<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=BernieandTrumpFan</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=BernieandTrumpFan"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/BernieandTrumpFan"/>
	<updated>2026-10-10T06:00:17Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1829672</id>
		<title>Debate:The Groyper Wars</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1829672"/>
		<updated>2022-01-07T01:55:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* Nick Fuentes actively roots for our enemies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;With the past controversies over Nick Fuentes, TPUSA, Michelle Malkin, YAF, Ashley St. Clair, etc., combined with Big Tech's and the federal government's current suppression of dissent, this is an important discussion to have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you agree with [[Essay:The Groyper Wars|this]]? Why or why not? Please discuss the content of the Essay itself, rather than the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Debate]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=No longer relevant, based on an older version and its talk page, potentially confusing|content=&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey, I'm a member of Nick's community and consider myself a groyper sympathizer. Made an account for this. Let's talk if you're still around. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 17:59, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You have a pretty hefty essay there, and I'm not sure which parts are most important to you, so I'll address what interests me and we can take it from there.&lt;br /&gt;
: First of all, I respect that you're honest and transparent about your own background in your user page, which isn't exactly orthodox conservatism. I'm kinda of like you, except I come from Ron Paul libertarianism. Obviously, this puts me at odds with a lot of &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; and Nick, who are very critical of libertarianism, but I have a good enough understanding of their views that I can defend them pretty well and I overlap with most of it. I also appreciate that you condemn censorship in no uncertain terms. The role that &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; or others with similar values is an interesting debate to have, and it's good that Conservapedia seems like they'll allow us to have it. In some &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; communities on bigger platforms, like reddit, you're not even allowed to play devil's advocate about it.&lt;br /&gt;
: My next 2 paragraphs will address some points in the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point about the legacy paleocons not being on board with the groypers is interesting, and seems true. I've already seen the Spectator article, back in the fall, and found it pretty sketchy or weak. More broadly, though, it is true and interesting. There is an angle you are missing though. For example, Cotto and Gottfried, a current events show co-hosted by the great Paul Gottfried, took JF Gariépy's side over Fuentes' when he took credit for getting Nick banned. I don't bring this up to make a censorship point. It was interesting to me, because JF is usually considered &amp;quot;less optical&amp;quot; than Nick Fuentes is, because his list of guests on his own show includes some colorful characters Nick refuses to associate with and because he sometimes says some things explicitly that Nick will leave to subtext instead. Movement paleoconservatism has taken a sour stance on the groypers on temperament, sometimes also on policy, but it's interesting to see how they're navigating that in a unique way.&lt;br /&gt;
: It doesn't surprise me that Ben Shapiro included Ron Paul on his hit list of alt-right influencers, but I don't think the reasons for his inclusion or others are condemnable. It's worth pointing out that Ben himself was a guest on Red Ice TV with Henrik and Lana back in 2014, another show that was banned from YouTube in 2019 or 2020. Similarly, Ben has spoken with Ann Coulter on camera who he also included on his alt-right list. In this sense, the issue with Ben isn't so much his own agenda or his disagreements with other factions but his own hypocrisy; the Daily Wire itself has been labelled alt-right by the mainstream media on multiple occasions, usually with retractions, but it has happened. People find it objectionable that an outlet with a lot of funding and close ties to Fox News, etc. gets a &amp;quot;get-out-of-alt-right-free&amp;quot; card, while more grassroots activists are left out to dry.&lt;br /&gt;
: I'll get to your main essay later, I'd like to do this in parts. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 22:53, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Hi, I really appreciate that you did this, I wasn't expecting it at all. The Groyper Wars have been over for a long time. And after my essay was deleted by an admin ([https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;oldid=1760851 here] is where my essay used to be), I was ready to give it up. Didn't see myself ever coming back to this. And I set up this page several months ago, this is the first time anyone has responded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: You said you would react to my main essay &amp;quot;later,&amp;quot; and it's been a few days. If you're still there, I'd love to debate this with you, but I want to wait until you've reacted to my actual essay until I react to your response. If you post your reaction to the essay, I'd be more than happy to have a discussion with you! --- [[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 13:48, 5 May 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Opinion==&lt;br /&gt;
This has definitely got to be the #1 most controversial topic amongst the right. I think it's an overblown subject. I do consider myself a member of the Groyper movement, though I do think that [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/ff/Groyper_cartoon.png &amp;quot;Groyper&amp;quot;] is a silly name for a political movement. Now, I can't speak for every member, but I really don't think most Groypers are inherently &amp;quot;eViL aNtI-sEmItIc WhItE nAtIoNaLiStS&amp;quot; like many will tell you. It's a traditionalist paleocon movement that urges America to put God and country first and to return the western values our society was founded on (by white people, hence Nick's many mentions of the anti-white agenda, the importance of white identity and shifting demographics, which many confuse to be racial, when they're actually cultural). The &amp;quot;antisemitic&amp;quot; claim is mainly due to Nick's edgy and often Jew-related jokes (which Nick has said are merely for shock value), as well as the Groypers' heavy criticism of Israel, especially from a foreign policy perspective, and can you blame them? Trillions of dollars in taxpayer money is funneled to Israel every year to help them fight their thousand-year war. They don't need all that money, they have a GDP of 402 billion. It's not like they're some third-world country that we're helping out of pity. Of course, say this at a Turning Point USA event or on The Ben Shapiro Show and you're deemed &amp;quot;Anti-semitic/racist&amp;quot;, somehow. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 12:53, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a curious and thought-provoking take. And I wouldn't characterize groypers as white nationalists or anti-Semites, though in the past I would have. A lot of conservatives like to jump the gun and disown anyone outside of the mainstream, condemning them in the harshest possible terms. I think I can give you an explanation why. Part of it is that conservatives are afraid of alienating left-wingers and centrists/moderates. They think if they embrace certain figures they won't be able to convince as many people to accept conservatism. In a lot of cases, the opposite is true. The other thing is that back in 2019, quite a few mainstream/popular right-wingers saw groypers as wignats. Nick Fuentes and Beardson Beardly are having to deal with actual wignats right now. I think the way they feel about TRS is how conservatives felt about groypers. &amp;quot;They're just trying to divide us.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're infiltrators.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They don't have anything to offer.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're idiots.&amp;quot; A lot of stuff was coming out about Nick especially that just put people off. Like that awful Holocaust joke. I get that he tries to be edgy and says things for shock value, but a lot of times he goes too far. And that's why some factions of the right were concerned that Nick was the new Richard Spencer, and didn't want their reputations tarnished through guilt by association --- which ironically is a tactic they themselves unjustly used against those on the right who chose to associate with the groypers. I know groypers presently are frustrated by wignats. Now they know how mainstream conservatives felt. You're absolutely right that most of Western civilization was built by white people. And there 100% is an anti-white agenda: it's pervasive and vitriolic. It's institutionalized across the Western world. I don't see how white identity politics solves anything. Every group should be proud of its identity. Whites have done many amazing things. But embracing identity politics, as Nick seems to frequently advocate, is playing on the left's battlefield, and that's a dangerous game. Altering a country's core demography inevitably comes with long-lasting and severe consequences. White Americans have a sub-replacement birth rate. Black Americans are aborting and shooting themselves out of existence. Latin American and Middle Eastern immigrants to the U.S., meanwhile, have very high birth rates... and they're only rising. Those immigrants obviously vote for the people importing them and tell their kids and grandkids to do the same. I don't think that's inextricably tied to race, I agree that it's cultural. But there is a link between culture and race, they're not entirely distinct. And we can dispute the reasons why demographic shifts have such drastic consequences, but the point is they have drastic consequences. So we need to import less people. As for Israel, a lot of people seem to think anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. I used to think that, too, reasoning that singling out the only Jewish State must be bad-faith criticism. But that point defeats itself: Israel is unique, which is why it is uniquely criticized. Having an unconventional opinion about a foreign country is not inherently bigoted. I support Israel. Others don't. Who cares? Besides, Israel has stains in its history --- think Lavon Affair and some of the shady/unethical actions of the Mossad. I have to correct you on the foreign aid: I believe it's low billions, not trillions. And hypothetically, I support them getting that money. Sure they do well for themselves, but they're (in theory) the only democracy in the Middle East, surrounded on all sides by hostile powers. Israel also has a lot of holy sites (for Christians, not just Jews). But I don't want my taxpayer dollars going to fund their COVID regime --- while non-Muslims still can't pray at the Temple Mount. I like Ben Shapiro and TPUSA, though I sometimes disagree with them. In spite of those disagreements, I see their conservative activism as a net positive. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 17:46, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm happy to say, then, that there's a lot of things we agree on; however, I don't think Nick is advocating for identity politics. I think he just wants whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda. As for TPUSA and Shapiro, they're not advocating for conservatism. They're advocating for libertarian, capitalist-worshipping economic policy, and squishy, practically nonexistent social policy that is getting us virtually nowhere in this culture war. ''(Fusionism and its consequences!)'' If we want to see an actual return to traditionalism in America, the ideas these mainstream &amp;quot;conservatives&amp;quot; are pushing are not contributing in any way. They're pushing us in the opposite direction.(''Plus, we all know Richard Spencer is a Democrat Psyop.'') [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 11:45, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you're right about Richard Spencer. And I would like both Ben Shapiro and TPUSA to put more emphasis on social conservatism and less emphasis on free-market economics (as Michael Knowles and Matt Walsh have advocated for the broader conservative movement several times). Shapiro is sort of libertarian, and so are Charlie Kirk and most of the people at Turning Point. I'm not really a fan of libertarianism. I'm a huge fan of Walsh and Knowles partly because neither of them is remotely libertarian. As well, Shapiro in particular seems to support free-market absolutism and neoliberal, globalized capitalism, though I also just heard him say that America should put tariffs on non-American companies that use child labour and American companies that do so should be punished. I think some people on the dissident right tend to overlook the positives about Ben Shapiro and The Daily Wire: an alt-Hollywood, an alt-publishing company. Openly defying Biden's vaccine mandate and suing him over it. TPUSA has been engaging in conservative activism all over the U.S. for years at this point, and they've improved over time. Charlie Kirk now talks about demographics, marriage, and the nuclear family. Ben Shapiro talks about corporate tyranny. They're human, not controlled opposition. And I'm all for &amp;quot;telling whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda.&amp;quot; That's great. It's something Matt Walsh talks about all the time, at least in 2021. But here's what I mean by saying Nick advocates for white identity politics: [https://tv.gab.com/channel/three_spoons/view/nick-fuentes-white-americans-are-61619c89645a5a7fe897dd5e here], at 31:24, Nick says &amp;quot;White racial identity politics is not going away.&amp;quot; And it's not just that. Nick has explicitly rejected &amp;quot;multi-racial, working-class populism&amp;quot; and grouping together as Americans, patriots, conservatives, or even Christians in favour of white identitarianism. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:58, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think Nick is making perfect sense in the video you linked. I don't think he means &amp;quot;identity politics&amp;quot; in the Obama-esque &amp;quot;I'm black n y'all gotta do everything I say or you racist&amp;quot; sort of sense here. Sounds to me like he's talking about political ideology that prioritizes white identity. (''White-identity'' politics, rather than white ''identity-politics'', if that makes sense). Also, he's not saying we can't come together as American patriots or Christians, he's just saying that many conservatives pretend that race isn't a thing, and that we can't properly fight the anti-white agenda if we don't recognize whiteness. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:22, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::From 37:30 - &amp;quot;Race is the basis, and I wish it wasn't that way. Understand, you know, people look at me and they say, 'That's the guy! That's the white supremacist that wants to make everything racist!' I didn't make it that way. Don't point the finger at me, don't blame me! I'm looking at the world and telling you how it is, I'm explaining it to you. I didn't make the world, okay? Don't blame me, I didn't make America the way it is!... We do have to acknowledge where we differ, and we have to account for those things so that we can live together in harmony... To the extent that it is possible that we get along, the way that we get along is by understanding our differences, accommodating for those differences, and then we can flourish. Not ignoring them, not pretending that they don't exist.&amp;quot; [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:40, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'd like to believe that race shouldn't factor into anything. In the abstract, it shouldn't. But that's not the world we're living in. You and Nick are right about that. This racial stuff has been foisted upon us. Matt Walsh pointed out that the Virginia governor's race was won by &amp;quot;white grievance politics&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that's a good thing.&amp;quot; We have to deal with the intensity of anti-white hate on both the left and the right properly. I get what you're saying about the difference between white identity-politics and white-identity politics. White identity exists and it's not inherently bad. Identity itself isn't bad. But how significant is racial identity in the political realm? It's significant, no doubt. But more so than everything else? I have to admit, it would be pretty cool to hear a candidate talk about how blue-collar white Americans are being left to dry by neoliberal globalism. Or to hear one talk about the historical accomplishments of white people. Should that exclude talking about America's Christian roots? Or condemning abortion, which disproportionately harms black Americans? Or criticizing LGBT radicalism? I don't think it should. So what should be prioritized? I'm not saying shun white interests in favour of corporate tax cuts --- corporations are part of the problem, so take away their (mostly non-white) foreign labour. Address demographics. Address anti-white critical race theory and other aspects of the anti-white agenda. But don't necessarily prioritize these things. Of course they're important. But you also have millions of unborn babies murdered in the womb each year. You have homosexuality/bisexuality/pansexuality and transgenderism/non-binarism/gender-fluidity/agenderism. You have Drag Queen Story Hour. Child drag queens. Drag queens on children's television. &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; drag queens. You have Internet pornography. Gun control. Drugs. War. Not everything is a racial issue. A lot have a racial aspect, but that's not what governs them. The prospect of a national divorce, or secession? That would be along political or sociocultural lines, not solid racial lines. So yes, appeal to whites. But why not also appeal to sensible non-whites (even if they're a tiny minority)? Instead of &amp;quot;I'm looking out for white people,&amp;quot; which can be a good thing, &amp;quot;I'm looking out for families.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for the working class.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for anyone who hates degeneracy.&amp;quot; Couldn't that work? Not pandering, or endless harping about &amp;quot;black unemployment,&amp;quot; but looking for something above race to unite us. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 18:27, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Of course, all those things are important, and race isn't the only issue. You're not wrong about any of that. I think you and I agree on the majority of things. Like I said, I don't think Nick is rejecting other forms of unity among conservatives, he simply doesn't see enough conservatives addressing the racial issues to the extent that they should be. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:32, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::If that's what Nick's saying, then fair enough. This has been and will probably continue to be a blind spot for many conservatives as they refuse to address the issues as they are on the ground. Thank you very much for taking the opportunity to have a civil discussion with me about all this. I think we can end it off here, seeing eye-to-eye on a lot of things. It always helps to be rational as we both are. You made excellent points. Hopefully, the right will improve with time. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:28, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Yes, of course. Thank you. Hopefully the Right will start facing these issues head-on, and hopefully someday we can change the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] page to be a less cringe version than the one Liberaltears wrote. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 20:00, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nick Fuentes actively roots for our enemies==&lt;br /&gt;
On August 15, Nick Fuentes posted [https://t.me/nickjfuentes/4273 this] on Telegram. It's one thing to oppose the War in Afghanistan. But it's a whole other thing to actively root for the Taliban and celebrate our defeat in Afghanistan, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And on October 27, Fuentes posted [https://t.me/nickjfuentes/4536 ''this''] on Telegram. It's one thing to oppose waging a cold war with China. But it's a whole other thing to actively root for the CCP and express hope that it nukes the US, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These posts make it clear where Fuentes stands. He is ''not'' a paleocon, despite his claims to the contrary. No, he's an extremist who actively supports our enemies -- our ''real'' enemies* -- and for purely ideological reasons. Any so-called &amp;quot;populist&amp;quot; movement which endorses ''this'' position should not, and ''must'' not be supported. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, we only have two real enemies on the international stage: The CCP and radical ''Sunni'' Islam. Fuentes has made it clear that he actively supports both, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 16:39, December 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry for taking so long to respond. I think in part, he was trolling when he said those things. But he has also made the point that, since the '''American regime''' (note the distinction from the American nation) is tyrannical and suppresses virtuous dissidents, we should root for anything that wants to destroy it. The enemy of my enemy is my friend, essentially. Since the regime is Nick's enemy, Nick wants to support the enemies of the regime, inside and out. I don't agree with that line of reasoning, but it's not as black-and-white as you're presenting it. It's not as though he has committed treason. --[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 22:22, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You're right that Fuentes hasn't committed treason. You can't commit treason by merely voicing an opinion, no matter how odious that opinion may be.&lt;br /&gt;
::That aside, only time will tell if Fuentes was indeed just trolling or was in fact being completely serious. But one thing's for certain, there ''are'' a lot of people on the alt-right who share that opinion, and ''are'' completely serious about it. I'm not sure if they compose a majority of the alt-right, but I am sure that they compose ''at minimum'' a significant minority.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 12:49, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nick seems to think Russia or China would be willing to protect American dissidents the way America protects dissidents of foreign regimes. It's important to note that Nick has been heavily targeted by the federal government, who seized his assets and put him on a no-fly list. I don't think either of us can fully understand Nick's thinking on this matter if we haven't been similarly persecuted. He feels like Edward Snowden or Julian Assange. He has lost faith in the system to the point where he looks elsewhere for pragmatic and mutual support. I believe he is searching in very dark places, but it is undeniable that many of these countries are a lot less degenerate than the United States right now. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 16:14, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Very few countries have governments more evil than our own. Iran and Russia's governments definitely are less evil than ours, although I'm not sure about China's government, or Turkey's. As for the Sunni Islamist regimes in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, those governments definitely are more evil than our own.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 17:01, January 1, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'm starting to understand what you're getting at with Sunni Islam. You hold it responsible for 9/11, which makes it more evil than the American regime. I'll let you know that Nick doesn't accept the mainstream narrative of 9/11, but putting that aside, the American regime is responsible for far more than 3,000 deaths through the abortion industry alone. Not to mention the military-industrial complex (al-Qaeda's not responsible for that one no matter how you spin it). The only reason I can fathom for your assertion that the governments of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are more evil than the U.S. government is because they are supposedly responsible for 9/11. Isn't it funny, though, that Saudi Arabia is technically an ally of the United States? Speaking of allies of the United States, Nick perceives Israel to be a far greater threat to America than any country we've mentioned so far. He would definitely consider Zionism to be more of a threat than Sunni Islam. I don't necessarily agree with him, but I think it bears mentioning. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 18:08, January 4, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::It's obvious to me that Fuentes views foreign relations from a purely ideological standpoint. And that he either has little to no understanding of geopolitics, or refuses to acknowledge geopolitical realities because they don't conform to his ideology. The truth is, we've always prioritized the interests of Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies above Israel's. This was especially apparent prior to the Gulf War. Many people, both then and now, have marked the Gulf War as the point when our foreign policy became &amp;quot;Israel first.&amp;quot; But that's not true. We didn't get involved in that war to defend Israel. We got involved in that war to defend Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies. The reason it may have ''looked like'' we were getting involved in that war to defend Israel was because that war was the point where Israel and Saudi Arabia's interests began to converge. And those interests appear to be more converged now than ever before. That being said, it has always been Saudi Arabia that has held our strings. After all, they have leverage over our economy through the petrodollar. What does Israel have? Of course the Groypers have an answer to ''that'' one: &amp;quot;Dual citizens.&amp;quot; Like, give me a break.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 23:18, January 4, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::On another note, what do you mean by Fuentes rejecting the mainstream narrative of 9/11? There are many alternative theories, including my own. I personally believe Saudi Arabia and Pakistan orchestrated the attacks, and that our government intentionally allowed them to happen. But I also believe that the attacks were directly carried out by al-Qaeda terrorists, that planes did hit the buildings, and that there were no controlled demolitions. So...--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 23:18, January 4, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Israel holds tremendous sway over geopolitics. Follow the money. I don't like to admit it, but well-funded Zionist organizations routinely lobby the American government to warmonger and occupy the Middle East in order to protect Israeli interests. I don't think the United States would have bombed Syria if it wasn't for Israel demonizing Assad. And have you ever heard a neocon talk about bombing Iran without mentioning Israel? Saudi oil is a major part of it, but it's not the only thing. &amp;quot;What does Israel have?&amp;quot; Congress, the Senate, the media, and the banks. Also the Anti-Defamation League. As for 9/11, Nick doesn't hold Muslims responsible. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 01:51, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Israel may be able to get our politicians and our media and our people to view the Middle East through a certain ideological lens. But whenever we actually go to war over there, it’s never on Israel’s behalf. It’s always either on behalf of Saudi Arabia itself or to protect the Saudi-sponsored petrodollar scheme. &lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Think about it. Iraq was always Israel’s enemy, but we didn’t go to war the first time until it invaded Kuwait, a Saudi ally. And we didn’t go to war the second time until Iraq started selling oil in Euros, which is a big problem when one considers how the petrodollar scheme is supposed to work. Libya and Syria were also  enemies of Israel, but they were also getting in the way of the petrodollar scheme. Plus, the Arab Spring was basically a giant Sunni Islamist revolt across multiple countries. Israel would benefit from its enemies descending into chaos, but it would not benefit from its ''allies'' descending into chaos, nor would it benefit from Sunni Islamist regimes coming to power in any way. Saudi Arabia on the other hand would benefit from all of those things.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Meanwhile, can you further clarify Fuentes’ position on 9/11? He doesn’t hold Muslims responsible, but does he or does he not believe al-Qaeda carried out the attacks? And if he doesn’t, who does he believe the true perpetrators were?--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:33, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Another issue that’s also often overlooked is the role of the Eurasian Heartland strategy in our Middle East (and general Eurasian) policy. That also plays a highly important role in our policies towards Iran, Russia, and even China.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:46, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Perhaps you’re right about Saudi Arabia. [https://tv.gab.com/channel/three_spoons/view/nick-fuentes-911-versus-16-6140dbdea63bd99c09a5cff5 Here’s] a full picture of Nick’s stance on 9/11. I have to admit, I’m not familiar with the Eurasian Heartland strategy. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:09, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Sometimes, I go back and forth when trying to decide which is more influential on our foreign policy: the petrodollar scheme or the Eurasian Heartland strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::The petrodollar scheme is the only thing keeping our economy alive. Without it, the dollar cannot be a global reserve currency. And without global reserve currency status, the dollar can't maintain its present value. Even now, in the era of Bidenflation, the dollar is still worth about four times as much as it would be if the petrodollar didn't exist. But what has it cost to keep the dollar in this state? Selling our financial independence to a terrorist state.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::The Eurasian Heartland strategy was originally conceived as a geopolitical strategy for the British Empire, but has been employed by the US since the end of World War II. The strategy's central premise is that the &amp;quot;Eurasian Heartland,&amp;quot; which roughly corresponds to Eastern Europe and the Middle East, is the &amp;quot;pivot region&amp;quot; which determines which countries rule the global arena. If the region ever were to fall under the hegemony of a single power, then so would the rest of the world. This theory is a central theme of Zbigniew Brzezinski's 1997 book &amp;quot;The Grand Chessboard.&amp;quot; In that book, he states that the top priority of American foreign policy is to maintain its status as the sole global superpower, which requires a policy of doing whatever is necessary to prevent the emergence of a hegemon within the Heartland, or as he calls it, the &amp;quot;Eurasian ''Balkans''.&amp;quot; He identifies seven countries as being capable of producing &amp;quot;geopolitical thrusts&amp;quot; which would disrupt to such a policy: China, India, Iran, Pakistan, Russia, and Turkey. In addition, he lists Ukraine as a potential seventh disruptive force. Do you notice a pattern here?--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 18:38, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I assume the pattern is they all have nuclear weapons. Israel also has nuclear weapons and is easily capable of a disruptive geopolitical thrust. They're right in the centre of that region (the heart of the Heartland). But I don't think the U.S. needs to maintain hegemony over any part of the world besides the U.S. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:44, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::First off, I need to correct a mistake I made in my last post. When I said &amp;quot;Eastern Europe and the Middle East,&amp;quot; I actually meant &amp;quot;Eastern Europe and Central Asia.&amp;quot; [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9c/Heartland.png/500px-Heartland.png Here] is a map of the Heartland (or the &amp;quot;Pivot Area&amp;quot;) as defined by the term's inventor, Halford Mackinder, for reference. And [http://orientalreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/EB_map.jpg here] is a map of the Heartland (or the &amp;quot;Eurasian Balkans&amp;quot;) from Brzezinski's book, for further reference. Both of those maps have the center of the Heartland being somewhere in the western part Central Asia, either in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, or Uzbekistan. &lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::Anyway, the common denominator between the &amp;quot;geopolitical thrust&amp;quot; countries is that all three of the American foreign policy establishment's major enemies -- China, Iran, and Russia -- are among them (again, I agree that China is an enemy, but not Iran and Russia). This is consistent with a claim Brzezinski makes in his book that a Sino-Iranian-Russo alliance is the most &amp;quot;dangerous&amp;quot; possible alliance combination among the &amp;quot;geopolitical thrust&amp;quot; countries. In his words:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::''&amp;quot;Potentially, the most dangerous scenario would be a grand coalition of China, Russia, and perhaps Iran, an “antihegemonic” coalition united not by ideology but by complementary grievances. It would be reminiscent in scale and scope of the challenge once posed by the Sino-Soviet bloc, though this time China would likely be the leader and Russia the follower.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::Additionally, Brzezinski states that the only alliance combinations anywhere in the world that would be even more &amp;quot;dangerous&amp;quot; for the US would be a Russo-EU alliance and a Sino-Japanese alliance. Now, wait a minute. Wouldn't preventing those alliances serve as a justification for our ongoing meddling in Europe and East Asia? Hmmm...--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:35, January 6, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::That Eurasian Heartland stuff is really interesting. I'm going to end the discussion off here, but I really appreciate it. Thank you, sincerely. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:55, January 6, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1829468</id>
		<title>Debate:The Groyper Wars</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1829468"/>
		<updated>2022-01-06T01:44:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* Nick Fuentes actively roots for our enemies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;With the past controversies over Nick Fuentes, TPUSA, Michelle Malkin, YAF, Ashley St. Clair, etc., combined with Big Tech's and the federal government's current suppression of dissent, this is an important discussion to have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you agree with [[Essay:The Groyper Wars|this]]? Why or why not? Please discuss the content of the Essay itself, rather than the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Debate]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=No longer relevant, based on an older version and its talk page, potentially confusing|content=&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey, I'm a member of Nick's community and consider myself a groyper sympathizer. Made an account for this. Let's talk if you're still around. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 17:59, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You have a pretty hefty essay there, and I'm not sure which parts are most important to you, so I'll address what interests me and we can take it from there.&lt;br /&gt;
: First of all, I respect that you're honest and transparent about your own background in your user page, which isn't exactly orthodox conservatism. I'm kinda of like you, except I come from Ron Paul libertarianism. Obviously, this puts me at odds with a lot of &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; and Nick, who are very critical of libertarianism, but I have a good enough understanding of their views that I can defend them pretty well and I overlap with most of it. I also appreciate that you condemn censorship in no uncertain terms. The role that &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; or others with similar values is an interesting debate to have, and it's good that Conservapedia seems like they'll allow us to have it. In some &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; communities on bigger platforms, like reddit, you're not even allowed to play devil's advocate about it.&lt;br /&gt;
: My next 2 paragraphs will address some points in the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point about the legacy paleocons not being on board with the groypers is interesting, and seems true. I've already seen the Spectator article, back in the fall, and found it pretty sketchy or weak. More broadly, though, it is true and interesting. There is an angle you are missing though. For example, Cotto and Gottfried, a current events show co-hosted by the great Paul Gottfried, took JF Gariépy's side over Fuentes' when he took credit for getting Nick banned. I don't bring this up to make a censorship point. It was interesting to me, because JF is usually considered &amp;quot;less optical&amp;quot; than Nick Fuentes is, because his list of guests on his own show includes some colorful characters Nick refuses to associate with and because he sometimes says some things explicitly that Nick will leave to subtext instead. Movement paleoconservatism has taken a sour stance on the groypers on temperament, sometimes also on policy, but it's interesting to see how they're navigating that in a unique way.&lt;br /&gt;
: It doesn't surprise me that Ben Shapiro included Ron Paul on his hit list of alt-right influencers, but I don't think the reasons for his inclusion or others are condemnable. It's worth pointing out that Ben himself was a guest on Red Ice TV with Henrik and Lana back in 2014, another show that was banned from YouTube in 2019 or 2020. Similarly, Ben has spoken with Ann Coulter on camera who he also included on his alt-right list. In this sense, the issue with Ben isn't so much his own agenda or his disagreements with other factions but his own hypocrisy; the Daily Wire itself has been labelled alt-right by the mainstream media on multiple occasions, usually with retractions, but it has happened. People find it objectionable that an outlet with a lot of funding and close ties to Fox News, etc. gets a &amp;quot;get-out-of-alt-right-free&amp;quot; card, while more grassroots activists are left out to dry.&lt;br /&gt;
: I'll get to your main essay later, I'd like to do this in parts. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 22:53, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Hi, I really appreciate that you did this, I wasn't expecting it at all. The Groyper Wars have been over for a long time. And after my essay was deleted by an admin ([https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;oldid=1760851 here] is where my essay used to be), I was ready to give it up. Didn't see myself ever coming back to this. And I set up this page several months ago, this is the first time anyone has responded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: You said you would react to my main essay &amp;quot;later,&amp;quot; and it's been a few days. If you're still there, I'd love to debate this with you, but I want to wait until you've reacted to my actual essay until I react to your response. If you post your reaction to the essay, I'd be more than happy to have a discussion with you! --- [[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 13:48, 5 May 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Opinion==&lt;br /&gt;
This has definitely got to be the #1 most controversial topic amongst the right. I think it's an overblown subject. I do consider myself a member of the Groyper movement, though I do think that [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/ff/Groyper_cartoon.png &amp;quot;Groyper&amp;quot;] is a silly name for a political movement. Now, I can't speak for every member, but I really don't think most Groypers are inherently &amp;quot;eViL aNtI-sEmItIc WhItE nAtIoNaLiStS&amp;quot; like many will tell you. It's a traditionalist paleocon movement that urges America to put God and country first and to return the western values our society was founded on (by white people, hence Nick's many mentions of the anti-white agenda, the importance of white identity and shifting demographics, which many confuse to be racial, when they're actually cultural). The &amp;quot;antisemitic&amp;quot; claim is mainly due to Nick's edgy and often Jew-related jokes (which Nick has said are merely for shock value), as well as the Groypers' heavy criticism of Israel, especially from a foreign policy perspective, and can you blame them? Trillions of dollars in taxpayer money is funneled to Israel every year to help them fight their thousand-year war. They don't need all that money, they have a GDP of 402 billion. It's not like they're some third-world country that we're helping out of pity. Of course, say this at a Turning Point USA event or on The Ben Shapiro Show and you're deemed &amp;quot;Anti-semitic/racist&amp;quot;, somehow. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 12:53, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a curious and thought-provoking take. And I wouldn't characterize groypers as white nationalists or anti-Semites, though in the past I would have. A lot of conservatives like to jump the gun and disown anyone outside of the mainstream, condemning them in the harshest possible terms. I think I can give you an explanation why. Part of it is that conservatives are afraid of alienating left-wingers and centrists/moderates. They think if they embrace certain figures they won't be able to convince as many people to accept conservatism. In a lot of cases, the opposite is true. The other thing is that back in 2019, quite a few mainstream/popular right-wingers saw groypers as wignats. Nick Fuentes and Beardson Beardly are having to deal with actual wignats right now. I think the way they feel about TRS is how conservatives felt about groypers. &amp;quot;They're just trying to divide us.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're infiltrators.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They don't have anything to offer.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're idiots.&amp;quot; A lot of stuff was coming out about Nick especially that just put people off. Like that awful Holocaust joke. I get that he tries to be edgy and says things for shock value, but a lot of times he goes too far. And that's why some factions of the right were concerned that Nick was the new Richard Spencer, and didn't want their reputations tarnished through guilt by association --- which ironically is a tactic they themselves unjustly used against those on the right who chose to associate with the groypers. I know groypers presently are frustrated by wignats. Now they know how mainstream conservatives felt. You're absolutely right that most of Western civilization was built by white people. And there 100% is an anti-white agenda: it's pervasive and vitriolic. It's institutionalized across the Western world. I don't see how white identity politics solves anything. Every group should be proud of its identity. Whites have done many amazing things. But embracing identity politics, as Nick seems to frequently advocate, is playing on the left's battlefield, and that's a dangerous game. Altering a country's core demography inevitably comes with long-lasting and severe consequences. White Americans have a sub-replacement birth rate. Black Americans are aborting and shooting themselves out of existence. Latin American and Middle Eastern immigrants to the U.S., meanwhile, have very high birth rates... and they're only rising. Those immigrants obviously vote for the people importing them and tell their kids and grandkids to do the same. I don't think that's inextricably tied to race, I agree that it's cultural. But there is a link between culture and race, they're not entirely distinct. And we can dispute the reasons why demographic shifts have such drastic consequences, but the point is they have drastic consequences. So we need to import less people. As for Israel, a lot of people seem to think anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. I used to think that, too, reasoning that singling out the only Jewish State must be bad-faith criticism. But that point defeats itself: Israel is unique, which is why it is uniquely criticized. Having an unconventional opinion about a foreign country is not inherently bigoted. I support Israel. Others don't. Who cares? Besides, Israel has stains in its history --- think Lavon Affair and some of the shady/unethical actions of the Mossad. I have to correct you on the foreign aid: I believe it's low billions, not trillions. And hypothetically, I support them getting that money. Sure they do well for themselves, but they're (in theory) the only democracy in the Middle East, surrounded on all sides by hostile powers. Israel also has a lot of holy sites (for Christians, not just Jews). But I don't want my taxpayer dollars going to fund their COVID regime --- while non-Muslims still can't pray at the Temple Mount. I like Ben Shapiro and TPUSA, though I sometimes disagree with them. In spite of those disagreements, I see their conservative activism as a net positive. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 17:46, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm happy to say, then, that there's a lot of things we agree on; however, I don't think Nick is advocating for identity politics. I think he just wants whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda. As for TPUSA and Shapiro, they're not advocating for conservatism. They're advocating for libertarian, capitalist-worshipping economic policy, and squishy, practically nonexistent social policy that is getting us virtually nowhere in this culture war. ''(Fusionism and its consequences!)'' If we want to see an actual return to traditionalism in America, the ideas these mainstream &amp;quot;conservatives&amp;quot; are pushing are not contributing in any way. They're pushing us in the opposite direction.(''Plus, we all know Richard Spencer is a Democrat Psyop.'') [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 11:45, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you're right about Richard Spencer. And I would like both Ben Shapiro and TPUSA to put more emphasis on social conservatism and less emphasis on free-market economics (as Michael Knowles and Matt Walsh have advocated for the broader conservative movement several times). Shapiro is sort of libertarian, and so are Charlie Kirk and most of the people at Turning Point. I'm not really a fan of libertarianism. I'm a huge fan of Walsh and Knowles partly because neither of them is remotely libertarian. As well, Shapiro in particular seems to support free-market absolutism and neoliberal, globalized capitalism, though I also just heard him say that America should put tariffs on non-American companies that use child labour and American companies that do so should be punished. I think some people on the dissident right tend to overlook the positives about Ben Shapiro and The Daily Wire: an alt-Hollywood, an alt-publishing company. Openly defying Biden's vaccine mandate and suing him over it. TPUSA has been engaging in conservative activism all over the U.S. for years at this point, and they've improved over time. Charlie Kirk now talks about demographics, marriage, and the nuclear family. Ben Shapiro talks about corporate tyranny. They're human, not controlled opposition. And I'm all for &amp;quot;telling whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda.&amp;quot; That's great. It's something Matt Walsh talks about all the time, at least in 2021. But here's what I mean by saying Nick advocates for white identity politics: [https://tv.gab.com/channel/three_spoons/view/nick-fuentes-white-americans-are-61619c89645a5a7fe897dd5e here], at 31:24, Nick says &amp;quot;White racial identity politics is not going away.&amp;quot; And it's not just that. Nick has explicitly rejected &amp;quot;multi-racial, working-class populism&amp;quot; and grouping together as Americans, patriots, conservatives, or even Christians in favour of white identitarianism. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:58, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think Nick is making perfect sense in the video you linked. I don't think he means &amp;quot;identity politics&amp;quot; in the Obama-esque &amp;quot;I'm black n y'all gotta do everything I say or you racist&amp;quot; sort of sense here. Sounds to me like he's talking about political ideology that prioritizes white identity. (''White-identity'' politics, rather than white ''identity-politics'', if that makes sense). Also, he's not saying we can't come together as American patriots or Christians, he's just saying that many conservatives pretend that race isn't a thing, and that we can't properly fight the anti-white agenda if we don't recognize whiteness. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:22, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::From 37:30 - &amp;quot;Race is the basis, and I wish it wasn't that way. Understand, you know, people look at me and they say, 'That's the guy! That's the white supremacist that wants to make everything racist!' I didn't make it that way. Don't point the finger at me, don't blame me! I'm looking at the world and telling you how it is, I'm explaining it to you. I didn't make the world, okay? Don't blame me, I didn't make America the way it is!... We do have to acknowledge where we differ, and we have to account for those things so that we can live together in harmony... To the extent that it is possible that we get along, the way that we get along is by understanding our differences, accommodating for those differences, and then we can flourish. Not ignoring them, not pretending that they don't exist.&amp;quot; [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:40, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'd like to believe that race shouldn't factor into anything. In the abstract, it shouldn't. But that's not the world we're living in. You and Nick are right about that. This racial stuff has been foisted upon us. Matt Walsh pointed out that the Virginia governor's race was won by &amp;quot;white grievance politics&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that's a good thing.&amp;quot; We have to deal with the intensity of anti-white hate on both the left and the right properly. I get what you're saying about the difference between white identity-politics and white-identity politics. White identity exists and it's not inherently bad. Identity itself isn't bad. But how significant is racial identity in the political realm? It's significant, no doubt. But more so than everything else? I have to admit, it would be pretty cool to hear a candidate talk about how blue-collar white Americans are being left to dry by neoliberal globalism. Or to hear one talk about the historical accomplishments of white people. Should that exclude talking about America's Christian roots? Or condemning abortion, which disproportionately harms black Americans? Or criticizing LGBT radicalism? I don't think it should. So what should be prioritized? I'm not saying shun white interests in favour of corporate tax cuts --- corporations are part of the problem, so take away their (mostly non-white) foreign labour. Address demographics. Address anti-white critical race theory and other aspects of the anti-white agenda. But don't necessarily prioritize these things. Of course they're important. But you also have millions of unborn babies murdered in the womb each year. You have homosexuality/bisexuality/pansexuality and transgenderism/non-binarism/gender-fluidity/agenderism. You have Drag Queen Story Hour. Child drag queens. Drag queens on children's television. &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; drag queens. You have Internet pornography. Gun control. Drugs. War. Not everything is a racial issue. A lot have a racial aspect, but that's not what governs them. The prospect of a national divorce, or secession? That would be along political or sociocultural lines, not solid racial lines. So yes, appeal to whites. But why not also appeal to sensible non-whites (even if they're a tiny minority)? Instead of &amp;quot;I'm looking out for white people,&amp;quot; which can be a good thing, &amp;quot;I'm looking out for families.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for the working class.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for anyone who hates degeneracy.&amp;quot; Couldn't that work? Not pandering, or endless harping about &amp;quot;black unemployment,&amp;quot; but looking for something above race to unite us. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 18:27, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Of course, all those things are important, and race isn't the only issue. You're not wrong about any of that. I think you and I agree on the majority of things. Like I said, I don't think Nick is rejecting other forms of unity among conservatives, he simply doesn't see enough conservatives addressing the racial issues to the extent that they should be. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:32, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::If that's what Nick's saying, then fair enough. This has been and will probably continue to be a blind spot for many conservatives as they refuse to address the issues as they are on the ground. Thank you very much for taking the opportunity to have a civil discussion with me about all this. I think we can end it off here, seeing eye-to-eye on a lot of things. It always helps to be rational as we both are. You made excellent points. Hopefully, the right will improve with time. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:28, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Yes, of course. Thank you. Hopefully the Right will start facing these issues head-on, and hopefully someday we can change the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] page to be a less cringe version than the one Liberaltears wrote. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 20:00, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nick Fuentes actively roots for our enemies==&lt;br /&gt;
On August 15, Nick Fuentes posted [https://t.me/nickjfuentes/4273 this] on Telegram. It's one thing to oppose the War in Afghanistan. But it's a whole other thing to actively root for the Taliban and celebrate our defeat in Afghanistan, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And on October 27, Fuentes posted [https://t.me/nickjfuentes/4536 ''this''] on Telegram. It's one thing to oppose waging a cold war with China. But it's a whole other thing to actively root for the CCP and express hope that it nukes the US, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These posts make it clear where Fuentes stands. He is ''not'' a paleocon, despite his claims to the contrary. No, he's an extremist who actively supports our enemies -- our ''real'' enemies* -- and for purely ideological reasons. Any so-called &amp;quot;populist&amp;quot; movement which endorses ''this'' position should not, and ''must'' not be supported. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, we only have two real enemies on the international stage: The CCP and radical ''Sunni'' Islam. Fuentes has made it clear that he actively supports both, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 16:39, December 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry for taking so long to respond. I think in part, he was trolling when he said those things. But he has also made the point that, since the '''American regime''' (note the distinction from the American nation) is tyrannical and suppresses virtuous dissidents, we should root for anything that wants to destroy it. The enemy of my enemy is my friend, essentially. Since the regime is Nick's enemy, Nick wants to support the enemies of the regime, inside and out. I don't agree with that line of reasoning, but it's not as black-and-white as you're presenting it. It's not as though he has committed treason. --[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 22:22, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You're right that Fuentes hasn't committed treason. You can't commit treason by merely voicing an opinion, no matter how odious that opinion may be.&lt;br /&gt;
::That aside, only time will tell if Fuentes was indeed just trolling or was in fact being completely serious. But one thing's for certain, there ''are'' a lot of people on the alt-right who share that opinion, and ''are'' completely serious about it. I'm not sure if they compose a majority of the alt-right, but I am sure that they compose ''at minimum'' a significant minority.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 12:49, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nick seems to think Russia or China would be willing to protect American dissidents the way America protects dissidents of foreign regimes. It's important to note that Nick has been heavily targeted by the federal government, who seized his assets and put him on a no-fly list. I don't think either of us can fully understand Nick's thinking on this matter if we haven't been similarly persecuted. He feels like Edward Snowden or Julian Assange. He has lost faith in the system to the point where he looks elsewhere for pragmatic and mutual support. I believe he is searching in very dark places, but it is undeniable that many of these countries are a lot less degenerate than the United States right now. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 16:14, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Very few countries have governments more evil than our own. Iran and Russia's governments definitely are less evil than ours, although I'm not sure about China's government, or Turkey's. As for the Sunni Islamist regimes in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, those governments definitely are more evil than our own.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 17:01, January 1, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'm starting to understand what you're getting at with Sunni Islam. You hold it responsible for 9/11, which makes it more evil than the American regime. I'll let you know that Nick doesn't accept the mainstream narrative of 9/11, but putting that aside, the American regime is responsible for far more than 3,000 deaths through the abortion industry alone. Not to mention the military-industrial complex (al-Qaeda's not responsible for that one no matter how you spin it). The only reason I can fathom for your assertion that the governments of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are more evil than the U.S. government is because they are supposedly responsible for 9/11. Isn't it funny, though, that Saudi Arabia is technically an ally of the United States? Speaking of allies of the United States, Nick perceives Israel to be a far greater threat to America than any country we've mentioned so far. He would definitely consider Zionism to be more of a threat than Sunni Islam. I don't necessarily agree with him, but I think it bears mentioning. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 18:08, January 4, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::It's obvious to me that Fuentes views foreign relations from a purely ideological standpoint. And that he either has little to no understanding of geopolitics, or refuses to acknowledge geopolitical realities because they don't conform to his ideology. The truth is, we've always prioritized the interests of Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies above Israel's. This was especially apparent prior to the Gulf War. Many people, both then and now, have marked the Gulf War as the point when our foreign policy became &amp;quot;Israel first.&amp;quot; But that's not true. We didn't get involved in that war to defend Israel. We got involved in that war to defend Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies. The reason it may have ''looked like'' we were getting involved in that war to defend Israel was because that war was the point where Israel and Saudi Arabia's interests began to converge. And those interests appear to be more converged now than ever before. That being said, it has always been Saudi Arabia that has held our strings. After all, they have leverage over our economy through the petrodollar. What does Israel have? Of course the Groypers have an answer to ''that'' one: &amp;quot;Dual citizens.&amp;quot; Like, give me a break.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 23:18, January 4, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::On another note, what do you mean by Fuentes rejecting the mainstream narrative of 9/11? There are many alternative theories, including my own. I personally believe Saudi Arabia and Pakistan orchestrated the attacks, and that our government intentionally allowed them to happen. But I also believe that the attacks were directly carried out by al-Qaeda terrorists, that planes did hit the buildings, and that there were no controlled demolitions. So...--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 23:18, January 4, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Israel holds tremendous sway over geopolitics. Follow the money. I don't like to admit it, but well-funded Zionist organizations routinely lobby the American government to warmonger and occupy the Middle East in order to protect Israeli interests. I don't think the United States would have bombed Syria if it wasn't for Israel demonizing Assad. And have you ever heard a neocon talk about bombing Iran without mentioning Israel? Saudi oil is a major part of it, but it's not the only thing. &amp;quot;What does Israel have?&amp;quot; Congress, the Senate, the media, and the banks. Also the Anti-Defamation League. As for 9/11, Nick doesn't hold Muslims responsible. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 01:51, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Israel may be able to get our politicians and our media and our people to view the Middle East through a certain ideological lens. But whenever we actually go to war over there, it’s never on Israel’s behalf. It’s always either on behalf of Saudi Arabia itself or to protect the Saudi-sponsored petrodollar scheme. &lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Think about it. Iraq was always Israel’s enemy, but we didn’t go to war the first time until it invaded Kuwait, a Saudi ally. And we didn’t go to war the second time until Iraq started selling oil in Euros, which is a big problem when one considers how the petrodollar scheme is supposed to work. Libya and Syria were also  enemies of Israel, but they were also getting in the way of the petrodollar scheme. Plus, the Arab Spring was basically a giant Sunni Islamist revolt across multiple countries. Israel would benefit from its enemies descending into chaos, but it would not benefit from its ''allies'' descending into chaos, nor would it benefit from Sunni Islamist regimes coming to power in any way. Saudi Arabia on the other hand would benefit from all of those things.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Meanwhile, can you further clarify Fuentes’ position on 9/11? He doesn’t hold Muslims responsible, but does he or does he not believe al-Qaeda carried out the attacks? And if he doesn’t, who does he believe the true perpetrators were?--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:33, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Another issue that’s also often overlooked is the role of the Eurasian Heartland strategy in our Middle East (and general Eurasian) policy. That also plays a highly important role in our policies towards Iran, Russia, and even China.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:46, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Perhaps you’re right about Saudi Arabia. [https://tv.gab.com/channel/three_spoons/view/nick-fuentes-911-versus-16-6140dbdea63bd99c09a5cff5 Here’s] a full picture of Nick’s stance on 9/11. I have to admit, I’m not familiar with the Eurasian Heartland strategy. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:09, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Sometimes, I go back and forth when trying to decide which is more influential on our foreign policy: the petrodollar scheme or the Eurasian Heartland strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::The petrodollar scheme is the only thing keeping our economy alive. Without it, the dollar cannot be a global reserve currency. And without global reserve currency status, the dollar can't maintain its present value. Even now, in the era of Bidenflation, the dollar is still worth about four times as much as it would be if the petrodollar didn't exist. But what has it cost to keep the dollar in this state? Selling our financial independence to a terrorist state.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::The Eurasian Heartland strategy was originally conceived as a geopolitical strategy for the British Empire, but has been employed by the US since the end of World War II. The strategy's central premise is that the &amp;quot;Eurasian Heartland,&amp;quot; which roughly corresponds to Eastern Europe and the Middle East, is the &amp;quot;pivot region&amp;quot; which determines which countries rule the global arena. If the region ever were to fall under the hegemony of a single power, then so would the rest of the world. This theory is a central theme of Zbigniew Brzezinski's 1997 book &amp;quot;The Grand Chessboard.&amp;quot; In that book, he states that the top priority of American foreign policy is to maintain its status as the sole global superpower, which requires a policy of doing whatever is necessary to prevent the emergence of a hegemon within the Heartland, or as he calls it, the &amp;quot;Eurasian ''Balkans''.&amp;quot; He identifies seven countries as being capable of producing &amp;quot;geopolitical thrusts&amp;quot; which would disrupt to such a policy: China, India, Iran, Pakistan, Russia, and Turkey. In addition, he lists Ukraine as a potential seventh disruptive force. Do you notice a pattern here?--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 18:38, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I assume the pattern is they all have nuclear weapons. Israel also has nuclear weapons and is easily capable of a disruptive geopolitical thrust. They're right in the centre of that region (the heart of the Heartland). But I don't think the U.S. needs to maintain hegemony over any part of the world besides the U.S. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:44, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1829426</id>
		<title>Debate:The Groyper Wars</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1829426"/>
		<updated>2022-01-05T20:09:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* Nick Fuentes actively roots for our enemies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;With the past controversies over Nick Fuentes, TPUSA, Michelle Malkin, YAF, Ashley St. Clair, etc., combined with Big Tech's and the federal government's current suppression of dissent, this is an important discussion to have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you agree with [[Essay:The Groyper Wars|this]]? Why or why not? Please discuss the content of the Essay itself, rather than the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Debate]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=No longer relevant, based on an older version and its talk page, potentially confusing|content=&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey, I'm a member of Nick's community and consider myself a groyper sympathizer. Made an account for this. Let's talk if you're still around. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 17:59, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You have a pretty hefty essay there, and I'm not sure which parts are most important to you, so I'll address what interests me and we can take it from there.&lt;br /&gt;
: First of all, I respect that you're honest and transparent about your own background in your user page, which isn't exactly orthodox conservatism. I'm kinda of like you, except I come from Ron Paul libertarianism. Obviously, this puts me at odds with a lot of &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; and Nick, who are very critical of libertarianism, but I have a good enough understanding of their views that I can defend them pretty well and I overlap with most of it. I also appreciate that you condemn censorship in no uncertain terms. The role that &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; or others with similar values is an interesting debate to have, and it's good that Conservapedia seems like they'll allow us to have it. In some &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; communities on bigger platforms, like reddit, you're not even allowed to play devil's advocate about it.&lt;br /&gt;
: My next 2 paragraphs will address some points in the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point about the legacy paleocons not being on board with the groypers is interesting, and seems true. I've already seen the Spectator article, back in the fall, and found it pretty sketchy or weak. More broadly, though, it is true and interesting. There is an angle you are missing though. For example, Cotto and Gottfried, a current events show co-hosted by the great Paul Gottfried, took JF Gariépy's side over Fuentes' when he took credit for getting Nick banned. I don't bring this up to make a censorship point. It was interesting to me, because JF is usually considered &amp;quot;less optical&amp;quot; than Nick Fuentes is, because his list of guests on his own show includes some colorful characters Nick refuses to associate with and because he sometimes says some things explicitly that Nick will leave to subtext instead. Movement paleoconservatism has taken a sour stance on the groypers on temperament, sometimes also on policy, but it's interesting to see how they're navigating that in a unique way.&lt;br /&gt;
: It doesn't surprise me that Ben Shapiro included Ron Paul on his hit list of alt-right influencers, but I don't think the reasons for his inclusion or others are condemnable. It's worth pointing out that Ben himself was a guest on Red Ice TV with Henrik and Lana back in 2014, another show that was banned from YouTube in 2019 or 2020. Similarly, Ben has spoken with Ann Coulter on camera who he also included on his alt-right list. In this sense, the issue with Ben isn't so much his own agenda or his disagreements with other factions but his own hypocrisy; the Daily Wire itself has been labelled alt-right by the mainstream media on multiple occasions, usually with retractions, but it has happened. People find it objectionable that an outlet with a lot of funding and close ties to Fox News, etc. gets a &amp;quot;get-out-of-alt-right-free&amp;quot; card, while more grassroots activists are left out to dry.&lt;br /&gt;
: I'll get to your main essay later, I'd like to do this in parts. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 22:53, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Hi, I really appreciate that you did this, I wasn't expecting it at all. The Groyper Wars have been over for a long time. And after my essay was deleted by an admin ([https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;oldid=1760851 here] is where my essay used to be), I was ready to give it up. Didn't see myself ever coming back to this. And I set up this page several months ago, this is the first time anyone has responded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: You said you would react to my main essay &amp;quot;later,&amp;quot; and it's been a few days. If you're still there, I'd love to debate this with you, but I want to wait until you've reacted to my actual essay until I react to your response. If you post your reaction to the essay, I'd be more than happy to have a discussion with you! --- [[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 13:48, 5 May 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Opinion==&lt;br /&gt;
This has definitely got to be the #1 most controversial topic amongst the right. I think it's an overblown subject. I do consider myself a member of the Groyper movement, though I do think that [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/ff/Groyper_cartoon.png &amp;quot;Groyper&amp;quot;] is a silly name for a political movement. Now, I can't speak for every member, but I really don't think most Groypers are inherently &amp;quot;eViL aNtI-sEmItIc WhItE nAtIoNaLiStS&amp;quot; like many will tell you. It's a traditionalist paleocon movement that urges America to put God and country first and to return the western values our society was founded on (by white people, hence Nick's many mentions of the anti-white agenda, the importance of white identity and shifting demographics, which many confuse to be racial, when they're actually cultural). The &amp;quot;antisemitic&amp;quot; claim is mainly due to Nick's edgy and often Jew-related jokes (which Nick has said are merely for shock value), as well as the Groypers' heavy criticism of Israel, especially from a foreign policy perspective, and can you blame them? Trillions of dollars in taxpayer money is funneled to Israel every year to help them fight their thousand-year war. They don't need all that money, they have a GDP of 402 billion. It's not like they're some third-world country that we're helping out of pity. Of course, say this at a Turning Point USA event or on The Ben Shapiro Show and you're deemed &amp;quot;Anti-semitic/racist&amp;quot;, somehow. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 12:53, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a curious and thought-provoking take. And I wouldn't characterize groypers as white nationalists or anti-Semites, though in the past I would have. A lot of conservatives like to jump the gun and disown anyone outside of the mainstream, condemning them in the harshest possible terms. I think I can give you an explanation why. Part of it is that conservatives are afraid of alienating left-wingers and centrists/moderates. They think if they embrace certain figures they won't be able to convince as many people to accept conservatism. In a lot of cases, the opposite is true. The other thing is that back in 2019, quite a few mainstream/popular right-wingers saw groypers as wignats. Nick Fuentes and Beardson Beardly are having to deal with actual wignats right now. I think the way they feel about TRS is how conservatives felt about groypers. &amp;quot;They're just trying to divide us.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're infiltrators.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They don't have anything to offer.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're idiots.&amp;quot; A lot of stuff was coming out about Nick especially that just put people off. Like that awful Holocaust joke. I get that he tries to be edgy and says things for shock value, but a lot of times he goes too far. And that's why some factions of the right were concerned that Nick was the new Richard Spencer, and didn't want their reputations tarnished through guilt by association --- which ironically is a tactic they themselves unjustly used against those on the right who chose to associate with the groypers. I know groypers presently are frustrated by wignats. Now they know how mainstream conservatives felt. You're absolutely right that most of Western civilization was built by white people. And there 100% is an anti-white agenda: it's pervasive and vitriolic. It's institutionalized across the Western world. I don't see how white identity politics solves anything. Every group should be proud of its identity. Whites have done many amazing things. But embracing identity politics, as Nick seems to frequently advocate, is playing on the left's battlefield, and that's a dangerous game. Altering a country's core demography inevitably comes with long-lasting and severe consequences. White Americans have a sub-replacement birth rate. Black Americans are aborting and shooting themselves out of existence. Latin American and Middle Eastern immigrants to the U.S., meanwhile, have very high birth rates... and they're only rising. Those immigrants obviously vote for the people importing them and tell their kids and grandkids to do the same. I don't think that's inextricably tied to race, I agree that it's cultural. But there is a link between culture and race, they're not entirely distinct. And we can dispute the reasons why demographic shifts have such drastic consequences, but the point is they have drastic consequences. So we need to import less people. As for Israel, a lot of people seem to think anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. I used to think that, too, reasoning that singling out the only Jewish State must be bad-faith criticism. But that point defeats itself: Israel is unique, which is why it is uniquely criticized. Having an unconventional opinion about a foreign country is not inherently bigoted. I support Israel. Others don't. Who cares? Besides, Israel has stains in its history --- think Lavon Affair and some of the shady/unethical actions of the Mossad. I have to correct you on the foreign aid: I believe it's low billions, not trillions. And hypothetically, I support them getting that money. Sure they do well for themselves, but they're (in theory) the only democracy in the Middle East, surrounded on all sides by hostile powers. Israel also has a lot of holy sites (for Christians, not just Jews). But I don't want my taxpayer dollars going to fund their COVID regime --- while non-Muslims still can't pray at the Temple Mount. I like Ben Shapiro and TPUSA, though I sometimes disagree with them. In spite of those disagreements, I see their conservative activism as a net positive. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 17:46, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm happy to say, then, that there's a lot of things we agree on; however, I don't think Nick is advocating for identity politics. I think he just wants whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda. As for TPUSA and Shapiro, they're not advocating for conservatism. They're advocating for libertarian, capitalist-worshipping economic policy, and squishy, practically nonexistent social policy that is getting us virtually nowhere in this culture war. ''(Fusionism and its consequences!)'' If we want to see an actual return to traditionalism in America, the ideas these mainstream &amp;quot;conservatives&amp;quot; are pushing are not contributing in any way. They're pushing us in the opposite direction.(''Plus, we all know Richard Spencer is a Democrat Psyop.'') [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 11:45, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you're right about Richard Spencer. And I would like both Ben Shapiro and TPUSA to put more emphasis on social conservatism and less emphasis on free-market economics (as Michael Knowles and Matt Walsh have advocated for the broader conservative movement several times). Shapiro is sort of libertarian, and so are Charlie Kirk and most of the people at Turning Point. I'm not really a fan of libertarianism. I'm a huge fan of Walsh and Knowles partly because neither of them is remotely libertarian. As well, Shapiro in particular seems to support free-market absolutism and neoliberal, globalized capitalism, though I also just heard him say that America should put tariffs on non-American companies that use child labour and American companies that do so should be punished. I think some people on the dissident right tend to overlook the positives about Ben Shapiro and The Daily Wire: an alt-Hollywood, an alt-publishing company. Openly defying Biden's vaccine mandate and suing him over it. TPUSA has been engaging in conservative activism all over the U.S. for years at this point, and they've improved over time. Charlie Kirk now talks about demographics, marriage, and the nuclear family. Ben Shapiro talks about corporate tyranny. They're human, not controlled opposition. And I'm all for &amp;quot;telling whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda.&amp;quot; That's great. It's something Matt Walsh talks about all the time, at least in 2021. But here's what I mean by saying Nick advocates for white identity politics: [https://tv.gab.com/channel/three_spoons/view/nick-fuentes-white-americans-are-61619c89645a5a7fe897dd5e here], at 31:24, Nick says &amp;quot;White racial identity politics is not going away.&amp;quot; And it's not just that. Nick has explicitly rejected &amp;quot;multi-racial, working-class populism&amp;quot; and grouping together as Americans, patriots, conservatives, or even Christians in favour of white identitarianism. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:58, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think Nick is making perfect sense in the video you linked. I don't think he means &amp;quot;identity politics&amp;quot; in the Obama-esque &amp;quot;I'm black n y'all gotta do everything I say or you racist&amp;quot; sort of sense here. Sounds to me like he's talking about political ideology that prioritizes white identity. (''White-identity'' politics, rather than white ''identity-politics'', if that makes sense). Also, he's not saying we can't come together as American patriots or Christians, he's just saying that many conservatives pretend that race isn't a thing, and that we can't properly fight the anti-white agenda if we don't recognize whiteness. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:22, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::From 37:30 - &amp;quot;Race is the basis, and I wish it wasn't that way. Understand, you know, people look at me and they say, 'That's the guy! That's the white supremacist that wants to make everything racist!' I didn't make it that way. Don't point the finger at me, don't blame me! I'm looking at the world and telling you how it is, I'm explaining it to you. I didn't make the world, okay? Don't blame me, I didn't make America the way it is!... We do have to acknowledge where we differ, and we have to account for those things so that we can live together in harmony... To the extent that it is possible that we get along, the way that we get along is by understanding our differences, accommodating for those differences, and then we can flourish. Not ignoring them, not pretending that they don't exist.&amp;quot; [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:40, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'd like to believe that race shouldn't factor into anything. In the abstract, it shouldn't. But that's not the world we're living in. You and Nick are right about that. This racial stuff has been foisted upon us. Matt Walsh pointed out that the Virginia governor's race was won by &amp;quot;white grievance politics&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that's a good thing.&amp;quot; We have to deal with the intensity of anti-white hate on both the left and the right properly. I get what you're saying about the difference between white identity-politics and white-identity politics. White identity exists and it's not inherently bad. Identity itself isn't bad. But how significant is racial identity in the political realm? It's significant, no doubt. But more so than everything else? I have to admit, it would be pretty cool to hear a candidate talk about how blue-collar white Americans are being left to dry by neoliberal globalism. Or to hear one talk about the historical accomplishments of white people. Should that exclude talking about America's Christian roots? Or condemning abortion, which disproportionately harms black Americans? Or criticizing LGBT radicalism? I don't think it should. So what should be prioritized? I'm not saying shun white interests in favour of corporate tax cuts --- corporations are part of the problem, so take away their (mostly non-white) foreign labour. Address demographics. Address anti-white critical race theory and other aspects of the anti-white agenda. But don't necessarily prioritize these things. Of course they're important. But you also have millions of unborn babies murdered in the womb each year. You have homosexuality/bisexuality/pansexuality and transgenderism/non-binarism/gender-fluidity/agenderism. You have Drag Queen Story Hour. Child drag queens. Drag queens on children's television. &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; drag queens. You have Internet pornography. Gun control. Drugs. War. Not everything is a racial issue. A lot have a racial aspect, but that's not what governs them. The prospect of a national divorce, or secession? That would be along political or sociocultural lines, not solid racial lines. So yes, appeal to whites. But why not also appeal to sensible non-whites (even if they're a tiny minority)? Instead of &amp;quot;I'm looking out for white people,&amp;quot; which can be a good thing, &amp;quot;I'm looking out for families.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for the working class.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for anyone who hates degeneracy.&amp;quot; Couldn't that work? Not pandering, or endless harping about &amp;quot;black unemployment,&amp;quot; but looking for something above race to unite us. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 18:27, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Of course, all those things are important, and race isn't the only issue. You're not wrong about any of that. I think you and I agree on the majority of things. Like I said, I don't think Nick is rejecting other forms of unity among conservatives, he simply doesn't see enough conservatives addressing the racial issues to the extent that they should be. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:32, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::If that's what Nick's saying, then fair enough. This has been and will probably continue to be a blind spot for many conservatives as they refuse to address the issues as they are on the ground. Thank you very much for taking the opportunity to have a civil discussion with me about all this. I think we can end it off here, seeing eye-to-eye on a lot of things. It always helps to be rational as we both are. You made excellent points. Hopefully, the right will improve with time. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:28, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Yes, of course. Thank you. Hopefully the Right will start facing these issues head-on, and hopefully someday we can change the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] page to be a less cringe version than the one Liberaltears wrote. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 20:00, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nick Fuentes actively roots for our enemies==&lt;br /&gt;
On August 15, Nick Fuentes posted [https://t.me/nickjfuentes/4273 this] on Telegram. It's one thing to oppose the War in Afghanistan. But it's a whole other thing to actively root for the Taliban and celebrate our defeat in Afghanistan, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And on October 27, Fuentes posted [https://t.me/nickjfuentes/4536 ''this''] on Telegram. It's one thing to oppose waging a cold war with China. But it's a whole other thing to actively root for the CCP and express hope that it nukes the US, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These posts make it clear where Fuentes stands. He is ''not'' a paleocon, despite his claims to the contrary. No, he's an extremist who actively supports our enemies -- our ''real'' enemies* -- and for purely ideological reasons. Any so-called &amp;quot;populist&amp;quot; movement which endorses ''this'' position should not, and ''must'' not be supported. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, we only have two real enemies on the international stage: The CCP and radical ''Sunni'' Islam. Fuentes has made it clear that he actively supports both, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 16:39, December 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry for taking so long to respond. I think in part, he was trolling when he said those things. But he has also made the point that, since the '''American regime''' (note the distinction from the American nation) is tyrannical and suppresses virtuous dissidents, we should root for anything that wants to destroy it. The enemy of my enemy is my friend, essentially. Since the regime is Nick's enemy, Nick wants to support the enemies of the regime, inside and out. I don't agree with that line of reasoning, but it's not as black-and-white as you're presenting it. It's not as though he has committed treason. --[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 22:22, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You're right that Fuentes hasn't committed treason. You can't commit treason by merely voicing an opinion, no matter how odious that opinion may be.&lt;br /&gt;
::That aside, only time will tell if Fuentes was indeed just trolling or was in fact being completely serious. But one thing's for certain, there ''are'' a lot of people on the alt-right who share that opinion, and ''are'' completely serious about it. I'm not sure if they compose a majority of the alt-right, but I am sure that they compose ''at minimum'' a significant minority.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 12:49, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nick seems to think Russia or China would be willing to protect American dissidents the way America protects dissidents of foreign regimes. It's important to note that Nick has been heavily targeted by the federal government, who seized his assets and put him on a no-fly list. I don't think either of us can fully understand Nick's thinking on this matter if we haven't been similarly persecuted. He feels like Edward Snowden or Julian Assange. He has lost faith in the system to the point where he looks elsewhere for pragmatic and mutual support. I believe he is searching in very dark places, but it is undeniable that many of these countries are a lot less degenerate than the United States right now. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 16:14, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Very few countries have governments more evil than our own. Iran and Russia's governments definitely are less evil than ours, although I'm not sure about China's government, or Turkey's. As for the Sunni Islamist regimes in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, those governments definitely are more evil than our own.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 17:01, January 1, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'm starting to understand what you're getting at with Sunni Islam. You hold it responsible for 9/11, which makes it more evil than the American regime. I'll let you know that Nick doesn't accept the mainstream narrative of 9/11, but putting that aside, the American regime is responsible for far more than 3,000 deaths through the abortion industry alone. Not to mention the military-industrial complex (al-Qaeda's not responsible for that one no matter how you spin it). The only reason I can fathom for your assertion that the governments of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are more evil than the U.S. government is because they are supposedly responsible for 9/11. Isn't it funny, though, that Saudi Arabia is technically an ally of the United States? Speaking of allies of the United States, Nick perceives Israel to be a far greater threat to America than any country we've mentioned so far. He would definitely consider Zionism to be more of a threat than Sunni Islam. I don't necessarily agree with him, but I think it bears mentioning. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 18:08, January 4, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::It's obvious to me that Fuentes views foreign relations from a purely ideological standpoint. And that he either has little to no understanding of geopolitics, or refuses to acknowledge geopolitical realities because they don't conform to his ideology. The truth is, we've always prioritized the interests of Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies above Israel's. This was especially apparent prior to the Gulf War. Many people, both then and now, have marked the Gulf War as the point when our foreign policy became &amp;quot;Israel first.&amp;quot; But that's not true. We didn't get involved in that war to defend Israel. We got involved in that war to defend Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies. The reason it may have ''looked like'' we were getting involved in that war to defend Israel was because that war was the point where Israel and Saudi Arabia's interests began to converge. And those interests appear to be more converged now than ever before. That being said, it has always been Saudi Arabia that has held our strings. After all, they have leverage over our economy through the petrodollar. What does Israel have? Of course the Groypers have an answer to ''that'' one: &amp;quot;Dual citizens.&amp;quot; Like, give me a break.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 23:18, January 4, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::On another note, what do you mean by Fuentes rejecting the mainstream narrative of 9/11? There are many alternative theories, including my own. I personally believe Saudi Arabia and Pakistan orchestrated the attacks, and that our government intentionally allowed them to happen. But I also believe that the attacks were directly carried out by al-Qaeda terrorists, that planes did hit the buildings, and that there were no controlled demolitions. So...--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 23:18, January 4, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Israel holds tremendous sway over geopolitics. Follow the money. I don't like to admit it, but well-funded Zionist organizations routinely lobby the American government to warmonger and occupy the Middle East in order to protect Israeli interests. I don't think the United States would have bombed Syria if it wasn't for Israel demonizing Assad. And have you ever heard a neocon talk about bombing Iran without mentioning Israel? Saudi oil is a major part of it, but it's not the only thing. &amp;quot;What does Israel have?&amp;quot; Congress, the Senate, the media, and the banks. Also the Anti-Defamation League. As for 9/11, Nick doesn't hold Muslims responsible. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 01:51, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Israel may be able to get our politicians and our media and our people to view the Middle East through a certain ideological lens. But whenever we actually go to war over there, it’s never on Israel’s behalf. It’s always either on behalf of Saudi Arabia itself or to protect the Saudi-sponsored petrodollar scheme. &lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Think about it. Iraq was always Israel’s enemy, but we didn’t go to war the first time until it invaded Kuwait, a Saudi ally. And we didn’t go to war the second time until Iraq started selling oil in Euros, which is a big problem when one considers how the petrodollar scheme is supposed to work. Libya and Syria were also  enemies of Israel, but they were also getting in the way of the petrodollar scheme. Plus, the Arab Spring was basically a giant Sunni Islamist revolt across multiple countries. Israel would benefit from its enemies descending into chaos, but it would not benefit from its ''allies'' descending into chaos, nor would it benefit from Sunni Islamist regimes coming to power in any way. Saudi Arabia on the other hand would benefit from all of those things.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Meanwhile, can you further clarify Fuentes’ position on 9/11? He doesn’t hold Muslims responsible, but does he or does he not believe al-Qaeda carried out the attacks? And if he doesn’t, who does he believe the true perpetrators were?--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:33, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Another issue that’s also often overlooked is the role of the Eurasian Heartland strategy in our Middle East (and general Eurasian) policy. That also plays a highly important role in our policies towards Iran, Russia, and even China.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:46, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Perhaps you’re right about Saudi Arabia. [https://tv.gab.com/channel/three_spoons/view/nick-fuentes-911-versus-16-6140dbdea63bd99c09a5cff5 Here’s] a full picture of Nick’s stance on 9/11. I have to admit, I’m not familiar with the Eurasian Heartland strategy. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:09, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1829153</id>
		<title>Debate:The Groyper Wars</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1829153"/>
		<updated>2022-01-05T06:51:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* Nick Fuentes actively roots for our enemies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;With the past controversies over Nick Fuentes, TPUSA, Michelle Malkin, YAF, Ashley St. Clair, etc., combined with Big Tech's and the federal government's current suppression of dissent, this is an important discussion to have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you agree with [[Essay:The Groyper Wars|this]]? Why or why not? Please discuss the content of the Essay itself, rather than the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Debate]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=No longer relevant, based on an older version and its talk page, potentially confusing|content=&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey, I'm a member of Nick's community and consider myself a groyper sympathizer. Made an account for this. Let's talk if you're still around. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 17:59, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You have a pretty hefty essay there, and I'm not sure which parts are most important to you, so I'll address what interests me and we can take it from there.&lt;br /&gt;
: First of all, I respect that you're honest and transparent about your own background in your user page, which isn't exactly orthodox conservatism. I'm kinda of like you, except I come from Ron Paul libertarianism. Obviously, this puts me at odds with a lot of &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; and Nick, who are very critical of libertarianism, but I have a good enough understanding of their views that I can defend them pretty well and I overlap with most of it. I also appreciate that you condemn censorship in no uncertain terms. The role that &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; or others with similar values is an interesting debate to have, and it's good that Conservapedia seems like they'll allow us to have it. In some &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; communities on bigger platforms, like reddit, you're not even allowed to play devil's advocate about it.&lt;br /&gt;
: My next 2 paragraphs will address some points in the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point about the legacy paleocons not being on board with the groypers is interesting, and seems true. I've already seen the Spectator article, back in the fall, and found it pretty sketchy or weak. More broadly, though, it is true and interesting. There is an angle you are missing though. For example, Cotto and Gottfried, a current events show co-hosted by the great Paul Gottfried, took JF Gariépy's side over Fuentes' when he took credit for getting Nick banned. I don't bring this up to make a censorship point. It was interesting to me, because JF is usually considered &amp;quot;less optical&amp;quot; than Nick Fuentes is, because his list of guests on his own show includes some colorful characters Nick refuses to associate with and because he sometimes says some things explicitly that Nick will leave to subtext instead. Movement paleoconservatism has taken a sour stance on the groypers on temperament, sometimes also on policy, but it's interesting to see how they're navigating that in a unique way.&lt;br /&gt;
: It doesn't surprise me that Ben Shapiro included Ron Paul on his hit list of alt-right influencers, but I don't think the reasons for his inclusion or others are condemnable. It's worth pointing out that Ben himself was a guest on Red Ice TV with Henrik and Lana back in 2014, another show that was banned from YouTube in 2019 or 2020. Similarly, Ben has spoken with Ann Coulter on camera who he also included on his alt-right list. In this sense, the issue with Ben isn't so much his own agenda or his disagreements with other factions but his own hypocrisy; the Daily Wire itself has been labelled alt-right by the mainstream media on multiple occasions, usually with retractions, but it has happened. People find it objectionable that an outlet with a lot of funding and close ties to Fox News, etc. gets a &amp;quot;get-out-of-alt-right-free&amp;quot; card, while more grassroots activists are left out to dry.&lt;br /&gt;
: I'll get to your main essay later, I'd like to do this in parts. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 22:53, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Hi, I really appreciate that you did this, I wasn't expecting it at all. The Groyper Wars have been over for a long time. And after my essay was deleted by an admin ([https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;oldid=1760851 here] is where my essay used to be), I was ready to give it up. Didn't see myself ever coming back to this. And I set up this page several months ago, this is the first time anyone has responded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: You said you would react to my main essay &amp;quot;later,&amp;quot; and it's been a few days. If you're still there, I'd love to debate this with you, but I want to wait until you've reacted to my actual essay until I react to your response. If you post your reaction to the essay, I'd be more than happy to have a discussion with you! --- [[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 13:48, 5 May 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Opinion==&lt;br /&gt;
