Difference between revisions of "Predicting ObamaCare Outcome"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Yes, the experts are wrong, and here's why)
(virtually all of the "experts" missed the boat, and continue to miss the boat, on Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge. Wrong about that, why would anyone expect them to right about anything else?)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
*95% of those same experts deny that logic/[[conservatism]] advances over time for the same reason technology does
 
*95% of those same experts deny that logic/[[conservatism]] advances over time for the same reason technology does
 
*ObamaCare could have been upheld more easily and quickly than to invalidate it
 
*ObamaCare could have been upheld more easily and quickly than to invalidate it
 +
*virtually all of the "experts" missed the boat, and continue to miss the boat, on [[Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge]].  Wrong about that, why would anyone expect them to right about anything else?

Revision as of 22:43, 27 June 2012

What is the best prediction of the outcome in the ObamaCare decision expected to be issued Thursday, June 27, 2012? 85% of experts predict that ObamaCare will be upheld - can so many experts be so wrong?

Yes, the experts are wrong, and here's why:

  • ObamaCare does violate the limits in the Commerce Clause, and it is difficult to overcome that logic
  • while 85% of experts think ObamaCare will be upheld, probably 90% are unwilling to criticize Obama, so when adjusted for bias it indicates disbelief that ObamaCare will be upheld
  • 95% of those same experts deny that logic/conservatism advances over time for the same reason technology does
  • ObamaCare could have been upheld more easily and quickly than to invalidate it
  • virtually all of the "experts" missed the boat, and continue to miss the boat, on Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge. Wrong about that, why would anyone expect them to right about anything else?