Essay: RationalWiki admits it has a weirdo, pansie infestation

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator of RationalWiki indicates their website attracts "all sorts of weird people"

RationalWiki (RW) is an atheist/agnostic, wiki website.

As can be seen above, on May 17, 2020, the RationalWiki administrator who goes by the moniker DuceMoosolini, indicated that RationalWiki "attracts all sorts of weird people". The statement was made on their Discord channel (Discord is a chat website). See also: Atheism and social outcasts and Atheism and social skills and Atheism and mental illness

Message to RationalWiki editors: Gentlemen, birds of a feather, flock together!

RationalWiki administrator Oxyaena wrote: "it's just that i am probably raging too much most of the time to form coherent sentences."

As can be seen above, on 5-24-2020, the RationalWiki administrator Oxyaena wrote: "it's just that i am probably raging too much most of the time to form coherent sentences." The statement was made on their Discord channel (Discord is a chat website).

At RationalWiki, the inmates are running the asylum.

Question: Why is the website called "Rational"Wiki if one of their administrators is probably raging too much to form coherent sentences? There is a lot of irrationality at "RationalWiki". See also: Atheism and irrationality and Atheism and emotional problems and Atheism and anger and Atheism and mental illness

RationalWiki editor Amassivegay wrote: "I am never sure I am even coherent most of the time."

On May 24,2020, which is the day he voted on whether a fellow editor should be permabanned from the website, the RationalWiki editor who goes by the moniker Amassivegay wrote: "I am never sure I am even coherent most of the time."

Gentlemen: Birds of a feather, flock together

Scientific proof gentlemen that birds of a feather flock together. If your website "attracts all sorts of weird people", then I suggest you gentlemen look in your respective mirrors!

See also: Atheism and social outcasts and Atheism and social skills and Atheism and mental illness

New atheist Sam Harris on the label of "atheist"

The new atheist Sam Harris said concerning the label of atheist, "It's right next to child molester as a designation."(see also: Distrust of atheists)[1][2] See also: Views on atheists

Scientific proof that atheists are mutant weirdos

See also: Atheists and genetic mutations

Of Mice and Men

Theodore Beale wrote: "This would also put Bruce Charlton's Mouse Utopia observations into context, as atheism appears to be one aspect of the nihilistic despair that is a consequence of the increased prevalence of genetic inferiority that results from easier circumstances."[3]

Gentlemen, full exoneration. Just like I expected!

Gentlemen, by admitting your website is infested with weirdos, I hope you realize this fully exhonerates me! Full exoneration, gentlemen! Full exoneration!

Of course, being familiar with the story Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, which also had a bizarre trial, I knew the "Chicken coop" trial would wind up showing the true nature of its participants which it mostly certainly did in spades.

And the icing on the cake, was your website changing its community guidelines so they are more capricious and authoritarian. Total victory, gentlemen! Thank you so much for unconditionally surrendering!

You can't win, gentlemen. Attempt to strike me down, and as always, I become more powerful than you can possibly imagine! Olé! Olé! Olé!

First atheist controlled, mainland China was shown to cause the coronavirus pandemic through their bizarre eating habits and deceit. And now this! 2020 is the worst year in the history of atheism gentlemen, just like I predicted! See also: Atheism and the Wuhan coronavirus epidemic

And one thing that cannot be denied. Your website is bleeding web traffic like a sieve. You have been tried in the world's court of public opinion and been found guilty, gentlemen. So very guilty! Guilty of being pansie weirdos!

Administrator of RationalWiki calls its editors "pearl clutching pansies"

On May 23, 2020, an administrator of the atheist/agnostic website RationalWiki who goes by the moniker Ace McWicked, admitted that its editors are a "bunch of pearl clutching pansies".[4]

The above graphic is from Examining Atheism which featured a screen capture and link to Ace McWicked's wiki post at the website RationalWiki.[5] See also: Atheism and mental toughness and Atheism and cowardice

RationalWiki is an atheist/agnostic wiki.

On May 23, 2020, an administrator of RationalWiki who goes by the moniker Ace McWicked, admitted that its editors are a "bunch of pearl clutching pansies".[6]

The comment was made on its moderation page.

Should this embarrassing revelation be called "PansieGate"? See also: Atheism and mental toughness and Atheism and cowardice

After losing a series of debate exchanges with one of the editors of the User: Conservative account at Conservapedia, RationalWiki administrators block him from their website and then cede the moral high ground

After losing a series of debate exchanges with one of the editors of the User: Conservative account at RationalWiki, RationalWiki administrators block him from their website and then cede the moral high ground. Administrator Brx basically admits that blocking him was cowardly. LeftyGreenMario then essentially acknowledges that RationalWiki does not have the moral high ground and cedes moral high ground to administrator User: Conservative at Conservapedia. See also: Atheism debates and Atheism and cowardice

Gentlemen, as much as I hate to do it, once more I am afraid I am going to have to declare victory. And remember, its not due to my debating prowess that I easily and effortlessly defeat secular leftists in debate, it's due to the utter weakness of their ideology. Olé! Olé! Olé!

RationalWiki administrator admits its website is becoming an echo chamber of its most prominent administrators

On May 23, 2020, a RationalWiki (RW) administrator who goes by the moniker Ace McWicked essentially admits that RationalWiki is becoming an echo chamber of its most prominent administrators. In the above quote, LGM is an acronym for RationalWiki administrator LeftyGreenMario. See: Atheism and groupthink

Atheist Joshua Kelly says atheists are more "docile" and "politically correct" now

In 2015, the atheist author Joshua Kelly wrote:

...since the death of Hitchens: angry atheism lost its most charismatic champion. Call it what you like: New Atheism, fire-brand atheism, etc., had a surge with the Four Horsemen in the middle of the last decade and in the last four years has generally peetered out to a kind that is more docile, politically correct, and even apologetic.[7]

Docile, politically correct and apologetic = Pansie! I rest my case, gentlemen! Olé! Olé! Olé!

