https://conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=ITSAMEMARIO&feedformat=atomConservapedia - User contributions [en]2024-03-29T10:08:43ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.24.2https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cthulhu&diff=484538Cthulhu2008-06-30T20:26:40Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: deleted vandals work.</p>
<hr />
<div>[[Image:Cthulu.png|thumb|right]]<br />
'''Cthulhu''' (pronounced "K'Thoo Loo") (Other spellings: Kutulu, Ktulu, Cthulu, Kthulhut, Thu Thu, Tulu) is a fictional entity (One of the so-called Great Old Ones) variously described as a "sleeping" or "dreaming" in the works of [[H. P. Lovecraft]]. Cthulhu sleeps in the sunken city of R'lyeh and when the stars are right, will reawaken ushering in the destruction of humanity. It is featured in the eponymous short story [[The Call of Cthulhu]], as well as many other works by both Lovecraft and his contemporaries. <br />
<br />
Some have suggested a connection between Cthulhu and Judeo-Christian figures such as [[Satan]], though this comparison is shaky at best. In every Lovecraft story, the universe is full of strange and terrible entities that humans mistakenly call Gods, Cthulhu being a powerful but not unique creature with Godlike powers. Lovecraft himself was an Athiest, and his stories reflected his views of humanity's role in the universe as insignificant and at the mercy of greater, unknown powers.{{fact}}<br />
<br />
==References==<br />
*http://www.cthulhu.org/cthulhu/index.html<br />
<br />
[[Category:Fantasy]]</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:U.S._History_Textbook_Project&diff=472618Talk:U.S. History Textbook Project2008-06-12T21:56:15Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>I read Churchill's 'The Great Republic' when I was in college. Highly reccomend it as something of a 'conservative' viewpoint.<br />
<br />
However, stick to the textbooks for examinations. Textbooks merely provide facts in a dry form. You are pulling at straws if you can find any sort of Liberal bias in them. [[User:TBarret|TBarret]] 10:05, 11 June 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Not to seem rude, but this whole "[insert item here] has a Liberal bias!" Is getting a little bit absurd. Now, I really can understand some of the things people are accusing of having "bias" (Media Outlets primarily) But now this whole "textbook conspiracy" seems a little bit absurd to me.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:03, 11 June 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
: Oh right - the media has liberal bias but somehow textbooks do not. What's their secret??? Perhaps you're next going to tell us that Wikipedia does not have any bias either.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:31, 11 June 2008 (EDT)<br />
::"The media has a liberal bias." How is it that an entity such as "the media" -- assuming that we can talk about it as an undifferentiated lump, which is problematic in itself -- would have an institutional bias that ran contrary to the interests of the people who own most of the outlets that make up what we think of as "the media?" Television networks and stations, radio networks and stations, magazines, newspapers, movie studios, record companies and in the context of this little article, book publishers are all - and over the last decade, decade and a half, increasingly so - owned by fewer and fewer large companies that are completely imbricated in corporate structures. Why - and more importantly how - would the corporate elites who own the media spend billions and billions of dollars to put out a "liberal" message that allegedly embraces a "party line" that would lead to their own loss of wealth and power? [[User:AliceBG|AliceBG]] 22:42, 11 June 2008 (EDT)<br />
::: Well, I have read ''America: Pathways to the Present'' and I didn't personally didn't see any bias in it. But, tell me what part(s) of it are biased, and if I can see where you are coming from then I will gladly admit I am wrong. --[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 17:56, 12 June 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:U.S._History_Textbook_Project&diff=471504Talk:U.S. History Textbook Project2008-06-12T02:03:33Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>I read Churchill's 'The Great Republic' when I was in college. Highly reccomend it as something of a 'conservative' viewpoint.<br />
<br />
However, stick to the textbooks for examinations. Textbooks merely provide facts in a dry form. You are pulling at straws if you can find any sort of Liberal bias in them. [[User:TBarret|TBarret]] 10:05, 11 June 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Not to seem rude, but this whole "[insert item here] has a Liberal bias!" Is getting a little bit absurd. Now, I really can understand some of the things people are accusing of having "bias" (Media Outlets primarily) But now this whole "textbook conspiracy" seems a little bit absurd to me.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:03, 11 June 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:ITSAMEMARIO&diff=471466User:ITSAMEMARIO2008-06-12T01:56:44Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{userboxtop}}<br />
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=I ♥ PAUL |info=This user supports RON PAUL for US President}}<br />
{{User guncontrol}}<br />
{{User patriot questions authority}}<br />
{{User political compass|-5.88|-7.33}}<br />
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=I ♥ MARIO |info=This user loves the Mario franchise, but thinks Nintendo has gone downhill after the N64}}<br />
<br />
{{User Evo}}<br />
<br />
<br />
{{User pubschool}}<br />
{{User Geek}}<br />
{{userboxbottom}}</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:ITSAMEMARIO&diff=452486User:ITSAMEMARIO2008-05-13T22:59:11Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{userboxtop}}<br />
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=I ♥ PAUL |info=This user supports RON PAUL for US President}}<br />
{{User guncontrol}}<br />
{{User patriot questions authority}}<br />
{{User political compass|-5.88|-7.33}}<br />
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=I ♥ MARIO |info=This user loves the Mario franchise, but thinks Nintendo has gone downhill after the N64}}<br />
<br />
{{User Evo}}<br />
<br />
<br />
{{User pubschool}}<br />
{{User Geek}}<br />
{{userboxbottom}}<br />
<br />
Sorry for the lack of recent edits guys, There has just been alot of things going on in my life currently, like my grandmothers recurring cancer. She is doing well though, for now.</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Internet_slang&diff=452484Internet slang2008-05-13T22:55:36Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''Internet slang''' is slang that Internet users have created and used, often in instant messaging and forum discussions. They are frequently acronyms, designed to save keystrokes in an attempt to speed up communication.<br />
<br />
== List of Internet slang ==<br />
<br />
*'''2:''' Substitution for to, too, and two.<br />
*'''4:''' Substitution for for and four.<br />
*'''AFAICT:''' As far as I can tell.<br />
*'''AFAIK:''' As far as I know.<br />
*'''AFAIR:''' As far as I recall/remember.<br />
*'''AFAIAW:''' As far as I am aware.<br />
*'''AFK:''' Away from keyboard.<br />
*'''ASL:''' A request for Age, Sex, and Location.<br />
*'''ATM:''' At The Moment.<br />
*'''BBL:''' be back later.<br />
*'''BBIAB:''' be back in a bit.<br />
*'''bewbs:''' breasts.<br />
*'''BRB:''' Be Right Back.<br />
*'''btw:''' By the way.<br />
*'''ch00b:''' Person who acts like a n00b, but has skill levels or a kill/death ratio of someone who is considered 1337. Typically spends time bragging, flaming, and asking question he or she should know.<br />
*'''D00d:''' [[L33tsp43k]] spelling of "dude".<br />
*'''ftw:''' For the win.<br />
*'''GDR:''' Grinning, Ducking and Running. Usually typed right after making a groan-inducing joke.<br />
*'''g2g:''' got to go, gotta go.<br />
*'''gg:''' Good game. Somtimes an 'a' is added to make gga: good game all.<br />
*'''IANAL:''' Sometimes IANALB, "I am not a lawyer (but)" said right before (usually) poor legal advice.<br />
*'''IIRC:''' If I remember correctly.<br />
*'''IM:''' Abbreviation for Instant Messaging.<br />
*'''IMHO''' In My Humble Opinion<br />
*'''l8r:''' later.<br />
*'''1337''' Leet. Usually means good, but some say it stands for Elite. Also the name for turning letters into numbers and symbols.<br />
*'''LMAO''' Laughing My Ass Off<br />
*'''LOL:''' Laugh Out Loud.<br />
*'''lvl:''' Level.<br />
*'''Newb''' Person is unskilled at whatever task they are trying to perform due to lack of experience.<br />
*'''Noob''' Person is unskilled at whatever task they are trying to perform due to lack of experience and refuse to acknowledge their difficulty with the task.<br />
*'''Omgwtfbbq''' is an internet slang term used in many MMORPG games like World of Warcraft. It is used as an expression of confusion and when someone asks an absurd newbie question. It is usually meant to be taken sarcastically. Although it can occasionally be used when someone is utterly confused by something that was said. It's various parts stand for, respectively, "Oh My G_d," "what the f___," and "barbecue," each of which can also appear individually, although "bbq," alone, is not actually considered internet slang.<br />
*'''Pwn:''' Defeat someone, misspelling of "own".<br />
*'''Pwnt:''' If someone "pwns" you, you have been pwnt. Usually spelled with an 'ed' rather than a 't'.<br />
*'''ROFL:''' Rolling On The Floor Laughing.<br />
*'''Roflcopter:''' An extreme version of "rofl," or, "rolling on the floor laughing." Origionated on World of Warcraft forums.<br />
*'''TMI:''' Too much information.<br />
*'''U:''' Substitution for you.<br />
*'''Ur:''' Substitution for your, you're, you are.<br />
*'''WYSIWYG:''' What you see is what you get, also a word processing editor type.<br />
*'''ZOMG:''' An extreme version of "Oh my God!"<br />
<br />
[[category:internet culture]]</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Internet_slang&diff=452482Talk:Internet slang2008-05-13T22:54:24Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>Is LMAO appropriate, and if so, how do I go about censoring it? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
: Nope. [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 22:08, 29 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
We have a few in here that drop the F-bomb and some that I doubt their reality.<br />
<br />
LMAO is appropiate, and the young audiences use it all the time [[User:Aknot|Aknot]] 17:53, 30 April 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
alphabeth sorting needed --[[User:Schifra|schifra]] 17:55, 30 April 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Gotta go is g2g, not GG<br />
<br />
::How can this possibly be even a near-complete reference, given the very dynamic nature of the subject and the tendency of individual communities to invent their own slang and in-jokes? Its a constantly changing set of fads. Perhaps this topic would be better avoided altogether, or perhaps made into a general discussion of internet slang rather than a list of examples. - Suricou<br />
<br />
<br />
==OMGWTFBBQ==<br />
Is it necessary to blank out "oh my God" for that word, when it is in other defs?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 18:54, 13 May 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Faux&diff=452481Faux2008-05-13T22:52:34Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Faux'''''(Pronounced like [[foe]]) is a French word for "not" or "false". The phrase is used to describe generic items that are trying to be passed off as the said "brand-name" item. It has also been used politically by liberals to describe [[Fox News]]. (IE "Faux News")</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Faux&diff=452480Faux2008-05-13T22:48:37Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: New page: '''''Faux'''''(Pronounced like foe) is a French word for "not" or "false". The phrase is used to describe generic items that are trying to be passed off as the said "brand-name" item. ...</p>
<hr />
<div>'''''Faux'''''(Pronounced like [[foe]]) is a French word for "not" or "false". The phrase is used to describe generic items that are trying to be passed off as the said "brand-name" item. It has also been used politically by liberals to describe [[Fox News]]</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ramos&diff=447026User talk:Ramos2008-05-05T00:55:44Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: New page: {{welcome|sig=~~~~}}</p>
<hr />
<div>{{welcome|sig=[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 20:55, 4 May 2008 (EDT)}}</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:ITSAMEMARIO&diff=447021User:ITSAMEMARIO2008-05-05T00:51:23Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{userboxtop}}<br />
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=I ♥ PAUL |info=This user supports RON PAUL for US President}}<br />
{{User guncontrol}}<br />
{{User patriot questions authority}}<br />
{{User political compass|-5.88|-7.33}}<br />
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=I ♥ MARIO |info=This user loves the Mario franchise, but thinks Nintendo has gone downhill after the N64}}<br />
<br />
{{User Evo}}<br />
<br />
<br />
{{User pubschool}}<br />
{{User Geek}}<br />
{{userboxbottom}}<br />
<br />
Hello world,<br />
<br />
I am new to all of this editing and whatnot, but if I make any mistakes (as I frequently do) Please kindly inform me of my error, so I know not to do it again.<br />
<br />
Thank you all,<br />
--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 20:20, 30 April 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SophieW&diff=444442User talk:SophieW2008-05-01T23:55:28Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{welcome}}<br />
<br />
Is this a sock puppet name again? --[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 19:54, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
:Assume good faith... [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:54, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
:: Sorry, with just all the other stuff goin' down right now, I kinda thought it might be. I am utterly sorry if I was wrong.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 19:55, 1 May 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:SophieW&diff=444439User talk:SophieW2008-05-01T23:54:15Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: New page: Is this a sock puppet name again? --~~~~</p>
<hr />
<div>Is this a sock puppet name again? --[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 19:54, 1 May 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Deborah/coding&diff=444428User talk:Deborah/coding2008-05-01T23:48:15Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: New page: looks like this will be helpful for everyone, thanks --~~~~</p>
<hr />
<div>looks like this will be helpful for everyone, thanks --[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 19:48, 1 May 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Animal_Terms_L&diff=444409Animal Terms L2008-05-01T23:36:08Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{Animals Index}}<br />
List of [[animal]]s beginning with "L"<br />
<br />
