Difference between revisions of "Naturalistic evolution"
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
(claims that new species of life came into being as a result of natural causes) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | ''' | + | The '''unguided evolution''' theory claims that new species of life came into being as a result of [[natural]] causes only, that is, without any supernatural intervention (compare [[Creationism]]). |
Opinion polls show that Americans make a distinction between evolution (1) not actually having happened at all, (2) having come about '''because of''' God's supernatural intervention, or (3) having come about purely by natural forces. | Opinion polls show that Americans make a distinction between evolution (1) not actually having happened at all, (2) having come about '''because of''' God's supernatural intervention, or (3) having come about purely by natural forces. |
Revision as of 10:36, August 8, 2007
The unguided evolution theory claims that new species of life came into being as a result of natural causes only, that is, without any supernatural intervention (compare Creationism).
Opinion polls show that Americans make a distinction between evolution (1) not actually having happened at all, (2) having come about because of God's supernatural intervention, or (3) having come about purely by natural forces.
Polls have tended to show the same proportion of belief regardless of whether they are conducted by liberals or conservatives. About 15% of Americans believe in unguided evolution, while 80% reject it and 5% have no opinion[Citation Needed].
- These numbers shows that skepticism that life developed via purely unguided evolutionary processes remains very high. [1]
Usage
Many evolutionists object to the term unguided evolution on the ground that the Theory of Evolution is a scientific theory which is concerned only with naturalistic causes and makes no reference to "guidance" other than the guiding effect of Natural Selection.
Partisanship
The concept of unguided evolution is important in the legal debates over evolution education in U.S. public schools. Evolutionists generally argue that evolution should be taught as a "fact" and without any discussion of whether it has been "guided" or not.Template:Fact-politics
US Polls
Poll results vary.
- 9-12%: Humans developed, but God had no part in process. [2]
- 18%: evolution took place without God playing a role (just teens polled) [3]
"Human beings have evolved, but God had no part in the process." [4]
- All: 12%
- Men: 17%
- Women: 8%