Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:AFD Islam and tolerance"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The article in question is a single qoute, without any context. The alternative is to move it into templatespace. [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 16:41, 5 July 2013 (EDT)
 
The article in question is a single qoute, without any context. The alternative is to move it into templatespace. [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 16:41, 5 July 2013 (EDT)
 
:Let me quote the CP Commandments: "Any content you create or change [...] must be family-friendly, clean, '''concise''', and without gossip or foul language. [emphasis added]". It manages to succinctly summarize a complex subject with a few short sentences, rather than engaging in excessive [[Talk pollution|liberal jibbar jabbar]]. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 16:52, 5 July 2013 (EDT)
 
:Let me quote the CP Commandments: "Any content you create or change [...] must be family-friendly, clean, '''concise''', and without gossip or foul language. [emphasis added]". It manages to succinctly summarize a complex subject with a few short sentences, rather than engaging in excessive [[Talk pollution|liberal jibbar jabbar]]. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 16:52, 5 July 2013 (EDT)
 +
::Indeed, but articles should also be useful by themselves. In this case, it is not. [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 17:03, 5 July 2013 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:03, 5 July 2013

The article in question is a single qoute, without any context. The alternative is to move it into templatespace. brenden 16:41, 5 July 2013 (EDT)

Let me quote the CP Commandments: "Any content you create or change [...] must be family-friendly, clean, concise, and without gossip or foul language. [emphasis added]". It manages to succinctly summarize a complex subject with a few short sentences, rather than engaging in excessive liberal jibbar jabbar. - Markman 16:52, 5 July 2013 (EDT)
Indeed, but articles should also be useful by themselves. In this case, it is not. brenden 17:03, 5 July 2013 (EDT)