcw:''' ''August, if you'd like to do those calculations, please feel free - the data isn't kept secret, it's right there on the page.'' I can't reproduce your calculations as there is not enough data: You say that it is a fit, but you don't explain how you fitted it:&lt;br /&gt;
::#How did you treat words like ''atheistic'' (1625-1635), ''deadweight loss''     (1930s) and ''design by committee'' (before 1958)&lt;br /&gt;
::#Which kind of fit did you use? For me, Maximum-Likelihood would be an obvious choice.  &lt;br /&gt;
::#Which family of functions did you look at? Obviously a*2^x. Why not a*2^x+b?&lt;br /&gt;
::#Did you use any weights? Which ones (or why not)?&lt;br /&gt;
All these choices result in different interpolating functions. So, which choices did you make and what was your result?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you'd like to see another presentation of it, go ahead. I'm very happy to explain things - and to justify my choices! - to well-meaning editors with genuine questions'' Obviously I won't promise  ''not'' to criticize your choices. Does this make me a not-well-meaning editor?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''You seem to be on the wrong side of every argument around here'' I seem to be constantly on the other side than you are. Doesn't make my side always wrong!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''@Aschlafly: ''' ''Well put, Jcw.'' Do you condone the policy to share data only with those who you expect not to criticize it? When reading [[Conservapedia:Lenski_dialog]] and its talk page, I got quite another impression! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''So August's date in his exponent appears wrong, but your graph is correct in show an intersection with the x-axis over a decade after 1600'' Jcw's graph (the green line!) doesn't intersect the x-axis at ~1610. I doubt that it intersects the x-axis at all! The red line shows the empirical data, so of course it begins at 1612 with the first word found - though ''obambulate''  (1600) is the oldest word in the table, and seems to be always counted in the ''perfect counts''. OTOH, the graph which I proposed intersects the x-axis at the turn of the 16th century, and crosses the empirical curve at the turn of each century (whether you shift the function by 1599 or 1600 is just a matter of taste...).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Americanadians ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How about 'Americanadians'? I've observed many good Americans being influenced by the blatant propaganda of our socialist neighbors, and starting to espouse their flawed line of thought. What do others think? Let me know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Claptrap ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest &amp;quot;claptrap.&amp;quot;  I'm surprised it's not on the list already. --[[User:AndyJ|AndyJ]] 00:20, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Superb suggestion!  I'll add it now.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:45, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was already on the list.  I added an 1800s term instead.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 01:10, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== free speech ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps I simply fail to understand the context you provided, but is free speech really a &amp;quot;conservative word?&amp;quot;  Terms like &amp;quot;political correctness&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;obamacare&amp;quot; are undeniably conservative (to the point where liberals won't use them), but free speech is at best non-partisan, and at worst (I am attempting to write from a conservative viewpoint- I may fail miserably at this) a term co-opted by liberals to justify their perversions and excesses. &amp;lt;/attempt to write from conservative viewpoint&amp;gt;--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 01:20, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You raise a valid point.  But isn't it the conservatives who protect, for example, corporate and many other types of expenditures in elections as &amp;quot;free speech&amp;quot;?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 01:28, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Indeed, you are correct.  But I think it's fair to say now that it is a word used by conservatives as well as liberals to represent their agendas.  I do not know how this factors into this particular list--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 02:13, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll continue to think about your valid criticism.  Maybe I can search Supreme Court opinions and see who is using the term &amp;quot;free speech&amp;quot; most.  I don't think [[liberals]] are using it as much as [[conservatives]] are today.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:30, 21 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Decades ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added a column for the decades (rather than for the centuries). I hope this will help to keep the count of the words up-to-date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:05, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not sure how that will help - surely the decade is already contained in the 'year' column? If you'd like a more accurate count, I suggest doing what I do - use a perl script to parse the wikitext and print out whatever information you want. To me the decade column looks annoyingly redundant, but perhaps I've missed something... [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 10:27, 28 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I wanted to facilitate the count: as some of the dates are not purely numeric (1950s, before 1958, 1625-1635), it's hard to sort the table by the column ''date''. If there is a purely numeric column, the table can be easily copied into a spreadsheet and recounted even by those who don't know anything about regular expressions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If you have a script, please use it to keep an eye on the count: I'm surprised that you didn't spot the miscount earlier on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'll add the column for the decades again, this time at the last place. This should be more pleasing...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 12:07, 29 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know how to upload a picture, so here is an ascii-graphic for the distribution by decades:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*1600: *&lt;br /&gt;
*1610: ****&lt;br /&gt;
*1620: *****&lt;br /&gt;
*1630: *&lt;br /&gt;
*1640: ******&lt;br /&gt;
*1650: ****&lt;br /&gt;
*1660: **&lt;br /&gt;
*1670:&lt;br /&gt;
*1680: **&lt;br /&gt;
*1690: *&lt;br /&gt;
*1700: *&lt;br /&gt;
*1710: ***&lt;br /&gt;
*1720: *****&lt;br /&gt;
*1730: ****&lt;br /&gt;
*1740: ****&lt;br /&gt;
*1750: *****&lt;br /&gt;
*1760: ******&lt;br /&gt;
*1770: ******&lt;br /&gt;
*1780: ********&lt;br /&gt;
*1790: *********&lt;br /&gt;
*1800: ********&lt;br /&gt;
*1810: *********&lt;br /&gt;
*1820: ***************&lt;br /&gt;
*1830: ***************&lt;br /&gt;
*1840: *********&lt;br /&gt;
*1850: **********&lt;br /&gt;
*1860: **********&lt;br /&gt;
*1870: *******&lt;br /&gt;
*1880: ************&lt;br /&gt;
*1890: **********&lt;br /&gt;
*1900: ***********************&lt;br /&gt;
*1910: ***********************&lt;br /&gt;
*1920: **********************&lt;br /&gt;
*1930: *******************&lt;br /&gt;
*1940: ***************************&lt;br /&gt;
*1950: **************************&lt;br /&gt;
*1960: *************************&lt;br /&gt;
*1970: ****************&lt;br /&gt;
*1980: **********************&lt;br /&gt;
*1990: ******&lt;br /&gt;
*2000: ***************&lt;br /&gt;
*2010: ***&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1820/1830,1900/1910, and 1940/1950 seem to be decades in which significantly more conservative terms were created than one would have expected... [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 12:15, 29 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Suggested additions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eurabia - what Europe will become if people don't stand up for themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Islamofascism - repressive muslim shariah regimes/totalitarian islamism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:MeganH|MeganH]] 01:01, 30 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Go ahead and add if you have some dates of origin, even if only approximate.  I hadn't heard of the first one (&amp;quot;Eurabia&amp;quot;) before.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 01:04, 30 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dumpster diving ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Was 'dumping diving' added because food is not going to waste, or am I misunderstanding why it's conservative? --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 09:54, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll take a stab at it. Conservative words can describe liberal actions. I am not saying dumpster divers are liberal, those poor folks maybe hungry. Dumpster Diving is not limited to food. It's also a method to get trade secrets from companies or dig up dirt against somebody. Most likely, Dumpster Diving is used for deceitful purposes for example gaining a social security number from discarded bills used for the creation of fraudulent IDs. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:06, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Great points.  This is a list of [[conservative]] terms, often insightful, about activities that may be conservative or liberal, harmful or helpful, or none of the above.  Evidently this term was developed by small businessmen to describe an unhelpful activity outside their restaurants and other stores.  Dumpster diving may sometimes be the equivalent of recycling or getting a hungry person some food, but in any event '''the term''' is a perfect description of the activity.  And once there is a good term for something, then the activity can be understood and addressed better.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:39, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Good analysis. But is dumpster diving a conservative act? --[[User:GeorgeZ|GeorgeZ]] 15:53, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Read Andy's post. He specifically says that that does not matter. It was created by conservatives. Therefore it is a conservative word. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:12, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Right that it does not matter whether it is a conservative act.  In the case of dumpster diving, whether it is ever conservative depends on what the purpose and effect are.  It also doesn't matter if a conservative coined it; a liberal can sing a [[Essay:Greatest Conservative Songs|conservative song]].  The point is whether the insight is conservative.  In this case, small businessmen (a conservative line of work) coined the term to criticize how homeless people were digging through their trash.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:19, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I see Andy. Thanks for explaining. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:22, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Indeed, one might suggest that liberals have indirectly contributed to the increase in conservative terms by constantly inventing new ways to avoid work and personal responsibility.  Conservatives are then, naturally, obligated to develop terms for these behaviors.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 17:18, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 2000s ==&lt;br /&gt;
It's fascinating how the new Conservative words and insights do seem to grow geometrically by century, but I'm curious as to why the 2000s seem to be pretty far behind.  We're 11 years in, so you'd expect there to be roughly 40 new words so far, but we've got less than half that many.  With the rise of the TEA Party, I'd expect to be much closer. --[[User:FergusE|FergusE]] 15:06, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Excellent point. Possible reasons could include that it is too soon to recognize new words in the most recent decade ... or maybe there has been a short-term decline in conservative intellectualism?  At any rate, I've been meaning to add the term &amp;quot;Tea Party&amp;quot; itself with its etymology in the last decade!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:12, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I have to agree with you, Andy. Even though we're in 2011 now, it might be too early to be able to fully appreciate all the new conservative words created last decade. I think &amp;quot;Tea Party&amp;quot; might just be one of the most important words to add and I think the movement itself will produce a lot of new, conservative words in its own right! [[User:BobSherman|BobSherman]] 19:58, 20 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Very perceptive, Andy.  It takes time for the gatekeepers of knowledge to acknowledge the validity of new terms; therefore, while the public production of new conservative insights and terms may be quite rapid, the assimilation of those insights and terms into formal reference works is likely to be much slower.  This is, I would suggest, exacerbated by reliance on archaic forms of knowledge dissemination such as print dictionaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An interesting side project might be to evaluate dictionaries (both online and print) to see how rapidly they accept and incorporate new conservative words versus new liberal words.  In this way, it might be possible to determine which dictionaries are reliable and which are liberally biased.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 12:19, 22 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Help! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to archive the page - at least the parts which were from last year, but I totally botched it: my browser can't handle long pages, I have difficulties with the captchas &amp;amp; I created the wrong page for an archive [[Archive 3]] instead of [[Talk:Essay:Best New Conservative Words/Archive 3]] ([[Archive 3]] should be moved there...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I give up... [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 11:58, 26 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I archived 2010... [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:44, 30 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you -  I had problems with the captchas! [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 15:26, 30 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Maybe these two ==&lt;br /&gt;
Here's two possibilities I found in [[Federal debt limit]], &amp;quot;leveraged loss&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;debt spiral&amp;quot;, but I'm not sure how to fit them in.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:01, 30 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== More possibilities... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Constructionist (1835-45)&lt;br /&gt;
Inalienable (1635-45)&lt;br /&gt;
Hubris (1880-1885)&lt;br /&gt;
Scientism (1875-1880)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Benp|Benp]] 14:11, 30 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trickle-down? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a descriptor for the trickle-down theory of economics, it dates to 1950-1955.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 21:43, 31 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think &amp;quot;trickle-down&amp;quot; is pejorative, and thus more a [[liberal]] term than a [[conservative]] one.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:47, 1 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::If trickle-down is the pejorative would the standard, conservative, phrase be &amp;quot;supply-side&amp;quot;? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 18:53, 1 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, it would - and &amp;quot;supply side&amp;quot; is already on the list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:56, 1 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::ah, excellent. my work here is done! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:00, 1 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Civil body politic ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Civil body politic&amp;quot; is an interesting bit of history but does not seem to have caught on as widely used term, and hence would not seem to warrant inclusion in this list.  Does anyone disagree?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:43, 8 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Medal of Honor (and other proper names) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure that a proper name given to an award is inherently conservative-- the Medal itself reflects conservative values of course, but would do so even if had been called, say, the Award of Bravery or the Citation of Courage. &amp;quot;Coolant,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;transistor&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;greasy spoon&amp;quot; are all truly conservative both in terms of content and syntax. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 19:50, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Your point is valid.  Perhaps it does not fit this particular list, but I'm reluctant to delete it.  Isn't there something conservative about simply recognizing &amp;quot;honor&amp;quot;, and calling the medal after the concept, rather than after, say, a liberal politician?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:15, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==alcoholism ?==&lt;br /&gt;
Could you please explain how alcoholism is a conservative word ? Alcoholism is more of a liberal trait.--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:24, 17 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Alcoholism&amp;quot; is a criticism of excessive drinking, and thus is a conservative word.  Words that end in &amp;quot;ism&amp;quot; are often pejoratives, as in &amp;quot;alarmism&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;collectivism&amp;quot; (which are also on the list).--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:41, 17 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: And do you feel the same way about the word &amp;quot;liberalism&amp;quot;?--[[User:JeanB|JeanB]] 21:49, 17 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Word that end in -ism are not always pejorative, capitalism is good. And when the words socialism or communism were invented, they were meant to be good.--[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 21:53, 17 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Handout==&lt;br /&gt;
1882, I wanted to add this to best new conservative words as it describes a liberal policy of government giveaways. But it also could be the conservative position of helping the poor through charity. Either way it is a conservative word but the proper way to describe alludes me. Op?--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 09:28, 25 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That would a superb addition!  It would also leave the list only two 20-century words shy of another perfect doubling by century.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:48, 25 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Level Playing Field ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added the term &amp;quot;level playing field&amp;quot; for two main reasons: 1) It is an intuitive metaphor used in its [http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/228650.html first recorded use] to describe how markets usually work best when they are fair for all participants and free of interference. 2) The term has since been used by liberals to describe policies such as affirmative action, progressive taxation, and government handouts, but it obvious to anyone who looks at these policies objectively that they actually distort the playing field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe that is enough for the term to stand on its own merits, but it looks even more conservative if we compare it to other words on the list such as &amp;quot;motivation,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;quantify,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;coolant.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe I have overlooked something and the word does not belong on the list. Comments are welcome. --[[User:Toadaron|AaronT]] 21:03, 8 May 2012 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=980218</id>
		<title>Essay:Best New Conservative Words</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=980218"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T02:30:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: added &amp;quot;level playing field&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--[[Image:Tax-spend.jpg|thumb|480px|The &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; slogan stuck to [[Harry Hopkins]] like a well-fitted suit.]]--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Conservative words.jpg|thumb|480px|The growth in conservative words on an annual basis (red), compared with a geometric growth rate (Courtesy [[User:Jcw]])]]Each year the [[English language]] develops about a thousand new words.  The [[King James Version]] of the [[Bible]] contains only about 8,000 different words;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8013859.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; many good words have developed since then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative]] terms, expressing [[conservative insights]], originate at a faster rate, and with much higher quality, than [[liberal]] terms.  Conservative triumph over liberalism is thus inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Powerful new conservative terms have grown at a [[geometric progression|geometric rate]], roughly doubling every century.  For each new conservative term originating in the 1600s,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The King James Version of the Bible was published in 1611, by then [[William Shakespeare]] had written nearly all his plays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; there are two new terms originating in the 1700s, four new terms in the 1800s, and eight new terms in the 1900s, for a pattern of &amp;quot;1-2-4-8&amp;quot;.  This implies a conservative future and a correlation between conservatism and truth.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Century&lt;br /&gt;
!# New Conservative Terms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1600s&lt;br /&gt;
|29&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1700s&lt;br /&gt;
|57&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|116&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|233&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|22 (preliminary)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservative words and terms==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--{| align=lwft border=1 cellspacing=0 style=&amp;quot;border-width: 5px; border-color: #c0c0c0; background: #e0e0e0; margin: 2em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | Newest Layer by century, 1600s-1900s&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; 0-0-0-0&lt;br /&gt;
|}--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!New Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[accountability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|the willingness or obligation to be held responsible for one's actions- a fundamental conservative ideal, unlike liberals who believe that 'society,' and not individuals, are responsible for their wrongdoing. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|accuracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1660&lt;br /&gt;
|conservatives strive for accuracy, while many liberals are masters of [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action-at-a-distance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1693&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Newton]]'s acceptance of this concept -- which became fundamental to [[electrostatics]] and [[quantum mechanics]] and has a basis in Christianity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', [[Jesus]]'s cure of the centurion's slave.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; -- was central to the development of his theory of gravity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-philosophy/#ActDis&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Materialists]] censor this concept, while Einstein criticized it  as &amp;quot;spooky&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|activism&lt;br /&gt;
|1915&lt;br /&gt;
|this differentiates conservatives from inactive people; this term might have originated in connection with [[Prohibition]] and efforts to pass the [[Eighteenth Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|aerobics&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|invented by the [[Christian]] Dr. Kenneth H. Cooper&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianadvice.net/famous_christians.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to describe his self-help program to improve health; he gave the title &amp;quot;Aerobics&amp;quot; to his ground-breaking book in 1968, and eventually it revolutionized attitudes toward exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|agitprop&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|propaganda designed to incite agitation, originally coined to describe communist propaganda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|alarmism&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|needless warnings, as in the politically motivated claims of [[global warming]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{#ifexist: alcoholism | [[alcoholism]] | alcoholism }}&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive or addictive drinking of alcohol&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|algorithm&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient and consistent step-by-step methodology for achieving a goal, the opposite of [[liberal style]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|altruism&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|selfless assistance of others; this also occurs in the animal kingdom, and is a [[counterexample to evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ambulance chaser&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|a lawyer who searches for victims to persuade them to sue for his profit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American dream]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1911 is the date given by the &amp;quot;OED&amp;quot;, which refers to the Oxford English Dictionary. The Merriam-Webster dictionary gives a date of 1931.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the vision that, with hard work, anyone in American can attain happiness and prosperity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American exceptionalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1835&lt;br /&gt;
|the idea that the United States and the American people hold a special place in the world, by offering opportunity and hope for humanity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|American Way&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&lt;br /&gt;
|later conservative entrepreneurs used this to coin a new name for what became a highly successful and uniquely American business model: &amp;quot;Amway&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[anti-Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing Christian ideals and institutions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anticompetitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|interfering with open competition and the enormous benefits that flow from it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|antilife&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|term criticizing a tendency to oppose life and lifesaving care&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apathetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1744&lt;br /&gt;
|term critical of the those who are deliberately inactive and disengaged mentally&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apple pie&lt;br /&gt;
|1780&lt;br /&gt;
|honesty, simplicity, wholesomeness. Relating to, or characterized by traditionally American values. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apple%20pie Merriam-webster- Apple pie]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|assimilate&lt;br /&gt;
|1880s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;estimate only; this originated sometime in the late 1880s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the desired absorption of immigrant groups into the culture and mores of the resident population&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|atheistic&lt;br /&gt;
|1625-35&lt;br /&gt;
|An adjective pertaining to or characteristic of atheists or atheism; containing, suggesting, or disseminating atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|attention span&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|correlated with intelligence, the attention span is how long someone can concentrate on something.  It is rapidly shortening; the Lincoln-Douglas debates 150 years ago lasted for hours, but none do today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.help4teachers.com/ras.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The average length of sentences in speech is another indication of attention span, and it has been shortening significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|axiomatic&lt;br /&gt;
|1797&lt;br /&gt;
|self-evident (first usage), and later it developed the meaning of being based on a set of axioms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|baby boom&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in birthrate, which is a good thing; note that the baby boom actually started before World War II, contrary to what textbooks teach. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|back burner&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|inactive status away from attention, as in &amp;quot;RINOs try to put social issues on the back burner&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bailout]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|wasting taxpayer money to rescue, temporarily, a failing company&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|balkanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|to break a region or neighborhood into divisive components; the opposite of the American concept of assimilation or &amp;quot;[[E pluribus unum]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bedrock&lt;br /&gt;
|1840-1850&lt;br /&gt;
|an American term for unbroken solid rock underneath fragments or soil, which adopted the figurative meaning of strong values:  &amp;quot;bedrock principles&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bedrock&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|beltway mentality&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Paul Weyrich]] though possibly first used by then-Governor [[John Sununu]] (&amp;quot;captives of yourselves&amp;quot;), it refers to a governing style that sees only as far as the highway that surrounds its capital, especially the one around D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Best of the Public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|A term coined by [[Andy Schlafly]] to express the idea that one does not need [[liberal]] credentials that so-called &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; have.  Indeed, many great historical figures would have failed the liberal &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; test.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|biased&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&lt;br /&gt;
|to show prejudice for or against something; American society is rapidly becoming ''biased'' against Christian and Conservative beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Big Brother&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|government constantly watching its citizens; [[George Orwell]] first coined this term in his classic, ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|biological clock&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how each woman begins to lose her ability to have children at age 27, no matter how much [[feminists]] try to conceal this scientific fact from women&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Blame America Crowd&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or &amp;quot;Blame-America-First Crowd&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Barone quoted [[Jeane Kirkpatrick]] as saying that the &amp;quot;San Francisco Democrats&amp;quot; (site of the Democratic National Convention in 1984) &amp;quot;always blame America first.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creators.com/opinion/michael-barone/the-blame-america-first-crowd.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blank check&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|irresponsibly giving someone unlimited spending authority or power, as in &amp;quot;a Con Con would be a blank check to destroy the nation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blather&lt;br /&gt;
|1719&lt;br /&gt;
|nonsensical or insignificant babble, as in &amp;quot;liberal blather is common in the [[lamestream media]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Blue Dog Democrat]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who adheres to conservative principles within the Democratic party, once called a Boll Weevil; as of 2009 there are 45-50 Blue Dog Democrats in the [[House of Representatives]], which is enough to form a majority with [[Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boondoggle&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;popularized during the [[New Deal]] as a contemptuous word for make-work projects for the unemployed.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=boondoggle&amp;amp;searchmode=none&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The term gained popularity in [[Canada]] following a corruption scandal tied to the [[Liberal]] government in 2000.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boomerang&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|originally coined to describe a throwing device that returns to the thrower, the term became increasingly useful to describe how wrongful conduct returns to bite the perpetrator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bootstrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|unaided effort, personal merit, hard work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bork&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by William Safire to refer to how Democrats savage a conservative nominee, such as their defeat of Supreme Court nominee [[Robert H. Bork]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|born-again&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|it takes an open mind and heart&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainstorm&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|a burst of productive thought&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainwashing&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|derived from the Chinese term &amp;quot;xǐnǎo&amp;quot; soon after the [[communist]] takeover of China, &amp;quot;brainwashing&amp;quot; means forced abandonment of [[faith]] in favor of regimented [[atheism]]. In a more general sense, it refers to the manipulation and control of the human mind through torture and propaganda techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bright-line rule&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First used by [[U.S. Supreme Court]] Justice [[John Harlan II]] in ''United States v. Jorn'', 400 U.S. 470, 486 (1971), where he rejected adopting a bright-line rule for that case.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a clear, unwavering line dividing what is allowed from what is prohibited; increasingly favored to avoid confusion and requirements that arbitrarily change&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brinkmanship&lt;br /&gt;
|1956&lt;br /&gt;
|the art of displaying a willingness to use military force in order to obtain a just resolution to a conflict between nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bureaucracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1818&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|busywork&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|meaningless activity under the pretense of accomplishing something&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|can-do&lt;br /&gt;
|1903 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; according to the Oxford English Dictionary. [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/can-do Miram-webster] gives the date of 1945 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Phrase coined in a short story by [[Rudyard Kipling]] that has come to refer to an attitude that espouses individual ability and responsibility and not reliance on [[entitlements]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-1855&lt;br /&gt;
|creating jobs and wealth based on a private invention, ownership and investments rather than state-controlled resources&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|career politician&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First use found by ''Conservapedia'' was in an article describing a controversy in communist [[Yugoslavia]] over their &amp;quot;career politicians,&amp;quot; published in the ''New York Times'' and authored by Malcolm W. Browne, sect. 4, p. 3, col. 1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a term used for the entrenched communist government officials in Yugoslavia, with whom even President Tito was fed up&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[carpetbagger]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|a politician who moves to a new area to be elected to a government position, as in [[Hillary Clinton]] moving to [[New York]] to become a U.S. Senator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|carte blanche&lt;br /&gt;
|1645-1655&lt;br /&gt;
|unconditional authority or power, without any limits on misuse of that power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|catharsis&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|facilitating forgiveness and spiritual renewal by expression, as in writing or teaching or confession&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|caucus&lt;br /&gt;
|1763&lt;br /&gt;
