Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Fact"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by Poisonicepenwedge (Talk); changed back to last version by Elamdri)
(I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT))
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Good Idea! Done.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:23, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 
Good Idea! Done.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 19:23, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT) ==
 +
 +
Could a sysop ''please'' close the "noinclude" tag? It's a small thing, but it has horrible consequences. See for example [[Template:Examples of Liberal Bias]] where the documentation gets added after every Fact Tag. To show that it's really this template that's causing it, I'll attach it once below this post. --[[User:JakeC|JakeC]] 13:58, 30 December 2007 (EST)
 +
===Example===
 +
{{fact}}

Revision as of 14:58, 30 December 2007

Given the frequency of this template's use, the unlikelihood that it will change in the future, and how often it has been a target of vandalism... it would probably be a good idea to protect this. --Mtur 18:53, 14 May 2007 (EDT)

Good Idea! Done.--Elamdri 19:23, 14 May 2007 (EDT)

I need some sysop attention here (REALLY URGENT)

Could a sysop please close the "noinclude" tag? It's a small thing, but it has horrible consequences. See for example Template:Examples of Liberal Bias where the documentation gets added after every Fact Tag. To show that it's really this template that's causing it, I'll attach it once below this post. --JakeC 13:58, 30 December 2007 (EST)

Example

[Citation Needed]