Difference between revisions of "Talk:Marxism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Really?)
m (Reverted edits by Gplanter6 (talk) to last revision by TK)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
:Gosh I see all kinds of explanations of the theory in the article, but it is not locked, and I look forward to your improvements. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 20:30, 17 July 2010 (EDT)
 
:Gosh I see all kinds of explanations of the theory in the article, but it is not locked, and I look forward to your improvements. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 20:30, 17 July 2010 (EDT)
 
==Really?==
 
Why is Barack Obama in the "see also" section?  The man is ''no where near'' a marxist, that's just slander.  It's like calling Bush a "fascist" or a "nazi," which is also not true.  [[Gplanter6]] 07:24, 16 November 2012 (EDT)
 

Latest revision as of 22:02, 16 November 2012

Not Appropriate

I think this article doesn't show how evil marxism is and gives the impression that it is a good thing, can someone please write about how marxism has hurt the world? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jesusbushcheney (talk)

The article is not locked. HelpJazz 14:07, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

Marxism, as a political view point, is not evil. However those who warp it, such as Stalin, are.

ComradeK 22:19, 17 April 2009 (EDT)

Add Theory?

Would anyone mind if I put any actual marxist theory in this article? Its all about Soviet history, with a very very brief glimpse of anything remotely relating to Marxism itself LuxemburgFTW 18:22 April Your mother 2999

Gosh I see all kinds of explanations of the theory in the article, but it is not locked, and I look forward to your improvements. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 20:30, 17 July 2010 (EDT)