Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

User talk:Aschlafly

782 bytes added, 04:28, July 15, 2017
/* Dispute resolution request */ reply
:JDano, I want to work with you on CP. I don't want to punish you. But, I also don't want to see you make bad edits that have no consensus, or for you to continue in your editing behaviors that make you very hard for me to work with. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:48, 14 July 2017 (EDT)
::To summarize the above if one reads between the lines, 1990sguy feels that he has license to follow another long-standing experienced editor around and revert every edit that he makes because 1990sguy feels honor bound to defend "the status quo" instead of evaluating the current text of the article. Do not follow other editors around and revert all of their edits. It is not as though you are our supervisor. The other editors involved recently in these pages, SamHB and Whiterose, recognized the same problems with the article that I was trying to address and 1990sguy was trying to perpetuate. To quote Whiterose, "I really think this article needs to be toned down a notch. Some Conservatives can accept it, sure, but saying that gun control if a leftist conspiracy to confiscate everyone's firearms is not going to help convert people to Conservatism." Gun control is a complicated issue with many aspects and viewpoints and the article needs a lot of work to be accurate and to reflect the areas of controversy. Again, we need a reasonable editing environment, not one where an editor follows around a second editor with hounding and harrassment. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 22:42, 14 July 2017 (EDT)
 
:::JDano, I find [[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] to have made justifiable criticisms, and he is free to use his blocking authority. In addition to changing the introduction of the popular [[gun control]] entry in a way that obscured the [[liberal]] push for it, you inserted this sentence: "So, to the extent that opponents of gun control laws claim that the government is trying to "take away" guns, such [forfeiture] provisions are the focus of their concerns." [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gun_control&diff=prev&oldid=1361089] That is '''''not''''' what most opponents of gun control are focusing on when they talk about the government trying to take away guns.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:28, 15 July 2017 (EDT)
 
==Request==
Sure, I will do it soon when I have enough time to dedicate to it. Do you think that the additional books should be included in the Old Testament section, or in a separate "Apocryphal" section? --Anglican (talk) 19:51, 1 July 2017 (EDT)
Siteadmin, bureaucrat, check user, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrator
104,937
edits