*[[Locust]]<br />
*[[Lobster]]<br />
*[[Llama]]<br />
*[[Limpet]]<br />
*[[Lion]]<br />
*[[Lizard]]<br />
*[[Leopard]]<br />
*[[Leopard Seal]]<br />
*[[Lark]]<br />
*[[Leech]]<br />
*[[Lemming]]<br />
*[[Lemur]]<br />
*[[Louse]]<br />
*[[Lamb]]<br />
*[[Lynx]]</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Animal_Terms_K&diff=444408Animal Terms K2008-05-01T23:35:20Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{Animals Index}}<br />
List of [[animal]]s beginning with "K"<br />
*[[Kingfisher]]<br />
*[[Kiwi]]<br />
*[[Kawala]]<br />
*[[Koala bear]]<br />
*[[Kangaroo]]<br />
*[[Katydid]]<br />
*[[Kodiak bear]]<br />
*[[Kestrel]]<br />
*[[Kite]]<br />
*[[Kudu]]<br />
*[[Komodo dragon]]<br />
*[[Killdeer]]<br />
*[[Kinglet]]<br />
*[[Kitty]]<br />
*[[Kitten]]<br />
*[[Killer Whale]]</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Animal_Terms_N&diff=444403Talk:Animal Terms N2008-05-01T23:31:41Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>I made a animal list, but allot of the animals haven't been created yet. Also, if the formatting is wrong, please tell me! so I won't do it again.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 19:08, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
: Well, before every link you should put a *. Other than that you're doing it right. [[User:CMcC|CMcC]] 19:12, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
When creating a terms list look at other relater terms list created for example I edited this to look similar to the already created Animal Terms M--<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 19:21, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
By the way awesome list this is the longest animal terms list I have ever seen --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 19:22, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Should [[Neanderthal]] be put on this list? --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 19:26, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I dont see why not. Even if you believe in evolution, I think it could still count as an animal. --[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 19:31, 1 May 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Animal_Terms_N&diff=444380Talk:Animal Terms N2008-05-01T23:08:45Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: New page: I made a animal list, but allot of the animals haven't been created yet. Also, if the formatting is wrong, please tell me! so I won't do it again.--~~~~</p>
<hr />
<div>I made a animal list, but allot of the animals haven't been created yet. Also, if the formatting is wrong, please tell me! so I won't do it again.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 19:08, 1 May 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Animal_Terms_N&diff=444378Animal Terms N2008-05-01T23:07:14Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: New page: Naked Mole Rat Nightingale Nuthatch Nurse Shark Northern Spotted Owl Northern Fur Seal Northern Elephant Seal [[Narwhal]...</p>
<hr />
<div> [[Naked Mole Rat]]<br />
[[Nightingale]]<br />
[[Nuthatch]]<br />
[[Nurse Shark]]<br />
[[Northern Spotted Owl]]<br />
[[Northern Fur Seal]]<br />
[[Northern Elephant Seal]]<br />
[[Narwhal]] <br />
[[Newt]]<br />
[[Neon Tetra]]<br />
[[Neon Rainbow Fish]]<br />
[[Neon Blue Guppy]]<br />
[[Neon Red Guppy]]<br />
[[Nautilus]]<br />
[[Newfoundland Dog]]<br />
[[Nag]]<br />
[[Nighthawk]]<br />
[[Norway Lobster]]<br />
[[Nymph]]<br />
[[Nematode Worm]]<br />
[[Nelly]]<br />
[[Norway Rat]]<br />
[[Nutria]]<br />
[[Northern Pike]]<br />
[[Northern flying squirrel]]<br />
[[Nematode]]<br />
[[Nine-banded Armadillo]]<br />
[[Northern Sea Horse]]<br />
[[Neon Blue Hermit Crab]]<br />
[[Needle Fish]]<br />
[[Nubian Goat]]<br />
[[Night Crawler]]<br />
[[Night Heron]]<br />
[[Nutcracker]]<br />
[[Noddy]]</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Animal_Terms_L&diff=444372Animal Terms L2008-05-01T23:01:38Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: New page: Locust Lobster Llama Limpet Lion Lizard Leopard Leopard Seal Lark Leech Lemming [[Le...</p>
<hr />
<div> [[Locust]]<br />
[[Lobster]]<br />
[[Llama]]<br />
[[Limpet]]<br />
[[Lion]]<br />
[[Lizard]]<br />
[[Leopard]]<br />
[[Leopard Seal]]<br />
[[Lark]]<br />
[[Leech]]<br />
[[Lemming]]<br />
[[Lemur]]<br />
[[Louse]]<br />
[[Lamb]]<br />
[[Lynx]]</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:Censorship&diff=444370Conservapedia talk:Censorship2008-05-01T22:59:39Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>I'm new around here, so i don't want to stick my feet into what's obviously an old battle. But doesn't it seem like [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservative&diff=next&oldid=443810 this quote regarding the Evolution article] is the very essence of censorship on Conservapedia in action? <br />
<br />
{{QuoteBox|"the article is protected to keep it a 100% anti-evolutionary propaganda article as the website leadership wants it to be a 100% anti-evolutionary propaganda article"}} <br />
<br />
I mean, the word "propaganda" is used, which is hardly the mission of a 'Trustworthy Encyclopedia', no? [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 18:49, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
:I can see what you are saying, but if it's Ed Poor who put it up in the first place, and then changed his own words, I don't really think its censorship.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 18:52, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
::No, it was [[User:Conservative|Conservative]]. [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 18:55, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
:::Oh, my bad. Well, I don't know, it just might become a sysop war (if it hasn't already) I would advise to just stay out of it.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 18:59, 1 May 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:Censorship&diff=444369Conservapedia talk:Censorship2008-05-01T22:59:26Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>I'm new around here, so i don't want to stick my feet into what's obviously an old battle. But doesn't it seem like [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservative&diff=next&oldid=443810 this quote regarding the Evolution article] is the very essence of censorship on Conservapedia in action? <br />
<br />
{{QuoteBox|"the article is protected to keep it a 100% anti-evolutionary propaganda article as the website leadership wants it to be a 100% anti-evolutionary propaganda article"}} <br />
<br />
I mean, the word "propaganda" is used, which is hardly the mission of a 'Trustworthy Encyclopedia', no? [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 18:49, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
:I can see what you are saying, but if it's Ed Poor who put it up in the first place, and then changed his own words, I don't really think its censorship.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 18:52, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
::No, it was [[User:Conservative|Conservative]]. [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 18:55, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
:::Oh, my bad. Well, I don't know, it just might become a sysop war (if it hasn't already) I would adive to just stay out of it.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 18:59, 1 May 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Animal_Terms_K&diff=444367Animal Terms K2008-05-01T22:57:43Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div> [[Kingfisher]]<br />
[[Kiwi]]<br />
[[Kawala]]<br />
[[Koala Bear]]<br />
[[Kangaroo]]<br />
[[Katydid]]<br />
[[Kodiak bear]]<br />
[[Kestrel]]<br />
[[Kite]]<br />
[[Kudu]]<br />
[[Komodo dragon]]<br />
[[Killdeer]]<br />
[[Kinglet]]<br />
[[Kitty]]<br />
[[Kitten]]<br />
[[Killer Whale]]</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Animal_Terms_K&diff=444366Animal Terms K2008-05-01T22:57:13Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>[[Kingfisher]]<br />
[[Kiwi]]<br />
[[Kawala]]<br />
[[Koala Bear]]<br />
[[Kangaroo]]<br />
[[Katydid]]<br />
[[Kodiak bear]]<br />
[[Kestrel]]<br />
[[Kite]]<br />
[[Kudu]]<br />
[[Komodo dragon]]<br />
[[Killdeer]]<br />
[[Kinglet]]<br />
[[Kitty]]<br />
[[Kitten]]<br />
[[Killer Whale]]</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Animal_Terms_K&diff=444365Animal Terms K2008-05-01T22:56:34Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: New page: Kingfisher Kiwi Kawala Koala Bear Kangaroo Katydid Kodiak bear Kestrel Kite Kudu [[Komodo dra...</p>
<hr />
<div> [[Kingfisher]]<br />
[[Kiwi]]<br />
[[Kawala]]<br />
[[Koala Bear]]<br />
[[Kangaroo]]<br />
[[Katydid]]<br />
[[Kodiak bear]]<br />
[[Kestrel]]<br />
[[Kite]]<br />
[[Kudu]]<br />
[[Komodo dragon]]<br />
[[Killdeer]]<br />
[[Kinglet]]<br />
[[Kitty]]<br />
[[Kitten]]<br />
[[Killer Whale]]</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:Censorship&diff=444359Conservapedia talk:Censorship2008-05-01T22:52:59Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>I'm new around here, so i don't want to stick my feet into what's obviously an old battle. But doesn't it seem like [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservative&diff=next&oldid=443810 this quote regarding the Evolution article] is the very essence of censorship on Conservapedia in action? I mean, the word "propaganda" is used, which is hardly the mission of a 'Trustworthy Encyclopedia, no? [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 18:49, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I can see what you are saying, but if it's Ed Poor who put it up in the first place, and then changed his own words, I don't really think its censorship.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 18:52, 1 May 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Should_gay_marriage_be_allowed%3F&diff=444355Debate:Should gay marriage be allowed?2008-05-01T22:47:37Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: /* No */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{Debate-religion}}<br />
{{Debate-politics}}<br />
{{Debate}} <br />
This is basically a forum. You can chat with your friends, and reminise with them about that special person that you will never meet because you were too busy here answering if gay marrage should be legaized. So, answer. The sooner you do, the faster you might meet that special someone.<br /><br />
<br /><br />
==Yes==<br />
Yes, it should be allowed. For all too long, there has been discrimination in this country. For instance, racism was considered normal for a long time. However, although people might think that there is no discrimination going on in America today, there is prejudice against the homosexual population. The discrimination is that they are denied their free right to, well, equal rights. The right of being married. One of this country's fundimental principals was to have everyone come here and be equals. Although that promise wasn't nessicerally held up (slaves are still people, yet they were still imprisoned for many years after this country was founded), do we need to fight another war in order to try to get homosexual marrage allowed (a very long strech, but you get the point). Discrimination was tolerated at one point in America. Can't we leave that point behind us? --[[User:Rocky|Rocky]]<br />
<br />
You say it should be legalized because of equality. But, it’s because of equality that it shouldn’t be legalized. Homosexuals already have the exact same rights as heterosexuals. A homosexual man can marry any woman he chooses (assuming that she is of legal age and is consenting) just as any heterosexual man can. They already have the exact same rights. Allowing homosexuals to marry one another would be giving them special rights based on a behavioral preference. They choose to engage in homosexuality. Note that when I say they’re “choosing”, I’m not talking about whether they’re born that way or not. I mean they’re choosing their lifestyle. Born that way or not, they still choose to engage in that particular sexual behavior, just like heterosexuals choose to engage in their sexual acts. So, it is a behavioral choice, and legalizing it would be giving them a special right based on a behavior. That is inequality. [[User:BillyJ|BillyJ]] 01:44, 30 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
:I don't quite see why they would marry someone that is heterosexual if they are homosexual. I mean, look at it this way. Let's say that it was illigal for everyone that was not Roman Catholic to be married. Should it not be legalized for other religons to do that. Because, I mean, religion is simply the truth that you prefer to believe (for catholics, it is that Jesus was the messiah, for example). Should it not be legal for other religions to marry, even though they prefer not to be Roman Catholics? --[[User:Rocky|Rocky]]<br />
<br />
The point is that they can marry. You're giving examples of people who can't marry at all, but that doesn't fit the current scenario of things. Homosexuals might not want to marry the opposite gender, but they have the right to, just like a heterosexual person can. The point is that they all have the same rights, and to allow them to wed the same sex would be to give out special rights. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 23:05, 30 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
::Yes, homosexuals can marry those of opposite gender, but, if gay marriage is legalized, heterosexuals will be able to marry people of the same gender, so everyone will still have equal rights. If gay marriage doesn't hurt anybody, why shouldn't it be allowed? [[User:Blinkadyblink|Blinkadyblink]]<font color="#aa1000"><sup><small><small>[[User talk:Blinkadyblink|RAGE]]</small></small></sup></font> 23:11, 30 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Because you're giving out rights based on a behavioral preference. It's saying, "I prefer to do this, so it should be legal because I want to do it." Besides, who says that gay marriage doesn't hurt anyone? I would dispute that. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 23:26, 30 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
If you want to do something why shouldn't it be legal? The only answer I can think of is if it hurts someone. If gay marriage indeed hurts someone, who does it hurt? (And I'm not giving out rights based on behavioral preference; everyone would get the right to a homosexual marriage just like everyone gets the right to a heterosexual marriage.) [[User:Blinkadyblink|Blinkadyblink]]<font color="#aa1000"><sup><small><small>[[User talk:Blinkadyblink|RAGE]]</small></small></sup></font> 23:32, 30 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
