Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hendrik Lorentz"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(capitalization of Lorentz Contraction vs Lorentz contraction... opinions?)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
was it a major change? brilliant is subjective, while renowned is objective.--[[User:Yousoundperfect|Yousoundperfect]] 17:19, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
 
was it a major change? brilliant is subjective, while renowned is objective.--[[User:Yousoundperfect|Yousoundperfect]] 17:19, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Lorentz Contraction vs Lorentz contraction==
 +
I've seen it written both ways, but personally have always used the double capitalization... anyone else have an opinion/preference? I feel we should be consistent if we're going to expand the hard science articles on this wiki. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 00:01, 10 May 2013 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 00:01, 10 May 2013

Discuss changes like this first. --Ed Poor Talk 17:16, 13 April 2008 (EDT)

was it a major change? brilliant is subjective, while renowned is objective.--Yousoundperfect 17:19, 13 April 2008 (EDT)

Lorentz Contraction vs Lorentz contraction

I've seen it written both ways, but personally have always used the double capitalization... anyone else have an opinion/preference? I feel we should be consistent if we're going to expand the hard science articles on this wiki. Fnarrow 00:01, 10 May 2013 (EDT)