<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=BorisJohnson</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=BorisJohnson"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/BorisJohnson"/>
	<updated>2026-10-27T23:16:53Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bisexual&amp;diff=1781352</id>
		<title>Bisexual</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bisexual&amp;diff=1781352"/>
		<updated>2021-07-24T18:40:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BorisJohnson: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Crowley.jpg‎|thumbnail|250px|The [[occult]]ist [[Aleister Crowley]] was a bisexual and was dubbed in his lifetime &amp;quot;the most wicked man on earth&amp;quot;.  Aleister Crowley stated: &amp;quot;I was not content to believe in a personal [[devil]] and serve him, in the ordinary sense of the word. I wanted to get hold of him personally and become his chief of staff.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://books.google.com/books?id=k_uVVznqdssC&amp;amp;pg=PA49&amp;amp;lpg=PA49&amp;amp;dq=I+was+not+content+to+believe+in+a+personal+devil+and+serve+him,+in+the+ordinary+sense+of+the+word.+I+wanted+to+get+hold+of+him+personally+and+become+his+chief+of+staff.&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=w0mmSaLOcC&amp;amp;sig=rSH3vqIlpfp3U5-mSLKD5vsVG5w&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;resnum=2&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Bisexual''' refers to a person with both [[heterosexual]] and [[homosexual]] desires. Bisexuality is in direct conflict with biblical teachings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a national survey, 90% of men aged 18–44 considered themselves to be heterosexual, 2.3% as homosexual, 1.8% as bisexual, and 3.9% as 'something else' (Mosher, Chandra, &amp;amp; Jones, 2005).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/resources/FAQ.html Homosexuality] The Kinsey Institute for Research in ex, Gender, and Reproduction, Inc.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 2003 poll done by Ellison Research of [[Phoenix]], [[Arizona]] stated that 82% of all [[United States|American]] [[Protestantism|Protestant]] ministers agreed with the statement [[Homosexuality and choice|“homosexuality is a choice people make&amp;quot;]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ellisonresearch.com/ERPS%20II/Release%206%20Homosexuality.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the [[Catholic]] Catechism states regarding the issue of [[homosexuality and choice]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. They do not choose their homosexual condition; for most of them it is a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. The persons are called to fulfill [[God]]'s will in their lives and, if they are [[Christians]], to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord's cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition&amp;quot; (CCC 2358). &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. [[Alfred Kinsey]] developed a scale that ranks sexual desires from 0-6, describing those desires that are neither exclusively hetero- or homosexual as &amp;quot;ambisexual&amp;quot; or bisexual. Kinsey proposed that most people are neither exclusively heterosexual or homosexual, but rather fall into the more gray areas at either end of the scale. For example, having a ranking of one would indicate that you are predominately heterosexual, but incidentally homosexual.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/resources/ak-hhscale.html Kinsey Scale] The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction, Inc.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bisexuality in Africa==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to [[Michael Fumento]], German anthropologist [[Kurt Falk]] reported in the 1920s that bisexuality was almost universal among the male populations of African tribes he studied. [http://fumento.com/aids/aids2005.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.bisexual.org/home.html The American Institute of Bisexuality]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/~tomshoemaker/StudentPapers/JewishSexuality.html Sexuality in Judaism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=25922 BNP news]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Health]][[Category:Bisexuality]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BorisJohnson</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminism&amp;diff=1781349</id>
		<title>Feminism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminism&amp;diff=1781349"/>
		<updated>2021-07-24T18:38:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BorisJohnson: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Braque woman 400pix.jpg|thumb|200px|''Woman with a guitar'' by [[Georges Braque]], 1913.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Feminism''' is a cancerous ideology that causes an alienation in affection by women for men.  Feminism denies or downplays differences between men and women; feminism opposes homemaking, child-rearing, and [[homeschooling]] by women; and feminism promotes participation by women in predominantly male activities regardless of their life pursuits or interests.  Most prominent modern feminists support [[abortion]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attributes common to many feminists include an [[entitlement mentality]] and a bit of an attitude, such as a &amp;quot;chip on one's shoulder&amp;quot; despite benefiting from a life of privilege.