From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jpatt (Talk | contribs) at 22:41, 22 November 2011. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

Bias has more than one meaning. As such, this article is merely a disambiguation page, listing articles associated with Bias.

If you were linked to this page from another article, feel free to edit that article to make it point at the correct entry.

Bias has numerous meanings. It literally means diagonal or slant.


Bias is a DC voltage level added to an AC signal which is to be amplified. This is done to put the AC signal within the amplifying transistor's linear operating area.

Bias is also a name for a high-frequency sine wave added to an audio signal as part of the process of magnetic tape recording; it eliminates distortion that would otherwise be caused by magnetic hysteresis.


Bias means flaws in the collection, analysis or interpretation of research data that lead to incorrect conclusions.[1]


A bias is sometimes defined as a violation of a normative standard. For example, the fact that people will be less likely to trade an object they already have for another one--regardless of which object they initially possess--violates the normative standard that preference for an object should not be swayed by what is already possessed.

Studies of biases in psychology have shown that many principles assumed in economics are incorrect (Kahneman 2003) by illustrating that the notion of a free rational agent is idealistic.


In works describing a potentially controversial topic, bias refers to the tendency of an author who holds a particular viewpoint to express that viewpoint (whether intentionally or subconsciously) in his work. This typically goes against the ideal of compendiums which are meant to be neutral, such as encyclopedias. For example, if an article on abortion is written by someone who supports it, it will likely be biased towards that viewpoint, and vice versa.


  • ... far too much historical scholarship consists of contorting the evidence to fit ideological models. The worst examples of such contortions are the Nazi and Communist histories of the early- and mid-twentieth century. [1]

See also