Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conservative of the Year 2012"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(DamianJohn's comments above are welcome, but logic and principles determine the best, like everything else on this site)
(rankings)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
:DamianJohn's comments above are welcome, but '''''logic and principles determine the best, like everything else on this site'''''.
 
:DamianJohn's comments above are welcome, but '''''logic and principles determine the best, like everything else on this site'''''.
 +
 +
I think that Paul Ryan should probably have the top spot with Ron Paul a close second.  I don't know enough about the various international figures to assess their rankings. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 02:01, 27 December 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 03:01, 27 December 2012

What, if any, is the procedure for voting on this? DanAP 01:48, 25 December 2012 (EST)

There's no voting. It is done on the meritocratic basis, much like this site (Andy chooses). If you have constructive suggestions or comments I am sure they are welcome and will be taken into account when the final decision is made. --DamianJohn 02:53, 25 December 2012 (EST)

I find it troubling that some of the nominees are sufficiently prominent to make the list, but do not have a separate article in CP. Let's get to work. Wschact 06:06, 25 December 2012 (EST)

DamianJohn's comments above are welcome, but logic and principles determine the best, like everything else on this site.

I think that Paul Ryan should probably have the top spot with Ron Paul a close second. I don't know enough about the various international figures to assess their rankings. Wschact 02:01, 27 December 2012 (EST)