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSo-q2Dq1aY ''Mickey Randleman - _Feminist_ (IWPS 2014) - 1080P HD_this video was deleted by buttons youtube channel'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a personal level feminism can disrupt marriages, relationships, child-rearing, education and the workplace.  The feminist ideology is particularly dominant in elite universities, many large corporations, and competitive women's team sports. Feminism claims it wants to make men and women equal but in reality, it opposes any sort of support for men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2015/11/18/male-university-of-york-student-commits-suicide-on-day-his-university-ditches-international-mens-day-after-pressure-from-feminists/ &amp;quot;Male University of York Student Commits Suicide on Day His University Ditches International Men’s day&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWgslugtDow ''Feminists protesting Men's Rights talk pull fire alarm, 4/4/2013'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feminism was originally an expression used by [[suffragettes]] – who were predominantly [[pro-life]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.godlessprolifers.org/library/wallace4.html ''Susan B. Anthony opposed abortion'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''&amp;quot;There is no question that she deplored the practice of abortion, as did every one of her colleagues in the suffrage movement.&amp;quot;'' [https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/13/opinion/13schiff.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin ''Desperately Seeking Susan''] [[New York Times]] (13 October 2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.feministsforlife.org/history/foremoth.htm ''Voices of our Feminist Foremothers''] Feminists for Life&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; – to obtain the right for women to vote in the early 1900s in the [[United States]] and the [[United Kingdom]].  By the 1970s, however, at the height of what was termed Second-wave feminism, [[liberals]] had changed the meaning to represent people who favored [[abortion]] and identical roles or quotas for women in the military and in society as a whole.  Today in the midst of what is called Third-wave feminism, also known as Feminazism, some feminists are enforcers of [[liberal censorship]] and [[political correctness]], at the expense of [[free speech]]. In fact, much of what drove Second-wave feminism and what now drives Third-wave feminism was derived from Communist doctrine and both have a great deal in common, including the shared goal of the destruction of the family and the promotion of homosexuality and promiscuity (via Goal 26 of the 1963 Communist goals for America).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2014/09/04/feminism-is-communism/ Feminism is Communism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fathersforlife.org/feminism/hubbard1.htm Feminist family politics and their roots in Communist ideology]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most feminists:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* want to remove significant distinctions between how men and women dress, such as preferring that women wear pantsuits rather than dresses,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[T]he wearing of pantsuits is often a useful feminism signifier, depending on the culture of the law firm.&amp;quot; [http://feministlawprofs.law.sc.edu/?p=2640]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;I was part of a growing tribe of pesky women called feminists by friends and enemies alike.  We women stormed out the door in our imitation men's suits ....&amp;quot; [http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/arts/story.html?k=60432&amp;amp;id=3b3c71f6-0d7d-4e1a-b8fb-cf8d5b1af478]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; even though many feminists also want women to be able dress immodestly without harassment. In some cases, most infamously during the Miss America protests in 1968, feminists have even gone as far as to indicate that female products such as makeup, bras, and heels were &amp;quot;instruments of oppression.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* want gender equality&lt;br /&gt;
* in movies and television, portray the men, in particular, the white heterosexual men, as inherently evil, dumb or incompetent, and the women, in particular those that adhere to the feminist agenda, as inherently good, smart or competent (note that this conflicts with gender equality).&lt;br /&gt;
** on that note, some movies and television programs, in addition to depicting men as inherently evil, dumb, or incompetent, can sometimes depict women who adhere to more traditional femininity, including promoting traditional family values and traditional marriage (see below), as well as expressing more traditional gender roles and natures, in an extremely demeaning manner, usually implying that they are at best brainless bimbos and at worst gold-diggers (women who only marry someone for their wealth), often with the implication that traditional femininity is considered inherently bad (which goes against the concept of women having free choices regarding how to pursue their life).&lt;br /&gt;
* conveniently pretend that there are no meaningful differences between men and women when that advances [[liberal]] causes (e.g., women and men equally in military combat, to weaken the U.S. military), but reject equality when that results in more money to women (e.g., [[VAWA]] funding of women's groups).&lt;br /&gt;
* oppose [[chivalry]] and even feign insult at harmless displays of it (see battle between the sexes).&lt;br /&gt;
