Difference between revisions of "Genetic engineering"
| (35 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | '''Genetic Engineering''' is the deliberate manipulation of an [[organism]]'s [[genetic]] material. | |
| − | + | Work done by American geneticist Barbara McClintock showed that [[gene|genes]] could jump between [[DNA]] strands. Biologists can now transfer genetic information from one organism to another. For example, genes that produce a protein that stops deep-water fish from freezing in the [[Antarctic]] can now be put into transgenic [[tomato]]es, [[potato]]es, and [[tobacco]], to make them more resistant to frost.<ref>http://www.biobasics.gc.ca/english/View.asp?x=795</ref> | |
| − | + | ==Controversy== | |
| + | *The shadow of [[eugenics]] hangs over today's debates about genetic engineering and enhancement. Critics of genetic engineering argue that human [[cloning]], enhancement, and the quest for designer children are nothing more than "privatized" or "free-market" eugenics. Defenders of enhancement reply that genetic choices freely made are not really eugenic-at least not in the pejorative sense. To remove the coercion, they argue, is to remove the very thing that makes eugenic policies repugnant. | ||
| + | *Sorting out the lesson of eugenics is another way of wrestling with the ethics of enhancement. The [[Nazis]] gave eugenics a bad name. But what, precisely, was wrong with it? Was the old eugenics objectionable only insofar as it was coercive? Or is there something inherently wrong with the resolve to deliberately design our progeny's traits? [http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:MoOFUWPq3V4J:web.mit.edu/writing/fee/2004_FEE_June_Readins.html] | ||
| − | + | ===Opinions in favor of genetic engineering=== | |
| + | Some people believe that modifying [[food]] crops to improve the [[vitamin]] content or make them resist [[drought]] or [[herbicide]]s will provide the world with more and better food. | ||
| − | + | Genetically engineered [[bacteria]] can produce human [[insulin]] for [[diabetes|diabetics]]. Scientists hope they will be able to use it in the future to cure DNA errors that cause illnesses such as [[muscular dystrophy]] and [[cystic fibrosis]]. Cures though, are not yet imminent. | |
| − | Other people believe we know far too little about the consequences of altering plants in a way that is impossible in nature. They think it is too high a risk to let such plants loose in the environment where they might cross-breed with other plants and cannot be recalled if it is clear that the effects are harmful. There have been suggestions that one of the causes of the dramatic drop in the population of [[bee|bees]] is the use in the USA of genetically-modified crops that are resistant to herbicides. | + | ===Opinions against genetic engineering=== |
| + | Other people believe we know far too little about the consequences of altering [[plants]] in a way that is impossible in nature. They think it is too high a risk to let such plants loose in the environment where they might cross-breed with other plants and cannot be recalled if it is clear that the effects are harmful. There have been suggestions that one of the causes of the dramatic drop in the population of [[bee|bees]] is the use in the USA of genetically-modified crops that are resistant to herbicides. | ||
Many people are worried that if people are ever designed genetically, the human race could change in ways we cannot foresee. Most countries still have laws to prevent scientists researching genetic engineering in humans. | Many people are worried that if people are ever designed genetically, the human race could change in ways we cannot foresee. Most countries still have laws to prevent scientists researching genetic engineering in humans. | ||
| − | [category: | + | |
| + | == Genetically Modified Organism == | ||
| + | A [[genetically modified organism]] ([[GMO]]) is an organism whose genetic material has been altered using genetic engineering techniques. Organisms that have been genetically modified include [[micro-organisms]] such as [[bacteria]] and [[yeast]], [[insects]], [[plant]]s, [[fish]], and [[mammal]]s. GMOs are the source of genetically modified foods, and are also widely used in scientific research and to produce goods other than food. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==See Also== | ||
| + | * [[Terminator seeds]] of [[Monsanto]] | ||
| + | * [[Permaculture]] and [[seed saving]] | ||
| + | * [[Seeds]] | ||
| + | * [[Agriculture]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==External Links== | ||
| + | *[http://ethics.wikia.com/wiki/Genetic_Engineering Genetic Engineering] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[category:Genetics]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Science]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Technology]] | ||
| + | [[Category:American Inventions]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Inventions]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Survivalism]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Permaculture]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Environmentalism]] | ||
Revision as of 04:28, December 12, 2014
Genetic Engineering is the deliberate manipulation of an organism's genetic material.
Work done by American geneticist Barbara McClintock showed that genes could jump between DNA strands. Biologists can now transfer genetic information from one organism to another. For example, genes that produce a protein that stops deep-water fish from freezing in the Antarctic can now be put into transgenic tomatoes, potatoes, and tobacco, to make them more resistant to frost.[1]
Contents
Controversy
- The shadow of eugenics hangs over today's debates about genetic engineering and enhancement. Critics of genetic engineering argue that human cloning, enhancement, and the quest for designer children are nothing more than "privatized" or "free-market" eugenics. Defenders of enhancement reply that genetic choices freely made are not really eugenic-at least not in the pejorative sense. To remove the coercion, they argue, is to remove the very thing that makes eugenic policies repugnant.
- Sorting out the lesson of eugenics is another way of wrestling with the ethics of enhancement. The Nazis gave eugenics a bad name. But what, precisely, was wrong with it? Was the old eugenics objectionable only insofar as it was coercive? Or is there something inherently wrong with the resolve to deliberately design our progeny's traits? [1]
Opinions in favor of genetic engineering
Some people believe that modifying food crops to improve the vitamin content or make them resist drought or herbicides will provide the world with more and better food.
Genetically engineered bacteria can produce human insulin for diabetics. Scientists hope they will be able to use it in the future to cure DNA errors that cause illnesses such as muscular dystrophy and cystic fibrosis. Cures though, are not yet imminent.
Opinions against genetic engineering
Other people believe we know far too little about the consequences of altering plants in a way that is impossible in nature. They think it is too high a risk to let such plants loose in the environment where they might cross-breed with other plants and cannot be recalled if it is clear that the effects are harmful. There have been suggestions that one of the causes of the dramatic drop in the population of bees is the use in the USA of genetically-modified crops that are resistant to herbicides.
Many people are worried that if people are ever designed genetically, the human race could change in ways we cannot foresee. Most countries still have laws to prevent scientists researching genetic engineering in humans.
Genetically Modified Organism
A genetically modified organism (GMO) is an organism whose genetic material has been altered using genetic engineering techniques. Organisms that have been genetically modified include micro-organisms such as bacteria and yeast, insects, plants, fish, and mammals. GMOs are the source of genetically modified foods, and are also widely used in scientific research and to produce goods other than food.
See Also
