Difference between revisions of "Limitations of science"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Quote)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
"The great climate science centres around the world are more than well aware how weak their science is. If you talk to them privately they're scared stiff of the fact that they don't really know what the clouds and the aerosols are doing." [http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2010/mar/29/james-lovelock]
 
"The great climate science centres around the world are more than well aware how weak their science is. If you talk to them privately they're scared stiff of the fact that they don't really know what the clouds and the aerosols are doing." [http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2010/mar/29/james-lovelock]
 +
 +
== See also ==
 +
 +
*[[Science]]
 +
*[[Christianity and science]]
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==

Revision as of 07:33, April 27, 2013

A few of the limitations of science are: "the scientific method is limited to what can be observed with the five senses; the scientific method is limited to the present; the scientific method is limited to telling us “how” a process works, not “why.”; the scientific method is limited in that it is amoral (non-moral); and the scientific method is limited in that it cannot deal with the unique."[1]

Quote

"The great climate science centres around the world are more than well aware how weak their science is. If you talk to them privately they're scared stiff of the fact that they don't really know what the clouds and the aerosols are doing." [1]

See also

External links

  • Limitations of science and its method