It hurts society. We already have moral standards that are in place that have been there a long time. The standard for marriage is one man and one woman who are of legal age. If we redefine the standard, then we move the line back a little. If you set the precedence that it's okay to move that line in regards to morality as we see fit, then where does it end? Polygamy? Bestiality? Pedophilia? And it is a special right, because it is giving out a right because a particular group of people hold to that behavior. It's like drug users who want drugs to be legalized because they like to use them. That's giving in to a person's behavior. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 23:40, 30 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Is society really hurt just because it stops reflecting your morals? There have been other opinions that had "been there a long time" before they got changed: see [[slavery]]. The government has to protect its citizens and residents and so it cannot allow bestiality or pedophilia because neither a (non-human) animal nor a child is mentally capable of consenting to sex. Polygamy is a little trickier. While I don't object to it in principle, it generally seems to lead to abusive husbands and male-dominated societies and so the government could certainly outlaw it. <br />
And homosexuality is not like drug use because drug users actually ''do'' harm society; they make roads more dangerous and tend to commit more crimes than non-drug users. [[User:Blinkadyblink|Blinkadyblink]]<font color="#aa1000"><sup><small><small>[[User talk:Blinkadyblink|RAGE]]</small></small></sup></font> 23:56, 30 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
How are you asking that first question? Are you asking my morals in particular, or in a generalistic sense? If it's my morals that society no longer reflects, well, I think it's morally wrong to steal, rape, murder, etc. So, yea, socitey would be hurt real bad. What I'm saying about changing values is that it makes things easier to pass that were at one time considered terrible. Let me give you an example:<br />
<br />
An 18 year old can marry anyone they want without their parents permission. But, a 17 year old can't. But is a 17 year old that much different from an 18 year old? Most would say they're not. So shouldn't a 17 year old be able to marry as he chooses as well? Really, that makes pretty good sense. But, a 16 year old isn't that different from a 17 year old, so why can't he marry as he wants? And on and on it goes until you get to, "Well, a 5 year old isn't that much different than a 6 year old, so hey should be able to get married." My point is that it's just a real slippery sloap. Simillarly, how do you tell the very next thing after homosexuality that they can't when you just made the exception for homosexuals? [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 00:07, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
To answer your first question, yes, I am asking about your morals. I really don't care what society thinks. If society thinks that it is okay to steal, rape, and murder, I don't care. I do care about what the government thinks, because, even if society condones murder, people will not be allowed to murder each other as long as the government opposes it. The government does not need any moral standard to outlaw theft, rape, and murder, as I said before: the government has to protect its citizens. As a result, the government should, and would, outlaw theft, rape, and murder without any morals. <br />
<br />
As to your slippery slope example, in 1971 the minimun voting age was lowered from 21 to 18. 37 years later, there are still no supporters of suffrage for 15 year olds. I can't see why allowing gay marriage would be so different. Finally, I haven't made an exception for homosexuals until you prove that they harm society. If you do that I will oppose gay marriage. [[User:Blinkadyblink|Blinkadyblink]]<font color="#aa1000"><sup><small><small>[[User talk:Blinkadyblink|RAGE]]</small></small></sup></font> 00:31, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Wait. Government doesn't need any moral standards? I disagree. There have been lots of governments that kill their own citizens when it's convenient for them to do so. Everybody needs an objective standard, otherwise your just making you morals up out of your own preferences. The voting age was changed from 21 to 18 because 18 years olds were dieing in Vietnam but couldn't elect the officials who sent them there. That made no sense. The reason it isn't continuing to be lowered is because people realize that there must be some standard. If you lower to 17, then why not 16. If 16, why not 15? But we realize that you have to keep some standard otherwise where does it end? The same goes for marriage. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 00:41, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I would like to add something. If the government does not have any moral stadards, then the government will end up deciding to destroy it's people and if anyone speeks out against it, then they will stop at nothing to make sure you will not say anything. However, I would like to say this. In a way, heterosexual marrages are based upon one's behavioral preferance. For instance, let's say that a man likes women. Isn't that a preference? Why, then should a homosexual not be able to marry because of their behavioral preference? --[[User:Rocky|Rocky]]<br />
<br />
==No==<br />
It's said that it is discrimination to be against homosexual marriage. But, whether you agree with it or not, you have to look at things from the Christian perspective to see where we are coming from. As a Christian, I see the Bible says that homosexuality is a sin, therefore I am against it. It's not about prejudice. It's just the fact I have a moral obligation to stand against anything that is wrong. I am against homosexuality in the same sense that I am against stealing. I consider them both to be wrong. Would someone say that I'm discriminating against thieves when I say that's wrong? Of course not. I don't think that homosexuals should be treated badly, or made fun of, but it is wrong and Christians have to say so.<br />
: I do agree that Christians should say it's wrong if that is what they believe in. But I do believe that not allowing them to marry is unconstitutional, because of the first amendment that states "no law should be made enforcing or discriminating religion" (I'm paraphrasing here.) and if a law were to be passed, it would be enforcing a religious value on people that may not believe in what the people that put that action into law believe. But, even though I think gay marriage is OK, I also support peoples right to say its wrong, start up "rehab" for gay people (If the homosexual chooses to go there and its not tax-funded), and tell the world what they think about the issue. As long as the wall of separation between church and state is intact, and that homosexuals are not verbally or physically harassed, I believe it is OK for Christians (and any other religion) to say its wrong and not like it. --[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 18:47, 1 May 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==It Depends==<br />
*If the marriage is going to be carried out as a religious service, it should be up to the relevant religious authorities. If the marriage is nonreligious (carried out by a justice of the peace, or Elvis, for example), then it should be allowed. -[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 18:38, 30 April 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Mary_Stachowicz&diff=444347Talk:Mary Stachowicz2008-05-01T22:37:38Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>Just like Matthew Sheppard, this woman was murdered over hatred. When the hell is this going to end? --[[User:Rocky|Rocky]]<br />
<br />
Thats horrible, when can both sides learn to live with each other in peace without forcing their moral values down each others mouth?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 18:37, 1 May 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Cannonshot&diff=443963User talk:Cannonshot2008-05-01T13:26:51Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: New page: == Welcome == {{welcome|sig=~~~~}}</p>
<hr />
<div>== Welcome ==<br />
{{welcome|sig=[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 09:26, 1 May 2008 (EDT)}}</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Yeah5000&diff=443962User talk:Yeah50002008-05-01T13:26:01Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: New page: == Welcome == {{welcome|sig=~~~~}}</p>
<hr />
<div>== Welcome ==<br />
{{welcome|sig=[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 09:26, 1 May 2008 (EDT)}}</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Operation_Downfall&diff=443792Talk:Operation Downfall2008-05-01T01:51:16Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: New page: Excellent Page my friend! I was considering writing a similar article but I guess you beat me too it! ha ha--~~~~</p>
<hr />
<div>Excellent Page my friend! I was considering writing a similar article but I guess you beat me too it! ha ha--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 21:51, 30 April 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:HenryS&diff=443783User talk:HenryS2008-05-01T01:37:58Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{welcome|sig=<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 23:59, 8 April 2008 (EDT)}}<br />
<br />
Now I see that you are back. Great. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 21:08, 1 November 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Welcome back!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:14, 11 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
: Are you back? --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 10:21, 5 February 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
== My vandal counter ==<br />
<br />
It's there, but I had to hide it, because it attracted too many <s>Bohdans</s> vandals. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 00:03, 5 February 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
Could you have a read of [[Holodomor denial]]. Thanks.--[[User:Bandurist|Bandurist]] 12:30, 23 February 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
== Sysop ==<br />
<br />
Welcome back to your Sysop status, Bohdan! We've missed you, and your expertise about Eastern Europe.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:46, 29 February 2008 (EST)<br />
:Thanks! But I might not be very active... Nevertheles, I will try to help. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 14:58, 29 February 2008 (EST)<br />
::Congratulations Bohdan. [[User:Absentismens|Absentismens]] 01:26, 3 March 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
== Question ==<br />
<br />
Is there a place I can ask the community as a whole something?--'''''<span style="border: 2px #000000 solid;background:#FFD800; font-variant:small-caps">[[User:FellowChristian16|<font color="#000000">Fellow</font>]][[User talk:FellowChristian16|<font color="#000000">Christian16</font>]]</span>''''' 16:36, 19 March 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I also have a question. Currently there are three broken redirects. Should I delete the redirects and request deletion of the page? or just name the pages and allow a sysop to delete them? [[User:DrCB|DrCB]] 21:35, 20 March 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== Really random ==<br />
<br />
I was taking a nap today and you were in my dream. I had a dream that my real life cat (who's name is Jazz... my secret's out) was actually a housefly, and not a cat. And then my cousin found out that she was actually a unicorn and she was flying around the house trying to catch and eat my pet fly. And then it wasn't my pet cat/fly named Jazz, it was my pet cat/fly named Bohdan. I was all like "oh no, cousin! Don't eat Bohdan, I will be sad!"<br />
<br />
I have strange dreams. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:09, 20 March 2008 (EDT)<br />
:I am so honored :) [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 22:39, 20 March 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== deletion of lawyer values ==<br />
<br />
Dear Bohdan,<br />
<br />
Could you please explain why you deleted this article?<br />
<br />
thanks--[[User:JBuscombe|JBuscombe]] 16:41, 28 March 2008 (EDT)<br />
also what is this WP:POINT?--[[User:JBuscombe|JBuscombe]] 16:50, 28 March 2008 (EDT)<br />
:It was unencyclopedic, and obviously just a response to [[professor values]]. If you have a problem with that article, go to the [[Talk:Professor values|talk page]]. Please do not create unencyclopedic articles to make a point. It is disruptive. Thanks, [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 16:51, 28 March 2008 (EDT)<br />
WP:POINT is a policy on wikipedia. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:POINT] [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 16:52, 28 March 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
<br />
::Dear Bohdan<br />
How can you say [[Lawyer values]] is unencyclopedic and disruptive while [[Professor values]] are not? It was not just a response to the Professor values, but was inspired by it! I do not believe it was in any way disruptive. I am sure the public opinion about lawyers are more in line with what I wrote while the public still respect Professors. --[[User:JBuscombe|JBuscombe]] 17:04, 28 March 2008 (EDT)<br />
::::I point you to the newly-created [[logical fallacy#Ad hominem tu quoque|tu quoque]]. You don't have to show that professor values is right to show that lawyer values is wrong. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 21:35, 28 March 2008 (EDT)<br />
:::I actually never said I consider professor values to be encyclopedic. But the author of that article is the owner of the site, and he has said before that it won't be deleted. Please take any issues you have with professor values to its talk page. Thanks, [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 17:57, 28 March 2008 (EDT)<br />
::::Did you just delete something for breaking a rule that ''doesn't exist on this site''? --[[User:Gulik5|Gulik5]] 21:32, 28 March 2008 (EDT)<br />
:::::No. Please read the above discussion, especially where I say it was unencyclopedic. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 20:51, 29 March 2008 (EDT)<br />
The CP Commandments demand the truth. Bohdan was right, IMO. However the real point is, he answered the question as to why he removed it, clearly and concisely. Editors who keep repeating and asking in several different ways are indeed just trying to be disruptive. It is the job of CP Sysops to decide those questions, "what is encyclopedic" and what isn't. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 21:40, 28 March 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== Request ==<br />
<br />
Dear Bohdan, I am currently trying to get night edit rights so that I can better contribute to Conservapedia. As a sysop who has had experience working with me, I would like to ask for your support. If you feel that I deserve edit rights, please say so [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Request_.2F_question|here]]. If you do not think I deserve them, I fully understand and I thank you anyway. Sincerely, [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 01:19, 30 March 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==EdBot==<br />
<br />
I had a feeling that letting it sleep only 6 seconds between edits would trigger something. Thanks for the unblock. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 20:22, 1 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
:I will keep an eye on this guard dog. He will regret the next time he messes with Edbot. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 20:29, 1 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==Admin review==<br />
<br />