* view traditional [[marriage]] as unacceptably &amp;quot;patriarchal&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* belittle and mock other women who follow traditional gender roles&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/clinton/etc/03261992.html Nightline Transcripts, &amp;quot;Making Hillary Clinton an Issue&amp;quot;], [[PBS]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Being a [[housewife]] is an illegitimate profession... The choice to serve and be protected and plan towards being a family-maker is a choice that shouldn't be. The heart of  [[radical feminism]] is to change that.&amp;quot; - Vivian Gornick, University of Illinois, &amp;quot;The Daily Illini,&amp;quot; April 25, 1981. [http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/artman/publish/LAF_Theme_Articles_13/You_Don_t_Know_Feminism_744100744.shtml         &amp;quot;You Don't Know Feminism&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* shirk traditional gender activities, like baking.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;But sometime between the Ides of March and Canada Day, I remembered that I'd given up baking cookies as a political act in 1975. ... No self-respecting feminist could be found in the company of cookie dough.&amp;quot; [https://web.archive.org/web/20071204191342/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/arts/story.html?k=60432&amp;amp;id=3b3c71f6-0d7d-4e1a-b8fb-cf8d5b1af478]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* support [[affirmative action]] for women.&lt;br /&gt;
* advocate for [[women in combat]] in the military just like men, and coed submarines.&lt;br /&gt;
* refuse to take her husband's last name when marrying.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.salon.com/2003/10/16/names_2/  Mrs. Feminist ]: &amp;quot;(Almost half the married women in the Harvard-Radcliffe class of 1990 kept or hyphenated their names.) If you read the New York Times wedding pages, and shut up, you do, the phrase 'the bride, who is keeping her name' seems like the norm, unless his name is Rockefeller.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* distort historical focus onto female figures, often overshadowing important events (E.g.: Henry VIII's wives take precedence in common knowledge to his actual reign.)&lt;br /&gt;
* often condemn the God-given order of gender roles, as laid out in the Holy [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
* object to being addressed as &amp;quot;ma'am,&amp;quot; or feminine nicknames such as &amp;quot;sweetheart&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;honey&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2009-06-19/news/0906180620_1_sen-barbara-boxer-ma-am-state-condoleezza-rice Sen. Barbara Boxer: No ma'am references, please], [[Chicago Tribune]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; object to other female-only names, such as &amp;quot;temptress&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* take offense needless gendering in the English language, like using the pronoun &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; when referring to a hypothetical/anonymous person, or phrases like 'fireman' and 'stewardess.'&lt;br /&gt;
* support the [[homosexual agenda]].&lt;br /&gt;
* push propaganda that implies that women weren't allowed to be granted an education until the 1960s, and all education beforehand was granted solely to &amp;quot;rich white males.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.mediafire.com/folder/e02pmeur6q4yb/World_History_up_to_the_1500s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* demands that women choose a career over raising children without any remorse.&lt;br /&gt;
* criticize music such as [[heavy metal music|heavy metal]], [[rock and roll]], and [[country music|country]] for being &amp;quot;sexist&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* object to anyone describing [[Northern Europe|Northern]] and [[Western Europe]]an women being [[modesty|demure]] or [[Southern Europe|Southern]] and [[Eastern Europe]]an women as [[seduction|seductive]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that women who have to take over the family business due to their parents not having a son and the parents themselves being unable to continue working at the area is not considered feminist due to the circumstances involved. Some feminists want to do away with masculinity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ernst, Douglas (October 30, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/30/occidental-college-professor-attack-masculinity-di/ Professor pushes need to ‘attack masculinity directly’ to survive Trump era]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved October 31, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
Roots of the movement in the United States and the United Kingdom include the [[suffrage|Women's Suffrage]] movement of the early 1900s (First-wave feminism) and the Women's Liberation (Second-wave feminism) movement of the 1960s and 1970s. Second-wave feminism had its roots from [[Betty Friedan]] and [[Simone de Beauvoir]], who both advocated for the abolition of the career of housewife with the false implication that it was comparable to a Nazi concentration camp or a parasite, though they are more akin to the later third-wave feminism, as they fought against what they saw as patriarchal systems designed to hold women down. Another notable feminist was Simone Veil, who was instrumental to legalizing abortion in France. One of her key methods to its legalization was citing her experience as a holocaust survivor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/06/30/534974403/french-politician-simone-veil-holocaust-survivor-and-abortion-pioneer-dies-at-89&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Equal Rights Amendment]] (ERA), whose proponents claimed would address the inadequacies of the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] concerning women and citizenship, was proposed in the US in 1923.  