Difference between revisions of "Talk:Recession of 2008"
From Conservapedia
(→First paragraph under U.S. Politics is repeated.: new section) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Much as I dislike Obama, recessions are not historically named for individuals, and since Congress is equally duplicitous with BHO, and is the appropriator, it would not be accurate. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 02:25, 31 July 2009 (EDT) | :Much as I dislike Obama, recessions are not historically named for individuals, and since Congress is equally duplicitous with BHO, and is the appropriator, it would not be accurate. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 02:25, 31 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == First paragraph under U.S. Politics is repeated. == | ||
+ | |||
+ | As I was reading the article, I noticed that the first paragraph under the U.S. Politics section is repeated under the Optimism or Pessimism? section. I was wondering if there's any specific reason for that. --[[User:Dfrischknecht|Dfrischknecht]] 22:10, 21 October 2009 (EDT) |
Revision as of 02:10, October 22, 2009
Rename article?
Can we rename this article to the recession of 2008-2009? This has become Obama's Recession. Brown25 00:56, 31 July 2009 (EDT)
- Much as I dislike Obama, recessions are not historically named for individuals, and since Congress is equally duplicitous with BHO, and is the appropriator, it would not be accurate. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 02:25, 31 July 2009 (EDT)
First paragraph under U.S. Politics is repeated.
As I was reading the article, I noticed that the first paragraph under the U.S. Politics section is repeated under the Optimism or Pessimism? section. I was wondering if there's any specific reason for that. --Dfrischknecht 22:10, 21 October 2009 (EDT)