Speaking of regret, what do you think of my block on [[User:Adg2011]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:00, 1 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
:I just logged in now. A quick look at his contribs reveals some POV edits, but mostly talk page complaining. I probably wouldn't have blocked him for what I saw, but I just glanced. Was there something specific he was blocked for? [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 22:09, 1 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
::Almost in violation of 90/10, and too many reverts. Not an auspicious start. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:12, 1 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
:::agreed. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 22:19, 1 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== I am sorry ==<br />
<br />
I will never again forget to sign my posts. Nor will I press the tilde key one too many times. Nor will I sign on a mainspace page, then forget to sign on a talk page. Please accept my utmost apologies. ~~<br />
<br />
PS: I saw when you unblocked me the other night. I was doing my work, then all the sudden I had this urge to stop working. I look at the recent changes and lo and behold, Bohdan unblocked me. ~<br />
<br />
==Subliminal messages==<br />
<br />
I don't know, but I feel somehow you want me to get in touch with you. Could it be a subliminal message of some kind? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:10, 8 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== If it will help...... ==<br />
<br />
I will be pleased to address you as Henry! --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 22:57, 8 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
:Don't forget the "s". [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 00:09, 9 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
::There's more than one of you? That's confusing! [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 00:11, 9 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
::Sorry, HenryS, but my earlier post was made before the transmogrification was made from Henry to HenryS. ;-) I was just a bit ahead of you and Andy. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 00:14, 9 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== Contribution warning ==<br />
I took ASchafly's warning about the 90/10 rule seriously, and have only posted a few brief questions (and a fact about superdelegates he acknowledged as helpful) since then, instead of engaging in long debates as I've done prior. I'm researching some articles to contribute, but if even this level of talk activity is a violation, then I'm not sure if this site is worth the effort. I may be verbose, but I've always felt that a thoughtful, respectful discussion about controversial issues can be as educational as the underlying articles themselves. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 00:19, 10 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
:It less of a warning, more like friendly advice so there would be no warning. And while thoughtful and respectful discussion about issues is educational, it won't help the encyclopedia grow, nor benefit the article readers who have no interest in talk pages. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 00:24, 10 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== "taking out the trash" ==<br />
<br />
You do know that you just completely confirmed that Conservative was talking about and to a site Conservapedia is apparently afraid of to the degree of putting its name into the spam filter, right?<br />
<br />
But riddle me this: If sysops openly address that satellite in specifically created userspace articles, why is explicitly mentioning it apparently classified as "trash"? --[[User:MilesM|MilesM]] 20:07, 13 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
:Let it go, friend, let it go. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:12, 13 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
::You tried to [[deceit|deceive]] me and another user when we asked a question, and then you labeled my comments (and those of others) as "trash". I'm sorry, but I don't think that this is a good basis to call someone "friend".<br />
::Also, the combination of "site name in spam filter + attempted to mislead users + wiping out any mention of the name" is basically telling people to most definitely go there. If so much work has been done to deny the existence of a site, then it just has to be extremely interesting.<br />
::But hey, I've seen the extremes you're willing to go to, so I won't bring the site name on this site here. --[[User:MilesM|MilesM]] 20:26, 13 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
:::Okay, online acquaintance. Go ahead and go there if you want. But here, please drop this and don't bring it up again. Thanks, [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:31, 13 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
::::You got it, [http://avatar.wikia.com/wiki/Long_Feng Long Feng]. --[[User:MilesM|MilesM]] 20:42, 13 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Thanks[[User:Dalek|Dalek]]<br />
<br />
You can't be serious about calling HelpJazz "too liberal" on your userpage. That would be horrible thing to say about another contributor, (especially since a number of admins support him being granted night-editing rights)[[User:Dalek|Dalek]] 16:23, 14 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
:Joke. I am one of the admins who supports him. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 16:45, 14 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== thanks ==<br />
Thank you for that recent block you just made, I was looking for an admin to report it to. ^.^ --[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 21:37, 30 April 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:DarinBobby&diff=443776User talk:DarinBobby2008-05-01T01:34:43Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: New page: Welcome to Conservapedia! We hope you enjoy your stay here. But remember not to vandalize! --~~~~</p>
<hr />
<div>Welcome to Conservapedia! We hope you enjoy your stay here. But remember not to vandalize! --[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 21:34, 30 April 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Oberon&diff=443764Talk:Oberon2008-05-01T01:17:24Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: New page: Can't figure out to make the table of contents, please help!--~~~~</p>
<hr />
<div>Can't figure out to make the table of contents, please help!--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 21:17, 30 April 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Oberon&diff=443762Oberon2008-05-01T01:16:37Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: /* Name */</p>
<hr />
<div>Oberon is the farthest moon outside of [[uranus]] with a 760 Km ratio. It is the second largest moon in orbit of the planet.<br />
<br />
== Name ==<br />
Oberon, like the other moons of the same planet, have names from various productions of [[Shakespeare]].<br />
The name Oberon came from the [[king of faeries]] from [[A Midsummer Night's Dream]].<br />
<br />
== discovery ==<br />
<br />
The moon was discovered by [[William Herschel]] along with five others that he found within a few years of each other.</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Oberon&diff=443761Oberon2008-05-01T01:16:28Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: New page: Oberon is the farthest moon outside of uranus with a 760 Km ratio. It is the second largest moon in orbit of the planet. == Name == Oberon, like the other moons of the same planet, ha...</p>
<hr />
<div>Oberon is the farthest moon outside of [[uranus]] with a 760 Km ratio. It is the second largest moon in orbit of the planet.<br />
<br />
== Name ==<br />
Oberon, like the other moons of the same planet, have names from various productions of [[Shakespeare]].<br />
The name Oberon came from the [[king of faeries]] from [[A Midsummer Night's Dream]].<br />
<br />
== discovery ==<br />
<br />
The moon was discovered by [[William Herschel]] along with five others that he found within a few years of each other.</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fox_News_Channel&diff=443737Talk:Fox News Channel2008-05-01T00:27:54Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: /* Requested edits */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{protect|TK}}<br />
<br />
Suggest someone writes this page properly, fairly and honestly (yes it's biased toward GOP/conservatism) and then locks it. <br />
<br />
This article is exceptionally better than its predecessor. --[[User:Truth is bipartisan|Truth is bipartisan]] 17:59, 18 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Well... the last article called Fox News Channel was copied wholesale from wikipedia. This is fine. But we appear to have lost the discussion page for [[Fox News]]. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 18:47, 17 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Please don't revert pages while someone is editing!<br />
<br />
Thanks. :-) --[[User:TK|TK]] 03:02, 18 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
:Psst... no way to know something is being edited ;) [[User:Myk|Myk]] 03:17, 18 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
::* IM me! Exculpatory1 on AIM. ;-)<br />
<br />
<br />
== Morons/Vandals ==<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Okay, it was pretty much made crap by a vandal, who has now been blocked. Post your suggestions here, if you have something worth-while to suggest, and I can incorporate your changes. I think it more important we spend our time creating pages which are badly needed, and missing from here, rather than constantly reverting pages screwed around with by ***holes, who are obviously mentally impaired, or little kids with too much free time.''' --[[User:TK|TK]] 06:20, 19 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
----<br />
<br />
<br />
Why is the point of this whole article to defend FOX news against criticism? Shouldnt it be about facts about FOX, and facts only? And then maybe have a separate "criticism" or "controversial" section at the bottom?<br />
<br />
Is this an encyclopedia or is it something else? [[User:Messpm|Messpm]] 22:09, 18 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
*''Well, it is something else'', it is the '''Conserv'''-apedia. It would be intellectually arguable that the smears and disinformation put out there about the Fox News Channel is now integral to all of the information about it. Therefore a large portion of the page will contain the "information you object to. Since you do not have a user page here, I have no idea if you are a registered member or what. If you had bothered to look at the page information, you would see it was totally devoid of information until I populated it two days ago. I am sorry if my abilities are not up to your obviously higher standards, but I have been doing other things, like working at my job, placating needy clients who also demand attention. It has been my intention to get back to it, organize it, add headers, etc. But since this is a wiki, I also expected others to help organize it as well. I have no problem with you adding the header: "Controversy" Some of the information, especially quotes from Roger Ailes would necessarily end up in both sections. If you feel you can at least be aware of our users affinity for Fox News, because they provide a non-judgemental forum for the Christian right and Republicans, have at it, your help would, indeed, and most sincerely be welcome! --[[User:TK|&#91;&#91;TK&#124;TerryK]]&lt;sup&gt;(&#91;&#91;User talk:TK&#124;contact me]])&lt;/sup&gt;]] 23:02, 18 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
<br />
::I apologise for the somewhat aggressive tone in my former message. I had just read the locked moon article which, quite frankly, almost made me cry. I realize that this is a work in progress and that it is not no-where near complete in it's current state. And I would be happy to help, if I can find the time since I, like you, have things in real life to do as well. But until I can find the time to make some proper research my contribution will solely be in commenting the article.<br />
<br />
::That being said, my biggest concern with the article is perhaps the large amount of facts, or maybe information is the right term since as you pointed out this is conservapedia and it is bound to have a bias, being added at once, instead of little at a time. In my mind, and you may or may not agree on this, less information in smaller packages makes the article easier to structure. Still, your effort in contributing what you have is a start and I would like to point out that this is not a complaint you should take personally, it is rather a suggestion to the future editors. Whoever that is, you, me, or someone else. [[User:Messpm|Messpm]] 10:34, 19 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Thanks, Messpm! When collecting information, I find it sometimes easier to compose using Word, then pasting it over, so as I have the time, I add to it, then BAM! I paste it here. I know some additional headers and splitting it up some, for readability is needed. Sometimes with very political things, we need to move lots slower refining things. Putting emotions aside, by all credible studies and comments from people in the public arena, Fox has indeed surpassed the other news organizations in the US, in crediability, without giving up it's pro-America stance. A nifty trick, if the pros are to believed. ;-) Besides, just before midnite, my blood sugar is low, so I get cranky! :p --~ [[User:TK|Terry]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 10:43, 19 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== Introductory paragraph needs work ==<br />
<br />
The end of the first paragraph doesn't sound great on an encyclopedic level. There are several oddly worded rhetorical questions which need to go. Also the tone sounds like someone is loudly arguing, which is not encyclopedic.--[[User:Nomine Cervus|Nomine Cervus]] 02:23, 27 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I agree.<br />
<br />
==Pic to add==<br />
[[Image:FNC logo.jpg|thumb|right|Fox News Logo]]<br />
<br />
== '''FOX NOISE CHANNEL''' ==<br />
<br />
Thats the real name of this neocon run noise making channel. Its full of fear-mongers and radical neocons. KO said it best so get it right its Fox Noise Channel.<br />
<br />
The worst part about it is these neocons are all fakes.[[USER:Smithson9999]]<br />
<br />
:Oh, look. A Slobbermann groupie carrying out their marching orders. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 21:34, 29 June 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Jinxmchue just cured my anemia with all that irony. --[[User:9820|9820]] 00:21, 27 July 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
:You think I watch Fox News? I don't have cable TV at all. Not even rabbit ears anymore. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 19:18, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
Eh, who needs TV when you have the internet? :P--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 20:24, 30 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== Requested edits ==<br />
<br />