|citizens or representatives gathering to meet and reach political decisions as a group while harnessing aspects of the [[best of the public]]; first coined by John Adams&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The future author of the Massachusetts Constitution who also played a role in developing the [[Declaration of Independence]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when he described a meeting of political Boston elders as a &amp;quot;caucus club&amp;quot;; the word may be from an Algonquian term for a group of advisers or elders.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cesspool&lt;br /&gt;
|1782&lt;br /&gt;
|an evil or corrupt place or state.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|chaperone&lt;br /&gt;
|1720&lt;br /&gt;
|care and well-being of youths overseen by adults&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|charisma&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|literally &amp;quot;a gift from God&amp;quot;, charisma is a personal magic of leadership found in [[conservative]] public figures (but beware of the liberal tendency to put style before substance!) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Chicken Little&lt;br /&gt;
|1895&lt;br /&gt;
|one who falsely predicts disaster, especially for silly reasons: &amp;quot;global alarmists&amp;quot; are the Chicken Littles of our time&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In characteristically [[liberal]] style, the online Merriam-Webster spins the [[global warming]] example usage by saying the data showed he wasn't a Chicken Little.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|churchgoer&lt;br /&gt;
|1687&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who makes an effort, during the 168 hours in a week, to attend a church service&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|circle the wagons&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|regroup with family and friends, when under attack. usage from settlers in the old US west.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|citizen's arrest&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|private enforcement of the law without the need of a taxpayer-funded police officer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|civil defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|civilians protecting themselves and their community against attack or natural disasters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1799&lt;br /&gt;
|pretentious, verbose, and often liberal nonsense; example usage: &amp;quot;the professor wasted the rest of the class on his liberal claptrap&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|class act&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|exemplify conservative principles with values, integrity and a work ethic&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|class warfare&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|this concept was initially coined by [[Karl Marx]] in ''[[The Communist Manifesto]]'', but it has become so discredited that it is now used mostly by conservatives to point out liberal demagoguery&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|closed shop&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&lt;br /&gt;
|a business that requires membership in a union as a condition of working there; 22 conservative states prohibit this&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|clueless&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|hopelessly ignorant about something important, as liberals often are&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Coase theorem|Coasean]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient result or bargain based on market forces without the distortions caused by [[transaction costs]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cogent&lt;br /&gt;
|1659&lt;br /&gt;
|compelling with the powerful force of reason, the opposite of [[liberal]] claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Columbian&lt;br /&gt;
|1757&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to Christopher Columbus ''or the United States''	&lt;br /&gt;
|-	&lt;br /&gt;
|Cold War&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[George Orwell]] shortly after he wrote ''Animal Farm'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldwar2history.info/war/causes/Cold-War.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as recognition that communist nations were at war with American freedom even in the absence of actual military conflict&lt;br /&gt;
|-	&lt;br /&gt;
|collectivism&lt;br /&gt;
|1880&lt;br /&gt;
|when decision-making by a group takes priority over the good ideas of an individual, often preventing progress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|common sense&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|sound judgment based on facts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|competitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Con Con&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Phyllis Schlafly]] to highlight the deception and risks inherent in proposed national constitutional conventions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conniption&lt;br /&gt;
|1833&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria or alarm, as in &amp;quot;having a conniption fit&amp;quot;; a typical response by [[liberals]] when confronted with their [[double standards]] and illogical positions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conservation of charge&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|overall charge does not change in an isolated system; it is neither created nor destroyed; the concept was first suggested by [[Benjamin Franklin]] but the date of origin for this term is surprisingly recent&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who adheres to principles of limited government, personal responsibility and moral values&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=conservative&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative field]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1870s?&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of physical force over a region such that items moving throughout the region can store energy ''without loss'', as in the planetary system and electrical products&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The mathematical definition of a conservative field -- which arises in [[multivariable calculus]] -- is that a scalar potential exists for the function and, alternatively, it is [[irrotational]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[consumer surplus]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First coined by Cambridge University Professor Alfred Marshall in his acclaimed text, ''Principles of Economics'' (1890).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the extra benefit received by consumers above the price they paid for a good or service, illustrating the value of the [[free market]]; specifically, consumer surplus is the difference between what consumers would have paid for something, and the lower price they did pay.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constant&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) something unchanging in value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constitutionality&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|its date of origin is the year of the [[Constitutional Convention]] that proposed the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cooking the data&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Charles Babbage]] used it in his book, &amp;quot;Reflections on the Decline of Science in England&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.scientus.org/Church-Science-History.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|coolant&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a fluid, typically water, that facilitates efficient energy production, especially nuclear energy to cool a reactor and slow down the fission of neutrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copacetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1890s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster officially lists its date of origin as 1919 and its source as unknown, but that is well after when Robinson says he developed it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Bill “Bojangles” Robinson, tap dancer extraordinaire, claimed the invention of this word; it was first popularized by African Americans&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copyright&lt;br /&gt;
|1735&lt;br /&gt;
|extending private property to protect expressive works&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|corporate socialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency of large corporations to act in a socialistic manner, at the expense of meritocracy and productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|correlate&lt;br /&gt;
|1742&lt;br /&gt;
|(verb) to show that one thing relates to another, such as [[atheism]] or [[homosexuality]] and selfishness or lack of charity; [[liberal]]s falsely rely on anecdotes to deny the general relationship&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[countability (Mathematics)|countability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1874&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Georg Cantor]], loathed by the leading contemporary [[mathematicians]], developed this in proving that the real numbers are ''uncountable''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterexample&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|an example that is contrary to the proposition. A common point in logical, reasoned debate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterfactual&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|especially assumptions that are contrary to fact; Chief Justice [[John Roberts]] wrote for the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], &amp;quot;petitioners' standing does not require precise proof of what the Board's policies might have been in that counterfactual world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Free Enter. Fund v. Pub. Co. Accounting Oversight Bd.'', 130 S. Ct. 3138, 3163 (2010) (5-4 decision).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterproductive&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|interfering with a worthy goal.  Example usage: &amp;quot;nearly everything a liberal supports is counterproductive.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crackpot&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|crazy talk, lunacy, a person on the fringe of reality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[creation science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|a term coined by the anti-[[evolution|evolutionist]] [[Henry Morris]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/28/AR2006022801716.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cross-examination&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|the most effective tool against [[liberal]] [[deceit]], better than even the requirement of an oath&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crystal clear&lt;br /&gt;
|1815&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals are the opposite&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[culture war]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after the book ''Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America'' by James Davison Hunter&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cyberbullying&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of obnoxious and hurtful liberal behavior on the internet&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deadweight loss]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Confirmation of the first use is desired.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the loss in overall wealth and efficiency imposed by monopolies and taxation, due to the loss in extra value that someone would have received beyond what he would have paid for a good at a free market price&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|death panel&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|a provision of [[Obamacare]] that will enable a panel of government bureaucrats to decide who receives medical treatment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|death tax&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|interestingly, the term was coined by Canadians opposed to the high estate tax on their assets held in the United States; Frank Luntz is credited with later popularizing this term in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' Dr. Frank Luntz, ''Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decentralization&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|the dispersion of power, as in a shift from national to local control&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decrypt&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|military code-breaking, which played an instrumental role in World War II in deciphering enemy codes that many felt were unbreakable; illustrates the &amp;quot;can do&amp;quot; approach of conservatism in a patriotic way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[defeatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|a negative attitude that becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|defensive driving&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of driving a car that always focuses on avoiding accidents, even those potentially caused by others; nearly a half-century later, dictionaries still do not recognize this term&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deflation&lt;br /&gt;
|1891&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in the value of savings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|defund&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|refers especially to termination of government funding of a wasteful or hurtful program&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deliberative assembly&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Introduction to Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised'' (19th Ed. 2000), xxv.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Edmund Burke in describing the British parliament during a speech to voters in Bristol; he meant a body of persons meeting to discuss and decide common action under parliamentary law&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|demagogue&lt;br /&gt;
|1648&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Den mother&lt;br /&gt;
|1936&lt;br /&gt;
|leader of children's group&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deregulation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|Reagan won in 1980 by campaigning on this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|design by committee&lt;br /&gt;
|before 1958&lt;br /&gt;
|pejorative term directed against collective production by a group &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|despotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1727&lt;br /&gt;
|a ruler with unlimited powers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deterrence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|Disincentive of committing a crime based on the amount of punishment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devalue&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|describing an unwelcome attitude or act, as in &amp;quot;devaluing human life&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devil's advocate&lt;br /&gt;
|1760&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who espouses the position of the wrong side, in order to test, sharpen and strengthen the right side&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devotee&lt;br /&gt;
|1645&lt;br /&gt;
|ardent follower, supporter, or loyalty to. 56 years separates devotee and devoted&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|disinformation&lt;br /&gt;
|1950s&lt;br /&gt;
|false information spread (and sometimes manufactured) by groups with a strong political agenda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|division of labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|increasing productivity through specialization of labor, as in a husband working in manufacturing while his wife cares for children&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dog and pony show&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|an overblown event, typically having more fanfare than substance; liberals like to run a &amp;quot;dog and pony show&amp;quot; in towns having a large public university, where students brainwashed by liberal professors are led like cattle to the events&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|domino effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|how the fall of one nation to communism can result in its harmful spread to neighboring nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|double standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|applying harsher criticism against one group, such as churchgoers or conservatives, than against another group, such as atheists or liberals; recognition of a double standard by the [[Prodigal Son]] led him to repent and convert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doublethink&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|a term first coined by [[George Orwell]] in his dystopian novel ''[[1984]]''; it means simultaneously holding contradictory beliefs, which is a characteristic of [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doubting Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who believes only what he can see and touch, and doubts all else&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|duh science&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|First coined by the ''LA Weekly'' to criticize the ''[[LA Times]]'' for failing to criticize a publicly funded study that concluded that pessimistic people are often in bad moods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Originally &amp;quot;duh!&amp;quot; science: &amp;quot;But couldn't we have been treated to just a soupcon of critical thinking, some irony even -- perhaps a glancing reference to the wisdom of public funding for 'duh!' science?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;L.A. TIMES WHO KNEW? DEPARTMENT&amp;quot;, ''LA Weekly'' p. 12 (Jan. 14, 2000).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dumb down&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dumpster diving&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|Searching through dumpsters for food or other material that can used rather than discarded; first known use: &amp;quot;Restaurant and store owners have complained about drunks panhandling during the day and 'dumpster diving' through trash at night.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Phil Long, &amp;quot;Special Wing for Drunks Suggested at Future Jail,&amp;quot; Miami Herald D1 (Nov. 24, 1982).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eagle Scout&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest rank in the [[Boy Scouts]], the term also means &amp;quot;a straight-arrow and self-reliant man.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|editorialize&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;to introduce opinion into the reporting of facts&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[efficiency]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1633&lt;br /&gt;
|ultimately from the Latin ''efficientem'', meaning ''&amp;quot;working out, or accomplishing&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=efficient Online Etymological Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|egotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1714&lt;br /&gt;
|the root of atheism, as explained by Paul in Romans 1:21-22; the root of depression and anxiety also&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|electioneering&lt;br /&gt;
|1780s&lt;br /&gt;
|to work for the success of a particular candidate, party, ticket, etc., in an election. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elementary proof]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|a mathematical proof based on the minimum assumptions associated with real analysis; term probably does not predate [[complex analysis]] and its first use may have been the English mathematician James Joseph Sylvester's paper, &amp;quot;On an elementary proof and generalisation of Sir Isaac Newton's hitherto undenionstrated rule for the discovery of imaginary roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/circular129johnuoft/circular129johnuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[embryoscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first endoscopic image of the unborn child was in 1967, by Mandelbaum.  The date of origin of the term &amp;quot;embryoscopy&amp;quot; may have been later, but likely before the 1990s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Search this term on the internet and see the spectacular photos of the unborn child (&amp;quot;embryo&amp;quot;) that were &amp;quot;scoped&amp;quot; by tiny cameras.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|empowerment&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|facilitating power for the ordinary; see also [[best of the public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entitlement]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|entrepreneur&lt;br /&gt;
|1852&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ethnic voting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|widely recognized and even advocated by some,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/5/2/3/4/p152345_index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet the dictionary doesn't yet recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|etiquette&lt;br /&gt;
|1740&lt;br /&gt;
|social standards of behavior that promote dignity and discourage inept communications (or lack thereof)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eurabia&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|A satirical word based on the idea that Europe is rapidly becoming Islamized.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eurosceptic&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who opposes joining the super-socialist [[European Union]]; some prefer the term &amp;quot;Eurorealist&amp;quot; to express this opposition, and sometimes &amp;quot;Eurosceptic&amp;quot; is used to criticize opponents of the EU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|everyman&lt;br /&gt;
|1906&lt;br /&gt;
|the typical person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exceptional&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|same year of origin as the [[U.S. Constitution]]!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exculpatory&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|often used in the phrase &amp;quot;exculpatory evidence,&amp;quot; it took nearly 50 years to develop this term after origination of the legal term suggesting guilt: &amp;quot;incriminate&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|expatriate&lt;br /&gt;
|1768&lt;br /&gt;
|to give up one's own citizenship, or be banished by one's own nation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|expose&lt;br /&gt;
|1803&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) a statement of the facts, typically to discredit wrongdoing by government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|facade&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1845 is the date of origin for the figurative use.  The literal use dates back to 1650s, meaning the front of a building.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Example usage: &amp;quot;The facade of a liberal politician is often conservative.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fair shake&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|approaching an idea or concept with an open mind&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|faith healing&lt;br /&gt;
|1885&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[falsifiability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|first emphasized by Karl Popper in 1934, this helps define science:  if a proposition is false, then it can be shown to be false.  If not, then the proposition is not scientific.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[family values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1916&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after a speech by Vice President [[Dan Quayle]], 1992 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fat farm&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a place where obese people -- such as self-centered [[atheists]] -- might go to try to lose weight&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|father figure&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who fulfills the essential role of a father&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[federalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1789&lt;br /&gt;
|the unique system of dual sovereigns, state and federal (national), established by the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fear-mongering&lt;br /&gt;
|1938&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The ''[[New York Times]]'' attributed the first use -- ironically -- to President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|stir up exaggerated fear by the public, typically to expand government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|feedback&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|an all-important element of accountability and improvement, and a key consideration in good engineering design&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[fellow traveller]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|may have existed earlier, but popularized in 1924 by Leon Trotsky. Describes a sympathizer of a cause but who does not formally belong to the cause, such as a [[communist]] sympathizer who is not part of the communist party. The term was invented by the communists in its original, non-negative sense, but the conservatives were the first to use it as a pejorative term. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Flip flop (politics)|flip-flop]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|''verb'', meaning to change political position, typically due to [[liberal]] pressure.  First used by the Republican S.I. Hayakawa campaign to describe California Democratic incumbent U.S. Senator John Tunney, whom Hayakawa defeated in an upset.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|force-feed&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|what liberals do to students in [[public schools]] today in training them to be [[atheist]]ic socialists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|forward-looking&lt;br /&gt;
|1800&lt;br /&gt;
|planning for the future rather than dwelling on the past&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Founding Fathers&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|the several dozen [[Christian]] men &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html Religious Affiliation of the Founding Fathers of the United States of America, Adherents.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who helped draft the formative documents of the United States&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[free enterprise]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free lunch&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|something acquired ostensibly without paying for it, as in welfare; often used to remind people that &amp;quot;there's no such thing as a free lunch&amp;quot; in order to point out that it must cost someone something, now or later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free market&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free speech&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|shorthand for &amp;quot;freedom of speech,&amp;quot; but with a connotation that extends to non-citizens and listeners; first used in a U.S. Supreme Court opinion in dissent in the [[Slaughter-House Cases]] by Justice Bradley&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free world&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|areas of the world free of communism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|freeloader&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who avoids paying or working for his share of a benefit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|frontiersmen&lt;br /&gt;
|1814&lt;br /&gt;
|living and working in a self-sufficient manner and with courage in a new land.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fuzzy math&lt;br /&gt;
|1937&lt;br /&gt;
|non-computational math designed to obscure the differences between the correct answers and the incorrect -- but perhaps politically motivated -- answers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|galvanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|as in, &amp;quot;the liberal proposals ''galvanized'' the grassroots in opposition&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[gambit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a sacrifice that obtains an advantageous position, as in the game of [[chess]] ([[Bobby Fischer]]'s queen's gambit was a masterpiece) or in real life (the [[Passion of Christ]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gang up&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|group pressure&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gateway drug&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|abuse of alcohol/marijuana eventually leads to harder drugs cocaine/heroin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gerrymandering&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by a newspaper editor to criticize the manipulation of the lines of a new district into a salamander shape&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allbusiness.com/information/publishing-industries/251259-1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that favored election of a liberal politician&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gimmick&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|originally meant a deceptive mechanical device for controlling a [[gambling]] machine, and then its meaning expanded to include all trickery to attract attention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|globalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|Merriam-Webster states it was first used in 1943&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/globalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the OED gives a date of 1965 for the exact term &amp;quot;globalism&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50095613/50095613se2?single=1&amp;amp;query_type=word&amp;amp;queryword=globalism&amp;amp;first=1&amp;amp;max_to_show=10&amp;amp;hilite=50095613se2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the term &amp;quot;globalization&amp;quot; was first used in the mid-1980s in a different, complimentary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God-fearing&lt;br /&gt;
|1835 &lt;br /&gt;
|Living by the rules of God; living in a way that is considered morally right.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|godsend&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|go-getter&lt;br /&gt;
|1921&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gold standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest standard; in currency, when money could be exchanged for a fixed amount of gold&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|golden parachute&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for a pre-arranged handout to a corporate executive when fired, as when the company is taken over by new ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|good book&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|the [[Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Good Samaritan&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|how genuine charity is the best approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|goon&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a dim-witted thug, espec. one who intimidates on behalf of a union&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|government school&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[economist]] [[Milton Friedman]] as a more accurate name for [[public schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grade inflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency by Liberal educationalists and public schools to increase marks, irrespective of merit or actual achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grassroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|greasy spoon&lt;br /&gt;
|1902&lt;br /&gt;
|a free enterprise term for a small, cheap restaurant - which in many places is just what the public wants; reflects Jesus' [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]] about the digestive system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Great Awakening&lt;br /&gt;
|1730-1740&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian spiritualism recurs periodically.  See [[Essay:The Coming Fifth Great Awakening in America]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gresham's law&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency in a free market for bad money (which loses its value) to drive out (be used more often in transactions) than good money (which retains its value), because people want to horde the good money while getting rid of the bad money; a similar effect can be seen when profanity drives out intelligent discussion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|groupthink&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of thought consisting of conformity to a manufactured consensus and self-deception; coined by William H. Whyte in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|half-baked&lt;br /&gt;
|1855&lt;br /&gt;
|an idea that can appear reasonable at first, but with just a little thought it is recognized to be absurd&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hallmark&lt;br /&gt;
|1721&lt;br /&gt;
|purity, authentic, official seal, distinguishing feature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|handout&lt;br /&gt;
|1882&lt;br /&gt;
|describes charity and government giveaways&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hardworking&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|harmless error&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|an insignificant violation of a duty or procedural rule; first used in ''Western Ins. Co. v. The Goody Friends'', 29 F. Cas. 764 (S.D. Ohio 1861) (referring to a duty)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hatchet job&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|still looking for the context of its first use; today it means an article, typically by a liberal, that misleadingly smears someone, typically a conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hawthorne effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&lt;br /&gt;
|the increase in achievement resulting merely from being observed; this was demonstrated by experiment at the Hawthorne Works of Western Electric in Cicero, Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heckler's veto&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by University of Chicago Law Professor Harvey Kalven, Jr., a strong supporter of free speech in politics, this term has been used in [[Supreme Court]] decisions by Justices [[Sam Alito]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' ''Pleasant Grove City v. Summum'', 129 S. Ct. 1125 (2009); ''see also'' ''Child Evangelism Fellowship of N.J., Inc. v. Stafford Twp. Sch. Dist.'', 386 F.3d 514 (3rd Cir. 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Antonin Scalia]], and [[Clarence Thomas]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Good News Club v. Milford Cent. Sch.'', 533 U.S. 98 (2001)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hippie&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who rejects traditional morality and does what he wants, often growing long hair and smoking [[marijuana]] rather than working hard; this term became increasingly pejorative over time&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hissy fit&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|an unjustified tantrum, typically female in nature, as in &amp;quot;[[feminist]]s had a hissy fit when [[Lawrence Summers]] suggested (but criticized) the possibility that women have weaker scientific aptitude than men, and Summers ultimately resigned.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hobson's choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;this term has the entertaining history of originating with an English liveryman who required customers to &amp;quot;choose&amp;quot; the horse closest to the door.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an ostensible choice that disguises a lack of freedom, because each alternative is completely unacceptable.  This term is invoked to criticize an illusory freedom of choice.  This term has been used in 48 cases by Supreme Court Justices, more often by conservatives than by liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hokey&lt;br /&gt;
|1927&lt;br /&gt;
|phony, in an obvious or corny way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|honor system&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|an approach to discipline that emphasizes and encourages trust, honesty and personal responsibility rather than constant supervision&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homeschool]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;the OED assigns a date of origin of 1850 to &amp;quot;homeschool&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homemaker]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1876&lt;br /&gt;
|a wife and mother whose efforts are wisely spent running the household for the family&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hometown&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|the place where someone grew up and typically obtained some benefit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homosexual agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|used to promote the agenda in the book ''After the Ball'', but then used to criticize the movement by Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] in his dissent in''Lawrence v. Texas'' (2003)''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|human rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1766&lt;br /&gt;
|rights of all peoples, such as to &amp;quot;life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness&amp;quot; as set forth in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hype&lt;br /&gt;
|1931&lt;br /&gt;
|originally meant to deceive or &amp;quot;put on,&amp;quot; and then its meaning shifted slightly to represent extravagant promotion of something as the liberal media often do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hyphenated American&lt;br /&gt;
|1889&lt;br /&gt;
