Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:About"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(what kind is that, exactly?)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Well, I'm going to assume economic bias, unless I hear otherwise, and change the page accordingly.
 
Well, I'm going to assume economic bias, unless I hear otherwise, and change the page accordingly.
 +
 +
==What kind?==
 +
 +
"Conservapedia is rapidly becoming one of the largest and most reliable online educational resources of its kind."
 +
 +
What kind is this, exactly? Is it the kind of source that has an inherent bias and slant towards a point of view? Because in my readings of CP articles, there hardly seems to be an attempt to be factually correct and completely bias-free...    – [[User:frijole|Fʀɪ<small>ɺ</small>øʟɛ]] <sub>( [[User_talk:Frijole|тɐʟк]] • [[Special:Contributions/Frijole|¢<small>ʘ</small>и†ʀ¡<small>β</small>s]] )</sub> 12:58, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:58, 13 March 2007

Is that "LIBERAL BIAS" economic or social?

Well, I'm going to assume economic bias, unless I hear otherwise, and change the page accordingly.

What kind?

"Conservapedia is rapidly becoming one of the largest and most reliable online educational resources of its kind."

What kind is this, exactly? Is it the kind of source that has an inherent bias and slant towards a point of view? Because in my readings of CP articles, there hardly seems to be an attempt to be factually correct and completely bias-free... – Fʀɪɺøʟɛ ( тɐʟк¢ʘи†ʀ¡βs ) 12:58, 13 March 2007 (EDT)