This has definitely got to be the #1 most controversial topic amongst the right. I think it's an overblown subject. I do consider myself a member of the Groyper movement, though I do think that [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/ff/Groyper_cartoon.png &amp;quot;Groyper&amp;quot;] is a silly name for a political movement. Now, I can't speak for every member, but I really don't think most Groypers are inherently &amp;quot;eViL aNtI-sEmItIc WhItE nAtIoNaLiStS&amp;quot; like many will tell you. It's a traditionalist paleocon movement that urges America to put God and country first and to return the western values our society was founded on (by white people, hence Nick's many mentions of the anti-white agenda, the importance of white identity and shifting demographics, which many confuse to be racial, when they're actually cultural). The &amp;quot;antisemitic&amp;quot; claim is mainly due to Nick's edgy and often Jew-related jokes (which Nick has said are merely for shock value), as well as the Groypers' heavy criticism of Israel, especially from a foreign policy perspective, and can you blame them? Trillions of dollars in taxpayer money is funneled to Israel every year to help them fight their thousand-year war. They don't need all that money, they have a GDP of 402 billion. It's not like they're some third-world country that we're helping out of pity. Of course, say this at a Turning Point USA event or on The Ben Shapiro Show and you're deemed &amp;quot;Anti-semitic/racist&amp;quot;, somehow. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 12:53, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a curious and thought-provoking take. And I wouldn't characterize groypers as white nationalists or anti-Semites, though in the past I would have. A lot of conservatives like to jump the gun and disown anyone outside of the mainstream, condemning them in the harshest possible terms. I think I can give you an explanation why. Part of it is that conservatives are afraid of alienating left-wingers and centrists/moderates. They think if they embrace certain figures they won't be able to convince as many people to accept conservatism. In a lot of cases, the opposite is true. The other thing is that back in 2019, quite a few mainstream/popular right-wingers saw groypers as wignats. Nick Fuentes and Beardson Beardly are having to deal with actual wignats right now. I think the way they feel about TRS is how conservatives felt about groypers. &amp;quot;They're just trying to divide us.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're infiltrators.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They don't have anything to offer.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're idiots.&amp;quot; A lot of stuff was coming out about Nick especially that just put people off. Like that awful Holocaust joke. I get that he tries to be edgy and says things for shock value, but a lot of times he goes too far. And that's why some factions of the right were concerned that Nick was the new Richard Spencer, and didn't want their reputations tarnished through guilt by association --- which ironically is a tactic they themselves unjustly used against those on the right who chose to associate with the groypers. I know groypers presently are frustrated by wignats. Now they know how mainstream conservatives felt. You're absolutely right that most of Western civilization was built by white people. And there 100% is an anti-white agenda: it's pervasive and vitriolic. It's institutionalized across the Western world. I don't see how white identity politics solves anything. Every group should be proud of its identity. Whites have done many amazing things. But embracing identity politics, as Nick seems to frequently advocate, is playing on the left's battlefield, and that's a dangerous game. Altering a country's core demography inevitably comes with long-lasting and severe consequences. White Americans have a sub-replacement birth rate. Black Americans are aborting and shooting themselves out of existence. Latin American and Middle Eastern immigrants to the U.S., meanwhile, have very high birth rates... and they're only rising. Those immigrants obviously vote for the people importing them and tell their kids and grandkids to do the same. I don't think that's inextricably tied to race, I agree that it's cultural. But there is a link between culture and race, they're not entirely distinct. And we can dispute the reasons why demographic shifts have such drastic consequences, but the point is they have drastic consequences. So we need to import less people. As for Israel, a lot of people seem to think anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. I used to think that, too, reasoning that singling out the only Jewish State must be bad-faith criticism. But that point defeats itself: Israel is unique, which is why it is uniquely criticized. Having an unconventional opinion about a foreign country is not inherently bigoted. I support Israel. Others don't. Who cares? Besides, Israel has stains in its history --- think Lavon Affair and some of the shady/unethical actions of the Mossad. I have to correct you on the foreign aid: I believe it's low billions, not trillions. And hypothetically, I support them getting that money. Sure they do well for themselves, but they're (in theory) the only democracy in the Middle East, surrounded on all sides by hostile powers. Israel also has a lot of holy sites (for Christians, not just Jews). But I don't want my taxpayer dollars going to fund their COVID regime --- while non-Muslims still can't pray at the Temple Mount. I like Ben Shapiro and TPUSA, though I sometimes disagree with them. In spite of those disagreements, I see their conservative activism as a net positive. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 17:46, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm happy to say, then, that there's a lot of things we agree on; however, I don't think Nick is advocating for identity politics. I think he just wants whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda. As for TPUSA and Shapiro, they're not advocating for conservatism. They're advocating for libertarian, capitalist-worshipping economic policy, and squishy, practically nonexistent social policy that is getting us virtually nowhere in this culture war. ''(Fusionism and its consequences!)'' If we want to see an actual return to traditionalism in America, the ideas these mainstream &amp;quot;conservatives&amp;quot; are pushing are not contributing in any way. They're pushing us in the opposite direction.(''Plus, we all know Richard Spencer is a Democrat Psyop.'') [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 11:45, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you're right about Richard Spencer. And I would like both Ben Shapiro and TPUSA to put more emphasis on social conservatism and less emphasis on free-market economics (as Michael Knowles and Matt Walsh have advocated for the broader conservative movement several times). Shapiro is sort of libertarian, and so are Charlie Kirk and most of the people at Turning Point. I'm not really a fan of libertarianism. I'm a huge fan of Walsh and Knowles partly because neither of them is remotely libertarian. As well, Shapiro in particular seems to support free-market absolutism and neoliberal, globalized capitalism, though I also just heard him say that America should put tariffs on non-American companies that use child labour and American companies that do so should be punished. I think some people on the dissident right tend to overlook the positives about Ben Shapiro and The Daily Wire: an alt-Hollywood, an alt-publishing company. Openly defying Biden's vaccine mandate and suing him over it. TPUSA has been engaging in conservative activism all over the U.S. for years at this point, and they've improved over time. Charlie Kirk now talks about demographics, marriage, and the nuclear family. Ben Shapiro talks about corporate tyranny. They're human, not controlled opposition. And I'm all for &amp;quot;telling whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda.&amp;quot; That's great. It's something Matt Walsh talks about all the time, at least in 2021. But here's what I mean by saying Nick advocates for white identity politics: [https://tv.gab.com/channel/three_spoons/view/nick-fuentes-white-americans-are-61619c89645a5a7fe897dd5e here], at 31:24, Nick says &amp;quot;White racial identity politics is not going away.&amp;quot; And it's not just that. Nick has explicitly rejected &amp;quot;multi-racial, working-class populism&amp;quot; and grouping together as Americans, patriots, conservatives, or even Christians in favour of white identitarianism. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:58, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think Nick is making perfect sense in the video you linked. I don't think he means &amp;quot;identity politics&amp;quot; in the Obama-esque &amp;quot;I'm black n y'all gotta do everything I say or you racist&amp;quot; sort of sense here. Sounds to me like he's talking about political ideology that prioritizes white identity. (''White-identity'' politics, rather than white ''identity-politics'', if that makes sense). Also, he's not saying we can't come together as American patriots or Christians, he's just saying that many conservatives pretend that race isn't a thing, and that we can't properly fight the anti-white agenda if we don't recognize whiteness. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:22, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::From 37:30 - &amp;quot;Race is the basis, and I wish it wasn't that way. Understand, you know, people look at me and they say, 'That's the guy! That's the white supremacist that wants to make everything racist!' I didn't make it that way. Don't point the finger at me, don't blame me! I'm looking at the world and telling you how it is, I'm explaining it to you. I didn't make the world, okay? Don't blame me, I didn't make America the way it is!... We do have to acknowledge where we differ, and we have to account for those things so that we can live together in harmony... To the extent that it is possible that we get along, the way that we get along is by understanding our differences, accommodating for those differences, and then we can flourish. Not ignoring them, not pretending that they don't exist.&amp;quot; [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:40, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'd like to believe that race shouldn't factor into anything. In the abstract, it shouldn't. But that's not the world we're living in. You and Nick are right about that. This racial stuff has been foisted upon us. Matt Walsh pointed out that the Virginia governor's race was won by &amp;quot;white grievance politics&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that's a good thing.&amp;quot; We have to deal with the intensity of anti-white hate on both the left and the right properly. I get what you're saying about the difference between white identity-politics and white-identity politics. White identity exists and it's not inherently bad. Identity itself isn't bad. But how significant is racial identity in the political realm? It's significant, no doubt. But more so than everything else? I have to admit, it would be pretty cool to hear a candidate talk about how blue-collar white Americans are being left to dry by neoliberal globalism. Or to hear one talk about the historical accomplishments of white people. Should that exclude talking about America's Christian roots? Or condemning abortion, which disproportionately harms black Americans? Or criticizing LGBT radicalism? I don't think it should. So what should be prioritized? I'm not saying shun white interests in favour of corporate tax cuts --- corporations are part of the problem, so take away their (mostly non-white) foreign labour. Address demographics. Address anti-white critical race theory and other aspects of the anti-white agenda. But don't necessarily prioritize these things. Of course they're important. But you also have millions of unborn babies murdered in the womb each year. You have homosexuality/bisexuality/pansexuality and transgenderism/non-binarism/gender-fluidity/agenderism. You have Drag Queen Story Hour. Child drag queens. Drag queens on children's television. &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; drag queens. You have Internet pornography. Gun control. Drugs. War. Not everything is a racial issue. A lot have a racial aspect, but that's not what governs them. The prospect of a national divorce, or secession? That would be along political or sociocultural lines, not solid racial lines. So yes, appeal to whites. But why not also appeal to sensible non-whites (even if they're a tiny minority)? Instead of &amp;quot;I'm looking out for white people,&amp;quot; which can be a good thing, &amp;quot;I'm looking out for families.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for the working class.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for anyone who hates degeneracy.&amp;quot; Couldn't that work? Not pandering, or endless harping about &amp;quot;black unemployment,&amp;quot; but looking for something above race to unite us. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 18:27, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Of course, all those things are important, and race isn't the only issue. You're not wrong about any of that. I think you and I agree on the majority of things. Like I said, I don't think Nick is rejecting other forms of unity among conservatives, he simply doesn't see enough conservatives addressing the racial issues to the extent that they should be. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:32, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::If that's what Nick's saying, then fair enough. This has been and will probably continue to be a blind spot for many conservatives as they refuse to address the issues as they are on the ground. Thank you very much for taking the opportunity to have a civil discussion with me about all this. I think we can end it off here, seeing eye-to-eye on a lot of things. It always helps to be rational as we both are. You made excellent points. Hopefully, the right will improve with time. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:28, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Yes, of course. Thank you. Hopefully the Right will start facing these issues head-on, and hopefully someday we can change the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] page to be a less cringe version than the one Liberaltears wrote. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 20:00, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nick Fuentes actively roots for our enemies==&lt;br /&gt;
On August 15, Nick Fuentes posted [https://t.me/nickjfuentes/4273 this] on Telegram. It's one thing to oppose the War in Afghanistan. But it's a whole other thing to actively root for the Taliban and celebrate our defeat in Afghanistan, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And on October 27, Fuentes posted [https://t.me/nickjfuentes/4536 ''this''] on Telegram. It's one thing to oppose waging a cold war with China. But it's a whole other thing to actively root for the CCP and express hope that it nukes the US, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These posts make it clear where Fuentes stands. He is ''not'' a paleocon, despite his claims to the contrary. No, he's an extremist who actively supports our enemies -- our ''real'' enemies* -- and for purely ideological reasons. Any so-called &amp;quot;populist&amp;quot; movement which endorses ''this'' position should not, and ''must'' not be supported. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, we only have two real enemies on the international stage: The CCP and radical ''Sunni'' Islam. Fuentes has made it clear that he actively supports both, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 16:39, December 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry for taking so long to respond. I think in part, he was trolling when he said those things. But he has also made the point that, since the '''American regime''' (note the distinction from the American nation) is tyrannical and suppresses virtuous dissidents, we should root for anything that wants to destroy it. The enemy of my enemy is my friend, essentially. Since the regime is Nick's enemy, Nick wants to support the enemies of the regime, inside and out. I don't agree with that line of reasoning, but it's not as black-and-white as you're presenting it. It's not as though he has committed treason. --[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 22:22, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You're right that Fuentes hasn't committed treason. You can't commit treason by merely voicing an opinion, no matter how odious that opinion may be.&lt;br /&gt;
::That aside, only time will tell if Fuentes was indeed just trolling or was in fact being completely serious. But one thing's for certain, there ''are'' a lot of people on the alt-right who share that opinion, and ''are'' completely serious about it. I'm not sure if they compose a majority of the alt-right, but I am sure that they compose ''at minimum'' a significant minority.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 12:49, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nick seems to think Russia or China would be willing to protect American dissidents the way America protects dissidents of foreign regimes. It's important to note that Nick has been heavily targeted by the federal government, who seized his assets and put him on a no-fly list. I don't think either of us can fully understand Nick's thinking on this matter if we haven't been similarly persecuted. He feels like Edward Snowden or Julian Assange. He has lost faith in the system to the point where he looks elsewhere for pragmatic and mutual support. I believe he is searching in very dark places, but it is undeniable that many of these countries are a lot less degenerate than the United States right now. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 16:14, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Very few countries have governments more evil than our own. Iran and Russia's governments definitely are less evil than ours, although I'm not sure about China's government, or Turkey's. As for the Sunni Islamist regimes in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, those governments definitely are more evil than our own.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 17:01, January 1, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'm starting to understand what you're getting at with Sunni Islam. You hold it responsible for 9/11, which makes it more evil than the American regime. I'll let you know that Nick doesn't accept the mainstream narrative of 9/11, but putting that aside, the American regime is responsible for far more than 3,000 deaths through the abortion industry alone. Not to mention the military-industrial complex (al-Qaeda's not responsible for that one no matter how you spin it). The only reason I can fathom for your assertion that the governments of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are more evil than the U.S. government is because they are supposedly responsible for 9/11. Isn't it funny, though, that Saudi Arabia is technically an ally of the United States? Speaking of allies of the United States, Nick perceives Israel to be a far greater threat to America than any country we've mentioned so far. He would definitely consider Zionism to be more of a threat than Sunni Islam. I don't necessarily agree with him, but I think it bears mentioning. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 18:08, January 4, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::It's obvious to me that Fuentes views foreign relations from a purely ideological standpoint. And that he either has little to no understanding of geopolitics, or refuses to acknowledge geopolitical realities because they don't conform to his ideology. The truth is, we've always prioritized the interests of Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies above Israel's. This was especially apparent prior to the Gulf War. Many people, both then and now, have marked the Gulf War as the point when our foreign policy became &amp;quot;Israel first.&amp;quot; But that's not true. We didn't get involved in that war to defend Israel. We got involved in that war to defend Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies. The reason it may have ''looked like'' we were getting involved in that war to defend Israel was because that war was the point where Israel and Saudi Arabia's interests began to converge. And those interests appear to be more converged now than ever before. That being said, it has always been Saudi Arabia that has held our strings. After all, they have leverage over our economy through the petrodollar. What does Israel have? Of course the Groypers have an answer to ''that'' one: &amp;quot;Dual citizens.&amp;quot; Like, give me a break.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 23:18, January 4, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::On another note, what do you mean by Fuentes rejecting the mainstream narrative of 9/11? There are many alternative theories, including my own. I personally believe Saudi Arabia and Pakistan orchestrated the attacks, and that our government intentionally allowed them to happen. But I also believe that the attacks were directly carried out by al-Qaeda terrorists, that planes did hit the buildings, and that there were no controlled demolitions. So...--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 23:18, January 4, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Israel holds tremendous sway over geopolitics. Follow the money. I don't like to admit it, but well-funded Zionist organizations routinely lobby the American government to warmonger and occupy the Middle East in order to protect Israeli interests. I don't think the United States would have bombed Syria if it wasn't for Israel demonizing Assad. And have you ever heard a neocon talk about bombing Iran without mentioning Israel? Saudi oil is a major part of it, but it's not the only thing. &amp;quot;What does Israel have?&amp;quot; Congress, the Senate, the media, and the banks. Also the Anti-Defamation League. As for 9/11, Nick doesn't hold Muslims responsible. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 01:51, January 5, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1828947</id>
		<title>Debate:The Groyper Wars</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1828947"/>
		<updated>2022-01-04T23:08:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* Nick Fuentes actively roots for our enemies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;With the past controversies over Nick Fuentes, TPUSA, Michelle Malkin, YAF, Ashley St. Clair, etc., combined with Big Tech's and the federal government's current suppression of dissent, this is an important discussion to have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you agree with [[Essay:The Groyper Wars|this]]? Why or why not? Please discuss the content of the Essay itself, rather than the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Debate]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=No longer relevant, based on an older version and its talk page, potentially confusing|content=&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey, I'm a member of Nick's community and consider myself a groyper sympathizer. Made an account for this. Let's talk if you're still around. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 17:59, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You have a pretty hefty essay there, and I'm not sure which parts are most important to you, so I'll address what interests me and we can take it from there.&lt;br /&gt;
: First of all, I respect that you're honest and transparent about your own background in your user page, which isn't exactly orthodox conservatism. I'm kinda of like you, except I come from Ron Paul libertarianism. Obviously, this puts me at odds with a lot of &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; and Nick, who are very critical of libertarianism, but I have a good enough understanding of their views that I can defend them pretty well and I overlap with most of it. I also appreciate that you condemn censorship in no uncertain terms. The role that &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; or others with similar values is an interesting debate to have, and it's good that Conservapedia seems like they'll allow us to have it. In some &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; communities on bigger platforms, like reddit, you're not even allowed to play devil's advocate about it.&lt;br /&gt;
: My next 2 paragraphs will address some points in the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point about the legacy paleocons not being on board with the groypers is interesting, and seems true. I've already seen the Spectator article, back in the fall, and found it pretty sketchy or weak. More broadly, though, it is true and interesting. There is an angle you are missing though. For example, Cotto and Gottfried, a current events show co-hosted by the great Paul Gottfried, took JF Gariépy's side over Fuentes' when he took credit for getting Nick banned. I don't bring this up to make a censorship point. It was interesting to me, because JF is usually considered &amp;quot;less optical&amp;quot; than Nick Fuentes is, because his list of guests on his own show includes some colorful characters Nick refuses to associate with and because he sometimes says some things explicitly that Nick will leave to subtext instead. Movement paleoconservatism has taken a sour stance on the groypers on temperament, sometimes also on policy, but it's interesting to see how they're navigating that in a unique way.&lt;br /&gt;
: It doesn't surprise me that Ben Shapiro included Ron Paul on his hit list of alt-right influencers, but I don't think the reasons for his inclusion or others are condemnable. It's worth pointing out that Ben himself was a guest on Red Ice TV with Henrik and Lana back in 2014, another show that was banned from YouTube in 2019 or 2020. Similarly, Ben has spoken with Ann Coulter on camera who he also included on his alt-right list. In this sense, the issue with Ben isn't so much his own agenda or his disagreements with other factions but his own hypocrisy; the Daily Wire itself has been labelled alt-right by the mainstream media on multiple occasions, usually with retractions, but it has happened. People find it objectionable that an outlet with a lot of funding and close ties to Fox News, etc. gets a &amp;quot;get-out-of-alt-right-free&amp;quot; card, while more grassroots activists are left out to dry.&lt;br /&gt;
: I'll get to your main essay later, I'd like to do this in parts. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 22:53, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Hi, I really appreciate that you did this, I wasn't expecting it at all. The Groyper Wars have been over for a long time. And after my essay was deleted by an admin ([https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;oldid=1760851 here] is where my essay used to be), I was ready to give it up. Didn't see myself ever coming back to this. And I set up this page several months ago, this is the first time anyone has responded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: You said you would react to my main essay &amp;quot;later,&amp;quot; and it's been a few days. If you're still there, I'd love to debate this with you, but I want to wait until you've reacted to my actual essay until I react to your response. If you post your reaction to the essay, I'd be more than happy to have a discussion with you! --- [[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 13:48, 5 May 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Opinion==&lt;br /&gt;
This has definitely got to be the #1 most controversial topic amongst the right. I think it's an overblown subject. I do consider myself a member of the Groyper movement, though I do think that [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/ff/Groyper_cartoon.png &amp;quot;Groyper&amp;quot;] is a silly name for a political movement. Now, I can't speak for every member, but I really don't think most Groypers are inherently &amp;quot;eViL aNtI-sEmItIc WhItE nAtIoNaLiStS&amp;quot; like many will tell you. It's a traditionalist paleocon movement that urges America to put God and country first and to return the western values our society was founded on (by white people, hence Nick's many mentions of the anti-white agenda, the importance of white identity and shifting demographics, which many confuse to be racial, when they're actually cultural). The &amp;quot;antisemitic&amp;quot; claim is mainly due to Nick's edgy and often Jew-related jokes (which Nick has said are merely for shock value), as well as the Groypers' heavy criticism of Israel, especially from a foreign policy perspective, and can you blame them? Trillions of dollars in taxpayer money is funneled to Israel every year to help them fight their thousand-year war. They don't need all that money, they have a GDP of 402 billion. It's not like they're some third-world country that we're helping out of pity. Of course, say this at a Turning Point USA event or on The Ben Shapiro Show and you're deemed &amp;quot;Anti-semitic/racist&amp;quot;, somehow. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 12:53, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a curious and thought-provoking take. And I wouldn't characterize groypers as white nationalists or anti-Semites, though in the past I would have. A lot of conservatives like to jump the gun and disown anyone outside of the mainstream, condemning them in the harshest possible terms. I think I can give you an explanation why. Part of it is that conservatives are afraid of alienating left-wingers and centrists/moderates. They think if they embrace certain figures they won't be able to convince as many people to accept conservatism. In a lot of cases, the opposite is true. The other thing is that back in 2019, quite a few mainstream/popular right-wingers saw groypers as wignats. Nick Fuentes and Beardson Beardly are having to deal with actual wignats right now. I think the way they feel about TRS is how conservatives felt about groypers. &amp;quot;They're just trying to divide us.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're infiltrators.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They don't have anything to offer.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're idiots.&amp;quot; A lot of stuff was coming out about Nick especially that just put people off. Like that awful Holocaust joke. I get that he tries to be edgy and says things for shock value, but a lot of times he goes too far. And that's why some factions of the right were concerned that Nick was the new Richard Spencer, and didn't want their reputations tarnished through guilt by association --- which ironically is a tactic they themselves unjustly used against those on the right who chose to associate with the groypers. I know groypers presently are frustrated by wignats. Now they know how mainstream conservatives felt. You're absolutely right that most of Western civilization was built by white people. And there 100% is an anti-white agenda: it's pervasive and vitriolic. It's institutionalized across the Western world. I don't see how white identity politics solves anything. Every group should be proud of its identity. Whites have done many amazing things. But embracing identity politics, as Nick seems to frequently advocate, is playing on the left's battlefield, and that's a dangerous game. Altering a country's core demography inevitably comes with long-lasting and severe consequences. White Americans have a sub-replacement birth rate. Black Americans are aborting and shooting themselves out of existence. Latin American and Middle Eastern immigrants to the U.S., meanwhile, have very high birth rates... and they're only rising. Those immigrants obviously vote for the people importing them and tell their kids and grandkids to do the same. I don't think that's inextricably tied to race, I agree that it's cultural. But there is a link between culture and race, they're not entirely distinct. And we can dispute the reasons why demographic shifts have such drastic consequences, but the point is they have drastic consequences. So we need to import less people. As for Israel, a lot of people seem to think anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. I used to think that, too, reasoning that singling out the only Jewish State must be bad-faith criticism. But that point defeats itself: Israel is unique, which is why it is uniquely criticized. Having an unconventional opinion about a foreign country is not inherently bigoted. I support Israel. Others don't. Who cares? Besides, Israel has stains in its history --- think Lavon Affair and some of the shady/unethical actions of the Mossad. I have to correct you on the foreign aid: I believe it's low billions, not trillions. And hypothetically, I support them getting that money. Sure they do well for themselves, but they're (in theory) the only democracy in the Middle East, surrounded on all sides by hostile powers. Israel also has a lot of holy sites (for Christians, not just Jews). But I don't want my taxpayer dollars going to fund their COVID regime --- while non-Muslims still can't pray at the Temple Mount. I like Ben Shapiro and TPUSA, though I sometimes disagree with them. In spite of those disagreements, I see their conservative activism as a net positive. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 17:46, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm happy to say, then, that there's a lot of things we agree on; however, I don't think Nick is advocating for identity politics. I think he just wants whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda. As for TPUSA and Shapiro, they're not advocating for conservatism. They're advocating for libertarian, capitalist-worshipping economic policy, and squishy, practically nonexistent social policy that is getting us virtually nowhere in this culture war. ''(Fusionism and its consequences!)'' If we want to see an actual return to traditionalism in America, the ideas these mainstream &amp;quot;conservatives&amp;quot; are pushing are not contributing in any way. They're pushing us in the opposite direction.(''Plus, we all know Richard Spencer is a Democrat Psyop.'') [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 11:45, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you're right about Richard Spencer. And I would like both Ben Shapiro and TPUSA to put more emphasis on social conservatism and less emphasis on free-market economics (as Michael Knowles and Matt Walsh have advocated for the broader conservative movement several times). Shapiro is sort of libertarian, and so are Charlie Kirk and most of the people at Turning Point. I'm not really a fan of libertarianism. I'm a huge fan of Walsh and Knowles partly because neither of them is remotely libertarian. As well, Shapiro in particular seems to support free-market absolutism and neoliberal, globalized capitalism, though I also just heard him say that America should put tariffs on non-American companies that use child labour and American companies that do so should be punished. I think some people on the dissident right tend to overlook the positives about Ben Shapiro and The Daily Wire: an alt-Hollywood, an alt-publishing company. Openly defying Biden's vaccine mandate and suing him over it. TPUSA has been engaging in conservative activism all over the U.S. for years at this point, and they've improved over time. Charlie Kirk now talks about demographics, marriage, and the nuclear family. Ben Shapiro talks about corporate tyranny. They're human, not controlled opposition. And I'm all for &amp;quot;telling whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda.&amp;quot; That's great. It's something Matt Walsh talks about all the time, at least in 2021. But here's what I mean by saying Nick advocates for white identity politics: [https://tv.gab.com/channel/three_spoons/view/nick-fuentes-white-americans-are-61619c89645a5a7fe897dd5e here], at 31:24, Nick says &amp;quot;White racial identity politics is not going away.&amp;quot; And it's not just that. Nick has explicitly rejected &amp;quot;multi-racial, working-class populism&amp;quot; and grouping together as Americans, patriots, conservatives, or even Christians in favour of white identitarianism. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:58, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think Nick is making perfect sense in the video you linked. I don't think he means &amp;quot;identity politics&amp;quot; in the Obama-esque &amp;quot;I'm black n y'all gotta do everything I say or you racist&amp;quot; sort of sense here. Sounds to me like he's talking about political ideology that prioritizes white identity. (''White-identity'' politics, rather than white ''identity-politics'', if that makes sense). Also, he's not saying we can't come together as American patriots or Christians, he's just saying that many conservatives pretend that race isn't a thing, and that we can't properly fight the anti-white agenda if we don't recognize whiteness. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:22, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::From 37:30 - &amp;quot;Race is the basis, and I wish it wasn't that way. Understand, you know, people look at me and they say, 'That's the guy! That's the white supremacist that wants to make everything racist!' I didn't make it that way. Don't point the finger at me, don't blame me! I'm looking at the world and telling you how it is, I'm explaining it to you. I didn't make the world, okay? Don't blame me, I didn't make America the way it is!... We do have to acknowledge where we differ, and we have to account for those things so that we can live together in harmony... To the extent that it is possible that we get along, the way that we get along is by understanding our differences, accommodating for those differences, and then we can flourish. Not ignoring them, not pretending that they don't exist.&amp;quot; [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:40, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'd like to believe that race shouldn't factor into anything. In the abstract, it shouldn't. But that's not the world we're living in. You and Nick are right about that. This racial stuff has been foisted upon us. Matt Walsh pointed out that the Virginia governor's race was won by &amp;quot;white grievance politics&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that's a good thing.&amp;quot; We have to deal with the intensity of anti-white hate on both the left and the right properly. I get what you're saying about the difference between white identity-politics and white-identity politics. White identity exists and it's not inherently bad. Identity itself isn't bad. But how significant is racial identity in the political realm? It's significant, no doubt. But more so than everything else? I have to admit, it would be pretty cool to hear a candidate talk about how blue-collar white Americans are being left to dry by neoliberal globalism. Or to hear one talk about the historical accomplishments of white people. Should that exclude talking about America's Christian roots? Or condemning abortion, which disproportionately harms black Americans? Or criticizing LGBT radicalism? I don't think it should. So what should be prioritized? I'm not saying shun white interests in favour of corporate tax cuts --- corporations are part of the problem, so take away their (mostly non-white) foreign labour. Address demographics. Address anti-white critical race theory and other aspects of the anti-white agenda. But don't necessarily prioritize these things. Of course they're important. But you also have millions of unborn babies murdered in the womb each year. You have homosexuality/bisexuality/pansexuality and transgenderism/non-binarism/gender-fluidity/agenderism. You have Drag Queen Story Hour. Child drag queens. Drag queens on children's television. &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; drag queens. You have Internet pornography. Gun control. Drugs. War. Not everything is a racial issue. A lot have a racial aspect, but that's not what governs them. The prospect of a national divorce, or secession? That would be along political or sociocultural lines, not solid racial lines. So yes, appeal to whites. But why not also appeal to sensible non-whites (even if they're a tiny minority)? Instead of &amp;quot;I'm looking out for white people,&amp;quot; which can be a good thing, &amp;quot;I'm looking out for families.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for the working class.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for anyone who hates degeneracy.&amp;quot; Couldn't that work? Not pandering, or endless harping about &amp;quot;black unemployment,&amp;quot; but looking for something above race to unite us. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 18:27, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Of course, all those things are important, and race isn't the only issue. You're not wrong about any of that. I think you and I agree on the majority of things. Like I said, I don't think Nick is rejecting other forms of unity among conservatives, he simply doesn't see enough conservatives addressing the racial issues to the extent that they should be. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:32, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::If that's what Nick's saying, then fair enough. This has been and will probably continue to be a blind spot for many conservatives as they refuse to address the issues as they are on the ground. Thank you very much for taking the opportunity to have a civil discussion with me about all this. I think we can end it off here, seeing eye-to-eye on a lot of things. It always helps to be rational as we both are. You made excellent points. Hopefully, the right will improve with time. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:28, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Yes, of course. Thank you. Hopefully the Right will start facing these issues head-on, and hopefully someday we can change the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] page to be a less cringe version than the one Liberaltears wrote. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 20:00, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nick Fuentes actively roots for our enemies==&lt;br /&gt;
On August 15, Nick Fuentes posted [https://t.me/nickjfuentes/4273 this] on Telegram. It's one thing to oppose the War in Afghanistan. But it's a whole other thing to actively root for the Taliban and celebrate our defeat in Afghanistan, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And on October 27, Fuentes posted [https://t.me/nickjfuentes/4536 ''this''] on Telegram. It's one thing to oppose waging a cold war with China. But it's a whole other thing to actively root for the CCP and express hope that it nukes the US, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These posts make it clear where Fuentes stands. He is ''not'' a paleocon, despite his claims to the contrary. No, he's an extremist who actively supports our enemies -- our ''real'' enemies* -- and for purely ideological reasons. Any so-called &amp;quot;populist&amp;quot; movement which endorses ''this'' position should not, and ''must'' not be supported. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, we only have two real enemies on the international stage: The CCP and radical ''Sunni'' Islam. Fuentes has made it clear that he actively supports both, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 16:39, December 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry for taking so long to respond. I think in part, he was trolling when he said those things. But he has also made the point that, since the '''American regime''' (note the distinction from the American nation) is tyrannical and suppresses virtuous dissidents, we should root for anything that wants to destroy it. The enemy of my enemy is my friend, essentially. Since the regime is Nick's enemy, Nick wants to support the enemies of the regime, inside and out. I don't agree with that line of reasoning, but it's not as black-and-white as you're presenting it. It's not as though he has committed treason. --[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 22:22, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You're right that Fuentes hasn't committed treason. You can't commit treason by merely voicing an opinion, no matter how odious that opinion may be.&lt;br /&gt;
::That aside, only time will tell if Fuentes was indeed just trolling or was in fact being completely serious. But one thing's for certain, there ''are'' a lot of people on the alt-right who share that opinion, and ''are'' completely serious about it. I'm not sure if they compose a majority of the alt-right, but I am sure that they compose ''at minimum'' a significant minority.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 12:49, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nick seems to think Russia or China would be willing to protect American dissidents the way America protects dissidents of foreign regimes. It's important to note that Nick has been heavily targeted by the federal government, who seized his assets and put him on a no-fly list. I don't think either of us can fully understand Nick's thinking on this matter if we haven't been similarly persecuted. He feels like Edward Snowden or Julian Assange. He has lost faith in the system to the point where he looks elsewhere for pragmatic and mutual support. I believe he is searching in very dark places, but it is undeniable that many of these countries are a lot less degenerate than the United States right now. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 16:14, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Very few countries have governments more evil than our own. Iran and Russia's governments definitely are less evil than ours, although I'm not sure about China's government, or Turkey's. As for the Sunni Islamist regimes in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, those governments definitely are more evil than our own.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 17:01, January 1, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'm starting to understand what you're getting at with Sunni Islam. You hold it responsible for 9/11, which makes it more evil than the American regime. I'll let you know that Nick doesn't accept the mainstream narrative of 9/11, but putting that aside, the American regime is responsible for far more than 3,000 deaths through the abortion industry alone. Not to mention the military-industrial complex (al-Qaeda's not responsible for that one no matter how you spin it). The only reason I can fathom for your assertion that the governments of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are more evil than the U.S. government is because they are supposedly responsible for 9/11. Isn't it funny, though, that Saudi Arabia is technically an ally of the United States? Speaking of allies of the United States, Nick perceives Israel to be a far greater threat to America than any country we've mentioned so far. He would definitely consider Zionism to be more of a threat than Sunni Islam. I don't necessarily agree with him, but I think it bears mentioning. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 18:08, January 4, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&amp;diff=1827612</id>
		<title>Electronic cigarette</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&amp;diff=1827612"/>
		<updated>2022-01-01T01:56:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: Undo revision 1827591 by Mike hock (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Electronic Cigarette''', also known as '''E-cigarette''', is a popular new form of [[nicotine]] delivery. These are battery operated devices that vaporize an aerosol to mimic the effect of smoking. Millions of people use these and it has become so extremely popular that vaping is now a multibillion-dollar market. Electronic cigarettes are not a safe  alternative to [[cigarette]]s however they are can help smokers quit the habit. In comparison, regular [[tobacco]] cigarettes are comprised of 4,000 chemicals. The ingredients in electronic cigarettes, e-liquid, contains about 5 chemical ingredients (water, flavorings, propylene glycol, glycerin) and can be sold with or without nicotine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Chinese]] entrepreneur Hon Lik developed the electronic cigarette in 2003.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://articles.latimes.com/2009/apr/25/world/fg-china-cigarettes25 A high-tech approach to getting a nicotine fix, LA Times, April 25, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; American Herbert A. Gilbert holds a 1963 patent for such a device.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A public health study conducted in [[England]] found that E-cigarettes Are 95% Safer Than Tobacco.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://dailycaller.com/2015/08/19/study-e-cigarettes-are-95-safer-than-tobacco/ Study: E-cigarettes Are 95% Safer Than Tobacco, DailyCaller, August 19, 2015]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There are concerns that use of electronic cigarettes by minors will lead to smoking cigarettes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.vaporvanity.com/teen-vaping-guide/|title=How to Tell if Your Kid is Vaping: Everything You Need to Know About Teen “Juuling”|last=Hopkins|first=Brandon L.|date=22 September 2018|publisher=Vapor Vanity|language=English|accessdate=19 October 2018|quote=Neural pathways expand and are cut effectively throughout our whole maturing phase to determine how our brains function for the rest of our lives. The prefrontal cortex - the part responsible for reasoning and self-control - is the last part of the organ to develop. This is why many experts believe that youth e-cigarette use can potentially lead to developing a dependency on nicotine, which could result in them eventually switching to traditional combustible cigarettes.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Controversy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FDA]] has approved these devices but certain groups are strongly against. Concerns of use by minors will lead to smoking cigarettes. Not many studies have been conducted on e-cigarettes due to its limited time on the marketplace. Most studies available conclude that e-cigarettes are no more harmful than chewing tobacco.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While studies showing harm or no harm are inconclusive, computer experts have demonstrated that e-cigs can be used as a hacking tool thanks to their USB charging port. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4611914/Experts-warn-e-cigs-altered-hack-computers.html The fake cigarette that could steal your files Dailymail.co.uk, June 16, 2017]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2019, the FDA and the Trump administration criminalized vaping. Some, like mainstream conservative Steven Crowder, strongly opposed the ban.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxcieZTDoSM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, the move was only taken due to deaths resulting from lung-related illnesses which themselves resulted from children utilizing flavoured electronic cigarettes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://video.foxnews.com/v/6085038545001/#sp=show-clips&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Health]] [[Category:Addiction]] [[Category:Drugs]] [[Category:Chemical Compounds]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1827577</id>
		<title>Debate:The Groyper Wars</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1827577"/>
		<updated>2021-12-31T21:14:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* Nick Fuentes actively roots for our enemies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;With the past controversies over Nick Fuentes, TPUSA, Michelle Malkin, YAF, Ashley St. Clair, etc., combined with Big Tech's and the federal government's current suppression of dissent, this is an important discussion to have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you agree with [[Essay:The Groyper Wars|this]]? Why or why not? Please discuss the content of the Essay itself, rather than the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Debate]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=No longer relevant, based on an older version and its talk page, potentially confusing|content=&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey, I'm a member of Nick's community and consider myself a groyper sympathizer. Made an account for this. Let's talk if you're still around. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 17:59, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You have a pretty hefty essay there, and I'm not sure which parts are most important to you, so I'll address what interests me and we can take it from there.&lt;br /&gt;
: First of all, I respect that you're honest and transparent about your own background in your user page, which isn't exactly orthodox conservatism. I'm kinda of like you, except I come from Ron Paul libertarianism. Obviously, this puts me at odds with a lot of &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; and Nick, who are very critical of libertarianism, but I have a good enough understanding of their views that I can defend them pretty well and I overlap with most of it. I also appreciate that you condemn censorship in no uncertain terms. The role that &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; or others with similar values is an interesting debate to have, and it's good that Conservapedia seems like they'll allow us to have it. In some &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; communities on bigger platforms, like reddit, you're not even allowed to play devil's advocate about it.&lt;br /&gt;
: My next 2 paragraphs will address some points in the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point about the legacy paleocons not being on board with the groypers is interesting, and seems true. I've already seen the Spectator article, back in the fall, and found it pretty sketchy or weak. More broadly, though, it is true and interesting. There is an angle you are missing though. For example, Cotto and Gottfried, a current events show co-hosted by the great Paul Gottfried, took JF Gariépy's side over Fuentes' when he took credit for getting Nick banned. I don't bring this up to make a censorship point. It was interesting to me, because JF is usually considered &amp;quot;less optical&amp;quot; than Nick Fuentes is, because his list of guests on his own show includes some colorful characters Nick refuses to associate with and because he sometimes says some things explicitly that Nick will leave to subtext instead. Movement paleoconservatism has taken a sour stance on the groypers on temperament, sometimes also on policy, but it's interesting to see how they're navigating that in a unique way.&lt;br /&gt;
: It doesn't surprise me that Ben Shapiro included Ron Paul on his hit list of alt-right influencers, but I don't think the reasons for his inclusion or others are condemnable. It's worth pointing out that Ben himself was a guest on Red Ice TV with Henrik and Lana back in 2014, another show that was banned from YouTube in 2019 or 2020. Similarly, Ben has spoken with Ann Coulter on camera who he also included on his alt-right list. In this sense, the issue with Ben isn't so much his own agenda or his disagreements with other factions but his own hypocrisy; the Daily Wire itself has been labelled alt-right by the mainstream media on multiple occasions, usually with retractions, but it has happened. People find it objectionable that an outlet with a lot of funding and close ties to Fox News, etc. gets a &amp;quot;get-out-of-alt-right-free&amp;quot; card, while more grassroots activists are left out to dry.&lt;br /&gt;
: I'll get to your main essay later, I'd like to do this in parts. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 22:53, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Hi, I really appreciate that you did this, I wasn't expecting it at all. The Groyper Wars have been over for a long time. And after my essay was deleted by an admin ([https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;oldid=1760851 here] is where my essay used to be), I was ready to give it up. Didn't see myself ever coming back to this. And I set up this page several months ago, this is the first time anyone has responded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: You said you would react to my main essay &amp;quot;later,&amp;quot; and it's been a few days. If you're still there, I'd love to debate this with you, but I want to wait until you've reacted to my actual essay until I react to your response. If you post your reaction to the essay, I'd be more than happy to have a discussion with you! --- [[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 13:48, 5 May 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Opinion==&lt;br /&gt;
This has definitely got to be the #1 most controversial topic amongst the right. I think it's an overblown subject. I do consider myself a member of the Groyper movement, though I do think that [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/ff/Groyper_cartoon.png &amp;quot;Groyper&amp;quot;] is a silly name for a political movement. Now, I can't speak for every member, but I really don't think most Groypers are inherently &amp;quot;eViL aNtI-sEmItIc WhItE nAtIoNaLiStS&amp;quot; like many will tell you. It's a traditionalist paleocon movement that urges America to put God and country first and to return the western values our society was founded on (by white people, hence Nick's many mentions of the anti-white agenda, the importance of white identity and shifting demographics, which many confuse to be racial, when they're actually cultural). The &amp;quot;antisemitic&amp;quot; claim is mainly due to Nick's edgy and often Jew-related jokes (which Nick has said are merely for shock value), as well as the Groypers' heavy criticism of Israel, especially from a foreign policy perspective, and can you blame them? Trillions of dollars in taxpayer money is funneled to Israel every year to help them fight their thousand-year war. They don't need all that money, they have a GDP of 402 billion. It's not like they're some third-world country that we're helping out of pity. Of course, say this at a Turning Point USA event or on The Ben Shapiro Show and you're deemed &amp;quot;Anti-semitic/racist&amp;quot;, somehow. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 12:53, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a curious and thought-provoking take. And I wouldn't characterize groypers as white nationalists or anti-Semites, though in the past I would have. A lot of conservatives like to jump the gun and disown anyone outside of the mainstream, condemning them in the harshest possible terms. I think I can give you an explanation why. Part of it is that conservatives are afraid of alienating left-wingers and centrists/moderates. They think if they embrace certain figures they won't be able to convince as many people to accept conservatism. In a lot of cases, the opposite is true. The other thing is that back in 2019, quite a few mainstream/popular right-wingers saw groypers as wignats. Nick Fuentes and Beardson Beardly are having to deal with actual wignats right now. I think the way they feel about TRS is how conservatives felt about groypers. &amp;quot;They're just trying to divide us.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're infiltrators.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They don't have anything to offer.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're idiots.&amp;quot; A lot of stuff was coming out about Nick especially that just put people off. Like that awful Holocaust joke. I get that he tries to be edgy and says things for shock value, but a lot of times he goes too far. And that's why some factions of the right were concerned that Nick was the new Richard Spencer, and didn't want their reputations tarnished through guilt by association --- which ironically is a tactic they themselves unjustly used against those on the right who chose to associate with the groypers. I know groypers presently are frustrated by wignats. Now they know how mainstream conservatives felt. You're absolutely right that most of Western civilization was built by white people. And there 100% is an anti-white agenda: it's pervasive and vitriolic. It's institutionalized across the Western world. I don't see how white identity politics solves anything. Every group should be proud of its identity. Whites have done many amazing things. But embracing identity politics, as Nick seems to frequently advocate, is playing on the left's battlefield, and that's a dangerous game. Altering a country's core demography inevitably comes with long-lasting and severe consequences. White Americans have a sub-replacement birth rate. Black Americans are aborting and shooting themselves out of existence. Latin American and Middle Eastern immigrants to the U.S., meanwhile, have very high birth rates... and they're only rising. Those immigrants obviously vote for the people importing them and tell their kids and grandkids to do the same. I don't think that's inextricably tied to race, I agree that it's cultural. But there is a link between culture and race, they're not entirely distinct. And we can dispute the reasons why demographic shifts have such drastic consequences, but the point is they have drastic consequences. So we need to import less people. As for Israel, a lot of people seem to think anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. I used to think that, too, reasoning that singling out the only Jewish State must be bad-faith criticism. But that point defeats itself: Israel is unique, which is why it is uniquely criticized. Having an unconventional opinion about a foreign country is not inherently bigoted. I support Israel. Others don't. Who cares? Besides, Israel has stains in its history --- think Lavon Affair and some of the shady/unethical actions of the Mossad. I have to correct you on the foreign aid: I believe it's low billions, not trillions. And hypothetically, I support them getting that money. Sure they do well for themselves, but they're (in theory) the only democracy in the Middle East, surrounded on all sides by hostile powers. Israel also has a lot of holy sites (for Christians, not just Jews). But I don't want my taxpayer dollars going to fund their COVID regime --- while non-Muslims still can't pray at the Temple Mount. I like Ben Shapiro and TPUSA, though I sometimes disagree with them. In spite of those disagreements, I see their conservative activism as a net positive. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 17:46, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm happy to say, then, that there's a lot of things we agree on; however, I don't think Nick is advocating for identity politics. I think he just wants whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda. As for TPUSA and Shapiro, they're not advocating for conservatism. They're advocating for libertarian, capitalist-worshipping economic policy, and squishy, practically nonexistent social policy that is getting us virtually nowhere in this culture war. ''(Fusionism and its consequences!)'' If we want to see an actual return to traditionalism in America, the ideas these mainstream &amp;quot;conservatives&amp;quot; are pushing are not contributing in any way. They're pushing us in the opposite direction.(''Plus, we all know Richard Spencer is a Democrat Psyop.'') [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 11:45, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you're right about Richard Spencer. And I would like both Ben Shapiro and TPUSA to put more emphasis on social conservatism and less emphasis on free-market economics (as Michael Knowles and Matt Walsh have advocated for the broader conservative movement several times). Shapiro is sort of libertarian, and so are Charlie Kirk and most of the people at Turning Point. I'm not really a fan of libertarianism. I'm a huge fan of Walsh and Knowles partly because neither of them is remotely libertarian. As well, Shapiro in particular seems to support free-market absolutism and neoliberal, globalized capitalism, though I also just heard him say that America should put tariffs on non-American companies that use child labour and American companies that do so should be punished. I think some people on the dissident right tend to overlook the positives about Ben Shapiro and The Daily Wire: an alt-Hollywood, an alt-publishing company. Openly defying Biden's vaccine mandate and suing him over it. TPUSA has been engaging in conservative activism all over the U.S. for years at this point, and they've improved over time. Charlie Kirk now talks about demographics, marriage, and the nuclear family. Ben Shapiro talks about corporate tyranny. They're human, not controlled opposition. And I'm all for &amp;quot;telling whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda.&amp;quot; That's great. It's something Matt Walsh talks about all the time, at least in 2021. But here's what I mean by saying Nick advocates for white identity politics: [https://tv.gab.com/channel/three_spoons/view/nick-fuentes-white-americans-are-61619c89645a5a7fe897dd5e here], at 31:24, Nick says &amp;quot;White racial identity politics is not going away.&amp;quot; And it's not just that. Nick has explicitly rejected &amp;quot;multi-racial, working-class populism&amp;quot; and grouping together as Americans, patriots, conservatives, or even Christians in favour of white identitarianism. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:58, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think Nick is making perfect sense in the video you linked. I don't think he means &amp;quot;identity politics&amp;quot; in the Obama-esque &amp;quot;I'm black n y'all gotta do everything I say or you racist&amp;quot; sort of sense here. Sounds to me like he's talking about political ideology that prioritizes white identity. (''White-identity'' politics, rather than white ''identity-politics'', if that makes sense). Also, he's not saying we can't come together as American patriots or Christians, he's just saying that many conservatives pretend that race isn't a thing, and that we can't properly fight the anti-white agenda if we don't recognize whiteness. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:22, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::From 37:30 - &amp;quot;Race is the basis, and I wish it wasn't that way. Understand, you know, people look at me and they say, 'That's the guy! That's the white supremacist that wants to make everything racist!' I didn't make it that way. Don't point the finger at me, don't blame me! I'm looking at the world and telling you how it is, I'm explaining it to you. I didn't make the world, okay? Don't blame me, I didn't make America the way it is!... We do have to acknowledge where we differ, and we have to account for those things so that we can live together in harmony... To the extent that it is possible that we get along, the way that we get along is by understanding our differences, accommodating for those differences, and then we can flourish. Not ignoring them, not pretending that they don't exist.&amp;quot; [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:40, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'd like to believe that race shouldn't factor into anything. In the abstract, it shouldn't. But that's not the world we're living in. You and Nick are right about that. This racial stuff has been foisted upon us. Matt Walsh pointed out that the Virginia governor's race was won by &amp;quot;white grievance politics&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that's a good thing.&amp;quot; We have to deal with the intensity of anti-white hate on both the left and the right properly. I get what you're saying about the difference between white identity-politics and white-identity politics. White identity exists and it's not inherently bad. Identity itself isn't bad. But how significant is racial identity in the political realm? It's significant, no doubt. But more so than everything else? I have to admit, it would be pretty cool to hear a candidate talk about how blue-collar white Americans are being left to dry by neoliberal globalism. Or to hear one talk about the historical accomplishments of white people. Should that exclude talking about America's Christian roots? Or condemning abortion, which disproportionately harms black Americans? Or criticizing LGBT radicalism? I don't think it should. So what should be prioritized? I'm not saying shun white interests in favour of corporate tax cuts --- corporations are part of the problem, so take away their (mostly non-white) foreign labour. Address demographics. Address anti-white critical race theory and other aspects of the anti-white agenda. But don't necessarily prioritize these things. Of course they're important. But you also have millions of unborn babies murdered in the womb each year. You have homosexuality/bisexuality/pansexuality and transgenderism/non-binarism/gender-fluidity/agenderism. You have Drag Queen Story Hour. Child drag queens. Drag queens on children's television. &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; drag queens. You have Internet pornography. Gun control. Drugs. War. Not everything is a racial issue. A lot have a racial aspect, but that's not what governs them. The prospect of a national divorce, or secession? That would be along political or sociocultural lines, not solid racial lines. So yes, appeal to whites. But why not also appeal to sensible non-whites (even if they're a tiny minority)? Instead of &amp;quot;I'm looking out for white people,&amp;quot; which can be a good thing, &amp;quot;I'm looking out for families.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for the working class.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for anyone who hates degeneracy.&amp;quot; Couldn't that work? Not pandering, or endless harping about &amp;quot;black unemployment,&amp;quot; but looking for something above race to unite us. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 18:27, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Of course, all those things are important, and race isn't the only issue. You're not wrong about any of that. I think you and I agree on the majority of things. Like I said, I don't think Nick is rejecting other forms of unity among conservatives, he simply doesn't see enough conservatives addressing the racial issues to the extent that they should be. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:32, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::If that's what Nick's saying, then fair enough. This has been and will probably continue to be a blind spot for many conservatives as they refuse to address the issues as they are on the ground. Thank you very much for taking the opportunity to have a civil discussion with me about all this. I think we can end it off here, seeing eye-to-eye on a lot of things. It always helps to be rational as we both are. You made excellent points. Hopefully, the right will improve with time. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:28, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Yes, of course. Thank you. Hopefully the Right will start facing these issues head-on, and hopefully someday we can change the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] page to be a less cringe version than the one Liberaltears wrote. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 20:00, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nick Fuentes actively roots for our enemies==&lt;br /&gt;
On August 15, Nick Fuentes posted [https://t.me/nickjfuentes/4273 this] on Telegram. It's one thing to oppose the War in Afghanistan. But it's a whole other thing to actively root for the Taliban and celebrate our defeat in Afghanistan, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And on October 27, Fuentes posted [https://t.me/nickjfuentes/4536 ''this''] on Telegram. It's one thing to oppose waging a cold war with China. But it's a whole other thing to actively root for the CCP and express hope that it nukes the US, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These posts make it clear where Fuentes stands. He is ''not'' a paleocon, despite his claims to the contrary. No, he's an extremist who actively supports our enemies -- our ''real'' enemies* -- and for purely ideological reasons. Any so-called &amp;quot;populist&amp;quot; movement which endorses ''this'' position should not, and ''must'' not be supported. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, we only have two real enemies on the international stage: The CCP and radical ''Sunni'' Islam. Fuentes has made it clear that he actively supports both, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 16:39, December 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry for taking so long to respond. I think in part, he was trolling when he said those things. But he has also made the point that, since the '''American regime''' (note the distinction from the American nation) is tyrannical and suppresses virtuous dissidents, we should root for anything that wants to destroy it. The enemy of my enemy is my friend, essentially. Since the regime is Nick's enemy, Nick wants to support the enemies of the regime, inside and out. I don't agree with that line of reasoning, but it's not as black-and-white as you're presenting it. It's not as though he has committed treason. --[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 22:22, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You're right that Fuentes hasn't committed treason. You can't commit treason by merely voicing an opinion, no matter how odious that opinion may be.&lt;br /&gt;
::That aside, only time will tell if Fuentes was indeed just trolling or was in fact being completely serious. But one thing's for certain, there ''are'' a lot of people on the alt-right who share that opinion, and ''are'' completely serious about it. I'm not sure if they compose a majority of the alt-right, but I am sure that they compose ''at minimum'' a significant minority.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 12:49, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nick seems to think Russia or China would be willing to protect American dissidents the way America protects dissidents of foreign regimes. It's important to note that Nick has been heavily targeted by the federal government, who seized his assets and put him on a no-fly list. I don't think either of us can fully understand Nick's thinking on this matter if we haven't been similarly persecuted. He feels like Edward Snowden or Julian Assange. He has lost faith in the system to the point where he looks elsewhere for pragmatic and mutual support. I believe he is searching in very dark places, but it is undeniable that many of these countries are a lot less degenerate than the United States right now. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 16:14, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1827438</id>
		<title>Debate:The Groyper Wars</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1827438"/>
		<updated>2021-12-31T03:22:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* Nick Fuentes actively roots for our enemies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;With the past controversies over Nick Fuentes, TPUSA, Michelle Malkin, YAF, Ashley St. Clair, etc., combined with Big Tech's and the federal government's current suppression of dissent, this is an important discussion to have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you agree with [[Essay:The Groyper Wars|this]]? Why or why not? Please discuss the content of the Essay itself, rather than the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Debate]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=No longer relevant, based on an older version and its talk page, potentially confusing|content=&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey, I'm a member of Nick's community and consider myself a groyper sympathizer. Made an account for this. Let's talk if you're still around. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 17:59, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You have a pretty hefty essay there, and I'm not sure which parts are most important to you, so I'll address what interests me and we can take it from there.&lt;br /&gt;
: First of all, I respect that you're honest and transparent about your own background in your user page, which isn't exactly orthodox conservatism. I'm kinda of like you, except I come from Ron Paul libertarianism. Obviously, this puts me at odds with a lot of &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; and Nick, who are very critical of libertarianism, but I have a good enough understanding of their views that I can defend them pretty well and I overlap with most of it. I also appreciate that you condemn censorship in no uncertain terms. The role that &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; or others with similar values is an interesting debate to have, and it's good that Conservapedia seems like they'll allow us to have it. In some &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; communities on bigger platforms, like reddit, you're not even allowed to play devil's advocate about it.&lt;br /&gt;
: My next 2 paragraphs will address some points in the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point about the legacy paleocons not being on board with the groypers is interesting, and seems true. I've already seen the Spectator article, back in the fall, and found it pretty sketchy or weak. More broadly, though, it is true and interesting. There is an angle you are missing though. For example, Cotto and Gottfried, a current events show co-hosted by the great Paul Gottfried, took JF Gariépy's side over Fuentes' when he took credit for getting Nick banned. I don't bring this up to make a censorship point. It was interesting to me, because JF is usually considered &amp;quot;less optical&amp;quot; than Nick Fuentes is, because his list of guests on his own show includes some colorful characters Nick refuses to associate with and because he sometimes says some things explicitly that Nick will leave to subtext instead. Movement paleoconservatism has taken a sour stance on the groypers on temperament, sometimes also on policy, but it's interesting to see how they're navigating that in a unique way.&lt;br /&gt;
: It doesn't surprise me that Ben Shapiro included Ron Paul on his hit list of alt-right influencers, but I don't think the reasons for his inclusion or others are condemnable. It's worth pointing out that Ben himself was a guest on Red Ice TV with Henrik and Lana back in 2014, another show that was banned from YouTube in 2019 or 2020. Similarly, Ben has spoken with Ann Coulter on camera who he also included on his alt-right list. In this sense, the issue with Ben isn't so much his own agenda or his disagreements with other factions but his own hypocrisy; the Daily Wire itself has been labelled alt-right by the mainstream media on multiple occasions, usually with retractions, but it has happened. People find it objectionable that an outlet with a lot of funding and close ties to Fox News, etc. gets a &amp;quot;get-out-of-alt-right-free&amp;quot; card, while more grassroots activists are left out to dry.&lt;br /&gt;
: I'll get to your main essay later, I'd like to do this in parts. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 22:53, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Hi, I really appreciate that you did this, I wasn't expecting it at all. The Groyper Wars have been over for a long time. And after my essay was deleted by an admin ([https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;oldid=1760851 here] is where my essay used to be), I was ready to give it up. Didn't see myself ever coming back to this. And I set up this page several months ago, this is the first time anyone has responded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: You said you would react to my main essay &amp;quot;later,&amp;quot; and it's been a few days. If you're still there, I'd love to debate this with you, but I want to wait until you've reacted to my actual essay until I react to your response. If you post your reaction to the essay, I'd be more than happy to have a discussion with you! --- [[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 13:48, 5 May 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Opinion==&lt;br /&gt;
This has definitely got to be the #1 most controversial topic amongst the right. I think it's an overblown subject. I do consider myself a member of the Groyper movement, though I do think that [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/ff/Groyper_cartoon.png &amp;quot;Groyper&amp;quot;] is a silly name for a political movement. Now, I can't speak for every member, but I really don't think most Groypers are inherently &amp;quot;eViL aNtI-sEmItIc WhItE nAtIoNaLiStS&amp;quot; like many will tell you. It's a traditionalist paleocon movement that urges America to put God and country first and to return the western values our society was founded on (by white people, hence Nick's many mentions of the anti-white agenda, the importance of white identity and shifting demographics, which many confuse to be racial, when they're actually cultural). The &amp;quot;antisemitic&amp;quot; claim is mainly due to Nick's edgy and often Jew-related jokes (which Nick has said are merely for shock value), as well as the Groypers' heavy criticism of Israel, especially from a foreign policy perspective, and can you blame them? Trillions of dollars in taxpayer money is funneled to Israel every year to help them fight their thousand-year war. They don't need all that money, they have a GDP of 402 billion. It's not like they're some third-world country that we're helping out of pity. Of course, say this at a Turning Point USA event or on The Ben Shapiro Show and you're deemed &amp;quot;Anti-semitic/racist&amp;quot;, somehow. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 12:53, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a curious and thought-provoking take. And I wouldn't characterize groypers as white nationalists or anti-Semites, though in the past I would have. A lot of conservatives like to jump the gun and disown anyone outside of the mainstream, condemning them in the harshest possible terms. I think I can give you an explanation why. Part of it is that conservatives are afraid of alienating left-wingers and centrists/moderates. They think if they embrace certain figures they won't be able to convince as many people to accept conservatism. In a lot of cases, the opposite is true. The other thing is that back in 2019, quite a few mainstream/popular right-wingers saw groypers as wignats. Nick Fuentes and Beardson Beardly are having to deal with actual wignats right now. I think the way they feel about TRS is how conservatives felt about groypers. &amp;quot;They're just trying to divide us.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're infiltrators.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They don't have anything to offer.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're idiots.&amp;quot; A lot of stuff was coming out about Nick especially that just put people off. Like that awful Holocaust joke. I get that he tries to be edgy and says things for shock value, but a lot of times he goes too far. And that's why some factions of the right were concerned that Nick was the new Richard Spencer, and didn't want their reputations tarnished through guilt by association --- which ironically is a tactic they themselves unjustly used against those on the right who chose to associate with the groypers. I know groypers presently are frustrated by wignats. Now they know how mainstream conservatives felt. You're absolutely right that most of Western civilization was built by white people. And there 100% is an anti-white agenda: it's pervasive and vitriolic. It's institutionalized across the Western world. I don't see how white identity politics solves anything. Every group should be proud of its identity. Whites have done many amazing things. But embracing identity politics, as Nick seems to frequently advocate, is playing on the left's battlefield, and that's a dangerous game. Altering a country's core demography inevitably comes with long-lasting and severe consequences. White Americans have a sub-replacement birth rate. Black Americans are aborting and shooting themselves out of existence. Latin American and Middle Eastern immigrants to the U.S., meanwhile, have very high birth rates... and they're only rising. Those immigrants obviously vote for the people importing them and tell their kids and grandkids to do the same. I don't think that's inextricably tied to race, I agree that it's cultural. But there is a link between culture and race, they're not entirely distinct. And we can dispute the reasons why demographic shifts have such drastic consequences, but the point is they have drastic consequences. So we need to import less people. As for Israel, a lot of people seem to think anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. I used to think that, too, reasoning that singling out the only Jewish State must be bad-faith criticism. But that point defeats itself: Israel is unique, which is why it is uniquely criticized. Having an unconventional opinion about a foreign country is not inherently bigoted. I support Israel. Others don't. Who cares? Besides, Israel has stains in its history --- think Lavon Affair and some of the shady/unethical actions of the Mossad. I have to correct you on the foreign aid: I believe it's low billions, not trillions. And hypothetically, I support them getting that money. Sure they do well for themselves, but they're (in theory) the only democracy in the Middle East, surrounded on all sides by hostile powers. Israel also has a lot of holy sites (for Christians, not just Jews). But I don't want my taxpayer dollars going to fund their COVID regime --- while non-Muslims still can't pray at the Temple Mount. I like Ben Shapiro and TPUSA, though I sometimes disagree with them. In spite of those disagreements, I see their conservative activism as a net positive. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 17:46, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm happy to say, then, that there's a lot of things we agree on; however, I don't think Nick is advocating for identity politics. I think he just wants whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda. As for TPUSA and Shapiro, they're not advocating for conservatism. They're advocating for libertarian, capitalist-worshipping economic policy, and squishy, practically nonexistent social policy that is getting us virtually nowhere in this culture war. ''(Fusionism and its consequences!)'' If we want to see an actual return to traditionalism in America, the ideas these mainstream &amp;quot;conservatives&amp;quot; are pushing are not contributing in any way. They're pushing us in the opposite direction.(''Plus, we all know Richard Spencer is a Democrat Psyop.'') [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 11:45, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you're right about Richard Spencer. And I would like both Ben Shapiro and TPUSA to put more emphasis on social conservatism and less emphasis on free-market economics (as Michael Knowles and Matt Walsh have advocated for the broader conservative movement several times). Shapiro is sort of libertarian, and so are Charlie Kirk and most of the people at Turning Point. I'm not really a fan of libertarianism. I'm a huge fan of Walsh and Knowles partly because neither of them is remotely libertarian. As well, Shapiro in particular seems to support free-market absolutism and neoliberal, globalized capitalism, though I also just heard him say that America should put tariffs on non-American companies that use child labour and American companies that do so should be punished. I think some people on the dissident right tend to overlook the positives about Ben Shapiro and The Daily Wire: an alt-Hollywood, an alt-publishing company. Openly defying Biden's vaccine mandate and suing him over it. TPUSA has been engaging in conservative activism all over the U.S. for years at this point, and they've improved over time. Charlie Kirk now talks about demographics, marriage, and the nuclear family. Ben Shapiro talks about corporate tyranny. They're human, not controlled opposition. And I'm all for &amp;quot;telling whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda.&amp;quot; That's great. It's something Matt Walsh talks about all the time, at least in 2021. But here's what I mean by saying Nick advocates for white identity politics: [https://tv.gab.com/channel/three_spoons/view/nick-fuentes-white-americans-are-61619c89645a5a7fe897dd5e here], at 31:24, Nick says &amp;quot;White racial identity politics is not going away.&amp;quot; And it's not just that. Nick has explicitly rejected &amp;quot;multi-racial, working-class populism&amp;quot; and grouping together as Americans, patriots, conservatives, or even Christians in favour of white identitarianism. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:58, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think Nick is making perfect sense in the video you linked. I don't think he means &amp;quot;identity politics&amp;quot; in the Obama-esque &amp;quot;I'm black n y'all gotta do everything I say or you racist&amp;quot; sort of sense here. Sounds to me like he's talking about political ideology that prioritizes white identity. (''White-identity'' politics, rather than white ''identity-politics'', if that makes sense). Also, he's not saying we can't come together as American patriots or Christians, he's just saying that many conservatives pretend that race isn't a thing, and that we can't properly fight the anti-white agenda if we don't recognize whiteness. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:22, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::From 37:30 - &amp;quot;Race is the basis, and I wish it wasn't that way. Understand, you know, people look at me and they say, 'That's the guy! That's the white supremacist that wants to make everything racist!' I didn't make it that way. Don't point the finger at me, don't blame me! I'm looking at the world and telling you how it is, I'm explaining it to you. I didn't make the world, okay? Don't blame me, I didn't make America the way it is!... We do have to acknowledge where we differ, and we have to account for those things so that we can live together in harmony... To the extent that it is possible that we get along, the way that we get along is by understanding our differences, accommodating for those differences, and then we can flourish. Not ignoring them, not pretending that they don't exist.&amp;quot; [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:40, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'd like to believe that race shouldn't factor into anything. In the abstract, it shouldn't. But that's not the world we're living in. You and Nick are right about that. This racial stuff has been foisted upon us. Matt Walsh pointed out that the Virginia governor's race was won by &amp;quot;white grievance politics&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that's a good thing.&amp;quot; We have to deal with the intensity of anti-white hate on both the left and the right properly. I get what you're saying about the difference between white identity-politics and white-identity politics. White identity exists and it's not inherently bad. Identity itself isn't bad. But how significant is racial identity in the political realm? It's significant, no doubt. But more so than everything else? I have to admit, it would be pretty cool to hear a candidate talk about how blue-collar white Americans are being left to dry by neoliberal globalism. Or to hear one talk about the historical accomplishments of white people. Should that exclude talking about America's Christian roots? Or condemning abortion, which disproportionately harms black Americans? Or criticizing LGBT radicalism? I don't think it should. So what should be prioritized? I'm not saying shun white interests in favour of corporate tax cuts --- corporations are part of the problem, so take away their (mostly non-white) foreign labour. Address demographics. Address anti-white critical race theory and other aspects of the anti-white agenda. But don't necessarily prioritize these things. Of course they're important. But you also have millions of unborn babies murdered in the womb each year. You have homosexuality/bisexuality/pansexuality and transgenderism/non-binarism/gender-fluidity/agenderism. You have Drag Queen Story Hour. Child drag queens. Drag queens on children's television. &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; drag queens. You have Internet pornography. Gun control. Drugs. War. Not everything is a racial issue. A lot have a racial aspect, but that's not what governs them. The prospect of a national divorce, or secession? That would be along political or sociocultural lines, not solid racial lines. So yes, appeal to whites. But why not also appeal to sensible non-whites (even if they're a tiny minority)? Instead of &amp;quot;I'm looking out for white people,&amp;quot; which can be a good thing, &amp;quot;I'm looking out for families.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for the working class.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for anyone who hates degeneracy.&amp;quot; Couldn't that work? Not pandering, or endless harping about &amp;quot;black unemployment,&amp;quot; but looking for something above race to unite us. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 18:27, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Of course, all those things are important, and race isn't the only issue. You're not wrong about any of that. I think you and I agree on the majority of things. Like I said, I don't think Nick is rejecting other forms of unity among conservatives, he simply doesn't see enough conservatives addressing the racial issues to the extent that they should be. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:32, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::If that's what Nick's saying, then fair enough. This has been and will probably continue to be a blind spot for many conservatives as they refuse to address the issues as they are on the ground. Thank you very much for taking the opportunity to have a civil discussion with me about all this. I think we can end it off here, seeing eye-to-eye on a lot of things. It always helps to be rational as we both are. You made excellent points. Hopefully, the right will improve with time. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:28, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Yes, of course. Thank you. Hopefully the Right will start facing these issues head-on, and hopefully someday we can change the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] page to be a less cringe version than the one Liberaltears wrote. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 20:00, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nick Fuentes actively roots for our enemies==&lt;br /&gt;
On August 15, Nick Fuentes posted [https://t.me/nickjfuentes/4273 this] on Telegram. It's one thing to oppose the War in Afghanistan. But it's a whole other thing to actively root for the Taliban and celebrate our defeat in Afghanistan, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And on October 27, Fuentes posted [https://t.me/nickjfuentes/4536 ''this''] on Telegram. It's one thing to oppose waging a cold war with China. But it's a whole other thing to actively root for the CCP and express hope that it nukes the US, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These posts make it clear where Fuentes stands. He is ''not'' a paleocon, despite his claims to the contrary. No, he's an extremist who actively supports our enemies -- our ''real'' enemies* -- and for purely ideological reasons. Any so-called &amp;quot;populist&amp;quot; movement which endorses ''this'' position should not, and ''must'' not be supported. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In my opinion, we only have two real enemies on the international stage: The CCP and radical ''Sunni'' Islam. Fuentes has made it clear that he actively supports both, and for purely ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 16:39, December 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry for taking so long to respond. I think in part, he was trolling when he said those things. But he has also made the point that, since the '''American regime''' (note the distinction from the American nation) is tyrannical and suppresses virtuous dissidents, we should root for anything that wants to destroy it. The enemy of my enemy is my friend, essentially. Since the regime is Nick's enemy, Nick wants to support the enemies of the regime, inside and out. I don't agree with that line of reasoning, but it's not as black-and-white as you're presenting it. It's not as though he has committed treason. --[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 22:22, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1827422</id>
		<title>User:BernieandTrumpFan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1827422"/>
		<updated>2021-12-31T03:00:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump have stood up for the working class against the establishment and the elites. Both are populists who have discussed criminal justice reform and lowering prescription drug prices. I am here at Conservapedia not only to redeem myself in the eyes of God the Father and Christ His Son after my days as both a white supremacist and a far-left anarchist, but also to provide an objective analysis of history, current events, and the world at large. I don't always agree with Conservapedia, and I will not conform, but I will respect your opinions, and I hope that you will respect mine. It's been over a year since I joined Stormfront, and over a year since I've left it. Help me forget. Or at least, help me better myself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   More than two years since I joined Conservapedia, and I'm doing great!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   I don't care if Trump runs in 2024, but if it's not him, it should be someone who genuinely and strongly represents MAGA, especially in the face of&lt;br /&gt;
   adversity. I'm proud of what Trump accomplished overall, minus the last few weeks of his presidency, when he threw Capitol protesters under the bus,&lt;br /&gt;
   conceded the 2020 United States presidential election to Joe Biden, allowed Jared Kushner to keep him off Parler and Gab, and failed to pardon&lt;br /&gt;
   Snowden and Assange. I still support MAGA and believe that the social media bans and second attempted impeachment levelled against him were&lt;br /&gt;
   shameful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please stop blocking me, admins! Also, calling other conservatives racist is a leftist tactic!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Topics of Disagreement Between Myself and Conservapedia'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I disagree that:&lt;br /&gt;
* marijuana and violent video games cause school shootings [or any other types of mass murder]&lt;br /&gt;
* a show or movie is &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; if it contains a homosexual couple or a dysfunctional family&lt;br /&gt;
* vaccines cause autism&lt;br /&gt;
* it is debatable whether the United States should have entered World War II&lt;br /&gt;
I also believe Conservapedia goes too far on the matter of homosexuality, such as endorsing conversion therapy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Topics of Agreement Between Myself and Conservapedia'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree that:&lt;br /&gt;
[Error: file_size too large]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, all of the articles about the network, from Wikipedia, Conservapedia, and Metapedia, are anti-Fox News!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Examples of Institutionalized Racism in the West''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Planned Parenthood, which exterminates unborn African-American babies in what some have referred to as a &amp;quot;black genocide.&amp;quot; Also disproportionately targets Hispanics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Affirmative Action, which blocks Asian-Americans from certain schools and jobs simply based on their race, in addition to similarly blocking Caucasians, and assumes blacks and Hispanics lack the intellectual capacity to get by or achieve things on their own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- White Privilege theories, pushed into the mainstream by the media and Marxist university professors, which attack white people for the colour of their skin, and accuse them of possessing an inherent biological privilege which can only be compensated for by contributing to liberal causes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Islamic No-Go Zones, also known as &amp;quot;sanctuary cities,&amp;quot; which contain rampant anti-Semitism, in addition to a considerable amount of anti-white hatred.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Murders of Land-Owning White Farmers in South Africa, which is occurring en masse, and is almost genocidal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Racist Immigration System of Japan, which is aimed at preserving the ethnic Japanese supermajority.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Congressman Paul Gosar.jpg|thumbnail|[[Paul Gosar]] for President 2028!]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abortion is murder. Taxation is theft. All lives matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The biggest step toward both criminal justice reform and taking on Big Pharma would be the legalization of cannabis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evolution is a conspiracy theory. Creation is truth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I oppose [[globalization]] because I don't want [[multinational corporation]]s [[outsourcing]] [[blue-collar workers|blue-collar]] [[Main Street|domestic jobs]] to sweatshops in [[communist]] [[dictatorship]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative Criticisms of the GOP|The GOP is dead]]. [[List of Former Tea Party Supporters Who Have Become RINOs or Never Trumpers|As is the Tea Party]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would appear that [https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/11/27/are-white-nationalists-turning-trump white nationalists are Never Trump], and [https://www.thedailybeast.com/2020-democrats-are-starting-to-turn-obamas-legacy-against-biden 2020 Democrats are Never Obama].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a [[right-wing populism|right-wing populist]], [[nationalism|civic nationalist]], and [[social conservatism|social conservative]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a devout [[Catholic]], unlike [[Joe Biden]] and [[Nancy Pelosi]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jesus5.jpg|thumbnail|[[Jesus Christ]] the Messiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a registered member of the [[People's Party of Canada]]. [[Talk:Conservative Criticisms of the GOP|America needs the Patriot Party.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Canada.svg|thumbnail|I am a [[Canadian]] nationalist, and I love my country!]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
100th article (less than three months after joining): [[Jewish Defense League]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1st article to break 10,000 views: [[Media Bias Fact Check]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over 1,000 edits!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.criminaljusticereform.net/&lt;br /&gt;
https://fightpharma.org&lt;br /&gt;
http://usmca.com/&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.peoplespartyofcanada.ca&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intersection between the two greatest patriots of the past 50 years: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYsUpaVLWis His Dream is Now Our Dream].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1ZBhAINr8s][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G87UXIH8Lzo][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Vjeqd-UPCM][https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-just-deported-a-nazi-thats-a-move-i-can-get-behind/2018/08/21/ec1d2d1c-a56d-11e8-8fac-12e98c13528d_story.html][https://www.facebook.com/Bernie-Sanders-Supporters-For-Donald-Trump-227390520965009/][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AnUJYPPWXc][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qS4DjAaW8_s][https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/activist-milo-yiannopoulos-is-now-ex-gay-consecrating-his-life-to-st-joseph][https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/08/07/two-divergent-platforms-donald-trumps-main-street-vs-hillary-clintons-wall-street/][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge_RUxBTHN4][https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/presidential-message-international-holocaust-remembrance-day/][https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/presidential-message-international-holocaust-remembrance-day-2/][https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/presidential-message-international-holocaust-remembrance-day-2020/][https://townhall.com/columnists/armstrongwilliams/2018/07/26/in-defense-of-israel-n2503701][https://nationaleconomicseditorial.com/2017/03/21/economic-nationalism/][https://billmuehlenberg.com/2016/05/28/study-show-approved/][https://twitter.com/ForAshli/status/1369420490834640897]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2020 Democrats being off-the-rails far-left: [https://www.conservapedia.com/2020_Democrats%27_attacks_on_Barack_Hussein_Obama][https://www.westernjournal.com/democrats-approve-health-care-illegal-immigrants-trump-fires-back-end-race/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't trust [[Dan Bongino]].[https://nationalfile.com/video-dan-bongino-says-ex-parler-ceo-is-lying-site-absolutely-committed-to-free-speech/][https://tv.gab.com/channel/a/view/andrew-torba-responds-to-dan-bongino-6116c45008520fa71ff506f2] Don't trust [[Newsmax]] either.[https://gab.com/TheyKilledParler/posts/105664333665946733][https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/conservatives-hoping-for-new-media-hero-in-newsmax-may-find-an-obstacle-in-ceos-left-leaning-tendencies/] Newsmax and [[Breitbart]] are controlled opposition. [[The Daily Wire]] is not. Groypers and bears are decent people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maxime Bernier and Randy Hillier are excellent Canadian patriots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like it or not, major demographic shifts have consequences. The global white population is shrinking due to a sub-replacement birth rate and non-whites continue to have lots of kids. By and large, non-white voting patterns are not changing, and immigrants both legal and illegal obviously vote for the people importing them (and tell their children and grandchildren to do the same). This is demographic replacement, plain and simple. Non-whites may have socially conservative values, but they keep voting for degeneracy. The black population in America is also rapidly decreasing due to abortion and gang violence. America will eventually be comprised of a reliable coalition of Latin Americans and Middle Easterners who consistently vote for Democrats or, at best, pro-amnesty establishment Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's nothing wrong with race-mixing, but there's no need to fetishize it. Most people happen to be attracted to members of their own race --- there's nothing wrong with that, it's natural.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Same-sex &amp;quot;marriage,&amp;quot; sex changes, drag, and pornography should be outlawed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plaintiffs and defendants in ''Sines v. Kessler'' are morons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not [https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2018/11/30/usmca-cusma-what-the-new-nafta-is-called-depends-on-whos-talking.html CUSMA or T-MEC], it's the [[USMCA]]!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To the [https://dailycaller.com/2020/07/30/24-people-killed-george-floyd-riots-protests/ dozens of victims] of the [[2020 Leftwing insurrection|2020 Black Lives Matter insurrection]], may you rest in peace and may God bless your souls.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7bCThU4Wf0 CNN sucks!][https://www.westernjournal.com/jim-acosta-accidentally-admits-cnn-sucks-pathetic-comeback-attempt/][https://www.toddstarnes.com/media/video-hundreds-protest-outside-cnn-headquarters-chanting-cnn-sucks/] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqKhVzdXiEY&amp;amp;t=228s Fox News sucks!][https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/trump-supporters-washington-dc-chant-fox-news-sucks-stopthesteal-march-rally-video/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Ashli Babbitt]] is a hero. I hold her in higher regard than Donald Trump.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ashli Babbitt.PNG|thumbnail|[[Ashli Babbitt]], 14-year [[United States Air Force]] veteran, who was murdered in the [[United States Capitol Building|Capitol building]] during the [[2021 Capitol riot|January 6, 2021 protest]] for supporting the [[MAGA]] Movement and [[Trump]]'s allegations of [[2020 election fraud]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say Their Names:&lt;br /&gt;
* Ashli Babbitt&lt;br /&gt;
* Rosanne Boyland&lt;br /&gt;
* Kevin Greeson&lt;br /&gt;
* Benjamin Phillips&lt;br /&gt;
All 4 right-wing protesters were murdered by Capitol Police on January 6, 2021.[https://www.bitchute.com/video/GV6sKfAaBWbj/] The storming of the Capitol was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I watch [[One America News Network]][https://usnewson.com/watch/oann-live-stream]. I also follow the [[Alternative Influence Network]] on YouTube and Twitter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My [[Gab]], [[BitChute]], [[Twitter]], and [[Reddit]]: [https://gab.com/TheyKilledParler][https://www.bitchute.com/channel/7wR1grMkAGom/][https://twitter.com/KentMurray19/with_replies][https://www.reddit.com/user/KentMurray1]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am hooked on [https://cozy.tv Cozy TV]! I'm TopRightZoomer over there. Check it out!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=2020_Leftwing_insurrection&amp;diff=1827417</id>
		<title>2020 Leftwing insurrection</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=2020_Leftwing_insurrection&amp;diff=1827417"/>
		<updated>2021-12-31T02:42:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: Undo revision 1827280 by GODBLESSAMERICA (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{World War 2&lt;br /&gt;
| image       =Antifa DC.jpeg&lt;br /&gt;
| conflict    = Marxist Revolution&lt;br /&gt;
| date        =May 28, 2020 - ongoing&lt;br /&gt;
| location    =United States&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; and [[globalism|globally]]&lt;br /&gt;
| combatant1  =[[Antifa]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Black Lives Matter]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Liberation Road]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Socialist Alternative]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Organizing for Action]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Refuse Fascism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Revolutionary Communist Party]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Democratic Socialists of America]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Party for Socialism and Liberation]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Socialist Unity Party]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Workers World Party]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Communist Party USA]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Committees of Correspondence for Democratic Socialism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Sunrise Movement]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Momentum Community&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Democratic Party]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Left Inside/Outside Project]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Africa Town Coalition]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Expect Us&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ksdk.com/article/news/local/protests/this-is-not-a-kumbaya-organizers-of-expect-us-say-they-want-change-not-just-outward-showings-of-unity/63-06426b68-d009-434c-b65d-8b76f148ff74&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;NFAC&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NFAC, an alleged armed militant Black militia group advocating for [[slave reparations]], are said to be paid actors from more than one source. NFAC shot 3 of its own members in Louisville in July 2020.[https://youtu.be/pr06cA5XS6w][https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/atlantas-armed-black-panther-marchers-were-actors-dressed-in-costumes/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| combatant2  =Innocent citizens&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; representing the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[diversity]] of America&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; and local police&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; departments, along side some Federal Agents. &lt;br /&gt;
| commander1  =  [[Ocasio-Cortez]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;*https://twitter.com/Public_Citizen/status/1266776797301166088&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;*http://archive.is/wip/q7Oz2&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;*https://thepostmillennial.com/aoc-appears-to-encourage-rioting-and-looting-with-instagram-post&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;*https://www.amny.com/queens/progressive-queens-lawmaker-puzzled-after-democratic-socialists-protest-at-home/&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;*https://pjmedia.com/columns/stacey-lennox/2020/06/01/is-alexandra-ocasio-cortez-the-leader-of-the-pack-n478605&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;*[https://dailycaller.com/2019/09/02/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-antifa-boston/ Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez promoted a fundraiser for the Antifa terrorist organization.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Ayanna Pressley]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://gellerreport.com/2020/08/radical-hate-rep-ayanna-pressley-calls-for-unrest-in-the-streets-targeting-republicans.html/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Kamala Harris]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/chiIIum/status/1299077701916073984&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Nancy Pelosi]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dhs-chief-pelosi-federal-law-enforcement-stormtroopers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Chuck Schumer]]. [[George Soros]],&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Thousand Currents]], [[Alicia Garza]], [[Patrisse Cullors]],&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Opal Tometi]], Phil Murphy,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://whyy.org/articles/gop-assemblyman-n-j-gov-murphy-broke-own-order-marching-in-protests/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Ted Wheeler]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/news-wrap-mayor-of-portland-oregon-asks-for-cease-fire&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Kate Brown]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/29/trump-officials-portland-oregon-governor-protests&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; VA state Sen. Louise Lucas&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/aug/17/louise-lucas-virginia-democrat-hit-felony-charges-/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; WI state Rep. David Bowen&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2020-08-10-why-was-a-state-rep-at-the-mob-attack-on-a-police-officers-home/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  and other leftist agitators&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; and Democrat officials.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/federal-judge-rejects-oregons-efforts-to-block-federal-arrests-of-portland-protesters_3438057.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| commander2  = [[Operation Legend]]&lt;br /&gt;