|President Theodore Roosevelt said in 1915, &amp;quot;There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hypothesis&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a suggestion, typically scientific in nature, which must be tested and proven before asserted as truth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria&lt;br /&gt;
|1801&lt;br /&gt;
|From the Latin ''hystericus'', from Greek ''hystera '' meaning ''&amp;quot;womb&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hysteria Meriam Webster Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (an old notion that hysteria was caused by the [[womb]]).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|idealist&lt;br /&gt;
|1701&lt;br /&gt;
|a person guided by ideals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|illiteracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1660&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals seek to produce illiterate voters who lack independence, and many graduates of the [[public schools]] are illiterate today&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inalienable&lt;br /&gt;
|1640s&lt;br /&gt;
|cannot be taken away, especially by government, as in &amp;quot;inalienable rights&amp;quot; in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incentivize&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|create a reward to encourage good work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incidental inequality&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|inequalities that result as side effects of an objectively just system &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incoherent&lt;br /&gt;
|1626&lt;br /&gt;
|the term often applies to liberal [[double standard]]s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incompleteness&lt;br /&gt;
|1931&lt;br /&gt;
|a system of logic or mathematics that includes propositions that are impossible to prove or disprove; term coined as a result of [[Kurt Godel]]'s work in 1931&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incrementalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|imposing bad political or social change slowly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|independence&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|free will&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|individualism&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|values, rights and duties arise from the individual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inerrancy&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|free from error, as in &amp;quot;biblical inerrancy&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inflationary&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|policies causing inflation of the monetary supply&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|informed consent&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|consent to surgery is meaningful only if informed, a requirement that should apply to abortion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|initiative&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|self-starting first step toward improvement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|insightful&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|what conservatism is about: gaining insights into the truth, and bettering individuals and society with them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intangible&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|something valuable that cannot be seen or touched, such as goodwill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intellectual property&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;we [should] protect intellectual property, the labors of the mind, productions and interests as much a man's own, and as much the fruit of his honest industry, as the wheat he cultivates, or the flocks he rears.&amp;quot;  ''Davoll v. Brown'', 7 F. Cas. 197 (Cir. Ct. Mass. 1845) (Woodbury, federal judge).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|interventionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;governmental interference in economic affairs at home or in political affairs of another country&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|invisible hand&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Adam Smith in the ''Wealth of Nations'' and widely used today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[invisible hand of marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|discovered on Conservapedia, it is the unseen force of productivity that results from marriage (only between a man and woman).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Iron curtain&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Winston Churchill in a speech in Missouri just after World War II, to describe the communist's figurative wall against freedom&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[irreducible complexity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|coined&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Alan Turing]] reportedly used the term for a completely different meaning that went nowhere. [http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/nasty-feelings-in-the-ool-community-toward-yockey/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and later adopted  and developed by [[Michael Behe]] to describe structure or system that could not possibly have evolved, because removing any part makes it nonfunctional, thereby showing that [[God]] must have created it whole into biology; if the [[Nobel Prize]] were not dominated by [[atheism]], Behe could win one for this insight.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Islamofascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1990?&lt;br /&gt;
|A form of totalitarian Muslim fundamentalist rule, or extreme Islamism.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ivory tower&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a description of the pampered culture of liberal [[professor values|professors]], and how far out of touch with the truth it is&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John Hancock&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|a personal signature, especially in a bold style that stands up for principles as John Hancock did with his signing the Declaration of Independence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial activism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in an article in ''Fortune'' magazine by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/278089&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and repeatedly used in U.S. Supreme Court opinions since 1967,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''United States v. Wade'', &lt;br /&gt;
388 U.S. 218 (1967).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet as of 2009 [[Merriam-Webster]] dictionary still fails to recognize this widely used term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial prejudice&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|the bias of a judge in favor of a political correct identity group intended to rig outcome equality in favor of that group based on subjective bias rather than objective justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial restraint&lt;br /&gt;
|1942&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Assuming that this court has power to act, it does not necessarily follow that it should act. ... In a number of situations, and in a number of cases, it has been held that courts should voluntarily refrain from using or asserting power. Where the use or assertion of power might be destructive of a well defined purpose of law or of a declared public policy such voluntarily imposed '''judicial restraint''' may be commendable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Osage Tribe of Indians v. Ickes, 45 F. Supp. 179, 184-85 (D.D.C. 1942) (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial supremacist&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|one who advocates that the courts should be supreme over the other branches of government for certain legal issues; first coined in a book by [[Phyllis Schlafly]]; first used by the judiciary by the Michigan Supreme Court in ''Paige v. City of Sterling Heights'', 476 Mich. 495 (2006).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A similar yet different concept, &amp;quot;judicial supremacy,&amp;quot; was coined by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justice [[Robert H. Jackson]] as the title of his book,'' The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy: A Study of a Crisis in American Political Power'' (New York: Knopf, 1941).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial taking]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|the deprivation of private property due to a court decision; this concept was introduced by conservative Justice [[Potter Stewart]] in 1967, and the term was used for the first time independently by the Michigan and Hawaii Supreme Courts in the same month (!) in December 1982, and then used often in law review articles and Circuit Court decisions in the 2000s, and then four Justices of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] endorsed the principle in a decision in 2010, with two others accepting the possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[junk science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://rated.com/dir/Society/Issues/Environment/Opposing_Views/Junk_Science&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the corruption of the scientific method to advance other, often political, goals (such as [[Global Warming]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|jury nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|the power of a jury to overrule the law and acquit an ostensibly guilty defendant; the power was established in the colonies in 1735 in the trial of [[John Peter Zenger]], but this term was first used in state court by Pfeuffer v. Haas, 55 S.W.2d 111 (Tex. Civ. App. 1932) and in federal court by ''Skidmore v. Baltimore &amp;amp; O. R. Co.'', 167 F.2d 54 (2nd Cir. 1948)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|killjoy&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|one who spoils the pleasure of others. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/killjoy Killjoy 1776 Mer-Web]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Example''-Vandals seek to disrupt conservative wikis, an education project. They are a killjoy to the learning process.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kiss of death&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|from Judas's betrayal of Jesus with a kiss, Mark 14:44-4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kleptocrat&lt;br /&gt;
|1819&lt;br /&gt;
|A politician who seeks status and personal gain at the expense of the governed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kowtow&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|obsequious, unthinking obedience to someone or something, used especially in the context of dictatorships and liberal belief systems&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kremlinology&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the otherwise indecipherable behavior of the government of the [[communist]] [[Soviet Union]]. Refers to the Kremlin, the traditional seat of Russian government (Soviet or not). &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|la-la land&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First known use was in an article by Tom Zito, &amp;quot;Mr. Mike's Mania; Sick Humor, Very Well Indulged,&amp;quot; [[Washington Post]] F1 (Nov. 8, 1979): &amp;quot;But now, it's off to La-La land, and his movie deal. 'The thing about Southern Californians,' he says, 'is this: They wake up and say, 'Gee, what a wonderful morning. I think I'll make a salad.' And that takes them the whole day. ...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a term for the decadent, liberal culture of [[Hollywood]]-driven [[Los Angeles]], originally capitalized as &amp;quot;La-La land.&amp;quot;; Merriam-Webster is in denial about this etymology and claims a later origin of 1983.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|labor camp&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|forced work prison&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|laissez-faire&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing governmental interference in economic affairs beyond what is minimally necessary&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lame duck&lt;br /&gt;
|1761&lt;br /&gt;
|one falling being in achievement, especially a public official whose power is limited because his term in office is set to expire without possibility of reelection.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lamestream media&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Bernie Goldberg to describe the clueless [[Mainstream media]] that repeat superficial, discredited liberal claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|landslide&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|In the political sense, an overwhelming election victory. A clear, democratic expression of popular will.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leadership&lt;br /&gt;
|1821&lt;br /&gt;
|an ability and willingness to lead, often by example&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leftism&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|principles and doctrine of leftists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|level playing field&lt;br /&gt;
|1977&lt;br /&gt;
|A term originally used to describe fair, competitive [[free market]] conditions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/228650.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal policies such as [[affirmative action]] and [[progressive taxation]] have been enacted in the name of leveling the playing field, but by favoring certain groups of people these policies do the opposite.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|level-headed&lt;br /&gt;
|1876&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;balanced&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;having common sense and sound judgment&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leverage&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal creep&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal bias that gradually creeps or distorts an entry, definition, explanation, description, or historical account.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|life vest&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-life invention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lifelong&lt;br /&gt;
|1855&lt;br /&gt;
|something, usually a commitment, that lasts a lifetime, as in &amp;quot;a lifelong commitment to [[Christ]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|limousine liberal&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a multi-millionaire who pretends to be compassionate about the poor, but supports liberal policies that increase burdens on working Americans&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|local&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This date refers to its first usage as a ''noun'', which is an estimate of its adoption as a concept.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|common usage: &amp;quot;all politics is local&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lockstep&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|mindless conformity, often to liberal values&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|locomotive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|a great engine of economic growth during the [[Industrial Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lone wolf&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who prefers to work, act, or live alone,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lone%20wolf Lone wolf, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; synonymous with self-sufficiency&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|loose cannon&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|an undisciplined person or program that dangerously lacks forethought; used in mid-November 1976 to describe $11 billion in unspent appropriations by the Ford Administration:  &amp;quot;'That money,' says Arnold Packer, a senior Senate Budget Committee economist who is helping Carter draw up his shadow budget, 'is like a loose cannon rolling around the deck' because a sudden reappearance of the funds could be inflationary.&amp;quot; (''BusinessWeek'')&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lowest common denominator&lt;br /&gt;
|1854&lt;br /&gt;
|the lowest in work ethic, morals, or knowledge among a group; typically used to criticize the liberal practice of dumbing down content&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lunatic fringe&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by U.S. President [[Theodore Roosevelt]] to describe members of eccentric, radical or extremist groups&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=lunatic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|machismo&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|a word never used favorably by feminists!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mainstay&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|the primary support, typically for something good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|man-hater&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was during the epic struggle -- and defeat -- of the so-called [[Equal Rights Amendment]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|William Safire wrote in the ''New York Times'' in 1983, &amp;quot;Misandry, from the Greek misandros for 'hating men,' is in the 1961 Merriam-Webster New International Dictionary, and the Oxford Dictionary Supplement traces it to 1946.  The word is pronounced as 'Ms. Andry,' but I wonder why we need the Greek word for it. What's wrong with good, old-fashioned man-hater?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sunday, Oct. 30, 1983, Section 6, Page 12, Column 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|make-work&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|inefficient or useless activity that has the false appearance of being productive; a favorite endeavor of liberals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[market failure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[Coined as the title of a scholarly article by Francis M. Bator, &amp;quot;The Anatomy of Market Failure,&amp;quot; ''The Quarterly Journal of Economics'' (1958) [http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/Courses/econ335/out/bator_qje.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|instances where the free market does not provide a desirable result, as when information is withheld from an unsuspecting consumer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|manifest destiny&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|Providential design over future events, which originated in the context of expanding the United States to the Pacific Ocean&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the view of life that physical matter is all that exists; as an &amp;quot;ism&amp;quot;, the term criticizes such view&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|meat and potatoes&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|the most interesting or fundamental part&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Medal of Honor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|a special American honor for bravery on the battlefield&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|melting pot&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|requires &amp;quot;social and cultural assimilation&amp;quot; for successful immigration&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster dictionary (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[meritocracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|a system in which the talented are chosen and moved ahead on the basis of their achievement &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[microeconomics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the economics of the individual person or business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|micromanage&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|insistence on controlling details, typically by liberals to [[censorship|censor]] progress; [[Ronald Reagan]] was critical of this style by [[Democrat]] Presidents&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mind control&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for how an atheistic government influences what people believe, especially through public education&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|close-minded point-of-view, typically in adherence to a liberal falsehood and often to the exclusion of Christ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missile defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as part of [[SDI]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1625&lt;br /&gt;
|someone sent on a mission, typically a religious mission&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|mobocracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1754&lt;br /&gt;
|rule by a mob, as at Wikipedia&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|monogamy&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|this has the same date of origin as &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot;, and that may not be a coincidence!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moonlighting&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|working more than a full-time job in order to be as productive as possible; the [[work ethic]] at its best&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moral majority&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Jerry Falwell to describe the movement of growing moral, Christian conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|motivation&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe the word did not exist before 1873?!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckety–muck&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for an arrogant person who holds a title or position considered to be important by others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckraker&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who searches out and publicly exposes [[deceit]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/muckraker Merriam-Webster - Muckraker]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Murphy's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|if something can go wrong, then it will go wrong: this was a conservative insight by an engineer Edward Murphy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muscle car&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|placing a powerful engine in a classic two-door car for highly efficient performance; also celebrate masculine style against erosion by feminism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|myopic&lt;br /&gt;
|1752&lt;br /&gt;
|originally a term in optometry, 1990's used to describe liberals' lack of foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|name-dropping&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|a term critical of the [[liberal]] practice of seeking to impress others by casually mentioning personal association with prominent people, despite its lack of relevance to the conversation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nanny state&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Under the New Economic Policy, [the new French Prime Minister Raymond] Barre has made it clear that industrial lame ducks can no longer count on the generosity of Nanny i.e. the state - for bailing out.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leo Ryan, &amp;quot;Economy Shored up: France's new surge of liberalism,&amp;quot; The Globe and Mail (Canada) (Aug. 1, 1978)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Note how two powerful new conservative terms led to a third here!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|negativism&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|mental attitude that tends that is skeptical about almost everything, except one's own views&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|newspeak&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|political or media expressions using circumlocution and euphemisms to disguise or distract from the truth; first coined by [[George Orwell]] in ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-justiciable&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Used by the state attorneys for West Virginia (including Philip Steptoe, founder of Steptoe &amp;amp; Johnson) in ''Pennsylvania v. West Virginia'', 262 U.S. 553 (1923):  &amp;quot;It is not the 'subject of judicial cognizance,' Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 15; Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S 1, 15; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, or 'susceptible of judicial solution.' Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S. 1, 18, 22; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, 234.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a difficult issue that the courts should not attempt to resolve, often because it is too political in nature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-locality&lt;br /&gt;
|1920s&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action at a distance]] at the atomic level; even though proven, it is still opposed by those who believe in [[relativity]] and still not recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&lt;br /&gt;
|assertion of authority by a State against encroachment by the federal government, in defense of liberty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|obambulate&lt;br /&gt;
|1600&lt;br /&gt;
|From Latin ''obambulatus'', to walk to or before, akin to ''wander''.  Word currently claimed to have been invented by Rush Limbaugh in 2011 and used in reference to [[Barack Obama]], yet it is found in Oxford and Webster's dictionaries prior to 1991.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|obstructionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1879&lt;br /&gt;
|deliberate interference with free speech or legislative progress, as when liberal legislators (the &amp;quot;fleebaggers&amp;quot;) fled Wisconsin to try to block a reform&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Old Glory&lt;br /&gt;
|1862&lt;br /&gt;
|the ''United States of America'' flag, Stars &amp;amp; Stripes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-size-fits-all&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Was there an earlier conservative use?  Frank Zappa's album cover in the 1970s does not count!&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Lee Wishing, director of communications for conservative [[Grove City College]], in criticism of how the government administers student loans: &amp;quot;Unfortunately, with government programs, it's one size fits all.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/1996/dec96/er-dec96.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The 2008 Republican platform states, &amp;quot;We reject a one-size-fits-all approach and support parental options, including home schooling, and local innovations such as schools or classes for boys only or for girls only and alternative and innovative school schedules.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-trick pony&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|a person or group that relies repeatedly on the same gimmick, as in &amp;quot;the media are a one-trick pony in their criticism of [[Rand Paul]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|open-minded&lt;br /&gt;
|1828&lt;br /&gt;
|see [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[opportunity cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|optimism&lt;br /&gt;
|1759&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|originalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|taken from original intent, The belief that the United States Constitution should be interpreted in the way the authors originally intended it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Orwellian&lt;br /&gt;
|1960s&lt;br /&gt;
|terminology or style that advances the power of big government but is hurtful or nonsensical&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ntu.org/main/press.php?PressID=604&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ostensibly&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|having an outward appearance that may not reflect the underlying truth; good potential use is Luke 3:23 in describing Jesus as the son of Joseph&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|outflank&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|to move swiftly around an opponent, a military tactic mastered by [[conservative]] [[General]] [[George Patton]] to crush the [[Germans]] in [[World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|parenting&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|children raising&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Parkinson's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how bureaucracies expand regardless of the productivity, and how inefficient work expands to fill the time available for its completion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Parthian shot]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|a negative term for the tactic of expressing a criticism while one exits, just as the ancient Parthians would shoot arrows while retreating in battle.  This tactic is common among those who reject [[conservative]] truths, as seen when left-leaning editors leave ''Conservapedia''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[patent troll]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|a company that obtains or buys up patents for the sole purpose of asserting infringement claims, and without any intention of actually manufacturing the invention; the term was first coined by Peter Detkin, in-house counsel to Intel&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|patriotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pavlovian&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a conditioned, automatic and unthinking response to a signal; it has been used twice by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justices. &amp;quot;It is well established that this Court does not, or at least should not, respond in Pavlovian fashion to confessions of error by the [[Solicitor General]].&amp;quot;  ''De Marco v. United States'', 415 U.S. 449, 451 (1974) ([[Rehnquist]], J., dissenting); &amp;quot;'[[Incorporation doctrine|Incorporation]]' has become so Pavlovian that my Brother BLACK barely mentions the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] in the course of an 11-page opinion dealing with the procedural rule the State of [[Florida]] has adopted for cases tried in Florida courts under Florida's criminal laws.&amp;quot; '' Williams v. Fla.'', 399 U.S. 78, 144 (1970) ([[Potter Stewart|Stewart]], J., dissenting and concurring).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|perestroika&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|increasing economic freedom and free speech under [[communism]], which led to the unraveling of the [[communist]] [[Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|perpetual war&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|Coined by historian Charles A. Beard,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles A. Beard is best known for interpreting the Constitution as being primarily motivated by economic interests.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it has been used most recently by [[Ann Coulter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[personhood]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/personhood Personhood] Dictionary.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|Inherent rights guaranteed to all human beings from the beginning of their biological development, including the pre-born, partially born. Also, the state or fact of being a person.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Philadelphia&lt;br /&gt;
|1682&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[William Penn]] and meaning &amp;quot;city of brotherly love,&amp;quot; the concept captures the &amp;quot;[[best of the public]]&amp;quot; approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[phonics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1684&lt;br /&gt;
|conservatives have long championed phonics to promote literacy, Bible-reading, and informed voters; liberals take the opposite position&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|phony&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This surprisingly recent origin appears to be derived from a British confidence game.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|needed to address [[liberal deceit]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|plasticity&lt;br /&gt;
|1783&lt;br /&gt;
|having a plastic quality that conforms to molding or pressure; in pejorative usage, someone who easily conforms to [[peer pressure]] or [[liberal]] falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|poetic justice&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&lt;br /&gt;
|when virtue is rewarded and/or wrongdoing is punished in an indirect or unexpected way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|political machine&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for local and typically Democratic power structures that prevent outsiders from winning elections; first used by George Washington Plunkitt to criticize the Tammany Hall machine for which he served&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[politically correct]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|This term originated among radicals at the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] to enforce radical orthodoxy, but immediately flipped in usage to become a term of mockery of radicals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For an early different usage of the word, see 1793 J. WILSON in U.S. Rep. (U.S. Supreme Court) 2 (1798) 462 Sentiments and expressions of this inaccurate kind prevail in our..language... ‘The United States’, instead of the ‘People of the United States’, is the toast given. This is not politically correct.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The term may have come from Chairman Mao in 1936.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|politicize&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|seeking political gain at the expense of truth or quality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Merriam-Webster definition (1994 ed.) is incomplete and unclear: &amp;quot;to give a political tone or character to&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|politics of envy&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Australian [[conservative]] Christopher Pine to describe the philosophy behind taking money from private schools and giving it to public ones.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pork barrel&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|government as a source of handouts that redistribute money from hard-working people to those who avoid work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[post-abortive]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|the unexpected trauma and physical harm -- which can worsen over time -- that is experienced by a woman after having an [[abortion]]; coined by Dr. Kaye Cash in an editorial describing what she learned during a 365-mile walk in southeast Arkansas to speak with the public about abortion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Editorial by Kaye Cash, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Little Rock, AR), October 23, 1986.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|potential&lt;br /&gt;
|1817&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Usage here refers to &amp;quot;promise&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;possibility&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pothead&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who smokes marijuana and doesn't realize how it destroys people&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|powerhouse&lt;br /&gt;
|1881&lt;br /&gt;
|source of energy and strength - which is what the conservative movement is&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[price discrimination]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|charging different prices for the exact same service or good; first coined by the British economist (and critic of [[John Maynard Keynes]]) Arthur Cecil Pigou in ''The Economics of Welfare''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|prioritize&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|to recognize that some goals and activities are more important than others, and then focus accordingly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|private sector&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|non-governmental businesses and jobs functioning in free enterprise&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|privatize&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|to return a business or enterprise from state to private control; to de-nationalize.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proactive&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Procrustean&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative description of the one-size-fits-all mentality, which disregards individual differences&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productive&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|1810&lt;br /&gt;
|the gap of about 200 years between the creation of &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;productivity&amp;quot; is astounding&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[pro-life]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1960&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|property right&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|provocateur&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who spends more time causing unproductive conflicts rather than advancing knowledge, accomplishing legitimate goals, or helping anyone&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pseudoscience&lt;br /&gt;
|1844&lt;br /&gt;
|worthless claims written with the appearance of scientific rigor to gain an aura of credibility&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|publicity stunt&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Earlier usage in the 1900s may have occurred, but the term &amp;quot;stunt&amp;quot; was not coined until 1878.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Used on April 10, 1969 by Republican Senators who withdrew from a tour and probe by Senator [[Ted Kennedy]], criticizing him for his &amp;quot;publicity stunt&amp;quot; in preparation for his expected run for the presidency; the [[Chappaquiddick incident]] sunk his chances three months later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|quantify&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|race card&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is the date of its widespread familiarity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Playing the race card&amp;quot; consists of relying on racial emotions or charges of racism in order to overcome the truth and logic in politics, legal proceedings, or otherwise; this term became familiar in the criticism of the defense and acquittal of O.J. Simpson for the murder of his ex-wife and her friend.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rapture&lt;br /&gt;
