Difference between revisions of "Talk:Same-sex marriage"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Same sex marriage revert)
(Same sex marriage revert)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
:First, I'm confident other religions ban it.  Hinduism has been against the [[homosexual agenda]], for example.  Second, the phrase "Abrahamic religious faiths" is jargon at best.  Third, it is a redefinition of marriage, and "expansion" would be euphemism.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:29, 1 December 2012 (EST)
 
:First, I'm confident other religions ban it.  Hinduism has been against the [[homosexual agenda]], for example.  Second, the phrase "Abrahamic religious faiths" is jargon at best.  Third, it is a redefinition of marriage, and "expansion" would be euphemism.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:29, 1 December 2012 (EST)
  
::I don't think that your confidence is substitute for citation. Is there a rule against "jargon" on this site? What does that mean? And I guess that redefinition is another way to describe it, but I won't argue semantics and will concede that.
+
::I don't think that your confidence is substitute for citation. Is there a rule against "jargon" on this site? What does that mean? And I guess that redefinition is another way to describe it, but I won't argue semantics and will concede that. [[User:KatieKomori|KatieKomori]] 01:14, 3 December 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 02:14, 3 December 2012

archive 1

This page has been moved to archive 1

JonM 22:08, 20 December 2011 (EST)

Excellent Article

should be required reading before editing this page. We should link it in the main article: http://dissentmagazine.org/article/?article=1935

In fact, I recommend much of Dissent Magazine.

Same sex marriage revert

Hello, and hope you are well. I am still learning, and I hope only to make quality edits to this site. What was wrong with my edit to the same-sex marriage page? Specifically, what's wrong with the jargon of "Abrahamic religious faiths"? KatieKomori 10:35, 1 December 2012 (EST)

First, I'm confident other religions ban it. Hinduism has been against the homosexual agenda, for example. Second, the phrase "Abrahamic religious faiths" is jargon at best. Third, it is a redefinition of marriage, and "expansion" would be euphemism.--Andy Schlafly 11:29, 1 December 2012 (EST)
I don't think that your confidence is substitute for citation. Is there a rule against "jargon" on this site? What does that mean? And I guess that redefinition is another way to describe it, but I won't argue semantics and will concede that. KatieKomori 01:14, 3 December 2012 (EST)