https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Brian+Wilson 2026-10-08T08:37:24Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Ask_questions&diff=26853 2007-03-12T00:30:41Z

<p>Brian Wilson: </p> <hr /> <div>Hi! Leave any questions you have for us here.<br /> <br /> === Bias ===<br /> <br /> If wikipedia is &quot;liberal biased&quot; I assume it would be because that's the way the world is biased because the people who write for it are not censored unless it is blatantly wrong. I came to this site and thought that as the homepage calls it &quot;more accurate&quot; info. Unfortunately, I seemed to have stumbled on less accurate information. Note, that some articles leave out anything that doesn't have to do with a specific biased message. (Example: the abortion article doesn't even explain what it is, just why it's bad.) <br /> <br /> My real question is, why will this be deleted, instead of talked about and addressed on your site?<br /> <br /> :Not censored? Please see this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Pravknight&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=85523670#Question:_Why_is_Leftism_NPOV.3F] Recently when an editor pointed out &quot;Dominionism&quot;, as defined by Wikipedia is &quot;a trend in Protestant Christian evangelicalism&quot;, didn't apply to Paul Weyrich because he is Roman Catholic, he nonetheless received a community ban so the pejoratives aimed at Paul Weyrich will stick. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:55, 11 March 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> === Scope ===<br /> <br /> What is the proposed scope of Conservapedia? You currently have articles on History, Economics, Science, and Law. Do you intend to expand this list in future?--[[User:Smalltownhick|Smalltownhick]] 20:23, 11 March 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> <br /> === Parochial language commandment ===<br /> <br /> I just reflexively corrected (at least) 5 spelling errors in the above paragraphs.<br /> <br /> I am curious why the American version of spellings is considered so important that it is a &quot;commandment&quot; rather than simply an editorial policy?<br /> <br /> I think it is acceptable for you to pick and use any English dialect you wish as a policy, and American English is one of the more popular ones, but I think it capricious that you would ban otherwise valuable contributions from someone for using their own. Simply edit the articles for spelling as you see fit, as I did above.<br /> <br /> [[User:Brian Wilson|Brian Wilson]] 20:30, 11 March 2007 (EDT)</div>

Brian Wilson