Difference between revisions of "User talk:JJCC"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
("The Soviet Union was arguably not a combatant...")
(Hydromorphone: new section)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
::Ah "in the Axis." That's entirely different. Sorry to trouble you. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 20:05, 26 November 2012 (EST)
 
::Ah "in the Axis." That's entirely different. Sorry to trouble you. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 20:05, 26 November 2012 (EST)
 
:::No problem. And you weren't any trouble -- I enjoy discussing with other people :) [[User:JJCC|JJCC]] 20:07, 26 November 2012 (EST)
 
:::No problem. And you weren't any trouble -- I enjoy discussing with other people :) [[User:JJCC|JJCC]] 20:07, 26 November 2012 (EST)
 +
 +
== Hydromorphone ==
 +
 +
You are free to research, and create articles, but please do not copy WP's articles over. It is not merely a copyright violation (Violates their licence), but is also ethically frowned upon. [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 20:10, 26 November 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 21:10, 26 November 2012

My talk page. Remember to sign your messages with four tildes (~). I will not respond to spam, vandalism or idiots :-).

"The Soviet Union was arguably not a combatant..."

I would love to see how you would argue that the USSR was not a combatant in the war. MattyD 20:02, 26 November 2012 (EST)

Not in a greater WWII. Notice I removed it from the Axis side only. The Soviet Union did invade Poland -- but NEVER joined the Axis, and therefore is not part of the Axis in the left column of the infobox. JJCC 20:04, 26 November 2012 (EST)
Ah "in the Axis." That's entirely different. Sorry to trouble you. MattyD 20:05, 26 November 2012 (EST)
No problem. And you weren't any trouble -- I enjoy discussing with other people :) JJCC 20:07, 26 November 2012 (EST)

Hydromorphone

You are free to research, and create articles, but please do not copy WP's articles over. It is not merely a copyright violation (Violates their licence), but is also ethically frowned upon. brenden 20:10, 26 November 2012 (EST)