User talk:JHunter

From Conservapedia
This is the current revision of User talk:JHunter as edited by Ed Poor (Talk | contribs) at 13:25, 12 June 2012. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Useful links


Hello, JHunter, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, JHunter!

Please stop attacking other people's beliefs, as you are at User:PhilipN/Essay:Questions to evolutionists. JonM 23:30, 30 January 2012 (EST)


Dear JHunter,

You are awesome, and you should feel awesome. You have intelligently demonstrated an unbiased viewpoint, the only one that can be found on this website. I thank you for helping relieve the slow growing malignant cancer that is Conservapedia. Stay cool and stay classy.


Another Liberal

Man's downhill genetic slide - human genetic entropy

Evolutionist source:

I just discovered evolutionist Michael Lynch admitting this in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America in a December 3, 2009 article entitled: Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutation (taken from the abstract): "Finally, a consideration of the long-term consequences of current human behavior for deleterious-mutation accumulation leads to the conclusion that a substantial reduction in human fitness can be expected over the next few centuries in industrialized societies unless novel means of genetic intervention are developed." [1]

Creationist sources:

Here are some additional resources concerning the issue of genetic entropy: Genetic entropy and Genetic entropy and Respected Cornell geneticist rejects Darwinism in his recent book and Review of J. C. Sanford's Genetic Entropy & the Mystery of the Genome and Genetic entropy: a literal fall from perfection. Also, here are a few videos: Dr. John Sanford "Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Genome" 1/2 and Dr. John Sanford "Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Genome" 2/2 Conservative 23:15, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

re: Shockofgod

I just heard that Shockofgod has had a member of his family become ill. I am guessing you may have had a hard time reaching him. From what I heard, I am guessing that in about a week or two, you may find it easier to contact him. I would visit his free chat room in about a week or so. Conservative 14:17, 5 June 2012 (EDT)

I am sorry to hear that. Thank you for letting me know. I will contact him then. --JHunter 19:02, 5 June 2012 (EDT)
Shockofgod (and probably an admin of his debate room called "vivaromones" who is very much interested in biology) has resumed debating the 15 questions for evolutionists of the Question evolution! campaign. I heard a debate is happening today.Conservative 17:09, 10 June 2012 (EDT)
Shockofgod is in his chat room now. Conservative 17:19, 10 June 2012 (EDT)

Well Done

Hello JHunter, great job with your article on Developmental biology! Are you planning on creating more articles relating to biology? Perhaps we can start a WikiProject Biology if you're interested! Let me know! With regards, AnupamTalk 18:59, 8 June 2012 (EDT)

For your information, you are welcome to participate in Wikiproject:Biology. Cheers, AnupamTalk 15:43, 9 June 2012 (EDT)

Re:Wikiprojects Biology and Medicine

Dear User:JHunter, thanks for your message. Indeed, there are several biology and medicine related articles that could use improvement. If you search through Category:Biology, you can find many of the biology-related articles to work on. In the future, if you could format the references in the same fashion as I did for the article on Desmin, that might be helpful. As far as the evolution article, it is dubious that any changes you might want to introduce to the article would be accepted, keeping in mind CP:CPOV. You could consider improving the article on evolutionary creation, however; The Biologos Foundation, founded by Francis Collins, is a proponent of this view. Nevertheless, there are numerous other articles that need improvement in the fields of cell biology, molecular biology, genetics, microbiology, immunology, etc. As I am very busy in real life, I will try to contribute when I can. However, I warmly welcome your efforts to improve biology and medicine related articles on Conservapedia. I have worked with User:Conservative before and I am sure that if you ask him kindly, he will let you maintain references to evolution in the articles that you are working on, granted that you qualify them with "mainstream scientists theorize" or something of the like. Alternatively, he could insert something about what creation scientists believe on the subject. Hopefully this is helpful! With regards, AnupamTalk 20:55, 9 June 2012 (EDT)

Simpler articles

Can you explain biology topics in a way that junior high or high school students can understand what you're saying? --Ed Poor Talk 14:25, 12 June 2012 (EDT)