A message to RationalWikians from an editor who uses the User: Conservative account

Dear, 𝔖𝔲𝔪𝔪𝔞 𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔩𝔬𝔤𝔦𝔠𝔞 and the other gentlemen at an atheist/agnostic website RationalWiki. I just noticed that 𝔖𝔲𝔪𝔪𝔞 𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔩𝔬𝔤𝔦𝔠𝔞 posted "a theory" on my user talk page at your website in a desperate attempt to gain my attention.

His "theory" is that I have a strong attraction to your failing website which is currently losing a lot of web traffic. And like all atheistic theories, it is wrong.

Let me explain. Last week a lady by the name of Micah posted something about my beloved after seeing a recent picture of her. As you can see via the above screen capture, my beloved is "beautiful and lovely".

I hope this clarifies my position that the gentlemen at your wiki cannot effectively compete for my attention with "sweet, submissive, lovely, Christian ladies with long, luscious and luxurious hair".

I also hope this clarifies why I rarely think about the topic of homosexuality. I realize some gentlemen at your website wish I had some malady called "homophobia", but if wishes were fishes, we would all have a fry! And remember gentlemen, he who asserts must prove. You never did show that I fear/hate homosexuals and/or homosexuality. And don't think I didn't notice because I most certainly did! Perhaps, this is merely a case of projection. Namely, it is a case of self-loathing homosexuals at your website hating and fearing the sinful, homosexual cravings within them! See also: Ex-homosexuals and Overcoming homosexuality and Homosexuality and health and Homosexuality and the Bible

Gentlemen, do a majority of you have a girlfriend or wife, let alone an attractive girlfriend or wife? I very much doubt it! See: Atheism and social skills and Atheists and physical attractiveness

By the way, when I referred to you gentlemen as "pansies", I was merely quoting the administrator at your website who goes by the username Ace McWicked who said the editors at your website were "pearl clutching pansies". Gentlemen, a prophet of your own called you a bunch of pearl-clutching pansies! Sad!

Gentlemen, as much as I hate to say something to you, I feel compelled to: Olé! Olé! Olé!

Message to Ace McWicked from User: Conservative

The moose hunting Sarah Palin has more machismo than effete liberals/leftists.

Ace McWicked,

I came to your wiki. It is time you man up and come to Conservapedia. If you follow the Conservapedia commandments and Conservapedia's Manual of Style, you should have no problems.

It is my hope that if you spend some time with User: RobS, User: Karajou and User: VargasMilan at Conservapedia, some of their machismo may rub off on you. One of the definitions of machismo is an "exhilarating sense of power or strength."[8]

People often become like they people they hang around. Show me your friends and I will show you your future (see: You’re NOT The Average Of The Five People You Surround Yourself With). It is time you left RationalWiki before its too late.

Remember, the moose hunting Sarah Palin has more machismo than effete liberals/leftists.

Sincerely,

User: Conservative

Christianity's margin of victory over atheism

See also: Christianity and its margin of victory over atheism and Rebuttals to atheist arguments and Atheism vs. Christianity debates and Atheism debates

Jesus Christ said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me." - Matthew 28:18-19 (ESV)
Richard Dawkins
The Oxford University Professor Daniel Came wrote to the new atheist and evolutionist Richard Dawkins:: "The absence of a debate with the foremost apologist for Christian theism is a glaring omission on your CV and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."[9] See: Atheism and cowardice

Spuriousness of atheism

Napoleon Bonaparte quote

Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake - especially if he is weird pansie changing the guidelines to his website. Olé! Olé! Olé! - Napoleon Bonaparte

Sun Tzu quote

"So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong and to strike at what is weak. If your enemy has many weaknesses, then create a lot of articles with the word "and" in them. I can't believe how many "Atheism and...." articles that Conservapedia has! Atheists are such weird pansies.” - Sun Tzu.

See also: Conservapedia articles with the word "and" in them

Douglas MacArthur quote

"The history of war proves that nine out of ten times an army has been destroyed because it has had a weird, pansie infestation.” - General Douglas MacArthur

George S. Patton quote

"The object of war is not to die for your country but to make weird, pansies die for theirs. Olé! Olé! Olé!" - George S. Patton

Dwight D. Eisenhower quote

“Don't join the book burners. Don't think you're going to conceal faults by concealing evidence that they ever existed. If your website has a weird, pansie infestation then man up and admit to it.” ― Dwight D. Eisenhower

Gentlemen, I hope you are deeply embarrassed by your kangaroo court. Shame, gentlemen! Shame!

Gentlemen, always remember that in your Chicken Coop kangaroo court, I was not judged by a jury of my peers.

One of the administrators of your website who voted in your so-called "trial", namely Oxyaena, admits he is "probably raging too much most of the time to form coherent sentences".

On May 24,2020, which is the day he voted on whether a fellow editor should be permabanned from the website, the RationalWiki editor who goes by the moniker Amassivegay wrote: "I am never sure I am even coherent most of the time."

Gentlemen, you had madmen on the jury! Sad!

Contents

The cherry atop of the glorious sundae of total victory over RationalWiki

A quote from an administrator of RationalWiki: "So that would mean that...[User:GiuocoPiano]... gets permabanned by a narrow margin. Spud (talk) 13:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)".

A narrow margin?

