Jump to: navigation, search

User talk:Aschlafly

1,604 bytes added, 23:13, July 14, 2017
/* Dispute resolution request */
::JDano also has blocking authority. I thus do not have any authority to block him or do any other type of discipline on him. I need an admin to enforce your support. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:31, 14 July 2017 (EDT)
:::What does JDano's blocking authority have to do with this? What does it have to do with '''your''' course of action? Are you suggesting that you only bully people weaker than yourself, and won't bully people who might hit back? That's the kind of mentality that one sees in playground ruffians in grade school. You do not have the authority to block him over a content dispute. I've copied this before (twice, I think), and it seems to have sunk in to some people, but it seems that it needs saying again. As per the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]]:
::::The block function has been devolved to select users who have shown an ability to be trusted. Many of the current Administrators started as one of these Assistants and this status can be considered a way to evaluate users for promotion. '''As "emergency Sysops", the authority of these users is limited to warning users of policy violations and blocking for blatant vandalism and harassment requiring an immediate response.'''
:::Note that these "assistants" are being "evaluated for promotion", that is, their status is probationary.
:::A "blockocracy" is even worse than a "mobocracy". We shouldn't have people running around blocking people to get their way, as though this were a video game. (We have had such people in the past, as Markman once admitted to me.)
:::@Andy: I hope you are not condoning this kind of attitude.
:::@Jdano: Please do not tempt people to behave badly. Put in accurate edit summaries.
:::@both: Please try to avoid revert wars.
:::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 19:13, 14 July 2017 (EDT)
Sure, I will do it soon when I have enough time to dedicate to it. Do you think that the additional books should be included in the Old Testament section, or in a separate "Apocryphal" section? --Anglican (talk) 19:51, 1 July 2017 (EDT)