[[File:Penn Jillette.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|[[Penn Jillette]] ]]
The [[Atheism|atheist]] [[Penn Jillette]] says he won't debate
the [[User:Conservative |Conservapedian who issued the debate challenge]] on the existence of God because he has friends who are Christians whom he loves/respects and he won't debate the Conservapedian because he doesn't believe the Conservapedian means what he/she says about the existence of God, but on the other hand he/she might, but he needs to see more evidence of it (Please see: [[Essay: Conservapedia's challenge to atheist Penn Jillette|Conservapedia's challenge to atheist Penn Jillette]] and [[Essay: Penn Jillette's refusal to accept Conservapedia's debate offer|Penn Jillette's refusal to accept Conservapedia's debate offer]]).
== Penn Jillette, here is the evidence you claim you need to debate me ==
I, [[User: Conservative]], the issuer of the Consrvapedia debate challenge on the existence of God, largely created [[Atheism|Conservapedia's atheism article]] which is approximately 53 written pages long and has over 300 footnotes. In addition, I largely created [[Evolution|Conservapedia's evolution article]] which is approximately 45 written pages long and has over 300 footnotes.
Now that we have that cleared up, let the written debate of "Does God exist?" begin and I am giving you until November 20, 2011 to fully prepare mind and [[Atheism and obesity|body]] for the debate so you are debating at "full atheist power" (please see: [[Essay: Conservapedia's challenge to atheist Penn Jillette|Conservapedia's challenge to atheist Penn Jillette]]). Given the [[Atheism|weakness of atheism]], I strongly suspect at this point you will soon come up with another excuse on why you won't debate me (or remain silent). However, I don't believe
this is the real issue and the section below should settle this matter.
The written debate will be between Penn Jillette and two atheists of his choosing and myself and two Christians of my choosing. I prefer written debates as I believe they offer the audience the maximum amount of information to render a decision. Oral debates are often subject to the participants' memories and also do not allow additional research to be done on particular points (Please see: [[Essay: Conservapedia's challenge to atheist Penn Jillette|Conservapedia's challenge to atheist Penn Jillette]]).
<small>([http://www.flickr.com/photos/foreversouls/4803469/ Flickr] photo, see [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.en license agreement])</small> ]]
''See also:'' [[Essay: Penn Jillette, don't just stand there! Do something!]]
In 2011, the ''[[American Spectator]]'' citing research published in the ''International Bulletin of Missionary Research'' reported that atheism is on the decline as a whole in terms of adherents.<ref>http://spectator.org/archives/2011/02/28/thriving-christianity</ref>
*[[Essay: This year's best atheist debaters|This year's best atheist debaters]] - [[satire]]
*[[Essay: Penn Jillette's walrus slide vs. thin Christian lady dancers|Penn Jillette's walrus slide vs. thin Christian lady dancers]] - satire*[[Essay: Indian Christian culture is better than low class atheist "culture"|Indian Christian culture is better than low class atheist "culture"]] - satire
*[[Essay: Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?|Does Richard Dawkins have machismo?]] - satire
*[[Comedy and satires concerning atheism and evolution]] (large collection of comedy/satire concerning [[atheism]] and [[evolution]])
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJ2iOfAyViQ Conservapedia challenges atheist Penn Jillette to debate] - YouTube video
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfRDnJM7eiA Atheist Penn Jillete - new magic trick - turns himself into a chicken] - YouTube video
== Notes ==