|1629&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritual ecstasy[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=rapture]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[recidivism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1886&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency for people lacking in [[faith]] and determination to revert to prior patterns of harmful behavior, such as repeat criminal offenders&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|recuse&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|self-removal by a decision-maker (especially a judge) because of possible bias with respect to the pending issue&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|red tape&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive bureaucracy and procedural complexity which frustrate meaningful activity and progress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|refudiate&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|combination of ''refute'' and ''repudiate'', as coined by [[Sarah Palin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[relativism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|the view that ethical truths are not absolute, but depend on the person or group that holds them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[responsibility]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1737&lt;br /&gt;
|HAMILTON Federalist No. 63 (1988) II. 193 Responsibility in order to be reasonable must be limited to objects within the power of the responsible party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reverse discrimination&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|the use of quotas or affirmative action to use race or gender to discriminate against a better qualified person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|revisionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term, now obscure, refers to a Marxist movement that preferred evolutionary rather than revolutionary change.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|distortions of history to promote liberal bias&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|revolving-door&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|the liberal practice of repeatedly transferring into and out of government in a way that impedes progress and access by others, like the same people going round-and-round in a real revolving door&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|riot act&lt;br /&gt;
|1715&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Its colloquial use, as in &amp;quot;read them the riot act,&amp;quot; began in 1819.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the Riot Act was a law passed in England in 1715 to authorize officials to disperse riots&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rogue state&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|(Originally used in 1993 then reintroduced in 2002.) A 'rogue state' displays no regard for international law. It attempts to acquire weapons of mass destruction and other military technology with which to threaten neighbouring countries and support terrorism. Rogue states often reject human values and brutalize their own people.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rubber-stamp&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|unthinking repetition or endorsement of something, despite having the responsibility to make an independent decision, as in &amp;quot;Democrats rubber-stamp demands by the abortion industry.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|run of the mill&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|meaning &amp;quot;merely average, commonplace,&amp;quot; the term is critical of a failure to strive for excellence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sacred cow&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a person or idea, typically liberal, that becomes immune from criticism because of its political usefulness rather than its truthfulness, as in the theories of [[evolution]] and [[relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scapegoating&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|a term criticizing how people, particularly liberals, deflect accountability and blame from themselves to others; inspired by Leviticus 16:8.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|salutary neglect&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by the [[conservative]] [[Edmund Burke]] in his 1775 speech to the British [[House of Commons]] entitled &amp;quot;On Moving His Resolutions for Conciliation with the Colonies&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|school choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by Milton Friedman in his book, ''Free to Choose'' &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[scientific fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|a coordinated effort by a group of scientists to enforce a certain point of view upon others.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[secularism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-55&lt;br /&gt;
|attempts to educate, particularly through [[public school]], without including [[faith]] or even acknowledgment of [[God]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Segway&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|Dean Kamen's trademark spelling of &amp;quot;segue&amp;quot; for use of Yankee Ingenuity to improve efficiency, to refer to a form of battery-powered transportation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[self-defense]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1651&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-destruct&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|often the tragic result of liberal falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Discipline|self-discipline]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-preservation&lt;br /&gt;
|1614&lt;br /&gt;
|preservation of oneself from destruction or harm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-reliant&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|separation of powers&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the fundamental insight underlying the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|shotgun marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|pregnancy =&amp;gt; get married.  Think of someone besides yourself for a change.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|show trial&lt;br /&gt;
|1937&lt;br /&gt;
|trials, especially in communist countries, which have preordained outcomes but are used for propaganda purposes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sidewalk counseling&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice of volunteers exercising their right of [[free speech]] to advise women against [[abortion]] as they walk on sidewalks toward abortion clinics; liberals have passed laws to restrict and [[censorship|censor]] this&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|silent majority&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by President [[Richard Nixon]] in his speech to the nation on Nov. 3, 1969&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://watergate.info/nixon/silent-majority-speech-1969.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|skullduggery&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|underhanded or unscrupulous behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|slippery slope&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|term has been widely used for decades to expose the fallacy of &amp;quot;it doesn't hurt to try&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|something intended to disguise or draw attention away from an often embarrassing or unpleasant issue. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/smoke%20and%20mirrors Smoke and Mirrors, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Widely used during the 1990s to describe [[Bill Clinton]]'s political strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke-filled room&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term describing how a few political insiders sometimes pick a candidate or make a decision in a secret room (in the old days, filled with cigar smoke)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoking gun&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|a law-and-order term, &amp;quot;smoking gun&amp;quot; was first used as figurative term in a reported judicial decision in ''Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp.'', 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12775 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 1975), and many literal uses of the term in court decisions before that!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soapbox&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|staging for a typically liberal, unproductive rant having little substance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soccer mom&lt;br /&gt;
|1987&lt;br /&gt;
|a mother who devotes herself to her children's activities and a significant voting bloc or demographic group&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[socialist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who advocates government control over the economy, and particularly state control of the means of production&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|social justice rhetoric&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|Language and rhetorical ploys equating equality of outcome with justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spend-and-tax&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/02/morning-bell-the-obama-tax-and-spend-economy-is-here/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a variation on &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; (see below), &amp;quot;spend-and-tax&amp;quot; consists of spending the money first and then trying to justify raising taxes based on the deficit created by the spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spin doctor&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|someone ensuring that others interpret an event from a particular point of view.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/world/asia/22policy.html?_r=2 General Petraeus describes Axelrod by Bob Woodward]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spot-on&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|precisely correct, as in a prediction or in overcoming imprecision in a challenging task; its origin is from the military &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|squirrelly&lt;br /&gt;
|1928&lt;br /&gt;
|like a squirrel; jumpy and unpredictable; as in liberals get squirrelly when confronted with facts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[stagflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|inflation ''and'' high [[unemployment]] ''and'' stagnant demand by consumers, typically due to [[liberal]] policies as in the late 1970s under President [[Jimmy Carter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stalking horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1788&lt;br /&gt;
|a candidate or issue that serves to increase the chances that ''another'' will win, as in &amp;quot;antifederalists attempted to win elections by using 'the stalking horse of amendments.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Centinel'', 1788 (quoted in ''The Federalist party in Massachusetts to the year 1800'', By Anson Ely Morse).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[statism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|advocates for centralized government and government ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straightforward&lt;br /&gt;
|1806&lt;br /&gt;
|something liberals are not&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straw man&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|an imaginary argument or example set up for the purpose of easily knocking down, while distracting from valid arguments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Stupaked&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|hurt by someone who reassured everyone he would do the right thing, but then switched at the last minute to do the opposite (refers especially to [[abortion betrayal]]s)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Columnist Kathleen Parker is credited with first coining this term.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[subsidiarity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1936&lt;br /&gt;
|the concept (opposed by liberals) that responsibilities performed by local or subordinate organizations should not be usurped by centralized government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|supply-side&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|the economic theory that reducing taxes expands economic activity by encouraging greater earnings and investments; proven successful during the Reagan Administration in the 1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|takeover&lt;br /&gt;
|1917&lt;br /&gt;
|as in the takeover of government by the communist revolution in that year&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tax-and-spend&lt;br /&gt;
|1937 &lt;br /&gt;
|not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster, it is included in dictionary.com and it means the liberal policy of raising taxes and increasing government spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|taxpayer&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|the word highlights who is really paying for things&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tea party&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|an amorphous group of ordinary citizens unified against a more expensive government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Tebowing&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|bending on one knee in public to give glory to God (named after [[pro-life]] [[NFL]] [[QB]] [[Tim Tebow]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[term limits]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe this is not in the dictionary yet? Merriam-Webster omits it, but dictionary.com has it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/term+limit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|terrorism&lt;br /&gt;
|1795&lt;br /&gt;
|this was during the French Revolution&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[textualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|first used by Justice [[Robert Jackson]] in his influential concurrence in ''[[Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer]]'', 343 U.S. 579 (1952), it now describes the legal philosophy of Justice [[Antonin Scalia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[think tank]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1940s&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in [[Britain]] to describe intelligence organizations that helped the military, think tanks became part of the rise of conservatism in the 1970s and 1980s; is ''Conservapedia'' the think tank of the future?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|top-notch&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest quality, which requires respect for merit to recognize&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|term which identifies the similarities of fascist and communist regimes and ideologies and urges resistance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tour de force&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|a feat of skill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trademark&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|extends the concept of private property to the marks used by business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalist&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;adherence to the doctrines or practices of a tradition...the beliefs of those opposed to modernism, liberalism, or radicalism&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/traditionalist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transaction cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|Economist [[Ronald Coase]] won a [[Nobel Prize]] for this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transistor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|named by John R. Pierce and developed at the [[conservative]] [[Bell Labs]], this invention epitomized Yankee ingenuity; Pierce was a critic of claims of [[artificial intelligence]] and was the future developer of [[Telstar]], a precursor to the [[Strategic Defense Initiative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tree huggers&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|still not recognized by the dictionary, this term criticizes extreme environmentalists, but they proudly use the term also to describe what they literally do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trivia&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|insignificant detail, which can sometimes obscure what is important and distract people from the Bible; liberal [[Wikipedia]] is filled with trivial junk&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Trojan horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1837&lt;br /&gt;
|describes a type of liberal [[deceit]]:  subversion from within&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trust but verify&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as the approach to use towards communist [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ugly duckling&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|an unpromising appearance but often with great unseen potential&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ultra vires&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|beyond the authority, especially of a government or corporate official&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unborn child&lt;br /&gt;
|1791&lt;br /&gt;
|the rights of the unborn child have been recognized in English law since the 1600s, but the specific term &amp;quot;unborn child&amp;quot; itself may have been first used by an attorney arguing before the New Jersey Supreme Court in ''Den v. Sparks'', 1 N.J.L. 67 (Sup. Ct. 1791)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underachiever&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|a typically liberal person who fails to accomplish what he could&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underdog&lt;br /&gt;
|1887&lt;br /&gt;
|[[David]] v. [[Goliath]], [[Cinderella]], [[best of the public]], etc.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[underemployed]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1908&lt;br /&gt;
|having less than full-time or suitable employment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[underwater basket weaving]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Mid 1950's&lt;br /&gt;
|A pejorative that describes worthless college courses and a declining educational system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unscripted&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|speaking sincerely without parroting a script; &amp;quot;[[Rand Paul]] and [[Chris Christie]] are effective because, unlike [[Obama]], they are unscripted.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unsung hero&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who accomplishes good without receiving recognition for it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|useful idiot&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=135140 Attributed originally to Lenin], but since used by others like [[Nobel Prize]] winner (Literature) Doris Lessing to describe how she was manipulated by the [[communists]]: “I was taken around and shown things as a ‘useful idiot’... that’s what my role was. I can’t understand why I was so gullible.” [http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/documentaries/2010/07/100624_doc_useful_idiots_lenin.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Sample usage:  &amp;quot;There are not as many useful idiots on college campuses for the Obama reelection campaign in 2012 as there were in 2008, and it's doubtful he can fill a stadium rally unless the campaign pays students to attend.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vandalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&lt;br /&gt;
|malicious destruction of someone else's property&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|veracity&lt;br /&gt;
|1623&lt;br /&gt;
|devotion to truthfulness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vet&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2199254/?from=rss&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a verb meaning to screen for flaws&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[victimization]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|volunteer&lt;br /&gt;
|1618&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who freely offers to help&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wannabe&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a word that criticizes liberal [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|War on Terror&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|no listing at Merriam-Webster February 2, 2009 Obama ends use of the conservative lexicon. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pewforum.org/news/display.php?NewsID=17455 Obama administration drops 'war on terror' phrase] Pew Forum, February 2, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|washed-up&lt;br /&gt;
|1928&lt;br /&gt;
|no longer productive, as in &amp;quot;the washed-up liberal professor has not contributed anything to his field in 30 years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|waterloo&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|a final defeat or setback, coined merely one year after the [[English]] defeated [[Napoleon]] at the [[Battle of Waterloo]]; there has never been a &amp;quot;waterloo&amp;quot; for [[Christianity]] or [[conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wildcatter&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-energy term that describes someone who drills for oil in fields not known to have oil&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wishy-washy&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;An archaic meaning of poor quality dates to 1690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|easily changing in opinion, usually due to peer pressure&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|word poverty&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/summer2001/lang_gap_moats.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President [[George W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work (physical sense)&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|a physical measure&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;force times distance&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of effort used to increase energy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work ethic&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|a habit of working as a moral good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|workaholic&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by a Southern Baptist pastor to describe the work habits of himself and other ministers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2000/01/02/magazine/the-lives-they-lived-on-language-wordplayers.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|worldview&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|a comprehensive way of looking at life and the world; sometimes used to criticize a liberal's irrational belief system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Yankee&lt;br /&gt;
|1758   &lt;br /&gt;
|Inhabitants of New England, United States. Dutch slang in 1698- Americanized 50 years later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Yankee Ingenuity&lt;br /&gt;
|1761&lt;br /&gt;
|America's inhabitants had a knack for clever design and capitalist success. The early Americans had applied their exceptional skills prior to the terms existence, see [[Eli Whitney]] and [[Benjamin   Franklin]]. &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|yellow journalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice, started by newspaper publishers Joseph Pulitzer and his rival William Randolph Hearst, of sensationalizing and biasing newspaper headlines and articles in order to influence public opinion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative Words Not Yet Recognized by the Dictionary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thousand new words are developed in English each year.  Here is a growing list of conservative concepts, each of which is not yet defined by a single word or two.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Not Yet Recognized Terms&lt;br /&gt;
!Suggestions&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pre-9/11 thinking&lt;br /&gt;
|9/10 mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|terror is jurisdiction of the courts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anti-family&lt;br /&gt;
|tradition opposer, familiopathic&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blame shift&lt;br /&gt;
|false accusations&lt;br /&gt;
|e.g., guns blamed for an increasing murder rate&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|buycott&lt;br /&gt;
|counter support&lt;br /&gt;
|An effort to cooperate and promote an organization or a process to nullify campaigns that are targeted by boycott protests.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|causing harm by spreading falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|deceit&lt;br /&gt;
|e.g., denying or concealing disease and infertility caused by promiscuity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Constitutional values&lt;br /&gt;
|adherence to righteousness as set forth by the [[Founding Fathers]]&lt;br /&gt;
|principles set in the Declaration&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Counterfeit Marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|uncivil union&lt;br /&gt;
|Manipulating Man's laws by usurping God's laws.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cradle to grave &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/spanish/from%20cradle%20to%20grave cradle to grave- no entry found] Merriam-Websters&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|sanctity of life, conception to natural death&lt;br /&gt;
|pro-life stance, also can mean socialist entitlement programs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cut and run&lt;br /&gt;
|surrender advocates&lt;br /&gt;
|when the going gets tough, run away from the problem&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|debtucation&lt;br /&gt;
|tuition noose&lt;br /&gt;
|College student debt is now larger than credit card debt in the US&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deliberate ignorance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|mind-locked, self-centered pride obscuring the truth&lt;br /&gt;
|the term exists; the dictionary does not yet include it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|denial that [[Hell]] exists&lt;br /&gt;
|Hell-denier? Antinfernal? (Should be &amp;quot;antihadessic&amp;quot; so as not to mix Hellenate and Latinate roots)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[abstinence denial|denier of the effectiveness of abstinence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|abstinence-denier?&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|drive-by media&lt;br /&gt;
|partisan slander&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal mainstream media assault on the GOP or conservative principles, deceitful attacks for opposing viewpoints&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[earmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|spending on specific projects at the request of a particular congressman, and without meaningful examination by others voting on it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|easily amused by [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|dolophile&lt;br /&gt;
|from Greek/Latin root ''dolo-'' meaning guile, deceit, deception [http://www.wordinfo.info/words/index/info/view_unit/664]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|family-friendly&lt;br /&gt;
|wholesome&lt;br /&gt;
|describes TV programming, websites, social events that are not offensive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Fleebagger&lt;br /&gt;
|Oath breakers&lt;br /&gt;
|Describes [[liberal]] politicians who avoid their sworn duties as a way to advance their political agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hatred of one's country, refusal to recognize the good elements of it, or unreasonably critical of it&lt;br /&gt;
|misopatria, misopatrist&lt;br /&gt;
|From Greek ''misein'', to hate, and Latin ''patria'', nation or homeland&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heavenly body&lt;br /&gt;
|celestial body&lt;br /&gt;
|natural objects visible in the sky&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hellbound&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|recognized by over 1.3 million sites in a Google search and no substitute term is available, yet dictionaries refuse to recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hoax and Chains&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Keynesian economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|a phonetic play on the rhetoric slogan of Hope and Change. Hope replaced by unemployment and Change represents obsessive tax burdens. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hoax plant&lt;br /&gt;
|fake townhall, kkk teaparty&lt;br /&gt;
|a term to describe a deceitful method of placing an operative that appears to be part of a group in order to push an agenda or to make a competing agenda look ridiculous. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Hollywood values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|West Coast Hedonism &lt;br /&gt;
|Over 800,000 results on Google, not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|homo-fascist &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=1318230 LaBarbera: Apple's action stems from 'homo-facism', OneNewsNow, March 25, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|LGBT Stormtrooper, Gay-vangelist&lt;br /&gt;
|Guardians of gender identity ideology&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Illegal Alien|illegal alien]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|widely used in court decisions and political discourse for years, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it is as a term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ineptocracy&lt;br /&gt;
|circle of failure&lt;br /&gt;
|a government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|infotainment&lt;br /&gt;
|tabloid news, dramacast&lt;br /&gt;
|mainstream media presents drama fluff stories as news, e.g. 20/20 - Datelin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[limited government]]&lt;br /&gt;
|we the people democracy&lt;br /&gt;
|first testament to this was the [[U.S. Constitution]], defining [[Reagan]]s presidency, can't be found in Merriam-Websters. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/limited%20government Limited government - Not found] Merriam-Webster's&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|manufactured outrage&lt;br /&gt;
|fake tears &lt;br /&gt;
|liberal politicians and the liberal media's method of stroking anger to pursue an agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|media vigilantism&lt;br /&gt;
|soviet-style censorship&lt;br /&gt;
|media's public campaign to demonize dissent against people or groups, such as [[Juan Williams]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Mediscare&lt;br /&gt;
|fear card&lt;br /&gt;
|Democrats opposed to entitlement reform use fear to stop changes to Medicare&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|merit pay&lt;br /&gt;
|performance bonus&lt;br /&gt;
|Doing your job better with perks as a reward. The typical liberal union teacher avoids merit pay at all costs, self before students. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[militant gays]]&lt;br /&gt;
|intimidating homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|modern idolatry&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;media idolatry&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;money idolatry&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;celebrity idolatry&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|idolatry conjures images of golden calves, and a modern version is needed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moral fabric&lt;br /&gt;
|domestic tranquility&lt;br /&gt;
|ethics and virtues united for the common good of all&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|morally bankrupt&lt;br /&gt;
|[[atheism]], self-void  &lt;br /&gt;
|ethically and spiritually challenged souls&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|narrative hysteria&lt;br /&gt;
|delusional finger-pointing&lt;br /&gt;
|a frantic attempt to capitalize on calamity by casting their opponents as somehow responsible for an act of madness and evil&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|opposite of [[global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|regional warming&lt;br /&gt;
|the North pole shrinks as the South pole increases&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|opposite of [[materialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritualism and idealism have been its philosophical opposites, historically&lt;br /&gt;
|[[dualism]] has been suggested, but it is not the ''opposite'' of [[materialism]]; &amp;quot;spiritualism&amp;quot; is not a common term and is the &amp;quot;opposite&amp;quot; of materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[peer pressure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|used in titles to professional journal articles as early as 1994&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe that isn't recognized by Merriam-Webster?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proven wrong, a refusal to admit it&lt;br /&gt;
|mulism; heel-digger?&lt;br /&gt;
|cf. mulish. This refusal is what promoted the [[Parable of the Good Samaritan]]. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|religious right&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian conservatives&lt;br /&gt;
|religion in America almost exclusively a conservative institution, no religious left term in existence.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reward failure&lt;br /&gt;
|TARP &lt;br /&gt;
|too big to fail, bailout bankrupt, mismanagement subsidized &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rewrite history &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/rewrite%20history  rewrite history not found, Merriam-Websters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deceit]], mislead &lt;br /&gt;
|Commonly used term describing liberal deceit to hide, defraud others about factual history.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rogue states&lt;br /&gt;
|rogue nations&lt;br /&gt;
|nations defying international law, only rogue is listed in Merriman-Websters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|runaway jury&lt;br /&gt;
|The term has existed for decades, but Merriam-Webster has not recognized it yet.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rule of Law&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[schlockumentary]]&lt;br /&gt;
|propaganda film&lt;br /&gt;
|documentary films based on falsehoods and half-truths&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[Second generation atheist|second-generation atheist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|cradle atheist&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|selective outrage&lt;br /&gt;
|partisan hypocrisy, bipolar&lt;br /&gt;
|to be against something to further a cause and reject, stay silent, ignore or discount something similar. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smear merchant&lt;br /&gt;
|serial slander&lt;br /&gt;
|to constantly hurl degrading or false accusations against others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|strict constructionism&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|an important term for over 200 years to describe adherence to the text of the Constitution, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Conservative| Traditional Values]]&lt;br /&gt;
| principles of Conservatism&lt;br /&gt;
|much the same as family values but incorporating all aspects society; family, religion, self-sufficiency, the truth, hard work. Only listed in Merriam-Websters to describe what Nilihism is against. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|true emergency&lt;br /&gt;
|life support&lt;br /&gt;
|meaning a high probability of serious injury or death to an individual or property. Emergency has been watered down, e.g. to be locked out of one's car.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Unaffected by, or impervious to, the media&lt;br /&gt;
|mediaproof&lt;br /&gt;
|cf. bulletproof. ''Once John became aware of the extent of [[liberal deceit]], he set about mediaproofing his mind''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Wikipedia]]'s undue influence on people's thinking (eg the [[hearsay society]])&lt;br /&gt;
|wikiwashing&lt;br /&gt;
|comparable to brainwashing - Wikipedia's claims and procedures become more important than reality or [[logic]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terms Difficult to Classify ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These new terms are difficult to classify:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[affirmative action|affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|first used in [http://www.thecre.com/fedlaw/legal6/eo10925.htm JFK's Executive Order 10925] in 1961 and subsequently promoted by [[LBJ]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Americanism&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|Originally, a phrase unique to American English, later, loyalty to America and its principles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bipartisan&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|emphasized by liberals when they are in the minority in power, but ignored by liberals when they are the majority in power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colonist&lt;br /&gt;
|1701&lt;br /&gt;