* can someone mention the fact on how it finaly gave a voice to white middle class american males. Also,. it is an unfair unbalanced network [[User:Eljawa|Eljawa]] 10:06, 25 July 2007 (EDT)<br />
:Sounds like a fairly racist POV you have expressed. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:52, 25 July 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
* Could this article be added to [[:Category:Broadcasting]]? Thanks. --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 02:20, 1 April 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
<br />
Indeed it can! --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 07:23, 2 April 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
There is an error in the last sentence of the last paragraph of the "Founding" section. "quit" instead of "quite"--[[User:TheGoodSociety|Joe]] 15:34, 17 August 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
A lot of the statements in the article are not sourced and some are simply pure conjecture, also there is an obvious pro-Fox bias.--[[User:NeoCon4Life|NeoCon4Life]] 16:11, 4 November 2007 (EST)<br />
<br />
<br />
*NeoCon/Liberal, please be specific! This isn't WP and trolling will be dealt with harshly! --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 16:46, 4 November 2007 (EST)<br />
<br />
*Do we have a citation for "It's been trouncing CNN, MSNBC and CNBC for years, and it quite often draws a much larger audience share than all competitors, combined."?<br />
--[[User:Cowbell14|Cowbell14]] 15:18, 10 December 2007 (EST)<br />
<br />
*Please tag that the sentence "It's been trouncing CNN, MSNBC and CNBC for years, and it quite often draws a much larger audience share than all competitors, combined."? needs to be cited. Recent information shows that CNN has slightly pulled ahead in overall ratings but can most likely be explained because of the major advertising campaigns they've been using. Regardless it needs a source cited to be an accurate statement and not just an opinion. --[[User:TheRockstar|TheRockstar]] 20:43, 1 February 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
*Please help ensure accuracy by removing opinion or conjecture and citing sources. Example: "Who can say what host Greta Van Susteren's politics are? She mostly covers the crime-of-the-day stories. Geraldo Rivera has always been liberal on most issues, with the exception of being a strong supporter of the military and stiff penalties for sex offenders.". This statement does not cite a source. While I may know from viewing that Rivera has been more liberal then others on the network people who are trying to get an educated factual statement don't know where it came from --[[User:TheRockstar|TheRockstar]] 20:47, 1 February 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
<br />
I would think it would be a good idea to have an article about the criticism fox news has gotten (I myself DO think it is a right wing station though) But some of the criticism it has gotten is a little bit absurd, and it would be somthing interesting to talk about.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 20:27, 30 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== It's okay.... ==<br />
<br />
Three Sysops editing at once, LOL. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 22:48, 13 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
:This article is starting to look fair and balanced. We probably need a little more about Ailes & his background. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:49, 13 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
*Yes, maybe we can get another two or three admins in here working on it! :p --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 22:50, 13 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==Independent?==<br />
You guys are conservatives, so facts don't always matter... But Bill O'Reilly has been shown as a registered Republican Many times. [[User:SirJim|SirJim]] 08:04, 11 July 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
*That is in fact more [[deceit]]. O'Reilly is registered Independent. All voting rolls are public record in the United States, and you should not be making such inaccurate, and possible trolling posts. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 15:31, 25 July 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Yes, but he WAS a registered rebulican, and he supossed was one when he was saying he is "independent" [[user:thegovernator]]<br />
<br />
== bias. ==<br />
<br />
this article reads like fox news, please consider moving to conserva-<br />
<br />
owait, its already here. <br />
<br />
facts < politics<br />
<br />
flaming appreciated, its a bit cold here. {{unsigned|Headsup}}<br />
<br />
EXCUSE ME!!! is this an article or an advertisment for fox news channel????? how about some facts. eg, when did it start broadcasting, where does it broadcast besides the united states, who are its directors, what are its main topics and programmes??? {{unsigned|Plqgnmv}}<br />
<br />
<br />
*Okay, I excuse you. Now, how about you doing what editors are supposed to do, and suggest specifics here, or ask that it be unlocked for you to add them? --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 18:45, 1 September 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==Internal Links==<br />
Both [[Chris Wallace]] and [[Brit Hume]] lack internal links in this article, even though there are articles on both of them. You might want to change that. Thanks, --[[User:Tash|Tash]] 19:46, 12 September 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== Edit for Fair and Balanced section ==<br />
<br />
In the interest of full disclosure, should the fact that Fox News is the biggest backer of Republican presidential candidate Fred Thompson be mentioned?<br />
<br />
I'm not sure of the accuracy of the claim, but it is on the front page of Conservapedia right now, and a backing of a presidential candidate by a news source is something of enough import to warrant its inclusion. {{unsigned|Stitch}}-- 00:54, 7 November 2007<br />
<br />
*Well, news items are news items, articles in encyclopedia's are not the same, yes? What have one to do with the other? The source given was hard to find, but seems to be from someone's blog, and part of the citation there comes from one of those tabloid-like newspapers in the United Kingdom. Sort of a circuitous way to bring election coverage to the United States in my opinion, wouldn't you agree? So one should imagine whoever placed that item was just trying to use this silly sourced item for provoking discussion. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 04:53, 7 November 2007 (EST)<br />
<br />
== By way of criticism: Fox News still has a liberal style ==<br />
<br />
To demonstrate the impact [[liberal bias]] has on the media, this article should note some instances where the "liberal" style of news commentary remains on Fox, for example:<br />
* "preference for obscenity and profanity" http://foxnewsporn.com/ {{fact}}<br />
* "over-reliance on mockery" - Fox commentary shows do a lot of this, it's not very Christian<br />
* "believing that conservatives will fail" Fox's election coverage sometimes portrays Hillary as inevitable because of the overwhelming media consensus {{fact}}<br />
* "pretending to know more than he does" Fox's commentators, especially O'Reilly, sometimes presume to know things they don't know {{fact}}<br />
<br />
In this way the criticisms liberals lodge at Fox can be turned back at them as examples of typical liberal style. [[User:Shii|Shii]] 23:30, 23 November 2007 (EST)<br />
<br />
== Proof that Fox Noise has an agenda. ==<br />
[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-begala/fox-news-we-report-e_b_80698.html Fox News: We Report -- Even if We Know It's False] Paul Begala complains about the lies told about him on air.<br />
<br />
[http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/682323/EA_Slaps_Fox_News.html EA Slaps Fox News] EA's response to Fox News' recent overexaggerated claims of pornography in Mass Effect. Farren Ballast. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 23:04, 24 January 2008 (EST)<br />
:Fox dutifully fulfills New Media Are Evil: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNO6G4ApJQY here] and [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWVDRx-V5n4 here] Then you've got [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGqPxn7njqM Fox News editing footage to make a dem look worse] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5L5dYzu1w9k Fox ignoring Ron Paul], [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxAPf2x96I0 Fox attacking "non-existant" veterans], and [http://foxattacks.com/ pretty much everything from Fox Attacks.]<br />
:MSM is garbage. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 16:06, 27 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
::No? Fox Noise Channel's lies and attacks don't even warrant a "BUT THOSE ARE LOCAL CHANNELS" response? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 16:49, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
:::If you wish to continue to call it "Fox Noise Channel," please feel free to go back to DK or DU or wherever you came from (after I request that you be permanently blocked as a troll for it). [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 19:21, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
::::Stop trolling, Barakada. Maybe the reason you've been ignored is that nobody can take you seriously. How about you actually write something and say "this is what I think should go into the article" instead of posting a bunch of links strung together with nonesense and opinion? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:25, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
:::::Al...right... How about "The above links are proof that Fox News Channel does, indeed, have an agenda, and devotes parts of it's airtime to attacking forms of new media for no apparent reason, snubbing legit candidates, and attacking America's most patriotic citizens-- it's veterans."? Seriously, though, I thought I was allowed to show opinion on talk pages. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 23:25, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
::::::You are allowed to have an opinion. I've already said it's not ''what'' you said but how you said it. Nobody's going to do the work for you, so if you want something placed into the article, write it up, including wikimarkup, and ask someone (I think it has to be a sysop) to either unlock the page or put the text in. None of your above posts are written in good encyclopedic form, so if indeed you were suggesting material for addition, the value of what you said got lost in the noise. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 00:16, 29 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
:::::::I didn't expect anyone to put my exact comments in the article. Even if I were to put the links above in in an encyclopedic form in a criticism section, I would surely be banned. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 19:47, 29 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
::::::::I don't get the point of complaining if you fully intend not to be taken seriously. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 10:26, 30 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
:::::::::I do intend to be taken seriously. However, I fully realise that any attempt to include those links in the article will come off as liberal bias, because it is. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 22:21, 30 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
Barikada, please take your [[liberal]] links and your [[liberal]] stories elsewhere. Or else try being more fair and balanced, like Fox News. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 19:31, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
:Don't you start it now too, Feebas. There's nothing wrong with his links by themselves, but instead the problem is the manner in which he presented them. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:37, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
::I'm sorry... :) Admittedly, Barikada could have been a bit less grating and sardonic in his presentation. And perhaps - if it were kept relatively neutral/objective - a reasonable section on "criticisms of Fox News" section could even be written (not sure how well it'd go over, but regardless). [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 23:31, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
:::I think as long as the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]] are followed (particularly #Attribution), there is no reason why we shouldn't have a criticism section. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 00:16, 29 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
::::Criticism, yes. Hate-fueled smearing, no. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 00:10, 30 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
:::::Exactly. We don't allow that here, but neutral criticism is ok. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 10:26, 30 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
::::::The links above are hate-filled, I agree. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 22:21, 30 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/26/arts/television/26mass.html This] clear retraction by Cooper Lawrence, the author who made the accusation makes the Roger Ailes quote seem pretty empty - "If you make a mistake, get on the air as fast as you can and admit it. ... Do your homework."<br />
<br />
Also, despite having a commentator who <i>had actually played the game</i> available, Fox chose not to use him in the broadcast. It makes this quote of his fairly hollow-sounding: "Make sure you reach out to a point of view you don't agree with to be sure you have some balance in your piece, because journalists, despite the public perception, are not empty-headed fools.".<br />
<br />
Hollow, that is, unless Fox does indeed retract. Which they may. When Hell freezes over. [[User:Reasonableperson|Reasonableperson]] 22:43, 29 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
I believe that, at the very least, the Begala bit should at least get some mention-- there's no way to spin that. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 22:21, 30 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
==Fox's ratings take another dive==<br />
[http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/01/31/fox-news-ratings-take-another-slide/] Fox's ratings are dropping. If the decline of newspaper circulation is proof that society is becoming more liberal (As seen on the main page's talk page, courtesy of Andy) what does this mean? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 19:50, 3 February 2008 (EST)<br />
:Crooks and Liars and Media Matters. Wow. Great sources, Barikada. What's next? The Weekly World News? Don't bother clicking the link, folks. It's just mindless, biased liberal propaganda. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 15:02, 4 February 2008 (EST)<br />
