Talk:Epistle to the Hebrews
|!||This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Religion-related articles on Conservapedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.|
... quite possibly [written by] Jesus Himself
It's one thing to have an idee fixe, bolster it with some circumstantial evidence and make it into an essay. But it becomes problematic when such an unheard insight is put into an encyclopedic article without proper caveats.
[T]he authorship of this brilliant work is completely unknown, and was quite possibly Jesus Himself.
Quite possibly? I bag to differ:
- AFAIK no one but you, Aschlafly, has proposed this possibility during the last two millennia. If it were "quite possible" that would be very surprising.
- Has Jesus Christ deliberately covered his tracks? A text written by Him would be the ultimate relict! How was it passed along?
--AugustO 14:18, 22 November 2012 (EST)
Aschlafly, your "theory" doesn't hold any water. Read e.g., Hebrews 4:14 : "Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession." Is this something Jesus would have written? There are many more examples showing that the author ("we") is different from the Son of God! Read the text! Your "theory" is based on ignorance. --AugustO 14:36, 22 November 2012 (EST)
- At the end of the day, the claim is referenced sufficiently to the standards required here at Conservapedia. It should be left in for that reason. --DamianJohn 15:20, 22 November 2012 (EST)
Just a thought
If Jesus wrote this epistle, then surely it must be regarded as the most significant book of the NT, and surely he must have intended it to be regarded as such. What logical reason is there for him to allow Christianity to develop a Gospel fixation, as it were, and not to have made it abundantly clear that this epistle is his final message to mankind? --JohanZ 15:26, 22 November 2012 (EST)
- As I understand it, it is regarded as being abundantly clear that Jesus wrote it. Have you not read Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews? I'll admit to not being as strong a biblical scholar as Andy is (I can't speak Greek for one thing) but it cannot be said that it has not been made abundantly clear to him. --DamianJohn 15:35, 22 November 2012 (EST)
- Indeed. I'm still struggling with the idea of Christianity proceeding from such a fundamental misreading of its own scripture. --JohanZ 15:43, 22 November 2012 (EST)
At the moment we read:
- the authorship of this brilliant work is unknown, and one plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it.
The idea that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it is called "one plausible theory". It isn't. It's utterly implausible. In fact it is a statement which violates at least three of the Conservapedia:Commandments:
- It is not verifiable
- No source is stated
- It is just a personal opinion
The latter is obvious as no one shares Aschlafly's idea - and the reason for this: if you indeed read the epistle, you see that the author and the Son of God are different persons.
It should be obvious that this statement has to be removed.
--AugustO 17:48, 22 November 2012 (EST)