|settlers of a new country&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|compartmentalize&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|compartmentalizing the Bible away from knowledge and education leads to ignorance and despair&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|contrarian&lt;br /&gt;
|1657&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who delights in taking a position contrary to others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|eclectic&lt;br /&gt;
|1683&lt;br /&gt;
|taking the best from among different styles or ideas; compare [[best of the public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|evangelism&lt;br /&gt;
|1620-30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;isms&amp;quot; are usually pejorative, though this acquired a positive meaning over time, and perhaps from the outset&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|genetics&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|perhaps this should be on the conservative list?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|identity politics&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|exploiting racial, ethnic, gender alliances for political gain&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inane&lt;br /&gt;
|1662&lt;br /&gt;
|refers to comments, often made by liberals, that are utterly devoid of substance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|junk legislation&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|used initially by liberals to complain about the lack of meaningful legislation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1635-1645&lt;br /&gt;
|conservative?&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|multitasking&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|performing multiple tasks all at once&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|polar coordinates&lt;br /&gt;
|1694&lt;br /&gt;
|Newton may have used it earlier&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|republican&lt;br /&gt;
|1685&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reverse engineer&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|to deconstruct a product (or software) in order to understand how it works, often with the purpose of copying it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scrooge&lt;br /&gt;
|1843&lt;br /&gt;
|the main character in Charles Dickens' ''A Christmas Carol''; the story is based on materialism and is often used as a substitute for the Biblical account, but charity is a conservative value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|describes the use of deceit, particularly in politics; probably a conservative term, but will await more etymology about it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soapbox&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|now used pejoratively, but probably not initially when it was a way for the public to participate&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|states' rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1790&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals often invoke this too; Democrats were its biggest champions in the 1800s (in connection with slavery), and even today on issues like legalizing drugs and same-sex marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|technocrat&lt;br /&gt;
|1932&lt;br /&gt;
|technical expert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|telecommute&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term was in the British magazine ''The Economist''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a combination of a Greek root (&amp;quot;tele&amp;quot;, which means &amp;quot;far off&amp;quot;) and a Latin root (&amp;quot;commutare&amp;quot;, which means &amp;quot;to exchange&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|toady&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|a toady caves into peer pressure to seek acceptance by others: &amp;quot;the largest gathering of toadies is by college students herded into Obama campaign rallies&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tomfoolery&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|playful or foolish behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;beliefs of those opposed to [[modernism]], [[liberalism]], or [[radicalism]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[twilight zone]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|the realm of imagination that seems impossible but is difficult to disprove, and which challenges ordinary views of reality; also the terminator between night and day on a planetary body&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Whip&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In its political usage.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|late 1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|An elected position in each political party for the legislator responsible for gathering and confirming support for the party position on particular bills.  This term is derived from &amp;quot;whipper-in,&amp;quot; which in fox-hunting refers to the man who prevents hunting dogs from straying amid a chase.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2010/11/durbin_re-elected_number_two_s.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wiki&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|a website (or website software) that facilitates contributions and corrections by the public&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|working class&lt;br /&gt;
|1789&lt;br /&gt;
|those who work regular, 40-hour weeks in manual labor, such as factory jobs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Downgraded Conservative Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These conservative terms are less significant:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|byzantine&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The usage here -- in sense of complex governmental rules -- probably developed later.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|connive&lt;br /&gt;
|1601&lt;br /&gt;
|to pretend ignorance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|eleemosynary&lt;br /&gt;
|1616&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to charity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entropy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|disorder&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[filibuster]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1851&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incandescent&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|bright and radiant, conquering darkness, precursor to the invention of the incandescent lamp (light bulb)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|jabberwocky&lt;br /&gt;
|1902&lt;br /&gt;
|talking nonsense&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|luddite&lt;br /&gt;
|1811&lt;br /&gt;
|one who opposes and even destroys technological advances&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|media&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[milquetoast]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|timid and unassertive; easily persuaded or exploited; inspired by Caspar Milquetoast, the unassertive character in &amp;quot;The Timid Soul&amp;quot; cartoon strip by Harold T. Webster, which ran in the New York Herald Tribune on Sundays beginning in 1924.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|normalcy&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|related to the election of [[Warren G. Harding]] by the largest margin yet in history&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ne'er-do-well&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;an idle worthless person&amp;quot; - Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reticent&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|restrained in expression, presentation, or appearance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-indulgence&lt;br /&gt;
|1753&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smart aleck&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|an obnoxiously conceited and self-assertive person with pretensions to being superior to others. Etymology: Aleck, nickname for Alexander &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/smart%20alec Smart Aleck Merriam-Websters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ Merriam-Webster dictionary]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dictionary.reference.com/ Dictionary.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Conservapedia's Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:New Liberal Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Surprising Dates of Origin for Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Linguistic Analysis of Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Bible Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Secularized Language‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservapedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Double-slit_logic_experiment&amp;diff=979935</id>
		<title>Double-slit logic experiment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Double-slit_logic_experiment&amp;diff=979935"/>
				<updated>2012-05-06T22:23:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: /* Simple case */ clarification&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''double-slit logic experiment''' is the use of [[probability]] to determine of there is an underlying logical basis for the surprising effect observed in the [[double-slit experiment]] in [[physics]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The logical essence of the double-slit experiment is to have two levels of uncertainty in sequence.  First, there is uncertainty about which of the two slits a &amp;quot;particle&amp;quot; passes through, and then there is uncertainty about where it lands on the distant screen.  Resolving the uncertainty at the first level through observation then effects the outcome at the second level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A logic or thought experiment could model this phenonemon by setting up a [[random variable]] at the first level, and then another random variable at the second level that is a function of the first random variable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Simple case ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consider a double-slit experiment where a particle has a 50% chance of being found, if observed, to be passing through one of the slits.  When it ends up on a distant background screen could then be one of three places for each slit:  further left, straight ahead, or further right, each with a probability of one third.  Assume that the placement on the distant screen of &amp;quot;further right&amp;quot; for the left slit is the same as &amp;quot;further left&amp;quot; for the right slit.  ''''What is the pattern observed on the distant screen when the double slits remain unobserved?'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Answer''''':  The five locations on the distant screen have these probabilities:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:far left:  1/2 * 1/3 = 1/6&lt;br /&gt;
:center left:  1/2 * 1/3 = 1/6&lt;br /&gt;
:center:  1/2 * 1/3 * 2 = 1/3&lt;br /&gt;
:center right:  1/2 * 1/3 = 1/6&lt;br /&gt;
:far right:  1/2 * 1/3 = 1/6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Total = 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the answer change if there is observation of the double slits, to remove the uncertainty at that level, as in advanced forms of the [[double-slit experiment]] using particles?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conditional probability]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bayes' theorem]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Law of total probability]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:mathematics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:physics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Double-slit_experiment&amp;diff=979934</id>
		<title>Double-slit experiment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Double-slit_experiment&amp;diff=979934"/>
				<updated>2012-05-06T22:13:40Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: grammar fix&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''double-slit experiment''' is a [[physics]] [[experiment]] which demonstrates [[wave-particle duality]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment is easy to do, but difficult to understand.  It consists of setting up a light source on one side, facing a barrier (such as a piece of cardboard) that has two slits in it to permit some light to pass through to a distant wall on the other side.  If both slits are open, then one pattern is observed on the distant wall.  But if one slit is covered, then a completely different pattern is then seen on the distant wall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This simple experiment demonstrates the wave-particle duality of light.  Light behaves as a wave when both slits are open, such that the wave simultaneously passes through both slits and creates an interference pattern on the distant wall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment can also be done with particles, such that a series of particles are directed at a grid, or other similar device, while observing the pattern on the other side.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:physics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Quantum Mechanics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=977992</id>
		<title>Essay:Best New Conservative Words</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=977992"/>
				<updated>2012-04-26T00:58:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toadaron: Fixed, according to the originator of the graph&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--[[Image:Tax-spend.jpg|thumb|480px|The &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; slogan stuck to [[Harry Hopkins]] like a well-fitted suit.]]--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Conservative words.jpg|thumb|480px|The growth in conservative words on an annual basis (red), compared with an exponential growth rate (Courtesy [[User:Jcw]])]]Each year the [[English language]] develops about a thousand new words.  The [[King James Version]] of the [[Bible]] contains only about 8,000 different words;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8013859.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; many good words have since developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative]] terms, expressing [[conservative insights]], originate at a faster rate, and with much higher quality, than [[liberal]] terms.  Conservative triumph over liberalism is thus inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Powerful new conservative terms have grown at a [[geometric progression|geometric rate]], roughly doubling every century.  For each new conservative term originating in the 1600s,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The King James Version of the Bible was published in 1611, by then [[William Shakespeare]] had written nearly all his plays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; there are two new terms originating in the 1700s, four new terms in the 1800s, and eight new terms in the 1900s, for a pattern of &amp;quot;1-2-4-8&amp;quot;.  This implies a conservative future and a correlation between conservatism and truth.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Century&lt;br /&gt;
!# New Conservative Terms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1600s&lt;br /&gt;
|29&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1700s&lt;br /&gt;
|56&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|113&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|230&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|21 (preliminary)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservative words and terms==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--{| align=lwft border=1 cellspacing=0 style=&amp;quot;border-width: 5px; border-color: #c0c0c0; background: #e0e0e0; margin: 2em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | Newest Layer by century, 1600s-1900s&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; 0-0-0-0&lt;br /&gt;
|}--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!New Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[accountability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|the willingness or obligation to be held responsible for one's actions- a fundamental conservative ideal, unlike liberals who believe that 'society,' and not individuals, are responsible for their wrongdoing. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|accuracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1660&lt;br /&gt;
|conservatives strive for accuracy, while many liberals are masters of [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action-at-a-distance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1693&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Newton]]'s acceptance of this concept -- which became fundamental to [[electrostatics]] and [[quantum mechanics]] and has a basis in Christianity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', [[Jesus]]'s cure of the centurion's slave.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; -- was central to the development of his theory of gravity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-philosophy/#ActDis&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Einstein criticized this concept as &amp;quot;spooky&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|activism&lt;br /&gt;
|1915&lt;br /&gt;
|this differentiates conservatives from inactive people; this term might have originated in connection with [[Prohibition]] and efforts to pass the [[Eighteenth Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|aerobics&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|invented by the [[Christian]] Dr. Kenneth H. Cooper&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianadvice.net/famous_christians.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to describe his self-help program to improve health; he gave the title &amp;quot;Aerobics&amp;quot; to his ground-breaking book in 1968, and eventually it revolutionized attitudes toward exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|agitprop&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|propaganda designed to incite agitation, originally coined to describe communist propaganda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|alarmism&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|needless warnings, as in the politically motivated claims of [[global warming]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{#ifexist: alcoholism | [[alcoholism]] | alcoholism }}&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive or addictive drinking of alcohol&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|algorithm&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient and consistent step-by-step methodology for achieving a goal, the opposite of [[liberal style]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|altruism&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|selfless assistance of others; this also occurs in the animal kingdom, and is a [[counterexample to evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ambulance chaser&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|a lawyer who searches for victims to persuade them to sue for his profit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American dream]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1911 is the date given by the &amp;quot;OED&amp;quot;, which refers to the Oxford English Dictionary. The Merriam-Webster dictionary gives a date of 1931.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the vision that, with hard work, anyone in American can attain happiness and prosperity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American exceptionalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1835&lt;br /&gt;
|the idea that the United States and the American people hold a special place in the world, by offering opportunity and hope for humanity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|American Way&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&lt;br /&gt;
|later conservative entrepreneurs used this to coin a new name for what became a highly successful and uniquely American business model: &amp;quot;Amway&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[anti-Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing Christian ideals and institutions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anticompetitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|interfering with open competition and the enormous benefits that flow from it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|antilife&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|term criticizing a tendency to oppose life and lifesaving care&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apathetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1744&lt;br /&gt;
|term critical of the those who are deliberately inactive and disengaged mentally&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apple pie&lt;br /&gt;
|1780&lt;br /&gt;
|honesty, simplicity, wholesomeness. Relating to, or characterized by traditionally American values. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apple%20pie Merriam-webster- Apple pie]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|assimilate&lt;br /&gt;
|1880s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;estimate only; this originated sometime in the late 1880s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the desired absorption of immigrant groups into the culture and mores of the resident population&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|atheistic&lt;br /&gt;
|1625-35&lt;br /&gt;
|An adjective pertaining to or characteristic of atheists or atheism; containing, suggesting, or disseminating atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|attention span&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|correlated with intelligence, the attention span is how long someone can concentrate on something.  It is rapidly shortening; the Lincoln-Douglas debates 150 years ago lasted for hours, but none do today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.help4teachers.com/ras.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The average length of sentences in speech is another indication of attention span, and it has been shortening significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|axiomatic&lt;br /&gt;
|1797&lt;br /&gt;
|self-evident (first usage), and later it developed the meaning of being based on a set of axioms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|baby boom&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in birthrate, which is a good thing; note that the baby boom actually started before World War II, contrary to what textbooks teach. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|back burner&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|inactive status away from attention, as in &amp;quot;RINOs try to put social issues on the back burner&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bailout]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|wasting taxpayer money to rescue, temporarily, a failing company&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|balkanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|to break a region or neighborhood into divisive components; the opposite of the American concept of assimilation or &amp;quot;[[E pluribus unum]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bedrock&lt;br /&gt;
|1840-1850&lt;br /&gt;
|an American term for unbroken solid rock underneath fragments or soil, which adopted the figurative meaning of strong values:  &amp;quot;bedrock principles&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bedrock&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|beltway mentality&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Paul Weyrich]] though possibly first used by then-Governor [[John Sununu]] (&amp;quot;captives of yourselves&amp;quot;), it refers to a governing style that sees only as far as the highway that surrounds its capital, especially the one around D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Best of the Public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|A term coined by [[Andy Schlafly]] to express the idea that one does not need [[liberal]] credentials that so-called &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; have.  Indeed, many great historical figures would have failed the liberal &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; test.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|biased&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&lt;br /&gt;
|to show prejudice for or against something; American society is rapidly becoming ''biased'' against Christian and Conservative beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Big Brother&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|government constantly watching its citizens; [[George Orwell]] first coined this term in his classic, ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|biological clock&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how each woman begins to lose her ability to have children at age 27, no matter how much [[feminists]] try to conceal this scientific fact from women&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Blame America Crowd&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or &amp;quot;Blame-America-First Crowd&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Barone quoted [[Jeane Kirkpatrick]] as saying that the &amp;quot;San Francisco Democrats&amp;quot; (site of the Democratic National Convention in 1984) &amp;quot;always blame America first.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creators.com/opinion/michael-barone/the-blame-america-first-crowd.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blank check&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|irresponsibly giving someone unlimited spending authority or power, as in &amp;quot;a Con Con would be a blank check to destroy the nation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blather&lt;br /&gt;
|1719&lt;br /&gt;
|nonsensical or insignificant babble, as in &amp;quot;liberal blather is common on the [[lamestream media]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Blue Dog Democrat]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who adheres to conservative principles within the Democratic party, once called a Boll Weevil; as of 2009 there are 45-50 Blue Dog Democrats in the [[House of Representatives]], which is enough to form a majority with [[Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boondoggle&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;popularized during the [[New Deal]] as a contemptuous word for make-work projects for the unemployed.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=boondoggle&amp;amp;searchmode=none&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The term gained popularity in [[Canada]] following a corruption scandal tied to the [[Liberal]] government in 2000.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boomerang&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|originally coined to describe a throwing device that returns to the thrower, the term became increasingly useful to describe how wrongful conduct returns to bite the perpetrator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bootstrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|unaided effort, personal merit, hard work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bork&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by William Safire to refer to how Democrats savage a conservative nominee, such as their defeat of Supreme Court nominee [[Robert H. Bork]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|born-again&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|it takes an open mind and heart&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainstorm&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|a burst of productive thought&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainwashing&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|derived from the Chinese term &amp;quot;xǐnǎo&amp;quot; soon after the [[communist]] takeover of China, &amp;quot;brainwashing&amp;quot; means forced abandonment of [[faith]] in favor of regimented [[atheism]]. In a more general sense, it refers to the manipulation and control of the human mind through torture and propaganda techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bright-line rule&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First used by [[U.S. Supreme Court]] Justice [[John Harlan II]] in ''United States v. Jorn'', 400 U.S. 470, 486 (1971), where he rejected adopting a bright-line rule for that case.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a clear, unwavering line dividing what is allowed from what is prohibited; increasingly favored to avoid confusion and requirements that arbitrarily change&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brinkmanship&lt;br /&gt;
|1956&lt;br /&gt;
|the art of displaying a willingness to use military force in order to obtain a just resolution to a conflict between nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bureaucracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1818&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|busywork&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|meaningless activity under the pretense of accomplishing something&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|can-do&lt;br /&gt;
|1903 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; according to the Oxford English Dictionary. [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/can-do Miram-webster] gives the date of 1945 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Phrase coined in a short story by [[Rudyard Kipling]] that has come to refer to an attitude that espouses individual ability and responsibility and not reliance on [[entitlements]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-1855&lt;br /&gt;
|creating jobs and wealth based on a private invention, ownership and investments rather than state-controlled resources&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|career politician&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First use found by ''Conservapedia'' was in an article describing a controversy in communist [[Yugoslavia]] over their &amp;quot;career politicians,&amp;quot; published in the ''New York Times'' and authored by Malcolm W. Browne, sect. 4, p. 3, col. 1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a term used for the entrenched communist government officials in Yugoslavia, with whom even President Tito was fed up&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[carpetbagger]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|a politician who moves to a new area to be elected to a government position, as in [[Hillary Clinton]] moving to [[New York]] to become a U.S. Senator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|carte blanche&lt;br /&gt;
|1645-1655&lt;br /&gt;
|unconditional authority or power, without any limits on misuse of that power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|catharsis&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|facilitating forgiveness and spiritual renewal by expression, as in writing or teaching or confession&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|caucus&lt;br /&gt;
|1763&lt;br /&gt;
|citizens or representatives gathering to meet and reach political decisions as a group while harnessing aspects of the [[best of the public]]; first coined by John Adams&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The future author of the Massachusetts Constitution who also played a role in developing the [[Declaration of Independence]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when he described a meeting of political Boston elders as a &amp;quot;caucus club&amp;quot;; the word may be from an Algonquian term for a group of advisers or elders.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cesspool&lt;br /&gt;
|1782&lt;br /&gt;
|an evil or corrupt place or state.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|chaperone&lt;br /&gt;
|1720&lt;br /&gt;
|care and well-being of youths overseen by adults&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|charisma&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|literally &amp;quot;a gift from God&amp;quot;, charisma is a personal magic of leadership found in [[conservative]] public figures (but beware of the liberal tendency to put style before substance!) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Chicken Little&lt;br /&gt;
|1895&lt;br /&gt;
|one who falsely predicts disaster, especially for silly reasons: &amp;quot;global alarmists&amp;quot; are the Chicken Littles of our time&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In characteristically [[liberal]] style, the online Merriam-Webster spins the [[global warming]] example usage by saying the data showed he wasn't a Chicken Little.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|churchgoer&lt;br /&gt;
|1687&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who makes an effort, during the 168 hours in a week, to attend a church service&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|circle the wagons&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|regroup with family and friends, when under attack. usage from settlers in the old US west.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|citizen's arrest&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|private enforcement of the law without the need of a taxpayer-funded police officer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|civil defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|civilians protecting themselves and their community against attack or natural disasters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1799&lt;br /&gt;
|pretentious, verbose, and often liberal nonsense; example usage: &amp;quot;the professor wasted the rest of the class on his liberal claptrap&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|class warfare&lt;br /&gt;
|???&lt;br /&gt;
|[[liberal]] proposals to attack small businessmen and other job creators under the basis that they are more successful&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|closed shop&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&lt;br /&gt;
|a business that requires membership in a union as a condition of working there; 22 conservative states prohibit this&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|clueless&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|hopelessly ignorant about something important, as liberals often are&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Coase theorem|Coasean]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient result or bargain based on market forces without the distortions caused by [[transaction costs]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cogent&lt;br /&gt;
|1659&lt;br /&gt;
|compelling with the powerful force of reason, the opposite of [[liberal]] claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Columbian&lt;br /&gt;
|1757&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to Christopher Columbus ''or the United States''	&lt;br /&gt;
|-	&lt;br /&gt;
|Cold War&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[George Orwell]] shortly after he wrote ''Animal Farm'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldwar2history.info/war/causes/Cold-War.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as recognition that communist nations were at war with American freedom even in the absence of actual military conflict&lt;br /&gt;
|-	&lt;br /&gt;
|collectivism&lt;br /&gt;
|1880&lt;br /&gt;
|when decision-making by a group takes priority over the good ideas of an individual, often preventing progress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|common sense&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|sound judgment based on facts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|competitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Con Con&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Phyllis Schlafly]] to highlight the deception and risks inherent in proposed national constitutional conventions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conniption&lt;br /&gt;
|1833&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria or alarm, as in &amp;quot;having a conniption fit&amp;quot;; a typical response by [[liberals]] when confronted with their [[double standards]] and illogical positions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conservation of charge&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|overall charge does not change in an isolated system; it is neither created nor destroyed; the concept was first suggested by [[Benjamin Franklin]] but the date of origin for this term is surprisingly recent&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who adheres to principles of limited government, personal responsibility and moral values&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=conservative&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative field]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1870s?&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of physical force over a region such that items moving throughout the region can store energy ''without loss'', as in the planetary system and electrical products&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The mathematical definition of a conservative field -- which arises in [[multivariable calculus]] -- is that a scalar potential exists for the function and, alternatively, it is [[irrotational]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constant&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) something unchanging in value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constitutionality&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|its date of origin is the year of the [[Constitutional Convention]] that proposed the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cooking the data&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Charles Babbage]] used it in his book, &amp;quot;Reflections on the Decline of Science in England&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.scientus.org/Church-Science-History.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|coolant&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a fluid, typically water, that facilitates efficient energy production, especially nuclear energy to cool a reactor and slow down the fission of neutrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copacetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1890s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster officially lists its date of origin as 1919 and its source as unknown, but that is well after when Robinson says he developed it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Bill “Bojangles” Robinson, tap dancer extraordinaire, claimed the invention of this word; it was first popularized by African Americans&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copyright&lt;br /&gt;
