Essay:France Pays Dearly - Liberal Gun Control Laws and Gun Free Zones that Welcome Terrorists

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This essay is an original work by TheAmericanRedoubt. Please comment only on the talk page.

France Pays Dearly - Liberal Gun Control Laws and Free fire zones that Welcome Muslim Jihad Terrorists[edit]

In this conservative essay, I will discuss how Constitutional carry (as both concealed carry and open carry as is common in Israel) can be a useful antiterrorism tool in the American War on Terror.

On the 7th of January 2015, Muslim jihad terrorists execute cops on the sidewalk in Paris. Then calmly walk into the satirical liberal atheist newspaper Charlie Hebdo's office and do the same. Their goal is to silence and put in fear opposition voices to their Anti-Americanism and Islamofascism cause.

The Jihadism apologists within the Obama Administration suggest that Charles Hebdo exercised bad judgment and brought this upon themselves. "Earnest" Obama Administration spokesman Josh Earnest said "I’m describing a reason why we have not chosen to use that label because it doesn't seem to accurately describe what had happened."[1] The Obama Administration refused to call the gun free zone slaughter as an act of terrorism.[2] Obama White House Spokesman Josh Earnest said it was “inaccurate” to use the phrase “radical Islam.”.,[3][4]

More Liberal Apologists for Radical Islamic Jidaish[edit]

On September 19, 2012 at the White House daily press briefing then press secretary Jay Carney condemned the judgement of Charlie Hebdo magazine for publishing “deeply offensive,” anti-Islamic cartoons.[5]

French Artist Beaten Bloody By Muslims For Advocating Coexistence[edit]

"Often we hear Israel be lambasted as a Nazi-like regime that mistreats its Muslim inhabitants. The truth happens to differ like night and day. Israel treats all his citizens – gays, Muslims, Assyrians, Samaritans, Africans, etc. – extraordinarily well. The only reason the Palestinians fare worse is because they openly and proudly associate with Hamas, a terrorist organization that uses little children as suicide bombers. Outside of Gaza, however, everybody coexists peacefully, as they should."

"Now meet Combo, a French street artist who is the son of a Lebanese Christian father and a Moroccan Muslim mother. According to Artnet, he got severely beaten up last week for publicly advocating for the exact same sort of coexistence that exists in Israel:

"It seems like something one would be hard pressed to disagree with: the word “coexist,” written on a wall using a Muslim crescent as the letter “C,” a Star of David as the letter “X,” and a Christian cross as a “T.” But in Paris, this particular iteration of the popular inscription — here, created by the street artist Combo, who also pasted a life-size photo of himself next to it — didn’t go down well with everybody. Le Monde reports that four young people asked the artist to remove it last weekend, and beat him up severely when he refused to do so."[6]

Liberal-created Gun Free Zones are actual "Free Fire Zones"[edit]

The bigger issue attacked here is the impunity at which the gunmen operated in yet another liberal "gun free zone" created by hoplophobic leftist gun control laws.

These Islamic terrorists promise to do the same elsewhere. So-called politically correct "gun free zones" are known to Second Amendment self-defense supporting conservative patriots, veterans, preppers and gun enthusiasts via the politically corrected term "free fire zones". "Free fire zones" are where criminals, gangs, drug dealers, mafia, murderers, young mass murderers, and terrorists are free to fire at will on defenseless disarmed conservatives and never armed liberals.

The concept of a place where "people can be sure no one has a gun" has always been absurd left wing "unicorn utopia" wishful thinking pollyanna fantasy of the Anti-self-defense movement, for the simple reason that criminals by their nature never follow laws. The United States, Europe and most recently liberal Paris at Charlie Hebdo's offices have seen a number of mass murders and Muslim jihad terrorist attacks occurring in such zones.

Can you expect Islamic execution squads in your town soon? Maybe. They likely will be in-country nationals who respond to Islamic Anti-Americanism propaganda to "fight in place." But I think terrorists and criminals in general might find American cities, especially in the West (such as Arizona, Utah, Alaska, or the American Redoubt area of Idaho, Wyoming, Montana) and the South (Texas, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Florida), much more hazardous to their evil operations.

As a nation, we should have a truth discussion, not lamestream medica liberal media elitist "discussion" on how gun control destroys public safety and creates victims.

