Testability of intelligent design

From Conservapedia
This is the current revision of Testability of intelligent design as edited by PaulDiFoglio (Talk | contribs) at 00:22, 22 June 2012. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA:

"It is sometimes said that the hypothesis that there is a designer is untestable. This is false. It is testable, and the test is Darwinian evolution. The claim of the evolutionary biologists is that unintelligent causes did the whole job. If they can prove it, then the counter-hypothesis that you need intelligence has been tested, and it has been shown to be false."[1]

See also


  1. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html