Difference between revisions of "User:Brenden"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Thanks)
(RE:Block comments)
Line 45: Line 45:
 
==RE:Block comments==
 
==RE:Block comments==
 
I don't see any problem with mocking the liberals who come to this website in order to vandalize it. I know that mocking blocked liberals is also done by some of the best users here (them being the best users is evident by the fact they were promoted to administrators) so I don't see what the problem is. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 00:41, 23 February 2013 (EST)
 
I don't see any problem with mocking the liberals who come to this website in order to vandalize it. I know that mocking blocked liberals is also done by some of the best users here (them being the best users is evident by the fact they were promoted to administrators) so I don't see what the problem is. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 00:41, 23 February 2013 (EST)
 +
 +
==DonnyC==
 +
The offending edit in question is [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&diff=prev&oldid=1036893 this]. This kind of relatively mild snark would get a first time offender a warning only, but Donny is no first time offender. Already before the recent block he managed to incur [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ADonnyC five blocks] for activities such as trolling, rudeness toward others, 90/10 rule violation and spamming. Notice that even DamianJohn (who revoked his recent block) agreed with me one time that Donny's behavior was block worthy (see the blocks Donny received on February 16). The fact that on that day Damian did not revoke Donny's block but merely shortened it suggests that his disagreement with me was not about whether or not Donny's behavior was blockowrthy, but only about the length of the block. In light of his past behavior, the only problem I have with the current block is that it's too short. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 04:02, 27 February 2013 (EST)

Revision as of 05:02, 27 February 2013

Proposed templates

Pages being worked on

user:Brenden/Answers to Question Evolution! with sbs

Vandalbox

Misc

Woot, dancing at 2:15 in the morning.. Party hard!

Vandalbox

When interesting additions to my page are added, I generally keep them, here.

Earthsat.jpeg This user believes in an old Earth

  — 4,000,000,000 years old.

Exploding Planet.jpg This user believes that the Big Bang was the physical explanation for the universe
I'm fine here, thanksbrenden 22:08, 21 May 2012 (EDT)

legitimate alternative accounts

I'm user:Calculus, when I'm using an insecure internet connection.

Hello from Katie

Hello :) Also belatedly. KatieKomori 23:09, 2 December 2012 (EST)

Thanks

I guess you have access to IP addresses and more tools. When legitimate new editors arrive, we need to do a better job of making them feel welcomed. Wschact 12:45, 29 December 2012 (EST)

RE:Block comments

I don't see any problem with mocking the liberals who come to this website in order to vandalize it. I know that mocking blocked liberals is also done by some of the best users here (them being the best users is evident by the fact they were promoted to administrators) so I don't see what the problem is. - Markman 00:41, 23 February 2013 (EST)

DonnyC

The offending edit in question is this. This kind of relatively mild snark would get a first time offender a warning only, but Donny is no first time offender. Already before the recent block he managed to incur five blocks for activities such as trolling, rudeness toward others, 90/10 rule violation and spamming. Notice that even DamianJohn (who revoked his recent block) agreed with me one time that Donny's behavior was block worthy (see the blocks Donny received on February 16). The fact that on that day Damian did not revoke Donny's block but merely shortened it suggests that his disagreement with me was not about whether or not Donny's behavior was blockowrthy, but only about the length of the block. In light of his past behavior, the only problem I have with the current block is that it's too short. - Markman 04:02, 27 February 2013 (EST)