Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wicca"
From Conservapedia
IHateCommies (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Not to be sarcastic but I found this article strangely devoid of bias. I find that nice.--[[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] 18:01, 28 February 2008 (EST) | Not to be sarcastic but I found this article strangely devoid of bias. I find that nice.--[[User:Snotbowst|Snotbowst]] 18:01, 28 February 2008 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Wicca and Bisexuality and Vegetarianism. Someone had to say it. It's a conspiracy. [[User:IHateCommies|IHateCommies]] 19:52, 19 April 2008 (EDT) |
Revision as of 23:52, April 19, 2008
There is a lot of information in this article with no references at all. I know very little about Wicca, but if someone claims to, they should provide the information to back it up. --Todd 21 March 2007.
Being Pagan myself, I know a bit about Wicca. Tsengfox
Not to be sarcastic but I found this article strangely devoid of bias. I find that nice.--Snotbowst 18:01, 28 February 2008 (EST)
Wicca and Bisexuality and Vegetarianism. Someone had to say it. It's a conspiracy. IHateCommies 19:52, 19 April 2008 (EDT)