|1735&lt;br /&gt;
|extending private property to protect expressive works&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|corporate socialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency of large corporations to act in a socialistic manner, at the expense of meritocracy and productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|correlate&lt;br /&gt;
|1742&lt;br /&gt;
|(verb) to show that one thing relates to another, such as [[atheism]] or [[homosexuality]] and selfishness or lack of charity; [[liberal]]s falsely rely on anecdotes to deny the general relationship&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[countability (Mathematics)|countability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1874&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Georg Cantor]], loathed by the leading contemporary [[mathematicians]], developed this in proving that the real numbers are ''uncountable''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterexample&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|an example that is contrary to the proposition. A common point in logical, reasoned debate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterfactual&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|especially assumptions that are contrary to fact; Chief Justice [[John Roberts]] wrote for the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], &amp;quot;petitioners' standing does not require precise proof of what the Board's policies might have been in that counterfactual world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Free Enter. Fund v. Pub. Co. Accounting Oversight Bd.'', 130 S. Ct. 3138, 3163 (2010) (5-4 decision).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterproductive&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|interfering with a worthy goal.  Example usage: &amp;quot;nearly everything a liberal supports is counterproductive.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crackpot&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|crazy talk, lunacy, a person on the fringe of reality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[creation science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|a term coined by the anti-[[evolution|evolutionist]] [[Henry Morris]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/28/AR2006022801716.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cross-examination&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|the most effective tool against [[liberal]] [[deceit]], better than even the requirement of an oath&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crystal clear&lt;br /&gt;
|1815&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals are the opposite&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[culture war]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after the book ''Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America'' by James Davison Hunter&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cyberbullying&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of obnoxious and hurtful liberal behavior on the internet&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deadweight loss]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Confirmation of the first use is desired.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the loss in overall wealth and efficiency imposed by monopolies and taxation, due to the loss in extra value that someone would have received beyond what he would have paid for a good at a free market price&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|death panel&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|a provision of [[Obamacare]] that will enable a panel of government bureaucrats to decide who receives medical treatment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|death tax&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|interestingly, the term was coined by Canadians opposed to the high estate tax on their assets held in the United States; Frank Luntz is credited with later popularizing this term in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' Dr. Frank Luntz, ''Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decentralization&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|the dispersion of power, as in a shift from national to local control&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decrypt&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|military code-breaking, which played an instrumental role in World War II in deciphering enemy codes that many felt were unbreakable; illustrates the &amp;quot;can do&amp;quot; approach of conservatism in a patriotic way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[defeatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|a negative attitude that becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|defensive driving&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of driving a car that always focuses on avoiding accidents, even those potentially caused by others; nearly a half-century later, dictionaries still do not recognize this term&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deflation&lt;br /&gt;
|1891&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in the value of savings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|defund&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|refers especially to termination of government funding of a wasteful or hurtful program&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deliberative assembly&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Introduction to Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised'' (19th Ed. 2000), xxv.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Edmund Burke in describing the British parliament during a speech to voters in Bristol; he meant a body of persons meeting to discuss and decide common action under parliamentary law&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|demagogue&lt;br /&gt;
|1648&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Den mother&lt;br /&gt;
|1936&lt;br /&gt;
|leader of children's group&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deregulation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|Reagan won in 1980 by campaigning on this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|design by committee&lt;br /&gt;
|before 1958&lt;br /&gt;
|pejorative term directed against collective production by a group &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|despotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1727&lt;br /&gt;
|a ruler with unlimited powers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deterrence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|Disincentive of committing a crime based on the amount of punishment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devalue&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|describing an unwelcome attitude or act, as in &amp;quot;devaluing human life&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devotee&lt;br /&gt;
|1645&lt;br /&gt;
|ardent follower, supporter, or loyalty to. 56 years separates devotee and devoted&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|disinformation&lt;br /&gt;
|1950s&lt;br /&gt;
|false information spread (and sometimes manufactured) by groups with a strong political agenda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|division of labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|increasing productivity through specialization of labor, as in a husband working in manufacturing while his wife cares for children&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dog and pony show&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|an overblown event, typically having more fanfare than substance; liberals like to run a &amp;quot;dog and pony show&amp;quot; in towns having a large public university, where students brainwashed by liberal professors are led like cattle to the events&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|domino effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|how the fall of one nation to communism can result in its harmful spread to neighboring nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|double standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|applying harsher criticism against one group, such as churchgoers or conservatives, than against another group, such as atheists or liberals; recognition of a double standard by the [[Prodigal Son]] led him to repent and convert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doublethink&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|a term first coined by [[George Orwell]] in his dystopian novel ''[[1984]]''; it means simultaneously holding contradictory beliefs, which is a characteristic of [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doubting Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who believes only what he can see and touch, and doubts all else&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|duh science&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|First coined by the ''LA Weekly'' to criticize the ''[[LA Times]]'' for failing to criticize a publicly funded study that concluded that pessimistic people are often in bad moods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Originally &amp;quot;duh!&amp;quot; science: &amp;quot;But couldn't we have been treated to just a soupcon of critical thinking, some irony even -- perhaps a glancing reference to the wisdom of public funding for 'duh!' science?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;L.A. TIMES WHO KNEW? DEPARTMENT&amp;quot;, ''LA Weekly'' p. 12 (Jan. 14, 2000).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dumb down&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dumpster diving&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|Searching through dumpsters for food or other material that can used rather than discarded; first known use: &amp;quot;Restaurant and store owners have complained about drunks panhandling during the day and 'dumpster diving' through trash at night.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Phil Long, &amp;quot;Special Wing for Drunks Suggested at Future Jail,&amp;quot; Miami Herald D1 (Nov. 24, 1982).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eagle Scout&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest rank in the [[Boy Scouts]], the term also means &amp;quot;a straight-arrow and self-reliant man.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|editorialize&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;to introduce opinion into the reporting of facts&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[efficiency]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1633&lt;br /&gt;
|ultimately from the Latin ''efficientem'', meaning ''&amp;quot;working out, or accomplishing&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=efficient Online Etymological Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|egotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1714&lt;br /&gt;
|the root of atheism, as explained by Paul in Romans 1:21-22; the root of depression and anxiety also&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|electioneering&lt;br /&gt;
|1780s&lt;br /&gt;
|to work for the success of a particular candidate, party, ticket, etc., in an election. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elementary proof]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|a mathematical proof based on the minimum assumptions associated with real analysis; term probably does not predate [[complex analysis]] and its first use may have been the English mathematician James Joseph Sylvester's paper, &amp;quot;On an elementary proof and generalisation of Sir Isaac Newton's hitherto undenionstrated rule for the discovery of imaginary roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/circular129johnuoft/circular129johnuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[embryoscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first endoscopic image of the unborn child was in 1967, by Mandelbaum.  The date of origin of the term &amp;quot;embryoscopy&amp;quot; may have been later, but likely before the 1990s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Search this term on the internet and see the spectacular photos of the unborn child (&amp;quot;embryo&amp;quot;) that were &amp;quot;scoped&amp;quot; by tiny cameras.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|empowerment&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|facilitating power for the ordinary; see also [[best of the public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entitlement]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|entrepreneur&lt;br /&gt;
|1852&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ethnic voting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|widely recognized and even advocated by some,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/5/2/3/4/p152345_index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet the dictionary doesn't yet recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|etiquette&lt;br /&gt;
|1740&lt;br /&gt;
|social standards of behavior that promote dignity and discourage inept communications (or lack thereof)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eurabia&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|A satirical word based on the idea that Europe is rapidly becoming Islamized.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eurosceptic&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who opposes joining the super-socialist [[European Union]]; some prefer the term &amp;quot;Eurorealist&amp;quot; to express this opposition, and sometimes &amp;quot;Eurosceptic&amp;quot; is used to criticize opponents of the EU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|everyman&lt;br /&gt;
|1906&lt;br /&gt;
|the typical person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exceptional&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|same year of origin as the [[U.S. Constitution]]!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exculpatory&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|often used in the phrase &amp;quot;exculpatory evidence,&amp;quot; it took nearly 50 years to develop this term after origination of the legal term suggesting guilt: &amp;quot;incriminate&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|expatriate&lt;br /&gt;
|1768&lt;br /&gt;
|to give up one's own citizenship, or be banished by one's own nation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|expose&lt;br /&gt;
|1803&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) a statement of the facts, typically to discredit wrongdoing by government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|facade&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1845 is the date of origin for the figurative use.  The literal use dates back to 1650s, meaning the front of a building.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Example usage: &amp;quot;The facade of a liberal politician is often conservative.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fair shake&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|approaching an idea or concept with an open mind&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|faith healing&lt;br /&gt;
|1885&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[falsifiability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|first emphasized by Karl Popper in 1934, this helps define science:  if a proposition is false, then it can be shown to be false.  If not, then the proposition is not scientific.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[family values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1916&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after a speech by Vice President [[Dan Quayle]], 1992 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fat farm&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a place where obese people -- such as self-centered [[atheists]] -- might go to try to lose weight&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|father figure&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who fulfills the essential role of a father&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[federalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1789&lt;br /&gt;
|the unique system of dual sovereigns, state and federal (national), established by the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fear-mongering&lt;br /&gt;
|1938&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The ''[[New York Times]]'' attributed the first use -- ironically -- to President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|stir up exaggerated fear by the public, typically to expand government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|feedback&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|an all-important element of accountability and improvement, and a key consideration in good engineering design&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[fellow traveller]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|may have existed earlier, but popularized in 1924 by Leon Trotsky. Describes a sympathizer of a cause but who does not formally belong to the cause, such as a [[communist]] sympathizer who is not part of the communist party. The term was invented by the communists in its original, non-negative sense, but the conservatives were the first to use it as a pejorative term. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Flip flop (politics)|flip-flop]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|''verb'', meaning to change political position, typically due to [[liberal]] pressure.  First used by the Republican S.I. Hayakawa campaign to describe California Democratic incumbent U.S. Senator John Tunney, whom Hayakawa defeated in an upset.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|force-feed&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|what liberals do to students in [[public schools]] today in training them to be [[atheist]]ic socialists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|forward-looking&lt;br /&gt;
|1800&lt;br /&gt;
|planning for the future rather than dwelling on the past&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Founding Fathers&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|the several dozen [[Christian]] men &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html Religious Affiliation of the Founding Fathers of the United States of America, Adherents.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who helped draft the formative documents of the United States&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[free enterprise]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free lunch&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|something acquired ostensibly without paying for it, as in welfare; often used to remind people that &amp;quot;there's no such thing as a free lunch&amp;quot; in order to point out that it must cost someone something, now or later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free market&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free speech&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|shorthand for &amp;quot;freedom of speech,&amp;quot; but with a connotation that extends to non-citizens and listeners; first used in a U.S. Supreme Court opinion in dissent in the [[Slaughter-House Cases]] by Justice Bradley&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free world&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|areas of the world free of communism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|freeloader&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who avoids paying or working for his share of a benefit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|frontiersmen&lt;br /&gt;
|1814&lt;br /&gt;
|living and working in a self-sufficient manner and with courage in a new land.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fuzzy math&lt;br /&gt;
|1937&lt;br /&gt;
|non-computational math designed to obscure the differences between the correct answers and the incorrect -- but perhaps politically motivated -- answers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|galvanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|as in, &amp;quot;the liberal proposals ''galvanized'' the grassroots in opposition&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[gambit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a sacrifice that obtains an advantageous position, as in the game of [[chess]] ([[Bobby Fischer]]'s queen's gambit was a masterpiece) or in real life (the [[Passion of Christ]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gang up&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|group pressure&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gateway drug&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|abuse of alcohol/marijuana eventually leads to harder drugs cocaine/heroin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gerrymandering&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by a newspaper editor to criticize the manipulation of the lines of a new district into a salamander shape&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allbusiness.com/information/publishing-industries/251259-1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that favored election of a liberal politician&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gimmick&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|originally meant a deceptive mechanical device for controlling a [[gambling]] machine, and then its meaning expanded to include all trickery to attract attention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|globalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|Merriam-Webster states it was first used in 1943&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/globalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the OED gives a date of 1965 for the exact term &amp;quot;globalism&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50095613/50095613se2?single=1&amp;amp;query_type=word&amp;amp;queryword=globalism&amp;amp;first=1&amp;amp;max_to_show=10&amp;amp;hilite=50095613se2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the term &amp;quot;globalization&amp;quot; was first used in the mid-1980s in a different, complimentary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God-fearing&lt;br /&gt;
|1835 &lt;br /&gt;
|Living by the rules of God; living in a way that is considered morally right.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|godsend&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|go-getter&lt;br /&gt;
|1921&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gold standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest standard; in currency, when money could be exchanged for a fixed amount of gold&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|golden parachute&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for a pre-arranged handout to a corporate executive when fired, as when the company is taken over by new ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Good Samaritan&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|how genuine charity is the best approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|goon&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a dim-witted thug, espec. one who intimidates on behalf of a union&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|government school&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[economist]] [[Milton Friedman]] as a more accurate name for [[public schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grade inflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency by Liberal educationalists and public schools to increase marks, irrespective of merit or actual achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grassroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|greasy spoon&lt;br /&gt;
|1902&lt;br /&gt;
|a free enterprise term for a small, cheap restaurant - which in many places is just what the public wants; reflects Jesus' [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]] about the digestive system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Great Awakening&lt;br /&gt;
|1730-1740&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian spiritualism recurs periodically.  See [[Essay:The Coming Fifth Great Awakening in America]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gresham's law&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency in a free market for bad money (which loses its value) to drive out (be used more often in transactions) than good money (which retains its value), because people want to horde the good money while getting rid of the bad money; a similar effect can be seen when profanity drives out intelligent discussion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|groupthink&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of thought consisting of conformity to a manufactured consensus and self-deception; coined by William H. Whyte in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|half-baked&lt;br /&gt;
|1855&lt;br /&gt;
|an idea that can appear reasonable at first, but with just a little thought it is recognized to be absurd&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hallmark&lt;br /&gt;
|1721&lt;br /&gt;
|purity, authentic, official seal, distinguishing feature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|handout&lt;br /&gt;
|1882&lt;br /&gt;
|describes charity and government giveaways&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hardworking&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|harmless error&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|an insignificant violation of a duty or procedural rule; first used in ''Western Ins. Co. v. The Goody Friends'', 29 F. Cas. 764 (S.D. Ohio 1861) (referring to a duty)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hatchet job&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|still looking for the context of its first use; today it means an article, typically by a liberal, that misleadingly smears someone, typically a conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hawthorne effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&lt;br /&gt;
|the increase in achievement resulting merely from being observed; this was demonstrated by experiment at the Hawthorne Works of Western Electric in Cicero, Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heckler's veto&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by University of Chicago Law Professor Harvey Kalven, Jr., a strong supporter of free speech in politics, this term has been used in [[Supreme Court]] decisions by Justices [[Sam Alito]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' ''Pleasant Grove City v. Summum'', 129 S. Ct. 1125 (2009); ''see also'' ''Child Evangelism Fellowship of N.J., Inc. v. Stafford Twp. Sch. Dist.'', 386 F.3d 514 (3rd Cir. 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Antonin Scalia]], and [[Clarence Thomas]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Good News Club v. Milford Cent. Sch.'', 533 U.S. 98 (2001)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hippie&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who rejects traditional morality and does what he wants, often growing long hair and smoking [[marijuana]] rather than working hard; this term became increasingly pejorative over time&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hissy fit&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|an unjustified tantrum, typically female in nature, as in &amp;quot;[[feminist]]s had a hissy fit when [[Lawrence Summers]] suggested (but criticized) the possibility that women have weaker scientific aptitude than men, and Summers ultimately resigned.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hobson's choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;this term has the entertaining history of originating with an English liveryman who required customers to &amp;quot;choose&amp;quot; the horse closest to the door.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an ostensible choice that disguises a lack of freedom, because each alternative is completely unacceptable.  This term is invoked to criticize an illusory freedom of choice.  This term has been used in 48 cases by Supreme Court Justices, more often by conservatives than by liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hokey&lt;br /&gt;
|1927&lt;br /&gt;
|phony, in an obvious or corny way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|honor system&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|an approach to discipline that emphasizes and encourages trust, honesty and personal responsibility rather than constant supervision&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homeschool]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;the OED assigns a date of origin of 1850 to &amp;quot;homeschool&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homemaker]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1876&lt;br /&gt;
|a wife and mother whose efforts are wisely spent running the household for the family&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hometown&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|the place where someone grew up and typically obtained some benefit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homosexual agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|used to promote the agenda in the book ''After the Ball'', but then used to criticize the movement by Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] in his dissent in''Lawrence v. Texas'' (2003)''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|human rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1766&lt;br /&gt;
|rights of all peoples, such as to &amp;quot;life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness&amp;quot; as set forth in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hype&lt;br /&gt;
|1931&lt;br /&gt;
|originally meant to deceive or &amp;quot;put on,&amp;quot; and then its meaning shifted slightly to represent extravagant promotion of something as the liberal media often do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hyphenated American&lt;br /&gt;
|1889&lt;br /&gt;
|President Theodore Roosevelt said in 1915, &amp;quot;There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hypothesis&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a suggestion, typically scientific in nature, which must be tested and proven before asserted as truth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria&lt;br /&gt;
|1801&lt;br /&gt;
|From the Latin ''hystericus'', from Greek ''hystera '' meaning ''&amp;quot;womb&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hysteria Meriam Webster Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (an old notion that hysteria was caused by the [[womb]]).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|idealist&lt;br /&gt;
|1701&lt;br /&gt;
|a person guided by ideals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|illiteracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1660&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals seek to produce illiterate voters who lack independence, and many graduates of the [[public schools]] are illiterate today&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inalienable&lt;br /&gt;
|1640s&lt;br /&gt;
|cannot be taken away, especially by government, as in &amp;quot;inalienable rights&amp;quot; in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incentivize&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|create a reward to encourage good work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incidental inequality&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|inequalities that result as side effects of an objectively just system &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incoherent&lt;br /&gt;
|1626&lt;br /&gt;
|the term often applies to liberal [[double standard]]s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incompleteness&lt;br /&gt;
|1931&lt;br /&gt;
|a system of logic or mathematics that includes propositions that are impossible to prove or disprove; term coined as a result of [[Kurt Godel]]'s work in 1931&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incrementalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|imposing bad political or social change slowly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|independence&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|free will&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|individualism&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|values, rights and duties arise from the individual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inerrancy&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|free from error, as in &amp;quot;biblical inerrancy&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inflationary&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|policies causing inflation of the monetary supply&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|informed consent&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|consent to surgery is meaningful only if informed, a requirement that should apply to abortion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|initiative&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|self-starting first step toward improvement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|insightful&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|what conservatism is about: gaining insights into the truth, and bettering individuals and society with them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intangible&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|something valuable that cannot be seen or touched, such as goodwill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intellectual property&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;we [should] protect intellectual property, the labors of the mind, productions and interests as much a man's own, and as much the fruit of his honest industry, as the wheat he cultivates, or the flocks he rears.&amp;quot;  ''Davoll v. Brown'', 7 F. Cas. 197 (Cir. Ct. Mass. 1845) (Woodbury, federal judge).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|interventionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;governmental interference in economic affairs at home or in political affairs of another country&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|invisible hand&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Adam Smith in the ''Wealth of Nations'' and widely used today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[invisible hand of marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|discovered on Conservapedia, it is the unseen force of productivity that results from marriage (only between a man and woman).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Iron curtain&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Winston Churchill in a speech in Missouri just after World War II, to describe the communist's figurative wall against freedom&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[irreducible complexity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|coined&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Alan Turing]] reportedly used the term for a completely different meaning that went nowhere. [http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/nasty-feelings-in-the-ool-community-toward-yockey/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and later adopted  and developed by [[Michael Behe]] to describe structure or system that could not possibly have evolved, because removing any part makes it nonfunctional, thereby showing that [[God]] must have created it whole into biology; if the [[Nobel Prize]] were not dominated by [[atheism]], Behe could win one for this insight.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Islamofascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1990?&lt;br /&gt;
|A form of totalitarian Muslim fundamentalist rule, or extreme Islamism.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ivory tower&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a description of the pampered culture of liberal [[professor values|professors]], and how far out of touch with the truth it is&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John Hancock&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|a personal signature, especially in a bold style that stands up for principles as John Hancock did with his signing the Declaration of Independence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial activism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in an article in ''Fortune'' magazine by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/278089&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and repeatedly used in U.S. Supreme Court opinions since 1967,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''United States v. Wade'', &lt;br /&gt;
388 U.S. 218 (1967).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet as of 2009 [[Merriam-Webster]] dictionary still fails to recognize this widely used term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial prejudice&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|the bias of a judge in favor of a political correct identity group intended to rig outcome equality in favor of that group based on subjective bias rather than objective justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial restraint&lt;br /&gt;
