• Home
  • Random
  • Watchlist
  • Settings
  • Log in
  • About Conservapedia
  • Disclaimers

User contributions

DMajor

September 24, 2012

  • Rachel Maddow

    Undo revision 1008619 by Biblethumpinjosh (talk)

    04:13

    -2,925

  • Talk:Rachel Maddow

    ‎The article is devoid of any verifiable facts

    04:12

    -1

  • Rachel Maddow

    Undo revision 1008616 by Biblethumpinjosh (talk)

    04:11

    -2,925

  • Rachel Maddow

    Undo revision 1008611 by Biblethumpinjosh (talk)

    04:09

    -2,925

  • Talk:Rachel Maddow

    ‎The article is devoid of any verifiable facts

    04:06

    +105

  • Rachel Maddow

    The information that was removed is not supported by sources.

    04:04

    -2,925

  • Rachel Maddow

    Fixed citation so that it points to the indicated transcript

    03:59

    +19

  • Rachel Maddow

    Undo revision 1008592 by Dvergne (talk)

    03:52

    -3,301

  • Talk:Rachel Maddow

    no edit summary

    03:51

    +344

  • Rachel Maddow

    I came here looking for a conservative depiction of the subject and found an article completely devoid of any verifiable facts. Perhaps we should source our claims before broadcasting them.

    03:48

    -3,301

  • Rachel Maddow

    no edit summary

    03:40

    -3,301

  • Rachel Maddow

    We can certainly do a better job of sourcing our claims. Most of the article is not sourced at all, and the sources that are provided are totally irrelevant to the claims made. It make us look silly.

    03:32

    -3,299

  • Rachel Maddow

    Undo revision 1008526 by Dvergne (talk)

    02:43

    -3,324

  • Rachel Maddow

    Removed all claims that lacked proper sourcing and were not common knowledge.

    02:36

    -3,324

  • Conservapedia

    • Mobile‌
    • Desktop
  • Privacy