::Besides, any drop in [[Fox News]]' ratings is likely due to the liberal [[MSM]], trying to draw viewers away from responsable, balanced reporting with their [[liberal]] [[propaganda]]. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 18:05, 4 February 2008 (EST)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fox_News_Channel&diff=443736Talk:Fox News Channel2008-05-01T00:24:43Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: /* '''FOX NOISE CHANNEL''' */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{protect|TK}}<br />
<br />
Suggest someone writes this page properly, fairly and honestly (yes it's biased toward GOP/conservatism) and then locks it. <br />
<br />
This article is exceptionally better than its predecessor. --[[User:Truth is bipartisan|Truth is bipartisan]] 17:59, 18 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Well... the last article called Fox News Channel was copied wholesale from wikipedia. This is fine. But we appear to have lost the discussion page for [[Fox News]]. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 18:47, 17 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Please don't revert pages while someone is editing!<br />
<br />
Thanks. :-) --[[User:TK|TK]] 03:02, 18 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
:Psst... no way to know something is being edited ;) [[User:Myk|Myk]] 03:17, 18 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
::* IM me! Exculpatory1 on AIM. ;-)<br />
<br />
<br />
== Morons/Vandals ==<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Okay, it was pretty much made crap by a vandal, who has now been blocked. Post your suggestions here, if you have something worth-while to suggest, and I can incorporate your changes. I think it more important we spend our time creating pages which are badly needed, and missing from here, rather than constantly reverting pages screwed around with by ***holes, who are obviously mentally impaired, or little kids with too much free time.''' --[[User:TK|TK]] 06:20, 19 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
----<br />
<br />
<br />
Why is the point of this whole article to defend FOX news against criticism? Shouldnt it be about facts about FOX, and facts only? And then maybe have a separate "criticism" or "controversial" section at the bottom?<br />
<br />
Is this an encyclopedia or is it something else? [[User:Messpm|Messpm]] 22:09, 18 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
*''Well, it is something else'', it is the '''Conserv'''-apedia. It would be intellectually arguable that the smears and disinformation put out there about the Fox News Channel is now integral to all of the information about it. Therefore a large portion of the page will contain the "information you object to. Since you do not have a user page here, I have no idea if you are a registered member or what. If you had bothered to look at the page information, you would see it was totally devoid of information until I populated it two days ago. I am sorry if my abilities are not up to your obviously higher standards, but I have been doing other things, like working at my job, placating needy clients who also demand attention. It has been my intention to get back to it, organize it, add headers, etc. But since this is a wiki, I also expected others to help organize it as well. I have no problem with you adding the header: "Controversy" Some of the information, especially quotes from Roger Ailes would necessarily end up in both sections. If you feel you can at least be aware of our users affinity for Fox News, because they provide a non-judgemental forum for the Christian right and Republicans, have at it, your help would, indeed, and most sincerely be welcome! --[[User:TK|&#91;&#91;TK&#124;TerryK]]&lt;sup&gt;(&#91;&#91;User talk:TK&#124;contact me]])&lt;/sup&gt;]] 23:02, 18 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
<br />
::I apologise for the somewhat aggressive tone in my former message. I had just read the locked moon article which, quite frankly, almost made me cry. I realize that this is a work in progress and that it is not no-where near complete in it's current state. And I would be happy to help, if I can find the time since I, like you, have things in real life to do as well. But until I can find the time to make some proper research my contribution will solely be in commenting the article.<br />
<br />
::That being said, my biggest concern with the article is perhaps the large amount of facts, or maybe information is the right term since as you pointed out this is conservapedia and it is bound to have a bias, being added at once, instead of little at a time. In my mind, and you may or may not agree on this, less information in smaller packages makes the article easier to structure. Still, your effort in contributing what you have is a start and I would like to point out that this is not a complaint you should take personally, it is rather a suggestion to the future editors. Whoever that is, you, me, or someone else. [[User:Messpm|Messpm]] 10:34, 19 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Thanks, Messpm! When collecting information, I find it sometimes easier to compose using Word, then pasting it over, so as I have the time, I add to it, then BAM! I paste it here. I know some additional headers and splitting it up some, for readability is needed. Sometimes with very political things, we need to move lots slower refining things. Putting emotions aside, by all credible studies and comments from people in the public arena, Fox has indeed surpassed the other news organizations in the US, in crediability, without giving up it's pro-America stance. A nifty trick, if the pros are to believed. ;-) Besides, just before midnite, my blood sugar is low, so I get cranky! :p --~ [[User:TK|Terry]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 10:43, 19 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== Introductory paragraph needs work ==<br />
<br />
The end of the first paragraph doesn't sound great on an encyclopedic level. There are several oddly worded rhetorical questions which need to go. Also the tone sounds like someone is loudly arguing, which is not encyclopedic.--[[User:Nomine Cervus|Nomine Cervus]] 02:23, 27 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I agree.<br />
<br />
==Pic to add==<br />
[[Image:FNC logo.jpg|thumb|right|Fox News Logo]]<br />
<br />
== '''FOX NOISE CHANNEL''' ==<br />
<br />
Thats the real name of this neocon run noise making channel. Its full of fear-mongers and radical neocons. KO said it best so get it right its Fox Noise Channel.<br />
<br />
The worst part about it is these neocons are all fakes.[[USER:Smithson9999]]<br />
<br />
:Oh, look. A Slobbermann groupie carrying out their marching orders. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 21:34, 29 June 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Jinxmchue just cured my anemia with all that irony. --[[User:9820|9820]] 00:21, 27 July 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
:You think I watch Fox News? I don't have cable TV at all. Not even rabbit ears anymore. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 19:18, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
Eh, who needs TV when you have the internet? :P--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 20:24, 30 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== Requested edits ==<br />
<br />
* can someone mention the fact on how it finaly gave a voice to white middle class american males. Also,. it is an unfair unbalanced network [[User:Eljawa|Eljawa]] 10:06, 25 July 2007 (EDT)<br />
:Sounds like a fairly racist POV you have expressed. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:52, 25 July 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
* Could this article be added to [[:Category:Broadcasting]]? Thanks. --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 02:20, 1 April 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
<br />
Indeed it can! --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 07:23, 2 April 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
There is an error in the last sentence of the last paragraph of the "Founding" section. "quit" instead of "quite"--[[User:TheGoodSociety|Joe]] 15:34, 17 August 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
A lot of the statements in the article are not sourced and some are simply pure conjecture, also there is an obvious pro-Fox bias.--[[User:NeoCon4Life|NeoCon4Life]] 16:11, 4 November 2007 (EST)<br />
<br />
<br />
*NeoCon/Liberal, please be specific! This isn't WP and trolling will be dealt with harshly! --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 16:46, 4 November 2007 (EST)<br />
<br />
*Do we have a citation for "It's been trouncing CNN, MSNBC and CNBC for years, and it quite often draws a much larger audience share than all competitors, combined."?<br />
--[[User:Cowbell14|Cowbell14]] 15:18, 10 December 2007 (EST)<br />
<br />
*Please tag that the sentence "It's been trouncing CNN, MSNBC and CNBC for years, and it quite often draws a much larger audience share than all competitors, combined."? needs to be cited. Recent information shows that CNN has slightly pulled ahead in overall ratings but can most likely be explained because of the major advertising campaigns they've been using. Regardless it needs a source cited to be an accurate statement and not just an opinion. --[[User:TheRockstar|TheRockstar]] 20:43, 1 February 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
*Please help ensure accuracy by removing opinion or conjecture and citing sources. Example: "Who can say what host Greta Van Susteren's politics are? She mostly covers the crime-of-the-day stories. Geraldo Rivera has always been liberal on most issues, with the exception of being a strong supporter of the military and stiff penalties for sex offenders.". This statement does not cite a source. While I may know from viewing that Rivera has been more liberal then others on the network people who are trying to get an educated factual statement don't know where it came from --[[User:TheRockstar|TheRockstar]] 20:47, 1 February 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
== It's okay.... ==<br />
<br />
Three Sysops editing at once, LOL. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 22:48, 13 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
:This article is starting to look fair and balanced. We probably need a little more about Ailes & his background. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:49, 13 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
*Yes, maybe we can get another two or three admins in here working on it! :p --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 22:50, 13 May 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==Independent?==<br />
You guys are conservatives, so facts don't always matter... But Bill O'Reilly has been shown as a registered Republican Many times. [[User:SirJim|SirJim]] 08:04, 11 July 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
*That is in fact more [[deceit]]. O'Reilly is registered Independent. All voting rolls are public record in the United States, and you should not be making such inaccurate, and possible trolling posts. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 15:31, 25 July 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Yes, but he WAS a registered rebulican, and he supossed was one when he was saying he is "independent" [[user:thegovernator]]<br />
<br />
== bias. ==<br />
<br />
this article reads like fox news, please consider moving to conserva-<br />
<br />
owait, its already here. <br />
<br />
facts < politics<br />
<br />
flaming appreciated, its a bit cold here. {{unsigned|Headsup}}<br />
<br />
EXCUSE ME!!! is this an article or an advertisment for fox news channel????? how about some facts. eg, when did it start broadcasting, where does it broadcast besides the united states, who are its directors, what are its main topics and programmes??? {{unsigned|Plqgnmv}}<br />
<br />
<br />
*Okay, I excuse you. Now, how about you doing what editors are supposed to do, and suggest specifics here, or ask that it be unlocked for you to add them? --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 18:45, 1 September 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==Internal Links==<br />
Both [[Chris Wallace]] and [[Brit Hume]] lack internal links in this article, even though there are articles on both of them. You might want to change that. Thanks, --[[User:Tash|Tash]] 19:46, 12 September 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== Edit for Fair and Balanced section ==<br />
<br />
In the interest of full disclosure, should the fact that Fox News is the biggest backer of Republican presidential candidate Fred Thompson be mentioned?<br />
<br />
I'm not sure of the accuracy of the claim, but it is on the front page of Conservapedia right now, and a backing of a presidential candidate by a news source is something of enough import to warrant its inclusion. {{unsigned|Stitch}}-- 00:54, 7 November 2007<br />
<br />
*Well, news items are news items, articles in encyclopedia's are not the same, yes? What have one to do with the other? The source given was hard to find, but seems to be from someone's blog, and part of the citation there comes from one of those tabloid-like newspapers in the United Kingdom. Sort of a circuitous way to bring election coverage to the United States in my opinion, wouldn't you agree? So one should imagine whoever placed that item was just trying to use this silly sourced item for provoking discussion. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 04:53, 7 November 2007 (EST)<br />
<br />
== By way of criticism: Fox News still has a liberal style ==<br />
<br />
To demonstrate the impact [[liberal bias]] has on the media, this article should note some instances where the "liberal" style of news commentary remains on Fox, for example:<br />
* "preference for obscenity and profanity" http://foxnewsporn.com/ {{fact}}<br />
* "over-reliance on mockery" - Fox commentary shows do a lot of this, it's not very Christian<br />
* "believing that conservatives will fail" Fox's election coverage sometimes portrays Hillary as inevitable because of the overwhelming media consensus {{fact}}<br />
* "pretending to know more than he does" Fox's commentators, especially O'Reilly, sometimes presume to know things they don't know {{fact}}<br />
<br />
In this way the criticisms liberals lodge at Fox can be turned back at them as examples of typical liberal style. [[User:Shii|Shii]] 23:30, 23 November 2007 (EST)<br />
<br />
== Proof that Fox Noise has an agenda. ==<br />
[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-begala/fox-news-we-report-e_b_80698.html Fox News: We Report -- Even if We Know It's False] Paul Begala complains about the lies told about him on air.<br />
<br />
[http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/682323/EA_Slaps_Fox_News.html EA Slaps Fox News] EA's response to Fox News' recent overexaggerated claims of pornography in Mass Effect. Farren Ballast. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 23:04, 24 January 2008 (EST)<br />
:Fox dutifully fulfills New Media Are Evil: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNO6G4ApJQY here] and [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWVDRx-V5n4 here] Then you've got [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGqPxn7njqM Fox News editing footage to make a dem look worse] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5L5dYzu1w9k Fox ignoring Ron Paul], [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxAPf2x96I0 Fox attacking "non-existant" veterans], and [http://foxattacks.com/ pretty much everything from Fox Attacks.]<br />