Once again, a godless "community" is divided. See also: Atheist factions and Decline of the atheist movement

"If your opponent is temperamental, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. If sovereign and subject are in accord, put division between them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected. The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting." - Sun Tzu[10]

Question: Is there any type of individuals more temperamental and arrogant than atheists? See: Atheism and emotional problems and Atheism and negative emotions/thoughts and Atheism and anger and Atheism and arrogance

Gentlemen, I did not even seek to sow division within your "community", yet that is exactly what happened! Why do you continually engage in self-defeating behaviors, gentlemen? Once again, I subdued you without fighting.

“And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand.” - Jesus (Matthew, 12:25)

See also: Atheism: A house divided and in global decline
Hong Kong Christians at Gateway Camp. In 2005, there were four times as many non-Western World Christians as there were Western World Christians.[11] See: Global Christianity

Sour and tyrannical Chinese mainland atheist leaders are trying to suppress these ladies, but they cannot quench their Christian joy.

See also: China and atheism and Atheism and human rights violations and Christian joy, atheist despair and the good news of Christianity

Gentlemen, I laugh at your so-called permaban

There is a gaping hole in your so-called permaban, gentlemen. Once again, you arrogance exceeds your capabilities. As Dirty Harry said in the movie Magnum Force, "A man's got to know his limitations." It is apparent you do not know yours, gentlemen.

A RationalWiki admin who goes by the moniker Spud wrote:

"...if you try to edit here again under a different account after you have been permabanned, your new account will also immediately get blocked for ban evasion. It's not as if you'll be difficult to spot. You won't even try to hide who you are. But even if you did try, your writing style would give you away immediately/ The only danger is somebody pretending to be you to take the piss out of you might get blocked as well, since the two are completely indistinguishable. Spud (talk) 05:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)"

Gentleman, I have a working user account at your wiki website now. I am not blocked. Furthermore, there are two editors of the User: Conservative account now. I can easily get the other editor to post whatever I wish at your wiki, but have him merely reword it. I can also vary my sentence length, choice of words and sentence structures. Anytime I wish to add information to one of the talk pages or main spaces of your wiki I can, gentlemen.

I can also have allies rewrite posts to your wiki or have them post at your wiki as well. For example, I have access to Shockofgod's blog. Could it be that Shockofgod is an ally of mine? How many other allies do I have gentlemen? Do I have allies at the Freedom From Atheism Foundation? The truth is that you only know what I want you to know.

You are powerless pansies gentlemen. Always several moves behind behind the most humble servant of God who edited the User: GuiciPiano account - a bondservant inspired by the Almighty who knows the beginning from the end and can think many more moves ahead than you gentlemen. You are mere mortals gentlemen and are clearly no match! Checkmate atheists!

At the present time and for the foreseeable future, like most people, I have no desire to look at your wiki or edit your wiki, but that may change. You will have to be eternally vigilant, but even then you will be utterly powerless. Should I wish to edit your failing wiki (which is profusely bleeding web traffic) rather than contribute material to the myriad of superior alternatives, I will do so, gentlemen.

Face it, gentlemen. Pansies are not able to enforce permabans. Pansies are capable of very little. You can't even stop your website from suffering the loss of great amounts of web traffic, let alone enforce a so-called permaban. Who do you think you are fooling?

"The wind blows where it wishes and you hear the sound of it, but do not know where it comes from and where it is going; so is everyone who is born of the Spirit." - Jesus (John 3:8)

"Subtle and insubstantial, the expert leaves no trace; divinely mysterious, he is inaudible. Thus, he is master of his enemy's fate." - Sun Tzu

Furthermore, you cannot stop evangelical Christianity from growing in Europe and in the world (see: Growth of evangelical Christianity). Nor can you stop young earth creationism from expanding swiftly in Europe and throughout the world (see: Global creationism). You cannot stop the world from becoming more religious as a percentage of the population (see: Desecularization). Should the Lord tarry, you cannot stop the anti-homosexuality Abrahamic religions of Christianity and Islam from becoming 75% of the world's population by the 22nd century and the irreligious/nonreligious from being a lower percentage of the world's population than it is now (see: Religion and its projected increase in the 22nd century).

"Men of low degree are only vanity and men of rank are a lie; In the balances they go up; They are together lighter than breath." - Psalm 62:9

"For the LORD of hosts has planned, and who can frustrate it? And as for His stretched-out hand, who can turn it back?" - Isaiah 14-7
Gentlemen, you cannot stop Me nor my resourceful, yet extremely humble bondservant, who edited your wiki using the User: GiuocoPiano account. Apart from me, you are pansies gentlemen. The sooner you face this fact, the better off you will be.

"He disappointeth the devices of the crafty, so that their hands cannot perform their enterprise." - Job 5:12
Mr. Secular Leftist, if you're so powerful, then why is Donald Trump president of the United States and leader of the free world? Put that in your so-called permaban pipe and smoke it!

My sockpuppet account at RationalWiki (RW) still has not been found out despite being "permabanned"

The SS Permaban is taking on water.
After I made my 10th edit to RationalWiki with my sockpuppet User: AndreyL account, despite being told by RationalWiki administrator Spud that I would be immediately detected due to my very distinctive writing style, the RationalWiki MediaWiki system sent me the message, "You just made your 10th edit; thank you, and please keep going!"

If only the RationalWiki administrators were as intelligent and wise as the MediaWiki software developers that programmed the message "You just made your 10th edit; thank you, and please keep going!". Unfortunately for RationalWiki administrators, they are not as smart and wise as those MediaWiki software developers.
I made 1 edit to a existence of God related talk page and 7 edits in RationalWiki's own back page which is called their Saloon Bar making political edits with my sockpuppet User: AndreyL account, despite being told by RationalWiki administrator Spud that I would be immediately detected due to my very distinctive writing style.

