Difference between revisions of "Talk:Recession of 2008"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(First paragraph under U.S. Politics is repeated.: new section)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
:Much as I dislike Obama, recessions are not historically named for individuals, and since Congress is equally duplicitous with BHO, and is the appropriator, it would not be accurate. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 02:25, 31 July 2009 (EDT)
 
:Much as I dislike Obama, recessions are not historically named for individuals, and since Congress is equally duplicitous with BHO, and is the appropriator, it would not be accurate. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 02:25, 31 July 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
== First paragraph under U.S. Politics is repeated. ==
 +
 +
As I was reading the article, I noticed that the first paragraph under the U.S. Politics section is repeated under the Optimism or Pessimism? section.  I was wondering if there's any specific reason for that.  --[[User:Dfrischknecht|Dfrischknecht]] 22:10, 21 October 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 02:10, October 22, 2009

Rename article?

Can we rename this article to the recession of 2008-2009? This has become Obama's Recession. Brown25 00:56, 31 July 2009 (EDT)

Much as I dislike Obama, recessions are not historically named for individuals, and since Congress is equally duplicitous with BHO, and is the appropriator, it would not be accurate. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 02:25, 31 July 2009 (EDT)

First paragraph under U.S. Politics is repeated.

As I was reading the article, I noticed that the first paragraph under the U.S. Politics section is repeated under the Optimism or Pessimism? section. I was wondering if there's any specific reason for that. --Dfrischknecht 22:10, 21 October 2009 (EDT)