:MSM is garbage. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 16:06, 27 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
::No? Fox Noise Channel's lies and attacks don't even warrant a "BUT THOSE ARE LOCAL CHANNELS" response? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 16:49, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
:::If you wish to continue to call it "Fox Noise Channel," please feel free to go back to DK or DU or wherever you came from (after I request that you be permanently blocked as a troll for it). [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 19:21, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
::::Stop trolling, Barakada. Maybe the reason you've been ignored is that nobody can take you seriously. How about you actually write something and say "this is what I think should go into the article" instead of posting a bunch of links strung together with nonesense and opinion? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:25, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
:::::Al...right... How about "The above links are proof that Fox News Channel does, indeed, have an agenda, and devotes parts of it's airtime to attacking forms of new media for no apparent reason, snubbing legit candidates, and attacking America's most patriotic citizens-- it's veterans."? Seriously, though, I thought I was allowed to show opinion on talk pages. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 23:25, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
::::::You are allowed to have an opinion. I've already said it's not ''what'' you said but how you said it. Nobody's going to do the work for you, so if you want something placed into the article, write it up, including wikimarkup, and ask someone (I think it has to be a sysop) to either unlock the page or put the text in. None of your above posts are written in good encyclopedic form, so if indeed you were suggesting material for addition, the value of what you said got lost in the noise. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 00:16, 29 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
:::::::I didn't expect anyone to put my exact comments in the article. Even if I were to put the links above in in an encyclopedic form in a criticism section, I would surely be banned. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 19:47, 29 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
::::::::I don't get the point of complaining if you fully intend not to be taken seriously. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 10:26, 30 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
:::::::::I do intend to be taken seriously. However, I fully realise that any attempt to include those links in the article will come off as liberal bias, because it is. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 22:21, 30 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
Barikada, please take your [[liberal]] links and your [[liberal]] stories elsewhere. Or else try being more fair and balanced, like Fox News. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 19:31, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
:Don't you start it now too, Feebas. There's nothing wrong with his links by themselves, but instead the problem is the manner in which he presented them. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:37, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
::I'm sorry... :) Admittedly, Barikada could have been a bit less grating and sardonic in his presentation. And perhaps - if it were kept relatively neutral/objective - a reasonable section on "criticisms of Fox News" section could even be written (not sure how well it'd go over, but regardless). [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 23:31, 28 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
:::I think as long as the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]] are followed (particularly #Attribution), there is no reason why we shouldn't have a criticism section. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 00:16, 29 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
::::Criticism, yes. Hate-fueled smearing, no. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 00:10, 30 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
:::::Exactly. We don't allow that here, but neutral criticism is ok. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 10:26, 30 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
::::::The links above are hate-filled, I agree. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 22:21, 30 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/26/arts/television/26mass.html This] clear retraction by Cooper Lawrence, the author who made the accusation makes the Roger Ailes quote seem pretty empty - "If you make a mistake, get on the air as fast as you can and admit it. ... Do your homework."<br />
<br />
Also, despite having a commentator who <i>had actually played the game</i> available, Fox chose not to use him in the broadcast. It makes this quote of his fairly hollow-sounding: "Make sure you reach out to a point of view you don't agree with to be sure you have some balance in your piece, because journalists, despite the public perception, are not empty-headed fools.".<br />
<br />
Hollow, that is, unless Fox does indeed retract. Which they may. When Hell freezes over. [[User:Reasonableperson|Reasonableperson]] 22:43, 29 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
I believe that, at the very least, the Begala bit should at least get some mention-- there's no way to spin that. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 22:21, 30 January 2008 (EST)<br />
<br />
==Fox's ratings take another dive==<br />
[http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/01/31/fox-news-ratings-take-another-slide/] Fox's ratings are dropping. If the decline of newspaper circulation is proof that society is becoming more liberal (As seen on the main page's talk page, courtesy of Andy) what does this mean? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 19:50, 3 February 2008 (EST)<br />
:Crooks and Liars and Media Matters. Wow. Great sources, Barikada. What's next? The Weekly World News? Don't bother clicking the link, folks. It's just mindless, biased liberal propaganda. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 15:02, 4 February 2008 (EST)<br />
::Besides, any drop in [[Fox News]]' ratings is likely due to the liberal [[MSM]], trying to draw viewers away from responsable, balanced reporting with their [[liberal]] [[propaganda]]. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 18:05, 4 February 2008 (EST)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:ITSAMEMARIO&diff=443734User:ITSAMEMARIO2008-05-01T00:20:26Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{userboxtop}}<br />
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=I ♥ PAUL |info=This user supports RON PAUL for US President}}<br />
{{User guncontrol}}<br />
{{User patriot questions authority}}<br />
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=I ♥ MARIO |info=This user loves the Mario franchise, but thinks Nintendo has gone downhill after the N64}}<br />
<br />
{{User Evo}}<br />
<br />
<br />
{{User pubschool}}<br />
{{User Geek}}<br />
{{userboxbottom}}<br />
<br />
Hello world,<br />
<br />
I am new to all of this editing and whatnot, but if I make any mistakes (as I frequently do) Please kindly inform me of my error, so I know not to do it again.<br />
<br />
Thank you all,<br />
--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 20:20, 30 April 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:ITSAMEMARIO&diff=443733User:ITSAMEMARIO2008-05-01T00:20:15Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{userboxtop}}<br />
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=I ♥ PAUL |info=This user supports RON PAUL for US President}}<br />
{{User guncontrol}}<br />
{{User patriot questions authority}}<br />
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=I ♥ MARIO |info=This user loves the Mario franchise, but thinks Nintendo has gone downhill after the N64}}<br />
<br />
{{User Evo}}<br />
<br />
<br />
{{User pubschool}}<br />
{{User Geek}}<br />
{{userboxbottom}}<br />
<br />
Hello world,<br />
<br />
I am new to all of this editing and whatnot, but if I make any mistakes (as I frequently do) Please kindly inform me of my error, so I know not to do it again.<br />
<br />
Thank you all,<br />
--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 20:20, 30 April 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bereshit&diff=443722Talk:Bereshit2008-05-01T00:04:10Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>Bereshit is the [[Hebrew]] word for the word for the book of Genesis, it is pronounced Bere Sheet--<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 20:03, 30 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
<br />
Ah, I saw this and thought it was an act of vandalism for a moment, with the "s-word" in it and all --[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 20:04, 30 April 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:ITSAMEMARIO&diff=443090User talk:ITSAMEMARIO2008-04-30T02:59:56Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>Hey, if any people who are familiar with the "scripting" of this website, I would like some help!--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:32, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I'm familiar with it --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:32, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Could you direct me to a site that explains all of this crazy stuff?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:33, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I don't know of a specific place that teaches the scripting but here is 95% of what you will need to know<br />
<br />
<nowiki>[[:Category:A]]</nowiki> links to the category on A<br />
<nowiki>[[Category:A]]</nowiki> adds something to the category A<br />
<nowiki>[[Car|Hello]]</nowiki> links to the article Car with the word Hello<br />
<nowiki>[[Car]]</nowiki> links to the article Car using the word Car<br />
<nowiki>{{Car}}</nowiki> adds the template Car to an article<br />
<br />
--<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:36, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Do you need any more information --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:39, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
No, I'm good for now... I think. I will just Google 'how to use wikipedia code' If I need any more help. This site does use the same code as wikipedia, right?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:41, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
We use the same coding but we do have templates they don't have --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:42, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
One last code you'll need to know is <nowiki>#REDIRECT[[A]]</nowiki> it redirects an article to the article A --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:44, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
K thanks, I ask for more if I don't know anything. Thanks for helping out a noob! ^.^ lol--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:45, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==Error in your user box==<br />
You have a spelling error in your I (heart) Mario user box. "..thinks nitendo has..". I thought I'd point this out instead of changing it myself and having you yell at me for editing your user page without permission. +_+ [[User:Kektklik|Kektk]] 22:44, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Whats the error? (sorry, I just have horrible grammar skills)--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:47, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
It's spelled nintendo --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:52, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
DUH! Now I do feel like a total idiot. But eh, its late at night for me, and I'm tired, sooo. :P<br />
--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:55, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==Ron Paul, /b/==<br />
<br />
Sup? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 22:56, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
<s>Dear god, moar /b/ tards, as much as I find this amusing, an admin probably wont and you will get the B& hammer.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:57, 29 April 2008 (EDT)</s><br />
Put a meme on your page, so now we are even! lol--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:59, 29 April 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:ITSAMEMARIO&diff=443087User talk:ITSAMEMARIO2008-04-30T02:57:48Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>Hey, if any people who are familiar with the "scripting" of this website, I would like some help!--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:32, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I'm familiar with it --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:32, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Could you direct me to a site that explains all of this crazy stuff?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:33, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I don't know of a specific place that teaches the scripting but here is 95% of what you will need to know<br />
<br />
<nowiki>[[:Category:A]]</nowiki> links to the category on A<br />
<nowiki>[[Category:A]]</nowiki> adds something to the category A<br />
<nowiki>[[Car|Hello]]</nowiki> links to the article Car with the word Hello<br />
<nowiki>[[Car]]</nowiki> links to the article Car using the word Car<br />
<nowiki>{{Car}}</nowiki> adds the template Car to an article<br />
<br />
--<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:36, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Do you need any more information --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:39, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
No, I'm good for now... I think. I will just Google 'how to use wikipedia code' If I need any more help. This site does use the same code as wikipedia, right?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:41, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
We use the same coding but we do have templates they don't have --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:42, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
One last code you'll need to know is <nowiki>#REDIRECT[[A]]</nowiki> it redirects an article to the article A --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:44, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
K thanks, I ask for more if I don't know anything. Thanks for helping out a noob! ^.^ lol--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:45, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==Error in your user box==<br />