Two of my political edits unequivocally declared that Donald Trump would win the 2020 election and gave arguments why I thought he would win because I really wanted the posts to stand out so the hapless administrators could offer no lame excuses why they could not detect my sockpuppet account. Of course, my account was never discovered to be a sockpuppet account. I had to tell RationalWikians it was a sockpuppet.

Gentlemen, I realize that atheists tend to be very prideful, but you are really embarrassing yourselves by grossly inflating your personal abilities. See also: Atheism and arrogance
As of May 31, 2020 1:10 AM GMT, Administrator Spud and his fellow RationalWiki administrators have still not have found my sockpuppet account at their wiki despite imposing a "permaban" upon me.

Gentlemen, how many times have you said I write with a very distinctive writing style? How many times have you said that my writing is incredibly easy to detect as far as it being mine? As much as I hate to say it gentlemen, you are failing my "Where's Waldo/Wally test".

Gentlemen, with your superior atheist intellects, have you determined which account is mine so you can impose your "permaban" with great alacrity? I'm waiting gentlemen - still waiting - and waiting - and waiting. Olé! Olé! Olé!

As of 5-31-2020 12:23 AM GMT, my sockpuppet account at RationalWiki (RW) still has not been found out despite being "permabanned".

RW Administrator Spud wrote:

...if you try to edit here again under a different account after you have been permabanned, your new account will also immediately get blocked for ban evasion. It's not as if you'll be difficult to spot. You won't even try to hide who you are. But even if you did try, your writing style would give you away immediately/ The only danger is somebody pretending to be you to take the piss out of you might get blocked as well, since the two are completely indistinguishable. Spud (talk) 05:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[12]

My RationalWiki sockpuppet account has not been immediately blocked for ban evasion.

I am difficult to spot.

Spud, you teach English as a profession and claim my writing style will give me away immediately. Yet, you cannot detect my sockpuppet account. I suggest you resign your position as a RW moderator/administrator and consider resign being a member of the RationalWiki Foundation Board of Trustees.

Egotistical authoritarians often overestimate their abilities. Once again, history repeats itself.

By the way, as far as sophisticated software that changes a writer's writing style, there was a free program developed in 2019 called Mutant-X and the developers plan on improving the program.[13][14] Good luck trying to detect my sockpuppet account, you will need it!

One of the definitions of the word machismo is an "exhilarating sense of power or strength".[15] Gentlemen, every day you fail to discover my sockpuppet account, I feel an exhilarating sense of power or strength! Olé! Olé! Olé!

Conservapedia proven right. RationalWiki Administrator Spud proven wrong, gentlemen

Remember gentlemen, you cannot stop Me nor my resourceful, yet humble bondservant, who edited your wiki using the User: GiuocoPiano account. Apart from me, you are total and utter pansies gentlemen. The sooner you face this reality, the better off you will be.

Gentlemen, I edited your RationalWiki using the account User: AndreyL.

RationalWiki administrator Spud said I would be be immediately blocked due to your wiki's so-called permaban. He claimed, as do many RationalWikians, that my internet posts are easily identifiable. Repeatedly, I announced that I was editing RationalWiki at this essay which was featured at the Freedom From Atheism Foundation's Facebook page. The Conservapedia essay been accessed 12,000 times as of 6-2-2020.

And yet over the course of 3 days, I made 10 posts at your wiki and 7 of them were in the religious/politics related sections of your wiki.[1] And to make it even easier for you gentlemen to spot me, I only used the preview button once (Even though your administrator Grammar Commie complained about me not using the preview button enough). Yet, you still did not spot me, gentlemen. Despite me making a few edits to re-edit my posts. Once again, you utterly and completely failed gentlemen.

Despite my so-called permaban, I predicted in some posts at RationalWiki that Donald Trump would win the U.S. presidential election in 2020. I pointed out that in times of riots, Republicans having a law and order message have the advantage. I also cited the Reuters news article Biden losing economic argument to Trump as U.S. begins to re-open. And I purposely made my last few posts emphatic about Trump winning the election in 2020 just to make my posts stand out. And yet, although some RationalWiki editors responded to my posts including the RationalWiki administrator Grammar Commie (Dance gentlemen! Dance! How easily it is to make you dance!), not a single editor at RationalWiki spotted my sockpuppet despite some RationalWikians saying over the years that my posts are very easily to spot. Oh, how the mighty secular leftists have fallen!

I had to clearly and unmistakably tell RationalWikians that my account was a sock account of my supposedly permabanned account in order to for them to "detect" it. Sad!

I do realize that there isn't absolute certainty that Donald Trump will be elected, but he is a very strong candidate being an incumbent, law and order candidate with a strong record on the economy before the coronavirus pandemic virus hit. The odds of Trump winning the presidency are high. Very high! But it will be a brutal election with a lot of negative political advertisements. Hillary Clinton wasn't a great candidate, but at least she wasn't a hair sniffer and she could put some thoughts together with some regularity. And when Donald Trump is re-elected, don't say I didn't tell you so! Of course if you did, like the rest of most of the world I would not read it on your failing and uninteresting website whose website traffic continues to fall.

When pondering why you repeatedly failed to indentify my sockpuppet while vigorously maintaining you easily could identify my posts online, consider this: According to Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia founded by an atheist and agnostic, "In the field of psychology, the Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people with low ability at a task overestimate their ability. It is related to the cognitive bias of illusory superiority and comes from the inability of people to recognize their lack of ability. Without the self-awareness of metacognition, people cannot objectively evaluate their competence or incompetence."[2]

And your wiki's failure to identify my multiple sockpuppet posts at your website is another brick in the high wall of evidence I have provided that more than one editor has edited using the User: Conservative account. And yet, many of the prideful, godless men at your website continue to double down on their pigheaded denialism about this matter.