| strength1   = ~ 66,000&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/cities-burn-but-none-dare-call-it-communist-insurrection_3371302.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| strength2   = 230,000,000+ &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.newsweek.com/majority-americans-support-calling-military-assist-police-during-nationwide-unrest-polling-shows-1508210&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| casualties1 = At least five protesters&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; were killed by other protesters&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; including one child.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/JordanPeterson/comments/hk3em1/can_someone_please_explain_to_me_all_these_chaz/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/crime-and-courts/2020/06/01/davenport-iowa-rioting-two-people-shot-dead-police-officers-ambushed/5306484002/&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;*https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/06/29/louisville-breonna-taylor-protest-shooting-suspect-identified/3277736001/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Another was struck and killed&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; by a Black driver while blocking traffic on a freeway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/nick-arama/2020/07/06/media-finally-acknowledged-that-man-who-hit-protesters-on-highway-is-black-likely-not-a-white-supremacist/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  1 White&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; BLM terrorists was killed in Austin and 2 in Kenosha for a total of 9.&lt;br /&gt;
| casualties2 = more than 710&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/09/30/us-sees-710-additional-homicides-and-2800-more-shootings-attributed-to-minneapolis-effect-978986&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;*[[Lee Keltner]] was murdered by an Antifa terrorist working for [[NBC News]]; https://bigleaguepolitics.com/revealed-charged-denver-shooter-matthew-dolloffs-left-wing-facebook-posts/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; two children and three police.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/us/deadly-unrest-people-have-died-amid-george-floyd-protests-across-us&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.odmp.org/officer/24695-sergeant-damon-gutzwiller&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  At least 6 Black&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
bystanders&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2020/07/05/say-their-names-20-people-killed-in-the-george-floyd-riots-n592577&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  including a one year old baby in a stroller&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2020/07/14/family-of-1-year-old-who-was-shot-and-killed-do-baby-lives-matter/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A staffer for Lacy Johnson&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; GOP opponent of [[Ilhan Omar]] was shot and killed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/republican-campaign-aide-murdered-minneapolis-staffer-lacy-johnson-running-ilhan-omar-shot-dead-drive-shooting/ Republican Campaign Aide Murdered in Minneapolis — Staffer for Lacy Johnson Who Is Running Against Ilhan Omar Shot Dead in Drive-By Shooting]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8743623/Campaign-staffer-17-Ilhan-Omars-Republican-opponent-shot-killed-Minneapolis.html Campaign staffer, 17, for Ilhan Omar's Republican congressional opponent is shot and killed in Minneapolis]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/teenage-campaign-staffer-for-ilhan-omars-opponent-killed-in-minneapolis-shooting Teenage campaign staffer for Ilhan Omar's opponent killed in Minneapolis shooting]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/09/17/ilhan-omars-gop-challenger-shocked-after-campaign-aides-shot-in-random-drive-by-teen-staffer-dies-973381 Ilhan Omar’s GOP challenger shocked after campaign aides shot in random drive-by, teen staffer dies]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.rt.com/usa/500970-ilhan-omar-lacy-johnson-shooting-staffer/ Suspect arrested in murder of 17-year-old staffer of GOP challenger to Ilhan Omar]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Numerous African&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Americans were targeted&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; by the racist left.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://100percentfedup.com/prominent-black-trump-supporter-shot-to-death-in-milwaukee-hours-after-pro-trump-interview/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More than 700 police injured.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2020/06/08/more-than-700-officers-injured-in-george-floyd-protests-across-us/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''2020 Leftwing insurrection''' is an ongoing effort by the [[DNC]] and [[mainstream media]] to spark a race war in the [[United States]] in advance of the [[2020 presidential election]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://creativedestructionmedia.com/analysis/2020/05/28/the-last-7-days-media-and-the-reckless-push-for-race-war/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After the death of a [[Black]] man while being taken into [[Minneapolis]] police custody, [[white]] [[liberal]] [[racist]]s and [[social justice warrior]]s nationwide began [[riot]]ing, knowing that African Americans would be blamed for the [[violence]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=254536622291839&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The violence was discovered to have been pre-planned&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/nypd-violent-acts-planned-in-advance/2440865/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and well financed.  [[Democrat]] leaders and mainstream media refused to condemn the loss of innocent lives and property.  The Antifa terrorist organization and other violent socialist groups hijacked peaceful protests and were responsible for church burnings,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/churches-burned-and-vandalized-in-riots&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; book burning,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/KN4f4o0563U&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and used mothers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/07/portland-antifa-moms-provide-human-shield-against-federal-law-enforcement/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and children&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://heavy.com/news/2020/07/portland-protester-video-baby/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/nick-arama/2020/07/23/watch-tiny-little-kids-led-to-portland-federal-courthouse-encouraged-to-use-vile-curses-against-police/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as human shields for riots.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.waynedupree.com/2020/07/portland-antifa-blm-baby-shield/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  More people were killed in the first week of rioting, which continued throughout the year, than unarmed blacks who were shot by police while resisting arrest in all of 2019.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://summit.news/2020/06/04/riot-death-toll-now-higher-than-total-deaths-of-unarmed-black-people-for-whole-of-2019/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Democratic Socialists of America]] (DSA) is a key support group.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the death of [[George Floyd]] by ingesting a fatal amount of [[fentanyl]] while being taken into [[Minneapolis]] police custody,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.lifezette.com/2020/08/george-floyd-died-of-drug-overdose-bodycam-footage-shows-him-ingesting-fatal-amount-of-drugs-cops-lawyers-contend/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the [[communist]]-dominated ''[[New York Times]]'' called for a movement to [[defund the police]] nationwide.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/30/opinion/george-floyd-police-funding.html?action=click&amp;amp;module=RelatedLinks&amp;amp;pgtype=Article&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Hillary Clinton]]'s [[2016 presidential campaign]] spokesman immediately echoed the sentiment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2020/06/04/former-hillary-clinton-spokesman-calls-for-defunding-police/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In [[Atlanta]], after a drunk driver assaulted police with a stolen weapon and was killed, an incumbent prosecutor facing a primary runoff election charged a policeman with first degree murder which led to a large number of police walking off the job, leaving the city vulnerable to criminal elements of the [[Democratic party]] voter base.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/trqqiAw--tA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A one year old black toddler was murdered while sitting in a stroller in the BLM violence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2020/07/13/go-to-hell-gardner-family-slain-toddler-tells-killers/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  An  8 year old black girl and a black man were murdered by Black Lives Matter protesters in the violent aftermath.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dcdirtylaundry.com/black-lives-matter-upgrades-rules-of-engagement-roe-to-shoot-people-in-vehicles-protester-shoots-unarmed-elderly-man-in-a-vehicle-chaz-security-opens-f/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cbs46.com/news/shooting-leaves-8-year-old-girl-dead-on-university-avenue-police-investigate/article_3de6674c-be41-11ea-8e33-2b7eacb8bee8.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is certain the riots were non-spontaneous; the delivery of unbound pallets of bricks placed at strategic points in front of government buildings and affluent shopping districts in metropolitan areas throughout the country on the morning the riots broke out demonstrates a high degree of logistical coordination and financing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://deepclips.com/clip/4951/insurrection-pallets-of-bricks-are-being-pre-staged-in-flashpoint-cities-across-the-country#top&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Community organizer]]s had been preparing for a violent uprising months in advance. The evidence suggest a classic communist [[revolution]], which much of the world has suffered at one time or another over the past 100 years, but the American people has been isolated from and remains somewhat naive in dealing with such threats to preserving their [[freedom]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democrat Speaker [[Nancy Pelosi]] called upon rioters to stop &amp;quot;Trump and his [[stormtroopers]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/SpeakerPelosi/status/1284294427654197248&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  150 federal buildings were defaced and 750 police officers injured nationwide in the liberal Democrat/Socialist violence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/06/405-law-enforcement-officers-were-injured-black-daniel-greenfield/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==You ain't Black==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:You ain't Black.jpeg|right|300px|thumb|Biden was roundly criticized by Black leaders for his racist comments.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/499214-african-american-figures-slam-biden-on-you-aint-black-comments&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Democrat presidential nominee former [[Vice President]] [[Joe Biden]] made a particularly offensive and egregious [[racist]] comment toward [[African American]]'s during a radio interview.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/GaTv5FQHqVw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Biden's comments were an effort at [[voter intimidation]]. [[Black Entertainment Television]] (BET) co-founder Bob Johnson called him out saying in part,&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Secoriea Turner.png|left|350px|thumb|[[Black Lives Matter]] protesters [[murder]]ed 8 year old [[Secoriea Turner]] on July 5, 2020 in [[Atlanta]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/police-identify-8-year-old-girl-killed-in-atlanta-4th-of-july-shooting&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|&amp;quot;This proves unequivocally that the Democratic nominee believes that black people owe him their vote without question; even though we as black people know it is exactly the opposite. He should spend the rest of his campaign apologizing to every black person he meets.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/05/25/joe-biden-you-aint-black-racism-trump-column/5254434002/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[NBC]]'s ''America’s Got Talent'' host Terry Crews&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbc.com/americas-got-talent/credits/host/terry-crews&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; pointed out the inherent racism in the Democratic nominee's train of thought:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|“When you’re white, you can be Republican, [[Libertarian]], Democrat. You can be anything. But if you’re black, you have to be one thing. Even Joe Biden said, ‘Hey man, if you don’t vote for me, you ain’t black.’”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/election/tyler-o-neil/2020/06/18/terry-crews-slams-biden-warns-against-black-supremacy-n545003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Biden won the Democrat presidential nomination when South Carolina Rep. [[Jim Clyburn]] endorsed him, and the dominos of the Democrat machine fell into place.  In short choreographed order, the remaining white candidates, Amy Klobuchar, [[Pete Buttigieg]], Tom Steyer, [[Michael Bloomberg]] and a host of local officials began goosestepping in lockstep.  The minority candidates, [[Kamala Harris]], [[Cory Booker]], [[Julian Castro]], and [[Tulsi Gabbard]] had been driven out earlier in a rigged process that allowed rich white male billionaires - Steyer and Bloomberg - to buy their way into the process once all the people of color had been forced out.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/02/michael-moore-goes-ballistic-on-dnc-for-changing-debate-rules-for-bloomberg/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Clyborn admitted he cringed when he heard Biden's racist attack on Black people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/HNgrTu1YhuU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats cynically tried to take advantage of George Floyd's killing, which occurred only days after Biden's racist comments, to repair his relations with Blacks by attacking the alleged [[systemic racism]] of police departments.  Police groups and unions which Biden courted since the 1990s on behalf of the [[Democratic party]] and [[Clinton administration]] with the [[Biden Crime Bill]], mass incarceration, and effort to put 100,000 new cops on the street to deal with &amp;quot;Superpredators&amp;quot;, responded by withdrawing their support.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/04/police-groups-joe-biden-300222&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  ''Jacobin'' magazine summarized Biden's record: {{Quotebox-float|&amp;quot;It’s not as if Biden didn’t know what he was doing.... He just didn’t care. Biden had made a calculated decision that the elections he would win were worth the damage he inflicted....even if Biden has subsequently learned the error of his ways, the rank cynicism and callousness involved in his two-decade-long championing of carceral policies should be more than enough to give anyone pause about his qualities as a leader, let alone a progressive one.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.jacobinmag.com/2018/08/biden-crime-mass-incarceration-police-prisons&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Lee Stranahan observed the organized George Floyd riots were an attempt to win the alienated white [[Bernie Sanders]] supporters back to the Democrat plantation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cultural appropriation===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Elizabeth Warren}}&lt;br /&gt;
Democrat lawmakers, led by House Speaker [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[Karen Bass]] faced overwhelming backlash after wearing Kente cloth during their nearly nine-minute moment of silence in a [[photo-op]] staged to show their alleged sympathy for black victims of police brutality. Some fiddled with iPhones while allegedly mourning Floyd.  Many users across social media questioned their motives and blasted them for missing the mark.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/06/08/outrage-at-democrats-wearing-kente-cloth-during-moment-of-silence-so-woke-it-actually-feels-racist/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Author Obianuju Ekeocha posted a video telling Democrats to stop &amp;quot;[[virtue signalling]]&amp;quot; by wearing African cloth.&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;In your tokenism, you didn't wait to find out that this thing that you're hanging around your neck is not just some African uniform -- it's actually the kente material. The kente belongs to the Ghanaian people, mainly the Ashanti tribe.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/obianuju/status/1270053042340139008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kente cloth of Ashante slave traders.jpeg|right|300px|thumb|Democrats wearing the kente cloth of the Ashanti slave trading tribe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/06/figures-democrats-wore-kente-cloth-honor-geoge-floyd-fabric-ashanti-slave-traders/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Kente reflects the history of the Ashanti people, from the emergence of the various Ashanti kingdoms to the development of the slave trade up to and including contemporary life in [[Ghana]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://ultimatehistoryproject.com/kente-cloth-and-the-history-of-the-ashanti-people.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Slavery was historically a tradition with the Ashanti, slaves typically taken as captives from enemies in warfare. The welfare of their slaves varied from being able to acquire wealth and intermarry with the master's family to being a human sacrifice in funeral ceremonies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Alfred Burdon Ellis]],&lt;br /&gt;
[https://archive.org/details/tshispeakingpeo01elligoog/page/n302 &amp;lt;!-- pg=290 --&amp;gt; , ''The Tshi-speaking peoples of the Gold Coast of West Africa''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160610125849/https://books.google.com/books?id=jtMSAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA290 |date=2016-06-10 }}, 1887. p. 290&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rodriguez, Junius P. ''The Historical Encyclopedia of World Slavery, Volume 1'', 1997. p. 53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the early 1800s the Ashanti had become a major [[export]]er of enslaved people.  The slave trade was originally focused north with captives going to Mande and Hausa traders who exchanged them for goods from [[North Africa]] and indirectly from [[Europe]].  By 1800, the trade had shifted to the south as the Ashanti sought to meet the growing demand of the British, Dutch, and French for captives.  In exchange, the Ashanti received luxury items and some manufactured goods including most importantly [[firearm]]s.  The consequence of this trade for the Ashanti and their neighbors was horrendous.  From 1790 until 1896, the Ashanti were in a perpetual state of war involving expansion or defense of its domain.  Most of these wars afforded the opportunity to acquire more slaves for trade.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.blackpast.org/global-african-history/ashanti-empire-asante-kingdom-18th-late-19th-century/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The modern-day Ashanti claim that slaves were seldom abused,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johann Gottlieb Christaller, &lt;br /&gt;
''Ashanti Proverbs: (the primitive ethics of a savage people)'', 1916, pp. 119-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and defend the &amp;quot;humanity&amp;quot; of Ashanti slavery by noting that those slaves were allowed to marry, and that their children were born free.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;History of the Ashanti Empire&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.ashanti.com.au/pb/wp_8078438f.html ''History of the Ashanti Empire''.] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120413213927/http://www.ashanti.com.au/pb/wp_8078438f.html |date=2012-04-13 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  ''[[USA Today]]'' fact checkers rated the claim as True that Democrats wore the garb of slave traders.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/06/16/fact-check-kente-cloths-have-ties-west-african-slave-trade/5345941002/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Central Park Karen==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:CNN Jones.png|left|175px|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
CNN analyst [[Van Jones]] summarized sentiments in the Black community days after Floyd's death:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;It's not the racist white person who is in the [[Ku Klux Klan]] that we have to worry about. It's the white liberal [[Hillary Clinton]] supporter walking her dog in [[Central Park]] who would tell you right now, you know, people like that, 'I don't see race, race is no big deal to me, I see us all as the same, I give to charities,' but the minute she sees a black man who she does not respect or who she has a slight thought against, she weaponized race like she had been trained by the [[Aryan nation]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/central-park-karen&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A Klansmember could not have been better trained to pick up her phone and tell the police a black man, African-American man, come get him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So even the most liberal well-intentioned white person has a [[virus]] in his or her brain that can be activated at an instant. And so what you're seeing now is a curtain falling away. And those of us who have been burdened by this every minute, every second of our entire lives are fragile right now. We are fragile right now. We are tired. And so I appreciate people who have been reaching out, I've had people reaching out to me for two days now, expressing their empathy and sympathy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My only prayer, look in the mirror at how you choke off black opportunity. How you choke off black dignity. How you behave in ways that make it harder for African-Americans to rise in your profession, in your place of work, on your campus, in your house of worship, and start working on that. Because this is the last domino of a whole series of dominos that have been falling for a long time. And black people have been getting [[gaslighting|gas lit]] every time we point this out.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2020/05/29/van-jones-george-floyd-white-liberal-hillary-clinton-supporter-sot-newday.cnn&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Minneapolis riots: White people riot to destroy civilized society==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Velshi-riot.jpeg|right|350px|thumb|As buildings burned behind him, Ali Velshi of [[MSNBC]] reported with a straight face that [[leftist]] &amp;quot;protests&amp;quot; were &amp;quot;not generally speaking unruly.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2020/05/29/msnbc-reporter-front-burning-liquor-store-protest-not-generally-speaking-unruly/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|DFL riots}}&lt;br /&gt;
The leftist riots were triggered by the death of a Black man who was pinned to the ground in an allegedly &amp;quot;non-lethal&amp;quot; choke hold approved by the city's Democratic administration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.lawofficer.com/neck-hold-used-by-minneapolis-officer-was-approved-by-department-policy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The neck hold used by the Minneapolis cop was approved by the city's [[Democratic party|Democrat administration]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.lawofficer.com/neck-hold-used-by-minneapolis-officer-was-approved-by-department-policy/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  According to the Minneapolis Police Policy Manual, the restraint used was a &amp;quot;Non-deadly force option&amp;quot; and training is given to officers on the maneuver.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/Avjb5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Minneapolis has not elected a [[Republican]] mayor since 1957; all police chiefs entrusted with overseeing police training, conduct, and community relations in six decades have been appointed by Democrat mayors, with the approval of a Democrat majority city council, and elected by Democrat voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[White]] [[Antifa]] [[liberal]]s were identified as smashing windows at an Autozone car parts store and Wendy's restaurant where the violence originated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1265906786541830144&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/vtzsYFs-2Qc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  ''Jacobin'' magazine, described as &amp;quot;the closest thing to a flagship publication of the [[DSA]] left&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=https://weeklyworker.co.uk/worker/1195/walking-the-tightrope/ |title=Walking the Tightrope |last=Creegan |first=Jim |date=22 March 2018 |website=[[Weekly Worker]]|access-date=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; asked, &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;Should we care about the looting of stores like Target and Autozone? ...Should we participate in this ritual condemnation even though our media consistently treats identical acts of property destruction by sports fans as simply revelry and exuberance, and corporate looting of working-class communities as business as usual? No.... until working people of all races unite against capitalists and their repressive apparatus, it is a good thing that bosses, government officials, and the police who protect them are sometimes reminded that black lives matter through a little proletarian fury.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://jacobinmag.com/2020/05/george-floyd-minneapolis-uprising-police-brutality/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:White rioters in George Floyd protests.jpeg|left|350px|thumb|The real “face” of the instigators in Minneapolis. Screenshot from FB video of an Antifa [[black bloc]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/antifa.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who smashed Autozone windows, carrying hammer, trying to sneak away.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/Minneapolis/comments/gs6jwn/the_real_face_of_the_instigators_in_minneapolis/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2646114418996236&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Fires, looting,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://streamable.com/6fouwt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and violence spread to [[St. Paul, Minnesota]] and nationwide from the burning of the Autozone store, Target, and Wendy's. Both the Minneapolis and St. Paul mayors identified the vast majority of arrests of leftwing rioters the first night were from out of state;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.fox9.com/news/twin-cities-mayors-vast-majority-of-violent-rioters-are-from-out-of-state&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; crossing state lines to incite riot is a federal offense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Minnesota]] [[Attorney General]] and former DNC vice chair [[Keith Ellison]] is a proponent of Antifa and political violence&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2018/01/04/keith-ellison-invites-antifa-to-the-party/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who's had a long-running dispute with the Minneapolis police.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.mprnews.org/story/2006/06/22/ellisonprofile&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  According to reports, &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|The crowd that had gathered outside the police precinct was, for the most part, peaceful. White members of Antifa, however, began to attempt to do what they do and begin escalating the situation with violence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before it got anywhere, a black man spoke up and addressed the crowd.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He assured people that they aren’t trying to shut down anyone’s speech, but they weren’t going to allow anyone to start getting violent, understanding that if that started, the black members of the crowd would get the bulk of the response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We’re going to keep our social distance, and we’re not going to allow somebody in the crowd to throw some bulls**t and then we feel the bulk of that,” said the man. “We’re not allowing that no more. That’s the reality of what we’re dealing with right now.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2020/05/28/peaceful-black-protester-shuts-down-antifa-after-they-tried-to-get-violent/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ellison-antifa.jpg|right|175px|thumb|The Antifa Manual calls for [[defunding police]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
Before the night was over, violent revolutionaries burnt down the Minneapolis 3rd precinct police station.  The ''Minneapolis Star-Tribune'' reported that one of the [[Boogaloo Boys]] from [[Texas]] fired into the building with an [[AK 47]]-type weapon shouting, &amp;quot;Justice for George!&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.startribune.com/charges-boogaloo-bois-fired-on-mpls-precinct-shouted-justice-for-floyd/572843802/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The mayor politely asked rioters to wear masks and practice social distancing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2020/05/28/minneapolis-mayor-to-rioters-please-practice-social-distancing-wear-masks/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Minneapolis &amp;quot;boy mayor&amp;quot; [[Jacob Frey]] still did not request [[National Guard]] assistance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://bombardsbodylanguage.com/2020/05/29/body-language-minneapolis-riots-mayor-jacob-frey/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[DFL]] governor [[Tim Walz]] peddled a curious [[conspiracy theory]] that international drug cartels and [[white supremacist]]s were behind the violence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.waynedupree.com/2020/05/mn-gov-mobilizes-national-guard/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[St. Paul]], Minnesota mayor Melvin Carter said that all &amp;quot;protesters&amp;quot; who were arrested the first night in his city were from out of state.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/500268-st-paul-mayor-says-arrested-protesters-were-from-out-of-state&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Mike Griffin, a longtime political activist from Minneapolis, told ''The New York Times'' there were people he never witnessed before demonstrating, including “well-dressed young white men in expensive boots carrying hammers and talking about torching buildings.”&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|“I know protests, I’ve been doing it for 20 years.  People not affiliated with the protests are creating havoc on the streets.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archive.is/QNWOS&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
The Minneapolis Police department warned of “incendiary materials and accelerants” such as water bottles filled with [[gasoline]] found hidden in bushes and neighborhoods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/MinneapolisPD/status/1267306513594494977&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Minneapolis [[veto]]-proof Democratic City Council considered disbanding the police department completely, leaving the citizenry vulnerable to [[lawlessness]] and Socialist thugs.  One councilman said the entire council had been discussing the proposal “to some degree”:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|“Several of us on the council are working on finding out what it would take to disband the Minneapolis Police Department and start fresh with a community-oriented, nonviolent public safety and outreach capacity.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.citypages.com/news/minneapolis-city-council-members-consider-disbanding-the-police/570993291&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Compassionate liberals destroyed a subsidized housing project under construction in the name of [[equality]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20210107233625/https://streamable.com/dxmc0w&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Initial reports estimated Democrats destroyed 220 buildings and 500 businesses, mostly in minority neighborhoods, and $55 million in damages.&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Minneapolis City Council members on Tuesday received an update from the city’s Community Planning &amp;amp; Economic Development department that estimated at least 220 buildings had been damaged, resulting in a minimum of $55 million in costs, though the city was “not yet ready to produce a credible estimate” of the losses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.startribune.com/mayor-frey-seeks-federal-state-aid-for-mpls-as-early-estimate-shows-at-least-55m-in-damages/570984542/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Amy Klobuchar===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Harris Mpls riot.jpeg|right|300px|thumb|Sen. [[Kamala Harris]] solicited bail money for the [[terrorist]]s who burnt down the [[Minneapolis]] Police Station.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Alleged &amp;quot;centrist&amp;quot; [[Amy Klobuchar]], who ranks high on Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden's short list of VP choices, was the Minneapolis Hennepin County prosecutor prior to being elected by the longtime [[communist]] infiltrated [[Democrat Farm Labor]] party senator from Minnesota. Klobuchar handled a case involving the same police officer charged in the death of [[George Floyd]].  When exposed for protecting racist cops, Klobuchar blamed the [[Bill of Rights]] for not indicting the same cop accused of killing George Floyd in the death of another black man in 2006.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nysun.com/editorials/amy-klobuchar-blames-the-bill-of-rights/91150/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier in 2020 the [[NAACP]] and [[Black Lives Matter]] called on Klobuchar to withdraw her presidential bid due to her racist prosecution in a 2003 murder case resulting in a life sentence for an innocent black man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.startribune.com/activists-call-on-amy-klobuchar-to-withdraw-over-2003-murder-case/567397292/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As district attorney, Klobutcher built her career prosecuting a vastly disproportionate number of black youths.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s0W1-ILBT4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Klobuchar's racist views are in keeping with her opposition to [[due process]] rights and her [[anti-constitutionalist]] ideology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With Klobuchar forced out of contention and her appeal to Blacks tainted, the [[liberal media]] re-booted [[Stacey Abrams]] of [[Georgia]] as the top contender for the Number 2 spot.  A much touted Biden/Abrams &amp;quot;dream ticket&amp;quot; had already been peddled &amp;quot;out of the gate&amp;quot; even before Biden announced his candidacy in the Spring of 2019.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.axios.com/2020-presidential-election-joe-biden-stacey-abrams-vp-54472f8f-5bb2-4d1f-bc7c-0544a09ebba5.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Abrams supposedly is  representative the vital Black female vote that Democrats relied upon to win back the [[House of Representatives|House]] in the [[2018 Midterm elections]].  Abrams has proven herself a loyal dogface pony soldier shilling for the [[Democrat plantation]], attacking [[Tara Reade]]'s credibility, with the added bonus of poo-pooing the &amp;quot;Believe All Women&amp;quot; and [[MeToo movement]]s.  Racist Biden's staffers quietly and ironically told journalists behind Abrams back, 'no one takes Stacey seriously'.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2020/05/02/the-powerful-female-democrats-angling-for-biden-administration-hjobs/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Keith Ellison===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Keith Ellison]] was actively opposed by the Minneapolis Police Officers Federation when he ran for Minnesota Attorney General in 2018. Bad blood has existed between the police officer's union and Ellison since the 1990s when Ellison, as a private attorney, defended a gang leader implicated in the public execution of a Minneapolis police officer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theminnesotasun.com/2018/11/04/minneapolis-police-make-final-plea-dont-vote-for-gang-attorney-keith-ellison/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Ellison's sympathy for cop killers has been accentuated by his close association with the leader of [[Portland]]'s notoriously violent, [[homophobic]], and racist Antifa faction.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/YECDzSn7co8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As congressman and Attorney General, Ellison promoted Antifa and political violence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://bigleaguepolitics.com/busted-keith-ellison-photographed-with-portland-antifa-leader-deletes-pro-antifa-tweet/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   Antifa has been designated as a domestic terrorist organization by the [[Department of Homeland Security]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/9/2/1695501/-Homeland-Security-has-named-AntiFA-as-a-domestic-terrorist-organization&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ellison is a former [[Democrat National Committee]] vice chair and congressman who gave up his seat to [[Ilhan Omar]] to run for Minnesota Attorney General.  His son is on the Minneapolis City Council that wants to disband the city's police department.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Attorney General Ellison overcharged the accused police officers, setting up future riots when and if the accused officers are exonerated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/SETEqKnXug4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Newsweek]]'' reported shortly after charges were filed, ''Prosecutors of George Floyd Police Officers Will Struggle to Get Four Convictions''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.newsweek.com/prosecutors-george-floyd-police-officers-will-struggle-get-four-convictions-1509258&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Democratic Socialists of America===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Communism}}&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Democratic Socialists of America]] (DSA) has 600 comrades in the [[Twin Cities]] who work closely with Antifa aligned groups. On May 27, 2020 the Twin Cities DSA issued a call on [[Twitter]] asking comrades for supplies at the same intersection where the Auto Zone was burned to the ground kicking off the nationwide riots. Later that evening the [[Marxist]]s tweeted,&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Twin Cities DSA.PNG|right|3o0px|thumb|DSA call for supplies at the 3rd Precinct police station in Minneapolis which rioters burnt down hours later.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|&amp;quot;Want to help out your comrades protesting at the 3rd precinct?  Here's a good list of much needed supplies.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/TwinCitiesDSA/status/1265774113693372417&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
The folks on the ground attached a list and included medical supplies, plywood for shields, anything else useful for shielding from the cops.  The Minneapolis Police 3rd precinct building was evacuated and burnt down hours later.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.fox9.com/news/rioters-set-minneapolis-police-precinct-on-fire-as-protests-reignite-over-george-floyds-death&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Private cars were then requested. The tweet read,&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|&amp;quot;Another big need: if you have a car, some folks may need a quick ride out of the area.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.facebook.com/TwinCitiesDSA/photos/a.252330275204626/951997051904608/?type=3&amp;amp;theater&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
The Twin Cities DSA Ecosocialists Working Group tweeted to comrades,&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|&amp;quot;Support the ongoing mass [[working-class]] uprising!&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
The daughters of Democrat governor Tim Walz and Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar were two of the insurgents tweeting out strategic intelligence for the communist uprising.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/05/breaking-exclusive-minnesota-governors-daughter-hope-walz-tweeting-intel-violent-looters-rioters-just-like-ilhan-omars-daughter-isra-hirsi/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  On May 28, 2020, after the violence and burning down of law enforcement buildings, the DSA National Political Committee issued a statement in support of the rioters:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|&amp;quot;We the National Political Committee of the Democratic Socialists of America condemn the public execution of George Floyd at the hands of the Minneapolis Police. His murder falls into the deeply entrenched pattern of violence, anti-Blackness, and oppression upheld by policing in this country.... This is [[white supremacy]]... We stand with and share the rage of all of those who are making themselves heard on the streets after years of being suffocated by policing and poverty after years of being looted by corporations landlords and billionaires.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dsausa.org/statements/dsa-condemns-the-public-execution-of-george-floyd/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
On May 30, journalist [[Andy Ngo]] tweeted:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|“We are witnessing glimpses of the full insurrection the [[far-left]] has been working on for decades. Within hours, militant antifa cells across the country mobilized to aid BLM rioters. The first broken window is the blood in the water for looters to move in. The fires come next.”}}&lt;br /&gt;
Ngo later added:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“Media, politicians, public—all of us—have underestimated the training, purpose &amp;amp; capability of left-wing extremists. Every part of the rioting has a purpose. Fires destroy economy. Riots can overwhelm police &amp;amp; even military. All of it leads to a destabilized state if maintained.”}}&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Marxist–Leninist]] and [[Maoist]] theory, a [[United front]] is a [[coalition]] of [[leftist]] organizations that [[collude]] for the purpose of taking over a [[government]]. In the [[116th Congress]], the [[Committees of Correspondence for Democratic Socialism]], Democratic Socialists of America, [[Liberation Road]] (formerly Freedom Road Socialist Organization), and Communist Party of the United States formally created a united front of the nation's four largest Communist organizations to take over the [[Democratic Party]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://m.theepochtimes.com/how-57000-socialists-and-communists-plan-to-take-over-the-democratic-party_2654589.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As of 2018 the umbrella group is known as the  [[Left Inside/Outside Project]] (“One foot in the institutions, one foot in the streets.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dsabuild.org/r9-establishing-a-national-antifascist-and-direct-action-working-group&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) consisted of 57,000 [[community organizer]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://organizingupgrade.com/the-left-we-want/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  At its August 2019 convention the DSA passed a resolution to form a &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“National Working Group to help drive collaboration and resource sharing to support our antifascist organizing.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dsausa.org/2019-convention-a-world-to-win/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Law enforcement authorities found evidence of pre-planning. The ''Minneapolis Star/Tribune'' reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|state officials said several caches of flammable materials were found both in neighborhoods where there have already been fires and “in cars we’ve stopped as recently as this morning,” said John Harrington, state public safety commissioner. Some of the caches look like they may have been planted days ago and some only in the last 24 hours or so, he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Police are also finding stolen vehicles with plates removed that are being used to transport the flammable materials. Looted goods and weapons also have been found in the stolen cars, he said.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.startribune.com/police-arrest-150-driver-who-barreled-into-crowd-held/570908442/?refresh=true&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Sunrise Movement]], with established groups in several major cities, has heavily recruited activists from the DSA and Liberation Road affiliated groups, such as the Pennsylvania Student Power Network.  Sunrise founding activists are all current trainers with Momentum Community, which is a training workshop funded by millionaires and billionaires to “incubate” supposed &amp;quot;[[grassroots]]&amp;quot; organizations such as Sunrise and the Movimiento Cosecha (Harvest Movement).  Democrat millionaire donor and former 2020 presidential election candidate [[Tom Steyer]]'s [[NextGen America]] is also tied to the Sunrise Movement, and according to the ''New York Times'', the two groups “strategize” together.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.fo/ytfYT&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DSA itself as of 2020 has 66,000 members nationwide and locals in almost every state. Other communist groups such as Communist Party USA, Liberation Road, [[Socialist Alternative]], Workers World Party, Party for Socialism and Liberation, [[Socialist Unity Party]], and Revolutionary Communist Party and their allies in Black Lives Matter and [[Antifa]] can mobilize tens of thousands of militants and organizing cadre at short notice.  The American [[Left]] has the power to start race riots in nearly every major U.S. city.  DSA branches in [[Memphis]], [[Los Angeles]], [[Brooklyn]], [[Louisville]], [[Philadelphia]], and [[Richmond]] are raising funds for “George Floyd Uprisings Nationwide.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dsa-la.org/support_floyd_protests_nationwide&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==New York insurgency: Obama subversives toss Molotov cocktails at police==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Obama domestic terrorists.png|right|300px|thumb|[[Soros]]-trained lawyer tosses a Molotov cocktail into a police vehicle. The Progressive terrorist was bailed out of jail by a former [[Obama administration]] intelligence official.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/former-obama-intelligence-official-helps-secure-bail-for-molotov-cocktail-throwing-nyc-lawyer/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[NBC News]] reported that New York's Deputy Commissioner for Intelligence and Counterterrorism said there is a high level of confidence within the New York Police Department (NYPD) that rioters had organized scouts, medics, and supply routes of rocks, bottles and accelerants to commit vandalism and violence. There are strong indicators they planned for violence in advance while using encrypted communications.  NYPD has received intelligence that U-Haul trucks with NJ registrations were aiding looters and vandals by transporting stolen goods and criminal actors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1267877057817698305&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NYPD Commissioner Dermot Shea explained how bricks and water bottles filled with cement had been thrown at NYPD members.  Shea wrote that construction sites in the city have had bricks stolen from them.&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|“Pre-staged bricks are being placed and then transported to ‘peaceful protests,’ which are peaceful protests, but then used by that criminal group within.  We’ve had construction sites burglarized in recent days in Manhattan … during a riot, it’s interesting what was taken – bricks.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/feds-investigating-whether-criminal-actors-exerting-command-and-control-over-unrest-as-bricks-thrown-at-copsM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
''The Daily Mail'' reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|video captured the moment rioters in [[Manhattan]] chanced upon a cache of bricks between St. Marks Place and Seventh Street in the East Village on Sunday evening, though no construction site appeared to be nearby.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8377069/Bricks-randomly-appear-protests-sparking-theories-planted-stoke-violence.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Teams of looters armed with power tools systematically worked together to loot one location after another.  A neighborhood eyewitness stated,&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“Cars would drive up, let off the looters, unload power tools and suitcases and then the cars would drive away.  Then the cars would come back pick them up and then drive off to the next spot. They seemed to know exactly where they were going. Some of the people were local, but there were a lot of out-of-towners.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://6abc.com/nyc-looters-and-vandals-chauffeured-in-cars-had-power-tools-witness/6228327/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
One out of every seven arrests in [[New York City]] were of people from out of state. Those arrested came from [[Massachusetts]], [[Connecticut]], [[Pennsylvania]], [[New Jersey]], [[Iowa]], [[Nevada]], [[Virginia]], [[Maryland]], [[Texas]] and St. Paul, Minnesota. The Police Commissioner estimated at least 20% of arrests were from out of town. Democrat mayor [[Bill de Blasio]]'s daughter was among those arrested along with others for acts of violence.  The counterterrorism deputy commissioner told [[NBC News]],&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;Before the protests began, organizers of certain anarchists groups set out to raise bail money and people who would be responsible to be raising bail money, they set out to recruit medics and medical teams with gear to deploy in anticipation of violent interactions with police. They prepared to commit property damage and directed people who were following them that this should be done selectively and only in wealthier areas or at high-end stores run by corporate entities....[they] developed a complex network of bicycle scouts to move ahead of demonstrators in different directions of where police were and where police were not for purposes of being able to direct groups from the larger group to places where they could commit acts of [[vandalism]] including the torching of police vehicles and [[Molotov cocktail]]s where they thought officers would not be.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/nypds-terrorism-chief-says-unnamed-groups-planned-protest-violence-in-advance/2440722/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[2020 Biden campaign]] staffers and [[Hollywood values|Hollywood celebrities]] were among those providing financing and bail money for arrested terrorists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.lifezette.com/2020/05/hollywood-celebs-and-biden-staff-team-up-to-bail-out-violent-rioters/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Two attorney's, including an [[Ivy League]] corporate lawyer, were charged with after tossing a Molotov cocktail into a police car.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-molotov-nypd-brooklyn-lawyers-charged-20200531-nxamwxnjmzgvzmczi6z2ypcbzi-story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/us/new-york-molotov-cocktail-nypd-van-federal-charges-antifa-brooklyn-riots-floyd&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  An [[Obama]] [[intelligence community|intelligence official]] secured bail over the objections of government prosecutors for the attorney charged with a domestic terror attack on law enforcement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8388125/Obama-era-intelligence-posts-bail-NYC-lawyer-alleged-Molotov-cocktail-Floyd-protest.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In another event, an out-of-town white woman was charged with attempted murder after tossing a Molotov cocktail into a police van with four [[law enforcement]] officers inside.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/nick-arama/2020/06/03/minnesota-finds-incendiary-devices-stashed-in-residential-neighborhoods-this-is-organized-and-its-not-just-minnesota/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three officers were poisoned with bleach while eating at a restaurant.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://headlineswithavoice.com/2020/06/16/public-service-announcement/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Colin Kaepernick]]'s paymaster's, [[Nike shoes]], were looted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200926231642/https://streamable.com/6sdcb3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A one year old Black toddler was murdered while sitting in a stroller during the BLM violence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/ny-baby-fatally-shot-stroller-brooklyn-park-cookout-20200713-hso2fb63r5bsjebq7ltp2ki5gu-story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==DC riots: Socialist burn churches, deface Lincoln memorial and Memorial to WWII anti-fascists==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Antifa church burners.png|right|300px|thumb|Antifa church burners set fire to the historic St. John's Church where [[Abraham Lincoln]] prayed during the [[Civil War]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.christianpost.com/news/historic-st-johns-episcopal-church-set-on-fire.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
On the evening of June 1, 2020 the United States Park Police encountered violent protestors throwing bricks, frozen water bottles and caustic liquids.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/WG8B8kGDLpc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The protestors climbed onto a historic building at the north end of Lafayette Park that was destroyed by arson days prior. Intelligence had revealed calls for violence against the police, and officers found caches of glass bottles, baseball bats and metal poles hidden along the street.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nps.gov/subjects/uspp/6_2_20_statement_from_acting_chief_monahan.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberal white protesters obstructed [[Washington, D.C.]] police as rioters attempted to storm the [[White House]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/z7--xbI08lQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and ransacked the [[Treasury Department]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3WNqL7_W_w&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Rioters breached the Treasury Department building and the White House was put under a brief lockdown.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-rioters-breach-treasury-department-in-washington-d-c&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A gang of white liberals vandalize emergency vehicles outside [[White House]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/ZntBe29UXSI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/ABC7Kevin/status/1266842420874010625&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The liberal mob defaced the [[Lincoln Memorial]] where Martin Luther King gave his &amp;quot;I Have a Dream&amp;quot; speech,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://amgreatness.com/2020/06/01/antifa-rioters-deface-world-war-ii-and-lincoln-memorials-on-national-mall/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
the memorial to 16 million soldiers who fought and defeated [[fascism]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/do-black-vets-count-lincoln-and-wwii-memorial-among-dc-landmarks-vandalized-during-riots&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and memorial to 100 million victims of [[Communism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.facebook.com/victimsofcommunism/posts/3212803305438891&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Two crates filled with pipe bombs were discovered near Korean War Memorial.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://bigleaguepolitics.com/report-crates-filled-with-pipe-bombs-discovered-near-korean-war-memorial-authorities-pursuing-suspect/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
The lobby, entrance area and the front offices of the [[AFL-CIO]] headquarters a block from the White House grounds were left in shambles.  Antifa church burners set fire to the historic St. John's Church on Lafayette Square across from the White House.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://video.foxnews.com/v/6160734355001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Liberal rioters attacked the White House injuring more than 60 [[Secret Service]] agents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://gellerreport.com/2020/05/dc-antifia-terror.html/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Investigators feared leftists using car bombs to kill innocent people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dennismichaellynch.com/dmBlack%20Pidgeonl-morning-briefing-june-1/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Spectator USA'' reported on the damage Democrat church burners did in the nation's capital:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Biden 2020.png|right|350px|thumb|The Chaldean Catholic Cathedral in El Cajon, California was defaced with [[swastika]]s, [[Biden 2020]], upside down crosses and [[BLM]] imagery.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/chaldean-catholic-cathedral-vandalized-in-san-diego-with-white-power-blm-and-swastikas-29343]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|over 100 police showed up last night but essentially did nothing to stop the looting. Their passivity is extraordinary. The idea seems to be that it’s better to allow the looting than to prevent it. It’s an odd mindset: the criminal gets to set the terms of the encounter.&lt;br /&gt;
Downtown Washington resembles a war zone rather than the nation’s capital. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lafayette Square, right across from the White House, is a disgusting mess. The protestations of the protesters extended to defacing statues of the likes of Polish [[Tadeusz Kosciuszko|Col. Andrzej Tadeusz Bonawentura Kosciuszko]] who fought in the [[American Revolutionary War]] in the [[Continental Army]]. The ubiquitous ‘f*** 12’ was sprayed in black on the plinth. Rather rough treatment, I should think, for a [[Polish]] [[freedom fighter]] against the Russians who also directed in his will that the proceeds of his American estate be used to procure the freedom of American [[slave]]s, including ones that his friend [[Thomas Jefferson]] owned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the acrid stench of smoke lingered in the air from a fire at the venerable St John’s Church, I strolled over to the middle of the park to look at a Secret Service structure that was covered with such pearls of wisdom as ‘F*** AmericaKKKa’. Buildings, including the [[Department of Veterans Affairs]], had smashed windows. The old standby, ‘eat the rich’, was sprayed near the Bombay Club. Clean-up crews were everywhere, performing the laborious task of effacing, as far as possible, the slogans that had been scribbled to liberate America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://spectator.us/washington-war-zone-vandalism-protests/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Progressive rioters looted pharmacies for controlled substances.  National Guardsmen found broken glass baked into a pizza they ordered.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2020/06/12/national-guardsmen-found-glass-in-pizza-they-ordered-in-dc/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  By mid June, year-to-date homicide numbers were 13 percent higher than the year prior. Nevertheless, the District PD is slated to be defunded by more than $15 million.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Atlanta: Black Lives Matter murders 8 year old Black girl==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Occupy Wall Street}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:CNN racist.jpeg|right|300px|thumb|Consistent with their racist editorial policy, CNN built a wall to keep unwanted intruders out.]] &lt;br /&gt;
And 8-year-old girl was murdered by Black Lives Matter protesters when they shot into a car in the violent aftermath.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dcdirtylaundry.com/black-lives-matter-upgrades-rules-of-engagement-roe-to-shoot-people-in-vehicles-protester-shoots-unarmed-elderly-man-in-a-vehicle-chaz-security-opens-f/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cbs46.com/news/shooting-leaves-8-year-old-girl-dead-on-university-avenue-police-investigate/article_3de6674c-be41-11ea-8e33-2b7eacb8bee8.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A day later, Black Lives Matter murdered a Black man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/atlanta-triple-shooting-leaves-one-dead-scene-fatal-shooting-8-year-old-black-girl-parents-cry-black-lives-matter-killed/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Protesters&amp;quot; took over the [[CNN]] headquarters in Atlanta.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/GwMxzWqh5q4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rapper #KillerMike delivered a message to CNN:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|Stop feeding fear and anger every day. Stop making people feel so fearful. Give them hope!&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/media/rapper-killer-mike-pleads-to-cnn-stop-feeding-fear-and-anger-everyday&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
A rift has developed between peaceful [[Black Lives Matter]] protesters and the violent white liberal domestic terrorist organization, Antifa and other similar groups.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/08/21/antifa-thug-attacks-black-lives-matter-member-in-dallas&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2020/05/28/peaceful-black-protester-shuts-down-antifa-after-they-tried-to-get-violent/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Antifa]] Manual specifically instructs members to target Black Lives Matter and immigrant rights groups for subversive infiltration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTwitterFeed/comments/gul0yk/jackposobiec_the_antifa_manual_specifically/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  White liberal [[anarchist]]s and [[socialist]]s from the Antifa terrorist organization piggy-back on peaceful [[civil rights]] protests, acting as the  [[provocateur]]s of violence.  This occurs in cities throughout the United States.  Consequently, Blacks as a whole are blamed for rioting, looting, and violence. Then Blacks are reminded by the [[Democrat plantation]] establishment, &amp;quot;if you don't vote Democrat, you ain't Black&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metro Atlanta [[DSA]] was involved in the [[lawlessness]].  Dozens of cars were burnt and destroyed near CNN headquarters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200926231645/https://streamable.com/ubjohz&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Two black police officers were fired for tazzing a white riot protester.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dmlnewsapp.com/video-attorney-fired-police-officers-says-bodycam-footage-incident-edited-multiple-times/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In what can only be described as &amp;quot;institutional white flight&amp;quot;, CNN's parent company Time Warner announced in the following days its intention to bail on the property and move their subversive communist propaganda headquarters to a civilized environment after having accomplished their objective of creating poverty and misery for the oppressed Black people of Atlanta.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When a drunk driver attempted to taze police with a stolen weapon and was shot and killed at a ''Wendy's'' restaurant, a communist white woman tried to burn down the Wendy's.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/VlSi2MT3Xgk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.citizenfreepress.com/column-1/breaking-video-atlanta-wendys-set-on-fire-by-rioters/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The rioters then turned on CNN cameramen.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thepoliticalinsider.com/video-shows-atlanta-rioters-attacking-cnn-crew-outside-of-wendys-where-rayshard-brooks-was-shot/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Video footage from the police bodycam and a nearby witness makes it clear that Brooks resisted arrest after failing a breathalyzer test when police approached him sleeping in his car at a Wendy's parking lot, punching an officer and taking a taser the police had attempted to use on him before trying to flee the scene. Video footage from the parking lot makes it clear that Brooks was running away, and, without ceasing to run, pointed the taser at police behind him, at which point he was shot twice in the back by an officer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And 8-year-old girl was murdered by Black Lives Matter protesters when they shot into a car in the violent aftermath.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dcdirtylaundry.com/black-lives-matter-upgrades-rules-of-engagement-roe-to-shoot-people-in-vehicles-protester-shoots-unarmed-elderly-man-in-a-vehicle-chaz-security-opens-f/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cbs46.com/news/shooting-leaves-8-year-old-girl-dead-on-university-avenue-police-investigate/article_3de6674c-be41-11ea-8e33-2b7eacb8bee8.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fulton County prosecutor [[Paul Howard]], a 28-year [[incumbent]], was presently under investigation for taking bribes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/fulton-county-da-faces-election-runoff-battle-while-under-state-investigation/7ACT6BS25ZBCLHOOPT6C36I644/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Nine days earlier Howard finished second in a [[primary election]] and forced into a runoff election. Howard then filed felony murder charges against the officer involved in the shooting. Atlanta police walked off the job leaving citizens undefended from criminals and furthering the objectives of the [[Democratic National Committee]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/policy/what-does-defund-the-police-mean-depends-which-democrat-you-ask/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Georgia Bureau of Investigation was never consulted before the charging and had not completed its investigation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2020/06/18/georgia-investigation-bureau-not-consulted-charges-da-brooks-rolfe/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailywire.com/news/atlanta-police-continuing-to-call-out-sick-over-d-a-s-decision-to-charge-police-officer&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wrdw.com/content/news/Atlanta-police-says-dont-worry-about-the-Blue-Flu-Atlanta-mayor-calls-for-officers-to-honor-community-571333811.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The next day 25 police officers called in sick on in Zone 5, which was every cop scheduled to work.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.11alive.com/article/news/local/protests/officer-sickout-blue-flu-third-day-atlanta/85-515886b4-7241-4320-8db3-e257fb2754a5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The criminals owned the night.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/06/22/mayhem-reigns-as-blue-flu-spreads-in-atlanta-wild-gun-battle-breaks-out-in-streets-937589&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Capital Hill Autonomous Zone==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Main|CHAZ}}&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Seattle]] DSA provided logistical support to rioters. Police surrendered the East Precinct to armed [[far leftist]]s, and a 7 block radius declared &amp;quot;Autonomous Zone&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/2RF_HqelHVU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Socialists employ Stop and Frisk and [[extortion|extort]] money from residents for protection.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Occupied-seattle-1.jpg|right|350px|thumb|[[Marxist]] insurrectionists set up check points and border walls in Occupied Seattle. Residents were [[extortion|extorted]] and forced to pay protection money.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Antifa]] terrorists declared the [[Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone]] (CHAZ), established border walls and checkpoints, took [[hostage]]s,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/XMxR3ciTyRM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; discriminated against [[illegal alien]]s, and engaged in police brutality against innocent protesters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://bearingarms.com/tom-k/2020/06/11/first-case-police-brutality/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20210415201422/https://gofile.io/d/IffAr1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Antifa paramilitants seized land without the consent of the native inhabitants and [[colonized]] a seven-block radius in east Seattle, illegally imposing Stop and Frisk harassment and restrictions on residents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.facebook.com/officialbenshapiro/posts/3801648196539248&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Not since the Paris Commune has a libertarian anarchist state been declared in [[the West]].  Others compared it to an [[ISIS]]-style insurrectionist state.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2020/06/09/antifa-militants-seize-seattle-police-hq-set-up-autonomous-zone-n512621&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a prolonged siege the Seattle Police Department abandoned its East Precinct building.  In a private message to the department, Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best passed the buck upstairs:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|“You fought for days to protect it. I asked you to stand on that line day in and day out, to be pelted with projectiles, to be screamed at, threatened, and in some cases hurt. Then to have a change of course nearly two weeks in — it seems like an insult on our community.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.capitolhillseattle.com/2020/06/seattle-police-chief-speaks-out-on-chaz-leaving-the-precinct-was-not-my-decision/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Several hundred demonstrators, led by Seattle City Council [[Socialist Alternative]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Socialist Alternative is a [[Trotsky]]ite organization.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Kshama Sawant, occupied City Hall calling for the resignation of Democrat mayor [[Jenny Durkan]] and the [[defund the police|defunding of the Seattle Police Department]] after a march from the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone.  Sawant was backed by [[Democratic Socialists of America]] (DSA).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://keywiki.org/File:Zshama.PNG&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The DSA provided logistical support for the [[riot]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-communist-origins-of-the-antifa-extremist-group_2282816.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Sawant called for the importance of Black LGBTQIA+ women and other issues.  At City Hall another speaker decried Sawant's co-opting of the movement to push her own agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“Please stop using [[Black Lives Matter]] for your political campaigns....I’m really sorry, I want to tax [[Amazon.com|Amazon]] too, I want to do all these things too, but this is not a movement for you to be politically active, for you to be [[politically correct]], and for you to gain all these votes. Please stop taking advantage of us.”}}&lt;br /&gt;
The speaker noted the whiteness of many speakers at recent protests. Protesters left City Hall chanting &amp;quot;Defund SPD&amp;quot; and headed back to the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone, where protesters watched ''13th'', a documentary on the [[The New Jim Crow]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A two-hour rally of an estimated 2,000 protesters gathered in the rain for a community meeting hosted by Sawant.  &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“What we’ve defeated here is the political establishment of this city....You can never have zero police and an elimination of racism and oppression on the basis of capitalism.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
A 30-point list of demands was published.  “We demand the de-gentrification of Seattle, starting with rent control,&amp;quot; etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Community members were subjected to barricades set up by the protesters with some armed individuals running them as checkpoints in the neighborhood, a police spokesman said. “While they have a constitutionally protected right to bear arms there is no legal right for those arms to be used to intimidate community members.”  Residents described a small number of people armed with rifles who have been seen serving as guards.  Many businesses and residential buildings in the so-called CHAZ hired private security staff.  The entire area was lawless, and residents were left to fend for themselves.  A social media posting from inside the illegally occupied territory read,&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;Due to the police not being able to respond for fear of reprisal and the shear amount of police resources required that makes it possible to have any presents in our area, residents needed to have an emergency plan that does not involve 911. Whether it is contacting friends, family or driving someone or yourself to the emergency room. You can still call 911 for help with planning and dealing with emergencies, but they may ask that you attempt to make your way to one of their other locations or possibly deal with a significant delayed response.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.capitolhillseattle.com/2020/06/sawant-and-protesters-briefly-occupy-seattle-city-hall-as-capitol-hill-autonomous-zone-grows/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Democrat riots.png|right|300px|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
Civil disorder and [[vigilante]] [[justice]] erupted over a [[property]] rights dispute when a socialist stole an iPhone from a resident they claimed was &amp;quot;unwilling&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;share the wealth&amp;quot;.  911 calls reporting violence and [[sexual assault|sex crime]]s increased 300% in four days in the area which Durkan seceded the area to terrorists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nationalfile.com/police-911-calls-for-violent-and-sex-crimes-triples-in-seattle-autonomous-zone/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Durkan illegally ordered the police to stand down and provided material support to the terrorists,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/06/seattle-officials-deliver-porta-potties-support-antifa-mayor-defends-autonomous-zone-chaz-not-lawless-wasteland-anarchist-insurrection/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; calling them &amp;quot;patriotic.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
The Occupied Seattle Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone offered no social and mental health care for victims of the occupation.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One resident, called Brandon, described daily life in the CHAZ as being &amp;quot;scared every day of my life&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Daily Caller Interview of CHAZ Resident&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://dailycaller.com/2020/06/13/exclusive-seattle-resident-life-border-capitol-hill-autonomous-zone-chaz/ Link text], As mentioned before, nights in CHAZ are where the crime usually happens:.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;I’m scared. I’ve been scared every day since Sunday, and I haven’t gotten a lot of sleep. For the first time in my life in Capitol Hill, I hear gunshots every single night. I’ve heard people screaming every single night outside. And they’re not protest screams … I’ve also heard screams of terror out there, and I don’t know what’s happening out there.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Daily Caller Interview of CHAZ Resident&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://dailycaller.com/2020/06/13/exclusive-seattle-resident-life-border-capitol-hill-autonomous-zone-chaz/ Link text], As mentioned before, nights in CHAZ are where the crime usually happens:.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[BLM]] and Antifa racists set fires at the Seattle juvenile detention facility. 21 police officers were injured.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/07/26/seattle-police-declare-protests-a-riot-after-fires-erupt-21-cops-injured-youth-center-set-ablaze-951572&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Seattle Chief of Police warned citizens that the police could not protect them after the [[Democrat]] city council [[politburo]] defunded [[riot]]-control measures.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/seattle-police-chief-warns-city-cops-unable-protect-property-antifa-blm-riots-thanks-city-council-barring-crowd-control-tools/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portland Antifa riots==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Leftwing violence in the Trump era}}&lt;br /&gt;
Antifa broke into the [[Portland, Oregon]] Justice Center,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20201222113346/https://streamable.com/1j6fof&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; housing the central police precinct and the sheriff's office, and set a room on fire with occupants still inside the building.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200926231644/https://streamable.com/avcfq0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A man carrying an American flag was beaten by white Antifa terrorists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/hpVj4658Zvc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Small businesses were vandalized and looted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20201222113330/https://streamable.com/bfs08c&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200926231653/https://streamable.com/adfxxt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Stolen cars were driven into stores.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200926231648/https://streamable.com/o1w92j&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A Chase Bank branch was attacked&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200904195247/https://streamable.com/o1wtom&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and set on fire.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200926231647/https://streamable.com/nanakz&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Virtually all offenders in these incidents were white.  Antifa terrorists attempted to blind police with laser lights.  Communist protesters tore down a statue of [[Thomas Jefferson]], author of &amp;quot;all men are created equal.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.kptv.com/news/demonstrators-pull-down-thomas-jefferson-statue-in-front-of-portland-high-school/article_73436e00-aecc-11ea-9077-d733d2846650.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Antifa terrorists toppled the [[George Washington]] statue. Washington is commonly referred to as the &amp;quot;father of the nation.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/_fgK3a2JDN0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Antifa wildfires.png|thumb|left|350px|Despite the [[lamestream media]] insisting that wildfires that occurred in the West Coast were due to &amp;quot;[[global warming]]&amp;quot;, this [[CNN]] headline admits otherwise that conservatives were right about arsonists.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Portland has been the hotbed of [[subversive]] [[Anti-American]] communist and [[anti-Trump]] activity since 2017.  More than 100 fires were set in and around downtown.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pamplinmedia.com/pt/9-news/470191-380568-nearly-100-arson-fires-in-portland-under-investigation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After the Minneapolis George Floyd riot, Portland was under siege by leftwing white supremacists nightly for over a month.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/WXnT7Iolmt8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  More than 100 people were injured and over $20 million in damages.  Marxist Democrat mayor [[Ted Wheeler]] ordered the police to stand down during the riots/protests.  Oregon Democrat governor [[Kate Brown]] did absolutely nothing to stop the violence.  Oregon Democrat [[Attorney General]] Ellen Rosenblum sued the [[Trump administration]] on behalf of the [[riot]]ers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/oregon-attorney-general-loses-court-motion-restrain-feds-stopping-rioters-portland/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A white Antifa racist, Blake David Hampe, stabbed a [[gay]] [[Black]] Trump supporter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20201206121448/https://twitter.com/SpaceForceUSA_&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Hampe the assailant, a leftwing racist and [[homophobe]], previously was convicted of child pornography.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://bigleaguepolitics.com/antifa-terrorist-accused-of-stabbing-trump-supporter-had-once-been-indicted-for-child-porn/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Antifa [[white supremacist]] stalked and menaced the Black man for several blocks before the stabbing. The victim believes that ANTIFA fascists doxxed his identity and posted his location on social media before he was stabbed.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Racist Democrats.jpeg|right|350px|thumb|[[Progressive]] defaced the Monument to the all-volunteer Black 54th Massachusetts Regiment of Union Soldiers in the [[Civil War]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/06/02/rioters-deface-glory-monument-to-black-civil-war-soldiers-boston-54th/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boston: Leftwing racists deface Black Civil War monument==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Boston]], [[Progressive]]s defaced the 54th Regiment Memorial to black soldiers in the [[Civil War]] as Antifa protests moved through the city.  A website dedicated to the memorial, which stands at the top of a hill on the Boston Common, explains:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox-float|The most acclaimed piece of sculpture on Boston Common is the Robert Gould Shaw and Massachusetts 54th Regiment Memorial by Augustus Saint-Gaudens; a memorial to that group of men who were among the first African Americans to fight in the Civil War. The monument portrays Shaw and his men marching down Beacon Street past the State House on May 28, 1863 as they left Boston on their way to South Carolina, Shaw erect on his horse, the men marching alongside.}}&lt;br /&gt;
The monument, which commemorates black lives dedicated and sacrificed to the struggle against slavery, was defaced with profane anti-police graffiti, as well as tributes to [[George Floyd]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.westernjournal.com/rioters-deface-monument-black-civil-war-veterans-served-union/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The story of the 54th was immortalized in the Hollywood movie ''Glory'', for which [[Denzel Washington]] received the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Anchor|Patrick Underwood}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Underwood.PNG|right|350px|thumb|Federal Security Police officer Patrick Underwood was murdered by Antifa terrorists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.lifezette.com/2020/06/police-officers-all-over-the-country-targeted-for-murder-by-antifa-rioters/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Virgin Mary]] statue outsideof a church was set on fire.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/virgin-mary-statue-set-on-fire-outside-boston-church/2158037/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Oakland: Socialists murder Black policeman==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bay Area Democrats rioted in [[Oakland]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://calwatchdog.com/2013/12/18/actually-jim-jones-cult-was-bay-area-democrats/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; California.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQq1Kv2UNpo&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Nearly 10,000 people took to the streets of the California community, looting stores like Target and Walgreens,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200926231651/https://streamable.com/y9s4x9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and setting fire to a Chase bank.  A Black officer from the [[Department of Homeland Security]] was [[murder]]ed and another officer shot.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/east-bay/one-of-two-federal-officers-shot-friday-night-dies-from-injuries/2299729/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2020/05/30/federal-police-officer-shot-dead-another-injured-in-oakland/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf ordered a [[hate crime]] investigation after Oakland Police identified five ropes they described as “nooses” hanging from trees at Lake Merrit, with the city government apparently believing that the ropes were akin to racial intimidation tactics and allusions to [[lynching]]s carried out by groups such as the Ku Klux Klan.  The FBI was called in support of the investigation.  A black man stepped forward stating that he and some of his friends installed the rope and small nooses merely for use as swings and exercise equipment. The nooses were used to attach a makeshift swing. “It’s unfortunate that a genuine gesture of just wanting to create a good time got misinterpreted,&amp;quot; stating that he couldn't see how anyone would view the small ropes as a hangman's noose.  The Democrat mayor however, refused to accept the word of a Black man and continued to claim the findings are indicative of a hate crime and continued the [[witchhunt]] for white supremacists invading Oakland.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://bigleaguepolitics.com/racial-panic-erupts-in-oakland-over-nooses-that-were-actually-exercise-equipment/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Beloved-st-louis-police-captain-killed-amid-unrest.jpg|right|250px|thumb|Retired St. Louis Police Captain David Dorn was murdered by socialist [[revolution]]aries during the [[Marxist]] uprising.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://canadafreepress.com/article/george-floyd-riots-antifas-marxist-anti-cop-skulduggery&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==St. Louis: Socialists murder retired Black police captain==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Progressive rioters murdered 77 year old retired Black Police Captain [[David Dorn]] working as a private security guard.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jun/2/donald-trump-pays-tribute-david-dorn-retired-st-lo/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The shooting and theft was posted on [[Facebook]] Live.  Dorn served on the [[St. Louis]] police force for 38 years. Dorn’ s personality was described as “bigger than life...a fun guy, a happy guy....He wanted them to do the right thing all the time.&amp;quot;  The Ethical Society of Police, which represents black officers in St. Louis, said in a news release that Dorn was “the type of brother that would’ve given his life to save them if he had to.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://news.immitate.com/2020/06/03/beloved-st-louis-police-captain-killed-amid-unrest/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Neighborhoods were set on fire.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200926231644/https://streamable.com/8lnd7v&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros funded St. Louis Circuit Attorney [[Kim Gardner]], the city's prosecutor, said she would investigate a white couple for having the audacity to protect their home from violent Black Lives Matter thugs who tore down a gate and stormed their property.  Gardner issued a search warrant to confiscate the firearms the couple used to defend themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other cities - Antifa's Summer of Love==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|2020 Democratic party issues|Democrat urban issues|Kenosha riots}}&lt;br /&gt;
The Socialists paid particular attention to the destruction of several [[New Deal]] projects, such as [[Lincoln Memorial]] or the [[Teddy Roosevelt]] statue in front of the Museum of Natural History in New York. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Guardhouse in front of the White House was set on fire.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200926231647/https://streamable.com/vfopia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2020_leftist_insurrection.png|right|300px|thumb|Year-over-year increase in the Murder Rate in Democrat run cities during the 2020 [[U.S. Color Revolution]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Columbus]], Ohio: The State capital building was attacked and ransacked by anti-democratic Marxist forces.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20201225053839/https://streamable.com/k13b3l&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nashville]]: The mayor urged protesters to join him in a rally downtown; the attendees burnt down the courthouse.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/05/nashville-mayor-urges-people-join-black-lives-matter-protest-saturday-leftist-mob-torches-city-hall-nashville-courthouse-video/?utm_source=Twitter&amp;amp;utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Las Vegas]]: A Police Officer shot during the Democrat riots is paralyzed from the neck down –and can't speak.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thepoliticalinsider.com/las-vegas-police-officer-shot-during-riot-is-paralyzed-from-the-neck-down-cant-speak/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dallas]]: A huge pallet of bricks was found just outside of a Dallas court house. There was no construction going on in the area.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/ShoreProgress/status/1266687820984451073&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/06/01/15/29081824-8376737-image-a-22_1591023422698.jpg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A pharmacy was looted and destroyed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200904195254/https://streamable.com/fl7e5z&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  White people smashed windows.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200926231653/https://streamable.com/hn1qng&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Baltimore]]: Law enforcement officials found “mounds of bricks and bottles” that had been staged in downtown Baltimore.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/mounds-of-bricks-bottles-found-in-baltimore-ahead-of-expected-george-floyd-unrest/ar-BB14TxmI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Fayetteville, [[North Carolina]]: Stacks of bricks found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/64hunblock/status/1266914365355315200&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8377069/Bricks-randomly-appear-protests-sparking-theories-planted-stoke-violence.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kansas City]]: Police announced they found “stashes of bricks and rocks in &amp;amp; around the Plaza and Westport to be used during a riot”. The ''[[Daily Caller]]'' reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|Kansas City police officers found bricks and rocks staged near protest sites around the city, stoking concerns that individuals or groups had pre-planned looting and destruction that hit the city over the weekend, the department said Sunday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We have learned of &amp;amp; discovered stashes of bricks and rocks in &amp;amp; around the Plaza and Westport to be used during a riot,” the department said in a tweet on Sunday.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2020/06/01/kansas-city-bricks-george-floyd-retail-riots/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Alamosa shooting3.png|right|200px|thumb|BLM terrorist James Edward Marshall IV, an attorney, shot an innocent pick-up driver at a stop light in Alamosa, Colorado.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://coloradosun.com/2020/06/28/black-lives-matter-shooting-alamosa-colorado/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Los Angeles]]: Crates of bricks were left at a bus stop on Ventura Blvd.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/Lkeb-rDwtgw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Leftist rioters beat up a cop&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/05/leftist-mob-beats-police-officer-street-la-officer-mobbed-rescued-good-samaritan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and burnt a police vehicle.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200904195238/https://streamable.com/61mdlo&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The city's Democrat mayor Eric Garcetti cut funding for the police department by $250 million.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/DcGSvEl44ow&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  LAPD reported that during the week of May 31 to Jun 6 homicides went up 250% and victims shot went up 56% compared to the previous week.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/LAPDHQ/status/1270441223753396224&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A Black Lives Matter organizer attempted to murder two Trump supports by ramming them with her vehicle.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8777035/Shocking-moment-BLM-organizer-plows-car-crowd-Trump-supporters.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Alamosa, [[Colorado]]: Black Lives Matter shoot driver in the head at a stop light.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://krdo.com/news/2020/06/06/video-shows-moments-surrounding-alamosa-protest-shooting/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Provo, Utah]]: Blacks Lives Matter shoot driver at a stop light.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.rt.com/usa/493416-utah-protesters-shoot-vehicle/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Cottonwood Heights, Utah: Democrats arrested for assaulting police.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/XTwyuvYQH94&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NPR]] claims that people resisting Socialism will try to run barricades.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/ian_mckelvey/status/1274874461511127041&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Black Lives Matter upgraded its Rules of Engagement (ROE) to “shoot people in vehicles”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dcdirtylaundry.com/black-lives-matter-upgrades-rules-of-engagement-roe-to-shoot-people-in-vehicles-protester-shoots-unarmed-elderly-man-in-a-vehicle-chaz-security-opens-f/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CHOP]]: Two Blacks murdered by Black Lives Matter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/06/30/volunteer-medic-in-seattles-autonomous-zone-says-chop-security-shot-at-black-teen-killed-in-mondays-shooting/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2020/06/30/seattle-police-chief-blasts-chop-two-men-are-dead-enough-is-enough/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Redlands, California: [[Amazon.com|Amazon]] warehouse burnt down.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2020/06/05/hmmm-an-amazon-warehouse-is-burned-to-the-ground-in-la-n498384&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Asheville, North Carolina: Insurrectionists attempt to create a [[No Go Zone]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2020/06/13/how-its-done-asheville-nc-protesters-attempt-an-autonomous-zone-police-immediately-dismantle-it-watch/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Chicago]]: On May 31, 2020 Chicago saw its deadliest day in at least 60 years (records only go back to 1961), with 18 killings in a 24-hour period. Over the [[Memorial Day]] holiday - 85 people were shot and 24 killed, according to the University of Chicago Crime Lab.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52984535&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Democrat Mayor [[Lori Lightfoot]] said that day the city's 911 emergency call centre received 65,000 calls - 50,000 more than on an average day.  White rioters assaulted a police woman.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200531072423if_/https://twitter.com/silver_report/status/1266551798057316364&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Lightfoot acknowledged “an organized effort”.  ''Chicago Business reported Lightfoot as saying,&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“There is no doubt. This was an organized effort last night,” she said. “There were clearly efforts to subvert the peaceful process and make it into something violent.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.chicagobusiness.com/greg-hinz-politics/there-no-doubt-was-organized-effort&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John Sullivan Utah.jpg|left|350px|thumb|At left, BLM terrorist fires into a car in Provo, Utah; at right with his back to the camera is [[John Sullivan]], organizer of the January 6, 2021 Capitol Hill riot.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1349577218146635776&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.trendsmap.com/twitter/tweet/1349577218146635776&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
