<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=613auditie</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=613auditie"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/613auditie"/>
	<updated>2026-10-07T17:29:28Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Uncyclopedia&amp;diff=936582</id>
		<title>Talk:Uncyclopedia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Uncyclopedia&amp;diff=936582"/>
		<updated>2011-11-13T05:46:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;613auditie: /* Last Section */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Last Section==&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, who wrote that? Was it a disgruntled user who got banned there too, or is it satire on a non-satrical wiki? Tell me. They have a very rigid deletion policy over there (I should know; I take part in it regularly), and the only time they ban users at random is when Administrators prank each other (it happens all the time). The whole point of the website is satire. If you want true idiocy, see Encyclopedia Dramatica, where all of that is true. there's also the fact that pages of that nature are highly vandalized. Please check your revision history next time... --[[User:BrandonLyall|Brandon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They are directed more so at conservatives because we are more easily offended because we have values and principles. We also have an air of respect, which makes it funnier to see it ridiculed. [[User:613auditie|613auditie]] 00:46, 13 November 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>613auditie</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>