Talk:Wikipedia on bestiality

From Conservapedia
This is the current revision of Talk:Wikipedia on bestiality as edited by SamCoulter (Talk | contribs) at 02:29, 23 September 2011. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

No worthwhile encyclopedia in existence has an article on zoophilia

How many worthwhile encyclopedia do you know with an article on Atheism and bestiality ?--ARamis 22:27, 22 September 2011 (EDT)

At the moment that would be none. --SamCoulter 22:29, 22 September 2011 (EDT)

Redundancy

Contains the same information in the main article. Why bother taking up space with something that doesn't provide any new insight? Pageviews aren't everything. ~ JonG ~ 02:26, 23 September 2011 (EDT)

Why bother including it at all? It's not exactly encyclopaedic information, is it? --SamCoulter 02:29, 23 September 2011 (EDT)