|1942&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Assuming that this court has power to act, it does not necessarily follow that it should act. ... In a number of situations, and in a number of cases, it has been held that courts should voluntarily refrain from using or asserting power. Where the use or assertion of power might be destructive of a well defined purpose of law or of a declared public policy such voluntarily imposed '''judicial restraint''' may be commendable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Osage Tribe of Indians v. Ickes, 45 F. Supp. 179, 184-85 (D.D.C. 1942) (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial supremacist&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|one who advocates that the courts should be supreme over the other branches of government for certain legal issues; first coined in a book by [[Phyllis Schlafly]]; first used by the judiciary by the Michigan Supreme Court in ''Paige v. City of Sterling Heights'', 476 Mich. 495 (2006).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A similar yet different concept, &amp;quot;judicial supremacy,&amp;quot; was coined by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justice [[Robert H. Jackson]] as the title of his book,'' The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy: A Study of a Crisis in American Political Power'' (New York: Knopf, 1941).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial taking]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|the deprivation of private property due to a court decision; this concept was introduced by conservative Justice [[Potter Stewart]] in 1967, and the term was used for the first time independently by the Michigan and Hawaii Supreme Courts in the same month (!) in December 1982, and then used often in law review articles and Circuit Court decisions in the 2000s, and then four Justices of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] endorsed the principle in a decision in 2010, with two others accepting the possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[junk science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://rated.com/dir/Society/Issues/Environment/Opposing_Views/Junk_Science&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the corruption of the scientific method to advance other, often political, goals (such as [[Global Warming]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|jury nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|the power of a jury to overrule the law and acquit an ostensibly guilty defendant; the power was established in the colonies in 1735 in the trial of [[John Peter Zenger]], but this term was first used in state court by Pfeuffer v. Haas, 55 S.W.2d 111 (Tex. Civ. App. 1932) and in federal court by ''Skidmore v. Baltimore &amp;amp; O. R. Co.'', 167 F.2d 54 (2nd Cir. 1948)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|killjoy&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|one who spoils the pleasure of others. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/killjoy Killjoy 1776 Mer-Web]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Example''-Vandals seek to disrupt conservative wikis, an education project. They are a killjoy to the learning process.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kiss of death&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|from Judas's betrayal of Jesus with a kiss, Mark 14:44-4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kleptocrat&lt;br /&gt;
|1819&lt;br /&gt;
|A politician who seeks status and personal gain at the expense of the governed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kowtow&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|obsequious, unthinking obedience to someone or something, used especially in the context of dictatorships and liberal belief systems&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kremlinology&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the otherwise indecipherable behavior of the government of the [[communist]] [[Soviet Union]]. Refers to the Kremlin, the traditional seat of Russian government (Soviet or not). &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|la-la land&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First known use was in an article by Tom Zito, &amp;quot;Mr. Mike's Mania; Sick Humor, Very Well Indulged,&amp;quot; [[Washington Post]] F1 (Nov. 8, 1979): &amp;quot;But now, it's off to La-La land, and his movie deal. 'The thing about Southern Californians,' he says, 'is this: They wake up and say, 'Gee, what a wonderful morning. I think I'll make a salad.' And that takes them the whole day. ...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a term for the decadent, liberal culture of [[Hollywood]]-driven [[Los Angeles]], originally capitalized as &amp;quot;La-La land.&amp;quot;; Merriam-Webster is in denial about this etymology and claims a later origin of 1983.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|labor camp&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|forced work prison&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|laissez-faire&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing governmental interference in economic affairs beyond what is minimally necessary&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lame duck&lt;br /&gt;
|1761&lt;br /&gt;
|one falling being in achievement, especially a public official whose power is limited because his term in office is set to expire without possibility of reelection.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lamestream media&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Bernie Goldberg to describe the clueless [[Mainstream media]] that repeat superficial, discredited liberal claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|landslide&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|In the political sense, an overwhelming election victory. A clear, democratic expression of popular will.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leadership&lt;br /&gt;
|1821&lt;br /&gt;
|an ability and willingness to lead, often by example&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leftism&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|principles and doctrine of leftists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|level-headed&lt;br /&gt;
|1876&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;balanced&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;having common sense and sound judgment&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leverage&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal creep&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal bias that gradually creeps or distorts an entry, definition, explanation, description, or historical account.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|life vest&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-life invention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lifelong&lt;br /&gt;
|1855&lt;br /&gt;
|something, usually a commitment, that lasts a lifetime, as in &amp;quot;a lifelong commitment to [[Christ]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|limousine liberal&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a multi-millionaire who pretends to be compassionate about the poor, but supports liberal policies that increase burdens on working Americans&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|local&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This date refers to its first usage as a ''noun'', which is an estimate of its adoption as a concept.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|common usage: &amp;quot;all politics is local&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lockstep&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|mindless conformity, often to liberal values&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|locomotive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|a great engine of economic growth during the [[Industrial Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lone wolf&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who prefers to work, act, or live alone,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lone%20wolf Lone wolf, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; synonymous with self-sufficiency&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|loose cannon&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|an undisciplined person or program that dangerously lacks forethought; used in mid-November 1976 to describe $11 billion in unspent appropriations by the Ford Administration:  &amp;quot;'That money,' says Arnold Packer, a senior Senate Budget Committee economist who is helping Carter draw up his shadow budget, 'is like a loose cannon rolling around the deck' because a sudden reappearance of the funds could be inflationary.&amp;quot; (''BusinessWeek'')&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lowest common denominator&lt;br /&gt;
|1854&lt;br /&gt;
|the lowest in work ethic, morals, or knowledge among a group; typically used to criticize the liberal practice of dumbing down content&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lunatic fringe&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by U.S. President [[Theodore Roosevelt]] to describe members of eccentric, radical or extremist groups&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=lunatic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|machismo&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|a word never used favorably by feminists!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mainstay&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|the primary support, typically for something good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|man-hater&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was during the epic struggle -- and defeat -- of the so-called [[Equal Rights Amendment]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|William Safire wrote in the ''New York Times'' in 1983, &amp;quot;Misandry, from the Greek misandros for 'hating men,' is in the 1961 Merriam-Webster New International Dictionary, and the Oxford Dictionary Supplement traces it to 1946.  The word is pronounced as 'Ms. Andry,' but I wonder why we need the Greek word for it. What's wrong with good, old-fashioned man-hater?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sunday, Oct. 30, 1983, Section 6, Page 12, Column 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|make-work&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|inefficient or useless activity that has the false appearance of being productive; a favorite endeavor of liberals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[market failure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[Coined as the title of a scholarly article by Francis M. Bator, &amp;quot;The Anatomy of Market Failure,&amp;quot; ''The Quarterly Journal of Economics'' (1958) [http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/Courses/econ335/out/bator_qje.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|instances where the free market does not provide a desirable result, as when information is withheld from an unsuspecting consumer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|manifest destiny&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|Providential design over future events, which originated in the context of expanding the United States to the Pacific Ocean&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the view of life that physical matter is all that exists; as an &amp;quot;ism&amp;quot;, the term criticizes such view&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|McCarthyism&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|a heroic but ultimately unsuccessful attempt to keep the United States free from Communist influence.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|meat and potatoes&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|the most interesting or fundamental part&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Medal of Honor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|a special American honor for bravery on the battlefield&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|melting pot&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|requires &amp;quot;social and cultural assimilation&amp;quot; for successful immigration&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster dictionary (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[meritocracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|a system in which the talented are chosen and moved ahead on the basis of their achievement &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[microeconomics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the economics of the individual person or business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|micromanage&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|insistence on controlling details, typically by liberals to [[censorship|censor]] progress; [[Ronald Reagan]] was critical of this style by [[Democrat]] Presidents&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mind control&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for how an atheistic government influences what people believe, especially through public education&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|close-minded point-of-view, typically in adherence to a liberal falsehood and often to the exclusion of Christ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missile defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as part of [[SDI]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1625&lt;br /&gt;
|someone sent on a mission, typically a religious mission&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|mobocracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1754&lt;br /&gt;
|rule by a mob, as at Wikipedia&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|monogamy&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|this has the same date of origin as &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot;, and that may not be a coincidence!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moonlighting&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|working more than a full-time job in order to be as productive as possible; the [[work ethic]] at its best&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moral majority&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Jerry Falwell to describe the movement of growing moral, Christian conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|motivation&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe the word did not exist before 1873?!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckety–muck&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for an arrogant person who holds a title or position considered to be important by others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckraker&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who searches out and publicly exposes [[deceit]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/muckraker Merriam-Webster - Muckraker]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Murphy's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|if something can go wrong, then it will go wrong: this was a conservative insight by an engineer Edward Murphy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muscle car&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|placing a powerful engine in a classic two-door car for highly efficient performance; also celebrate masculine style against erosion by feminism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|myopic&lt;br /&gt;
|1752&lt;br /&gt;
|originally a term in optometry, 1990's used to describe liberals' lack of foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|name-dropping&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|a term critical of the [[liberal]] practice of seeking to impress others by casually mentioning personal association with prominent people, despite its lack of relevance to the conversation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nanny state&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Under the New Economic Policy, [the new French Prime Minister Raymond] Barre has made it clear that industrial lame ducks can no longer count on the generosity of Nanny i.e. the state - for bailing out.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leo Ryan, &amp;quot;Economy Shored up: France's new surge of liberalism,&amp;quot; The Globe and Mail (Canada) (Aug. 1, 1978)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Note how two powerful new conservative terms led to a third here!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|negativism&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|mental attitude that tends that is skeptical about almost everything, except one's own views&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|newspeak&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|political or media expressions using circumlocution and euphemisms to disguise or distract from the truth; first coined by [[George Orwell]] in ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-justiciable&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Used by the state attorneys for West Virginia (including Philip Steptoe, founder of Steptoe &amp;amp; Johnson) in ''Pennsylvania v. West Virginia'', 262 U.S. 553 (1923):  &amp;quot;It is not the 'subject of judicial cognizance,' Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 15; Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S 1, 15; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, or 'susceptible of judicial solution.' Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S. 1, 18, 22; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, 234.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a difficult issue that the courts should not attempt to resolve, often because it is too political in nature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-locality&lt;br /&gt;
|1920s&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action at a distance]] at the atomic level; even though proven, it is still opposed by those who believe in [[relativity]] and still not recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&lt;br /&gt;
|assertion of authority by a State against encroachment by the federal government, in defense of liberty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|obambulate&lt;br /&gt;
|1600&lt;br /&gt;
|From Latin ''obambulatus'', to walk to or before, akin to ''wander''.  Word currently claimed to have been invented by Rush Limbaugh in 2011 and used in reference to [[Barack Obama]], yet it is found in Oxford and Webster's dictionaries prior to 1991.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|obstructionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1879&lt;br /&gt;
|deliberate interference with free speech or legislative progress, as when liberal legislators (the &amp;quot;fleebaggers&amp;quot;) fled Wisconsin to try to block a reform&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Old Glory&lt;br /&gt;
|1862&lt;br /&gt;
|the ''United States of America'' flag, Stars &amp;amp; Stripes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-size-fits-all&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Was there an earlier conservative use?  Frank Zappa's album cover in the 1970s does not count!&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Lee Wishing, director of communications for conservative [[Grove City College]], in criticism of how the government administers student loans: &amp;quot;Unfortunately, with government programs, it's one size fits all.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/1996/dec96/er-dec96.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The 2008 Republican platform states, &amp;quot;We reject a one-size-fits-all approach and support parental options, including home schooling, and local innovations such as schools or classes for boys only or for girls only and alternative and innovative school schedules.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-trick pony&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|a person or group that relies repeatedly on the same gimmick, as in &amp;quot;the media are a one-trick pony in their criticism of [[Rand Paul]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|open-minded&lt;br /&gt;
|1828&lt;br /&gt;
|see [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[opportunity cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|optimism&lt;br /&gt;
|1759&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|originalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|taken from original intent, The belief that the United States Constitution should be interpreted in the way the authors originally intended it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Orwellian&lt;br /&gt;
|1960s&lt;br /&gt;
|terminology or style that advances the power of big government but is hurtful or nonsensical&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ntu.org/main/press.php?PressID=604&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ostensibly&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|having an outward appearance that may not reflect the underlying truth; good potential use is Luke 3:23 in describing Jesus as the son of Joseph&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|outflank&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|to move swiftly around an opponent, a military tactic mastered by [[conservative]] [[General]] [[George Patton]] to crush the [[Germans]] in [[World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|parenting&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|children raising&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Parkinson's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how bureaucracies expand regardless of the productivity, and how inefficient work expands to fill the time available for its completion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Parthian shot]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|a negative term for the tactic of expressing a criticism while one exits, just as the ancient Parthians would shoot arrows while retreating in battle.  This tactic is common among those who reject [[conservative]] truths, as seen often on ''Conservapedia''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[patent troll]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|a company that obtains or buys up patents for the sole purpose of asserting infringement claims, and without any intention of actually manufacturing the invention; the term was first coined by Peter Detkin, in-house counsel to Intel&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|patriotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pavlovian&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a conditioned, automatic and unthinking response to a signal; it has been used twice by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justices. &amp;quot;It is well established that this Court does not, or at least should not, respond in Pavlovian fashion to confessions of error by the [[Solicitor General]].&amp;quot;  ''De Marco v. United States'', 415 U.S. 449, 451 (1974) ([[Rehnquist]], J., dissenting); &amp;quot;'[[Incorporation doctrine|Incorporation]]' has become so Pavlovian that my Brother BLACK barely mentions the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] in the course of an 11-page opinion dealing with the procedural rule the State of [[Florida]] has adopted for cases tried in Florida courts under Florida's criminal laws.&amp;quot; '' Williams v. Fla.'', 399 U.S. 78, 144 (1970) ([[Potter Stewart|Stewart]], J., dissenting and concurring).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|perestroika&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|increasing economic freedom and free speech under [[communism]], which led to the unraveling of the [[communist]] [[Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|perpetual war&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|Coined by historian Charles A. Beard,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles A. Beard is best known for interpreting the Constitution as being primarily motivated by economic interests.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it has been used most recently by [[Ann Coulter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[personhood]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/personhood Personhood] Dictionary.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|Inherent rights guaranteed to all human beings from the beginning of their biological development, including the pre-born, partially born. Also, the state or fact of being a person.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Philadelphia&lt;br /&gt;
|1682&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[William Penn]] and meaning &amp;quot;city of brotherly love,&amp;quot; the concept captures the &amp;quot;[[best of the public]]&amp;quot; approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[phonics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1684&lt;br /&gt;
|conservatives have long championed phonics to promote literacy, Bible-reading, and informed voters; liberals take the opposite position&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|phony&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This surprisingly recent origin appears to be derived from a British confidence game.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|needed to address [[liberal deceit]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|plasticity&lt;br /&gt;
|1783&lt;br /&gt;
|having a plastic quality that conforms to molding or pressure; in pejorative usage, someone who easily conforms to [[peer pressure]] or [[liberal]] falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|poetic justice&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&lt;br /&gt;
|when virtue is rewarded and/or wrongdoing is punished in an indirect or unexpected way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|political machine&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for local and typically Democratic power structures that prevent outsiders from winning elections; first used by George Washington Plunkitt to criticize the Tammany Hall machine for which he served&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[politically correct]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|This term originated among radicals at the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] to enforce radical orthodoxy, but immediately flipped in usage to become a term of mockery of radicals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For an early different usage of the word, see 1793 J. WILSON in U.S. Rep. (U.S. Supreme Court) 2 (1798) 462 Sentiments and expressions of this inaccurate kind prevail in our..language... ‘The United States’, instead of the ‘People of the United States’, is the toast given. This is not politically correct.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The term may have come from Chairman Mao in 1936.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|politicize&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|seeking political gain at the expense of truth or quality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Merriam-Webster definition (1994 ed.) is incomplete and unclear: &amp;quot;to give a political tone or character to&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|politics of envy&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Australian [[conservative]] Christopher Pine to describe the philosophy behind taking money from private schools and giving it to public ones.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pork barrel&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|government as a source of handouts that redistribute money from hard-working people to those who avoid work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[post-abortive]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|the unexpected trauma and physical harm -- which can worsen over time -- that is experienced by a woman after having an [[abortion]]; coined by Dr. Kaye Cash in an editorial describing what she learned during a 365-mile walk in southeast Arkansas to speak with the public about abortion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Editorial by Kaye Cash, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Little Rock, AR), October 23, 1986.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|potential&lt;br /&gt;
|1817&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Usage here refers to &amp;quot;promise&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;possibility&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pothead&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who smokes marijuana and doesn't realize how it destroys people&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|powerhouse&lt;br /&gt;
|1881&lt;br /&gt;
|source of energy and strength - which is what the conservative movement is&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[price discrimination]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|charging different prices for the exact same service or good; first coined by the British economist (and critic of [[John Maynard Keynes]]) Arthur Cecil Pigou in ''The Economics of Welfare''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|prioritize&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|to recognize that some goals and activities are more important than others, and then focus accordingly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|private sector&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|non-governmental businesses and jobs functioning in free enterprise&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|privatize&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|to return a business or enterprise from state to private control; to de-nationalize.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proactive&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Procrustean&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative description of the one-size-fits-all mentality, which disregards individual differences&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productive&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|1810&lt;br /&gt;
|the gap of about 200 years between the creation of &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;productivity&amp;quot; is astounding&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[pro-life]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1960&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|property right&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|provocateur&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who spends more time causing unproductive conflicts rather than advancing knowledge, accomplishing legitimate goals, or helping anyone&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pseudoscience&lt;br /&gt;
|1844&lt;br /&gt;
|worthless claims written with the appearance of scientific rigor to gain an aura of credibility&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|publicity stunt&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Earlier usage in the 1900s may have occurred, but the term &amp;quot;stunt&amp;quot; was not coined until 1878.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Used on April 10, 1969 by Republican Senators who withdrew from a tour and probe by Senator [[Ted Kennedy]], criticizing him for his &amp;quot;publicity stunt&amp;quot; in preparation for his expected run for the presidency; the [[Chappaquiddick incident]] sunk his chances three months later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|quantify&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|race card&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is the date of its widespread familiarity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Playing the race card&amp;quot; consists of relying on racial emotions or charges of racism in order to overcome the truth and logic in politics, legal proceedings, or otherwise; this term became familiar in the criticism of the defense and acquittal of O.J. Simpson for the murder of his ex-wife and her friend.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rapture&lt;br /&gt;
|1629&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritual ecstasy[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=rapture]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[recidivism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1886&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency for people lacking in [[faith]] and determination to revert to prior patterns of harmful behavior, such as repeat criminal offenders&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|recuse&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|self-removal by a decision-maker (especially a judge) because of possible bias with respect to the pending issue&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|red tape&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive bureaucracy and procedural complexity which frustrate meaningful activity and progress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|refudiate&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|combination of ''refute'' and ''repudiate'', as coined by [[Sarah Palin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[relativism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|the view that ethical truths are not absolute, but depend on the person or group that holds them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[responsibility]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1737&lt;br /&gt;
|HAMILTON Federalist No. 63 (1988) II. 193 Responsibility in order to be reasonable must be limited to objects within the power of the responsible party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reverse discrimination&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|the use of quotas or affirmative action to use race or gender to discriminate against a better qualified person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|revisionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term, now obscure, refers to a Marxist movement that preferred evolutionary rather than revolutionary change.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|distortions of history to promote liberal bias&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|revolving-door&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|the liberal practice of repeatedly transferring into and out of government in a way that impedes progress and access by others, like the same people going round-and-round in a real revolving door&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|riot act&lt;br /&gt;
|1715&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Its colloquial use, as in &amp;quot;read them the riot act,&amp;quot; began in 1819.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the Riot Act was a law passed in England in 1715 to authorize officials to disperse riots&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rogue state&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|(Originally used in 1993 then reintroduced in 2002.) A 'rogue state' displays no regard for international law. It attempts to acquire weapons of mass destruction and other military technology with which to threaten neighbouring countries and support terrorism. Rogue states often reject human values and brutalize their own people.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rubber-stamp&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|unthinking repetition or endorsement of something, despite having the responsibility to make an independent decision, as in &amp;quot;Democrats rubber-stamp demands by the abortion industry.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|run of the mill&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|meaning &amp;quot;merely average, commonplace,&amp;quot; the term is critical of a failure to strive for excellence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sacred cow&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a person or idea, typically liberal, that becomes immune from criticism because of its political usefulness rather than its truthfulness, as in the theories of [[evolution]] and [[relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scapegoating&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|a term criticizing how people, particularly liberals, deflect accountability and blame from themselves to others; inspired by Leviticus 16:8.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|salutary neglect&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by the [[conservative]] [[Edmund Burke]] in his 1775 speech to the British [[House of Commons]] entitled &amp;quot;On Moving His Resolutions for Conciliation with the Colonies&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|school choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by Milton Friedman in his book, ''Free to Choose'' &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[scientific fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|a coordinated effort by a group of scientists to enforce a certain point of view upon others.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[secularism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-55&lt;br /&gt;
|attempts to educate, particularly through [[public school]], without including [[faith]] or even acknowledgment of [[God]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Segway&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|Dean Kamen's trademark spelling of &amp;quot;segue&amp;quot; for use of Yankee Ingenuity to improve efficiency, to refer to a form of battery-powered transportation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[self-defense]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1651&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-destruct&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|often the tragic result of liberal falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Discipline|self-discipline]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-preservation&lt;br /&gt;
|1614&lt;br /&gt;
|preservation of oneself from destruction or harm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-reliant&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|selfishness&lt;br /&gt;
|1630&lt;br /&gt;
|concern with one's own interests &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rand, Ayn. ''The Virtue of Selfishness: A New Concept of Egoism''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|  &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|separation of powers&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the fundamental insight underlying the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|shotgun marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|pregnancy =&amp;gt; get married.  Think of someone besides yourself for a change.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|show trial&lt;br /&gt;
|1937&lt;br /&gt;
|trials, especially in communist countries, which have preordained outcomes but are used for propaganda purposes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sidewalk counseling&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice of volunteers exercising their right of [[free speech]] to advise women against [[abortion]] as they walk on sidewalks toward abortion clinics; liberals have passed laws to restrict and [[censorship|censor]] this&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|silent majority&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by President [[Richard Nixon]] in his speech to the nation on Nov. 3, 1969&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://watergate.info/nixon/silent-majority-speech-1969.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|skullduggery&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|underhanded or unscrupulous behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|slippery slope&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|term has been widely used for decades to expose the fallacy of &amp;quot;it doesn't hurt to try&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|something intended to disguise or draw attention away from an often embarrassing or unpleasant issue. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/smoke%20and%20mirrors Smoke and Mirrors, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Widely used during the 1990s to describe [[Bill Clinton]]'s political strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke-filled room&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term describing how a few political insiders sometimes pick a candidate or make a decision in a secret room (in the old days, filled with cigar smoke)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoking gun&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|a law-and-order term, &amp;quot;smoking gun&amp;quot; was first used as figurative term in a reported judicial decision in ''Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp.'', 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12775 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 1975), and many literal uses of the term in court decisions before that!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soapbox&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|staging for a typically liberal, unproductive rant having little substance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soccer mom&lt;br /&gt;