:A racist black woman objected to [[Arab]]s defending their [[property]] with [[AK-47]]s &amp;quot;if we decided to loot it&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2020/06/09/chicago-woman-goes-ballistic-because-shop-owners-with-guns-prevent-her-from-looting/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Chicago Alderman Raymond Lopez, a frequent critic of Lightfoot and her leftist policies, asked Lightfoot,  &amp;quot;Once they’re done looting and rioting, and whatever’s going to happen tonight, God help us, what happens when they start going after residents? Going into the neighborhoods? Once they start trying to break down people’s doors if they think they’ve got something,&amp;quot; noting that there were “gang-bangers with AK-47s walking around right now, just waiting to settle some scores.&amp;quot; When Lightfoot did not respond, Lopez added, &amp;quot;It’s not something you ignore. This is a question that I have.&amp;quot;  Lightfoot dismissively responded, &amp;quot;I think you’re 100% full of sh**, is what I think.&amp;quot; Lopez then angrily told Lightfoot off as he shot back, &amp;quot;No offense — F*** you, then. Who are you to tell me I’m full of sh**? Maybe you should come out and see what’s going on.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/06/08/chicago-mayor-lori-lightfoot-in-expletive-filled-fight-with-alderman-over-black-lives-matter-riots/ Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot In Expletive-Filled Fight with Alderman over Black Lives Matter Riots] at Breitbart News Network ('''Warning:''' Contains foul language)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The call was recorded.  One alderman could be heard weeping while others angrily decried what was going on in the city. &amp;quot;My ward is a sh** show,&amp;quot; one alderman says. &amp;quot;They are shooting at the police.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://news.wttw.com/2020/06/05/what-are-we-going-have-left-our-community-aldermen-react-panic-sorrow-unrest&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  On July 17, 2020, BLM and Antifa rioters assaulted police with bricks, rocks, sticks, bottles, and fireworks.  The police, most of whom  had no helmets, were  defending a monument.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/nick-arama/2020/07/17/dozens-of-blm-and-antifa-full-on-attack-police-in-chicago-police-reinforcements-make-them-regret-it/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the month of July 2020 alone there were 105 homicides compared to 44 the previous July.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://apnews.com/5a4b1f1cde30f26bd1a9dcd6f2390d83&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*St. Petersburg, [[Florida]]: ''Tampa Bay Times'' reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|officers at about 12:16 a.m. found a container of gasoline, bricks and “materials used to assemble crude incendiary devices commonly known as a ‘Molotov cocktail’” inside a red Mitsubishi Outlander parked on Central Avenue, near the police department at 1301 First Ave. N, according to arrest reports.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.tampabay.com/news/crime/2020/06/02/three-arrested-at-st-pete-protest-had-materials-for-molotov-cocktail-police-say/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tom Carpenter.jpeg|right|300px|thumb|Sen. Tim Carpenter was assaulted and left for dead by [[homophobic]] Black Lives Matter protesters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2020/06/25/wisconsin-gay-democrat-state-senator-violence-attack-tim-carpenter-black-lives-matter/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Alhambra, California: Police find razor blade in restaurant take-out food.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ktla.com/news/local-news/police-find-metal-blade-in-food-from-alhambra-restaurant/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Northern [[California]]: 70 looters descended upon a car dealership simultaneously and stole 70 vehicles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/auto/more-than-70-cars-stolen-from-dealership-amid-looting-in-northern-california&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Davenport, [[Iowa]]: Democrat protester murdered another protester.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1267670598127357952&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Columbus, [[Ohio]]: Police seized a bus supplying riot equipment, bats, rocks, meat cleavers, axes, clubs &amp;amp; other projectiles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/Columbus/comments/gutj0l/this_bus_was_stopped_yesterday_at_broad_st_3rd/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Buffalo, New York]]: Progressives targeted police and ran over an officer with a vehicle.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/KEEMSTAR/status/1267654257014161409&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Buffalo City Councilman Rasheed N.C. Wyatt livestreamed a call for rioters to loot and destroy communities that aren't their own.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/06/watch-new-york-politician-livestreams-call-rioters-loot-communities-arent/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A crowd of over 1.000 people gathered at Buffalo City Hall,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=May 30, 2020 |title=Protest in Buffalo leads to State of Emergency |url=https://wben.radio.com/articles/protest-in-buffalo-leads-to-state-of-emergency |access-date= |website=WBEN 930am |language=en}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the federal courthouse. Violence escalated. The Erie County Executive issued a state of emergency and curfew.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |date=May 30, 2020 |title=Watch now: Poloncarz declares state of emergency, curfew in Buffalo as protests spread |url=https://buffalonews.com/2020/05/30/hundreds-gather-in-niagara-square-to-protest-minneapolis-killing-mayor-brown-issues-statement-in-support/ |access-date=|website=The Buffalo News |language=en-us}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A flaming object was thrown through a City Hall window and several buildings were damaged.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Protester tries to set Buffalo City Hall on fire; vandals damage several buildings |url=https://www.wgrz.com/article/news/crime/protester-tries-to-set-buffalo-city-hall-on-fire/71-557ea29e-a40a-4da3-a5a4-f4726589010c |access-date= |website=wgrz.com |language=en-US}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rioting continued for several days.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|title=Curfew remains for Buffalo, 8 p.m. to 5 a.m. until Sunday|url=https://www.wgrz.com/article/news/local/curfew-issued-for-buffalo-from-8pm-5am-until-sunday/71-197fed2a-d89a-4d02-ac43-ddefdec8eff8|access-date=|website=wgrz.com|language=en-US}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  All 57 members of the Buffalo Police Department's Emergency Response Team resigned from the unit in a show of support for two officers who were suspended without pay after pushing an elderly white man to the ground when he approached a police skirmish line, violated New York state social distancing orders, and riot control instructions to disperse.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investigativepost.org/2020/06/05/police-unit-resigns-in-protest/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The old white man was in fact an Antifa [[provocateur]] using a capture scanner to transmit locations of police.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/06/06/buffalo-officials-duped-by-professional-antifa-provocateur-arrest-and-charge-two-police-officers-righteous-police-team-stand-together-and-walk-out/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[North Carolina]]: A white rioter lit himself on fire attempting to burn down a museum.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://districtherald.com/idiot-north-carolina-rioter-lights-himself-on-fire-while-attempting-to-burn-down-historic-building/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*White rioters destroyed Grand Rapids, [[Michigan]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/JriEI6ZDNlQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NBC employee kills Patriot. jpeg.jpg|right|300px|thumb|An [[NBC News]] employee murdered [[Lee Keltner]], an unarmed peaceful protester during a Patriot Rally, in [[Denver]], [[Colorado]], October 10, 2020.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-alleged-antifa-militant-shoots-and-kills-conservative-at-patriot-rally-in-denver&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charleston]], South Carolina: Democrat mayor John Tecklenburg ordered police to stand down allowing Democrat rioters to destroy the cities central business district.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://abcnews4.com/news/local/business-owners-react-to-911-calls-during-downtown-charleston-riots&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Philadelphia]]: White Antifa rioters hijack protests again.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/DxQpVWR1ylE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cars were torched.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200926231646/https://streamable.com/13784m&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Armed [[patriot]]s protected statues from godless communist rioters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wgal.com/article/armed-people-vigilantes-protect-christopher-columbus-statue-philadelphia/32866381#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Leftists drove a car into the West Philadelphia Lowe's home improvement store, stole a forklift, and used it to break into a Wells Fargo bank and lifted out the vault.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10158648728727859&amp;amp;set=a.10151098801937859&amp;amp;type=3&amp;amp;theater&amp;amp;ifg=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richmond]]: Leftist rioters torched a home with children inside and then blocked the fire department.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/06/pure-evil-police-chief-breaks-describing-richmond-leftist-rioters-torched-home-children-inside-blocked-fire-department-video/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Antifa marked the Richmond Federal Courthouse for arson.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2020/06/04/richmond-federal-courthouse-antifa-arson-riots/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Antifa rioters were confirmed to be present.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/BwXvXmsYiTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Indianapolis]]: Black Lives Matter murder a 24 year old white mother for saying &amp;quot;All lives matter.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://fox59.com/news/crimetracker/indy-mother-becomes-2nd-homicide-along-downtown-canal-in-1-week/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Austin]]: White people destroyed police vehicles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200818145347/https://streamable.com/v8zk1e&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  An armed BLM protester with a rifle banged on car and was shot dead by the driver.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/07/26/armed-blm-protester-shot-dead-by-a-motorist-in-austin-was-on-camera-earlier-calling-critics-puies-951567&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Fall River, Massachusetts: White communist beats 82 year old veteran for holding a Trump sign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.masslive.com/police-fire/2020/06/fall-river-man-accused-of-beating-82-year-old-man-holding-trump-sign-in-massachusetts-now-facing-civil-rights-violation-charge.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charlotte]], North Carolina: 2 dead 7 wounded in shooting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/sosxuh34XCc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  WBTV in Charlotte reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|The memorial at Evergreen Cemetery on Central Avenue is covered with the words “Glory to the day of heroism June 19, 1986.” The phrase appears to correspond to the Peruvian prison massacres of 1986, when 224 people died in a series of riots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hammer and sickle symbol of communism was also painted on the memorial. Yellow paint covers a passage reading, “Dedicated to the memory of the Mecklenburg heroes of World War II who made the supreme sacrifice that you might live in liberty, freedom and peace.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/06/23/gen-z-targets-greatest-generation-as-ww-ii-monuments-are-defaced-in-hatred-for-america-938053&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BLM protester Steven Lopez.jpg|right|200px|thumb|BLM protester Steven Lopez taken into custody on rioting charges; he was released and days later allegedly shot and killed a journalist covering the &amp;quot;peaceful protests&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/06/29/louisville-breonna-taylor-protest-shooting-suspect-identified/3277736001/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Santa Monica: Beating and stomping guy on the ground Santa Monica. [https://streamable.com/x6ue5x]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atlantic City]]: Rioters came from out of town.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/tU52nMGL3m8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tulsa]]: White people attacked a horse trailer on the highway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200926231651/https://streamable.com/ixpxh9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ocean City, Maryland: A [[diversity]] mob attacked and viciously beat a group of people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/NathalieDecuyp2/status/1271377908255375361&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Madison, Wisconsin]]: Democrats pull down statue of Col. Christian Heg, an [[abolitionist]] who fell in the [[Battle of Chickamauga]]. State Senator Tim Carpenter was assaulted by [[homophobic]] Black Lives Matter protestors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://wkow.com/2020/06/23/protesters-pull-down-forward-statue-outside-state-capitol/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A licensed physical therapist and a school social worker were arrested in the attack. The school social worker's profile on the school website said that she helps “students and families who are struggling with social-emotional needs, behavioral issues, or [[environmentalist|environmental]] issues in the family, school and/or community.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/nick-arama/2020/07/29/police-arrest-two-women-protesters-in-attack-on-dem-state-senator-who-they-are-is-disturbing/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Progressive defund police movement calls for reducing police brutality by replacing police with more social workers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Haven, Connecticut]]: Skirmishes erupt over removal of Christopher Columbus statue.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=kxf3x_1593014406&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Memphis]]: Peaceful protesters hung a pet dog with cable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://mobile.twitter.com/redlikereagan/status/1268070925066547201&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fort Worth]]: All charges against rioters dropped.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wksu.org/post/fort-worth-police-drop-rioting-charges-against-protesters&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cleveland]]: Owner of a small cupcake business that was destroyed by Democrats says she's being threatened with future harm and destruction for cooperating with police.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/06/22/destroyed-cleveland-cupcake-store-owner-gets-threats-to-shut-up-or-her-business-will-be-looted-again-937729&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Louisville]]: 7 people shot.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.pressherald.com/2020/05/29/7-shot-at-louisville-protest-over-fatal-police-shooting/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Steven Lopez, a Black Lives Matter protester, was arrested for inciting a riot, disorderly conduct, harassment and possession of drug paraphernalia.  His citation noted he was in possession of a handgun &amp;quot;with two full mags of ammo&amp;quot; at the time of the arrest. He was released. Ten days later Lopez was arrested again for murder and first-degree wanton endangerment. The murder victim was another Black Lives Matter protester.  Lopez fired into an encampment of protesters wanting to defund the police. Bystanders returned fire, wounding the accused killer in the leg.  Lopez participated in many protests, which rocked the streets of Louisville for a month.  Media accounts referred to the BLM protester as a [[Hispanic]] [[white supremacist]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/what-we-know-about-steven-lopez-the-suspect-in-the-fatal-louisville-protest-shooting/ar-BB166xfs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The leftwing armed militia group [[NFAC]] shot three people in Braxton Park.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200811134945if_/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmI8bJ7Kgr8&amp;amp;gl=US&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/2020/07/25/louisville-shooting-accidental-shots-fired-injures-3-nfac-protest/5510892002/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Kamala Harris referred to the violence as “brilliant” and was “an essential component or mark of a real [[democracy]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2020/09/26/kamala-harris-blasted-for-praising-blm-as-essential-and-brilliant-amid-violence/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the Breonna Taylor case, police executed the search warrant by knocking on the door. The warrant listed Breonna Taylor and two men.  Both men were under suspicion of trafficking drugs.  Taylor's apartment was being used as part of a trafficking ring.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wave3.com/2020/05/12/breonna-taylor-shooting-warrant-says-suspect-used-her-apartment-hide-drugs/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Breonna Taylor and her boyfriend Kenneth Walker refused to answer the door after the police identified themselves. The police broke down the door. Kenneth Walker was armed and shot first at police. Walker used Taylor as a shield. The police returned fire and Breonna Taylor was shot and killed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/Igp5Ov2aluM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Antifa Hollywood.png|right|350px|thumb|Progressives looted expensive stores on [[Hollywood values|Hollywood]]'s fashionable Rodeo Drive.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Orleans]]: Democrat Mayor LaToya Cantrell praised Black Lives Matter until a mob converged on her home. ''NOLA'' reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Cantrell issued a scathing rebuke of their actions, saying they scared her daughter and should take their concerns to state lawmakers.  In an open letter released late Tuesday, Cantrell praised the Black Lives Matter movement that has inspired protests across the nation in the wake of the police killing of George Floyd, but condemned demonstrators who used the movement’s rallying cry when they converged on her home.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/06/new-orleans-mayor-latoya-cantrell-cheers-black-lives-matter-except-outside-house/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Rome, [[Georgia]]: Alleged white supremacists made an appearance on June 10, indicating a possible capitulation to leftists' demand for a race war. However, the alleged white supremacists committed no violence or destruction of property.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhLwRV_p27A&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Detroit]]: A Customs and Border Protection (CBP) helicopter monitoring activities in the southeastern portion of Detroit near the Canadian border. While aloft, someone on the Canadian side of the border began repeatedly pointed a green laser into the cockpit. This continued even after the pilot took evasive action to avoid being blinded.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ny-cbp-helicopter-struck-laser-canada-border-20200609-jtatkcjqifhxnb2dip4uhhuvie-story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Scottsdale, Arizona: [[Youtube]]r Jake Paul involved in riot.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/youtube-jake-paul-california-home-raided-fbi-ongoing-federal-investigation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Eaton, Colorado: Marxist terrorist weaponizes vehicle and assaults' [[Blue Lives Matter]] rally sponsored by [[Young Republicans]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://lawandcrime.com/crazy/man-allegedly-tried-to-drive-through-or-over-blue-lives-matter-protesters/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Lincoln County, Oregon: exempts non-whites from wearing covid masks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2020/06/23/oregon-county-issues-face-mask-order-exempting-non-white-people/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Toronto]]: Antifa declares [[class war]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/XEQbLsRn6Zo&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Montreal]]: A check cashing establishment was looted and destroyed&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20200926231643/https://streamable.com/3hwkx2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and other businesses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20210107233515/https://streamable.com/92h4rr&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sydney]], [[Australia]]: Antifa protests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8374261/George-Floyd-protests-set-hit-Hyde-Park-Sydney-Australia-week.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Commie vandals.png|right|300px|thumb|Communists vandalized the Memorial to the 100 million dead victims of Communism.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[London]]: Antifa protests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2020/05/31/george-floyd-protests-erupt-in-berlin-london-and-toronto/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In support of alleged protests over the death of George Floyd, on the 76th anniversary of the liberation of [[Europe]] from [[Nazi]] occupation by [[British]] and [[American]] soldiers, Leftwing socialists defaced the statue of [[Winston Churchill]] who led the [[UK]] to victory over [[Adolph Hitler]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/QB2z05j-V6o&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Black Lives Matter protesters deface the statue to Abraham Lincoln who signed the [[Emancipation Proclamation]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/alexparker/2020/06/06/london-protestors-black-lives-matter-london-abraham-lincoln-statue/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Berlin]], [[Germany]]: Antifa's parent organization, Die Linke remnant of the East Germany Communist Party and [[Stasi]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-communist-origins-of-the-antifa-extremist-group_2282816.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; organizes protests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theleftberlin.com/post/tell-us-police-no-more-racist-murders&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Stuttgart]] [[German]] youth riot and vandalize after police begin [[drug]] checks based upon suspected drug dealing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dw.com/en/germany-stuttgart-reckons-with-youth-rage-after-riots-rock-city/a-53893055&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Islamic State]]: celebrated the progressive riots.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://summit.news/2020/06/05/isis-celebrates-blm-protests-in-hope-they-will-weaken-the-west/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Beijing]]: Chinese Foreign Ministry and state media expressed sympathy for the communist uprising.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''[[Associated Press]]'' went through the records of arrests at protests around the United States and determined that more than 10,000 people had been arrested in the first week on charges ranging from curfew violations and failures to disperse to looting. Most of the arrests occurred in Los Angeles (where there have been more than 3,000), New York, Dallas, and Philadelphia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/george-floyd-protests-police-clashes-continue-updates.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Party for Socialism and Liberation===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Marxist-Leninist]] pro-[[China]], [[Iran]], [[North Korea]], [[Cuba]], [[Venezuela]], and [[Russia]], [[Party for Socialism and Liberation]] has chapters in about 30 states. They also seek to exploit the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis Police, referring to this time in history as an “absolutely critical period” to impose their vision of a [[communist]] [[revolution]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“The police will always fulfill their role of being shock troops for white supremacy and capitalism as long as it exists in this racist state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“In this absolutely critical period, we sharpen our resolve to build organizations capable of waging militant [[class struggle]] against the racist state and their ruling class. … Amidst the deep crisis, the racist killings of George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery in Brunswick, Georgia, Breonna Taylor in Louisville, Ky. and Sean Reed in Indianapolis, Ind., make it clear that the protests and fight back must continue and intensify.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.liberationnews.org/psl-statement-justice-for-george-floyd/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Revolutionary Communist Party===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RCP USA.jpeg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Revolutionary Communist Party]] used the death of George Floyd at the hands of [[Minneapolis]] Police to call for “a movement for an actual [[revolution]].” They issued communique #6 titled, “Police murder after murder after murder… To YOU who are sick and tired of the madness, and ready to be part of a movement for an ACTUAL REVOLUTION”:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|“If you’re sick of watching video after video of these murders by police … you need to … join with a movement for an actual revolution, to prepare for a time when it will be possible to lead millions to bring this system down, and replace it with a new society based on the Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://revcom.us/a/649/communique-6-police-murder-after-murder-after-murder-en.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Project Veritas]] infiltrated Rose City Antifa. In an undercover video, Antifa instructors teach [[white]] people how to maim and disable people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20201215052921/https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1268527969586360320?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Project Veritas video also introduces Andy Zee, an organizer for Refuse Fascism, a project of the Revolutionary Communist Party, talking about a possible meet-up with [[Democrat]] donor [[Tom Steyer]].&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“I don’t know if we took the meeting today. We were meeting with his main advisor on impeachment...Tom Steyer’s been retweeting some of our stuff.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Zee said the group was hoping to raise $2M to $5M to organize massive protests in major cities against President Trump.  “You’re actually going to sustain millions of people, hundreds of thousands on the streets in certain cities,” Zee explained.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/video/debra-heine/2018/08/01/okeefe-catches-antifa-fight-instructors-teaching-activists-how-to-inflict-pain-on-their-targets-n91391&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Workers World Party===&lt;br /&gt;
Monica Moorehead of the [[Workers World Party]] (WWP) wrote an article May 28, 2020 titled, ''Against police violence and capitalism, to rebel is justified:''&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“Workers World salutes all the brave protesters in [[Minneapolis]], currently ground zero against police terror. We also salute those activists in [[Los Angeles]], [[Memphis]] and other cities who are organizing protests and braving the [[pandemic]] to be in the streets or in car caravans to show solidarity with the demand: Justice for George Floyd and all victims of police violence.”}}&lt;br /&gt;
Moorehead goes on to quote WWP founder Sam Marcy's defense of the 1992 Los Angeles riots—in which 63 people died:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“In times when the [[bourgeoisie]] is up against the wall, when the masses have risen suddenly and unexpectedly, the bourgeoisie gets most lyrical in abjuring violence. It conjures up all sorts of lies and deceits about the unruliness of a few among the masses as against the orderly law-abiding many.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“[[Marxism]] here again cuts through it all. The Marxist view of [[violence]] distinguishes between the violence of the oppressors as against the responsive violence of the masses. Just to be able to formulate it that way is a giant step forward, away from disgusting bourgeois praise for nonviolence. It never occurs to any of them to show that the masses have never made any real leap forward with the theory of nonviolence. Timidity never made it in history.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.workers.org/2020/05/49008/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Helter Skelter: Charles Manson's dream of race war reborn==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:816-manson-death-to-pigs.jpg|right|300px|thumb|&amp;quot;Death to Pigs&amp;quot; written in blood at a Manson family crime scene. The same slogan was resurrected by Progressives and Antifa 50 years later.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Helter Skelter&amp;quot; was the [[Beatles]] song that inspired [[progressive]] icon [[Charles Manson]]'s efforts to spark a race war in 1969.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/vCHUhxGbIZw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Manson, who masterminded the Tate-LaBianca murders in 1969 and was originally sentenced to death for those crimes before his sentence was commuted to life in prison in 1972, was the inspiration behind other progressive pop-icons such as [[Marilyn Manson]] and [[Bernadine Dohrn]], [[Michelle Obama]]'s bridesmaid.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/michelle-obama-bernardine-dohrn-and-sidley-austin-ed-whelan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Dohrn was enamored by Manson.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://spectator.org/charles-manson-and-the-weather-underground/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Barack Obama]] began his political career in Bernardine Dohrn's living room&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/story/2008/02/obama-once-visited-60s-radicals-008630&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; where the mantle of Progressive leadership was passed from one generation to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Twitter account named OC Antifa, allegedly from Orange County, [[California]] posted a series of tweets on May 31, 2020. The tweets read:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Attention Antifa &amp;quot;comrades&amp;quot;: today marks the end of an almost three year operation. Our infiltration of your movement was a success, and the faces and identities of everyone who has attended or financially supported Marxist and [[seditious]] activities has been recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say hello to the terrorists at @UciYdsa . Their leader, Steph, and many of their members have participated in Antifa demonstrations and acts of vandalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
in local politics and academia, including professors at University of California, Irvine, and local DSA officials. The reckoning is here, and you are all going to feel the wrath of a nation who has finally had enough of your games. Enjoy prison!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The countless patriots whose lives you have ruined, and families you have terrorized, will finally be avenged. No longer will the American people tolerate your Red terror and subversion of everything we hold dear. We have identified dozens of militants,  and sympathizers ...&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/orangecounty/comments/gumkeb/oc_antifa_possibly_infiltrated_twitter_deleted/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For much of the 20th century, [[Detroit]] was the fourth largest city in the United States.  Today it ranks as the 18th largest.  Since five days of looting and burning in 1967, Detroit lost 60% of its population.  Detroit never recovered from its riots.  And unlike Minneapolis in 2020, Detroit in 1967 did not have elected officials sympathetic to lawlessness during and after the riots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Maoist Rectification comes to America===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BLM rectification.PNG|right|300px|thumb|A white woman accosted on the street with a demand to kneel and apologize for her whiteness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1267734418241830912&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Rectification}}&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Maoist]] rectification campaign erupted out of the Antifa riots.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://justthenews.com/nation/culture/forced-apologies-and-public-shaming-doctrinal-deviation-sweep-american-culture&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Whites were asked, if not demanded, to kneel and publicly disavow their [[white privilege]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/06/03/brain-washed-whites-convulsing-from-white-guilt-make-pledge-of-allegiance-to-black-people-929304&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Calling police to report crimes or threats to life and safety was deemed &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/06/08/minn-official-tells-cnns-camerota-wanting-to-protect-your-home-comes-from-a-place-of-privilege-931770&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The mayor of Minneapolis was shamed before a leftist mob of mostly white people for not agreeing to disband the Minneapolis police.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/eACIjK36mek&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A ''New York Times'' columnist urged white people to text “relatives and loved ones telling them you will not be visiting them or answering phone calls until they take significant action in supporting black lives either through protest or financial contributions.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://summit.news/2020/06/09/new-york-times-columnist-demands-white-people-ditch-family-members-who-dont-support-black-lives-matter/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[New Orleans Saints]] quarterback Drew Brees told an interviewer “I will never agree with anybody disrespecting the [[flag]] of the United States of America.”  Brees and his family received death threats. Brees asked for &amp;quot;forgiveness&amp;quot; for saying Americans should respect the flag.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailywire.com/news/drew-brees-caves-asks-for-forgiveness-for-saying-americans-should-respect-the-flag?itm_source=parsely-api&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Even Brees wife wrote an apology: “WE ARE THE PROBLEM. I write this with tears in my eyes and I hope you all hear our hearts.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2020/06/07/drew-brees-wife-brittany-issues-apology-we-are-the-problem/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aleksandar Katai, a [[Serbia]]n soccer who played with the Los Angeles Galaxy, wife posted criticism of the Minneapolis rioters in Serbian. Someone noticed, translated the posting and criticized her. She deleted the posting. Katai's wife was in Chicago when she wrote the post, and Aleksandar may not have even been aware of the post. Riot protesters arrived at the Los Angeles stadium to call for Alexander's firing.  The management of the L.A. Galaxy forced Alexander Katai to apologize for his wife, and then to denounce her. Then they made him endorse Black Lives Matter, which he did, and then they fired him anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://skugal.org/racist-violent-la-galaxy-fire-aleksandar-katai-over-wifes-shocking-social-media-posts-about-us-police-brutality-protests/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Then Katai was attacked on his way out for something he didn't do, may not have even been aware of, in a language most Americans don't understand.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2020/06/06/la-galaxy-releases-aleksandar-katai-amid-wifes-racist-posts/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[UCLA]] investigated a [[white]] professor who read [[Martin Luther King Jr.]]’s ''Letter from Birmingham Jail,'' which reportedly contains the N-word, to students in a [[political science]] class.  UCLA also held a town hall shaming and urged students to come forward with complaints.  The department head and other faculty charged,&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;The lecturer also showed a portion of a documentary which included graphic images and descriptions of lynching, with a narrator who quoted the n-word in explaining the history of lynching. Many students expressed distress and anger regarding the lecture and the lecturer's response to their concerns during the lecture.  We share students' concerns that the lecturer did not simply pause and reassess their teaching pedagogy to meet the students' needs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/professor-under-investigation-for-reading-mlks-letter-from-birmingham-jail-containing-n-word&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Editorial page director of the ''[[New York Times]]'' James Bennet apologized, and then resigned, after publishing an [[op-ed]] from [[Sen. Tom Cotton]].   The article suggested the U.S. military might be necessary to quell nationwide socialist insurrection if governors and mayors refused to defend the lives and property of American citizens and taxpayers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stepmother of an Atlanta policeman charged in a politically motivated indictment before the Georgia Bureau of Investigation completed its investigation was fired from her job for being a relative of a person designated as a scapegoat by the Left.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/tucker-carlson-reports-stepmother-of-ex-atlanta-officer-who-shot-rayshard-brooks-fired-from-job&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Jonestown reborn===&lt;br /&gt;
Author Daniel Greenfield wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|[[File:Jim Jones and the Democrat party.jpg|right|400px|thumb|''Left to Right:'' The [[Rev. Jim Jones]], Mayor [[George Moscone]] (murdered along with City Councilman [[Harvey Milk]]), Speaker [[Nancy Pelosi]] a [[white privilege]]d refugee from [[Baltimore]], Speaker [[Willie Brown]] ex-lover and political patron of [[Kamala Harris]], and Sen. [[Dianne Feinstein]] whose rise came on the heels of the Moscone/Milk murders. The Moscone/Milk murders and the tragedy at [[Jonestown]] are intimately connected in San Francisco's [[Progressive]] [[Democratic party]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzyXNWYmfXg Jim Jones, The Most Admired Democrat of The 1970s, Censored Info], youtube&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a fact kept hidden by the [[mainstream media]] for decades.]] &amp;quot;the viral videos of white millennials kneeling and confessing their privilege, are the [[People's Temple]] writ large on a nation. Jones, the son of a Klansman, who was inspired by a Communist-allied cult to build a following as a Marxist preacher of interracial brotherhood, joining the California Democrat establishment before going down in flames, has once again become the future....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Peoples Temple used the [[moral]] drama of racism to create a racial conflict, playing on the guilt of white people and the fears of black people to divide them, threatening apocalypse and offering redemption through socialism. Racism was the source of Jones’ power. It was the primal sin and fear that he held over the heads of his followers to incite them to commit horrible crimes against each other....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no meaningful reckoning that Americans can make with 1619, but it is vitally important that there be a reckoning with the seventies as Jonestown is becoming a statewide and nationwide model....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ultimate victims of Jonestown were largely black. That’s also true of the Democrat Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jim Jones was the first to turn racism into a [[religion]]. The end of the Peoples Temple and Jonestown are instructive now that racism has become the national religion of Jones’ Democrat Party. The cult leader had told his followers that God was socialism and that a man was as godly as he embodied socialism. And Jones was the ultimate divinity because he was the embodiment of the Principle of Socialism which alone could reconcile the races and all of humanity to paradise by becoming the gods of socialism....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats and their [[media]] are telling the nation that burning and looting cities is the path to utopia....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like [[Jim Jones]], the Democrats have no vision or [[hope]] to offer. Utopia has been replaced with pain and death. The screams of hate and the wrecked blocks in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco are the nation’s Jonestowns. The country’s biggest cities have become failed experiments in social justice where the socialist cant is preached all the louder even as things only get worse.....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The arc of history points not to progress, but to [[Jonestown]]. The Joneses are torturing their followers with pandemic lockdowns, rioting, economic destruction, environmental impoverishment, and cultural collapse to sate their own sadistic impulses and to divert attention from the failures of their ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All that’s left now is the grim death march through the opening of prisons, the normalization of crime, the [[Green New Deal]], socialized medicine, and the random crises met with tyranny on the way to utopia. At the end, the men and women who had followed Jones realized that the promise of a socialist kingdom of heaven on earth was a lie. There was no food. [[Bible]]s were being torn up for toilet paper. The only escape from the misery was death. That is also the great leftist vision for [[western civilization]]....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“There’s scientific consensus that the lives of children are going to be very difficult. And it does lead young people to have a legitimate question: Is it OK to still have children?” [[Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]] wondered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats have perfected Jones’ trick of using racial guilt to empower a white elite to carry out the socialist schemes that make them feel like gods even as they impoverish, enslave, and destroy. But, just like in Jonestown, all anyone has to do is look at the carnage and ask, “Is this progress? Where’s utopia?” Are the burning cities, the kneeling mobs, and the terrorized people really leading to utopia?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jim Jones was the socialist son of a Klansman who exploited and killed hundreds of black people. The Democrats are the socialist party of the Klan who exploited and killed hundreds of thousands of black people. When the Democrats claim to care about black lives, they take them in horrifying numbers.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dcclothesline.com/2020/06/21/the-jonestowning-of-america/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===SDS, WUO, and Black Panthers reborn===&lt;br /&gt;
Antifa has a hundred-year plan in which they want to transform the United States into exactly the opposite of what it has been. Antifa has rallied an army around its objectives.  People who &amp;quot;identify&amp;quot; as straight, white, males are excluded, and are being targeted clearly as the enemy, whom they deem as &amp;quot;fascists&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;colonizers&amp;quot;, and whom they seek to eliminate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.intellihub.com/intellihubs-shepard-ambellas-reveals-antifa-playbook-must-watch/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antifa has drawn on the organizing principles and game plan of the [[SDS]], [[Weather Underground]] (WUO), and [[Black Panthers]] of the 1960s. Like the SDS, WUO, and Black Panthers they seek violent Marxist, and Maoist, revolution. The SDS was a million member band of students, predominantly white, from which a few hardcore, violent radicals were recruited which constituted the Weather Underground.  Under Marxist and Maoist theory of communist revolution, the Black Panthers were designated as the spearhead of the revolution, with the predominantly white WUO and SDS as &amp;quot;support&amp;quot; groups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Copying the 1960s model, Antifa is the modern violent, predominantly white, support group to the spearhead of Marxist revolution, Black Lives Matter.  All these groups trace their organization and ideals from the veritable ant heap of American [[communist front]] organizations over the past fifty-plus years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist revolution in the 1960s and 1970s in America failed; however through tutoring and mentoring from oldtime believers, true dedicated Marxist revolutionaries study and learn from their previous failures. The question America faces today is, are the ordinary people who believe in democracy, freedom, and the goodness of America willing to stand up to senseless violence and criminals, and their corporate sponsors, who have the police and taxpaying citizens intimidated?  Are Americans in 2020 willing to lay down and be slaves to communism?  This is the objective that these [[community organizer]]s have been working toward for decades.&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
The attacks on the family and church are completed. The takeover of education and brainwashing in schools is complete. All that remains is violence in the street, and eliminating the enemies of revolution, which has already occurred in countless [[nation state]]s on the planet over the past 100 years.  Now America faces on its own shores what it has fought to protect other peoples overseas from for the past century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Color revolutions are not about color===&lt;br /&gt;
Linda Goudsmit writes:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://goudsmit.pundicity.com/24540/color-revolutions-are-not-about-color&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|[[Color revolution]] is a known tactical CIA operation that uses a seemingly spontaneous act as the precipitating event to destabilize a country and effect regime change. Color revolution is what is happening in America, and its front line soldiers are Antifa and Black Lives Matter (BLM).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;''America's Own Color Revolution'',&amp;quot; a June 29, 2020, Geopolitics article explains how &amp;quot;Hundreds of thousands of young Americans are being used as a battering ram to not only topple a U.S. President, but in the process, the very structures of the U.S. Constitutional order.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://geopolitics.co/2020/06/29/americas-own-color-revolution/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The organization Black Lives Matter (BLM) is not about black lives. BLM is a Marxist organization disguised as a [[civil rights]] organization. Instead of improving race relations, BLM exploits racial tensions to collapse America from within and replace our [[constitutional republic]] with socialism/communism. BLM is the ultimate humanitarian hoax being perpetrated on unsuspecting Americans who still believe that BLM cares about black lives. They don't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxism, socialism, and communism are often used interchangeably, but Sandra Campbell clarifies the differences and shows how each builds on the other. &amp;quot;Marxism is the theoretical framework which lays the foundation for the economic and political philosophies of socialism and communism.&amp;quot; Communism is the end game. . . . [[Karl Marx]] argued that [[capitalism]], with its strict adherence to [[free market]] principles, divided people because of competition. He believed communism was the solution.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The failure of Karl Marx's experiment is that in the real world, socialism and communism create the same centralized government with the same tyrannical, binary [[feudal]] structure of rulers and ruled. [[Globalism]] is centralized government on an internationalized planetary scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, back to race in America. Of course black lives matter - all lives matter in the United States of America! The foundation of life in the USA is that we all matter - all of us - white, black, blue, red, yellow, young, old, thin, fat, [[gay]], straight, [[Christian]], [[Jew]], [[Muslim]], [[Buddhist]], [[atheist]], etc etc etc. [...]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our founding fathers rejected the tyranny of the aristocratic attitude that puts monarchs, emperors, oligarchs, caliphs, political elites, Hollywood glitterati, professional athletes, etc etc above the people. Ideologically, our founding fathers rejected the oppressive construct of rulers and ruled. Instead, they created a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Our forefathers rejected the tyranny of elitism, and embraced the individual freedom and upward mobility of the people. They dreamed the American dream - the opposite of the ruler and ruled nightmare of Marxist socialism, communism, Islamism, and globalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our founding fathers fought for our freedom from the British monarchy and prevailing social pyramid of the few privileged elite at the top ruling their enslaved subjects below. The American War of Independence replaced the binary socio-political structure of feudalism with a threefold system that embraces an upwardly mobile middle class. Our forefathers dreamed a more perfect union of inclusion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States of America is the greatest experiment in individual freedom the world has ever known. &amp;quot;Only in America&amp;quot; is the phrase that captures the possibilities of freedom. For 232 years, United States Presidents tried various methods to achieve the American dream of equal opportunity and upward mobility. Then came Barack Hussein Obama, the anti-American president who tried to fundamentally transform America and kill the American dream.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barack Obama]] was the most divisive president in U.S. history. His promise to fundamentally transform the United States was the insidious effort to destroy the American dream, and replace our decentralized constitutional republic with the centralized government of socialism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's wrong with socialism?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The problem with socialism, communism, [[Islamism]], and globalism, is that NO LIVES MATTER except the lives of the ruling elite! Citizens' individual rights and freedoms are forfeited to the state. The individual is not valued in [[collectivism]], only the state and what the state deceitfully labels &amp;quot;the greater good&amp;quot; matters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's eight anti-American presidential years were devoted to weakening the country. Obama's four anti-American post-presidential years were dedicated to overthrowing duly elected America-first President Donald Trump. Obama marketed his Marxist movement as &amp;quot;resistance.&amp;quot; Obama's resistance movement is ideologically aligned with Black Lives Matter and Antifa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BLM and Antifa are Marxist communist organizations leading the color revolution in America, attempting to destabilize the country and effect regime change. Out with America-first President Donald Trump, and in with communist China's puppet, Beijing Joe Biden.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's connect the dots and examine the picture that emerges. Follow the money - always follow the money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John Haywood's June 11, 2020, Breitbart article, &amp;quot;The Complex Funding and Ideology of Black Lives Matter,&amp;quot; is very informative. Despite BLM's attempt to present itself as a grassroots, humanitarian, civil rights organization, it is heavily funded by radical leftist corporate sponsors pushing Obama's anti-American Marxist agenda:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BLM's major financial supporters include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Airbnb – $500,000 to BLM and the NAACP&lt;br /&gt;
Anastasia Beverly Hills fashions – $1 million pledged, $100,000 donated so far to groups including BLM&lt;br /&gt;
Bad Robot Productions – film studio involved in Star Trek, Star Wars, and Mission Impossible, $10 million pledged to &amp;quot;anti-racist&amp;quot; groups. BLM among the first recipients&lt;br /&gt;
BTS, a Korean pop group – $1 million, matching donations from fans&lt;br /&gt;
Cisco, electronics giant – $5 million to groups including BLM and its own Fighting Racism and Discrimination fund&lt;br /&gt;
DECIEM cosmetics – $100,000 to NAACP and BLM&lt;br /&gt;
Democracy Alliance – another Soros-linked group, added BLM to its annual $500 million donor list&lt;br /&gt;
Door Dash – food delivery company, $500,000&lt;br /&gt;
Ford Foundation and Borealis Philanthropy – Left-wing groups that established a $100 million donor fund&lt;br /&gt;
George Soros' Open Society Foundation – $33 million&lt;br /&gt;
Glossier cosmetics – $500,000&lt;br /&gt;
Pokemon Company – owners of the popular card game and its characters, $100,000&lt;br /&gt;
Scopely – mobile phone game developer, $1 million to BLM, NAACP, and Equal Justice Initiative&lt;br /&gt;
Spanx – undergarment manufacturer, $100,000 to groups including BLM&lt;br /&gt;
Square Enix computer games – $250,000 to BLM, also matching employee donations&lt;br /&gt;
Ubisoft computer games – $100,000 to NAACP and BLM&lt;br /&gt;
The Weeknd – Canadian R&amp;amp;B singer, $250,000&lt;br /&gt;
This brings us to public enemy #1, the king of radical leftist Democrats, humanitarian huckster extraordinaire, George Soros—the principal funder of Antifa and BLM through his Open Society Foundation. Antifa and BLM should both be designated as domestic terrorist organizations. Former New York City Police Commissioner Bernie Kirk says, &amp;quot;The FBI should investigate to see who's doing this. Who's behind these groups? Because when you look up the definition of terrorism - threats, intimidation, and extreme violence or violence for political reasons - that's what these people are doing. . . .These aren't protesters. These people are paid radical left-wing anarchists that come to instigate and engage in extreme violence, arson, and looting.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lew Rockwell's June 21, 2020 video, &amp;quot;The Soros 2020 Color Revolution Explained,&amp;quot; is very instructive:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;They [Antifa and BLM] are created to disrupt and to continue the sowing of division. And in connected news earlier this year, Mr. Soros has launched his open societies University Network with a $1 billion gift and he will thus continue to help mold the thoughts of young people in the increasingly stifled halls of academia worldwide long after his death. While there is much back and forth, as to whether Mr. Soros has paid out of pocket for the mysterious flats of bricks conveniently left for looters and rioters to use in the recent round of violence, arson, looting and murder, it doesn't really matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He has for decades helped build the infrastructure, the organization, and the command-and-control that can immediately be fielded, once a single case of police brutality is caught on video and within a few days, have cities put to the torch with elected government officials bending the knee to violent mobs while the corporate mainstream media cheers it all on from the sidelines.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why are these corporate sponsors and radical leftist organizations so eager to support Antifa and BLM? Color revolutions and war on America are expensive, and the corporations who rely on cheap Chinese communist labor to manufacture their goods need Trump OUT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
America-first President Donald. J. Trump is the existential enemy of globalism, socialism, Islamism, and communism. He is committed to Americanism, American sovereignty, the U.S. Constitution, and the American dream. The enemies of America must remove America-first President Donald Trump in order to fundamentally transform America into socialism and then communism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BLM and Antifa soldiers need money and materials to launch the next phase of their Marxist revolution after President Trump is reelected - armed insurrection. Marxist leader Angela Davis warned in a Vanity Fair interview that, &amp;quot;the violent BLM and Antifa protests across the country are the early stages of a far larger far-left 'revolution.'&amp;quot; Then what happens?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then the unholy alliance of America's enemies including Marxists, leftists, socialists, globalists, Islamists, and communists will battle each other for dominance, unless they are denied ascendancy in November 2020. VOTER BEWARE!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All lives matter in Trump's constitutional America. Only elite lives matter in the 2020 radical leftist Democrat party.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Funding==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Alliance for Global Justice]] (AFGJ, sometimes styled AfGJ) is an organizing group that serves as a fiscal sponsor to numerous left-wing initiatives, among them [[Refuse Fascism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richardson, Valerie. [https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/13/antifa-protest-of-ben-shapiro-looms-at-berkeley/ “Antifa violence splits left as another major protest looms at Berkeley.”], ''[[The Washington Times]]''. September 13, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Stop Mass Incarceration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/blacklivesmatter-protests-held-amid-parties-new-years-eve-n277896 “#BlackLivesMatter Protests Held Amid Parties on New Year’s Eve.”] NBCNews.com. January 01, 2015.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The group describes itself as “anti-capitalist,” opposed to the principles of [[liberal democracy]] and [[individual rights]], and favoring a “multi-polar” world order with powerful rivals to American international primacy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref.[https://afgj.org/about/our-principles Our Principles.” Alliance for Global Justice.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Death-camps-trump-supporters.jpg|right|300px|thumb|The poster reads, &amp;quot;Deathcamps for Trump Supporters&amp;quot;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The organization provides “fiscal sponsorship” to groups advocating numerous foreign and domestic far-left and extreme-left causes, including eliminating the [[Israel|State of Israel]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.ngo-monitor.org/funder/alliance-for-global-justice/ “Alliance for Global Justice.” NGO Monitor.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; supporting convicted violent leftist extremists, and advancing various labor union efforts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alliance for Global Justice has received substantial funding from organizations often claiming to be the mainstream of the center-left. The [[Open Society Foundations]], [[Tides Foundation]], Arca Foundation, Surdna Foundation, Public Welfare Foundation, and the Brightwater Fund have all made contributions to AFGJ.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Data compiled by Foundationsearch.com subscription service, a project of Metasoft Systems, Inc. from forms filed with the Internal Revenue Service. Queries conducted December 14, 2017 by Influencewatch.org.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  AFGJ has also received substantial contributions through donor-advised funds, which allow donors to anonymize contributions which might otherwise be disclosed using an intermediary foundation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hogberg, David. [https://capitalresearch.org/article/communists-funding-the-resistance-the-alliance-for-global-justice/ “Communists Funding the Resistance: The Alliance for Global Justice.”] Capital Research Center. August 29, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to more general left-of-center organizations, AFGJ has taken money from foundations associated with the extreme left. The Foundation for Deep Ecology, an extremist environmentalist funder, has provided $30,000 to AFGJ.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hogberg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The group has also received funding from the left-wing Ben and Jerry's Foundation, the anti-Israeli Firedoll Foundation, and the left-wing Hill-Snowdon Foundation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hogberg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Labor unions are also substantial contributors to AFGJ and its sponsored projects. In 2016, the [[SEIU]] reported a contribution to AFGJ, while numerous other unions have funded AFGJ projects United Students Against Sweatshops and US Labor Against the War.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Data compiled by the U.S. Department of Labor Office of Labor Management Standards from Annual Report of a Labor Organization (Forms LM-2) filed with OLMS in 2016 and 2017. Queries conducted December 15, 2017, Influencewatch.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===BLM/DNC money laundering===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Money laundering}}&lt;br /&gt;
Raheem Kassam and Gatewaypundit exposed [[Black Lives Matter]] as a money laundering scheme for the [[Democratic National Committee]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/06/exclusive-donations-including-international-funding-blacklivesmatter-com-go-directly-dnc-money-laundering/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  On the BLM homepage, which features a “[[Defund The Police]]” petition front and center, if a user chooses to donate, they're rerouted to a site hosted by [[ActBlue]], the [[DNC]]'s official payment portal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/expenditures.php?cmte=C00401224&amp;amp;cycle=2020&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;    ActBlue claims to be tax exempt organization and all donations to it are tax-deductible.  The terms and conditions also link to ActBlue and mention “Campaign Finance Laws”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://secure.actblue.com/content/fineprint&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Joe Biden]] is a top beneficiary of the ActBlue's fundraising efforts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thenationalpulse.com/politics/biden-black-lives-matter-defund-the-police/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ActBlue contributions comprise 99.64 percent of all funds raised for the “[[Biden for President]]” entity and the total is nearly 773 times greater than the group with the second-highest donation sum.  As of May 21, 2020, the organization has donated $119,253,857 to the “Biden for President” effort.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/expenditures.php?cmte=c00401224&amp;amp;cycle=2020&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response, the Democrats note that ActBlue is a fundraising gateway platform which each funding campaign maintaining separate accounts.  So that even if the political camapaigns of Democratic candidates make up the vast majority of ActBlue's revenues, each campaign accounts for the funds that it raises separately with the [[Federal Election Commission]], and that funds raised by the BLM-related campaigns were paid directly to those organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.factcheck.org/2020/06/donations-to-black-lives-matter-group-dont-go-to-dnc/|title=Donations to Black Lives Matter Group Don’t Go to DNC&lt;br /&gt;
|first=Angelo |last=Fichera|date=June 12, 2020|accessdate=2020-09-05}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bail fund scam===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Minnesota Freedom Fund]] said it's spent “well over” $200,000 in bailing protesters and rioters out of jail — despite receiving more than $30 million in donations from Biden and Harris' fundraising efforts. The [[MFF]] issued a statement:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“One week ago we were a small bail fund struggling to get anyone to listen about the harms of cash bail and pre-trial detention. We are now flooded with resources and we are going to take a beat while we marshal those. We have some big plays in mind.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archive.is/xQMVv&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
The donors demanded their money back. It is illegal for a non-profit organization to raise money under one pretext and to divert those funds to other uses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Louisville Bail Inititative, another Soros-connected entity, supplied riot gear to alleged demonstrators in a riot wherein two police officers were shot.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/09/24/u-haul-that-supplied-riot-gear-to-louisville-protesters-reportedly-rented-by-soros-connected-bail-project-976285&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Campus &amp;quot;Black Life&amp;quot; Crowdsourcing===&lt;br /&gt;
As a means of &amp;quot;virtue signaling&amp;quot;, students on several campuses started crowdsourcing fundraises from BLM-related causes.  &amp;quot;Rice University for Black Life&amp;quot; was the first such effort.  It raised $93,362 to benefit four organizations including Black Lives Matter Houston.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/education/article/Rice-group-raises-more-than-90K-for-black-lives-15312335.php|title=Rice group raises more than $90K for black lives|work=Houston Chronicle|first=Brittany |last=Britto |date=June 1, 2020|accessdate=2020-09-05}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.gofundme.com/f/rice-for-black-life-contactathon|title=Rice For Black Life Contact-A-Thon|accessdate=2020-09-05}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Cornell University]] then followed raising $118,136.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.gofundme.com/f/rs6fpv-cornell-4-black-lives|title=&lt;br /&gt;
Cornell Students 4 Black Lives|accessdate=2020-09-05}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the last few days of Cornell's campaign, the Cornell Black Alumni Association, a 501(c)(3) non-profit, became involved so as to make donations tax deductible.  However, the CBAA failed to register its solicitation with New York State.  Cornell President Martha Pollack and VP Ryan Lombardi both donated.  With the funds being delivered to the CBAA, the original four beneficiaries became subject to change.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.cbaa1976.com/c4bl-fundraiser/|title=C4BL FUNDRAISER|accessdate=2020-09-05}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Organizers===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Obama FISA abuse|}}&lt;br /&gt;
In an interview with Roland Martin in 2015, Rep. [[Maxine Waters]] said:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|'''Roland Martin:''' Come 2016 that’s it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Maxine Waters:''' Well, you know, I don’t know. And I think some people are missing something here.&lt;br /&gt;
The president [Obama] has put in place an organization that contains a kind of database&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/?s=%22secret+project%22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that no one has seen before in life. That’s going to be very very powerful, and whoever…(crosstalk)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Roland Martin (interrupts):''' In terms of [[Organizing for America]] that he’s now shifted to a 501(c)4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Maxine Waters:''' That’s right. That’s right. And that database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that its never been done before and whoever runs on the [[Democratic party|Democratic]] ticket will have to deal with that…it’s very powerful what he’s leaving in place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theblacksphere.net/2020/06/obama-planned-for-the-riots/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The New York Post]]'' reported in early 2017:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2017/02/11/how-obama-is-scheming-to-sabotage-trumps-presidency/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|When former President Barack Obama said he was “heartened” by anti-Trump protests, he was sending a message of approval to his troops. Troops? Yes, Obama has an army of agitators — numbering more than 30,000 — who will fight his Republican successor at every turn of his historic presidency. And Obama will command them from a bunker less than two miles from the White House.&lt;br /&gt;
In what’s shaping up to be a highly unusual post-presidency, Obama isn’t just staying behind in Washington. He’s working behind the scenes to set up what will effectively be a shadow government to not only protect his threatened legacy, but to sabotage the incoming administration and its popular “America First” agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
He’s doing it through a network of leftist nonprofits led by Organizing for Action. Normally you’d expect an organization set up to support a politician and his agenda to close up shop after that candidate leaves office, but not Obama’s OFA. Rather, it’s gearing up for battle, with a growing war chest and more than 250 offices across the country.&lt;br /&gt;
Since Donald Trump’s election, this little-known but well-funded protesting arm has beefed up staff and ramped up recruitment of young liberal activists, declaring on its website, “We’re not backing down.” Determined to salvage Obama’s legacy, it’s drawing battle lines on immigration, ObamaCare, race relations and climate change.}}&lt;br /&gt;
While Obama worried that Trump was now president, he left enough swamp rats in DC to keep his operation running. Still, he was forced to have a more hands-on approach to OFA than intended. The article continues:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Obama is intimately involved in [[OFA]] operations and even tweets from the group’s account. In fact, he gave marching orders to OFA foot soldiers following Trump’s upset victory.&lt;br /&gt;
“It is fine for everybody to feel stressed, sad, discouraged,” he said in a conference call from the White House. “But get over it.” He demanded they “move forward to protect what we’ve accomplished.”&lt;br /&gt;
“Now is the time for some organizing,” he said. “So don’t mope.”&lt;br /&gt;
Far from sulking, OFA activists helped organize anti-Trump marches across US cities, some of which turned into riots. After Trump issued a temporary ban on immigration from seven terror-prone Muslim nations, the demonstrators jammed airports, chanting: “No ban, no wall, sanctuary for all!”&lt;br /&gt;
Run by old Obama aides and campaign workers, federal tax records show “nonpartisan” OFA marshals 32,525 volunteers nationwide. Registered as a 501(c)(4), it doesn’t have to disclose its donors, but they’ve been generous. OFA has raised more than $40 million in contributions and grants since evolving from Obama’s campaign organization Obama for America in 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
OFA, in IRS filings, says it trains young activists to develop “organizing skills.” Armed with Obama’s 2012 campaign database, OFA plans to get out the vote for Democratic candidates it’s grooming to win back Congress and erect a wall of resistance to Trump at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2017/01/30/obama-says-hes-heartened-by-backlash-to-trumps-ban/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Obama told aides that the nationwide riots following the death of [[George Floyd]] are “a tailor-made moment” to help his former vice president Joe Biden defeat Donald Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/06/obama_admits_it_riots_and_protests_are_tailormade_for_electing_joe_biden.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2020 Elections==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|2020 Presidential election}}&lt;br /&gt;
As [[Bernie Sanders]] rose in the polls, [[Leftwing violence in the Trump era|leftist violence]] escalated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A Bernie supporter tried to burn down GOP HQ in [[California]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WyYUshFe3k&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*A [[Leftist]] attempted voter intimidation and suppression at a Trump registration event, deliberately driving his vehicle through it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.news4jax.com/news/local/2020/02/08/police-van-drives-through-republican-partys-voter-registration-tent/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*A Leftist wanted to &amp;quot;Slit Republican throats&amp;quot; at a voter registration table.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.conservapedia.com/Left-wing_violence_in_the_Trump_era#cite_note-608&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*An aide to Democrat Gov. [[Michelle Lujan Grisham]] vandalized GOP Headquarters in [[New Mexico]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/police-republican-headquarters-building-vandalized//&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*A retired cop was punched in the face when his red hat triggered a leftist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/02/13/former-ny-cop-reportedly-punched-in-face-at-his-own-birthday-party-when-red-hat-is-mistaken-for-maga-cap-886522&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The Washington Times]]'' reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Activists of the far-left Antifa movement began planning to foment a nationwide anti-government [[insurgency]] as early as November [2019] as the U.S. presidential campaign season kicked off in earnest....“Antifa’s actions represent a hard break with the long tradition of a peaceful political process in the United States,” said former [[National Security Council]] staff member Rich Higgins. “Their Marxist ideology seeks not only to influence elections in the short term, but to destroy the use of elections as the determining factor in political legitimacy.”&lt;br /&gt;
Added Joe Myers, a former [[Defense Intelligence Agency]] official and counterinsurgency expert, “[[President Trump]]’s election and revitalization of [[America]] are a threat to Antifa’s [[nihilist]] goals. They are fomenting this violence to create havoc, despair and to target the Trump campaign for defeat in 2020.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archive.is/ympwz#selection-2715.0-2743.30&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Democrat convention===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wisconsin-solidarity-fist1.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Wisconsin has a long history of [[radical]]ism, beginning with the adoption of its state motto from the [[Revolutions of 1848]], &amp;quot;''Forward''&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;According to the [[far left]] online encyclopedia [[Wikipedia]], &amp;quot;The name Forward carries a special meaning in socialist political terminology. It has been frequently used as a name for socialist, communist and other leftwing newspapers and publications.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread836229/pg1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;There have been at least two radical-left publications named “Vorwaerts” (the German word for “Forward”). One was the daily newspaper of the Social Democratic Party of Germany whose writers included [[Friedrich Engels]] and [[Leon Trotsky]]. It still publishes as the organ of Germany’s SDP, though that party has changed considerably since World War II. Another was the 1844 biweekly reader of the Communist League. [[Karl Marx]], Engels and Mikhail Bakunin are among the names associated with that publication....[[Vladimir Lenin]] founded the publication “Vpered” (the Russian word for “forward”) in 1905.&amp;quot;  President Barack Obama adopted the motto for his [[2012 presidential election]] campaign.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;https://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/apr/30/new-obama-slogan-has-long-ties-marxism-socialism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|2020 Democrat issues}}&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Democrat Convention]] originally scheduled to held in Milwaukee was cancelled. A virtual convention in which the [[Politburo]] nominated Joe Biden was held instead. The virtual convention was widely panned as one of the most despicable displays of [[hate]] and divisiveness in American political history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/ENQlgoSbF60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailywire.com/news/absolutely-our-party-democrats-embrace-linda-sarsour-at-national-convention&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/08/18/whitmer-irreverent-joke-shark-week-makes-sense-internet/3388789001/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democrat [[community organizer]] Kyle Jurek vowed in January, before primary voting began, that “If Bernie doesn’t get the nomination, or it goes to the second round at the DNC convention, f–ing [[Milwaukee]] will burn. It’ll start in Milwaukee, and then when the police push back on that, other cities will just f–ing (explosion sound).”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/01/14/project-veritas-bernie-campaigner-predicts-violence-at-dnc-police-will-get-fing-beaten/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Jurek also said “We’re going to make 1978 [1968] look like a f–ing Girl Scout f–ing cookout. The cops are going to be the ones that are getting f–ing beaten in Milwaukee. They’re going to call out the [[National Guard]] for that s–t. I promise you that.”  Jurek aligned himself with Antifa, saying that Trump supporters are “scared f–ing senseless of anti-fascists” and that “the only thing that fascists understand is violence,&amp;quot; adding &amp;quot;There’s a reason [[Josef Stalin]] had gulags” and that “[[gulag]]s were actually meant for, like, reeducation.”   “I mean, we don’t have a lot of time left, we have to save f–ing human civilization.”  [[Speaker Nancy Pelosi]] has echoed similar comments&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/election/pelosi-warns-civilization-as-we-know-it-is-at-stake-if-trump-wins/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and has advocated incivility and violence against American citizens.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/pelosi-collateral-damage-dont-share-view/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/2BWzfEh9mEs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jun/14/nancy-pelosi-wonders-why-there-arent-uprisings-acr/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Federal Election Commission]] records show that Kyle Jurek was paid by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) during the [[2018 Midterm elections]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jan/14/project-veritas-sanders-staffer-says-cities-burn-i/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Milwaukee a prominent Black community leader and Trump supporter was assassinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/07/25/peace-loving-black-trump-super-supporter-shot-dead-hours-after-giving-pro-trump-interview-951222&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Biden Putsch===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Biden Putsch}}&lt;br /&gt;
Biden Putsch organizers called for riots beginning Election night, November 3, 2020 using their trademark Marxist coded language.&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|almost every strategy to protect the democratic process is dependent on mass mobilization, and in particular, on people taking peacefully to the streets in large numbers, potentially for an extended period. Large, base-building groups on the [[progressive]] side will need to anchor this strategy, but their success will likely depend on supporting and resourcing new and emerging racial justice leaders, many of whom are not affiliated with formal institutions and [[coalition]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/36948-soros-linked-org-prepares-for-election-coup-calls-for-mass-street-uprisings&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;People taking peacefully to the streets&amp;quot; is language intended to recruit children, mothers, the elderly, and peaceful minority civil rights protesters to march in the front line as cannon fodder and human shields for anarchists and Marxists behind them who toss Molotov cocktails at police, set diversionary fires, and smash windows to set off looting. &amp;quot;Emerging racial justice leaders&amp;quot; are spontaneous mob leaders who then must be either recruited into the Marxist hierarchy, compromised or blackmailed, or otherwise neutralized if they resist the agenda of the overall Marxist movement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A key element to understanding Marxism is to know what &amp;quot;trained Marxists&amp;quot; already know, and that is, in large crowds otherwise ordinary rational people are capable of doing things that as an individual they would never imagine. The trained Marxist uses this incitement to mob mentality to sacrifice innocent &amp;quot;peaceful protesters&amp;quot; to gain power for themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Counterrevolution==&lt;br /&gt;
::{{Cquote|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;''With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;|||[[Republican]] President [[Abraham Lincoln]] shortly before accepting the surrender of [[Democrat]] rebels at [[Battle of Appomattox Court House|Appamattox]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
After the [[DOJ]]'s motion to dismiss bogus charges in the [[Obamagate scandal]] and awaiting final action by the judge, [[Deep State]] [[POW]] [[Gen. Michael Flynn]] was able to issue a communique:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flynn letter.jpeg|right|35-px|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|If the United States wants to survive the onslaught of socialism, if we are to continue to enjoy self-government. To secure the God-given individual blessings of [[liberty]] to ourselves, to our families, then good Americans must accept that each has a [[moral]] obligation to participate in the political life of our country.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The art and exercise of self governance requires active participation. [[vote|Voting]] matters but it is only a part-time engagement of the American citizenry and doesn't go far enough if we are to survive as a [[constitutional republic]]. I want to see more of our [[Veteran]] and [[law enforcement|Law Enforcement]] communities become involved in the [[political]] life of America. We are a participatory experiment in governing. Without a greater commitment, we will continue our slide into the abyss of [[socialism]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And we must not be intimidated by the smear campaigns that will most certainly come with greater and more active participation. We will only keep America if we dedicate ourselves to freedom's victory over the [[socialist]] monster by our good [[citizen]]'s accepting greater responsibility. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am not done.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/letter-from-lt-gen-michael-t-flynn-i-am-not-done/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
After the Nike store was raided, Curtis Sliwa and the Guardian Angels guarded a Footlocker store where they were vastly outnumbered.  Sneakers are like currency on the street. Progressive leftists were trying to get into the Footlocker store because it contained limited edition Nike sneakers.  Leftists tried to get past the Guardian Angels three times, each time with a bigger group of rioters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/3srSyVR3Y5Q&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the third attack, Sliwa suffered a fractured jaw when he was hit with a hammer and another Guardian Angel suffered a broken eye socket and broken nose.&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“The police had been told to stand down. I said to the cops, ‘How do you allow this? We’re not standing down. We’re making a stand.’ ”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2jeAuLb4Gw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Dan Bongino]] told the [[House Judiciary Committee]],&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;We can, and should, commit to police accountability without shredding the thin wall between civilization and chaos.... please stop this defund the police abomination before someone gets hurt.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archive.is/gbKjV&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Author Lloyd Marcus noted:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:People's Revolutionary Movement.png|right|250px|thumb|A member of the People's Revolutionary Movement still holding a [[Glock]] after sustaining a serious injury during the [[Kenosha, Wisconsin|Kenosha riots]]. The communist is also a [[felon]] illegally in possession of a firearm.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://scallywagandvagabond.com/2020/08/gaige-paul-grosskreutz-kenosha-shooting-victim-shot-activist/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Many Democrat rioters had criminal records and are motivated by anti-police sentiment rather than anti-racism.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;Leftists do not give a rat’s derriere about black empowerment or black lives. They view blacks as [[useful idiot]]s towards transforming America into their socialist/communist utopia in which anything goes sexually.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A huge elephant in the room is how long will the white majority tolerate being repeatedly poked in the eye with a hot poker of racial hate by BLM; demanded to kneel in worship to blacks? While claiming to be against racial hate, leftists are intentionally generating such hate. They believe voters will blame Trump and vote against him in November.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evidence that leftists are lying about America being eternally racist is everywhere for anyone willing to see it. Eager to heal our nation from the wounds of slavery and racial discrimination, white America excitedly allowed a black man to bypass the usual vetting process for a presidential candidate. They gifted Obama two terms in the White House. Naive whites believed electing a black president would usher in a new era in which they could never be called “racist” again. Democrats and [[fake news]] media used [[Obama]]’s skin-color as a bludgeon to beat Republicans into submission, giving Obama free rein to implement their agenda to transform America into a socialist nation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here’s another example of the good-hearted nature and generosity of the American people. Fake news media and Democrats promoted the lie that Republicans and white America did not care about the victims of [[Hurricane Katrina]] because they were mostly black. The truth is U.S. donors opened their hearts, giving $4.2 billion to victims of Katrina which is believed to be the highest amount ever....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would love for the [[Tea Party]] buses to roll again. Frankly, thus far, the funding is simply not there. Yes, I have been contacted by concerned Americans who are eager to donate. However, a tour needs a major donor to get the ball rounding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While we struggle to find funding for a bus tour to inspire and encourage Trump’s base, BLM has a war-chest of mega-millions to destroy America and block Trump’s reelection. There is something terribly wrong with this picture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another thing causing my head to explode is of the pandering to BLM… an evil and demonic hate group. In compliance with BLM, pastors are telling their white congregations to own up to their white privilege. My response is, “Stop it! Stop falling for leftists’ bogus guilt-trip.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.trevorloudon.com/2020/06/blm-at-war-with-america/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Dennis Prager]] wrote in ''The Dehumanization Of Blacks'',&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“If you take black and white left-wing rhetoric seriously, blacks are not [[human being]]s like members of other races…They are first and foremost black; they are human beings defined before anything else by their color — not their humanity, their personality, their character, their mind or their heart…So much so that, according to white and black leftists, if you dissent from this racist view, you are now labeled racist”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailywire.com/news/prager-the-dehumanization-of-blacks&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Retired General Paul Vallely wrote,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ccnationalsecurity.org/chinese-scientist-says-covid-19-was-created-by-chinas-military/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;It became clear to many of us that the [[Obama administration]] (with some help from [[Bill Clinton]]’s presidency) had seeded the [[Pentagon]] with leftist generals whose allegiance was to the [[Deep State]], to [[Cultural Marxism|cultural leftism]], and to the infamous and profitable “[[military industrial complex]]” that [[Eisenhower]] warned about in 1961. In only five years, Obama had conducted a major Pentagon purge, firing almost 200 senior officers who held the old-fashioned belief that the military exists to protect America and should not be a [[social justice]] institution with limited firepower.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/197-military-officers-purged-by-obama/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://rense.com/general96/listof.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The upper-level officers who remained were hardcore [[Democrat]]s. Several were assigned to our Military academies at [[US Military Academy at West Point]], The [[United States Naval Academy|Naval]] and [[Colorado Springs|Air Force Academies]], bringing their [[liberal]], left-wing philosophies with them. All the above says there is something rotten happening in the Pentagon. The implications are not just in the past. They are also in the future. Michael Anton has written the best article spelling out the fact that the Democrats are openly planning a [[coup]] if [[Biden]] doesn’t win.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://americanmind.org/essays/the-coming-coup/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One of the crucial points about this planned coup is that the Democrats have been explicit about [[military]] involvement. [...]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Enough is enough” America! The Deep State is still filled with [[NeverTrump|anti-Trump]] political appointees, senior Generals and Admirals and staffers, who need to be removed from the ranks. [[Patriot]]ic Americans know in their hearts what is needed to keep the [[Republic]] from crumbling. We have a President now who fights for them and this great country and will not permit [[anarchist]]s and [[Socialist]]s to destroy what our forefathers created.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We recommend that the President convene a meeting immediately at the Pentagon to be attended by the senior Defense leaders, Secretaries and four-star Generals and Admirals. The President can then determine and sound out their concerns. He can, then, determine their loyalty and commitment to the Trump team. Those that cannot commit to the President should be asked to submit their resignations by close of business. Selected Retired Generals and Admirals who are apart of a Trump coup should be called back to Active Duty and tried by [[Court-martial|Court Martial]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The laughable ''[[The Atlantic|Atlantic]]'' article about Trump disrespecting the military was intended not just to get military votes on November 3 [2020], but to get military coup participants after November 3. [[Critical Race Theory]] training and eight years of Obama’s social justice policies appear to have shifted many of the enlisted ranks from strong [[conservative]]s to equally strong Democrats.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bookwormroom.com/2020/09/07/the-democrats-plan-for-the-military-in-the-coming-coup/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former [[Reagan]] Undersecretary of the Treasury [[Paul Craig Roberts]] noted,&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;The [[Long march through the institutions|March Through the Institutions]] Has Set the Stage for a [[Color Revolution]].  The [[public school]]s, and probably also the private ones, are teaching your children self-loathing and loathing of you, their parents. The goal of [[critical race theory]] and associated activism, now being taught to five-year olds, is to motivate white children to despise their [[systemic racism|systemic racist]] parents and be good Antifa members.  Vote Democrat and bring on more such [[social justice]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/09/no_author/the-orwellian-indoctrination-of-kindergarteners-with-critical-race-theory-is-outrageous-and-must-be-stopped/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same thing is occurring in the federal government.  President Trump ordered a halt to the Obama-regime-initiated anti-white [[propaganda]] forced down the throats of white federal employees, but the [[State Department]], [[Environmental Protection Agency]] (which no longer protects the environment), and the [[Veterans Administration]] openly defy President Trump’s order.  Anti-white propagandists, not President Trump, control the federal government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.rt.com/usa/501329-agencies-defy-ban-critical-race-seminars/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the military/security complex focused the white population on “foreign enemies,” domestic enemies seized control of American institutions.  No people can survive such total insouciance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2020/09/22/the-march-through-the-institutions-has-set-the-stage-for-a-color-revolution/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Leftwing racists attack statue of Mexican colonizer===&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Albuquerque]], Antifa fascists attempt to tear down a statue of Juan de Oñate, the first Spanish Governor General of [[Nuevo Mexico]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hiddenhispanicheritage.com/timeline-1598---juan-de-ontildeate---new-mexico.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One rioter was shot when the mob attacked and threaten to murder a [[citizen]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2020/06/16/856433/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Brandon Morse of ''Red State'' summarized the state of [[chaos]] leftists created in America:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Time and again, Antifa have pushed intimidation and violence upon the innocent Americans. They have threatened us, torn down and burned our businesses, showed up at our homes, and even conducted hostile takeovers of city blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Collectively speaking, Americans are peaceful people who will try every non-violent solution before we, ourselves, resort to any kind of violence. It’s the way we’ve done things before our nation’s founding. Even our most famous moments of defiance of authority were incredibly polite. But Americans have also proved that once the sleeping giant is awakened, whoever is on the receiving end of its wrath will suffer. Whatever we do in return is going to hurt and it’s going to hurt badly....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antifa, despite being made up of [[middle-class]] white kids, may not have understood this as its playbooks and historical knowledge all seem to be imported from nations that fell to communism. It’s not concerned with American history or how it’s people really think or act. Perhaps they thought that this “revolutionary” attitude and the violent, destructive methods that came with it were really going to pave the way for a systemic shift to the hard-left.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They probably moved with all confidence seeing as how their extremist actions rarely resulted in any real punishment. Hell, they were taught they could conduct hostile takeovers of a section of an entire city and the authorities would back off....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antifa’s real power lies in how well it can sell the idea that it’s a powerful group, but has no real power to begin with. It’s “revolution” is a silly idea bandied about by bored rich kids who are led by the nose by bitter college professors and special interest grifters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2020/06/16/antifa-lesson/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Federal response==&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Operation Legend}}&lt;br /&gt;
On April 2, 2020 the website of the International Department of the Central Committee of the [[Communist Party of China]] published an open letter which, according to the official CCP propaganda outlet Xinhua, at least 230 political parties from more than 100 countries endorsed or re-published the letter.  The [[CPUSA]] was one such party.  The letter calls for,&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;all countries to further foster the global governance outlook of achieving shared growth through discussion and collaboration and to support the leading role of the United Nations and the World Health Organization.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/chinese-communist-party-rallies-230-leftist-parties-to-exploit-ccp-virus-for-political-gain_3302341.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Project Veritas]] has provided evidence of DSA infiltration and [[subversion]] into the federal government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.projectveritas.com/news/deep-state-unmasked-state-department-on-hidden-cam-resist-everything-i-have-nothing-to-lose/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/09/20/project-veritas-gao-socialist-activism-destroy-capitalists/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the wake of the nationwide destruction caused by leftwing rioters, President Trump tweeted,&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;80% of the RIOTERS in Minneapolis last night were from OUT OF STATE. They are harming businesses (especially African American small businesses), homes, and the community of good, hardworking Minneapolis residents who want peace, equality, and to provide for their families.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/donaldtrump/comments/gtj8y1/donald_j_trump_80_of_the_rioters_in_minneapolis/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Attorney General [[Bill Barr]] issued a statement:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|The outrage of our national community about what happened to George Floyd in Minneapolis is real and legitimate....In many places, it appears the violence is planned, organized, and driven by anarchistic and [[far left]] extremists, using Antifa-like tactics, many of whom travel from out of state to promote the violence. ...In that regard, it is a federal crime to cross state lines or to use interstate facilities to incite or participate in violent rioting.  We will enforce these laws.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-william-p-barr-s-statement-death-george-floyd-and-riots&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Tucker Carlson]] and [[Steven Crowder]] have accused President Trump and [[Republicans]] of taking insufficient actions against the rioters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWmw3IzdDVQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrJHOcKQFi4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Anarchist jurisdictions===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Insurrection Act}}&lt;br /&gt;
On September 2, 2020 President Trump issued a memorandum entitled “Memorandum on Reviewing Funding to State and Local Government Recipients That Are Permitting Anarchy, Violence, and Destruction in American Cities.”  The memorandum stated,&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“When state and local leaders impede their own law enforcement officers and agencies from doing their jobs, it endangers innocent citizens who deserve to be protected, including those who are trying to peacefully assemble and protest,” said Attorney General William P. Barr.  “We cannot allow federal tax dollars to be wasted when the safety of the citizenry hangs in the balance. It is my hope that the cities identified by the Department of Justice today will reverse course and become serious about performing the basic function of government and start protecting their own citizens.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/memorandum-reviewing-funding-state-local-government-recipients-permitting-anarchy-violence-destruction-american-cities/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Criteria for evaluating each city is below:&lt;br /&gt;
*Whether a jurisdiction forbids the police force from intervening to restore order amid widespread or sustained violence or destruction.&lt;br /&gt;
*Whether a jurisdiction has withdrawn law enforcement protection from a geographical area or structure that law enforcement officers are lawfully entitled to access but have been officially prevented from accessing or permitted to access only in exceptional circumstances, except when law enforcement officers are briefly withheld as a tactical decision intended to resolve safely and expeditiously a specific and ongoing unlawful incident posing an imminent threat to the safety of individuals or law enforcement officers.&lt;br /&gt;
*Whether a jurisdiction disempowers or defunds police departments.&lt;br /&gt;
*Whether a jurisdiction unreasonably refuses to accept offers of law enforcement assistance from the Federal Government.&lt;br /&gt;
*Any other related factors the Attorney General deems appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 21, 2020 the [[Department of Justice]] identified New York, Seattle, and Portland, Oregon as [[anarchist jurisdiction]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-identifies-new-york-city-portland-and-seattle-jurisdictions-permitting&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====New York City====&lt;br /&gt;
*Shootings in New York City have been on the rise since looting and protests began on or about May 28, 2020.  For July 2020, shootings increased from 88 to 244, an increase of 177% over July 2019.  In August 2020, shootings increased from 91 to 242, a 166% increase over August 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*While the city faced increased unrest, gun violence, and property damage, the New York City Council cut $1 billion from NYPD's FY21 budget.&lt;br /&gt;
*The budget resulted in the cancellation of the new police recruiting class, cuts to overtime spending, and the transfer of certain police functions, including school safety, out of the NYPD.&lt;br /&gt;
*Meanwhile, the Manhattan and Brooklyn District Attorneys have declined to prosecute charges of disorderly conduct and unlawful assembly arising from the protests, and the District Attorneys in Queens and the Bronx have declined to prosecute other protest-related charges.&lt;br /&gt;
*Both Mayor de Blasio and Governor [[Andrew Cuomo]] have forcefully rejected federal law enforcement support.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Portland, Oregon====&lt;br /&gt;
*In September 2020 Portland marked 100 consecutive nights of protests marred by vandalism, chaos, and even killing.&lt;br /&gt;
*Those bent on violence regularly started fires, threw projectiles at law enforcement officers, and destroyed property. Numerous law enforcement officers, among others, suffered injury.&lt;br /&gt;
*Shootings increased by more than 140% in June and July 2020 compared to the same period last year.&lt;br /&gt;
*In the midst of this violence, the Portland City Council cut $15 million from the police bureau, eliminating 84 positions. Crucially, the cuts included the Gun Violence Reduction Team, which investigates shootings, and several positions from the police team that responds to emergency incidents.&lt;br /&gt;
*In August, Portland Mayor Wheeler sent a letter to President Trump expressly rejecting the Administration's offer of federal law enforcement to stop the violent protests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Seattle, Washington====&lt;br /&gt;
*For nearly a month, starting in June, the City of Seattle permitted anarchists and activists to seize six square blocks of the city's Capitol Hill neighborhood, naming their new enclave the “Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone” (CHAZ) and then the “Capitol Hill Occupied Protest” (CHOP).&lt;br /&gt;
*Law enforcement and fire fighters were precluded from entering the territory.  The Seattle Police Department was ordered to abandon their precinct within the CHOP.&lt;br /&gt;
*Person-related crime in the CHOP increased 525% from the same period of time in the same area the year before, including by Mayor Durkan's own count “two additional homicides, 6 additional robberies, and 16 additional aggravated assaults (to include 2 additional non-fatal shootings).”&lt;br /&gt;
*The CHOP was allowed to stand for nearly a month, during which time two teenagers were shot and killed in the zone.&lt;br /&gt;
*The Seattle City Council, Mayor Durkan, and Washington Governor Jay Inslee publicly rejected federal involvement in law enforcement activities within the city of Seattle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2020 Marxist insurrection timeline‎==&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|2020 Marxist insurrection timeline‎}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Blexit]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[2019 Chilean State of Emergency]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama riots]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bolshevism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obamunism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Aaron Danielson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Blue state Civil War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.prageru.com/video/peaceful-civil-rights-march-vs-violent-rioters-and-looters/ Peaceful Civil Rights March vs. Violent Rioters and Looters], [[Prager University]]. Disproves the leftist lie that these are ''only'' peaceful civil rights protests.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtestsofPeace/duplicates/gvjb6x/protests_of_peace_democrat_stronghold_minneapolis/ Protests of Peace- Democrat Stronghold &amp;quot;Minneapolis&amp;quot; Gets Third Fascist Police Precinct Set on Fire]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/05/antifa-national-mobilization-riots-across-country-raise-questions-about-coordination/ ANTIFA National Mobilization? Riots Across Country Raise Questions About Coordination]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.periscope.tv/w/1zqKVljlzyDJB Rough Cut of my film Black Lives Matter Unmasked + Interviews. What is behind the riots?] - Lee Stranahan&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://youtu.be/rkbE6lQM3E4 NYC RIOTS Union Square George Floyd BLM!!!], Smooth Sanchez, June 1, 2020.&lt;br /&gt;
{{communism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Terrorism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Presidential Election, 2020]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Terrorism]][[Category:Democrats]][[Category:Socialism]][[Category:Progressivism]][[Category:Communism]][[Category:Riots and Terrorist Incidents in the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Media]][[Category:Anti-American]][[Category:Biden Putsch]][[Category:Crime]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2020s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-Police]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alt-right&amp;diff=1826067</id>
		<title>Alt-right</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alt-right&amp;diff=1826067"/>
		<updated>2021-12-26T20:53:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* Distinction from National Socialism (Nazism) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;:''The term &amp;quot;alt-right&amp;quot; has more than one definition, and this article currently uses both''&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Alt-right''', or '''alternative right''', is a supposed right-wing faction that opposes unrestrained multiculturalism, un-&amp;quot;skilled&amp;quot; immigration, and [[globalism|globalization]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/03/29/an-establishment-conservatives-guide-to-the-alt-right/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://theweek.com/articles/641595/how-american-nationalism-coexist-globalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The term was coined by  [[Richard B. Spencer]], supporter of the 2020 [[Biden/Harris]] ticket and organizer of the 2017 [[racist]] Charlottesville [[Neo-Nazi]] rally.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.newsweek.com/richard-spencer-joe-biden-trump-maga-1527141&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Spencer, president of the National Policy Institute and founder of Alternative Right magazine,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.salon.com/2016/10/08/from-the-old-right-to-the-alt-right-how-the-conservative-ideology-of-fdrs-day-fueled-the-rise-of-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; advocates voting a straight [[Democrat]] ticket.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the [[mainstream media]] the alt-right supposedly emerged as one of the central opponents of the [[Establishment]], and was also oftentimes hostile to mainstream anti-Establishment conservatives. Although originally intended to refer to nationalist and anti-establishment conservatives, [[liberal]]s have twisted the term and have used it to describe white supremacists and neo-Nazis. Regardless of the definition(s) of &amp;quot;alt-right,&amp;quot; the [[Liberal|Left]]'s extreme beliefs and behaviors are the cause of the alt-right's growth, not conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fiene, Hans (May 17, 2019). [https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/17/mom-reveals-lefty-political-tribe-breeds-affection-alt-right/ Mom Reveals How Her Lefty Political Tribe Breeds Affection For The Alt-Right]. ''The Federalist''. Retrieved May 20, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Alt-Right supposedly is synonymous with Hillary Clinton's &amp;quot;deplorables&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alt-right movement's central theme is as follows:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://angrywhitedude.com/2016/04/51778/ What is the Alt-Right?, AngryWhiteDude.com, April 12, 2016]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The alt-right is not defined by any particular school of thought, but by the [[neoliberal]] school of thought it rejects. The alt-right, in the simplest terms, is an unapologetic purging of [[liberal]] idiocy.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The origins of the alternative right can be found in thinkers as diverse as Oswald Spengler, Joseph Sobran, H.L Mencken, Julius Evola, Sam Francis, and the [[paleoconservative]] movement that rallied around the presidential campaigns of [[Pat Buchanan]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/how-2015-fueled-the-rise-of-the-freewheeling-white-nationali?utm_term=.gro5QeAlb#.am3VkM4ZB&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The French New Right also serve as a source of inspiration for many leaders of the alt-right.&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/03/29/an-establishment-conservatives-guide-to-the-alt-right/ An Establishment Conservative’s Guide To The Alt-Right, Breitbart, March 29, 2016]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Contemporary alt-right authors include Jared Taylor, Steve Sailor, Richard Spencer, Paul Kersey, Razib Khan, and [[Milo Yiannopoulos]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/05/meet-milo-yiannopoulos-the-appealing-young-face-of-the-racist-alt-right.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leading alt-right websites include Radix Journal, Countercurrents Publishing, The Unz Review, Taki Mag, The Right Stuff, and Red Ice.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.counter-currents.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.radixjournal.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.unz.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://takimag.com/#axzz4MpkgjNbs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://therightstuff.biz/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://redice.tv/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  More mainstream &amp;quot;alt-lite&amp;quot; websites include [[Breitbart]] and The Gateway Pundit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alt-right as a term appeared in November 2008 when Paul Gottfried addressed the H. L. Mencken Club about what he called &amp;quot;the alternative right&amp;quot;. In 2009, two more posts at Taki's Magazine, by Patrick J. Ford and Jack Hunter, further discussed the 'alternative right.' The term is commonly attributed to&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative right has alternately been called libertarian nationalism, &amp;quot;neo&amp;quot;-paleoconservatism, &amp;quot;evolutionary&amp;quot; conservatism, &amp;quot;scientific&amp;quot; conservatism, and the post-'''religious right'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/douthatnyt/status/704462319074594816&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Distinction from National Socialism (Nazism)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alt-right seeks racial &amp;quot;identitarianism&amp;quot; through a largely monocultural state; and cultural cohesion over economic interests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amren.com/news/2016/10/what-is-the-alt-right-jared-taylor/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The alt-right does not explicitly seek genocide of non-white races. It views national borders as a proxy for racial segregation, but does not support de facto racial segregation.  Mainstream alt-righter members support skilled immigration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Relationally, neo-nazism is a component of the alt-right (big-tent movement); the alt-right is NOT a component of neo-nazism.  The alt-right heavily employs principles from Italian fascism which is the racially-agnostic predecessor of Nazism (German fascism).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, there are growing tensions between the mainstream alt-right and the neo-Nazi wing. In September 2015, mainstream Alex Jones and neo-Nazi David Duke have also exchanged barbs, the former calling the latter a &amp;quot;Democratic plant&amp;quot; and the latter referring to his news organization, ''Infowars'', as being &amp;quot;infiltrated&amp;quot; by Zionists.'In November 2016, a feud broke out between neo-Nazi Richard B. Spencer (who, as previously stated, was one of the coiners of the term &amp;quot;alt-right&amp;quot;) and Mike Cernovich, one of the most prominent alt-right meme-makers, after Cernovich publicly condemned Spencer and accused him of being controlled opposition for including the use of Nazi salutes at a pro-Trump victory party he held. Meanwhile, Paul Joseph Watson was harassed on Twitter by neo-Nazis after he posted a tweet that claimed that there were ''two'' alt-rights (the mainstream and the neo-Nazis), and that the neo-Nazi alt-right were &amp;quot;right-wing SJWs.&amp;quot; [http://davidduke.com/dr-david-duke-official-statement-on-the-duke-jones-great-debate/][http://heatst.com/culture-wars/the-alt-right-movement-is-in-disarray-founder-claims-its-civil-war/] In December 2016, Mike Cernovich again got into a clash with the neo-Nazi wing after he banned Tim Treadstone from attending a pro-Trump victory party after Treadstone posted multiple purportedly anti-Semitic tweets on Twitter.[https://www.businessinsider.com/alt-right-civil-war-twitter-cernovich-milo-alaska-2016-12] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metapedia, an alt-right online encyclopedia, has attacked President Donald Trump for having Jewish allies, acquaintances, friends, and family members, whom the wiki lists under the title, &amp;quot;Donald Trump's Jewish Friends and Associates.&amp;quot; This list is under the &amp;quot;See Also&amp;quot; section in their article about the President, who is listed under the category, &amp;quot;Zionists.&amp;quot; Note that Metapedia is fervently anti-Zionist. These are attempts to demonize Trump by linking him with a malicious, destructive Jewish plot which doesn't exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In light of such ideological differences, it is important to debate how often the term &amp;quot;alt-right&amp;quot; should be used by those who claim to follow the mainstream version of it. On one hand, the term is an accurate description (the mainstream &amp;quot;alt-right&amp;quot; are an ''alternative'' to RINOs). But on the other hand, since the term is most commonly attributed to neo-Nazi Richard B. Spencer, it might not be smart to proclaim to belong to a term associated with him unless you actually agree with his core positions, and doing so could be considered as ideologically dishonest as the left's hijacking of the term &amp;quot;liberal.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hostility to Conservapedia===&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, the two neo-Nazi alt-right wikis, Metapedia and Rightpedia (the latter which was created by neo-Nazis that think Metapedia isn't racist enough) portray Conservapedia in an extremely negative light. Just to be clear how deranged those websites are, at least one of them, and in many cases both of them, do the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reject conservatism because it doesn't put race as a central tenet of its ideology&lt;br /&gt;
