Difference between revisions of "Convention of States"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(s)
m (Reverted edits by TheMathematical (talk) to last revision by 1990'sguy)
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
This was a decline in momentum from the prior year, 2014, in which three states had passed "convention of states" resolutions (Florida, Georgia, and Alaska).
 
This was a decline in momentum from the prior year, 2014, in which three states had passed "convention of states" resolutions (Florida, Georgia, and Alaska).
It is known that numerous countries around the world are utilizing this system. G
 
I
 
M
 
M
 
I
 
C
 
K
 
  
 
== History ==
 
== History ==

Revision as of 00:13, November 29, 2016

Convention of States (COS) is a variation on the discredited idea of a Con Con, by attempting to change the U.S. Constitution by holding a convention of delegates. The Convention of States is a gimmick which in the best case is merely a waste of time, but in the worst case could enable liberals to rewrite the Constitution.

After years of effort, the Convention of States had passed in only six states as of April 20, 2016: Alabama, Alaska, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, and Tennessee. Even then, some of their resolutions differed from each other, casting doubt on whether they can be counted together. A total of 34 states are needed under the U.S. Constitution before Congress could call a new constitutional convention.

Opponents

(add to list)

2015

In the calendar year 2015, only one state legislature, Alabama, had passed the gimmick of a "convention of states" as of May 23, 2015. Proposals for a convention of states failed in the following state legislatures in 2015:

Arizona, Missouri, South Carolina, Montana, South Dakota, New Hampshire, Virginia, Utah, Indiana, West Virginia, Wyoming, Kentucky, North Dakota, Nevada, and Pennsylvania (no vote in Pennsylvania).

This was a decline in momentum from the prior year, 2014, in which three states had passed "convention of states" resolutions (Florida, Georgia, and Alaska).

History

On December 8, 2013, perhaps 100 state legislators from more than 30 states secretly met at Mount Vernon in Virginia to hatch their plan for another Con Con. Some of these state legislators have themselves voted to increase taxes, and yet insist that a rewriting of the Constitution is necessary to rein in government spending. If the idea is so great, then why do the legislators keep their identities secret?

The meeting may remind historians of the Hartford Convention, by which Federalist Party members caused the demise of their own political party.

No genuine movement conservatives have supported this dangerous scheme, and many vocally oppose it. Outspoken opponents of attempts to convene a Con Con include: Eagle Forum, Gun Owners of America, National Rifle Association, the Conservative Caucus, the American Legion, Daughters of the American Revolution, Sons of the American Revolution, Veterans of Foreign Wars, and General Conference of Seventh Day Adventists. Here are some resolutions by several of these groups in the past:

"Resolved, By The American Legion in National Convention assembled in San Antonio, Texas, August 25, 26, 27, 1987, That it states its opposition to efforts to convene a Constitutional Convention for any purpose and specifically opposes the rewriting of the United States Constitution."

"Resolved, by the 85th National Convention of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, that we oppose any attempt to call a Constitutional Convention, as this would give our enemies from within and without the opportunity to destroy our Nation." Resolution No. 449, Adopted by the 85th National Convention of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States held in Chicago, Illinois, August 17–24, 1984.

"Resolved, That members of the National Society Daughters of the American Revolution oppose efforts to rewrite the Constitution by Constitutional Convention." Adopted by the DAR Continental Congress, April 1986, Washington, D.C.

"Resolved, By the eligible voting members at the 1992 Annual Meeting of the National Rifle Association of America held in Salt Lake City on the 25th of April, 1992, that we oppose any attempt to call for a Constitutional Convention for any purpose whatsoever because it cannot be limited to a single issue and that our right to keep and bear arms can be seriously eroded."

Liberal Roots

A collection of left-leaning organizations met on April 8–10, 2005, at a conference called "The Constitution in 2020," held at Yale Law School. Perhaps as many as three of the five organizations which hosted the event were apparently recipients of funding from George Soros. A list of sponsors of that convention are:

  • The American Constitution Society
  • The Arthur Liman Public Interest Program at Yale
  • The Open Society Institute
  • The Center for American Progress
  • The Yale Law School

Supporters today of the gimmick of a Convention of the States include:

"Make history"[2] appears to be the motto, rather than engaging in grassroots conservatism using the timeless Constitution that has worked so well for more than 200 years.

References

  1. Conference on the Constitutional Convention, co-sponsored by Lessig
  2. http://www.conventionofstates.com/news/reflections-mt-vernon-assembly