You have a spelling error in your I (heart) Mario user box. "..thinks nitendo has..". I thought I'd point this out instead of changing it myself and having you yell at me for editing your user page without permission. +_+ [[User:Kektklik|Kektk]] 22:44, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Whats the error? (sorry, I just have horrible grammar skills)--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:47, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
It's spelled nintendo --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:52, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
DUH! Now I do feel like a total idiot. But eh, its late at night for me, and I'm tired, sooo. :P<br />
--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:55, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==Ron Paul, /b/==<br />
<br />
Sup? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 22:56, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Dear god, moar /b/ tards, as much as I find this amusing, an admin probably wont and you will get the B& hammer.--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:57, 29 April 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:ITSAMEMARIO&diff=443080User talk:ITSAMEMARIO2008-04-30T02:55:05Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>Hey, if any people who are familiar with the "scripting" of this website, I would like some help!--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:32, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I'm familiar with it --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:32, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Could you direct me to a site that explains all of this crazy stuff?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:33, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I don't know of a specific place that teaches the scripting but here is 95% of what you will need to know<br />
<br />
<nowiki>[[:Category:A]]</nowiki> links to the category on A<br />
<nowiki>[[Category:A]]</nowiki> adds something to the category A<br />
<nowiki>[[Car|Hello]]</nowiki> links to the article Car with the word Hello<br />
<nowiki>[[Car]]</nowiki> links to the article Car using the word Car<br />
<nowiki>{{Car}}</nowiki> adds the template Car to an article<br />
<br />
--<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:36, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Do you need any more information --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:39, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
No, I'm good for now... I think. I will just Google 'how to use wikipedia code' If I need any more help. This site does use the same code as wikipedia, right?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:41, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
We use the same coding but we do have templates they don't have --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:42, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
One last code you'll need to know is <nowiki>#REDIRECT[[A]]</nowiki> it redirects an article to the article A --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:44, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
K thanks, I ask for more if I don't know anything. Thanks for helping out a noob! ^.^ lol--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:45, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==Error in your user box==<br />
You have a spelling error in your I (heart) Mario user box. "..thinks nitendo has..". I thought I'd point this out instead of changing it myself and having you yell at me for editing your user page without permission. +_+ [[User:Kektklik|Kektk]] 22:44, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Whats the error? (sorry, I just have horrible grammar skills)--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:47, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
It's spelled nintendo --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:52, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
DUH! Now I do feel like a total idiot. But eh, its late at night for me, and I'm tired, sooo. :P<br />
--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:55, 29 April 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:ITSAMEMARIO&diff=443078User talk:ITSAMEMARIO2008-04-30T02:53:42Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>Hey, if any people who are familiar with the "scripting" of this website, I would like some help!--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:32, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I'm familiar with it --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:32, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Could you direct me to a site that explains all of this crazy stuff?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:33, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I don't know of a specific place that teaches the scripting but here is 95% of what you will need to know<br />
<br />
<nowiki>[[:Category:A]]</nowiki> links to the category on A<br />
<nowiki>[[Category:A]]</nowiki> adds something to the category A<br />
<nowiki>[[Car|Hello]]</nowiki> links to the article Car with the word Hello<br />
<nowiki>[[Car]]</nowiki> links to the article Car using the word Car<br />
<nowiki>{{Car}}</nowiki> adds the template Car to an article<br />
<br />
--<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:36, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Do you need any more information --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:39, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
No, I'm good for now... I think. I will just Google 'how to use wikipedia code' If I need any more help. This site does use the same code as wikipedia, right?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:41, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
We use the same coding but we do have templates they don't have --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:42, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
One last code you'll need to know is <nowiki>#REDIRECT[[A]]</nowiki> it redirects an article to the article A --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:44, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
K thanks, I ask for more if I don't know anything. Thanks for helping out a noob! ^.^ lol--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:45, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==Error in your user box==<br />
You have a spelling error in your I (heart) Mario user box. "..thinks nitendo has..". I thought I'd point this out instead of changing it myself and having you yell at me for editing your user page without permission. +_+ [[User:Kektklik|Kektk]] 22:44, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Whats the error? (sorry, I just have horrible grammar skills)--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:47, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
It's spelled nintendo --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:52, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
DUH! Now I do feel like a total idiot. But eh, its late at night for me, and I'm tired, sooo. :P</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:ITSAMEMARIO&diff=443069User talk:ITSAMEMARIO2008-04-30T02:47:49Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>Hey, if any people who are familiar with the "scripting" of this website, I would like some help!--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:32, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I'm familiar with it --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:32, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Could you direct me to a site that explains all of this crazy stuff?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:33, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I don't know of a specific place that teaches the scripting but here is 95% of what you will need to know<br />
<br />
<nowiki>[[:Category:A]]</nowiki> links to the category on A<br />
<nowiki>[[Category:A]]</nowiki> adds something to the category A<br />
<nowiki>[[Car|Hello]]</nowiki> links to the article Car with the word Hello<br />
<nowiki>[[Car]]</nowiki> links to the article Car using the word Car<br />
<nowiki>{{Car}}</nowiki> adds the template Car to an article<br />
<br />
--<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:36, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Do you need any more information --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:39, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
No, I'm good for now... I think. I will just Google 'how to use wikipedia code' If I need any more help. This site does use the same code as wikipedia, right?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:41, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
We use the same coding but we do have templates they don't have --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:42, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
One last code you'll need to know is <nowiki>#REDIRECT[[A]]</nowiki> it redirects an article to the article A --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:44, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
K thanks, I ask for more if I don't know anything. Thanks for helping out a noob! ^.^ lol--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:45, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==Error in your user box==<br />
You have a spelling error in your I (heart) Mario user box. "..thinks nitendo has..". I thought I'd point this out instead of changing it myself and having you yell at me for editing your user page without permission. +_+ [[User:Kektklik|Kektk]] 22:44, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Whats the error? (sorry, I just have horrible grammar skills)--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:47, 29 April 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:ITSAMEMARIO&diff=443068User:ITSAMEMARIO2008-04-30T02:47:08Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{userboxtop}}<br />
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=I ♥ PAUL |info=This user supports RON PAUL for US President}}<br />
{{User guncontrol}}<br />
{{User patriot questions authority}}<br />
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=I ♥ MARIO |info=This user loves the Mario franchise, but thinks Nintendo has gone downhill after the N64}}<br />
<br />
{{User Evo}}<br />
<br />
<br />
{{User pubschool}}<br />
{{User Geek}}<br />
{{userboxbottom}}</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:ITSAMEMARIO&diff=443064User talk:ITSAMEMARIO2008-04-30T02:45:50Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>Hey, if any people who are familiar with the "scripting" of this website, I would like some help!--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:32, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I'm familiar with it --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:32, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Could you direct me to a site that explains all of this crazy stuff?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:33, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I don't know of a specific place that teaches the scripting but here is 95% of what you will need to know<br />
<br />
<nowiki>[[:Category:A]]</nowiki> links to the category on A<br />
<nowiki>[[Category:A]]</nowiki> adds something to the category A<br />
<nowiki>[[Car|Hello]]</nowiki> links to the article Car with the word Hello<br />
<nowiki>[[Car]]</nowiki> links to the article Car using the word Car<br />
<nowiki>{{Car}}</nowiki> adds the template Car to an article<br />
<br />
--<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:36, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Do you need any more information --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:39, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
No, I'm good for now... I think. I will just Google 'how to use wikipedia code' If I need any more help. This site does use the same code as wikipedia, right?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:41, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
We use the same coding but we do have templates they don't have --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:42, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
One last code you'll need to know is <nowiki>#REDIRECT[[A]]</nowiki> it redirects an article to the article A --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:44, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
K thanks, I ask for more if I don't know anything. Thanks for helping out a noob! ^.^ lol--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:45, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==Error in your user box==<br />
You have a spelling error in your I (heart) Mario user box. "..thinks nitendo has..". I thought I'd point this out instead of changing it myself and having you yell at me for editing your user page without permission. +_+ [[User:Kektklik|Kektk]] 22:44, 29 April 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:ITSAMEMARIO&diff=443058User talk:ITSAMEMARIO2008-04-30T02:41:49Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>Hey, if any people who are familiar with the "scripting" of this website, I would like some help!--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:32, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I'm familiar with it --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:32, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Could you direct me to a site that explains all of this crazy stuff?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:33, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
I don't know of a specific place that teaches the scripting but here is 95% of what you will need to know<br />
<br />
<nowiki>[[:Category:A]]</nowiki> links to the category on A<br />
<nowiki>[[Category:A]]</nowiki> adds something to the category A<br />
<nowiki>[[Car|Hello]]</nowiki> links to the article Car with the word Hello<br />
<nowiki>[[Car]]</nowiki> links to the article Car using the word Car<br />
<nowiki>{{Car}}</nowiki> adds the template Car to an article<br />
<br />
--<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:36, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Do you need any more information --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 22:39, 29 April 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
No, I'm good for now... I think. I will just Google 'how to use wikipedia code' If I need any more help. This site does use the same code as wikipedia, right?--[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 22:41, 29 April 2008 (EDT)</div>ITSAMEMARIOhttps://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:ITSAMEMARIO&diff=443054User:ITSAMEMARIO2008-04-30T02:38:14Z<p>ITSAMEMARIO: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{userboxtop}}<br />
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=I ♥ PAUL |info=This user supports RON PAUL for US President}}<br />
{{User guncontrol}}<br />
{{User patriot questions authority}}<br />
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=I ♥ MARIO |info=This user loves the Mario franchise, but thinks nitendo has gone downhill after the N64}}<br />
<br />
{{User Evo}}<br />
<br />
<br />
{{User pubschool}}<br />
{{User Geek}}<br />
{{userboxbottom}}</div>ITSAMEMARIO