* Proclaim bigotry against evangelicals for their pro-Israel stance&lt;br /&gt;
* Reject creationism&lt;br /&gt;
* Accuse Conservapedia of being politically correct because it's not blatantly racist&lt;br /&gt;
* Reject capitalism as being too materialistic&lt;br /&gt;
* Pretend to be anti-Islam but in fact support it when it comes to Israel's enemies Hamas and Hezbollah&lt;br /&gt;
* Accuse Freemasonry of being a Jewish plot&lt;br /&gt;
* Promote Holocaust denial and a positive view of Adolf Hitler&lt;br /&gt;
* Attack Conservapedia for using the Bible, and not Social Darwinism, as the basis for its support for social conservatism&lt;br /&gt;
* Promotes eugenics&lt;br /&gt;
* Accuse Conservapedia of being a partisan hack website, completely ignoring the constant references to &amp;quot;RINOs&amp;quot; on that site&lt;br /&gt;
* Accuse Conservapedia of being pro-Communist for even ''using'' the word &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Nazi&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* Attack the Bible for suggesting that all humans of all colors are descendants of Noah, and falsely claims that Noah was only the father of the white man [http://en.rightpedia.info/w/Conservapedia][http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Style of Alt-right ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The style of the alt-right is to reject the approaches of the [[mainstream media]], and use the internet rather than traditional avenues of communication preferred by moderates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-American-alternative-right&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alt-right employs a &amp;quot;culture jammming&amp;quot; approach to its opposition with memes on Reddit, 4chan, 9gag, and Facebook.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_jamming&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This involves using modified artifacts of popular culture, specifically  characters such as Pepe the frog, Moonman or anime characters to demonstrate the non-falsifiabile attributes of the neoliberal mantra of social change driven by global capitalism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=emo+fascism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.salon.com/2016/10/25/meet-moon-man-the-alt-rights-new-racist-rap-sensation-borrowed-from-1980s-mcdonalds-ads/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Breitbart news editor Stephen Bannon joined the Trump campaign in August 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/18/us/politics/donald-trump-stephen-bannon-paul-manafort.html?_r=0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rejection of neoliberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alternative right holds neoliberalism responsible for the decimation of national borders and national identity. It views the rise of left-leaning governments as an effect of multicultural amalgamation caused by large  business interests run amok. Libertarian (anarcho-capitalistic) elements of the alt-right oppose Keynesianism as well which, paradoxically, is the national (as opposed to global) predecessor of neoliberalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the alt-right's equation of globalized capitalism with Marxism, the movement has been compared to national anarchism (anarcho-fascism) on [[Wikipedia]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism_and_nationalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Libertarian Nationalism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alt-right distrusts large (anti-tribal) financial institutions as corrupt and rejects the open-borders aspect of mainstream libertarianism while affirming new allegiances, such as supporting gays by encouraging firearm ownership or giving support to unaffiliated Independent candidates that are anti-establishment, regardless of their political leanings.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alt-right has seen its membership ranks swell exponentially with libertarians that reject weak national (non-tribal) leadership within their movement.  Although they are not part of the original alt-right, ex-libertarians make up a plurality of this emerging grassroots movement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agnosticism, atheism and the alt-right ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and the alt-right]] and [[Secular right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor George Hawley of the University of Alabama and author of the book ''Making Sense of the Alt-Right'' said in an interview with National Public Radio (NPR) about the alt-right movement:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I would say it is definitely a young movement. I'd say that it is predominantly white millennial men. It is not sort of stereotypically conservative in its profile. I'd say that probably it is a more secular population than the country overall. That is, there are a lot of [[agnosticism|agnostics]] and [[Atheism|atheists]] or people who are just generally indifferent to religion. And I think that it is a fairly well-educated movement on average, that as I think that probably the model alt-right member has at least some college education.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.npr.org/2017/08/15/543730227/unite-the-right-charlottesville-rally-represented-collection-of-alt-right-groups 'Unite The Right': Charlottesville Rally Represented Collection Of Alt-Right Groups], All Things Considered, National Public Radio&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[Western World]] whites and males are both majorities within the  [[atheist population]] (see: [[Demographics of atheism]] and  [[Western atheism and race]]  and [[Atheism and women]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alt-right leader Richard Spencer is an atheist who calls himself a &amp;quot;cultural Christian&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2017/01/22/white-nationalist-richard-spencer-says-hes-an-atheist/ White Nationalist Richard Spencer Says He’s an Atheist] by HEMANT MEHTA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==View of Christianity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alt-right emphasizes the crypto-polytheistic aspects of Christianity and links it to Greco-Roman and pan-European polytheistic history and &amp;quot;Western&amp;quot; accomplishments.  The alt-right views Christianity as a religion distinct from Islam and Judaism in its polytheistic elements and &amp;quot;special&amp;quot; relationship to European history.   The alt-right accepts the study of evolution and global warming as a product of Western polytheistic science.  It rejects the faction of evangelical Christianity for its pro-immigration stance (for proselytization purposes) although it views Europe's history of colonization and Christian proselytization as having a positive effect on those respective colonial countries.  Evangelical Christianity has moved to the right in recent times when it comes to immigration. Evangelical - especially white Evangelicals -overwhelmingly voted for Donald Trump. However, the alt-right has not made significant inroads among evangelicals due to many alt-right individuals being irreligious or not very religious. In addition, many evangelicals have a sense of  solidarity with their fellow Christians from other races. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to its pro-&amp;quot;Western science&amp;quot; views the alternative right has on occasion called itself &amp;quot;evolutionary&amp;quot; conservatism or &amp;quot;scientific&amp;quot; conservatism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alt-right's approach to Israel==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alt-right views Israel as a model for white nationalism and/or Christianism. While opposing Jewish 'hypocrisy' on white identity issues, the alt-right admires the Jewish unity and tribalism manifested in a Zionist state &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/05/jewish-hypocrisy-on-ethnonationalism-in-israel-versus-the-diaspora-a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-words/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In keeping with its isolationist approach, the alt-right opposes an EXCLUSIVE alliance between America and Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alt-right's approach to the Constitution==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A large chorous of authors and activist in the alt-right view the Constitution as subordinate to nationalism, and some view the [[Constitution]] as completely outmoded, including mainstream alt-right publications such as Radix Journal, Counter-Currents, and The Right Stuff.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/12/the-solution-is-state-power/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.radixjournal.com/blog/2014/9/26/power-is-power]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.radixjournal.com/blog/2016/2/29/paper-worship]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2016/03/27/the-constitution-cargo-cult/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://therightstuff.biz/2016/02/04/constitutional-logic-and-the-sanhedrin/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  When [[Vox Day]] wrote a journal entry saying that he believes that &amp;quot;the constitution has failed us&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://voxday.blogspot.com/2016/06/who-killed-conservatism.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; one single author on Red Ice came to the defense of the Constitution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://redice.tv/news/an-alt-right-defense-of-the-u-s-constitution]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some college students are coming to resent the ideals of [[Progressivism]], which seemingly pushes them toward the right.  However, having a deep dissatisfaction for the perversion of &amp;quot;equality&amp;quot; (which is actually re-packaged sameness) that has come as a part of [[Postmodernism]], this leads them to reject &amp;quot;equality&amp;quot; outright and no attempts to describe the difference between equality and the push toward sameness have any effect.  As such, these students are not progressives, but they wholly reject Christianity,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.firstthings.com/article/2018/03/the-anti-christian-alt-right THE ANTI-CHRISTIAN ALT-RIGHT]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the Christian Reformation, the resulting age of Enlightenment, and finally the United States Constitution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.claremont.org/crb/article/are-the-kids-altright/ ARE THE KIDS AL(T)RIGHT?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Opposition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The movement is smeared by elitists of society that thinks it knows better. However, the usual liberal scare tactics and other social engineering schemes are rejected. The alt-right moves to its own beat. The alt-right opposes [[Feminism]], and masculinity is promoted. Anything liberal and the views held by [[RINO]]s: immigration, [[political correctness]], [[cultural appropriation]], [[misogyny]], &amp;quot;[[homophobia]]&amp;quot;, etc. are fiercely rejected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where the [[Establishment]] or modern conservatives shy away from a fight for fear of being called &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;bigoted&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;ignorant&amp;quot; by liberals projecting their own attitudes and beliefs onto them, the alt-right unapologetically fights against this notion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Extremist leftwing progressives at the [[Southern Poverty Law Center]] have taken notice, recently commenting about [[Breitbart]] and their inclusion to the SPLC hate-list&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://dailycaller.com/2016/04/29/southern-poverty-law-center-slaps-breitbart-news-with-racist-charge/#ixzz47FmwBQ4z southern-poverty-law-center-slaps-breitbart-news-with-racist-charge, DailyCaller, April 29, 2016]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The outlet has undergone a noticeable shift toward embracing ideas on the extremist fringe of the conservative right. Racist ideas. Race-baiting ideas. Anti-Muslim and anti-Immigrant ideas –– all key tenants making up an emerging racist ideology known as the ‘Alt-Right.'}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the term has been used in specialized writing about politics and ideology for years, the term gain mainstream usage following a speech by [[Hillary Clinton]] attacking [[Donald Trump]]'s connections to the Alt-Right.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/08/28/the-alt-rights-take-on-clintons-speech-botched-but-legitimizing/|work=Washington Post|date=August 28, 2016|first=David |last=Weigel|title=The alt-right’s take on Clinton’s speech: Botched, but legitimizing|accessdate=August 29, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unofficial &amp;quot;Creed&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We've hijacked your -isms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We've hijacked your -phobias.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We've hijacked your divisive rhetoric.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We've Pepe'd/meme'd/gif'd/video edited it all into oblivion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can censor/flag/ban us, we'll come back stronger. We always do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We won't be silenced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We won't go away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're just getting started.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shortterm, midterm and long term prospects of the alt-right ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===  Shortterm and midterm prospects of the alt-right ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vox Day.jpg|thumbnail|right|150px|[[Vox Day]] ]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Vox Day]], a vocal proponent of the alt-right, argues the alt-right will see substantial growth in the shortterm and midterm due to immigration backlash and whites becoming a racial minority in the United States (Day argues that whites will embrace [[identity politics]]).  In addition, Day believes that the alt-right has a long-term future, but it must embrace cultural Christianity and support Christian revival if this is going to happen.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2017/05/darkstream-christianity-paganism-and.html Christianity, Paganism and the alt-right]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Day also argues that right-wing parties in Europe started to grow quickly in Europe after they publicly dissociated themselves with neo-nazis. Day argues that alt-right can do the same. Also, Day argues that Nazism is leftist and never has been right-wing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2004/04/left-wing-nazi.html The Leftwing Nazi]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Furthermore, Day predicts that there will be a [[Reconquista]] 2.0 and that Muslims will be expelled out of Europe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2016/12/these-are-merkels-dead.html These are Merkel's Dead]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, Paul Gottfried argues that the alt-right brand has been permanently damaged due to the alt-right leader Richard Spencer and others ruining the brand of the alt-right and the movement is now associated with neo-nazism and racism (Richard Spencer made some allusions to Nazism and gave a Nazi salutes at an alt-right gathering and it was caught on film. Spencer claimed he was only joking and it was a display or irony and exhuberance. At the alt-right gathering, many alt-righters joined him in his Nazi salutes).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8VYmY89_KU The Alt Right - What went wrong?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/white-nationalist/ Nazi salutes ‘done in a spirit of irony and exuberance,’ alt-right leader says]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Long term prospects of the alt-right ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alt-right is heavily dependent on white nationalism. In Europe, the fertility rate of whites is below a sub-replacement level.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sneps.net/RD/uploads/1-Shall%20the%20Religious%20Inherit%20the%20Earth.pdf Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?: Demography and Politics in the Twenty-First Century by Eric Kaufmann, Belfer Center, Harvard University/Birkbeck College, University of London]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   In the United States in many areas, whites have a sub-replacement levels of fertility while racial minorities are growing thanks in part to their higher fertility rates (this is particularly true among Hispanics).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://time.com/4585232/white-deaths-exceed-births-united-states/ More White People Are Dying Than Are Being Born in 17 States]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Evangelicals and the shortterm, midterm and long term prospects of the alt-right ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism vs. Christian revival and Christian apologetics]] and [[Revival]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evangelicals have not been very receptive to the alt-right. If there was a substantial growth of evangelicalism in the West (due to a revival, their higher fertility rates, immigration and other factors), it likely would not benefit the alt-right. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, a significant growth of evangelical Christianity in the West is due to American Hispanic evangelicals and evangelical European immigrants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Decline of the secular left]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Western atheism, schisms and political polarization]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/03/29/an-establishment-conservatives-guide-to-the-alt-right/ A Guide To The Alt-Right] by ALLUM BOKHARI &amp;amp; MILO YIANNOPOULOS, ''Breitbart News''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxist Terminology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ted_Cruz&amp;diff=1821240</id>
		<title>Ted Cruz</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ted_Cruz&amp;diff=1821240"/>
		<updated>2021-12-14T21:13:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Ted Cruz&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Ted cruz.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Heidi Cruz&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Southern Baptist Convention|Southern Baptist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|website=[http://cruz.senate.gov Senate website]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Texas&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 2013 – present&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Kay Bailey Hutchison]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|status=j&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Rafael Edward Cruz''', known as '''Ted Cruz''' (born December 22, 1970, in [[Calgary]], Canada) is the junior [[United States Senator]] from [[Texas]], having won the seat vacated by [[Kay Bailey Hutchison]] in 2012. A [[Republican Party|Republican]], Cruz was a Solicitor General of Texas, the chief lawyer for the state before the [[U.S. Supreme Court]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cruz has been listed as an author of more than eighty U.S. Supreme Court briefs and personally argued in nine before the U.S. Supreme Court, plus another 31 before other courts. He graduated ''[[magna cum laude]]'' from [[Harvard Law School]] and served as an editor of the ''[[Harvard Law Review]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Cruz supported the Trade Promotion Authority (TPA, also known as &amp;quot;Fast Track&amp;quot;).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/11/11/senator-ted-cruz-did-support-tpa/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Cruz attends the secret [[Koch brothers]]' meetings and advances their agenda without admitting to doing so.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Robillard, Kevin. [https://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/24/koch-brothers-pence-trump-239928 &amp;quot;Koch network ramps up political spending while trying to push Trump team&amp;quot;], Politico, June 24, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He pandered to the Koch brothers by at first refusing to endorse [[Donald Trump]] for president.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Cruz was the first candidate to announce for president in 2016, He formed multiple political organizations to support his candidacy prior to the official nomination of Trump in the summer of 2016.  Cruz considers himself the political heir of [[Ronald Reagan]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Ronald W. Reagan]] lost the Republican nomination for president in 1976, but then won the nomination and the presidency in 1980.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cruz initially refused during his televised address at the Republican National Convention in [[Cleveland, Ohio]], to endorse Trump. He was loudly booed by the audience for his stance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.conservativehq.com/node/23643 Analysis by Richard Viguerie, a former Cruz supporter]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Eventually, Cruz did endorse Trump,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Ted-Cruz-Endorses-Donald-Trump/2016/09/23/id/749888 Retrieved September 24, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but not before becoming the recipient of anger and disdain from many for his hesitation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cruz's wife, Heidi, is an executive for [[Goldman Sachs]] and was on leave from that [[liberal]] investment bank during the campaign, where she played a dominant strategically and for defining policy positions and fundraising.  Ted Cruz has sided with some [[feminist]] positions. Heidi has been a member of the globalist [[Council on Foreign Relations]] and was on the task force that recommended the [[leftist]] [[North American Union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkmZ64nmUfE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cfr.org/canada/building-north-american-community/p8102 &amp;quot;Building a North American Community/More about this publication&amp;quot;] (May 2005).  Council on Foreign Relations website/Canada.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Reportedly neither Ted Cruz nor his wife donated anything to churches, including what they describe as their own church, from 2006 to 2010, the most recent time period Cruz has released.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2016-01-30/now-deeply-christian-cruzs-religion-once-wasnt-so-obvious&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cruz is promoted heavily by [[neocons]] who like his interventionist foreign policy, but some conservatives see more grandstanding than achievement on social issues. Many prominent neocon Cruz supporters later acquired positions in the Trump administration, and used those positions to sabotage his agenda from within. These people included Ezra Cohen-Watnick, [[Steve_Bannon|Steve Bannon]], and [[Mark_Meadows|Mark Meadows]]. It is unknown what role -- if any -- Cruz himself played in said sabotage, but the fact that said saboteurs all supported him in 2016 cannot be ignored. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In prior elections, Cruz has been supported by the [[Tea Party movement]], [[Tea Party Express]], [[Club for Growth]], [[FreedomWorks]], Erick Erickson of [[RedState]], [[Mark Levin]], and former [[Alaska]] Governor [[Sarah Palin]], but also by pro-[[homosexual]] donors as discussed below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Texas Senate primary elections of May 29, 2012, Cruz finished second to Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst, but the nine-candidate Republican field forced a run-off.  On July 31, Cruz defeated Dewhurst in a second round of voting. Cruz easily defeated [[Democratic Party|Democrat]] former State Representative Paul Sadler in the general election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
Cruz's father [[Rafael Bienvenido Cruz]] fought alongside [[Fidel Castro]] during the [[Cuban Revolution]] and was imprisoned three years later for his political activities. In 1957, he escaped to the [[United States]]. Today he is a pastor in [[Dallas]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |author=Cruz, Ted|url=http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/senator-ted-cruz-confronting-the-threat-of-radical-islam/ |title=Senator Ted Cruz: Confronting the threat of radical Islam |work=FrontPage Magazine |date=May 20, 2013 }} See [[FrontPage Magazine]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cruz's mother is an American. After Cruz's birth in [[Alberta]], Canada, the family moved to Texas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cruz attended [[Princeton]], at which he authored a senior thesis on the [[9th Amendment|9th]] and [[10th Amendment|10th]] Amendments to the [[United States Constitution]], titled &amp;quot;Clipping the Wings of Angels&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://archive.org/details/480888-cruz-thesis Ted Cruz's 1992 Princeton Undergrad Thesis], &amp;quot;Clipping the Wings of Angels&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a student at [[Harvard Law School]], Cruz was more of a [[libertarian]] than a social conservative.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/metro/what-was-ted-cruz-like-at_b_6941178.html &amp;quot;What was Ted Cruz like at Harvard?&amp;quot;] (May 30, 2015). Huffington Post website/''Metro New York'' blog.  See [[Huffington Post]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He graduated ''magna cum laude'', with his ''Juris Doctor'' degree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cruz is a [[Southern Baptist Convention|Southern Baptist]], married with two children.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Texas Solicitor General==&lt;br /&gt;
Cruz served as Solicitor General of Texas.  In that capacity, he was involved with court cases such as ''[[Medellin v. Texas]]'', ''[[Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow]]'', ''[[League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry]]'', ''[[Van Orden v. Perry]]'', and ''[[D.C. v. Heller]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senate career==&lt;br /&gt;
Cruz was elected as a member of the Senate in 2012. Beginning on September 24, 2013, Cruz gave a 21-hour speech on the Senate floor against [[Obamacare]]. The speech greatly boosted his national profile and led to denunciations from the [[liberal media]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/25/opinion/the-embarrassment-of-senator-ted-cruz.html |title=The embarrassment of Senator Ted Cruz|publisher=''New York Times'' website|date=September 24, 2013}}  See [[New York Times]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His arguments at the time that once ObamaCare was fully implemented, it would be impossible to repeal it, were shown to be accurate when the GOP had serious trouble agreeing to a repeal-and-replace plan in 2017.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;York, Bryan (June 29, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-when-ted-cruz-gop-saw-troubled-future-of-obamacare-repeal/article/2627403 Byron York: When Ted Cruz, GOP saw troubled future of Obamacare repeal]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved June 29, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2019, Cruz reached out to a far-left member of Congress [[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]]. Cruz indicated that he would be willing to work with Cortez to support a lifetime ban on former Members of Congress becoming lobbyists and passing a bill that would make birth control available over the counter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pappas, Alex (July 21, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ted-cruz-progressive-hero-texan-defies-hardliner-image-with-aoc-cooperation-and-more Ted Cruz, progressive hero? Texan defies hard-liner image with AOC cooperation and more]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 15, 2021.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2021, Cruz called the second impeachment of President Donald Trump by the Democrat-controlled U.S. House vindictive and punitive, adding that Democrats seem obsessed with hatred for Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mena, Bryan. [https://www.texastribune.org/2021/01/25/ted-cruz-john-cornyn-impeachment-trial-donald-trump/ Ted Cruz, John Cornyn come out against Donald Trump's second impeachment trial], ''Texas Tribune'', January 25, 2021.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 6, 2021, Cruz signed a statement by [[Paul Gosar]] and rose alongside him to object to electoral certification of the state of [[Arizona]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nationalfile.com/breaking-paul-gosar-and-ted-cruz-object-to-arizona-electors-receive-uproarious-applause/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He subsequently explained his reasoning in a fiery five-minute speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=42xJ3Mcthhg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cruz also joined [[Josh Hawley]]’s and Scott Perry’s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2021/01/07/sen-josh-hawley-objects-to-pa-electors/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; objection to electoral certification of the state of [[Pennsylvania]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/six-six-gop-senators-stood-president-arizona-election-results/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In December 2021, in a classic neocon move, Cruz stated that he was willing to approve [[Joseph_Biden|Joe Biden's]] [[Leftist|left-wing]] State Department nominees in exchange for Biden imposing more sanctions on Russia.[https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/12/03/cruz-pushes-to-reinstate-sanctions-on-russian-pipeline-biden-supports-in-exchange-for-nominee-approvals/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Campaigns financed by substantial pro-[[homosexual]] donations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Texas Tribune'' determined in 2012 that Ted Cruz's:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Root, Jay (July 3, 2012).  [https://www.texastribune.org/2012/07/03/ted-cruzs-gay-billionaire-donor-draws-criticism/ &amp;quot;Cruz mega-donor is gay, pro-pot billionaire&amp;quot;].  The Texas Tribune website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|largest longtime contributor is a gay billionaire who supports same-sex marriage and [[marijuana]] legalization, campaign finance filings show.  Peter Thiel, a [[Germany|German]]-born hedge fund manager and founder of the online payment system [[PayPal]], gave Cruz $251,000 in 2009 for his aborted run for attorney general. The money represented 19 percent of the total raised for that campaign, which Cruz ended after Attorney General [[Greg Abbott]] decided to run for re-election.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Texas Monthly'' ran a similar exposé entitled, &amp;quot;Ted Cruz's Gay Marriage Money.&amp;quot;  This article described how one of Cruz's donors has been:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ratcliffe, R. G. (March 22, 2015).  [http://www.texasmonthly.com/burka-blog/ted-cruzs-gay-marriage-money &amp;quot;Ted Cruz's gay marriage money&amp;quot;].  ''TexasMonthly'' website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Paul Elliott Singer of the hedge fund Elliott Management Corporation. Singer, whose son married his partner, donated $425,000 and raised another $500,000 to push for legalization of same-sex marriage in [[New York]]. In 2012, Singer donated $1 million to the American Unity PAC, with the purpose of supporting candidates who back gay marriage. Singer gave Cruz $25,000 in 2009.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April, the ''[[New York Times]]'' ran an article about the special fundraising meeting that Cruz had in [[Manhattan]] with homosexual potential donors:  &amp;quot;At New York Reception, Ted Cruz Said to Strike Different Tone Toward Gays.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Judicial nominees ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ted Cruz speaking in Des Moines.jpg|thumb|Cruz speaking at the Iowa GOP's Growth and Opportunity Party in Des Moines on October 31, 2015.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Ted Cruz recommended Judge Gregg Costa for nomination and confirmation to the [[Fifth Circuit|U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cruz.senate.gov/?p=news&amp;amp;id=1288 &amp;quot;''Dallas Morning News'': Senate confirms Cornyn and Cruz pick for appeals court&amp;quot;] (May 20, 2014).  Ted Cruz U.S. Senate webpage/Press office/News.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As a Senator from Texas, Cruz could have blocked the nomination.  Instead, Cruz's support made it happen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Within five months of his confirmation in May 2014, Judge Costa then voted in favor of rehearing [[Planned Parenthood]]'s case in their attempt to reverse a Fifth Circuit's ruling that had upheld the pro-women, pro-life Texas House Bill 2, a good law that resulted in the closure of roughly half the abortion clinics in Texas.  Judge Edith Jones and the majority of the Fifth Circuit outvoted Costa on the petition for rehearing ''en banc'' in ''Planned Parenthood of Greater Tex. Surgical Health Servs. v. Abbott''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite court|litigants=Planned Parenthood of Greater Tex. Surgical Health Servs. v. Abbott|url=http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/13/13-51008-CV2.pdf|vol=Vol. 769|reporter=''Federal Reporter'', 3rd series|opinion=Opinion 330|pinpoint=p. 2|date=October 9, 2014|court=United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit}}  Retrieved from United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit website on February 6, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was obvious prior to Ted Cruz's recommendation that Judge Costa was not [[pro-life]].  In one of his decisions as a [[United States District Courts|United States district court]] judge in 2012, Judge Costa uncritically cited ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' for a procedural point.  Judge Costa had also been a Democrat volunteer in college in the 1990s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2016 presidential race==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Senator of Texas Ted Cruz at New England College Town Hall Meeting.jpg|thumb|Cruz speaking at a Town Hall Meeting at New England College in Henniker, New Hampshire on February 3, 2016.]]&lt;br /&gt;
On March 23, 2015, Cruz became the first person to announce his candidacy for the [[Republican]] nomination for president in [[2016 presidential election|2016]] in a speech before an audience at [[Liberty University]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.c-span.org/video/?324979-1/ted-cruz-presidential-campaign-announcement &amp;quot;Ted Cruz presidential campaign announcement&amp;quot;] (March 23, 2015). C-SPAN video, 38:18.  See [[C-SPAN]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The predictable liberal media immediately went on the offense claiming he has no chance but was in awe of his speech without [[teleprompter]]s.{{fact}} His wife would take a leave of absence from her job at Goldman Sachs to join her husband on the campaign trail. This decision left his family without health insurance. Cruz, by law, has to be insured and took Obamacare coverage. This drove the media batty at the irony of railing against Obamacare but using it.{{fact}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cruz would raise $4 million in donations after the first week of his announcement. Liberal media jaws hit the floor when it was learned he raised $31 million in one week from [[PAC]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |last=Boyle |first=Matthew |url=https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/08/mark-halperin-unprecedented-31-million-super-pac-effort-backing-ted-cruz-for-president/ |title=Mark Halperin: Unprecedented $31 million super PAC effort backing Ted Cruz for president|publisher=Breitbart News Network/Big government|date=April 8, 2015 }} See [[Breitbart News Network]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Eligibility====&lt;br /&gt;
The same liberals who mocked opponents of Obama for claiming he was not born in [[Hawaii]] have decided to make the same case against Cruz for being born in Canada. Cruz's mother being an American citizen (even though she voted in Canadian elections), just like Obama's mother, insures that he is American no matter what country he was born in. There are several differences in Obama/Cruz birth certificate controversies. Cruz released his immediately after it was requested. Obama held onto his for years, spending nearly $4 million in legal fees.{{fact}}  Cruz renounced his Canadian citizenship on May 14, 2014.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/08/19/cruz-will-renounce-canadian-citizenship/?wprss=rss_homepage|title=Cruz Will Renounce Canadian Citizenship|last=Blake|first=Aaron|date=August 19, 2013|work=[[The Washington Post]]|accessdate=February 6, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political positions==&lt;br /&gt;
Cruz opposes [[illegal immigration]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ontheissues.org/international/Ted_Cruz_Immigration.htm &amp;quot;Ted Cruz on immigration&amp;quot;] (January 20, 2015).  On the Issues website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[gun control]] and [[homosexuality]]. He is [[pro-life]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |last=Bair |first=Andrew |url=https://www.lifenews.com/2013/06/05/pro-life-senator-ted-cruz-to-address-national-right-to-life-convention/ |title=Pro-life Senator Ted Cruz to address National Right to Life Convention |publisher=LifeNews.com|date= June 5, 2013 }}  See [[LifeNews.com]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; supports the [[death penalty]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Ted_Cruz.htm#Crime &amp;quot;Ted Cruz on the issues/Ted Cruz on crime&amp;quot;] (February 2015).  On the Issues website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and believes that the [[USA]] should not get involved in the [[Syrian Civil War]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |last=Tomasky |first=Michael |url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/09/09/marco-rubio-ted-cruz-and-their-craven-and-brazen-hypocrisy-on-syria.html |title=Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, and their craven and brazen hypocrisy on Syria|work=The Daily Beast |date=September 9, 2013 }}  See [[The Daily Beast]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cruz has effectively criticized [[RINO]]s, calling them &amp;quot;squishes.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |last=Weiner |first=Rachel |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/04/29/ted-cruz-mocks-squishes-in-republican-party/ |title=Ted Cruz mocks Senate Republican ‘squishes’|work=Washington Post|date=April 29, 2013 }} See [[Washington Post]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Showing his support for [[Taiwan]] over the communist and authoritarian [[People's Republic of China]], Cruz met with the Taiwanese president in January 2017, along with Texas governor [[Greg Abbott]], even after China sent a statement asking members of Congress not to do so.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | title=Cruz Meets with Taiwanese President, Blasts China | url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/08/cruz-meets-with-taiwanese-president-blasts-china.html | date=January 8, 2017 | publisher=[[Fox News]] | accessdate=January 14, 2017}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Border Patrol agents have spoken highly of Cruz for advocating for them and a secure border with [[Mexico]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Price, Bob (July 25, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/07/25/ted-cruz-advocate-congress-says-border-patrol-agent/ Ted Cruz is Our Advocate in Congress, Says Border Patrol Agent]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 25, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite voicing support for protecting American [[sovereignty]], Cruz hypocritically supports [[NAFTA]] despite it being a threat to sovereignty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Byas, Steve (November 8, 2017). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/27329-cruz-support-for-nafta-contradicts-his-passion-for-national-sovereignty Cruz Support for NAFTA Contradicts His “Passion” for National Sovereignty]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 25, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The right has argued that Ted Cruz is a RINO,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://themoderatevoice.com/speaking-of-trickery-ted-cruz-is-a-rino/amp/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while the left has admitted he would have been &amp;quot;worse than Trump&amp;quot; as president, due to his [[establishment]] conservatism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.latimes.com/opinion/topoftheticket/la-na-tt-president-cruz-20160309-story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/30/opinion/the-one-thing-worse-than-trump.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-cruz-is-more-dangerous-than-trump/2015/12/15/00a425fa-a360-11e5-9c4e-be37f66848bb_story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Best selling author==&lt;br /&gt;
[[The New York Times|The ''New York Times'']] has engaged in a scheme to keep Cruz's book off of its bestseller list.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |last=Howerton |first=Jason |url=https://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/07/09/despite-stellar-sales-new-york-times-keeps-ted-cruzs-new-book-off-bestseller-list-heres-the-excuse-given/ |title=Despite stellar sales, ''New York Times'' keeps Ted Cruz’s new book off bestseller list—here’s the excuse given|publisher=The Blaze website|date=July 9, 2015 }} See [[The Blaze]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  At issue was the practice of some politicians to pre-purchase a large quantity of books for use by their campaigns with the hope that those purchases would place the books on the bestseller list for one week.  The ''New York Times'' tries to exclude those bulk campaign purchases from the totals used to determine which books have the top sales. The question is whether the bestseller list shows what books the public buys rather than which books the politicians give away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2018 reelection bid==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his bid for a second term in the Senate in the November 6 general election, Cruz narrowly defeated the outgoing Democratic U.S. Representative [[Beto O'Rourke]] of [[El Paso]] by about two and one-half percent. Cruz received 50.89% of the vote and O'Rourke received 48.33%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news |last= |first= |date=November 6, 2018 |work=State of Texas, Office of the Secretary of State |url=https://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist331_state.htm |title=Race Summary Report, 2018 General Election |location=[[Austin, Texas]] |access-date=January 15, 2021}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the primary held on March 6, 2018, Cruz defeated four weak intra-party opponents. He polled 1,317,450 votes (85.3 percent). In the Democratic primary, O'Rourke received 641,337 votes (61.8 percent). Some 506,000 more Republicans voted in the Texas primary than did Democrats. The liberal O'Rourke, who unlike Cruz is not Hispanic, was believed to be a potentially strong opponent because of favorable media coverage, strong fund-raising, large crowds at campaign rallies, and respectable opinion polling. O'Rourke was said to resemble &amp;quot;a Kennedy,&amp;quot; referring to the popular [[Massachusetts]] family of liberal politicians. In July, the magazine ''Politico'' declared that &amp;quot;Beto-mania&amp;quot; was sweeping Texas, an early warning to Senator Cruz that he could be unseated in a considerable &amp;quot;blue wave&amp;quot; across the Lone Star State.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/07/09/beto-mania-sweeps-texas-218961|title=Beto-mania Sweeps Texas|publisher=''Politico'' magazine|date=July 9, 2018|author=Ben Schreckinger|accessdate=July 13, 2018}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The &amp;quot;blue wave in Texas toppled more than a dozen state legislators and two U.S. Representatives. It also produced Democratic sweeps in the large urban areas, particularly at the judicial level. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Texas Conservative Review,'' edited in Houston by [[Gary Polland]], in August 2018 called upon Cruz to conduct a more active campaign than he had done thus far to retain his Senate seat:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
…Conservatives are increasingly concerned about the fate of Senator Ted Cruz. The race is a critical one on the ballot. Cruz's opponent, left-wing Congressman O'Rourke is out-running Cruz, out-campaigning Cruz and out-personalizing Cruz. Where is the beef, we are asking what happened to making this race about Texas vs. California values? What happened to making the race about Cruz's mainstream values vs. O'Rourke's out-of-step leftist values? Where is the Ted Cruz we know and love from his campaign six years ago and from his campaign for President?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If O'Rourke is allowed to make this race about personality and showing up all over, Cruz will lose. Yes, he needs more money, but first, the fighter Ted Cruz needs to re-emerge now.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Texas Conservative Review'', Vol. XVII No. 20, August 24, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quote==&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Tonight's ([[Barack Hussein Obama]]) speech was less a State of the Union and more a state of denial.&amp;quot; (January 12, 2016)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;If standing for liberty and standing for the Constitution makes you a wacko bird, then count me a proud wacko bird.&amp;quot; (A response to &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; [[John McCain]]'s attack on conservatives)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2013/03/16/ted-cruz-count-me-a-proud-wacko-bird/ Cruz: 'Count Me a Proud Wacko Bird' for Standing with Rand], [[Breitbart.com]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Books==&lt;br /&gt;
''A Time for Truth: Reigniting the Promise of America'' (2015)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Ted Cruz:  For God and Country'' (2015)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Senate Elections 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Senate Conservatives Fund]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Salazar v. Buono]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.tedcruz.org/ Official Senate campaign website]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.facebook.com/tedcruzpage facebook page]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://twitter.com/#!/tedcruz Twitter page]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.tedcruz.org/media/videos/ Ted Cruz Videos]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.tedcruz.org Ted Cruz 2016 campaign website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Article: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/06/ted-cruzs-father-delivers-epic-speech-touting-patriotism-and-lambasting-obamas-socialist-inclinations/ Ted Cruz’s father delivers epic speech touting patriotism and lambasting Obama’s ‘socialist’ inclinations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Cruz, Ted}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Texas]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Baptists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tea Party Movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2016 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Best Selling Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:117th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:118th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pro First Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pro Second Amendment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nicholas_J._Fuentes&amp;diff=1820092</id>
		<title>Nicholas J. Fuentes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nicholas_J._Fuentes&amp;diff=1820092"/>
		<updated>2021-12-09T04:30:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* External links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Nicholas Joseph “Nick” Fuentes''' is an American internet personality, supporter of [[Joe Biden]]'s disastrous foreign policy,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/U3P0G&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and a self-described paleoconservative commentator who runs a podcast he dubbed America First on [[YouTube]], and previously ran the ''Nationalist Review'' (not to be confused with ''National Review'') podcast with James Allsup. He has been criticized by both liberals and mainstream conservatives for numerous bigoted remarks, although he says he is joking.&amp;lt;ref name=list&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1196604409607794688&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Fuentes, like Charlottesville protest organizer [[Richard Spencer]], is said to be a federal agent and [[provocateur]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dissident-mag.com/2020/07/07/america-first-fed-problem/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Fuentes claimed the U.S. federal government has seized his assets and placed him on a no-fly list to force compliance, although he's issued denials by saying &amp;quot;federal informants won't even work with&amp;quot; him, referring to the [[Oath Keepers]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://tv.gab.com/channel/officialamericafirst/view/nick-addresses-slander-of-his-character-617c395c05dc60172aff0827&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Education==&lt;br /&gt;
Fuentes graduated from Lyons Township High School and was president of the school's student council.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Career==&lt;br /&gt;
On August 12, 2017, Fuentes flew from [[Chicago]] to [[Virginia]] to attend the Second Day of the so-called 'Unite The Right' rally in Charlottesville organized by  [[Richard Spencer]]. Fuentes claimed that the majority of protesters in attendance were not [[KKK]] members nor were they [[Neo-Nazis]]. The notorious far left racist rag, ''[[The New York Times]]'' attributed prejudicial comments to Fuentes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Previously, Fuentes worked as a host on the Right Side Broadcasting Network; however, he was abruptly fired after making a statement on his show that the First Amendment is only meant for citizens, not immigrants and foreigners, and that mainstream media networks, such as [[Cable News Network|CNN]], should be held responsible for making people believe it was universal. He later left Boston University after receiving several death threats and declared that he wished to move to Auburn University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political views==&lt;br /&gt;
Fuentes is a devout Catholic and self-described paleoconserative. He has criticized the establishment and the left many times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although, Fuentes has made anti-Semitic remarks, including using bigoted tropes following the Charlottesville attack.&amp;lt;ref name=list/&amp;gt; He has also mocked the atrocities of the [[Holocaust]].&amp;lt;ref name=list/&amp;gt; He has also defended [[Jim Crow]] laws which were instituted by the [[Democratic Party]].&amp;lt;ref name=list/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fuentes has whined over President Trump condemning white supremacy, and similarly attacked [[Dinesh D'Souza]] in a childish manner.&amp;lt;ref name=list/&amp;gt; He also also expressed sympathetic remarks for [[Antifa]].&amp;lt;ref name=list/&amp;gt; Fuentes claims to be joking, and seems to be overly ironic though.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
On August 7, 2019, Fuentes got into a feud with Matt Walsh on Twitter over comments Walsh had made about a mass shooting by a suspected White Supremacist in which Walsh says that &amp;quot;white racist scumbags should be executed&amp;quot;. Fuentes had made what detractors call an &amp;quot;Antisemitic outburst&amp;quot; on his show, America First over the comments made by Walsh, who writes for [[Daily Wire]]. Fuentes called Walsh derogatory terms and said that he &amp;quot;works for [[Jews]]&amp;quot;, he is a &amp;quot;Race Traitor&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;Shabbos [[Goy]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/08/15/citing-death-threats-year-old-who-attended-violent-rally-won-return/CJU7GioWLClGjIHZ2YqshM/story.html 18-Year Old Who Attended Rally Won't Return to BU]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://cozy.tv Cozy TV]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Fuentes, Nicholas J.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Commentators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bigotry]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-Semitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biden Supporters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Populists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Activists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cozy.TV&amp;diff=1820091</id>
		<title>Cozy.TV</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cozy.TV&amp;diff=1820091"/>
		<updated>2021-12-09T04:30:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Cozy.TV''' is an anti-censorship internet streaming platform for conservative dissidents developed by [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] and the team behind AmericaFirst.Live.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
Upon Fuentes's ban from DLive and the resultant creation of AmericaFirst.Live, Fuentes announced that a new, permanent platform would be developed as a permanent home for conservative livestreamers (who otherwise are forced to hop between Twitch, DLive, Trovo, YouTube, and other streaming platforms due to bans). As a direct result of the bans, [[Alex Jones]] generously gave Fuentes a channel on his platform, Banned.Video, where Fuentes has since regularly posted clips from his live show. While this solved many issues, Banned.Video is not built to host livestreams or have SuperChat (messages with donations) functionality; thus, a new platform remained necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Launch ==&lt;br /&gt;
On October 12/13, 2021, the platform officially launched, with Fuentes, Jaden McNeil, and Vincent James as the first three streamers. Since then, livestreamers Beardson Beardly, Bryson Gray, Tyler Russell, Steve Franssen, JimboZoomer, and JoeTheBoomer have all been added to the platform (which remains in its beta testing phase). More functionality is planned in the future, with general availability of the platform to the public for streaming possibly in 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://cozy.tv/ Official website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alt-tech]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1820043</id>
		<title>User:BernieandTrumpFan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1820043"/>
		<updated>2021-12-09T00:06:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump have stood up for the working class against the establishment and the elites. Both are populists who have discussed criminal justice reform and lowering prescription drug prices. Bernie Sanders is analogous to [[Leon Trotsky]], a Jewish socialist who was eventually murdered by the Soviet Union's ruling class for being an outspoken critic of said ruling class.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Trockiy2.jpg|thumbnail|[[Leon Trotsky]]]] I am here at Conservapedia not only to redeem myself in the eyes of God the Father and Christ His Son after my days as both a white supremacist and a far-left anarchist, but also to provide an objective analysis of history, current events, and the world at large. I don't always agree with Conservapedia, and I will not conform, but I will respect your opinions, and I hope that you will respect mine. It's been over a year since I joined Stormfront, and over a year since I've left it. Help me forget. Or at least, help me better myself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   More than two years since I joined Conservapedia, and I'm doing great!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   I don't care if Trump runs in 2024, but if it's not him, it should be someone who genuinely and strongly represents MAGA, especially in the face of&lt;br /&gt;
   adversity. I'm proud of what Trump accomplished overall, minus the last few weeks of his presidency, when he threw Capitol protesters under the bus,&lt;br /&gt;
   conceded the 2020 United States presidential election to Joe Biden, allowed Jared Kushner to keep him off Parler and Gab, and failed to pardon&lt;br /&gt;
   Snowden and Assange. I still support MAGA and believe that the social media bans and second attempted impeachment levelled against him were&lt;br /&gt;
   shameful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please stop blocking me, admins! Also, calling other conservatives racist is a leftist tactic!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Topics of Disagreement Between Myself and Conservapedia'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I disagree that:&lt;br /&gt;
* marijuana and violent video games cause school shootings [or any other types of mass murder]&lt;br /&gt;
* a show or movie is &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; if it contains a homosexual couple or a dysfunctional family&lt;br /&gt;
* vaccines cause autism&lt;br /&gt;
* it is debatable whether the United States should have entered World War II&lt;br /&gt;
I also believe Conservapedia goes too far on the matter of homosexuality, such as endorsing conversion therapy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Topics of Agreement Between Myself and Conservapedia'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree that:&lt;br /&gt;
[Error: file_size too large]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, all of the articles about the network, from Wikipedia, Conservapedia, and Metapedia, are anti-Fox News!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Examples of Institutionalized Racism in the West''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Planned Parenthood, which exterminates unborn African-American babies in what some have referred to as a &amp;quot;black genocide.&amp;quot; Also disproportionately targets Hispanics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Affirmative Action, which blocks Asian-Americans from certain schools and jobs simply based on their race, in addition to similarly blocking Caucasians, and assumes blacks and Hispanics lack the intellectual capacity to get by or achieve things on their own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- White Privilege theories, pushed into the mainstream by the media and Marxist university professors, which attack white people for the colour of their skin, and accuse them of possessing an inherent biological privilege which can only be compensated for by contributing to liberal causes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Islamic No-Go Zones, also known as &amp;quot;sanctuary cities,&amp;quot; which contain rampant anti-Semitism, in addition to a considerable amount of anti-white hatred.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Murders of Land-Owning White Farmers in South Africa, which is occurring en masse, and is almost genocidal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Racist Immigration System of Japan, which is aimed at preserving the ethnic Japanese supermajority.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Congressman Paul Gosar.jpg|thumbnail|[[Paul Gosar]] for President 2028!]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abortion is murder. Taxation is theft. All lives matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The biggest step toward both criminal justice reform and taking on Big Pharma would be the legalization of cannabis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evolution is a conspiracy theory. Creation is truth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I oppose [[globalization]] because I don't want [[multinational corporation]]s [[outsourcing]] [[blue-collar workers|blue-collar]] [[Main Street|domestic jobs]] to sweatshops in [[communist]] [[dictatorship]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative Criticisms of the GOP|The GOP is dead]]. [[List of Former Tea Party Supporters Who Have Become RINOs or Never Trumpers|As is the Tea Party]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would appear that [https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/11/27/are-white-nationalists-turning-trump white nationalists are Never Trump], and [https://www.thedailybeast.com/2020-democrats-are-starting-to-turn-obamas-legacy-against-biden 2020 Democrats are Never Obama].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a [[right-wing populism|right-wing populist]], [[nationalism|civic nationalist]], and [[social conservatism|social conservative]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a devout [[Catholic]], unlike [[Joe Biden]] and [[Nancy Pelosi]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jesus5.jpg|thumbnail|[[Jesus Christ]] the Messiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a registered member of the [[People's Party of Canada]]. [[Talk:Conservative Criticisms of the GOP|America needs the Patriot Party.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of Canada.svg|thumbnail|I am a [[Canadian]] nationalist, and I love my country!]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
100th article (less than three months after joining): [[Jewish Defense League]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1st article to break 10,000 views: [[Media Bias Fact Check]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over 1,000 edits!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.criminaljusticereform.net/&lt;br /&gt;
https://fightpharma.org&lt;br /&gt;
http://usmca.com/&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.peoplespartyofcanada.ca&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intersection between the two greatest patriots of the past 50 years: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYsUpaVLWis His Dream is Now Our Dream].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1ZBhAINr8s][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G87UXIH8Lzo][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Vjeqd-UPCM][https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-just-deported-a-nazi-thats-a-move-i-can-get-behind/2018/08/21/ec1d2d1c-a56d-11e8-8fac-12e98c13528d_story.html][https://www.facebook.com/Bernie-Sanders-Supporters-For-Donald-Trump-227390520965009/][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AnUJYPPWXc][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qS4DjAaW8_s][https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/activist-milo-yiannopoulos-is-now-ex-gay-consecrating-his-life-to-st-joseph][https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/08/07/two-divergent-platforms-donald-trumps-main-street-vs-hillary-clintons-wall-street/][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge_RUxBTHN4][https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/presidential-message-international-holocaust-remembrance-day/][https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/presidential-message-international-holocaust-remembrance-day-2/][https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/presidential-message-international-holocaust-remembrance-day-2020/][https://townhall.com/columnists/armstrongwilliams/2018/07/26/in-defense-of-israel-n2503701][https://nationaleconomicseditorial.com/2017/03/21/economic-nationalism/][https://billmuehlenberg.com/2016/05/28/study-show-approved/][https://twitter.com/ForAshli/status/1369420490834640897]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2020 Democrats being off-the-rails far-left: [https://www.conservapedia.com/2020_Democrats%27_attacks_on_Barack_Hussein_Obama][https://www.westernjournal.com/democrats-approve-health-care-illegal-immigrants-trump-fires-back-end-race/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't trust [[Dan Bongino]].[https://nationalfile.com/video-dan-bongino-says-ex-parler-ceo-is-lying-site-absolutely-committed-to-free-speech/][https://tv.gab.com/channel/a/view/andrew-torba-responds-to-dan-bongino-6116c45008520fa71ff506f2] Don't trust [[Newsmax]] either.[https://gab.com/TheyKilledParler/posts/105664333665946733][https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/conservatives-hoping-for-new-media-hero-in-newsmax-may-find-an-obstacle-in-ceos-left-leaning-tendencies/] Newsmax and [[Breitbart]] are controlled opposition. [[The Daily Wire]] is not. [[Essay:The Groyper Wars|I don't like the groypers, but I also don't like guilt by association.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maxime Bernier, Randy Hillier, and Derek Sloan are excellent Canadian patriots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like it or not, major demographic shifts have consequences. The global white population is shrinking due to a sub-replacement birth rate and non-whites continue to have lots of kids. By and large, non-white voting patterns are not changing, and immigrants both legal and illegal obviously vote for the people importing them (and tell their children and grandchildren to do the same). This is demographic replacement, plain and simple. Non-whites may have socially conservative values, but they keep voting for degeneracy. The black population in America is also rapidly decreasing due to abortion and gang violence. America will eventually be comprised of a reliable coalition of Latin Americans and Middle Easterners who consistently vote for Democrats or, at best, pro-amnesty establishment Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's nothing wrong with race-mixing, but there's no need to fetishize it. Most people happen to be attracted to members of their own race --- there's nothing wrong with that, it's natural.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Same-sex &amp;quot;marriage,&amp;quot; sex changes, drag, and pornography should be outlawed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not [https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2018/11/30/usmca-cusma-what-the-new-nafta-is-called-depends-on-whos-talking.html CUSMA or T-MEC], it's the [[USMCA]]!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To the [https://dailycaller.com/2020/07/30/24-people-killed-george-floyd-riots-protests/ dozens of victims] of the [[2020 Leftwing insurrection|2020 Black Lives Matter insurrection]], may you rest in peace and may God bless your souls.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7bCThU4Wf0 CNN sucks!][https://www.westernjournal.com/jim-acosta-accidentally-admits-cnn-sucks-pathetic-comeback-attempt/][https://www.toddstarnes.com/media/video-hundreds-protest-outside-cnn-headquarters-chanting-cnn-sucks/] [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqKhVzdXiEY&amp;amp;t=228s Fox News sucks!][https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/trump-supporters-washington-dc-chant-fox-news-sucks-stopthesteal-march-rally-video/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Ashli Babbitt]] is a hero. I hold her in higher regard than Donald Trump.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ashli Babbitt.PNG|thumbnail|[[Ashli Babbitt]], 14-year [[United States Air Force]] veteran, who was murdered in the [[United States Capitol Building|Capitol building]] during the [[2021 Capitol riot|January 6, 2021 protest]] for supporting the [[MAGA]] Movement and [[Trump]]'s allegations of [[2020 election fraud]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Say Their Names:&lt;br /&gt;
* Ashli Babbitt&lt;br /&gt;
* Rosanne Boyland&lt;br /&gt;
* Kevin Greeson&lt;br /&gt;
* Benjamin Phillips&lt;br /&gt;
All 4 right-wing protesters were murdered by Capitol Police on January 6, 2021.[https://www.bitchute.com/video/GV6sKfAaBWbj/] The storming of the Capitol was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I watch [[One America News Network]][https://usnewson.com/watch/oann-live-stream] and read [[The Gateway Pundit]].[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com] I also follow the [[Alternative Influence Network]] on YouTube and Twitter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My [[Gab]], [[BitChute]], [[Twitter]], and [[Reddit]]: [https://gab.com/TheyKilledParler][https://www.bitchute.com/channel/7wR1grMkAGom/][https://twitter.com/KentMurray19/with_replies][https://www.reddit.com/user/KentMurray1]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am hooked on [https://cozy.tv Cozy TV]! I'm TopRightZoomer over there. Check it out!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=YouTube&amp;diff=1818848</id>
		<title>YouTube</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=YouTube&amp;diff=1818848"/>
		<updated>2021-12-03T17:55:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* The few remaining positive aspects of YouTube */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Commie youtube.png|right|300px|thumb|An artistic rendering of YouTube's logo, edited to represent the true nature of its owners.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''YouTube''' is an [[Internet]] website that allows users to upload and share [[video]]s for the general public to watch. Overtime, YouTube has come under increasing criticism from users for its [[far-left]] [[liberal bias]], [[authoritarian]] terms of service, [[censorship]], and interference in the [[2020 Presidential election]]. A major point of issue many take is that while conservative views are often removed, left wing, including sometimes extremely left wing, views are allowed. The website often shows bias against [[conservative]] creators, often disabling accounts of conservative hosts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Youtube-saves-biden.jpg|right|300px|thumb|YouTube manipulation of likes/dislikes on the Biden White House channel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://81m.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
YouTube was founded by Steve Chen, Chad Hurley and Jawed Karim in February of 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;YouTube Generation&amp;quot; was named [[Time Magazine]]'s ''Person of the Year'' for 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Grossman, Lev. [You — Yes, You — Are TIME's Person of the Year http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1570810,00.html] December 25, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
In October 2006, YouTube was purchased by [[Google|Google Inc.]] Google's monitoring over YouTube has resulted in a distinct suppression of videos with conservative themes, along with direct promotion and over-saturation of liberal content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major flaw of the site is its poorly worded terms of conditions, which can warrant the deletion of almost any video that the moderators deem harmful to the left-wing agenda, deeming it as &amp;quot;hate speech&amp;quot;. An example would be showing surgical operations but preventing showing abortion videos. YouTube is consistent when removing undercover videos that exposes dishonest counseling practices at [[Planned Parenthood]] centers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.lifenews.com/nat5165.html YouTube Removes New Undercover Video Exposing Planned Parenthood on Abortion] LifeNews.com, June 25, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. They are known for censoring videos critical of Democrats like [[Barack Obama]]. In addition, videos were censored if they were deemed anti-[[Islam]]. A large amount of YouTube content is also dedicated to [[video game]] channels, which go largely unrestricted despite some containing exceedingly violent content. YouTube also promotes individual introversion and internet dependency, especially within the millennial generation. In December 2019, YouTube announced it would demonetize certain videos even if they don't violate any of the company's policies&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bokhari, Allum (December 11, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/12/11/youtube-to-demonetize-channels-even-if-videos-dont-cross-policy-line/ YouTube to Demonetize Channels Even if Videos ‘Don’t Cross Policy Line’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved December 11, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On July 23, 2007, YouTube hosted an interactive debate between the [[Democratic]] candidates in the [[2008 Presidential Election]], in which users submitted videos of themselves asking questions. A similar debate involving the [[Republican]] candidates occurred on November 28. This led to controversy, as they used a question submitted by Keith Kerr, who has ties to [[Hillary Clinton]]'s campaign&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=23698 &amp;quot;There's More to the Keith Kerr Story | Human Events&amp;quot;]. ''Human Events''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slate states that YouTube may be operating at a loss of nearly half a billion dollars a year&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.slate.com/id/2216162/ &amp;quot;The high costs of running YouTube.&amp;quot;]. ''Slate Magazine''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, suggesting that it may be a loss leader for parent company Google or perhaps an investment in changing the landscape of information flow in the public. Attempts to reduce the costs and increase profitable content have been met with hostility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most popular video on YouTube is &amp;quot;Baby Shark&amp;quot; by children's Korean nursery rhyme channel ''Pinkfong'', and has surpassed 9 billion views&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Citation|last=Pinkfong|title=Baby Shark Dance  #babyshark Most Viewed Video  Animal Songs  PINKFONG Songs for Children)|date=2021-09-22|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqZsoesa55w}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;YouTube's [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLirAqAtl_h2r5g8xGajEwdXd3x1sZh8hC &amp;quot;Most Viewed Videos of All Time&amp;quot;] (videos surpassing 100 million views)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Censorship==&lt;br /&gt;
Controversy arose in conservative circles after people such as [[Michelle Malkin]] claimed that YouTube censored [[conservative]] content&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://michellemalkin.com/2006/10/04/banned-on-youtube-3/ &amp;quot;Michelle Malkin |  » Banned on YouTube&amp;quot;]. ''MichelleMalkin.com''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This led the creation of a pair of video-sharing websites: [[QubeTV]], an alternative site whose origins are reminiscent of the creation of [[Conservapedia]] by people who believed [[Wikipedia®]] to be [[liberal]], and the Christian alternative, [[GodTube]], which has been renamed &amp;quot;[http://www.tangle.com/ Tangle]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://mashable.com/2009/03/10/tangle/ GodTube is Born Again as MySpace-Like Tangle] Mashable&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 6, 2007, a group of music publishing companies announced a [[lawsuit]] against YouTube for its hosting of [[copyright]]ed content without providing proper compensation to the copyright holders when the videos containing the content were viewed&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070806/ap_on_hi_te/youtube_music_publishers;_ylt=AmjdpxJDZVebD_Qp.hhWImKs0NUE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In May 2009, in response to the suspension of the account of a child named Luke Taylor (screen name &amp;quot;Lukeywes1234&amp;quot;), for being under the age of 13, a group of users from the sites ebaumsworld and 4chan, among others, launched an &amp;quot;International Porn Day&amp;quot; raid on YouTube. They managed to upload thousands of explicit videos which were often tagged to show up in searches containing words such as &amp;quot;Jonas Brothers&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Twilight&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Hanna Montana&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;High School Musical&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;[[John McCain]]&amp;quot;. YouTube's delayed response was in part due to the raiders sowing confusion amongst YouTube users by purposely flagging non pornographic videos as containing inappropriate material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
YouTube was recently listed by [[Gab]] as one of numerous leftist-controlled companies that have gone &amp;quot;[[woke]]&amp;quot; and support the criminal rioters of [[Antifa]] and [[Black Lives Matter]] in the wake of the [[2020 leftist riots]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://gab.com/a/posts/104311289660016704 Here Are The Companies That Support Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and Want You Dead] at Gab.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As [[White House]] videos of the [[Biden regime]] continued to show Dislikes outnumbering Likes by a ratio of 6-1, 8-1 and even 15-1&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/4300-tune-watch-joe-biden-speak-2-25-trillion-infrastructure-bill-spends-157-billion-roads-bridges-airports/ Only 4,300 Tune in to Watch Joe Biden Speak on His $2.25 Trillion Infrastructure Bill That Spends Only $157 Billion on Roads, Bridges, Airports] at the Gateway Pundit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, YouTube actively got involved to tamper with and remove high numbers of dislikes&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/youtube-caught-red-handed-removing-dislikes-biden-white-house-page-anything-fool-proletariat/ YOUTUBE CAUGHT RED-HANDED Removing Dislikes from Biden White House Page — Anything to Fool the Proletariat] at the Gateway Pundit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, then eliminated the Dislike feature on videos on the White House YouTube channel to deceptively hide the high level of Biden's unpopularity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;*[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/youtube-removing-public-dislikes-count-totals-biden-terribly-disliked/ It Appears YouTube Is Removing ‘Dislikes’ on Videos Because Biden Is Terribly Disliked] at the Gateway Pundit&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://thenationalpulse.com/breaking/youtube-to-remove-dislike-count/ YouTube To Remove ‘Dislike’ Feature As Biden WH Content Continues To See Likes Massively Trail Dislikes], Natalie Winters, ''National Pulse'', MARCH 30, 2021.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Comments are also currently turned off on all videos released by the White House because the Biden regime does not want to hear any negative comments about its unpopular policies, or any criticism of regime officials, from the public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the start of the [[Delta variant panic]], Youtube suspended [[Sky News]] Australia, a vocal [[Biden junta]] critic&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/minnesotans-take-legal-action-over-critical-race-theory_3927475.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In October 2021 Youtube censored conservative [[Rap]]per Bryson Gray's anti-Biden #1 hit, ''Let's Go Brandon'', as &amp;quot;medical misinformation&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.blackconservativeboogeyman.com/youtube-bans-conservative-bryson-grays-hit-song-lets-go-brandon-takes-aim-at-other-accounts-that-use-the-fk-joe-biden-euphemism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In November of 2021, former Chinese Vice Premier Zhang Gaoli was accused of sexual assault on social media by tennis star Peng Shuai in 2021. Peng disappeared shortly thereafter&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/14/china/peng-shuai-zhang-gaoli-allegations-wta-intl-hnk/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. YouTube de-monetized a video entitled ''Chinese Star VANISHES After Rape Accusation'' posted on the Breaking Points channel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycallernewsfoundation.org/2021/11/19/youtube-demonetizes-video-on-missing-chinese-tennis-star/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Youtube has identified the popular [[World War II]] song, ''[[The Sacred War]]'', rallying the defeat of the &amp;quot;fascist vermin hordes&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;inappropriate or offensive for some audiences&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2N366xn6V4&amp;amp;t=132s The Sacred War! (English Lyrics)]. youtube (Viewer discretion is advised}.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of November 2021, YouTube no longer allows the dislike count on any videos to be shown, in an attempt by YouTube to cover for the creators of highly unpopular videos by hiding the true number of dislikes; this came about to protect the Biden White House YouTube channel, because of the high number of dislikes all of its videos (particularly including all press conferences by Joe Biden, [[Jen Psaki]] and [[Anthony Fauci]]) have received, with that protection also extended to videos from other left-wing and &amp;quot;woke&amp;quot; YouTube channels&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1Izh3-c88Y The Real Reason YouTube Is Hiding Dislikes] at the Daily Wire YouTube channel&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Democrat collusion==&lt;br /&gt;
A website that tracks that tracks the YouTube page of the Biden White House confirmed that YouTube suppressed the dislikes on every single one of [[Joe Biden]] White House video.  YouTube suppressed dislikes of Biden by as much as 600% on some videos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/amazing-new-website-confirms-youtube-suppressing-dislikes-joe-biden-videos-much-600/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Christian/Creationist YouTube video evangelism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Many YouTube users are vehemently anti-[[conservative]], and pro-conservative videos are censored within hours. However videos directed at conservatives will usually garner high ratings, as with videos directed at liberals. Christian comments on some videos frequently attract insults by atheists&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52405 &amp;quot;YouTube blocked video mocking Clinton administration&amp;quot;]. ''WND''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Campus Crusade for Christ]] International (CCCI) is one of the world's largest evangelism organizations within Christendom and has over 25,000 full-time missionaries. In 2006, Alan Beeber of CCCI predicted that [[internet evangelism]] will result in more conversion than all other forms of evangelism for CCCI combined&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lausanneworldpulse.com/pdf/issues/LWP0206.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The YouTube search engine is the second largest search engine in the world&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.tgdaily.com/trendwatch-features/39777-youtube-surpasses-yahoo-as-world%E2%80%99s-2-search-engine &amp;quot;YouTube surpasses Yahoo as world’s #2 search engine | TG Daily&amp;quot;]. ''TG Daily''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. There is a widespread problem with [[Atheistic bullying|atheist cyberbullying]] on YouTube toward [[Christian]] and [[creationist]] YouTube channels. [[CreationWiki]] has developed a web page entitled [http://creationwiki.org/YouTube_participant_advice YouTube participant advice], designed to show creationists how to thwart atheist cyberbullies]]. Also, one popular Christian YouTube channel, [[shockofgod]], was shut down several times by atheist [[cyberbullying]] through false reports, but [http://creationwiki.org/YouTube_participant_advice he was able to thwart their cyberbullying using some effective tactics]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kax-zAJxi-U &amp;quot;The man that proved the Bible has power&amp;quot;]. ''YouTube''. 28 March 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. These false reports are not isolated incidents, many atheists will try this deceitful tactic to block out [[creation science]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The few remaining positive aspects of YouTube==&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the many liberal and degenerate aspects of the site, all hope is not lost. For example, Christian videos and music are extremely popular amongst users, reaching tens of millions of views. The most-viewed Christian video on the site has 30 million views, and is a compilation of Christian music, titled &amp;quot;Religious Songs | Praise &amp;amp; Worship | Playlist&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qaj4NOO6dQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. ''(Sadly, however, it is not the most-viewed video containing the search term &amp;quot;Christ&amp;quot;; that spot belongs to vulgar Rap song &amp;quot;Christ Conscious&amp;quot; by rapper Joey Bada$$, with 36 million.)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another positive of YouTube is the popularity and accesibility of conservative political videos, (see [[Alternative Influence Network]]). though truly conservative channels are dwindling in number due to the aforementioned censorship. Curiously enough, mainstream conservatives, such as [[Ben Shapiro]], remain largely immune. YouTube CEO Susan Wojicki even said that she knows she won't have to censor Shapiro at the Lesbian Who Tech Summit, saying &amp;quot;there’s a set of content that has to meet the community guidelines. Ben Shapiro is going to meet the community guidelines. I don’t think you’re suggesting that we remove him from the platform. Are you?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.vox.com/podcasts/2019/3/11/18259303/youtube-susan-wojcicki-child-comments-videos-google-walkout-kara-swisher-decode-podcast-interview&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward J. Snowden]] — whistleblower of [[unconstitutional]], warrantless mass domestic surveillance by the U.S. [[police state]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[America Rising (video)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Voter suppression]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[2008 YouTube presidential debates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{communism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Technology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Internet]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Information Technology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communication]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Google]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:YouTube]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Websites]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:SJWs]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-Free Speech]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Perpetrators of Cancel Culture]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:CCP puppets]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joe_Rogan&amp;diff=1818847</id>
		<title>Joe Rogan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joe_Rogan&amp;diff=1818847"/>
		<updated>2021-12-03T17:55:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Joseph James &amp;quot;Joe&amp;quot; Rogan''' (born August 11, 1967) is an American comedian and podcast host, with &amp;quot;the most-streamed program on Spotify&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;more than 13 million followers on Instagram&amp;quot; for his podcast.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/joe-rogan-says-he-tested-positive-covid-took-ivermectin-n1278323&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He is also a, hunter, fisherman, actor, game show host, television host, and retired martial artist. He is [[conservative]]. He is also [[Jewish]] and from [[New Jersey]]. [[Animal rights]] activists, [[environmentalism|environmentalists]], and [[eugenics|eugenicists]] have criticized him for making jokes about their lifestyles. &amp;quot;Gamers&amp;quot; have also attacked him for criticizing [[video game addiction]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1igHSzaplOE&amp;amp;t=1442s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ItOG6mNsuM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUUnJsiQxdU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Despite being conservative to an extent, he still strongly supports [[marijuana]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Rogan was widely criticized for giving [[Twitter]] CEO [[Jack Dorsey]] a softball interview.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://cloverchronicle.com/2019/02/04/joe-rogan-exposed-popular-podcaster-is-secretly-funded-by-twitter-ceo-jack-dorsey-and-george-soros/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archives.infowars.com/twitter-ceo-appears-on-joe-rogan-show-gets-ratioed-over-censorship-policies/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mBBiSvCUjs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhrpFaBag3g&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2020, his endorsement was accepted by [[Bernie Sanders]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://people.com/politics/joe-rogan-bernie-sanders-endorsement-controversy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but at the same time, a video resurfaces of Rogan comparing a black neighborhood to Planet of the Apes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Rogan moved his podcast to Spotify, fans noted that a number of episodes featuring controversial figures had been removed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thepostmillennial.com/joe-rogan-experience-launches-on-spotify-episodes-featuring-alex-jones-gavin-mcinnes-others-removed/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Jews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pro Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alternative Influence Network]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Breitbart_News&amp;diff=1814386</id>
		<title>Breitbart News</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Breitbart_News&amp;diff=1814386"/>
		<updated>2021-11-22T04:26:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Breitbartlogo.jpg|thumb|right|275px]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Breitbart News''' {{Verified}} is a major [[conservative]] news source founded by [[Andrew Breitbart]]. Presently, it is a [[conservative media]] juggernaut providing breaking news stories that the [[mainstream media]] would suppress from the general public. Exposing [[liberal bias]] in media has proven profitable as Breitbart has created other successful news sites; ''Breitbart.TV'', ''BigGovernment'', ''BigJournalism'', ''BigHollywood'', and most recently ''BigPeace''. Breitbart is such a threat to the left that [[Media Matters]] constantly harasses them with misinformation campaigns. The Breitbart properties have provided some of the most ground-breaking news stories over the last several years and can be credited with taking down [[ACORN]] and exposing [[race baiting]] against the [[Tea Party movement]] by [[Democrat]] politicians. Per their website, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Breitbart is currently serving about 20 million news pages per month to more than three million unique visitors. Many top bloggers rely on Breitbart as a primary news resource. Technorati puts Breitbart.com in its Top 50, with more than 30,000 links from nearly 8,000 blogs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2016, Breitbart News ranked 29th in overall internet traffic according to Alexa.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Concha, Joe (June 6, 2017). [https://thehill.com/homenews/media/336607-breitbart-sees-huge-advertising-drop-in-may-report Breitbart sees huge advertising drop in May: report]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 7, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It played an influential role in the media and in the [[United States presidential election, 2016|2016 presidential election]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bokhari, Allum (March 4, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/03/04/study-breitbart-led-right-wing-media-ecosystem-altered-media-agenda/ Study: Breitbart Dominated Right Wing Coverage, ‘Altered Media Agenda’ In 2016]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 8, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Benkler, Yochai; Faris, Robert; Roberts, Hal; Zuckerman, Ethan (March 3, 2017). [https://www.cjr.org/analysis/breitbart-media-trump-harvard-study.php Study: Breitbart-led right-wing media ecosystem altered broader media agenda]. ''Columbia Journalism Review''. Retrieved June 8, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ingram, Mathew (March 6, 2017). [http://fortune.com/2017/03/06/charting-the-breitbart-ecosystem/ How the Breitbart-Led Media Ecosystem Elected Donald Trump]. ''Fortune''. Retrieved June 8, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Breitbart's London section became so influential that Damian Green, Prime Minister [[Theresa May]]'s deputy, called it out by name due to its criticism of the UK government for its failure at ensuring a clean [[Brexit]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/10/20/telegraph-uk-govt-panics-slams-breitbart-london-fake-news-dangerous/ Telegraph: UK Govt Panics, Slams Breitbart London as ‘Fake News’, ‘Dangerous’]. ''Breitbart News''. October 20, 2017. Retrieved October 20, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal]]s have claimed that Breitbart is an &amp;quot;[[alt-right]]&amp;quot; website and have tried to connect the site with [[White supremacy|white supremecists]] and [[neo-Nazis]]. However, Breitbart supports economic nationalism, which has nothing to do with race or ethnicity, and it is a strong supporter of [[Israel]] and conservative non-white politicians. In addition, a study conducted by Harvard and M.I.T. found that Breitbart does not represent any of those ideologies and that Breitbart readers actually were regular conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lee, Tony (August 16, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/08/16/harvard-mit-study-breitbart-is-not-alt-right/ Harvard/MIT Study: ‘Breitbart Is NOT Alt-Right’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved August 16, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Unlike the [[mainstream media]], which claims to be unbiased and objective while actually promoting a left-wing point of view, Breitbart is transparent about the fact that it promotes conservative and nationalist views.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Friedman, Victoria (August 20, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/08/20/watch-kassam-tells-fox-media-weapon-breitbart-just-honest/ WATCH: Kassam Tells Fox All Media Is a Weapon, Breitbart Is Just Honest About It]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved August 20, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Despite being a conservative news outlet, it has taken certain liberal positions at times, such as firing an editor in June 2017 for posting Tweets in opposition to Islam and Islamic immigration,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chasmar, Jessica (June 5, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/5/katie-mchugh-breitbart-writer-fired-over-muslims-t/ Breitbart writer Katie McHugh fired over ‘Muslims’ tweet]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved June 7, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and attempting to elicit a condemnation from a sitting U.S. Republican Congressman of a right-wing activist and political commentator in July 2021.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fuentes, Nicholas (July 6, 2021). [https://tv.gab.com/channel/officialamericafirst/view/why-are-fox-and-breitbart-writing-60e4b292e73e5aad92db5ce9 Why Are FOX And BREITBART Writing Hitpieces On American Patriots Paul Gosar and Nick Fuentes?] ''Gab TV''. Retrieved November 21, 2021.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Boyle, Matthew (June 29, 2021). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/06/29/flyer-rep-gosar-fundraiser-racist-holocaust-denier-sparks-uproar/ Flyer Purporting to Announce Rep. Gosar Fundraiser with Racist Holocaust Denier Sparks Uproar]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved November 21, 2021.&lt;br /&gt;
*Three Spoons. (November 9, 2021). [https://tv.gab.com/channel/three_spoons/view/nick-fuentes-steve-bannons-delusional-618a840a91bd86272723fefa Nick Fuentes || Steve Bannon's Delusional View on Racial Politics]. ''Gab TV''. Retrieved November 21, 2021.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some liberal commentators have admitted that Breitbart is more influential than [[Fox News]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lee, Tony (September 11, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/09/11/nbcs-john-heilemann-breitbart-powerful-media-institution-fox-news/ NBC’s John Heilemann: Breitbart ‘More Powerful Media Institution’ Than Fox News]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 19, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ownership and leadership==&lt;br /&gt;
Until August 2016, Bannon was the executive chairman of Breitbart News,&amp;lt;ref name=own&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.politico.eu/blogs/on-media/2017/02/breitbart-reveals-owners-ceo-larry-solov-the-mercer-family-and-susie-breitbart-donald-trump-media/|title=Breitbart reveals owners: CEO Larry Solov, the Mercer family and Susie Breitbart|date=February 25, 2017|accessdate=August 10, 2017}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; though he briefly returned as its chief executive in 2017 and early 2018. The current owners are: Larry Solov, founder Andrew Breitbart's widow, Susie Breitbart, and the Mercer family. Breitbart's family owns the largest stake.&amp;lt;ref name=own/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Right-wing populism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nationalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Steve Bannon]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: Why I no longer support Breitbart]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Why Breitbart is not family friendly]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ben Shapiro]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elijahandskip|Elijahandskip - A Wikipedia Editor and Conservapedia Editor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.breitbart.com/ Breitbart.com]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://biggovernment.com/ BigGovernment.com]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ BigHollywood.com]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://breitbart.tv/ Breitbart.TV]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://bigjournalism.com/ BigJournalism.com]&lt;br /&gt;
** [http://bigpeace.com/ BigPeace.com]&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.breitbart.com/breitbart-sports Breitbart Sports]&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.breitbart.com/newswires The Wires]&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.breitbart.com/breitbart-california Breitbart California]&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.breitbart.com/breitbart-texas Breitbart Texas]&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.breitbart.com/breitbart-london Breitbart London/Europe]&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.breitbart.com/tag/united-kingdom Breitbart United Kingdom]&lt;br /&gt;
** [https://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/ Breitbart Jerusalem]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{conservatism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Breitbart]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative News Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Websites]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:America First Agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Movement Conservatives]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Newsmax_Media&amp;diff=1814344</id>
		<title>Newsmax Media</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Newsmax_Media&amp;diff=1814344"/>
		<updated>2021-11-22T03:17:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Newsmax Media''' is a for-profit company that publishes news from a neutral-to-conservative viewpoint.  It is more [[conservative]] than the [[Fox News Channel]], but can occasionally censor conservative viewpoints as Fox does far more frequently.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They publish a monthly [[magazine]], maintain a website, and offer a cable [[television]] channel, NewsMax TV. They also send out daily emails of breaking news stories of interest that may not be fully covered in the general media. Newsmax was founded to point out [[liberal bias]] and improprieties in the media that are forced upon the American people, and they report true news.  They also seek to extol men and women who show [[conservative]] virtues. However, they have arguably censored criticism of [[Dominion Voting Systems]] and their alleged role in [[2020 election fraud]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/12/22/gorka-cuts-off-my-pillow-ceo-during-dominion-claims-after-newsmax-runs-its-own-clarification-segment-1008525/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One incident in particular in February 2021, wherein Newsmax host Bob Sellers repeatedly interrupted and talked over MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell before walking off the set because Lindell attempted to discuss election fraud related to Dominion's voting machines, sparked criticism from many anti-establishment conservatives,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rOGLRwHBXw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://tatumreport.com/newsmax-interviews-mike-lindell-tech-censorship-hosts-storms-censoring-lindell-video/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/watch-newsmax-host-mike-lindell-talk-tech-censorship-ends-censoring-storms-studio/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including the more consistently conservative [[One America News Network]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oann.com/newsmax-shuts-down-interview-with-mypillow-ceo-over-comments-on-dominion-voting-fraud/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/christina_bobb/status/1356804730756939786&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/christina_bobb/status/1356997162656276483&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which may currently be a Newsmax competitor. Subsequently, OANN repeatedly aired Lindell's documentary &amp;quot;Absolute Proof&amp;quot; about 2020 presidential election fraud relating to voting machines.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oann.com/absoluteproof/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Sellers apologized for his behaviour while blaming Lindell for misunderstanding the topic of the segment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.newsweek.com/newsmax-anchor-apologizes-mypillow-ceo-storming-off-bob-sellers-mike-lindell-1566770&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A Dominion executive has already sued Newsmax, OANN, and even [[Fox News]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2020/12/23/dominion-employee-sues-trump-newsmax-oann-defamation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but Newsmax escaped that lawsuit by publicly apologizing to the executive and asserting that Dominion had not engaged in malpractice during the election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/newsmax-apologizes-vote-manipulation-claims-against-dominion-leader-n1266040&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Smartmatic]], another voting machine manufacturing company which was allegedly involved in 2020 presidential election fraud, has threatened to sue those three networks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/12/14/smartmatic-threatens-legal-action-gives-fox-news-deadline-to-retract-false-and-defamatory-statements-1005879/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy once donated $1 million to the [[Clinton Foundation]]. Newsmax has reported positively on the activities of [[George Soros]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/conservatives-hoping-for-new-media-hero-in-newsmax-may-find-an-obstacle-in-ceos-left-leaning-tendencies/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In November 2021, Newsmax suspended journalist Emerald Robinson for her claims about the ingredients of the Moderna [[COVID-19 vaccine]] while promoting the vaccines as unquestionably &amp;quot;safe and effective.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.mediaite.com/news/anti-vax-conspiracist-emerald-robinsons-is-reportedly-out-at-newsmax-the-decision-has-essentially-been-made/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.newsmax.com Newsmax Website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Magazines]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1814197</id>
		<title>Debate:The Groyper Wars</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1814197"/>
		<updated>2021-11-21T20:28:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* My Opinion */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;With the past controversies over Nick Fuentes, TPUSA, Michelle Malkin, YAF, Ashley St. Clair, etc., combined with Big Tech's and the federal government's current suppression of dissent, this is an important discussion to have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you agree with [[Essay:The Groyper Wars|this]]? Why or why not? Please discuss the content of the Essay itself, rather than the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Debate]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=No longer relevant, based on an older version and its talk page, potentially confusing|content=&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey, I'm a member of Nick's community and consider myself a groyper sympathizer. Made an account for this. Let's talk if you're still around. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 17:59, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You have a pretty hefty essay there, and I'm not sure which parts are most important to you, so I'll address what interests me and we can take it from there.&lt;br /&gt;
: First of all, I respect that you're honest and transparent about your own background in your user page, which isn't exactly orthodox conservatism. I'm kinda of like you, except I come from Ron Paul libertarianism. Obviously, this puts me at odds with a lot of &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; and Nick, who are very critical of libertarianism, but I have a good enough understanding of their views that I can defend them pretty well and I overlap with most of it. I also appreciate that you condemn censorship in no uncertain terms. The role that &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; or others with similar values is an interesting debate to have, and it's good that Conservapedia seems like they'll allow us to have it. In some &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; communities on bigger platforms, like reddit, you're not even allowed to play devil's advocate about it.&lt;br /&gt;