Gentlemen, I hope this clarifies the fact that Conservapedians are often proven right and RationalWikians are often proven wrong. That just the way the cookie crumbles gentlemen. Deny this and lose all credibility!

I hope this clarifies the fact that Conservapedians are often proven right and RationalWikians are often proven wrong. That just the way the cookie crumbles gentlemen. Deny this and lose all credibility!

And don't think I haven't noticed that there is no "RationalWiki proven right" page because I have noticed! Just the other day Andy Schafly said to me, "Conservapedia has a Conservapedia proven right page. Have you noticed that RationalWiki doesn't have a RationalWiki proven right page?" (Psyche! Of course Mr. Schlafly never said this. A Harvard and Princeton man who was was raised by none other than Phyllis Schlafly never thinks about lowbrow and unsavory websites such as RationalWiki. And now that RationalWiki is rapidly losing web traffic, all your hopes and dreams that Andy Schlafly would finally acknowledge your existence have been dashed!).

By the way gentlemen, an administrator of the Freedom From Atheism Foundation indicated that information related to RW is no longer wanted due to the fact that so many people have never heard of RW. If only RW had the traffic of the top Christian websites!

Conservapedia attracts people with an extremely high interest in history/math. It does not attract weirdos and pansies!

Gentlemen from RationalWiki, as you can see above, according to Alexa, Conservapedia attracts a lot of people with a "extremely high interest" in history and a "extremely high interest" in math. On the other hand, your website attracts a lot of "weirdos" and "pearl clutching pansies".

Birds of a feather, flock together. Oh atheists and agnostics, feel the sting!

User: Conservative shows his sensitive and delicate side

A quote from an editor of RationalWiki who goes by the moniker Amassivegay:

"I would like to say, that over the years this...[ User: Conservative at Conservapedia ]...has been debated, such as is possible, almost constantly. take a quick tour of the archives for wigo cp. there is no shortage of shout outs and responses... atheism has been having a bad year since forever... its all so wearying. never quite sure which bit of past trauma led me to where I find myself, over which events I seem to obsess over, how they made feel then, or now, or if its really significant. its not this...[User: Conservative]..saddens me. its being told its no big deal, theres been worse offenders, toughen up, snow flake. thanks for that. hope getting to say 'macheesmo' again really scratched an itch. AMassiveGay (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)"

The RationalWiki editor is one of the few keyboard warriors left at RationalWiki which is experiencing a massive loss of web traffic. Besides being a culture warrior at website that the Los Angeles Times said had editors who actively engaged in vandalizing Conservapedia, he seems rather glum. See also: Atheism and depression

Is Amassivegay concerned about the feelings of that sensitive editor who is one of the editors of the User: Conservative account? Oh no, he cares nothing about him! Does he care that delicate soul User: Conservative has been cyber-harassed for years? Apparently, not!

It's all so tragic really. Perhaps, if a Amassivegay and his fellow editors of RationalWiki had stopped their cyber-harassment of User: Conservative, the endless heavy artillery barrage of new atheism articles at Conservapedia that caused the his shell shock could have been avoided. Conservapedia now has over 1,000 articles on atheism. Conservapedia's atheism articles receive hundreds of thousands of page views a year.

But it's too late now. The atheist movement is dead (see: Decline of the atheist movement). Thanks to that crusading User: Conservative, Christian apologists and other Christians who rained on his atheist parade. All he has left is the burnt rubble of a website which is in the midst of raging fire of web traffic decline. And if that wasn't bad enough, the world is going through desecularization. Furthermore, all his weak and fallacious excuses for being an atheist have been burned to a crisp (see: Rebuttals to atheist arguments and Evidence for Christianity).

So Amassivegay is having a pity party. Woes me!

And then to add insult to injury, one of the editors who uses the User: Conservative account has the gall to say that not only does he rarely think about homosexuality, but soon he will rarely think about atheism. That's crazy talk! Amassivegay hates one of the editors who uses the User: Conservative account. He curses the day that he was born. He cries out: "Let that cursed day not be blessed by the God I say I lack belief in."

A suggestion to Amassivegay: If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. See also: Atheism and mental toughness

My final message to RationalWiki administrators and editors

RationalWiki features a brain in its website logo.

Brain researchers have conducted a number of studies focusing on the differences between atheists and the religious. The results they found were not great results to show others if you are an atheist activist. See: Atheism and the brain

RationalWiki breaks its own policy and cyberharasses me for years. Now it claims I am clamoring for attention. Isn't that rich?

The truth is that I gave your website more attention than your website deserved due to your cyber-harassment.

I just wanted to point out amidst your very steep web traffic loss how inept your website's administrators and editors are. And also point out that your website isn't even good at supposedly addressing authoritarianism given its capricious and authoritarian bent (which isn't good at imposing its authoritarianism as shown by my easy evasion of your so-called permaban. You couldn't even spot my sockpuppet even though I provided some clues and tried to stand out by being very emphatic in my latter posts. I do realize that there isn't absolute certainty that Donald Trump will be elected but he is a very strong candidate being an incumbent, law and order candidate with a strong record on the economy before the coronavirus pandemic virus hit.).

RationalWiki Administrator Ace McWicked has pointed out some of your website's recent authoritarianism. He is not alone.

Your website is filled with incompetents who couldn't argue or debate their way out of a wet paper bag. In recent times, a large amount of left of center governments in the West/world have been thrown out of office and replaced with right of center governments and this trend is continuing.[3] And this has occurred amidst left of center leaders and activists engaging in censorship and bullying. You banned me because you couldn't debate effectively, not because you could. It's so easy to refute leftism/liberalism that it is child's play.

I have access to web traffic that has far more reach than your website currently receives. A few of your editors are aware of this matter. Try coming up with a better explanation for my recent posts about your wiki other than the lame explanation that I am clamoring for attention.

