https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Attonitus 2026-10-22T21:02:04Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Natural_Numbers&diff=15403 2007-02-22T15:30:19Z

<p>Attonitus: first draft. needs something about transcendentals? quaternions and bestiality?</p> <hr /> <div>The positive integers, 0, 1, 2, 57, etc.<br /> <br /> == Origins ==<br /> <br /> All numbers used in the [[Bible]] are [[positive]] [[integers]], for example, 20 loaves of bread, 4 horsemen of the apocalypse, 50 ways to leave your lover. By inference, all such numbers are referred to as &quot;natural&quot;. Other other numbers are equated with progressive degrees of unnaturalness. The [[negative]] numbers are commonly associated with basic [[evil]]. The [[CIA]] uses negative numbers to denominate the ranks of terrorist groups, -1 is an ordinary member, -2 is a squadron leader, etc. This is because there is no [[lower bound]] to the negative numbers and thus no limit need be imposed on their evil[https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/gz.html]. The [[rational]] numbers are the next most unnatural numbers. Rationality runs directly counter to naturalness, see [[evolution]] vs [[creationism]], [[Einstein]] vs [[Newton]]. [[Irrational]] numbers are the first numbers that cannot be formed from [[arithmetic]] operations of natural numbers and thus are the first [[unbiblical]] numbers[http://americansfortruth.com/news/report-highlights-unbiblical-beliefs-of-obama-and-his-pastor.html]. [[Complex numbers]] are the most unnatural numbers. Recent research has suggested a link between [[homosexuality]] and complex-valued genetic base-pairs[http://www.narth.com/docs/lefthand.html].</div>

Attonitus