Difference between revisions of "Cooper v. Aaron"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
'''''Cooper v. Aaron''''', 358 U.S. 1 (1958), was an assertion by the [[Warren Court]] that the federal judiciary, and the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], was "supreme in the exposition of the law of the Constitution."  This was the a raw power grab by the Supreme Court of authority over the other two branches of government, and unnecessary to the resolution of the dispute in that case.
+
'''''Cooper v. Aaron''''', 358 U.S. 1 (1958), was an assertion by the [[Warren Court]] that the federal judiciary and the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] was "supreme in the exposition of the law of the Constitution."  This was a raw power grab by the Supreme Court of authority over the other two branches of government, as well as unnecessary to the resolution of the dispute in that case.
  
 
[[category:law]]
 
[[category:law]]
 
[[category:judicial activism]]
 
[[category:judicial activism]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

Revision as of 17:24, October 15, 2008

Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958), was an assertion by the Warren Court that the federal judiciary and the U.S. Supreme Court was "supreme in the exposition of the law of the Constitution." This was a raw power grab by the Supreme Court of authority over the other two branches of government, as well as unnecessary to the resolution of the dispute in that case.