Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sex"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (adding more confusion to the debate)
m (Reverted edits by PER9000 (Talk); changed back to last version by Menkatron)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
:Even though the page could be an informative article, it is forbidden (currently) under commandment 3 of [[The Conservapedia Commandments]]. It's not "family-friendly". --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:48, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:Even though the page could be an informative article, it is forbidden (currently) under commandment 3 of [[The Conservapedia Commandments]]. It's not "family-friendly". --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:48, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:: How do you define "family-friendly"? Contradiction of this policy and sex: Me and my fiancé compose a family. Sometimes we have sex. Are we then doing something that is unfriendly to ourselves? [[User:PER9000|PER9000]] 09:53, 19 March 2007 (EDT) 
 
  
 
Funny, isn't that how families are made?  :D --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 22:50, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 
Funny, isn't that how families are made?  :D --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 22:50, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 10:10, 19 March 2007

What about parents that want to have access to credible information on sex to educate their children? --Truth is bipartisan 01:01, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

I'm confused as to why this page has been blocked. I am aware that its probably subject to much vandalism, but there is a valid reasoning behind allowing it.--Elamdri 22:47, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Even though the page could be an informative article, it is forbidden (currently) under commandment 3 of The Conservapedia Commandments. It's not "family-friendly". --Hojimachongtalk 22:48, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Funny, isn't that how families are made?  :D --Gulik 22:50, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Quite XD. --Hojimachongtalk 22:51, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Personally, I feel its possible to make a family-friendly page about sex, but I respect the decision.--Elamdri 22:52, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

I concur. --Hojimachongtalk 22:53, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

This page is linked to from The Ninteenth Amendment of the US constitution, and from Choice, but not from abortion. Which of these are "family friendly"? --Scott 23:38, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

I too find it interesting that abortion is considered family friendly but sex itself isn't. Sulgran 23:40, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

I think this needs to be taken up with Aschlafly. It is clean, can be family-friendly, and is biblically described (we can use the song of Solomon, perhaps?) --Hojimachongtalk 23:46, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
I think the general reason is that the page has been targeted by vandals ten times. MountainDew 23:48, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Well, if the page was created it could always be protected, and users could post ideas on this talk page. I really think it needs inclusion; It's awfully important, and doesn't have to be amoral or obscene or anything like that. --Hojimachongtalk 23:50, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Check with Aschlafly first. Geo. 00:08, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
I was planning on it. --Hojimachongtalk 00:09, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

I just want to ask... does anyone else think the place holder there is sort of funny? Anyways, I hope a page about this gets made, because quite frankly it's silly to pretend it doesn't exist, and I'm sure a family-friendly article can be made, as said before. --Ronnyreg 22:13, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

"Male and female created He them." Genesis 1:27 "And Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived... 4:1 DDG 23:23, 12 March 2007 (EDT)


The irony here is fantastic!!! Menkatron 11:07, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
Eh, that's a bit bland. How about some of the hotter quotes from the Song of Solomon? :D --Scrap 01:55, 15 March 2007 (EDT)