"The situation during the Charlie Hebdo attack was very lopsided–in favor of the terrorists–because of current policing and arms policy. Breitbart News reported that “unarmed Paris police officers” were forced to flee when confronted with the armed attackers. UK’s Independent reported that “three policemen arrived [at the scene of the attack] on bikes but had to leave because [the attackers] were armed.” A policeman assigned to the duty of body guard to Charlie Hebdo editor Stephane Charbonnier was killed, and an officer on a mountain bike was gunned down."[7]

Constitutional Carry is the Conservative Antiterrorism Solution to "Free fire zones"[edit]

Constitutional carry (as both concealed carry and open carry as is common in Israel) is the conservative alternative to the "Free fire zones" supported by the progressive police state's Anti-self-defense movement. Constitutional carry can also be a useful antiterrorism tool in the American War on Terror. An example of an antiterrorist policy is Israel permitting its citizens to carry weapons. This has helped to cut down on terrorist attacks there.[8]

Renowned Oath Keeper gun enthusiast Air Force Lt. Colonel Nutnfancy,[9] says "Gun free zones are a LIE. There is no such thing and wolves can always get a firearm into these areas. Given an evildoer with a willingness to die, these areas then become 'free fire zones' where shooters have engaged with initial impunity. In these areas, few law abiding citizens possess the most efficient means to stop the killing: the gun. There are many case studies which prove the abhorrent failure of this feel-good but dangerous policy. It is a misguided and corrupt political system that seeks to disarm the good guys in some dragnet-type, pseudo-public safety policy that happily disarms ALL citizens in the slight hope that the lawless will also comply. They won't and haven't and never will. The 'gun-less' approach has failed miserably in the face of disturbed but motivated mass killers. It continues to cost lives."

Nutnfancy asserts that "No technology, no system, no law will or can prevent such a determined individual in taking lives. If it isn't the gun, he will find other means to accomplish his brutal agenda. The REAL solution is politically incorrect but proven to work: lethal force (concealed carry and/or open carry) employed immediately by a sheepdog, either civilian, veteran or law enforcement (also reference Nutnfancy video 'The Concealed Carry Protocol" Youtube). Police have an unreliable track record in being able to quickly stop the mass murderer; they can never arrive in time to prevent death. Better it is to have responsible citizens armed and at the ready and vigilant. The gun will stop the gun and has many times. As in my video 'Close to Engage' (YouTube) shows, other methodologies exist but all require increased risk and closer contact. Instead we should abolish Gun Free Zones and encourage responsible, mature CCW holders to prevail in the next mass killing by allowing them to have the most effective means of resistance. For some individuals, it may be necessary to engage in 'conscientious objection' against these disarmament restrictions. A prepared 'Sheepdog' who is courageous, with sound judgment, has been proven to be the real life saver in past mass shootings."

Nutnfancy encourages 'Sheepdogs' by saying that "All manner of political pressure should be applied in allowing these individuals to legally possess and carry whatever weapons are needed that will truly protect the public against these killers. Join and contribute generously to the NRA and NRA-ILA as they fights these freedom battles to genuinely increase public safety."[10]


External links[edit]


  1. Hoft, Jim, "Whitehouse Spokesman Josh Earnest: It’s “Inaccurate” to Blame Charlie Hebdo Attacks on Radical Islam (Video). Washington D.C.: The Gateway Pundit, Publish January 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015
  2. Ibid.
  3. Ibid.
  4. Henry, Ed, "White House Denies Paris Attacks 'Radical Islam'. Washington D.C., Fox News, Published on Jan 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015.
  5. Key, Pam, FLASHBACK: WH CONDEMNED JUDGEMENT OF ‘DEEPLY OFFENSIVE’ CHARLIE HEBDO, Breitbart, Published 7 Jan 2015, Accessed January 17, 2015
  6. 220 word Fair use citation. Saxena, V., "French Artist Beaten Bloody By Muslims For Advocating Coexistence". Published by: " - Because that's the direction of our freedoms." Published on February 10, 2015. Accessed February 10, 2015
  7. Hawkins, Awr, FRENCH POLICE: GUN CONTROL ISN’T WORKING FOR US, Breitbart, 19 Jan 2015. Accessed January 21, 2015
  8. Israel shopper users her gun to stop a suicide bomber. Accessed January 12, 2015
  9. YouTube Channel has 174,010,430 views and 505,609 subscribers since he established it on Jul 9, 2006
  10. Nutnfancy, "Gun Free, Death Pay", Utah in the American Redoubt, YouTube. Uploaded on Nov 8, 2009. 116,632 when accessed January 12, 2015.