: My next 2 paragraphs will address some points in the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point about the legacy paleocons not being on board with the groypers is interesting, and seems true. I've already seen the Spectator article, back in the fall, and found it pretty sketchy or weak. More broadly, though, it is true and interesting. There is an angle you are missing though. For example, Cotto and Gottfried, a current events show co-hosted by the great Paul Gottfried, took JF Gariépy's side over Fuentes' when he took credit for getting Nick banned. I don't bring this up to make a censorship point. It was interesting to me, because JF is usually considered &amp;quot;less optical&amp;quot; than Nick Fuentes is, because his list of guests on his own show includes some colorful characters Nick refuses to associate with and because he sometimes says some things explicitly that Nick will leave to subtext instead. Movement paleoconservatism has taken a sour stance on the groypers on temperament, sometimes also on policy, but it's interesting to see how they're navigating that in a unique way.&lt;br /&gt;
: It doesn't surprise me that Ben Shapiro included Ron Paul on his hit list of alt-right influencers, but I don't think the reasons for his inclusion or others are condemnable. It's worth pointing out that Ben himself was a guest on Red Ice TV with Henrik and Lana back in 2014, another show that was banned from YouTube in 2019 or 2020. Similarly, Ben has spoken with Ann Coulter on camera who he also included on his alt-right list. In this sense, the issue with Ben isn't so much his own agenda or his disagreements with other factions but his own hypocrisy; the Daily Wire itself has been labelled alt-right by the mainstream media on multiple occasions, usually with retractions, but it has happened. People find it objectionable that an outlet with a lot of funding and close ties to Fox News, etc. gets a &amp;quot;get-out-of-alt-right-free&amp;quot; card, while more grassroots activists are left out to dry.&lt;br /&gt;
: I'll get to your main essay later, I'd like to do this in parts. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 22:53, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Hi, I really appreciate that you did this, I wasn't expecting it at all. The Groyper Wars have been over for a long time. And after my essay was deleted by an admin ([https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;oldid=1760851 here] is where my essay used to be), I was ready to give it up. Didn't see myself ever coming back to this. And I set up this page several months ago, this is the first time anyone has responded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: You said you would react to my main essay &amp;quot;later,&amp;quot; and it's been a few days. If you're still there, I'd love to debate this with you, but I want to wait until you've reacted to my actual essay until I react to your response. If you post your reaction to the essay, I'd be more than happy to have a discussion with you! --- [[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 13:48, 5 May 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Opinion==&lt;br /&gt;
This has definitely got to be the #1 most controversial topic amongst the right. I think it's an overblown subject. I do consider myself a member of the Groyper movement, though I do think that [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/ff/Groyper_cartoon.png &amp;quot;Groyper&amp;quot;] is a silly name for a political movement. Now, I can't speak for every member, but I really don't think most Groypers are inherently &amp;quot;eViL aNtI-sEmItIc WhItE nAtIoNaLiStS&amp;quot; like many will tell you. It's a traditionalist paleocon movement that urges America to put God and country first and to return the western values our society was founded on (by white people, hence Nick's many mentions of the anti-white agenda, the importance of white identity and shifting demographics, which many confuse to be racial, when they're actually cultural). The &amp;quot;antisemitic&amp;quot; claim is mainly due to Nick's edgy and often Jew-related jokes (which Nick has said are merely for shock value), as well as the Groypers' heavy criticism of Israel, especially from a foreign policy perspective, and can you blame them? Trillions of dollars in taxpayer money is funneled to Israel every year to help them fight their thousand-year war. They don't need all that money, they have a GDP of 402 billion. It's not like they're some third-world country that we're helping out of pity. Of course, say this at a Turning Point USA event or on The Ben Shapiro Show and you're deemed &amp;quot;Anti-semitic/racist&amp;quot;, somehow. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 12:53, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a curious and thought-provoking take. And I wouldn't characterize groypers as white nationalists or anti-Semites, though in the past I would have. A lot of conservatives like to jump the gun and disown anyone outside of the mainstream, condemning them in the harshest possible terms. I think I can give you an explanation why. Part of it is that conservatives are afraid of alienating left-wingers and centrists/moderates. They think if they embrace certain figures they won't be able to convince as many people to accept conservatism. In a lot of cases, the opposite is true. The other thing is that back in 2019, quite a few mainstream/popular right-wingers saw groypers as wignats. Nick Fuentes and Beardson Beardly are having to deal with actual wignats right now. I think the way they feel about TRS is how conservatives felt about groypers. &amp;quot;They're just trying to divide us.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're infiltrators.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They don't have anything to offer.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're idiots.&amp;quot; A lot of stuff was coming out about Nick especially that just put people off. Like that awful Holocaust joke. I get that he tries to be edgy and says things for shock value, but a lot of times he goes too far. And that's why some factions of the right were concerned that Nick was the new Richard Spencer, and didn't want their reputations tarnished through guilt by association --- which ironically is a tactic they themselves unjustly used against those on the right who chose to associate with the groypers. I know groypers presently are frustrated by wignats. Now they know how mainstream conservatives felt. You're absolutely right that most of Western civilization was built by white people. And there 100% is an anti-white agenda: it's pervasive and vitriolic. It's institutionalized across the Western world. I don't see how white identity politics solves anything. Every group should be proud of its identity. Whites have done many amazing things. But embracing identity politics, as Nick seems to frequently advocate, is playing on the left's battlefield, and that's a dangerous game. Altering a country's core demography inevitably comes with long-lasting and severe consequences. White Americans have a sub-replacement birth rate. Black Americans are aborting and shooting themselves out of existence. Latin American and Middle Eastern immigrants to the U.S., meanwhile, have very high birth rates... and they're only rising. Those immigrants obviously vote for the people importing them and tell their kids and grandkids to do the same. I don't think that's inextricably tied to race, I agree that it's cultural. But there is a link between culture and race, they're not entirely distinct. And we can dispute the reasons why demographic shifts have such drastic consequences, but the point is they have drastic consequences. So we need to import less people. As for Israel, a lot of people seem to think anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. I used to think that, too, reasoning that singling out the only Jewish State must be bad-faith criticism. But that point defeats itself: Israel is unique, which is why it is uniquely criticized. Having an unconventional opinion about a foreign country is not inherently bigoted. I support Israel. Others don't. Who cares? Besides, Israel has stains in its history --- think Lavon Affair and some of the shady/unethical actions of the Mossad. I have to correct you on the foreign aid: I believe it's low billions, not trillions. And hypothetically, I support them getting that money. Sure they do well for themselves, but they're (in theory) the only democracy in the Middle East, surrounded on all sides by hostile powers. Israel also has a lot of holy sites (for Christians, not just Jews). But I don't want my taxpayer dollars going to fund their COVID regime --- while non-Muslims still can't pray at the Temple Mount. I like Ben Shapiro and TPUSA, though I sometimes disagree with them. In spite of those disagreements, I see their conservative activism as a net positive. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 17:46, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm happy to say, then, that there's a lot of things we agree on; however, I don't think Nick is advocating for identity politics. I think he just wants whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda. As for TPUSA and Shapiro, they're not advocating for conservatism. They're advocating for libertarian, capitalist-worshipping economic policy, and squishy, practically nonexistent social policy that is getting us virtually nowhere in this culture war. ''(Fusionism and its consequences!)'' If we want to see an actual return to traditionalism in America, the ideas these mainstream &amp;quot;conservatives&amp;quot; are pushing are not contributing in any way. They're pushing us in the opposite direction.(''Plus, we all know Richard Spencer is a Democrat Psyop.'') [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 11:45, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you're right about Richard Spencer. And I would like both Ben Shapiro and TPUSA to put more emphasis on social conservatism and less emphasis on free-market economics (as Michael Knowles and Matt Walsh have advocated for the broader conservative movement several times). Shapiro is sort of libertarian, and so are Charlie Kirk and most of the people at Turning Point. I'm not really a fan of libertarianism. I'm a huge fan of Walsh and Knowles partly because neither of them is remotely libertarian. As well, Shapiro in particular seems to support free-market absolutism and neoliberal, globalized capitalism, though I also just heard him say that America should put tariffs on non-American companies that use child labour and American companies that do so should be punished. I think some people on the dissident right tend to overlook the positives about Ben Shapiro and The Daily Wire: an alt-Hollywood, an alt-publishing company. Openly defying Biden's vaccine mandate and suing him over it. TPUSA has been engaging in conservative activism all over the U.S. for years at this point, and they've improved over time. Charlie Kirk now talks about demographics, marriage, and the nuclear family. Ben Shapiro talks about corporate tyranny. They're human, not controlled opposition. And I'm all for &amp;quot;telling whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda.&amp;quot; That's great. It's something Matt Walsh talks about all the time, at least in 2021. But here's what I mean by saying Nick advocates for white identity politics: [https://tv.gab.com/channel/three_spoons/view/nick-fuentes-white-americans-are-61619c89645a5a7fe897dd5e here], at 31:24, Nick says &amp;quot;White racial identity politics is not going away.&amp;quot; And it's not just that. Nick has explicitly rejected &amp;quot;multi-racial, working-class populism&amp;quot; and grouping together as Americans, patriots, conservatives, or even Christians in favour of white identitarianism. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:58, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think Nick is making perfect sense in the video you linked. I don't think he means &amp;quot;identity politics&amp;quot; in the Obama-esque &amp;quot;I'm black n y'all gotta do everything I say or you racist&amp;quot; sort of sense here. Sounds to me like he's talking about political ideology that prioritizes white identity. (''White-identity'' politics, rather than white ''identity-politics'', if that makes sense). Also, he's not saying we can't come together as American patriots or Christians, he's just saying that many conservatives pretend that race isn't a thing, and that we can't properly fight the anti-white agenda if we don't recognize whiteness. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:22, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::From 37:30 - &amp;quot;Race is the basis, and I wish it wasn't that way. Understand, you know, people look at me and they say, 'That's the guy! That's the white supremacist that wants to make everything racist!' I didn't make it that way. Don't point the finger at me, don't blame me! I'm looking at the world and telling you how it is, I'm explaining it to you. I didn't make the world, okay? Don't blame me, I didn't make America the way it is!... We do have to acknowledge where we differ, and we have to account for those things so that we can live together in harmony... To the extent that it is possible that we get along, the way that we get along is by understanding our differences, accommodating for those differences, and then we can flourish. Not ignoring them, not pretending that they don't exist.&amp;quot; [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:40, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'd like to believe that race shouldn't factor into anything. In the abstract, it shouldn't. But that's not the world we're living in. You and Nick are right about that. This racial stuff has been foisted upon us. Matt Walsh pointed out that the Virginia governor's race was won by &amp;quot;white grievance politics&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that's a good thing.&amp;quot; We have to deal with the intensity of anti-white hate on both the left and the right properly. I get what you're saying about the difference between white identity-politics and white-identity politics. White identity exists and it's not inherently bad. Identity itself isn't bad. But how significant is racial identity in the political realm? It's significant, no doubt. But more so than everything else? I have to admit, it would be pretty cool to hear a candidate talk about how blue-collar white Americans are being left to dry by neoliberal globalism. Or to hear one talk about the historical accomplishments of white people. Should that exclude talking about America's Christian roots? Or condemning abortion, which disproportionately harms black Americans? Or criticizing LGBT radicalism? I don't think it should. So what should be prioritized? I'm not saying shun white interests in favour of corporate tax cuts --- corporations are part of the problem, so take away their (mostly non-white) foreign labour. Address demographics. Address anti-white critical race theory and other aspects of the anti-white agenda. But don't necessarily prioritize these things. Of course they're important. But you also have millions of unborn babies murdered in the womb each year. You have homosexuality/bisexuality/pansexuality and transgenderism/non-binarism/gender-fluidity/agenderism. You have Drag Queen Story Hour. Child drag queens. Drag queens on children's television. &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; drag queens. You have Internet pornography. Gun control. Drugs. War. Not everything is a racial issue. A lot have a racial aspect, but that's not what governs them. The prospect of a national divorce, or secession? That would be along political or sociocultural lines, not solid racial lines. So yes, appeal to whites. But why not also appeal to sensible non-whites (even if they're a tiny minority)? Instead of &amp;quot;I'm looking out for white people,&amp;quot; which can be a good thing, &amp;quot;I'm looking out for families.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for the working class.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for anyone who hates degeneracy.&amp;quot; Couldn't that work? Not pandering, or endless harping about &amp;quot;black unemployment,&amp;quot; but looking for something above race to unite us. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 18:27, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Of course, all those things are important, and race isn't the only issue. You're not wrong about any of that. I think you and I agree on the majority of things. Like I said, I don't think Nick is rejecting other forms of unity among conservatives, he simply doesn't see enough conservatives addressing the racial issues to the extent that they should be. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:32, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::If that's what Nick's saying, then fair enough. This has been and will probably continue to be a blind spot for many conservatives as they refuse to address the issues as they are on the ground. Thank you very much for taking the opportunity to have a civil discussion with me about all this. I think we can end it off here, seeing eye-to-eye on a lot of things. It always helps to be rational as we both are. You made excellent points. Hopefully, the right will improve with time. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:28, November 21, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cancel_culture&amp;diff=1814120</id>
		<title>Cancel culture</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cancel_culture&amp;diff=1814120"/>
		<updated>2021-11-21T18:24:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: Undo revision 1814085 by AquaSnek (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Nicki Minaj flag.jpeg|right|250px|thumb|[[Nicki Minaj]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Cancel culture''' is the banning of individuals from [[employment]] and social status based upon their race, ethnicity, or ideology. It originated in [[Nazi Germany]] in the 1930s to remove [[Jew]]s from all aspects of public life. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-the-nazis-pioneered-cancel-culture-&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is a [[radical-left]] extremist idea.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term describes a phenomenon related to [[political correctness]] wherein one is &amp;quot;cancelled&amp;quot; (i.e., censored, boycotted, cyber-bullied, etc.) for being of the wrong race or saying or doing something allegedly immoral/amoral, [[bigotry|bigoted]], insensitive or purposefully offensive, or simply politically incorrect. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Certain aspects of cancel &amp;quot;cult&amp;quot;ure may lead one to argue that it is, in fact, a [[cult]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/happiness-and-the-pursuit-leadership/201906/the-apocalyptic-cult-cancel-culture&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Numerous mainstream liberals signed an open letter deploring cancel culture as inherently opposed to freedom of opinion, open discussion, and reasonable discourse.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2fJ0f5Fp1c&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Voltaire]], [[Denis Diderot]], and D'Alembert were known to have engaged in similar practices for what would later be called cancel culture, including silencing the [[Jesuit]] order and eventually forcing them into exile.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.org/details/BarruelMemoirsIllustratingTheHistoryOfJacobinism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[United States]] President [[Donald John Trump]] unequivocally condemned the &amp;quot;cancel culture&amp;quot; of the [[2020 Leftwing insurrection]] in a speech delivered at [[Mount Rushmore]] on [[Independence Day]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oann.com/president-trump-praises-american-history-condemns-cancel-culture-during-mount-rushmore-4th-of-july-event/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2020/07/04/at-mount-rushmore-trump-warns-of-a-cultural-revolution-destroying-the-american-revolution-n603801&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On the other hand, some conservatives have defended cancel culture in principle but not as applied by leftists, such as [[The Daily Wire]] host Michael Knowles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoVFo20ZCiA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Knowles argues that society needs standards, and has praised [[McCarthyism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nukBmCJX5l0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[Liberty Hangout]] Twitter account has tweeted, &amp;quot;Cancel culture would be pretty cool if it were right-wingers doing the canceling.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/LibertyHangout/status/1372704003604242433&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wikipedia entry on Bill Cosby.PNG|right|600px|thumb|[[Wikipedia]] entry on [[Bill Cosby]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/fUjSy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the age of 81, &amp;quot;America's dad&amp;quot; spent two years in prison after a [[woke]] show trial before the charges were finally overturned and dismissed.]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Critical race theory==&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Critical race theory}}&lt;br /&gt;
Critical race theory (CRT) is a [[Postmodernist]] construct based on [[Critical theory]] that teaches that race is not [[genetic]].  Instead, race is a [[social construct]] and a basis for political struggles in the fight for [[social justice]].  Descendants of &amp;quot;[[colonialism|colonial]]&amp;quot; cultures are discriminated against and indigenous peoples are celebrated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stella Morabito describes CRT as, &amp;quot;. . . the insidious ideology being used to promote estrangement rather than friendship, and hostility rather than goodwill. Indeed, the tactics used by proponents of critical race theory share many parallels with old tactics used by the [[Bolshevik]]s.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/29/critical-race-theory-is-a-classic-communist-divide-and-conquer-tactic/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Republican]] Representative [[Louie Gohmert]] has offered to cancel the [[Democrat Party]] for its history of [[racism]] and [[slavery]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.newsmax.com/politics/rep-louie-gohmert-democratic-party-slavery-cancel-culture-movement/2020/07/23/id/978664/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kitler.jpeg|right|250px|thumb|Kitler the cat was immediately canceled and a [[Kansas City]] meteorologist forced to make a public apology and rectification for thoughtlessness and insensitivity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-meteorologist-sorry-for-showing-kitler-a-hitleresque-cat-on-air/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]] &lt;br /&gt;
==YouTube==&lt;br /&gt;
[[YouTube]]r [[PewDiePie]] reviewed a video from the company ''Jubilee'' containing a debate over cancel culture, which included [[conservative]] music artist Joy Villa as an opponent to cancel culture. Though PewDiePie facetiously called the discussion, &amp;quot;the least productive thing I've ever seen,&amp;quot; he was able to thoroughly discuss and analyze the various nuances in the topic of cancel culture. PewDiePie, who has had experiences with being &amp;quot;cancelled&amp;quot; himself, appreciated that bad people must face the consequences of their actions, especially in [[best of the public|the court of public opinion]], but ultimately condemned the overzealousness of cancel culture in harassing people and/or destroying their livelihoods without regard to [[due process]] (the idea that a person is innocent until proven guilty, which is non-existent within cancel culture). PewDiePie argued that cancel culture often goes &amp;quot;too far.&amp;quot; He specifically named instances of several YouTubers being cancelled unfairly. He concluded that, though there are rational and legitimate reasons to support cancel culture, he personally opposes it and believes that it does more harm than good to society and culture.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKCrRH-1l_k&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cancellation by movement conservatives==&lt;br /&gt;
Unfair examples of cancel culture within conservative circles include the cases of [[Todd Akin]] and [[Steve King]]. A more justified example is a loose cluster of [[movement conservative]]s, [[right-wing populist]]s, and civic [[nationalist]]s, who had previously grouped together under the term &amp;quot;alt-right,&amp;quot; until morality forced them to condemn the numerous [[white nationalist]]s and other extremists who were carrying the &amp;quot;alt-right&amp;quot; label. As they became increasingly outspoken against the white supremacists, they were arbitrarily nicknamed by the latter, &amp;quot;alt-lite.&amp;quot; They subsequently adopted the term &amp;quot;new right.&amp;quot; The new right repeatedly condemned [[racism]], [[anti-Semitism]], [[xenophobia]], and all other forms of bigotry in no uncertain terms. (See [[Alt-right#Distinction from National Socialism (Nazism)]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Maoist rectification==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Li660912-1-b.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Self-criticism and public shaming is the core of Progressive rectification.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Rectification}}&lt;br /&gt;
According to [[Rebel News]], modern cancel culture was directly inspired largely by [[Communist]] [[China]]'s [[Cultural Revolution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=na6tkgxEc8Y&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Maoist]]s instituted a national cancel-culture campaign that burned books, demolished statues, erased history, destroyed culture and cultural norms in a re-education campaign that replaced traditional Chinese culture with Maoist slogans and loyalty to the state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rectification is aimed at purging society of dissenters of leftwing, communist, and [[atheist]] [[totalitarian]] rule, and purifying society for a future [[socialist]] order.  To rectify, is to &amp;quot;make right&amp;quot; imaginary crimes of [[capitalist]]s and beneficiaries of so-called &amp;quot;[[white privilege]]&amp;quot;.  Self-criticism and confession is forced either through torture or public shaming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Linda Goudsmit says in contemporary America, the radical leftist Democrats are following the Maoist cancel-culture model. They are targeting the three supporting pillars of American society; the American family, Judeo-Christian faith, and the [[U.S. Constitution]] symbolized by the American flag. Cancel-culture is asymmetric warfare used by the advancing enemy to prepare the population for a replacement ideology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://goudsmit.pundicity.com/25228/the-collapsing-american-family&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Politically correct]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Partisan tolerance]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[McCarthyism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Big Tech]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Historical revisionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Newspeak]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Trump Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bernie Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rush Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cruz Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fox Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bush Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Moscow Mitch Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://youtu.be/C-lGKTGK270 Claira Janover, Cancel Culture, &amp;amp; What We ALL Need to Learn] - Viva Frei Vlawg&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9TKP-Fyi5U CANCEL CULTURE IS A CAPITALIST CON FOR SJWS!] - Daisy Cousens&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6DZ2VHN5wU Cancel &amp;quot;Cancel Culture&amp;quot;] - [[PragerU]] on [[YouTube]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HPJDlPTvi4 Who Will Be Next in the Cancel Culture Movement? | Larry Elder]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/rowan-atkinson-says-cancel-culture-like-a-medieval-mob-looking-for-someone-to-burn/news-story/3e6e59fff942cf053ae53c79ca17b39a Rowan Atkinson says cancel culture like a medieval mob ‘looking for someone to burn’] - ''The Australian''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fourth Generation Warfare]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Corporate Threats]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxist Terminology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cancel Culture|*]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lin_Wood&amp;diff=1813979</id>
		<title>Lin Wood</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lin_Wood&amp;diff=1813979"/>
		<updated>2021-11-21T02:56:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Lucian Lincoln “Lin” Wood, Jr.''' (born October 19, 1952 (age {{age|1952|10|19}})) is an attorney in [[Georgia]] who has been a leader in litigation for restoring [[election integrity]] in the aftermath of the [[United States presidential election, 2020]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 25, 2020, he was co-counsel on a complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, by [[Sidney Powell]] and other attorneys against Georgia Governor [[Brian Kemp]], stating that:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|This civil action brings to light a massive election fraud, multiple violations of Georgia laws, including O.C.G.A. §§ 21-2-30(d), 21-2-31, 21-2-33.1 and §21-2-522, and multiple Constitutional violations, as shown by fact witnesses to specific incidents, multiple expert witnesses and the sheer mathematical impossibilities found in the Georgia 2020 General Election.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lin Wood has been accused by [[Kyle Rittenhouse]]'s defense team of attempted extortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://bigleaguepolitics.com/rittenhouse-defense-attorney-mark-richards-reveals-lin-wood-sought-to-whore-this-kid-for-money/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On the other hand, the Rittenhouse defense team has separately been accused of impotence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailywire.com/news/kids-life-is-at-stake-top-legal-expert-criticizes-passive-defense-team-of-kyle-rittenhouse&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Election Fraud}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Wood, Lin}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Georgia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Attorneys]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1813939</id>
		<title>Debate:The Groyper Wars</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1813939"/>
		<updated>2021-11-20T23:27:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* My Opinion */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;With the past controversies over Nick Fuentes, TPUSA, Michelle Malkin, YAF, Ashley St. Clair, etc., combined with Big Tech's and the federal government's current suppression of dissent, this is an important discussion to have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you agree with [[Essay:The Groyper Wars|this]]? Why or why not? Please discuss the content of the Essay itself, rather than the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Debate]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=No longer relevant, based on an older version and its talk page, potentially confusing|content=&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey, I'm a member of Nick's community and consider myself a groyper sympathizer. Made an account for this. Let's talk if you're still around. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 17:59, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You have a pretty hefty essay there, and I'm not sure which parts are most important to you, so I'll address what interests me and we can take it from there.&lt;br /&gt;
: First of all, I respect that you're honest and transparent about your own background in your user page, which isn't exactly orthodox conservatism. I'm kinda of like you, except I come from Ron Paul libertarianism. Obviously, this puts me at odds with a lot of &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; and Nick, who are very critical of libertarianism, but I have a good enough understanding of their views that I can defend them pretty well and I overlap with most of it. I also appreciate that you condemn censorship in no uncertain terms. The role that &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; or others with similar values is an interesting debate to have, and it's good that Conservapedia seems like they'll allow us to have it. In some &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; communities on bigger platforms, like reddit, you're not even allowed to play devil's advocate about it.&lt;br /&gt;
: My next 2 paragraphs will address some points in the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point about the legacy paleocons not being on board with the groypers is interesting, and seems true. I've already seen the Spectator article, back in the fall, and found it pretty sketchy or weak. More broadly, though, it is true and interesting. There is an angle you are missing though. For example, Cotto and Gottfried, a current events show co-hosted by the great Paul Gottfried, took JF Gariépy's side over Fuentes' when he took credit for getting Nick banned. I don't bring this up to make a censorship point. It was interesting to me, because JF is usually considered &amp;quot;less optical&amp;quot; than Nick Fuentes is, because his list of guests on his own show includes some colorful characters Nick refuses to associate with and because he sometimes says some things explicitly that Nick will leave to subtext instead. Movement paleoconservatism has taken a sour stance on the groypers on temperament, sometimes also on policy, but it's interesting to see how they're navigating that in a unique way.&lt;br /&gt;
: It doesn't surprise me that Ben Shapiro included Ron Paul on his hit list of alt-right influencers, but I don't think the reasons for his inclusion or others are condemnable. It's worth pointing out that Ben himself was a guest on Red Ice TV with Henrik and Lana back in 2014, another show that was banned from YouTube in 2019 or 2020. Similarly, Ben has spoken with Ann Coulter on camera who he also included on his alt-right list. In this sense, the issue with Ben isn't so much his own agenda or his disagreements with other factions but his own hypocrisy; the Daily Wire itself has been labelled alt-right by the mainstream media on multiple occasions, usually with retractions, but it has happened. People find it objectionable that an outlet with a lot of funding and close ties to Fox News, etc. gets a &amp;quot;get-out-of-alt-right-free&amp;quot; card, while more grassroots activists are left out to dry.&lt;br /&gt;
: I'll get to your main essay later, I'd like to do this in parts. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 22:53, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Hi, I really appreciate that you did this, I wasn't expecting it at all. The Groyper Wars have been over for a long time. And after my essay was deleted by an admin ([https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;oldid=1760851 here] is where my essay used to be), I was ready to give it up. Didn't see myself ever coming back to this. And I set up this page several months ago, this is the first time anyone has responded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: You said you would react to my main essay &amp;quot;later,&amp;quot; and it's been a few days. If you're still there, I'd love to debate this with you, but I want to wait until you've reacted to my actual essay until I react to your response. If you post your reaction to the essay, I'd be more than happy to have a discussion with you! --- [[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 13:48, 5 May 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Opinion==&lt;br /&gt;
This has definitely got to be the #1 most controversial topic amongst the right. I think it's an overblown subject. I do consider myself a member of the Groyper movement, though I do think that [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/ff/Groyper_cartoon.png &amp;quot;Groyper&amp;quot;] is a silly name for a political movement. Now, I can't speak for every member, but I really don't think most Groypers are inherently &amp;quot;eViL aNtI-sEmItIc WhItE nAtIoNaLiStS&amp;quot; like many will tell you. It's a traditionalist paleocon movement that urges America to put God and country first and to return the western values our society was founded on (by white people, hence Nick's many mentions of the anti-white agenda, the importance of white identity and shifting demographics, which many confuse to be racial, when they're actually cultural). The &amp;quot;antisemitic&amp;quot; claim is mainly due to Nick's edgy and often Jew-related jokes (which Nick has said are merely for shock value), as well as the Groypers' heavy criticism of Israel, especially from a foreign policy perspective, and can you blame them? Trillions of dollars in taxpayer money is funneled to Israel every year to help them fight their thousand-year war. They don't need all that money, they have a GDP of 402 billion. It's not like they're some third-world country that we're helping out of pity. Of course, say this at a Turning Point USA event or on The Ben Shapiro Show and you're deemed &amp;quot;Anti-semitic/racist&amp;quot;, somehow. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 12:53, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a curious and thought-provoking take. And I wouldn't characterize groypers as white nationalists or anti-Semites, though in the past I would have. A lot of conservatives like to jump the gun and disown anyone outside of the mainstream, condemning them in the harshest possible terms. I think I can give you an explanation why. Part of it is that conservatives are afraid of alienating left-wingers and centrists/moderates. They think if they embrace certain figures they won't be able to convince as many people to accept conservatism. In a lot of cases, the opposite is true. The other thing is that back in 2019, quite a few mainstream/popular right-wingers saw groypers as wignats. Nick Fuentes and Beardson Beardly are having to deal with actual wignats right now. I think the way they feel about TRS is how conservatives felt about groypers. &amp;quot;They're just trying to divide us.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're infiltrators.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They don't have anything to offer.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're idiots.&amp;quot; A lot of stuff was coming out about Nick especially that just put people off. Like that awful Holocaust joke. I get that he tries to be edgy and says things for shock value, but a lot of times he goes too far. And that's why some factions of the right were concerned that Nick was the new Richard Spencer, and didn't want their reputations tarnished through guilt by association --- which ironically is a tactic they themselves unjustly used against those on the right who chose to associate with the groypers. I know groypers presently are frustrated by wignats. Now they know how mainstream conservatives felt. You're absolutely right that most of Western civilization was built by white people. And there 100% is an anti-white agenda: it's pervasive and vitriolic. It's institutionalized across the Western world. I don't see how white identity politics solves anything. Every group should be proud of its identity. Whites have done many amazing things. But embracing identity politics, as Nick seems to frequently advocate, is playing on the left's battlefield, and that's a dangerous game. Altering a country's core demography inevitably comes with long-lasting and severe consequences. White Americans have a sub-replacement birth rate. Black Americans are aborting and shooting themselves out of existence. Latin American and Middle Eastern immigrants to the U.S., meanwhile, have very high birth rates... and they're only rising. Those immigrants obviously vote for the people importing them and tell their kids and grandkids to do the same. I don't think that's inextricably tied to race, I agree that it's cultural. But there is a link between culture and race, they're not entirely distinct. And we can dispute the reasons why demographic shifts have such drastic consequences, but the point is they have drastic consequences. So we need to import less people. As for Israel, a lot of people seem to think anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. I used to think that, too, reasoning that singling out the only Jewish State must be bad-faith criticism. But that point defeats itself: Israel is unique, which is why it is uniquely criticized. Having an unconventional opinion about a foreign country is not inherently bigoted. I support Israel. Others don't. Who cares? Besides, Israel has stains in its history --- think Lavon Affair and some of the shady/unethical actions of the Mossad. I have to correct you on the foreign aid: I believe it's low billions, not trillions. And hypothetically, I support them getting that money. Sure they do well for themselves, but they're (in theory) the only democracy in the Middle East, surrounded on all sides by hostile powers. Israel also has a lot of holy sites (for Christians, not just Jews). But I don't want my taxpayer dollars going to fund their COVID regime --- while non-Muslims still can't pray at the Temple Mount. I like Ben Shapiro and TPUSA, though I sometimes disagree with them. In spite of those disagreements, I see their conservative activism as a net positive. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 17:46, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm happy to say, then, that there's a lot of things we agree on; however, I don't think Nick is advocating for identity politics. I think he just wants whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda. As for TPUSA and Shapiro, they're not advocating for conservatism. They're advocating for libertarian, capitalist-worshipping economic policy, and squishy, practically nonexistent social policy that is getting us virtually nowhere in this culture war. ''(Fusionism and its consequences!)'' If we want to see an actual return to traditionalism in America, the ideas these mainstream &amp;quot;conservatives&amp;quot; are pushing are not contributing in any way. They're pushing us in the opposite direction.(''Plus, we all know Richard Spencer is a Democrat Psyop.'') [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 11:45, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you're right about Richard Spencer. And I would like both Ben Shapiro and TPUSA to put more emphasis on social conservatism and less emphasis on free-market economics (as Michael Knowles and Matt Walsh have advocated for the broader conservative movement several times). Shapiro is sort of libertarian, and so are Charlie Kirk and most of the people at Turning Point. I'm not really a fan of libertarianism. I'm a huge fan of Walsh and Knowles partly because neither of them is remotely libertarian. As well, Shapiro in particular seems to support free-market absolutism and neoliberal, globalized capitalism, though I also just heard him say that America should put tariffs on non-American companies that use child labour and American companies that do so should be punished. I think some people on the dissident right tend to overlook the positives about Ben Shapiro and The Daily Wire: an alt-Hollywood, an alt-publishing company. Openly defying Biden's vaccine mandate and suing him over it. TPUSA has been engaging in conservative activism all over the U.S. for years at this point, and they've improved over time. Charlie Kirk now talks about demographics, marriage, and the nuclear family. Ben Shapiro talks about corporate tyranny. They're human, not controlled opposition. And I'm all for &amp;quot;telling whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda.&amp;quot; That's great. It's something Matt Walsh talks about all the time, at least in 2021. But here's what I mean by saying Nick advocates for white identity politics: [https://tv.gab.com/channel/three_spoons/view/nick-fuentes-white-americans-are-61619c89645a5a7fe897dd5e here], at 31:24, Nick says &amp;quot;White racial identity politics is not going away.&amp;quot; And it's not just that. Nick has explicitly rejected &amp;quot;multi-racial, working-class populism&amp;quot; and grouping together as Americans, patriots, conservatives, or even Christians in favour of white identitarianism. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:58, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think Nick is making perfect sense in the video you linked. I don't think he means &amp;quot;identity politics&amp;quot; in the Obama-esque &amp;quot;I'm black n y'all gotta do everything I say or you racist&amp;quot; sort of sense here. Sounds to me like he's talking about political ideology that prioritizes white identity. (''White-identity'' politics, rather than white ''identity-politics'', if that makes sense). Also, he's not saying we can't come together as American patriots or Christians, he's just saying that many conservatives pretend that race isn't a thing, and that we can't properly fight the anti-white agenda if we don't recognize whiteness. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:22, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::From 37:30 - &amp;quot;Race is the basis, and I wish it wasn't that way. Understand, you know, people look at me and they say, 'That's the guy! That's the white supremacist that wants to make everything racist!' I didn't make it that way. Don't point the finger at me, don't blame me! I'm looking at the world and telling you how it is, I'm explaining it to you. I didn't make the world, okay? Don't blame me, I didn't make America the way it is!... We do have to acknowledge where we differ, and we have to account for those things so that we can live together in harmony... To the extent that it is possible that we get along, the way that we get along is by understanding our differences, accommodating for those differences, and then we can flourish. Not ignoring them, not pretending that they don't exist.&amp;quot; [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 14:40, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'd like to believe that race shouldn't factor into anything. In the abstract, it shouldn't. But that's not the world we're living in. You and Nick are right about that. This racial stuff has been foisted upon us. Matt Walsh pointed out that the Virginia governor's race was won by &amp;quot;white grievance politics&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;that's a good thing.&amp;quot; We have to deal with the intensity of anti-white hate on both the left and the right properly. I get what you're saying about the difference between white identity-politics and white-identity politics. White identity exists and it's not inherently bad. Identity itself isn't bad. But how significant is racial identity in the political realm? It's significant, no doubt. But more so than everything else? I have to admit, it would be pretty cool to hear a candidate talk about how blue-collar white Americans are being left to dry by neoliberal globalism. Or to hear one talk about the historical accomplishments of white people. Should that exclude talking about America's Christian roots? Or condemning abortion, which disproportionately harms black Americans? Or criticizing LGBT radicalism? I don't think it should. So what should be prioritized? I'm not saying shun white interests in favour of corporate tax cuts --- corporations are part of the problem, so take away their (mostly non-white) foreign labour. Address demographics. Address anti-white critical race theory and other aspects of the anti-white agenda. But don't necessarily prioritize these things. Of course they're important. But you also have millions of unborn babies murdered in the womb each year. You have homosexuality/bisexuality/pansexuality and transgenderism/non-binarism/gender-fluidity/agenderism. You have Drag Queen Story Hour. Child drag queens. Drag queens on children's television. &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; drag queens. You have Internet pornography. Gun control. Drugs. War. Not everything is a racial issue. A lot have a racial aspect, but that's not what governs them. The prospect of a national divorce, or secession? That would be along political or sociocultural lines, not solid racial lines. So yes, appeal to whites. But why not also appeal to sensible non-whites (even if they're a tiny minority)? Instead of &amp;quot;I'm looking out for white people,&amp;quot; which can be a good thing, &amp;quot;I'm looking out for families.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for the working class.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I'm looking out for anyone who hates degeneracy.&amp;quot; Couldn't that work? Not pandering, or endless harping about &amp;quot;black unemployment,&amp;quot; but looking for something above race to unite us. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 18:27, November 20, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1813463</id>
		<title>Debate:The Groyper Wars</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1813463"/>
		<updated>2021-11-19T01:58:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* My Opinion */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;With the past controversies over Nick Fuentes, TPUSA, Michelle Malkin, YAF, Ashley St. Clair, etc., combined with Big Tech's and the federal government's current suppression of dissent, this is an important discussion to have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you agree with [[Essay:The Groyper Wars|this]]? Why or why not? Please discuss the content of the Essay itself, rather than the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Debate]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=No longer relevant, based on an older version and its talk page, potentially confusing|content=&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey, I'm a member of Nick's community and consider myself a groyper sympathizer. Made an account for this. Let's talk if you're still around. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 17:59, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You have a pretty hefty essay there, and I'm not sure which parts are most important to you, so I'll address what interests me and we can take it from there.&lt;br /&gt;
: First of all, I respect that you're honest and transparent about your own background in your user page, which isn't exactly orthodox conservatism. I'm kinda of like you, except I come from Ron Paul libertarianism. Obviously, this puts me at odds with a lot of &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; and Nick, who are very critical of libertarianism, but I have a good enough understanding of their views that I can defend them pretty well and I overlap with most of it. I also appreciate that you condemn censorship in no uncertain terms. The role that &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; or others with similar values is an interesting debate to have, and it's good that Conservapedia seems like they'll allow us to have it. In some &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; communities on bigger platforms, like reddit, you're not even allowed to play devil's advocate about it.&lt;br /&gt;
: My next 2 paragraphs will address some points in the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point about the legacy paleocons not being on board with the groypers is interesting, and seems true. I've already seen the Spectator article, back in the fall, and found it pretty sketchy or weak. More broadly, though, it is true and interesting. There is an angle you are missing though. For example, Cotto and Gottfried, a current events show co-hosted by the great Paul Gottfried, took JF Gariépy's side over Fuentes' when he took credit for getting Nick banned. I don't bring this up to make a censorship point. It was interesting to me, because JF is usually considered &amp;quot;less optical&amp;quot; than Nick Fuentes is, because his list of guests on his own show includes some colorful characters Nick refuses to associate with and because he sometimes says some things explicitly that Nick will leave to subtext instead. Movement paleoconservatism has taken a sour stance on the groypers on temperament, sometimes also on policy, but it's interesting to see how they're navigating that in a unique way.&lt;br /&gt;
: It doesn't surprise me that Ben Shapiro included Ron Paul on his hit list of alt-right influencers, but I don't think the reasons for his inclusion or others are condemnable. It's worth pointing out that Ben himself was a guest on Red Ice TV with Henrik and Lana back in 2014, another show that was banned from YouTube in 2019 or 2020. Similarly, Ben has spoken with Ann Coulter on camera who he also included on his alt-right list. In this sense, the issue with Ben isn't so much his own agenda or his disagreements with other factions but his own hypocrisy; the Daily Wire itself has been labelled alt-right by the mainstream media on multiple occasions, usually with retractions, but it has happened. People find it objectionable that an outlet with a lot of funding and close ties to Fox News, etc. gets a &amp;quot;get-out-of-alt-right-free&amp;quot; card, while more grassroots activists are left out to dry.&lt;br /&gt;
: I'll get to your main essay later, I'd like to do this in parts. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 22:53, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Hi, I really appreciate that you did this, I wasn't expecting it at all. The Groyper Wars have been over for a long time. And after my essay was deleted by an admin ([https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;oldid=1760851 here] is where my essay used to be), I was ready to give it up. Didn't see myself ever coming back to this. And I set up this page several months ago, this is the first time anyone has responded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: You said you would react to my main essay &amp;quot;later,&amp;quot; and it's been a few days. If you're still there, I'd love to debate this with you, but I want to wait until you've reacted to my actual essay until I react to your response. If you post your reaction to the essay, I'd be more than happy to have a discussion with you! --- [[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 13:48, 5 May 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Opinion==&lt;br /&gt;
This has definitely got to be the #1 most controversial topic amongst the right. I think it's an overblown subject. I do consider myself a member of the Groyper movement, though I do think that [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/ff/Groyper_cartoon.png &amp;quot;Groyper&amp;quot;] is a silly name for a political movement. Now, I can't speak for every member, but I really don't think most Groypers are inherently &amp;quot;eViL aNtI-sEmItIc WhItE nAtIoNaLiStS&amp;quot; like many will tell you. It's a traditionalist paleocon movement that urges America to put God and country first and to return the western values our society was founded on (by white people, hence Nick's many mentions of the anti-white agenda, the importance of white identity and shifting demographics, which many confuse to be racial, when they're actually cultural). The &amp;quot;antisemitic&amp;quot; claim is mainly due to Nick's edgy and often Jew-related jokes (which Nick has said are merely for shock value), as well as the Groypers' heavy criticism of Israel, especially from a foreign policy perspective, and can you blame them? Trillions of dollars in taxpayer money is funneled to Israel every year to help them fight their thousand-year war. They don't need all that money, they have a GDP of 402 billion. It's not like they're some third-world country that we're helping out of pity. Of course, say this at a Turning Point USA event or on The Ben Shapiro Show and you're deemed &amp;quot;Anti-semitic/racist&amp;quot;, somehow. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 12:53, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a curious and thought-provoking take. And I wouldn't characterize groypers as white nationalists or anti-Semites, though in the past I would have. A lot of conservatives like to jump the gun and disown anyone outside of the mainstream, condemning them in the harshest possible terms. I think I can give you an explanation why. Part of it is that conservatives are afraid of alienating left-wingers and centrists/moderates. They think if they embrace certain figures they won't be able to convince as many people to accept conservatism. In a lot of cases, the opposite is true. The other thing is that back in 2019, quite a few mainstream/popular right-wingers saw groypers as wignats. Nick Fuentes and Beardson Beardly are having to deal with actual wignats right now. I think the way they feel about TRS is how conservatives felt about groypers. &amp;quot;They're just trying to divide us.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're infiltrators.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They don't have anything to offer.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're idiots.&amp;quot; A lot of stuff was coming out about Nick especially that just put people off. Like that awful Holocaust joke. I get that he tries to be edgy and says things for shock value, but a lot of times he goes too far. And that's why some factions of the right were concerned that Nick was the new Richard Spencer, and didn't want their reputations tarnished through guilt by association --- which ironically is a tactic they themselves unjustly used against those on the right who chose to associate with the groypers. I know groypers presently are frustrated by wignats. Now they know how mainstream conservatives felt. You're absolutely right that most of Western civilization was built by white people. And there 100% is an anti-white agenda: it's pervasive and vitriolic. It's institutionalized across the Western world. I don't see how white identity politics solves anything. Every group should be proud of its identity. Whites have done many amazing things. But embracing identity politics, as Nick seems to frequently advocate, is playing on the left's battlefield, and that's a dangerous game. Altering a country's core demography inevitably comes with long-lasting and severe consequences. White Americans have a sub-replacement birth rate. Black Americans are aborting and shooting themselves out of existence. Latin American and Middle Eastern immigrants to the U.S., meanwhile, have very high birth rates... and they're only rising. Those immigrants obviously vote for the people importing them and tell their kids and grandkids to do the same. I don't think that's inextricably tied to race, I agree that it's cultural. But there is a link between culture and race, they're not entirely distinct. And we can dispute the reasons why demographic shifts have such drastic consequences, but the point is they have drastic consequences. So we need to import less people. As for Israel, a lot of people seem to think anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. I used to think that, too, reasoning that singling out the only Jewish State must be bad-faith criticism. But that point defeats itself: Israel is unique, which is why it is uniquely criticized. Having an unconventional opinion about a foreign country is not inherently bigoted. I support Israel. Others don't. Who cares? Besides, Israel has stains in its history --- think Lavon Affair and some of the shady/unethical actions of the Mossad. I have to correct you on the foreign aid: I believe it's low billions, not trillions. And hypothetically, I support them getting that money. Sure they do well for themselves, but they're (in theory) the only democracy in the Middle East, surrounded on all sides by hostile powers. Israel also has a lot of holy sites (for Christians, not just Jews). But I don't want my taxpayer dollars going to fund their COVID regime --- while non-Muslims still can't pray at the Temple Mount. I like Ben Shapiro and TPUSA, though I sometimes disagree with them. In spite of those disagreements, I see their conservative activism as a net positive. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 17:46, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm happy to say, then, that there's a lot of things we agree on; however, I don't think Nick is advocating for identity politics. I think he just wants whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda. As for TPUSA and Shapiro, they're not advocating for conservatism. They're advocating for libertarian, capitalist-worshipping economic policy, and squishy, practically nonexistent social policy that is getting us virtually nowhere in this culture war. ''(Fusionism and its consequences!)'' If we want to see an actual return to traditionalism in America, the ideas these mainstream &amp;quot;conservatives&amp;quot; are pushing are not contributing in any way. They're pushing us in the opposite direction.(''Plus, we all know Richard Spencer is a Democrat Psyop.'') [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 11:45, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you're right about Richard Spencer. And I would like both Ben Shapiro and TPUSA to put more emphasis on social conservatism and less emphasis on free-market economics (as Michael Knowles and Matt Walsh have advocated for the broader conservative movement several times). Shapiro is sort of libertarian, and so are Charlie Kirk and most of the people at Turning Point. I'm not really a fan of libertarianism. I'm a huge fan of Walsh and Knowles partly because neither of them is remotely libertarian. As well, Shapiro in particular seems to support free-market absolutism and neoliberal, globalized capitalism, though I also just heard him say that America should put tariffs on non-American companies that use child labour and American companies that do so should be punished. I think some people on the dissident right tend to overlook the positives about Ben Shapiro and The Daily Wire: an alt-Hollywood, an alt-publishing company. Openly defying Biden's vaccine mandate and suing him over it. TPUSA has been engaging in conservative activism all over the U.S. for years at this point, and they've improved over time. Charlie Kirk now talks about demographics, marriage, and the nuclear family. Ben Shapiro talks about corporate tyranny. They're human, not controlled opposition. And I'm all for &amp;quot;telling whites to embrace their heritage and take action against the anti-white agenda.&amp;quot; That's great. It's something Matt Walsh talks about all the time, at least in 2021. But here's what I mean by saying Nick advocates for white identity politics: [https://tv.gab.com/channel/three_spoons/view/nick-fuentes-white-americans-are-61619c89645a5a7fe897dd5e here], at 31:24, Nick says &amp;quot;White racial identity politics is not going away.&amp;quot; And it's not just that. Nick has explicitly rejected &amp;quot;multi-racial, working-class populism&amp;quot; and grouping together as Americans, patriots, conservatives, or even Christians in favour of white identitarianism. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:58, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1813010</id>
		<title>Debate:The Groyper Wars</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1813010"/>
		<updated>2021-11-16T22:46:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* My Opinion */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;With the past controversies over Nick Fuentes, TPUSA, Michelle Malkin, YAF, Ashley St. Clair, etc., combined with Big Tech's and the federal government's current suppression of dissent, this is an important discussion to have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you agree with [[Essay:The Groyper Wars|this]]? Why or why not? Please discuss the content of the Essay itself, rather than the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Debate]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=No longer relevant, based on an older version and its talk page, potentially confusing|content=&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey, I'm a member of Nick's community and consider myself a groyper sympathizer. Made an account for this. Let's talk if you're still around. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 17:59, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You have a pretty hefty essay there, and I'm not sure which parts are most important to you, so I'll address what interests me and we can take it from there.&lt;br /&gt;
: First of all, I respect that you're honest and transparent about your own background in your user page, which isn't exactly orthodox conservatism. I'm kinda of like you, except I come from Ron Paul libertarianism. Obviously, this puts me at odds with a lot of &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; and Nick, who are very critical of libertarianism, but I have a good enough understanding of their views that I can defend them pretty well and I overlap with most of it. I also appreciate that you condemn censorship in no uncertain terms. The role that &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; or others with similar values is an interesting debate to have, and it's good that Conservapedia seems like they'll allow us to have it. In some &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; communities on bigger platforms, like reddit, you're not even allowed to play devil's advocate about it.&lt;br /&gt;
: My next 2 paragraphs will address some points in the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point about the legacy paleocons not being on board with the groypers is interesting, and seems true. I've already seen the Spectator article, back in the fall, and found it pretty sketchy or weak. More broadly, though, it is true and interesting. There is an angle you are missing though. For example, Cotto and Gottfried, a current events show co-hosted by the great Paul Gottfried, took JF Gariépy's side over Fuentes' when he took credit for getting Nick banned. I don't bring this up to make a censorship point. It was interesting to me, because JF is usually considered &amp;quot;less optical&amp;quot; than Nick Fuentes is, because his list of guests on his own show includes some colorful characters Nick refuses to associate with and because he sometimes says some things explicitly that Nick will leave to subtext instead. Movement paleoconservatism has taken a sour stance on the groypers on temperament, sometimes also on policy, but it's interesting to see how they're navigating that in a unique way.&lt;br /&gt;
: It doesn't surprise me that Ben Shapiro included Ron Paul on his hit list of alt-right influencers, but I don't think the reasons for his inclusion or others are condemnable. It's worth pointing out that Ben himself was a guest on Red Ice TV with Henrik and Lana back in 2014, another show that was banned from YouTube in 2019 or 2020. Similarly, Ben has spoken with Ann Coulter on camera who he also included on his alt-right list. In this sense, the issue with Ben isn't so much his own agenda or his disagreements with other factions but his own hypocrisy; the Daily Wire itself has been labelled alt-right by the mainstream media on multiple occasions, usually with retractions, but it has happened. People find it objectionable that an outlet with a lot of funding and close ties to Fox News, etc. gets a &amp;quot;get-out-of-alt-right-free&amp;quot; card, while more grassroots activists are left out to dry.&lt;br /&gt;
: I'll get to your main essay later, I'd like to do this in parts. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 22:53, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Hi, I really appreciate that you did this, I wasn't expecting it at all. The Groyper Wars have been over for a long time. And after my essay was deleted by an admin ([https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;oldid=1760851 here] is where my essay used to be), I was ready to give it up. Didn't see myself ever coming back to this. And I set up this page several months ago, this is the first time anyone has responded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: You said you would react to my main essay &amp;quot;later,&amp;quot; and it's been a few days. If you're still there, I'd love to debate this with you, but I want to wait until you've reacted to my actual essay until I react to your response. If you post your reaction to the essay, I'd be more than happy to have a discussion with you! --- [[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 13:48, 5 May 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Opinion==&lt;br /&gt;
This has definitely got to be the #1 most controversial topic amongst the right. I think it's an overblown subject. I do consider myself a member of the Groyper movement, though I do think that [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/ff/Groyper_cartoon.png &amp;quot;Groyper&amp;quot;] is a silly name for a political movement. Now, I can't speak for every member, but I really don't think most Groypers are inherently &amp;quot;eViL aNtI-sEmItIc WhItE nAtIoNaLiStS&amp;quot; like many will tell you. It's a traditionalist paleocon movement that urges America to put God and country first and to return the western values our society was founded on (by white people, hence Nick's many mentions of the anti-white agenda, the importance of white identity and shifting demographics, which many confuse to be racial, when they're actually cultural). The &amp;quot;antisemitic&amp;quot; claim is mainly due to Nick's edgy and often Jew-related jokes (which Nick has said are merely for shock value), as well as the Groypers' heavy criticism of Israel, especially from a foreign policy perspective, and can you blame them? Trillions of dollars in taxpayer money is funneled to Israel every year to help them fight their thousand-year war. They don't need all that money, they have a GDP of 402 billion. It's not like they're some third-world country that we're helping out of pity. Of course, say this at a Turning Point USA event or on The Ben Shapiro Show and you're deemed &amp;quot;Anti-semitic/racist&amp;quot;, somehow. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 12:53, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a curious and thought-provoking take. And I wouldn't characterize groypers as white nationalists or anti-Semites, though in the past I would have. A lot of conservatives like to jump the gun and disown anyone outside of the mainstream, condemning them in the harshest possible terms. I think I can give you an explanation why. Part of it is that conservatives are afraid of alienating left-wingers and centrists/moderates. They think if they embrace certain figures they won't be able to convince as many people to accept conservatism. In a lot of cases, the opposite is true. The other thing is that back in 2019, quite a few mainstream/popular right-wingers saw groypers as wignats. Nick Fuentes and Beardson Beardly are having to deal with actual wignats right now. I think the way they feel about TRS is how conservatives felt about groypers. &amp;quot;They're just trying to divide us.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're infiltrators.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They don't have anything to offer.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;They're idiots.&amp;quot; A lot of stuff was coming out about Nick especially that just put people off. Like that awful Holocaust joke. I get that he tries to be edgy and says things for shock value, but a lot of times he goes too far. And that's why some factions of the right were concerned that Nick was the new Richard Spencer, and didn't want their reputations tarnished through guilt by association --- which ironically is a tactic they themselves unjustly used against those on the right who chose to associate with the groypers. I know groypers presently are frustrated by wignats. Now they know how mainstream conservatives felt. You're absolutely right that most of Western civilization was built by white people. And there 100% is an anti-white agenda: it's pervasive and vitriolic. It's institutionalized across the Western world. I don't see how white identity politics solves anything. Every group should be proud of its identity. Whites have done many amazing things. But embracing identity politics, as Nick seems to frequently advocate, is playing on the left's battlefield, and that's a dangerous game. Altering a country's core demography inevitably comes with long-lasting and severe consequences. White Americans have a sub-replacement birth rate. Black Americans are aborting and shooting themselves out of existence. Latin American and Middle Eastern immigrants to the U.S., meanwhile, have very high birth rates... and they're only rising. Those immigrants obviously vote for the people importing them and tell their kids and grandkids to do the same. I don't think that's inextricably tied to race, I agree that it's cultural. But there is a link between culture and race, they're not entirely distinct. And we can dispute the reasons why demographic shifts have such drastic consequences, but the point is they have drastic consequences. So we need to import less people. As for Israel, a lot of people seem to think anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. I used to think that, too, reasoning that singling out the only Jewish State must be bad-faith criticism. But that point defeats itself: Israel is unique, which is why it is uniquely criticized. Having an unconventional opinion about a foreign country is not inherently bigoted. I support Israel. Others don't. Who cares? Besides, Israel has stains in its history --- think Lavon Affair and some of the shady/unethical actions of the Mossad. I have to correct you on the foreign aid: I believe it's low billions, not trillions. And hypothetically, I support them getting that money. Sure they do well for themselves, but they're (in theory) the only democracy in the Middle East, surrounded on all sides by hostile powers. Israel also has a lot of holy sites (for Christians, not just Jews). But I don't want my taxpayer dollars going to fund their COVID regime --- while non-Muslims still can't pray at the Temple Mount. I like Ben Shapiro and TPUSA, though I sometimes disagree with them. In spite of those disagreements, I see their conservative activism as a net positive. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 17:46, November 16, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nicholas_J._Fuentes&amp;diff=1812349</id>
		<title>Nicholas J. Fuentes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nicholas_J._Fuentes&amp;diff=1812349"/>
		<updated>2021-11-13T23:50:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Nicholas Joseph “Nick” Fuentes''' is an American internet personality, supporter of [[Joe Biden]]'s disastrous foreign policy,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/U3P0G&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and a so-called alt-right commentator who runs a podcast he dubbed America First on [[YouTube]], and previously ran the ''Nationalist Review'' (not to be confused with ''National Review'') podcast with James Allsup. He has been criticized by conservatives for numerous bigoted remarks.&amp;lt;ref name=list&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1196604409607794688&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Fuentes, like Charlottesville protest organizer [[Richard Spencer]], is said to be a federal agent and [[provocateur]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dissident-mag.com/2020/07/07/america-first-fed-problem/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Fuentes has responded to this accusation by pointing out that the U.S. federal government has seized his assets and placed him on a no-fly list, and by saying &amp;quot;federal informants won't even work with&amp;quot; him, referring to the [[Oath Keepers]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://tv.gab.com/channel/officialamericafirst/view/nick-addresses-slander-of-his-character-617c395c05dc60172aff0827&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Education==&lt;br /&gt;
Fuentes graduated from Lyons Township High School and was president of the school's student council.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Career==&lt;br /&gt;
On August 12, 2017, Fuentes flew from [[Chicago]] to [[Virginia]] to attend the Second Day of the so-called 'Unite The Right' rally in Charlottesville organized by  [[Richard Spencer]]. Fuentes claimed that the majority of protesters in attendance were not [[KKK]] members nor were they [[Neo-Nazis]]. The notorious far left racist rag, ''[[The New York Times]]'' attributed racist comments to Fuentes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Previously, Fuentes worked as a host on the Right Side Broadcasting Network; however, he was abruptly fired after making a statement on his show that the First Amendment is only meant for citizens, not immigrants and foreigners, and that mainstream media networks, such as [[Cable News Network|CNN]], should be held responsible for making people believe it was universal. He later left Boston University after receiving several death threats and declared that he wished to move to Auburn University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political views==&lt;br /&gt;
Fuentes has made anti-Semitic remarks, including using bigoted tropes following the Charlottesville attack.&amp;lt;ref name=list/&amp;gt; He has also mocked the atrocities of the [[Holocaust]].&amp;lt;ref name=list/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He has also defended [[Jim Crow]] laws which were instituted by the [[Democratic Party]].&amp;lt;ref name=list/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fuentes has whined over President Trump condemning white supremacy, and similarly attacked [[Dinesh D'Souza]] in a childish manner.&amp;lt;ref name=list/&amp;gt; He also also expressed sympathetic remarks for [[Antifa]].&amp;lt;ref name=list/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
On August 7, 2019, Fuentes got into a feud with Matt Walsh on Twitter over comments Walsh had made about a mass shooting by a suspected White Supremacist in which Walsh says that &amp;quot;white racist scumbags should be executed&amp;quot;. Fuentes had made what detractors call an &amp;quot;Antisemitic outburst&amp;quot; on his show, America First over the comments made by Walsh, who writes for [[Daily Wire]]. Fuentes called Walsh derogatory terms and said that he &amp;quot;works for [[Jews]]&amp;quot;, he is a &amp;quot;Race Traitor&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;Shabbos [[Goy]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/08/15/citing-death-threats-year-old-who-attended-violent-rally-won-return/CJU7GioWLClGjIHZ2YqshM/story.html 18-Year Old Who Attended Rally Won't Return to BU]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Fuentes, Nicholas J.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Commentators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bigotry]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-Semitism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Glenn_Youngkin&amp;diff=1812300</id>
		<title>Glenn Youngkin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Glenn_Youngkin&amp;diff=1812300"/>
		<updated>2021-11-13T21:57:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Glenn Allen Youngkin''' (born December 9, 1966) is the [[Governor]]-elect of his home state of [[Virginia]]. A [[Republican Party|Republican]], he narrowly defeated the [[Democratic Party|Democrat]] former Governor [[Terry McAuliffe]] in the 2021 Virginia gubernatorial election, a victory widely considered a rejection of the [[left-wing]], [[Establishment|establishmentarian]] presidency of [[Joe Biden]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before running for Governor in the Commonwealth of [[Virginia]], Youngkin was a businessman for 25 years, becoming a co-CEO of the Carlyle Group, a company hosting financial and asset management services connected to the [[World Economic Forum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political career ==&lt;br /&gt;
Before education became the hot-button issue, Youngkin ran a moderate campaign,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBX1DDGs22E&amp;amp;t=2700s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; airing an advertisement seeming to imply that white supremacists were responsible for rising crime&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://tv.gab.com/channel/nationalfile/view/trump-offers-master-class-in-terrible-613a6590f8a8477a1c06fa60&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and refraining from a strong condemnation of [[abortion]] during a debate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qj_JQLaThi8&amp;amp;t=1776s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laWfBJe42e8&amp;amp;t=1907s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Youngkin also supported the removal of a [[Robert E. Lee]] statue from a public park.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nationalfile.com/virginia-glenn-youngkin-gop-nominee-for-governor-endorses-removing-lee-statue-says-confederate-monuments-can-go/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Youngkin won with 50.7 percent of the popular vote. Even far-left biased newspaper ''The Guardian'' admitted that the victory constitutes &amp;quot;a blow&amp;quot; to Joe Biden, who campaigned with McAuliffe before going to a [[climate change]] conference to which [[Russia]] and [[China]] did not send delegates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/nov/02/glenn-youngkin-wins-virginia-governor-election-result&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 2022, Youngkin will succeed the term-limited Democrat Governor [[Ralph Northam]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Youngkin, Glenn}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Virginia Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Virginia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicans]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nicholas_J._Fuentes&amp;diff=1812288</id>
		<title>Nicholas J. Fuentes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nicholas_J._Fuentes&amp;diff=1812288"/>
		<updated>2021-11-13T20:49:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Nicholas Joseph “Nick” Fuentes''' is an American internet personality, supporter of [[Joe Biden]]'s disastrous foreign policy,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/U3P0G&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and a so-called alt-right commentator who runs a podcast he dubbed America First on [[YouTube]], and previously ran the ''Nationalist Review'' (not to be confused with ''National Review'') podcast with James Allsup. He has been criticized by conservatives for what they perceive as numerous bigoted remarks.&amp;lt;ref name=list&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1196604409607794688&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Education==&lt;br /&gt;
Fuentes graduated from Lyons Township High School and was president of the school's student council.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Career==&lt;br /&gt;
On August 12, 2017, Fuentes flew from [[Chicago]] to [[Virginia]] to attend the Second Day of the so-called 'Unite The Right' rally in Charlottesville organized by  [[Richard Spencer]]. Fuentes claimed that the majority of protesters in attendance were not [[KKK]] members nor were they [[Neo-Nazis]]. The notorious far left racist rag, ''[[The New York Times]]'' attributed racist comments to Fuentes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Previously, Fuentes worked as a host on the Right Side Broadcasting Network; however, he was abruptly fired after making a statement on his show that the First Amendment is only meant for citizens, not immigrants and foreigners, and that mainstream media networks, such as [[Cable News Network|CNN]], should be held responsible for making people believe it was universal. He later left Boston University after receiving several death threats and declared that he wished to move to Auburn University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political views==&lt;br /&gt;
Fuentes has made anti-Semitic remarks, including using bigoted tropes following the Charlottesville attack.&amp;lt;ref name=list/&amp;gt; He has also mocked the atrocities of the [[Holocaust]].&amp;lt;ref name=list/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He has also defended [[Jim Crow]] laws which were instituted by the [[Democratic Party]].&amp;lt;ref name=list/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fuentes has whined over President Trump condemning white supremacy, and similarly attacked [[Dinesh D'Souza]] in a childish manner.&amp;lt;ref name=list/&amp;gt; He also also expressed sympathetic remarks for [[Antifa]].&amp;lt;ref name=list/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
On August 7, 2019, Fuentes got into a feud with Matt Walsh on Twitter over comments Walsh had made about a mass shooting by a suspected White Supremacist in which Walsh says that &amp;quot;white racist scumbags should be executed&amp;quot;. Fuentes had made what detractors call an &amp;quot;Antisemitic outburst&amp;quot; on his show, America First over the comments made by Walsh, who writes for [[Daily Wire]]. Fuentes called Walsh derogatory terms and said that he &amp;quot;works for [[Jews]]&amp;quot;, he is a &amp;quot;Race Traitor&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;Shabbos [[Goy]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://time.com/4905939/nicholas-fuentes-white-supremacist-rally-charlottesville/ White Nationalist Leaves Boston University after Charlottesville Rally]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/08/15/citing-death-threats-year-old-who-attended-violent-rally-won-return/CJU7GioWLClGjIHZ2YqshM/story.html 18-Year Old Who Attended Rally Won't Return to BU]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Fuentes, Nicholas J.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Commentators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Activists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Mr._Nationalist&amp;diff=1812226</id>
		<title>User talk:Mr. Nationalist</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Mr._Nationalist&amp;diff=1812226"/>
		<updated>2021-11-13T07:02:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{greeting&lt;br /&gt;
|username=DavidB4&lt;br /&gt;
|sig=--[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:38, 23 July 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you for all your edits so far! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Mr. Nationalist, I saw some of your edits, and I appreciate your contributions to the [[Conservapedia]] mainspace! I want to note that while it's good to use more politically incorrect terms such as &amp;quot;pro-abortion&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;pro-choice&amp;quot; (as you have done), &amp;quot;pro-choice&amp;quot; may be better suited in certain contexts. Sorry to revert your edit [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Neil_Gorsuch&amp;amp;curid=142415&amp;amp;diff=1674555&amp;amp;oldid=1674554 here]; as for Neil Gorsuch, I would think that &amp;quot;pro-choice&amp;quot; would sound better for now as compared to &amp;quot;pro-abortion&amp;quot;, as I believe he did make some more pro-life rulings while on the Court; please correct me if you're right and I'm wrong. —[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|May Dataclarifier be well!]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot!]]'''''&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Wednesday, 13:38, 5 August 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh. So does that mean there is a difference between being pro-abortion and pro-choice? I thought both were technically the same thing, with pro-choice being the term abortionists and feminists use to describe their beliefs. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 13:58, 5 August 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, I see your point. I felt &amp;quot;pro-choice&amp;quot; was a better choice of words for that specific context, largely because the term might sometimes be associated with a lower degree of supporting abortion than &amp;quot;pro-abortion&amp;quot;. For instance, some left-leaning moderates may support abortion only in the first trimester but oppose any afterwards. In that type of a situation, using &amp;quot;pro-choice&amp;quot; might sound more accurate than &amp;quot;pro-abortion&amp;quot; because most people that are &amp;quot;pro-abortion&amp;quot; are much more supportive of it than opposed. And since Gorsuch arguably hasn't held a mostly pro-abortion tenure so far, I thought that it would've been better to stick with &amp;quot;pro-choice&amp;quot;. Maybe you can put quotation marks around the term in the page, since it is a misnomer anyways. Does that sound like a good idea to you? —[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|May Dataclarifier be well!]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot!]]'''''&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Wednesday, 14:07, 5 August 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While it's true that &amp;quot;pro-choice&amp;quot; means the same as pro-abortion, I would think that it's better to use the terms in such a way that differentiates the degree of supporting abortion. —[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|May Dataclarifier be well!]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot!]]'''''&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Wednesday, 14:10, 5 August 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ah. Thank you. That does sound like a good idea to me. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 14:18, 5 August 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, awesome! —[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|May Dataclarifier be well!]] | [[Special:Contributions/Liberaltears|Don't be an anti-Catholic zealot!]]'''''&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Wednesday, 14:19, 5 August 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Utilizing &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{reflist}}, etc.&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Mr. Nationalist, thank you for all your edits to improve/add on to quite a few [[CP]] pages so far! I just want to note, looking at your edit [[Special:Diff/1687855&amp;amp;oldid=1682300|here]] followed by your reverting [[Special:Diff/1687856&amp;amp;oldid=1687855|here]], I believe you were trying to put the source that was under a &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; in a &amp;quot;References&amp;quot; section but didn't manage to do so (correct me if I'm wrong). If that's what you were attempting to do, it's important to always put either &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{reflist}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, or &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{reflist|2}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; right under the &amp;quot;References&amp;quot; section. Thank you!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;—[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]'''''&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Friday, 22:30, 17 September 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you! I noticed one source was under the external links section, so I thought adding a references section would fix it. However, it failed, so I decided to revert it and come back to it later when I had time. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 22:44, 17 September 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm more than happy to help whenever I can!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;—[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!]]'''''&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Friday, 22:50, 17 September 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Troll IP ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Read this: [[User:United States/Troll IP]]. If trolls cause me to get autoblocked, I will meet you in Wikipedia. Thanks! --[[User:United States|United States]] ([[User talk:United States|talk]]) 17:38, 3 December 2020 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Federal Reserve==&lt;br /&gt;
Please keep your Jewish bankers' conspiracy theories to yourself, next time. Thanks. [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Federal_Reserve_System&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1676301]  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:40, 1 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That was not a Jewish bankers' conspiracy. Dice simply discussed the corrupt origins of the Federal Reserve and did not even mention the Jews. There is nothing wrong with saying that elitists control it. That is entirely different from a conspiracy theory. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 17:31, June 2, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, so now you've [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Mr._Nationalist&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1764214 openly gone over to Hamas?]  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:06, June 2, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, but I've become less pro-Israel over time as I have become more isolationist. I mean I favor them over Palestine, but we have given them billions and funded their defense when they openly sell our tech to China, our #1 enemy. Also, I learned that Zionism is sort of a neocon talking point, and saying I support Israel could imply I want a more interventionist foreign policy in favor of them. Pat Buchanan holds those very same sentiments, (in fact he is arguably harsher) and we would not say he likes Hamas, right? Plus Israel can take out Hamas on their own easily without our help or anybody's help. That is why I removed that userbox today. But this itself has nothing to do with that. Dice's video on the Federal Reserve was interesting and educational, so I included it. I assure you, I have no Anti-Semitic intentions. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 19:27, June 2, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So why do you pose as one? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:02, June 2, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't. Again, not all criticisms of the Federal Reserve and its origins are Anti-Semitic. If I have done something that made you think I were trying to pose as one, I again assure you that it was not and I apologize. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 20:06, June 2, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If supporting Zionism is a neoconservative trait/talking point, then why was it Trump who finally moved the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and not someone like Bush, who made that a campaign promise in 2000? [https://dailycaller.com/2017/12/06/flashback-all-the-times-past-presidents-promised-to-move-us-embassy-to-jerusalem/][https://www.haaretz.com/1.4940914][http://www.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/stories/02/04/bush.israel.balkans/index.html] There's also McCain acolyte/[[Lincoln Project]] co-founder [[Steve Schmidt]] [https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2018/05/15/schmidt-on-israel-embassy-move-there-is-blood-on-trumps-hands/ having bashed Trump for moving the embassy], plus [[Bill Kristol]] being silent as [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/05/12/leading-never-trump-republicans-near-silent-in-defense-of-israel/ as Israel's attacked with rockets]. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 20:56, June 2, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
True, but I'm talking in terms of things like foreign aid, intervention, etc. I myself am not a &amp;quot;free Palestine&amp;quot; person, I think they are terrible and I do not really hold anything against Israel and believe they have a right to self-defense, but generally, Zionism is regarded as less of a paleoconservative belief and more of a neoconservative one. I could see the Republican establishment spitting on Israel when they defend themselves against Palestine, but people like Dan Crenshaw and Nikki Haley (both neocons) have fought for Israel and want increased funding to Israel. Also, in regards to Trump moving the embassy to Jersusalem, it should be noted Jared Kushner had a lot to do with it and the aforementioned Nikki Haley strongly backed it while UN ambassador, so it could go both ways there. I personally believe that Jersusalem should be Israel's capital, though it's not really a high priority for me as a conservative. So yes, emphasization of Zionism is a neoconservative trait, and I personally think that is why the GOP establishment has been going crazy over the Israel-Hamas fight when we had the gas shortage a few weeks ago, which was a much more important priority to our country than that. I just find Zionism inconsistent with an &amp;quot;America First&amp;quot; foreign policy approach, which is why I am against it. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 21:24, June 2, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So neocons are Nazis. Okay, got it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:26, June 4, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As to Nixon, so MSM and liberals determine what corruption is, huh? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:28, June 4, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As to the Illuminati, only conservatives believe in conspiracy theories, huh? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:29, June 4, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. No, neocons are not Nazis. I did not say that. One is a group of former Old Left intellectuals and another is a group of white supremacists who have very bigoted goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. No, they do not. Nonetheless, because he decided to cover up the small scandal of Watergate that he did not know about, he unfortunately is corrupt because of that, simply because it constituted an impeachment offense and was a scandal. The break-in was the least important part of the scandal and this was more about a battle between the president and the press, but his small mistake technically ruined it all, though Watergate is definitely only a small stain on Nixon's legacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. I put that because liberals apparently do not believe the Illunimati caused the French Revolution. It is an example of liberal denialism and it is pretty clear to me that the Illuminati caused the Revolution, but since liberals love to sweep that one under the rug I felt forced to say that. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 18:29, June 4, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Special invite ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I started a Discord server for Conservapedia; if you're interested in joining, [https://discord.gg/e953Rag3 here's] the invite. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 21:04, July 10, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debate:The Groyper Wars==&lt;br /&gt;
Would you be interested in a civil discussion about groypers? [[Debate:The Groyper Wars|Here's the Debate page]], if you are. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 02:02, November 13, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Vince_Did_7-14&amp;diff=1812225</id>
		<title>User talk:Vince Did 7-14</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Vince_Did_7-14&amp;diff=1812225"/>
		<updated>2021-11-13T06:50:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: Created page with &amp;quot;You seem to be quite interested in defending groypers and their views, and critical of people like Ben Shapiro and TPUSA. I was wondering if you'd be interested in discussing...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;You seem to be quite interested in defending groypers and their views, and critical of people like Ben Shapiro and TPUSA. I was wondering if you'd be interested in discussing these issues further. A while ago, I set up a Debate page just for that purpose. [[Debate:The Groyper Wars|Here it is.]] Feel free to add your commentary. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 01:50, November 13, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1812222</id>
		<title>Debate:The Groyper Wars</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;diff=1812222"/>
		<updated>2021-11-13T06:06:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;With the past controversies over Nick Fuentes, TPUSA, Michelle Malkin, YAF, Ashley St. Clair, etc., combined with Big Tech's and the federal government's current suppression of dissent, this is an important discussion to have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you agree with [[Essay:The Groyper Wars|this]]? Why or why not? Please discuss the content of the Essay itself, rather than the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Debate]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=No longer relevant, based on an older version and its talk page, potentially confusing|content=&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey, I'm a member of Nick's community and consider myself a groyper sympathizer. Made an account for this. Let's talk if you're still around. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 17:59, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You have a pretty hefty essay there, and I'm not sure which parts are most important to you, so I'll address what interests me and we can take it from there.&lt;br /&gt;
: First of all, I respect that you're honest and transparent about your own background in your user page, which isn't exactly orthodox conservatism. I'm kinda of like you, except I come from Ron Paul libertarianism. Obviously, this puts me at odds with a lot of &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; and Nick, who are very critical of libertarianism, but I have a good enough understanding of their views that I can defend them pretty well and I overlap with most of it. I also appreciate that you condemn censorship in no uncertain terms. The role that &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; or others with similar values is an interesting debate to have, and it's good that Conservapedia seems like they'll allow us to have it. In some &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; communities on bigger platforms, like reddit, you're not even allowed to play devil's advocate about it.&lt;br /&gt;
: My next 2 paragraphs will address some points in the talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point about the legacy paleocons not being on board with the groypers is interesting, and seems true. I've already seen the Spectator article, back in the fall, and found it pretty sketchy or weak. More broadly, though, it is true and interesting. There is an angle you are missing though. For example, Cotto and Gottfried, a current events show co-hosted by the great Paul Gottfried, took JF Gariépy's side over Fuentes' when he took credit for getting Nick banned. I don't bring this up to make a censorship point. It was interesting to me, because JF is usually considered &amp;quot;less optical&amp;quot; than Nick Fuentes is, because his list of guests on his own show includes some colorful characters Nick refuses to associate with and because he sometimes says some things explicitly that Nick will leave to subtext instead. Movement paleoconservatism has taken a sour stance on the groypers on temperament, sometimes also on policy, but it's interesting to see how they're navigating that in a unique way.&lt;br /&gt;
: It doesn't surprise me that Ben Shapiro included Ron Paul on his hit list of alt-right influencers, but I don't think the reasons for his inclusion or others are condemnable. It's worth pointing out that Ben himself was a guest on Red Ice TV with Henrik and Lana back in 2014, another show that was banned from YouTube in 2019 or 2020. Similarly, Ben has spoken with Ann Coulter on camera who he also included on his alt-right list. In this sense, the issue with Ben isn't so much his own agenda or his disagreements with other factions but his own hypocrisy; the Daily Wire itself has been labelled alt-right by the mainstream media on multiple occasions, usually with retractions, but it has happened. People find it objectionable that an outlet with a lot of funding and close ties to Fox News, etc. gets a &amp;quot;get-out-of-alt-right-free&amp;quot; card, while more grassroots activists are left out to dry.&lt;br /&gt;
: I'll get to your main essay later, I'd like to do this in parts. [[User:StupidFrogposter|StupidFrogposter]] ([[User talk:StupidFrogposter|talk]]) 22:53, 29 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Hi, I really appreciate that you did this, I wasn't expecting it at all. The Groyper Wars have been over for a long time. And after my essay was deleted by an admin ([https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:The_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;oldid=1760851 here] is where my essay used to be), I was ready to give it up. Didn't see myself ever coming back to this. And I set up this page several months ago, this is the first time anyone has responded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: You said you would react to my main essay &amp;quot;later,&amp;quot; and it's been a few days. If you're still there, I'd love to debate this with you, but I want to wait until you've reacted to my actual essay until I react to your response. If you post your reaction to the essay, I'd be more than happy to have a discussion with you! --- [[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 13:48, 5 May 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mainstream_conservative&amp;diff=1812202</id>
		<title>Mainstream conservative</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mainstream_conservative&amp;diff=1812202"/>
		<updated>2021-11-13T03:53:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Mainstream conservatives''' is a term sometimes used to describe those whose political views fall between those of [[establishment]] conservatives and [[movement conservatives]] on the [[political spectrum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally, mainstream conservatives are not [[Never Trump]]ers, although they might still disagree with some of his policies and his rhetoric.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://utahpolicy.com/index.php/features/policy-buzz/6847-what-is-a-mainstream-conservative&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; While movement conservatives take consistently conservative stances on issues, promoting individual freedom and opposing government power, mainstream conservatives generally support [[free trade|&amp;quot;free&amp;quot; trade]] and [[criminal justice reform]]; they also believe that populists support big government. Mainstream conservatives, however, are not [[RINO]]s, as they still take many right-wing (though non-populist) stances and support most of Trump's policies (RINOs will support few or none). Mainstream conservatives are not nationalists, but they are still patriotic. Mainstream conservatives include owner of the Daily Wire [[Ben Shapiro]], who has acknowledged the existence of Never Trumpers, although he believes they are small in quantity, and comedian [[Steven Crowder]], who has made jokes at the expense of both Donald Trump and, especially Bernie Sanders, criticized populism for supposedly supporting big government, referred to Never Trump RINO [[Shepard Smith]] as a &amp;quot;libertarian,&amp;quot; and, in response to the chanting of President Donald Trump's name, which was itself a response to leftist heckling, during a free speech presentation at a university where Christina Hoff Sommers and Milo Yiannopoulos were also speaking, said, &amp;quot;I don't like Trump, but I ''love'' that.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mainstream conservatives may differ from [[movement conservative]]s on certain policies and on attitudes toward President Trump, but they carry themselves with much more respect than establishment conservatives. However, since there are very few mainstream conservative politicians, mainstream conservatives generally vote for establishment conservatives. For example, [[Ben Shapiro]] endorsed [[Ted Cruz]], and some non-RINO political commentators at Fox News endorsed [[Marco Rubio]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mainstream conservatives, however, are not anti-establishment, but are generally oblivious to its presence. They understand that there is a left-wing bias in the mainstream media, for instance, but they do not understand that these problems come from both the left and the right, that the GOP is in fact just as corrupt and elitist as the Democrat Party, and that Fox News Channel is, in fact, an establishment GOP echo chamber.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mainstream conservatives, like everyone else, were astounded by President Trump's electoral victory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Nicholas_J._Fuentes&amp;diff=1812191</id>
		<title>Talk:Nicholas J. Fuentes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Nicholas_J._Fuentes&amp;diff=1812191"/>