The amendment passed Congress in 1972 but was ultimately defeated, falling just three states short of the required [[three-quarters majority]] on June 30, 1982. Some conservatives, particularly [[Phyllis Schlafly]], felt that its passage would entail adverse consequences, including making girls subject to the [[military draft]], requiring taxpayer-funded [[abortion]], the end of [[single-sex schools]] and classes, requiring the issuance of [[homosexual marriage]] licenses, and the revocation of laws that protect women in dangerous jobs, such as factory or mining work.  Indeed, in states that passed their own versions of ERA, several of these results were subsequently ordered by courts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the [[Hawaii]] and [[Massachusetts]] Supreme Courts illegally ordered the issuance of homosexual &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot; licenses based in part on their on their state ERAs, and the [[New Mexico]] Supreme Court illegally ordered taxpayer-funded abortion based on its state ERA.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The feminist movement in the West evolved in the 1980s with the rise of so-called [[Post-Feminism]] (Third-wave feminism), which stresses that women have many rights that go unrecognized, often by women themselves, in everyday life, and in the [[Critical legal studies|American legal structure]]. Most members of the feminist movement support reproductive rights currently guaranteed by American law, including the legal right to abortion. This stance is opposed by many conservatives. Third-wave feminism has been highly influenced by postmodern thought, and is a more intellectual form of feminism. It fights against the systems that it sees as detrimental to women as a group, systems designed to keep women in traditional roles, in contrast with second-wave feminism, which fought for equal rights and pay with men in a fight against the traditional status of women as second class citizens. Another distinction made from second-wave feminism is the claimed recognition of the struggles faced by women who are minorities, disabled, immigrants, etc. (intersection theory), as most second-wave feminists focused only on white suburban middle-class able-bodied women. Second-wave feminism, however, was not always a good thing, as it pushed for abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leading political commentator [[Rush Limbaugh]] to coin the term &amp;quot;Feminazis&amp;quot; to refer to extreme feminist activists. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the major features of feminism prior to the 1990s was opposition to women being treated as [[sex objects]]. However, some feminists today support women being more sexual, viewing it as a means of empowerment over the traditional [[Judeo-Christian]] family structure and [[conservative values]]. While there is a push for sex-positive feminism (seen in works like ''The Vagina Monologues''), it is not necessarily a push for the objectification of women. Largely, feminists fight against this objectification of women. The opposite of sex-positive is sex-negative, which is predominately used as a snarl word to label criticizers of the porn industry. Ultimately, however, it continues on the same promotion of [[liberalism]] and [[anti-Christian]] values, as feminists today treat [[Women's rights and Islam|Islam's cruel treatment of women]] as a matter of &amp;quot;personal choice&amp;quot;. Similarly, the National Organization for Women proceeded to list the likes of [[Hugh Hefner]], the founder of the infamous porn rag ''Playboy'', as a &amp;quot;defender of women.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://worthy-magazine.com/hugh-hefner-defender-of-women-says-republicans-at-war-with-sex/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://rosemarycounter.com/hugh-hefner-dirty-old-man-or-radical-feminist/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the administration of [[Bill Clinton]], feminism made a partial resurgence, although feminist leadership was criticized by people such as Christina Odone and Candice E. Jackson for largely failing to criticize President Clinton's [[sexist]] behavior toward female employees as both Arkansas Governor and U.S. president.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Odone, Christina [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article528875.ece ''Left-wing misogyny is alive and well: The party’s feminist agenda allows Labour men to get away with sexist behaviour''] (2 June 2005) [[The Times]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jackson, Candice E. ''&amp;quot;Their Lives: The Women Targeted by the Clinton Machine&amp;quot;'' (World Ahead Publishing; 2005) ISBN 0-9746-7013-8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]], a staunch advocate of [[civil rights]] and [[non-violence]] said, &amp;quot;When a mother has to work she does violence to motherhood by depriving her children of her loving guidance and protection.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Stride Toward Freedom : The Montgomery Story'', Martin Luther King, Jr., Harper and Rowe, New York, 1958, p. 203.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Larrey Anderson, philosopher, writer and submissions editor for ''American Thinker'', links feminism to Marxism, and concludes, &amp;quot;Feminism by grounding itself in the philosophy of Hegel and [[Marxism|Marx]], is condemning women to a new servitude: slavery to the State.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Larrey Anderson, ''The Feminine Mistake'', ''American Thinker'', November 29, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Critique==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Christine Hoff Sommers]] wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