The destruction of Sodom by God.

Lot's wife wife looked back at Sodom and Gomorrah amidst the cities being destroyed and she became a pillar of salt.

Sometimes you have to stand up to bullies. On the other hand, you don't want to overdo it and wrestle with pigs in the mud. And some of greatest generals in the world have written that to avoid conflict and/or to end it quickly is preferable to prolonged conflict. So I have decided to move on. Despite the coronavirus pandemic, I have some great opportunities before me and it makes sense to focus on these matters rather than a rapidly failing website with a poor future. One of the editors of your website who I have good relations with and who is also aware of the some of the opportunities I have open to me advised that I take advantage of these opportunities rather than confront childish bullies and of course he is right about this matter. Surrounding yourself with positive, productive people with excellent character is preferable to confronting bullies.

Looking back, I should have just run through the all the doors that are opening to me and not looked back at website that was in the midst of destroying itself - despite its continued cyber-harassment. The Apostle Paul wrote about forgetting what lies behind and moving forward with all one's might to a greater calling. Lot's wife looked back at cities undergoing destruction and the result was not good for her. So I have finally decided to move on. I should have done it earlier. After all, Jesus said to turn the other cheek and focus on loving God and your neighbors.

At heart, I am a peaceable person. Someone told me that is very hard to make me angry which is true. I have a very thick skin. With God, it is easy to turn the other cheek. But given our free will, it is easy not to turn the other check as well. Committing to do the right thing every day in the end is better for yourself and others. So this is what I am going to do.

Gallery of RationalWiki editors

See also: Gallery of RationalWiki editors

RationalWiki editors Ace McWicked, Oxyaena, DuceMoosolini, LeftyGreenMario, Spud, Brx, Grammar Commie and a Amassivegay are the trophy heads featured on the right.

For more information, please see: 2020 was a very bad year for atheism. VERY, VERY BAD. HORRIBLE

"And always remember, it is not due to my debating prowess that I so easily and effortlessly triumph in debates with secular leftists, it is due to the utter weakness of the atheist worldview. Olé! Olé! Olé!" - User: Conservative. See also: Atheism debates

Gentlemen, it's now time for me to practice the first rule of Italian driving

Gentlemen, given the massive loss of web traffic your website has recently experienced and its current dysfunctional leadership which is pushing a declining ideology in the world, it's now time to practice the first rule of Italian driving as far as your website. In case you are not familiar with the first rule of Italian driving, I mention it below.

As far as your so-called "permaban", it was fun to so easily evade your clueless moderators with my sockpuppet account, but all good things must eventually come to an end.

Like most people in the world, I will now longer view your wiki, let alone edit it. In your hour of greatest need, a popular search engine that begins with a G will see further proof that your website is untrustworthy and boring!

So what is the first rule of Italian driving? The first rule of Italian driving is "What's behind me is not important."

With that being said, it's time for me to fry some much bigger fish in life! Arriva derchi, gentlemen!

2020 was a very bad year for atheism. VERY, VERY BAD. HORRIBLE.

Addendum: My reply to SamHB on the talk page of this essay

See also: Talk:Essay: RationalWiki admits it has a weirdo, pansie infestation

First of all, as I was researching the topic of atheism while producing a web resource for others, I was very content producing articles at Conservapedia. It was only because RationalWiki's administrator Ace McWicked repeatedly invited me to RationalWiki to debate him that I created a second account at RationalWiki after losing access to the first account I created there in the past and used briefly (I lost the password).

SamHB, my favorite two sentences of my recent essay: "And your wiki's failure to identify my multiple sockpuppet posts at your website is another brick in the high wall of evidence I have provided that more than one editor has edited using the User: Conservative account. And yet, many of the prideful, godless men at your website continue to double down on their pigheaded denialism about this matter."

SamHB, my favorite two sentences of my recent essay: "And your wiki's failure to identify my multiple sockpuppet posts at your website is another brick in the high wall of evidence I have provided that more than one editor has edited using the User: Conservative account. And yet, many of the prideful, godless men at your website continue to double down on their pigheaded denialism about this matter."

The fact that a website was largely launched in response to the edits emanating from the User: Conservative account and has a web page on its website specifically and obsessively geared to commenting on this website and yet is unable to get the basic history of the website correct is rather humorous to me. Of course, no true skeptic maintains that one editor has edited using the User: Conservative account.

SamHB, I am just God's humble servant who puts his trousers on one leg at a time (A former U.S. Marine Corps manager told an employee at a company I worked for: Women wear pants. Men wear trousers! He made the mistake of offering an explanation on why he was not wearing the company provided trousers). And I currently share my Conservapedia account with another humble servant of God (who may be a man or woman).

SamHB, what you fail to realize is that most atheists are very prideful (see: Atheism and arrogance). My taunts are certainly not due to great pride, SamHB. They are just away of stripping away the multiple layers of pride that most atheists have. This is so easy for you to observe and readily comprehend that I am surprised that I even have to explain it to you.

The sad truth is that I should be applauded by secular leftists for having diversity within my account. And that I enjoy music from a wide varieties of cultures. But no! This is not the case! Is the User: Conservative account multiracial? Only Andy Schafly knows! SamHB, the User: Conservative account is a living testimony to the fact that secular leftists push their narratives despite the evidence and not because of it!

machismo
So many times I have pointed out the failings of atheists to achieve social justice (see: Atheism and social justice and Atheist hypocrisy). And this has helped push RationalWiki towards a frenzy of SJWism that finally imploded their wiki's web traffic and caused a deep rift within their website.

SamHB, I am the puppet master and RationalWikians are the puppets! And it's not because I am some super genius that my string pulling has worked so well. I just wave my well-supported articles that Western atheists are not diverse and have failed to achieve social justice in their direction and they charge like angry bulls in a predictable direction (See: Atheism and diversity). Olé! Olé! Olé!

