Difference between revisions of "Epistle of James"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(improved)
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Epistle of James''' refers to the writings of James, son of Alpheus, the [[Bishop]] of [[Jerusalem]], the [[Lord]]'s brother and one of the [[twelve Apostles]].  It may be one of the earliest written works of the [[New Testament]], possibly as early as the late 40s.  The authenticity of this work as having been inspired has been fully accepted since at least the third century, as demonstrated by the various lists of the Sacred books drawn up since the fourth century.<ref>[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08275b.htm Epistle of St. James] Catholic  Encyclopedia</ref>
+
'''Epistle of James''' refers to the writings of James, son of Alpheus, the [[Bishop]] of [[Jerusalem]], the [[Lord]]'s brother and one of the [[twelve Apostles]].  It may be one of the earliest written works of the [[New Testament]], possibly as early as the late 40s.  There is reason to conclude that this letter was written prior to the Jerusalem Council, which was held in A.D. 50.  The authenticity of this inspired work has been fully accepted since at least the third century, as demonstrated by the various lists of the Sacred books drawn up since the fourth century,<ref>[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08275b.htm Epistle of St. James] Catholic  Encyclopedia</ref> although debate continues about who actually wrote it.
  
The quality of the Greek in the Epistle of James is relatively high compared with the Greek spoken by the Apostles.
+
In support of James as the author, as the Epistle indicates, is its simplicity of introduction of the author (who would be familiar to all) and linguistic similarities between this Epistle and a speech given by James in [[Acts of the Apostles]] chapter 15.
 +
 
 +
The quality of the Greek in the Epistle of James is higher than the Greek written by Apostles, which further suggests that this Epistle was written by a relative of Jesus rather than by an average disciple.  The only higher form of Greek in the New Testament is the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], which may have been written by Jesus himself.
  
 
== Martin Luther ==
 
== Martin Luther ==
Line 12: Line 14:
 
*[https://www.biblicaltraining.org/library/epistle-james Biblical training - analysis]
 
*[https://www.biblicaltraining.org/library/epistle-james Biblical training - analysis]
  
 +
== References ==
 +
{{reflist}}
 
{{New Testament Books}}
 
{{New Testament Books}}
 
== References ==
 
<references/>
 
 
 
[[Category:Biblical Books]]
 
[[Category:Biblical Books]]
 
[[Category:New Testament Books]]
 
[[Category:New Testament Books]]

Revision as of 22:38, May 14, 2017

Epistle of James refers to the writings of James, son of Alpheus, the Bishop of Jerusalem, the Lord's brother and one of the twelve Apostles. It may be one of the earliest written works of the New Testament, possibly as early as the late 40s. There is reason to conclude that this letter was written prior to the Jerusalem Council, which was held in A.D. 50. The authenticity of this inspired work has been fully accepted since at least the third century, as demonstrated by the various lists of the Sacred books drawn up since the fourth century,[1] although debate continues about who actually wrote it.

In support of James as the author, as the Epistle indicates, is its simplicity of introduction of the author (who would be familiar to all) and linguistic similarities between this Epistle and a speech given by James in Acts of the Apostles chapter 15.

The quality of the Greek in the Epistle of James is higher than the Greek written by Apostles, which further suggests that this Epistle was written by a relative of Jesus rather than by an average disciple. The only higher form of Greek in the New Testament is the Epistle to the Hebrews, which may have been written by Jesus himself.

Martin Luther

Martin Luther had difficulty with the Epistle of James as it did not easily fit his concept of justification by faith alone as James also seems to stress the importance of works. Nevertheless, he kept it as a part of the New Testament canon in Protestant Churches.

In the very early Universal Church years (1st and 2nd centuries A.D.), some of this work was disputed as to authenticity and scattered among churches.

See also

References

  1. Epistle of St. James Catholic Encyclopedia