|1987&lt;br /&gt;
|a mother who devotes herself to her children's activities and a significant voting bloc or demographic group&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[socialist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who advocates government control over the economy, and particularly state control of the means of production&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|social justice rhetoric&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|Language and rhetorical ploys equating equality of outcome with justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spend-and-tax&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/02/morning-bell-the-obama-tax-and-spend-economy-is-here/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a variation on &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; (see below), &amp;quot;spend-and-tax&amp;quot; consists of spending the money first and then trying to justify raising taxes based on the deficit created by the spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spin doctor&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|someone ensuring that others interpret an event from a particular point of view.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/world/asia/22policy.html?_r=2 General Petraeus describes Axelrod by Bob Woodward]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spot-on&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|precisely correct, as in a prediction or in overcoming imprecision in a challenging task; its origin is from the military &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|squirrelly&lt;br /&gt;
|1928&lt;br /&gt;
|like a squirrel; jumpy and unpredictable; as in liberals get squirrelly when confronted with facts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[stagflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|inflation ''and'' high [[unemployment]] ''and'' stagnant demand by consumers, typically due to [[liberal]] policies as in the late 1970s under President [[Jimmy Carter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stalking horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1788&lt;br /&gt;
|a candidate or issue that serves to increase the chances that ''another'' will win, as in &amp;quot;antifederalists attempted to win elections by using 'the stalking horse of amendments.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Centinel'', 1788 (quoted in ''The Federalist party in Massachusetts to the year 1800'', By Anson Ely Morse).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[statism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|advocates for centralized government and government ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straightforward&lt;br /&gt;
|1806&lt;br /&gt;
|something liberals are not&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straw man&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|an imaginary argument or example set up for the purpose of easily knocking down, while distracting from valid arguments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Stupaked&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|hurt by someone who reassured everyone he would do the right thing, but then switched at the last minute to do the opposite (refers especially to [[abortion betrayal]]s)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Columnist Kathleen Parker is credited with first coining this term.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[subsidiarity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1936&lt;br /&gt;
|the concept (opposed by liberals) that responsibilities performed by local or subordinate organizations should not be usurped by centralized government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|supply-side&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|the economic theory that reducing taxes expands economic activity by encouraging greater earnings and investments; proven successful during the Reagan Administration in the 1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|takeover&lt;br /&gt;
|1917&lt;br /&gt;
|as in the takeover of government by the communist revolution in that year&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tax-and-spend&lt;br /&gt;
|1937 &lt;br /&gt;
|not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster, it is included in dictionary.com and it means the liberal policy of raising taxes and increasing government spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|taxpayer&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|the word highlights who is really paying for things&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tea party&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|an amorphous group of ordinary citizens unified against a more expensive government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Tebowing&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|bending on one knee in public to give glory to God (named after [[pro-life]] [[NFL]] [[QB]] [[Tim Tebow]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[term limits]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe this is not in the dictionary yet? Merriam-Webster omits it, but dictionary.com has it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/term+limit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|terrorism&lt;br /&gt;
|1795&lt;br /&gt;
|this was during the French Revolution&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[textualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|first used by Justice [[Robert Jackson]] in his influential concurrence in ''[[Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer]]'', 343 U.S. 579 (1952), it now describes the legal philosophy of Justice [[Antonin Scalia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[think tank]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1940s&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in [[Britain]] to describe intelligence organizations that helped the military, think tanks became part of the rise of conservatism in the 1970s and 1980s; is ''Conservapedia'' the think tank of the future?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|top-notch&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest quality, which requires respect for merit to recognize&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|term which identifies the similarities of fascist and communist regimes and ideologies and urges resistance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tour de force&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|a feat of skill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trademark&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|extends the concept of private property to the marks used by business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalist&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;adherence to the doctrines or practices of a tradition...the beliefs of those opposed to modernism, liberalism, or radicalism&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/traditionalist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transaction cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|Economist [[Ronald Coase]] won a [[Nobel Prize]] for this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transistor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|named by John R. Pierce and developed at the [[conservative]] [[Bell Labs]], this invention epitomized Yankee ingenuity; Pierce was a critic of claims of [[artificial intelligence]] and was the future developer of [[Telstar]], a precursor to the [[Strategic Defense Initiative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tree huggers&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|still not recognized by the dictionary, this term criticizes extreme environmentalists, but they proudly use the term also to describe what they literally do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trivia&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|insignificant detail, which can sometimes obscure what is important and distract people from the Bible; liberal [[Wikipedia]] is filled with trivial junk&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Trojan horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1837&lt;br /&gt;
|describes a type of liberal [[deceit]]:  subversion from within&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trust but verify&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as the approach to use towards communist [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ugly duckling&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|an unpromising appearance but often with great unseen potential&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ultra vires&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|beyond the authority, especially of a government or corporate official&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unborn child&lt;br /&gt;
|1791&lt;br /&gt;
|the rights of the unborn child have been recognized in English law since the 1600s, but the specific term &amp;quot;unborn child&amp;quot; itself may have been first used by an attorney arguing before the New Jersey Supreme Court in ''Den v. Sparks'', 1 N.J.L. 67 (Sup. Ct. 1791)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underachiever&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|a typically liberal person who fails to accomplish what he could&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underdog&lt;br /&gt;
|1887&lt;br /&gt;
|[[David]] v. [[Goliath]], [[Cinderella]], [[best of the public]], etc.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[underemployed]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1908&lt;br /&gt;
|having less than full-time or suitable employment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[underwater basket weaving]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Mid 1950's&lt;br /&gt;
|A pejorative that describes worthless college courses and a declining educational system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unscripted&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|speaking sincerely without parroting a script; &amp;quot;[[Rand Paul]] and [[Chris Christie]] are effective because, unlike [[Obama]], they are unscripted.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unsung hero&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who accomplishes good without receiving recognition for it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|useful idiot&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=135140 Attributed originally to Lenin], but since used by others like [[Nobel Prize]] winner (Literature) Doris Lessing to describe how she was manipulated by the [[communists]]: “I was taken around and shown things as a ‘useful idiot’... that’s what my role was. I can’t understand why I was so gullible.” [http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/documentaries/2010/07/100624_doc_useful_idiots_lenin.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Sample usage:  &amp;quot;There are not as many useful idiots on college campuses for the Obama reelection campaign in 2012 as there were in 2008, and it's doubtful he can fill a stadium rally unless the campaign pays students to attend.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vandalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&lt;br /&gt;
|malicious destruction of someone else's property&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|veracity&lt;br /&gt;
|1623&lt;br /&gt;
|devotion to truthfulness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vet&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2199254/?from=rss&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a verb meaning to screen for flaws&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[victimization]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|volunteer&lt;br /&gt;
|1618&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who freely offers to help&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wannabe&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a word that criticizes liberal [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|War on Terror&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|no listing at Merriam-Webster February 2, 2009 Obama ends use of the conservative lexicon. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pewforum.org/news/display.php?NewsID=17455 Obama administration drops 'war on terror' phrase] Pew Forum, February 2, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|washed-up&lt;br /&gt;
|1928&lt;br /&gt;
|no longer productive, as in &amp;quot;the washed-up liberal professor has not contributed anything to his field in 30 years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|waterloo&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|a final defeat or setback, coined merely one year after the [[English]] defeated [[Napoleon]] at the [[Battle of Waterloo]]; there has never been a &amp;quot;waterloo&amp;quot; for [[Christianity]] or [[conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wildcatter&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-energy term that describes someone who drills for oil in fields not known to have oil&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wishy-washy&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;An archaic meaning of poor quality dates to 1690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|easily changing in opinion, usually due to peer pressure&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|word poverty&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/summer2001/lang_gap_moats.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President [[George W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work (physical sense)&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|a physical measure&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;force times distance&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of effort used to increase energy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work ethic&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|a habit of working as a moral good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|workaholic&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by a Southern Baptist pastor to describe the work habits of himself and other ministers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2000/01/02/magazine/the-lives-they-lived-on-language-wordplayers.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|worldview&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|a comprehensive way of looking at life and the world; sometimes used to criticize a liberal's irrational belief system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Yankee&lt;br /&gt;
|1758   &lt;br /&gt;
|Inhabitants of New England, United States. Dutch slang in 1698- Americanized 50 years later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Yankee Ingenuity&lt;br /&gt;
|1761&lt;br /&gt;
|America's inhabitants had a knack for clever design and capitalist success. The early Americans had applied their exceptional skills prior to the terms existence, see [[Eli Whitney]] and [[Benjamin   Franklin]]. &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|yellow journalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice, started by newspaper publishers Joseph Pulitzer and his rival William Randolph Hearst, of sensationalizing and biasing newspaper headlines and articles in order to influence public opinion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative Words Not Yet Recognized by the Dictionary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thousand new words are developed in English each year.  Here is a growing list of conservative concepts, each of which is not yet defined by a single word or two.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Not Yet Recognized Terms&lt;br /&gt;
!Suggestions&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pre-9/11 thinking&lt;br /&gt;
|9/10 mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|terror is jurisdiction of the courts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anti-family&lt;br /&gt;
|tradition opposer, familiopathic&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blame shift&lt;br /&gt;
|false accusations&lt;br /&gt;
|e.g., guns blamed for an increasing murder rate&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|buycott&lt;br /&gt;
|counter support&lt;br /&gt;
|An effort to cooperate and promote an organization or a process to nullify campaigns that are targeted by boycott protests.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|causing harm by spreading falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|deceit&lt;br /&gt;
|e.g., denying or concealing disease and infertility caused by promiscuity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Constitutional values&lt;br /&gt;
|adherence to righteousness as set forth by the [[Founding Fathers]]&lt;br /&gt;
|principles set in the Declaration&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Counterfeit Marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|uncivil union&lt;br /&gt;
|Manipulating Man's laws by usurping God's laws.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cradle to grave &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/spanish/from%20cradle%20to%20grave cradle to grave- no entry found] Merriam-Websters&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|sanctity of life, conception to natural death&lt;br /&gt;
|pro-life stance, also can mean socialist entitlement programs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cut and run&lt;br /&gt;
|surrender advocates&lt;br /&gt;
|when the going gets tough, run away from the problem&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|debtucation&lt;br /&gt;
|tuition noose&lt;br /&gt;
|College student debt is now larger than credit card debt in the US&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deliberate ignorance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|mind-locked, self-centered pride obscuring the truth&lt;br /&gt;
|the term exists; the dictionary does not yet include it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|denial that [[Hell]] exists&lt;br /&gt;
|Hell-denier? Antinfernal? (Should be &amp;quot;antihadessic&amp;quot; so as not to mix Hellenate and Latinate roots)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[abstinence denial|denier of the effectiveness of abstinence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|abstinence-denier?&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|drive-by media&lt;br /&gt;
|partisan slander&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal mainstream media assault on the GOP or conservative principles, deceitful attacks for opposing viewpoints&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[earmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|spending on specific projects at the request of a particular congressman, and without meaningful examination by others voting on it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|easily amused by [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|dolophile&lt;br /&gt;
|from Greek/Latin root ''dolo-'' meaning guile, deceit, deception [http://www.wordinfo.info/words/index/info/view_unit/664]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|family-friendly&lt;br /&gt;
|wholesome&lt;br /&gt;
|describes TV programming, websites, social events that are not offensive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Fleebagger&lt;br /&gt;
|Oath breakers&lt;br /&gt;
|Describes [[liberal]] politicians who avoid their sworn duties as a way to advance their political agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hatred of one's country, refusal to recognize the good elements of it, or unreasonably critical of it&lt;br /&gt;
|misopatria, misopatrist&lt;br /&gt;
|From Greek ''misein'', to hate, and Latin ''patria'', nation or homeland&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heavenly body&lt;br /&gt;
|celestial body&lt;br /&gt;
|natural objects visible in the sky&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hellbound&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|recognized by over 1.3 million sites in a Google search and no substitute term is available, yet dictionaries refuse to recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hoax and Chains&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Keynesian economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|a phonetic play on the rhetoric slogan of Hope and Change. Hope replaced by unemployment and Change represents obsessive tax burdens. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hoax plant&lt;br /&gt;
|fake townhall, kkk teaparty&lt;br /&gt;
|a term to describe a deceitful method of placing an operative that appears to be part of a group in order to push an agenda or to make a competing agenda look ridiculous. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Hollywood values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|West Coast Hedonism &lt;br /&gt;
|Over 800,000 results on Google, not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|homo-fascist &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=1318230 LaBarbera: Apple's action stems from 'homo-facism', OneNewsNow, March 25, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|LGBT Stormtrooper, Gay-vangelist&lt;br /&gt;
|Guardians of gender identity ideology&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Illegal Alien|illegal alien]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|widely used in court decisions and political discourse for years, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it is as a term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ineptocracy&lt;br /&gt;
|circle of failure&lt;br /&gt;
|a government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|infotainment&lt;br /&gt;
|tabloid news, dramacast&lt;br /&gt;
|mainstream media presents drama fluff stories as news, e.g. 20/20 - Datelin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[limited government]]&lt;br /&gt;
|we the people democracy&lt;br /&gt;
|first testament to this was the [[U.S. Constitution]], defining [[Reagan]]s presidency, can't be found in Merriam-Websters. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/limited%20government Limited government - Not found] Merriam-Webster's&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|manufactured outrage&lt;br /&gt;
|fake tears &lt;br /&gt;
|liberal politicians and the liberal media's method of stroking anger to pursue an agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|media vigilantism&lt;br /&gt;
|soviet-style censorship&lt;br /&gt;
|media's public campaign to demonize dissent against people or groups, such as [[Juan Williams]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Mediscare&lt;br /&gt;
|fear card&lt;br /&gt;
|Democrats opposed to entitlement reform use fear to stop changes to Medicare&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|merit pay&lt;br /&gt;
|performance bonus&lt;br /&gt;
|Doing your job better with perks as a reward. The typical liberal union teacher avoids merit pay at all costs, self before students. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[militant gays]]&lt;br /&gt;
|intimidating homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|modern idolatry&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;media idolatry&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;money idolatry&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;celebrity idolatry&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|idolatry conjures images of golden calves, and a modern version is needed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moral fabric&lt;br /&gt;
|domestic tranquility&lt;br /&gt;
|ethics and virtues united for the common good of all&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|morally bankrupt&lt;br /&gt;
|[[atheism]], self-void  &lt;br /&gt;
|ethically and spiritually challenged souls&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|narrative hysteria&lt;br /&gt;
|delusional finger-pointing&lt;br /&gt;
|a frantic attempt to capitalize on calamity by casting their opponents as somehow responsible for an act of madness and evil&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|opposite of [[global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|regional warming&lt;br /&gt;
|the North pole shrinks as the South pole increases&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|opposite of [[materialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritualism and idealism have been its philosophical opposites, historically&lt;br /&gt;
|[[dualism]] has been suggested, but it is not the ''opposite'' of [[materialism]]; &amp;quot;spiritualism&amp;quot; is not a common term and is the &amp;quot;opposite&amp;quot; of materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[peer pressure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|used in titles to professional journal articles as early as 1994&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe that isn't recognized by Merriam-Webster?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proven wrong, a refusal to admit it&lt;br /&gt;
|mulism; heel-digger?&lt;br /&gt;
|cf. mulish. This refusal is what promoted the [[Parable of the Good Samaritan]]. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|religious right&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian conservatives&lt;br /&gt;
|religion in America almost exclusively a conservative institution, no religious left term in existence.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reward failure&lt;br /&gt;
|TARP &lt;br /&gt;
|too big to fail, bailout bankrupt, mismanagement subsidized &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rewrite history &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/rewrite%20history  rewrite history not found, Merriam-Websters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deceit]], mislead &lt;br /&gt;
|Commonly used term describing liberal deceit to hide, defraud others about factual history.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rogue states&lt;br /&gt;
|rogue nations&lt;br /&gt;
|nations defying international law, only rogue is listed in Merriman-Websters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|runaway jury&lt;br /&gt;
|The term has existed for decades, but Merriam-Webster has not recognized it yet.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rule of Law&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[schlockumentary]]&lt;br /&gt;
|propaganda film&lt;br /&gt;
|documentary films based on falsehoods and half-truths&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[Second generation atheist|second-generation atheist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|cradle atheist&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|selective outrage&lt;br /&gt;
|partisan hypocrisy, bipolar&lt;br /&gt;
|to be against something to further a cause and reject, stay silent, ignore or discount something similar. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smear merchant&lt;br /&gt;
|serial slander&lt;br /&gt;
|to constantly hurl degrading or false accusations against others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|strict constructionism&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|an important term for over 200 years to describe adherence to the text of the Constitution, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Conservative| Traditional Values]]&lt;br /&gt;
| principles of Conservatism&lt;br /&gt;
|much the same as family values but incorporating all aspects society; family, religion, self-sufficiency, the truth, hard work. Only listed in Merriam-Websters to describe what Nilihism is against. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|true emergency&lt;br /&gt;
|life support&lt;br /&gt;
|meaning a high probability of serious injury or death to an individual or property. Emergency has been watered down, e.g. to be locked out of one's car.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Unaffected by, or impervious to, the media&lt;br /&gt;
|mediaproof&lt;br /&gt;
|cf. bulletproof. ''Once John became aware of the extent of [[liberal deceit]], he set about mediaproofing his mind''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terms Difficult to Classify ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These new terms are difficult to classify:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[affirmative action|affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|first used in [http://www.thecre.com/fedlaw/legal6/eo10925.htm JFK's Executive Order 10925] in 1961 and subsequently promoted by [[LBJ]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Americanism&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|Originally, a phrase unique to American English, later, loyalty to America and its principles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bipartisan&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|emphasized by liberals when they are in the minority in power, but ignored by liberals when they are the majority in power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colonist&lt;br /&gt;
|1701&lt;br /&gt;
|settlers of a new country&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|compartmentalize&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|compartmentalizing the Bible away from knowledge and education leads to ignorance and despair&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|contrarian&lt;br /&gt;
|1657&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who delights in taking a position contrary to others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|eclectic&lt;br /&gt;
|1683&lt;br /&gt;
|taking the best from among different styles or ideas; compare [[best of the public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|evangelism&lt;br /&gt;
|1620-30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;isms&amp;quot; are usually pejorative, though this acquired a positive meaning over time, and perhaps from the outset&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|genetics&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|perhaps this should be on the conservative list?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|identity politics&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|exploiting racial, ethnic, gender alliances for political gain&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inane&lt;br /&gt;
|1662&lt;br /&gt;
|refers to comments, often made by liberals, that are utterly devoid of substance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|junk legislation&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|used initially by liberals to complain about the lack of meaningful legislation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1635-1645&lt;br /&gt;
|conservative?&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|multitasking&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|performing multiple tasks all at once&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|polar coordinates&lt;br /&gt;
|1694&lt;br /&gt;
|Newton may have used it earlier&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|republican&lt;br /&gt;
|1685&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reverse engineer&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|to deconstruct a product (or software) in order to understand how it works, often with the purpose of copying it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scrooge&lt;br /&gt;
|1843&lt;br /&gt;
|the main character in Charles Dickens' ''A Christmas Carol''; the story is based on materialism and is often used as a substitute for the Biblical account, but charity is a conservative value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|describes the use of deceit, particularly in politics; probably a conservative term, but will await more etymology about it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soapbox&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|now used pejoratively, but probably not initially when it was a way for the public to participate&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|states' rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1790&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals often invoke this too; Democrats were its biggest champions in the 1800s (in connection with slavery), and even today on issues like legalizing drugs and same-sex marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|technocrat&lt;br /&gt;
|1932&lt;br /&gt;
|technical expert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|telecommute&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term was in the British magazine ''The Economist''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a combination of a Greek root (&amp;quot;tele&amp;quot;, which means &amp;quot;far off&amp;quot;) and a Latin root (&amp;quot;commutare&amp;quot;, which means &amp;quot;to exchange&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tomfoolery&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|playful or foolish behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;beliefs of those opposed to [[modernism]], [[liberalism]], or [[radicalism]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[twilight zone]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|the realm of imagination that seems impossible but is difficult to disprove, and which challenges ordinary views of reality; also the terminator between night and day on a planetary body&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Whip&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In its political usage.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|late 1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|An elected position in each political party for the legislator responsible for gathering and confirming support for the party position on particular bills.  This term is derived from &amp;quot;whipper-in,&amp;quot; which in fox-hunting refers to the man who prevents hunting dogs from straying amid a chase.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2010/11/durbin_re-elected_number_two_s.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wiki&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|a website (or website software) that facilitates contributions and corrections by the public&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|working class&lt;br /&gt;
|1789&lt;br /&gt;
|those who work regular, 40-hour weeks in manual labor, such as factory jobs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Downgraded Conservative Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These conservative terms are less significant:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|byzantine&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The usage here -- in sense of complex governmental rules -- probably developed later.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|connive&lt;br /&gt;
|1601&lt;br /&gt;
|to pretend ignorance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|eleemosynary&lt;br /&gt;
|1616&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to charity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entropy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|disorder&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[filibuster]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1851&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incandescent&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|bright and radiant, conquering darkness, precursor to the invention of the incandescent lamp (light bulb)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|jabberwocky&lt;br /&gt;
|1902&lt;br /&gt;
|talking nonsense&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|luddite&lt;br /&gt;
|1811&lt;br /&gt;
|one who opposes and even destroys technological advances&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|media&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[milquetoast]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|timid and unassertive; easily persuaded or exploited; inspired by Caspar Milquetoast, the unassertive character in &amp;quot;The Timid Soul&amp;quot; cartoon strip by Harold T. Webster, which ran in the New York Herald Tribune on Sundays beginning in 1924.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|normalcy&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|related to the election of [[Warren G. Harding]] by the largest margin yet in history&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ne'er-do-well&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;an idle worthless person&amp;quot; - Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reticent&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|restrained in expression, presentation, or appearance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-indulgence&lt;br /&gt;
|1753&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smart aleck&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|an obnoxiously conceited and self-assertive person with pretensions to being superior to others. Etymology: Aleck, nickname for Alexander &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/smart%20alec Smart Aleck Merriam-Websters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ Merriam-Webster dictionary]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dictionary.reference.com/ Dictionary.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Conservapedia's Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:New Liberal Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Surprising Dates of Origin for Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Linguistic Analysis of Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Bible Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Secularized Language‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservapedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toadaron</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>