You see if I say the sky is blue, atheists being the quarrelsome, socially challenged people they are, they will try to prove I am wrong! See: Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence

"If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu. See also: Atheism and anger

So many times I have pointed out the failings of atheists to achieve social justice (see: Atheism and social justice and Atheist hypocrisy). And this has helped push RationalWiki towards a frenzy of SJWism that finally imploded their wiki's web traffic and caused a deep rift within their website. SamHB, I am the puppet master and RationalWikians are the puppets! And it's not because I am some super genius that my string pulling has worked so well. I just wave my well-supported articles that Western atheists are not diverse and have failed to achieve social justice in their direction and they charge like angry bulls in a predictable direction (see: Atheism and diversity). Olé! Olé! Olé! You see if I say the sky is blue, atheists being the quarrelsome, socially challenged people they are, they will try to prove I am wrong! See: Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence

"If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu. See also: Atheism and anger

And of course, the icing on the cake is that they proclaim that they are focused on advancing SJWism, etc. etc. and have little interest in Conservapedia. And yet, the page that is on their website giving the most recent fake news (and some news) about Conservapedia remains and is regularly updated. Talk about denialism! Within prideful atheists/agnostics, is there any deception which is harder to detect than self-deception?

SamHB, you wrote about my sockpuppet at RationalWiki and their failure to detect it: "Maybe they don't care." First of all, this essay have over 13,000 page views! I am so thankful Mr. Schlafy decided to merely update this wiki to the version which has still page views so I could contest your point (Hopefully, Mr. Schafly's decision is not due to any satisfaction he may get when intolerant liberals/leftists look at the view counters and become enraged). Not a day goes by where I am not thankful for the retention of the view counters. By the way, did you know this website has been accessed over 500,000,000 times? And to think this project started off with Andy and his homeschooler students. So sorry I degressed for a few moments.

Getting back to your question, SamHB, like a moth to the flame, RationalWikians read my web content on atheism which tortures their souls because it frequently reminds them of the many failures of their godless ideology. Every year my atheism content at Conservapedia receives hundreds of thousands of views. You see many atheists desperately hope to find some chink or error in my atheism articles so they may attempt to rationalize away my web content. And yet, every atheism article that I or the other user of my account has created and/or contributed to has a talk page where mistakes can be pointed out. The collective of the editors of the User: Conservative welcome constructive feedback and have made a handful of corrections when mistakes were pointed out. You see, we are are not prideful like secular leftists!

As far as the websites that are among the 1.5 billion plus websites in the world that the editors of the User: Conservative have access to, I regret to tell you that that remains a mystery to many and only a select few Conservapedians know. You have to be in the innermost of innermost circles of Conservapedia to know this matter. Try as RationalWikians might to infiltrate Conservapedia's innermost workings over Conservapedia's history at various points, this particular confidential information has never been compromised - and never will be! Believe it or not, it is more shrouded in mystery than the book for middle schoolers that encourages them to question evolution (if such a thing were even possible!).

Richard Dawkins
Richard Dawkins told Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, “you shriek like Hitler… You shriek and yell and rant like Hitler…you periodically rise to climaxes of shrieking rant, and that is just like Hitler.”[16] See: Atheism and intolerance and Richard Dawkins and Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

SamHB, you wrote: "If you really want to taunt those people, why don't you just go over there and taunt them directly?". SamHB, you are at an online encyclopedia with an article on one of the famous strategists and tactions ever produced by man and taught in U.S. military academies and military academies throughout the world. I am of course referring to Sun Tzu. "For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill." SamHB, I certainly don't need to spend a lot of time wrangling with atheists/agnostics at their failing wiki. I just have them come to Conservapedia where they have ready access to a multitude of interconnected articles on atheism. One stop shopping! So easy. So convenient for them. And did you know that atheists have one of the lowest retention rates in the world when it comes to worldviews (see: Atheism and its retention rate in individuals).

Next, Master Tzu wrote: "And therefore those skilled in war bring the enemy to the field of battle and are not brought there by him." And Master Tzu also wrote: "It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle." SamHB, given the intolerance and closed-mindedness of most atheists, I knew should I spend much time at RationalWiki, my material would be often erased/obscured and eventually a so-called "permaban" would be tried to be imposed (see: Atheism and intolerance and Atheism and dogmatism and Atheism and open-mindedness).

In short, posting at Conservapedia was far most efficient and didn't involve some censorious and ham-handed atheist like RationalWiki's administrator Grammar Commie erasing my web content because he cannot produce refuting arguments (see: Atheism debates). After all, Sun Tzu's strategies and tactics utilize the "Eastern tradition of strategy that emphasizes outwitting an opponent through speed, stealth, flexibility, and a minimum of effort."[17][18] A minimal of effort. Not a maximum of effort, SamHB.

