Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:North American Man/Boy Love Association

3,729 bytes added, 19:27, 4 March 2013
{{protected|TK}}
----
<small>Archives: [[/archive 1|01]]</small>
----
::No link on the main page found. sorry. I think someone made this up for ideological gain. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 14:48, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:::We can't link to NAMBLA. You'd have to google or clusty it and link yourself; be forewarned, you'll go on the FBI watchlist. Clusty shows two NAMBLA Editorials using these search terms < NAMBLA Bulletin, Editorial "War in Iraq?" >. This ''ABC News'' [http://abcnews.go.com/images/pdf/883a24WarUpdateIV.pdf] poll shows 77% supported the War whereas 10% strongly opposed it and 7% somewhat opposed. Clearly NAMBLA was in the forefront by publicy taking a stand against the War before it even started. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:20, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
 
::Why does that merit mention in the article? Should we mention all the groups that ran afoul of the ABC poll? I think this is a lame attempt to connect liberals to this group and an intellectually dishonest attempt at that. It should be removed completely. Otherwise, all you are doing is pushing ideology and specious reasoning. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 15:39, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
:::It seems like a lousy attempt to link all opposition to the war with pedophiles. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 15:40, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
:::: I checked, the ABC poll ''does not mention'' NAMBLA. Please add valid content, not speculation. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 15:41, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
 
Many, many people opposed the war, not just NAMBLA. Your mistake is you don’t want to admit that 100’s of thousands took part in anti-war protests that month. Also, we now know, ironically, that nambla was ''right.''
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2765215.stm
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0118-03.htm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/antiwar/story/0,,1111755,00.html
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,896658,00.html
 
Even the FBI believes the group only has about 1,100 members. You look ridiculous when you claim that their influence had anything to do with the ''world’s'' response to the war. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 15:49, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
:Of course many opposed the War, NAMBLA doesn't constitute 16% of the population. The point being, the so-called "center" has now moved to NAMBLAs position, which NAMBLA has been consistent in. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:56, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
 
 
 
::However, you portray it as part of the homosexual agenda to oppose the war, which it most certainly wasn't. If you can show that the ABC poll has ''anything'' to do with NAMBLA, other than your interpetation, I am all ears. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 16:03, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
::BTW, I don't think there is room enough to list anyone else that might be affected by this study if that is what you mean to do. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 16:05, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
:::NAMBLA is not exclusively a pedophile group; it is a group which fits within other liberal activist coalitions. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:14, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
::::Ah. So then we can look forward to relevant notations where, say, the Klan supports conservative positions?--[[User:WJThomas|WJThomas]] 17:07, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
 
==Thanks==
Despite opinions about the organisation itself or its objectives, in my view it's a well-written and objective article. I am pleasantly surprised. [[User:G7mzh|G7mzh]] 14:04, 16 June 2007 (EDT)
 
== Link ==
Please remove the link to pedophilia. It is a blocked page. I realize that the protecting sysop is no longer here, but I'm sure there's some way around it. [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 17:52, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 
 
 
== Sean Hannity Link ==
The link on the page is no longer good. Here is another one regarding the same subject. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQnfVpHqhBA
609
edits