Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay: Capsizing people's evolutionary views via 15 questions"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Yesss!)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
How are those "''Upcoming man-on-the-street Question evolution! videos''" coming along. It's been almost a year now. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 22:16, 9 November 2012 (EST)
 
How are those "''Upcoming man-on-the-street Question evolution! videos''" coming along. It's been almost a year now. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 22:16, 9 November 2012 (EST)
:::How are the explanations of how macroevolution supposedly happens going? It has been over 150 years now and still no credible explanations.[http://creation.com/review-altenberg-16][http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Theory_of_evolution_and_little_scientific_consensus] How are the credible missing link transitional fossils going? It has been 150 years and still not compelling transitional fossils.[http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Lack_of_Any_Clear_Transitional_Forms]  "In any case, no real evolutionist, whether gradualist or punctuationist, uses the fossil record as evidence in favour of the theory of evolution as opposed to special creation." - evolutionist Mark Ridley in 1981 .  Checkmate evolutionists! Is it any wonder that global creationism is expanding rapidly in the world?[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/06/down-with-evolutionary-belief-down-with.html] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:38, 9 November 2012 (EST)
+
:::How are the explanations of how macroevolution supposedly happens going? It has been over 150 years now and still no credible explanations.[http://creation.com/review-altenberg-16][http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Theory_of_evolution_and_little_scientific_consensus] How are the credible missing link transitional fossils going? It has been 150 years and still not compelling transitional fossils.[http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution#Lack_of_Any_Clear_Transitional_Forms]  "In any case, no real evolutionist, whether gradualist or punctuationist, uses the fossil record as evidence in favour of the theory of evolution as opposed to special creation." - evolutionist Mark Ridley in 1981 .  Checkmate evolutionists! Is it any wonder that global creationism is expanding rapidly in the world?[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/06/down-with-evolutionary-belief-down-with.html] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:38, 9 November 2012 (EST
 +
:Thanks mate... [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 23:48, 9 November 2012 (EST)

Latest revision as of 00:48, 10 November 2012

How are those "Upcoming man-on-the-street Question evolution! videos" coming along. It's been almost a year now. AlanE 22:16, 9 November 2012 (EST)

How are the explanations of how macroevolution supposedly happens going? It has been over 150 years now and still no credible explanations.[1][2] How are the credible missing link transitional fossils going? It has been 150 years and still not compelling transitional fossils.[3] "In any case, no real evolutionist, whether gradualist or punctuationist, uses the fossil record as evidence in favour of the theory of evolution as opposed to special creation." - evolutionist Mark Ridley in 1981 . Checkmate evolutionists! Is it any wonder that global creationism is expanding rapidly in the world?[4] Conservative 22:38, 9 November 2012 (EST
Thanks mate... AlanE 23:48, 9 November 2012 (EST)