Gustave Doré's depiction of Satan from John Milton's Paradise Lost. See: Atheism and satanic deception

I hope this reply helps clarifies matters for you. Conservative (talk) 01:21, 3 June 2020 (EDT)

P.S. If you want to know another reason I chose not to spend too much time at RationalWiki, please read the essay section entitled "Message to Ace McWicked from User: Conservative". I do hope AceMicked heeds my advice and chooses not spend much time at RationalWiki. But perhaps given the oppositional and quarrelsome nature of atheists, perhaps I should say that I hope he does spend at lot of time at RationalWiki. Then he will do the exact opposite. Conservative (talk) 03:32, 3 June 2020 (EDT)

P.S.S. Perhaps the reason why RationalWiki has so few editors now is that there website invariably leads them to Conservapedia where their atheism drops like flies! Perhaps that is why RationalWikians became so enraged when I linked to Conservapedia at their website (see: Atheism and anger). It reminds me of vampire movies when the vampires are shown crosses. The ex-atheist C.S. Lewis: “A young man who wishes to remain a sound Atheist cannot be too careful of his reading”. See: Rebuttals to atheist arguments and Evidence for Christianity

My reply to User: VargasMilan

Conservative, why must you provoke members of that wiki with descriptions of your own success-proving viewcounts? Their envy and anger have reduced them to charging about hither and yon in an unfocused rage where no one—man, woman, child or beast—is safe from their onslaughts! VargasMilan (talk) Wednesday, 06:10, 3 June 2020 (EDT)

"America is a nation of believers, and together we are strengthened by the power of prayer." - President Donald Trump[19] See also: Donald Trump and American atheists
VargasMilan, one thing I have noticed about RationalWiki: They can dish out ridicule and mocking, but they cannot take it (see: Atheism and mockery and Mocking of atheism and Atheist hypocrisy). RationalWiki administrator Ace McWicked described RationalWikians perfectly. They are a "bunch of pearl clutching pansies" as Ace McWicked so aptly stated (see: Atheist whining).
VargasMilan, Ace McWicked has a tendency to go on rants about Donald Trump. I believe he has Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Personally, I try to remain calm, cool and objective about politicians. Perhaps, that is why my sockpuppet account went undetected at RationalWiki. I did say that Trump had some "authoritarian tendencies" at their wiki. Of course, when you have rioting in the streets from unruly anarchists and other malcontents (often anarchist are atheists given the rebelliousness of atheism, see: Atheism and anarchism), it's hard not to exercise authority in order to restore order.

Thin-skinned and hypocritical atheists

See also: Atheist hypocrisy and Atheist trolls and Atheism and humor and Atheism and arrogance

Both atheists and Muslims have developed a reputation of being thin-skinned (and for wanting to impose their ideology on others). It has been quipped that "Atheism is the easiest religion to troll".[20][21] Internet trolls often actively pursue trolling atheists due to their penchant of being so proud and so easily angered.[22]

In 2012, The Guardian published an article entitled Limmy's Show: Confessions of an internet troll which had the subtitle There's a witch-hunt going on against internet trolls right now. But, argues Scots funnyman Limmy, randomly goading atheists, jocks and non-existent techno geeks can be fun.[22] And of course, being thin-skinned is symptomatic of having excessive pride.

Breitbart journalist Milo Yiannopoulos, a self-described provocateur, indicates "the reason I have a go at atheists is that it's fun. They are so thin-skinned. They are like libertarians, or...they are like liberal Democrats in the UK or..feminists in fact. They are so easy to wind up... They are so touchy."[23]

Most people and cultures take a very dim view of proud people and some cultures are known for actively engaging humbling successful people and/or proud people (Several Anglosphere nations are known for having tall poppy syndrome and Filipinos are known for having a "crab culture". Crabs in a bucket of water will pull down crabs trying to escape from the bucket).

Atheist trolls and atheist bullying:

See also: Atheist trolls

At the same time, atheists are known for trolling others and for engaging in internet atheist bullying.[24][25] See also: Atheist trolls

VargasMilan: Don't miss out on these pictures with captions

An angry atheist speaking to a woman with a Bible in her hand.

The Christian philosopher James S. Spiegel says the path from Christianity to atheism among several of his friends involved moral slippage such as resentment or unforgiveness.[26] See: Atheism and anger and Atheism and unforgiveness and Atheism and morality

See also

Humor:

References

  1. NEWSWEEK Poll: 90% Believe in God, Newsweek 2007
  2. Roberts, Jessica, et al. (June 19, 2007). "Interview with an atheist". News21. Retrieved on July 30, 2014.
  3. [http://voxday.blogspot.com/2017/12/genetically-inferior.html Genetically Inferior by Theodore Beale
  4. Administrator of RationalWiki admits its editors are a "bunch of pearl clutching pansies"
  5. Administrator of RationalWiki admits its editors are a "bunch of pearl clutching pansies"
  6. Administrator of RationalWiki admits its editors are a "bunch of pearl clutching pansies"
  7. Uproar Against Dawkins Is Sign of New Atheism Retrogression by Joshua Kelly
  8. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/machismo
  9. Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God, The Daily Telegraph, May 14, 2011
  10. [Sun Tzu's 31 Best Pieces Of Leadership Advice], Forbes
  11. Is Christianity taking over the planet?
  12. Administrator Spud at RationalWiki, May 25, 2020
  13. A Girl Has No Name: Automated Authorship Obfuscation using Mutant-X by Asad Mahmood, Faizan Ahmad, Zubair Shafiq, Padmini Srinivasan, and Fareed Zaffar, Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies; 2019 (4):54–71
  14. Mutant X - Github
  15. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/machismo
  16. Ammi, Ken (2011 or bef.) “Hitler’s Rabbi”. TrueFreethinker website. Retrieved on May 17, 2015.
  17. The Seven Military Classics of Ancient China, including The Art of War - Amazon
  18. Sun Tzu Compared to Clausewitz by Walter S. Zapotoczny
  19. President Donald J. Trump Stands Up For Religious Freedom In The United States, WhiteHouse.gov, May 3, 2018
  20. "Martin Wefail" on Twitter
  21. Atheism is the easiest religion to troll
  22. 22.0 22.1 Limmy's Show: Confessions of an internet troll, The Guardian, Brian Limond The Guardian, Friday 9 November 2012 10.00 EST
  23. Milo Yiannopoulos vs Atheism
  24. Atheist trolls
  25. The distribution of atheist intelligence by Vox Day
  26. Christian Philosopher Explores Causes of Atheism