Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:Free speech

1,599 bytes added, 07:54, December 6, 2020
:::::A French court has sentenced some anti-illegal immigration activists for "activities carried out under conditions likely to create confusion in the minds of the public with the performance of a public service": [https://www.connexionfrance.com/French-news/French-anti-immigrant-group-members-from-Generation-Identitaire-jailed-and-fined-for-border-actions] This almost seems to give the impression that it's simply because of their activism, though I'm not sure enough to add it to the article. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:13, 8 September 2019 (EDT)
::::::This group is somewhat akin to the Arizona Minuteman who patrolled the border. Their "crime" is something like impersonating a government official and/or intimidating criminals. "Vigilantism". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 12:19, 8 September 2019 (EDT)
:::::::Germany's upper house passed a bill making it a crime to denigrate the EU's flag or anthem, with three years in prison: [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/09/27/german-regions-pass-prison-eu-flag-denigration-legislation/] --[[User:1990&#39;sguy|1990&#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&#39;sguy|talk]]) 08:12, 27 September 2019 (EDT)
 
==Isn't it a bit hypocritical==
 
If i'm not allowed to post opinionated bits in talk sections please don't ban me, just delete this section.
 
Claim: Isn't it a bit hypocritical to say that that leftists don't support support free speech on a website that bans users for spreading truthful information that doesn't support your agenda?
 
Note: This account was created to get around a ban, but I only use it for debate pages, and as of now, talk pages.
 
I was banned for saying that marriage existed before most modern day religions, including christianity. That is true, I will give you links below, but you can look it up on your own. That is a true fact, but it doesn't happen to support this sites pro-Christian agenda, so I was banned. You can say that this site was created to more clearly represent the facts and include the conservative Christian POV, but in reality, it is a site that forcefully excludes information to support an agenda. You can't deny that, it's called "Conservapedia", it has an agenda. I'm not saying that this site denies that marriage existed before the bible, it just doesn't want people to acknowledge that.
 
https://theweek.com/articles/528746/origins-marriage
https://www.livescience.com/amp/37777-history-of-marriage.html