User talk:JohnD

From Conservapedia
This is the current revision of User talk:JohnD as edited by TK (Talk | contribs) at 14:37, 3 March 2009. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Useful links


Hello, JohnD, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, JohnD!

User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 10:59, 4 September 2008 (EDT)

Use the article's talk page, not an edit comment, for stuff like this:

It is widely accepted that homosexuals were targeted during the holocuast. The second sentance even admitts there were gay people in the camp, and that they indentified as such.

Okay? --Ed Poor Talk 09:31, 12 November 2008 (EST)

Avoid nonsense about nanotechnology and help me with Homosexuals and the Holocaust. If you know something, contribute. --Ed Poor Talk 09:48, 12 November 2008 (EST)


Thanks for your edits as well. I don't work in the field, but have a great interest in it from both a real-world and science-fiction perspective. I like to contribute to the fact-based articles on CP since my viewpoint is not in the mainstream, and this is a topic I'm looking forward to expanding over time. Have a great Thanksgiving! --DinsdaleP 12:41, 26 November 2008 (EST)

Contentious Edits

If you are going to make an edit that is contentious, maybe discuss it on the talk-page first. I have spoken to Rick too. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 09:51, 4 January 2009 (EST)

I appreciate your concern. I did try to dicuss it on the talk page, but Rick stopped replying. I would like to propose this compromise. Since you are a sysop and someone I respect, I would like you to make the finally decision regarding the article. I personally do not think it is fair to accusse someone of hate speech without providing any proof, but whatever decision you make I will respect. Thanks for you help.--JohnD 09:56, 4 January 2009 (EST)
One of us was reading the other's mind I think. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 10:02, 4 January 2009 (EST)
That must be one of your new sysop powers:) For what it's worth, I think Andy made a very wise choice promoting you.--JohnD 10:06, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Thank you

for helping to revert the idiots vandals. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 14:05, 5 January 2009 (EST)

Talk:Robert L. Gibbs

I invite you to cooperate and actually add content, meaningful content, about Gibbs, rather than leave the mis-spelled, horrid little tract you have. --₮K/Admin/Talk 14:37, 3 March 2009 (EST)