:... The problem with feminism is not that it has fostered achievement for women. Rather it is feminism's attempts to demean the roles and achievements of men and &amp;quot;feminize&amp;quot; boys that are problematic. [https://www.amazon.com/WAR-AGAINST-BOYS-Misguided-Feminism/dp/0684849577]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feminism and reason==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Liberals and reason]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Antifeminist Literature states:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;Our culture, including all that we are taught in schools and universities, is so infused with patriarchal thinking that it must be torn up root and branch if genuine change is to occur. Everything must go - even the allegedly universal disciplines of logic, mathematics and science, and the intellectual values of objectivity, clarity and precision on which the former depend.&amp;quot; — Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge, Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women’s Studies, (New York Basic Books, 1994), p.116 [http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/why-feminism-is-a-fraud/] }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feminists in the [[Swedish]] government on Valentine's Day, February 14, 2017, were urged by the Iranian women's right activist Masih Alinejad “to stand for their own dignity” and to refuse to wear the compulsory [[hijab]] while visiting Iran. The pleas were ignored. The Jihad Watch website reported,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/02/swedens-first-feminist-government-dons-hijabs-in-iran ]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Sweden’s female leaders have not only betrayed all women who fight for equality globally, but they have also fully exposed how confused they are: they are so-called feminists who – for example — furiously insist on control over their own bodies to choose abortion, but they are willing to fully submit to male dominance at the demand of Muslim men to dictate their clothing. And they did so in front of a global audience to boot.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cultural Marxism==&lt;br /&gt;
The Feminist movement is part of the [[Cultural Marxist]] attack on the family. Studies have shown that &lt;br /&gt;
*63 percent of youth suicides take place in fatherless homes.&lt;br /&gt;
*90 percent of all homeless youth and runaways are from fatherless homes, which is a whopping 32 times the national average.&lt;br /&gt;
*85 percent of all children with behavior issues come from fatherless homes, 20 times the national average.&lt;br /&gt;
*80 percent of rapists with established anger issues come from fatherless homes, 14 times the national average.&lt;br /&gt;
*71 percent of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes, nine times the national average.&lt;br /&gt;
*70 percent of those in state-operated institutions come from fatherless homes, nine times the national average.&lt;br /&gt;
*85 percent of all juveniles in prison come from single-parent households, 20 times the national average.&lt;br /&gt;
*90 percent of adolescent repeat arson offenders are from fatherless homes.&lt;br /&gt;
*Fatherless children are nearly twice as likely to be victims of abuse or neglect.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/07/no_author/bowling-alone-how-washington-has-helped-destroy-american-civil-society-and-family-life/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Feminism, sub-replacement levels of fertility in the West and the growth of the percentage of people living in patriarchal societies in the world ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The historian Martin van Creveld wrote in his book ''Equality: The Impossible Quest': &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|In many modern societies, the advent of feminism has caused men and women to be placed on a more equal footing than ever before. The catch is that, in most of the societies in question, women, desperately trying to achieve what they see as equality, no longer bear enough children to maintain the population. Some countries, such as the U.S., are making up for the deficit by importing millions of foreigners. Others, such as Japan, seem resigned to gradual demographic decline and hope that robots will make up the difference. If demographics count for anything, the future of patriarchy — not the comparatively mild form of patriarchy that is said to have characterized the West, but the more rigorous [[Islam]]ic variety—seems assured...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If present trends continue, the societies in which the movement towards women’s equality is strongest are simply doomed to disappear.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Martin van Creveld, ''Equality: The Impossible Quest'' (p. 165-166, 174). Castalia House. Kindle Edition&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This effect, of lowering fertility rates, is known as the DTM, or Demographic Transition model. There are a variety of ways that this lower fertility rate can be raised, however, such as improving availability of IVF, or surrogacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Quotations about Feminism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheist feminism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheist feminism]] and [[Atheism and women's rights]] and [[Atheism and women]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Annie Laurie Gaylor.