Difference between revisions of "Principle of explosion"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (cats)
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''principle of explosion''' is a logical principle which states that we accept that a certain statement is true at the same time it is not true, any other statement can be proven.  In other words, from a false premise, any imaginable conclusion can be reached.  It is used to illustrate the importance of having a set of [[axiom]]s which are self-consistent.
+
The '''principle of explosion''' is a logical principle which states that if we accept that a certain statement is true at the same time it is not true, then any other statement, no matter how false, can be proven.  In other words, from a false premise, any imaginable conclusion can be reached.  It is used to illustrate the importance of having a set of [[axiom]]s which are self-consistent.
  
 
==The Principle==
 
==The Principle==

Latest revision as of 04:32, 5 March 2012

The principle of explosion is a logical principle which states that if we accept that a certain statement is true at the same time it is not true, then any other statement, no matter how false, can be proven. In other words, from a false premise, any imaginable conclusion can be reached. It is used to illustrate the importance of having a set of axioms which are self-consistent.

The Principle

Suppose we accept both of the statements "red is a color" and "red is not a color" as true.

Since "red is a color" is true, at least one of the two statements "red is a color" and "Obama is a competent president" is true, and so the single statement "red is a color, or Obama is a competent president, or both" is true. Since we know "red is not a color" is true, the only clause in "red is a color, or Obama is a competent president" which can be true it the latter, ie, "Obama is a competent president."

From the false assumption "red both is and isn't a color," we have reached a false conclusion.