Difference between revisions of "User talk:Aschlafly"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(John Hughes Picture: new section)
m (trim a bit)
Line 37: Line 37:
 
:It's not right to censor all ideas that you don't agree with, but I have to be honest and say that some (not all) people at Conservapedia are in no position to complain about this. --[[User:HarryPagett|HarryPagett]] 17:27, 22 December 2011 (EST)
 
:It's not right to censor all ideas that you don't agree with, but I have to be honest and say that some (not all) people at Conservapedia are in no position to complain about this. --[[User:HarryPagett|HarryPagett]] 17:27, 22 December 2011 (EST)
 
::The vandals are inevitable, I am afraid. They keep on targeting. However, congratulations on the promotion!--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 17:38, 22 December 2011 (EST)
 
::The vandals are inevitable, I am afraid. They keep on targeting. However, congratulations on the promotion!--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 17:38, 22 December 2011 (EST)
 
== ''perpetuum mobile'' ==
 
 
*I answered your inquiry on my stand on [[perpetual motion machine]]s [[Talk:Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth#Major_earthquakes_are_doubling_every_40_years.3F|here]]. When talking about [[entropy]] often common misconceptions about ''order'', ''disorder'' and ''chaos'' creep in. To avoid this it is -- specially (but not only) for a layman -- often helpful to think of entropy as energy dispersal and to formulate the 2nd law as something like: ''"Energy spontaneously spreads out from being localized to becoming dispersed if it is not hindered from doing so."''
 
*A week ago I sent you an email (addressed to aschlafly@aol.com and conservapedia@zoho.com). I'd appreciate to get an answer. Thanks.
 
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:36, 23 December 2011 (EST)
 
  
 
== John Hughes ==
 
== John Hughes ==

Revision as of 11:33, 24 December 2011

Archive Index

Elvis Presley template

Would you approve if I made an Elvis Presley template for the existing and future articles on the subject. It would include every article in Category:Elvis Presley and any related subjects. It would make navigation easier. This endeavor could bring some additional pageviews to Conservapedia; our article on the Elvis Presley phenomenon is now the fifth article that appears on the Google search for the subject, despite still being in development! search I hope I can make this. As it goes into development, I may request a few more images on the request page; User:Ed Poor was kind enough to upload the last one. Thanks!--James Wilson 14:10, 18 December 2011 (EST)

I just made a rough draft here.--James Wilson 14:21, 18 December 2011 (EST)

Good idea, please continue building and implementing the template as you suggest.--Andy Schlafly 14:35, 18 December 2011 (EST)
It should be fine now. May I move it into mainspace and insert it in the appropriate articles? I just ask it stay unprotected so I can add more articles as I write them.--James Wilson 14:42, 18 December 2011 (EST)
Yes, please proceed with your suggested edits as you think best.--Andy Schlafly 15:17, 18 December 2011 (EST)
It has been implemented.--James Wilson 19:23, 19 December 2011 (EST)


A Question for You

I have been viewing this site for quite some time, and have a question for you: Why is this site so against liberals? I find references everywhere comparing nearly everything this site opposes to liberalism, but nowhere can I find the reason liberals are so bad. As far as I was concerned, "liberal" and "conservative" were just titles describing somebody's views and beliefs. However, on Conservapedia I am getting a different message all together. Please explain. previous unsigned post by user:MarcusC

Merry Christmas

I won't be online for the holidays, so I thought I'd pop on and wish you a merry Christmas a bit in advance. I also wanted to share this story with you--a genuine Christmas miracle. [1]

May God bless you and your family.

--Benp 16:39, 22 December 2011 (EST)

That's an inspirational story BenP! :-) Best Wishes for a blessed holiday to you & yours. Taj 16:47, 22 December 2011 (EST)

A christmas wish

My Christmas wish for Conservapedia - I wish vandals would stop targeting this wiki. To those who do: please allow others to express their views even if they do not coincide with yours. Is it right to try to censor all ideas or thought that you don't agree with? If you want to change someone's mind or heart, polite discussion about the topic is always better. Realize that not everyone is going to agree with your point of view all the time - and it isn't right to destroy others work just because you don't agree with what they say. Taj 17:10, 22 December 2011 (EST)

It's not right to censor all ideas that you don't agree with, but I have to be honest and say that some (not all) people at Conservapedia are in no position to complain about this. --HarryPagett 17:27, 22 December 2011 (EST)
The vandals are inevitable, I am afraid. They keep on targeting. However, congratulations on the promotion!--James Wilson 17:38, 22 December 2011 (EST)

John Hughes

Hi, I'd like to write a page on great American filmmaker John Hughes from a conservative viewpoint. The image I would like to start with is [2]thanks

The credits for that image are unclear. Can you find a public domain image? It would be great to see a good entry written about John Hughes.--Andy Schlafly 19:27, 23 December 2011 (EST)

British Columbia

Sorry to bother you, but if possible, can you please upload a copy of the flag of British Columbia? The url is here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_British_Columbia.svg, and as a flag of a province of Canada, there is free permission to reuse the image[1]. Thanks in advance, JonM 20:13, 23 December 2011 (EST)


Ps: I also asked Joaquin Martinez to do the same, so if there is a duplicate, I apologize

John Hughes Public Domain Picture

Thanks for your response. This picture is believed to be in the public domain [3] May I have permission to use it?

I'm fine with it as long as it is in the public domain. I looked at your link and did not see any indication of that.--Andy Schlafly 23:44, 23 December 2011 (EST)

John Hughes Picture

This, if I may, is quite troublesome. The Wikipedia picture for the departed filmmaker Anthony Minghella was originally used by the New York Times and given proper accreditation. The first picture I submitted for approval is in the New York Times obituary for Mr. Hughes under the ownership of "Universal Pictures/Everett Collection", which would have been properly credited had I been given permission to use it. Apologies for apparently not fully understanding U.S. copy-write laws. Best regards.