		<updated>2021-11-13T03:14:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* This article needs a re-write */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Why is everything capitalized in this article? It looks cut n pasted from somewhere. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:19, 12 March 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This article needs a re-write ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the bigot/troll/idiot Fuentes seems to increasingly be a [https://archive.is/U3P0G Biden supporter]. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Saturday, 21:57, August 20, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I disagree. I don't agree with everything Nick has to say nor do I consider myself a Groyper but the article was fine as it was. Nick can be a very immature troll at times and can say stupid stuff but the article should not be condemning him as an anti-Semitic bigot or calling him a Biden supporter at all. Fuentes is not in the same camp as David Duke and Richard Spencer and has condemned these kinds of people on numerous occasions. The only reason why he praised Biden's foreign policy was because of the Afghanistan withdrawal, which was started by Trump and needed to happen. Although Biden was disastrous in orchestrating the withdrawal, it can overall be viewed as a minor victory as it helped get us out of the Middle East. He's said a few things about Jews that he probably should not have said, but he overall seems more focused on putting America's interests over those of Israel, something Conservative Inc. does not want to talk about and do. Like it or not, Nick has helped the America First movement go mainstream and has even helped to fight establishment conservatives like Ben Shapiro. He's been targeted by the establishment so we shouldn't join them in smearing his character. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 01:15, October 15, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Mr. Nationalist, did you see the Twitter thread I linked to in the article? —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Saturday, 10:58, October 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, I did. A lot of that is just him being edgy. I don't exactly like it and it is inappropriate in some ways, but a lot of it is taken out of context by mainstream conservatives like Benny Johnson. He said in a Zoom call debate that he believed everyone was equal before God and should be equal before the law, so it is hard to call him bigoted when he believes that. Also he said he supports the efforts of Booker T. Washington to advance civil rights. Obviously I don't agree with what he said about Jim Crow and the slurs he used against homosexuals and women and some of what he said about Jews, but much of it is likely him being sarcastic, so you can't take what he said seriously. Johnson resorted to using the same tactics leftists used to attack conservatives, and he should just leave him alone. The conservative movement is lost if it is concerned in wasting its time condemning a troll. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 13:31, October 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Exactly! That's what I'm saying! And LT, what's up with the warning you put over my reply? What did I say that was ad hominem or deflection? Was it my sarcasm or do are you just a staunch defender of Benny Johnson? [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 18:34, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Huh, it's almost as if you're a sock of Mr. Nationalist... —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 18:43, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::So if he says something that that isn't bigoted, it's proof he isn't a bigot, but if it's excessively vile like the &amp;gt;dozen times he spouts racism, anti-Semitism, etc., one should just assume it's merely &amp;quot;edgy&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;sarcastic&amp;quot;? You aren't very good at hiding your intended schemes, Bongol- er, ''Mr. Nationalist''. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 16:27, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::One should assume with Nick that he is being edgy when making these kind of jokes, yes. Perhaps he is being too edgy at times and cut back a little bit, but he is still just being edgy. That is just the way Zoomer humor is. Zoomers tend to be edgy whenever they make memes or attack the left because that is just the way they are. They want to be competant because they have studied the failures of conservatives over the past 60 years or so and at times attempt to bait woke leftists. Their tactics are about utilizing power the same way the left does when achieving their goals because at how effective liberals have been at doing so. It's something where you kind of have to be an America First, Zoomer conservative who keeps up with stuff in order to understand. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 23:27, October 22, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As a zoomer, I can attest to this. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 22:14, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yo LT, leave the article the way it is. Quit acting like Ben Shill-piro and smearing the guy. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:52, October 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1196604409607794688 The facts speak for themselves.] —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Saturday, 10:55, October 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::After reading that thread, I don't know if he's smart enough to be a commie infiltrator. He sounds more like just another victim of public schools. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:46, October 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=Ad hominem, deflections, trolling|content=&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah, there's definitely no way that ''Benny Johnson'' of ''Turning Point USA'' could be wrong about this at all. Sure! There's absolutely no way he could be mis-contextualizing any of these clips, because him and his organization are totally reliable 100% of the time and we have 0 reason to distrust them. They're not neocons/grifters/controlled opposition/the literal faces of modern Conservative Inc. at ALL! And Fuentes definitely doesn't have an edgy, provocative sense of humor and make jokes that could be taken out of context at any time and used against him, the same way as many other guys in his age range have. It's not suspicious at all that the vast majority of Conservative Inc. &amp;amp; establishment shills all have the same opinion on him as the left does. This is not in any way reminiscent of how they treated Trump in 2015, noo! [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 15:56, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
::::(ec) Ok, so some kid learns in public school that he has a right to free speech. Then when he exercises it with some nonsense and gets smashed in the teeth by communists, how does that make him a spokesman or representative of conservatives? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:10, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::How is, for example, comparing the Holocaust to baking cookies merely an &amp;quot;edgy, provocative sense of humor&amp;quot;? Sounds like you're either a subversive infiltrator or an actual shill for bigotry. Either way, it's certainly not in good faith. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 16:07, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From The Hill:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In an interview with The Hill, Fuentes insisted that he is not racist, anti-Semitic or a white nationalist. '''Fuentes said he believes that the Holocaust did take place and that the “cookies” bit was said for shock value.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“I’ve never advocated for a white ethno-state,” Fuentes said. “Multiracialism is here and we have to live with it and [the question is] how will we do that?”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fuentes said that in hindsight, he probably would not have gone to the Charlottesville rally if he had known it would be co-opted by David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, and Richard Spencer, a white supremacist and neo-Nazi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''He said that some of his remarks are meant as outrage trolling to draw attention to his show or as over-the-top digs at political rivals aimed at getting under their skin.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“That’s kind of the whole thing,” he said. “We have figured out the game. The algorithm. We’ve hacked the conversation where if you say sensational things like we do, you get attention. I don’t want it to be like that. I wish I could ascend with ideas.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He's only like that because he knows it pisses people off, more people pissed off = more people paying attention, more attention = more people looking into the movement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, Nick says that Biden gave one good speech, and all of a sudden, he's a Biden supporter? That's some leftist-esque thinking right there. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:56, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(A) I don't see the value of dedicating a lot of space to &amp;quot;so and so says so and so is racist and so and so says he's not&amp;quot;; (B) I don't see the value in trying to explain a joke; and (C) we are not Wikipedia. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:23, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In a day where a bacon cheeseburger is racist, this is just a waste of time and space. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:25, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And this is a waste of a talk page. Just write a neutral article including what people say about him, as well as what he's said about his actual beliefs. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 20:39, November 8, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpG4w3Y-rsY Here, a rare interview of Nick being serious about what he thinks.] [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 09:35, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's just a bunch of crazy hypotheticals about what America is going to be like in the year 2070, without even laying the foundation as to who the gypsy fortune teller is who claims to know what America will be like in 2070. Looks like more public school b.s.  Then there is an obsession with labels, like &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; without even knowing what he understands a &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; to be. Same with &amp;quot;paleoconservative&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;ethno-nationalist&amp;quot;.  It's just all naive trash, as is to be expected from a tweenty-something victim of a public school education.  What is the relevance in this article? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::And since we are speaking in hypotheticals, did Fuentas or whoever his alleged source is for his views on America's demographic makeup in the year 2070 is, consider that if the [[CCP]] sent a large portion of its 30 million excesses males (as a result of selective abotion) of military age as an occupying force to America sometime between now and 2070, would that altar the underlying premise? Likely not. Or the devastation of certain bioweapons targeting specific ethnic groups? Etc. &lt;br /&gt;
::::If anything, we could place Fuentas in the same camp as Greta Thunberg and AOC who preach apocalyptical premonitions based on questionable premises and experts, only in his case there is some question whether he even conmsiders his futuristic premonitions either &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;bad&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:14, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article didn't need a re-write before, but it needs one now. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 22:08, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This article had at least one bold claim that was uncited.  I deleted it. Is the article a mess?  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article had at least one bold claim that was uncited.  I deleted it. Is the article a mess? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, there is no citation demonstrating the [[Robert Spencer]] is a Joe Biden operative. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I skimmed the article and at first glance it appears to represent him correctly.  I don't know much about Mr. Fuentes. I blew him off after it appeared he was anti-Semitic and a racist. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:22, November 7, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::RICHARD Spencer, not Robert Spencer. But yeah, it's not a very accurate article. My version was way less biased and way more informative imo.[[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:56, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yup, your version (or even Mr. Nationalist's version from late December 2020) was much fairer and better. It's a shame they've protected the current version so we can't edit it. Biden Supporters? Seriously? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 22:04, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::You can do your proposed changes here. And whatewver looks like a cut n paste from Rightwing Watch can be edited out. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:10, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Here's the citation on Spencer. [https://thefederalist.com/2020/08/24/white-supremacist-who-organized-charlottesville-race-riots-endorses-joe-biden/]  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:40, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Here's another: [https://www.newsweek.com/richard-spencer-reiterates-support-biden-disavows-useless-traitorous-gop-1527555] —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 10:32, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Nicholas_J._Fuentes&amp;diff=1812189</id>
		<title>Talk:Nicholas J. Fuentes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Nicholas_J._Fuentes&amp;diff=1812189"/>
		<updated>2021-11-13T03:08:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Why is everything capitalized in this article? It looks cut n pasted from somewhere. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:19, 12 March 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This article needs a re-write ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the bigot/troll/idiot Fuentes seems to increasingly be a [https://archive.is/U3P0G Biden supporter]. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Saturday, 21:57, August 20, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I disagree. I don't agree with everything Nick has to say nor do I consider myself a Groyper but the article was fine as it was. Nick can be a very immature troll at times and can say stupid stuff but the article should not be condemning him as an anti-Semitic bigot or calling him a Biden supporter at all. Fuentes is not in the same camp as David Duke and Richard Spencer and has condemned these kinds of people on numerous occasions. The only reason why he praised Biden's foreign policy was because of the Afghanistan withdrawal, which was started by Trump and needed to happen. Although Biden was disastrous in orchestrating the withdrawal, it can overall be viewed as a minor victory as it helped get us out of the Middle East. He's said a few things about Jews that he probably should not have said, but he overall seems more focused on putting America's interests over those of Israel, something Conservative Inc. does not want to talk about and do. Like it or not, Nick has helped the America First movement go mainstream and has even helped to fight establishment conservatives like Ben Shapiro. He's been targeted by the establishment so we shouldn't join them in smearing his character. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 01:15, October 15, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Mr. Nationalist, did you see the Twitter thread I linked to in the article? —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Saturday, 10:58, October 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, I did. A lot of that is just him being edgy. I don't exactly like it and it is inappropriate in some ways, but a lot of it is taken out of context by mainstream conservatives like Benny Johnson. He said in a Zoom call debate that he believed everyone was equal before God and should be equal before the law, so it is hard to call him bigoted when he believes that. Also he said he supports the efforts of Booker T. Washington to advance civil rights. Obviously I don't agree with what he said about Jim Crow and the slurs he used against homosexuals and women and some of what he said about Jews, but much of it is likely him being sarcastic, so you can't take what he said seriously. Johnson resorted to using the same tactics leftists used to attack conservatives, and he should just leave him alone. The conservative movement is lost if it is concerned in wasting its time condemning a troll. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 13:31, October 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Exactly! That's what I'm saying! And LT, what's up with the warning you put over my reply? What did I say that was ad hominem or deflection? Was it my sarcasm or do are you just a staunch defender of Benny Johnson? [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 18:34, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Huh, it's almost as if you're a sock of Mr. Nationalist... —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 18:43, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::So if he says something that that isn't bigoted, it's proof he isn't a bigot, but if it's excessively vile like the &amp;gt;dozen times he spouts racism, anti-Semitism, etc., one should just assume it's merely &amp;quot;edgy&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;sarcastic&amp;quot;? You aren't very good at hiding your intended schemes, Bongol- er, ''Mr. Nationalist''. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 16:27, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::One should assume with Nick that he is being edgy when making these kind of jokes, yes. Perhaps he is being too edgy at times and cut back a little bit, but he is still just being edgy. That is just the way Zoomer humor is. Zoomers tend to be edgy whenever they make memes or attack the left because that is just the way they are. They want to be competant because they have studied the failures of conservatives over the past 60 years or so and at times attempt to bait woke leftists. Their tactics are about utilizing power the same way the left does when achieving their goals because at how effective liberals have been at doing so. It's something where you kind of have to be an America First, Zoomer conservative who keeps up with stuff in order to understand. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 23:27, October 22, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yo LT, leave the article the way it is. Quit acting like Ben Shill-piro and smearing the guy. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:52, October 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1196604409607794688 The facts speak for themselves.] —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Saturday, 10:55, October 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::After reading that thread, I don't know if he's smart enough to be a commie infiltrator. He sounds more like just another victim of public schools. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:46, October 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=Ad hominem, deflections, trolling|content=&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah, there's definitely no way that ''Benny Johnson'' of ''Turning Point USA'' could be wrong about this at all. Sure! There's absolutely no way he could be mis-contextualizing any of these clips, because him and his organization are totally reliable 100% of the time and we have 0 reason to distrust them. They're not neocons/grifters/controlled opposition/the literal faces of modern Conservative Inc. at ALL! And Fuentes definitely doesn't have an edgy, provocative sense of humor and make jokes that could be taken out of context at any time and used against him, the same way as many other guys in his age range have. It's not suspicious at all that the vast majority of Conservative Inc. &amp;amp; establishment shills all have the same opinion on him as the left does. This is not in any way reminiscent of how they treated Trump in 2015, noo! [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 15:56, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
::::(ec) Ok, so some kid learns in public school that he has a right to free speech. Then when he exercises it with some nonsense and gets smashed in the teeth by communists, how does that make him a spokesman or representative of conservatives? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:10, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::How is, for example, comparing the Holocaust to baking cookies merely an &amp;quot;edgy, provocative sense of humor&amp;quot;? Sounds like you're either a subversive infiltrator or an actual shill for bigotry. Either way, it's certainly not in good faith. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 16:07, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From The Hill:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In an interview with The Hill, Fuentes insisted that he is not racist, anti-Semitic or a white nationalist. '''Fuentes said he believes that the Holocaust did take place and that the “cookies” bit was said for shock value.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“I’ve never advocated for a white ethno-state,” Fuentes said. “Multiracialism is here and we have to live with it and [the question is] how will we do that?”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fuentes said that in hindsight, he probably would not have gone to the Charlottesville rally if he had known it would be co-opted by David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, and Richard Spencer, a white supremacist and neo-Nazi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''He said that some of his remarks are meant as outrage trolling to draw attention to his show or as over-the-top digs at political rivals aimed at getting under their skin.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“That’s kind of the whole thing,” he said. “We have figured out the game. The algorithm. We’ve hacked the conversation where if you say sensational things like we do, you get attention. I don’t want it to be like that. I wish I could ascend with ideas.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He's only like that because he knows it pisses people off, more people pissed off = more people paying attention, more attention = more people looking into the movement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, Nick says that Biden gave one good speech, and all of a sudden, he's a Biden supporter? That's some leftist-esque thinking right there. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:56, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(A) I don't see the value of dedicating a lot of space to &amp;quot;so and so says so and so is racist and so and so says he's not&amp;quot;; (B) I don't see the value in trying to explain a joke; and (C) we are not Wikipedia. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:23, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In a day where a bacon cheeseburger is racist, this is just a waste of time and space. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:25, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And this is a waste of a talk page. Just write a neutral article including what people say about him, as well as what he's said about his actual beliefs. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 20:39, November 8, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpG4w3Y-rsY Here, a rare interview of Nick being serious about what he thinks.] [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 09:35, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's just a bunch of crazy hypotheticals about what America is going to be like in the year 2070, without even laying the foundation as to who the gypsy fortune teller is who claims to know what America will be like in 2070. Looks like more public school b.s.  Then there is an obsession with labels, like &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; without even knowing what he understands a &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; to be. Same with &amp;quot;paleoconservative&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;ethno-nationalist&amp;quot;.  It's just all naive trash, as is to be expected from a tweenty-something victim of a public school education.  What is the relevance in this article? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::And since we are speaking in hypotheticals, did Fuentas or whoever his alleged source is for his views on America's demographic makeup in the year 2070 is, consider that if the [[CCP]] sent a large portion of its 30 million excesses males (as a result of selective abotion) of military age as an occupying force to America sometime between now and 2070, would that altar the underlying premise? Likely not. Or the devastation of certain bioweapons targeting specific ethnic groups? Etc. &lt;br /&gt;
::::If anything, we could place Fuentas in the same camp as Greta Thunberg and AOC who preach apocalyptical premonitions based on questionable premises and experts, only in his case there is some question whether he even conmsiders his futuristic premonitions either &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;bad&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:14, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article didn't need a re-write before, but it needs one now. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 22:08, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
== This article had at least one bold claim that was uncited.  I deleted it. Is the article a mess?  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article had at least one bold claim that was uncited.  I deleted it. Is the article a mess? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, there is no citation demonstrating the [[Robert Spencer]] is a Joe Biden operative. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I skimmed the article and at first glance it appears to represent him correctly.  I don't know much about Mr. Fuentes. I blew him off after it appeared he was anti-Semitic and a racist. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:22, November 7, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::RICHARD Spencer, not Robert Spencer. But yeah, it's not a very accurate article. My version was way less biased and way more informative imo.[[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:56, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yup, your version (or even Mr. Nationalist's version from late December 2020) was much fairer and better. It's a shame they've protected the current version so we can't edit it. Biden Supporters? Seriously? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 22:04, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Here's the citation on Spencer. [https://thefederalist.com/2020/08/24/white-supremacist-who-organized-charlottesville-race-riots-endorses-joe-biden/]  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:40, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Here's another: [https://www.newsweek.com/richard-spencer-reiterates-support-biden-disavows-useless-traitorous-gop-1527555] —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 10:32, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Nicholas_J._Fuentes&amp;diff=1812188</id>
		<title>Talk:Nicholas J. Fuentes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Nicholas_J._Fuentes&amp;diff=1812188"/>
		<updated>2021-11-13T03:04:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* This article had at least one bold claim that was uncited.  I deleted it. Is the article a mess? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Why is everything capitalized in this article? It looks cut n pasted from somewhere. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:19, 12 March 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This article needs a re-write ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the bigot/troll/idiot Fuentes seems to increasingly be a [https://archive.is/U3P0G Biden supporter]. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Saturday, 21:57, August 20, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I disagree. I don't agree with everything Nick has to say nor do I consider myself a Groyper but the article was fine as it was. Nick can be a very immature troll at times and can say stupid stuff but the article should not be condemning him as an anti-Semitic bigot or calling him a Biden supporter at all. Fuentes is not in the same camp as David Duke and Richard Spencer and has condemned these kinds of people on numerous occasions. The only reason why he praised Biden's foreign policy was because of the Afghanistan withdrawal, which was started by Trump and needed to happen. Although Biden was disastrous in orchestrating the withdrawal, it can overall be viewed as a minor victory as it helped get us out of the Middle East. He's said a few things about Jews that he probably should not have said, but he overall seems more focused on putting America's interests over those of Israel, something Conservative Inc. does not want to talk about and do. Like it or not, Nick has helped the America First movement go mainstream and has even helped to fight establishment conservatives like Ben Shapiro. He's been targeted by the establishment so we shouldn't join them in smearing his character. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 01:15, October 15, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Mr. Nationalist, did you see the Twitter thread I linked to in the article? —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Saturday, 10:58, October 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, I did. A lot of that is just him being edgy. I don't exactly like it and it is inappropriate in some ways, but a lot of it is taken out of context by mainstream conservatives like Benny Johnson. He said in a Zoom call debate that he believed everyone was equal before God and should be equal before the law, so it is hard to call him bigoted when he believes that. Also he said he supports the efforts of Booker T. Washington to advance civil rights. Obviously I don't agree with what he said about Jim Crow and the slurs he used against homosexuals and women and some of what he said about Jews, but much of it is likely him being sarcastic, so you can't take what he said seriously. Johnson resorted to using the same tactics leftists used to attack conservatives, and he should just leave him alone. The conservative movement is lost if it is concerned in wasting its time condemning a troll. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 13:31, October 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Exactly! That's what I'm saying! And LT, what's up with the warning you put over my reply? What did I say that was ad hominem or deflection? Was it my sarcasm or do are you just a staunch defender of Benny Johnson? [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 18:34, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Huh, it's almost as if you're a sock of Mr. Nationalist... —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 18:43, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::So if he says something that that isn't bigoted, it's proof he isn't a bigot, but if it's excessively vile like the &amp;gt;dozen times he spouts racism, anti-Semitism, etc., one should just assume it's merely &amp;quot;edgy&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;sarcastic&amp;quot;? You aren't very good at hiding your intended schemes, Bongol- er, ''Mr. Nationalist''. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 16:27, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::One should assume with Nick that he is being edgy when making these kind of jokes, yes. Perhaps he is being too edgy at times and cut back a little bit, but he is still just being edgy. That is just the way Zoomer humor is. Zoomers tend to be edgy whenever they make memes or attack the left because that is just the way they are. They want to be competant because they have studied the failures of conservatives over the past 60 years or so and at times attempt to bait woke leftists. Their tactics are about utilizing power the same way the left does when achieving their goals because at how effective liberals have been at doing so. It's something where you kind of have to be an America First, Zoomer conservative who keeps up with stuff in order to understand. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 23:27, October 22, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yo LT, leave the article the way it is. Quit acting like Ben Shill-piro and smearing the guy. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:52, October 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1196604409607794688 The facts speak for themselves.] —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Saturday, 10:55, October 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::After reading that thread, I don't know if he's smart enough to be a commie infiltrator. He sounds more like just another victim of public schools. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:46, October 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=Ad hominem, deflections, trolling|content=&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah, there's definitely no way that ''Benny Johnson'' of ''Turning Point USA'' could be wrong about this at all. Sure! There's absolutely no way he could be mis-contextualizing any of these clips, because him and his organization are totally reliable 100% of the time and we have 0 reason to distrust them. They're not neocons/grifters/controlled opposition/the literal faces of modern Conservative Inc. at ALL! And Fuentes definitely doesn't have an edgy, provocative sense of humor and make jokes that could be taken out of context at any time and used against him, the same way as many other guys in his age range have. It's not suspicious at all that the vast majority of Conservative Inc. &amp;amp; establishment shills all have the same opinion on him as the left does. This is not in any way reminiscent of how they treated Trump in 2015, noo! [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 15:56, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
::::(ec) Ok, so some kid learns in public school that he has a right to free speech. Then when he exercises it with some nonsense and gets smashed in the teeth by communists, how does that make him a spokesman or representative of conservatives? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:10, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::How is, for example, comparing the Holocaust to baking cookies merely an &amp;quot;edgy, provocative sense of humor&amp;quot;? Sounds like you're either a subversive infiltrator or an actual shill for bigotry. Either way, it's certainly not in good faith. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 16:07, October 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From The Hill:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In an interview with The Hill, Fuentes insisted that he is not racist, anti-Semitic or a white nationalist. '''Fuentes said he believes that the Holocaust did take place and that the “cookies” bit was said for shock value.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“I’ve never advocated for a white ethno-state,” Fuentes said. “Multiracialism is here and we have to live with it and [the question is] how will we do that?”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fuentes said that in hindsight, he probably would not have gone to the Charlottesville rally if he had known it would be co-opted by David Duke, the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, and Richard Spencer, a white supremacist and neo-Nazi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''He said that some of his remarks are meant as outrage trolling to draw attention to his show or as over-the-top digs at political rivals aimed at getting under their skin.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“That’s kind of the whole thing,” he said. “We have figured out the game. The algorithm. We’ve hacked the conversation where if you say sensational things like we do, you get attention. I don’t want it to be like that. I wish I could ascend with ideas.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He's only like that because he knows it pisses people off, more people pissed off = more people paying attention, more attention = more people looking into the movement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, Nick says that Biden gave one good speech, and all of a sudden, he's a Biden supporter? That's some leftist-esque thinking right there. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:56, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(A) I don't see the value of dedicating a lot of space to &amp;quot;so and so says so and so is racist and so and so says he's not&amp;quot;; (B) I don't see the value in trying to explain a joke; and (C) we are not Wikipedia. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:23, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In a day where a bacon cheeseburger is racist, this is just a waste of time and space. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:25, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And this is a waste of a talk page. Just write a neutral article including what people say about him, as well as what he's said about his actual beliefs. [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 20:39, November 8, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpG4w3Y-rsY Here, a rare interview of Nick being serious about what he thinks.] [[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 09:35, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's just a bunch of crazy hypotheticals about what America is going to be like in the year 2070, without even laying the foundation as to who the gypsy fortune teller is who claims to know what America will be like in 2070. Looks like more public school b.s.  Then there is an obsession with labels, like &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; without even knowing what he understands a &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; to be. Same with &amp;quot;paleoconservative&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;ethno-nationalist&amp;quot;.  It's just all naive trash, as is to be expected from a tweenty-something victim of a public school education.  What is the relevance in this article? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::And since we are speaking in hypotheticals, did Fuentas or whoever his alleged source is for his views on America's demographic makeup in the year 2070 is, consider that if the [[CCP]] sent a large portion of its 30 million excesses males (as a result of selective abotion) of military age as an occupying force to America sometime between now and 2070, would that altar the underlying premise? Likely not. Or the devastation of certain bioweapons targeting specific ethnic groups? Etc. &lt;br /&gt;
::::If anything, we could place Fuentas in the same camp as Greta Thunberg and AOC who preach apocalyptical premonitions based on questionable premises and experts, only in his case there is some question whether he even conmsiders his futuristic premonitions either &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;bad&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:14, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This article had at least one bold claim that was uncited.  I deleted it. Is the article a mess?  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article had at least one bold claim that was uncited.  I deleted it. Is the article a mess? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, there is no citation demonstrating the [[Robert Spencer]] is a Joe Biden operative. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I skimmed the article and at first glance it appears to represent him correctly.  I don't know much about Mr. Fuentes. I blew him off after it appeared he was anti-Semitic and a racist. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:22, November 7, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::RICHARD Spencer, not Robert Spencer. But yeah, it's not a very accurate article. My version was way less biased and way more informative imo.[[User:Vince Did 7-14|Vince Did 7-14]] ([[User talk:Vince Did 7-14|talk]]) 10:56, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yup, your version (or even Mr. Nationalist's version from late December 2020) was much fairer and better. It's a shame they've protected the current version so we can't edit it. Biden Supporters? Seriously? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 22:04, November 12, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Here's the citation on Spencer. [https://thefederalist.com/2020/08/24/white-supremacist-who-organized-charlottesville-race-riots-endorses-joe-biden/]  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:40, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Here's another: [https://www.newsweek.com/richard-spencer-reiterates-support-biden-disavows-useless-traitorous-gop-1527555] —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 10:32, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cancel_culture&amp;diff=1812175</id>
		<title>Cancel culture</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cancel_culture&amp;diff=1812175"/>
		<updated>2021-11-13T02:40:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* Cancellation of movement conservatives */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Nicki Minaj flag.jpeg|right|250px|thumb|[[Nicki Minaj]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Cancel culture''' is the banning of individuals from [[employment]] and social status based upon their race, ethnicity, or ideology. It originated in [[Nazi Germany]] in the 1930s to remove [[Jew]]s from all aspects of public life. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-the-nazis-pioneered-cancel-culture-&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is a [[radical-left]] extremist idea.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term describes a phenomenon related to [[political correctness]] wherein one is &amp;quot;cancelled&amp;quot; (i.e., censored, boycotted, cyber-bullied, etc.) for being of the wrong race or saying or doing something allegedly immoral/amoral, [[bigotry|bigoted]], insensitive or purposefully offensive, or simply politically incorrect. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Certain aspects of cancel &amp;quot;cult&amp;quot;ure may lead one to argue that it is, in fact, a [[cult]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/happiness-and-the-pursuit-leadership/201906/the-apocalyptic-cult-cancel-culture&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Numerous mainstream liberals signed an open letter deploring cancel culture as inherently opposed to freedom of opinion, open discussion, and reasonable discourse.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2fJ0f5Fp1c&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Voltaire]], [[Denis Diderot]], and D'Alembert were known to have engaged in similar practices for what would later be called cancel culture, including silencing the [[Jesuit]] order and eventually forcing them into exile.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.org/details/BarruelMemoirsIllustratingTheHistoryOfJacobinism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[United States]] President [[Donald John Trump]] unequivocally condemned the &amp;quot;cancel culture&amp;quot; of the [[2020 Leftwing insurrection]] in a speech delivered at [[Mount Rushmore]] on [[Independence Day]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oann.com/president-trump-praises-american-history-condemns-cancel-culture-during-mount-rushmore-4th-of-july-event/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2020/07/04/at-mount-rushmore-trump-warns-of-a-cultural-revolution-destroying-the-american-revolution-n603801&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On the other hand, some conservatives have defended cancel culture in principle but not as applied by leftists, such as [[The Daily Wire]] host Michael Knowles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoVFo20ZCiA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Knowles argues that society needs standards, and has praised [[McCarthyism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nukBmCJX5l0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[Liberty Hangout]] Twitter account has tweeted, &amp;quot;Cancel culture would be pretty cool if it were right-wingers doing the canceling.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/LibertyHangout/status/1372704003604242433&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wikipedia entry on Bill Cosby.PNG|right|600px|thumb|[[Wikipedia]] entry on [[Bill Cosby]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/fUjSy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the age of 81, &amp;quot;America's dad&amp;quot; spent two years in prison after a [[woke]] show trial before the charges were finally overturned and dismissed.]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Critical race theory==&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Critical race theory}}&lt;br /&gt;
Critical race theory (CRT) is a [[Postmodernist]] construct based on [[Critical theory]] that teaches that race is not [[genetic]].  Instead, race is a [[social construct]] and a basis for political struggles in the fight for [[social justice]].  Descendants of &amp;quot;[[colonialism|colonial]]&amp;quot; cultures are discriminated against and indigenous peoples are celebrated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stella Morabito describes CRT as, &amp;quot;. . . the insidious ideology being used to promote estrangement rather than friendship, and hostility rather than goodwill. Indeed, the tactics used by proponents of critical race theory share many parallels with old tactics used by the [[Bolshevik]]s.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/29/critical-race-theory-is-a-classic-communist-divide-and-conquer-tactic/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Republican]] Representative [[Louie Gohmert]] has offered to cancel the [[Democrat Party]] for its history of [[racism]] and [[slavery]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.newsmax.com/politics/rep-louie-gohmert-democratic-party-slavery-cancel-culture-movement/2020/07/23/id/978664/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kitler.jpeg|right|250px|thumb|Kitler the cat was immediately canceled and a [[Kansas City]] meteorologist forced to make a public apology and rectification for thoughtlessness and insensitivity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-meteorologist-sorry-for-showing-kitler-a-hitleresque-cat-on-air/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]] &lt;br /&gt;
==YouTube==&lt;br /&gt;
[[YouTube]]r [[PewDiePie]] reviewed a video from the company ''Jubilee'' containing a debate over cancel culture, which included [[conservative]] music artist Joy Villa as an opponent to cancel culture. Though PewDiePie facetiously called the discussion, &amp;quot;the least productive thing I've ever seen,&amp;quot; he was able to thoroughly discuss and analyze the various nuances in the topic of cancel culture. PewDiePie, who has had experiences with being &amp;quot;cancelled&amp;quot; himself, appreciated that bad people must face the consequences of their actions, especially in [[best of the public|the court of public opinion]], but ultimately condemned the overzealousness of cancel culture in harassing people and/or destroying their livelihoods without regard to [[due process]] (the idea that a person is innocent until proven guilty, which is non-existent within cancel culture). PewDiePie argued that cancel culture often goes &amp;quot;too far.&amp;quot; He specifically named instances of several YouTubers being cancelled unfairly. He concluded that, though there are rational and legitimate reasons to support cancel culture, he personally opposes it and believes that it does more harm than good to society and culture.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKCrRH-1l_k&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cancellation by movement conservatives==&lt;br /&gt;
Unfair examples of cancel culture within conservative circles include the cases of [[Todd Akin]] and [[Steve King]]. A more justified example is a loose cluster of [[movement conservative]]s, [[right-wing populist]]s, and civic [[nationalist]]s, who had previously grouped together under the term &amp;quot;alt-right,&amp;quot; until morality forced them to condemn the numerous [[white nationalist]]s and other extremists who were carrying the &amp;quot;alt-right&amp;quot; label. As they became increasingly outspoken against the white supremacists, they were arbitrarily nicknamed by the latter, &amp;quot;alt-lite.&amp;quot; They subsequently adopted the term &amp;quot;new right.&amp;quot; The new right repeatedly condemned [[racism]], [[anti-Semitism]], [[xenophobia]], and all other forms of bigotry in no uncertain terms. (See [[Alt-right#Distinction from National Socialism (Nazism)]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Maoist rectification==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Li660912-1-b.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Self-criticism and public shaming is the core of Progressive rectification.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Rectification}}&lt;br /&gt;
According to [[Rebel News]], modern cancel culture was directly inspired largely by [[Communist]] [[China]]'s [[Cultural Revolution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=na6tkgxEc8Y&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Maoist]]s instituted a national cancel-culture campaign that burned books, demolished statues, erased history, destroyed culture and cultural norms in a re-education campaign that replaced traditional Chinese culture with Maoist slogans and loyalty to the state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rectification is aimed at purging society of dissenters of leftwing, communist, and [[atheist]] [[totalitarian]] rule, and purifying society for a future [[socialist]] order.  To rectify, is to &amp;quot;make right&amp;quot; imaginary crimes of [[capitalist]]s and beneficiaries of so-called &amp;quot;[[white privilege]]&amp;quot;.  Self-criticism and confession is forced either through torture or public shaming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Linda Goudsmit says in contemporary America, the radical leftist Democrats are following the Maoist cancel-culture model. They are targeting the three supporting pillars of American society; the American family, Judeo-Christian faith, and the [[U.S. Constitution]] symbolized by the American flag. Cancel-culture is asymmetric warfare used by the advancing enemy to prepare the population for a replacement ideology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://goudsmit.pundicity.com/25228/the-collapsing-american-family&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Politically correct]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Partisan tolerance]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[McCarthyism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Big Tech]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Historical revisionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Newspeak]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Trump Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bernie Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rush Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cruz Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fox Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bush Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Moscow Mitch Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://youtu.be/C-lGKTGK270 Claira Janover, Cancel Culture, &amp;amp; What We ALL Need to Learn] - Viva Frei Vlawg&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9TKP-Fyi5U CANCEL CULTURE IS A CAPITALIST CON FOR SJWS!] - Daisy Cousens&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6DZ2VHN5wU Cancel &amp;quot;Cancel Culture&amp;quot;] - [[PragerU]] on [[YouTube]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HPJDlPTvi4 Who Will Be Next in the Cancel Culture Movement? | Larry Elder]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/rowan-atkinson-says-cancel-culture-like-a-medieval-mob-looking-for-someone-to-burn/news-story/3e6e59fff942cf053ae53c79ca17b39a Rowan Atkinson says cancel culture like a medieval mob ‘looking for someone to burn’] - ''The Australian''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fourth Generation Warfare]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Corporate Threats]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxist Terminology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cancel Culture|*]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Shills_for_corporate_neoconservatism&amp;diff=1812166</id>
		<title>Shills for corporate neoconservatism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Shills_for_corporate_neoconservatism&amp;diff=1812166"/>
		<updated>2021-11-13T02:19:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Shills for corporate neoconservatism''' are those fake conservatives who are willing to profit from the [[establishment]] rather than defend [[conservative values]]. Though [[Nicholas J. Fuentes|some]] label conservative organizations such as [[Charlie Kirk|TPUSA]] or [[The Daily Wire]] as aligned with the establishment or &amp;quot;Conservative Inc.,&amp;quot; this is debated more among conservatives, and some argue that [[Essay:The Groyper Wars|the group of people applying these labels is actually wrong]]. Regardless, there are many legitimate examples of shills for corporate neoconservatism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Hunter Avallone'': Has sold out to [[Big Tech]] and attacked as many legitimate conservatives as the &amp;quot;groypers&amp;quot; he claims to oppose, and, like the groypers, is anti-[[Israel]]. His most concerted attacks appear to be against [[Kaitlin Bennett]]. In October 2019, Avallone delivered a speech in which he asserted that conservative claims of Big Tech censorship were greatly exaggerated. Some criticized him for this, which caused him to release a video on his YouTube channel fervently denying the existence of Big Tech censorship, and attacking a string of conservatives, including people who did not criticize him for his speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dt2Mk6ECe6c&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He followed this up by again denying Big Tech's existence and releasing a hit piece on [[James O'Keefe]] and Project Veritas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLHVCRTdxNc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the same period of time, he livestreamed himself with his family taking hardcore conservative businessman Dan Pena's &amp;quot;Snowflake Test,&amp;quot; during which he became increasingly uncomfortable, Googled Dan Pena to find out who he is, and gave up halfway through because he and his wife didn't like the questions. He then privatized the livestream so that this embarrassing ordeal could not be viewed by the public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WS49jefI-g&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Later, in February 2020, Avallone attacked libertarian activist Kaitlin Bennett three times. First, Avallone released an attack video on YouTube smearing Bennett,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAu7VQguM0U&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which her friend Joel Patrick responded to on Instagram by &amp;quot;exposing&amp;quot; Avallone; then, Avallone responded to Patrick by calling him a &amp;quot;grifter&amp;quot; and calling Israel an &amp;quot;ethnostate,&amp;quot; and admitting that he scammed [[PragerU]] out of $170;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvEaqkxEiJE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and finally, when Bennett published a 25-minute video critical of Avallone on her &amp;quot;[[Liberty Hangout]]&amp;quot; YouTube channel,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnNM7h_-Di8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Avallone attacked Bennett once again.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cY1FxxXqbrI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Later in the month, Hunter Avallone attacked Blaire White, a hawkishly anti-predator right-leaning YouTuber who was instrumental in the arrest of pedophile Jonathan Yaniv. Avallone asserted, without evidence, that White had falsely accused several people of being pedophiles, causing them to receive major harassment and death threats online, (Blaire has already proven that these people are pedophiles and Hunter made no effort to disprove this in any of these cases) and Avallone also stated that White lied about a woman who pressured her son to become transexual (again, with no evidence to the contrary).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCwozXKCEhc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition to believing that Big Tech does not exist, Hunter Avallone believes [[gender spectrum|that there are more than two genders]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSy1T8HxVMU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Alex Marlow'': In June 2017, Alex Marlow and [[Breitbart News]] fired and abandoned editor Katie McHugh for tweets criticizing Islam and mass immigration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/06/07/just-happened-newly-politically-correct-breitbart-fires-editor-tweet-islam-499698&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This led to McHugh being brainwashed by leftists by 2019 into thinking she had been a &amp;quot;white nationalist,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/rosiegray/katie-mchugh&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and she then participated in the concerted left-wing smear of Stephen Miller as a &amp;quot;white nationalist&amp;quot; as well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/13/politics/katie-mchugh-stephen-miller/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Chris Ruddy'': In 2014, Ruddy gave $1 million to the [[Clinton Foundation]]. He has lent money to various other Democrats as well. He has spoken positively of the Clintons and even [[George Soros]]. He admits that he is primarily motivated by profit. He describes himself as &amp;quot;very pro-immigration.&amp;quot; With Ruddy as CEO, [[Newsmax]] has given favourable coverage to Soros&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/conservatives-hoping-for-new-media-hero-in-newsmax-may-find-an-obstacle-in-ceos-left-leaning-tendencies/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and censored Mike Lindell.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/12/22/gorka-cuts-off-my-pillow-ceo-during-dominion-claims-after-newsmax-runs-its-own-clarification-segment-1008525/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/watch-newsmax-host-mike-lindell-talk-tech-censorship-ends-censoring-storms-studio/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They escaped a lawsuit from [[Dominion Voting Systems|Dominion]]'s Eric Coomer by apologizing for covering allegations of election fraud in late 2020.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/newsmax-apologizes-vote-manipulation-claims-against-dominion-leader-n1266040&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[Dan Bongino]]'': In February 2021, Bongino attacked former [[Parler]] CEO John Matze for claiming that Rebekah Mercer, daughter of hedge fund billionaire Robert Mercer, was taking the site away from free speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nationalfile.com/video-dan-bongino-says-ex-parler-ceo-is-lying-site-absolutely-committed-to-free-speech/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Matze's statements were vindicated after Parler returned and began censoring people's posts, hiding them under content warnings.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nationalfile.com/free-speech-website-parler-now-censors-posts-with-trolling-content-warnings/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The new incarnation of Parler even temporarily banned [[Milo Yiannopoulos]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/free-speech-platform-parler-bans-milo-yiannopoulos/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It became clear that Mercer had a significant role in the decision by Parler's board of directors to fire Matze for supporting free speech. Later that month, Bongino lashed out at National File for criticizing Mark Meckler.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nationalfile.com/bongino-attacks-national-file-for-article-about-parler-ceo-falsely-claims-article-planted-by-gabs-andrew-torba/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bongino has made particularly vicious remarks toward [[Gab]] CEO Andrew Torba.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://tv.gab.com/channel/a/view/andrew-torba-responds-to-dan-bongino-6116c45008520fa71ff506f2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Inc.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Neoconservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:RINOs]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Establishment|*]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Corporate Threats]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Deceit]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Ben_Shapiro&amp;diff=1811295</id>
		<title>Talk:Ben Shapiro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Ben_Shapiro&amp;diff=1811295"/>
		<updated>2021-11-09T22:21:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most==&lt;br /&gt;
Does this page really belong in &amp;quot;Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most&amp;quot;? He's an anti-trump neocon, who big tech seems to like a bit too much. [https://nationalfile.com/facebook-gives-ben-shapiro-shadow-boost-to-make-more-users-see-his-content-report/] --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:47, June 9, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Even if he does, most leftists tend to bash him anyways and lump him with Trump, same as they make Bush out to be a far-right president even when he's technically closer to being of the left, being more moderate, so he still counts ultimately. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 07:09, June 9, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Mark Dice criticism is overblown and needs to be cut down. This is Conservapedia, not Rightwing Watch. Add some content about his life and accomplishments. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:56, November 9, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with this. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 14:44, November 9, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Dice's criticism looks like nothing but professional jealously. Dice, who's been de-monetized, earns a living selling T-shirts from his kitchen table. Shapiro runs a $1o million payroll and employs people, so he needs to be concerned about sponsors. The trifle about Lake Tahoe and his kid's education is irrelevant. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:44, November 9, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Mark seemed hyperfocused in that video on the dumb things Ben has said over the years. Mark unfortunately didn't do a cost/benefit analysis. I disagree with Ben on many of the things Mark brought up, but those are far outweighed by: interviewing the Covington kids and then helping them through their lawsuits against the media over the phone continuously; initially calling out even Fox News for their shoddy election coverage in November 2020; repeatedly calling out John Roberts; calling out Neil Gorsuch for pandering to the LGBT; hiring Candace Owens; hiring Gina Carano; suing the Biden admin over the vax mandate; calling out Klaus Schwab in his book; launching a Hollywood alternative; etc. Sadly, Mark never brought any of that up in his hit piece. Mark thought it was more important that Ben was caught on a hot mic telling his editors to cut a 10-second bit about &amp;quot;pansexualism.&amp;quot; ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 17:21, November 9, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Ben_Shapiro&amp;diff=1811281</id>
		<title>Talk:Ben Shapiro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Ben_Shapiro&amp;diff=1811281"/>
		<updated>2021-11-09T19:44:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most==&lt;br /&gt;
Does this page really belong in &amp;quot;Category:The 100 Americans The Left Hates Most&amp;quot;? He's an anti-trump neocon, who big tech seems to like a bit too much. [https://nationalfile.com/facebook-gives-ben-shapiro-shadow-boost-to-make-more-users-see-his-content-report/] --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:47, June 9, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Even if he does, most leftists tend to bash him anyways and lump him with Trump, same as they make Bush out to be a far-right president even when he's technically closer to being of the left, being more moderate, so he still counts ultimately. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 07:09, June 9, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Mark Dice criticism is overblown and needs to be cut down. This is Conservapedia, not Rightwing Watch. Add some content about his life and accomplishments. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:56, November 9, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with this. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 14:44, November 9, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1811054</id>
		<title>User talk:BernieandTrumpFan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1811054"/>
		<updated>2021-11-08T17:15:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* I unblocked you. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I already mentioned Trump's deportation of the Nazi guy in the article (in the &amp;quot;Illegal immigration&amp;quot; section), though I did not name him (I see no reason to name him and give him publicity, and it distracts from Trump's achievements). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:42, 1 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for creating the [[Criminal justice reform]] article! I [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Criminal_justice_reform&amp;amp;diff=1545861&amp;amp;oldid=1545825 made some changes] to improve formatting (in-line citations, etc.), and to change some wording to make the article read like an encyclopedia article. Once again, thank you! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:47, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, thank you for your edits. Please add sources [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Nazi_Party&amp;amp;diff=1549360&amp;amp;oldid=1519690 to your recent edit] in the [[American Nazi Party]] article. It is important that all information on CP is well sourced. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:43, 9 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stormfrint and homosexuality==&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel that strongly about homosexuality, why don't you return to Stormfront - you'll be right at home.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:52, 16 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LGBT Pride ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see that you created [[LGBT Pride]], but there's already a [[Gay pride]] page. Should the two be merged, since they essentially seem like duplicates (not the content, but the topics)? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:36, 20 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I would be fine with merging the two.&lt;br /&gt;
---BernieandTrumpFan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, I merged the articles, except for the intro of your article to avoid any repetition. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:22, 21 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Let's start off on a clean slate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tell you what. Let's just start off with a clean slate. I deleted my previous remarks. I don't forsee deleting any more of your content. I just thought the errors of fact in these articles were not by accident: [[Agnosticism, deism, and confusion]] and [[List of Social Darwinists]]. I will assume your edits are good faith henceforth plus 1990sguy said he would review your future edits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I probably was too quick on the draw in determining some of your errant edits were made in bad faith (agnosticism has caused many people to become insane with the footnotes not supporting that, Yasser Arafat is a social Darwinist, etc.). My apologies if I made a mistake. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not restore those articles two articles above because they had some quality issues, but I did restore the mainspace articles/essays I could find. I turned [[Atheism and chaos]] into an essay.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 21:47, 1 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I restored all but 2 of your articles/essays.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 09:27, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think I overreacted to 2 mistakes which were in a few of the articles I initially read of yours. They did not reflect your overall work on the wiki. I am sorry I overreacted.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 11:56, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friendly advice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, I had to delete your [[Randy Rainbow]] page because it wasn't a notable topic. If the topic is a leftist, it has to be someone who truly is notable for us to keep. Otherwise, we're effectively promoting irrelevant leftists who hate our beliefs. Since the only cited sources were YouTube links, it was clear this person wasn't notable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, I really appreciate that you cited sources. One of the most important things on CP is to cite good sources for everything (you can look at the articles I created as reference).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, one good thing to note is to use encyclopedic language on mainspace CP articles (not including &amp;quot;essay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot; pages) -- don't use words like &amp;quot;good,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bad,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;unfortunately,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;dumb,&amp;quot; etc. (you get the point). Since CP is an encyclopedia, we're higher quality than an opinion blog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope all this advice helps! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:57, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===More friendly advice===&lt;br /&gt;
Do I detect a pattern of linking conservatism with issues of [[identity politics]], racism, and homosexuality? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:19, 7 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Orphan articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, thank you very much for your new article creations -- they seem like good articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When creating new articles, I strongly recommend that you add links to them to existing articles (only those which are relevant). That way, your new articles won't be &amp;quot;orphans,&amp;quot; not linking to any other article, which makes it harder for readers to find them. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:44, 9 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==We're kindred spirits==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our disagreements line up pretty well, and obviously so do our agreements.  I believe that marijuana does the opposite of inciting violence, that vaccines are still quite necessary, and that homosexuality, like pedophilia, should not be outright condemned- in both cases, one can live a moral life of abstinence.  I went Trump in 2016, but if the DNC didn't shoot themselves in the foot by going with Hillary, I just might have been persuaded toward Bernie.--[[User:LawfulLibertarian|LawfulLibertarian]] ([[User talk:LawfulLibertarian|talk]]) 21:03, 8 January 2020 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[User:United States]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this you?--[[User:Bac|Bac]] ([[User talk:Bac|talk]]) 10:04, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No it isn't. Why do you ask? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 12:02, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I've restored your Groyper Wars essay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know why in the world VargasMilan blanked it. Then again, he has a record of questionable behavior on CP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 12:59, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, I appreciate this. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:05, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. If you're also interested, I posted a suggestion for rewriting the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] article [[Talk:Nicholas J. Fuentes|here]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 15:07, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I unblocked you.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contact the Conservapedia admin who blocked you. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And have that Conservapedia admin contact me also. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:29, November 7, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A 30 day block for Racism is entirely appropriate. It is neither too harsh nor too lenient. Being the unblocking Admin at this moment is disputing charges of racism from another wiki, he should consider the message this sends before not consulting the blocking Admin or undoing this block. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is a really dumb game, Rob, and I'm not playing. Next will you guys block Nick Fuentes fans [[User:Vince Did 7-14]] and [[User:Mr. Nationalist]]? You blocked me over an innocuous two-year-old Essay, that's absurd. What will you do when users have the gall to point out that Afghan migration will have significant demographic consequences for the U.S.... just like the caravan of Latin Americans headed for the U.S.-Mexico border who beat up the Mexican police? You also blocked me and a bunch of other people on JANUARY 6 (coincidence?) for no reason at all. [[User:Northwest]] and others have noticed you've been pretty erratic. I don't know or care what's going on with you or [[User:Liberaltears]], just leave me out of it. Besides, how come [[User:DavidB4]] wasn't disciplined for LITERALLY LINKING TO THE DAILY STORMER? Give me a break. Are Gabbers and groypers just not welcome on Conservapedia? Let's not behave like leftists. We're better than that. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As for why DavidB4 was never punished for linking to a neo-Nazi site, I've wondered the same thing. Your inappropriate insertions aren't simply excusable, though. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:16, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Inappropriate? If you're talking about the Essay, that was '''two years ago'''. And name what was inappropriate about it. Name the inappropriate thing I've said since then. This is so frustrating... ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:26, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I can't access that particular essay anymore because it's now deleted. As for other inappropriate postings by you, [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay%3AThe_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;diff=1810764&amp;amp;oldid=1798712 the recent additions you've put to your Groypers essay seem questionable at best], and your user page blatantly calls the Capitol riot &amp;quot;justified.&amp;quot; —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:29, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The whole matter is a little too reminiscent of the Senate Hit List published years back, which really set me off when I found out about it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:33, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::My kangaroo court is here. Who will defend me and who will disavow? At least I don't have to spend months in solitary confinement abused by prison guards while on a no-fly list and an FBI hit list for entering a public building unarmed... ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 21:24, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::[https://web.archive.org/web/20210829221439/https://conservapedia.com/Essay:Race_As_A_Determining_Factor_of_IQ,_Sexual_Preference,_And_Nothing_Else Here's that troublesome Essay.] Scary, isn't it? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 21:27, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Looks like troll bait to me. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:49, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Here's the thing: conservatives generally do not pee their pants over issues of race. Communists, Democrats, and trolls however come here to CP and insert issues of race at every opportunity, in mainspace, talk pages, and essays. It's a dead giveaway.  You should go back to subversive infiltrator school and learn the basics of gaining people's confidence. Unfortunately, you've fallen for the communist disinformation line that conservatives are interested or would view you as an ally for holding some screwed-up racial theory. &lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::What is racism? To put it simply, it is mocking other people's parents. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:58, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I checked an email account I thought I hadn't checked in a long while and found his email to me, but it appears I was mistaken about not using that email account in a long time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He said he merely wanted to be unblocked to discuss his block. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I will let RobS decide this one. In retrospect, I should have asked RobS first. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:05, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Gosh, that no swearing rule gets harder every day. Guys, this is stupid. {{unsigned|BernieandTrumpFan}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Cons: If RW can be sued for the postings of one editor, then can CP be held responsible for a racist Essay posted by one user two years ago? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:27, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not everything is racist, Rob, don't be a gatekeeper. On a related note, [[Andrew Torba]] is not an &amp;quot;idiot.&amp;quot; ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:35, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So let's be absolutely clear. There are certain subjects I'm not allowed to talk about because they hurt people's feelings? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:36, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::(ec) It was the big boss who deemed it racist and deleted it. I was only the trigger man in assessing disciplinary action. You would have gotten 6 mos to life from anyone else. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:38, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The criticism from Andy that it wasn't encyclopedic seemed fair enough to me. I took issue with the blocking. I could've just taken a month off, but I chose to fight this because I need to resist the slanderous charge of racism. It's interesting that you guys won't hesitate to string me up for positions more moderate than what most people believe. A majority of Americans want a permanent immigration moratorium (as do a majority of Canadians and a majority of Europeans), but I've never advocated that. Are the stances of people like Brandon Tatum, Candace Owens, Kaitlin Bennett, Milo Yiannopoulos, Lauren Witzke, Bryson Gray, Mark Dice, Andrew Torba, Matt Walsh, and Michael Knowles really too fringe for this site? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:47, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Truthfully, I never read your racist garbage. I took Andy's assessment for it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I've gotten more than 6 months from you, Rob, on January 6. 1 year. I once got 5 years from WikiGnome72, but he eventually backed down and apologized. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHEq58AOQK4 Sometimes I feel like it's just me against the world.] ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:51, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::You look like an RW insurrectionist, that's why. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most conservatives, I refuse to back down. I refuse to apologize. I refuse to be cancelled. I refuse to cower, to be a coward. I'm standing up because I know I'm right. That's just how it is. Shooting the messenger is not justice. Don't attack me for telling the truth. ''I am in the right.'' ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:59, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Bernie is a conservative? You haven't backed down from that yet. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You’re being purposefully ignorant. I’ve never claimed that Bernie Sanders is conservative. I’m not an idiot. He’s a populist.—[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 01:50, November 8, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You have conservativism confused with so-called &amp;quot;rightwing populism&amp;quot;, which of course is a leftist construct. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:30, November 8, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bernie Sanders is a left-wing populist. I’m a right-wing populist. You’re a…neocon? —[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 12:15, November 8, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Nick Fuentes is not David Duke. The Lavon Affair was bad. Demographic shifts affect voting patterns. The Civil Rights Movement is not immaculate. I've done nothing wrong. I don't see the problem here. Let's not be [[Conservative Inc.]] ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 21:10, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1811008</id>
		<title>User talk:BernieandTrumpFan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1811008"/>
		<updated>2021-11-08T06:50:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* I unblocked you. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I already mentioned Trump's deportation of the Nazi guy in the article (in the &amp;quot;Illegal immigration&amp;quot; section), though I did not name him (I see no reason to name him and give him publicity, and it distracts from Trump's achievements). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:42, 1 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for creating the [[Criminal justice reform]] article! I [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Criminal_justice_reform&amp;amp;diff=1545861&amp;amp;oldid=1545825 made some changes] to improve formatting (in-line citations, etc.), and to change some wording to make the article read like an encyclopedia article. Once again, thank you! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:47, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, thank you for your edits. Please add sources [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Nazi_Party&amp;amp;diff=1549360&amp;amp;oldid=1519690 to your recent edit] in the [[American Nazi Party]] article. It is important that all information on CP is well sourced. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:43, 9 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stormfrint and homosexuality==&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel that strongly about homosexuality, why don't you return to Stormfront - you'll be right at home.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:52, 16 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LGBT Pride ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see that you created [[LGBT Pride]], but there's already a [[Gay pride]] page. Should the two be merged, since they essentially seem like duplicates (not the content, but the topics)? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:36, 20 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I would be fine with merging the two.&lt;br /&gt;
---BernieandTrumpFan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, I merged the articles, except for the intro of your article to avoid any repetition. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:22, 21 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Let's start off on a clean slate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tell you what. Let's just start off with a clean slate. I deleted my previous remarks. I don't forsee deleting any more of your content. I just thought the errors of fact in these articles were not by accident: [[Agnosticism, deism, and confusion]] and [[List of Social Darwinists]]. I will assume your edits are good faith henceforth plus 1990sguy said he would review your future edits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I probably was too quick on the draw in determining some of your errant edits were made in bad faith (agnosticism has caused many people to become insane with the footnotes not supporting that, Yasser Arafat is a social Darwinist, etc.). My apologies if I made a mistake. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not restore those articles two articles above because they had some quality issues, but I did restore the mainspace articles/essays I could find. I turned [[Atheism and chaos]] into an essay.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 21:47, 1 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I restored all but 2 of your articles/essays.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 09:27, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think I overreacted to 2 mistakes which were in a few of the articles I initially read of yours. They did not reflect your overall work on the wiki. I am sorry I overreacted.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 11:56, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friendly advice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, I had to delete your [[Randy Rainbow]] page because it wasn't a notable topic. If the topic is a leftist, it has to be someone who truly is notable for us to keep. Otherwise, we're effectively promoting irrelevant leftists who hate our beliefs. Since the only cited sources were YouTube links, it was clear this person wasn't notable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, I really appreciate that you cited sources. One of the most important things on CP is to cite good sources for everything (you can look at the articles I created as reference).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, one good thing to note is to use encyclopedic language on mainspace CP articles (not including &amp;quot;essay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot; pages) -- don't use words like &amp;quot;good,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bad,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;unfortunately,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;dumb,&amp;quot; etc. (you get the point). Since CP is an encyclopedia, we're higher quality than an opinion blog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope all this advice helps! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:57, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===More friendly advice===&lt;br /&gt;
Do I detect a pattern of linking conservatism with issues of [[identity politics]], racism, and homosexuality? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:19, 7 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Orphan articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, thank you very much for your new article creations -- they seem like good articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When creating new articles, I strongly recommend that you add links to them to existing articles (only those which are relevant). That way, your new articles won't be &amp;quot;orphans,&amp;quot; not linking to any other article, which makes it harder for readers to find them. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:44, 9 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==We're kindred spirits==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our disagreements line up pretty well, and obviously so do our agreements.  I believe that marijuana does the opposite of inciting violence, that vaccines are still quite necessary, and that homosexuality, like pedophilia, should not be outright condemned- in both cases, one can live a moral life of abstinence.  I went Trump in 2016, but if the DNC didn't shoot themselves in the foot by going with Hillary, I just might have been persuaded toward Bernie.--[[User:LawfulLibertarian|LawfulLibertarian]] ([[User talk:LawfulLibertarian|talk]]) 21:03, 8 January 2020 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[User:United States]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this you?--[[User:Bac|Bac]] ([[User talk:Bac|talk]]) 10:04, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No it isn't. Why do you ask? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 12:02, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I've restored your Groyper Wars essay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know why in the world VargasMilan blanked it. Then again, he has a record of questionable behavior on CP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 12:59, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, I appreciate this. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:05, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. If you're also interested, I posted a suggestion for rewriting the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] article [[Talk:Nicholas J. Fuentes|here]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 15:07, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I unblocked you.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contact the Conservapedia admin who blocked you. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And have that Conservapedia admin contact me also. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:29, November 7, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A 30 day block for Racism is entirely appropriate. It is neither too harsh nor too lenient. Being the unblocking Admin at this moment is disputing charges of racism from another wiki, he should consider the message this sends before not consulting the blocking Admin or undoing this block. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is a really dumb game, Rob, and I'm not playing. Next will you guys block Nick Fuentes fans [[User:Vince Did 7-14]] and [[User:Mr. Nationalist]]? You blocked me over an innocuous two-year-old Essay, that's absurd. What will you do when users have the gall to point out that Afghan migration will have significant demographic consequences for the U.S.... just like the caravan of Latin Americans headed for the U.S.-Mexico border who beat up the Mexican police? You also blocked me and a bunch of other people on JANUARY 6 (coincidence?) for no reason at all. [[User:Northwest]] and others have noticed you've been pretty erratic. I don't know or care what's going on with you or [[User:Liberaltears]], just leave me out of it. Besides, how come [[User:DavidB4]] wasn't disciplined for LITERALLY LINKING TO THE DAILY STORMER? Give me a break. Are Gabbers and groypers just not welcome on Conservapedia? Let's not behave like leftists. We're better than that. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As for why DavidB4 was never punished for linking to a neo-Nazi site, I've wondered the same thing. Your inappropriate insertions aren't simply excusable, though. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:16, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Inappropriate? If you're talking about the Essay, that was '''two years ago'''. And name what was inappropriate about it. Name the inappropriate thing I've said since then. This is so frustrating... ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:26, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I can't access that particular essay anymore because it's now deleted. As for other inappropriate postings by you, [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay%3AThe_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;diff=1810764&amp;amp;oldid=1798712 the recent additions you've put to your Groypers essay seem questionable at best], and your user page blatantly calls the Capitol riot &amp;quot;justified.&amp;quot; —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:29, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The whole matter is a little too reminiscent of the Senate Hit List published years back, which really set me off when I found out about it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:33, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::My kangaroo court is here. Who will defend me and who will disavow? At least I don't have to spend months in solitary confinement abused by prison guards while on a no-fly list and an FBI hit list for entering a public building unarmed... ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 21:24, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::[https://web.archive.org/web/20210829221439/https://conservapedia.com/Essay:Race_As_A_Determining_Factor_of_IQ,_Sexual_Preference,_And_Nothing_Else Here's that troublesome Essay.] Scary, isn't it? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 21:27, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Looks like troll bait to me. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:49, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Here's the thing: conservatives generally do not pee their pants over issues of race. Communists, Democrats, and trolls however come here to CP and insert issues of race at every opportunity, in mainspace, talk pages, and essays. It's a dead giveaway.  You should go back to subversive infiltrator school and learn the basics of gaining people's confidence. Unfortunately, you've fallen for the communist disinformation line that conservatives are interested or would view you as an ally for holding some screwed-up racial theory. &lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::What is racism? To put it simply, it is mocking other people's parents. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:58, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I checked an email account I thought I hadn't checked in a long while and found his email to me, but it appears I was mistaken about not using that email account in a long time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He said he merely wanted to be unblocked to discuss his block. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I will let RobS decide this one. In retrospect, I should have asked RobS first. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:05, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Gosh, that no swearing rule gets harder every day. Guys, this is stupid. {{unsigned|BernieandTrumpFan}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Cons: If RW can be sued for the postings of one editor, then can CP be held responsible for a racist Essay posted by one user two years ago? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:27, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not everything is racist, Rob, don't be a gatekeeper. On a related note, [[Andrew Torba]] is not an &amp;quot;idiot.&amp;quot; ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:35, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So let's be absolutely clear. There are certain subjects I'm not allowed to talk about because they hurt people's feelings? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:36, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::(ec) It was the big boss who deemed it racist and deleted it. I was only the trigger man in assessing disciplinary action. You would have gotten 6 mos to life from anyone else. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:38, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The criticism from Andy that it wasn't encyclopedic seemed fair enough to me. I took issue with the blocking. I could've just taken a month off, but I chose to fight this because I need to resist the slanderous charge of racism. It's interesting that you guys won't hesitate to string me up for positions more moderate than what most people believe. A majority of Americans want a permanent immigration moratorium (as do a majority of Canadians and a majority of Europeans), but I've never advocated that. Are the stances of people like Brandon Tatum, Candace Owens, Kaitlin Bennett, Milo Yiannopoulos, Lauren Witzke, Bryson Gray, Mark Dice, Andrew Torba, Matt Walsh, and Michael Knowles really too fringe for this site? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:47, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Truthfully, I never read your racist garbage. I took Andy's assessment for it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I've gotten more than 6 months from you, Rob, on January 6. 1 year. I once got 5 years from WikiGnome72, but he eventually backed down and apologized. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHEq58AOQK4 Sometimes I feel like it's just me against the world.] ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:51, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::You look like an RW insurrectionist, that's why. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most conservatives, I refuse to back down. I refuse to apologize. I refuse to be cancelled. I refuse to cower, to be a coward. I'm standing up because I know I'm right. That's just how it is. Shooting the messenger is not justice. Don't attack me for telling the truth. ''I am in the right.'' ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:59, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Bernie is a conservative? You haven't backed down from that yet. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You’re being purposefully ignorant. I’ve never claimed that Bernie Sanders is conservative. I’m not an idiot. He’s a populist.—[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 01:50, November 8, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Nick Fuentes is not David Duke. The Lavon Affair was bad. Demographic shifts affect voting patterns. The Civil Rights Movement is not immaculate. I've done nothing wrong. I don't see the problem here. Let's not be [[Conservative Inc.]] ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 21:10, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810902</id>
		<title>User talk:BernieandTrumpFan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810902"/>
		<updated>2021-11-08T02:27:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* I unblocked you. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I already mentioned Trump's deportation of the Nazi guy in the article (in the &amp;quot;Illegal immigration&amp;quot; section), though I did not name him (I see no reason to name him and give him publicity, and it distracts from Trump's achievements). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:42, 1 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for creating the [[Criminal justice reform]] article! I [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Criminal_justice_reform&amp;amp;diff=1545861&amp;amp;oldid=1545825 made some changes] to improve formatting (in-line citations, etc.), and to change some wording to make the article read like an encyclopedia article. Once again, thank you! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:47, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, thank you for your edits. Please add sources [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Nazi_Party&amp;amp;diff=1549360&amp;amp;oldid=1519690 to your recent edit] in the [[American Nazi Party]] article. It is important that all information on CP is well sourced. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:43, 9 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stormfrint and homosexuality==&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel that strongly about homosexuality, why don't you return to Stormfront - you'll be right at home.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:52, 16 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LGBT Pride ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see that you created [[LGBT Pride]], but there's already a [[Gay pride]] page. Should the two be merged, since they essentially seem like duplicates (not the content, but the topics)? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:36, 20 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I would be fine with merging the two.&lt;br /&gt;
---BernieandTrumpFan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, I merged the articles, except for the intro of your article to avoid any repetition. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:22, 21 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Let's start off on a clean slate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tell you what. Let's just start off with a clean slate. I deleted my previous remarks. I don't forsee deleting any more of your content. I just thought the errors of fact in these articles were not by accident: [[Agnosticism, deism, and confusion]] and [[List of Social Darwinists]]. I will assume your edits are good faith henceforth plus 1990sguy said he would review your future edits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I probably was too quick on the draw in determining some of your errant edits were made in bad faith (agnosticism has caused many people to become insane with the footnotes not supporting that, Yasser Arafat is a social Darwinist, etc.). My apologies if I made a mistake. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not restore those articles two articles above because they had some quality issues, but I did restore the mainspace articles/essays I could find. I turned [[Atheism and chaos]] into an essay.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 21:47, 1 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I restored all but 2 of your articles/essays.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 09:27, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think I overreacted to 2 mistakes which were in a few of the articles I initially read of yours. They did not reflect your overall work on the wiki. I am sorry I overreacted.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 11:56, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friendly advice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, I had to delete your [[Randy Rainbow]] page because it wasn't a notable topic. If the topic is a leftist, it has to be someone who truly is notable for us to keep. Otherwise, we're effectively promoting irrelevant leftists who hate our beliefs. Since the only cited sources were YouTube links, it was clear this person wasn't notable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, I really appreciate that you cited sources. One of the most important things on CP is to cite good sources for everything (you can look at the articles I created as reference).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, one good thing to note is to use encyclopedic language on mainspace CP articles (not including &amp;quot;essay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot; pages) -- don't use words like &amp;quot;good,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bad,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;unfortunately,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;dumb,&amp;quot; etc. (you get the point). Since CP is an encyclopedia, we're higher quality than an opinion blog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope all this advice helps! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:57, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===More friendly advice===&lt;br /&gt;
Do I detect a pattern of linking conservatism with issues of [[identity politics]], racism, and homosexuality? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:19, 7 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Orphan articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, thank you very much for your new article creations -- they seem like good articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When creating new articles, I strongly recommend that you add links to them to existing articles (only those which are relevant). That way, your new articles won't be &amp;quot;orphans,&amp;quot; not linking to any other article, which makes it harder for readers to find them. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:44, 9 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==We're kindred spirits==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our disagreements line up pretty well, and obviously so do our agreements.  I believe that marijuana does the opposite of inciting violence, that vaccines are still quite necessary, and that homosexuality, like pedophilia, should not be outright condemned- in both cases, one can live a moral life of abstinence.  I went Trump in 2016, but if the DNC didn't shoot themselves in the foot by going with Hillary, I just might have been persuaded toward Bernie.--[[User:LawfulLibertarian|LawfulLibertarian]] ([[User talk:LawfulLibertarian|talk]]) 21:03, 8 January 2020 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[User:United States]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this you?--[[User:Bac|Bac]] ([[User talk:Bac|talk]]) 10:04, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No it isn't. Why do you ask? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 12:02, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I've restored your Groyper Wars essay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know why in the world VargasMilan blanked it. Then again, he has a record of questionable behavior on CP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 12:59, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, I appreciate this. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:05, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. If you're also interested, I posted a suggestion for rewriting the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] article [[Talk:Nicholas J. Fuentes|here]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 15:07, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I unblocked you.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contact the Conservapedia admin who blocked you. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And have that Conservapedia admin contact me also. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:29, November 7, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A 30 day block for Racism is entirely appropriate. It is neither too harsh nor too lenient. Being the unblocking Admin at this moment is disputing charges of racism from another wiki, he should consider the message this sends before not consulting the blocking Admin or undoing this block. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is a really dumb game, Rob, and I'm not playing. Next will you guys block Nick Fuentes fans [[User:Vince Did 7-14]] and [[User:Mr. Nationalist]]? You blocked me over an innocuous two-year-old Essay, that's absurd. What will you do when users have the gall to point out that Afghan migration will have significant demographic consequences for the U.S.... just like the caravan of Latin Americans headed for the U.S.-Mexico border who beat up the Mexican police? You also blocked me and a bunch of other people on JANUARY 6 (coincidence?) for no reason at all. [[User:Northwest]] and others have noticed you've been pretty erratic. I don't know or care what's going on with you or [[User:Liberaltears]], just leave me out of it. Besides, how come [[User:DavidB4]] wasn't disciplined for LITERALLY LINKING TO THE DAILY STORMER? Give me a break. Are Gabbers and groypers just not welcome on Conservapedia? Let's not behave like leftists. We're better than that. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As for why DavidB4 was never punished for linking to a neo-Nazi site, I've wondered the same thing. Your inappropriate insertions aren't simply excusable, though. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:16, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Inappropriate? If you're talking about the Essay, that was '''two years ago'''. And name what was inappropriate about it. Name the inappropriate thing I've said since then. This is so frustrating... ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:26, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I can't access that particular essay anymore because it's now deleted. As for other inappropriate postings by you, [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay%3AThe_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;diff=1810764&amp;amp;oldid=1798712 the recent additions you've put to your Groypers essay seem questionable at best], and your user page blatantly calls the Capitol riot &amp;quot;justified.&amp;quot; —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:29, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The whole matter is a little too reminiscent of the Senate Hit List published years back, which really set me off when I found out about it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:33, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::My kangaroo court is here. Who will condemn me and who will disavow? At least I don't have to spend months in solitary confinement abused by prison guards while on a no-fly list and an FBI hit list for entering a public building unarmed... ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 21:24, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::[https://web.archive.org/web/20210829221439/https://conservapedia.com/Essay:Race_As_A_Determining_Factor_of_IQ,_Sexual_Preference,_And_Nothing_Else Here's that troublesome Essay.] Scary, isn't it? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 21:27, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I checked an email account I thought I hadn't checked in a long while and found his email to me, but it appears I was mistaken about not using that email account in a long time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He said he merely wanted to be unblocked to discuss his block. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I will let RobS decide this one. In retrospect, I should have asked RobS first. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:05, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Gosh, that no swearing rule gets harder every day. Guys, this is stupid. {{unsigned|BernieandTrumpFan}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Cons: If RW can be sued for the postings of one editor, then can CP be held responsible for a racist Essay posted by one user two years ago? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:27, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not everything is racist, Rob, don't be a gatekeeper. On a related note, [[Andrew Torba]] is not an &amp;quot;idiot.&amp;quot; ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:35, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So let's be absolutely clear. There are certain subjects I'm not allowed to talk about because they hurt people's feelings? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:36, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::(ec) It was the big boss who deemed it racist and deleted it. I was only the trigger man in assessing disciplinary action. You would have gotten 6 mos to life from anyone else. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:38, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The criticism from Andy that it wasn't encyclopedic seemed fair enough to me. I took issue with the blocking. I could've just taken a month off, but I chose to fight this because I need to resist the slanderous charge of racism. It's interesting that you guys won't hesitate to string me up for positions more moderate than what most people believe. A majority of Americans want a permanent immigration moratorium (as do a majority of Canadians and a majority of Europeans), but I've never advocated that. Are the stances of people like Brandon Tatum, Candace Owens, Kaitlin Bennett, Milo Yiannopoulos, Lauren Witzke, Bryson Gray, Mark Dice, Andrew Torba, Matt Walsh, and Michael Knowles really too fringe for this site? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:47, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I've gotten more than 6 months from you, Rob, on January 6. 1 year. I once got 5 years from WikiGnome72, but he eventually backed down and apologized. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHEq58AOQK4 Sometimes I feel like it's just me against the world.] ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:51, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most conservatives, I refuse to back down. I refuse to apologize. I refuse to be cancelled. I refuse to cower, to be a coward. I'm standing up because I know I'm right. That's just how it is. Shooting the messenger is not justice. Don't attack me for telling the truth. ''I am in the right.'' ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:59, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nick Fuentes is not David Duke. The Lavon Affair was bad. Demographic shifts affect voting patterns. The Civil Rights Movement is not immaculate. I've done nothing wrong. I don't see the problem here. Let's not be [[Conservative Inc.]] ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 21:10, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810900</id>
