Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atheistic science"
From Conservapedia
QuantumDude (Talk | contribs) |
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Black holes are demonstrated to exist though, Cygnus X-1 is a known black hole, along with many others, and relativity is known to be more accurate for celestial bodies than Newtonian physics. I don't understand where "atheism" comes into the picture for any of this? [[User:QuantumDude|QuantumDude]] ([[User talk:QuantumDude|talk]]) 10:06, 8 February 2016 (EST) | ::Black holes are demonstrated to exist though, Cygnus X-1 is a known black hole, along with many others, and relativity is known to be more accurate for celestial bodies than Newtonian physics. I don't understand where "atheism" comes into the picture for any of this? [[User:QuantumDude|QuantumDude]] ([[User talk:QuantumDude|talk]]) 10:06, 8 February 2016 (EST) | ||
| + | ::QuantumDude, "Last week, famed physicist Stephen Hawking made headlines with this bold statement: 'there are no black holes.'". - PBS, 2014[http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/hawking-meant-black-holes/] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::You wrote: "First, what are 'non-materialistic phenomena'?" I believe you know what was meant by this phrase and you are just being difficult. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Lastly, I am not going to comment on other matters related to this article or talk page and merely wanted to make these two points. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:09, 8 February 2016 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 16:09, February 8, 2016
First, what are "non-materialistic phenomena"? Second, black holes most certainly exist. Cygnus X-1 and Sagittarius A* are examples. QuantumDude (talk) 00:16, 8 February 2016 (EST)
- Black holes are an implausible fiction of atheistic science. They help sell atheistic pseudo-scientific magazines to the public. They are contrary to quantum mechanics and are one of the Counterexamples to Relativity.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 10:00, 8 February 2016 (EST)
- Black holes are demonstrated to exist though, Cygnus X-1 is a known black hole, along with many others, and relativity is known to be more accurate for celestial bodies than Newtonian physics. I don't understand where "atheism" comes into the picture for any of this? QuantumDude (talk) 10:06, 8 February 2016 (EST)
- QuantumDude, "Last week, famed physicist Stephen Hawking made headlines with this bold statement: 'there are no black holes.'". - PBS, 2014[1]
- You wrote: "First, what are 'non-materialistic phenomena'?" I believe you know what was meant by this phrase and you are just being difficult.
- Lastly, I am not going to comment on other matters related to this article or talk page and merely wanted to make these two points. Conservative (talk) 11:09, 8 February 2016 (EST)