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|[[Annie Laurie Gaylor]] is an atheist feminist. She is co-president of the [[Freedom From Religion Foundation]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gaylor's husband, [[Dan Barker]], who heads the organization along with her, is usually the person invited to speaking engagements, despite her longer tenure as the organization's leader and her many books on atheism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bekiempis, Victoria (Summer 2011). [http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/sep/26/new-atheism-boys-club &amp;quot;Why the New Atheism is a boys' club&amp;quot;].  Bitch Magazine, no. 51.  Retrieved from September 26, 2011 edition of The Guardian/CommentaryIsFree.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surveys throughout the world and other data indicate that women are less inclined to be [[atheism|atheists]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Khan, Razib (November 18, 2010).  [http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/11/sex-differences-in-global-atheism-part-n/ &amp;quot;Gene expression; Sex differences in global atheism, part N&amp;quot;].  Discover magazine website.&lt;br /&gt;
*Carter, Stephen L. (March 27, 2015).  [http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-03-27/the-atheism-gap &amp;quot;The atheism gap&amp;quot;].  ''BloombergView''.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://blog.oup.com/2014/09/atheism-feminism/#sthash.0yIBbelF.dpuf Atheism and Feminism], ''Oxford University Press'' blog&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;PZ&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Myers, P.Z. (June 29, 2010).  [http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/06/29/the-woman-problem/ &amp;quot;The woman problem&amp;quot;]. Pharyngula [blog].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See: [[Atheism and women]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheist feminism]] is a type of feminism whose advocates are [[Atheism|atheists]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Writing on the [[Atheism and sexism|sexism within the atheist population]], atheist Victoria Bekiempis wrote in a ''Guardian'' article entitled ''Why the [[New Atheism]] is a boys' club'':  &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|[[Annie Laurie Gaylor]], who founded the Freedom From Religion Foundation with her mother, Anne Nicol Gaylor, in 1978, sums it up succinctly: “One word — sexism.” Gaylor’s husband, Dan Barker, who helms the organization along with her, is usually the one invited to speaking engagements, despite her longer tenure as the organization’s leader and her numerous books on atheism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bekiempis, Victoria (Summer 2011). [http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/sep/26/new-atheism-boys-club &amp;quot;Why the New Atheism is a boys' club&amp;quot;].  Bitch Magazine, no. 51.  Retrieved from September 26, 2011 edition of The Guardian/CommentaryIsFree.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feminists who are [[theism|theists]] often belong to religious bodies which practice [[liberal]] theology. In addition, some feminists practice goddess worship. Since atheism rejects theism, atheistic feminism rejects/disbelieves in the existence of God or gods (see: [[Definition of atheism]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Atheism, women, men and atheist feminism ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since most atheists lean Left politically (see: [[Atheism and politics]]) most atheist women are feminists. However, this may not apply to atheist men or apply to a lesser degree, given that a significant majority of atheist are men and that the men's rights movement has many atheist men within it. [[Reddit]] is a popular place for atheists and a Reddit survey found that 94% of Men's Rights Movement  supporters indicated that they had no religion (see also: [[Reddit atheism]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rawstory.com/2014/04/confirmed-mens-rights-activism-is-for-misogynists-without-god/ Confirmed: &amp;quot;Men’s Rights Activism&amp;quot; Is For Misogynists Without God], ''Raw Story''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; YouTube's most popular atheist is [[TheAmazingAtheist]] who is a men's rights activist. Another popular YouTube atheist [[Thunderf00t]] is very critical of feminism within atheism (See also: [[Atheism plus]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Atheist movement, feminism and schism within atheism ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Within the [[atheist movement]] post [[New Atheism]] and the [[Elevatorgate]] controversy, there has been a lot of conflict between [[Atheism|atheists]] concerning feminism. One of the results of the conflict was the new atheist [[Richard Dawkins]] losing a lot of public support and support among the irreligious (see: [[Richard Dawkins' loss of influence]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Atheist feminism and its view of religion ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: [[Atheist feminism and religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Intersectionality==&lt;br /&gt;