		<title>User talk:BernieandTrumpFan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810900"/>
		<updated>2021-11-08T02:24:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* I unblocked you. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I already mentioned Trump's deportation of the Nazi guy in the article (in the &amp;quot;Illegal immigration&amp;quot; section), though I did not name him (I see no reason to name him and give him publicity, and it distracts from Trump's achievements). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:42, 1 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for creating the [[Criminal justice reform]] article! I [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Criminal_justice_reform&amp;amp;diff=1545861&amp;amp;oldid=1545825 made some changes] to improve formatting (in-line citations, etc.), and to change some wording to make the article read like an encyclopedia article. Once again, thank you! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:47, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, thank you for your edits. Please add sources [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Nazi_Party&amp;amp;diff=1549360&amp;amp;oldid=1519690 to your recent edit] in the [[American Nazi Party]] article. It is important that all information on CP is well sourced. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:43, 9 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stormfrint and homosexuality==&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel that strongly about homosexuality, why don't you return to Stormfront - you'll be right at home.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:52, 16 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LGBT Pride ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see that you created [[LGBT Pride]], but there's already a [[Gay pride]] page. Should the two be merged, since they essentially seem like duplicates (not the content, but the topics)? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:36, 20 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I would be fine with merging the two.&lt;br /&gt;
---BernieandTrumpFan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, I merged the articles, except for the intro of your article to avoid any repetition. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:22, 21 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Let's start off on a clean slate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tell you what. Let's just start off with a clean slate. I deleted my previous remarks. I don't forsee deleting any more of your content. I just thought the errors of fact in these articles were not by accident: [[Agnosticism, deism, and confusion]] and [[List of Social Darwinists]]. I will assume your edits are good faith henceforth plus 1990sguy said he would review your future edits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I probably was too quick on the draw in determining some of your errant edits were made in bad faith (agnosticism has caused many people to become insane with the footnotes not supporting that, Yasser Arafat is a social Darwinist, etc.). My apologies if I made a mistake. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not restore those articles two articles above because they had some quality issues, but I did restore the mainspace articles/essays I could find. I turned [[Atheism and chaos]] into an essay.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 21:47, 1 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I restored all but 2 of your articles/essays.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 09:27, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think I overreacted to 2 mistakes which were in a few of the articles I initially read of yours. They did not reflect your overall work on the wiki. I am sorry I overreacted.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 11:56, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friendly advice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, I had to delete your [[Randy Rainbow]] page because it wasn't a notable topic. If the topic is a leftist, it has to be someone who truly is notable for us to keep. Otherwise, we're effectively promoting irrelevant leftists who hate our beliefs. Since the only cited sources were YouTube links, it was clear this person wasn't notable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, I really appreciate that you cited sources. One of the most important things on CP is to cite good sources for everything (you can look at the articles I created as reference).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, one good thing to note is to use encyclopedic language on mainspace CP articles (not including &amp;quot;essay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot; pages) -- don't use words like &amp;quot;good,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bad,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;unfortunately,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;dumb,&amp;quot; etc. (you get the point). Since CP is an encyclopedia, we're higher quality than an opinion blog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope all this advice helps! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:57, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===More friendly advice===&lt;br /&gt;
Do I detect a pattern of linking conservatism with issues of [[identity politics]], racism, and homosexuality? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:19, 7 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Orphan articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, thank you very much for your new article creations -- they seem like good articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When creating new articles, I strongly recommend that you add links to them to existing articles (only those which are relevant). That way, your new articles won't be &amp;quot;orphans,&amp;quot; not linking to any other article, which makes it harder for readers to find them. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:44, 9 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==We're kindred spirits==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our disagreements line up pretty well, and obviously so do our agreements.  I believe that marijuana does the opposite of inciting violence, that vaccines are still quite necessary, and that homosexuality, like pedophilia, should not be outright condemned- in both cases, one can live a moral life of abstinence.  I went Trump in 2016, but if the DNC didn't shoot themselves in the foot by going with Hillary, I just might have been persuaded toward Bernie.--[[User:LawfulLibertarian|LawfulLibertarian]] ([[User talk:LawfulLibertarian|talk]]) 21:03, 8 January 2020 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[User:United States]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this you?--[[User:Bac|Bac]] ([[User talk:Bac|talk]]) 10:04, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No it isn't. Why do you ask? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 12:02, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I've restored your Groyper Wars essay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know why in the world VargasMilan blanked it. Then again, he has a record of questionable behavior on CP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 12:59, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, I appreciate this. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:05, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. If you're also interested, I posted a suggestion for rewriting the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] article [[Talk:Nicholas J. Fuentes|here]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 15:07, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I unblocked you.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contact the Conservapedia admin who blocked you. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And have that Conservapedia admin contact me also. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:29, November 7, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A 30 day block for Racism is entirely appropriate. It is neither too harsh nor too lenient. Being the unblocking Admin at this moment is disputing charges of racism from another wiki, he should consider the message this sends before not consulting the blocking Admin or undoing this block. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is a really dumb game, Rob, and I'm not playing. Next will you guys block Nick Fuentes fans [[User:Vince Did 7-14]] and [[User:Mr. Nationalist]]? You blocked me over an innocuous two-year-old Essay, that's absurd. What will you do when users have the gall to point out that Afghan migration will have significant demographic consequences for the U.S.... just like the caravan of Latin Americans headed for the U.S.-Mexico border who beat up the Mexican police? You also blocked me and a bunch of other people on JANUARY 6 (coincidence?) for no reason at all. [[User:Northwest]] and others have noticed you've been pretty erratic. I don't know or care what's going on with you or [[User:Liberaltears]], just leave me out of it. Besides, how come [[User:DavidB4]] wasn't disciplined for LITERALLY LINKING TO THE DAILY STORMER? Give me a break. Are Gabbers and groypers just not welcome on Conservapedia? Let's not behave like leftists. We're better than that. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As for why DavidB4 was never punished for linking to a neo-Nazi site, I've wondered the same thing. Your inappropriate insertions aren't simply excusable, though. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:16, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Inappropriate? If you're talking about the Essay, that was '''two years ago'''. And name what was inappropriate about it. Name the inappropriate thing I've said since then. This is so frustrating... ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:26, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I can't access that particular essay anymore because it's now deleted. As for other inappropriate postings by you, [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay%3AThe_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;diff=1810764&amp;amp;oldid=1798712 the recent additions you've put to your Groypers essay seem questionable at best], and your user page blatantly calls the Capitol riot &amp;quot;justified.&amp;quot; —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:29, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The whole matter is a little too reminiscent of the Senate Hit List published years back, which really set me off when I found out about it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:33, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::My kangaroo court is here. Who will condemn me and who will disavow? At least I don't have to spend months in solitary confinement abused by prison guards while on a no-fly list and an FBI hit list for entering a public building unarmed... ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 21:24, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I checked an email account I thought I hadn't checked in a long while and found his email to me, but it appears I was mistaken about not using that email account in a long time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He said he merely wanted to be unblocked to discuss his block. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I will let RobS decide this one. In retrospect, I should have asked RobS first. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:05, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Gosh, that no swearing rule gets harder every day. Guys, this is stupid. {{unsigned|BernieandTrumpFan}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Cons: If RW can be sued for the postings of one editor, then can CP be held responsible for a racist Essay posted by one user two years ago? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:27, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not everything is racist, Rob, don't be a gatekeeper. On a related note, [[Andrew Torba]] is not an &amp;quot;idiot.&amp;quot; ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:35, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So let's be absolutely clear. There are certain subjects I'm not allowed to talk about because they hurt people's feelings? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:36, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::(ec) It was the big boss who deemed it racist and deleted it. I was only the trigger man in assessing disciplinary action. You would have gotten 6 mos to life from anyone else. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:38, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The criticism from Andy that it wasn't encyclopedic seemed fair enough to me. I took issue with the blocking. I could've just taken a month off, but I chose to fight this because I need to resist the slanderous charge of racism. It's interesting that you guys won't hesitate to string me up for positions more moderate than what most people believe. A majority of Americans want a permanent immigration moratorium (as do a majority of Canadians and a majority of Europeans), but I've never advocated that. Are the stances of people like Brandon Tatum, Candace Owens, Kaitlin Bennett, Milo Yiannopoulos, Lauren Witzke, Bryson Gray, Mark Dice, Andrew Torba, Matt Walsh, and Michael Knowles really too fringe for this site? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:47, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I've gotten more than 6 months from you, Rob, on January 6. 1 year. I once got 5 years from WikiGnome72, but he eventually backed down and apologized. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHEq58AOQK4 Sometimes I feel like it's just me against the world.] ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:51, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most conservatives, I refuse to back down. I refuse to apologize. I refuse to be cancelled. I refuse to cower, to be a coward. I'm standing up because I know I'm right. That's just how it is. Shooting the messenger is not justice. Don't attack me for telling the truth. ''I am in the right.'' ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:59, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nick Fuentes is not David Duke. The Lavon Affair was bad. Demographic shifts affect voting patterns. The Civil Rights Movement is not immaculate. I've done nothing wrong. I don't see the problem here. Let's not be [[Conservative Inc.]] ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 21:10, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810898</id>
		<title>User talk:BernieandTrumpFan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810898"/>
		<updated>2021-11-08T02:10:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* I unblocked you. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I already mentioned Trump's deportation of the Nazi guy in the article (in the &amp;quot;Illegal immigration&amp;quot; section), though I did not name him (I see no reason to name him and give him publicity, and it distracts from Trump's achievements). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:42, 1 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for creating the [[Criminal justice reform]] article! I [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Criminal_justice_reform&amp;amp;diff=1545861&amp;amp;oldid=1545825 made some changes] to improve formatting (in-line citations, etc.), and to change some wording to make the article read like an encyclopedia article. Once again, thank you! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:47, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, thank you for your edits. Please add sources [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Nazi_Party&amp;amp;diff=1549360&amp;amp;oldid=1519690 to your recent edit] in the [[American Nazi Party]] article. It is important that all information on CP is well sourced. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:43, 9 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stormfrint and homosexuality==&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel that strongly about homosexuality, why don't you return to Stormfront - you'll be right at home.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:52, 16 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LGBT Pride ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see that you created [[LGBT Pride]], but there's already a [[Gay pride]] page. Should the two be merged, since they essentially seem like duplicates (not the content, but the topics)? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:36, 20 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I would be fine with merging the two.&lt;br /&gt;
---BernieandTrumpFan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, I merged the articles, except for the intro of your article to avoid any repetition. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:22, 21 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Let's start off on a clean slate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tell you what. Let's just start off with a clean slate. I deleted my previous remarks. I don't forsee deleting any more of your content. I just thought the errors of fact in these articles were not by accident: [[Agnosticism, deism, and confusion]] and [[List of Social Darwinists]]. I will assume your edits are good faith henceforth plus 1990sguy said he would review your future edits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I probably was too quick on the draw in determining some of your errant edits were made in bad faith (agnosticism has caused many people to become insane with the footnotes not supporting that, Yasser Arafat is a social Darwinist, etc.). My apologies if I made a mistake. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not restore those articles two articles above because they had some quality issues, but I did restore the mainspace articles/essays I could find. I turned [[Atheism and chaos]] into an essay.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 21:47, 1 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I restored all but 2 of your articles/essays.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 09:27, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think I overreacted to 2 mistakes which were in a few of the articles I initially read of yours. They did not reflect your overall work on the wiki. I am sorry I overreacted.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 11:56, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friendly advice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, I had to delete your [[Randy Rainbow]] page because it wasn't a notable topic. If the topic is a leftist, it has to be someone who truly is notable for us to keep. Otherwise, we're effectively promoting irrelevant leftists who hate our beliefs. Since the only cited sources were YouTube links, it was clear this person wasn't notable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, I really appreciate that you cited sources. One of the most important things on CP is to cite good sources for everything (you can look at the articles I created as reference).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, one good thing to note is to use encyclopedic language on mainspace CP articles (not including &amp;quot;essay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot; pages) -- don't use words like &amp;quot;good,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bad,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;unfortunately,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;dumb,&amp;quot; etc. (you get the point). Since CP is an encyclopedia, we're higher quality than an opinion blog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope all this advice helps! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:57, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===More friendly advice===&lt;br /&gt;
Do I detect a pattern of linking conservatism with issues of [[identity politics]], racism, and homosexuality? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:19, 7 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Orphan articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, thank you very much for your new article creations -- they seem like good articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When creating new articles, I strongly recommend that you add links to them to existing articles (only those which are relevant). That way, your new articles won't be &amp;quot;orphans,&amp;quot; not linking to any other article, which makes it harder for readers to find them. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:44, 9 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==We're kindred spirits==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our disagreements line up pretty well, and obviously so do our agreements.  I believe that marijuana does the opposite of inciting violence, that vaccines are still quite necessary, and that homosexuality, like pedophilia, should not be outright condemned- in both cases, one can live a moral life of abstinence.  I went Trump in 2016, but if the DNC didn't shoot themselves in the foot by going with Hillary, I just might have been persuaded toward Bernie.--[[User:LawfulLibertarian|LawfulLibertarian]] ([[User talk:LawfulLibertarian|talk]]) 21:03, 8 January 2020 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[User:United States]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this you?--[[User:Bac|Bac]] ([[User talk:Bac|talk]]) 10:04, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No it isn't. Why do you ask? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 12:02, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I've restored your Groyper Wars essay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know why in the world VargasMilan blanked it. Then again, he has a record of questionable behavior on CP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 12:59, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, I appreciate this. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:05, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. If you're also interested, I posted a suggestion for rewriting the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] article [[Talk:Nicholas J. Fuentes|here]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 15:07, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I unblocked you.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contact the Conservapedia admin who blocked you. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And have that Conservapedia admin contact me also. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:29, November 7, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A 30 day block for Racism is entirely appropriate. It is neither too harsh nor too lenient. Being the unblocking Admin at this moment is disputing charges of racism from another wiki, he should consider the message this sends before not consulting the blocking Admin or undoing this block. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is a really dumb game, Rob, and I'm not playing. Next will you guys block Nick Fuentes fans [[User:Vince Did 7-14]] and [[User:Mr. Nationalist]]? You blocked me over an innocuous two-year-old Essay, that's absurd. What will you do when users have the gall to point out that Afghan migration will have significant demographic consequences for the U.S.... just like the caravan of Latin Americans headed for the U.S.-Mexico border who beat up the Mexican police? You also blocked me and a bunch of other people on JANUARY 6 (coincidence?) for no reason at all. [[User:Northwest]] and others have noticed you've been pretty erratic. I don't know or care what's going on with you or [[User:Liberaltears]], just leave me out of it. Besides, how come [[User:DavidB4]] wasn't disciplined for LITERALLY LINKING TO THE DAILY STORMER? Give me a break. Are Gabbers and groypers just not welcome on Conservapedia? Let's not behave like leftists. We're better than that. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As for why DavidB4 was never punished for linking to a neo-Nazi site, I've wondered the same thing. Your inappropriate insertions aren't simply excusable, though. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:16, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Inappropriate? If you're talking about the Essay, that was '''two years ago'''. And name what was inappropriate about it. Name the inappropriate thing I've said since then. This is so frustrating... ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:26, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I can't access that particular essay anymore because it's now deleted. As for other inappropriate postings by you, [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay%3AThe_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;diff=1810764&amp;amp;oldid=1798712 the recent additions you've put to your Groypers essay seem questionable at best], and your user page blatantly calls the Capitol riot &amp;quot;justified.&amp;quot; —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:29, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The whole matter is a little too reminiscent of the Senate Hit List published years back, which really set me off when I found out about it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:33, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I checked an email account I thought I hadn't checked in a long while and found his email to me, but it appears I was mistaken about not using that email account in a long time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He said he merely wanted to be unblocked to discuss his block. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I will let RobS decide this one. In retrospect, I should have asked RobS first. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:05, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Gosh, that no swearing rule gets harder every day. Guys, this is stupid. {{unsigned|BernieandTrumpFan}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Cons: If RW can be sued for the postings of one editor, then can CP be held responsible for a racist Essay posted by one user two years ago? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:27, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not everything is racist, Rob, don't be a gatekeeper. On a related note, [[Andrew Torba]] is not an &amp;quot;idiot.&amp;quot; ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:35, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So let's be absolutely clear. There are certain subjects I'm not allowed to talk about because they hurt people's feelings? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:36, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::(ec) It was the big boss who deemed it racist and deleted it. I was only the trigger man in assessing disciplinary action. You would have gotten 6 mos to life from anyone else. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:38, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The criticism from Andy that it wasn't encyclopedic seemed fair enough to me. I took issue with the blocking. I could've just taken a month off, but I chose to fight this because I need to resist the slanderous charge of racism. It's interesting that you guys won't hesitate to string me up for positions more moderate than what most people believe. A majority of Americans want a permanent immigration moratorium (as do a majority of Canadians and a majority of Europeans), but I've never advocated that. Are the stances of people like Brandon Tatum, Candace Owens, Kaitlin Bennett, Milo Yiannopoulos, Lauren Witzke, Bryson Gray, Mark Dice, Andrew Torba, Matt Walsh, and Michael Knowles really too fringe for this site? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:47, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I've gotten more than 6 months from you, Rob, on January 6. 1 year. I once got 5 years from WikiGnome72, but he eventually backed down and apologized. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHEq58AOQK4 Sometimes I feel like it's just me against the world.] ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:51, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most conservatives, I refuse to back down. I refuse to apologize. I refuse to be cancelled. I refuse to cower, to be a coward. I'm standing up because I know I'm right. That's just how it is. Shooting the messenger is not justice. Don't attack me for telling the truth. ''I am in the right.'' ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:59, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nick Fuentes is not David Duke. The Lavon Affair was bad. Demographic shifts affect voting patterns. The Civil Rights Movement is not immaculate. I've done nothing wrong. I don't see the problem here. Let's not be [[Conservative Inc.]] ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 21:10, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810887</id>
		<title>User talk:BernieandTrumpFan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810887"/>
		<updated>2021-11-08T01:59:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* I unblocked you. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I already mentioned Trump's deportation of the Nazi guy in the article (in the &amp;quot;Illegal immigration&amp;quot; section), though I did not name him (I see no reason to name him and give him publicity, and it distracts from Trump's achievements). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:42, 1 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for creating the [[Criminal justice reform]] article! I [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Criminal_justice_reform&amp;amp;diff=1545861&amp;amp;oldid=1545825 made some changes] to improve formatting (in-line citations, etc.), and to change some wording to make the article read like an encyclopedia article. Once again, thank you! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:47, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, thank you for your edits. Please add sources [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Nazi_Party&amp;amp;diff=1549360&amp;amp;oldid=1519690 to your recent edit] in the [[American Nazi Party]] article. It is important that all information on CP is well sourced. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:43, 9 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stormfrint and homosexuality==&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel that strongly about homosexuality, why don't you return to Stormfront - you'll be right at home.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:52, 16 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LGBT Pride ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see that you created [[LGBT Pride]], but there's already a [[Gay pride]] page. Should the two be merged, since they essentially seem like duplicates (not the content, but the topics)? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:36, 20 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I would be fine with merging the two.&lt;br /&gt;
---BernieandTrumpFan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, I merged the articles, except for the intro of your article to avoid any repetition. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:22, 21 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Let's start off on a clean slate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tell you what. Let's just start off with a clean slate. I deleted my previous remarks. I don't forsee deleting any more of your content. I just thought the errors of fact in these articles were not by accident: [[Agnosticism, deism, and confusion]] and [[List of Social Darwinists]]. I will assume your edits are good faith henceforth plus 1990sguy said he would review your future edits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I probably was too quick on the draw in determining some of your errant edits were made in bad faith (agnosticism has caused many people to become insane with the footnotes not supporting that, Yasser Arafat is a social Darwinist, etc.). My apologies if I made a mistake. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not restore those articles two articles above because they had some quality issues, but I did restore the mainspace articles/essays I could find. I turned [[Atheism and chaos]] into an essay.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 21:47, 1 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I restored all but 2 of your articles/essays.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 09:27, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think I overreacted to 2 mistakes which were in a few of the articles I initially read of yours. They did not reflect your overall work on the wiki. I am sorry I overreacted.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 11:56, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friendly advice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, I had to delete your [[Randy Rainbow]] page because it wasn't a notable topic. If the topic is a leftist, it has to be someone who truly is notable for us to keep. Otherwise, we're effectively promoting irrelevant leftists who hate our beliefs. Since the only cited sources were YouTube links, it was clear this person wasn't notable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, I really appreciate that you cited sources. One of the most important things on CP is to cite good sources for everything (you can look at the articles I created as reference).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, one good thing to note is to use encyclopedic language on mainspace CP articles (not including &amp;quot;essay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot; pages) -- don't use words like &amp;quot;good,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bad,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;unfortunately,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;dumb,&amp;quot; etc. (you get the point). Since CP is an encyclopedia, we're higher quality than an opinion blog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope all this advice helps! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:57, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===More friendly advice===&lt;br /&gt;
Do I detect a pattern of linking conservatism with issues of [[identity politics]], racism, and homosexuality? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:19, 7 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Orphan articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, thank you very much for your new article creations -- they seem like good articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When creating new articles, I strongly recommend that you add links to them to existing articles (only those which are relevant). That way, your new articles won't be &amp;quot;orphans,&amp;quot; not linking to any other article, which makes it harder for readers to find them. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:44, 9 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==We're kindred spirits==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our disagreements line up pretty well, and obviously so do our agreements.  I believe that marijuana does the opposite of inciting violence, that vaccines are still quite necessary, and that homosexuality, like pedophilia, should not be outright condemned- in both cases, one can live a moral life of abstinence.  I went Trump in 2016, but if the DNC didn't shoot themselves in the foot by going with Hillary, I just might have been persuaded toward Bernie.--[[User:LawfulLibertarian|LawfulLibertarian]] ([[User talk:LawfulLibertarian|talk]]) 21:03, 8 January 2020 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[User:United States]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this you?--[[User:Bac|Bac]] ([[User talk:Bac|talk]]) 10:04, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No it isn't. Why do you ask? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 12:02, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I've restored your Groyper Wars essay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know why in the world VargasMilan blanked it. Then again, he has a record of questionable behavior on CP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 12:59, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, I appreciate this. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:05, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. If you're also interested, I posted a suggestion for rewriting the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] article [[Talk:Nicholas J. Fuentes|here]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 15:07, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I unblocked you.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contact the Conservapedia admin who blocked you. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And have that Conservapedia admin contact me also. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:29, November 7, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A 30 day block for Racism is entirely appropriate. It is neither too harsh nor too lenient. Being the unblocking Admin at this moment is disputing charges of racism from another wiki, he should consider the message this sends before not consulting the blocking Admin or undoing this block. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is a really dumb game, Rob, and I'm not playing. Next will you guys block Nick Fuentes fans [[User:Vince Did 7-14]] and [[User:Mr. Nationalist]]? You blocked me over an innocuous two-year-old Essay, that's absurd. What will you do when users have the gall to point out that Afghan migration will have significant demographic consequences for the U.S.... just like the caravan of Latin Americans headed for the U.S.-Mexico border who beat up the Mexican police? You also blocked me and a bunch of other people on JANUARY 6 (coincidence?) for no reason at all. [[User:Northwest]] and others have noticed you've been pretty erratic. I don't know or care what's going on with you or [[User:Liberaltears]], just leave me out of it. Besides, how come [[User:DavidB4]] wasn't disciplined for LITERALLY LINKING TO THE DAILY STORMER? Give me a break. Are Gabbers and groypers just not welcome on Conservapedia? Let's not behave like leftists. We're better than that. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As for why DavidB4 was never punished for linking to a neo-Nazi site, I've wondered the same thing. Your inappropriate insertions aren't simply excusable, though. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:16, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Inappropriate? If you're talking about the Essay, that was '''two years ago'''. And name what was inappropriate about it. Name the inappropriate thing I've said since then. This is so frustrating... ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:26, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I can't access that particular essay anymore because it's now deleted. As for other inappropriate postings by you, [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay%3AThe_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;diff=1810764&amp;amp;oldid=1798712 the recent additions you've put to your Groypers essay seem questionable at best], and your user page blatantly calls the Capitol riot &amp;quot;justified.&amp;quot; —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:29, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The whole matter is a little too reminiscent of the Senate Hit List published years back, which really set me off when I found out about it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:33, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I checked an email account I thought I hadn't checked in a long while and found his email to me, but it appears I was mistaken about not using that email account in a long time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He said he merely wanted to be unblocked to discuss his block. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I will let RobS decide this one. In retrospect, I should have asked RobS first. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:05, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Gosh, that no swearing rule gets harder every day. Guys, this is stupid. {{unsigned|BernieandTrumpFan}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Cons: If RW can be sued for the postings of one editor, then can CP be held responsible for a racist Essay posted by one user two years ago? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:27, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not everything is racist, Rob, don't be a gatekeeper. On a related note, [[Andrew Torba]] is not an &amp;quot;idiot.&amp;quot; ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:35, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So let's be absolutely clear. There are certain subjects I'm not allowed to talk about because they hurt people's feelings? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:36, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::(ec) It was the big boss who deemed it racist and deleted it. I was only the trigger man in assessing disciplinary action. You would have gotten 6 mos to life from anyone else. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:38, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The criticism from Andy that it wasn't encyclopedic seemed fair enough to me. I took issue with the blocking. I could've just taken a month off, but I chose to fight this because I need to resist the slanderous charge of racism. It's interesting that you guys won't hesitate to string me up for positions more moderate than what most people believe. A majority of Americans want a permanent immigration moratorium (as do a majority of Canadians and a majority of Europeans), but I've never advocated that. Are the stances of people like Brandon Tatum, Candace Owens, Kaitlin Bennett, Milo Yiannopoulos, Lauren Witzke, Bryson Gray, Mark Dice, Andrew Torba, Matt Walsh, and Michael Knowles really too fringe for this site? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:47, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I've gotten more than 6 months from you, Rob, on January 6. 1 year. I once got 5 years from WikiGnome72, but he eventually backed down and apologized. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHEq58AOQK4 Sometimes I feel like it's just me against the world.] ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:51, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most conservatives, I refuse to back down. I refuse to apologize. I refuse to be cancelled. I refuse to cower, to be a coward. I'm standing up because I know I'm right. That's just how it is. Shooting the messenger is not justice. Don't attack me for telling the truth. ''I am in the right.'' ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:59, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810883</id>
		<title>User talk:BernieandTrumpFan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810883"/>
		<updated>2021-11-08T01:51:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* I unblocked you. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I already mentioned Trump's deportation of the Nazi guy in the article (in the &amp;quot;Illegal immigration&amp;quot; section), though I did not name him (I see no reason to name him and give him publicity, and it distracts from Trump's achievements). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:42, 1 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for creating the [[Criminal justice reform]] article! I [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Criminal_justice_reform&amp;amp;diff=1545861&amp;amp;oldid=1545825 made some changes] to improve formatting (in-line citations, etc.), and to change some wording to make the article read like an encyclopedia article. Once again, thank you! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:47, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, thank you for your edits. Please add sources [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Nazi_Party&amp;amp;diff=1549360&amp;amp;oldid=1519690 to your recent edit] in the [[American Nazi Party]] article. It is important that all information on CP is well sourced. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:43, 9 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stormfrint and homosexuality==&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel that strongly about homosexuality, why don't you return to Stormfront - you'll be right at home.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:52, 16 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LGBT Pride ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see that you created [[LGBT Pride]], but there's already a [[Gay pride]] page. Should the two be merged, since they essentially seem like duplicates (not the content, but the topics)? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:36, 20 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I would be fine with merging the two.&lt;br /&gt;
---BernieandTrumpFan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, I merged the articles, except for the intro of your article to avoid any repetition. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:22, 21 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Let's start off on a clean slate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tell you what. Let's just start off with a clean slate. I deleted my previous remarks. I don't forsee deleting any more of your content. I just thought the errors of fact in these articles were not by accident: [[Agnosticism, deism, and confusion]] and [[List of Social Darwinists]]. I will assume your edits are good faith henceforth plus 1990sguy said he would review your future edits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I probably was too quick on the draw in determining some of your errant edits were made in bad faith (agnosticism has caused many people to become insane with the footnotes not supporting that, Yasser Arafat is a social Darwinist, etc.). My apologies if I made a mistake. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not restore those articles two articles above because they had some quality issues, but I did restore the mainspace articles/essays I could find. I turned [[Atheism and chaos]] into an essay.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 21:47, 1 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I restored all but 2 of your articles/essays.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 09:27, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think I overreacted to 2 mistakes which were in a few of the articles I initially read of yours. They did not reflect your overall work on the wiki. I am sorry I overreacted.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 11:56, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friendly advice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, I had to delete your [[Randy Rainbow]] page because it wasn't a notable topic. If the topic is a leftist, it has to be someone who truly is notable for us to keep. Otherwise, we're effectively promoting irrelevant leftists who hate our beliefs. Since the only cited sources were YouTube links, it was clear this person wasn't notable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, I really appreciate that you cited sources. One of the most important things on CP is to cite good sources for everything (you can look at the articles I created as reference).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, one good thing to note is to use encyclopedic language on mainspace CP articles (not including &amp;quot;essay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot; pages) -- don't use words like &amp;quot;good,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bad,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;unfortunately,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;dumb,&amp;quot; etc. (you get the point). Since CP is an encyclopedia, we're higher quality than an opinion blog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope all this advice helps! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:57, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===More friendly advice===&lt;br /&gt;
Do I detect a pattern of linking conservatism with issues of [[identity politics]], racism, and homosexuality? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:19, 7 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Orphan articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, thank you very much for your new article creations -- they seem like good articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When creating new articles, I strongly recommend that you add links to them to existing articles (only those which are relevant). That way, your new articles won't be &amp;quot;orphans,&amp;quot; not linking to any other article, which makes it harder for readers to find them. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:44, 9 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==We're kindred spirits==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our disagreements line up pretty well, and obviously so do our agreements.  I believe that marijuana does the opposite of inciting violence, that vaccines are still quite necessary, and that homosexuality, like pedophilia, should not be outright condemned- in both cases, one can live a moral life of abstinence.  I went Trump in 2016, but if the DNC didn't shoot themselves in the foot by going with Hillary, I just might have been persuaded toward Bernie.--[[User:LawfulLibertarian|LawfulLibertarian]] ([[User talk:LawfulLibertarian|talk]]) 21:03, 8 January 2020 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[User:United States]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this you?--[[User:Bac|Bac]] ([[User talk:Bac|talk]]) 10:04, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No it isn't. Why do you ask? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 12:02, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I've restored your Groyper Wars essay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know why in the world VargasMilan blanked it. Then again, he has a record of questionable behavior on CP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 12:59, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, I appreciate this. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:05, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. If you're also interested, I posted a suggestion for rewriting the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] article [[Talk:Nicholas J. Fuentes|here]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 15:07, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I unblocked you.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contact the Conservapedia admin who blocked you. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And have that Conservapedia admin contact me also. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:29, November 7, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A 30 day block for Racism is entirely appropriate. It is neither too harsh nor too lenient. Being the unblocking Admin at this moment is disputing charges of racism from another wiki, he should consider the message this sends before not consulting the blocking Admin or undoing this block. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is a really dumb game, Rob, and I'm not playing. Next will you guys block Nick Fuentes fans [[User:Vince Did 7-14]] and [[User:Mr. Nationalist]]? You blocked me over an innocuous two-year-old Essay, that's absurd. What will you do when users have the gall to point out that Afghan migration will have significant demographic consequences for the U.S.... just like the caravan of Latin Americans headed for the U.S.-Mexico border who beat up the Mexican police? You also blocked me and a bunch of other people on JANUARY 6 (coincidence?) for no reason at all. [[User:Northwest]] and others have noticed you've been pretty erratic. I don't know or care what's going on with you or [[User:Liberaltears]], just leave me out of it. Besides, how come [[User:DavidB4]] wasn't disciplined for LITERALLY LINKING TO THE DAILY STORMER? Give me a break. Are Gabbers and groypers just not welcome on Conservapedia? Let's not behave like leftists. We're better than that. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As for why DavidB4 was never punished for linking to a neo-Nazi site, I've wondered the same thing. Your inappropriate insertions aren't simply excusable, though. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:16, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Inappropriate? If you're talking about the Essay, that was '''two years ago'''. And name what was inappropriate about it. Name the inappropriate thing I've said since then. This is so frustrating... ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:26, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I can't access that particular essay anymore because it's now deleted. As for other inappropriate postings by you, [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay%3AThe_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;diff=1810764&amp;amp;oldid=1798712 the recent additions you've put to your Groypers essay seem questionable at best], and your user page blatantly calls the Capitol riot &amp;quot;justified.&amp;quot; —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:29, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The whole matter is a little too reminiscent of the Senate Hit List published years back, which really set me off when I found out about it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:33, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I checked an email account I thought I hadn't checked in a long while and found his email to me, but it appears I was mistaken about not using that email account in a long time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He said he merely wanted to be unblocked to discuss his block. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I will let RobS decide this one. In retrospect, I should have asked RobS first. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:05, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Gosh, that no swearing rule gets harder every day. Guys, this is stupid. {{unsigned|BernieandTrumpFan}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Cons: If RW can be sued for the postings of one editor, then can CP be held responsible for a racist Essay posted by one user two years ago? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:27, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not everything is racist, Rob, don't be a gatekeeper. On a related note, [[Andrew Torba]] is not an &amp;quot;idiot.&amp;quot; ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:35, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So let's be absolutely clear. There are certain subjects I'm not allowed to talk about because they hurt people's feelings? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:36, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::(ec) It was the big boss who deemed it racist and deleted it. I was only the trigger man in assessing disciplinary action. You would have gotten 6 mos to life from anyone else. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:38, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The criticism from Andy that it wasn't encyclopedic seemed fair enough to me. I took issue with the blocking. I could've just taken a month off, but I chose to fight this because I need to resist the slanderous charge of racism. It's interesting that you guys won't hesitate to string me up for positions more moderate than what most people believe. A majority of Americans want a permanent immigration moratorium (as do a majority of Canadians and a majority of Europeans), but I've never advocated that. Are the stances of people like Brandon Tatum, Candace Owens, Kaitlin Bennett, Milo Yiannopoulos, Lauren Witzke, Bryson Gray, Mark Dice, Andrew Torba, Matt Walsh, and Michael Knowles really too fringe for this site? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:47, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I've gotten more than 6 months from you, Rob, on January 6. 1 year. I once got 5 years from WikiGnome72, but he eventually backed down and apologized. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHEq58AOQK4 Sometimes I feel like it's just me against the world.] ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:51, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810880</id>
		<title>User talk:BernieandTrumpFan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810880"/>
		<updated>2021-11-08T01:47:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* I unblocked you. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I already mentioned Trump's deportation of the Nazi guy in the article (in the &amp;quot;Illegal immigration&amp;quot; section), though I did not name him (I see no reason to name him and give him publicity, and it distracts from Trump's achievements). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:42, 1 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for creating the [[Criminal justice reform]] article! I [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Criminal_justice_reform&amp;amp;diff=1545861&amp;amp;oldid=1545825 made some changes] to improve formatting (in-line citations, etc.), and to change some wording to make the article read like an encyclopedia article. Once again, thank you! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:47, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, thank you for your edits. Please add sources [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Nazi_Party&amp;amp;diff=1549360&amp;amp;oldid=1519690 to your recent edit] in the [[American Nazi Party]] article. It is important that all information on CP is well sourced. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:43, 9 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stormfrint and homosexuality==&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel that strongly about homosexuality, why don't you return to Stormfront - you'll be right at home.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:52, 16 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LGBT Pride ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see that you created [[LGBT Pride]], but there's already a [[Gay pride]] page. Should the two be merged, since they essentially seem like duplicates (not the content, but the topics)? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:36, 20 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I would be fine with merging the two.&lt;br /&gt;
---BernieandTrumpFan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, I merged the articles, except for the intro of your article to avoid any repetition. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:22, 21 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Let's start off on a clean slate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tell you what. Let's just start off with a clean slate. I deleted my previous remarks. I don't forsee deleting any more of your content. I just thought the errors of fact in these articles were not by accident: [[Agnosticism, deism, and confusion]] and [[List of Social Darwinists]]. I will assume your edits are good faith henceforth plus 1990sguy said he would review your future edits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I probably was too quick on the draw in determining some of your errant edits were made in bad faith (agnosticism has caused many people to become insane with the footnotes not supporting that, Yasser Arafat is a social Darwinist, etc.). My apologies if I made a mistake. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not restore those articles two articles above because they had some quality issues, but I did restore the mainspace articles/essays I could find. I turned [[Atheism and chaos]] into an essay.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 21:47, 1 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I restored all but 2 of your articles/essays.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 09:27, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think I overreacted to 2 mistakes which were in a few of the articles I initially read of yours. They did not reflect your overall work on the wiki. I am sorry I overreacted.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 11:56, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friendly advice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, I had to delete your [[Randy Rainbow]] page because it wasn't a notable topic. If the topic is a leftist, it has to be someone who truly is notable for us to keep. Otherwise, we're effectively promoting irrelevant leftists who hate our beliefs. Since the only cited sources were YouTube links, it was clear this person wasn't notable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, I really appreciate that you cited sources. One of the most important things on CP is to cite good sources for everything (you can look at the articles I created as reference).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, one good thing to note is to use encyclopedic language on mainspace CP articles (not including &amp;quot;essay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot; pages) -- don't use words like &amp;quot;good,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bad,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;unfortunately,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;dumb,&amp;quot; etc. (you get the point). Since CP is an encyclopedia, we're higher quality than an opinion blog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope all this advice helps! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:57, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===More friendly advice===&lt;br /&gt;
Do I detect a pattern of linking conservatism with issues of [[identity politics]], racism, and homosexuality? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:19, 7 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Orphan articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, thank you very much for your new article creations -- they seem like good articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When creating new articles, I strongly recommend that you add links to them to existing articles (only those which are relevant). That way, your new articles won't be &amp;quot;orphans,&amp;quot; not linking to any other article, which makes it harder for readers to find them. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:44, 9 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==We're kindred spirits==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our disagreements line up pretty well, and obviously so do our agreements.  I believe that marijuana does the opposite of inciting violence, that vaccines are still quite necessary, and that homosexuality, like pedophilia, should not be outright condemned- in both cases, one can live a moral life of abstinence.  I went Trump in 2016, but if the DNC didn't shoot themselves in the foot by going with Hillary, I just might have been persuaded toward Bernie.--[[User:LawfulLibertarian|LawfulLibertarian]] ([[User talk:LawfulLibertarian|talk]]) 21:03, 8 January 2020 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[User:United States]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this you?--[[User:Bac|Bac]] ([[User talk:Bac|talk]]) 10:04, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No it isn't. Why do you ask? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 12:02, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I've restored your Groyper Wars essay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know why in the world VargasMilan blanked it. Then again, he has a record of questionable behavior on CP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 12:59, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, I appreciate this. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:05, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. If you're also interested, I posted a suggestion for rewriting the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] article [[Talk:Nicholas J. Fuentes|here]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 15:07, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I unblocked you.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contact the Conservapedia admin who blocked you. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And have that Conservapedia admin contact me also. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:29, November 7, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A 30 day block for Racism is entirely appropriate. It is neither too harsh nor too lenient. Being the unblocking Admin at this moment is disputing charges of racism from another wiki, he should consider the message this sends before not consulting the blocking Admin or undoing this block. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is a really dumb game, Rob, and I'm not playing. Next will you guys block Nick Fuentes fans [[User:Vince Did 7-14]] and [[User:Mr. Nationalist]]? You blocked me over an innocuous two-year-old Essay, that's absurd. What will you do when users have the gall to point out that Afghan migration will have significant demographic consequences for the U.S.... just like the caravan of Latin Americans headed for the U.S.-Mexico border who beat up the Mexican police? You also blocked me and a bunch of other people on JANUARY 6 (coincidence?) for no reason at all. [[User:Northwest]] and others have noticed you've been pretty erratic. I don't know or care what's going on with you or [[User:Liberaltears]], just leave me out of it. Besides, how come [[User:DavidB4]] wasn't disciplined for LITERALLY LINKING TO THE DAILY STORMER? Give me a break. Are Gabbers and groypers just not welcome on Conservapedia? Let's not behave like leftists. We're better than that. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As for why DavidB4 was never punished for linking to a neo-Nazi site, I've wondered the same thing. Your inappropriate insertions aren't simply excusable, though. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:16, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Inappropriate? If you're talking about the Essay, that was '''two years ago'''. And name what was inappropriate about it. Name the inappropriate thing I've said since then. This is so frustrating... ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:26, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I can't access that particular essay anymore because it's now deleted. As for other inappropriate postings by you, [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay%3AThe_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;diff=1810764&amp;amp;oldid=1798712 the recent additions you've put to your Groypers essay seem questionable at best], and your user page blatantly calls the Capitol riot &amp;quot;justified.&amp;quot; —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:29, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The whole matter is a little too reminiscent of the Senate Hit List published years back, which really set me off when I found out about it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:33, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I checked an email account I thought I hadn't checked in a long while and found his email to me, but it appears I was mistaken about not using that email account in a long time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He said he merely wanted to be unblocked to discuss his block. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I will let RobS decide this one. In retrospect, I should have asked RobS first. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:05, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Gosh, that no swearing rule gets harder every day. Guys, this is stupid. {{unsigned|BernieandTrumpFan}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Cons: If RW can be sued for the postings of one editor, then can CP be held responsible for a racist Essay posted by one user two years ago? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:27, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not everything is racist, Rob, don't be a gatekeeper. On a related note, [[Andrew Torba]] is not an &amp;quot;idiot.&amp;quot; ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:35, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So let's be absolutely clear. There are certain subjects I'm not allowed to talk about because they hurt people's feelings? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:36, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::(ec) It was the big boss who deemed it racist and deleted it. I was only the trigger man in assessing disciplinary action. You would have gotten 6 mos to life from anyone else. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:38, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The criticism from Andy that it wasn't encyclopedic seemed fair enough to me. I took issue with the blocking. I could've just taken a month off, but I chose to fight this because I need to resist the slanderous charge of racism. It's interesting that you guys won't hesitate to string me up for positions more moderate than what most people believe. A majority of Americans want a permanent immigration moratorium (as do a majority of Canadians and a majority of Europeans), but I've never advocated that. Are the stances of people like Brandon Tatum, Candace Owens, Kaitlin Bennett, Milo Yiannopoulos, Lauren Witzke, Bryson Gray, Mark Dice, Andrew Torba, Matt Walsh, and Michael Knowles really too fringe for this site? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:47, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810878</id>
		<title>User talk:BernieandTrumpFan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810878"/>
		<updated>2021-11-08T01:36:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* I unblocked you. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I already mentioned Trump's deportation of the Nazi guy in the article (in the &amp;quot;Illegal immigration&amp;quot; section), though I did not name him (I see no reason to name him and give him publicity, and it distracts from Trump's achievements). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:42, 1 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for creating the [[Criminal justice reform]] article! I [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Criminal_justice_reform&amp;amp;diff=1545861&amp;amp;oldid=1545825 made some changes] to improve formatting (in-line citations, etc.), and to change some wording to make the article read like an encyclopedia article. Once again, thank you! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:47, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, thank you for your edits. Please add sources [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Nazi_Party&amp;amp;diff=1549360&amp;amp;oldid=1519690 to your recent edit] in the [[American Nazi Party]] article. It is important that all information on CP is well sourced. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:43, 9 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stormfrint and homosexuality==&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel that strongly about homosexuality, why don't you return to Stormfront - you'll be right at home.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:52, 16 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LGBT Pride ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see that you created [[LGBT Pride]], but there's already a [[Gay pride]] page. Should the two be merged, since they essentially seem like duplicates (not the content, but the topics)? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:36, 20 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I would be fine with merging the two.&lt;br /&gt;
---BernieandTrumpFan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, I merged the articles, except for the intro of your article to avoid any repetition. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:22, 21 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Let's start off on a clean slate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tell you what. Let's just start off with a clean slate. I deleted my previous remarks. I don't forsee deleting any more of your content. I just thought the errors of fact in these articles were not by accident: [[Agnosticism, deism, and confusion]] and [[List of Social Darwinists]]. I will assume your edits are good faith henceforth plus 1990sguy said he would review your future edits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I probably was too quick on the draw in determining some of your errant edits were made in bad faith (agnosticism has caused many people to become insane with the footnotes not supporting that, Yasser Arafat is a social Darwinist, etc.). My apologies if I made a mistake. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not restore those articles two articles above because they had some quality issues, but I did restore the mainspace articles/essays I could find. I turned [[Atheism and chaos]] into an essay.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 21:47, 1 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I restored all but 2 of your articles/essays.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 09:27, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think I overreacted to 2 mistakes which were in a few of the articles I initially read of yours. They did not reflect your overall work on the wiki. I am sorry I overreacted.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 11:56, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friendly advice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, I had to delete your [[Randy Rainbow]] page because it wasn't a notable topic. If the topic is a leftist, it has to be someone who truly is notable for us to keep. Otherwise, we're effectively promoting irrelevant leftists who hate our beliefs. Since the only cited sources were YouTube links, it was clear this person wasn't notable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, I really appreciate that you cited sources. One of the most important things on CP is to cite good sources for everything (you can look at the articles I created as reference).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, one good thing to note is to use encyclopedic language on mainspace CP articles (not including &amp;quot;essay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot; pages) -- don't use words like &amp;quot;good,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bad,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;unfortunately,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;dumb,&amp;quot; etc. (you get the point). Since CP is an encyclopedia, we're higher quality than an opinion blog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope all this advice helps! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:57, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===More friendly advice===&lt;br /&gt;
Do I detect a pattern of linking conservatism with issues of [[identity politics]], racism, and homosexuality? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:19, 7 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Orphan articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, thank you very much for your new article creations -- they seem like good articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When creating new articles, I strongly recommend that you add links to them to existing articles (only those which are relevant). That way, your new articles won't be &amp;quot;orphans,&amp;quot; not linking to any other article, which makes it harder for readers to find them. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:44, 9 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==We're kindred spirits==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our disagreements line up pretty well, and obviously so do our agreements.  I believe that marijuana does the opposite of inciting violence, that vaccines are still quite necessary, and that homosexuality, like pedophilia, should not be outright condemned- in both cases, one can live a moral life of abstinence.  I went Trump in 2016, but if the DNC didn't shoot themselves in the foot by going with Hillary, I just might have been persuaded toward Bernie.--[[User:LawfulLibertarian|LawfulLibertarian]] ([[User talk:LawfulLibertarian|talk]]) 21:03, 8 January 2020 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[User:United States]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this you?--[[User:Bac|Bac]] ([[User talk:Bac|talk]]) 10:04, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No it isn't. Why do you ask? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 12:02, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I've restored your Groyper Wars essay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know why in the world VargasMilan blanked it. Then again, he has a record of questionable behavior on CP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 12:59, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, I appreciate this. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:05, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. If you're also interested, I posted a suggestion for rewriting the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] article [[Talk:Nicholas J. Fuentes|here]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 15:07, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I unblocked you.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contact the Conservapedia admin who blocked you. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And have that Conservapedia admin contact me also. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:29, November 7, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A 30 day block for Racism is entirely appropriate. It is neither too harsh nor too lenient. Being the unblocking Admin at this moment is disputing charges of racism from another wiki, he should consider the message this sends before not consulting the blocking Admin or undoing this block. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is a really dumb game, Rob, and I'm not playing. Next will you guys block Nick Fuentes fans [[User:Vince Did 7-14]] and [[User:Mr. Nationalist]]? You blocked me over an innocuous two-year-old Essay, that's absurd. What will you do when users have the gall to point out that Afghan migration will have significant demographic consequences for the U.S.... just like the caravan of Latin Americans headed for the U.S.-Mexico border who beat up the Mexican police? You also blocked me and a bunch of other people on JANUARY 6 (coincidence?) for no reason at all. [[User:Northwest]] and others have noticed you've been pretty erratic. I don't know or care what's going on with you or [[User:Liberaltears]], just leave me out of it. Besides, how come [[User:DavidB4]] wasn't disciplined for LITERALLY LINKING TO THE DAILY STORMER? Give me a break. Are Gabbers and groypers just not welcome on Conservapedia? Let's not behave like leftists. We're better than that. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As for why DavidB4 was never punished for linking to a neo-Nazi site, I've wondered the same thing. Your inappropriate insertions aren't simply excusable, though. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:16, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Inappropriate? If you're talking about the Essay, that was '''two years ago'''. And name what was inappropriate about it. Name the inappropriate thing I've said since then. This is so frustrating... ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:26, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I can't access that particular essay anymore because it's now deleted. As for other inappropriate postings by you, [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay%3AThe_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;diff=1810764&amp;amp;oldid=1798712 the recent additions you've put to your Groypers essay seem questionable at best], and your user page blatantly calls the Capitol riot &amp;quot;justified.&amp;quot; —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:29, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The whole matter is a little too reminiscent of the Senate Hit List published years back, which really set me off when I found out about it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:33, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I checked an email account I thought I hadn't checked in a long while and found his email to me, but it appears I was mistaken about not using that email account in a long time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He said he merely wanted to be unblocked to discuss his block. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I will let RobS decide this one. In retrospect, I should have asked RobS first. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:05, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Gosh, that no swearing rule gets harder every day. Guys, this is stupid. {{unsigned|BernieandTrumpFan}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Cons: If RW can be sued for the postings of one editor, then can CP be held responsible for a racist Essay posted by one user two years ago? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:27, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not everything is racist, Rob, don't be a gatekeeper. On a related note, [[Andrew Torba]] is not an &amp;quot;idiot.&amp;quot; ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:35, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So let's be absolutely clear. There are certain subjects I'm not allowed to talk about because they hurt people's feelings? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:36, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810877</id>
		<title>User talk:BernieandTrumpFan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810877"/>
		<updated>2021-11-08T01:35:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* I unblocked you. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I already mentioned Trump's deportation of the Nazi guy in the article (in the &amp;quot;Illegal immigration&amp;quot; section), though I did not name him (I see no reason to name him and give him publicity, and it distracts from Trump's achievements). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:42, 1 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for creating the [[Criminal justice reform]] article! I [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Criminal_justice_reform&amp;amp;diff=1545861&amp;amp;oldid=1545825 made some changes] to improve formatting (in-line citations, etc.), and to change some wording to make the article read like an encyclopedia article. Once again, thank you! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:47, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, thank you for your edits. Please add sources [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Nazi_Party&amp;amp;diff=1549360&amp;amp;oldid=1519690 to your recent edit] in the [[American Nazi Party]] article. It is important that all information on CP is well sourced. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:43, 9 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stormfrint and homosexuality==&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel that strongly about homosexuality, why don't you return to Stormfront - you'll be right at home.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:52, 16 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LGBT Pride ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see that you created [[LGBT Pride]], but there's already a [[Gay pride]] page. Should the two be merged, since they essentially seem like duplicates (not the content, but the topics)? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:36, 20 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I would be fine with merging the two.&lt;br /&gt;
---BernieandTrumpFan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, I merged the articles, except for the intro of your article to avoid any repetition. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:22, 21 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Let's start off on a clean slate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tell you what. Let's just start off with a clean slate. I deleted my previous remarks. I don't forsee deleting any more of your content. I just thought the errors of fact in these articles were not by accident: [[Agnosticism, deism, and confusion]] and [[List of Social Darwinists]]. I will assume your edits are good faith henceforth plus 1990sguy said he would review your future edits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I probably was too quick on the draw in determining some of your errant edits were made in bad faith (agnosticism has caused many people to become insane with the footnotes not supporting that, Yasser Arafat is a social Darwinist, etc.). My apologies if I made a mistake. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not restore those articles two articles above because they had some quality issues, but I did restore the mainspace articles/essays I could find. I turned [[Atheism and chaos]] into an essay.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 21:47, 1 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I restored all but 2 of your articles/essays.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 09:27, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think I overreacted to 2 mistakes which were in a few of the articles I initially read of yours. They did not reflect your overall work on the wiki. I am sorry I overreacted.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 11:56, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friendly advice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, I had to delete your [[Randy Rainbow]] page because it wasn't a notable topic. If the topic is a leftist, it has to be someone who truly is notable for us to keep. Otherwise, we're effectively promoting irrelevant leftists who hate our beliefs. Since the only cited sources were YouTube links, it was clear this person wasn't notable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, I really appreciate that you cited sources. One of the most important things on CP is to cite good sources for everything (you can look at the articles I created as reference).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, one good thing to note is to use encyclopedic language on mainspace CP articles (not including &amp;quot;essay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot; pages) -- don't use words like &amp;quot;good,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bad,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;unfortunately,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;dumb,&amp;quot; etc. (you get the point). Since CP is an encyclopedia, we're higher quality than an opinion blog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope all this advice helps! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:57, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===More friendly advice===&lt;br /&gt;
Do I detect a pattern of linking conservatism with issues of [[identity politics]], racism, and homosexuality? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:19, 7 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Orphan articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, thank you very much for your new article creations -- they seem like good articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When creating new articles, I strongly recommend that you add links to them to existing articles (only those which are relevant). That way, your new articles won't be &amp;quot;orphans,&amp;quot; not linking to any other article, which makes it harder for readers to find them. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:44, 9 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==We're kindred spirits==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our disagreements line up pretty well, and obviously so do our agreements.  I believe that marijuana does the opposite of inciting violence, that vaccines are still quite necessary, and that homosexuality, like pedophilia, should not be outright condemned- in both cases, one can live a moral life of abstinence.  I went Trump in 2016, but if the DNC didn't shoot themselves in the foot by going with Hillary, I just might have been persuaded toward Bernie.--[[User:LawfulLibertarian|LawfulLibertarian]] ([[User talk:LawfulLibertarian|talk]]) 21:03, 8 January 2020 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[User:United States]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this you?--[[User:Bac|Bac]] ([[User talk:Bac|talk]]) 10:04, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No it isn't. Why do you ask? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 12:02, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I've restored your Groyper Wars essay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know why in the world VargasMilan blanked it. Then again, he has a record of questionable behavior on CP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 12:59, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, I appreciate this. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:05, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. If you're also interested, I posted a suggestion for rewriting the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] article [[Talk:Nicholas J. Fuentes|here]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 15:07, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I unblocked you.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contact the Conservapedia admin who blocked you. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And have that Conservapedia admin contact me also. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:29, November 7, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A 30 day block for Racism is entirely appropriate. It is neither too harsh nor too lenient. Being the unblocking Admin at this moment is disputing charges of racism from another wiki, he should consider the message this sends before not consulting the blocking Admin or undoing this block. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is a really dumb game, Rob, and I'm not playing. Next will you guys block Nick Fuentes fans [[User:Vince Did 7-14]] and [[User:Mr. Nationalist]]? You blocked me over an innocuous two-year-old Essay, that's absurd. What will you do when users have the gall to point out that Afghan migration will have significant demographic consequences for the U.S.... just like the caravan of Latin Americans headed for the U.S.-Mexico border who beat up the Mexican police? You also blocked me and a bunch of other people on JANUARY 6 (coincidence?) for no reason at all. [[User:Northwest]] and others have noticed you've been pretty erratic. I don't know or care what's going on with you or [[User:Liberaltears]], just leave me out of it. Besides, how come [[User:DavidB4]] wasn't disciplined for LITERALLY LINKING TO THE DAILY STORMER? Give me a break. Are Gabbers and groypers just not welcome on Conservapedia? Let's not behave like leftists. We're better than that. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As for why DavidB4 was never punished for linking to a neo-Nazi site, I've wondered the same thing. Your inappropriate insertions aren't simply excusable, though. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:16, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Inappropriate? If you're talking about the Essay, that was '''two years ago'''. And name what was inappropriate about it. Name the inappropriate thing I've said since then. This is so frustrating... ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:26, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I can't access that particular essay anymore because it's now deleted. As for other inappropriate postings by you, [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay%3AThe_Groyper_Wars&amp;amp;diff=1810764&amp;amp;oldid=1798712 the recent additions you've put to your Groypers essay seem questionable at best], and your user page blatantly calls the Capitol riot &amp;quot;justified.&amp;quot; —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:29, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The whole matter is a little too reminiscent of the Senate Hit List published years back, which really set me off when I found out about it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:33, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I checked an email account I thought I hadn't checked in a long while and found his email to me, but it appears I was mistaken about not using that email account in a long time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He said he merely wanted to be unblocked to discuss his block. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I will let RobS decide this one. In retrospect, I should have asked RobS first. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:05, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Gosh, that no swearing rule gets harder every day. Guys, this is stupid. {{unsigned|BernieandTrumpFan}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Cons: If RW can be sued for the postings of one editor, then can CP be held responsible for a racist Essay posted by one user two years ago? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:27, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not everything is racist, Rob, don't be a gatekeeper. On a related note, [[Andrew Torba]] is not an &amp;quot;idiot.&amp;quot; ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:35, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810872</id>
		<title>User talk:BernieandTrumpFan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BernieandTrumpFan&amp;diff=1810872"/>
		<updated>2021-11-08T01:26:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BernieandTrumpFan: /* I unblocked you. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I already mentioned Trump's deportation of the Nazi guy in the article (in the &amp;quot;Illegal immigration&amp;quot; section), though I did not name him (I see no reason to name him and give him publicity, and it distracts from Trump's achievements). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:42, 1 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for creating the [[Criminal justice reform]] article! I [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Criminal_justice_reform&amp;amp;diff=1545861&amp;amp;oldid=1545825 made some changes] to improve formatting (in-line citations, etc.), and to change some wording to make the article read like an encyclopedia article. Once again, thank you! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:47, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, thank you for your edits. Please add sources [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Nazi_Party&amp;amp;diff=1549360&amp;amp;oldid=1519690 to your recent edit] in the [[American Nazi Party]] article. It is important that all information on CP is well sourced. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 05:43, 9 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stormfrint and homosexuality==&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel that strongly about homosexuality, why don't you return to Stormfront - you'll be right at home.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:52, 16 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LGBT Pride ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see that you created [[LGBT Pride]], but there's already a [[Gay pride]] page. Should the two be merged, since they essentially seem like duplicates (not the content, but the topics)? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:36, 20 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I would be fine with merging the two.&lt;br /&gt;
---BernieandTrumpFan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, I merged the articles, except for the intro of your article to avoid any repetition. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:22, 21 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Let's start off on a clean slate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tell you what. Let's just start off with a clean slate. I deleted my previous remarks. I don't forsee deleting any more of your content. I just thought the errors of fact in these articles were not by accident: [[Agnosticism, deism, and confusion]] and [[List of Social Darwinists]]. I will assume your edits are good faith henceforth plus 1990sguy said he would review your future edits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I probably was too quick on the draw in determining some of your errant edits were made in bad faith (agnosticism has caused many people to become insane with the footnotes not supporting that, Yasser Arafat is a social Darwinist, etc.). My apologies if I made a mistake. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not restore those articles two articles above because they had some quality issues, but I did restore the mainspace articles/essays I could find. I turned [[Atheism and chaos]] into an essay.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 21:47, 1 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I restored all but 2 of your articles/essays.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 09:27, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think I overreacted to 2 mistakes which were in a few of the articles I initially read of yours. They did not reflect your overall work on the wiki. I am sorry I overreacted.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 11:56, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Friendly advice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, I had to delete your [[Randy Rainbow]] page because it wasn't a notable topic. If the topic is a leftist, it has to be someone who truly is notable for us to keep. Otherwise, we're effectively promoting irrelevant leftists who hate our beliefs. Since the only cited sources were YouTube links, it was clear this person wasn't notable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, I really appreciate that you cited sources. One of the most important things on CP is to cite good sources for everything (you can look at the articles I created as reference).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, one good thing to note is to use encyclopedic language on mainspace CP articles (not including &amp;quot;essay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot; pages) -- don't use words like &amp;quot;good,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bad,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;unfortunately,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;dumb,&amp;quot; etc. (you get the point). Since CP is an encyclopedia, we're higher quality than an opinion blog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope all this advice helps! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:57, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===More friendly advice===&lt;br /&gt;
Do I detect a pattern of linking conservatism with issues of [[identity politics]], racism, and homosexuality? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:19, 7 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Orphan articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello BernieandTrumpFan, thank you very much for your new article creations -- they seem like good articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When creating new articles, I strongly recommend that you add links to them to existing articles (only those which are relevant). That way, your new articles won't be &amp;quot;orphans,&amp;quot; not linking to any other article, which makes it harder for readers to find them. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:44, 9 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==We're kindred spirits==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our disagreements line up pretty well, and obviously so do our agreements.  I believe that marijuana does the opposite of inciting violence, that vaccines are still quite necessary, and that homosexuality, like pedophilia, should not be outright condemned- in both cases, one can live a moral life of abstinence.  I went Trump in 2016, but if the DNC didn't shoot themselves in the foot by going with Hillary, I just might have been persuaded toward Bernie.--[[User:LawfulLibertarian|LawfulLibertarian]] ([[User talk:LawfulLibertarian|talk]]) 21:03, 8 January 2020 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[User:United States]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this you?--[[User:Bac|Bac]] ([[User talk:Bac|talk]]) 10:04, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No it isn't. Why do you ask? ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 12:02, 3 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I've restored your Groyper Wars essay ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know why in the world VargasMilan blanked it. Then again, he has a record of questionable behavior on CP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 12:59, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, I appreciate this. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 15:05, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. If you're also interested, I posted a suggestion for rewriting the [[Nicholas J. Fuentes]] article [[Talk:Nicholas J. Fuentes|here]]. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 15:07, September 23, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I unblocked you.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contact the Conservapedia admin who blocked you. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And have that Conservapedia admin contact me also. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:29, November 7, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A 30 day block for Racism is entirely appropriate. It is neither too harsh nor too lenient. Being the unblocking Admin at this moment is disputing charges of racism from another wiki, he should consider the message this sends before not consulting the blocking Admin or undoing this block. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::This is a really dumb game, Rob, and I'm not playing. Next will you guys block Nick Fuentes fans [[User:Vince Did 7-14]] and [[User:Mr. Nationalist]]? You blocked me over an innocuous two-year-old Essay, that's absurd. What will you do when users have the gall to point out that Afghan migration will have significant demographic consequences for the U.S.... just like the caravan of Latin Americans headed for the U.S.-Mexico border who beat up the Mexican police? You also blocked me and a bunch of other people on JANUARY 6 (coincidence?) for no reason at all. [[User:Northwest]] and others have noticed you've been pretty erratic. I don't know or care what's going on with you or [[User:Liberaltears]], just leave me out of it. Besides, how come [[User:DavidB4]] wasn't disciplined for LITERALLY LINKING TO THE DAILY STORMER? Give me a break. Are Gabbers and groypers just not welcome on Conservapedia? Let's not behave like leftists. We're better than that. ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:13, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As for why DavidB4 was never punished for linking to a neo-Nazi site, I've wondered the same thing. Your inappropriate insertions aren't simply excusable, though. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:16, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Inappropriate? If you're talking about the Essay, that was '''two years ago'''. And name what was inappropriate about it. Name the inappropriate thing I've said since then. This is so frustrating... ---[[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 20:26, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I checked an email account I thought I hadn't checked in a long while and found his email to me, but it appears I was mistaken about not using that email account in a long time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He said he merely wanted to be unblocked to discuss his block. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I will let RobS decide this one. In retrospect, I should have asked RobS first. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:05, November 7, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Gosh, that no swearing rule gets harder every day. Guys, this is stupid.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BernieandTrumpFan</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>