Difference between revisions of "EvoWiki"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
EvoWiki is a failed wiki project that attempted to gain an internet audience by promoting evolutionary pseudoscience. It currently has no active editors. The website traffic tracking company Compete reported that as of August 20, 2012, EvoWiki had 771 unique visitors a month.<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/09/did-attempt-to-revive-evowiki-fail-is.html Did an attempt to revive EvoWiki fail? Is Google Panda mauling EvoWiki, Talk.Origins and atheist websites?]</ref><ref>[http://siteanalytics.compete.com/evolutionwiki.org/ Compete - EvoWiki]</ref>
+
'''EvoWiki''' is a failed wiki project that attempted to gain an internet audience by promoting [[evolution]]ary [[pseudoscience]]. It currently has no active editors. The website traffic tracking company Compete reported that as of August 20, 2012, EvoWiki had 771 unique visitors a month.<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/09/did-attempt-to-revive-evowiki-fail-is.html Did an attempt to revive EvoWiki fail? Is Google Panda mauling EvoWiki, Talk.Origins and atheist websites?]</ref><ref>[http://siteanalytics.compete.com/evolutionwiki.org/ Compete - EvoWiki]</ref>
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==

Revision as of 19:32, 19 September 2012

EvoWiki is a failed wiki project that attempted to gain an internet audience by promoting evolutionary pseudoscience. It currently has no active editors. The website traffic tracking company Compete reported that as of August 20, 2012, EvoWiki had 771 unique visitors a month.[1][2]

See also

References

  1. Did an attempt to revive EvoWiki fail? Is Google Panda mauling EvoWiki, Talk.Origins and atheist websites?
  2. Compete - EvoWiki