Difference between revisions of "Talk:2012 Republican Primary"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Merge with 2012 Republican Primaries?)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
Shouldn't this paragraph just be put at the top (or wherever) of the [[2012 Republican Primaries]] article? What's the point of having both? I'd merge them myself, but I have no idea how to do that and doubt I have the authority. --[[User:JustinD|JustinD]] 02:37, 24 February 2012 (EST)
 
Shouldn't this paragraph just be put at the top (or wherever) of the [[2012 Republican Primaries]] article? What's the point of having both? I'd merge them myself, but I have no idea how to do that and doubt I have the authority. --[[User:JustinD|JustinD]] 02:37, 24 February 2012 (EST)
 
:I fixed it. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 15:17, 24 February 2012 (EST)
 
:I fixed it. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 15:17, 24 February 2012 (EST)
 +
::Great, thanks. Semi-related, is there anywhere I can look to either learn how to do move advanced edits like this or to find out what abilities I've been entrusted with?--[[User:JustinD|JustinD]] 19:34, 24 February 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 20:34, 24 February 2012

Can we add some references here? How many is "many," for instance. --Bogart12

You can find the references as well as anyone. Personally I don't think well known facts need to be referenced. "Many" means many, it doesn't mean a specific number. --CraigF 22:47, 23 February 2012 (EST)

Merge with 2012 Republican Primaries?

Shouldn't this paragraph just be put at the top (or wherever) of the 2012 Republican Primaries article? What's the point of having both? I'd merge them myself, but I have no idea how to do that and doubt I have the authority. --JustinD 02:37, 24 February 2012 (EST)

I fixed it. --CraigF 15:17, 24 February 2012 (EST)
Great, thanks. Semi-related, is there anywhere I can look to either learn how to do move advanced edits like this or to find out what abilities I've been entrusted with?--JustinD 19:34, 24 February 2012 (EST)