As women attain a majority in society and a significant portion of the workforce, including leadership positions, the predicate of &amp;quot;disadvantage&amp;quot; was overtaken by competing  &amp;quot;identity groups.&amp;quot;  In fact, many women identify with these other groups, and a theory was needed to sort out conflicting claims for social redress.  For example, should the social handicap of being a black deaf woman be addressed in terms of 1) race, 2) hearing impairment or 3) gender?  Under the [[intersectionality]] theory, such people should receive accommodations from society for all of their identities and a hierarchy of identify groups governs how much claim each group has to social capital based upon identity.  Without intersectionality, the comparative privilege held by women in Western societies would be overshadowed by and put into competition with the claims of other identity groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Intersectionality&amp;quot; was coined by [[Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw]] in 1989.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | url=https://www.law.columbia.edu/pt-br/news/2017/06/kimberle-crenshaw-intersectionality | title=Kimberlé Crenshaw on Intersectionality, More than Two Decades Later | accessd-date=9 March 2019 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190223111809/https://www.law.columbia.edu/pt-br/news/2017/06/kimberle-crenshaw-intersectionality | archive-date=23 February 2019 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=https://philpapers.org/archive/CREDTI.pdf |title=Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics |author=Kimberlé Krenshaw |publisher=University of Chicago Legal Forum |date=1989 |accessdate=7 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180513141436/https://philpapers.org/archive/CREDTI.pdf |archive-date=13 May 2018 |url-status=live }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Without intersectionality, feminism and its advocates would be regarded as out-of-date by social justice warriors.&lt;br /&gt;
== Femen ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Femen]] and [[Atheist feminism]] and [[Atheism and women]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Femen]] is a [[Ukraine|Ukrainian]] radical feminist activist group which is now based in Paris. According to the ''[[Washington Post]]'', &amp;quot;Femen’s members consider [[atheism]] to be a fundamental tenet of the group’s ideology.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2018/11/12/meet-femen-naked-shock-troops-feminism-who-greeted-trump-with-topless-protest-paris/?noredirect=on&amp;amp;utm_term=.eb5ef3499053 Meet Femen, the ‘naked shock troops of feminism’ who greeted Trump with a topless protest in Paris], By Antonia Noori Farzan, Washington Post, November 12, 2018&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Femen engages in topless publicity stunts/protests. Femen was one of the first radical feminist organizations to gain transnational media publicity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christianity and women's rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: [[Christianity and women's rights]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti-Feminism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Me Too Movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Conservative Women Vs. Feminism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminism and housewives]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminist style]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gender equality]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gender police]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminists for Life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminism and reason]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminist hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Battered woman syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Communism and feminism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminist myths]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminist nitpicking]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminist quotes about Richard Dawkins]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The personal is political]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Misandry]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Erica Jong]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yi-ftIGVsCI Dana Loesch Rips Feminists] on [[Louder With Crowder]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ee_ESpTudus #SJW Feminist Myths Destroyed by Karen Straughan] on Louder With Crowder&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRj2qMLq8SY Feminism &amp;amp; Fat Pride: The Unholy Alliance] on Louder With Crowder with [[Paul Joseph Watson]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYo1ewgG94M The Truth About 'Rape Culture'] by Paul Joseph Watson&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.feministezine.com/feminist/ The Feminist eZine] Archive of articles about Feminist History.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cia-on-campus.org/surveil/steinem.html Gloria Steinem and the CIA], ''The New York Times'', February 21, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg02217.html Inside the CIA with Gloria Steinem], Nancy Borman,  ''The Village Voice''.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.american.com/archive/2008/march-april-magazine-contents/why-can2019t-a-woman-be-more-like-a-man Why Can't a Woman Be More Like a Man?], Christina Hoff Sommers, ''The American'' March/April 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCritical/comments/f0wr6b/conservatives_find_unlikely_ally_in_fighting/ Conservatives find unlikely ally in fighting transgender rights: Radical feminists], ''[[The Washington Post]]'', February 8, 2020.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Communism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Feminism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BorisJohnson</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Asexuality&amp;diff=1781313</id>
