Difference between revisions of "Unattractiveness of atheism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎See also)
(→‎See also)
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
 +
 +
*[[Atheism statistics]]
  
 
*[[Atheism and meaninglessness]]
 
*[[Atheism and meaninglessness]]

Revision as of 11:39, January 22, 2015

Eric Kaufmann, a professor at Birkbeck College, University of London, using a a wealth of demographic studies argues the decline of atheism in terms of its global adherents is an established trend that will persist for the foreseeable future and the rate of decline will accelerate.[1][2][3][4]

The American Christian Todd Strandberg said of atheism: "The ranks of atheists have always been small... The key problem with atheism is that it lacks a strong 'selling point'".[5] Christians maintain that the benefits of Christianity totally outweigh the benefits of atheism.[6] For example, Bible believing Christians point out that the atheist population is more depressed than the Christian population and that atheists will ultimately wind up in Hell (See also: Hopelessness of atheism and Atheism and meaninglessness).[7]

Furthermore, while atheism lacks any proof and evidence that it is true, Christianity offers a wealth of evidence confirming its veracity (see: Evidence for Christianity).

In addition, the significant amount of unpleasant personalities within the atheist population and the resulting amount of atheist infighting has made atheist community unattractive to many people who are looking for a sense of community and/or a common cause (see: Atheist factions and Views on atheists).[8][9] Also, besides having a poor sense of community within atheism, atheists give less to others outside their community than religious groups (see: Atheism and uncharitableness).

The imbalance between men and women involved in the atheist community (men are significantly more likely to be atheists) and the impoliteness of many atheist men towards atheist women is also unattractive to many individuals (see: Atheism and women and Elevatorgate and Atheism and rape).

Another unappealing aspect of atheism is its bloody history which has surpassed all other worldviews in terms of loss of life (see: Atheism and mass murder).

See also: Atheism and social outcasts

World interest in atheism has declined since 2000

Currently, global atheism is shrinking and sound scholarship in the discipline of demographic research indicates that the shrinking of global atheism will accelerate and affect Western atheism (see: Decline of atheism).[10][11][12][13] Global atheism has been on the decline since 2000.[14] In addition, in terms of the English speaking world, Google trend data as of August 2013 indicates that the world's interest in atheism and evolutionism has declined since 2004 while interest in God has increased.[15] The British academic Eric Kaufmann told a secular audience in Australia: "The trends that are happening worldwide inevitably in an age of globalization are going to affect us."[16]

The 2004 to 2007 publicity campaign for atheism in the Western World, offering a militant form of atheism (called the New Atheism) was not sustainable.[17] The level of public interest in atheism is not coming back in the West and global atheism shrinking will make subsequent publicity attempts more likely to fail.[18]

Atheism contrasted with Christianity - additional information

Unlike atheism which merely offers vanity and unrelenting despair, Christianity offers an accurate view of the universe and man's place in it. For more information, please see: Resources for leaving atheism and becoming a Christian and Christian joy, atheist despair and the good news of Christianity and Evidence for Christianity

See also

Essay:

Humor:

Notes

  1. ↑ Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?: Demography and Politics in the Twenty-First Century by Eric Kaufmann, Belfer Center, Harvard University/Birkbeck College, University of London
  2. ↑ Eric Kaufmann: Shall The Religious Inherit The Earth?
  3. ↑ Eric Kaufmann's Atheist Demographic series
  4. ↑ Eric Kaufmann: Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?, Australian Broadcasting Corporation
  5. ↑ Atheism: The cult of death
  6. ↑ And the benefits of atheism are what again?
  7. ↑ And the benefits of atheism are what again?
  8. ↑ Brendan O'Neill, The Telegraph, How atheists became the most colossally smug and annoying people on the planet, August 14th, 2013
  9. ↑ Atheism cannot replace religion
  10. ↑ Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?: Demography and Politics in the Twenty-First Century by Eric Kaufmann, Belfer Center, Harvard University/Birkbeck College, University of London
  11. ↑ Eric Kaufmann: Shall The Religious Inherit The Earth?
  12. ↑ Eric Kaufmann's Atheist Demographic series
  13. ↑ Eric Kaufmann: Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?, Australian Broadcasting Corporation
  14. ↑ Global data upend usual picture of Christianity trends
  15. ↑ Google trends: Interest in atheism and evolution down. Google searches for God are up. Atheism beaches will be softened up before major attacks on atheism
  16. ↑ Shall the religious inherit the earth
  17. ↑ The 2004 to 2007 publicity campaign for atheism was not sustainable. Level of public interest is not coming back
  18. ↑ The 2004 to 2007 publicity campaign for atheism was not sustainable. Level of public interest is not coming back
Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Unattractiveness_of_atheism&oldid=1134308"