Difference between revisions of "Debate:Does the Resurrection negate Gods Sacrifice of his only son?"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(No)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==No==
 
==No==
 
Not at all. In fact the two go together... God's wrath being poured out on Jesus Christ, who was bearing our sin willingly. Then, conquering death, which was the last enemy to conquer, He rose bodily from the dead. If He was not risen, that means basically everyone in the New Testament, including Jesus Himself, was a liar. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 15:31, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
 
Not at all. In fact the two go together... God's wrath being poured out on Jesus Christ, who was bearing our sin willingly. Then, conquering death, which was the last enemy to conquer, He rose bodily from the dead. If He was not risen, that means basically everyone in the New Testament, including Jesus Himself, was a liar. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 15:31, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
If he rose was resurrected from death what was the sacrifice.[[User:Rebiu|Rebiu]] 16:15, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
  
 
==Yes==
 
==Yes==
  
 
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
 
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]

Revision as of 15:15, 31 March 2007

No

Not at all. In fact the two go together... God's wrath being poured out on Jesus Christ, who was bearing our sin willingly. Then, conquering death, which was the last enemy to conquer, He rose bodily from the dead. If He was not risen, that means basically everyone in the New Testament, including Jesus Himself, was a liar. --Ymmotrojam 15:31, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

If he rose was resurrected from death what was the sacrifice.Rebiu 16:15, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

Yes