		<title>Asexuality</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Asexuality&amp;diff=1781313"/>
		<updated>2021-07-24T18:16:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;BorisJohnson: Minor sense clarifications. Tendence to greater neutrality whilst maintianing string biblical focus. Fixed contradicitons about libido. Removed confusion with aromanticism&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Asexuality''' is the [[sexual orientation]] of those who do not feel sexual attraction to people of either [[gender]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.asexuality.org|title=Asexual Visibility &amp;amp; Education Network}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is distinct from [[antisexualism]], opposition to sexual behavior and sexuality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since it is possible to have libido without attraction, some asexual people engage in sexual self-stimulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Implications of low-libido asexuality for Christians==&lt;br /&gt;
For those who have already decided to be [[celibate]], a lack of sexual attraction could be rather convenient. Sexual appetites serve no Godly purpose in those who are unmarried and have no intent to become married, except as an exercise in building [[faith]] by asking God to take away those desires and having the petition be granted. Sexual desires can also pose problems for those who are married but whose spouses request or require temporary or permanent [[sexual abstinence]], whether due to [[menstruation]], disability, long-term military deployment, giving oneself to a period of [[fasting]] and [[prayer]], or other circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Book of Matthew|Matthew]] 19, [[Jesus]] responds to his disciples' statement that &amp;quot;it is not good to marry&amp;quot; by saying, &amp;quot;All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given. For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.&amp;quot; [[Paul]] also states in [[1 Corinthians]] 7 that &amp;quot;I would that all men were even as I myself&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, it is good for them if they abide even as I&amp;quot; and that the unmarried are better able to focus on pleasing the Lord without being distracted by those things of the world that are necessary to please one's spouse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those with little desire for sex may be in a good position to serve the Lord because they are able to avoid falling into sinful thoughts that result from sexual frustration. However, those who do find that they must marry in order to avoid burning with lustful thoughts or succumbing to temptation to [[fornication|fornicate]] do not commit any sin by marrying; Paul notes, &amp;quot;every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some youthful asexual Christians may be dismayed by others' suspicion of their lack of sexual interest in the opposite sex as implying that they are [[closeted homosexual]]s.  These unbelievers will typically mask their ridicule in [[plausible deniability]] by relying on snide innuendo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asexual Christians would do well to disregard such ignorant behavior and remember the admonition of Paul to the young pastor [[Timothy]] to &amp;quot;be a vessel unto honour, sanctified, and meet for the master's use, and prepared unto every good work. Flee also youthful lusts: but follow [[righteousness]], [[faith]], [[charity]], [[peace]], with them that call on the Lord out of a pure heart.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;2 Timothy 2:22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The ability to serve the Lord unimpeded by sexual desires can be regarded as a gift rather than a burden. It is not for man to question why he lacks as strong a sexual desire as other men; as [[Book of Romans|Romans]] 9:20 asks, &amp;quot;Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Asexual movement==&lt;br /&gt;
The asexual movement is mostly organized by the Asexual Visibility &amp;amp; Education Network, which is allied with the LGBT community. Their viewpoint is that the same logic by which non-heterosexuality should be accepted also demands that asexuality be accepted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bible-believing Christians and society in general already accept as a legitimate option a celibate lifestyle that is abstinent from sexual self-stimulation, because it does not offend public morality and it causes no social problems, unlike fornication and &amp;quot;those things which are not convenient&amp;quot;, viz., sexual acts that are against nature.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Romans 1:26-28&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, many people view asexuality as a disorder, or even something that should be fixed, despite evidence that this is not possible. There is also an absence of representation of asexuality in media. It is also rarely taught about, and in modern sexualized society, asexual people may feel broken. It is therefore important to present asexuality as a possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Asexual]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Psychology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>BorisJohnson</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>